1: %
2: % LaTeX template file for
3: % Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.
4: % Version 4.0 - 1 May 2004
5: %
6: % The most current version of this file can be found at:
7: % http://www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa/template.tex
8: %
9: % Other information on PASA can be found at:
10: % http://www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa
11: %
12: % Instructions for submitting to PASA can be found at:
13: % http://www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa/authors.html
14: %
15: % VERSIONS:
16: % 3.0 Implements natbib
17: % Thanks to D. Kawata for spotting natbib error
18: %
19: % 4.0 Has changed layout to be closer to final article
20: %
21: \documentclass[a4paper,twoside]{article}
22: %
23: % Baselineskip may be altered if desired.
24: %
25: \baselineskip=2em
26: %
27: % A few definitions.
28: %
29: \def\changemargin#1#2{\list{}{\rightmargin#2\leftmargin#1}\item[]}
30: \let\endchangemargin=\endlist
31: \newcommand{\affil}[1]{$^{\rm #1}$}
32: %
33: % Do not change the page dimensions as these are approximately the size of
34: % the finished article.
35: \textwidth=16.1cm
36: \textheight=23.3 cm
37: \topmargin=-.5 cm
38: \oddsidemargin=0.5cm
39: \evensidemargin=0.5cm
40: \columnsep=0.8cm
41: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{.95}
42: %
43: %
44: %%%%%%%%%%%% PAGE HEADERS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45: \pagestyle{myheadings}
46: \markboth{\small Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia}{\small
47: www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa}
48: %
49: %
50: %
51: %%%%%%% ADD ADDITIONAL PACKAGES HERE %%%%%%%%%
52: %Citations may be made using the natbib commands \citet{},\citep{} etc.
53: \usepackage[authoryear]{natbib}
54: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
55: %Use of the graphicx package for figures is recommended, but other well-known
56: %packages, e.g. psfig are also acceptable.
57: \usepackage{graphicx}
58: \usepackage{rotating}
59: %
60: %
61: \date{} %Please leave the date blank
62: %
63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64: % You may add your own commands here, e.g.
65: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km\,s$^{-1}$}}
66: %
67: \def\mnras {{MNRAS}}
68: \def\apj {ApJ}
69: \def\apjs {ApJS}
70: \def\apjl {ApJL}
71: \def\aj {AJ}
72: \def\aap {A\&A}
73: \def\aaps {A\&AS}
74: \def\araa {ARA\&A}
75: \def\pasj {PASJ}
76:
77: %%%%%%%%%%%%% TITLE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
78: % PASA titles use initial capitals style, e.g.
79: \title{\large\bf\flushleft Are Dumbbell Brightest Cluster Members Signposts to Galaxy Cluster Activity?}
80: %%%%%%%%%%%% AUTHORS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81: \author{\parbox{\textwidth}{\flushleft
82: \vspace{-0.5cm}
83: %
84: % Please indicate only one corresponding author email, as per the following example:
85: {\it K.\ A.\ Pimbblet\affil{A,B}}\\
86: %
87: \vspace{0.4cm}
88: %
89: {\small \affil{A}\,Department of Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia}\\
90: {\small \affil{B}\,Email: pimbblet@physics.uq.edu.au}}}
91: %
92: %
93: %%%%%%%% DO NOT EDIT FOLLOWING %%%%%%%%%%%%
94: \begin{document}
95: %
96: \twocolumn[
97: \begin{changemargin}{.8cm}{.5cm}
98: \begin{minipage}{.9\textwidth}
99: \vspace{-1cm}
100: \maketitle
101: %
102: %
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%% ABSTRACT %%%%%%%%%%%%%
104: %Abstract of no more than 200 words here.
105: \small{\bf Abstract:}
106: We assemble a sample of galaxy clusters whose brightest members
107: are dumbbell galaxies and compare them with a control sample in order
108: to investigate if they are the result of recent mergers.
109: We show that the dumbbell sample is no more likely than other
110: clusters to exhibit subclustering.
111: However, they are much more likely to have at least one dumbbell
112: component possessing a significant peculiar velocity with respect
113: to the parent cluster than a non-dumbbell
114: brightest cluster member.
115: We interpret this in the context of seeing the clusters
116: at various stages of post-merger relaxation.
117:
118:
119: %%%%%%%%%%%%% KEYWORDS %%%%%%%%%%%%%
120: \medskip{\bf Keywords:} galaxies: clusters: general ---
121: galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD ---
122: galaxies: evolution
123: % Please write all keywords in lower case. PASA uses the
124: % standard list of subject headings adopted by The Astrophysical Journal
125: % and available from http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ/keywords_text.html.
126: % Keywords are separated by em-dashes, i.e. ---
127:
128: %%%%%%%%DO NOT EDIT%%%%%%%%%%%%
129: \medskip
130: \medskip
131: \end{minipage}
132: \end{changemargin}
133: ]
134: \small
135: %%%%%%%%EDIT FROM HERE%%%%%%%%%%%%
136:
137: \section{Introduction}
138: Brightest cluster member (BCM)
139: galaxies have historically held a special
140: place in both the theoretical and observational study of galaxy
141: evolution and formation since they are believed to be
142: directly connected with the conditions in the cluster that
143: they reside in.
144: Consider, for instance, a BCM that is located at
145: the bottom of the gravitational well of a galaxy cluster:
146: there, a process such as cannibalism (e.g.\ Ostriker \& Tremaine 1975)
147: would be at maximum efficiency there and we would
148: be likely to observe BCMs with
149: multiple cores (e.g.\ Laine et al.\ 2003;
150: Yamada et al.\ 2002; Oegerle \& Hill 2001;
151: Dubinski 1998; Lauer 1988; Hoessel \& Schneider 1985).
152: However, if a more hierarchical paradigm is correct, then
153: the BCM should have formed through multiple minor merger events
154: in a sub-group that was originally outside the cluster centre.
155: It would have then subsequently merged with the rest of the cluster
156: (Merritt 1985), yielding several observational
157: road-signs such as high peculiar velocities for the BCM
158: and cluster substructure (see Woudt et al.\ 2008;
159: Pimbblet et al.\ 2006; Oergle \& Hill 2001; Pinkney et al.\ 1996;
160: Quintana et al.\ 1996; Valentijn \& Casertano 1988).
161:
162: Cases of dumbbell galaxies as BCMs
163: (e.g.\ Gregorini et al.\ 1994; 1992)
164: are doubly interesting for these reasons --
165: these galaxies should be an indicator of
166: the pre-virialization scenario and should therefore be accompanied
167: by significant substructure indicative of recent cluster merger activity.
168: Indeed, Quintana et al.\ (1996)
169: present evidence for a dumbbell system where the two
170: components of the BCM \emph{each} belong to major sub-groups that
171: are undergoing a merger (see also de Souza \& Quintana 1990).
172:
173: What is unclear is whether dumbbell BCM clusters in general
174: are special?
175: Does the presence of a dumbbell BCM point toward
176: observable cluster activity
177: such as subclustering (Quintana et al.\ 1996)
178: and large BCM peculiar velocities (Pimbblet et al.\ 2006)
179: as would be found during a merger event? If so, then
180: what stage is the merger event at?
181: In order to make a pass at answering these questions,
182: this work assembles a modest sample
183: of dumbbell BCMs from Gregorini et al.\ (1992) and a control
184: sample derived from the 2 degree field galaxy redshift survey
185: (2dFGRS; Colless et al.\ 2001).
186:
187: The format of this paper is as follows.
188: In Section~2 we fully
189: describe our derived dumbbell sample and control sample.
190: In Section~3, we ask whether clusters with dumbbell BCMs are
191: more likely to have substructuring than any other clusters and then
192: in Section~4, we examine the incidence of significant peculiar
193: velocities in our samples are different.
194: We summarize our findings in Section~5.
195: Throughout this work, we adopt a cosmological concordance model with
196: values of $H_0 = 70$ kms$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_M = 0.3$ and
197: $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$.
198:
199: \section{The Samples}
200: The Gregorini et al.\ (1992) sample claims to be a
201: volume limited \& homogeneous
202: sample of dumbbell BCM galaxies which should be ideal for our
203: purposes. It is
204: based on the Abell catalogue (Abell 1958; Abell et al.\ 1989)
205: and is complete out to a comoving distance
206: of 210h$^{-1}$ Mpc (Gregorini et al.\ 1992).
207: In addition, they state
208: there are no possible selection biases present in this sample that
209: would have prevented the successful detection and
210: identification of dumbbell galaxies for this
211: sample (Gregorini et al.\ 1992; see also
212: Scaramella et al.\ 1991).
213: There are a couple of
214: debatable clusters that
215: could have been added to this sample
216: (e.g.\ Abell~3323; Gregorini et al.\ 1994), but were left out.
217: We do not view the exclusion of these clusters as having a significant
218: impact on the ensemble.
219: However, our review of the available
220: literature redshifts demonstrates that this sample
221: does contain several clusters with $z>0.1$ (Table~1)
222: due to earlier cluster redshifts being under-estimated.
223: We do not regard this as a major impediment to the present
224: investigation either, since the time evolved between $z\sim0.07$ and
225: $z\sim0.10$ is much smaller (i.e.\ $<0.5$ Gyr) than the
226: expected time it would take for sub-clusters to fully merge
227: (Lacey \& Cole 1993).
228: For this work, we restrict ourselves to the complete sample of
229: dumbbell galaxies -- Table~1 from Gregorini et al.\ (1992;
230: herein the dumbbell sample) --
231: with one exception: Abell~3653. Abell~3653 is listed by
232: Gregorini et al.\ (1992) as only a `possible' dumbbell BCM.
233: However, a combination of
234: observations made by Postman \& Lauer (1995) and
235: Pimbblet et al.\ (2006) show that this cluster should also be
236: considered to be a confirmed dumbbell BCM galaxy
237: (Figure~\ref{fig:a3653}) and we include it in the present
238: dumbbell sample.
239:
240:
241: Redshift information for the dumbbell sample is initially obtained by
242: downloading all redshifts within 30 arcmin of each cluster
243: from the NASA Extra-galactic Database (NED). At $z\sim0.1$, this
244: corresponds to a radius of 1.6 Mpc from the cluster centre.
245: Several clusters in the resultant dumbbell sample
246: (Abell~2824, 3098, 3368, 3397, \& 3740) generate very few members
247: ($N<20$) within 30 arcmin
248: ($\approx$ an Abell radius)
249: and are eliminated from the final
250: sample at this stage since it is
251: likely that any subclustering or cluster velocity
252: dispersion measurement
253: would be unreliable (Girardi et al.\ 1993).
254: For the remaining sample, we compute the
255: mean cluster velocity and velocity dispersion ($\sigma$) using
256: the `gapping' procedure of Zabludoff et al.\ (1990; 1993) and
257: tabulate these values in Table~1.
258: The final sample yields 13 dumbbell
259: BCM galaxy clusters for us to work with that
260: have a range of velocity dispersions consistent with large
261: and massive clusters (cf.\ Ebeling et al.\ 2007).
262:
263: Our control sample is obtained from the 2dFGRS
264: cluster sample of De Propris et al.\ (2002; see Colless et al.\ 2001
265: for a description of this survey).
266: This is essentially a complete catalogue at $cz< \ \sim
267: 35000$ km s$^{-1}$ of
268: Abell (Abell 1958; Abell et al.\ 1989) clusters.
269: In order to attempt to match the relatively high velocity
270: dispersions in the dumbbell sample, we restrict the
271: control sample to only those clusters with a high X-ray
272: luminosity ($L_X>0.5 \times 10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$;
273: Ebeling et al.\ 1996; Cruddace et al.\ 2002). We also trim from
274: this sample any clusters with poor completeness levels
275: (i.e.\ less than 20 galaxies within an Abell radius of the cluster centre).
276: Our final control sample consists of 14 clusters and
277: is presented in Table~2 with mean velocities and velocity
278: dispersions sourced from De Propris et al.\ (2002).
279: Although the control sample has a smaller absolute range of
280: $\sigma$ (597--1038 kms$^{-1}$) than the dumbbell cluster
281: sample (455--1376 kms$^{-1}$), the median values
282: (783.5 kms$^{-1}$ and 825 kms$^{-1}$ respectively)
283: are very similar.
284: The average redshift of the control sample
285: ($cz=26010$ kms$^{-1}$)
286: is also somewhat higher
287: than the dumbbell sample ($cz=18854$ kms$^{-1}$). In look-back
288: time this is barely 0.3 Gyr, so again we do not regard this as
289: significant for this work
290: due to the comparative time taken for clusters to violently relax
291: after a merger event (Lacey \& Cole 1993).
292: With the control sample being sourced from 2dFGRS, we ensure that
293: all the constituent galaxies are very homogeneously sampled
294: down to $b_J=19.45$ (Colless et al.\ 2001); albeit not at
295: 100\% completeness levels (see De Propris et al.\ 2002).
296: Conversely, our dumbbell sample
297: is a collection of diverse redshifts from multiple
298: sources each with different purposes and
299: associated selection limits imposed (see Table~1).
300: We also eyeball the BCMs in the control sample to ensure that
301: they are not dumbbells themselves that are outside the Gregorini
302: et al.\ (1992) selection limits. Only two of them give us cause for
303: concern: Abell~2811 has a nearby faint companion,
304: but would not be considered a dumbbell in the definition of Gregorini
305: et al.\ (1992); Abell~S1136 has multiple galaxies near to the BCM
306: that may be interacting with it, but again it is not a dumbbell
307: and its removal from the control sample does not affect our conclusions.
308:
309: \begin{figure}[h]
310: %\begin{figure}
311: \begin{center}
312: \includegraphics[scale=1, angle=0, width=3.in]{f1.eps}
313: \caption{Spectroscopic observations
314: of the components of the dumbbell BCM
315: galaxy in Abell~3653 have been
316: made by Postman \& Lauer (1995) and Pimbblet et al.\ (2006);
317: the circles in the plot
318: denote the location of where the redshift was taken.
319: They give redshifts of
320: $z=0.1091\pm0.0003$ and $z=0.1099\pm0.0002$ respectively.
321: Since both components are within $2\sigma$ of each other, we consider
322: this galaxy to be a confirmed dumbbell BCM
323: galaxy for the purposes of this work.}\label{fig:a3653}
324: \end{center}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327:
328: %
329: % TABLE 1. Dumbbell Sample
330: %
331: \begin{sidewaystable*}
332: \begin{center}
333: \caption{The dumbbell cluster sample$^{a}$. \hfil}
334: \begin{tabular}{llllllllllllll}
335: %\noalign{\medskip}
336: \hline
337: Cluster & RA & Dec & N(30')$^{b}$ & $cz$ & $\sigma$ & $R_{V}$ & N$_{R_V}$ & $\Delta_{R_V}$ & P($\Delta$)$_{R_V}$ & N$_{2R_V}$ & $\Delta_{2R_V}$ & P($\Delta$)$_{2R_V}$\\
338: & (J2000) & (J2000) & & (kms$^{-1}$) & (kms$^{-1}$) & (Mpc) & & & \\
339: \hline
340: Abell~2860 & 1$^{h}$4$^{m}$20.60$^{s}$ & -39$^{o}$2961.4" & 59 & 31738$\pm$97 & $741^{+80}_{-60}$ & 1.48 & 28 & 76 & 0.990 & 45 & 148 & 0.985 \\
341: Abell~2911 & 1$^{h}$26$^{m}$12.87$^{s}$ & -37$^{o}$3381.8" & 50 & 24110$\pm$102 & $720^{+85}_{-63}$ & 1.44 & 34 & 30 & 0.720 & 50 & 41 & 0.959 \\
342: Abell~3151 & 3$^{h}$40$^{m}$27.73$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$2543.0" & 68 & 19992$\pm$124 & $1013^{+101}_{-78}$ & 2.03 & 60 & 115 & 0.009 & 103 & 230 & 0.016 \\
343: Abell~3266 & 4$^{h}$31$^{m}$11.92$^{s}$ & -61$^{o}$1462.6" & 286 & 17852$\pm$81 & $1376^{+61}_{-54}$ & 2.75 & 248 & 277 & 0.313 & 399 & 524 & $<$0.001 \\
344: Abell~0533 & 5$^{h}$1$^{m}$30.79$^{s}$ & -22$^{o}$2202.4" & 27 & 13932$\pm$229 & $1191^{+208}_{-136}$ & 2.38 & 35 & 92 & $<$0.001 & 52 & 146 & $<$0.001 \\
345: Abell~3391 & 6$^{h}$26$^{m}$15.43$^{s}$ & -53$^{o}$2452.3" & 104 & 16070$\pm$127 & $1294^{+101}_{-82}$ & 2.59 & 131 & 207 & $<$0.001 & 241 & 440 & $<$0.001 \\
346: Abell~3528 & 12$^{h}$54$^{m}$18.36$^{s}$ & -29$^{o}$75.6" & 146 & 16219$\pm$87 & $1047^{+67}_{-56}$ & 2.09 & 145 & 194 & 0.017 & 236 & 327 & $<$0.001 \\
347: Abell~3532 & 12$^{h}$57$^{m}$19.08$^{s}$ & -30$^{o}$1332.7" & 167 & 16504$\pm$60 & $780^{+47}_{-40}$ & 1.56 & 117 & 150 & 0.061 & 233 & 303 & 0.018 \\
348: Abell~3535 & 12$^{h}$57$^{m}$48.60$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1752.1" & 55 & 20190$\pm$61 & $455^{+51}_{-38}$ & 0.91 & 37 & 46 & 0.041 & 53 & 78 & 0.010 \\
349: Abell~3570 & 13$^{h}$46$^{m}$50.88$^{s}$ & -37$^{o}$3298.3" & 31 & 11261$\pm$83 & $463^{+74}_{-50}$ & 0.93 & 19 & 17 & 0.589 & 37 & 34 & 0.627 \\
350: Abell~3653 & 19$^{h}$52$^{m}$37.92$^{s}$ & -52$^{o}$74.1" & 106 & 32234$\pm$81 & $836^{+64}_{-52}$ & 1.67 & 50 & 61 & 0.164 & 92 & 123 & 0.044 \\
351: Abell~3716 & 20$^{h}$51$^{m}$16.56$^{s}$ & -52$^{o}$2503.4" & 124 & 13517$\pm$74 & $825^{+58}_{-48}$ & 1.65 & 110 & 113 & 0.226 & 196 & 365 & $<$0.001 \\
352: Abell~3744 & 21$^{h}$7$^{m}$13.80$^{s}$ & -25$^{o}$1733.7" & 69 & 11483$\pm$72 & $596^{+59}_{-45}$ & 1.19 & 64 & 88 & 0.066 & 88 & 129 & 0.007 \\
353: \hline
354: %\noalign{\smallskip}
355: \end{tabular}
356: \ \\
357: $^{a}$Redshifts for this sample are sourced from: Fairall 1988;
358: Teague et al.\ 1990;
359: da Costa et al.\ 1991;
360: Dalton et al.\ 1994;
361: Collins et al.\ 1995; Postman \& Lauer 1995; Quintana et al.\ 1995;
362: Loveday et al.\ 1996; Quintana \& Ramirez 1996; Shectman et al.\ 1996;
363: Caldwell \& Rose 1997;
364: da Costa et al.\ 1998; Katgert et al.\ 1998; Vettolani et al.\ 1998;
365: Wegner et al.\ 1999;
366: Schindler 2000;
367: Bardelli et al.\ 2001; Colless et al.\ 2001; Donnelly et al.\ 2001;
368: Christlein \& Zabludoff 2003; Kaldare et al.\ 2003; Paturel et al.\ 2003;
369: Jones et al.\ 2004; Smith et al.\ 2004;
370: Pimbblet et al.\ 2006.\\
371: $^{b}$This is the number of NED galaxies within 30 arcmin used to compute $cz$ and $\sigma$ from.\\
372: \label{tab:dumbbells}
373: \end{center}
374: \end{sidewaystable*}
375:
376:
377:
378: \section{Substructure}
379: In order to place the clusters onto a common scale
380: and perform a meaningful comparison of subclustering, we
381: use a virial radius estimator
382: derived by Girardi et al.\ (1998):
383: $R_v = 0.002 \sigma h^{-1}_{100}$ Mpc.
384: Cluster members are then defined to be those galaxies
385: whose velocity is within $3\sigma$ of the cluster velocity.
386: We add the caveat that although this approximation's
387: validity for semi-virialized systems may not be ideal, it
388: is sufficient for our purposes of placing the clusters
389: on to a $\sim$common scale.
390:
391: For the cluster centres, we use the quoted NED cluster
392: centres -- this choice of cluster centre is somewhat arbitrary,
393: but it will not dramatically affect the final subclustering
394: result since we are sampling the cluster members from a relatively
395: large radius away from this centre.
396: The resultant number of galaxies and values for $R_v$
397: for each of the clusters are given in Tables~1 \&~2.
398:
399: There are a number of statistical tools available to
400: assess the degree of subclustering in each cluster, ranging from
401: 2 dimensional searches for asymmetry (e.g.\ West et al.\ 1988)
402: and bimodality (e.g.\ Fitchett \& Webster 1987) to more complex 3 dimensional
403: tests (e.g. Dressler \& Shectman 1988; among others).
404: Given all these different tools, Pinkney et al.\ (1996) made
405: extensive tests to determine the relative merits of these tools and
406: concluded that the Dressler \& Shectman (1988) $\Delta$ test is
407: the best one to use to find substructure in arbitrary cases.
408: Its only real limitation is an insensitivity to equal mass
409: mergers in the plane of the sky and superpositions of sub-groups
410: (Pinkney et al.\ 1996). Both of these situations would require
411: special and unusual lines of sight to the cluster and are therefore
412: considered to be rare events.
413: Importantly for this study, the DS test
414: will be able to detect substructure in
415: 3:1 mergers with reasonable confidence (circa 95\%)
416: down to a sample size of even 30 galaxies (Fig.~27 in
417: Pinkney et al.\ 1996). At a sample size of $>$60, this confidence
418: rapidly grows to $>$99\%.
419:
420: We therefore proceed by applying the Dressler \& Shectman (1988)
421: approach to each of our clusters and we refer the reader to that
422: publication for details of its algorithmic execution. For the purposes
423: of this work, it is sufficient to note that if there is little or no
424: substructure, then we may expect the resultant $\Delta$ statistic to
425: be of approximately the same value as the number of galaxies sampled.
426: The final parameter of merit is then $P(\Delta)$ which gives the
427: probability of the observed value of $\Delta$ occurring randomly when
428: the redshifts of cluster members are randomly assigned to other members
429: in a Monte Carlo fashion (i.e. very low values of $P(\Delta)$ indicate
430: the presence of substructure).
431:
432: Values of $\Delta$ and $P(\Delta)$ are computed for each cluster
433: within radial limits of both $R_V$ and $2R_V$ (Tables~1 \& 2).
434: The reason for looking at both these radii is that it may be possible
435: that the $\Delta$ statistic is insensitive to
436: substructure at small ($<2$Mpc) radii (Pinkney et al.\ 1996).
437: We also plot the `bubble plots' in Figure~2 for the results of
438: the DS test for the dumbbell sample.
439: In these plots, substruture can be interpreted as
440: spatially close overlapping circles (Dressler \& Shectman 1988).
441: Within $R_V$, we find that the fraction of clusters with certain
442: substructure (i.e.\ $P(\Delta)<0.001$) is 2/13 (15\%) for the
443: dumbbell sample and 1/14 (7\%) for the control sample.
444: At $2R_V$, these fractions change to 5/13 (39\%) and 4/14 (29\%)
445: respectively (in addition, a further two of control clusters
446: are very close to being considered as having subclustering).
447: We consider the difference in subclustering fractions between
448: the two cluster samples to be statistically insignificant.
449:
450: %
451: % TABLE 2. Control Sample
452: %
453: \begin{sidewaystable*}
454: \begin{center}
455: \caption{The control cluster sample. \hfil}
456: \begin{tabular}{lllllllllllll}
457: %\noalign{\medskip}
458: \hline
459: Cluster & RA & Dec & $cz$ & $\sigma$ & $R_{V}$ & N$_{R_V}$ & $\Delta_{R_V}$ & P($\Delta$)$_{R_V}$ & N$_{2R_V}$ & $\Delta_{2R_V}$ & P($\Delta$)$_{2R_V}$ \\
460: & (J2000) & (J2000) & (kms$^{-1}$) & (kms$^{-1}$) & (Mpc) & & & \\
461: \hline
462: Abell 2734 & 0$^{h}$11$^{m}$19.44$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$3099.6" & $18646 \pm 94$ & $1038^{+73}_{-84}$ & 2.08 & 120 & 153 & 0.127 & 214 & 427 & $<$0.001 \\
463: Abell 2751 & 0$^{h}$16$^{m}$19.92$^{s}$ & -31$^{o}$1314.0" & $31863 \pm 103$ & $763^{+80}_{-95}$ & 1.47 & 43 & 67 & 0.014 & 99 & 128 & 0.027 \\
464: Abell 2755 & 0$^{h}$17$^{m}$34.80$^{s}$ & -35$^{o}$669.6" & $28469 \pm 135$ & $829^{+102}_{-129}$ & 1.66 & 29 & 21 & 0.844 & 64 & 87 & 0.180 \\
465: Abell 2798 & 0$^{h}$37$^{m}$27.12$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1886.4" & $33516 \pm 108$ & $739^{+84}_{-102}$ & 1.48 & 41 & 60 & 0.008 & 77 & 120 & 0.004 \\
466: Abell 2811 & 0$^{h}$42$^{m}$8.88$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1933.2" & $32557 \pm 168$ & $988^{+126}_{-162}$ & 1.98 & 83 & 111 & 0.193 & 175 & 264 & $<$0.001 \\
467: Abell 2829 & 0$^{h}$51$^{m}$19.20$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1868.4" & $33565 \pm 123$ & $793^{+94}_{-117}$ & 1.59 & 39 & 50 & 0.043 & 69 & 118 & 0.010 \\
468: Abell 3027 & 2$^{h}$30$^{m}$51.12$^{s}$ & -33$^{o}$349.2" & $23166 \pm 97$ & $907^{+76}_{-88}$ & 1.81 & 85 & 111 & 0.041 & 166 & 233 & 0.002 \\
469: Abell 0389 & 2$^{h}$51$^{m}$28.80$^{s}$ & -24$^{o}$3416.4" & $34085 \pm 118$ & $667^{+90}_{-115}$ & 1.33 & 26 & 24 & 0.632 & 45 & 55 & 0.173 \\
470: Abell 3094 & 3$^{h}$11$^{m}$25.18$^{s}$ & -26$^{o}$3240.0" & $20475 \pm 77$ & $774^{+61}_{-70}$ & 1.55 & 89 & 110 & 0.084 & 140 & 233 & $<$0.001 \\
471: Abell 0957 & 10$^{h}$13$^{m}$49.80$^{s}$ & -0$^{o}$3254.4" & $13623 \pm 79$ & $722^{+63}_{-73}$ & 1.44 & 77 & 95 & 0.084 & 115 & 149 & 0.065 \\
472: Abell 1651 & 12$^{h}$59$^{m}$24.00$^{s}$ & -4$^{o}$680.4" & $25152 \pm 107$ & $817^{+83}_{-99}$ & 1.63 & 90 & 127 & 0.194 & 173 & 218 & 0.213 \\
473: Abell 1750 & 13$^{h}$30$^{m}$49.68$^{s}$ & -1$^{o}$3110.4" & $25647 \pm 113$ & $981^{+88}_{-104}$ & 1.96 & 101 & 168 & $<$0.001 & 193 & 296 & $<$0.001 \\
474: Abell 2597 & 23$^{h}$25$^{m}$16.68$^{s}$ & -12$^{o}$446.4" & $24691 \pm 117$ & $597^{+117}_{-90}$ & 1.19 & 21 & 16 & 0.529 & 36 & 37 & 0.276 \\
475: Abell S1136 & 23$^{h}$36$^{m}$14.76$^{s}$ & -31$^{o}$2156.4" & $18688 \pm 92$ & $617^{+72}_{-87}$ & 1.23 & 38 & 51 & 0.097 & 55 & 79 & 0.025 \\
476: \hline
477: %\noalign{\smallskip}
478: \end{tabular}
479: \ \\
480: %$^{\dagger}$ Values of $cz$ and $\sigma$ are sourced from De Propris et al.\ (2002)\\
481: \label{tab:control}
482: \end{center}
483: \end{sidewaystable*}
484:
485: This is somewhat surprising as we may have
486: naively expected there
487: to have been recent cluster activity in these dumbbell cluster
488: systems (cf.\ Quintana et al.\ 1996) compared to the general
489: cluster population.
490: We re-emphasize the caveat of the DS test limitations: with some
491: of our clusters (size$\sim30$),
492: the confidence level in the $\Delta$ statistic may
493: drop to only 95\% to be able to detect a 3:1 merger
494: (Pinkney et al.\ 1996) -- $\sim$5 clusters
495: at radii$<R_V$ and $\sim1$ cluster at $<2R_V$ in the dumbbell sample;
496: and similar numbers in the control sample.
497: Even with this confidence level and sample sizes, the data suggest
498: that the incidence of 3:1 mass mergers is equal in both samples.
499: Given that Quintana et al.\ (1996) demonstrate
500: that each component of the dumbbell in NGC 4782/3 system occupies
501: different sub-groups, it is therefore a
502: natural next step to ask whether the other galaxies in
503: our samples also have large peculiar velocities?
504:
505: \section{Peculiar Velocities}
506: Pimbblet et al.\ (2006) have already noted that the
507: dumbbell BCM galaxy from Abell~3653 has
508: a very large peculiar velocity relative to the cluster frame
509: (for both components of the dumbbell -- Fig~\ref{fig:a3653}).
510: Using the positions of the individual dumbbell components given
511: by Gregorini et al.\ (1994), we compare each of their redshifts
512: with the mean cluster velocity from Table~1. The results of
513: this are displayed in Table~3. The error listed on the
514: velocity offset, $\Delta cz$, in this Table is simply
515: the mean cluster velocity error (Table~1)
516: added in quadrature to the galaxy velocity error given by
517: NED (where more than 1 redshift measurement of a given
518: dumbbell component is available, we choose the most recent since
519: there is some uncertainty concerning which redshift may
520: refer to what component in older measurements; e.g.\ Green et al.\ 1988).
521: We perform a similar analysis on the control sample,
522: identifying the BCM by eye and a magnitudinal comparison using
523: NED (see Table~4).
524:
525: For the control sample, we find that 3/14 (21\%) of the clusters
526: have BCMs with significant peculiar velocities
527: (i.e.\ $>3$ standard errors away from $| \Delta cz | = 0$).
528: Meanwhile in the dumbbell sample, 8/13 (62\%) clusters
529: have at least 1 dumbbell
530: component with significant peculiar velocities (7 of which are
531: large, $>300$kms$^{-1}$);
532: but consistent to the control sample,
533: only 3/13 (23\%) have \emph{both} dumbbell components with
534: significant peculiar velocities.
535: We note that for Abell~0533 the two dumbbell components
536: have a very significant velocity offset ($>1600$ kms$^{-1}$!)
537: which questions whether this system should be considered
538: as a proper dumbbell system.
539: Notwithstanding Abell~0533, we suggest that a
540: cluster with a BCM dumbbell system
541: is more likely to possess a significant peculiar velocity
542: in at least one of the dumbbell components
543: than a non-dumbbell BCM cluster.
544: Save for Abell~0533, no peculiar velocity is beyond 1.1 times the
545: velocity dispersion measurement of the clusters, very much
546: inline with
547: the results of Valentijn \& Casertano (1988).
548:
549:
550:
551:
552: %
553: % TABLE 3. Peculiar velocities for the dumbbells
554: %
555: \begin{table*}
556: \begin{center}
557: \caption{Peculiar velocities of the dumbbells. \hfil}
558: \begin{tabular}{llllllllll}
559: \noalign{\medskip}
560: \hline
561: Dumbbell & RA & Dec & $| \Delta cz |$ & Significance \\
562: Component & (J2000) & (J2000) & (kms$^{-1}$) \\
563: \hline
564: Abell~2860 1 & 1$^{h}$4$^{m}$50.13$^{s}$ & -39$^{o}$2749.6" & 539$\pm$110 & 4.90 \\
565: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 1$^{h}$4$^{m}$50.11$^{s}$ & -39$^{o}$2749.8" & 634$\pm$(97)$^{a}$ & (6.54)$^{a}$ \\
566: Abell~2911 1 & 1$^{h}$26$^{m}$5.42$^{s}$ & -37$^{o}$3472.9" & 143$\pm$120 & 1.19 \\
567: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & uncertain & uncertain & uncertain$^{b}$ & -- \\
568: Abell~3151 1 & 3$^{h}$40$^{m}$26.94$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$2437.5" & 376$\pm$132 & 2.85 \\
569: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 3$^{h}$40$^{m}$25.14$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$2439.0" & 426$\pm$128 & 3.33 \\
570: Abell~3266 1 & 4$^{h}$31$^{m}$13.29$^{s}$ & -61$^{o}$1631.8" & 247$\pm$103 & 2.40 \\
571: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 4$^{h}$31$^{m}$12.18$^{s}$ & -61$^{o}$1635.1" & 114$\pm$101 & 1.13 \\
572: Abell~0533 1 & 5$^{h}$1$^{m}$8.29$^{s}$ & -22$^{o}$2095.5" & 255$\pm$241 & 1.06 \\
573: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 5$^{h}$1$^{m}$6.63$^{s}$ & -22$^{o}$2096.2" & 1906$\pm$230 & 8.29 \\
574: Abell~3391 1 & 6$^{h}$26$^{m}$20.22$^{s}$ & -53$^{o}$2494.0" & 489$\pm$133 & 3.68 \\
575: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 6$^{h}$26$^{m}$17.80$^{s}$ & -53$^{o}$2489.4" & 68$\pm$142 & 0.48 \\
576: Abell~3528 1 & 12$^{h}$54$^{m}$23.40$^{s}$ & -29$^{o}$64.8" & 100$\pm$107 & 0.93 \\
577: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 12$^{h}$54$^{m}$22.32$^{s}$ & -29$^{o}$46.8" & 0$\pm$101 & 0.00 \\
578: Abell~3532 1 & 12$^{h}$57$^{m}$21.96$^{s}$ & -30$^{o}$1308.9" & 257$\pm$64 & 4.02 \\
579: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 12$^{h}$57$^{m}$19.80$^{s}$ & -30$^{o}$1312.9" & 36$\pm$67 & 0.54 \\
580: Abell~3535 1 & 12$^{h}$57$^{m}$55.44$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1720.0" & 485$\pm$92 & 5.27 \\
581: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 12$^{h}$57$^{m}$54.72$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1728.0" & 462$\pm$75 & 6.16 \\
582: Abell~3570 1 & 13$^{h}$46$^{m}$47.28$^{s}$ & -37$^{o}$3268.4" & 24$\pm$111 & 0.22 \\
583: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 13$^{h}$46$^{m}$46.92$^{s}$ & -37$^{o}$3282.4" & 49$\pm$120 & 0.41 \\
584: Abell~3653 1 & 19$^{h}$53$^{m}$3.48$^{s}$ & -52$^{o}$133.2" & 736$\pm$105 & 7.01 \\
585: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 19$^{h}$53$^{m}$2.76$^{s}$ & -52$^{o}$134.6" & 495$\pm$126 & 3.93 \\
586: Abell~3716 1 & 20$^{h}$52$^{m}$0.48$^{s}$ & -52$^{o}$2718.0" & 559$\pm$92 & 6.08 \\
587: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 20$^{h}$51$^{m}$56.88$^{s}$ & -52$^{o}$2710.8" & 255$\pm$88 & 2.90 \\
588: Abell~3744 1 & 21$^{h}$7$^{m}$25.68$^{s}$ & -25$^{o}$1543.3" & 27$\pm$94 & 0.29 \\
589: ~~''~~~~~~''~~~ 2 & 21$^{h}$7$^{m}$24.60$^{s}$ & -25$^{o}$1557.0" & 211$\pm$75 & 2.81 \\
590: \hline
591: \noalign{\smallskip}
592: \end{tabular}
593: \ \\
594: $^{a}$Redshift error not recorded for this component --
595: the error quoted is simply the error on the cluster mean
596: velocity and should therefore be
597: taken as a lower bound.\\
598: $^{b}$Unable to unambiguously distinguish the second
599: component and its redshift from the first component.
600: \\
601: \label{tab:pecvdumbbells}
602: \end{center}
603: \end{table*}
604:
605: %
606: % TABLE 4. Peculiar velocities for the control sample
607: %
608: \begin{table*}
609: \begin{center}
610: \caption{BCM peculiar velocities in the control sample. \hfil}
611: \begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
612: \noalign{\medskip}
613: \hline
614: Cluster & BCM RA & BCM Dec & $| \Delta cz |$ & Significance \\
615: & (J2000) & (J2000) & (kms$^{-1}$) \\
616: \hline
617: Abell 2734 & 0$^{h}$11$^{m}$21.67$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$3075.8" & 171$\pm$101 & 1.69\\
618: Abell 2751 & 0$^{h}$16$^{m}$13.65$^{s}$ & -31$^{o}$1392.1" & 245$\pm$261 & 0.94 \\
619: Abell 2755 & 0$^{h}$17$^{m}$40.99$^{s}$ & -35$^{o}$720.7" & 284$\pm$224 & 1.27 \\
620: Abell 2798 & 0$^{h}$37$^{m}$32.20$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1915.9" & 249$\pm$116 & 2.15 \\
621: Abell 2811 & 0$^{h}$42$^{m}$8.83$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1928.8" & 23$\pm$179 & 0.13 \\
622: Abell 2829 & 0$^{h}$51$^{m}$22.53$^{s}$ & -28$^{o}$1897.5" & 416$\pm$126 & 3.30 \\
623: Abell 3027 & 2$^{h}$30$^{m}$49.42$^{s}$ & -33$^{o}$371.8" & 384$\pm$132 & 2.91 \\
624: Abell 0389 & 2$^{h}$51$^{m}$24.80$^{s}$ & -24$^{o}$3399.4" & 331$\pm$191 & 1.73 \\
625: Abell 3094 & 3$^{h}$11$^{m}$25.00$^{s}$ & -26$^{o}$3351.9" & 75$\pm$92 & 0.82 \\
626: Abell 0957 & 10$^{h}$13$^{m}$38.28$^{s}$ & -0$^{o}$3331.8" & 253$\pm$95 & 2.66 \\
627: Abell 1651 & 12$^{h}$59$^{m}$22.56$^{s}$ & -4$^{o}$706.3" & 419$\pm$111 & 3.97 \\
628: Abell 1750 & 13$^{h}$30$^{m}$50.76$^{s}$ & -1$^{o}$3097.0" & 441$\pm$116 & 3.80 \\
629: Abell 2597 & 23$^{h}$25$^{m}$19.92$^{s}$ & -12$^{o}$446.0" & 189$\pm$118 & 1.60 \\
630: Abell S1136 & 23$^{h}$36$^{m}$16.56$^{s}$ & -31$^{o}$2169.3" & 19$\pm$112 & 0.17 \\
631: \hline
632: \noalign{\smallskip}
633: \end{tabular}
634: \label{tab:pecvcontrol}
635: \end{center}
636: \end{table*}
637:
638: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
639: Even though the dumbbell sample is a collection of
640: redshifts from many disparate sources, we believe that
641: we have assembled a sufficient quantity of (bright) cluster
642: members to adequately map out each of the clusters to a similar
643: level found in 2dFGRS (cf.\ Tables~1 \&~2).
644: Although the sample is likely not an optimal (homogeneously selected)
645: one, we are nonetheless confident that the results presented
646: would not change significantly with the addition of further
647: observations. Indeed, subtracting a small
648: percentage of galaxies from
649: the better sampled clusters produces no significant change in
650: the measured peculiar velocities, or substructuring.
651:
652: Our results show that dumbbell BCM clusters are no more or less
653: likely than other clusters to possess (3:1) subclustering
654: (cf.\ Oegerle \& Hill 2001).
655: However,
656: they are more likely to have at least one BCM component with
657: a significant peculiar velocity. We suggest the
658: unifying interpretation
659: of these observations is that our
660: dumbbell BCM clusters may be in various states of post-merger
661: activity. Those with both subclustering and peculiar velocities
662: (e.g.\ Abell~3391) are probably in the early stages of mixing:
663: the bulk of the galaxies are separable in to sub-groups with a
664: dumbbell component belonging to one (or even each) sub-grouping
665: (cf.\ Quintana et al.\ 1996).
666: As the merger progresses, we may
667: expect the less massive galaxies to homogenize first
668: eventually leaving only a large peculiar velocity
669: in one or both dumbbell components as the
670: singular signpost to recent cluster activity, before
671: the individual components of the dumbbell BCM itself relax with
672: respect to each other and the rest of the merged cluster (Abell~2911).
673: Alternatively, we note that intermediate clusters such as
674: Abell~3570 may simply be the result
675: of ellipticals preferentially being on radial orbits
676: (e.g.\ Ramirez \& de Souza 1998; see also Hwang \& Lee 2008)
677: and hence observationally indistinguishable.
678: The dumbbell itself may be a final
679: transient phase before ultimately merging into a more
680: massive cD-like galaxy (e.g.\ Tremaine 1990; West 1994).
681: These results and the emerging picture of
682: the evolution of dumbbells with respect to cluster substructure are
683: also consistent with other observational
684: evidence that the timescale for clusters to accrete new galaxies
685: is much shorter than the timescale required for the central galaxy
686: to merge with the accreted galaxies (e.g. Cooray \& Milosavljevi{\'c}
687: 2005; Brough et al.\ 2008).
688:
689:
690: \begin{figure*}[h]
691: \begin{center}
692: \vspace*{-1.5in}
693: \hspace*{-1in}
694: \includegraphics[scale=1, angle=0, width=8.in]{multiplot1.ps}
695: \vspace*{-1.5in}
696: \caption{Results of applying the DS test to the dumbbell sample.
697: In these bubble plots, each circle's radius is scaled proportional to
698: the Dressler \& Shectman (1988) $\delta$ statistic (i.e.\ proportional to
699: the deviation of a localized group of galaxies
700: mean velocity away from the whole cluster's mean velocity).
701: Substruture is therefore indicated by spatially close and relatively big
702: overlapping circles.}\label{fig:multi1}
703: \end{center}
704: \end{figure*}
705:
706: \begin{figure*}[h]
707: \begin{center}
708: \vspace*{-1.5in}
709: \hspace*{-1in}
710: \includegraphics[scale=1, angle=0, width=8.in]{multiplot2.ps}
711: \vspace*{-4.5in}
712: \setcounter{figure}{1}
713: \caption{continued.}\label{fig:multi2}
714: \end{center}
715: \end{figure*}
716:
717:
718: \section*{Acknowledgments} %If needed
719: We thank the efforts of the 2dFGRS team and Anglo-Australian Observatory
720: in creating the 2dFGRS survey.
721: We also thank H.\ Andernach and I.\ G.\ Roseboom for fruitful discussion
722: during the course of this work and the diligent work of the referee whose
723: comments have improved this work.
724: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
725: (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
726: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
727: and Space Administration.
728:
729: \begin{thebibliography}{}
730: % References are listed as in the following example, for more examples, please
731: % see the PASA Style Guide
732: %\bibitem[Smith, Jones, \& Brown(Year)Smith et al.]{example}Smith, A.~B., Jones,
733: %C.~D., Brown, E.~F. Year, Journal, Volume, Page
734:
735: \bibitem[Abell(1958)]{1958ApJS....3..211A} Abell, G.~O.\ 1958, \apjs, 3,
736: 211
737:
738: \bibitem[Abell et al.(1989)]{1989ApJS...70....1A} Abell, G.~O., Corwin,
739: H.~G., Jr., \& Olowin, R.~P.\ 1989, \apjs, 70, 1
740:
741: \bibitem[Bardelli et al.(2001)]{2001MNRAS.320..387B} Bardelli, S., Zucca,
742: E., \& Baldi, A.\ 2001, \mnras, 320, 387
743:
744: \bibitem[Brough et al.(2008)]{2008MNRAS.385L.103B} Brough, S., Couch,
745: W.~J., Collins, C.~A., Jarrett, T., Burke, D.~J.,
746: \& Mann, R.~G.\ 2008, \mnras, 385, L103
747:
748: \bibitem[Caldwell \& Rose(1997)]{1997AJ....113..492C} Caldwell, N., \&
749: Rose, J.~A.\ 1997, \aj, 113, 492
750:
751: \bibitem[Christlein \& Zabludoff(2003)]{2003ApJ...591..764C} Christlein,
752: D., \& Zabludoff, A.~I.\ 2003, \apj, 591, 764
753:
754: \bibitem[Colless et al.(2001)]{2001MNRAS.328.1039C} Colless, M.,
755: et al.\ 2001, \mnras, 328, 1039
756:
757: \bibitem[Collins et al.(1995)]{1995MNRAS.274.1071C} Collins, C.~A., Guzzo,
758: L., Nichol, R.~C., \& Lumsden, S.~L.\ 1995, \mnras, 274, 1071
759:
760: \bibitem[Cooray
761: \& Milosavljevi{\'c}(2005)]{2005ApJ...627L..85C} Cooray, A., \& Milosavljevi{\'c}, M.\ 2005, \apjl, 627, L85
762:
763: \bibitem[da Costa et al.(1991)]{1991ApJS...75..935D} da Costa, L.~N.,
764: Pellegrini, P.~S., Davis, M., Meiksin, A., Sargent, W.~L.~W., \& Tonry,
765: J.~L.\ 1991, \apjs, 75, 935
766:
767: \bibitem[da Costa et al.(1998)]{1998AJ....116....1D} da Costa, L.~N., et
768: al.\ 1998, \aj, 116, 1
769:
770: \bibitem[Cruddace et al.(2002)]{2002ApJS..140..239C} Cruddace, R., et al.\
771: 2002, \apjs, 140, 239
772:
773: \bibitem[Dalton et al.(1994)]{1994MNRAS.269..151D} Dalton, G.~B.,
774: Efstathiou, G., Maddox, S.~J., \& Sutherland, W.~J.\ 1994, \mnras, 269, 151
775:
776: \bibitem[De Propris et al.(2002)]{2002MNRAS.329...87D} De Propris, R., et
777: al.\ 2002, \mnras, 329, 87
778:
779: \bibitem[Donnelly et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...562..254D} Donnelly, R.~H.,
780: Forman, W., Jones, C., Quintana, H., Ramirez, A., Churazov, E., \&
781: Gilfanov, M.\ 2001, \apj, 562, 254
782:
783: \bibitem[Dressler \& Shectman(1988)]{1988AJ.....95..985D} Dressler, A., \&
784: Shectman, S.~A.\ 1988, \aj, 95, 985
785:
786: \bibitem[Dubinski(1998)]{1998ApJ...502..141D} Dubinski, J.\ 1998, \apj,
787: 502, 141
788:
789: \bibitem[Ebeling et al.(1996)]{1996MNRAS.281..799E} Ebeling, H., Voges, W.,
790: Bohringer, H., Edge, A.~C., Huchra, J.~P., \& Briel, U.~G.\ 1996, \mnras,
791: 281, 799
792:
793: \bibitem[Ebeling et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...661L..33E} Ebeling, H., Barrett,
794: E., Donovan, D., Ma, C.-J., Edge, A.~C., \& van Speybroeck, L.\ 2007,
795: \apjl, 661, L33
796:
797: \bibitem[Fairall(1988)]{1988MNRAS.233..691F} Fairall, A.~P.\ 1988, \mnras,
798: 233, 691
799:
800: \bibitem[Fitchett \& Webster(1987)]{1987ApJ...317..653F} Fitchett, M., \&
801: Webster, R.\ 1987, \apj, 317, 653
802:
803: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(1993)]{1993ApJ...404...38G} Girardi, M., Biviano,
804: A., Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., \& Mezzetti, M.\ 1993, \apj, 404, 38
805:
806: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...505...74G} Girardi, M., Giuricin,
807: G., Mardirossian, F., Mezzetti, M., \& Boschin, W.\ 1998, \apj, 505, 74
808:
809: \bibitem[Gregorini et al.(1992)]{1992A&AS...95....1G} Gregorini, L.,
810: Vettolani, G., de Ruiter, H.~R., \& Parma, P.\ 1992, \aaps, 95, 1
811:
812: \bibitem[Gregorini et al.(1994)]{1994A&AS..106....1G} Gregorini, L., de
813: Ruiter, H.~R., Parma, P., Sadler, E.~M., Vettolani, G., \& Ekers, R.~D.\
814: 1994, \aaps, 106, 1
815:
816: \bibitem[Green et al.(1988)]{1988MNRAS.234.1051G} Green, M.~R., Godwin,
817: J.~G., \& Peach, J.~V.\ 1988, \mnras, 234, 1051
818:
819: \bibitem[Hoessel
820: \& Schneider(1985)]{1985AJ.....90.1648H} Hoessel, J.~G., \& Schneider, D.~P.\ 1985, \aj, 90, 1648
821:
822: \bibitem[Hwang \& Lee(2008)]{2008ApJ...676..218H} Hwang, H.~S., \& Lee,
823: M.~G.\ 2008, ApJ, 676, 218
824:
825: \bibitem[Jones et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.355..747J} Jones, D.~H., et al.\
826: 2004, \mnras, 355, 747
827:
828: \bibitem[Kaldare et al.(2003)]{2003MNRAS.339..652K} Kaldare, R., Colless,
829: M., Raychaudhury, S., \& Peterson, B.~A.\ 2003, \mnras, 339, 652
830:
831: \bibitem[Katgert et al.(1998)]{1998A&AS..129..399K} Katgert, P., Mazure,
832: A., den Hartog, R., Adami, C., Biviano, A., \& Perea, J.\ 1998, \aaps, 129,
833: 399
834:
835: \bibitem[Lacey \& Cole(1993)]{1993MNRAS.262..627L} Lacey, C., \& Cole, S.\
836: 1993, \mnras, 262, 627
837:
838: \bibitem[Laine et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....125..478L} Laine, S., van der Marel,
839: R.~P., Lauer, T.~R., Postman, M., O'Dea, C.~P., \& Owen, F.~N.\ 2003, \aj,
840: 125, 478
841:
842: \bibitem[Lauer(1988)]{1988ApJ...325...49L} Lauer, T.~R.\ 1988, \apj, 325,
843: 49
844:
845: \bibitem[Loveday et al.(1996)]{1996ApJS..107..201L} Loveday, J., Peterson,
846: B.~A., Maddox, S.~J., \& Efstathiou, G.\ 1996, \apjs, 107, 201
847:
848: \bibitem[Merritt (1985)]{1985ApJ...289...18M}
849: Merritt, D.\ 1985, \apj, 289, 18
850:
851: \bibitem[Oegerle \& Hill(2001)]{2001AJ....122.2858O} Oegerle, W.~R., \&
852: Hill, J.~M.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2858
853:
854: \bibitem[Ostriker \& Tremaine(1975)]{1975ApJ...202L.113O} Ostriker, J.~P.,
855: \& Tremaine, S.~D.\ 1975, \apjl, 202, L113
856:
857: \bibitem[Paturel et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...412...57P} Paturel, G., Theureau,
858: G., Bottinelli, L., Gouguenheim, L., Coudreau-Durand, N., Hallet, N., \&
859: Petit, C.\ 2003, \aap, 412, 57
860:
861: \bibitem[Pimbblet et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.368..651P} Pimbblet, K.~A.,
862: Roseboom, I.~G., \& Doyle, M.~T.\ 2006, \mnras, 368, 651
863:
864: \bibitem[Pinkney et al.(1996)]{1996ApJS..104....1P} Pinkney, J., Roettiger,
865: K., Burns, J.~O., \& Bird, C.~M.\ 1996, \apjs, 104, 1
866:
867: \bibitem[Postman \& Lauer(1995)]{1995ApJ...440...28P} Postman, M., \&
868: Lauer, T.~R.\ 1995, \apj, 440, 28
869:
870: \bibitem[Quintana et al.(1995)]{1995AJ....110..463Q} Quintana, H., Ramirez,
871: A., Melnick, J., Raychaudhury, S., \& Slezak, E.\ 1995, \aj, 110, 463
872:
873: \bibitem[Quintana et al.(1996)]{1996AJ....112...36Q} Quintana, H., Ramirez,
874: A., \& Way, M.~J.\ 1996, \aj, 112, 36
875:
876: \bibitem[Ramirez \& de Souza(1998)]{1998ApJ...496..693R} Ramirez, A.~C., \&
877: de Souza, R.~E.\ 1998, \apj, 496, 693
878:
879: \bibitem[Scaramella et al.(1991)]{1991AJ....101..342S} Scaramella, R.,
880: Zamorani, G., Vettolani, G., \& Chincarini, G.\ 1991, \aj, 101, 342
881:
882: \bibitem[Shectman et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...470..172S} Shectman, S.~A.,
883: Landy, S.~D., Oemler, A., Tucker, D.~L., Lin, H., Kirshner, R.~P., \&
884: Schechter, P.~L.\ 1996, \apj, 470, 172
885:
886: \bibitem[Schindler(2000)]{2000A&AS..142..433S} Schindler, S.\ 2000, \aaps,
887: 142, 433
888:
889: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....128.1558S} Smith, R.~J., et al.\
890: 2004, \aj, 128, 1558
891:
892: \bibitem[de Souza \& Quintana(1990)]{1990AJ.....99.1065D} de Souza, R., \&
893: Quintana, H.\ 1990, \aj, 99, 1065
894:
895: \bibitem[Teague et al.(1990)]{1990ApJS...72..715T} Teague, P.~F., Carter,
896: D., \& Gray, P.~M.\ 1990, \apjs, 72, 715
897:
898: \bibitem[Tremaine(1990)]{1990dig..book..394T} Tremaine, S.\ 1990, Dynamics
899: and Interactions of Galaxies, 394
900:
901: \bibitem[Valentijn \& Casertano(1988)]{1988A&A...206...27V} Valentijn,
902: E.~A., \& Casertano, S.\ 1988, \aap, 206, 27
903:
904: \bibitem[Vettolani et al.(1998)]{1998A&AS..130..323V} Vettolani, G., et
905: al.\ 1998, \aaps, 130, 323
906:
907: \bibitem[Wegner et al.(1999)]{1999MNRAS.305..259W} Wegner, G., Colless, M.,
908: Saglia, R.~P., McMahan, R.~K., Davies, R.~L., Burstein, D., \& Baggley, G.\
909: 1999, \mnras, 305, 259
910:
911: \bibitem[West et al.(1988)]{1988ApJ...327....1W} West, M.~J., Oemler,
912: A.~J., \& Dekel, A.\ 1988, \apj, 327, 1
913:
914: \bibitem[West(1994)]{1994MNRAS.268...79W} West, M.~J.\ 1994, \mnras, 268,
915: 79
916:
917: \bibitem[Woudt et al.(2008)]{2008MNRAS.383..445W} Woudt, P.~A.,
918: Kraan-Korteweg, R.~C., Lucey, J., Fairall, A.~P., \& Moore, S.~A.~W.\ 2008,
919: \mnras, 383, 445
920:
921: \bibitem[Yamada et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...577L..89Y} Yamada, T., Koyama, Y.,
922: Nakata, F., Kajisawa, M., Tanaka, I., Kodama, T., Okamura, S., \& De
923: Propris, R.\ 2002, \apjl, 577, L89
924:
925: \bibitem[Zabludoff et al.(1990)]{1990ApJS...74....1Z} Zabludoff, A.~I.,
926: Huchra, J.~P., \& Geller, M.~J.\ 1990, \apjs, 74, 1
927:
928: \bibitem[Zabludoff et al.(1993)]{1993AJ....106.1301Z} Zabludoff, A.~I.,
929: Geller, M.~J., Huchra, J.~P., \& Ramella, M.\ 1993, \aj, 106, 1301
930:
931:
932:
933: \end{thebibliography}
934:
935: %\end{multicols}
936:
937:
938:
939: \end{document}
940: