1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %\usepackage{natbib}
21:
22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
23:
24: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
25:
26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
27:
28: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
29:
30: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
31: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
32: %% use the longabstract style option.
33:
34: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
35:
36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
38: %% the \begin{document} command.
39: %%
40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
43: %% for information.
44:
45: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
46: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
47: \newcommand{\einten}{\mbox{{\rm $ergs\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-2}\,sr^{-1}$}}}
48: \newcommand{\pinten}{\mbox{{\rm $photons\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-2}\,sr^{-1}$}}}
49: \newcommand{\cinten}{\mbox{{\rm $counts\,s^{-1}\,arcmin^{-2}$}}}
50: \newcommand{\eflux} {\mbox{{\rm $ergs\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-2}$}}}
51: \newcommand{\pflux} {\mbox{{\rm $photons\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-2}$}}}
52: \newcommand{\cflux} {\mbox{{\rm $counts\,s^{-1}$}}}
53: \newcommand{\ergss} {\mbox{{\rm $ergs\,s^{-1}$}}}
54: \newcommand{\kms} {\mbox{{\rm km s$^{-1}$}}}
55: \newcommand{\cms} {\mbox{{\rm cm s$^{-1}$}}}
56: \newcommand{\glimpse} {\mbox{\it GLIMPSE~}}
57: \newcommand{\spitzer}{\mbox {\it Spitzer}}
58: \newcommand{\irac}{\mbox {\it IRAC~}}
59: \newcommand{\um}{$\mu$m}
60: \newcommand{\hii}{\mbox{\ion{H}{2}}}
61: \renewcommand{\deg}{$^\circ$}
62: \newcommand{\degree}{^{\circ}}
63:
64: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
65:
66: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal}
67:
68: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
69: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
70: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
71: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
72: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
73: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
74:
75: \shorttitle{Infrared Stellar-Wind Bowshocks}
76: \shortauthors{Povich et al.}
77:
78: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
79: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
80:
81: \begin{document}
82:
83: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
84: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
85: %% you desire.
86:
87: \title{Interstellar Weather Vanes: GLIMPSE Mid-Infrared Stellar-Wind Bowshocks in M17 and RCW49}
88:
89: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
90: %% author and affiliation information.
91: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
92: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
93: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
94: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
95:
96: \author{Matthew S. Povich\altaffilmark{1,5},
97: Robert A. Benjamin\altaffilmark{2,6},
98: Barbara A. Whitney\altaffilmark{3},
99: Brian L. Babler\altaffilmark{1},
100: R\'emy Indebetouw\altaffilmark{4},
101: Marilyn R. Meade\altaffilmark{1},
102: and Ed Churchwell\altaffilmark{1}}
103:
104: \altaffiltext{1}{Dept.\ of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 475 N. Charter St., Madison, WI 53706}
105: \altaffiltext{2}{Dept.\ of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, 800 W. Main St, Whitewater, WI 53190}
106: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Science Institute, 3100 Marine Street, Suite A353, Boulder, CO 80303-1058}
107: \altaffiltext{4}{Dept.\ of Astronomy, University of Virginia,
108: Charlottesville, VA 22903-0818}
109: \altaffiltext{5}{email: povich@astro.wisc.edu}
110: \altaffiltext{6}{email: benjamin@wisp.physics.wisc.edu}
111:
112: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
113: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
114: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
115: %% affiliation.
116:
117: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
118: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
119: %Foundation.}
120: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
121: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
122: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
123: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
124: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
125:
126: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
127: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
128: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
129: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
130: %% editorial office after submission.
131:
132: \begin{abstract}
133: We report the discovery of six infrared stellar-wind bowshocks in
134: the Galactic massive star formation regions M17 and RCW49 from {\it Spitzer}
135: GLIMPSE (Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane
136: Survey Extraordinaire) images.
137: The InfraRed Array Camera (IRAC) on the {\it Spitzer Space
138: Telescope} clearly resolves the arc-shaped emission
139: produced by the bowshocks. We combine {\it Two Micron
140: All-Sky Survey
141: (2MASS),} {\it Spitzer,} {\it MSX,} and {\it IRAS} observations to obtain
142: the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the bowshocks and their
143: individual driving stars. We use the stellar SEDs to
144: estimate the spectral types of the three newly-identified O stars in
145: RCW49 and one previously undiscovered O star in M17.
146: One of the bowshocks in RCW49 reveals the presence of a large-scale
147: flow of gas escaping the \hii\ region at a few $10^2$ \kms.
148: Radiation-transfer modeling of
149: the steep rise in the SED of this bowshock toward
150: longer mid-infrared wavelengths indicates that the emission is
151: coming principally from dust heated by the star driving the shock.
152: The other 5 bowshocks occur where the stellar winds of O stars sweep
153: up dust in the expanding \hii\ regions.
154: %The
155: %morphology of the
156: %bowshocks are used to constrain the interstellar density and velocity field in these two star formation regions.
157: %The fact that the first scheduled GLIMPSE
158: %observations have uncovered two clear bowshocks, and the recent Gemini
159: %discovery of a similar structure in the H and K bands towards a
160: %Galactic center source, indicates that there are many more detections
161: %of infrared stellar bowshocks yet to come.
162: \end{abstract}
163:
164: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
165: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
166: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
167: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
168:
169: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
170: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
171: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
172: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
173: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
174: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
175: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
176: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
177: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
178: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
179: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
180: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
181:
182: \keywords{infrared: ISM --- shock waves --- stars: winds
183: --- \hii\ regions: individual(\objectname{RCW49, M17})}
184:
185: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
186: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
187: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
188: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
189: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
190: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
191: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
192: %% each reference.
193:
194: \section{Introduction}
195:
196: The Solar wind ends in a termination shock
197: \citep[e.g.][]{V105},
198: where the pressure of the heliosphere balances the ram pressure of the
199: surrounding
200: interstellar medium (ISM). Massive stars with more energetic winds generate much
201: stronger shocks.
202: %Exterior to the wind termination shock, the ambient
203: %ISM gas is swept into a second shock, separated
204: %from the termination shock by a contact discontinuity.
205: In cases where
206: the relative
207: motion between the
208: star driving the wind and the ambient ISM is large, the shock
209: will be bent back
210: around the star. If the relative velocity is supersonic, the ambient
211: ISM gas is swept into a second shock, forming an arc-shaped
212: ``bowshock'' that is separated from the termination shock by a contact
213: discontinuity.
214: Stellar-wind bowshocks have been reported for a variety of sources, including
215: nearby runaway O stars \citep{vBu88,vBu95,Nor97,BB05,CP07,FML07}, high-mass
216: X-ray binaries \citep{EC92,K97,HK02}, LL Ori-type stars \citep{Bally00}, radio
217: pulsars \citep{GS06}, Galactic center O stars \citep{geb04,geb06}, and
218: mass-losing red giants \citep{Martin07}. Recently, an infrared (IR) bowshock has
219: been observed around the young A-type star $\delta$ Vel \citep{AG08}.
220: %Even the
221: %ordinary winds of solar-type
222: %stars are observed to end in termination shocks \citep{Frisch04}.
223: Cometary
224: \hii\ regions also resemble bowshocks, due either to density
225: gradients in the ambient gas or to motion of the ionizing source with respect to
226: the interstellar surroundings \citep{vB90,AH06}.
227: % measurement of
228: %the stellar wind properties, combined with constraints on the space motion of
229: %the source, can give valuable information about the local conditions in the
230: %interstellar medium (ISM), particularly the gas density.
231: Both the direction of a bowshock and its ``standoff distance'' from
232: the star generating the wind are determined by the velocity of the star with
233: respect to the surrounding medium.
234: In the case of runaway O stars, this is
235: dominated by the high space motion of the star.
236:
237: We report the
238: detection of three mid-IR bowshocks in each of two massive star formation
239: regions: M17 and RCW49. Two of the bowshocks in M17 are around known O
240: stars. We will demonstrate that the other bowshocks are also around likely O
241: stars. Since these stars are in or near expanding \hii\
242: regions, we find that
243: the direction of the bowshock is determined principally by the flow of the ISM
244: rather than the space motion of the star.
245: %, and that the brightness of the
246: %bowshock and the standoff distance of the shock is a measure of the momentum
247: %flux within the star formation region.
248:
249:
250: \section{Observations and Interpretation}
251:
252: The Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire \citep[GLIMPSE;][]{ben03}
253: programs have mapped
254: the inner Galactic midplane ($|l| \le 65\degree$) using the IRAC
255: instrument on the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}
256: \citep[2\arcsec\ resolution;][]{IRAC}.
257: RCW49, located at $(l,b)=(284.3,-0.3)$, was observed as part of the validation of the
258: GLIMPSE observing strategy. % using the IRAC detector by
259: %\spitzer\ over the period Dec 23--25.
260: The same area of the sky was
261: imaged 10 times with 2-second exposures,
262: and the combined data were mosaicked together
263: to produce high resolution images (0.6\arcsec\ pixels) of this region in the four IRAC bands: 3.6, 4.5,
264: 5.8, and 8.0 \um. An overview
265: of these observations was given by \citet{chu04}. M17, at
266: $(l,b)=(15.0,-0.7)$, was included in the GLIMPSE survey area, with two %correct?
267: visits on the sky combined to make mosaics with 0.6\arcsec\ pixels.
268:
269: % This Letter concentrates on
270: %a new diagnostic of star formation regions, namely the thermalization
271: %and re-radiation of the energy associated with stellar outflows in the
272: %form of infrared bowshocks.
273:
274: %Figure ~\ref{fig1} shows two examples of bowshocks surrounding stars in the vicinity of RCW 49. Their location, in the context of the whole RCW49 region is shown in \citep{chu04}
275:
276: %The parameters for these bowshocks and their associated stars are given in table~\ref{tbl-1}.
277:
278: %The overall structure of the diffuse mid-IR emission in both M17 and
279: %RCW49 shows clear evidence of
280: %dynamical processing of the gas surrounding the central star clusters,
281: %NGC 6618 and
282: %Westerlund 2, respectively.
283:
284: \subsection{M17}
285:
286: \begin{figure}[t]
287: \epsscale{.80}
288: \plotone{f1.eps}
289: \caption{GLIMPSE full-color image of M17 ({\it blue:} 3.6 \um, {\it
290: green:} 4.5 \um, {\it orange:} 5.8 \um, {\it red:} 8.0 \um). The region
291: containing the bowshocks M17-S1, -S2, and -S3 is enlarged (scalebar
292: shows $30\arcsec = 0.23$ pc at 1.6 kpc). The central ring of O stars in the
293: NGC 6618 cluster is circled. The bowshocks, along with the prominent
294: pillar structure near M17-S2, all appear to be oriented in the
295: general direction of CEN 1, the O4-O4 binary system
296: in the center of the ionizing cluster.
297: \label{M17}}
298: \end{figure}
299: \citet{MSP07} studied the diffuse emission morphology of M17
300: at multiple wavelengths from IR to radio, %
301: %They calculated the bolometric luminosity of the entire region,
302: constraining the distance to 1.4--1.9 kpc. We will assume the
303: widely-adopted value of 1.6 kpc for the M17 distance, following
304: \citet{MN01}. The
305: winds and radiation of the %13
306: O stars in
307: the NGC 6618 cluster have excavated a cavity in the center of the M17
308: \hii\ region.
309: %The overall morphology, as traced by polycyclic
310: %aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emission,
311: %indicates that the cavity is open in the direction away from the
312: %Galactic midplane
313: %(equatorial East).
314: The cavity is filled with hot, X-ray-emitting gas
315: % in a ``champagne flow'' that
316: %pours through the cavity opening, indicative of a ``blowout''
317: from shocked stellar winds \citep{T03}. \citet{MSP07} noted
318: the presence of 3 apparent
319: stellar-wind bowshocks along the northern wall of the cavity, along
320: with a prominent ``elephant trunk,'' or pillar, all
321: oriented in the direction of the central ring of 7 O stars in NGC
322: 6618.
323: %The O4--O4 binary known as Kleinmann's Anonymous Star
324: %or CEN 1 \citep{CEN} contains 2 of the earliest-type stars in the
325: %cluster \citep{HHC97}.
326: These structures are highlighted in Figure
327: \ref{M17}, a GLIMPSE image of M17 with an enlargement of the region
328: containing the bowshocks. The bowshocks stand out as yellow-orange
329: features in the image because they are faint at 3.6 \um\ (colored {\it
330: blue}) compared to the other 3 IRAC bands.
331:
332: We designate these stellar-wind bowshocks in Figure \ref{M17} with the
333: name of the
334: region followed by an identification number, in order
335: of increasing Galactic longitude (for example, M17-S1). IR fluxes for all of the bowshock driving
336: stars are given in Table 1, and background-subtracted IR fluxes from
337: aperture photometry
338: of the
339: bowshocks are listed in Table 2.
340: %
341: \begin{deluxetable}{crrcccccc}
342: %\center
343: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
344: %\rotate
345: \tablecaption{2MASS and IRAC\tablenotemark{a} IR Fluxes for Bowshock Driving Stars (mJy)\label{tbl-1}}
346: %\tablewidth{0pt}
347: \tablehead{
348: \colhead{ID \#} & \colhead{$l$} & \colhead{$b$}
349: & \colhead{$F[J]$}
350: & \colhead{$F[H]$}
351: & \colhead{$F[K]$}
352: & \colhead{$F[3.6]$}
353: & \colhead{$F[4.5]$\tablenotemark{b}}
354: & \colhead{$F[5.8]$\tablenotemark{b}}
355: % & \colhead{$F[8.0]$}
356: }
357: \startdata
358: M17-S1 & 15.07486 & -0.64607 & 196 & 214 & 186 & 96 & 67 & \nodata
359: \\
360: M17-S2 & 15.08126 & -0.65699 & 427 & 534 & 495 & 257 & 181 & 120 \\
361: M17-S3\tablenotemark{c} & 15.10325 & -0.64867 & 103 & 200 & 238 & 151
362: & $\leq 154$ & $\leq 155$ \\
363: \tableline
364: RCW49-S1 & 284.07646 & -0.43228 & 24 & 40 & 46 & 28 & 21 & 15 \\
365: RCW49-S2 & 284.30107 & -0.37121 & 10 & 18 & 20 & 13 &
366: $\leq{11}$ & $\leq 27$ \\
367: RCW49-S3 & 284.33999 & -0.28269 & 83 & 97 & 90 & 47 & 32 & 27 \\
368: \enddata
369:
370: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
371: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
372: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
373:
374: \tablenotetext{a}{None of these stars was detected in the IRAC [8.0] band.}
375: \tablenotetext{b}{In cases where bowshock emission appears to
376: cause a mid-IR excess over the stellar spectrum,
377: the [4.5] and [5.8] fluxes are
378: reported as upper limits.
379: Due to suspected contamination from the bowshock or other diffuse emission, these
380: fluxes are treated as upper limits to the stellar flux.}
381: \tablenotetext{c}{Because the star driving SWB M17-3 is surrounded by bright,
382: complex diffuse background emission, it was not extracted as part of
383: the GLIMPSE point-source catalog. The fluxes reported here were
384: measured using aperture photometry.}
385:
386: \end{deluxetable}
387: %
388: \begin{deluxetable}{crrcccc}
389: %\center
390: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
391: %\rotate
392: \tablecaption{IR Fluxes for Bowshocks (mJy)\label{tbl-2}}
393: \tablewidth{0pt}
394: \tablehead{\multicolumn{3}{c}{} &
395: \multicolumn{4}{c}{IRAC Fluxes\tablenotemark{a}} \\
396: \colhead{ID \#} & \colhead{$l_{\rm apex}$} & \colhead{$b_{\rm apex}$} & \colhead{$F[3.6]$\tablenotemark{b}}
397: & \colhead{$F[4.5]$}
398: & \colhead{$F[5.8]$}
399: & \colhead{$F[8.0]$}
400: }
401: \startdata
402: M17-S1 & 15.0744 & -0.6465 & $\leq 34$ & $71\pm 9$ & $252\pm 42$ & $1110\pm 290$ \\
403: M17-S2 & 15.0791 & -0.6613 & $43\pm 17$ & $245\pm
404: 48$ & $1240\pm 159$ & $8700\pm 1500$ \\
405: M17-S3 & 15.1026 & -0.6503 & $69\pm 16$ & $240\pm
406: 19$ & $620\pm 100$ & $1800\pm 320$ \\
407: \tableline
408: RCW49-S1 & 284.0775 & -0.4305 & $5.7\pm 0.9$ & $12\pm 1$ & $33\pm
409: 1$ & $322\pm 5$ \\
410: RCW49-S2 & 284.3018 & -0.3712 & $\leq 2$ & $9.6\pm 0.5$ & $32\pm
411: 3$ & $172\pm 7$ \\
412: RCW49-S3 & 284.3388 & -0.2829 & $\leq 21$ & $50\pm 7$ & $160\pm
413: 20$ & $825\pm 120$ \\
414: \tableline \tableline
415: \multicolumn{3}{c}{} &
416: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\it MSX} Fluxes\tablenotemark{c}} \\
417: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{MSXC6 Name} & \colhead{$F[8.3]$} &
418: \colhead{$F[12.1]$} & \colhead{$F[14.6]$} & \colhead{$F[21.3]$} \\
419: \tableline
420: RCW49-S1 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{G284.0776-00.4340} & $627$ &
421: $2729$ & $5674$ & $1.56\times 10^4$ \\
422: %RCW49-3\tablenotemark{b} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{G284.3372-00.2831} & 5340
423: %& $1.87\times 10^4$ & $2.72\times 10^4$ & $7.45\times 10^4$ \\
424: \tableline \tableline
425: \multicolumn{3}{c}{} &
426: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\it IRAS} Fluxes\tablenotemark{c}} \\
427: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{{\it IRAS} Name} & \colhead{$F[12]$} &
428: \colhead{$F[25]$} & \colhead{$F[60]$} & \colhead{$F[100]$} \\
429: \tableline
430: RCW49-S1 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{IRAS 10205-5729} & $3810$ &
431: $4.21\times 10^4$ & $\leq 2.26\times 10^5$ & $2.75\times 10^5$ \\
432: %RCW49-3\tablenotemark{b} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{IRAS 10227-5730} & $2.19\times 10^4$ &
433: %$1.43\times 10^5$ & \nodata
434: %%$1.43\times 10^5$ & $< 9.97\times 10^3$
435: %& $<8.59\times 10^4$ \\
436: \enddata
437:
438: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
439: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
440: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
441: \tablenotetext{a}{The IRAC fluxes are background-subtracted. Fluxes were measured using irregular apertures drawn to enclose all of the visible bowshock structure. Separate apertures were used to estimate the background flux. For each bowshock, the same set of apertures was used for all IRAC wavelengths.}
442: \tablenotetext{b}{In cases where stellar emission appears to be
443: confused with bowshock emission, the [3.6] bowshock fluxes reported
444: are upper limits only.}
445: \tablenotetext{c}{RCW49-S1 is a point source in both the {\it MSX} and {\it IRAS} catalogs. All of the other bowshocks are confused with bright diffuse background IR emission features at the resolutions of {\it MSX} and {\it IRAS}.
446: %The lower resolution of {\it MSX} compared to IRAC, and {\it IRAS} compared to {\it MSX} in turn, is responsible for
447: }
448:
449: \end{deluxetable}
450: %
451: Spectral types of two of the driving
452: stars have been determined photometrically \citep{Bum92} and spectroscopically
453: \citep{HHC97}. M17-S1 is associated with CEN
454: 16, an O9--B2 star. The larger bowshock, M17-S2, is driven by CEN
455: 18, an earlier-type star (O7--O8).
456: %We note that both CEN 16 and CEN 18
457: %have anomalously hard components to their X-ray spectra \citep{PB07}.
458: %The source of these hard components is mysterious, but they may
459: %indicate that these stars are unresolved colliding-wind binaries.
460: Both
461: bowshocks were
462: detected at 10.5 and 20 \um\ by \citet{MN01}. These observations did
463: not resolve the arc shapes of the
464: bowshocks, and \citet{MN01} attributed the excess
465: IR emission to circumstellar disks and classified CEN 16 and IRS 9
466: (the star visible just to the right of the arrowhead in Figure
467: \ref{M17}) as massive protostars.
468:
469: % M17-S3 appears to be associated with a ``teardrop'' structure of
470: %diffuse emission, with the driving star at the center.
471: %, providing strong
472: %circumstantial evidence that the star is associated with M17.
473: M17-S3 lies outside of the field analyzed by \citet{HHC97},
474: and the
475: driving star does
476: not appear in any catalog of the region. It is not found in any GLIMPSE
477: sourcelist,
478: because the bright, spatially variable diffuse background prevented
479: the automatic
480: extraction of the point source. We measured the flux this source
481: manually using a 5\arcsec\ aperture. Using the spectral energy distribution
482: (SED) fitting tool of \citet{fitter}, we
483: fit the IR fluxes of this star (Table 1) with \citet{Kurucz} stellar
484: atmosphere models. Following the method described by \citet{CW08}, we scale the
485: models to the 1.6-kpc distance of M17 and estimate a spectral type of
486: O7 V for the star. Carrying out the same analysis on 7 other O stars
487: in M17 with independently known spectral types \citep{MSP08}, we
488: estimate that our
489: spectral typing is accurate to within 2 subclasses.
490: %Further evidence
491: %supporting our
492: %claim that this star is an O star comes from \citet{MSP07}: (1)
493: %The abrupt edge of polycyclic hydrocarbon (PAH) emission delineating the \hii region boundary
494: %is pushed back from this star, suggesting that the star is
495: %contributing to the ionization of the \hii\ region; (2) a bright peak
496: %in the {\it
497: % MSX} 21.3 \um\
498: %emission from heated dust coincides with this position; and (3)
499: %there is a corresponding peak in the 20 cm thermal radio continuum.
500:
501: \subsection{RCW49}
502:
503: RCW49 presents a more complicated morphology than M17.
504: \citet{chu04} discussed the structure and spectrum of
505: the diffuse emission. Like M17, RCW49 is filled
506: with X-ray gas \citep{T05}. The interstellar structures are dominated by two
507: large cavities. The first, blown out to the West, contains the
508: massive young cluster
509: Westerlund 2, and the second is an enclosed bubble around the
510: Wolf-Rayet star WR 20b (Figure \ref{RCW49}).
511: %
512: \begin{figure}[ht]
513: \begin{onecolumn}
514: \epsscale{0.8}
515: \plotone{f2.eps}
516: \caption{GLIMPSE full-color image of RCW49 ({\it blue:} [3.6], {\it
517: green:} [4.5], {\it orange:} [5.8], {\it red:} [8.0]). The
518: bowshocks RCW49-S1, -S2, and -S3, are enlarged in 3 separate insets
519: (scalebars are $30\arcsec \approx 0.6$ pc at 4.2 kpc).
520: Three energy sources that could drive
521: large-scale interstellar flows are also indicated: The Westerlund 2
522: cluster (circled), and the Wolf-Rayet stars WR 20a and WR 20b.
523: \label{RCW49}}
524: \end{onecolumn}
525: \end{figure}
526: %
527: The distance to RCW49
528: remains disputed, with recent estimates placing the region as close as
529: 2.8 kpc \citep{JA07} %Ascenso et al. 2007
530: or as far as 8.0 kpc \citep{GR07}, %Rauw et al. 2007
531: with a kinematic distance estimate of $6\pm1$ kpc \citep{dame07}.
532: We consider distances of both 4.2 kpc \citep{chu04} and 6 kpc in our analysis.
533:
534: We have found three bowshocks associated with RCW49, shown in three separate
535: insets in Figure \ref{RCW49}. RCW49-S1 is unique among our sample,
536: because it lies relatively far from the \hii\ region,
537: but we believe it is associated with RCW49
538: % (as
539: %opposed to being a foreground or background object)
540: for the following
541: reasons: (1)
542: %We principally
543: %observe IR bowshock structures near \hii regions like RCW49; (2)
544: The RCW49
545: distance is consistent with the luminosity of the
546: driving star being an O star (see below);
547: and (2) the bowshock points (approximately)
548: toward the central
549: cluster, Westerlund 2. Because it is far from any other bright IR
550: source, RCW49-S1 appears as a point source in both the {\it Midcourse
551: Space Experiment} \citep[{\it MSX};][]{MSX} and {\it Infrared
552: Astronomical Satellite} \citep[{\it IRAS};][]{IRAS} point source
553: catalogs, and these fluxes are also given in Table 2.
554:
555: RCW49-S2 is oriented away from Westerlund 2
556: and appears to be influenced primarily by the
557: nearby WR 20b. RCW49-S3 is oriented in the general direction
558: of Westerlund 2. None of the RCW49 bowshocks
559: points directly back toward the central cluster, while all three M17
560: bowshocks do. Perhaps the
561: expanding bubbles driven by %large-scale wind-driven flows from
562: Westerlund 2 and the Wolf-Rayet stars are interacting turbulently,
563: producing non-radial components to the
564: flows. It is also possible that the bowshock driving stars have large
565: orbital motions relative to the dynamic interstellar medium.
566:
567: The three bowshock driving stars in RCW49 are of previously
568: undetermined spectral type, so we again estimate the spectral type
569: by fitting model SEDs to the broadband fluxes of Table 1, scaled to both the
570: 4.2 kpc and 6 kpc distances. The results are given in Table 3.
571: %
572: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}[ht]
573: %\center
574: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
575: %\rotate
576: \tablecaption{Bowshock Standoff Distances and Estimated Stellar Wind Properties\label{tbl-3}}
577: \tablewidth{0pt}
578: \tablehead{
579: \colhead{ID \#} & \colhead{Spectral}
580: & \colhead{$\dot{M}_{w,-6}v_{w,8}$\tablenotemark{b}}
581: & \colhead{$d_w\cos i$}
582: & \colhead{$d_{cl}\cos i$} & \colhead{$v_{0}n_{0,3}^{1/2} (\cos{i})^{-1}$} \\
583: \colhead{} & \colhead{type\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{}
584: & \colhead{(pc)}& \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$ )} }
585: \startdata
586: \multicolumn{5}{l}{M17 Distance $=1.6$ kpc} \\
587: \tableline
588: M17-S1 & O9--B2 V & $\leq 0.2$ &0.03 & 1.4 & $\le 22$ \\
589: M17-S2 & O7--O8 V & 0.5--2.5 & 0.11 & 0.9 & 10--22 \\
590: M17-S3 & O7 V & 0.5--2.5 & 0.05 & 1.7 & 21--47 \\
591: \tableline
592: \multicolumn{5}{l}{RCW49 Distance $=4.2$ kpc} \\
593: \tableline
594: RCW49-S1 & O6 V & $\sim{1.3}$ & 0.16 & 16.2 & 11 \\
595: RCW49-S2 & O9 V & $\sim{0.2}$ & 0.04 & 2.46 & 17 \\
596: RCW49-S3 & O5 V or O9 III & 2.5--3.2 & 0.096 & 6.13 & 25--28 \\
597: \tableline
598: \multicolumn{5}{l}{RCW49 Distance $=6.1$ kpc} \\
599: \tableline
600: RCW49-S1 & O5 III & $\sim{16}$ & 0.23 & 23.2 & 26 \\
601: RCW49-S2 & O6 V & $\sim{1.3}$ & 0.06 & 3.52 & 28 \\
602: RCW49-S3 & O3 V or O6.5 III &$> 3.2$ & 0.14 & 8.8 & $> 19$ \\
603: \enddata
604:
605: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
606: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
607: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
608: \tablenotetext{a}{Spectral types for the stars driving M17-S1 and -S2
609: are taken from CEN and \citet{HHC97}. All others were estimated by
610: fitting Kurucz (1993) stellar atmosphere models to the broadband IR
611: fluxes (Table 1) and scaling to the distance of M17 or
612: RCW49. Spectral types given for RCW49 are highly uncertain due to the
613: disputed distance to that region.}
614: \tablenotetext{b}{Estimates of stellar mass-loss rates
615: $\dot{M}_{w,-6}=\dot{M_w}/(10^{-6}$
616: M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$) and wind velocities $v_{w,8}=v_{w}/(10^{8}$ cm
617: s$^{-1})$ are based upon
618: \citet{VdKL01} and \citet{FMP06}.}
619:
620: \end{deluxetable}
621: %
622: All three stars are plausibly O stars. Assuming 4.2 kpc, the driving star of
623: RCW49-S1 is fit as O6 V, RCW49-S2 as O 9 V, and RCW49-S3 as
624: O5 V (or O9 III).
625: If we increase the distance to 6 kpc, the fits become O 5 III, O6 V,
626: and O5 V (or O6.5 III), respectively \citep[see][for an explanation of the
627: degeneracy between luminosity classes]{CW08}.
628: %Mention that 6 kpc makes the types too early; and point out Uzpen's O4 star.
629: The spectral types at 6 kpc seem improbably luminous.
630: %The winds of these
631: %stars are observed to shock against an external, large-scale
632: %interstellar gas flow.
633: Highly luminous and windy stars
634: dominate the dynamics of their local ISM.
635: We do not observe IR bowshocks around any
636: of the earliest-type stars in either RCW49 or M17, because they have
637: blown large, evacuated cavities in the centers of the \hii\
638: regions. Little or no ambient material remains close to the stars to produce
639: a bowshock.
640:
641:
642: %There is an additional reason to be skeptical of distance estimates for RCW49
643: %that exceed 5 kpc.
644: Apart from the Wolf-Rayet systems, one of the
645: earliest stars in RCW49
646: is G284.2642-00.3156. Using optical spectroscopy, \citet{BU05}
647: classified this star as O4 V(f)
648: and derived a spectrophotometric distance of $3.2\pm 0.5$
649: kpc. Using IR SED fitting, we confirm that the luminosity of this star
650: is consistent with an O4 V star
651: at 3.2 kpc. Yet this distance falls on the low end of the range of published
652: distance
653: estimates for RCW49, and we do not adopt it here. %We suggest instead that
654: Like CEN 1 in M17, G284.2642-00.3156 may be an unresolved, equal-mass O4--O4
655: binary. Doubling the luminosity moves the spectrophotometric distance from 3.2
656: to 4.5 kpc, in agreement with a distance of 4.2 kpc but inconsistent with 6 kpc.
657:
658:
659:
660: \section{Bowshock Properties}
661:
662: The standoff distance $d_w$ of a bowshock from its driving star is
663: %related %how? are they not
664: %the same?
665: %to
666: the point where the momentum flux of the stellar wind balances the momentum
667: flux of the
668: ambient medium: $n_{w}v_{w}^{2}=n_{0}v_{0}^{2}$. Following \citet{vBu88}, we
669: normalize the stellar wind mass loss rate,
670: $\dot{M}_{w,-6}=10^{-6}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$, stellar wind velocity
671: $v_{w,8}=10^{8}$ cm s$^{-1}$, ambient hydrogen particle density of
672: $n_{0,3}=10^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$, and use a mean ISM gas mass per hydrogen atom
673: $\mu =2.36 \times 10^{-24}$ g. Assuming a spherically symmetric stellar wind
674: with a mass-loss rate given by $\dot{M}=4\pi
675: d_w^{2}\mu n_{w}v_{w}$, the velocity of the star
676: with respect to the ambient ISM can be written as
677: %
678: \begin{equation}
679: v_{0}= 1.5\left(\frac{d_{w}}{{\rm pc}}\right)^{-1} (\dot{M}_{w,-6}v_{w,8})^{1/2}n_{0,3}^{-1/2}~[{\rm km~s^{-1}}],
680: \end{equation}
681: %
682: where $v_{w}$ is the terminal velocity of the stellar wind.
683: %and $d_{w}$ is the distance from the star to the bowshock.
684: Values of
685: $v_{0}n_{0,3}^{1/2}$ and $d_w$ for each bowshock %(and at 2 different assumed distances
686: %for RCW49)
687: are presented in Table 3. The standoff distance can be measured only
688: as $d_w\cos{i}$ on the sky,
689: where $i$ is the inclination
690: (or viewing angle) made by the line connecting the star with the apex
691: of the bowshock
692: against the plane of the sky
693: ($i=0$ if the line joining the star to the bowshock apex lies in the
694: plane of the
695: sky). Because a bowshock oriented at high $i$ will not produce an arc
696: morphology, it is likely that $i \la 45\degree$, and hence $\cos{i}$
697: will not differ greatly from unity in our measurements.\footnote{The
698: average value of $\cos{i}$ for $0\le i \le 45\degree$ is 0.9.} The
699: distance from each bowshock to the likely source of the large-scale ISM flow,
700: measured on the sky as $d_{cl} \cos{i}$, are also presented for
701: reference in Table 3.
702:
703:
704: % (and now for the ref also).
705: The mass-loss rates and stellar wind velocities in Equation 1 suffer from
706: high dispersion as a function of spectral type \citep{FMP06}, a factor
707: of 2 or even greater, and this is compounded by a comparable level of
708: uncertainty in the spectral types. The uncertainty on our measurements of $d_w$
709: ranges from ${\sim}20\%$ for the largest bowshocks (M17-S2 and
710: RCW49-S1) to ${\sim 40\%}$
711: for the smaller bowshocks that are barely resolved by IRAC.
712: % Hence,
713: %the uncertainty in the stellar wind properties dominates the overall
714: %uncertainty on our calculation of $v_0n_0^{1/2}$.
715: We estimate that
716: $v_0n_0^{1/2}$ is uncertain by a factor of 2 in M17 and up to a factor
717: of 3 in RCW49, where the spectral types of the driving stars are less
718: constrained. These uncertainties, reflected in the range of values
719: for $v_0n_0^{1/2}$ in Table 3, are dominated by the uncertainty in the
720: stellar wind properties.
721:
722: %This paragraph is for Ellen
723: We have neglected the effects of turbulent pressure in our calculation
724: of the momentum flux balance of the bowshocks. This is a potentially
725: significant contributor to the total ISM pressure held off by the
726: bowshocks. The effect of turbulent pressure would be to systematically
727: decrease the
728: standoff distance $d_w$, causing us to overestimate $v_0$.
729:
730: %and for the ref
731: In reality, for the fast winds of early-type stars, the observed
732: bowshock is displaced from the standoff distance by a
733: significant amount. This happens because the cooling timescale of the
734: shocked stellar wind is very long. The result is a thick layer of hot
735: gas intervening between the wind terminal shock at the standoff
736: distance and the thin, dense layer of interstellar gas and dust
737: forming the observed bowshock. The numerical simulations of \citet{CK98} predict
738: that the bowshock should be located at twice the standoff distance
739: from the driving star. In this case, our derived values of
740: $v_0n_0^{1/2}$ in Table 3 would be underestimated by the same factor
741: of 2. This systematic correction is comparable to the intrinsic
742: uncertainties in our estimates of $v_0n_0^{1/2}$, and it partially
743: compensates for the
744: effects of neglecting turbulent pressure in the ambient ISM. Therefore, the
745: assumption that the observed distance of the bowshocks from the
746: driving stars corresponds to the standoff distance $d_w$ should not
747: have a large impact on our results, and we find that the cautious
748: application of Equation 1
749: yields reasonable results.
750:
751: %Discussion of implications for the structure of the surrounding ISM and stellar winds.
752: %The velocities of the O stars relative to the ambient ISM in both RCW49 and
753: %M17 are suprisingly high. O stars with observed spatial velocities in excess
754: %of 30 km
755: %s$^{-1}$ are generally runaways, but this explanation is inadequate to explain
756: %the presence of bowshocks that point generally back toward the centers of the
757: %ionizing clusters.
758: Orbital velocities of O stars in massive clusters are typically ${<
759: 10}$ \kms. %Reference?
760: The expansion speed
761: of ionized gas in \hii\ regions
762: is generally comparable to the sound speed of ${\sim}10$ \kms, and
763: this appears to be true
764: in M17 \citep{EP07}. Most of
765: the bowshocks (the exception being RCW49-S1) are apparently
766: located within the ionized gas of the radio \hii\ regions.
767: The likely explanation for the bowshock emission in the IR is that
768: dust in the \hii\ regions \citep{MSP07} is swept-up by the bowshocks.
769: %In order to reproduce relative velocities of ${\sim}10$ \kms,
770: %however, we must invoke gas densities of $n_{0,3} \sim 10$, an order of
771: %magnitude above gas densities generally measured in \hii\ regions
772: The observed average electron density in the Northern bar of the M17
773: \hii\ region is ${\sim}10^3$ cm$^{-3}$ \citep{FCM84}, so
774: the values of $v_0n_{0,3}^{1/2}$ listed in Table 3 are likely to be
775: close to the actual relative velocities of the stars and the ISM for
776: most of the bowshocks.
777: %Even considering the large uncertainties in the
778: %stellar mass loss rates and wind velocities, it appears that our calculated
779: %values for $v_0$ are systematically high.
780:
781:
782: % An alternate interpretation of relative velocities that are higher than
783: % expected would be that the bowshock distances are {\it smaller} than
784: % expected. The IR emission from the bowshocks is very bright (Table 2), bright
785: % enough to be detected over the large diffuse background emission in these
786: % regions. It is therefore possible that radiative losses from
787: % dust emission in the IR steals a large amount of the stellar wind kinetic
788: % energy, thereby shrinking the bowshocks. The IR SEDs of the bowshocks cannot
789: % be modeled by a simple one- or two-component blackbody, so it appears that a
790: % range of dust temperatures and grain sizes contribute to the bowshock
791: % emission. A complete treatment of the bowshock emission physics is beyond the
792: % scope of this Letter. {\bf Bob, is this what you had in mind? If not, does it
793: % make sense?}
794:
795: %Comparing the values
796: %of $v_{0}n_{0,3}^{-1/2}$ among the different bowshocks, we find some
797: %variation. This can be explained by differences in the
798: %physical conditions of the ambient ISM at
799: %the locations of the driving stars. %For example, t
800: The values of $v_{0}n_{0,3}^{1/2}$ calculated for
801: M17-S1 and -S2
802: are in good agreement.
803: %, as expected given
804: %the apparent close
805: %proximity of these 2 stars to each other in the M17 \hii\ region.
806: M17-S3,
807: however, presents a different picture.
808: %The $v_{0}$ of this star is unlikely to
809: %be much different from that of the other 2.
810: %, given that it is no closer to the
811: %central ionizing cluster.
812: M17-S3 appears to be associated with a ``teardrop'' structure (Figure 1) in the
813: photodissociation region
814: (PDR),
815: near the ionization front. The ambient density
816: surrounding this star could be significantly higher than the density
817: within the \hii\ region. If $v_0$ for this
818: bowshock is comparable to that of the other 2 bowshocks in M17, then
819: $n_{0,3} \sim 2.25$ cm$^{-3}$ in this location. This value agrees with
820: the measurements of electron density in the dense clumps of ionized
821: gas in M17 \citep{FCM84}.
822: The unusual morphology of the
823: diffuse IR emission associated with M17-S3 suggests that the star
824: may have
825: recently emerged from an evaporating globule on the edge of the
826: PDR; a larger,
827: more evolved analog of the nearby pillar structure seen in Figure 1.
828:
829: In RCW49,
830: all 3 bowshocks are found in very different locations, but we note that 2 of
831: the bowshocks appear to be similar in size, color, and ambient environment
832: (Figure 2). The largest
833: bowshock, %RCW49-S1, is interacting with a fundamentally
834: %different type of ISM flow from the other 5 in our sample.
835: RCW49-S1, is different, since it is located
836: relatively far (16.2 pc at 4.2 kpc)
837: from Westerlund 2, outside the \hii\ region.
838: The presence of RCW49-S1, along with its orientation, indicates
839: that RCW49 vents a large-scale flow of
840: gas through the cavity opening to the West.
841: This flow likely originates in the combined winds of the Westerlund
842: 2 cluster and thus should be much more diffuse than the \hii\ region
843: gas \citep{T03,T05}. Assuming a density of 1 cm$^{-3}$ in the flow
844: from Westerlund 2, the standoff distance of RCW49-S1 at 4.2 kpc
845: gives a flow velocity of ${\sim}350$ \kms. Such a high value of $v_0$
846: is reasonable, given that the gas must move supersonically relative to
847: the star to produce a shock, and the sound speed in the hot, rarefied
848: gas of the flow
849: streaming away from the \hii\ region is ${\sim}100$ \kms.
850:
851: %
852: \begin{figure}[ht]
853:
854: \epsscale{0.5}
855: \plotone{f3.eps}
856: \caption{Radiation transfer model of RCW49-S1. {\it Top:} Model SEDs
857: plotted with the fluxes of the bowshock and driving star from Tables
858: 1 \& 2 ({\it triangles:} 2MASS and GLIMPSE; {\it crosses: MSX}; {\it
859: diamonds: IRAS}). The {\it green} curve includes low-density
860: material in a shell 2--3 pc from the star in order to match the {\it
861: IRAS} 60 and 100 \um\ fluxes. {\it Bottom:} Image of the model
862: %giving
863: % the {\it green} SED
864: bowshock at GLIMPSE wavelengths
865: (compare to Fig.\ 2).
866: \label{model}}
867:
868: \end{figure}
869: %
870: Because RCW49-S1 was detected by {\it MSX} and {\it IRAS} in addition
871: to GLIMPSE, we can construct the SED of the bowshock from 4.5 \um\ to
872: 100 \um\ (Table 2). We computed SED models of RCW49-S1 using a 3-D
873: radiative equilibrium code \citep{WI} %(Whitney et al. 2003a)
874: modified to include very small grain (VSG) and PAH emission
875: \citep{KW08}. %(Wood et al. 2008).
876: We used the canonical mass fraction for VSG/PAH grains of 5\%
877: \citep{DL07}. %(Draine \& Li
878: %2007, ApJ, 657, 810)
879: We modeled the bowshock geometry as a paraboloid with the apex offset
880: by $d_w=0.16$ pc from the O6 V star (assuming $i=0$ and the 4.2 kpc
881: distance). For models that reproduced the observed images, the SED
882: shape was insensitive both to the thickness of the shock and to the
883: radial density profile of the
884: dust (with the total mass scaled to match the observed SED).
885: The black line in Figure \ref{model} shows the SED for a model with a
886: density varying as $r^{-2}$ from the 0.16 pc standoff distance out to
887: a radius of 1.5 pc. The observed SED shortward of 30 \um\ is
888: well-matched by the model.
889: For radial density exponents from $-2$ to 0, the mass of this material
890: ranges from ${\sim}0.5$ M$_{\odot}$ to 2 M$_{\odot}$, respectively, assuming a
891: dust-to-gas mass ratio of 0.01. The optical depth in all models is
892: low, with $A_V < 0.02$ within 1 pc. To match the {\it IRAS} data at 60
893: and 100 \um\ requires low-density material farther from the star. The
894: {\it green} line in Figure \ref{model} is a model including a shell
895: 2--3 pc from the star. This material added mid-IR PAH emission, so we
896: lowered the VSG/PAH mass fraction to 3\% to continue to match the
897: mid-IR SED, and the image still matches the data well. The $A_V$
898: through the
899: bowshock in this model is 0.25, most of it due to the outer shell.
900: Along the line of sight to the star, $A_V = 10$, so the
901: bowshock and shell contribute a negligible fraction of the
902: interstellar extinction.
903: These models show that dust distributed in a bowshock geometry matches
904: both the images and the SED reasonably well. The IR
905: emission from the bowshock can be explained by reprocessed stellar
906: radiation without any additional dust heating by the shock.
907:
908: The structure of RCW-S1 is probably significantly different from that
909: of the other 5 bowshocks in our sample, because it is located in a
910: distinct interstellar environment. Because of the high temperature and
911: low density in the
912: flow outside the \hii\ region, the shocked interstellar gas cannot
913: cool quickly enough to form a dense layer behind the bowshock,
914: as likely happens in the other 5 cases. The shock is approximately
915: adiabatic, remaining very hot and only moderately compressed (by a factor
916: of ${\sim}4$) as it flows past the star, forming a relatively thick layer.
917: % Because the gas streaming away
918: %from the \hii\ region is very hot and rarefied compared to the
919: %ionized gas within the \hii\ region, the sound speed is ${\sim}100$
920: %\kms.
921: Hence, while RCW-S1 is the only bowshock in our sample
922: observed at enough
923: different mid-IR wavelengths to allow us to create a meaningful model
924: of the emission, it may not be appropriate to
925: draw strong conclusions about the remaining bowshocks based upon this model.
926:
927: %Spectroscopy of the stars associated with the bowshocks would independently
928: %constrain the wind velocity and spectral types, and thus provide better
929: %constraints on the mass
930: %loss rate, ambient density, and relative velocity of the stellar wind.
931: %Additional X-ray observations in the direction of the outflow with
932: %{\it Chandra} or {\it XMM-Newton} could
933: %confirm the existence of a
934: %large-scale outflow of plasma from RCW49.
935:
936:
937:
938:
939:
940: %The mechanical luminosity associated with this shock, i.e. the amount of kinetic energy converted into thermal energy is
941:
942: %\begin{equation}
943: %L_{therm}=
944: %\end{equation}
945:
946: %Discuss efficiency of conversion of shock kinetic energy into infrared.
947:
948:
949:
950: \section{Summary}
951:
952: We have observed 6 prominent IR bowshocks in M17 and
953: RCW49. These objects appear to be produced by the winds of
954: individual O
955: stars colliding with large-scale interstellar gas flows
956: in the \hii\ regions.
957: % originating from
958: %other hot stars or clusters.
959: One bowshock, M17-S3, may be the
960: leading edge of an evaporating globule containing a newly-formed and
961: previously undiscovered O star in the
962: %, One of the bowshock driving stars in the
963: well-studied M17 region.
964: %is a previously
965: %undiscovered O star, and
966: All three bowshocks associated with RCW49
967: lead us to identify new candidate O stars. Our stellar classifications
968: also suggest
969: that the true distance to RCW49 is less than the kinematic distance of
970: 6 kpc.
971:
972: The bowshocks are bright at IR
973: wavelengths due to emission from dust swept up from the ambient
974: ISM and heated by radiation from the bowshock driving stars.
975: As \citet{AG08} note, IR excess emission from a bowshock could be
976: attributed to the presence of a circumstellar disk, particularly when
977: the bowshock
978: morphology is not spatially well-resolved. This can be a pitfall for
979: observational studies of accreting massive protostars.
980:
981: %The sizes of the bowshocks are smaller than would be expected due to the
982: %orbital motion of O stars through the ionized gas of an expanding \hii\ region.
983: %These observations make clear that IR emission is
984: % potentially an energetically important route for the thermalization
985: % and radiation of the kinetic energy associated with {\it any}
986: % bowshock in a dusty environment. Observing programs searching for IR
987: % emission associated with stellar outflows, both within and
988: % outside star formation regions, seem likely to provide new
989: % examples of this phenomenon.
990: % Stellar-wind bowshocks provide new insights into
991: % both stellar outflows and the surrounding interstellar
992: % medium.
993:
994: %Regions of massive star formation are windy places.
995: The collective
996: winds of the most luminous stars in young, massive clusters produce
997: overlapping large-scale flows that
998: hollow out thermally hot cavities in the parent molecular cloud \citep{T03}.
999: %The radiation from the massive stars produces evaporative flows from the
1000: %surface of molecular clouds \citep{MSP07}.
1001: The largest bowshock presented here, RCW49-S1, is evidence that the
1002: combined winds of the ionizing stars in Westerlund 2 have escaped the \hii\
1003: region, creating a flow of hot gas moving at a few $10^2$ \kms\ that
1004: extends at least 16 pc away from RCW49.
1005:
1006: The driving stars of the other 5 bowshocks
1007: are surrounded by ionized gas and dust of their natal \hii\
1008: regions, where the density of the ambient medium ($n_0\sim 10^3$ cm$^{-3}$)
1009: is sufficiently high to produce the observed bowshocks with a relative
1010: velocity of only 10--20 \kms.
1011: The winds of
1012: the bowshock driving stars do not directly encounter the ${>}2000$
1013: \kms\ winds from the most massive stars in the cluster. Instead, the
1014: bowshocks are shaped by the expansion of the ionized
1015: gas in the \hii\ regions relative to
1016: the orbital motions of the stars.
1017:
1018: Eventually, supernova explosions
1019: will produce high velocity shock waves that heat and disperse the original
1020: gas cloud. In star forming regions like M17 and RCW49 that have not yet been
1021: disrupted by supernovae, IR bowshocks serve as interstellar ``weather vanes,''
1022: indicating the speed and direction of large-scale gas flows at points within
1023: and around giant \hii\ regions.
1024:
1025: \acknowledgments
1026:
1027: We thank the anonymous referee for incisive and very useful suggestions
1028: that helped us improve this work. We are grateful to Joseph
1029: Cassinelli, Eric
1030: Pellegrini, John Raymond, Ellen Zweibel, Heidi Gneiser, and Don Cox
1031: for useful conversations while preparing this paper.
1032: M. S. P. thanks the members of the ``dissertator club,'' Kathryn
1033: Devine, K. Tabetha Hole, and Nicholas Murphy, for their helpful comments.
1034: This work was supported by NSF grant AST-030368 (E. B. C.) and NASA/JPL
1035: Contracts 1282620 and 1298148. Additional support was provided by the
1036: NASA Theory Program (NNG05GH35G; B. A. W.). R. I. acknowledges support
1037: from a Spitzer Fellowship at the time that these data were analyzed,
1038: and from JPL RSA1275467.
1039: %{\bf Co-authors, please tell me your grant numbers. :-)}
1040:
1041: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
1042: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
1043: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
1044: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
1045: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
1046: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
1047: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
1048: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
1049:
1050: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
1051: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
1052: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
1053: %% copy editing. Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,
1054: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
1055:
1056: %Facilities: \facility{Spitzer}
1057:
1058: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
1059: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
1060: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
1061:
1062: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
1063: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
1064: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
1065:
1066:
1067:
1068:
1069:
1070: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1071: \bibitem[Arthur \& Hoare(2006)]{AH06} Arthur, S.~J., \&
1072: Hoare, M.~G.\ 2006, \apjs, 165, 283
1073: \bibitem[Ascenso et al.(2007)]{JA07} Ascenso, J., Alves, J., Beletsky, Y., \& Lago, M. T. V. T. 2007, \aap, 466, 137
1074: \bibitem[Bally et al.(2000)]{Bally00} Bally, J., O'Dell, C.~R.,
1075: \& McCaughrean, M.~J.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 2919
1076: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(1988)]{IRAS} Beichman, C. A., Neugebauer, G.,
1077: Habing, H. J., Clegg, P. E., \& Chester, T. J., eds. 1988, IRAS
1078: Catalogs and Atlases: Explanatory Supplement, NASA RP-1190
1079: \bibitem[Benjamin et al.(2003)]{ben03} Benjamin, R.A. et al. 2003, \pasp, 115, 953
1080: %\bibitem[Benjamin et al.(2005)]{ben05} Benjamin, R.A. et al. 2005,
1081: % \apjl, 630, L149
1082: \bibitem[Brown \& Bomans(2005)]{BB05} Brown, D., \& Bomans,
1083: D.~J.\ 2005, \aap, 439, 183
1084: %\bibitem[Broos et al.(2007)]{PB07} Broos, P. S. et al.\ 2007, \apjs, 169, 353
1085: \bibitem[Bumgardner(1992)]{Bum92} Bumgardner, T. E. 1992,
1086: M.S. thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus
1087: \bibitem[Chini, Els\"asser, \& Neckel(1980)]{CEN} Chini, R.,
1088: Els\"asser, H., \& Neckel, T. 1980, \aap, 91, 186 (CEN)
1089: \bibitem[Churchwell et al.(1992)]{EC92} Churchwell, E., Bieging,
1090: J. H., van der Hucht, K. A., Williams, P. M., Spoelstra, T. A. Th.,
1091: \& Abbott, D. C. 1992, \apj, 393, 329
1092: \bibitem[Churchwell et al.(2004)]{chu04} Churchwell, E. et al. 2004,
1093: \apjs, 154, 322 %UPDATED
1094: %\bibitem[Churchwell et al.(2006)]{bubbles} Churchwell, E. et al.\
1095: % 2006, \apj, 649, 759
1096: \bibitem[Comer{\'o}n \& Kaper(1998)]{CK98} Comer{\'o}n, F. \&
1097: Kaper, L. 1998, \aap, 338, 273
1098: \bibitem[Comer{\'o}n \& Pasquali(2007)]{CP07} Comer{\'o}n,
1099: F. \& Pasquali, A.\ 2007, \aap, 467, L23
1100: \bibitem[Dame(2007)]{dame07} Dame, T.~M.\ 2007, \apjl, 665,
1101: L163
1102: \bibitem[Decker et al.(2005)]{V105} Decker, R. B. et al.\ 2005, Science, 309, 2020
1103: \bibitem[Draine \& Li(2007)]{DL07} Draine, B. T. \& Li, A. 2007, \apj,
1104: 657, 810
1105: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{IRAC} Fazio, G. G. et al.\ 2004, \apjs,
1106: 154, 10
1107: \bibitem[Felli, Churchwell, \& Massi(1984)]{FCM84} Felli, M., Churchwell, E.,
1108: \& Massi, M. 1984, \aap, 136, 53
1109: \bibitem[France et al.(2007)]{FML07} France, K., McCandliss,
1110: S.~R., \& Lupu, R.~E.\ 2007, \apj, 655, 920
1111: %\bibitem[Frisch(2004)]{Frisch04} Frisch, P.\ 2004, 35th COSPAR
1112: %Scientific Assembly, 35, 4124
1113: \bibitem[Fullerton, Massa, \& Prinja(2006)]{FMP06} Fullerton, A. W.,
1114: Massa, D. L., \& Prinja, R. K. 2006, \apj, 637, 1025
1115: %\bibitem[Gaenssler (2004)]{gae04} Gaenssler, B. 2004 in How Does The Galaxy Work?, ed. J. Franco (Springer-Verlag: New York), in press. %update!
1116: \bibitem[Gaensler \& Slane(2006)]{GS06} Gaensler, B.~M., \&
1117: Slane, P.~O.\ 2006, \araa, 44, 17
1118: \bibitem[G\'{a}sp\'{a}r et al.(2008)]{AG08} G\'{a}sp\'{a}r, A., Su, K. Y. L.,
1119: Rieke, G. H., Balog, Z., Kamp, I., Mart\'{i}nex-Galarza, J. R., \&
1120: Stapelfeldt, K. 2008, \apj, 672, 974 %cite in text...
1121: \bibitem[Geballe et al.(2004)]{geb04} Geballe, T.R., Rigaut, F., Roy,
1122: J.-R., \& Draine, B.T. 2004, \apj, 602, 77
1123: \bibitem[Geballe et al.(2006)]{geb06} Geballe, T.~R.,
1124: Najarro, F., Rigaut, F., \& Roy, J.-R.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 370
1125: \bibitem[Hanson, Howarth, \& Conti(1997)]{HHC97} Hanson, M. M.,
1126: Howarth, I. D., \& Conti, P. S. 1997, \apj, 489, 698
1127: \bibitem[Huthoff \& Kaper(2002)]{HK02} Huthoff, F., \&
1128: Kaper, L.\ 2002, \aap, 383, 999
1129: \bibitem[Kaper et al.(1997)]{K97} Kaper, L., van Loon,
1130: J.~T., Augusteijn, T., Goudfrooij, P., Patat, F., Waters, L.~B.~F.~M., \&
1131: Zijlstra, A.~A.\ 1997, \apjl, 475, L37
1132: %\bibitem[Kobulnicky et al.(2005)]{GC} Kobulnicky, H. A. et al.\ 2005,
1133: % \aj, 129, 239
1134: \bibitem[Kurucz(1993)]{Kurucz} Kurucz, R. 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar
1135: Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid. Kurucz CD-ROM
1136: No. 13. Cambridge, MA: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
1137: \bibitem[Martin et al.(2007)]{Martin07} Martin, D, C. et al , 2007, Nature, 448, 780
1138: %\bibitem[Moffat, Shara, \& Potter(1991)]{MSP91} Moffat, A. F. J., Shara,
1139: % M. M., \& Potter, M. 1991, \aj, 102, 642
1140: \bibitem[Nielbock et al.(2001)]{MN01} Nielbock, M., Chini, R.,
1141: J\"utte, M., \& Manthey, E. 2001, \aap, 273, 284
1142: \bibitem[Noriega-Crespo et al.(1997)]{Nor97} Noriega-Crespo,
1143: A., van Buren, D., \& Dgani, R.\ 1997, \aj, 113, 780
1144: \bibitem[Pellegrini et al.(2007)]{EP07} Pellegrini, E. W. et al.\ 2007, \apj,
1145: 658, 1119 %cite in text
1146: \bibitem[Povich et al.(2007)]{MSP07} Povich, M. S., Stone, J. M.,
1147: Churchwell, E., Zweibel, E. G., Wolfire, M. G., Babler, B. L.,
1148: Indebetouw, R., Meade, M. R., \& Whitney, B. A. 2007, \apj, 660, 346
1149: \bibitem[Povich et al.(2008)]{MSP08} Povich, M. S. et al.\ 2008, \apj, submitted
1150: \bibitem[Price et al.(2001)]{MSX} Price, S. D., Egan, M. P., Carey,
1151: S. J., Mizuno, D. R., and Kuchar, T. A. 2001, \aj, 121, 2842
1152: \bibitem[Rauw et al.(2007)]{GR07} Rauw, G., Manfroid, J., Gosset, E., Naz\'{e}, Y., Sana, H., De Becker, M., Foellmi,
1153: C., \& Moffat, A. F. J. 2007, \aap, 463, 981
1154: \bibitem[Robitaille et al.(2007)]{fitter} Robitaille, T. P., Whitney,
1155: B. A., Indebetouw, R., \& Wood, K. 2007, \apjs, 169, 328
1156: \bibitem[Townsley et al.(2003)]{T03} Townsley, L. K., Feigelson,
1157: E. D., Montmerle, T., Broos, P. S., Chu, Y.-H., \& Garmire, G. P.
1158: 2003, \apj, 593, 874
1159: \bibitem[Townsley et al.(2005)]{T05}
1160: Townsley, L., Feigelson, E., Montmerle, T., Broos, P., Chu, Y.-H.
1161: Garmire, G., \& Getman, K. 2005, X-Ray and Radio Connections, eds.\
1162: L.O. Sjouwerman \& K.K Dyer (NRAO: Santa Fe, NM)
1163: \bibitem[Uzpen et al.(2005)]{BU05} Uzpen, B. et al.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 512
1164: \bibitem[van Buren \& McCray(1988)]{vBu88} van Buren, D. \& McCray,
1165: R. 1988, \apjl, 329, 93
1166: \bibitem[van Buren et al.(1990)]{vB90} van Buren, D., Mac Low, M. M.,
1167: Wood, D. O. S., \& Churchwell, E. 1990, \apj, 353, 570
1168: \bibitem[van Buren, Noriega-Crespo, \& Dgani(1995)]{vBu95} van Buren, D., Noriega-Crespo, A., \& Dgani, R. 1995, \aj, 110, 2914
1169: \bibitem[Vink, de Koter, \& Lamers(2001)]{VdKL01} Vink, J. S., de Koter, A.,
1170: \& Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2001, \aap, 369, 574 %cite with Table 3
1171: \bibitem[Watson et al.(2008)]{CW08} Watson, C., Povich, M. S.,
1172: Churchwell, E. B., Babler, B. L., Chunev, G. Hoare, M., Indebetouw,
1173: R., Meade, M. R., \& Whitney, B. A. 2008, \apj, 681, 1341 (astro-ph 0806.0609)
1174: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2003)]{WI} Whitney, B. A., Wood, K.,
1175: Bjorkman, J. E., \& Wolff, M. J. 2003, \apj, 591, 1049
1176: %\bibitem[Whitney et al.(2004)]{whi04} Whitney, B.A. et al.\ 2004,
1177: %\apjs, 154, 315 %UPDATE!
1178: \bibitem[Wood et al.(2008)]{KW08} Wood, K., Whitney, B. A.,
1179: Robitaille, T. P., \& Draine, B. T. 2008, \apj, in press (astro-ph 0807.2398)
1180:
1181:
1182: \end{thebibliography}
1183:
1184: \clearpage
1185:
1186: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
1187: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
1188: %% To embed the sample graphics in
1189: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
1190: %% \includegraphics commands
1191: %%
1192: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
1193: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
1194: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
1195: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
1196: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
1197: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
1198: %%
1199: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
1200: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
1201: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
1202: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
1203: %% journal to journal.
1204:
1205:
1206: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
1207: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
1208: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
1209: %% available in the electronic journal.
1210:
1211:
1212:
1213: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
1214: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
1215: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
1216: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
1217: %%
1218:
1219:
1220:
1221: %\include{table1}
1222:
1223:
1224: %\include{table2}
1225:
1226:
1227: %\include{table3}
1228:
1229: \end{document}
1230: