1: \documentclass{pasj00}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{spr-astr-addons}
4:
5: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6: \newcommand{\inst}{\altaffilmark}
7: \newcommand{\instM}{\altaffiltext}
8:
9: \draft
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \SetRunningHead{Yu--Peng Chen et al}{IGR J17098-3628 Observed by INTEGRAL and RXTE/ASM}
14: %\Received{2000/12/31}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
15: %\Accepted{2001/01/01}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
16:
17: \title{INTEGRAL and RXTE/ASM Observations on IGR J17098-3628 }
18: \author {Yu--Peng Chen \inst{1},Shu Zhang \inst{1}, Nick Schurch \inst{1,2}, Jian--Min Wang\inst{1,3}, Werner Collmar\inst{4},\\ Ti--Pei Li \inst{1,5}, Jin--Lu Qu\inst{1}, Cheng--Min Zhang\inst{6}
19: }
20: \altaffiltext{1} {Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, 19B YuQuan Road, Beijing 100049, China}
21: \altaffiltext{2} {Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK}
22: \altaffiltext{3} {Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities (TPCSF), CAS}
23: \altaffiltext{4} {Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik,
24: P.O. Box 1603, D-85740 Garching, Germany }
25: \altaffiltext{5} {Center for Astrophysics,Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China}
26: \altaffiltext{6} {National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academic of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China}
27:
28: % \date{Received; accepted }
29:
30: \KeyWords{outburst--X-ray:individual: IGR J17098-3628}
31:
32: \maketitle
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35: To probe further the possible nature of the unidentified source IGR J17098-3628, we have carried out
36: a detailed analysis of its long-term time variability as monitored
37: by RXTE/ASM, and of its hard X-ray properties as observed by
38: INTEGRAL. INTEGRAL has monitored this sky
39: region over years and significantly detected IGR J17098-3628 only
40: when the source was in this dubbed active state. In particular, at
41: $\ge$ 20 keV, IBIS/ISGRI caught an outburst in March 2005, lasting
42: for $\sim$5 days with detection significance of 73$\sigma$ (20-40
43: keV) and with the emission at $< $200 keV. The ASM observations reveal that the soft X-ray lightcurve shows a similar outburst to that detected by INTEGRAL, however the peak of the soft X-ray lightcurve either lags, or is preceded by, the hard X-ray ($>$20 keV) outburst by $\sim$2 days. This resembles the behavior of X-ray novae like XN 1124-683, hence it further suggests a LMXB nature for IGR J17098-3628. While the quality of the ASM data prevents us from drawing any definite conclusions, these discoveries are important clues that, coupled with future observations, will help to resolve the as yet unknown nature of IGR J17098-3628.
44:
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48:
49:
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52:
53: INTEGRAL has detected roughly 500 sources at energies $\ge$
54: 20 keV \citep{boda}. Among them, X-ray binary systems were identified for
55: 32\% of the times, and another 26\% remained unidentified.
56: %
57: %These sources, together with other mscellaneously classified, sum up
58: %more than half of the total and have mostly resulted
59: %from the deep INTEGRAL survey of the Galactic disk, with the spatial
60: %distribution concentrating to the Galactic bulge of the largest
61: %exposed region.
62: %
63: As one of the unidentified sources, IGR J17098-3628 was discovered
64: \citep{source} at the end of March 2005 by INTEGRAL/IBIS during the
65: private Open Program observation dedicated to the deep view to the
66: Galactic center.
67: %during its
68: %Galactic Centre Deep Exposure programme.
69: The source was located at R.A.(2000) $=17^{h}09^{m}48^{s} $, Dec. $=-36\degree
70: 28\arcmin 12\arcsec $, with an error box of $2\arcmin$ at 90$\%$
71: confidence. The source got a peak flux at $\sim$ 60 and 95 mCrab for
72: 18-45 and 45-80 keV, respectively. The 20-60 keV flux evolved from
73: $\sim50$ mCrab at 2005 March 26 00:00, to $\sim9$ mCrabs at April 3 23:30 (UTC) \citep{453}.
74: The preliminary spectral analysis \citep{spe} showed the source spectrum
75: became quite soft along this evolution. Following INTEGRAL, IGR J17098-3628 was observed by RXTE on March 29
76: of 2005, and was detected at 80 mCrab in the 3--20 keV band, with a
77: hard power-law tail of a spectral index $\sim$ 2.5. Then the source was assumed a
78: BHC and X-ray Nova (Grebenev et al. 2007). The column density was found to be less than 1$\times$10$^{22}$ atoms cm$^2$.
79:
80: Later on, Swift observed this source on May 1 of 2005, and refined
81: its location to R.A.\ (2000) $=17^{\rm h}09^{\rm m}45.9^{\rm s} $, Dec.\
82: $=-36\degree 27\arcmin 57\arcsec $, with 90$\%$ confidence, and an
83: uncertain radius of 5 arcseconds \citep{kenn}. This made the search
84: possible for the potential counterparts in optical and infrared
85: bands. From the 2MASS ALL-SKY Catalog a possible counterpart was found,
86: J17094612-3627573 \citep{kong}. However, the most recent optical and
87: infrared observations, made with the 6.5m Magellan-Baade telescope,
88: revealed that 2MASS J17094612-3627573 is in fact composed off
89: several sources \citep{stee}. Furthermore, Very Large Array (VLA)
90: observations of IGR J17098-3628 were made on March 31, April 5, and
91: May 4, 2005 at 4.86 GHz \citep{radio}, which led to the discovery of a
92: radio transient at 0.8 arcseconds from the Swift XRT position, and
93: hence regarded as the possible radio counterpart. Finally on July 9,
94: Swift/XRT observed IGR J17098-3628 again and found that the spectrum was fitted by an
95: absorbed disk blackbody model. The column density obtained was
96: (0.89$\pm$0.02$)\times$10$^{22}$ atoms cm$^{-2}$ \citep{kenn2}.
97:
98:
99: In this paper, we report the analysis of all available observations
100: on IGR J17098-3628 carried out by IBIS/ISGRI and JEMX onboard
101: INTEGRAL, and the All Sky Monitor (ASM) onboard RXTE. This allows us
102: to trace the source behavior in X-rays back to 1996 with ASM and
103: back to 2002 with INTEGRAL. We put the outburst in 2005 in this context.
104:
105:
106: \section{Time variability monitored by ASM}
107:
108:
109: ASM is one of the three detectors onboard the RXTE
110: satellite \citep{gruber96,swank94}, which has been used to track the
111: long-term behavior of the source in the energy band 1.5-12 keV since
112: February 1996. The target source was usually observed several times
113: per day, within the so-called dwells, of duration 96 seconds each.
114: The extracted source light curves are presented for the energy bands of 1.5--3, 3--5, 5--12, and
115: 1.5--12 keV, respectively.
116:
117:
118: IGR J17098-3628 has been monitored by ASM as one
119: of the most active sources ever seen since 2002. As shown in
120: Figure \ref{asm_lc}, the 1.5--12 keV lightcurves, retrieved
121: in a time period from January 1996 to May 2008, show the
122: variability, where each bin represents a dwell, or --in the middle
123: panel-- the average over month timescale. Many individual
124: bursts-like events existing in the dwell lightcurve can be spotted, and the flux
125: maxima can sometimes reach 65.5 cts/s (the dwell at
126: MJD=51958.219410), corresponding to 873 mCrab in the 1.5-12 keV band.
127: We have made communication with the ASM team for consulting on such feature.
128: It turns out that the source IGR J17098-3628 is only 1 degree away from GX349+2, a very strong
129: X-ray source. The angular resolution of each of the ASM cameras is
130: much better in one coordinate $\phi$ ($\sim$3$\arcmin$) than in the other coordinate
131: $\theta$ ($\sim$15$\arcmin$). This is the kind of problem that is (understandably) difficult for the ASM
132: analysis system to properly handle; similar problems have arisen with
133: other sources. But in general, GX349+2 is stable in the 1.5-12 keV band observed by ASM (see Figure \ref{asm_lc}, the bottom panel).
134: In short, the analysis software has incorrectly
135: attributed the flux from GX349+2 to IGR J17098-3628 only on those
136: relatively few occasions. Actually,
137: the big uncertainty in this lightcurve is the contamination from the neighboring source, IGR J17091-3624, located (only
138: $0.17 \degree$ away) too close to IGR J17098-3628 to be resolved by ASM. As the result, the burst events on monthly timescale
139: as shown in the middle panel of Fig.1 may
140: sometimes attribute to IGR J17091-3624. Fortunately, this problem can be well solved via INTEGRAL's mapping this region with
141: either ISGRI or JEMX. In the monthly lightcurve there are several well established
142: outbursts with a duration of several months. The first one occurs
143: around MJD 52800 (June, 2003), with averaged peak flux reaching 40 mCrab level. We will see later that, this outburst came
144: from the IGR J17091-3624 (Grebenev et al. 2007), and the ones thereafter observed by INTEGRAL were from IGR J17098-3628.
145: IGR J17091-3624 seems to be in quiet most of time since MJD 52800 (Grebenev et al. 2007).
146: A sequence of outbursts have happened since MJD 53455 (March, 2005), and the
147: 1.5--12 keV flux has kept staying at the flux level of $\sim$ 50
148: mCrab over years. These results, accompanying with the INTEGRAl results which will be shown later on,
149: suggest IGR J17098-3628 is in active phase within the last several years.
150:
151:
152:
153:
154: \section{Hard X-ray properties revealed by INTEGRAL}
155: \subsection{Observations and data analysis}
156:
157: INTEGRAL is an ESA scientific mission (Winkler et
158: al. 2003) dedicated to spectroscopy
159: ($E/\Delta E$$\simeq$500; SPI see Vedrenne et al. 2003) and imaging (angular
160: resolution: 12$\arcmin$ FWHM, source location accuracy:
161: $\simeq$1--3$\arcmin$; IBIS, see Ubertini et al. 2003) of celestial
162: $\gamma$-ray sources in the energy range 15\,keV to 10\,MeV, with
163: simultaneous monitoring in the X-ray (3--35\,keV, angular
164: resolution: 3$\arcmin$; JEMX, see Lund et al. 2003) and optical (V-band,
165: 550\,nm; OMC, see Mas-Hesse et al. 2003)
166: energy ranges.
167: All the instruments onboard INTEGRAL, except the OMC, work with
168: coded masks.
169: The observational data from the detectors IBIS/ISGRI (15-200 keV) and JEMX
170: have been adopted in our analysis of IGR J17098-3628.
171:
172: The available INTEGRAL observations when IGR J17098-3628 falls into
173: the Fully Coded Field of View (FCFoV) of ISGRI comprise about 2400
174: science windows (scw's, typically 2000 seconds each), adding to a
175: total exposure of 3700 ks. Most of these observations are carried
176: out in a 5x5 dithering mode. The data are subdivided into 9 groups
177: according to the sequence in observational time. The groups T5, T6,
178: and T7 represent the observations made one month prior to the hard
179: X-ray outburst, 6 days in 2005 March 23-28 --during the outburst, and one
180: month after the outburst, respectively (see Table 1 for a summary of
181: the individual observational groups).
182:
183: The analysis of JEMX and ISGRI data is performed by using the
184: INTEGRAL Offline Scientific Analysis (OSA) software, version 6.0.
185: All the sources within the FoV that are brighter than or comparable
186: to IGR J17098-3628 are taken into account in extracting the source
187: spectrum. An additional 2\% systematic error are added to the
188: spectra because of calibration uncertainties. The ISGRI spectrum was normalized to the JEMX spectrum by a factor $0.77^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ derived from the fit. The
189: spectra are fitted with XSPEC v12.3.1 and the model parameters are
190: estimated with 90$\%$ confidence level.
191: \subsection{INTEGRAL results}
192: \subsubsection{Sky maps }
193: We have looked into the skymaps of both ISGRI and JEMX to see for each of the 9 time zones which source was on active. The detection
194: significances from ISGRI in the 20-40 keV band are summarised in Table 1. We find that
195: IGR J17091-3624 was in active phase within 2003 April and 2004 April (T1--T3), and IGR J17098-3628 took the role since 2005 March
196: in T6. After 2004 August (in T4), IGR J17091-3624 was not detectable by INTEGRAL at the X-rays.
197:
198: IGR J17098-3628 was detected by ISGRI at energies $\ge$ 20 keV
199: during March 24-28, 2005 when the source had an outburst in hard X-rays.
200: The detection significances were 73.4$\sigma$ in the 20--40 keV band
201: (for the mosaic image seen in Figure \ref{skymap2}), 38$\sigma$ in
202: the 40--60 keV band, 21 $\sigma$ in the 60--100 keV band, and
203: 8$\sigma$ in the 100--200 keV band. The source was still visible
204: during its decay in the following one month (T7), with the
205: detections significances dropping to 16.9$\sigma$ in 20--40 keV. For
206: all other INTEGRAL observations, only marginal detections or upper
207: limits were obtained at energies $\ge$ 20 keV, e.g., for the time
208: period T9, the source was detected only in 20-40 keV with
209: significance $\sim$ 8$\sigma$ level (see Table 1). Since JEMX overlaps with ASM
210: in most of its working energies, the detections at $\le$ 15 keV
211: follow in general the same trend indicated by the
212: ASM light curves. Figure \ref{skymap1} shows the most significant JEMX
213: detection of the source in March 31-April 21, 2005, which gives $\sim$
214: 22 $\sigma$ in the 3--6 keV band.
215:
216:
217:
218: \subsubsection{Light curves }
219:
220: We use version 6.0 of the INTEGRAL Offline Scientific Analysis (OSA) software to construct the $>$20 keV ISGRI X-ray
221: lightcurve of this outburst and compare it to the 1.5-12 keV ASM lightcurve from the same period.
222: Unfortunately IGR J17098-3628 was either prohibitively faint or out of the FoV for JEMX for most of the INTEGRAL
223: observation, and the remaining data are contaminated by a strong source in the JEMX field-of-view
224: (this is a known issue for JEMX data extraction - INTEGRAL Help Desk Priv. Comm.) to prevent from producing the proper
225: lightcurve through running the pipeline. We therefore generate the JEMX lightcurves via reading out the flux
226: at the source position from the mosaic map. A comparison of the JEMX and ASM lightcurves at 3-12 keV is shown in Figure \ref{asm-jemx}, where
227: the trends are consistent with each other. We find that the soft X-ray lightcurve shows a similar outburst to that detected by INTEGRAL,
228: however the peak of the soft X-ray lightcurve lags the hard X-rays by $\sim$2 days (Figure \ref{asm-integral}).
229: We note, however, that no hard X-ray data cover the peak outburst observed in the ASM data.
230: If there is a hard X-ray peak that coincides with the soft X-ray peak, then, since there is no evidence for two peaks
231: in the ASM data, the earlier hard X-ray peak may well be interpreted a precursor event to a wider band concurrent X-ray outburst rather than evidence for a lag between the hard and soft X-ray bands. Figure \ref{asm-jemx-isgri} shows a comparison of the flux variability in
232: the time zones T5--T9, as obtained with ASM in 1.5--3 keV, JEMX in 3--6,
233: 6--10, 10--15 keV, and ISGRI in 20--40 keV, and 40--60 keV bands.
234: %We refine the energy to $\ge$ 6 keV where the emissions start to overwhelm the lower
235: %energies.
236:
237:
238: \subsubsection{Spectra}
239:
240:
241: Since the lightcurves show quite different behavior between the higher and lower energy bands,
242: it would be interesting to investigate the spectrum at the different periods of the outburst,
243: i.e., the time evolution of the spectrum along the outburst, although the overall spectra have been presented in Grebenev et al (2007) from using ISGRI data of
244: the outburst, supplemented by the available PCA/RXTE data.
245: For investigating the spectrum of the source, the time zone where the outburst was recorded
246: by INTEGRAL (T6) was subdivided
247: into three smaller time periods according to observations:
248: March 23st 03:13 to 25st 02:35(the rising phase), 25st 23:03 to 27st 00:51 ( the peaking phase) and 27st 00:53 to
249: 28st 11:15 (UTC) (the decaying phase). Due to the relatively small
250: FoV of the JEMX, its data are only available during the decaying phase,
251: which is then combined with the corresponding ISGRI data
252: for a broader spectral fitting.
253: Firstly we have
254: tried different fitting models in the 20--200 keV band only using the ISGRI data: simple power-law, power-law with cutoff, and
255: broken power-law shapes. The goodness of each trial
256: is shown in Table 2. We find that the relatively
257: poor statistics of the data from
258: the rising of the hard X-ray outburst prevents from discriminating
259: the models; the
260: power-law with cutoff model might be the best choice when the outburst
261: reached the maximum; and the
262: power-law model shows a good fit to the data from the decay of the
263: outburst onwards. From the fit of a simple power law model, the spectral index changes from
264: $\sim$ 1.7 when rising to roughly 2.6 when decaying. We tried as well a disk blackbody model for the decaying phase (the broadband 5-200 keV spectrum), and found
265: the reduced $\chi^2$ ($\sim$1.36) gets worse than that from the best-fit model of a broken power law (see Figure \ref{spe_3}).
266: The best-fit parameters of
267: the proper model are then presented in Tables 3, 4, and 5, for the three phases, respectively.
268: That the different episodes of the
269: outburst have to be described by different models might suggest rather
270: strong time evolution. By taking the
271: distance of 10.5 kpc as estimated by Grebenev et al.(2007), the source had a
272: luminosity of $\sim$ $9.8\times 10^{36}$erg s$^{-1}$ averaged over
273: the whole outburst in the 20--200 keV. The luminosities in individual phase are $5.3\times 10^{36}$erg s$^{-1}$ (the rising),
274: $1.6\times 10^{37}$erg s$^{-1}$ (the peaking) and $8.9\times 10^{36}$erg s$^{-1}$ (the decaying).
275:
276:
277: \section{Discussion and summary}
278:
279:
280: IGR J17098-3628 may have stepped into an active phase in the beginning of 2005. INTEGRAL detected a days-long
281: outburst extending up to energies of $\sim$200 keV. A similar outburst is detected in the soft X-ray (1.5-12 keV) band,
282: however the onset of the outburst lags the hard X-ray outburst by $\sim$2 days, in a fashion reminiscent of X-ray novae
283: like XN 1124-683 \citep{nova}.
284: The spectral analysis of the initial stages of the outburst detected by INTEGRAL supports the association with X-ray novae
285: (Grebenev et al. 2007), the cool disk temperature and small inner radius of the accretion disk both suggest that
286: IGR J17098-3628 is a newly discovered black hole system. Current theoretical models of the formation of X-ray novae
287: include the mass transfer instability (MTI) model \citep{hkl86}, the disk thermal instability (DTI) model
288: (Cannizzo et al. 1982; Faulkner et al. 1983; Meyer \& Meyer-Hofmeister 1984; Huang \& Wheeler 1989; Mineshige \& Wheeler 1989; Ichikawa et al. 1994)
289: Unfortunately, the only way to discriminate between these models relies
290: on detailed differences in the observed soft energy spectrum of the source and so the lack of any detailed X-ray spectra
291: of the IGR J17098-3628 outburst in this energy band prevents us from drawing any conclusions on the X-ray nova mechanism
292: for IGR J17098-3628. That the three episodes of the hard X-ray outburst observed by INTEGRAL have to be described by different
293: models might suggest rather strong time evolution. i.e., the spectral index changed from $\sim$ 1.7 when rising to
294: roughly 2.6 when decaying suggesting the cooling of the source.
295:
296:
297:
298: Although the time variability of X-ray novae is not well understood theoretically, observations of a variety of
299: X-ray novae not only show that the hard X-ray flux often rises and peaks earlier than the outburst in soft X-rays,
300: but can also show precursor events at hard X-rays several days prior to the main outburst (Chen et al. 1997).
301: While it is not possible to associate the outburst in IGR J17098-3628 with any particular X-ray nova mechanism spectrally,
302: it is clear that the typical accretion scenario for the low mass X-ray binaries holding a black hole is not capable of reproducing the observed lag
303: between the hard and soft X-ray outbursts. In this scenario, the soft X-rays are produced by the accretion disk,
304: while the hard X-rays are produced by comptonization of soft seed photons in the inner part of the accretion disk
305: \citep{disalvo,stella}. Clearly, large changes
306: in the hard X-ray flux can, at best, be coeval with large changes in the soft X-ray seed photons and cannot precede
307: variations of the soft X-ray photons that the process of comptonization relies on to produce the hard X-ray tail.
308: One potential mechanism that may reproduce the observed lag is for an instability in the disk to trigger the formation
309: of a temporary jet, which produces hard X-rays via inverse comptonization, in advance of any change in the flux of soft
310: X-rays from the disk.
311:
312: A more straightforward scenario in understanding this different time behaviour between the hard and the soft X-rays
313: may lie in the tie-up with the structure of the accretion flow.
314: The precursor event can be explained as the transition from the "hard" state to "soft" state in the BHC system.
315: The accretion time in the inner parts of the disk is much smaller
316: than the duration of X-ray nova's outburst therefore changes in the
317: spectral state of these sources are connected with general changes in
318: structure of the accretion flow rather than in changes in number of
319: soft seed photons for Comptonization. Observations show that all BH
320: systems have the hard Comptonized spectrum at low
321: accretion rates and the soft DBB(disc blackbody) spectrum (with a possible weak hard
322: tail) at high accretion rates. This may be connected with approaching
323: of the inner radius of a cold accretion disk to the radius of
324: marginally stable orbit when the accretion rate increases. The
325: observed lag between outbursts in hard X-rays and soft X-ray may be
326: directly connected with this observed dependence: the accretion rate
327: is small at the initial stage of the outburst thus the spectrum is
328: hard and the outburst is observed in hard X-rays, but later the
329: accretion rate rises and the spectrum becomes soft thus the outburst
330: is observed in soft X-rays.
331:
332:
333:
334: Although no clear statement can be made regarding their nature, the discovery the lag/precursor event revealed by the concurrent RXTE ASM and INTEGRAL observations in 2005, is important piece of the IGR J17098-3628 puzzle that will help to resolve the as yet unknown nature of this perplexing source.
335:
336: %\begin{acknowledgments}
337: %\newline
338: %\acknowledgments
339: %\linebreak[4]
340: %\newpage
341: \section{Acknowledgement}
342: The authors are highly grateful to the anonymous referee for his/her many valuable comments that are great helpful to improve the paper. The authors would like to thank Prof. Cui Wei for his many valuable comments, especially regarding the details of the ASM data. This work was subsidised by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the CAS key Project KJCX2-YW-T03. J.-M. Wang would like to thank the Natural Science Foundation of China for support via NSFC-10325313, 10521001, 10733010, C.-M. Zhang would like to thank the Natural Science Foundation of China for support via NSFC-10773017, and N. J. Schurch would like to thank the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (UK) for support via a UK-China Fellowship for Excellence.
343:
344: \newpage
345:
346: \begin{thebibliography}{}
347:
348: \bibitem[Bodaghee et al. (2007) ]{boda}
349: Bodaghee, A., Courvoisier, T. J.-L., Rodriguez, J., et al. 2007, A\&A, 467, 585
350: \bibitem[Cannizzo et al. (1982) ]{cgw82}
351: Cannizzo, J.K., Ghosh, P., \& Wheeler, J.C.\ 1982, ApJ, 260, L83
352: \bibitem[Chen et al. (1997) ]{nova}
353: Chen, W. , Shrader, C.R., \& Mario L. 1997, ApJ, 491, 312
354: \bibitem[Di Salvo et al. (2004) ]{disalvo}
355: Di Salvo, T., Santangelo, A., \& Segreto, A. 2004, NuPhS, 132, 446
356: \bibitem[Di Salvo, \& Stella (2002) ]{stella}
357: Di Salvo, T., \& Stella, L. 2002, to appear in the XXII Moriond Astrophysics
358: Meeting "The Gamma-Ray Universe" (Les Arcs, March 9-16, 2002), eds. A. Goldwurm,
359: D. Neumann, and J. Tran Thanh Van, The Gioi Publishers (Vietnam), astro-ph/0207219
360: \bibitem[Faulkner et al. (1983) ]{flp83} Faulkner, J., Lin, D.N.C., \& Papaloizou, J.\ 1983, MNRAS, 205, 359
361: \bibitem[Grebenev et al. (2005a) ]{source}
362: Grebenev, S.A., Molkov, S.V., \& Sunyaev R.A.\ 2005a, ATel, 444
363: \bibitem[Grebenev et al. (2005b) ]{spe}
364: Grebenev, S.A., Molkov, S.V., Revnivtsev, M.G., \& Sunyaev, R.A.\ 2005b, ATel, 447
365: \bibitem[Grebenev et al. (2007) ]{gre07}
366: Grebenev, S. A., Molcov, S. V., Revnivtsev, M.G., \& Sunyaev, R.A.\ 2007, Proceedings of the 6th INTEGRAL Workshop 'The Obscured Universe', ESA SP-622, page 373, astro-ph/07092313
367: \bibitem[Gruber et al. (1996) ]{gruber96}
368: Gruber, D.E., Blanco, P.R., Heindl, W.A., et al. 1996, A\&AS, 120, 641
369: \bibitem[Hameury et al. (1986) ]{hkl86} Hameury, J.M., King, A.R., \& Lasota, J.-P.\ 1986, A\&A, 162, 71
370: \bibitem[Huang \& Wheeler (1989) ]{hw89} Huang, M., \& Wheeler, J.C.\ 1989, ApJ, 343, 229
371: \bibitem[Ichikawa et al. (1994) ]{ich94} Ichikawa, S., Mineshige, S., \& Kato, T.\ 1994, ApJ, 435, 748
372: \bibitem[Kennea et al. (2005) ]{kenn}
373: Kennea, J.A., Burrows, D.N., Nousek, J.A., et al. 2005, ATel, 476
374: \bibitem[Kennea et al. (2007) ]{kenn2}
375: Kennea, J.A., Capitanio, F. 2007, ATel, 1140
376: \bibitem[Kong (2005) ]{kong}
377: Kong, A.K.H. 2005, ATel, 477
378: \bibitem[Lund et al. (2003) ]{jemx}
379: Lund, N., Budtz-J\o rgensen, C., Westergaard, N.J., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L231
380: \bibitem[Mas-Hesse et al. (2003) ]{omc}
381: Mas-Hesse, J.M., Gim\'enez, A., Culhane, J.L., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L261
382: \bibitem[Meyer \& Meyer-Hofmeister (1984) ]{mmh84} Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E.\ 1984, A\&A, 132, 143
383: \bibitem[Mineshige \& Wheeler (1989) ]{mw89} Mineshige, S., \& Wheeler, J.C. \ 1989, ApJ, 343, 241
384: \bibitem[Mowlavi et al. (2005) ]{453}
385: Mowlavi, N., Kuulkers, E., Rodriguez, J., et al. 2005, ATel, 453
386: \bibitem[Rupen et al. (2005) ]{radio}
387: Rupen, M.P., Mioduszewski, A.J., \& Dhawan, V. 2005, ATel, 490
388: \bibitem[Steeghs et al. (2005) ]{stee}
389: Steeghs, D., Torres, M.A.P., Jonker, P.G., et al. 2005, ATel, 478
390: \bibitem[Swank (1994) ]{swank94}
391: Swank, J.H. 1994, AAS, 185.6701
392: \bibitem[Ubertini et al. (2003) ]{ibis}
393: Ubertini, P., Lebrun, F., Di Cocco, G., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L131
394: \bibitem[Vedrenne et al. (2003) ]{esa}
395: Vedrenne, G., Roques, J.-P., Sch\"onfelder, V., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L63
396: \bibitem[Winkler et al. (2003) ]{Win}
397: Winkler, C. Courvoisier, T. J.-L., Di Cocco, G., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L1
398:
399:
400: \end{thebibliography}
401:
402: \newpage
403: \begin{table}[ptbptbptb]
404: \begin{center}
405: \label{tab1}
406: \caption{INTEGRAL IBIS/ISGRI Observations of IGR J17091-3624 and J17098-3628 in the 20--40 keV band for those with the detection significance (signal to noise ratio) larger than 3$\sigma$.}
407: \vspace{5pt}
408: \begin{tabular}{cccccccccc}
409: \hline \hline
410: Label & Revolution & Start Date & End Date & Exposure (ks) & IGR J17091-3624 & IGR J17098-3628\\
411: & & & & & counts/s (significance)& counts/s (significance)\\
412: \hline
413: T1 &0037--0063 & 2003-02-01 & 2003-04-22 & 593 & 0.35(8.6) & -\\
414: \hline
415: T2 & 0100--0120 & 2003-08-09 & 2003-10-07 & 652 &1.64(41.8) & -\\
416: \hline
417: T3 &0164--0185 & 2004-02-16 & 2004-04-19 & 360 & 2.51(44.9) & -\\
418: \hline
419: T4 &0224--0246 & 2004-08-15 & 2004-10-20 & 477 & - & -\\
420: \hline
421: T5 & 0286--0297 & 2005-02-15 & 2005-03-22 & 456 & - & -\\
422: \hline
423: T6 &0298--0299 & 2005-03-23 & 2005-03-28 & 152 & - & 6.08(73.4)\\
424: \hline
425: T7 &0300--0307 & 2005-04-02 & 2005-04-21 & 341 & - & 0.96(16.9)\\
426: \hline
427: T8 & 0345--0370 & 2005-08-10 & 2005-10-26 & 386 & - & -\\
428: \hline
429: T9 &0406--0423 & 2006-02-09 & 2006-04-03 & 337 & - & 0.49(7.8)\\
430: \hline
431: \end{tabular}
432: \end{center}
433: \end{table}
434:
435: \newpage
436:
437: \begin{table}[ptbptbptb]
438: \begin{center}
439: \label{tab2}
440: \caption{The spectral index and reduced $\chi^2$ resulting from the fitting of
441: ISGRI data in the 20--200 keV band with different models}
442: \vspace{5pt}
443: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
444: \hline
445: \hline
446: Date & Pow law & Cutoff pow law & Broken pow law \\
447: (phase) & $ \alpha$ & $ \alpha$ & $ \alpha$ \\
448: & ($\chi^2$/$\nu$) & ($\chi^2$/$\nu$) & ($\chi^2$/$\nu$) \\
449: \hline
450: 03-23 03:13..03-25 02:35 & $1.74^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$ & $1.61^{+0.3}_{-1.8}(<464 keV)$ & $1.74^{+0.25}_{-0.25}(>3.7 keV)$ \\
451: (rising phase) & (0.71) & (0.78) & (0.88) \\
452: \hline
453: 03-25 23:03..03-27 00:51 & $2.13^{+0.06}_{-0.06}$ & $1.54^{+0.27}_{-0.27}(<82 keV)$ & $2.13^{+0.06}_{-0.06}(>5.5 keV)$ \\
454: (peaking phase) & (1.49) & (0.95) & (1.60) \\
455: \hline
456: 03-27 00:53..03-28 11:15 & $2.60^{+0.08}_{-0.08}$ & $2.16^{+0.33}_{-0.36}(<95 keV)$ & $2.60^{+0.08}_{-0.08}(>7.4 keV)$ \\
457: (decaying phase) & (0.86) & (0.72) & (0.93) \\
458: \hline
459: \end{tabular}
460: \end{center}
461: \end{table}
462:
463: \newpage
464:
465: \begin{table}[ptbptbptb]
466: \begin{center}
467: \caption{Modelling to the ISGRI data from the rising phase of the hard X-ray outburst.}
468: \vspace{5pt}
469: \label{fit_1}
470: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
471: \hline
472: \hline
473: model & $N$& $ \alpha$& $\chi^2$/$\nu$& d.o.f & $F$(20--200 keV)\\
474: & ${\rm keV}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ at 1 keV & & & & erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \\
475: \hline
476: powerlaw & $0.036^{+0.064}_{-0.036}$& $1.74^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$& 0.71& 10& $4.0\times 10^{-10}$\\
477: \hline
478: \end{tabular}
479: \end{center}
480: \end{table}
481:
482: \newpage
483:
484: \begin{table}[ptbptbptb]
485: \begin{center}
486: \caption{Modelling to the ISGRI data from the peaking phase of the hard X-ray outburst.}
487: \vspace{5pt}
488: \label{fit_2}
489: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
490: \hline
491: \hline
492: model & $N$& $ E_{\kappa}$&$ \alpha$& $\chi^2$/$\nu$& d.o.f & $F$(20-200 keV)\\
493: & ${\rm keV}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ at 1 keV & keV & & & & erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \\
494: \hline
495: cutoffpl & $0.12^{+0.14}_{-0.07}$& $82^{+65}_{-26}$& $1.54^{+0.27}_{-0.27}$& 0.95& 27& $1.2\times 10^{-09}$\\
496: \hline
497: \end{tabular}
498: \end{center}
499: \end{table}
500:
501: \newpage
502:
503: \begin{table}[ptbptbptb]
504: \begin{center}
505: \caption{Modelling to the combined ISGRI/JEMX data from the decaying phase of the hard X-ray outburst.}
506: \vspace{5pt}
507: \label{fit_3}
508: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
509: \hline
510: \hline
511: model & $N$&$ \alpha_{1}$& $ E_{break}$&$ \alpha_{2}$& $\chi^2$/$\nu$& d.o.f & $F$(5-200 keV)\\
512: & ${\rm keV}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ at 1 keV & & keV & & & & erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \\
513: \hline
514: bknpower & $0.08^{+0.14}_{-0.06}$& $0.85^{+0.53}_{-0.79}$& $7.19^{+0.28}_{-0.49}$& $2.66^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$&1.07& 133& $1.9\times 10^{-09}$\\
515: \hline
516: \end{tabular}
517: \end{center}
518: \end{table}
519:
520: \newpage
521:
522:
523:
524: \begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
525: \centering
526: \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.7]{f1.eps}
527: \caption{ASM light curves (1.5--12 keV) of IGR J17098-3628 with each bin representing a dwell (top) or average over month (middle) timescales
528: between 1996 and 2008. In the middle panel, the available INTEGRAL observations are shown by the bars. ASM light curve (1.5--12 keV) of GX349+2
529: is presented in the bottom panel, with each bin representing average over month timescales between 1996 and 2008. }
530: \label{asm_lc}
531: \end{figure}
532:
533: %\begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
534: % \centering
535: % \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.7]{isgri_T3.eps}
536: % \caption{The 20-40 keV significance map from IBIS/ISGRI of IGR J17098-3628. The countours start at detection significance level of 10 $\sigma$, with the step of 10 %$\sigma$ for the time period during T3 (2004-02-16 to 2004-04-19).
537: % }
538: % \label{skymap_t3}
539: % \end{figure}
540:
541:
542:
543: \begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
544: \centering
545: \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.7]{f2.eps}
546: \caption{The 20-40 keV significance map from IBIS/ISGRI of IGR J17091-3624. The contours start at detection significance level of 10 $\sigma$, with the step of 10 $\sigma$ for the time period during the hard X-ray outburst (March 23--28, 2005).
547: }
548: \label{skymap2}
549: \end{figure}
550:
551: \begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
552: \centering
553: \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.7]{f3.eps}
554: \caption{The 3-6 keV significance map from JEMX of IGR J17098-3628. The contours start at detection significance level of 10 $\sigma$, with the step of 5 $\sigma$ for the time period during April 2--21, 2005.}
555: \label{skymap1}
556: \end{figure}
557:
558:
559: \begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
560:
561: \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.7] {f4.eps}
562: \caption{Lightcurves from ASM and JEMX in the 3--12 keV band, with each bin averaged over the individual data group in T5-T9. The hard X-ray outburst is marked by the red circle. }
563: \label{asm-jemx}
564: \end{figure}
565:
566:
567: \begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
568: \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.7] {f5.eps}
569: \caption{Lightcurves of IGR J17098-3628 covering the March 2005 days-duration outburst. {\it Upper panel}: 1.5-12 keV ASM lightcurve (1-day binsize). {\it Lower Panel}: 20-80 keV INTEGRAL/ISGRI lightcurve (0.2-day bin size).}
570: \label{asm-integral}
571: \end{figure}
572:
573:
574:
575: \begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
576:
577: \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.7] {f6.eps}
578: \caption{Lightcurves from ASM (1.5--3 keV), JEMX (3--6keV, 6--10, 10--15 keV) and ISGRI (20--40 keV, 40--60keV), with each bin averaged over the individual data group T5-T9. The hard X-ray outburst is marked by the red circle. }
579: \label{asm-jemx-isgri}
580: \end{figure}
581:
582:
583:
584:
585: \begin{figure}[ptbptbptb]
586: % \includegraphics[width=8in,height=6in,angle=0, scale=0.7] {fig11.ps}
587: \includegraphics[angle=-90, scale=0.7] {f7.eps}
588: \caption{Spectral fit of a broken power-law model to the combined ISGRI/JEMX data obtained during the decaying phase of the hard X-ray outburst. }
589: \label{spe_3}
590: \end{figure}
591:
592:
593:
594:
595: \end{document}
596: