1: \documentclass[aps,preprint]{revtex4}%
2: \usepackage{amsfonts}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}%
6: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
7: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
8: %TCIDATA{Version=5.50.0.2952}
9: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex4.cst}
10: %TCIDATA{Created=Sunday, August 10, 2008 06:36:10}
11: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Wednesday, June 10, 2009 21:23:34}
12: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="SaveForMode" CONTENT="1">}
14: %TCIDATA{BibliographyScheme=Manual}
15: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="Articles\SW\REVTeX 4">}
16: %BeginMSIPreambleData
17: \providecommand{\U}[1]{\protect\rule{.1in}{.1in}}
18: %EndMSIPreambleData
19: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
20: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}
21: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}
22: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}
23: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}
24: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}
25: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}
26: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
27: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
28: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}
29: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
30: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
31: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}
32: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
33: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}
34: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}
35: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
36: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
37: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}
38: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}
39: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\noindent\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}
40: \begin{document}
41: \preprint{ }
42: \title[QED$_{3}$]{Infrared behaviour of the fermion propagator in unquenched QED$_{3}$ with
43: finite threshold effects}
44: \author{Yuichi Hoshino}
45: \affiliation{Kushiro National College of Technology,Otanoshike Nishi 2-32-1,Kushiro
46: City,HOkkaido 084,Japan}
47: \keywords{confinement,low-dimensional field theory}
48: \pacs{PACS number}
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: To remove the linear infrared divergences in quenched approximation we include
52: the massive fermion loop to the photon spectral function.Spectral function of
53: fermion has no one particle singularity if we fix the anomalous dimension to
54: be unity.In the case of $N$ flavour,$N$ dependence of order parameter is mild
55: which may be due to screening effects.
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58: \eid{identifier}
59: \date{}
60: \startpage{101}
61: \endpage{102}
62: \maketitle
63: \tableofcontents
64:
65:
66: \section{Introduction}
67:
68: To study the infrared behavior of the propagator in QED$_{2+1}$,we evaluated
69: the spectral function which is known as the Bloch-Nordsieck approximation in
70: four dimension.In quenched case linear and logarithmic infrared divergences
71: appear in the order $e^{2}$ spectral function $F$.Exponentiation of $F$ yields
72: full propagator with all order of infrared divergences.In four dimension
73: anomalous dimension modifies the short distance singularity at least for weak
74: coupling,which leads cut structure near the mass shell.For fixed infrared
75: cut-off we expand the function $F$ and find a mass shift,its log correction
76: and anomalous dimension of wave function.To avoid the infrared divergences we
77: choose the gauge $d=-1$ and include effects of massive fermion loops to the
78: photon spectral function.The resutls have no infrared divergence but the
79: effects of finite threshold seems to make oscillation of the propagator.If we
80: set the anomalous dimension to be unity short distance singularity
81: disappears,chiral symmetry breaks dynamically, and the spectral function has
82: $-\delta^{\prime}(p^{2}/m^{2}-1)$ like singularity which shows the absence of
83: one particle state and vanishment of $Z_{2}^{-1}$.
84:
85: \section{Spectral representation of the propagator}
86:
87: \subsection{\bigskip Fermion}
88:
89: In this section we show how to evalute the fermion propagator non
90: pertubatively by the spectral represntation which preserves unitarity and
91: analyticity [1,2,3]. Assuming parity conservation we adopt 4-component spinor.
92: The spectral function of the fermion in (2+1) dimension is defined
93: \begin{align}
94: \left\langle 0|T(\psi(x)\overline{\psi}(y)|0\right\rangle & =i\int
95: \frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}e^{-ip\cdot(x-y)}\int_{0}^{\infty}ds\frac{\gamma\cdot
96: p\rho_{1}(s)+\rho_{2}(s)}{p^{2}-s+i\epsilon},\\
97: \rho(p) & =-\frac{1}{\pi}\operatorname{Im}S_{F}(p)=\gamma\cdot p\rho
98: _{1}(p)+\rho_{2}(p)\nonumber\\
99: & =(2\pi)^{2}\sum_{n}\delta^{(3)}(p-p_{n})\left\langle 0|\psi
100: (x)|n\right\rangle \left\langle n|\overline{\psi}(0)|0\right\rangle .
101: \end{align}
102: In the quenched approximation the state $|n>$ stands for a fermion and
103: arbitrary numbers of photons,%
104: \begin{equation}
105: |n>=|r;k_{1},...,k_{n}>,r^{2}=m^{2}.
106: \end{equation}
107: In deriving the matrix element $\left\langle 0|\psi(x)|n\right\rangle $ we
108: must take into occount the soft photon emission vertex which is written in the
109: textbook for the scattering of charged particle by external electromagnetic
110: fied or collision of charged particles.Based on low-energy theorem the most
111: singular contribution for the matrix element $T_{n}=\left\langle \Omega
112: |\psi|r;k_{1},....,k_{n}\right\rangle $ is known as the soft photons attached
113: to external line.Ward-Takahashi-identity
114: \begin{align}
115: T_{n} & =\epsilon_{\mu}^{n}T_{n}^{\mu},\nonumber\\
116: k_{\mu}^{n}T_{n}^{\mu}(r;k_{1},..kn) & =eT_{n-1}(r;k_{1,}..k_{n-1}),k_{\mu
117: }^{n2}\neq0
118: \end{align}
119: is proved to be satisfied with the use of LSZ reduction formula[2].We have an
120: approximate solution of (4)
121: \begin{equation}
122: T_{n}|_{k_{n}^{2}=0}=e\frac{\gamma\cdot\epsilon}{\gamma\cdot(r+k_{n}%
123: )-m}T_{n-1}.
124: \end{equation}
125: From this relation the n-photon matrix element is replaced by the products of
126: $T_{1}$
127: \begin{equation}
128: T_{n}T_{n}^{+}\gamma_{0}\rightarrow%
129: %TCIMACRO{\dprod \limits_{j=1}^{n}}%
130: %BeginExpansion
131: {\displaystyle\prod\limits_{j=1}^{n}}
132: %EndExpansion
133: T_{1}(k_{j})T_{1}^{+}(k_{j})\gamma_{0}.
134: \end{equation}
135: By one-photon matrix element[4]
136: \begin{equation}
137: T_{1}=-ie\frac{\gamma\cdot(r+k)+m}{(r+k)^{2}-m^{2}+i\epsilon}\gamma_{\mu
138: }\epsilon_{\lambda}^{\mu}(k)U_{S}(r),
139: \end{equation}
140: and the function
141: \begin{equation}
142: F=\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{2}}\exp(ik\cdot x)\theta(k_{0})\delta(k^{2}%
143: )\sum\limits_{\lambda,S}T_{1}\overline{T_{1}},
144: \end{equation}
145: where polarization sum we have%
146: \begin{equation}
147: \Pi^{\mu\nu}(k)=\sum_{\lambda}\epsilon_{\lambda}^{\mu}(k)\epsilon_{\lambda
148: }^{\nu}(k)=-(g^{\mu\nu}-\frac{k^{\mu}k^{\nu}}{k^{2}})-d\frac{k^{\mu}k^{\nu}%
149: }{k^{2}}.
150: \end{equation}
151: The infinite sum $\sum_{n=0}T_{n}T_{n}^{+}\gamma_{0}/n!$ leads an $\exp(F)$.In
152: this way we obtain a dressed fermion propagator with soft photon
153: \begin{equation}
154: S_{F}(x)=-(\frac{i\gamma\cdot\partial}{m}+1)\int\frac{md^{2}r}{(2\pi)^{2}%
155: \sqrt{r^{2}+m^{2}}}\exp(ir\cdot x)\exp(F),
156: \end{equation}
157: where $F$ is known as model independent
158: \begin{equation}
159: F=-\frac{e^{2}}{2}(\frac{\gamma\cdot r+m}{m})\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{2}}%
160: \exp(ik\cdot x)\theta(k^{0})\delta(k^{2})[\frac{m^{2}}{(r\cdot k)^{2}}%
161: +\frac{1}{(r\cdot k)}+\frac{d-1}{k^{2}}],
162: \end{equation}
163: here we used covaiant$\ d$ gauge photon propagator and $\delta(k^{2})$ is read
164: as the imaginary part of the free photon propagator at on shell.In our
165: approximation two kinds of spectral function satisfy $\rho_{2}=m\rho_{1}.$
166:
167: \subsection{\bigskip Photon}
168:
169: For unquenched case we use the dressed photon with massive fermion loop with
170: $N$ \ flavours.Spectral functions for dressed photon are given by vacuum
171: polarization [5,6]%
172: \begin{align}
173: \Pi_{\mu\nu}(k) & \equiv ie^{2}\int\overline{d^{3}}pTr(\gamma_{\mu}\frac
174: {1}{\gamma\cdot p-m}\gamma_{\nu}\frac{1}{\gamma\cdot(p-k)-m})\nonumber\\
175: & =-e^{2}\frac{T_{\mu\nu}}{8\pi}[(\sqrt{k^{2}}+\frac{4m^{2}}{\sqrt{k^{2}}%
176: })\ln(\frac{2m+\sqrt{k^{2}}}{2m-\sqrt{k^{2}}})-4m],\\
177: T_{\mu\nu} & =(g_{\mu\nu}-\frac{k_{\mu}k_{\nu}}{k^{2}}),\overline{d^{3}%
178: }p=\frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}},\nonumber
179: \end{align}%
180: \begin{equation}
181: D_{\mu\nu}^{-1}(k)\equiv-(T_{\mu\nu}k^{2}+dk_{\mu}k_{\nu})+\Pi_{\mu\nu}(k).
182: \end{equation}
183: Polarization function $\Pi(k)$ is
184: \begin{align}
185: \Pi(k) & =-\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}[(\sqrt{-k^{2}}+\frac{4m^{2}}{\sqrt{-k^{2}}}%
186: )\ln(\frac{2m+\sqrt{-k^{2}}}{2m-\sqrt{-k^{2}}})-4m],\nonumber\\
187: & =-\frac{e^{2}}{8}i\sqrt{-k^{2}}(-k^{2}>0,m=0),\\
188: & =\frac{e^{2}}{6\pi m}k^{2}+O(k^{4})(-k^{2}/m\ll1).
189: \end{align}
190: Fermion mass is assumed to be generated dynamically.In quenched case it is
191: shown that $m$ is proportional to $e^{2}$[2].For massless case or high-energy
192: limit we have for number of $N$ fermion flavour
193: \begin{equation}
194: \rho_{\gamma}^{D}(k)=\frac{1}{\pi}\operatorname{Im}D_{F}(k)=\frac{c\sqrt
195: {k^{2}}}{k^{2}(k^{2}+c^{2})},c=\frac{e^{2}N}{8},
196: \end{equation}%
197: \begin{equation}
198: D_{\mu\nu}(k)=-T_{\mu\nu}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\rho_{\gamma}(\mu^{2})d\mu
199: ^{2}}{k^{2}-\mu^{2}+i\epsilon}-d\frac{k_{\mu}k_{\nu}}{(k^{2}-i\epsilon)^{2}}.
200: \end{equation}
201: If we include finite threshold effects of massive fermion pair we have
202: \begin{equation}
203: \rho_{\gamma}^{F}(k)=\frac{1}{\pi}\Im D_{F}(k)=\delta(k^{2})+\frac{1}{\pi}%
204: \Im\frac{1}{(-k^{2}-\Pi(-k^{2}))}\theta(-k^{2}-4m^{2}).
205: \end{equation}
206:
207:
208: \section{Analysis in position space}
209:
210: To evaluate the function $F$ it is helpful to use the exponential
211: cut-off(infrared cut-off)[2,3].Using the bare photon propagator with bare mass
212: $\mu$ ;$D_{F}^{(0)}(x)_{+}=\exp(-\mu|x|)/8\pi i|x|.$The function $F$ is
213: written in the following form%
214: \begin{equation}
215: F=ie^{2}m^{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\alpha d\alpha D_{F}(x+\alpha r)-e^{2}\int
216: _{0}^{\infty}d\alpha D_{F}(x+\alpha r)-i(d-1)e^{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial
217: \mu^{2}}D_{F}(x,\mu^{2}).
218: \end{equation}
219: The above formulea are derived by the parameter tric%
220: \begin{align}
221: \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow0}\int_{0}^{\infty}d\alpha\exp(-\alpha(\epsilon
222: -ik\cdot r)) & =\frac{i}{k\cdot r},\nonumber\\
223: \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow0}\int_{0}^{\infty}\alpha d\alpha\exp(-\alpha
224: (\epsilon-ik\cdot r)) & =-\frac{1}{(k\cdot r)^{2}}.
225: \end{align}
226: In this case we have%
227: \begin{align}
228: F & =\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}[\frac{\exp(-\mu|x|)-\mu|x|E_{1}(\mu|x|)}{\mu}%
229: -\frac{E_{1}(\mu|x|)}{m}\nonumber\\
230: & +\frac{(d-1)\exp(-\mu\left\vert x\right\vert ))}{2\mu}],|x|=\sqrt{x^{2}}%
231: \end{align}
232: where $\mu$ is a bare photon mass.Short distance behaiviour of $F$ has the
233: following form%
234: \begin{equation}
235: F\sim\frac{e^{2}(1+d)}{16\pi\mu}+\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi m}(\gamma+(1+m|x|)\ln
236: (\mu\left\vert x\right\vert ))-\frac{(d+1-2\gamma)e^{2}|x|}{16\pi},(\mu
237: |x|\ll1).
238: \end{equation}
239: Long distance behaviour is given by the asymptotic expansion of $E_{1}%
240: (\mu|x|)$%
241: \begin{equation}
242: E_{1}(z)\sim\frac{\exp(-z)}{z}\{1-\frac{1}{z}+\frac{1\cdot2}{z^{2}}%
243: -\frac{1\cdot2\cdot3}{z^{3}}+...\},(|\arg z|<\frac{3}{2}\pi),
244: \end{equation}%
245: \begin{equation}
246: F\sim-\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}[\frac{\exp(-\mu|x|)}{\mu^{2}|x|}+\frac{\exp(-\mu
247: |x|)}{m\mu|x|}+\frac{(d-1)\exp(-\mu|x|)}{2\mu}],(\mu|x|\gg1).
248: \end{equation}
249: where $\gamma$ is an Euler constant.In (20) linear term in $\left\vert
250: x\right\vert $ is understood as the finite mass shift from the form of the
251: propagator in position space (9,25) and $\left\vert x\right\vert \ln
252: (\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )$ term is position dependent mass
253: \begin{align}
254: m & =m_{0}+\frac{e^{2}}{16\pi}(1+d-2\gamma)+\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi m}\mu,\\
255: m(x) & =m-\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}\ln(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert ),
256: \end{align}
257: which has mass changing effects at short distance and it will be discussed in
258: section 4.These mass terms has different gauge dependence from that obtained
259: by self-energy in the Dyson-Schwinger equation.Here we notice that the
260: propagator in poition space can be written%
261: \begin{align}
262: S_{F}(x) & =-(i\gamma\cdot\partial+m)\frac{1}{4\pi|x|}\left(
263: \begin{array}
264: [c]{c}%
265: \exp(-m|x|)A(\mu|x|)^{D+C|x|}(\mu|x|\ll1)\\
266: \exp(-m|x|)(\mu|x|\gg1)
267: \end{array}
268: \right) ,\nonumber\\
269: & =i\gamma\cdot\partial S_{V}(x)+S_{S}(x),
270: \end{align}
271: where%
272: \begin{equation}
273: A=\exp(\frac{e^{2}(1+d)}{16\pi\mu}+\frac{e^{2}\gamma}{8\pi m}),C=\frac{e^{2}%
274: }{8\pi},D=\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi m}.
275: \end{equation}
276: For the finitenes of the value $S_{F}(0)$ we imply $D=1.$In this case the
277: physical mass equals to $m=e^{2}/8\pi$ and fermion may be confined for finite
278: $\mu$.Here we apply the spectral function of photon to evaluate the unquenched
279: fermion proagator.We simply integrate the function $F(x,\mu)$ for quenched
280: case which is given in (19),where $\mu$ is a photon mass.Spectral function of
281: photon with massless fermion loop is given in (13) and we have
282: \begin{equation}
283: \rho_{\gamma}^{D}(\mu)=\frac{c}{\pi\mu(\mu^{2}+c^{2})},Z_{3}^{-1}=\int
284: _{0}^{\infty}2\rho_{\gamma}^{D}(\mu)\mu d\mu=1.
285: \end{equation}
286: In this case the spectral function of the fermion is given
287: \begin{equation}
288: \widetilde{\rho}(x)=\int_{0}^{\infty}2\rho_{\gamma}^{D}(\mu)\exp(F(x,\mu
289: ))d\mu.
290: \end{equation}
291: In this way the short distance fermion propagator with $N$ flavours is
292: modified in the gauge $d=-1$
293: \begin{equation}
294: S_{F}(x)=-(i\gamma\cdot\partial+m)\frac{\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}%
295: {4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert }\widetilde{\rho}(x).
296: \end{equation}
297: For the case of $N$ fermion flavour we assume the physical mass $m$ as
298: $m=c/N\pi.$In the whole region of $|x|$ we evaluate $\widetilde{\rho}(x)$
299: numerically including finite threshold effect for the photon spectral function
300: with massive fermion loop
301: \begin{equation}
302: \widetilde{\rho}(x)=\int_{4m^{2}}^{\infty}\exp(F(s,x))\rho_{\gamma}^{F}(s)ds.
303: \end{equation}
304: The renormalization constant $Z_{3}^{-1}$ is defined as the residue of pole
305: \begin{equation}
306: Z_{3}^{-1}=1+\int_{4m^{2}}^{\infty}\rho_{\gamma}^{F}(s)ds.
307: \end{equation}
308: We set the mass $m=c/N\pi$ and see the $N$ dependence of $Z_{3}^{-1}$ for weak
309: coupling $c=1/8$ in Fig.1.In Fig.2 we see the screenig effect leads infrared
310: finite spectral function with dynamical fermion mass $m=c/N\pi$ from $N=1$ to
311: $4$ in the gauge $d=-1,c=1/8.$ In comparison with quenched case with finite
312: cut-off $\mu$ these are reduced from unity by screening effects at large distance.
313:
314: .%
315: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{itbphFU}{3.0113in}{3.0113in}{0in}{\Qcb{Fig.1 $Z_{3}^{-1}-1$
316: %for $N=1/2..10,c=1/8.$}}{\Qlb{z}}{z3.eps}%
317: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
318: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
319: %width 3.0113in; height 3.0113in; depth 0in; original-width 7.7089in;
320: %original-height 7.7089in; cropleft "0"; croptop "0.9549";
321: %cropright "0.9549"; cropbottom "0";
322: %filename 'Z3.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
323: %BeginExpansion
324: {\parbox[b]{3.0113in}{\begin{center}
325: \includegraphics[
326: trim=0.000000in 0.000000in 0.347671in 0.347671in,
327: height=3.0113in,
328: width=3.0113in
329: ]%
330: {Z3.eps}%
331: \\
332: Fig.1 $Z_{3}^{-1}-1$ for $N=1/2..10,c=1/8.$%
333: \end{center}}}%
334: %EndExpansion%
335: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ibphFU}{3.0113in}{3.0113in}{0in}{\Qcb{Fig.2.$\widetilde{\rho
336: %}(x)$ for $c=1/8,N=1(bottom),2,3,4(top)|.$}}{\Qlb{1}}{esp.eps}%
337: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
338: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
339: %width 3.0113in; height 3.0113in; depth 0in; original-width 7.7089in;
340: %original-height 7.7089in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
341: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'esp.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
342: %BeginExpansion
343: {\parbox[b]{3.0113in}{\begin{center}
344: \includegraphics[
345: height=3.0113in,
346: width=3.0113in
347: ]%
348: {esp.eps}%
349: \\
350: Fig.2.$\widetilde{\rho}(x)$ for $c=1/8,N=1(bottom),2,3,4(top)|.$%
351: \end{center}}}%
352: %EndExpansion
353:
354:
355: \section{Analysises in momentum space}
356:
357: \subsection{structure in Euclid space}
358:
359: Now we turn to the fermion propagator in momentum space.The momentum space
360: propagator at short distance is given by Fourier transform%
361: \begin{equation}
362: S_{F}(p)=-\int d^{3}x\exp(-ip\cdot x)(i\gamma\cdot\partial+m)\frac
363: {\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert }{4\pi|x|}\exp(F(x)),
364: \end{equation}
365: where
366: \begin{equation}
367: \exp(F(x))=A\exp(D\gamma)(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{D+C\left\vert
368: x\right\vert },D=\frac{c}{N\pi m},C=\frac{c}{N}.
369: \end{equation}
370: First we examine the perturbative effects by expanding $F$ in powers of
371: $e^{2}$ for quenched case at short distace%
372: \begin{align}
373: \exp(F) & =1+F(x)=1+A-B|x|+C|x|\ln(\mu|x|)+D\ln(\mu|x|),\nonumber\\
374: A & =\exp(\frac{e^{2}(1+d)}{16\pi\mu}+\frac{e^{2}\gamma}{8\pi m}%
375: ),B=\frac{(d+1-2\gamma)}{16\pi},C=\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi},D=\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi m}.
376: \end{align}
377: Terms proportional to $B,C$ represents dynamical mass generation correctly.On
378: the other hand it is known that%
379: \begin{equation}
380: \int d^{3}x\exp(-ip\cdot x)\frac{\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}%
381: {4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert }(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{D}=\frac{2m\mu
382: }{(p^{2}+m^{2})^{2}}\text{ for }D=1.\nonumber
383: \end{equation}
384: for Euclidean momentum $p^{2}\geq0.$However above formule are restricted for
385: small $|x|,$we may include the finite range effect and test the high ernergy
386: behaviour for small $\mu$
387: \begin{align}
388: & \int_{0}^{1/\mu}\frac{\exp(-m|x|)}{|x|}(\mu|x|)\frac{\sin(p|x|)}{p|x|}%
389: x^{2}dx\nonumber\\
390: & \rightarrow-\frac{\mu\exp(-m/\mu)\cos(p/\mu)}{p^{2}}+\frac{\mu\exp
391: (-m/\mu)\sin(p/\mu)(m-\mu)}{p^{3}}+O(1/p^{4}).
392: \end{align}
393: Above formula shows the oscillation and the propagator does not dump as
394: $1/p^{4}$.For large $N$ this oscillation effects becomes small as
395: $\mu\rightarrow0.$Numerical solutions of the scalar part of the propagator
396: $S_{S}(p)$ with various $N$ are shown in Fig.3-1, Fig.3-2, for
397: $c=1/8,1,N=1,2,3$ respectively.The boundary condition at $p=0$ is not specfied
398: in our approximation.For weak coupling $c=1/8$ and $c=1$ zero momentum mass
399: for $N=1$ is the largest among them, which has been seen in the
400: Dyson-Schwinger analysis[8].
401:
402: \bigskip%
403: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{itbphFU}{2.9862in}{2.9862in}{0in}{\Qcb{Figure.3-1 $S_{S}(p)$
404: %for $c=1/8,$ $N=1(top),2(middle),3(bottom),p=\exp(\pi/2\sinh(k/5)).$}%
405: %}{\Qlb{4-1-2}}{n1p-2.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
406: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF";
407: %valid_file "F"; width 2.9862in; height 2.9862in; depth 0in;
408: %original-width 7.7089in; original-height 7.7089in; cropleft "0";
409: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
410: %filename 'n1p-2.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
411: %BeginExpansion
412: {\parbox[b]{2.9862in}{\begin{center}
413: \includegraphics[
414: height=2.9862in,
415: width=2.9862in
416: ]%
417: {n1p-2.eps}%
418: \\
419: Figure.3-1 $S_{S}(p)$ for $c=1/8,$ $N=1(top),2(middle),3(bottom),p=\exp
420: (\pi/2\sinh(k/5)).$%
421: \end{center}}}%
422: %EndExpansion%
423: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{itbphFU}{3.0113in}{3.0113in}{0in}{\Qcb{Figure.3-2 $S_{S}(p)$
424: %for $c=1,$ $N=1(bottom),2(middle),3(top),p=\exp(\pi/2\sinh((m/5))$}%
425: %}{\Qlb{4-12}}{n1-p.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
426: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF";
427: %valid_file "F"; width 3.0113in; height 3.0113in; depth 0in;
428: %original-width 5.5564in; original-height 5.5564in; cropleft "0";
429: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
430: %filename 'n1-p.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
431: %BeginExpansion
432: {\parbox[b]{3.0113in}{\begin{center}
433: \includegraphics[
434: height=3.0113in,
435: width=3.0113in
436: ]%
437: {n1-p.eps}%
438: \\
439: Figure.3-2 $S_{S}(p)$ for $c=1,$ $N=1(bottom),2(middle),3(top),p=\exp
440: (\pi/2\sinh((m/5))$%
441: \end{center}}}%
442: %EndExpansion
443:
444:
445: \subsection{\bigskip structure in Minkowski space}
446:
447: Now we derive the propagator in Minkowski momentum region.To do this it is
448: helpful in real time to derive the spectral function[1,9].In Minkowski space
449: we change the variable from $r=\sqrt{x^{2}}$ to $iT.$We may define
450: \begin{equation}
451: \rho(s^{\prime2})=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\exp(-i(s^{\prime
452: 2}/m^{2}-1)T)\operatorname{Im}(\exp(\widetilde{F}(iT))dT,
453: \end{equation}
454: which is normalized to $\delta(s^{2}/m^{2}-1)$ for free case where
455: \begin{equation}
456: \exp(\widetilde{F}(iT))=\int_{4m^{2}}^{\infty}d\sigma\rho^{F}(\sigma
457: )\exp(F(iT,\sqrt{\sigma})).
458: \end{equation}
459: It is understood that the Fourier transformation is performed in $s^{2}$ by
460: the following form
461: \begin{equation}
462: \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dT\exp(-i(m-s)T)+\exp
463: (-i(m+s)T)=2|s|\delta(s^{2}-m^{2}).
464: \end{equation}
465: Taking the imaginary part of the function $\exp(F(\mu,iT))$ at short distance
466: in the gauge $d=-1$ for quenched case for $D=1$
467: \begin{equation}
468: \operatorname{Im}\exp(F(\mu,iT))\approx\exp(-\frac{\pi}{2}CT)\mu T\cos
469: (CT\ln(\mu T)),
470: \end{equation}
471: provided
472: \begin{equation}
473: (i\mu T)^{iCT+D}=\exp(\frac{\pi}{2}(-CT+Di))(\mu T)^{D}(\cos(CT\ln(\mu
474: T))+i\sin(CT\ln(\mu T))).
475: \end{equation}
476: In this way we see the oscillation of the propagator in Minkowski space by the
477: effects of position dependent mass as $m=iCT\ln(iCT).$In Fig.4 we see the
478: profile of real and imaginary part of the function $\exp(F(iT))$ for $c=1,N=1$.
479:
480: \ \ \
481: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{itbphFU}{3.0113in}{3.0113in}{0in}{\Qcb{Fig.4 $\Re
482: %(\exp(\widetilde{F}(iT))$, $\Im(\exp(\widetilde{F}(iT))..$}}{\Qlb{4-1}%
483: %}{mt.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
484: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
485: %width 3.0113in; height 3.0113in; depth 0in; original-width 7.7089in;
486: %original-height 7.7089in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
487: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'MT.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
488: %BeginExpansion
489: {\parbox[b]{3.0113in}{\begin{center}
490: \includegraphics[
491: height=3.0113in,
492: width=3.0113in
493: ]%
494: {MT.eps}%
495: \\
496: Fig.4 $\Re(\exp(\widetilde{F}(iT))$, $\Im(\exp(\widetilde{F}(iT))..$%
497: \end{center}}}%
498: %EndExpansion%
499: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{itbphFU}{3.0113in}{3.0113in}{0in}{\Qcb{Fig.5 $\rho
500: %(s),N=1(bottom),2,3(top).$}}{}{sp2.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
501: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF";
502: %valid_file "F"; width 3.0113in; height 3.0113in; depth 0in;
503: %original-width 7.7089in; original-height 7.7089in; cropleft "0";
504: %croptop "0.9547"; cropright "0.9547"; cropbottom "0";
505: %filename 'sp2.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
506: %BeginExpansion
507: {\parbox[b]{3.0113in}{\begin{center}
508: \includegraphics[
509: trim=0.000000in 0.000000in 0.349213in 0.349213in,
510: height=3.0113in,
511: width=3.0113in
512: ]%
513: {sp2.eps}%
514: \\
515: Fig.5 $\rho(s),N=1(bottom),2,3(top).$%
516: \end{center}}}%
517: %EndExpansion
518:
519:
520: In Fig.5 the spectral function $\rho(s)$ in unit of $e^{2}$ looks symmetric
521: about the point $s=1$.The function $\exp(F(iT))$ is approximated as $i\mu T$
522: \ for small $T$.This fact suggests the singularity of $\rho(s)$ such as the
523: $-\delta^{\prime}(s-1)$.
524:
525: \section{Renormalization constant and order parameter}
526:
527: In this section we consider the renormalization constant in our model.It is
528: easy to evaluate the renormalization constant and bare mass which are defined
529: by assuming multiplicative renormalization
530: \begin{equation}
531: \frac{Z_{2}^{-1}}{\gamma\cdot p-m_{0}}=S_{F}(p).
532: \end{equation}%
533: \begin{align}
534: Z_{2}^{-1} & =\lim_{p\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{4}tr(\gamma\cdot
535: pS_{F}(p))\nonumber\\
536: & =\lim_{p\rightarrow\infty}\int\frac{p^{2}\rho(s)ds}{p^{2}-s+i\epsilon}%
537: =\int\rho(s)ds,
538: \end{align}
539: where $Z_{2\text{ }}$is defined for one particle state in the intial and final
540: state in a weak sense $\psi(x)_{t\rightarrow+\infty,-\infty}\rightarrow
541: \sqrt{Z_{2}}\psi(x)_{out,in}$
542: \begin{equation}
543: Z_{2}(2\pi)^{-2}\theta(p_{0})\delta(p^{2}-m^{2})\equiv|\left\langle
544: p|\psi(0)|0\right\rangle |_{p^{2}=m^{2}}^{2}.
545: \end{equation}
546: However pole part is absent in our approximation and $Z_{2\text{ }}$vanishes
547: for $D>0$ case.For $D=1$ we have%
548: \begin{align}
549: Z_{2}^{-1} & =\int_{0}^{\infty}ds\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dt}{2\pi}%
550: \exp(-i(s-1)t)\Im(\exp(\widetilde{F}(it))\nonumber\\
551: & =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dt\delta_{+}(t)\Im(\exp(\widetilde{F}(it))=0,
552: \end{align}
553: provided $\Im(\exp(\widetilde{F}(it))=0$ in the limit $t_{+}\rightarrow0$ by
554: eq(38)$.$Order parameter for each flavour $\left\langle \overline{\psi}%
555: \psi\right\rangle $ is given
556: \begin{equation}
557: \left\langle \overline{\psi}\psi\right\rangle =-trS_{F}(x).
558: \end{equation}
559: The value of $\left\langle \overline{\psi}\psi\right\rangle $ is
560: $3.1(1.5.,1.0)\times10^{-3}e^{4}$ for $N=1(2,3)$ in $1/N$ which may be
561: compared with $1.2(0.13,0.0002)\times10^{-3}e^{4}$ for $N=1(2,3)$ in the CP
562: vertex with massless loop correction [8].In our approximation $N$ dependence
563: is mild.This may be understood as the large screening effect at small
564: $N.$Recently we solved the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the ladder approximation
565: for axial-scalar which corresponds the psedoscalar in four dimension.For
566: massless boundstate solution we find the $D=e^{2}/4\pi m=1$ from the
567: normalization condition at short distance[9].\qquad
568:
569: \section{Summary}
570:
571: We evaluated the fermion propagator in three dimensional QED with dressed
572: photon by the dispersion method.In the evaluation of lowest order matrix
573: element for fermion spectral function we obtain finite mass shift,wave
574: function renormalization and gauge invariant position dependent mass with bare
575: photon mass $\mu$ as an infrared cut-off..To remove linear infrared
576: divergences we include finite threshold effects of massive fermion loop to the
577: photon spectral function.We set the coupling constant mass ratio $c/N\pi m$ to
578: be unity which is consistent with perurabative analysis of the mass at high
579: energy which is proportional to$1/p^{4}$.In this case the order parameter
580: $\left\langle \overline{\psi}\psi\right\rangle $ becomes finite.In our
581: approximation vacumm expectation value and infrared mass are not sensitive to
582: flavour number $N$ which may due to the screening effects of $Z_{3}^{-1\text{
583: }}$for small $N$.In Minkowski space$.$the spectral fuction is not positive
584: definite and has a form such as $-\delta^{\prime}(p^{2}/m^{2}-1)$.In the
585: strong coupling there seems to be no particle content in the model.In our
586: analysis chiral symmetry breaks dyamically by anomalous dimension.Our results
587: suggests the importance of anomalous dimension to understand confinement.
588:
589: \section{Aknowledgement}
590:
591: The author would like to than Professor Rober Delbourgo for critiques of
592: linear divegrgence.
593:
594: \section{References}
595:
596: \noindent\lbrack1]R.Jackiw,L.Soloviev,Phys.Rev.\textbf{137}%
597: .3(1968)1485.\newline[2]Y.Hoshino,\textbf{JHEP0409}:048(2004),whereIhave a
598: wrong sign of $|x|\ln(\mu|x|)$ term.\nolinebreak\newline%
599: [3]Y.Hoshino,Nucl.Phys.A790(2007)613c-618c.\newline%
600: [4]K.Nishijima,\textbf{Fields and Particles},W.A.BENJAMIN,INC(1969).\newline%
601: [5]A.B.Waites,R.Delbourgo,Int.J.Mod.Phys.\textbf{A7}(1992)6857.\newline%
602: [6]C.Itzykson,J.B.Zuber,Quantum field theory,McGRAW-HILL.\newline%
603: [7]J.Schwinger,\textbf{Particle Sources and Fields},vol.I,Pereseus Books
604: Publishing, L,L,C(1970).\newline%
605: [8]C.S.Fischer,R.Alkofer,T.Dahm,P.Maris,Phys.Rev.\textbf{D70}%
606: ,073007(2004):[arXiv:hep-th/0407014].\newline[9]Y.Hoshino:[arXiv:0706.1063]
607:
608:
609: \end{document}