1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: \newcommand{\ISO}{{\it ISO}}
5: \newcommand{\etal}{ et al. }
6: \newcommand{\simgt}{\ga}
7: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
8:
9: %\accepted{8}
10: %\journalid{}{}
11: %\articleid{}{}
12: \slugcomment{draft date: \today}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Properties of protostars in the
17: Elephant Trunk globule IC 1396A}
18: %\subtitle{}
19:
20: \author{William T. Reach\altaffilmark{1,2},
21: Dohy Faied\altaffilmark{2},
22: Jeonghee Rho\altaffilmark{2},
23: Adwin Boogert\altaffilmark{1},
24: Achim Tappe\altaffilmark{2,3},
25: Thomas H. Jarrett\altaffilmark{1,2}
26: Patrick Morris\altaffilmark{1},
27: Laurent Cambr\'esy\altaffilmark{4},
28: Francesco Palla\altaffilmark{5},
29: Riccardo Valdettaro\altaffilmark{5}
30: }
31:
32: \altaffiltext{1}{Infrared Processing and Analysis Center,MS 100-22,
33: California Institute of Technology,
34: Pasadena, CA 91125}
35:
36: \altaffiltext{2}{{\it Spitzer} Science Center, MS 220-6,
37: California Institute of Technology,
38: Pasadena, CA 91125}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{4}{Observatoire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France}
43:
44: \altaffiltext{5}{NAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi 5, 50125 Florence, Italy}
45:
46: \email{reach@ipac.caltech.edu}
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49:
50: Extremely red objects, identified in the early {\it Spitzer}
51: Space Telescope observations of the bright-rimmed globule IC 1396A
52: and photometrically classified as Class I protostars Class II T Tauri stars
53: based on their mid-infrared colors, were observed spectroscopically
54: at 5.5--38 $\mu$m ({\it Spitzer} InfraRed Spectrograph),
55: at the 22 GHz water maser frequency (NRAO Green Bank Telescope),
56: and in the optical (Palomar Hale 5-m), to
57: confirm their nature and further elucidate their properties.
58: The sources photometrically identified as Class I,
59: including IC1396A:$\alpha$, $\gamma$, $\delta$, $\epsilon$, and $\zeta$, are confirmed as
60: objects dominated by accretion luminosity from dense envelopes, with
61: accretion rates 1--10$\times 10^{-6} M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$ and present stellar
62: masses 0.1--2 $M_{\odot}$.
63: The Class I sources have extremely
64: red continua, still rising at 38 $\mu$m, with a deep silicate
65: absorption at 9--11 $\mu$m, weaker silicate absorption around 18 $\mu$m,
66: and weak ice features including CO$_2$ at 15.2 $\mu$m and H$_2$O at
67: 6 $\mu$m.
68: %
69: The ice/silicate absorption ratio in the envelope is exceptionally low
70: for the IC 1396A protostars, compared to those in nearby star-forming regions,
71: suggesting the envelope chemistry is altered by the radiation field or globule
72: pressure.
73: %
74: Only one 22 GHz water maser
75: %(characteristic of a Class 0 protostar)
76: was detected in IC 1396A; it is coincident with a faint mid-infrared source,
77: offset from near the luminous Class I protostar IC 1396A$\gamma$.
78: The maser source, IC 1396A$\gamma_{b}$, has luminosity $<0.1 L_{\odot}$, the first
79: H$_{2}$O maser from such a low-luminosity object.
80: Two near-infrared H$_{2}$ knots on opposite sides of IC 1396A:$\gamma$ reveal a jet,
81: with axis clearly distinct from the H$_{2}$O maser of IC 1396A:$\gamma_{b}$.
82:
83: The objects photometrically classified as Class II,
84: including IC1396A:$\beta$, $\theta$, 2MASSJ 21364964+5722270,
85: 2MASSJ 21362507+5727502,
86: LkH$\alpha$ 349c, Tr 37 11-2146 and Tr 37 11-2037,
87: are confirmed as stars with warm, luminous disks, with a
88: silicate emission feature at 9--11 $\mu$m, and bright H$\alpha$
89: emission, so they are young, disk-bearing, classical T Tauri stars.
90: %
91: The disk properties change significantly with source luminosity:
92: low-mass (G--K) stars have prominent 9--11 emission features due
93: to amorphous silicates while higher-mass (A--F) stars have weaker
94: features requiring abundant crystalline silicates.
95: A mineralogical model that fits the wide and low-amplitude silicate
96: feature of IC1396A:$\theta$ requires small grains of crystalline olivine (11.3 $\mu$m peak)
97: and another material to to explain the its 9.1 $\mu$m peak;
98: reasonable fits are obtained with a phyllosilicate, quartz, or
99: relatively large ($>10$ $\mu$m) amorphous olivine grains.
100:
101: The distribution of Class I sources is concentrated within the molecular globule, while
102: the Class II sources are more widely scattered. Combined with the spectral results,
103: this suggests two
104: phases of star formation, the first (4 Myr ago) leading
105: to the widespread Class II sources and the central O star of IC 1396,
106: and the second ($< 1$ Myr ago)
107: occurring within the globule. The recent phase was
108: likely triggered by the wind and radiation of the central O star
109: of the IC 1396 \ion{H}{2} region.
110: %with possible additional contributions from the outflows of LkH$\alpha$ 349a,c
111: %and some nearby B stars.
112:
113:
114: \end{abstract}
115:
116: \keywords{young stellar objects; ISM: individual (IC 1396A); ISM: globules;
117: infrared: stars; planetary systems: protoplanetary disks}
118:
119:
120: \section{Introduction}
121:
122: {\it Spitzer} has opened widely the mid-infrared (3.6--24 $\mu$m) window for
123: studies of star formation.
124: In the earliest observations with the observatory,
125: as in many subsequent ones,
126: previously unknown, mid-infrared-bright sources have been discovered in
127: star-forming regions.
128: In this paper we follow up \citep[][Paper I]{reachIC} on the mid-infrared sources in the bright-rimmed
129: globule IC 1396A,
130: known as the Elephant Trunk Nebula, a dense globule in the large, nearby (750 pc)
131: \ion{H}{2} region IC 1396, which is is excited by the 4 Myr-old O6 star HD 206267 \citep[see][]{weikard}.
132: Based on comparison to measured colors to those of
133: young stellar objects in Taurus \citep{kenyonhartmann}, we suggested
134: 10 sources may be the very early Class I stage, which is thought to only last $10^{5}$ yr
135: \citep{spbook}, indicating that the globule is a site of very recent star formation.
136:
137: Detecting new protostars in a wide variety of star forming regions
138: is an important expansion of previous work that by necessity has
139: concentrated on the very closest star forming regions such as
140: Taurus and Orion. While these nearby regions provide excellent
141: opportunities to observe the widest range of star formation (from
142: brown dwarfs to massive stars), they are necessarily parochial.
143: Contrary to a long-standing common belief that the Sun formed in a
144: quiescent region like Taurus, meteoritic evidence indicates the Sun
145: likely formed near a high-mass star, whose \ion{H}{2} region, winds, and
146: supernova explosion influence the evolution and composition of
147: the protoplanetary disk \citep{meteorite,tachibana}.
148: To search for present-day star-forming regions similar to
149: those in which the Sun formed, we must consider massive star forming regions.
150: In such regions, stars can be formed by radiative driven implosion of
151: moderately dense cores \citep{lefloch},
152: and planet-building disks are exposed to strong ultraviolet
153: radiation \citep{proplyd}. A major goal of future star formation studies
154: should be to determine the effects of massive stars both in triggering
155: star formation and shaping disks around young stellar objects.
156:
157: In this paper, we present follow-up observations to examine the
158: nature of the sources in IC 1396A in more detail.
159: New {\it Spitzer} mid-infrared
160: spectra demonstrate that the photometrically extremely red objects are indeed
161: Class I protostars, with dense, highly-optically-thick envelopes
162: shrouding a moderately luminous core inside a dust photosphere.
163: We show that at least one of the extremely red objects, IC 1396 A:$\gamma$,
164: powers a molecular outflow with H$_2$O maser emission, characteristic
165: of a very young ($\sim 10^{4}$ yr) Class 0 protostars \citep{furuya}.
166: The photometrically-classified Class II objects are compared to
167: classical T Tauri stars, based on H$\alpha$ emission and
168: mid-infrared disk spectra.
169:
170:
171: \section{Observations\label{obssec}}
172:
173: \subsection{Spitzer Space Telescope}
174: Mid-infrared spectra were obtained using the
175: InfraRed Spectrograph \citep[IRS;][]{houck} in 2004 and 2005 November.
176: Table~\ref{opttab} lists the sources and IRS observing modes.
177: The 2004 observations was adversely affected
178: by poor pointing; the 2005 observations repeated
179: those of the first set that had offsets between actual and expected pointing
180: larger than half the slit width in the cross-slit direction.
181: Spectra were taken with both the short- and long-wavelength,
182: low-resolution mode for all sources. The brightest sources
183: were also observed with the high-resolution mode.
184: Observations were performed in groups (`clusters'), and
185: a single bright, isolated mid-infrared source (whose coordinates
186: were measured from the IRAC images taken in 2003 December) was
187: used as a peak-up source for each group.
188: Mid-infrared source brightnesses and positions were verified using the IRAC and MIPS
189: images from Paper I. The magnitudes are reported in Table~\ref{magtab}.
190: With respect to the values in Paper I, significant changes include the following.
191: Source IC 1396A:$\lambda$ is significantly fainter
192: in the IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m channels, because in Paper I it was
193: confused with another nearby source that is brighter in those channels
194: (but far fainter at 24 $\mu$m). The changed colors move the source in
195: the color-color diagram (Fig. 3 of Paper I) from an unlabeled region
196: into the Class 1 region. The position of source IC 1396A:$\kappa$ was
197: corrected from the typographical error (copied declination of $\lambda$).
198:
199: For the basic reductions, the on-slit nods were subtracted from
200: each other, and spectra were extracted using SMART \citep{smartref}.
201: In many cases, the nod-subtracted spectra were contaminated by other sources or
202: bright structures in the nebula; for these, a local background subtraction was performed
203: on each nodded image.
204: The extracted spectra from each nod position were averaged, and their uncertainties
205: combined using the root-sum-square of each extraction's uncertainty.
206:
207: For IC 1396A:$\alpha$, $\gamma$, $\delta$, and $\epsilon$, the low-resolution
208: ($R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim$90) 2-dimensional Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) spectral
209: images produced by the SSC pipeline versions S15.3.0 and S17.2.0 were used as
210: the starting point of a customized reduction. First, the spectral and
211: spatial dimensions were orthogonalized, and then the 2-dimensional
212: images of the two nodding positions were subtracted in order to remove
213: extended background emission. In some cases the background emission
214: is highly structured or multiple sources are present in the slit, and
215: nodding pairs could not be subtracted. Here, the background observed
216: in nearby telescope pointings was subtracted and any residual emission
217: was removed using the background determined from neighboring columns
218: in the source extraction process. Some background emission lines
219: (especially at 6.2, 17.0, and 18.7 $\mu$m) were not removed completely
220: or were over-corrected for, which was taken into account in the
221: interpretation of the YSO spectra. The background subtraction process
222: also removes most of the effects of pixels with deviating dark
223: currents (``hot pixels''). Any remaining bad pixels were replaced by
224: values from a two-dimensional interpolation. Subsequently a fixed
225: width (4 pixels) extraction was performed and the 1-dimensional
226: spectra were then averaged. Then the spectra were divided by spectra
227: of the standard star HR 2194 reduced in the same way in order to
228: correct for wavelength-dependent slit losses. Spectral features in HR
229: 2194 (A0~V) were divided out using the photospheric model of Decin et
230: al. (2004). Some residual standing wave structure with a period of
231: $\sim$1 $\mu$m observed above 20 $\mu$m was not corrected for.
232: Finally, the Spitzer/IRS modules and ground-based spectra were
233: multiplied along the flux scale in order to match Spitzer/IRAC 3.6 and
234: 8.0 $\mu$m fluxes, using the appropriate filter profiles, and to
235: provide smooth transitions between the IRS modules.
236:
237:
238: \subsection{Keck/NIRSPEC L-band Spectra}
239:
240: The Spitzer spectra of IC 1396A $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ are complemented
241: by ground-based L-band spectra obtained with the NIRSPEC spectrometer
242: at the Keck II telescope at Mauna Kea \citep{mcl98} at a resolving
243: power of $R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda$=2000. This provides an independent
244: measure of the solid H$_2$O column density through the strong O-H
245: stretching mode at 3.0 $\mu$m. The data were obtained on UT 24 July
246: 2004 in two separate grating settings covering the 2.70-3.54 and
247: 3.34-4.19 $\mu$m spectral ranges. The telescope was nodded on the sky
248: in an ABBA pattern for 12 and 8 minutes for the short and
249: long-wavelength settings respectively. The spectra were reduced in a
250: way standard for ground-based long-slit spectra, using the nearby main
251: sequence star HR 8208 (F0V) for telluric line correction. The final
252: signal-to-noise values are 30 and 50 for the short and long wavelength
253: sections, respectively. Finally, the ground-based spectra were
254: multiplied along the flux scale in order to match the Spitzer/IRAC 3.6
255: $\mu$m photometry, using the appropriate filter profile.
256:
257: \subsection{Palomar Hale Telescope: Optical spectra}
258:
259: Visible spectra were obtained using the Double Spectrograph \citep{oke}
260: in August 2006. Visible counterparts were identified for the Class II
261: sources using finder charts from the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS),
262: 2nd-generation Digitized Sky Survey; these sources were identified
263: easily and placed in the long slit with $1''$ width.
264: For objects not visible on the POSS, offsets were performed from
265: a nearby star, using the coordinates from the IRAC images relative
266: to the star in the POSS.
267: All spectra were obtained in the low-resolution mode, with a
268: resolving power 2100 (2500) in the blue (red) portion of the spectra.
269: A dichroic with transition at 5500 \AA\ was used
270: to separate light to the blue and red gratings and cameras.
271: The blue spectrum was centered at 4400 \AA, with useful
272: range 2700-5500 \AA.
273: The red spectrum was centered at 6800 \AA, with useful
274: range 5500-7900 \AA. The spectra were analyzed using IRAF and then normalized in IDL.
275: For objects not visible on the POSS, their spectra were extracted using a reference position on
276: the slit from a bright sources.
277:
278: \def\extra{
279: From \citet{osterbrock}, the ratio of Balmer lines for recombining gas is
280: $j($H$\beta)$/$j($H$\alpha)$= 0.350 for Case A and 0.348 for Case B.
281: %$j($H$\gamma)$/$j($H$\alpha)$=0.164 0.162
282: }
283:
284: \subsection{Green Bank Telescope}
285:
286: Spectroscopic observations to search for H$_2$O masers from
287: fourteen mid-infrared sources in IC 1396A were performed using the
288: National Radio Astronomy Observatory
289: (NRAO)\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the
290: National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
291: Universities, Inc.}
292: 100-m Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope.
293: The targets were observed in multiple sessions, to allow for the possible
294: strong variability of protostellar masers on month timescales.
295: The observing sessions were
296: on 2006 Aug 7 and 2006 Sep 27.
297:
298: The 18-22 GHz receiver was tuned to 22.23508 GHz, and the spectroscopic
299: observations were taken in two methods.
300: First, each source was observed by nodding between the two beams of the receiver;
301: this efficient technique always has the source within one of the beams, but it
302: only works the `off' beam located $3^{}\prime$ in azimuth is free of emission.
303: Second, each source was observed by position-switching to a blank (in radio and
304: mid-infrared emission) field.
305: Both the nods and position-switched
306: spectra were analyzed using GBTIDL. The well-known maser source S Per
307: was observed to validate the observing technique, and it was cleanly
308: detected with an antenna temperature 140 K, consistent with the
309: previously-measured
310: gain of 1.8 K/Jy and the previously-measured
311: S Per flux of 76 Jy \citep{vlemmings}.
312:
313: In all cases, the nodded and position-switched spectra agreed, and for
314: all spectra except those near IC 1396A:$\gamma$ the spectra are consistent
315: with noise.
316: Upper limits for undetected sources were derived as follows.
317: Each 1-min-per-beam nodded spectrum yielded an rms noise of 0.24 K antenna
318: temperature with 0.01 km~s$^{-1}$ autocorrelator bins after hanning smoothing.
319: Rebinning to 0.1 (1) km~s$^{-1}$ bins, the rms antenna temperature was
320: 0.11 (0.04) K.
321: Therefore,
322: we place a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit on the H$_2$O masers for all observed
323: sources (except detections noted below) of
324: 0.18 Jy peak (in 0.1 km~s$^{-1}$ bins) and 0.07 Jy~km~s$^{-1}$
325: flux (in 1 km~s$^{-1}$ bins).
326: For sources IC 1396A:$\gamma$, $\alpha$, and $\delta$,
327: observations were 8 times longer yielding an rms of 0.028 K,
328: and a 3-$\sigma$ upper limits of 0.05 Jy peak
329: and 0.02 Jy~km~s$^{-1}$ flux.
330:
331: Figure~\ref{gamwater} shows the H$_2$O maser spectra of IC1396A:$\gamma$.
332: This source had been previously detected by \citet{valdettaro05} using the
333: Medicina telescope with 1.9$'$ beam.
334: Relative to the peak flux of 33.7 Jy km~s$^{-1}$ in 2004 Dec as observed at Medicina, the
335: maser flux decreased by more than a factor of $10^{3}$ in 2006 Aug, the
336: first GBT epoch.
337: By the last GBT epoch in 2007 Jan, the maser brightness had increased, but still only to
338: a factor of 120 less than the flux in 2004 Dec.
339: Continued monitoring at Medicina at 7 different epochs during 2007 and in 2008 Apr
340: yielded upper limits of 1--2 Jy,
341: confirming that the maser has remained faint since 2006.
342:
343: The GBT observations with 33$''$ beam
344: show the maser is very close to IC1396 A:$\gamma$.
345: A cross pattern of observations through the source shows the offset of
346: the centroid of 22 GHz maser emission from the infrared source is $11''\pm 11''$.
347: High-angular-resolution VLA observations by \citet{valdettaro}
348: showed that the H$_{2}$O maser is actually $7''$ N of IC1396A:$\gamma$. The maser
349: spot is coincident with another, fainter mid-infrared source. The VLA observations were taken in 2005 Feb, when the maser was very bright (73 Jy), and the beam
350: size was $0.4''$ so the shift of $7''$ is highly significant.
351:
352: \clearpage
353:
354: \begin{figure}[th]
355: \epsscale{.5}
356: \plotone{f1}
357: \epsscale{1}
358: \figcaption[plotgammany]{GBT
359: 22 GHz H$_2$O maser spectra of IC1396A:$\gamma$ on 4 dates (as labeled). The
360: spectra are offset vertically by 0.2 Jy on each successive date, for clarity.
361: \label{gamwater}}
362: \end{figure}
363:
364: \clearpage
365:
366: \subsection{2MASS\label{extinctsec}}
367:
368: The 2 Micron All-Sky Survey \citep[2MASS;][]{skrutskie} Extended Mission
369: \footnote{http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/allsky/doc/explsup.html}
370: provides additional
371: products to the 2MASS survey. For a few regions of the sky, including
372: IC 1396A, 6 time exposures have been obtained.
373: As a longer exposure time extends the completeness level by about 1 mag,
374: there is a drawback regarding the photometric saturation which occurs for
375: fainter sources. Consequently, photometry from the main 2MASS survey must
376: be preferred for all saturated sources in the 2MASS 6X catalog (i.e. when
377: the flag {\tt rd\_flg} equals 1).
378:
379: We built the extinction map of IC 1396A following the method described in
380: \citet{cambresy02} using the 2MASS $H-K_s$ color excess of 32000
381: stars in a $40' \times 40'$ field around the nebula. Sources detected at 24
382: $\mu$m have been removed from the catalog since they are intrinsically red
383: objects for which the color is not related to the cloud extinction.
384: The extinction is obtained following the expression:
385: \begin{equation}
386: A_V = \left( \frac{A_H}{A_V} - \frac{A_{K_s}}{A_V} \right)^{-1} \times
387: (H-K_s) + {\cal Z}_{\rm col}
388: \end{equation}
389: where $(A_H/A_V - A_{K_s}/A_V)^{-1} = 15.87$ (Rieke \& Lebofsky 1985)
390: and $\mathcal{Z}_{\rm col}=-2.5$ mag. The zero point for the extinction
391: calibration, $\mathcal{Z}_{\rm col}$, corresponds to an intrinsic star
392: color of $H-K_s=0.16$ mag which is measured outside the nebula.
393: % get location from Laurent??
394: Any diffuse extinction in the field is therefore removed by construction.
395: The extinction is obtained using the median of the 10 stars included in each
396: cell. It produces a map of IC 1396A with a resolution of about 1 arcmin,
397: %shown in Figure~\ref{extinctfig},
398: with an average visual extinction of about 5 mag.
399: The extinction toward some specific Class II objects, which will be used later
400: in this paper are $A_{V}=5.4$, 3.8, 3.5, 4.5, and 3.5, for
401: IC 1396A:$\theta$, $\beta$, Tr37 11-2037, Tr37 11-2146, and 21364964+5722270,
402: respectively.
403:
404: The extinction map clearly shows the central hole associated with
405: LkH$\alpha$ 349 in the higher density round head of the globule. The
406: visual extinction in the hole is 2.8 mag whereas it is $\sim 6$ mag in
407: the north side of the head and $\sim 10$ mag for the south side with a
408: maximum of 16.3 mag at the position 21h36m59s +57d30m00s (J2000).
409: Beside, the correlation of the dust extinction and the emission in the
410: Spitzer images exhibits a region with a deficit of infrared emission that
411: corresponds to the $\sim 5'$ size structure at 21h36m +57d23m, LDN 1099. This
412: deficit can be explained assuming LDN 1099 is disconnected from IC 1396A and
413: located at a larger distance of the O6 heating star. This is confirmed by
414: the examination of the optical images which suggests IC 1396A is illuminated
415: from behind whereas L1099 would be illuminated on its front size. Assuming
416: the system composed by the O6 star, at 750 pc, and IC 1396A is seen with an
417: angle of 45 degrees (0 degree meaning the star and the globule are at
418: the same distance), we find the main globule IC 1396A is 4 pc closer to us
419: than the ionizing star and that L1099 is 9 pc farther. This is confirmed by
420: the difference of radial velocities for the two regions which are
421: -8 km s$^{-1}$ and 0 km s$^{-1}$ for IC 1396A and L1099, respectively \citep{weikard}.
422:
423: \subsection{Palomar Hale Telescope: Near-infrared images}
424:
425: IC 1396A was imaged using the Wide-Field Infrared Camera
426: \citep[WIRC;][]{wircref} on the $200''$ Hale telescope
427: on 2004 Aug 25-26. The 8.7$'$ field-of-view chip was
428: steered toward a series of 22 positions alternating between
429: a gradual scan across the globule and a nearby empty reference
430: field. The reference field images were combined to generate a
431: sky flat, which was then removed from each image.
432: %Detector non-linearity was corrected.
433: % using the methods described in \citep{jarrettwirc}.
434: While observing, a small dither offset was added to each position to ensure that stars in the 11 reference field observations were
435: removed during creation of the sky flat by robust averaging.
436: The astrometry for each image was measured by comparing to
437: the 2MASS point source catalog. Then images were combined into
438: mosaics for each filter.
439:
440: The absolute calibration of the
441: mosaics was measured by correlating photometry in image units
442: to the corresponding entries in the 2MASS catalog.
443: The cross-calibration is accurate to 5\%.
444: The location of each of the sources discussed in this paper was
445: inspected in each of the near-infrared images.
446: Some sources that were marginally detected by 2MASS
447: (e.g. $\alpha$, $\gamma$, $\eta$, in J band)
448: or suffered from blending with nearby sources
449: ($\beta$)
450: were clearly detected in the Palomar images (0.9$''$ FWHM seeing).
451: Table~\ref{magtab} (columns J and K)
452: lists the magnitudes determined from the
453: Palomar observations.
454:
455: Figure~\ref{ic1396apalomar} shows the near-infrared image. All of the bright Class I sources for which
456: we obtained mid-infrared spectra are detected in this image.
457: Two exceptionally red sources, $\alpha$ and $\gamma$, may be
458: marginally resolved in the Palomar J-band image, with sizes $\sim 1.5''$ (1100 AU).
459: In all the Palomar near-infrared images, the protostars are dominated by
460: continuum, since their fluxes in line (Pa$\beta$ and H$_{2}$ 2.12 $\mu$m) and
461: continuum (narrow 2.17 $\mu$m and broad J) filters
462: are similar.
463: The resolved J-band emission is likely to be scattered light.
464:
465: \begin{figure}
466: \epsscale{1}
467: \plotone{f2}
468: \epsscale{1}
469: \figcaption[]{Near-infrared image of IC 1396A from Palomar, combining the 2.2 $\mu$m narrow continuum (red),
470: H$_{2}$ (green), and J-band (blue). Since the H$_{2}$ and 2.2 $\mu$m continuum wavelengths are similar,
471: point sources with spectral energy distribution rising to longer wavelengths appear red+green=yellow.
472: The Class I protostars for which {\it Spitzer} spectra are presented in this paper are labeled,
473: as are the LkH$\alpha$ 349 stars and the Class II star Tr 37 11-2146.
474: The mid-infrared sources are generally `yellow' in this representation, but they do not stand out
475: based on near-infrared colors alone. The vast majority of near-infrared `yellow' sources,
476: which preferentially fall within the globule,
477: are faint or not detected at 8 $\mu$m with IRAC (too faint for
478: mid-infrared spectroscopy with IRS); they are probably extincted background stars.
479: \label{ic1396apalomar}}
480: \end{figure}
481:
482: \clearpage
483:
484: \section{Class I Sources}
485:
486: \subsection{Properties of the mid-infrared spectra}
487:
488: Figure~\ref{classispec} shows the spectra of the bright Class I protostars
489: $\alpha$, $\gamma$, $\delta$, $\epsilon$, $\eta$, and $\lambda$.
490: Table~\ref{protoproptab} lists several properties derived from the mid-infrared
491: spectra including colors and silicate feature amplitude.
492: For the Class I sources, the silicate features at 10 and 18 $\mu$m are in absorption
493: hence $\Delta F/F$ is negative; conversely for most Class II sources the silicate
494: features are in emission.
495:
496: \begin{figure}
497: \epsscale{1}
498: \plotone{f3}
499: \epsscale{1}
500: \end{figure}
501:
502: \clearpage
503: \figcaption[]{{\it Spitzer}/IRS spectra of Class I sources
504: IC1396A:$\lambda$, $\eta$, $\alpha$, $\gamma$, $\delta$, and $\epsilon$.
505: Each spectrum is in $\nu L_{\nu}$ units, divided by its value
506: at 8 $\mu$m and offset vertically by a factor of 3.7 for clarity.
507: Spitzer and Palomar photometry are over-plotted as asterisks.
508: For sources $\alpha$ and $\gamma$, IRS high-resolution spectra and
509: Keck L-band spectra are included.
510: For source $\alpha$, the IRS high-resolution spectrum continuum
511: does not agree with that in the low resolution-spectrum from
512: 15--20 $\mu$m;
513: the low-resolution continuum is believed to be more accurate (and agrees
514: with the MIPS 24 $\mu$m photometry).
515: Narrow spikes in the spectra are due to rogue pixels and should be ignored.
516: The positive feature in $\lambda$ and $\alpha$ and negative dip in $\eta$ at 11.2 $\mu$m
517: are due to incomplete subtraction of a bright, nebular PAH feature; the wavelengths
518: of nebular lines that are incompletely removed in some spectra are indicated by dotted
519: lines at 6.2 (PAH), 11.2 (PAH), 12.8 ([\ion{Ne}{2}]), and 18.7 ([\ion{S}{3}]) $\mu$m.
520: \label{classispec}}
521: \clearpage
522:
523: \subsection{Ice absorption features}
524:
525: The Spitzer spectra of IC 1396A $\alpha$, $\gamma$, $\delta$, and
526: $\epsilon$ show the well-known ice absorption features between 5 and 8
527: $\mu$m, and at 15.2 $\mu$m (Fig.~\ref{classispec}).
528: The latter is due to solid CO$_2$,
529: while the 5--8 $\mu$m absorption is caused by the overlapping bands of
530: many solid state species \citep{boogert}. At the long-wavelength side,
531: the 5--8 $\mu$m absorption overlaps with the edge of the strong 9.7
532: $\mu$m band of silicates, which complicates the determination of an
533: overall continuum level for the study of the ice absorption features.
534: A best-effort global continuum was determined, using all spectra and
535: photometry available between 1 and 40 $\mu$m, similar to the method
536: described in \citet{boogert}. It is kept in mind that the optical depth
537: of the broad absorption overlying the entire 5-8 $\mu$m range shown in
538: Fig.~\ref{f:iceplot1} is relatively uncertain, but that of individual,
539: narrower, features within it is not.
540:
541: \begin{figure}
542: %\includegraphics[angle=90, scale=0.75]{plot_ic1396_5_8um.eps}
543: %\includegraphics[angle=90, scale=0.75]{plot_ic1396_5_8um}
544: \plotone{f4}
545: \caption{Optical depth spectra (dots) of the Class I objects in IC 1396A showing
546: 5--8 $\mu$m absorption bands. The previously studied
547: spectrum of the low mass YSO HH 46 IRS, representative
548: of the large sample of low mass YSOs studied in \citet{boogert},
549: is included at the bottom. The
550: spectra are normalized to the peak optical depth by multiplication
551: with the factor indicated on the left, and then shifted along the
552: vertical axis for clarity. For each source the contribution of the
553: bending mode of pure solid H$_2$O is shown by a laboratory spectrum
554: (smooth line; \citealt{hud93}). Note that in all IC 1396A YSOs the
555: distinct 6.85 $\mu$m\ band is shifted to longer wavelengths compared
556: to HH 46 IRS.\label{f:iceplot1}}
557: \end{figure}
558:
559: The bending mode of solid H$_2$O peaks at 6.0 $\mu$m, but is a
560: prominent contributor to the entire 5--8 $\mu$m absorption region. In
561: order to determine its contribution, the H$_2$O column density is
562: obtained independently from the 3.0 $\mu$m H$_2$O stretching mode,
563: when available (sources $\alpha$ and $\gamma$) or from the 13 $\mu$m
564: libration band (Table~\ref{t:colden}). Clearly a significant fraction
565: of the 5--8 $\mu$m absorption is not due to the bending mode of solid
566: H$_2$O (Fig.~\ref{f:iceplot1}). The excess absorption between 5.7 and
567: 6.6 $\mu$m is likely real, and is caused by the overlapping bands of
568: solid H$_2$CO (5.7 $\mu$m), HCOOH (5.8 $\mu$m), NH$_3$ (6.12 $\mu$m),
569: and possibly ions (e.g. HCOO$^-$) and PAH species near 6.3 $\mu$m.
570:
571: At longer wavelengths, a distinct band centered at 6.9 $\mu$m is
572: detected toward all sources. This ``6.85 $\mu$m band'' is commonly
573: observed toward low- and high-mass YSOs, as well as background
574: stars. Its profile is known to vary considerably and has been
575: decomposed in short and long-wavelengths components (called C3 and C4
576: in \citealt{kea01, boogert}) centered on 6.755 and 6.943 $\mu$m,
577: respectively. The 6.85 $\mu$m bands toward the IC 1396A protostars are
578: shifted remarkably far to longer wavelengths, i.e. C4 is much stronger
579: than C3. Previously \citep{boogert} it was found that such sources tend
580: to have low solid H$_2$O abundances, expressed in the H$_2$O column
581: density scaled to the peak optical depth of the observed 9.7 $\mu$m
582: band of silicates.
583:
584: Indeed, the IC 1396A protostars have very low $N({\rm
585: H_2O})$/$\tau_{9.7}$ ratios as well (Fig.~\ref{f:iceplot2}). The
586: origin of the components of the 6.85 $\mu$m band is not fully
587: established, but the correlation with dust temperature tracers, such
588: as shown in Fig.~\ref{f:iceplot2}, suggests its carrier(s) are
589: affected by ice processing. The NH$_4^+$ ion has been considered a
590: reasonable candidate, as upon heating its band shifts to longer
591: wavelengths and its band strength increases \citep{sch03}. It is also
592: more refractory than H$_2$O ice. Regardless of its origin, it appears
593: that the ices toward the IC1396A protostars are thermally, and possibly
594: energetically processed. All 4 studied YSOs show these unusual ice
595: characteristics, which is distinct from most sources in the large
596: sample of low mass YSOs in nearby star-forming regions
597: studied by \citet{boogert}. This suggests that
598: the ices toward IC 1396A are processed by radiation external to the
599: YSOs, likely the harsh radiation from the nearby O star.
600:
601: Finally the solid CO$_2$ abundances relative to H$_2$O are between
602: 14-34\% (Table~\ref{t:colden}), which is typical for most YSOs
603: \citep{pon08}. Solid CH$_3$OH was looked for at 9.7 and 3.53 $\mu$m as
604: well, but is less than 5\% with respect to H$_2$O.
605:
606:
607: \begin{figure}
608: %\includegraphics[angle=90, scale=0.75]{correlationplot_ic1396.eps}
609: \epsscale{.7}
610: \plotone{f5}
611: \epsscale{1}
612: \caption{Correlation of the ratio of integrated optical depths of the
613: components C4 and C3 of the 6.85 $\mu$m bands with a measure of the
614: solid H$_2$O abundance for YSOs studied in the c2d ice survey
615: \citep[filled circles;][]{boogert}, ISO-observed massive
616: protostars \citep[open circles;][]{kea01}
617: and our results for IC 1396A (triangles). All 4 YSOs in IC 1396A
618: have strongly red-shifted 6.85 $\mu$m bands, i.e. large C4/C3
619: ratios and very low solid H$_2$O abundances. This likely implies a
620: high degree of thermal processing of the ices in the IC 1396A core
621: by the nearby O-star.
622: The sources with properties overlapping with the IC 1396A protostars
623: (C4/C3>1.2 and H$_2$O/$\tau_{9.7}$<0.25) from previous studies are
624: (from high to low C4/C3):
625: Mon R2 IRS3, IRAS 03301+3057, S140 IRS1, DG Tau B, and W3 IRS5.
626: %MonR2/3: outflow, OHmaser flare
627: %IRAS03301 = CLASS0
628: %S140IRS1: multiple bipolar molecular outflow, 1A has H2O maser
629: % DG Tau B: famous HDT jet
630: %W3/5: jet shock
631: \label{f:iceplot2}}
632: \end{figure}
633:
634:
635:
636: \def\oldversion{
637: Absorption features due to CO$_{2}$ (15.2 $\mu$m) and H$_{2}$O (6 $\mu$m),
638: as well as the unidentified but
639: frequently-observed feature at 6.9 $\mu$m, are evident in the Class I sources.
640: Figure~\ref{iceplot} shows the absorption spectra from 5.2--8.1 $\mu$m containing the 6 $\mu$m H$_2$O feature,
641: and Figure~\ref{iceplot15} shows the absorption spectra centered on containing the 15.2 $\mu$m CO$_2$ feature.
642: Table~\ref{protoproptab} lists the ice absorption features strengths.
643: The ice absorption features are correlated, with the average depth of CO$_{2}$ divided by depth of
644: the 9--11 $\mu$m silicate feature being 0.33. The H$_{2}$O feature is not detected in the weakest
645: sources; a linear correlation with the silicate depth yields a slope of 0.33 (the same as for
646: CO$_{2}$) but with a significant offset as if the H$_{2}$O is only present for sources with
647: silicate feature depth greater than 0.18.
648: Since the protostars are embedded within dense parts of the globule, some of the silicate
649: feature (and possibly also ice) could be due to the foreground.
650: Since the interstellar extinction curve has silicate feature depth $\sim 0.08 A_{V}$ and the
651: estimated extinction $\sim 1.5$--3.5 (based on the SED fits for the Class II sources),
652: we expect foreground extinction due to the globule to give rise to
653: silicate feature depths $\sim 0.08$--0.18 (taking into account the way we subtracted
654: baselines when measuring the silicate depth on the Spitzer spectra).
655: If we assume the globule extinction has no associated ices and remove it from the fit,
656: the ratio of CO$_{2}$/silicate and the ratio of H$_{2}$O/silicate absorption are both 0.33.
657:
658: Besides the 6 $\mu$m and 15 $\mu$m features, the 6.9 $\mu$m feature is detected with depth
659: comparable to and proportional to the 6 $\mu$m feature.
660: We searched for NH$_{3}$ (9.0 $\mu$m) and CH$_{3}$OH (9.7 $\mu$m) features such as
661: were seen toward W33A \citep{gibb}, but they are not present for the IC1396A protostars;
662: the upper limit on $\Delta F/F$ is 0.05. There is a hint of CH$_{3}$OH for $\alpha$ at a
663: level of 0.03. These features are at the bottom of the 9--11 $\mu$m silicate feature. For
664: source $\epsilon$, there is essentially zero light (to within measurement accuracy) transmitted
665: by silicates, so a measurement of these ice features is practically impossible.
666:
667: \begin{figure}
668: \epsscale{1.1}
669: %\plotone{iceplot_save}
670: \plotone{iceplot}
671: \epsscale{1}
672: \figcaption[]{Spectra from 5--8 $\mu$m of Class I sources in IC 1396A showing
673: the 6 $\mu$m H$_{2}$O and 6.9 $\mu$m unidentified ice features.
674: The sources are plotted in order of silicate absorption depth.
675: \label{iceplot}}
676: \end{figure}
677: %\clearpage
678:
679: \begin{figure}
680: \epsscale{1.1}
681: %\plotone{iceplot15_save}
682: \plotone{iceplot15}
683: \epsscale{1}
684: \figcaption[]{Spectra of Class I sources in IC 1396A centered on the 15.2 $\mu$m CO$_{2}$
685: ice feature.
686: \label{iceplot15}}
687: \end{figure}
688: %\clearpage
689: }
690:
691: \subsection{Models for the Class I protostars}
692:
693: We now attempt to derive the physical properties of the Class I protostars
694: from the observed spectra and photometry. To this end, we first create a
695: simple `toy' model of a Class I object and use it to derive some
696: fiducial parameters for the envelope.
697: The simple model is a combination of modified blackbodies, with outer layers
698: absorbing inner ones such as was applied to protostars in
699: the Trifid nebula \citep{rhotrifid}.
700: Then we compare the observations to
701: more sophisticated radiative transfer models developed by
702: \citep{whitney}, which allow us to estimate the properties of the central stars
703: and their accretion rate.
704: While the theoretical models are more physically detailed,
705: they don't fit the spectra as accurately as the simple models, which
706: we present here as an empirical description of the data.
707:
708: \subsubsection{Simple model}
709:
710: The spectral energy distributions of the Class I sources appear to be the sum of two primary
711: color temperatures, with the warmer component having $T_{1}\simeq 420$ K and a colder
712: component having $T_{2}\simeq 120$ K. To explain the 70 $\mu$m emission,
713: a colder component is required, with $T_{3}\simeq 40$K.
714: As a first, empirical, description of the
715: spectra, we will model each protostar as the sum of three nested components, with
716: the higher temperature ones residing closer to the center and being absorbed
717: by the colder ones:
718: \begin{equation}
719: F_{\nu}^{obs} = F_{\nu}^{1} e^{-(\tau_{2}+\tau_{3})} + F_{\nu}^{2} e^{-\tau3} + F_{\nu}^{3}.
720: \end{equation}
721: This simple model neglects direct emission from a potential central star, as well as neglecting
722: details of radiative transfer. Neglecting the central star is entirely justified based
723: on the lack of optical counterpart and the great optical depth toward the center.
724: Neglecting radiative transfer is not justified, so one must bear in mind that the empirical
725: models here are only descriptions of the data and not necessarily self-consistent.
726: (More sophisticated models are described in the next section.)
727: The optical depth of the outer layers was normalized to match the observed
728: depth of the 9--11 $\mu$m silicate feature, and the wavelength-dependence of the opacity
729: was taken from the interstellar dust model of \citet{draineLi}.
730: The coldest component (3) was fixed at 40 K and
731: was normalized to the difference between the observed 70 $\mu$m flux and the model
732: for components 1 and 2 (the inner and outer envelope, respectively).
733:
734: Figure~\ref{protomodel} shows the observed spectra and empirical model fits.
735: The color temperatures and ratio of the components 1 and 2 were adjusted to
736: match the spectrum from 5--40 $\mu$m.
737: We found it possible to match all the spectra with similar values of $T_{1}$ and $T_{2}$,
738: so we fixed them at 420 and 120 K, respectively. Specifying the 22 $\mu$m flux,
739: $F_{22}$, the ratio of fluxes at 22 to 8 $\mu$m, $F_{22}/F_{8}$, and the silicate
740: feature optical depth, $\tau_{sil}$ was sufficient to constrain components 1 and 2.
741: Greybody dust grains in region (2) heated by radiation
742: from region (1) with luminosity $L_{1}$ will be at temperature
743: \begin{equation}
744: T_{2}=278 \left(\frac{L_{1}}{L_{\odot}}\right)^{1/4} \left(\frac{R_{2}}{{\rm A.U.}}\right)^{-1/2}
745: \,\,{\rm K}.
746: \end{equation}
747: Combining the outer envelope (region 2) optical depth and size, and assuming dust/gas abundance as in the ISM,
748: we then derive the density, $n_{2}$, in region 2, which is of order $10^{9}$ cm$^{-3}$.
749: If the protostar is in steady accretion, then its density should follow
750: \begin{equation}
751: n_{2} = \frac{\dot{M} R_{2}^{-3/2}} {4 \pi \mu m_{H} \sqrt{2 G M_{*}}},
752: \end{equation}
753: \citep[e.g.][]{terebey}
754: from which we derive mass accretion rates
755: %$\dot{M}$
756: of order $10^{-6} M_{*}^{1/2}$ $M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$.
757: The accretion luminosity of the outer envelope alone (i.e. for initially distant material that
758: only moves $R_{2}$) is only of order 0.1 $M_* L_{\odot}$, less than
759: the observed luminosity of the outer core ($L_{2}\sim 1 L_{\odot}$).
760: This shows that material must be accreting further in than $R_{2}$.
761: If the accretion luminosity arises at a radius $R_{acc}$, and
762: there is a steady flow of matter inward, then
763: \begin{equation}
764: L_{core} = \frac{G M_{*} \dot{M}_{env}}{R_{acc}},
765: \end{equation}
766: which yields accretion radii $R_{acc}\sim 30 M_{*}$ AU.
767:
768: The coldest component (3), or outer envelope, was fixed at 40 K and
769: was normalized to the difference between the observed 70 $\mu$m flux and the model
770: for components 1 and 2. including for relevant component $i$ the visible extinction, $A_{V}^{i}$, the
771: distance from the center, $R_{i}$, the volume density, $n_{i}$, and the luminosity, $L_{i}$.
772: The opacity of the outer envelope was small, so the silicate absorption can be
773: identified with component 2, the envelope. The volume density of the outer envelope is only an order
774: of magnitude higher than that of a dense core \citep{myersref}, so it represents
775: the outermost layer of the protostar that merges with the surrounding globule gas.
776:
777: Table~\ref{protomodeltab} lists the results of the model fits,
778: In this empirical model, a collapsed object of
779: radius $<30 R_{\odot}$ has formed, and it resides inside a spherical,
780: optically thick region of size $\sim 2$ AU.
781: The mass of the star cannot be readily constrained without further guidance
782: from theoretical models. We assume masses of order 1 $M_{\odot}$ for the
783: calculations in this section. Changing to larger or smaller masses has
784: no effect on the luminosities (which are tied to the observed fluxes),
785: but mostly changes the size of the central object (which is hidden within
786: the optically thick core).
787:
788: The luminosity of sources $\alpha$ and $\delta$ arises primarily from components (1) and (2),
789: which is consistent with
790: these objects harboring a central protostar in the Class I phase.
791: The luminosity of component (3), the outer envelope, is highest for $\gamma$ and $\epsilon$.
792: The key measurement is the 70 $\mu$m flux: the ratio of 70/24 $\mu$m flux is
793: 22, 2.6, 12, 36 for $\gamma$, $\alpha$, $\delta$, and $\epsilon$, respectively.
794: The 70 $\mu$m fluxes are uncertain due to the bright nebular emission and large beam;
795: however they are sufficiently accurate to reveal differences between the sources.
796: (Sources $\delta$ and $\epsilon$ are not cleanly resolved from each
797: other at 70 $\mu$m; the peak pixel brightnesses are comparable [with $\epsilon$
798: being $\sim 7$\% brighter],
799: so we attributed half the 70 $\mu$m flux to each source.)
800: The origin of the 70 $\mu$m flux from $\gamma$ and $\epsilon$ may be different.
801: For $\gamma$, the presence of an H$_2$O maser spot $7''$ from the infrared source
802: (see \S\ref{gammassec})
803: indicates a Class 0 core may contribute some of the 70 $\mu$m flux we attributed to $\gamma$.
804: For $\epsilon$, the high 70/24 $\mu$m flux (and correspondingly, the high luminosity of component (3)
805: in the simple model) is due to the source being more envelope-dominated, since the
806: silicate feature is extremely deep for this source.
807:
808: \begin{figure}
809: \plotone{f6}
810: \figcaption{Empirical model fits to the Class I protostar spectra. For each source a sum
811: (thick solid line)
812: of three blackbodies (shown individually as dashed lines), with the warmest one absorbed by
813: the cooler ones, matches the observed IRS spectra (thin solid line) and
814: MIPS photometry (asterisk).
815: \label{protomodel}}
816: \end{figure}
817:
818: \def\old{
819: For IC 1396A:$\gamma$, $\tau_{sil}\simeq 1.7$ and the envelope extinction $A_{V}^{env}=24$.
820: The luminosity of the core, before being absorbed by the envelope, $L_{core}\sim 3.0 L_{\odot}$.
821: Greybody dust grains in the envelope at temperature $T_{env}$ heated by $L_{core}$ would be
822: at a distance $R_{env}\sim 3.1$ AU from the core.
823: Combining the envelope optical depth and size, its volume
824: density $n_{env}\sim 1.0\times 10^{9}$ cm$^{-3}$.
825: If the envelope is in steady accretion, then its density should follow
826: \begin{equation}
827: n_{env} = \frac{\dot{M}_{env} R_{env}^{-3/2}} {4 \pi \mu m_{H} \sqrt{2 G M_{*}}},
828: \end{equation}
829: \citep[e.g.][]{terebey}
830: which requires an accretion rate
831: $\dot{M}_{env}\sim 2.3\times 10^{-6} M_{*}^{1/2}$ $M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$.
832: The accretion luminosity of the envelope alone (i.e. for initially distant material that
833: only moves to the envelope radius) is only 0.1 $M_* L_{\odot}$, much less than
834: the observed luminosity of the envelope (2.9 $L_{\odot}$).
835: This shows that the envelope must be heated from within.
836: If we require the accretion luminosity to arise in the core, {\it and}
837: there is a steady flow of matter from the envelope, then
838: \begin{equation}
839: L_{core} = \frac{G M_{*} \dot{M}_{env}}{R_{acc}},
840: \end{equation}
841: which, given the values already derived, requires the accretion radius
842: $R_{acc}\sim 10 M_{*}$ AU. Thus in this empirical model, a collapsed object of
843: radius 10 $R_{\odot}$ must have formed and resides inside a spherical,
844: optically thick region of size $\sim 2$ AU.
845: }
846:
847:
848: \begin{figure}
849: \epsscale{.5}
850: \plotone{f7}
851: \epsscale{1}
852: \figcaption{Cartoon illustrating the structure of the Class I protostars. The mid-infrared
853: emission detected by {\it Spitzer} is attributed to the `dust photosphere' spanning
854: 1--100 AU and surrounded by a cooler envelope.\label{protocartoon}}
855: \end{figure}
856:
857: We can now compare this empirical, two-component description of the spectral
858: energy distribution to a simple theoretical model for the protostar. Following
859: \citet[][hereafter SP]{spbook}, we expect a dust photosphere, located where the protostar is optically
860: thick to its emergent radiation. This `photosphere' will span a range of radii due to the rapid
861: wavelength dependence of the dust opacity. To determine whether the mid-infrared
862: emission can be associated with such a photosphere, we
863: solve SP equations 11.12a,b using the luminosity 6 $L_{\odot}$ (like source $\alpha$) and
864: an assumed mass 1 $M_{\odot}$. The photospheric temperature is in the range
865: 500 -- 120 K for a mass accretion rate in the range
866: 0.15 -- 4$\times 10^{-5} M_{\odot}$, and
867: a photospheric radius in the range 1.4-120 AU, respectively.
868: These temperatures span the `core' and `envelope' color temperatures required to
869: explain the 5--40 $\mu$m emission.
870: We furthermore note that the `envelope', to which
871: we ascribed the 9--11 $\mu$m silicate absorption, has, by definition, an optical depth
872: greater than 1 (but not greater than 10) at 10 $\mu$m, so by the simplest definitions it
873: must be considered part of the photosphere. That we required two color temperatures
874: to match the spectral energy distribution, rather than a single blackbody, reflects only
875: that the wavelength-dependence of the opacity leads to an extended photosphere.
876: By ascribing the 9--11 $\mu$m silicate absorption to the cooler component, we have
877: implicitly assumed a negative temperature gradient, as anticipated for a source powered
878: by accretion luminosity rather than being heated by starlight and cosmic
879: rays from the outside.
880: Figure~\ref{protocartoon} summarizes the protostar parameters derived in this section.
881: The agreement of the accretion rate for a simple photosphere approximation with that
882: derived in the previous paragraph from the envelope density,
883: and the plausibility of the protostellar radius required for accretion to provide
884: the observed luminosity,
885: suggest the simple protostar model presented here is at least roughly consistent with
886: growing star surrounded by a thick envelope and powered by accretion.
887:
888: \subsubsection{Association with Whitney protostar models\label{classiwhitney}}
889:
890: Detailed radiative transfer models of protostars with realistic geometries
891: have been developed by \citet{whitney} and
892: calculated over a wide range of physical parameters by \citet{robitaille}.
893: To find the Whitney model that best matches the Class I source spectra, we
894: first tabulated, for the observed spectra for sources $\alpha$,
895: $\gamma$, $\delta$, $\epsilon$, $\zeta$, and $\eta$ at a set of 14 wavelengths
896: (1.22, 1.63, 2.19, 3.56, 4.51, 5.58, 7.65, 9.95, 12.93, 17.72, 24.28,
897: 29.95, 35.06, 71.42 $\mu$m).
898: These wavelengths were chosen to sample the SED and largely avoid ice features;
899: however, the 12.93 $\mu$m feature possibly contains a strong H$_{2}$O libration feature
900: which is not included in the models \citep{boogert}.
901: For each of the $2\times 10^{5}$ models from \citet{robitaille},
902: we used the model fluxes integrated over the J, H, K, IRAC 3.6, IRAC 4.5, and MIPS
903: 70µm filters\footnote{available at http://caravan.astro.wisc.edu/protostars/repository/index.php}, and individual
904: model fluxes at the remaining Spitzer IRS wavelengths provided separately by T.~Robitaille (personal communication).
905: A $\chi^2$ goodness-of-fit was calculated from the
906: difference between the observed and model tabulated fluxes, including for each protostar model
907: 10 possible inclination angles (87.1$^\circ$ [edge-on], 81.4, 75.5, 69.5 ,63.3, 56.6, 49.5, 41.4, 31.8, 18.2 [pole-on]),
908: variable ($1<A_V<8$ mag) line-of-sight reddening applied with the Milky Way $R_V=3.1$ extinction curve
909: \citep{weingartner}, and a normalization factor within the range $\pm 20$\% relative to that
910: appropriate for a distance of 750 pc. This procedure is very similar to the one available
911: from Robitaille's protostar model fitter$^3$, and we have verified for source IC1396A$\alpha$ that
912: the model identifications are in agreement.
913: % describe uncertainties/weights used ???
914: The goodness-of-fit ($\chi^{2}$) was often poor, potentially due to coarseness and inapplicability of the model grid,
915: and possible source multiplicity (IC1396A:$\gamma$ discussed below).
916: In many instances, particularly for sources IC 1396A: $\delta$ and $\epsilon$, the large
917: $\chi^2$ is caused by a steeply rising MIPS 70 $\mu$m flux
918: that was not reproduced by the models, although the rest of the SED was fitted very well.
919: These sources are located in the southwestern rim of IC 1396A and have large fitted extinctions of
920: $A_V\sim~7$--8 mag.
921: We suspect that outer envelope heating by the external UV radiation field that is not accounted for in the Robitaille models is the cause for the enhanced MIPS 70µm fluxes.
922:
923: The 10 models with the best $\chi^{2}$ were inspected in
924: detail for each source. Table~\ref{whitneytab} shows the most important parameters
925: for the best-fitting model for each source.
926: Figure~\ref{plotwhitney} compares the radiative transfer model to the observed spectrum
927: of IC1396A:$\alpha$.
928: At wavelengths longer than 10 $\mu$m , the Class I protostar models are
929: dominated by the `envelope,' while at 5--8 $\mu$m the flux is mostly
930: from the `disk' in these models.
931: The 9--11 $\mu$m silicate feature is
932: due both to absorption of the `disk' by the envelope and radiative transfer
933: through the envelope (whose temperature decreases radially outward).
934: Scattered light contributes significantly from $\sim 2$--4 $\mu$m, and
935: emergent flux from the central star
936: becomes dominant at wavelengths less than 2 $\mu$m.
937: It is immediately evident
938: that these radiative transfer models are more realistic and contain more of the
939: appropriate physics than the simple model in the previous section:
940: no direct flux from the star would be detectable in the simple, spherical model; nor
941: is the radiative transfer through the envelope taken into account.
942: The detection of these sources in the near-infrared demonstrates that the
943: envelope and/or disk must be flattened \citep[or inhomegenous; see][]{indebetouw},
944: in order to allow scattered light
945: from the star to emerge.
946:
947:
948: \begin{figure}
949: \epsscale{1}
950: \plotone{f8}
951: \epsscale{1}
952: \figcaption[]{Spectrum of IC1396A$\alpha$ together with its best-fitting radiative
953: transfer model from among those computed by \citet{robitaille}. The IRAC data are symbols
954: with error bars; the IRS spectrum is the solid, jagged lines. Model curves are scaled
955: downward by 10\% for clarity.
956: The model sum is a solid,
957: smooth line. Individual model components are the outer envelope (dashed line) that contributes in
958: the far-infrared,
959: the inner envelope or `disk' (dotted line) that contributes in the mid-infrared flux,
960: scattered light (dash-dot line), and direct light (dash-dot-dot-dot).
961: \label{plotwhitney}}
962: \end{figure}
963:
964:
965: The properties of the central stars are not well constrained, but
966: the model fits clearly prefer the youngest available stellar photosphere
967: models, with ages or order $10^3$ yr for $\alpha$, $\delta$ and $\epsilon$,
968: $10^4$ yr for $\gamma$ and $\eta$, and $10^5$ yr for $\zeta$.
969: The evident progression of SED shapes in Figure~\ref{classispec}
970: agrees with the model fitting results, suggesting that the SED shape
971: is sensitive to stellar age.
972: The central
973: star only contributes significantly to the K-band and 3.6 $\mu$m IRAC
974: band, and it is highly extincted. Taken at face value, the masses are
975: similar, at 0.2--0.3 $M_{\odot}$.
976: Since the accretion rates are still
977: high, these may not be the final masses of the young stars that will
978: evolve toward the main sequence. If the sources remain at this
979: accretion rate for a nominal Class I lifetime of $\sim 10^5$ yr,
980: the added mass would be in the range 0.2-0.9 $M_{\odot}$, suggesting
981: the final masses of the stars would be in the range 0.6-1.1 $M_{\odot}$.
982:
983: \subsubsection{Comparing the empirical and radiative transfer model results}
984:
985: For sources IC1396A:$\alpha$ and $\epsilon$, the total luminosities obtained
986: from the empirical (Tab.~\ref{protoproptab}) and radiative transfer (Tab.~\ref{protomodeltab})
987: are in accord.
988: The discrepancy in luminosities for $\gamma$ is due to lack of an outer envelope in the radiative transfer model,
989: or presence of a Class 0 source contaminating the 70 $\mu$m flux of $\gamma$, as discussed above.
990: The discrepancy in luminosity for $\epsilon$ is due to lack of an outer heated envelope
991: in the radiative transfer model. The accretion of the envelope is not included as
992: a source of heating \citep[see \S2.2.4 of][]{robitaille}.
993:
994: The accretion rates, which are probably the most interesting quantities
995: as they tell us how rapidly the stars are growing, are in the same order of magnitude
996: ($10^{{-6}} M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$).
997: In both the empirical and radiative transfer models,
998: the mid-infrared flux is dominated by the envelope, whose
999: luminosity is determined by the accretion rate; thus the
1000: accretion rates are fairly well constrained by the observations.
1001: Nonetheless, there are some significant differences.
1002: In particular, the empirical model yields an accretion rate 9 times higher
1003: than the best-fitting radiative transfer model for $\epsilon$.
1004: The massive outer envelope contributes 80\% of the emergent
1005: luminosity in the empirical model for source $\epsilon$.
1006: The luminosities are also in general agreement, as expected since
1007: the models were chosen to match the observations at wavelengths
1008: that span the brightest part of the spectral energy distribution.
1009: For source $\gamma$,
1010: the empirical model yields a significantly higher luminosity, due
1011: to the cold, outer component that was required to match the 70 $\mu$m
1012: flux. The Whitney models cannot match the 70 $\mu$m flux, hence the
1013: poor fit quality for $\gamma$.
1014: %Otherwise we
1015: %infer that the outer envelopes are more luminous than predicted.
1016: %This could be due to lack of inclusion of accretion luminosity
1017: %as a source of heating in the envelope \citep{robitaille} or
1018: %the details of how the protostar merges with the molecular cloud from
1019: %which it formed.
1020:
1021: \clearpage
1022:
1023: \section{Class II Sources}
1024:
1025: \subsection{Disk Properties from the mid-infrared spectra}
1026:
1027: \def\extra{
1028: temperature, silicate emission feature, luminosity of disk,
1029: Ldisk/Lstar
1030: num1 200
1031: num6 200
1032: Tr37 200
1033: }
1034:
1035: Figure~\ref{classiispec} shows the spectra of four Class II sources.
1036: Each spectrum was dereddened using the line of sight
1037: extinction derived in \S\ref{extinctsec}
1038: and a nominal $R_{V}=3.1$ extinction curve \citep{weingartner}.
1039: The extinction correction is small in the mid-infrared:
1040: for $A_{V}=5.4$, the optical depth $\tau=0.14$ at the shortest IRS
1041: wavelengths (5.5 $\mu$m), 0.38 at the peak of the interstellar silicate feature
1042: (9.5 $\mu$m) and 0.06 at long wavelength (30 $\mu$m).
1043: But the line of sight extinction is high enough to block much of the optical and nearly
1044: all ultraviolet light from these young stars, making it impossible to assign
1045: spectral types using the stars' colors.
1046:
1047: The mid-infrared spectra in Figure~\ref{classiispec}
1048: are characterized by a modest near-infrared brightness, a
1049: very flat continuum from 3-8 $\mu$m, a bright silicate emission
1050: feature at 9--11 $\mu$m, and a continuum beyond 15 $\mu$m
1051: with a range of brightnesses.
1052: Table~\ref{protoproptab} lists the colors and silicate feature
1053: strengths for the sources.
1054: %The spectral index from 5--8 $\mu$m, $\alpha_{5-8}$,
1055: The silicate feature ranges from very strong (twice the continuum)
1056: to weak (20\% of continuum) to undetectable.
1057:
1058: The radial and vertical structure of the disks can be complicated
1059: during the time of planet-building due to ejection of
1060: material from the planet growth zones as well as collection of material
1061: near stable resonances. Of particular importance for
1062: understanding formation of the Earth is the presence
1063: or lack of solid material in the $\sim 0.5$--2 AU `habitable'
1064: region. % \citep{habitable}.
1065: For all the Class II sources with significant emission at 24 $\mu$m,
1066: the color temperature of the 15--40 $\mu$m emission is around 200 K.
1067: There is no evidence of the presence of a colder disk. Given luminosities
1068: of $L_{*}$, the color temperatures suggest that the emission
1069: arises within 1.9 $L_{*}^{1/2}$ AU of the star, corresponding to
1070: the zone of terrestrial planet formation.
1071: Emission also arises from 5--10 $\mu$m,
1072: requiring dust even closer to the star.
1073:
1074: \begin{figure}
1075: \epsscale{1}
1076: \plotone{f9}
1077: \epsscale{1}
1078: \end{figure}
1079: \clearpage
1080: \figcaption[]{{\it Spitzer}/IRS spectra of Class II sources
1081: in IC 1396A. Each spectrum is in $\nu L_{\nu}$ units, divided by its value
1082: at 8 $\mu$m and offset vertically by 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 $L_{\odot}$,
1083: for sources IC1396A:$\theta$, $\beta$, Tr37 11-2146, Tr37 11-2037, and 21364964+5722270,
1084: respectively. The solid line is a simple blackbody through the near-infrared photometry to
1085: illustrate the approximate flux of the photosphere.
1086: \label{classiispec}}
1087: \clearpage
1088:
1089: Mid-infrared spectra of large samples of T Tauri and Herbig AeBe stars have been presented by
1090: \citet[][IRS: Taurus-Auriga]{furlan},
1091: \citet[][IRS: Chameleon, Lupus, and other nearby star-forming regions]{kessler},
1092: \citet[][Subaru: Taurus, TW Hydra]{honda},
1093: and \citet[IRS: Tr 37 and NGC 7160]{sicilia07}.
1094: Our spectra of Class II sources in IC 1396A,
1095: selected for 8 $\mu$m brightness, are generally similar to
1096: T Tauri stars in other star-forming regions.
1097: \def\extra{
1098: None of our sample present the distinctive
1099: shape of CoKu Tau 4, where the spectrum is dominated by the
1100: star out to 8 $\mu$m, followed by a weak silicate feature
1101: and then a rapidly-rising disk with a
1102: relatively cold color temperature (135 K).
1103: That disk gaps like in CoKu Tau 4, if due to planet formation,
1104: are not present in our sample may suggest that inner planets have not yet formed
1105: around these stars; however, a recent observation shows CoKu Tau 4 is a binary
1106: star \citep{ireland}, so the lack of similar stars in our sample may have no
1107: bearing on planet formation.
1108: }
1109: Silicate emission features are present in emission for all 5 stars in Figure~\ref{classiispec}.
1110: There are two evident morphologies of silicate features. The top 3 spectra show
1111: bright, distinct 9--11 and 18--22 $\mu$m features similar to other T Tauri stars.
1112: These features are produced by small amorphous silicate grains in an optically-thin portion
1113: of the disk, e.g. its upper surface or a flared or warped region illuminated by
1114: the star.
1115:
1116: The bottom two stars in Figure~\ref{classiispec},
1117: IC 1396A:$\theta$ and $\beta$, have much weaker and broader
1118: features at 9--11 $\mu$m and no evident feature at 20 $\mu$m.
1119: Both sources are bright in the IRAC and MIPS images;
1120: in the near-infrared (Fig.~\ref{ic1396apalomar}), both have have nearby confusing sources.
1121: Structured nebulosity could contaminate the spectra near the PAH and important
1122: ionic lines.
1123: $\theta$ may have
1124: associated scattered light in the optical (but not in our Palomar or IRAC images).
1125: We applied local background subtractions when extracting the spectra,
1126: to minimize any contamination from the nebula or neighboring sources.
1127: The silicate features for these stars have low amplitude, but
1128: there are two peaks that are
1129: evident at the long and short-wavelength edges, making the feature appear `horned.'
1130: The `horned' appearance is not an effect of line-of-sight extinction.
1131: The interstellar absorption feature peaks at 9.5 $\mu$m and is broad.
1132: If the extinction to IC 1396A:$\theta$ were $A_{V}>10$, then any silicate
1133: emission feature from the star would have its 9--10 $\mu$m portion depressed,
1134: generating a very ``red'' emission feature containing only the $\lambda>10$ $\mu$m
1135: portion.
1136: For IC1396A:$\theta$, the two `horns' are at 9.1 and 11.3 $\mu$m. The 11.3 $\mu$m horn is
1137: at the appropriate location for olivine, Mg$_{x}$Fe$_{1-x}$SiO$_{4}$. We now consider two
1138: possible explanations for the shape of the silicate feature.
1139:
1140: First, we consider that the peaks in the feature are due to small grains of specific minerals.
1141: The 9.1 $\mu$m horn is at the approximate location for a phyllosilicate like montmorillonite
1142: [(Na,Ca)$_{0.33}$(Al,Mg)$_2$(Si$_{4}$O$_{10}$)(OH)$_2$ánH$_2$O] or for amorphous quartz [SiO$_{2}$].
1143: We calculated absorption efficiencies for forsterite, montmorillonite, and quartz using
1144: a continuous distribution of ellipsoids (CDE) and laboratory optical constants
1145: \citep[from][respectively]{fabian,glotch,henning97}.
1146: A reasonable fit to the spectrum includes small grains ($<2$ $\mu$m) of
1147: both crystalline forsterite and either montmorillonite or quartz,
1148: with comparable abundance, together with
1149: continuum emission at temperatures ranging from 700 to 150 K.
1150: Figure~\ref{thetamin} compares the fit and data.
1151: The silicate feature can
1152: be explained exclusively with crystalline silicates,
1153: though the mineralogy of the larger grains cannot be distinguished.
1154: The crystalline features are emitted predominantly from the hottest part of the disk.
1155: If the luminosity is 40 $L_{\odot}$ (as inferred from the radiative transfer model fit
1156: discussed below), then the crystalline silicates are located about 1.6 AU from the star.
1157: % 21-2006: 6.1 Myr K5; 24-515 2.8 Myr, M0.5
1158: The terrestrial-planet-building materials around the stars IC1396A:$\theta$ and $\beta$
1159: could therefore
1160: be rather different from most low-mass stars, even in the same globule (cf. Tr37 11-2037
1161: and the other stars in the top of Fig.~\ref{classiispec} that are dominated by amorphous silicates).
1162:
1163: Second, we consider whether grain growth can explain the shape of the silicate feature.
1164: \citet{honda} showed that if the grains are glassy olivine, the weaker silicate features
1165: can be explained by $\sim 2$ $\mu$m grains and the stronger silicate features can
1166: be explained by $\sim 0.2$ $\mu$m grains.
1167: To determine whether larger grains can explain the spectrum of IC 1396A:$\theta$, we calculated
1168: absorption efficiencies for a range of grain sizes for glassy olivine \citep{dorschner},
1169: then optimized the disk and size to match the observed spectrum. Figure~\ref{thetamin}(a) shows
1170: the result. As noted previously, the larger grains have a flatter and wider spectra feature,
1171: eventually becoming featureless (and joining the continuum). A peak in the absorption efficiency
1172: of glassy olivine occurs around 8.6 $\mu$m for particles with radii greater than 12 $\mu$m.
1173: As seen in Figure~\ref{thetamin}, the peak is at wavelengths too short to match the observed feature;
1174: however, the general shape is very similar to the observed one, and wider mineralogical search
1175: may yield a better match.
1176:
1177: In summary, the distinctive silicate feature (weak, wide, and `horned') of IC 1396A:$\theta$ and $\beta$ could be due to crystalline mineralogy (with quartz or phyllosilicates
1178: providing the `blue' horn of the feature) or by grain growth (with larger grains providing
1179: the width of the feature and also explaining its weakness).
1180: For wide samples of T Tauri stars, \citet[][their Fig. 9]{kessler},
1181: \citet[][their Fig. 2]{honda}, and \citet[][their Fig. 6 versus their Figs. 3--5]{furlan}
1182: showed that the disks with weaker silicate
1183: features also have `flatter' silicate features, where flatness is defined based on the
1184: ratio of the amplitude of the 11.3 $\mu$m olivine peak relative to the 9.8 $\mu$m amorphous silicate peak. Our results in Figure~\ref{classiispec} also show this trend.
1185:
1186: \citet{furlan} propose an evolutionary sequence
1187: based on the mid-infrared spectral morphology, driven by dust settling and growth.
1188: In this scheme, IC 1396A:$\theta$ and $\beta$ would belong to their `Group D',
1189: the group with the greatest amount of grain growth.
1190: Other stars with similar spectral shapes in the star cluster include
1191: Tr 37 11-2006 and 24-515 \citep{sicilia07}.
1192: More recently, \citet{kessler07} showed that the `flatness' of the silicate feature is
1193: also correlated with stellar luminosity (i.e. flatter silicate features tend to be
1194: present around more luminous stars). Our data also support this trend. In particular
1195: IC1396A:$\theta$ and $\beta$ are relatively luminous stars (approximate types A2 and F0)
1196: with flat features,
1197: and the later-type stars like Tr 37 11-2146 and 21364964+5722270 (K6 and G5) have stronger features.
1198:
1199: Another possibility, as discussed above, is that
1200: the mineralogy is different, with increased abundance of phyllosilicates or quartz
1201: around the higher luminosity stars. Phyllosilicates could arise from the
1202: catastrophic disruption of a young asteroid, since aqueously altered silicates are
1203: common compositions of asteroids in particular in the outer main belt
1204: \citep{rivkin}.
1205: Amorphous SiO$_{2}$ may be produced from catastrophic collisions as well, perhaps
1206: among protoplanets as suggested recently for one star
1207: \citep{inseok}.
1208: It must be acknowledged that low-sensitivity infrared spectroscopy, such as presented
1209: in this paper,
1210: does not uniquely provide
1211: independent signatures of grain growth or mineralogy, because of the wide range of
1212: possible size distributions and compositions.
1213: High-quality spectroscopy of a wider sample of T Tauri stars will shed
1214: more light on this issue, which is important since the a disk bearing
1215: phyllosilicates versus a disk with moderate amounts of grain growth are such
1216: suggest distinctly different evolutionary state for the disk.
1217:
1218:
1219: \begin{figure}
1220: \epsscale{0.8}
1221: \plotone{f10}
1222: \epsscale{1}
1223: \figcaption[]{Spectrum of IC 1396A:$\theta$ together with three mineralogical fits.
1224: Panel {\it (a)} shows a combination of small (radius $< 1$ $\mu$m) crystalline olivine
1225: (forsterite; labeled `fors') and phyllosilicate (montmorillonite; labeled `phyll') particles.
1226: Panel {\it (b)} shows a combination of small crystalline olivine and large (radius 15 $\mu$m)
1227: glassy olivine particles (labeled `large ol').
1228: The minerals were placed at the same temperature, optimized in the range 500--800 K (as labeled)
1229: and combined with blackbody continua at 1200 and 120 K, as well as the extincted stellar photosphere.
1230: Individual components of the spectral model are shown as dashed lines with labels,
1231: and the model sum is shown as a solid line.
1232: \label{thetamin}}
1233: \end{figure}
1234:
1235: \subsection{Properties of the visible spectra}
1236:
1237: The optical spectra of the Class II sample show
1238: bright H$\alpha$ emission lines, making them 'classical' T Tauri stars.
1239: Figure ~\ref{optfig} shows some of the spectra.
1240: The stars appear similar to those observed by \citep{sicilia05}, suggesting
1241: they are part of the same population of T Tauri stars widespread throughout
1242: the IC 1396 region, of which IC 1396A is but a small part.
1243: Therefore, we do not elaborate upon their properties here.
1244:
1245: \begin{figure}
1246: \epsscale{1}
1247: \plotone{f11}
1248: \epsscale{1}
1249: \figcaption[]{Optical spectra of Class II sources in IC1396A.
1250: Each spectrum was normalized by its median, scaled by 0.8, and shifted by unity from the previous
1251: for clarity. The bright H$\alpha$ lines are evident for all sources, except LkH$\alpha$ 349a, which
1252: has a P Cygni-like line profile as had been seen by Cohen \& Kuhi (1979).
1253: \label{optfig}}
1254: \end{figure}
1255:
1256:
1257: \subsection{Association with Whitney protostar models}
1258:
1259: The best-matching radiative transfer model from \citet{robitaille}
1260: and \citet{whitney} was identified using the same
1261: procedure as used for the Class I sources (\S\ref{classiwhitney}).
1262: As was found for the Class I sources, the best-matching models
1263: for the Class II sources also had fairly high $\chi^{2}$, so
1264: the models are only to be used as a guide to plausible properties
1265: of the stars. Most of the mid-infrared-selected Class II sources
1266: are of order solar mass, with moderate-mass and slowly growing disks and
1267: negligible envelope.
1268: The two known T Tauri stars, LkH$\alpha$ 349a and c are
1269: fit by 2.2 and 0.7 $M_{\odot}$ stars. The main difference between
1270: them is that LkH$\alpha$ 349c has a massive disk.
1271:
1272: One Class II source whose model stands out from the others in terms
1273: of luminosity and mass is IC1396A:$\theta$.
1274: Its mid-infrared spectrum is very flat, and it could not
1275: be fit by low-mass models as could the others.
1276: The best fit model was a pre-main-sequence A star ($5 M_\odot$).
1277: Such a star has a large predicted photospheric
1278: decrement at 4000 \AA that is not observed in the optical spectrum, and
1279: the predicted V-J=-0.15 whereas the observed V-J=3.
1280: These could be reconciled if the extinction
1281: % E(V-J)=3.85?, curve AJ/AV=0.287; E(V-J)=AV-AJ=AV*(1-AJ/AV)=0.713*AV, so
1282: $A_{V}>5$ to this star; the best-fitting radiative transfer model has $A_V=8$.
1283: The determination of the stellar mass from the infrared luminosity is of course
1284: very model-dependent; a spectral type in the A--F range are possible.
1285: There are other intermediate mass
1286: stars in Tr 37, including B stars in the IC 1396A region with surrounding nebulosity,
1287: so it is not implausible that IC1396A:$\theta$ is a young, intermediate mass embedded
1288: within a dense clump of material that is not its envelope. These properties plus the
1289: bright H$\alpha$ line make IC1396A:$\theta$ plausibly a Herbig AeBe star \citep{waters}.
1290:
1291: The spectral energy distribution of IC 1396A:$\beta$ is also relatively flat in the
1292: mid-infrared, but its 24 $\mu$m flux is not high, which led us to assign
1293: a Class II photometric type. The spectra
1294: presented in this paper confirm that $\beta$ is a T Tauri star and not a
1295: Class I protostar. The best-fitting radiative transfer
1296: model has a large line of sight extinction, $A_V=6.8$, explaining the lack of
1297: bright optical counterpart and infrared-dominated SED. The spectrum of $\beta$ shows
1298: faint PAH features, similar to those seen around other young intermediate-mass
1299: stars \citep{sloan05}, though bright nebular emission in IC 1396A may contaminate
1300: the spectrum at the PAH wavelengths.
1301:
1302: The spectral observations of Class II sources show that the mid-infrared-selected
1303: sample, identified in Paper I, is dominated by highly reddenned, pre-main sequence
1304: stars of a wide range of masses from 0.4--5 $M_\odot$ and
1305: luminosities from 1--40 $L_{\odot}$.
1306:
1307: \clearpage
1308:
1309: \section{Interaction between the Protostars and Globule}
1310:
1311: \subsection{Physical conditions in the globule}
1312:
1313: The present configuration of the globule comprises an ionized
1314: layer on the side facing the O star (evident in H$\alpha$ emission),
1315: a dense bright rim (evident in PAH emission),
1316: and a high-opacity region (evident in extinction and in mm-wave molecular
1317: emission). The dense region comprises a round `head' (centered on LkH$\alpha$ 349)
1318: with a hole in its center, and `trunk' extending to the SW of the head.
1319:
1320: Let us denote properties of the ionized layer with subscript $i$.
1321: From radio observations, its emission measure \citep{matthews}
1322: \begin{equation}
1323: EM_i=n_i^2 L_i=2000\,\,{\rm cm}^{-6}\,\,{\rm pc},
1324: \end{equation}
1325: where $L_i\sim 0.07$~pc is the thickness of
1326: the ionized layer; hence we infer
1327: the density $n_i\sim 160$ cm$^{-3}$
1328: and, assuming temperature $T_i=10^4$ K, pressure
1329: $p_i/k=2\times 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ K.
1330: The ionized layer is maintained by the O 6.5 star, with
1331: the rate of ionizing photons incident on the surface
1332: of the globule equal to the case B recombination rate
1333: for gas with density $n_i$.
1334:
1335: Let us denote properties of the globule interior with subscript $g$.
1336: The radius of the head $R_g=0.51$ pc.
1337: From CO and $^{13}$CO measurements, the column density
1338: $N_g\sim 1.5\times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, and the velocity dispersion
1339: $\delta v_g=2.1$ km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{nakano},
1340: from which we infer the density $n_g\simeq 5000$ cm$^{-3}$ and
1341: pressure $p_g=3\times 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ K. Thus at present,
1342: the bright rim of the globule is in pressure balance with the
1343: ionizing layer.
1344:
1345: However, when the O star first generated its \ion{H}{2} region
1346: and illuminated the globule, the pressure would have been much
1347: higher than that of the ambient gas.
1348: The initial conditions of the medium surrounding the O star are
1349: unknown, but they need not have been exceptional in order to lead
1350: to the present configuration. For example, \citet{gritschm} showed
1351: that an initially randomly turbulent medium evolves into a `pillar'
1352: type morphology, like IC 1396A or the famous pillars of M 16, due
1353: to the pressure and ionization of the O star. The region that became
1354: IC 1396A would have had an initial density higher than average.
1355:
1356: After the O star was born ($\sim 4$ Myr ago),
1357: the pressure of the \ion{H}{2} region
1358: drove a shock into the proto-globule. Using the density of the
1359: ionized layer and globule now, and eq. 12-15 of \citet{spitzer},
1360: the shock speed would be $\sim 2$ km~s$^{-1}$. Such a shock
1361: would reach the center of the globule in $3\times 10^5$ yr.
1362: Of course the density of the proto-globule was initially lower,
1363: and the globule was initially larger. These effects approximately
1364: cancel: the shock velocity $\propto n_0^{-1/2}$, while
1365: for a globule of constant mass the radius $\propto n_0^{-1/3}$, so
1366: the shock crossing time $\propto n_0^{1/6}$, a very weak dependence
1367: on the initial density. When the shock reached the center of the
1368: globule, a strong over-density developed there. Numerical simulations,
1369: e.g. the landmark ones by \citet{lefloch}, show both the central
1370: concentration and instabilities leading to smaller fragments within
1371: the globule. During the $\sim 10^6$ yr period of compression,
1372: much of the globule mass becomes ablated in a
1373: `cometary' phase. IC 1396A is presently in this phase,
1374: with stars of a wide range of mass forming from the over-pressured
1375: globule material.
1376:
1377: %Next: rocket effect
1378:
1379:
1380: \subsection{Outflows and Globule Destruction from the Inside}
1381:
1382: The central hole in the head of the IC 1396A globule may be only one
1383: of several outflow-related structures in the globule. In the following
1384: subsections we discuss evidence for current outflows in the globule and
1385: for the shaping of the globule by outflows.
1386:
1387: \subsubsection{Central cavity and LkH$\alpha$ 349\label{holesec}}
1388:
1389: In optical images, a relatively transparent hole, through which background
1390: stars are visible, surrounds the young star centrally located in the
1391: head of the IC 1396A globule. Some wispy nebulosity is present,
1392: with the appearance of reflection nebulosity.
1393: In molecular line images, the hole appears relatively
1394: vacant of material. \citet{nakano} showed using high-resolution
1395: CO data that the central hole is indeed nearly devoid of molecular
1396: gas. In the {\it Spitzer} images, the hole also appears to be
1397: devoid of material, and furthermore shows a bright rim, with
1398: a particularly well-define `wall' on its W side. The hole size is
1399: $45'' \times 58''$ (EW$\times$NS). The central star, LkH$\alpha$ 349a,
1400: has a spectral type F9e and effective temperature 6165 K
1401: \citep{cohenkuhi,hernandez}. The extinction toward the star is
1402: is nontrivial (despite the nearly empty appearance of the hole).
1403: The extinction is mostly local to IC 1396A, as opposed to
1404: intervening line-of-sight interstellar dust (for which one expects
1405: less than 1 mag extinction at the distance of IC 1396), so
1406: the extinction curve may have high $R_V\sim 5$ typical of
1407: stars behind molecular clouds (as opposed to
1408: the random ISM value of 3.1).
1409: Using the $R_V=5.0$ (3.1) extinction curve, \citet{hernandez} find
1410: LkH$\alpha$ 349a to be a 5.4 (3.0) $M_\odot$ star with luminosity
1411: 270 (45) $L_\odot$. The preferred, higher-luminosity solution
1412: is near the birth-line (age $\sim 0.3$ Myr) and consistent
1413: with the other indications of the star's youth such as the H$\alpha$ line,
1414: which has a P Cygni profile indicating a wind with $v_w>300$ km~s$^{-1}$.
1415: The width and shape of the emission and absorption lines suggest
1416: a very high rotation rate $v \sin i \simeq 190$ km~s$^{-1}$, near
1417: the breakup speed; this may be related to its apparently high-speed
1418: wind. We note that LkH$\alpha$ 349a will be a late B- to early A-
1419: type star on the main sequence and is likely a very young Herbig AeBe
1420: star \citep{herbigrao}, many of which
1421: have similar properties (reflection nebulosity, self-absorbed
1422: H$\alpha$ winds) and are associated with star clusters with age of order 1 Myr
1423: \citep{habart}.
1424:
1425: The location of the LkH$\alpha$ 349 inside the hole, and its high luminosity and
1426: youth, lead one to suspect the star could have cleared the hole.
1427: This can readily be shown to be plausible. If the star produced, for
1428: a time $t_w$, a mechanical luminosity, $L_w$,
1429: leading to a bubble of radius $R_w$, then \citep{castor}
1430: \begin{equation}
1431: R_w = 0.44 \dot{L_w}^{\frac{1}{5}} n_{g4}^{-\frac{1}{5}} t_{w5}^{\frac{3}{5}}
1432: \,\,{\rm pc},
1433: \end{equation}
1434: where $t_{w5}=t_w/10^5$ yr, $n_{g4}=n_g/10^4$ cm$^{-3}$, and
1435: $L_w$ is in solar luminosities.
1436: If the stellar wind generated the presently-observed hole,
1437: $R_w=R_h=0.09$ pc, then we can solve for the mechanical luminosity
1438: \begin{equation}
1439: L_w\sim 2 t_{w5}^{-3} \left(\frac{n_g}{5000\,{\rm cm}^{-3}}\right) L_\odot,
1440: \end{equation}
1441: and, for a wind speed $v_w$, the required mass-loss rate
1442: \begin{equation}
1443: \dot{M}_w=1\times 10^{-7} t_{w5}^3
1444: %\left(\frac{10^5\,{\rm~yr}}{t_w}\right)^3
1445: \left(\frac{300\,{\rm km~s}^{-1}}{v_w}\right)^2
1446: \left(\frac{n_g}{5000\,{\rm cm}^{-3}}\right)
1447: M_\odot \,{\rm yr}^{-1}.
1448: \end{equation}
1449: Since $v_w>300$ km~s$^{-1}$,
1450: the mass-loss rate required for LkH$\alpha$ 349a to blow a bubble in
1451: the globule is plausible,
1452: by comparison to other young stars.
1453: Class I sources with luminosity $\sim 10^2$ $L_\odot$ have winds with
1454: $L_w\sim 0.1$--1 $L_\odot$ \citep{spbook}.
1455: Such a wind would only need to be active
1456: for $\sim 10^5$ yr to provide momentum to sweep the cavity
1457: clear.
1458: The SED models for LkH$\alpha$ 349a and c indicate ages of 0.4 and 1.2 Myr,
1459: respectively, allowing time for their wind phase to have passed.
1460: LkH$\alpha$ 349a is rotating exceptionally rapidly
1461: \citep{hessman}, and
1462: has little or no disk, perhaps enabling a relatively spherical and powerful wind.
1463: The star appears close to the stellar birth-line but is
1464: clearly exposed, suggesting that while young, the
1465: star is likely to have completed its main `wind-bearing' Class 0 and I
1466: phases and resides within the bubble that it blew.
1467:
1468: The existence of a bubble blown LkH$\alpha$ 349a provides supporting,
1469: circumstantial evidence that it could have been triggered by
1470: radiative driven implosion.
1471: If LkH$\alpha$ 349a and its bubble had existed {\it before} the formation
1472: of the O 6.5 star, the bubble would not have survived to
1473: this day. The shock front driven by the pressure of the expanding
1474: \ion{H}{2} region would have reached the center of the globule
1475: long ago, as discussed above. Such a large-scale shock would
1476: likely have significantly distorted the cavity sent it downwind
1477: of the young LkH$\alpha$ 349a.
1478:
1479:
1480: \subsubsection{Water maser near IC1396:$\gamma$\label{gammassec}}
1481:
1482: Figure~\ref{gamwater} shows water maser emission toward
1483: source IC 1396A:$\gamma$.
1484: 22 GHz H$_{2}$O masers are associated with Class 0 protostars,
1485: and only rarely (4\%) with Class I sources, in a survey of such sources \citep{furuya}.
1486: The mid-infrared
1487: spectrum of IC1396A:$\gamma$ has the characteristics of a Class I protostar with
1488: a rapidly-forming star accreting material from within a dense envelope.
1489: Is the H$_{2}$O maser from an outflow caught `in transition' from Class 0 to I?
1490: Or is the maser spot from a clump of gas far from the protostar?
1491:
1492: As noted by \citet{valdettaro}, the maser spot is significantly offset from
1493: the IC 1396A:$\gamma$ by $5000\pm 200$ AU. The maser peak
1494: coincides with a faint infrared
1495: source in the IRAC images.
1496: The coordinates of the IRAC source are
1497: 21$^h$36$^{m}$07.8$^{s}$ 57$^{\circ}$26$'$42.8$''$, within $1''$ of
1498: the VLA maser position;
1499: we will refer to this source for convenience as
1500: IC 1396A:$\gamma_{b}$.
1501: The fluxes of $\gamma_{b}$ at
1502: 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 $\mu$m are
1503: $<0.2$, $0.6\pm 0.1$, $1.5\pm 0.2$, and $1.2\pm 0.3$ mJy,
1504: respectively; with most of the uncertainty due to blending with the
1505: much brighter source $\gamma$.
1506: The corresponding magnitudes are
1507: [3.6]$>$15.3, [4.5]=13.7, [5.8]=12.2, [8.0]=11.8.
1508: No counterpart was evident in the near-infrared images.
1509: By chance, the orientation of one of the mid-infrared (IRS) spectrograph slits covered
1510: the faint source. The spectrum of $\gamma_{b}$
1511: cannot be cleanly separated from that of
1512: $\gamma$, but it is clear that the emission from the source is {\it not} line-dominated.
1513: If the infrared source were a Herbig-Haro type object, where the jet is impacting
1514: a dense clump, then we would expect strong emission lines of H$_2$.
1515: The IRS short-low spectrum (where the faint source can be separated from $\gamma$)
1516: covers 5.2-14 $\mu$m and would contain the pure rotational H$_{2}$ S(2) through S(7) lines
1517: if they were present. Furthermore, there is no corresponding spot at the
1518: H$_{2}$O maser position in the near-infrared rovibrational H$_{2}$v=1-0 S(1) image.
1519: Therefore, the IRAC source corresponding to the maser is not a shocked
1520: clump of gas. It is also unlikely to be a background galaxy, based
1521: on the lack of PAH features that would be prominent at 6.2 and 7.7 $\mu$m
1522: modulo some small redshift. The IRS spectrum of the faint source is
1523: dominated by continuum emission, and it looks
1524: roughly similar to that of the $\gamma$; the difficulty of separating the
1525: sources makes it impossible to study the spectrum in detail from
1526: the available data.
1527:
1528: Therefore, it appears that the H$_{2}$O maser is not directly associated with
1529: the luminous infrared source IC 1396A:$\gamma$, nor is it an interaction spot between the outflow and nearby molecular gas.
1530: The faint mid-infrared source IC 1396A:$\gamma_{b}$ may itself be a protostar powering an outflow responsible for the H$_{2}$O maser. At 24 $\mu$m,
1531: a very bright source clearly corresponds in position to the
1532: luminous source $\gamma$. There is
1533: an extension from this source at 24 $\mu$m that corresponds to the faint source seen with IRAC, but it is severely blended:
1534: the offset is $7''$ while the beam size is $5''$. We scaled
1535: and subtracted the point spread function to
1536: estimate the 24 $\mu$m flux of the fainter source as $\sim 10$ mJy,
1537: corresponding to [24]$\sim$7.1; a very conservative limit is
1538: [24]$>5.9$. Combining the mid-infrared colors of $\gamma_{b}$ and
1539: comparing to Figure 3 of Paper I (i.e. comparing to the locations
1540: of Taurus and IC 1396A young stellar objects), the H$_{2}$O maser
1541: source $\gamma_{b}$ appears
1542: to be a low-luminosity Class I protostar.
1543: This brings
1544: back the original question of why a Class I protostar has an
1545: associated maser. Perhaps this low-luminosity source is a Class I/0
1546: transition object.
1547:
1548: The remarkable result is that
1549: the brightest (only known) H$_{2}$O maser in the globule is
1550: close to the second-most-luminous ($L_{MIR}=1.6 L_\odot$) Class I protostar
1551: in the globule, but it is actually positionally coincident with
1552: a separate, low-luminosity ($0.02 L_\odot$) infrared source.
1553: The separation of 5000 AU is somewhat wider than a binary pair;
1554: if $\gamma$ has
1555: a mass (star plus envelope) of $\sim 1 M_{\odot}$ then the orbital speed would be 0.5 km~s$^{-1}$,
1556: comparable to the velocity dispersion of the globule.
1557: Class I sources have been found to have a wide distribution of separations, and this
1558: potential pair would be among the widest \citep[cf.][]{connelley}.
1559: There are other low-luminosity infrared sources in this field,
1560: so the total population of protostars may be much larger than the
1561: bright mid-infrared sources identified by eye in Paper I.
1562: Such low-luminosity objects have been found in other nearby
1563: star-forming regions that were surveyed by {\it Spitzer},
1564: including those in dense cores in L1014 \citep{young},
1565: L1448 \citep{kauffmann}, and L1521F \citep{bourke};
1566: they have been interpreted as sub-stellar protostars
1567: though the envelopes may contain more than $1 M_{\odot}$.
1568: The prototype of the class, L1014-IRS, was searched for H$_{2}$O masers
1569: on 7 epochs with no detection \citep{shirley}.
1570: The detection of an H$_{2}$O maser from IC 1396A$\gamma_{b}$
1571: is the first for a low-luminosity object of this class.
1572: Masers luminosities have been found to correlate roughly with the
1573: bolometric luminosity of their driving protostars \citep{furuya,shirley},
1574: with $L_{H_{2}O}=3\times 10^{-9}L_{\odot}$ and over an
1575: order of magnitude of scatter. One could simply use this scaling to
1576: estimate or constrain the luminosity of the source, despite the large scatter
1577: and wide range of variability (a factor of 180). For IC 1396A:$\gamma_{b}$,
1578: we would obtain $L_{bol}\sim 0.1$--$1 L_{\odot}$ depending which epochs
1579: are averaged together. Such a luminosity is not inconsistent with the
1580: observed mid-infrared luminosity, though it does suggest that the much
1581: of the luminosity emerges in the far-infrared.
1582: %Present technology
1583: %does not allow the source to be separated from the much brighter, nearby
1584: %source $\gamma$.
1585:
1586:
1587: \subsubsection{Molecular Outflow from IC 1396A:$\gamma$}
1588:
1589: The Palomar 2.12 $\mu$m H$_{2}$1--0 S(1) continuum-subtracted image shows two knots of
1590: emission near IC 1396A:$\gamma$. Figure~\ref{gammazoom} shows that these knots are located
1591: diametrically opposite each other along a line that passes through $\gamma$, a
1592: configuration strongly suggestive of a jet, powered by $\gamma$, that is striking molecular
1593: knots forming dense Herbig-Haro objects \citep{hhobject}.
1594: The short length of the outflow (in particular compared to pc-scale outflows)
1595: is likely due to its propagation into dense walls of
1596: the globule.
1597: That the outflow is seen in H$_{2}$ but not other tracers is also likely due to
1598: the dense material the jet interacts with.
1599:
1600:
1601: \def\extra{
1602: SMT observations...
1603: fitting to gamma CO(3-2) line
1604: Line Area Position Width Intensity
1605: 1 26.329 ( 0.270) -8.179 ( 0.011) 2.348 ( 0.026) 10.534
1606: 2 30.999 ( 0.489) -8.842 ( 0.059) 7.953 ( 0.088) 3.6619
1607: alpha
1608: Line Area Position Width Intensity
1609: 1 29.772 ( 0.155) -8.078 ( 0.005) 2.025 ( 0.012) 13.809
1610:
1611: 12M-HCO+
1612: gamma
1613: Line Area Position Width Intensity
1614: 1 3.7255 ( 0.198) -8.174 ( 0.063) 2.358 ( 0.139) 1.4843
1615: }
1616:
1617: Further evidence for a molecular outflow is found from observations this
1618: source using the Arizona Radio Astronomy Observatory Submillimeter
1619: Telescope in the CO(3--2) line ($23''$ beam, including both $\gamma$ and $\gamma_{b}$.
1620: Figure~\ref{gammaco32} shows
1621: a prominent blue wing; a two-component fit of
1622: narrow line typical of the globule plus a second Gaussian with a full width at half maximum
1623: of 7.9 km~s$^{-1}$ and peak antenna temperature 3.7 K.
1624:
1625: \clearpage
1626: \begin{figure}
1627: \epsscale{1}
1628: \plotone{f12}
1629: \epsscale{1}
1630: \figcaption{{\it Spitzer}/IRAC color image of the region around
1631: the protostar IC 1396A:$\gamma$. The 3.6 $\mu$m image is coded as blue,
1632: 4.5 $\mu$m as green, 5.8 $\mu$m as orange, and 8 $\mu$m as red.
1633: The Palomar/WIRC H$_{2}$ 2.12 $\mu$m image is coded as light green.
1634: Protostars IC 1396A:$\gamma$, $\delta$ and $\epsilon$ are labeled.
1635: Source $\gamma_{b}$ is coincident with the 22 GHz H$_{2}$O maser.
1636: A small `$\times$' indicates an IRAC image artifact exactly 4.88$''$
1637: (4 IRAC pixels) SE of $\gamma$. Dashed lines indicate the two shocked H$_{2}$
1638: blobs on either side of source $\gamma$.
1639: The scale bar is $30''$=0.11 pc=0.36 l.y.=22,000 AU long.
1640: \label{gammazoom}}
1641: \end{figure}
1642:
1643: \begin{figure}
1644: \plotone{f13}
1645: \figcaption{CO(3--2) spectrum of the protostar IC 1396A:$\gamma$.
1646: \label{gammaco32}}
1647: \end{figure}
1648:
1649: The presence of outflows from young stellar objects in IC 1396 is not unique
1650: to the globule studied in this paper. \citet{ic1396n} found HH objects and a
1651: 0.6-pc scale outflow in IC 1396N. The find that HH 777 emerges from the dense
1652: globule into the \ion{H}{2} region. In the following section we discuss the
1653: potential influence of outflows on IC 1396A.
1654:
1655:
1656: \subsection{Compartments within the globule due to outflows}
1657:
1658: The internal structure of the globule around IC 1396:$\gamma$ (Figure~\ref{gammazoom})
1659: is complicated, but it can be described
1660: as follows. There is a bright `wall' located directly $\sim 10''$ upstream
1661: (i.e. toward the central O star of the \ion{H}{2} region) of
1662: $\gamma$, with a curved shape that appears to merge with two east-west filaments
1663: that pass $\sim 30''$ north and south of $\gamma$; the filaments
1664: continue downstream of $\gamma$ for $\sim 180'$ before merging with
1665: other structures in the globule.
1666:
1667: Using the equations above, assuming the upstream wall is a boundary
1668: between the wind and the turbulent pressure of the globule (or the
1669: ionized layer surrounding the globule, which has comparable pressure),
1670: the required mechanical luminosity of the wind
1671: $\sim 0.02 L_\odot$ and the mass-loss rate $\sim 10^{-7} M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$
1672: (assuming an outflow speed $\sim 30$ km~s$^{-1}$ typical of such outflows)
1673: if the wind has been active for $10^5$ yr. Such a luminosity is plausible,
1674: as $\gamma$ is a class I/0 source with luminosity $\sim 30 L_\odot$, for
1675: which outflow mechanical luminosities $\sim 0.1 L_\odot$ are typical
1676: \citep{spbook}. The shape of the cavity around $\gamma$, if it is wind-blown,
1677: suggests a significantly lower density on its downstream side. If we naively
1678: use the wind bubble radius equation for the upstream and downstream
1679: directions separately, then with a size some 18 times longer in the downstream
1680: direction, the density would be lower by a factor of $10^6$, meaning the
1681: region downstream from $\gamma$ was already essentially empty, with
1682: $n<1$ cm$^{-3}$, compared to the rest of the globule. Thus it seems unlikely
1683: that the structure around $\gamma$ is an asymmetric, wind-blown bubble.
1684: Rather, its appearance and physical properties suggest a wind blowing into
1685: a high-pressure front of dense globule material upstream, and expanding
1686: relatively freely downstream into a region of much lower density.
1687:
1688: Could this shape be
1689: a wind bubble blown by $\gamma$ and other nearby protostars?
1690: We can use the same type of estimate
1691: as in the previous section to estimate the wind properties. The globule
1692: is very optically dark near $\gamma$ indicating a high column density.
1693: The H$_2$O maser line is narrow, but we cannot use this as an estimate of
1694: the wind speed because masers are highly localized spots within the outflow.
1695: Instead, a lower limit to the molecular outflow speed is obtained from
1696: the range of velocities observed for the H$_2$O maser, which spanned 5 km~s$^{-1}$
1697: over the observed epochs (Fig.~\ref{gamwater}).
1698: The actual outflow velocity is likely to be much higher
1699: depending on projection effects (as the masers are only individual spots
1700: in the outflow and can only under-represent the true range of velocities)
1701: and the bias that the H$_2$O emission traces only dense, warm molecular
1702: gas and not the likely ionized and much faster material closer to the star.
1703:
1704: This empirical reasoning can be further extended to the rest of the globule.
1705: There are 5 prominent `voids' within the globule and its main SE extension.
1706: All of the bright Class I sources for which we obtained IRS spectra are
1707: located within voids. The one containing $\gamma$ was just discussed in
1708: the previous paragraph. The one containing $\delta$ and $\epsilon$ is
1709: similar in many ways to the one containing $\gamma$, in size, shape,
1710: and orientation. Since $\delta$ and $\epsilon$ are so close, it is possible
1711: that their winds combine to form this void. Three large voids are located within
1712: the globule head. These include the one containing Lk$\alpha$ that was
1713: discussed above, as well as one that contains protostar $\alpha$. The
1714: third contains sources $\mu$ and $\zeta$, with its E edge overlapping the globule
1715: edge; however, its NE boundary is clearly not the globule edge and has a
1716: curvature consistent with a roughly parabolic surface with $\mu$ at its
1717: focus and $\zeta$ near its edge.
1718:
1719: Since the major voids all contain either mid-infrared-bright, Class I
1720: protostars, or the Herbig AeBe star in the globule hole, we suggest that
1721: the globule is being reshaped from the inside, with each protostar residing
1722: in a `compartment' that it has blown via its outflow. Turning the argument
1723: around, we should see what influence each of the photometrically-defined
1724: Class I sources may have had on its environment. For this we consider
1725: the sources in the Class I region of the color-color diagram from
1726: \citet{reachIC}. In order of 8 $\mu$m flux, these are $\alpha$,
1727: $\gamma$, $\delta$, $\epsilon$, $\eta$, $\zeta$, $\mu$.
1728: All except $\eta$ are accounted for in voids. Since $\eta$ is located in a
1729: relatively busy portion of the globule, it would be difficult to separate
1730: any potential cavity from other overlapping structures.
1731: There are other, poorly-defined or smaller voids within the globule.
1732: One such void in the SW `trunk' extension is located just W of $\delta$+$\epsilon$
1733: and just N of $\gamma$; this void is not as well defined and contains no
1734: mid-infrared source.
1735: Thus it appears
1736: that all (but one) of the Class I protostars are located within voids,
1737: and all (but one) of the voids contain Class I protostars or the
1738: Herbig AeBe star.
1739:
1740: The evidence suggests that protostellar outflows are shaping the globule from
1741: the inside, while the pressure from the \ion{H}{2} region maintains the
1742: bright rim in pressure equilibrium. The outflows may have a double
1743: significance. Not only are they destroying the globule's
1744: structural integrity, leading to its further fragmentation and dissipation,
1745: but they may also drive and maintain turbulence, which would otherwise dissipate
1746: quickly in the dense gas, within the globule \citep{linak06}. This
1747: induced turbulence may be what prevents the entire globule from collapsing
1748: into stars, limiting the star formation efficiency.
1749:
1750: \subsection{Proplyd-like objects near IC 1396A}
1751:
1752: In addition to the protostars and wind signatures, the mid-infrared images
1753: contain features indicative of dense, starless cores.
1754: The term `proplyd' was coined by \citet{odell} to refer to protoplanetary
1755: disks made observable as silhouettes in HST images of
1756: the Orion \ion{H}{2} region:
1757: a generic description would include a central star, an elliptical, dark
1758: patch, and a bright rim.
1759: Without a central star, we have a proplyd-like
1760: object that could be starless or harbor a protostar.
1761: There are numerous
1762: dark globules within IC 1396, ranging from the relatively large
1763: and bright ones like IC 1396A or IC 1396N \citep{ic1396n}
1764: to smaller fragments dispersed throughout
1765: the \ion{H}{2} region. We mention here some of the smallest ones,
1766: because the large, bright-rimmed globules contain multiple embedded
1767: infrared sources and do not meet the spirit of the definition as
1768: being produced by the circumestellar material of a single young star.
1769:
1770: In the $10^\prime$ region around IC 1396A, there are several small clouds that have
1771: distinct {\it dark cores} surrounded by {\it bright rims} and often with
1772: cometary tails. These look similar to the proplyd-like objects
1773: in other \ion{H}{2} regions. \citet{demarco} studied those in 8
1774: regions, finding that only one objects in M~17 contains a central
1775: star and may be a real proplyd (joining those originally found in
1776: Orion). \citet{smith} explains the paucity of such objects outside
1777: Orion as being due to the short lifetime of the proplyd phenomenon.
1778: (Only Orion contains numerous stars $< 0.5$ Myr very close to the
1779: O stars.)
1780: Are the proplyd-like objects in IC 1396 and other \ion{H}{2}
1781: regions small, individual-star-forming globules, or are they
1782: transient molecular cloud fragments en route to photoevaporation?
1783:
1784: Figure~\ref{proplydfig} shows images of 5 proplyd-like objects in
1785: IC 1396, and Table~\ref{proplydtab} tabulates their properties.
1786: For objects A, B, C, and E, the position angle of the vector from
1787: the object to the central O star (O* PA) is nearly equal to
1788: the position angle of the vector from the tail to the head
1789: (Tail PA), indicating the tails are material ablated from the
1790: head, as is the case on larger scale for the IC 1396A globule.
1791: The central holes are marginally resolved with IRAC at 8 $\mu$m,
1792: having diameters 5.0 to 15$''$ compared to the PSF diameter of 2.4$''$.
1793: For each object there is a distinct, dark `head' that could be
1794: due either to a lack of material (i.e. an empty hole) or
1795: extinction. If we attribute the `heads' as being dark due
1796: to extinction, then we
1797: require an optical depth at 8 $\mu$m $\tau_8>1$, which
1798: corresponds to $A_V>10$ and $N_H\sim 1.8 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$.
1799: The heads are not resolved in the MIPS images; the 24 $\mu$m image
1800: is consistent in morphology with a suitably smoothed and resampled
1801: 8 $\mu$m image (so the 24 $\mu$m morphology is consistent
1802: with either extinction or a central hole).
1803: The central volume density required in the heads are of order
1804: $10^6$ cm$^{-3}$
1805: and masses of order 0.1 $M_\odot$. The free-fall time is short
1806: ($10^5$ yr) in such high-density gas, but the cores can be supported
1807: if they have turbulent velocities around 0.2 km~s$^{-2}$ or
1808: a significant magnetic field. The properties of the heads are
1809: typical of small dense cores in nearby star-forming regions \citep{myersref}.
1810: The analysis just presented is similar in nature to that of
1811: \citet{demarco}, who set the optical depth to H$\alpha$ emission
1812: to of order unity and concluded their proplyd-like objects are
1813: low-density and transient. In contrast, we find significant optical
1814: depth at 8 $\mu$m, requiring a significantly higher density. The
1815: near balance between likely turbulent and magnetic pressure versus
1816: gravitational force suggests the cores {\it may} indeed be forming
1817: stars. Their dynamical configuration, with a central density enhancement,
1818: bright rim, and ablated tail, suggest that the central core density
1819: could be higher than indicated at the angular resolution presented here,
1820: in which case that portion of the dense core will almost certainly
1821: collapse into a small star.
1822:
1823: An alternative explanation for the proplyd-like objects is a standoff
1824: between a wind and the ionization front. In this case the deficit in
1825: brightness at the `head' is due at least partially to a lack of
1826: material, instead of extinction. Using the same relations as
1827: in \S\ref{holesec}, the required wind mechanical luminosity
1828: $L_w=0.002$--0.09 $t_{w5}^{-3}$ $L_\odot$. An outflow power of this order
1829: is typical for protostellar sources with luminosity or order 1 $L_\odot$.
1830: If the luminosity of such a source were emitted predominantly at
1831: 24 (70) $\mu$m, its flux would be of $\sim 0.5$ (1) Jy, which is clearly
1832: ruled out with the {\it Spitzer} data. The observed properties of the
1833: proplyd-like objects is therefore only consistent with being wind
1834: cavities if the embedded sources are significantly under-luminous
1835: (in photons) or high-powered (in wind). With the available information,
1836: we suggest the hypothesis previously mentioned, of an evaporating dense
1837: globule, is more likely.
1838:
1839: While we described the objects as `proplyd-like' based on analogy between
1840: their morphology and those of the silhouette protoplanetary disks in the
1841: HST image of Orion,
1842: another analogy is the evaporating gaseous globules (`EGGs') that are
1843: seen in many star-forming regions \citep{hesteregg}. The primary physical
1844: difference between EGG and proplyd
1845: is the lack of a bright central star, although
1846: even some EGGs are found to have low-luminosity stars or even outflows
1847: when observed at very high resolution. A point of distinction between
1848: these EGG-like objects is that they are not connected to a larger `pillar'
1849: or globule that is being eroded by the ionization front. Instead, the objects
1850: we present here are isolated.
1851: They were most likely small regions of
1852: relatively high density that are currently being illuminated by the
1853: star, just like miniature versions of the IC 1396A globule.
1854: The proplyd-like objects discussed here are similar to the
1855: Thackeray's globules in IC 2944, which appear to be starless \citep{thackeray}.
1856: That these
1857: small globules lack indications of star formation in the {\it Spitzer}
1858: images shows that the mechanism of triggered star formation may not
1859: operate on the smallest globules, which may be evaporating so quickly
1860: (perhaps due to their larger surface area to mass ratio) that stars to
1861: not have time to form in their cores.
1862:
1863: \clearpage
1864:
1865: \begin{figure}
1866: \epsscale{.23}
1867: \plotone{f14a}
1868: \plotone{f14b}
1869: \plotone{f14c}
1870: \plotone{f14d}
1871: \epsscale{1}
1872: \figcaption{{\it Spitzer} 8 $\mu$m images of proplyd-like objects in
1873: IC 1396. Coordinates are give in Table~\ref{proplydtab}; panel
1874: {\it (a)} contains objects A and B;
1875: panel {\it (b)} contains object C;
1876: panel {\it (c)} contains object D;
1877: and panel {\it (d)} contains object E.
1878: An arrow in each panel shows a $30''$ long vector pointed toward the
1879: central O star HD 206267. All images are oriented with N up and E to the left.
1880: \label{proplydfig}}
1881: \end{figure}
1882: \clearpage
1883: %\flushleft
1884:
1885:
1886: \section{Star formation in IC 1396A}
1887:
1888:
1889: \subsection{Pre-Main Sequence ages for infrared-bright stars near IC 1396A}
1890:
1891: To determine the ages of the pre-main sequence stars near IC 1396A,
1892: we used the models from \citet{siess} for a relatively high
1893: metallicity $Z=0.04$, based on the assumption that the
1894: young Cep OB2 region should be more enriched
1895: than the cloud from which the Sun formed some 5 Gyr ago.
1896: Figure~\ref{siessplot} shows the location on a color-magnitude
1897: diagram of the low-mass pre-main sequence stars within a
1898: $9'$ radius of IC 1396A from
1899: \citet{sicilia05} and from this paper.
1900: The photometry and extinction correction are not accurately known,
1901: so the large spread in H-R diagram and the precise locations of
1902: individual stars should not be over-interpreted.
1903: Taken at face value, LkH$\alpha$c is very young ($\sim 0.5$ Myr)
1904: and possibly coeval with the more-massive LkH$\alpha$ 349a
1905: (discussed in \S\ref{holesec}).
1906: The location of the source IC 1396A:$\theta$ can be only roughly
1907: estimated since it is not detected at 5500\AA; for illustration
1908: we placed it at the location appropriate for V=R+.5=17.5.
1909: The mid-infrared sources tend to be younger than the optically-selected stars.
1910: Most of the stars are in the 1--5 Myr range,
1911: including the infrared-selected Class II sources for
1912: which Palomar and {\it Spitzer} spectra were obtained.
1913:
1914: %WHERE ARE THE OTHER SOURCES WITH SPECTRA? PLACE ON HR DIAGRAM
1915:
1916: \begin{figure}
1917: \epsscale{1}
1918: \plotone{f15}
1919: \epsscale{1}
1920: \figcaption{
1921: Hertzprung-Russell diagram for IC 1396A, using theoretical
1922: models from \citep{siess} with $Z=0.04$.
1923: Solid red lines are pre-main sequence Hayashi
1924: tracks for stars with masses (right to left)
1925: 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1.3, 1.5,
1926: 1.9, 2.7, 5, and 7 $M_\odot$.
1927: The first 7 dashed black lines
1928: show isochrones for stars with ages
1929: (top to bottom)
1930: 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 2, and 5 Myr;
1931: the lowest dashed line shows the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS).
1932: Two filled cyan circles linked by a cyan line labeled `a'
1933: show the location of LkH$\alpha$ 349a for extinction curves with
1934: $R_V=3.1$ and 5; the larger circle is the preferred, $R_V=5$ result.
1935: A separate cyan filled circle labeled `c' marks the location of LkH$\alpha$ 349c, on the 0.5 Myr isochrone and 0.6--0.8 $M_{\odot}$
1936: Hayashi track.
1937: Blue triangles
1938: mark the locations of low-mass pre-main sequence stars within
1939: the IC 1396A field \citep{sicilia05}.
1940: DodgerBlue-colored squares show the locations of the
1941: mid-infrared-selected (and optically detected) stars
1942: from Table~\ref{opttab};
1943: IC 1396A:$\theta$ is labeled and includes a line for a 1 mag
1944: range of extinctions.
1945: Violet asterisks mark the locations of stars just upstream of the bright rim
1946: of IC 1396A from Table~\ref{rimfront}.
1947: \label{siessplot}}
1948: \end{figure}
1949: %\flushleft
1950:
1951:
1952: \subsection{Generations of Star Formation in IC 1396A}
1953:
1954: Apart from LkH$\alpha$ 349, which formed near the center of the globule,
1955: the triggered star formation in smaller condensations may be expected to follow a
1956: sequence. For example, \citet{sugitani95} found an age gradient such that
1957: T Tauri stars lie closer to the triggering O star than {\it IRAS} sources,
1958: which tend to lie behind the bright rim. \citet{matsuyanagi} showed this
1959: in detail for an individual bright rim.
1960: Does a similar sequence obtain among
1961: the young, mid-infrared sources in IC 1396A?
1962: There is a handful of Class I sources within IC 1396A---more than the typically 1 {\it IRAS} source
1963: for bright rims where the sequential trend was first noted
1964: \citep{sugitani95}.
1965: The youngest protostars in IC 1396A are likely
1966: those with the most `extreme' infrared colors; these
1967: are $\epsilon$, $\delta$, $\gamma$, $\alpha$, in order of increasing [8]-[24]
1968: (and [3.6]-[5.8]) color.
1969: The sources $\epsilon$, $\delta$, and $\gamma$ are located just behind (0.02 pc) bright rims.
1970: On a larger scale, all of these protostars are located downstream of the center of the
1971: globule, and all but $\alpha$ are in the `trunk' portion, known as SFO 36,
1972: which may have been
1973: swept back from the `head' of the globule.
1974: The luminous Class I sources
1975: are further behind the bright rim than LkH$\alpha$ 349 and
1976: the hole it has carved from the center of the head of the globule.
1977: Thus it appears that the centroid
1978: location of the youngest protostars
1979: is significantly behind the main concentration of globule mass.
1980:
1981:
1982: %4 6X21370360+5733173 21 37 3.4 +57 33 16.5 9.01 13.02 13.49 14.50 14.91 16.05 16.59 ...
1983:
1984: % from 6X
1985: %| cntr| ra| dec| j_m| h_m| k_m|j_msig|h_msig|k_msig| j_snr| h_snr| k_snr|j_psfchi|h_psfchi|k_psfchi|rd_flg|ph_qual|cc_flg| ndet|a|dist_opt|b_m_opt|vr_m_opt| ext_key_1| mp_key| jdate| scan_key|
1986: %| int| double| double| double| double| double|double|double|double| double| double| double| double| double| double| char| char| char| char|c| double| double| double| int| int| double| int|
1987: %| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1988: %| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null| null|n| null| null| null| null| null| null| null|
1989: %0 38543309 324.289000 57.496784 13.325 12.355 11.818 0.022 0.046 0.022 386.75 364.68 416.12 1.11 0.83 0.69 222 AAA 000 666666 U 0.32 19.40 18.20 null null 2451834.6438 2027
1990: %1 38543533 324.293911 57.520119 13.141 12.276 11.871 0.022 0.030 0.017 458.17 392.20 396.30 1.81 1.12 1.15 222 AAA 000 666666 U 0.97 18.30 17.10 null null 2451834.6439 2027
1991: %2 38543759 324.277071 57.542160 13.330 12.335 11.904 0.020 0.028 0.016 384.97 371.46 384.43 1.03 0.92 0.71 222 AAA 000 666666 U 0.62 19.40 17.40 null null 2451834.6440 2027
1992: %3 38543932 324.298800 57.558079 12.020 11.205 10.966 0.031 0.044 0.025 1286.56 1051.74 912.05 1.20 0.99 2.73 222 AAA 000 666655 0 null null null null null 2451834.6441 2027
1993: %4 38530218 324.264957 57.554813 17.609 16.593 16.050 null 0.139 0.139 null 7.36 8.44 null 0.79 1.15 022 UBB 000 000506 0 null null null null null 2451834.6381 2026
1994: %5 38544068 324.283421 57.569302 9.585 8.391 7.898 0.029 0.055 0.015 12117.97 14044.62 15389.34 12.84 6.37 27.43 111 AAA 000 776666 U 1.47 16.00 14.50 null null 2451834.6441 2027
1995: %5:USNO propert motion -54,94
1996:
1997: Inspired by this observation, we searched for Class II young stellar objects just
1998: upstream from the bright rim. Indeed, there is such a set of infrared
1999: sources. We measured the mid-infrared fluxes of several of the
2000: 24 $\mu$m sources, and
2001: found the corresponding entries in 2MASS ($J$, $H$, $K$) and where possible in
2002: the tables by \citep{sicilia05} (optical magnitudes, spectral type)
2003: or the USNO-A2 catalog.\footnote{From the USNOFS Image and Catalog Archive
2004: operated by the United States Naval Observatory, Flagstaff Station
2005: (http://www.nofs.navy.mil/data/fchpix/).}
2006: Table~\ref{rimfront} lists the 4 sources with [8]<11.
2007: All of these sources are visibly exposed, despite being mid-infrared
2008: selected. For the 3 stars with spectra from \citet{sicilia05},
2009: emission lines make them classical T Tauri stars, with ages $>10^6$ yr.
2010: A detailed study of such sources these sources is not possible without
2011: spectroscopy, because of variable extinction.
2012: One of the sources has essentially stellar color in the mid-infrared,
2013: but the optical counterpart is very faint (though it does have
2014: measured proper motion in the USNO catalog, indicating it is
2015: clearly not a background galaxy).
2016:
2017: \begin{figure}
2018: \plotone{f16}
2019: \figcaption{{\it Spitzer} 8 $\mu$m image of IC 1396A with sources
2020: photometrically identified as Class I enclosed in red diamonds, and
2021: those identified as Class II enclosed in blue circles.
2022: \label{class12}}
2023: \end{figure}
2024:
2025: Figure~\ref{class12} shows the distribution of sources photometrically
2026: identified as Class I and Class II using the {\it Spitzer}/IRAC and
2027: MIPS data from Paper I.
2028: The Class II sources are distributed throughout the region, while the
2029: Class I sources are clearly located within the globule. There may be a
2030: higher density of Class II sources toward the globule head and just upstream,
2031: though the number of sources is too small to determine if the over-density is
2032: significant.
2033:
2034: Note that we do not see the same trend of locations of
2035: {\it near}-infrared sources relative to mid-infrared that \citet{sugitani95}
2036: found for some other bright rims. Whereas they found the sources
2037: with $J-K>1.2$ are located preferentially upstream of the bright rim,
2038: we find instead that sources with $J-K>1.2$, and also even redder stars
2039: with $J-K>1.8$, tend to be located
2040: preferentially toward the globule. However, we do not believe this is a
2041: true association of large number of Class II YSOs with the densest part
2042: of the globule.
2043: Instead the distribution appears more consistent with a pattern of {\it extinction}
2044: of background sources, plus the Class I sources that are associated with the globule.
2045: To show this, we mapped the stars with
2046: more normal colors ($J-K<1.2$), finding a fairly uniform distribution over
2047: nearly the entire region except toward the globule, which appears
2048: as a dramatic deficit of blue sources. In contrast, the distribution
2049: of red sources traces the globule accurately, and the number of red
2050: sources is exactly what is needed to `fill in'
2051: the missing sources toward the globule. In \S\ref{extinctsec} we described
2052: the extinction map generated from near-infrared source colors;
2053: this extinction map is very closely related to the
2054: distribution of CO and diffuse infrared emission. Similar
2055: extinction maps were obtained for IC 1396 globules by \citet{froebrich}.
2056: Therefore, it would be challenging to use a simple near infrared
2057: color criterion to select near-infrared sources
2058: as T Tauri candidates for IC 1396A.
2059:
2060: With the available data, we can
2061: summarize that there are some mid-infrared-bright sources just upstream from
2062: the IC1396A bright rim, and most of these sources may be classical T Tauri
2063: stars. A small minority of the upstream stars may be highly
2064: embedded sources, but they are {\it much fainter} and less numerous
2065: than the Class I sources in the globule.
2066: There is a much wider distribution of Class II sources throughout the entire,
2067: large IC 1396 region.
2068: Thus we see some evidence for
2069: an age gradient versus density: the protostars are associated with the
2070: dense gas and the Class II objects are dispersed.
2071: Two possible mechanisms have been suggested for age gradients of this sort,
2072: and both of these mechanisms can work in concert.
2073: Stars that form earliest are gradually exposed as the
2074: pillar recedes due to progress of the ionization effect and `rocket'
2075: acceleration in response to the ionized evaporative flow toward the
2076: exciting O star. While this scenario does appear to match the
2077: configuration for IC 1396A, in this scenario the young stars are expected to
2078: appear near the `tips' of pillars \citep{hester05}, whereas we observe
2079: the presently-forming stars further downstream.
2080: The other scenario is small-scale sequential
2081: star formation \citep{lefloch,sugitani95}, where the earliest stars to form in
2082: a globule actually contribute to the collapse and triggering of
2083: the next generation.
2084:
2085: \section{Conclusions}
2086:
2087: We studied a mid-infrared-selected sample of young stellar objects from {\it Spitzer}
2088: imaging (Paper I) using spectroscopic observations from radio
2089: to optical wavelengths. The photometric classifications in Paper I are confirmed by
2090: the spectroscopy. The Class I sources have deep silicate absorption features and
2091: the vast majority of their luminosity arises in the infrared. None of them show
2092: H$_{2}$O masers (characteristic of Class 0) or optical (Class II) counterparts.
2093: The only H$_{2}$O maser associated with our original sample turns out to be a
2094: separate object, IC 1396A:$\gamma$b, with much lower luminosity $\sim 0.02 L_{\odot}$
2095: than the protostar we identified originally, IC 1396A$:\gamma$.
2096: The mid-infrared-selected Class I sources can be fitted with 0.1--2 $M_{\odot}$ stars
2097: with ages $<2\times 10^{5}$ yr.
2098:
2099: Compared to stars forming in the more quiescent Taurus molecular cloud,
2100: the physical conditions of the
2101: globule from which the stars are forming include a higher radiation field
2102: due to the O6 star exciting the \ion{H}{2} region and nearby young B stars.
2103: There is also a higher pressure due to compression by the ionization front from
2104: the O6 star and winds from the many young and still-forming stars. The wind
2105: from the $\sim 5 M_{\odot}$ star LkH$\alpha$ 349a has cleared a hole in the center
2106: of the dense globule, and outflows from the Spitzer-discovered Class I objects
2107: appear to have swept material into `compartments' whose walls are over-pressured.
2108: %
2109: The spectroscopy results show that the Class I objects are brighter in the
2110: far-infrared than the theoretical models
2111: predict, suggesting they have a warmer envelope.
2112: %
2113: Ice features in the Class I object envelopes differ somewhat from those seen around such
2114: objects in other star-forming regions. While the same set of features is present, their
2115: amplitude is lower, per unit silicate dust absorption, and the wavelengths are slightly shifted.
2116: Both of these effects suggest the Class I envelopes are warmer than in Class I sources in other
2117: star-forming regions, perhaps due to the warmer gas temperature in the star-forming material
2118: in the globule IC 1396A.
2119: %
2120: The somewhat different physical conditions of the Class I envelopes in this globule
2121: will affect the chemistry at the time when planet formation is just beginning.
2122: Because the Sun is thought to have formed near an O star,
2123: and most nearby star-forming regions lack an O star,
2124: astronomical searches for the physical conditions of the early solar
2125: nebula would be best conducted in regions like IC 1396.
2126:
2127: The stars photometrically classified as Class II are confirmed as such based on the
2128: presence of optical spectra with bright H$\alpha$ emission lines and mid-infrared
2129: spectra with silicate features in emission. Most of the disk spectra are similar to
2130: other commonly-seen T Tauri star spectra, dominated by amorphous silicates. But the
2131: star IC 1396A:$\theta$ has a particularly structured silicate feature with two
2132: `horns' at 9.1 and 11.3 $\mu$m. The 11.3 $\mu$m horn can be explained by crystalline olivine.
2133: The origin of the 9.1 $\mu$m horn cannot be uniquely identified, with reasonably good
2134: fits provided by quartz (SiO$_{2}$), a phyllosilicate (montmorillonite), or
2135: $>12$ $\mu$m radius amorphous olivine grains. Similar spectra are evident in other
2136: wide samples of T Tauri stars.
2137: Such spectra show that the planet-building material around at least some stars is
2138: dominated by crystalline silicates and is significantly different from interstellar
2139: silicates.
2140:
2141: The star formation history in IC 1396A cannot be described as a single ``burst'' of
2142: star formation: Class I and II sources in and near the globule span a range of ages
2143: and masses in a small region (2 pc across).
2144: It appears that the earliest star formation
2145: in IC 1396 occurred approximately 5 Myr ago,
2146: based on the ages of the Class II sources and the central O6 star.
2147: Some stars ahead of the present-day bright rim of IC 1396A
2148: have become exposed by the recession
2149: of the globule and by their own outflows.
2150: Recently, $< 1$ Myr ago, a powerful wind from the young
2151: AeBe star LkH$\alpha$ 349a blew
2152: a bubble through the center of the globule.
2153: The star formation in IC 1396A we observe now
2154: as Class I sources occurred within the last 0.2 Myr,
2155: based on the ages of the Class I sources.
2156:
2157: The most recent star formation occurs preferentially behind the center of the globule,
2158: just inside bright rims.
2159: The specific trigger for the most recent star formation may have included
2160: not only pressurization of the globule by the O star exciting IC 1396,
2161: but also
2162: the pressure of outflows and jets from the earlier generation of stars
2163: and in particular those with powerful winds like LkH$\alpha$ 349a.
2164: The young stars within IC 1396A appear to be reshaping the
2165: globule from the inside, clearing `compartments' within the globule.
2166: Gradually, the globule is being fragmented due to the exponentially
2167: increasing number of stars (if indeed they are sequentially triggered).
2168: The mass contained in walls of the compartments will eventually become
2169: small enough, and their overlapping structure chaotic enough, that
2170: further star formation in the globule will end. The limiting factor
2171: in the star formation efficiency of this one globule will be the
2172: dynamic effect of energy input from the stars formed within it.
2173:
2174:
2175: \acknowledgements
2176: WTR gratefully acknowledges exceptionally valuable discussions with Bruce
2177: Elmegreen regarding the dynamics of the globule.
2178: Geoff Blake is thanked for assistance in obtaining the
2179: Keck/NIRSPEC $L$-band spectra.
2180:
2181: This work is based in part on observations made with the {\it Spitzer Space
2182: Telescope}, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
2183: Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407.
2184:
2185: This work is based in part on observations obtained at the Hale Telescope,
2186: Palomar Observatory as part of a continuing collaboration between the
2187: California Institute of Technology, NASA/JPL, and Cornell University.
2188:
2189: Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck
2190: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the
2191: California Institute of Technology, the University of California and
2192: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was
2193: made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck
2194: Foundation.
2195:
2196: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.
2197: %\clearpage
2198:
2199: \clearpage
2200: \begin{thebibliography}{}
2201:
2202: \bibitem[Boogert et al.(2008)]{boogert} Boogert, A. C. A. et al. 2008, \apj, 678, 985
2203:
2204: \bibitem[Bourke et al.(2006)]{bourke}
2205: Bourke, T. L., and 14 coauthors. 2006, \apjl, 549, L37
2206:
2207: \bibitem[Cambr\'esy et al.(2002)]{cambresy02} Cambr\'esy, L., Beichman, C. A., Jarrett, T. H., Cutri, R. M.
2208: 2002, AJ, 123, 2559
2209:
2210: \bibitem[Castor, McCray, \& Weaver(1975)]{castor}
2211: Castor, J., McCray, R., \& Weaver, R. 1975, \apjl, 200, L107
2212:
2213: \bibitem[Cohen \& Kuhi(1979)]{cohenkuhi}
2214: Cohen, M., \& Kuhi, L. V. 1979, ApJS, 41, 743
2215:
2216: \bibitem[Connelley et al.(2008)]{connelley}
2217: Connelley, M. S., Reipurth, B., \& Tokunaga, A. 2008, astro-pu/0803.1172
2218:
2219: \bibitem[Decin et al.(2004)]{dec04} Decin, L., Morris, P.~W.,
2220: Appleton, P.~N., Charmandaris, V., Armus, L., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 2004,
2221: \apjs, 154, 408
2222:
2223: \bibitem[De Marco et al.(2006)]{demarco}
2224: De Marco, O., O'Dell, C. R., Gelfond, P., Rubin, R. H.,
2225: Glover, S. C. O. 2006, \aj, 131, 2580
2226:
2227: \bibitem[Dorschner et al.(1995)]{dorschner}
2228: Dorschner, J., Begemann, B., Henning, Th., J\"ager, C., Mutschke, H.. \aap 300, 503
2229:
2230: \bibitem[Draine \& Li(2001)]{draineLi}
2231: Draine, B. T., \& Li, A. 2001, \apj, 551, 807
2232:
2233: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2001)]{fabian}
2234: Fabian, D., Henning, Th., J\"ager, C., Mutschke, H., Dorschner, J., \& Werhan, O., \aap, 378, 228
2235:
2236: \bibitem[Froebrich et al.(2005)]{froebrich}
2237: Froebrich, D., Scholz, A., Eisl\"offel, J., Murphy, G. C.
2238: 2005, \aap, 432, 575
2239:
2240: %\bibitem[Forrest et al.(2004)]{forrest}
2241: %Forrest, W. J. et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 443
2242:
2243: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2006)]{furlan}
2244: Furlan, E., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Franco-Hern\'andez, R.,
2245: Forrest, W. J., Watson, D. M., Uchida, K. I., Sargent, B.,
2246: Green, J. D., Keller, L. D., Herter, T. L. 2006, \apjs, 165, 568
2247:
2248:
2249: \bibitem[Furuya et al.(2001)]{furuya}
2250: Furuya, R. S., Kitamura, Y., Wootten, H. A., Claussen, M. J., Kawabe, R. 2001, \apjl, 559, L143
2251:
2252: \bibitem[Gibb et al.(2000)]{gibb} Gibb, E. L., Whittet, D. C. B.,
2253: Schutte, W. A., Boogert, A. C. A., Chiar, J. E., Ehrenfreund, P.,
2254: Gerakines, P. A., Keane, J. V., Tielens, A. G. G. M., van Dishoeck,
2255: E. F., \& Kerkhof, O. 2000, \apj, 536, 347
2256:
2257: \bibitem[Glotch, Rossman, \& Aharanson(2007)]{glotch}
2258: Glotch, T. D., Rossman, G. R., Aharonson, O. 2007, Icarus, 192, 605
2259:
2260: \bibitem[Gritschneder et al.(2006)]{gritschm}
2261: Gritschneder, M., Naab, T., Heitsch, F., Burkert, A. 2006.
2262: in {\it Triggered Star Formation in a Turbulent ISM},
2263: eds. B. Elmegreen and J. Palous, in press
2264:
2265: \bibitem[Habart et al.(2003)]{habart} Habart, E., Testi, L., Natta, A.,
2266: Vanzi, L. 2003, \aap, 400, 575
2267:
2268: \bibitem[Henning \& Mutschke(1997)]{henning97}
2269: Henning, Th., \& Mutschke, H., \aap, 327, 743
2270:
2271: \bibitem[Hern\'andez et al.(2004)]{hernandez}
2272: Hern\'andez, J., Brice\~no, C., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Muzerrole, J. 2004,
2273: \aj, 127, 168
2274:
2275: \bibitem[Herbig \& Rao(1974)]{herbigrao}
2276: Herbig, G. H., \& Rao, N. K. 1974, \apj, 174, 401
2277:
2278: \bibitem[Hessman et al.(1995)]{hessman}
2279: Hessman, F. V., Beckwith, S. V. W., Bender, R., Eisl\"offel, J., G\"otz, W., \&
2280: Guenther, E. 1995, A\&A, 299, 464
2281:
2282: \bibitem[Hester et al.(2004)]{meteorite}
2283: Hester,J. J., Desch, S. J., Healy, K. R., \& Leshin, L. A. 2004, Science, 304, 1116
2284:
2285: \bibitem[Hester \& Desch(2005)]{hester05}
2286: Hester,J. J., Desch, S. J. 2005, in Chondrites and the Protoplanetary Disk,
2287: Eds. A. N. Krot, E. R. D. Scott, and B. Reipurth, (ASP: San Francisco), p. 107.
2288:
2289: \bibitem[Hester et al.(1996)]{hesteregg}
2290: Hester, J. J. et al. 1996, \aj, 111, 2349
2291:
2292: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{smartref}
2293: Higdon, S. J. U., Devost, D., Higdon, J. L., Brandl, B. R., Houck, J. R.,
2294: Hall, P., Barry, D., Charmandaris, V., Smith, J. D. T., Sloan, G. C.,
2295: Green, J. 2004, \pasp, 116, 975
2296:
2297: \bibitem[Honda et al.(2006)]{honda} Honda, M., Kataza, H., Okamoto, Y. K.,
2298: Yamashita, T., Min, M., Miyata, T., Sako, S., Fujiyoshi, T.,
2299: Sakon, I., Onaka, T. 2006, \apj, 646, 1024
2300:
2301: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{houck}
2302: Houck, J. R. et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
2303:
2304: \bibitem[Hudgins et al.(1993)]{hud93} Hudgins, D.~M., Sandford, S.~A.,
2305: Allamandola, L.~J., \& Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 1993, \apjs, 86, 713
2306:
2307: \bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2006)]{indebetouw}
2308: Indebetouw, R., Whitney, B. A., Johnson, K. E., Wood, K. 2006, \apj, 636, 362
2309:
2310: %\bibitem[Ireland \& Kraus(2008)]{ireland}
2311: %Ireland, M. J., Kraus, A. L. 2008, \apjl, in press (astro-ph/0803.2044)
2312:
2313: %\bibitem[]{jarrettwirc}
2314:
2315: \bibitem[Kauffmann et al.(2005)]{kauffmann}
2316: Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Evans, N. J., II, \& the C2D Collaboration. 2005,
2317: Astron. Nach., 326, 878
2318:
2319: \bibitem[Keane et al.(2001)]{kea01} Keane, J.~V., Tielens,
2320: A.~G.~G.~M., Boogert, A.~C.~A., Schutte, W.~A., \& Whittet, D.~C.~B.\
2321: 2001, \aap, 376, 254
2322:
2323: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kenyonhartmann}
2324: Kenyon, S. J., \& Hartmann, L. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117
2325:
2326: \bibitem[Kessler-Silacci et al.(2006)]{kessler}
2327: Kessler-Silacci, J. E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 639, 275
2328:
2329: \bibitem[Kessler-Silacci et al.(2007)]{kessler07}
2330: Kessler-Silacci, J. E., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 680
2331:
2332: \bibitem[Lefloch \& Lazareff(1994)]{lefloch}
2333: Lefloch, B., Lazareff, B. 1994, \aap, 289, 559
2334:
2335: \bibitem[Li \& Nakamura(2006)]{linak06}
2336: Nakamura, F. N., Li, Z.-Y. 2006, in {\it Triggered Star Formation in a Turbulent ISM},
2337: eds. B. Elmegreen and J. Palous, in press
2338:
2339: \bibitem[Matthews(1979)]{matthews}
2340: Matthews, H. I. 1979, \aap. 75, 345
2341:
2342: \bibitem[McLean et al.(1998)]{mcl98} McLean, I.~S., et al.\ 1998,
2343: \procspie, 3354, 566
2344:
2345: \bibitem[Moriarty-Schieven, Xie, \& Patel(1996)]{moriarty}
2346: Moriarty-Schieven, G. H., Xie, T., \& Patel, N. A, ApJL, 463, L105
2347:
2348: \bibitem[Myers, Linke, \& Benson(1983)]{myersref}
2349: Myers, P. C., Linke, R. A., Benson, P. J. 1983, \apj, 264, 517
2350:
2351: \bibitem[Nakano et al.(1989)]{nakano}
2352: Nakano, M., Tomita, Y., Ohtani, H., Ogura, K., \& Sofue, Y. 1989,
2353: PASJ, 41, 1073
2354:
2355: \bibitem[O'Dell \& Wen(1994)]{proplyd}
2356: O'Dell, C. R., \& Wen, Z. 1004, \apj, 436, 194
2357:
2358: \bibitem[Oke \& Gunn(1982)]{oke}
2359: Oke, J. B.,\& Gunn, J. E. 1982, PASP, 94, 586
2360:
2361: \bibitem[Osterbrock \& Ferland(2006)]{osterbrock}
2362: Osterbrock, D. E., Ferland, G. J. 2006, {\it Astrpphysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic
2363: nuclei (2$^{nd}$ edition)} (University Science Books)
2364:
2365: \bibitem[Pontoppidan et al.(2008)]{pon08} Pontoppidan, K.~M., et al.\
2366: 2008, \apj, 678, 1005
2367:
2368: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2003)]{reachzody} Reach, W. T., Morris, P.,
2369: Boulanger, F., \& Okumura, K. 2003, Icarus, 164, 384
2370:
2371: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2004)]{reachIC} Reach, W. T., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 385
2372:
2373: \bibitem[Reipurth et al.(1997)]{thackeray}
2374: Reipurth, B., Corporon, P., Olberg, M., and Tenorio-Tagle, G. 1997, \aap, 327, 1185
2375:
2376: \bibitem[Reipurth et al.(2003)]{ic1396n}
2377: Reipurth, B., Armond, T., Raga, A., Bally, J. 2003, \apjl, 593, L47
2378:
2379: \bibitem[Reipurth and Bally(2007)]{hhobject}
2380: Reipurth, B., Bally, J. 2001, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 39, 403
2381:
2382: \bibitem[Rivkin et al.(2002)]{rivkin}
2383: Rivkin, A. S., Howell, E. S., Vilas, F., \& Lebofsky, L. A., in
2384: {\it Asteroids III}, eds. W. F. Bottke, Jr., A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi,
2385: \& R. P. Binzel (Tucson: U. Arizona Press), p. 235
2386:
2387: \bibitem[Robitaille et al.(2006)]{robitaille}
2388: Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., Wood, K.,
2389: \& Denzmore, P. 2006, \apjs, 167, 256
2390:
2391: \bibitem[Schutte \& Khanna(2003)]{sch03} Schutte, W.~A., \& Khanna,
2392: R.~K.\ 2003, \aap, 398, 1049
2393:
2394: \bibitem[Shirley et al.(2007)]{shirley}
2395: Shirley, Y. L., Claussen, M. J., Bourke, . L., Young, C. H., \&
2396: Blake, G. A. 2007, \apj, 667, 478
2397:
2398: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2005)]{sicilia05}
2399: Sicilia-Aguilar, A. Hartmann, L. W., Hern\'andez, J., Brice\~no, C.,
2400: Calvet, N. 2005, \aj, 130, 188
2401:
2402: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2007)]{sicilia07}
2403: Sicilia-Aguilar, A. Hartmann, L. W., Watson, D., Bohac, C.,
2404: Henning, T., Dullemond, C., Brandner, W. 2007, \aj, 132, 2135
2405:
2406: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{siess}
2407: Siess L., Dufour E., Forestini M. 2000, \aap, 358, 593
2408:
2409: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skrutskie}
2410: Skrutskie, M. F. et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
2411:
2412: \bibitem[Stahler \& Palla(2004)]{spbook}
2413: Stahler, S. W., \& Palla, F. 2004, {\it The Formation of Stars},
2414: Wiley, Weinheim.
2415:
2416: \bibitem[Sugitani, Tamura, \& Ogura(1991)]{sugitani95}
2417: Sugitani, K., Tamura, M., Ogura, K. 1995, \apjl, 455, L39
2418:
2419: \bibitem[Sugitani, Fukui, \& Ogura(1991)]{sugitani91}
2420: Sugitani, K., Fukui, Y., Ogura, K. 1991, \apjs, 77, 59
2421:
2422: \bibitem[Tachibana et al.(2006)]{tachibana}
2423: Tachibana, S., Huss, G. R., Kita, N. T., Shimoda, G., \& Morisha, Y. 2006l, \apj, 639, L87
2424:
2425: \bibitem[Terebey, Shu, \& Cassen(1984)]{terebey}
2426: Terebey, S., Shu, F. H., \& Cassen, P. 1984, \apj, 286, 529
2427:
2428: \bibitem[Matsuyanagi et al.(2006)]{matsuyanagi}
2429: Matsuyanagi, I., Itoh, Y., Sugitani, K., Oasa, Y., Mukai, T.,
2430: Tamura, M. 2006, PASJ, 58, 29
2431:
2432: \bibitem[O'dell et al.(1993)]{odell}
2433: O'dell, C. R., Wen, Z., Hu, X. 1993, \apj, 410, 696
2434:
2435: \bibitem[Rhee et al.(2008)]{inseok}
2436: Rhee, J. H., Song, I., \& Zuckerman, B. 2008, \apj, 675, 777
2437:
2438: \bibitem[Rho et al.(2006)]{rhotrifid}
2439: Rho, J., Reach, W. T., Lefloch, B., Fazio, G. 2006, \apj, 643, 965
2440:
2441: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2005)]{sloan05}
2442: Sloan, G. C. et al. 2005, \apj, 632, 956
2443:
2444: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2005)]{smith}
2445: Smith, N., Bally, J., Shuping, R. Y., Morris, M., Kassis, M. 2005, \aj, 130, 1763
2446:
2447: \bibitem[Spitzer, L.(1978)]{spitzer}
2448: Spitzer, L. {\it Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium}
2449: (New York: Wiley)
2450:
2451: \bibitem[Valdettaro et al.(2005)]{valdettaro05}
2452: Valdettaro, R., Palla, F., Brand, J., \& Cesaroni, R. 2005, \aap, 443, 535
2453:
2454: \bibitem[Valdettaro et al.(2008)]{valdettaro}
2455: Valdettaro, R., Migenes, V., Trinidad, M. A., Brand, J., \& Palla, F. 2008, \apj, 675, 1352
2456:
2457: \bibitem[Vlemmings \& van Langevelde(2005)]{vlemmings}
2458: Vlemmings, W. H. T., \& van Langevelde, H. J. 2005, A\& A, 434, 1021
2459:
2460: \bibitem[Waters \& Waelkens(1998)]{waters}
2461: Waters, L. B. F. M., Waelkens, C. 1998, ARA\& A, 36, 233
2462:
2463: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2003)]{whitney}
2464: Whitney, B. A., Wood, K., Bjorkman, J. E., \& Wolff, M. J. 2003, \apj, 591, 1049
2465:
2466: \bibitem[Weikard et al.(1996)]{weikard}
2467: Weikard, H, Wouterloot, J. G. A., Castets, A., Winnewisser, G., \& Sugitani, K.
2468: 1996, A\& A, 309, 581
2469:
2470: \bibitem[Weingartner \& Draine(2001)]{weingartner} Weingartner, J. C., Draine, B. T. 2001, \apj 548, 296
2471:
2472: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{werner}
2473: Werner, M. W. et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1
2474:
2475: \bibitem[Wilson et al.(2003)]{wircref}
2476: Wilson, J. C. et al. 2003, SPIE, 4841, 451
2477:
2478: \bibitem[Young et al.(2004)]{young}
2479: Young, C. H. and 29 coauthors, 2004. \apjs, 154, 396
2480:
2481: \end{thebibliography}
2482:
2483: \clearpage
2484:
2485: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
2486: \tablewidth{0pt}
2487: \tablecaption{Source list and observing log\label{opttab}}
2488: \tablehead{
2489: \colhead{Name\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{RA DEC}& \colhead{Class\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{IRS\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{DBSP\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{GBT\tablenotemark{e}}
2490: }
2491: \startdata
2492: IC1396A:$\alpha$ & 21$^h$36$^m$46.6$^s$ +57$^\circ$29$'$38$''$ & I & SL+LL+H & o & Y \\
2493: IC1396A:$\beta$ & 21$^h$36$^m$55.2$^s$ +57$^\circ$30$'$30$''$ & II & SL+LL & o & Y \\
2494: IC1396A:$\gamma$ & 21$^h$36$^m$08.0$^s$ +57$^\circ$26$'$37$''$ & I/0 & SL+LL+H & o & Y \\
2495: IC1396A:$\delta$ & 21$^h$36$^m$19.3$^s$ +57$^\circ$28$'$38$''$ & I/0 & SL+LL & o & Y \\
2496: IC1396A:$\epsilon$&21$^h$36$^m$18.4$^s$ +57$^\circ$28$'$30$''$ & I/0 & SL+LL & o & Y \\
2497: IC1396A:$\eta$ & 21$^h$36$^m$57.8$^s$ +57$^\circ$30$'$55$''$ & I & SL+LL & o & Y \\
2498: IC1396A:$\theta$ & 21$^h$36$^m$39.2$^s$ +57$^\circ$29$'$53$''$ & II & SL+LL+H & Y & Y \\ %USNO R=17.0
2499: IC1396A:$\iota$ & 21$^h$36$^m$36.8$^s$ +57$^\circ$31$'$32$''$ & II & ... &...& Y \\
2500: IC1396A:$\kappa$ & 21$^h$36$^m$56.4$^s$ +57$^\circ$31$'$51$''$ & II & ... &...& Y \\ %USNO no
2501: IC1396A:$\lambda$& 21$^h$36$^m$54.8$^s$ +57$^\circ$30$'$00$''$ & I & SL+LL & o & Y \\
2502: IC1396A:$\mu$ & 21$^h$37$^m$02.9$^s$ +57$^\circ$30$'$48$''$ & I & ... &...& Y \\
2503: IC1396A:$\nu$ & 21$^h$36$^m$57.9$^s$ +57$^\circ$29$'$11$''$ & I/II & ... &...& Y \\
2504: IC1396A:$\xi$ & 21$^h$35$^m$57.9$^s$ +57$^\circ$29$'$11$''$ & I/II & ... &...& Y \\
2505: IC1396A:$\zeta$ & 21$^h$37$^m$02.3$^s$ +57$^\circ$31$'$15$''$ & I & ... &...& Y \\
2506: LkH$\alpha$349c & 21$^h$36$^m$49.5$^s$ +57$^\circ$31$'$22$''$ & II & SL+LL+H & Y & ... \\ %USNO R=12.4,B=17.0
2507: LkH$\alpha$349a & 21$^h$36$^m$50.7$^s$ +57$^\circ$31$'$10$''$ & III & SL & Y & ... \\ %USNO R=11.4,B=15.2
2508: Tr37 11-2146 & 21$^h$36$^m$57.6$^s$ +57$^\circ$27$'$32$''$ & II & SL+LL & Y & ... \\ %USNO R=15.6,B=17.1 32.9 K6.0, 16.92,12.44
2509: Tr37 11-2037 & 21$^h$37$^m$07.0$^s$ +57$^\circ$27$'$01$''$ & II & SL+LL & Y & ... \\ %num1 %USNO R=15.1,B=16.3 %11-2037; EW=50.5, K4.5,V=16.03,J=12.65
2510: Tr37 72-1427 & 21$^h$35$^m$16.3$^s$ +57$^\circ$28$'$22$''$ & II & SL+LL & Y & ... \\ %num2 %72-1427; EW=76.7, M1.0, V=18.08,J=14.005
2511: 21361664+5728404 & 21$^h$36$^m$16.6$^s$ +57$^\circ$28$'$40$''$ & II & SL & Y & ... \\ %num3 %USNO no
2512: 21364964+5722270 & 21$^h$36$^m$49.7$^s$ +57$^\circ$22$'$27$''$ & II & SL+LL & Y & ... \\ %num6 %USNO R=14.9,B=16.8
2513: Tr37 72-875 & 21$^h$35$^m$49.8$^s$ +57$^\circ$24$'$04$''$ & II & SL+LL & Y & ... \\ %num7 %72-875 20.7 M0.5 18.367, 14.09
2514: 21364398+5729287 & 21$^h$36$^m$43.9$^s$ +57$^\circ$29$'$28$''$ & II & SL+LL & Y & ... \\ %num8 %USNO no
2515: 21362507+5727502 & 21$^h$36$^m$25.1$^s$ +57$^\circ$27$'$50$''$ & II & SL+LL & Y & ... \\ %num9 %21362507+5727502 in SA06; unlabeled in S-A
2516: \enddata
2517: \tablenotetext{a}{Designations from IC1396A:x from Paper I, Simbad: [RRY2004] x; designations from \citep{sicilia05}, Simbad: [SHB2004] Trumpler 37 x-y; numeric designations from 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog}
2518: \tablenotetext{b}{Classification based on mid-infrared colors (Paper I).}
2519: \tablenotetext{c}{Observed with the Spitzer/Infrred Spectrograph; SL=5.2-14 $\mu$m, LL=14-35 $\mu$m, H=high-res (10-35 $\mu$m).}
2520: \tablenotetext{d}{Observed with the Palomar 5-m/Double Spectrograph; Y=good spectrum, o=observed but not detected (no optical counterpart).}
2521: \tablenotetext{e}{Observed with the NRAO Green Bank Telescope for 22 GHz H$_{2}$O masers.}
2522: \end{deluxetable}
2523:
2524: %\clearpage
2525:
2526: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrrrrr}
2527: \tablewidth{0pt}
2528: \tablecaption{Brightness (magnitudes) of observed sources\label{magtab}}
2529: \tablehead{
2530: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{B} & \colhead{V} & \colhead{R} & \colhead{J} & \colhead{H} & \colhead{K$_s$} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24]}
2531: % & \colhead{0.44} & \colhead{0.55} & \colhead{0.6} & \colhead{1.25} & \colhead{1.6} & \colhead{2.2}&\colhead{3.6} & \colhead{4.5} & \colhead{5.8} & \colhead{8} & \colhead{24}
2532: }
2533: \startdata
2534: % B V R J H K I1 i2 I3 I4 M1
2535: IC1396A:$\alpha$ & ... & ... & ... & 17.32 & 15.31 & 13.51 & 9.858 & 8.44 & 7.19 & 6.28 & 2.01 \\ %K=12.66 in 6X catalog??
2536: IC1396A:$\beta$ & ... & ... & ... & 13.83 & 12.47 & 11.29 & 9.832 & 9.97 & 8.75 & 8.03 & 5.04 \\
2537: IC1396A:$\gamma$ & ... & ... & ... & 19.76 & ... & 13.95 & 10.56 & 9.22 & 7.84 & 6.80 & 2.24 \\
2538: IC1396A:$\delta$ & ... & ... & ... & $>20$ & ... & 15.76 & 12.66 & 10.9 & 9.51 & 8.44 & 3.73 \\
2539: IC1396A:$\epsilon$ & ... & ... & ... & $>20$ & ... & 16.95 & 12.57 & 10.9 & 9.16 & 8.55 & 4.27 \\
2540: IC1396A:$\zeta$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & 16.48 & 13.62 & 10.84 & 9.86 & 9.02 & 8.84 & 4.48 \\
2541: IC1396A:$\eta$ & ... & ... & ... & 17.08 & 15.41 & 14.05 & 12.40 & 11.36 & 10.6 & 9.15 & 4.93 \\
2542: IC1396A:$\lambda$ & ... & ... & ... & 17.89 & 15.72 & 14.06 & 11.92 & 11.55 & 10.50 & 9.98 & 5.91 \\
2543: IC1396A:$\theta$ & ... & ... & 17.0 & 11.73 & 10.21 & 9.50 & 8.414 & 7.85 & 7.21 & 6.53 & 4.07 \\
2544: LkH$\alpha$349c & 17.0 & ... & 12.4 & 10.59 & 10.81 & 10.13 & 9.600 & 9.23 & 8.77 & 8.65 & 4.94 \\
2545: LkH$\alpha$349a & 15.2 & ... & 11.4 & 11.71 & 8.95 & 8.62 & 8.440 & 8.44 & 8.25 & 8.14 & ... \\
2546: Tr37 11-2146 & 17.1 & 16.92 & 15.6 & 12.07 & 11.52 & 10.82 & 9.932 & 9.69 & 9.13 & 8.34 & 4.89 \\
2547: Tr37 11-2037 & 16.3 & 16.03 & 15.1 & 12.58 & 11.72 & 11.29 & 10.87 & 10.59 & 10.2 & 9.51 & 4.49 \\
2548: Tr37 72-1427 & ... & 18.08 & ... & 14.03 & 13.07 & 12.67 & 12.08 & 11.89 & 11.4 & 10.8 & 6.81 \\
2549: 21361664+5728404 & ... & ... & ... & 17.02 & 15.06 & 13.98 & 12.29 & 11.57 & 10.8 & 10.0 & 7.22 \\
2550: 21364964+5722270 & 16.8 & ... & 14.9 & 12.84 & 12.07 & 11.79 & 11.38 & 11.51 & 10.9 & 10.3 & 5.73 \\
2551: Tr37 72-875 & ... & 18.37 & ... & 14.17 & 13.04 & 12.51 & 11.60 & 11.31 & 10.7 & 10.0 & 6.73 \\
2552: 21364398+5729287 & ... & ... & ... & 14.34 & 13.07 & 12.38 & 11.64 & 11.24 & 10.8 & 10.6 & 6.35 \\
2553: 21362507+5727502 & ... & ... & ... & 14.84 & 13.94 & 13.39 & 12.39 & 11.96 & 11.5 & 10.4 & 7.58 \\
2554: \enddata
2555: \end{deluxetable}
2556:
2557:
2558: \begin{deluxetable}{lrlrrrr}
2559: \tablewidth{0pt}
2560: \tablecaption{Derived properties from optical spectra\tablenotemark{a}\label{optmore}}
2561: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2562: %\rotate
2563: \tablehead{
2564: \colhead{name} & $10^{14}I($H$\alpha)$ & H$\beta$/H$\alpha$ & $A_{V}^{\beta/\alpha}$ & $A_{V}^{SED}$ & SpType & Age
2565: }
2566: \startdata
2567: IC1396A:$\alpha$ & 1.12 & 0.134 & 3.6 & 10.1 & ... & ... \\
2568: IC1396A:$\beta$ & 0.86 & 0.12 & 4.1 & 14.0 & F0\tablenotemark{b} & ... \\
2569: IC1396A:$\gamma$ & 1.05 & 0.19 & 2.3 & (1.5) & ... & ... \\
2570: IC1396A:$\delta$ & 0.87 & 0.16 & 3.0 & 4.2 & ... & ... \\ %(0.22,-4.2,5460) (0.85,-17,5577) (9.2,3934)Ca(6.9,3969)Ca
2571: %epsilon 4.2
2572: %eta 6.7
2573: %lambda 12.9
2574: IC1396A:$\theta$ & 1.28 & 0.071 & 6.0 & 3.8 & A2\tablenotemark{b} & ... \\
2575: LkH$\alpha$ 349c & 2.85 & 0.092 & 5.0 & 3.6 & G9\tablenotemark{b} & ... \\
2576: Tr37 11-2146 & 4.71 & 0.10 & 3.4 & 1.5 & K6.0 & 0.9 \\
2577: Tr37 11-2037 & 11.9 & 0.14 & 3.3 & 1.5 & K4.5 & 2.5 \\
2578: Tr37 72-1427 & 4.8 & 0.15 & 3.1 & 1.5 & M1.0 & 2.2 \\
2579: 21361664+5728404 & 1.13 & 0.177 & 2.5 & 3.6 & ... & ... \\
2580: 21364964+5722270 & 5.02 & 0.066 & 6.2 & 1.5 & G5\tablenotemark{b} & ... \\
2581: Tr37 72-875 & 2.75 & 0.145 & 3.3 & 2.4 & M0.5 & 8.4 \\
2582: 21364398+5729287 & 2.41 & 0.071 & 6.0 & 7.1 & ... & ... \\
2583: 21362507+5727502 & 3.26 & 0.17 & 2.7 & 1.7 & M0.0 & ... \\
2584: \enddata
2585: \tablenotetext{a}{H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ fluxes were measured for each source.
2586: For the Class I objects, the spectra were extracted at the position of the infrared source and
2587: integrated over the appropriate wavelengths, but
2588: no optical counterparts were evident (so the lines are most likely nebular).
2589: Spectral types are from \citet{sicilia05}}.
2590: \tablenotetext{b}{approximate spectral type based on luminosity}
2591: \end{deluxetable}
2592:
2593: %\clearpage
2594:
2595: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
2596: \tablewidth{0pt}
2597: \tablecaption{22 GHz Water masers in IC 1396A\label{masertab}}
2598: \tablehead{
2599: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{$F_\nu^{peak}$} & \colhead{$F_{H_2 0}$} & \colhead{$L_{H_2 0}$}\\
2600: & \colhead{(Jy)} & \colhead{(Jy~km~s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{($10^{-9} L_\odot$)}
2601: }
2602: \startdata
2603: % & 1993 Jan 28 & & 5.4 & 39\\
2604: % & 2004 Dec 18 & & 33.7 & 390\\
2605: % & 2005 Apr 14 & & 17.8 & 210\\
2606: 2006 Aug 07 & 0.030 & 0.02 & 0.2 \\ %ses1
2607: 2006 Sep 28 & 0.042 & 0.06 & 0.7 \\ %ses2
2608: 2006 Nov 18 & 0.032 & 0.02 & 0.2 \\ %ses3. v=-9.74
2609: 2007 Jan 24 & 0.29 & 0.28 & 3.7\\ %ses4
2610: \enddata
2611: %\\\tablenotemark{a}{Upper limits are 3$\sigma$}.
2612: \end{deluxetable}
2613:
2614:
2615: %\clearpage
2616:
2617:
2618: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}
2619: \tablewidth{0pt}
2620: \tablecaption{Mid-infrared spectral properties of protostars in
2621: IC 1396A\label{protoproptab}\tablenotemark{a}}
2622: \tablehead{
2623: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{[8]-[24]} & \colhead{[3.6]-[5.8]} & \colhead{$\alpha_{5-8}$} &
2624: \colhead{$\Delta F_{10}/F$ }
2625: %& \colhead{$\Delta F_{18}/F$}
2626: & \colhead{$\Delta F_{15.2}/F$} & \colhead{$\Delta F_{6.0}/F$}
2627: }
2628: \startdata
2629: \cutinhead{Class I Sources}
2630: IC1396A:$\alpha$ & 4.27 & 2.66 & -0.32 & -0.64 & -0.13 & -0.08\\
2631: IC1396A:$\gamma$ & 4.55 & 2.72 & +0.19 & -0.70 & -0.10 & -0.06\\
2632: IC1396A:$\delta$ & 4.70 & 3.15 & +0.16 & -0.79 & -0.18 & ...\\
2633: IC1396A:$\epsilon$& 4.27 & 3.41 & -0.04 & -1.00 & -0.25 & -0.17 \\
2634: IC1396A:$\eta$ & 4.22 & 1.75 & +0.24 & -0.31 & ... & ...\\
2635: IC1396A:$\lambda$& 3.57 & 1.26 & -0.12 & -0.15 & ... & ...\\
2636: \cutinhead{Class II Sources}
2637: IC1396A:$\beta$ & 2.99 & 1.07 &-0.26 & ... && \\
2638: IC1396A:$\theta$ & 2.45 & 1.19 &-0.22 & 0.208 && \\
2639: LkH$\alpha$349a & 1.62 & 0.82 &-0.30 & ... &&\\
2640: LkH$\alpha$349c & ... & 0.18 &-0.49 & ... &&\\
2641: Tr37 11-2146 & 3.44 & 0.79 &-0.38 & 0.817 && \\
2642: Tr37 11-2037 & 5.01 & 0.63 &-0.31 & 0.507 &&\\
2643: Tr37 72-1427 & 4.08 & 0.58 &-0.31 & ... &&\\
2644: 21364964+5722270 & 4.61 & 0.38 &-1.97 & 1.94 &&\\
2645: Tr37 72-875 & 3.31 & 0.87 &-0.03 & ... &&\\
2646: 21364398+5729287 & 4.32 & 0.78 &-0.95 & ... &&\\
2647: 21362507+5727502 & 2.83 & 0.88 &-0.15 & 0.625 &&\\
2648: \enddata
2649: \tablenotetext{a}{[a]-[b] is the color (magnitude difference) between bands a and b;
2650: $\alpha_{5-8}$ is the spectral slope $F_\nu\propto \nu^{\alpha}$ from 5 to 8 $\mu$m;
2651: $\Delta F_{\lambda}/F$ is the amplitude emission (or absorption, if negative) feature,
2652: centered on wavelength $\lambda$ ($\mu$m), relative to the local continuum.}
2653: \end{deluxetable}
2654:
2655:
2656: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrr}
2657: \tablewidth{0pt}
2658: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2659: %\rotate
2660: \tablecolumns{4}
2661: \tablewidth{0pc}
2662: \tablecaption{Ice Column Densities\label{t:colden}}
2663: \tablehead{
2664: \colhead{Source}& \colhead{$N$(H$_2$O)} & \colhead{$N$(CO$_2$)} & \colhead{$\tau_{9.7}$} \\
2665: \colhead{ }& \colhead{$10^{18}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$ } & \colhead{\% H$_2$O } & \colhead{} \\}
2666: \startdata
2667: IC 1396A $\alpha$ & 1.6 (0.2) & 14 & 1.12 (0.11)\\
2668: IC 1396A $\gamma$ & 1.2 (0.2) & 34 & 1.41 (0.14)\\
2669: IC 1396A $\delta$ & 4.3 (0.8) & 23 & 1.96 (0.20)\\
2670: IC 1396A $\epsilon$ & 6.8 (1.7) & 26 & 9.64 (1.00)\\
2671: \enddata
2672: %\tablecomments{HAVE TO CHECK CO2 VALUES!!!}
2673: %\tablenotetext{a}{blabla}
2674: \end{deluxetable}
2675:
2676:
2677: \def\extra{
2678: \clearpage
2679: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
2680: \tablewidth{0pt}
2681: \tablecaption{Ice absorption feature strengths\label{icetab}}
2682: \tablehead{
2683: \colhead{source} & \colhead{$\Delta F_{15.2}/F_{15.2}$} & \colhead{$\Delta F_{6}/F_{6}$}
2684: }
2685: \startdata
2686: alpha & -0.110 & ... \\
2687: delta & ... & ...\\
2688: epsilon& -0.259 & -0.281\\
2689: eta & ... & ...\\
2690: gamma & -0.111 & ...\\
2691: lambda & ... & ... \\
2692: \enddata
2693: \end{deluxetable}
2694: }
2695: %\clearpage
2696:
2697: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrl}
2698: \tablewidth{0pt}
2699: \tablecaption{Empirical model for Class I protostars in IC 1396A\label{protomodeltab}}
2700: \tablehead{
2701: \colhead{} & \colhead{IC1396A:$\gamma$} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\delta$} & \colhead{$\epsilon$}
2702: & \colhead{Units} }
2703: \startdata
2704: %$F_{22}$ & 0.75 & 0.92 & 0.18 & 0.11 & Jy\\
2705: %$F_{22}/F_{8}$ & 4.9 & 5.5 & 5.8 & 5.5 & \\
2706: $\tau_{sil}$ & 1.7 & 1.5 & 2.1 & 4.0 & \\
2707: $A_{V}^{2}$ & 24.5 & 21.6 & 30.2 & 57.6 & \\
2708: $A_{V}^{3}$ & 0.5 & 0.9 & 2.0 & 3.4 & \\
2709: $R_{acc}$ & 27 & 24 & 209 & 279 & $R_\odot$\\
2710: $R_{2}$ & 3.3 & 3.3 & 6.8 & 5.9 & AU\\
2711: $R_{3}$ & 9.5 & 1.8 & 1.6 & 1.7 & $10^{3}$ AU \\
2712: $n_{2}$ & 0.9 & 0.8 & 0.6 & 1.2 & $10^{9}$ cm$^{-3}$ \\
2713: $n_{3}$ & 0.6 & 6.4 & 16.3 & 24.8 & $10^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$ \\
2714: $\dot{M}$ & 2.3 & 2.0 & 4.1 & 7.3 & $10^{-6} M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$\\
2715: $L_{1}$ & 2.7 & 2.7 & 0.6 & 0.8 & $L_{\odot}$ \\
2716: %$L_{1}e^{-\tau_2}$ & 1.4 & 1.5 & 0.3 & 0.2 & $L_{\odot}$ \\
2717: %$L_{2}$ & 2.3 & 2.9 & 0.6 & 0.3 & $L_{\odot}$ \\
2718: %$L_{3}$ & 8.6 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 2.1 & $L_{\odot}$ \\
2719: $L_{tot}$ & 12.3 & 5.0 & 1.8 & 2.6 & $L_{\odot}$ \\
2720: \enddata
2721: %\tablenotetext{a}{}
2722: \end{deluxetable}
2723:
2724: %\clearpage
2725:
2726: % using Achim's fitter, photometry plus IRS SL: Achim's update from 4/4/08
2727: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrl}
2728: \tablewidth{0pt}
2729: \tablecaption{Radiative transfer models for Class I protostars in IC 1396A\label{whitneytab}}
2730: \tablehead{
2731: \colhead{} & \colhead{IC1396A:$\gamma$} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\delta$} & \colhead{$\epsilon$}
2732: & \colhead{$\eta$} & \colhead{$\zeta$} & \colhead{Units} }
2733: \startdata
2734: Model\tablenotemark{a}
2735: & 3016360 & 3000224 & 3017673 & 3016207 & 3003269 & 3013344 & \\
2736: $\chi^{2}_{\nu}$ & 5.09 & 1.41 & 3.5 & 6.8 & 2.24 & 1.6 & \\
2737: $\dot{M}$ & 91.4 & 2.39 & 2.55 & 0.76 & 19.3 & 27.8 & $10^{-6} M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$\\
2738: $R_{*}$ & 10.0 & 6.13 & 4.94 & 4.10 & 3.53 & 3.39 & $R_{\odot}$\\
2739: $M_{*}$ & 1.88 & 0.38 & 0.15 & 0.11 & 0.20 & 0.43 & $M_{\odot}$\\
2740: $T_{*}$ & 4321 & 3503 & 2839 & 2581 & 3062 & 3650 & K\\
2741: Age($*$) & 11.1 & 0.14 & 0.16 & 0.18 & 4.00 & 19.3 & $10^4$ yr \\
2742: $L_{tot}$ & 36.2 & 5.37 & 1.58 & 0.67 & 0.99 & 2.68 & $L_{\odot}$\\
2743: $i$ & 69.5 & 31.8 & 41.4 & 56.6 & 41.4 & 63.3 & $^\circ$\\
2744: $A_{V}^{int}$ & 65.2 & 62.9 & 64.3 & 73.6 & 26.5 & 30.4 & mag (to central star)\\
2745: $A_{V}$ & 7.4 & 1.4 & 8.0 & 7.4 & 4.4 & 4.4 & mag (line of sight)
2746: \enddata
2747: \tablenotetext{a}{Model identification from \citet{robitaille}.}
2748: \end{deluxetable}
2749:
2750: %\clearpage
2751:
2752: % using Achim's fitter 4/4/8
2753: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrl}
2754: \tablewidth{0pt}
2755: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2756: \tablecaption{Radiative transfer models for Class II protostars in IC 1396A\label{whitneytabII}}
2757: \tablehead{
2758: & \colhead{21364964+5722270} & \colhead{IC1396A:$\beta$} & \colhead{LkH$\alpha$ 349c} &
2759: %\colhead{Tr37 11-2146} &
2760: \colhead{LkH$\alpha$ 349a} &
2761: \colhead{IC1396A:$\theta$} & \colhead{Tr37 11-2037} & \colhead{Units}
2762: }
2763: \startdata
2764: Model\tablenotemark{a}
2765: & 3004629 & 3015197 & 3002727 & 3005288 & 3017958 & 3007956 &\\
2766: $\chi^2_{\nu}$ & 3.9 & 0.6 & 8.7 & 6.1 & 5.6 & 1.1 &\\
2767: $M_{disk}$ & 0.009 & 31.9 & 25.9 & 0.67 & 0.00007 & 0.26 & $10^{-3} M_{\odot}$ \\
2768: $\dot{M}_{disk}$& 0.007 & 68.2 & 70.9 & 0.01 & 0.002 & 1.53 & $10^{-9} M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$ \\
2769: $R_{*}$ & 1.77 & 2.34 & 4.41 & 3.63 & 2.67 & 2.24 &$R_{\odot}$\\
2770: $M_{*}$ & 1.50 & 0.80 & 0.70 & 2.28 & 4.99 & 0.80 &$M_{\odot}$ \\
2771: $T_{*}$ & 5247 & 4123 & 3988 & 4829 & 16,450 & 4124 & K\\
2772: Age($*$) & 91.6 & 10.1 & 4.1 & 12.4 & 31.8 & 11.7 & $10^5$ yr \\
2773: $L_{tot}$ & 2.1 & 7.59 & 4.73 & 6.43 & 46.9 & 1.31 & $L_{\odot}$ \\
2774: $i$ & 41.4 & 69.5 & 69.5 & 81.4 & 41.4 & 18.2 & $^\circ$\\
2775: $A_{V}^{int}$ & 0.002 & 0.016 & 0.85 & 0.003 & 0.001 & 0.011 & mag (to central star)\\
2776: $A_{V}$ & 2.8 & 6.8 & 1.80 & 1.60 & 8.0 & 1.40 & mag (line of sight)
2777: \enddata
2778: \tablenotetext{a}{Model identification from \citet{robitaille}.}
2779: \end{deluxetable}
2780:
2781:
2782: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrcrr}
2783: \tablewidth{0pt}
2784: \tablecaption{Proplyd-like objects in IC 1396\label{proplydtab}}
2785: \tablehead{
2786: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec} &
2787: \colhead{O* Dist} & \colhead{O* PA} & \colhead{Tail PA}
2788: & \colhead{$I_8$} & \colhead{$R_{hole}$} & \colhead{$L_{tail}$}\\
2789: & & & \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{($^\circ$)} & \colhead{($^\circ$)} & \colhead{(MJy sr$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(AU)}& \colhead{(AU)}
2790: }
2791: \startdata
2792: A & 21$^h$36$^m$25.2$^s$ & +57$^\circ$39$'$48$''$ & 5.0 & 207 & 196 & 1.4 & 2000 & 10500\\
2793: B & 21$^h$36$^m$24.2$^s$ & +57$^\circ$39$'$22$''$ & 5.0 & 207 & 199 & 1.5 & 1900 & 9800\\
2794: C & 21$^h$38$^m$13.7$^s$ & +57$^\circ$40$'$30$''$ & 2.6 & 242 & 240 & 2.4 & 3300 & 14000\\
2795: D & 21$^h$39$^m$12.2$^s$ & +57$^\circ$24$'$07$''$ & 1.2 & 112 & 35 & 3.1 & 5600 & 74000\\
2796: E & 21$^h$36$^m$19.0$^s$ & +57$^\circ$26$'$59$''$ & 4.7 & 174 & 161 & 5.5 & 1900 & 25000\\
2797: \enddata
2798: %\\\tablenotetext{a}{self-absorbed P Cygni profile}
2799: \end{deluxetable}
2800:
2801: %\clearpage
2802:
2803:
2804: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrrr}
2805: \tablewidth{0pt}
2806: \tablecaption{Selected Infrared Sources Upstream from IC 1396A\label{rimfront}}
2807: \tablehead{
2808: \colhead{2MASS} & \colhead{[24]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{K$_s$} & \colhead{H} & \colhead{J} & V
2809: }
2810: \startdata
2811: 21370936+5729483 & 6.70& 9.83 & 10.31 & 10.84 & 11.19 & 11.84 & 12.33 & 13.39 & 18.2 \\
2812: 21371054+5731124 & 7.35& 10.06 & 10.41 & 10.89 & 11.25 & 11.73 & 12.17 & 13.09 & 16.74\\
2813: 21370649+5732316 & 6.99& 9.91 & 10.44 & 10.69 & 11.19 & 11.91 & 12.33 & 13.32 & 17.85\\
2814: 21371172+573329 & 6.95& 10.78 & 10.73 & 10.88 & 11.06 & 10.90 & 11.12 & 11.94 & 17.4\\
2815: 21370802+5734094 & 7.66& 7.970 & ... & 8.01 & 7.74 & 7.86 & 8.37 & 9.62 & 14.5\\
2816: \enddata
2817: %\\\tablenotetext{a}{self-absorbed P Cygni profile}
2818: \end{deluxetable}
2819:
2820: \end{document}
2821:
2822:
2823: