1: \documentclass[prl,aps,twocolumn,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %TCIDATA{Created=Fri Jun 29 10:42:43 2001}
4: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Mon Oct 22 09:58:51 2001}
5: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
6:
7: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
8: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
9: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
10:
11:
12: \begin{document}
13: \title{Magnetic phase diagram in Eu$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ single crystals}
14: \author{T. Wu, G. Wu, H. Chen, Y. L. Xie, R. H. Liu, X. F. Wang}
15: \author{X. H. Chen}
16: \altaffiliation{Corresponding author} \email{chenxh@ustc.edu.cn}
17: \affiliation{Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Science at
18: Microscale and Department of Physics, University of Science and
19: Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P. R. China\\ }
20: \date{\today}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: {We have systematically measured resistivity, susceptibility and
24: specific heat under different magnetic fields (H) in
25: Eu$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ single crystals. It is found that a
26: metamagnetic transition from A-type antiferromagnetism to
27: ferromagnetism occurs at a critical field for magnetic sublattice of
28: $Eu^{2+}$. The jump of specific heat is suppressed and shifts to low
29: temperature with increasing H up to the critical value, then shifts
30: to high temperature with further increasing H. Such behavior
31: supports the metamagnetic transition. Detailed H-T phase diagrams
32: for x=0 and 0.15 crystals are given, and possible magnetic structure
33: is proposed. Magnetoresistance measurements indicate that there
34: exists a strong coupling between local moment of $Eu^{2+}$ and
35: charge in Fe-As layer. These results are very significant to
36: understand the underlying physics of FeAs superconductors.}
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: \pacs{71.27.+a; 71.30.+h; 72.90.+y}
40:
41: \maketitle
42: \newpage
43:
44: The discovery of superconductivity\cite{yoichi,chenxh,chen,ren} in
45: iron-pnicitides $LnFeAsO_{1-x}F_x$ (Ln=La, Sm, Ce and Pr) has
46: generated much interest for extensive study on such iron-based
47: superconductors, which is the second family of high-$T_c$
48: superconductors except for the high-$T_c$ cuprates. The magnetic
49: ordering of the rare earth ions $Ln^{3+}$ at low temperature has
50: been observed by neutron scattering\cite{rare1, rare2, rare3} except
51: for the spin density wave arose from $Fe^{2+}$. The coupling between
52: $Ln^{3+}$ and Fe$^{2+}$ has been found above ordering temperature
53: for local moment of rare earth ions $Ln^{3+}$\cite{rare1}. These
54: results indicate that the coupling between spins of rare earth ions
55: and Fe$^{2+}$ ions seems to be one important ingredient to
56: understand magnetic properties at low temperatures. It is well known
57: that spin density wave (SDW) is suppressed, while superconductivity
58: emerges with doping\cite{dong, liu, chenhong, Luetkens, cruz}.
59: However, no evidence is given for how to couple between SDW and
60: magnetic ordering of rare earth ions $Ln^{3+}$, and effect of
61: magnetic ordering of $Ln^{3+}$ on superconductivity. Therefore, the
62: coupling between the SDW from $Fe^{2+}$ and magnetic ordering of
63: rare earth ions $Ln^{3+}$ should be a very interesting issue. It
64: maybe shed light to understand the underlying physics in Fe-As
65: compounds.
66:
67:
68: EuFe$_2$As$_2$ is one of parent compounds with $ThCr_2Si_2$-type
69: structure. It shows a SDW transition around 190 K, and an
70: antiferromagnetic transition of Eu$^{2+}$ ions occurs at
71: T$_N$$\sim$20 K\cite{ren1}. Superconductivity at $\sim$ 30 K can be
72: achieved by K or Na doping\cite{Jeevan, Qi}. This compound is
73: believed to be more complicated than other parent compound due to
74: the large local moment of Eu$^{2+}$ ions. Similar to electron-type
75: $Nd_{2-x}Ce_xCu_2O_{4-\delta}$\cite{NCO1, NCO2, NCO3, NCCO1, NCCO2,
76: tao}, the interaction between magnetic moments of Fe$^{2+}$ and
77: Eu$^{2+}$ may lead to rich physical phenomena, and these maybe shed
78: light to the mechanism of superconductivity in these materials. In
79: this paper, we have studied magnetic transition by resistivity,
80: susceptibility and specific heat in Eu$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$
81: single crystals. The magnetic structure of Eu$^{2+}$ ions is found
82: to be strongly dependent on external magnetic field. A metamagnetic
83: transition from A-type antiferromagnetism to ferromagnetism is
84: observed at a certain magnetic field. The results show that the
85: critical magnetic field is anisotropic. With La doping, the SDW is
86: strongly suppressed and the critical magnetic field induced
87: metamagnetic transition decreases. A detailed H-T phase diagram is
88: given, and possible magnetic structure of Eu$^{2+}$ ions is
89: proposed. It is found that there exists strong coupling between
90: antiferromagnetic SDW in Fe-As layer and magnetic ordering of
91: $Eu^{2+}$, the internal magnetic field from ferromagnetic ordering
92: of $Eu^{2+}$ ions can polarize the antiferromagnetic SDW in Fe-As
93: layer.
94:
95: High quality single crystals with nominal composition
96: Eu$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ (x=0, 0.4 and 0.5) were grown by
97: self-flux method as described for growth of BaFe$_2$As$_2$ single
98: crystals with FeAs as flux\cite{Wang}. Many shinning plate-like
99: Eu$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ crystals were obtained. The typical
100: dimensional is about 4 x 4 x 0.05 mm$^{3}$. Elemental analysis of
101: the samples was performed using energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy
102: (EDX). The obtained actual La content is 0.15 and 0.18 for the
103: samples with x=0.4 and 0.5, respectively. The c-axis parameter is
104: determined by single crystal x-ray diffraction pattern (XRD). The
105: XRD results show that c-axis parameter shrinks with La doping from
106: 12.13 $\AA$ for x=0 to 12.03 $\AA$ x=0.18.
107:
108: \begin{figure}[t]
109: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig1.eps}
110: \caption{(color online). Temperature dependence of in-plane and
111: out-of-plane resistivity for Eu$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ single
112: crystals with x=0 (squares), 0.15 (circles) and 0.18
113: (up-triangles). The
114: inset shows c-axis parameter dependent SDW/structural transition temperature.\\
115: }
116: \end{figure}
117:
118: Temperature dependence of in-plane and out-of-plane resistivity for
119: x=0, 0.15 and 0.18 crystals is shown in Fig.1. Both in-plane and
120: out-of-plane resistivity show similar temperature dependent
121: behavior. In-plane and out-of-plane resistivities for parent
122: compound show almost a linear temperature dependence above $\sim
123: 188$ K, and a steep increase at 188 K, then changes to metallic
124: behavior. This transition is ascribed to SDW/structural
125: transition\cite{Wang}. With La doping, the SDW/structural transition
126: is suppressed with decreasing T$_s$ from 188 K to 110 K for the
127: crystal with x=0.18. It suggests that electrons are introduced into
128: the system with La doping, and lead to a decrease of $T_s$. For all
129: samples, there exists a kink in resistivity around 20 K. Such kink
130: is ascribed to antiferromagnetic transition of Eu$^{2+}$ ions. It
131: suggests that there exists a coupling between the local moment of
132: Eu$^{2+}$ ions and conducting electron in Fe-As layer.
133:
134:
135: \begin{figure}[b]
136: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig2.eps}
137: \caption{(color online). Temperature dependence of susceptibility
138: measured in field-cooled process under different H, (a):
139: H$\parallel$c and (b): H$\perp$c for x=0 crystal; (c): H$\parallel$c
140: and (d): H$\perp$c for x=0.15 crystal. The inset shows M-H curves
141: for x=0 and x=0.15 at 2 K.
142: \\
143: }
144: \end{figure}
145:
146:
147: Temperature dependence of susceptibility ($\chi$) for the crystals
148: with x=0 and 0.15 measured in field cooled process under different H
149: up to 7 Tesla applied within ab-plane and along c-axis is shown in
150: Fig.2, respectively. For the crystal with x=0, a standard
151: Curie-Weiss behavior is observed in high temperature region (T $>$
152: 50 K) for both H$\parallel$ab and H$\perp$ab. Below 20 K, a steep
153: decrease in $\chi$ happens with H$\parallel$ab plane, while the
154: $\chi$ with H$\perp$ab plane emerges a small peak, then almost
155: remains constant. It suggests that an antiferromagnetic transition
156: occurs below 20 K. For x=0.15 crystal, temperature dependent
157: susceptibility at high temperature is also Curie-Weiss behavior. The
158: antiferromagnetic transition shows up at T$_N$ of 16 K. All these
159: phenomena occur only at low magnetic fields. With increasing H
160: larger than a critical magnetic field, the antiferromagnetic
161: character in $\chi(T)$ disappears as shown in Fig.2. As shown in
162: insets of Fig.2, the magnetization (M) increases linearly with H
163: applied along c-axis, then the M saturates above a critical magnetic
164: field ($H_c$) of about 1.5 T and 0.8 T for the crystals with x=0 and
165: 0.15, respectively. Similar behavior is observed with H applied
166: within ab plane, the $H_c$ is about 1 T and 0.3 T for the crystals
167: with x=0 and 0.15, respectively. These results indicate that a
168: metamagnetic transition from antiferromagnetism (AFM) to
169: ferromagnetism (FM) happens with increasing magnetic field. It
170: should be pointed out that the M-H curve is linear before saturation
171: without loop for H$\parallel$c, while a step increase in M is
172: observed between linear behavior and saturation with a small loop
173: for H $\perp$c. The saturated magnetization for H $\perp$c is larger
174: than that for H$\parallel$c, eg: 7.01$\mu$$_B$ with H$\parallel$ab
175: and 6.71$\mu$$_B$ with H$\parallel$c for x=0 crystal. It indicates
176: that the easy axis is within ab plane. The high temperature
177: susceptibility data ($100K<T<300K$) were fitted by the Curie-Weiss
178: formulum: $\chi(T)=\chi_0+\frac{C}{T+\theta}$. $\chi$$_0$ is the
179: temperature-independent susceptibility, C is the Curie-Weiss
180: constant and $\theta$ is the Weiss temperature. The effective
181: magnetic moment and Weiss temperature are listed in Table I.
182: Effective magnetic moment is close to theoretical value of Eu$^{2+}$
183: ion: 7.94$\mu$$_B$. The Weiss temperature is negative, indicating a
184: ferromagnetic interaction between Eu$^{2+}$ ions. However, an
185: antiferromagnetic ordering occurs at low magnetic fields. A possible
186: magnetic structure is that the coupling of Eu$^{2+}$ ions is
187: ferromagnetic within ab plane, while antiferromagnetic for
188: interplane; that is: A-type antiferromagnetism. It needs neutron
189: experiment to confirm this speculation.
190:
191:
192: \begin{center}
193: \begin{table}[tp]%
194: \caption{\label{tab:table1}Magnetic parameters obtained by fitting
195: the high temperature (100 K$\sim$300 K) susceptibility data for
196: $Eu_{1-x}La_xFe_2As_2$ crystals with x=0 and 0.15 with Curie-Weiss
197: law: $\chi(T)=\chi_0+\frac{C}{T+\theta}$.}
198: \label{aggiungi} \centering %
199: \begin{tabular}{clccc}
200: \toprule %
201: EuFe$_2$As$_2$&H$\parallel$ab&H$\parallel$c\\\hline
202: $\theta$(K) & -24.67 & -21.60\\
203: C(emu/K Oe mol) & 7.78 & 7.52\\
204: $\mu$$_{eff}$($\mu$$_B$) & 7.89 & 7.76\\
205: \hline \hline
206: Eu$_{0.85}$La$_{0.15}$Fe$_2$As$_2$&H$\parallel$ab&H$\parallel$c\\
207: \hline $\theta$(K) & -22.82 & -22.20\\
208: C(emu/K Oe mol) & 7.86 & 7.45\\
209: $\mu$$_{eff}$($\mu$$_B$) & 7.93 & 7.72\\\hline\hline
210:
211: \end{tabular}
212: \end{table}
213: \end{center}
214:
215: \begin{figure}[t]
216: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig3.eps}
217: \caption{(color online). Specific heat as a function of temperature
218: under H applied along c-axis for x=0 crystal, (a): below 100 K; (b):
219: above 100 K. (c). Angle dependent in-plane magnetization at 2, 10
220: and 50 K under H=0.2 T and 1.5 T, respectively; (d) and (e):
221: Isothermal in-plane magnetoresistance with H along c-axis for x=0
222: and x=0.15 crystals, respectively.
223: \\}
224: \end{figure}
225:
226: In order to further study effect of H on magnetic ordering, specific
227: heat was measured with H applied along c-axis for x=0 crystal as
228: shown in Fig.3. A sharp jump around 185 K is observed, such anomaly
229: should arise from SDW/structural transition observed in resistivity.
230: Fig.3(b) shows no change for the anomaly at 185 K under H=14 T
231: relative to the case of H=0 T. It suggests that the effect of H=14 T
232: on the SDW/structural transition is negligible. Another jump around
233: 20 K, associated with the magnetic ordering of Eu$^{2+}$ ions
234: observed in $\chi(T)$, shows up as shown in Fig.3(a). In contrast to
235: the anomaly related with SDW/structural transition at 185 K, the
236: jump associated with the magnetic ordering of Eu$^{2+}$ ions is
237: suppressed and shifts to low temperature with increasing H up to
238: about 1 T. When H$>$1T, the sharp jump becomes a broad peak and
239: shifts to high temperature with further increasing H. These results
240: are consistent with susceptibility behavior shown in Fig.2, and
241: further confirm that a metamagnetism from antiferromagnetism to
242: ferromagnetism occurs with increasing H. Similar behavior in
243: specific heat is observed in Na$_{0.85}$CoO$_2$ due to a
244: metamagnetic transtion\cite{luo}. In order to further understand
245: metamagnetism of Eu$^{2+}$ ions, the angular dependent magnetization
246: with rotating H within ab plane is measured for x=0 crystal. As
247: shown in Fig.3(c), an apparent twofold symmetry is observed at 10 K
248: and 2 K under H =0.2 T. The anisotropy is about 2.0 at 2 K. With
249: increasing \emph{T} to 50 K, the magnetization under H =0.2 T is
250: changed to be isotropic. It is intriguing that the magnetization is
251: also isotropic at 2 and 10 K under H=1.5 T. It suggests that the
252: magnetization in antiferromagnetic state is anisotropic in ab plane,
253: while in ferromagnetic state is isotropic. An interesting question
254: is naturally proposed: what makes them different? Magnetic structure
255: of BaFe$_2$As$_2$ is stripe-like AFM in Fe-As layer from neutron
256: scattering\cite{Huang}, a twofold magnetic symmetry at 4 K with
257: anisotropy of 1.14 has been reported\cite{Wang}. Therefore, it is
258: easily understood that the twofold symmetry is observed in
259: antiferromagnetic state of Eu$^{2+}$ ions. In ferromagnetic state,
260: the ferromagnetic arrangement of spins for $Eu^{2+}$ leads to a
261: large internal magnetic field. Such large internal magnetic field
262: can polarize the spin orientation in Fe-As layer, so that the
263: magnetization is isotropic in ferromagnetic state.
264:
265:
266: Fig.3(d) and (e) show the isothermal in-plane magnetoresistance (MR)
267: with H along c-axis at 2 and 10 K for x=0 and x=0.15 crystals,
268: respectively. Fig.3(d) shows that negative in-plane MR increases
269: with increasing H up to a certain magnetic field, then decreases
270: with further increasing H. The clear kink in in-plane MR at 2 K is
271: observed at $H\sim1.7$ T for x=0 crystal. As shown in Fig.3(e), the
272: in-plane MR is positive for x=0.15 crystal, and increases with
273: increasing H up to $\sim 0.7$ T, then decreases with further
274: increasing H. The magnetic field corresponding to the kink at 2 K is
275: almost the same as the critical magnetic field induced metamagnetic
276: transition observed in Fig.2. As shown in Fig.3(d) and (e), the kink
277: shifts to low magnetic field with increasing temperature. This is
278: easily understood because the kink is closely associated with
279: metamagnetic transition from AFM to FM. These results suggest that
280: there exist strong coupling between local moment of $Eu^{2+}$ and
281: charge in Fe-As layer.
282:
283:
284: \begin{figure}[t]
285: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig4.eps}
286: \caption{(color online). Detailed H-T phase diagram for magnetism of
287: Eu$^{2+}$, (a): H$\parallel$c and (b): H$\parallel$ab for x=0
288: crystal; (c) H$\parallel$c and (d): H$\parallel$ab for x=0.15
289: crystal. The open squares stand for antiferromagnetic transition
290: temperature ($T_N$) determined by susceptibility. The open circles
291: present ferromagnetic transition temperature ($T_c$) determine by
292: d$\chi(T)$/dT. The open up-triangles and down triangles in (a)
293: present $T_c$ and $T_N$ determined by the peak position of specific
294: heat, respectively; (e) and (f): two possible AF magnetic
295: structures; (f) Ferromagnetic structure induced by H applied along
296: (110) direction.
297: \\}
298: \end{figure}
299:
300: Fig.4(a)-(d) show detailed H-T phase diagram for magnetism of
301: Eu$^{2+}$ ions for x=0 and x=0.15 crystals for H$\parallel$ab plane
302: and H$\perp$ab plane, respectively. The antiferromagnetic transition
303: temperature is determined by the kink in $\chi(T)$. The
304: ferromagnetic temperature is determined by the extremum in
305: $\frac{d\chi(T)}{dT}$. At low field, the magnetic structure is
306: A-type antiferromagnetism, while ferromagnetic state above critical
307: magnetic field. As shown in Fig.4(a)-(d), the critical field with H
308: along c-axis is two times of that with H applied within ab-plane for
309: both of the x=0 and 0.15 crystals. La doping suppresses the AFM
310: phase and leads to a decrease in the critical field. The critical
311: field with H along c-axis is about 1.5 T for x=0 and 0.8 T for
312: x=0.15 crystal. Possible magnetic structures for the spins of
313: $Eu^{2+}$ are proposed as shown in Fig.4(e) and 4(f) based on the
314: results of susceptibility and specific heat. In the possible
315: magnetic structures, the antiferromagnetic SDW in Fe-As layer keep
316: the same as that in BaFe$_2$As$_2$ determined by neutron
317: scattering\cite{Huang} since the different ions in Ba site have no
318: effect on magnetic structure of Fe$^{2+}$ for $MFe_2As_2$ (M=Ba, Sr,
319: and Ca). At low fields, the inter-plane coupling among Eu$^{2+}$
320: ions is antiferromagnetic, and the intra-plane coupling is
321: ferromagnetic; that is: A-type AFM structure for $Eu^{2+}$ spins.
322: The spin orientation of Eu$^{2+}$ ions has two possibilities
323: relative to the spin direction of $Fe^{2+}$. One possibility is that
324: the spin direction of Eu$^{2+}$ ions is perpendicular to that of
325: Fe$^{2+}$ ions, that is: noncollinear AFM structure, similar to that
326: of $Nd_2CuO_4$\cite{NCO1,NCO2,NCO3}. Another possibility is that the
327: spin direction of Eu$^{2+}$ ions is parallel to that of Fe$^{2+}$
328: ions, that is: collinear AFM structure. With increasing H, the
329: interplane coupling changes to ferromagnetic as shown in Fig.4(g).
330: Such interplane ferromagnetic coupling between $Eu^{2+}$ spins
331: enhances the coupling between Eu$^{2+}$ ions and Fe-As layer, so
332: that the internal magnetic field produced by FM of $Eu^{2+}$ has
333: strong effect on the SDW and the anisotropy disappears. The
334: understanding on interaction between magnetic ordering of rare earth
335: ions and SDW state of Fe-As layer is helpful to study the underlying
336: physics of Fe-As compound.
337:
338: In summary, we systematically study the magnetic ordering of
339: $Eu^{2+}$ through the resistivity, susceptibility and specific heat
340: measurements in high-quality single crystal $Eu_{1-x}La_xFe_2As_2$.
341: A metamagnetic transition from antiferromagnetism to ferromagnetism
342: is found for magnetic sublattice of Eu$^{2+}$ ions. Detailed H-T
343: phase diagrams for x=0 and 0.15 crystals are given, and possible
344: magnetic structure for $Eu^{2+}$ spins is proposed. At low fields,
345: the magnetic structure of $Eu^{2+}$ spins is A-type
346: antiferromagnetic. There exists a strong coupling between local
347: moment of $Eu^{2+}$ and charge in conducting Fe-As layer. Our
348: results indicate a coupling between magnetism of rare earth ions and
349: SDW ordering in Fe-As layer. These intriguing phenomena from
350: magnetism of rare earth ions maybe shed light on the underlying
351: physics of FeAs superconductors.
352:
353:
354:
355: \vspace*{2mm} {\bf Acknowledgment:} This work is supported by the
356: Nature Science Foundation of China and by the Ministry of Science
357: and Technology of China (973 project No: 2006CB601001) and by
358: National Basic Research Program of China (2006CB922005).
359:
360: {\bf Note:} At completion of this work we became aware of one paper
361: reported susceptibility of $EuFe_2As_2$ by Jiang et al.,
362: arXiv:0808.0325.
363:
364: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
365:
366: \baselineskip 9pt
367:
368: \bibitem{yoichi}
369: Y. Kamihara et al., \emph{J. Am. Chem. Sco.} {\bf 130}, 3296(2008).
370: \bibitem{chenxh}
371: X. H. Chen et al., Nature {\bf 453}, 761(2008).
372: \bibitem{chen}
373: G. F. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 100}, 247002(2008).
374: \bibitem{ren}
375: Z. A. Ren et al., Europhys. Lett. {\bf 83}, 17002(2008).
376: \bibitem{rare1}
377: J. Zhao et al., arXiv:0807.4872(2008).
378: \bibitem{rare2}
379: J. Zhao et al., arXiv:0806.2528(2008).
380: \bibitem{rare3}
381: Y. Qiu et al., arXiv:0806.2195(2008).
382: \bibitem{cruz}
383: C. Cruz et al., Nature {\bf 453}, 899(2008).
384: \bibitem{dong}
385: J. Dong et al., Europhys. Lett., {\bf 83}, 27006 (2008).
386: \bibitem{liu}
387: R. H. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2008) (in press).
388: \bibitem{chenhong}
389: H. Chen et al., arXiv:0807.3950v1(2008).
390: \bibitem{Luetkens}
391: H. Luetkens et al. arXiv:0806.3533(2008).
392: \bibitem{ren1}
393: Z. Ren et al., arxiv:0806.2591(2008).
394: \bibitem{Jeevan}
395: H. S. Jeevan et al., arXiv:0807.2530(2008).
396: \bibitem{Qi}
397: Y. P. Qi et al., arXiv:0807.3293(2008).
398: \bibitem{NCO1}
399: S. Skanthakumar et al., \emph{Physica C} {\bf 160}, 124(1989).
400: \bibitem{NCO2}
401: M. Matsuda et al., \emph{Phys. Rev. B} {\bf 42}, 10098(1990).
402: \bibitem{NCO3}
403: S. Skanthakumar et al., \emph{J. Appl. Phys.} {\bf 73}, 6326(1993).
404: \bibitem{NCCO1}
405: S. Li et al., Phys. Rev. B {\bf 71}, 054505(2005).
406: \bibitem{NCCO2}
407: X. H. Chen et al., \emph{Phys. Rev. B} {\bf72}, 064517 (2005).
408: \bibitem{tao}
409: T. Wu et al., J. Phys. Conden. Matt. {\bf 20}, 275226(2008).
410: \bibitem{Wang}
411: X. F. Wang et al., arXiv:0806.2452(2008).
412: \bibitem{Huang}
413: Q. Huang et al., arXiv:0806.2776(2008).
414: \bibitem{luo}
415: J. L. Luo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 187203(2004).
416: \end{thebibliography}
417:
418: \end{document}
419: