1: \nofiles
2: \documentclass[dvips]{acta}
3: \usepackage{supertabular,lscape,epsfig}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{amsmath}
6: \DeclareSymbolFont{ppa}{OT1}{ppl}{m}{it}
7: \DeclareMathSymbol{\vv}{\mathalpha}{ppa}{'166}
8:
9: \SetPages{163}{185}
10:
11: \SetVol{58}{2008}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: %Zwarte naglowki, jeden wiersz
16: \newcommand{\TabCapp}[2]{\begin{center}\parbox[t]{#1}{\centerline{
17: \small {\spaceskip 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt T a b l e}
18: \refstepcounter{table}\thetable}
19: \vskip2mm
20: \centerline{\footnotesize #2}}
21: \vskip3mm
22: \end{center}}
23:
24: %Zwarte naglowki, dwa wiersze
25: \newcommand{\TTabCap}[3]{\begin{center}\parbox[t]{#1}{\centerline{
26: \small {\spaceskip 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt T a b l e}
27: \refstepcounter{table}\thetable}
28: \vskip2mm
29: \centerline{\footnotesize #2}
30: \centerline{\footnotesize #3}}
31: \vskip1mm
32: \end{center}}
33:
34: %Zwarte naglowki, jeden wiersz
35: \newcommand{\MakeTableSepp}[4]{\begin{table}[p]\TabCapp{#2}{#3}
36: \begin{center} \TableFont \begin{tabular}{#1} #4
37: \end{tabular}\end{center}\end{table}}
38:
39: %Zwarte naglowki, jeden wiersz
40: \newcommand{\MakeTableee}[4]{\begin{table}[htb]\TabCapp{#2}{#3}
41: \begin{center} \TableFont \begin{tabular}{#1} #4
42: \end{tabular}\end{center}\end{table}}
43:
44: %Zwarte naglowki, dwa wiersze
45: \newcommand{\MakeTablee}[5]{\begin{table}[htb]\TTabCap{#2}{#3}{#4}
46: \begin{center} \TableFont \begin{tabular}{#1} #5
47: \end{tabular}\end{center}\end{table}}
48:
49: \newfont{\bb}{ptmbi8t at 12pt}
50: \newfont{\bbb}{cmbxti10}
51: \newfont{\bbbb}{cmbxti10 at 9pt}
52: \newcommand{\uprule}{\rule{0pt}{2.5ex}}
53: \newcommand{\douprule}{\rule[-2ex]{0pt}{4.5ex}}
54: \newcommand{\dorule}{\rule[-2ex]{0pt}{2ex}}
55: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
56:
57: \hyphenation{Ce-phe-ids eclip-ses chan-ges}
58:
59: \begin{Titlepage}
60: \Title{The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment.\\
61: The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars.\\
62: I. Classical Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud\footnote{Based on
63: observations obtained with the 1.3-m Warsaw telescope at the Las Campanas
64: Observatory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington.}}
65: \Author{I.~~S~o~s~z~y~\'n~s~k~i$^1$,~~
66: R.~~P~o~l~e~s~k~i$^1$,~~
67: A.~~U~d~a~l~s~k~i$^1$,~~
68: M.\,K.~~S~z~y~m~a~{\'n}~s~k~i$^1$,\\
69: M.~~K~u~b~i~a~k$^1$,~~
70: G.~~P~i~e~t~r~z~y~\'n~s~k~i$^{1,2}$,~~
71: \L.~~W~y~r~z~y~k~o~w~s~k~i$^{1,3}$,\\
72: O.~~S~z~e~w~c~z~y~k$^{1,2}$~~
73: and~~K.~~U~l~a~c~z~y~k$^1$}
74: {$^1$Warsaw University Observatory, Al.~Ujazdowskie~4, 00-478~Warszawa, Poland\\
75: e-mail:
76: (soszynsk,rpoleski,udalski,msz,mk,pietrzyn,wyrzykow,szewczyk,kulaczyk)
77: @astrouw.edu.pl\\
78: $^2$ Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Casilla 160--C,
79: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile\\
80: $^3$ Institute of Astronomy, University of
81: Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK}
82: \Received{August 15, 2008}
83: \end{Titlepage}
84: \Abstract{We present the first part of a new catalog of variable stars
85: (OIII-CVS) compiled from the data collected in the course of the third
86: phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE-III). In this
87: paper we describe the catalog of 3361 classical Cepheids detected in the
88: $\approx40$ square degrees area in the Large Magellanic Cloud. The sample
89: consists of 1848 fundamental-mode (F), 1228 first-overtone (1O), 14
90: second-overtone (2O), 61 double-mode F/1O, 203 double-mode 1O/2O, 2
91: double-mode 1O/3O, and 5 triple-mode classical Cepheids. This sample is
92: supplemented by the list of 23 ultra-low amplitude variable stars which may
93: be Cepheids entering or exiting instability strip.
94:
95: The catalog data include {\it VI} high-quality photometry collected since
96: 2001, and for some stars supplemented by the OGLE-II photometry obtained
97: between 1997 and 2000. We provide basic parameters of the stars:
98: coordinates, periods, mean magnitudes, amplitudes and parameters of the
99: Fourier light curve decompositions. Our sample of Cepheids is
100: cross-identified with previously published catalogs of these variables in
101: the LMC. Individual objects of particular interest are discussed, including
102: single-mode second-overtone Cepheids, multiperiodic pulsators with unusual
103: period ratios or Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems.
104:
105: We discuss the variations of the Fourier coefficients with periods and
106: point out on the sharp feature for periods around 0.35~days of
107: first-overtone Cepheids, which can be explained by the occurrence of 2:1
108: resonance between the first and fifth overtones. Similar behavior at
109: $P\approx3$~days for 1O Cepheids and $P\approx10$~days for F Cepheids are
110: also interpreted as an effect of resonances between two radial modes. We
111: fit the period--luminosity relations to our sample of Cepheids and compare
112: these functions with previous determinations.}{Cepheids -- Stars:
113: oscillations -- Magellanic Clouds}
114:
115: \Section{Introduction}
116: The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) is a wide-field sky
117: survey originally motivated by search for microlensing events
118: (Paczy{\'n}ski 1986). The observing strategy of the project is to regularly
119: monitor brightness of about 200~million stars in the Magellanic Clouds and
120: Galactic bulge in the time-scales of years. A~by-product of these
121: observations is an enormous database of photometric measurements, which can
122: be used for selecting long lists of newly discovered variable stars.
123:
124: The OGLE project yielded a wealth of information about variable stars. The
125: second phase of the survey, conducted between 1997 and 2000, resulted in
126: catalogs of thousands Cepheids, RR~Lyr stars, eclipsing binaries and long
127: period variables in the Magellanic Clouds. Moreover, the huge catalogs of
128: variable sources found in the OGLE-II fields in the Magellanic Clouds
129: ({\.Z}ebru{\'n} \etal 2001) and in the Galactic bulge (Wo{\'z}niak \etal
130: 2002) were released. In this paper we present the first part of the
131: OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars (OIII-CVS) -- the catalog containing
132: virtually all variable stars in the fields regularly observed by OGLE since
133: 2001 with the Warsaw telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile.
134:
135: Classical Cepheids ($\delta$~Cep stars, type I Cepheids), as the primary
136: distance indicator, are among the most important variable stars. The Large
137: Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is one of the most fundamental extragalactic targets
138: of modern astrophysics, because it is our nearest non-dwarf neighbor
139: galaxy. For this reason we begin the OIII-CVS with the catalog of classical
140: Cepheids in the LMC.
141:
142: Large number of variable stars in the LMC, including classical Cepheids,
143: were discovered by Leavitt (1908). However, the first period derivation and
144: the plot of the period--luminosity (PL) diagram for 40 LMC Cepheids was
145: made by Shapley (1931). In 1955 the periods of 550 classical Cepheids in
146: the LMC were published (see Shapley and McKibben Nail 1955 for the
147: bibliography). Then, a considerable survey for LMC Cepheids was done by
148: Woolley \etal (1962). The catalog prepared by Payne-Gaposchkin (1971) on
149: the basis of Harvard photographic plates contained about 1100 Cepheids in
150: the LMC. After hiatus, a number of Cepheids in the LMC were also discovered
151: by Hodge and Lee (1984), Kurochkin \etal (1989), van Genderen and Hadiyanto
152: Nitihardjo (1989) and Mateo \etal (1990). In the late 1990's very large
153: catalogs of Cepheids were published as a by-product of gravitational
154: microlensing surveys: EROS (Beaulieu \etal 1995, Afonso \etal 1999), MACHO
155: (Welch \etal 1997, Alcock \etal 1999b) and OGLE-II (Udalski \etal 1999d,
156: Soszy{\'n}ski \etal 2000).
157:
158: The catalog described in this work contains the largest sample of classical
159: Cepheids detected to date in the LMC and, likely, in any other
160: environment. Almost 1000 objects are new identifications. Double-mode
161: Cepheid sample presented in this paper is three times more numerous than
162: the largest sample presented so far. We also show individual objects of
163: particular interest, like triple-mode Cepheids, Cepheids with non-radial
164: pulsations, Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems, etc.
165:
166: The paper is organized as follows. In Section~2 we describe how the
167: observations were obtained and reduced. Section~3 gives the details about
168: the process of Cepheid selection. In Section~4 we describe the catalog
169: itself. We compare our sample with previously published catalogs of the LMC
170: classical Cepheids in Section~5. In Section~6 we discuss the Fourier
171: coefficients as a function of periods. In Section~7 we fit the
172: period--luminosity relations. Finally, Section~8 summarizes the paper.
173:
174: \Section{Observations and Data Reduction}
175: The photometric data were obtained with the 1.3-m Warsaw telescope located
176: at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile. The observatory is operated by the
177: Carnegie Institution of Washington. The telescope is equipped with the
178: ``second generation'' camera consisting of eight SITe $2048\times4096$ CCD
179: detectors with 15~$\mu$m pixels what corresponds to 0.26 arcsec/pixel
180: scale. The gain of the chips is adjusted to be about 1.3
181: $\mathrm{e}^-/\mathrm{ADU}$ with the readout noise from 6 to 9
182: $\mathrm{e}^-$ depending on the chip. For details of the instrumental setup
183: we refer to Udalski (2003).
184:
185: Observations of 116 OGLE-III fields covering 39.7 square degrees of the LMC
186: started in July 2001. The data presented in this paper were collected up to
187: March 2008. In the future, photometry provided with the catalog will be
188: supplemented by observations obtained after this date, up to the end of the
189: third phase of the OGLE survey.
190:
191: The photometry was obtained using Difference Image Analysis (DIA) technique
192: (Alard and Lupton 1998, Alard 2000, Wo{\'z}niak 2000), which is able to
193: perform in dense stellar fields considerably better photometry than the
194: traditional PSF-fitting programs. We emphasize that even though there are
195: small gaps between the chips of the CCD mosaic, our final DIA photometry
196: pipeline (Udalski \etal 2008a) provides photometry of stars from the entire
197: fields, because, due to imperfections of the telescope pointing, the
198: regions between the chips are also observed from time to time. Thus, the
199: completeness of the catalog is practically not limited by the lack of
200: observations in the gaps between the chips, although the smaller number of
201: points at the edges of the fields sometimes may decrease the efficiency of
202: variability search.
203:
204: About 90\% of observations were taken in the $I$ photometric band closely
205: resembling standard filter. The remaining frames were observed in the $V$
206: bandpass. The data were calibrated to the standard system using hundreds of
207: thousands stars observed during the OGLE-II project (1997--2000) and common
208: with the OGLE-III observations. The procedure of calibration of the data
209: and astrometric transformations were described by Udalski \etal
210: (2008a). The accuracy of the photometric calibrations is better than
211: 0.02~mag, while equatorial coordinates in the catalog have uncertainties of
212: about 0\zdot\arcs1.
213:
214: Photometry error bars derived by the DIA package were known to be
215: underestimated. Here we corrected the error bars using technique derived
216: for OGLE-II LMC microlensing events search and described in detail in
217: Wyrzykowski \etal (in preparation). In brief, the method compares observed
218: photometric scatter of constant stars in a given field with their mean
219: error bars and fits the coefficients of relation between original and
220: corrected error bar: $\sigma_{\rm corr} = ((\gamma\sigma)^2+
221: \epsilon^2)^{1/2}$. For OGLE-III data $\gamma$ and $\epsilon$ were derived
222: independently for each field and CCD chip. On the average $\gamma=1.204$
223: and $\epsilon=0.0046$ in the $I$ band. In $V$ filter: $\gamma=0.996$ and
224: $\epsilon=0.0035$.
225:
226: For the central 4.5 square degrees of the LMC the OGLE-II photometry
227: (Szyma{\'n}ski 2005) was available. When it was possible we tied both
228: datasets to obtain the time base of observations covering 12 years. For
229: each star we shifted the OGLE-II photometry to agree with the mean OGLE-III
230: magnitudes, however in some peculiar Cepheids with variable mean magnitudes
231: more advanced procedure should be applied.
232:
233: Our sample contains 47 Cepheids with no {\it I}-band data in the OGLE-III
234: database, usually due to exceeding the CCD saturation limit (which is about
235: $I=13$~mag). In a few cases our photometric techniques failed in the
236: centers of the clusters. For 16 of these objects the OGLE-II {\it I}-band
237: photometry is available, where the level of saturation was slightly higher
238: ($I=12.5$~mag). Note, that the OGLE-III photometry for the brightest stars
239: is sometimes more noisy due to exceeding the saturation limit.
240:
241: Luckily, most of these bright or cluster stars have observations in the $V$
242: filter, because our {\it V}-band data for classical Cepheids saturate for
243: periods longer than $\approx50$~days. Only for the five longest-period
244: Cepheids, neither $I$ nor {\it V}-band photometry are available. However,
245: even for these stars we could measure periods and shapes of their light
246: curves, because in the DIA technique every bright variable star produces a
247: number of artificial objects in the closest neighborhood that mimic the
248: variability of this bright star. This is because the DIA method does not
249: subtract the profiles of the neighboring objects while doing photometry. We
250: used these artificial light curves for measuring periods of the long-period
251: Cepheids. The calibrated {\it VI} photometry for brightest stars in the LMC
252: will be published soon, when the shallow survey conducted on the Warsaw
253: telescope will be finished. At that moment we will be able to supplement
254: our catalog with the data for the brightest Cepheids.
255:
256: \Section{Selection of Cepheids}
257: \subsection{Single-Mode Cepheids}
258: The search for classical Cepheids in the LMC was preceded by a massive
259: period search performed using supercomputers at the Interdisciplinary
260: Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modeling of Warsaw University
261: (ICM UW). We searched for periodicity all 32 million stars in the LMC using
262: program {\sc Fnpeaks} by Z.~Ko{\l}aczkowski. We tested the range of
263: frequencies from 0.0 to 24.0 cycles per day, with a frequency step of
264: 0.0001. For each star the ten highest peaks in the power spectrum were
265: recorded with appropriate amplitudes and S/N parameters. Then, the third
266: order Fourier series was fitted to each light curve folded with the
267: dominant period, the function was subtracted from the data, and the
268: procedure of period searching was repeated on the residual data.
269:
270: The first criterion used for the identification of classical Cepheids in
271: our data were positions in the PL diagrams. We tested stars located not
272: only strictly in the PL relations for classical Cepheids, but also in wide
273: region above and below these sequences, including type II Cepheids which
274: will be published in a forthcoming paper. We used PL diagrams in various
275: wave bands: -- $I$, $V$, Wesenheit index, and near-infrared $K$ band from
276: the 2MASS project (Cutri \etal 2003).
277:
278: Tens of thousands light curves selected in this manner were subsequently
279: subjected for a visual inspection. During the careful inspection the
280: variables were divided into pulsating-like stars, eclipsing binaries and
281: other variable objects. Then, the candidates for pulsating variables were
282: filtered according to the $(V-I)$ colors. We removed from the list objects
283: bluer than $(V-I)=0.2$~mag and redder than $(V-I)=1.8$~mag, however we
284: carefully checked, if the rejected objects are not real classical Cepheids
285: extraordinarily reddened or with erroneous photometry.
286:
287: Stars which remained on the list were a mixture of various pulsating
288: variables crossing the classical instability strip: classical Cepheids,
289: type II Cepheids, anomalous Cepheids, RR~Lyr stars from the Galaxy and the
290: LMC and High Amplitude $\delta$~Sct stars (HADS). The long period classical
291: Cepheids were relatively easy to distinguish, due to their narrow PL
292: relations and characteristic shapes of the light curves. However, in the
293: short-period domain (for $P<3$~days and in particular for $P<1$~days) the
294: PL sequences overlap with various types of pulsating variables. Separation
295: of classical Cepheids from other pulsators was based mainly on the shapes
296: of their light curves. We will discuss this problem in the next part of the
297: OIII-CVS.
298:
299: Our data show that first-overtone classical Cepheids and HADS follow the
300: same PL relation, with no discontinuity. Thus, our distinction between both
301: groups is arbitrary, being a matter of convention. To define limiting
302: period we used double-mode pulsators, which we detected in significant
303: number among classical Cepheids and HADS. In the Petersen diagram (\ie the
304: ratio of periods \vs logarithm of the longer period plot, Petersen 1973)
305: the stars pulsating simultaneously in the fundamental mode and first
306: overtone (F/1O) are naturally separated into two groups, with the gap
307: between (fundamental mode) periods in the range 0.4--1~days. Among
308: pulsators with the first two overtones excited (1O/2O) we detected only one
309: group with the shortest first overtone period of about 0.24 days. Thus,
310: $P_1=0.24$~days was taken for the first-overtone pulsators as a boundary
311: between HADS and classical Cepheids. For the fundamental-mode Cepheids we
312: cut our sample of $\delta$~Cep stars at $P_0=0.995$~days, \ie the shortest
313: F period of double-mode F/1O Cepheids (with exception of a peculiar object
314: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0083). We notice, that only a few pulsating-like variables
315: with shorter periods were found on the continuation of the fundamental-mode
316: Cepheids PL relation, but the shapes of their light curves were
317: considerably different than for F Cepheids.
318: The preliminary distinction between fundamental (F) and first overtone (1O)
319: classical Cepheids was done using their positions in the $W_I$--$\log{P}$
320: diagram, but the final classification utilized the Fourier parameters
321: $R_{21}$ and $\phi_{21}$ (see Section~6). The exemplary light curves of
322: single-mode Cepheids from the whole range of periods and luminosities
323: covered by OGLE are presented in Fig.~1.
324:
325: \begin{figure}[htb]
326: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=13cm]{fig1.ps}}
327: \FigCap{Illustrative light curves of fundamental-mode ({\it left panel}),
328: first-overtone ({\it middle panel}) and second-overtone ({\it right panel})
329: Cepheids. Small numbers at the right side of each panel show the rounded
330: periods in days of the light curves presented in panels.}
331: \end{figure}
332:
333: \subsection{Second-Overtone Cepheids}
334: Classical Cepheids pulsating solely in the second overtone are very rare
335: but astrophysically interesting objects, because they can be used as an
336: independent test of pulsational and evolutionary models (Antonello and
337: Kanbur 1997, Bono \etal 2001). There is only one potential candidate for
338: the pure 2O Cepheid in the Galaxy -- V473~Lyr (HR~7308 -- Burki \etal
339: 1986). Alcock \etal (1999a) undertook a search for single-mode 2O Cepheids
340: in the LMC using double-mode Cepheids pulsating in the first and the second
341: overtones as templates. They separated both modes in beat Cepheids and
342: studied the 2O variations. Singly-periodic second overtone Cepheids should
343: have nearly sinusoidal light curves, small amplitudes and mean luminosities
344: slightly higher than 1O Cepheids of the same periods. In the
345: color--magnitude diagram these stars should occupy the blue edge of the
346: instability strip. Alcock \etal (1999a) proposed one candidate for 2O
347: Cepheid in the LMC.
348:
349: Udalski \etal (1999b) followed the same strategy as MACHO group for
350: Cepheids in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). Theoretical investigations
351: suggest that metal-poor environments favor Cepheids pulsating purely in the
352: second overtone mode. As a result, Udalski \etal (1999b) found 13 firm
353: candidates for 2O pulsators -- the largest such sample detected to date.
354:
355: We started a search for singly-periodic second overtone Cepheids using all
356: LMC stars in our database. We selected stars with S/N of periods larger
357: than 9 and located just above the period -- {\it I}-band magnitude relation
358: for 1O Cepheids (spreading from the upper edge of the PL sequence to
359: 0.75~mag above this line). Then, the light curves were visually inspected
360: and obvious eclipsing binaries were rejected. At this stage we noticed a
361: distinct group of stars located at the blue edge of the instability strip
362: ($0.2<(V-I)<0.6$~mag). From this group we removed a few pulsating variables
363: with asymmetrical light curves which we classified as blended RR~Lyr
364: stars. The last criterion of our selection was the ratio of amplitudes in
365: the $V$ and $I$ bands, what allowed us to remove a couple of ellipsoidal
366: variables from our list. Ellipsoidal modulation is mainly a geometrical
367: effect, so the amplitudes in two filters are very similar, while for
368: Cepheids, the {\it V}-band amplitudes are larger than for $I$ band by a
369: factor of about 1.7.
370:
371: In total 14 objects passed our selection criteria, all of them in the
372: period range 0.58--1.2~days and in the low-amplitude domain. It is a very
373: homogeneous group which delineates additional PL sequence located above the
374: relation of the first-overtone pulsators. The shapes of the light curves
375: (see Fig.~1 for examples) are of the same type as in the 2O Cepheids found
376: by Udalski \etal (1999b), with Fourier parameter $R_{21}$ smaller
377: than~0.1. The MACHO candidate for 2O Cepheid in the LMC (Alcock \etal
378: 1999a) is also on our list.
379:
380: \subsection{Multiperiodic Cepheids}
381: Double-mode or beat Cepheids pulsate simultaneously in two radial modes --
382: usually fundamental mode and first overtone (F/1O) or first and second
383: overtones (1O/2O). Very few such objects had been known before the large
384: microlensing surveys era. The situation changed when the MACHO project
385: announced the discovery of 45 beat Cepheids in the LMC (Alcock \etal 1995),
386: increased later to 73 objects (Welch \etal 1997). Based on the data
387: collected during the OGLE-II project the OGLE group published samples of 93
388: double-mode Cepheids in the SMC (Udalski
389: \etal 1999a) and 76 such stars in the LMC (Soszy{\'n}ski \etal 2000).
390:
391: The search for double-mode Cepheids in the LMC was carried out in two
392: manners. First, using periods determined for all stars in the LMC we
393: calculated the ratios of the principal periods found in two iterations of
394: the period searching and plotted the Petersen diagram. Then, we selected
395: all the stars located close to the expected position of the double-mode
396: pulsators in the LMC. These stars were visually inspected, and objects with
397: clear double-periodic signal were left on the list. This way not only beat
398: Cepheids were selected, but also double mode $\delta$~Sct and RR~Lyr stars,
399: which will be presented in the next parts of the OIII-CVS.
400:
401: Second, additional search for double-mode variables was performed for all
402: previously selected Cepheids. Each light curve was fitted by a Fourier
403: series with a number of harmonics minimizing the $\chi^2$ per degree of
404: freedom and the function was subtracted from the observational data. The
405: residuals were searched for other periodic signals and, if detected, such a
406: candidate was marked for visual inspection. We discovered several new
407: double-mode Cepheids and a number of other multi-periodic variables, such
408: as Cepheids with periodicities very close to the dominant periods, Cepheids
409: in eclipsing binary systems, Cepheids blended with other variable stars.
410:
411: \begin{figure}[htb]
412: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=11.5cm, bb=25 270 565 745]{fig2.ps}}
413: \FigCap{Petersen diagram for multiperiodic Cepheids in the LMC. Solid dots
414: represent double-mode (F/1O, 1O/2O and 1O/3O) Cepheids, grey triangles show
415: triple-mode Cepheids (three points per star) and empty circles show
416: selected other stars with significant secondary periods.}
417: \end{figure}
418: Fig.~2 shows the Petersen diagram for multi-mode Cepheids in our
419: list. Black points represent the Cepheids pulsating in two radial modes. It
420: is worth emphasizing that our sample of double-mode Cepheids covers much
421: larger range of periods than presented to date. We especially point out for
422: one long-period F/1O Cepheid OGLE-LMC-CEP-1082 with fundamental-mode period
423: equal to 7.86~days, however connected with exceptionally low amplitude of
424: pulsations. In the list of F/1O double-mode Cepheid we included also one
425: double-periodic pulsator, OGLE-LMC-CEP-0083, with exceptionally short
426: periods (0.581~d and~0.440~d) and the period ratio placing this object in
427: the Petersen diagram somewhat above the line connecting F/1O double-mode
428: Cepheids and HADS. On the other hand, we found a considerable number of
429: short-period 1O/2O Cepheids, with the first-overtone periods even as short
430: as 0.24~days. It is remarkable that in the range of 1O periods
431: 0.5--0.75~days double-mode pulsators are significantly more common than
432: single-mode Cepheids.
433:
434: We also performed a search for triple mode Cepheids. Three new stars of
435: that type were discovered in addition to two already known triple-mode
436: Cepheids in the LMC (Moskalik \etal 2004). The analysis of these stars is
437: presented in the paper by Soszy{\'n}ski \etal (2008). In the same work we
438: also announced the discovery of two double-mode Cepheids pulsating
439: simultaneously in the first and third overtone modes. This is a new class
440: of double-mode Cepheids.
441:
442: During the search for multiperiodicity we detected a significant number of
443: Cepheids with the secondary periods very close to the primary ones. Such
444: ratios of periods close to 1 are usually connected with a long-term
445: amplitude and/or phase modulation, and, by analogy to RR~Lyr stars, these
446: objects are called Blazhko Cepheids. Using our simple analysis we detected
447: such behavior in about 4\% of F Cepheids, 28\% of 1O and in the same
448: fraction of 2O single-mode Cepheids, 18\% of F/1O beat Cepheids, and 36\%
449: of 1O/2O double-mode Cepheids. For single-mode pulsators this is somewhat
450: larger fraction than detected by Moskalik and Ko{\l}aczkowski (2008b) in
451: the OGLE-II data, what can be explained by the longer time span of our new
452: photometry. Among double-mode Cepheids, the fraction of non-radial
453: pulsators seem to be comparable with values determined by Moskalik and
454: Ko{\l}aczkowski (2008a,b).
455:
456: We also noticed in the Petersen diagram a number of objects with period
457: ratios that do not match any known phenomena. Especially numerous group was
458: found for period ratios of 0.60--0.63~days and (longer) periods in the
459: range 1.7--2.6~days. It is interesting that the longer periods are always
460: related to the first overtone mode, while the shorter periods are connected
461: to low-amplitude variations. A few such Cepheids were recently listed by
462: Moskalik \etal (2008b) who suggested that such a behavior is connected with
463: a kind of non-radial oscillations. In our Petersen diagram these stars seem
464: to follow two sequences, with period ratios in the ranges 0.60--0.61 and
465: 0.62--0.63.
466:
467: \begin{figure}[htb]
468: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{fig3.ps}}
469: \FigCap{Light curves of Cepheids with additional eclipsing
470: variability. {\it Left panels} show the original photometric data folded
471: with the Cepheid periods. {\it Right panels} show the eclipsing light
472: curves after subtracting the Cepheid component. In the case of
473: OGLE-LMC-CEP-1718 two Cepheid light curves are presented.}
474: \end{figure}
475: As a by-product of searching for double-mode pulsators we detected three
476: Cepheids with eclipsing modulation imposed on the pulsational light curves:
477: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0227, OGLE-LMC-CEP-1812 and OGLE-LMC-CEP-2532. Only the last
478: one was already reported by Udalski \etal (1999d -- LMC\_SC16 119952). Light
479: curves of these stars are presented in Fig.~3. Cepheids with eclipsing
480: variations are of particular interest, because, if they are physical
481: binaries with the pulsating star as one of the components, they can be used
482: for direct determination of the mass and radius of Cepheid variable. In
483: some cases it is possible to distinguish between physically related objects
484: and optical binaries. If the eclipses are caused by a nearby star which is
485: not resolved by standard photometry, we should have found the shift in
486: centroid positions measured during eclipse and out of eclipse. No such
487: shift was found for these objects. Four other Cepheids --
488: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0388, OGLE-LMC-CEP-2052, OGLE-LMC-CEP-2095, and
489: OGLE-LMC-CEP-3037 -- are suspected to be in eclipsing binary systems. They
490: are brighter than other Cepheids with the same periods, but we detected
491: only a few points in each of these stars that can be associated with
492: potential eclipses.
493:
494: We also draw attention to the extremely interesting object
495: OGLE-LMC-CEP-1718, which is a system consisting of two first overtone
496: Cepheids with eclipses visible every 412.8 days. This object was discovered
497: by Alcock \etal (1995 -- MACHO*05:21:54.8-69:21:50) and noticed by Udalski
498: \etal (1999d), but the eclipses were overlooked. Fig.~3 shows the light
499: curves of this object. Besides, we also detected two already known double
500: Cepheids (Alcock \etal 1995): OGLE-LMC-CEP-0571 and OGLE-LMC-CEP-0835.
501:
502: There are also several Cepheids in our sample exhibiting additional
503: short-period and low-amplitude eclipsing modulation certainly caused by
504: blending. There are also Cepheids with additional variability of other
505: types, \eg cataclysmic-like changes, semiregular variations, long secondary
506: periods, etc. The majority of these cases can be explained as an effect of
507: physical or optical binarity with other variable star.
508:
509: Since the time base of the OGLE-III observations is 2400 days, and for the
510: merged OGLE-II and OGLE-III data is longer than 4000 days, our data offer a
511: possibility of studying various long-term effects in the Cepheids -- period
512: changes, amplitude and phase modulation, or mean magnitude changes. The
513: full study of the period changing Cepheids will be published in the
514: forthcoming paper (Poleski 2008, in preparation).
515:
516: \Section{Catalog of Classical Cepheids in the LMC}
517: In total 3361 classical Cepheids were found in the LMC OGLE-III fields. The
518: sample consists of 1848 fundamental-mode, 1228 first-overtone, 14
519: second-over\-tone, 61 double mode F/1O, 203 double mode 1O/2O, 2
520: double-mode 1O/3O, 2~triple-mode F/1O/2O and 3~triple-mode 1O/2O/3O
521: classical Cepheids.
522:
523: In addition we prepared a list of 23 low amplitude variables which can be
524: related to classical Cepheids, because they lie in the vicinity of Cepheids
525: in the color--magnitude and PL diagrams. Such low-amplitude Cepheids are
526: expected by the evolutionary models as pulsators entering or exiting the
527: instability strip.
528: %\begin{figure}[p]
529: %\psfig{figure=tab1.ps,bbllx=0pt,bblly=0pt,bburx=725pt,bbury=715pt,angle=90,clip=}
530: %\end{figure}
531: %\begin{figure}[p]
532: %\psfig{figure=tab2.ps,bbllx=0pt,bblly=0pt,bburx=685pt,bbury=685pt,angle=90,clip=}
533: %\end{figure}
534: \begin{landscape}
535: \renewcommand{\TableFont}{\scriptsize}
536: \MakeTable{l@{\hspace{9pt}}
537: l@{\hspace{6pt}}
538: r@{\hspace{1pt}}
539: r@{\hspace{6pt}}
540: l@{\hspace{3pt}}
541: l@{\hspace{3pt}}
542: l@{\hspace{3pt}}
543: l@{\hspace{3pt}}
544: l@{\hspace{-1pt}}
545: c@{\hspace{-1pt}}
546: l}{12.5cm}{Exemplary part of the {\sf ident.dat} file}
547: {\hline
548: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Cepheid ID}
549: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{OGLE-III ID}
550: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Mode}
551: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{RA}
552: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{DEC}
553: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{OGLE-II ID}
554: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{MACHO ID}
555: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{ASAS ID}
556: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{GCVS ID}
557: &Other \\
558: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Field}
559: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{No} &
560: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{[J2000.0]}
561: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{[J2000.0]} & & & & LMC... & designation \\
562: \hline
563: \multicolumn{11}{l}{...}\\
564: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0931 & LMC118.5 & 23110 & F & 05:05:57.39 &$-$68:26:17.9 & LMC\_SC13\_125152 & & & V1015 & HV2305 \\
565: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0932 & LMC116.6 & 12576 & 1O & 05:05:59.04 &$-$67:20:42.4 & & & & & \\
566: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0933 & LMC115.6 & 14990 & F & 05:05:59.19 &$-$66:47:15.0 & & & & V1001 & HV13058 \\
567: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0934 & LMC121.2 & 30142 & F & 05:06:00.15 &$-$70:27:22.4 & &23.4151.25 & & V1041 & HV2330 \\
568: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0935 & LMC119.6 &101320 & F & 05:06:00.89 &$-$69:06:17.1 & LMC\_SC13\_74156 & & 050601-6906.3 & V1032 & HV893 \\
569: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0936 & LMC118.6 & 29152 & F & 05:06:01.13 &$-$68:37:38.5 & LMC\_SC13\_111968 & & & & \\
570: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0937 & LMC117.7 & 49519 & F/1O & 05:06:02.74 &$-$68:06:02.3 & &19.4186.876 & & & \\
571: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0938 & LMC118.7 & 77581 & F & 05:06:05.75 &$-$68:41:52.1 & LMC\_SC13\_106993 & & & V1019 & HV13022 LMV1696 \\
572: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0939 & LMC115.7 & 14854 & F & 05:06:05.98 &$-$66:59:43.9 & & & & V1013 & HV13057 \\
573: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0940 & LMC121.2 & 36964 & F & 05:06:07.06 &$-$70:26:08.8 & &23.4151.27 & & V1048 & DV81 \\
574: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0941 & LMC115.5 & 14135 & F & 05:06:07.13 &$-$66:37:49.3 & & & & & \\
575: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0942 & LMC121.4 & 39539 & 1O & 05:06:08.12 &$-$70:11:16.7 & & & & & \\
576: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0943 & LMC122.1 & 3754 & F & 05:06:08.88 &$-$71:15:26.1 & & & 050609-7115.4 & V1059 & HV2338 \\
577: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0944 & LMC121.3 & 7423 & 1O & 05:06:11.39 &$-$70:25:45.7 & &23.4151.40 & & & \\
578: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0945 & LMC115.5 & 17550 & F & 05:06:14.81 &$-$66:40:45.9 & & & 050615-6640.8 & V1022 & HV2294 \\
579: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0946 & LMC118.8 & 85656 & 1O & 05:06:14.89 &$-$68:51:56.7 & LMC\_SC13\_160626 &1.4175.14 & & & \\
580: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0947 & LMC117.8 & 26519 & 1O & 05:06:14.94 &$-$68:19:03.1 & LMC\_SC13\_197484 & & & & \\
581: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0948 & LMC118.7 & 34808 & 1O & 05:06:16.43 &$-$68:47:20.5 & LMC\_SC13\_165223 &1.4176.34 & & & \\
582: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0949 & LMC118.7 & 77545 & F & 05:06:16.89 &$-$68:40:33.7 & LMC\_SC13\_173745 &19.4178.3 & & V1040 & HV895 \\
583: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0950 & LMC119.1 & 81 & 1O & 05:06:18.33 &$-$69:31:47.9 & LMC\_SC12\_133630 & & & & \\
584: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0951 & LMC115.5 & 14063 & F & 05:06:18.53 &$-$66:38:44.7 & & & & V1029 & W48 \\
585: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0952 & LMC115.5 & 14065 & F & 05:06:19.60 &$-$66:35:47.8 & & & & & \\
586: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0953 & LMC122.4 & 139 & 1O & 05:06:22.14 &$-$70:48:05.3 & & 23.4146.20 & & & \\
587: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0954 & LMC117.6 & 51980 & F & 05:06:22.87 &$-$67:58:33.5 & & 19.4188.23 & & V1042 & HV5571 LMV779 \\
588: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0955 & LMC121.2 & 7798 & 1O & 05:06:29.11 &$-$70:31:03.4 & & 23.4150.47 & & & \\
589: \multicolumn{11}{l}{...}\\
590: \hline}
591: \end{landscape}
592: \noindent
593: Seven candidates for ultra-low amplitude Cepheids in the
594: LMC were found by Buchler \etal (2005). We stress that our sample of low
595: amplitude variables not necessarily consist of Cepheids only. Such light
596: curves can be a product of ellipsoidal or rotational modulation, or
597: blending with other type of variable star.
598:
599: The OIII-CVS is available in the electronic version only from the OGLE
600: Internet archive:
601: \begin{center}
602: {\it http://ogle.astrouw.edu.pl/} \\ {\it
603: ftp://ftp.astrouw.edu.pl/ogle/ogle3/OIII-CVS/lmc/cep/}\\
604: \end{center}
605: The catalog is accessible through a user-friendly WWW interface or {\it
606: via} FTP site. In the FTP the full list of our sample of classical Cepheids
607: is given in the file {\sf ident.dat}. Part of this file is shown in
608: Table~1. All objects are arranged according to their right ascension. The
609: Cepheids have designations of the form OGLE-LMC-CEP-NNNN, where NNNN is a
610: four digit consecutive number. In the following columns of Table~1 we
611: provide: Cepheid ID, OGLE-III field and the database number of star
612: (consistent with the LMC photometric maps of Udalski \etal 2008b), mode of
613: pulsation, RA and DEC coordinates for the epoch 2000.0 and
614: cross-identifications of our objects with previously published catalogs of
615: Cepheids in the LMC (see Section~5), successively: OGLE-II, MACHO, ASAS and
616: General Catalogue of Variable Stars (GCVS). Last columns contain other
617: designations taken from the GCVS.
618:
619: \renewcommand{\TableFont}{\scriptsize}
620: \MakeTableee{l@{\hspace{4pt}}
621: c@{\hspace{4pt}}
622: c@{\hspace{2pt}}
623: r@{\hspace{4pt}}
624: c@{\hspace{4pt}}
625: c@{\hspace{4pt}}
626: c@{\hspace{4pt}}
627: c@{\hspace{4pt}}
628: c@{\hspace{4pt}}
629: c@{\hspace{4pt}}c}{12.5cm}{First 20 lines of the {\sf cepF.dat} file}
630: {\hline
631: \noalign{\vskip3pt}
632: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Cepheid ID} & $\langle{I}\rangle$ & $\langle{V}\rangle$
633: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{$P$} & $\sigma_P$ & $T_{\rm max}$ & $A(I)$ & $R_{21}$ & $\phi_{21}$ & $R_{31}$ & $\phi_{31}$ \\
634: &[mag]& [mag] & \multicolumn{1}{c}{[days]} & [days] & {\tiny (HJD-2450000)}
635: &[mag]& & & & \\
636: \noalign{\vskip3pt}
637: \hline
638: \noalign{\vskip3pt}
639: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0002 & 15.672 &16.412 & 3.1181195 &0.0000161 & 2171.23921 & 0.257 & 0.296 &4.705 & 0.101 &2.962\\
640: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0005 & 14.661 &15.413 & 5.6120581 &0.0000135 & 2171.78078 & 0.521 & 0.431 &4.971 & 0.167 &3.391\\
641: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0012 & 15.469 &16.067 & 2.6601882 &0.0000022 & 2162.43751 & 0.688 & 0.522 &4.402 & 0.314 &2.611\\
642: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0016 & 13.707 &14.787 & 10.5064564 &0.0015553 & 2157.57180 & 0.115 & 0.028 &6.015 & 0.106 &0.923\\
643: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0017 & 15.345 &15.992 & 3.6772562 &0.0000299 & 2169.48050 & 0.611 & 0.494 &4.594 & 0.287 &2.983\\
644: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0018 & 15.222 &16.051 & 4.0478526 &0.0000275 & 2165.39166 & 0.265 & 0.284 &4.567 & 0.086 &2.998\\
645: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0021 & 14.722 &15.491 & 5.4579746 &0.0000259 & 2165.34485 & 0.431 & 0.416 &4.969 & 0.145 &3.555\\
646: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0023 & 16.325 &17.044 & 1.7018254 &0.0000019 & 2164.75709 & 0.403 & 0.441 &4.352 & 0.261 &2.493\\
647: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0025 & 15.343 &16.157 & 3.7334998 &0.0000099 & 2165.69444 & 0.360 & 0.409 &4.694 & 0.173 &3.131\\
648: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0026 & 15.466 &16.081 & 2.5706764 &0.0000033 & 2164.25802 & 0.622 & 0.442 &4.275 & 0.228 &2.263\\
649: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0027 & 15.039 &15.641 & 3.5229468 &0.0000052 & 2165.27241 & 0.647 & 0.449 &4.377 & 0.254 &2.509\\
650: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0028 & 16.620 &17.276 & 1.2629545 &0.0000007 & 2171.08146 & 0.513 & 0.475 &4.174 & 0.280 &2.120\\
651: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0033 & 14.400 &15.233 & 7.1807757 &0.0000217 & 2160.83200 & 0.488 & 0.339 &5.377 & 0.213 &3.723\\
652: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0034 & 13.737 &14.630 & 11.2546276 &0.0000595 & 2180.63850 & 0.478 & 0.170 &4.758 & 0.107 &5.295\\
653: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0035 & 14.375 &15.157 & 6.9436898 &0.0000448 & 2165.30738 & 0.393 & 0.359 &5.365 & 0.138 &3.768\\
654: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0037 & 15.525 &16.308 & 3.0669047 &0.0000082 & 2165.55271 & 0.271 & 0.345 &4.576 & 0.136 &2.958\\
655: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0039 & 15.415 &16.069 & 3.1477368 &0.0000291 & 2164.95088 & 0.338 & 0.411 &4.568 & 0.180 &2.783\\
656: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0040 & 14.662 &15.408 & 5.1651454 &0.0000080 & 2182.37433 & 0.574 & 0.436 &4.633 & 0.204 &3.009\\
657: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0041 & 15.522 &16.270 & 2.9106624 &0.0000235 & 2165.81479 & 0.181 & 0.245 &4.451 & 0.043 &2.401\\
658: OGLE-LMC-CEP-0042 & 15.673 &16.367 & 2.5770292 &0.0000034 & 2183.19453 & 0.599 & 0.485 &4.377 & 0.272 &2.568\\
659: \hline}
660: Files {\sf cepF.dat}, {\sf cep1O.dat}, {\sf cep2O.dat}, {\sf cepF1O.dat},
661: {\sf cep1O2O.dat},\linebreak {\sf cep1O3O.dat}, {\sf cepF1O2O.dat}, and
662: {\sf cep1O2O3O.dat} list basic parameters of the sin\-gle-, double- and
663: triple-mode Cepheids with the appropriate modes excited. For single-mode
664: objects the consecutive columns contain: intensity mean magnitudes in the
665: $I$ and $V$ bands, periods in days and their uncertainties, moments of the
666: zero phase corresponding to maximum light, amplitudes in the $I$-band, and
667: Fourier parameters $R_{21}$, $\phi_{21}$, $R_{31}$, $\phi_{31}$ derived for
668: the {\it I}-band light curves. For double-mode and triple-mode pulsators
669: the format of tables is longer including additional periodicities. First
670: rows of the file {\sf cepF.dat} are shown in Table~2.
671:
672: The file {\sf remarks.txt} contains additional information on some
673: Cepheids. We provide here remarks about uncertain classification,
674: interesting features as additional variability, variable mean magnitudes or
675: amplitude modulation, and information about differences compared to other
676: catalogs (for example different periods). Directory {\sf phot/} contains
677: {\it I}- and {\it V}-band OGLE photometry of the stars in our catalog. If
678: available, OGLE-II data are merged with the OGLE-III data. Finally, the
679: directory {\sf fcharts/} contains finding charts of all objects. These are
680: the $60\arcs\times60\arcs$ segments of the {\it I}-band DIA reference
681: images, oriented with N up, and E to the left.
682:
683: \begin{figure}[htb]
684: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=13cm]{fig4.ps}}
685: \vskip0.5cm
686: \FigCap{OGLE-III fields in the LMC. Dots indicate positions of classical
687: Cepheids from the OIII-CVS catalog. The background image of the LMC is
688: originated from the ASAS wide field sky survey.}
689: \end{figure}
690: Fig.~4 shows the spatial distribution of the classical Cepheids in the
691: LMC. The picture of the LMC was taken by the ASAS-3 wide field sky survey
692: (Pojma{\'n}ski 1997). Illustrative light curves of Cepheids pulsating in
693: the fundamental, first and second overtone modes are shown in Fig.~1. One
694: can notice the Hertzsprung progression (Hertzsprung 1926) for long period
695: fundamental-mode pulsators, \ie a~bump moving toward earlier phases with
696: increasing periods.
697:
698: \Section{Cross-Identification with Previous Catalogs}
699: The catalog includes matches of our objects with previously published list
700: of classical Cepheids in the LMC. We queried the following catalogs:
701: OGLE-II catalogs of Cepheids in the LMC (Udalski \etal 1999d, Soszy{\'n}ski
702: \etal 2000), on-line MACHO Variable Star
703: Catalog\footnote{{\it http://wwwmacho.mcmaster.ca/}}, the extragalactic
704: part of the General Catalogue of Variable Stars (Artyukhina \etal 1995),
705: and ASAS Catalog of Variable Stars\footnote{{\it
706: http://www.astrouw.edu.pl/asas/}} (Pojma{\'n}ski 2002). In our sample of
707: Cepheids 2367 stars were already published in any of these catalogs, 994
708: objects are new detections.
709:
710: With the aim of testing the completeness of our catalog we carefully
711: checked all objects not present in our list, but potentially covered by the
712: OGLE-III fields. Compared to the OGLE-II catalog of Cepheids in the LMC
713: published by Udalski \etal (1999d -- single-mode Cepheids) and
714: Soszy{\'n}ski \etal (2000 -- double-mode Cepheids) we missed 8 classical
715: Cepheids (not counting 16 objects saturated in the OGLE-III data). Five of
716: these Cepheids are members of LMC clusters and severe crowding affected the
717: OGLE-III photometry. The three remaining objects were close to the edges of
718: the fields and were affected by a small number of observations. We
719: supplemented our catalog with these missing objects.
720:
721: The MACHO project released the list of about 1800 Cepheids in the
722: LMC. 1721~of them could potentially be found in the OGLE-III fields. We did
723: not find counterparts for 15 variables. Lack of five of these stars can be
724: explained by a small number of points at the field edges or problems with
725: the photometry in dense regions of the sky. The other objects were
726: classified by us as different type of variable stars, usually eclipsing
727: binaries.
728:
729: The General Catalogue of Variable Stars contains 873 stars classified as
730: DCEP or DCEPS and potentially present in our fields in the LMC. We
731: performed an extensive searching for the counterparts of these stars in our
732: sample. In a number of cases the cross-identification between our sample
733: and the GCVS was uncertain, because of a large discrepancy (sometimes
734: larger than 2\arcm) in coordinates of the objects. Sometimes, the stars
735: were positionally coincident, but the periods disagreed. For many of these
736: objects we noticed that the period provided in the GCVS was an alias of the
737: true period. One missing object, LMC V0477 (DV53), we classified as
738: eclipsing or ellipsoidal binary. Another star, LMC~V0857 (HV~2284), was
739: recognized as Galactic RR~Lyr star. LMC~V0566 (HV~12509) is likely
740: a~type~II Cepheid in the eclipsing binary system.
741:
742: We found no counterparts for nine stars classified as classical Cepheids in
743: the GCVS, namely LMC~V0224 (HV~12496), V0452 (DV44), V1620 (HV~13018),
744: V2175 (HV~5767), V2329, V2368 (HV~13032), V3972, V4366, and V4441
745: (HV\linebreak 12909). Since periods and coordinates provided by the GCVS
746: are sometimes erroneous, it is possible that these objects are present in
747: our sample, but each case should be directly checked using finding charts
748: from the literature. Such investigation should also reveal possible
749: Cepheids which stopped pulsating.
750:
751: \Section{Basic Parameters}
752: The periods of variable stars and uncertainties of periods provided in the
753: catalog were calculated with the {\sc Tatry} program using multiharmonic
754: periodogram of Schwarzenberg-Czerny (1996). To determine mean luminosities,
755: amplitudes and Fourier parameters, each of the light curve was fitted by a
756: Fourier series of the order depending on the shape and scatter of the light
757: curve. The number of harmonics (maximum 12) was adjusted to minimize the
758: value of $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom. In this procedure we used the
759: program {\sc J-23} written by T.~Mizerski.
760:
761: \begin{figure}[p]
762: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=13.5cm]{fig5.ps}}
763: \FigCap{Fourier parameters of the fundamental-mode ({\it left panels}) and
764: overtone ({\it right panels}) Cepheids.}
765: \end{figure}
766:
767: The {\it VI} intensity mean magnitudes were derived by integrating the
768: light curves converted to intensity units and transforming the result back
769: to the magnitude scale. The amplitudes provided with the catalog are the
770: differences between the maximum and minimum values of the function fitted
771: to the light curves. Fourier parameters -- amplitude ratios
772: $R_{k1}=A_k/A_1$ and phase differences $\phi_{k1}=\phi_k-k\phi_1$ (Simon
773: and Lee 1981) -- were derived using the same method of Fourier
774: decomposition. For light curves with insignificant higher harmonics the
775: amplitude ratios are equal to zero, while the appropriate phase differences
776: are not defined.
777:
778: Fig.~5 shows Fourier parameters $R_{21}$, $\phi_{21}$, $R_{31}$, and
779: $\phi_{31}$ of the {\it I}-band light curves plotted against $\log{P}$. For
780: clarity fundamental-mode and overtone Cepheids are presented in separate
781: panels. Fourier coefficients are widely used tool for quantitative
782: description of the structure of Cepheid light curves. Complex pattern
783: visible in the diagrams reflects the Hertzsprung progression. The minimum
784: of $R_{21}$ at $P\approx10$~days for fundamental-mode Cepheids is
785: interpreted as a signature of 2:1 resonance between the fundamental and the
786: second overtone mode of pulsation (Andreasen and Petersen 1987). In the
787: vicinity of 10~days periods the $\phi_{21}$ parameter rises sharply to
788: $2\pi$ and appears again in the lower part of the diagram, what is caused
789: by rotation of $\phi_{21}$ modulo $2\pi$. Note that such sharp feature in
790: $\phi_{21}$ is not observed for some of the Cepheids around this period,
791: but all of them cross the line $\phi_{31}=0$ at $P\approx10$~days.
792:
793: Similar behavior seem to appear twice for the first-overtone pulsators --
794: at periods $\approx0.35$~days and $\approx3$~days. The second feature is
795: interpreted as the signature of 2:1 resonance between the first and fourth
796: overtones (Antonello and Poretti 1986). The short-period discontinuity can
797: be explained by a presence of the 2:1 resonance between the first and fifth
798: overtones in stars with masses of about 2.5~\MS\ (W.~Dziembowski, private
799: communication).
800:
801: \Section{Period-Luminosity Relation}
802: Period--luminosity relation of classical Cepheids plays a crucial role as
803: an indicator of the cosmic distance scale. The LMC is of special interest
804: in this field, because the extragalactic distances are calibrated with the
805: distance to this galaxy. Classical Cepheids found during the second phase
806: of the OGLE survey in the LMC were widely used in various programs aiming
807: at distance determinations, \eg HST Key Project (Freedman \etal 2001) or
808: Araucaria Project (Gieren \etal 2004).
809:
810: The PL diagrams in the $V$ and $I$ magnitudes and in the reddening-free
811: Wesenheit index $W_I=I-1.55(V-I)$ (Madore 1982) are shown in Fig.~6. It is
812: striking that substantial fraction of points in the first two plots are
813: located considerably below the mean PL relations, but these stars generally
814: follow the narrow sequences in the period -- Wesenheit index plane. We
815: interpret such behavior as an effect of interstellar extinction -- very
816: variable from star to star. Considerable reddening for some Cepheids is
817: visible on the color--magnitude diagram plotted in Fig.~7.
818: \begin{figure}[p]
819: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=13.5cm, bb=35 55 545 745]{fig6.ps}}
820: \FigCap{Period--luminosity diagrams for classical Cepheids in the LMC. Blue
821: and cyan points show fundamental-mode pulsators, red and magenta --
822: first-overtone, green -- second overtone. Solid dots are single-mode
823: Cepheids, while empty circles represent double-mode pulsators (two points
824: per star).}
825: \end{figure}
826: \begin{figure}[htb]
827: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=12.7cm]{fig7.ps}}
828: \FigCap{Color--magnitude diagram for classical Cepheids in the LMC. In the
829: background stars from the subfield LMC100.1 are shown. The significant
830: number of very red Cepheids are clearly located to the red side of the
831: respective instability strips for the various pulsation modes indicating
832: that large reddening is not unusual in the LMC.}
833: \end{figure}
834:
835: We also carefully checked the stars that do not obey the PL relations in
836: the $\log{P}$--$W_I$ plane. In the majority of these cases this discrepancy
837: can be explained by blending with other star unresolved in our data. Most
838: of the Cepheids with superimposed additional type of variations (including
839: Cepheids with eclipsing modulations) do not match the period-$W_I$
840: laws. Notice that the PL sequence for the longest-period fundamental-mode
841: Cepheids seem to be more scattered than for the shorter-period
842: variables. It may be due to saturation effects, but the definitive answer
843: will be given after publication of the OGLE shallow survey to the LMC.
844:
845: The PL relations provided below are not compensated for interstellar
846: extinction. We leave it to the reader to de-redden magnitudes using either
847: average extinction correction for the whole LMC or individual values for
848: each object. We also take no account for possible break of the linearity
849: suggested for the PL relation of fundamental mode Cepheids (see Ngeow \etal
850: 2008 and references therein). We expect that our catalog will be used many
851: times to establish PL relations, and various subtle effects will be taken
852: into consideration.
853:
854: The least squares solution with 3$\sigma$ clipping yields the following PL
855: relations for single-mode fundamental-mode classical Cepheids:
856: \begin{eqnarray*}
857: V &=&-2.762(\pm0.022)\log{P}+17.530(\pm0.015)\qquad\sigma=0.22~{\rm mag} \\
858: I &=&-2.959(\pm0.016)\log{P}+16.879(\pm0.010)\qquad\sigma=0.15~{\rm mag} \\
859: W_I&=&-3.314(\pm0.009)\log{P}+15.893(\pm0.006)\qquad\sigma=0.08~{\rm mag} \\
860: \end{eqnarray*}
861:
862: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
863: \noindent and for the first-overtone mode:
864: \begin{eqnarray*}
865: V &=&-3.194(\pm0.026)\log{P}+17.046(\pm0.009)\qquad\sigma=0.23~{\rm mag} \\
866: I &=&-3.297(\pm0.017)\log{P}+16.405(\pm0.006)\qquad\sigma=0.16~{\rm mag} \\
867: W_I&=&-3.451(\pm0.009)\log{P}+15.398(\pm0.003)\qquad\sigma=0.07~{\rm mag.} \\
868: \end{eqnarray*}
869:
870: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
871: The slopes of the PL relations for fundamental-mode Cepheids agree within
872: 1$\sigma$ with previous determinations by Udalski \etal
873: (1999c)\footnote{updated coefficients are available from:\\ {\it
874: ftp://ftp.astrouw.edu.pl/ogle/ogle2/var\_stars/lmc/cep/catalog/README.PL}},
875: and Fouqu{\'e} \etal (2007). Of course, in the $V$ and $I$ domains we can
876: only compare the slopes, because we did not applied the reddening
877: correction, but in the $W_I$ extinction-free index we can consider both,
878: the slope and the zero point, of the PL relation. There is larger
879: discrepancy ($>2\sigma$) in the zero point of the $\log{P}$--$W_I$
880: relation. We also obtained somewhat larger scatter of the PL relations in
881: the OGLE-III sample, what can be explained by the inclination of the LMC
882: disk in respect to the line of sight. The OGLE-II fields covered only the
883: central parts of the LMC, what kept this effect much smaller. It is
884: important to note that Udalski \etal (1999c) and Fouqu{\'e} \etal (2007)
885: used the same definition of the Wesenheit index as we did, but this
886: definition depends on the adopted reddening law. Using different
887: coefficient in the Wesenheit index results in different slope and zero
888: point of the fitted PL relation.
889:
890: The agreement in slopes is much worse for first-overtone Cepheids, although
891: still within $3\sigma$. We suspect that a considerable number of very
892: short-period first-overtone pulsators, not present in the OGLE-II sample of
893: Cepheids, which changed the fitted function could be an origin of this
894: discrepancy. The non-linearity of the PL relation may take place for the
895: first-overtone Cepheids, with the break at $P_1\approx0.5$~days.
896:
897: \Section{Summary}
898: In this paper we present the largest catalog of classical Cepheids in the
899: LMC and probably the largest sample of such stars identified to date in any
900: environment. Our list of Cepheids is supplemented by the high quality,
901: long-term standard photometry enabling precise analysis of these
902: stars. These data are ideal for studying many fundamental problems, such as
903: interpretation of the pulsational and evolutionary models of Cepheids,
904: non-radial oscillations in the pulsating stars, possible non-linearity of
905: the PL relation, structure and history of the LMC.
906:
907: The catalog contains very rare objects, such as Cepheids with three radial
908: modes excited, 1O/3O double-mode Cepheids, single-mode second-overtone
909: pulsators, Blazhko Cepheids, eclipsing binary systems containing Cepheids
910: including system of two Cepheids eclipsing each other. Our data show that
911: first-overtone classical Cepheids and high amplitude $\delta$~Sct stars
912: follow continuous PL relation. Distribution of the Fourier parameters
913: suggests that the internal resonance between radial modes may occur twice
914: for the first-overtone pulsators: for periods of about 0.35~days and
915: 3~days. The PL relation for first-overtone Cepheids is possibly non-linear,
916: with a~discontinuity in the slope around $P=0.5$~days.
917:
918: In the next parts of the OIII-CVS we will present other members of the
919: Cepheid family: type II Cepheids, anomalous Cepheids, HADS and RR~Lyr
920: stars. It is possible that the list of classical Cepheids described in this
921: paper will be supplemented with additional objects of this type detected
922: during further analysis.
923:
924: \Acknow{The authors wish to thank Prof.~W.A.~Dziembowski, Prof.~M.~Feast,
925: and Prof.~W.~Gieren for many helpful suggestions which improved the paper.
926: We thank Drs. Z.~Ko{\l}aczkowski, T.~Mizerski, G.~Pojma{\'n}ski,
927: A.~Schwar\-zenberg-Czerny and J.~Skowron for providing the software and
928: data which enabled us to prepare this study.
929:
930: This work has been supported by the Foundation for Polish Science through
931: the Homing (Powroty) Program and by MNiSW grants: NN203293533 to IS and
932: N20303032/4275 to AU.
933:
934: The massive period searching was performed at the Interdisciplinary Centre
935: for Mathematical and Computational Modeling of Warsaw University (ICM
936: UW). We are grateful to Dr. M.~Cytowski for helping us in this analysis.}
937:
938: \begin{references}
939: \refitem{Afonso, C., \etal (EROS)}{1999}{~}{~}{astro-ph/9907355}
940: \refitem{Alard, C., and Lupton, R.H.}{1998}{\ApJ}{503}{325}
941: \refitem{Alard, C.}{2000}{\AAS}{144}{363}
942: \refitem{Alcock, C., \etal (MACHO)}{1995}{\AJ}{109}{1653}
943: \refitem{Alcock, C., \etal (MACHO)}{1999a}{\ApJ}{511}{185}
944: \refitem{Alcock, C., \etal (MACHO)}{1999b}{\AJ}{117}{920}
945: \refitem{Andreasen, G.K., and Petersen, J.O.}{1987}{\AA}{180}{129}
946: \refitem{Antonello, E., and Poretti, E.}{1986}{\AA}{169}{149}
947: \refitem{Antonello, E., and Kanbur, S.M.}{1997}{\MNRAS}{286}{L33}
948: \refitem{Artyukhina N.M. \etal}{1995}{~}{~}{``General Catalogue of Variable
949: Stars'', 4rd ed., vol.~V. Extragalactic Variable Stars, "Kosmosinform", Moscow}
950: \refitem{Beaulieu, J.P. \etal}{1995}{\AA}{303}{137}
951: \refitem{Bono, G., Caputo, F., and Marconi, M.}{2001}{\MNRAS}{325}{1353}
952: \refitem{Buchler, J.R., Wood, P.R., Keller, S., and Soszy{\'n}ski, I.}{2005}{\ApJ}{631}{L151}
953: \refitem{Burki, G., Schmidt, E.G., Arellano Ferro, A., Fernie, J.D., Sasselov, D., Simon, N.R., Percy, J.R., and Szabados, L.}{1986}{\AA}{168}{139}
954: \refitem{Cutri, R.M., \etal}{2003}{~}{~}{``2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point
955: Sources''}
956: \refitem{Fouqu{\'e}, P., Arriagada,~P., Storm,~J., Barnes,~T.G., Nardetto,~N., M{\'e}rand,~A., Kervella,~P., Gieren,~W., Bersier,~D., Benedict,~G.F., and McArthur,~B.E.}{2007}{\AA}{476}{73}
957: \refitem{Freedman, W.L., \etal}{2001}{\ApJ}{553}{47}
958: \refitem{Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Walker, A., Bresolin, F., Minniti, D., Kudritzki, R.-P., Udalski, A., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Fouqu{\'e}, P., Storm, J., and Bono, G.}{2004}{\AJ}{128}{1167}
959: \refitem{Hertzsprung, E.}{1926}{Bull. Astr. Inst. Netherlands}{3}{115}
960: \refitem{Hodge, P.W., and Lee, S.-O.}{1984}{\ApJ}{276}{509}
961: \refitem{Kurochkin, N.E., Tokovinin, A.A., and Loggins, A.}{1989}{IBVS}{~}{3365}
962: \refitem{Leavitt, H.S}{1908}{Harvard Obs. Ann.}{60}{87}
963: \refitem{Madore, B.F.}{1982}{\ApJ}{253}{575}
964: \refitem{Mateo, M., Olszewski, E.W., and Madore, B.F.}{1990}{\ApJ}{353}{L11}
965: \refitem{Moskalik, P., Ko{\l}aczkowski, Z., and Mizerski, T.}{2004}{~}{~}
966: {in: ``Variable Stars in the Local Group'', Ed. D.W.~Kurtz, and K.~Pollard,
967: {\it ASP Conf. Ser.,} {\bf 310}, p.~498}
968: \refitem{Moskalik, P., and Ko{\l}aczkowski, Z.}{2008a}{~}{~}{arXiv:0807.0615}
969: \refitem{Moskalik, P., and Ko{\l}aczkowski, Z.}{2008b}{~}{~}{arXiv:0807.0623}
970: \refitem{Ngeow, C., Kanbur, S.M., and Nanthakumar, A.}{2008}{\AA}{477}{621}
971: \refitem{Paczy{\'n}ski, B.}{1986}{\ApJ}{304}{1}
972: \refitem{Payne-Gaposchkin, C.H.}{1971}{\it Smithsonian Contrib. Astrophys.}{13}{~}
973: \refitem{Petersen, J.O.}{1973}{\AA}{27}{89}
974: \refitem{Pojma{\'n}ski, G.}{1997}{\Acta}{47}{467}
975: \refitem{Pojma{\'n}ski, G.}{2002}{\Acta}{52}{397}
976: \refitem{Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A.}{1996}{\ApJ}{460}{L107}
977: \refitem{Shapley, H.}{1931}{Harvard College Observatory Bulletin}{883}{16}
978: \refitem{Shapley, H., and McKibben Nail, V.}{1955}{Proceedings of the National Academy of Science}{41}{829}
979: \refitem{Simon, N.R., and Lee, A.S.}{1981}{\ApJ}{248}{291}
980: \refitem{Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Udalski, A., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Wo{\'z}niak, P., and {\.Z}ebru{\'n}, K.}{2000}{\Acta}{50}{451}
981: \refitem{Soszy{\'n}ski,~I., Poleski,~R., Udalski, A., Kubiak,~M., Szyma{\'n}ski,~M.K., Pietrzy{\'n}ski,~G., Wyrzykowski,~{\L}., Szewczyk,~O., and Ulaczyk,~K.}{2008}{\Acta}{58}{153}
982: \refitem{Szyma{\'n}ski, M.K.}{2005}{\Acta}{55}{43}
983: \refitem{Udalski, A.}{2003}{\Acta}{53}{291}
984: \refitem{Udalski, A., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Wo{\'z}niak, P., and {\.Z}ebru{\'n}, K.}{1999a}{\Acta}{49}{1}
985: \refitem{Udalski, A., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Wo{\'z}niak, P., and {\.Z}ebru{\'n}, K.}{1999b}{\Acta}{49}{45}
986: \refitem{Udalski, A., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Wo{\'z}niak, P., and {\.Z}ebru{\'n}, K.}{1999c}{\Acta}{49}{201}
987: \refitem{Udalski, A., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Wo{\'z}niak, P., and {\.Z}ebru{\'n}, K.}{1999d}{\Acta}{49}{223}
988: \refitem{Udalski, A., Szyma\'nski, M.K., Soszy\'nski, I., and Poleski. R.}{2008a}{\Acta}{58}{69}
989: \refitem{Udalski, A., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Szyma{\'n}ski, M.K., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Wyrzykowski, {\L}., Szewczyk,~O., Ulaczyk, K., and Poleski. R.}{2008b}{\Acta}{58}{89}
990: \refitem{van Genderen A.M., and Hadiyanto Nitihardjo, G.}{1989}{\AA}{221}{230}
991: \refitem{Welch, D.L., \etal (MACHO)}{1997}{~}{~}{in: ``Variable Stars and
992: the Astrophysical Returns of Microlensing Surveys'', Ed. R. Ferlet,
993: J.P. Maillard, and B. Raban ({\'E}ditions Fronti{\'e}res), p.~205}
994: \refitem{Woolley, R.vdR., Sandage, A.R., Eggen, O.J., Alexander, J.B., Mather, L., Epps, E., and Jones, S.}{1962}{\it R. Obs. Bull.}{58}{~}
995: \refitem{Wo\'zniak, P.R.}{2000}{\Acta}{50}{421}
996: \refitem{Wo{\'z}niak, P.R., Udalski,~A., Szyma{\'n}ski,~M., Kubiak,~M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski,~G., Soszy{\'n}ski,~I., and {\.Z}ebru{\'n},~K.}{2002}{\Acta}{52}{129}
997: \refitem{{\.Z}ebru{\'n},~K., Soszy{\'n}ski,~I., Wo{\'z}niak,~P.R., Udalski,~A., Kubiak,~M., Szyma{\'n}ski,~M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski,~G., Szewczyk,~O., and Wyrzykowski,~{\L}.}{2001}{\Acta}{51}{317}
998: \end{references}
999: \end{document}
1000: