1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{/home/luisfr/aastex/aastex52/aastex}
4: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
5: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
7: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
8: \include{graphicx}
9:
10:
11: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
12:
13: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
14:
15: %\slugcomment{To appear in The Astronomical Journal}
16:
17: %\shorttitle{Observations at 7-mm of the Quadrupolar HH~111/121 Outflow}
18: %\shortauthors{Rodr\'\i guez et al.}
19:
20: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
21: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
26: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
27: %% you desire.
28:
29: To appear in The Astronomical Journal
30:
31: \title[Observations at 7-mm of the Quadrupolar HH~111/121 Outflow]
32: {High Angular Resolution Observations at 7-mm \\
33: of the Core of the Quadrupolar HH~111/121 Outflow}
34:
35: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
36: %% author and affiliation information.
37: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
38: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
39: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
40: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
41:
42: \author{Luis F. Rodr\'\i guez}
43: \address{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, UNAM, Morelia 58089, M\'exico}
44: \ead{l.rodriguez@astrosmo.unam.mx}
45:
46: \author{Jos\'e M. Torrelles}
47: \address{Instituto de Ciencias del Espacio (CSIC)-IEEC, Facultat de F\'\i sica,
48: Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain}
49: \ead{torrelles@ieec.fcr.es}
50:
51:
52: \author{Guillem Anglada}
53: \address{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Andaluc\'\i a (CSIC), Apartado 3004, E-18080 Granada, Spain}
54: \ead{guillem@iaa.es}
55:
56:
57: %\and
58:
59: \author{Bo Reipurth}
60: \address{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Hilo, HI, USA}
61: \ead{reipurth@ifa.hawaii.edu}
62:
63: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
64: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
65: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
66: %% affiliation.
67:
68: %\altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
69: %and
70: %Submillimeter Array, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
71:
72: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
73: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
74: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
75: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
76: %% editorial office after submission.
77:
78: \begin{abstract}
79: We present sensitive, high angular resolution ($0\rlap.{''}05$) VLA
80: continuum observations
81: made at 7 mm of
82: the core of the HH~111/121 quadrupolar outflow.
83: We estimate that at this wavelength the continuum emission is dominated by dust, although
84: a significant free-free contribution ($\sim$30\%) is still present.
85: The observed structure is formed by two overlapping, elongated sources
86: approximately perpendicular to each other as viewed from Earth.
87: We interpret this structure
88: as either tracing two circumstellar disks that exist around each of the protostars
89: of the close binary source at the core of this quadrupolar outflow
90: or a disk and a jet perpendicular to it. Both interpretations have advantages and disadvantages,
91: and future high angular resolution spectroscopic millimeter observations
92: are required to favor one of them in a more conclusive way.
93:
94: \end{abstract}
95:
96: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
97: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
98: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
99: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
100:
101: % \keywords{stars: formation --- ISM: individual (HH~111) --- ISM: jets and outflows ---
102: % ISM: circumstellar disks}
103:
104: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
105: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
106: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
107: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
108: %% to the KEY in the \item in the reference list below. We have
109: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
110: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
111: %% each reference.
112:
113:
114: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
115: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
116: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
117: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
118: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
119: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
120: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
121: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
122: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
123: %%
124: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
125: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
126: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
127: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
128:
129: \section{Introduction}
130:
131: It is generally accepted that most stars form in binary or multiple systems
132: (Lada \& Lada 2003).
133: Furthermore, in the case of low and intermediate-mass stars it is also
134: known that the process occurs with the presence of an accretion disk and
135: a collimated outflow. From these two facts it follows that binary disk-jet systems
136: should be common in regions of low-mass star
137: formation. However, in practice
138: these systems are hard to detect and identify and only a few
139: have been studied in detail
140: (e. g. Rodr\'\i guez et al. 1998; Anglada et al. 2004; Monin et al. 2007).
141: Furthermore, it is still unclear if the members of a binary system will
142: both be able to maintain the disks and outflows that characterize
143: the formation of
144: single stars. For example, the binary stars that form L1551~IRS5 are
145: both believed to possess disks and jets (Rodr\'\i guez et al. 2003;
146: Lim \& Takakuwa 2006), while it is known that only one
147: of the stars that forms the SVS 13 close binary system is
148: associated with detectable circumstellar dust emission
149: that is probably tracing a disk (Anglada et al. 2004).
150:
151:
152: One of the most interesting cases of a binary source that is known to
153: exhibit independent outflows, most probably associated with
154: each of the components of the binary, is HH~111 (Reipurth et al. 1999).
155: Located in Orion at a distance of 414 pc (Menten et al. 2007), the optical HH 111 jet was
156: discovered by Reipurth (1989).
157: It is an extremely well-collimated jet, aligned approximately in the east-west
158: direction (at a PA of $\sim 97^\circ$) and whose knots move in the plane of the sky
159: with velocities
160: of the order of several hundred km s$^{-1}$ (Reipurth, Raga \& Heathcote 1992).
161: Reipurth, Bally \& Devine (1997) found that this optical jet is part of
162: a giant HH complex extending over 7.7 pc.
163: This giant HH complex is very straight, suggesting great stability over the
164: $10^4$ years of its lifetime.
165:
166: Near-infrared observations (Gredel \& Reipurth 1993; 1994)
167: revealed a second bipolar flow, named HH 121, that emerges from about the same
168: position as the optical outflow, and is aligned approximately in the
169: north-south direction (at a PA of $\sim 35^\circ$). This result
170: suggested the presence of a close binary source
171: in this region.
172: Both the optical and the infrared outflows are detected as bipolar molecular outflows
173: (Cernicharo \& Reipurth 1996; Nagar et al. 1997; Lefloch et al. 2007).
174:
175: At the center of the
176: quadrupolar outflow is the source IRAS 05491+0247 = VLA 1, a suspected class I binary
177: with a total luminosity of about 25 L$_\odot$
178: (e.g. Stapelfeldt \& Scoville 1993, Yang et al. 1997).
179: To advance in our understanding of this source a high angular resolution image
180: at millimeter wavelengths was needed to compare with the information available
181: for the quadrupolar outflow.
182:
183:
184: \section{Observations}
185:
186: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
187: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
188: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
189: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
190: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
191: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
192: %% is currently hosting the data.
193: %%
194: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
195: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
196: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
197: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
198: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
199:
200: The 7 mm continuum observations were made in the A configuration
201: of the VLA of the NRAO\footnote{The National Radio
202: Astronomy Observatory is operated by Associated Universities
203: Inc. under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}, during
204: 2006 February 10 and 15. The central frequency observed was
205: 43.34 GHz and we integrated on-source for a total of
206: approximately 5 hours. The absolute amplitude
207: calibrator was 1331+305 (with an adopted flux density of 1.46 Jy)
208: and the phase calibrator was 0552+032 (with a bootstrapped flux density
209: of 0.84$\pm$0.01 Jy and 0.89$\pm$0.04 Jy, for the first and
210: second epoch, respectively). The phase noise rms was about 20$^\circ$
211: and 30$^\circ$, for the first and second epoch, respectively,
212: indicating good weather conditions. The phase center of the observations was at
213: $\alpha(2000) = 05^h~51^m~46\rlap.^s25;~\delta(2000) = +02^\circ~48{'}~29\rlap.^{''}6$.
214:
215: The data were acquired and reduced using the recommended VLA procedures
216: for high frequency data, including the fast-switching mode with a
217: cycle of 120 seconds. The effective bandwidth of the observations
218: was 100 MHz.
219:
220:
221: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
222: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
223:
224: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
225: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
226: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
227: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
228: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
229: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
230: %% automatically renumber them.
231:
232: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
233: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
234:
235: \section{Analysis}
236:
237: \subsection{7 mm Data}
238:
239: In Figure 1 we show the 7 mm image of the core of the HH 111/121 quadrupolar
240: outflow. An unusual structure is evident in the image. The structure can
241: be described as two overlapping, elongated sources
242: aligned in the plane of the sky and approximately perpendicular to each other.
243: We have fitted the emission with two Gaussian ellipsoids using the
244: task JMFIT of the AIPS package (see Table 1).
245: The data image and the model image are shown in Figure 2.
246: In what follows, we will interpret this 7 mm structure, as well as
247: that seen at 3.6 cm, in terms of combinations of ionized jet/dusty disk
248: scenarios. However, other possibilities such as the presence of
249: non-thermal components should be recognized.
250:
251:
252: For the purpose of comparison, we also show in Figure 1 the 3.6 cm
253: continuum image
254: obtained from the VLA data presented by Reipurth et al. (1999).
255: These data have been recalibrated and the position of their phase calibrators
256: updated by displacements of order
257: $0\rlap.{''}16$ to the most recent values in the VLA calibrator catalog
258: to allow accurate astrometric comparison with the 7 mm image.
259: As first discussed by these authors, the 3.6 cm VLA image is
260: suggestive of a quadrupolar jet, with a common origin within $0\rlap.{''}1$
261: ($\sim$40 AU).
262: The main jet is aligned approximately in the east-west direction
263: (that with a PA of $97^\circ \pm 1^\circ$ is taken to be the exciting agent of the extended
264: optical HH 111 flow),
265: while the second jet is aligned approximately in the north-south direction
266: (that with a PA of $4^\circ \pm 4^\circ$
267: is taken to be the exciting agent of HH 121). The error in the position angle
268: of the north-south jet was obtained from our reanalysis
269: of the Reipurth et al. (1999) data. The quadrupolar structure of the
270: 3.6 cm emission is more evident in the maximum entropy reconstruction of
271: the image shown by Reipurth et al. (1999). From this image we crudely estimate that
272: about 70\% (0.7$\pm$0.2 mJy) of the total 3.6 cm emission (1.0 mJy; see Table 2)
273: comes from the east-west jet, while the
274: remaining 30\% (0.3$\pm$0.2 mJy) comes from the weaker north-south jet.
275:
276: We are then faced with a question: since the position
277: angles of the two nearly perpendicular structures observed at
278: 7 mm are similar to those observed at 3.6 cm, are we seeing at
279: 7 mm two jets, two disks, or a jet and a disk?
280: To address these interpretations, we first discuss additional
281: continuum observations of the region.
282:
283: %There are two lines of argument that suggest that at 7 mm
284: %we are seeing dust emission from protoplanetary disks. The first
285: %is that at 3.6 cm the structure with the larger flux density is the
286: %east-west one, while at 7 mm this is true for the north-south structure
287: %(see Fig. 1 and Table 1). If we assume that the flux density of disks and
288: %jets is correlated, this favors matching the east-west structure at
289: %3.6 cm (the jet) with the north-south structure at 7 mm.
290:
291: %A stronger argument comes from discussing the centimeter and millimeter
292: %continuum spectrum of the source, that we do in the following section.
293:
294: \subsection{Flux Densities at Other Wavelengths}
295:
296: We searched in the literature and in the VLA archives for additional
297: data points of the continuum flux density of this source.
298: In Table 2 we present a summary of the total flux densities obtained for
299: the region. The observations are not taken simultaneously and
300: if time variations are present, this will lead to an erroneous
301: determination of the spectral indices.
302: We also note that the observations are taken at different angular
303: resolutions and that this may affect the comparison.
304: The VLA is sensitive only to emission in angular scales
305: smaller or comparable to $\sim$25 times its angular resolution, while for OVRO
306: the largest detectable angular scale is about 10 times the angular resolution.
307: In particular, the 7 mm data
308: was taken with the highest angular resolution (and thus the smallest
309: detectable angular scale) and
310: we may be underestimating the total flux density at this
311: wavelength in comparison with the other observations, that
312: are all taken at lower angular resolutions.
313: Lower angular resolution VLA observations at 7 mm are needed to
314: determine the complete flux density of HH~111.
315: %The VLA archive data at 4.86 GHz was taken in 1994 September 21
316: %in the CnB configuration.
317:
318: The total continuum flux density
319: at 7 mm is about 40\% larger than the addition of the
320: individual flux densities given in Table 1.
321: This difference results from the presence of faint, extended
322: 7 mm emission that is not accounted for in the individual
323: Gaussian fits. Analysis of the residual (with the
324: Gaussian fits removed) image suggests that this faint emission seems
325: to extend over a diameter
326: of $\sim0\rlap.{''}3$, but its nature is unclear.
327: As can be seen from Table 2 and in Figure 3,
328: the flux density is relatively flat in the centimeter range and rises rapidly above
329: $\sim$30 GHz. We have fitted the data points with the sum of two power laws
330: of the form:
331:
332: $$S_\nu(total) = S_{8.4~GHz}(free-free) (\nu/8.4~GHz)^{0.3} +
333: S_{43.3~GHz}(dust) (\nu/43.3~GHz)^{2.5},$$
334:
335: \noindent where the first term is intended to represent the contribution
336: of free-free emission from the ionized outflow and the second term
337: is intended to represent the contribution
338: of dust emission from the disks.
339: Since we have four parameters to fit and only five data points,
340: this fit is only intended to show that the data can be reasonably
341: fitted with the sum of two power laws.
342: In Figure 3 we show the
343: fit for $S_{8.4~GHz}(free-free)$ = 0.93 mJy and
344: $S_{43.3~GHz}(dust)$ = 3.6 mJy.
345: Under this interpretation, the 8.44 GHz emission is
346: clearly dominated by free-free,
347: with only $\sim$6\% of dust contribution. On the other hand,
348: the 43.34 GHz emission is dominated by dust,
349: with a $\sim$30\% contribution from free-free.
350: %Even when the free-free
351: %contribution is significant, we will interpret the 43.34 GHz emission
352: %as dominated by dust.
353: Following Rodr\'\i guez, Zapata, \& Ho (2007) and
354: Hunter et al. (2006), we estimate the total mass in
355: the dust to be in the order of 0.1 $M_\odot$.
356: For this estimate a dust temperature of 45 K was used, following
357: the assumptions of Stapelfeldt \& Scoville (1993).
358:
359: \subsection{Two jets?}
360:
361: The excess of 7-mm emission with respect to the value expected from the
362: extrapolation of the
363: centimeter measurements rules out the possibility that at 7-mm we are
364: simply observing
365: two jets since we have estimated that a significant fraction ($\sim$70\%) of the
366: 7-mm emission is due to dust. However, we cannot fully rule out the possibility that
367: we are seeing a core dominated by dust emission with the extended
368: emission dominated by free-free emission.
369: %Given the limitations
370: %of the data, we will assume that the dust and free-free emissions present
371: %have a similar spatial distribution.
372:
373: \subsection{Two disks?}
374:
375: This possible interpretation is suggested by the fact that at
376: 3.6 cm the structure with the larger flux density is the
377: east-west one, while at 7 mm this is true for the north-south structure
378: (see Fig. 1 and Table 1).
379: %At 3.6 cm the east-west structure has a flux density of
380: %0.8 mJy, while at 7-mm the north-south structure has a flux density
381: %of 2.2 mJy.
382: Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2008), from a comparison between the momentum
383: rate in the molecular outflow and the radio continuum emission from the jet,
384: have argued that high-mass young stars can be understood as a scaled-up
385: version of low-mass young stars. Assuming that this conclusion is valid also for the
386: parameters of jets and disks, and we tentatively assume
387: that the flux density of disks and
388: jets is correlated, this favors matching the east-west structure at
389: 3.6 cm (the jet) with the north-south structure at 7 mm (the disk),
390: and the north-south structure at
391: 3.6 cm (the second jet) with the east-west structure at 7 mm
392: (the second disk), forming a binary disk-jet system
393: as that observed in L1551~IRS5 (Rodr\'\i guez et al. 2003).
394:
395: This interpretation faces, however, three difficulties.
396: The first difficulty is that the axes of the proposed disk-jet structures
397: are not, as expected, nearly perpendicular.
398: The east-west structure at
399: 3.6 cm has a PA of $97^\circ \pm 1^\circ$, while the
400: north-south structure at 7 mm has a PA of $23^\circ \pm 6^\circ$,
401: having a relative angle of $74^\circ \pm 6^\circ$ between them.
402: Furthermore, the north-south structure at
403: 3.6 cm has a PA of $4^\circ \pm 4^\circ$, while the
404: east-west structure at 7 mm has a PA of $116^\circ \pm 7^\circ$,
405: having a relative angle of $112^\circ \pm 8^\circ$ between them.
406:
407: The second difficulty is related to the
408: stability of the proposed binary disk system.
409: From Table 1, we estimate that the centroids of the two 7 mm structures are
410: separated by $0\rlap.{''}036 \pm 0\rlap.{''}014$ or $\sim$15$\pm$6 AU at a
411: distance of 414 pc.
412: We expect the disks in a
413: binary system to be truncated at radii of order
414: a fraction of the binary separation (Armitage, Clarke, \& Tout 1999; Papaloizou \& Pringle 1987;
415: Pichardo, Sparke, \& Aguilar 2005).
416: We then expect the radii of the disks to be compact,
417: $\leq$15 AU (assuming that the observed separation is
418: comparable to the true separation).
419: In contrast, the observed radii (see Table 1) are
420: significantly larger,
421: in the order of 35 AU.
422:
423: The final difficulty is that, if we assume masses of order 1 $M_\odot$
424: for the stars in the binary system, an orbital period of order
425: 40 years is expected for a separation of $\sim$15 AU.
426: The expected timescale in which strongly misaligned binary
427: disks should be brought into rough alignment by tidal torques is
428: about 20 orbital periods (Bate et al. 2000), which is only
429: 800 years if the 15 AU separation is real.
430: With this relatively short timescale it is difficult to
431: explain the lifetime of 10$^4$ years of the HH 111 jet
432: and its remarkable stability over this period.
433: On the other hand, it should be noted that Reipurth et al.
434: (1992) have suggested that the separation of bright knots in the
435: optical flow are consistent with a timescale of variation
436: of the central source of 40 years.
437:
438: These last two difficulties are mitigated if we consider that the real separation is much larger
439: than the projected one. A physical separation of 105 AU would be consistent
440: with the values of 35 AU for tidally truncated radii. The orbital
441: period would now be about 800 years and the timescale for alignment
442: $\sim 1.6 \times 10^4$ years, consistent with the lifetime of
443: the system.
444: However, if we define the physical separation as $r$, the
445: probability of observing it at a projected separation
446: of $r'$ or smaller is:
447:
448: $$P(\leq r') = 1 - [1 - (r'/r)^2)]^{1/2},$$
449:
450: \noindent that for $r'$ = 15 AU and $r$ =105 AU,
451: gives $P(\leq r') \simeq 0.01$.
452:
453: We conclude that either we are observing the binary at an unlikely
454: orientation, that disks in binary systems are more stable
455: and independent than previously thought, or that the interpretation is
456: incorrect.
457:
458: \subsection{One jet and one disk?}
459:
460: This final interpretation implies that at 7-mm we are seeing a
461: north-south structure dominated by dust emission that traces a
462: disk and an east-west structure that could be related with the jet
463: that powers the optical HH~111 outflow. A major advantage with this
464: interpretation is that the structures have a relative angle of
465: $93^\circ \pm 9^\circ$, very close to perpendicularity.
466: The east-west structure has a flux density of 0.7$\pm$0.2 mJy at 3.6 cm and
467: of 1.4$\pm$0.3 mJy at 7-mm. This results in a spectral index of 0.4$\pm$0.2, that is
468: consistent with the value expected for a thermal jet (e. g. Anglada 1996;
469: Eisl\"offel et al. 2000).
470:
471: However, this interpretation also presents some difficulties.
472: The east-west structure at 3.6 cm has a position angle
473: of $97^\circ \pm 1^\circ$, while the east-west structure at 7 mm has a position angle
474: of $116^\circ \pm 7^\circ$. In other words, the two structures are not nearly parallel,
475: as expected if the 3.6 cm emission were the larger scale counterpart of the
476: 7 mm jet emission.
477: Under this interpretation, all the 7-mm emission is related to the
478: HH~111 disk-outflow system and there is no evidence at this wavelength of the
479: HH~121 system.
480: Of course, it should be pointed out that the dust and free-free emission
481: from the HH~121 system are probably present in the image at a low level
482: but that we cannot disentangle their presence given the modest signal-to-noise
483: ratio of the data.
484: % and could
485: %help alleviate the lack of alignment between the structures.
486:
487:
488: \section{Conclusions}
489:
490: Our main conclusions follow:
491:
492: 1) Our high angular resolution ($0\rlap.{''}05$) VLA
493: continuum 7 mm observations of
494: the core of the HH~111/121 quadrupolar outflow
495: reveal a structure that can be described as two overlapping, elongated sources
496: that appear approximately perpendicular to each other
497: in the plane of the sky.
498:
499: 2) We discuss possible interpretations for this structure and conclude that
500: the most viable ones are that we are observing two orthogonal disks
501: around separate protostars or
502: a disk with a perpendicular jet. Both intepretations
503: have advantages and disadvantages,
504: and high angular resolution spectroscopic millimeter observations
505: (possible only in the future with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array)
506: are required to disentangle what is going on at the core of this quadrupolar
507: outflow.
508:
509:
510: %% The equation environment wil produce a numbered display equation.
511:
512: %% The \notetoeditor{TEXT} command allows the author to communicate
513: %% information to the copy editor. This information will appear as a
514: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file. Nothing will
515: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or
516: %% preprint2 style files are used.
517:
518: %% The eqnarray environment produces multi-line display math. The end of
519: %% each line is marked with a \\. Lines will be numbered unless the \\
520: %% is preceded by a \nonumber command.
521: %% Alignment points are marked by ampersands (&). There should be two
522: %% ampersands (&) per line.
523:
524: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups
525: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead
526: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).
527: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.
528:
529: %% This section contains more display math examples, including unnumbered
530: %% equations (displaymath environment). The last paragraph includes some
531: %% examples of in-line math featuring a couple of the AASTeX symbol macros.
532:
533: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as
534: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered
535: %% by LaTeX.
536:
537: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
538: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
539: %% command.
540:
541: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
542: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
543: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
544: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
545: %% text to be printed in the second.
546:
547: \ack
548:
549: We thank an anonymous referee for valuable suggestions.
550: LFR acknowledges the support
551: of CONACyT, M\'exico and DGAPA, UNAM.
552: JMT and GA are supported by the MEC AYA2005-05823-C03 grant
553: (co-funded with FEDER funds). GA also acknowledges support from Junta de
554: Andaluc\'{\i}a.
555:
556: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
557: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
558: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
559: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
560: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
561: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
562: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
563: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
564:
565: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
566: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
567: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
568: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
569: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
570:
571: % {\it Facilities:} \facility{VLA}
572:
573: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
574: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
575: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
576:
577: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
578: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
579: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
580:
581: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
582: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
583: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
584: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
585: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
586: %%
587: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \item-\cite
588: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
589: %% \item command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
590: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
591: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \item or else the
592: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
593: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
594: %% place of the \cite commands.
595:
596: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
597: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
598: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
599:
600: %% Note that the style of the \item labels (in []) is slightly
601: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
602: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
603: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
604: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
605:
606: \section*{References}
607: %\begin{thebibliography}{}
608: \begin{harvard}
609:
610: \item[] Anglada, G. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 93, Radio
611: Emission from the Stars and the Sun, ed. A. R. Taylor \& J. M. Paredes
612: (San Francisco: ASP), 3
613:
614: \item[] Anglada, G., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Osorio, M.,
615: Torrelles, Jos\'e M., Estalella, R., Beltr\'an, M. T., \&
616: Ho, P. T. P. 2004,
617: ApJ, 605, L137
618:
619: \item[] Armitage, P. J., Clarke, C. J., \& Tout, C. A. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 425
620:
621: \item[] Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., Clarke, C. J., Lubow, S. H., Ogilvie, G. I.,
622: Pringle, J. E., \& Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 773
623:
624: \item[] Cernicharo, J. \& Reipurth, B. 1996, ApJ, 460, L57
625:
626: \item[] Eisl\"offel, J., Mundt, R., Ray, T. P., \& Rodr\'\i guez, L. F. 2000,
627: in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, \& S. S. Russell
628: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 815
629:
630: \item[] Gredel, R. \& Reipurth, B. 1993, ApJ, 407, L29
631:
632: \item[] Gredel, R. \& Reipurth, B. 1994, A\&A, 289, L19
633:
634: \item[] Hunter, T.~R., Brogan,
635: C.~L., Megeath, S.~T., Menten, K.~M., Beuther, H.,
636: \& Thorwirth, S.\ 2006, ApJ, 649, 888
637:
638: \item[] Lada, C.~J., \& Lada, E.~A.\ 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 57
639:
640: \item[] Lefloch, B., Cernicharo, J., Reipurth, B., Pardo, J. R., \& Neri, R.
641: 2007, ApJ, 658, 498
642:
643: \item[]
644: Lim, J., \& Takakuwa, S. 2006, ApJ, 653, 425
645:
646:
647: \item[] Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Forbrich, J., \& Brunthaler, A.
648: 2007, A\&A, 474, 515
649:
650: \item[] Monin, J.-L., Clarke, C. J., Prato, L., \& McCabe, C. 2007, in
651: Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press),
652: p. 395
653:
654: \item[] Nagar, N.M., Vogel, S.N., Stone, J.M., \& Ostriker, E.C. 1997, ApJ 482, L195
655:
656: \item[] Papaloizou, J. C. B., \& Pringle, J. E. 1987, MNRAS, 225, 267
657:
658: \item[] Pichardo, B., Sparke,
659: L.~S., \& Aguilar, L.~A.\ 2005, MNRAS, 359, 521
660:
661: \item[] Reipurth, B. 1989, Nature, 340, 42
662:
663: \item[] Reipurth, B., Raga, A.C., \& Heathcote, S. 1992, ApJ 392, 145
664:
665: \item[] Reipurth, B., Bally, J., \& Devine, D. 1997, AJ, 114, 2708
666:
667: \item[] Reipurth, B., Yu, K. C., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Heathcote, S., \& Bally, J.
668: 1999, A\&A, 352, L83
669:
670: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F. \& Reipurth, B. 1994, A\&A, 281, 882
671:
672: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., D'Alessio, P., Wilner, D. J., Ho, P. T. P.,
673: Torrelles, J. M., Curiel, S., G\'omez, Y., Lizano, S., Pedlar, A., Cant\'o, J.,
674: \& Raga, A. C. 1998, Nature, 395, 355
675:
676: \item[] Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., Porras, A., Claussen, M.~J., Curiel, S., Wilner,
677: D.~J., \& Ho, P.~T.~P.\ 2003, ApJ, 586, L137
678:
679: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Zapata, L. A., \& Ho, P. T. P.
680: 2007, ApJ, 654, L143
681:
682: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Moran, J. M., Franco-Hern\'andez, R.,
683: Garay, G., Brooks, K. J. \& Mardones, D. 2008, AJ, 135, 2370
684:
685: \item[] Stapelfeldt, K., Scoville, N.Z. 1993, ApJ, 408, 239
686:
687: \item[] Yang, J., Ohashi, N., Yan, J., Liu, C., Kaifu, N., \& Kimura, H. 1997, ApJ 475, 683
688:
689: %\end{thebibliography}
690: \end{harvard}
691:
692:
693: \clearpage
694:
695: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
696: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
697: %% To embed the sample graphics in
698: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
699: %% \includegraphics commands
700: %%
701: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
702: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
703: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
704: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
705: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
706: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
707: %%
708: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
709: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
710: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
711: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
712: %% journal to journal.
713:
714: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
715: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
716: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
717: %% available in the electronic journal.
718:
719: \begin{figure}
720: %\epsscale{.70}
721: \begin{center}
722: \includegraphics[scale=0.65, angle=0]{f1.eps}
723: \end{center}
724: %\plotone{test2.eps}
725: \caption{Top: Contour image of the 3.6 cm continuum emission from the core
726: of the HH111/121 quadrupolar outflow, made from the data of Reipurth et al. (1999).
727: Contours are
728: -4, -3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20 ,30, 40 , 50, 60, 80 and 100
729: times 4.8 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$, the rms noise of the image.
730: The half power contour of the synthesized beam ($0\rlap.{''}26 \times 0\rlap.{''}24$
731: with a position angle of $-8^\circ$) is shown in the bottom left corner.
732: The rectangle marks the region shown in the 7 mm image (see below).
733: Bottom:
734: Contour image of the 7 mm continuum emission from the core
735: of the HH111/121 quadrupolar outflow.
736: Contours are
737: -4, -3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12
738: times 56 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$, the rms noise of the image.
739: The half power contour of the synthesized beam ($0\rlap.{''}053 \times 0\rlap.{''}043$
740: with a position angle of $-5^\circ$) is shown in the bottom left corner.
741: Both images were made with the ROBUST parameter of IMAGR set to 0.5.
742: \label{fig1}}
743: \end{figure}
744:
745: \clearpage
746:
747: \begin{figure}
748: %\epsscale{.80}
749: \begin{center}
750: \includegraphics[scale=0.5, angle=0]{f2.eps}
751: \end{center}
752: % \plotone{spectrumnew.eps}
753: \caption{Contour images of the 7 mm continuum emission (left)
754: and of the model with two Gaussian ellipsoids.
755: Contours are
756: -4, -3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12
757: times 56 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$, the rms noise of the image.
758: The half power contour of the synthesized beam ($0\rlap.{''}053 \times 0\rlap.{''}043$
759: with a position angle of $-5^\circ$) is shown in the bottom left corner of the data
760: image.
761: \label{fig2}}
762: \end{figure}
763:
764: \clearpage
765:
766: \begin{figure}
767: %\epsscale{.80}
768: \begin{center}
769: \includegraphics[scale=0.75, angle=0]{f3.eps}
770: \end{center}
771: % \plotone{spectrumnew.eps}
772: \caption{Continuum data points for the core of the HH 111/121 quadupolar outflow,
773: from Table 2. The dashed line is the fit described in the text.
774: \label{fig3}}
775: \end{figure}
776:
777:
778: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
779: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
780: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
781: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
782: %%
783:
784: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
785: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
786: %% User Guide for details.
787: %%
788: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
789: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
790: %% after every seventh one.
791:
792: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
793: %% each one.
794:
795: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
796: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
797: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
798: %%
799:
800: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
801: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
802:
803: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
804: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
805: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
806: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
807: %% reduced font size.
808: %%
809: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
810: %% inside the \tablecaption.
811:
812: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
813: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
814: %% edition.
815:
816: \clearpage
817:
818: \begin{table}
819: \small
820: %\begin{center}
821: %\scriptsize
822: %\small
823: \caption{Decomposition of the 7 mm Continuum Emission in Two Components.\label{tbl-1}}
824: %\begin{indented}
825: %\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
826: %\tableline\tableline
827: % &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Position$^a$} & Total Flux
828: %& \\
829: %\cline{2-3}
830: %Component & $\alpha$(J2000) & $\delta$(J2000) & Density (mJy) &
831: %Deconvolved Angular Size$^b$ \\
832: % \tableline
833: %\item[]
834: \begin{tabular}{@{}lcccc}
835: %\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
836: \br
837: & & & Total Flux & Deconvolved \cr
838: \ns
839: Component & $\alpha$(J2000)$^a$ & $\delta$(J2000)$^a$ & Density (mJy) & Angular Size$^b$ \cr
840: \mr
841: North-South & 05 51 46.2545 & 02 48 29.660 & 2.2$\pm$0.3
842: & $0\rlap.{''}15 \pm 0\rlap.{''}02 \times 0\rlap.{''}05 \pm 0\rlap.{''}01;~ +23^\circ
843: \pm 6^\circ$ \\
844: East-West & 05 51 46.2521 & 02 48 29.659 & 1.4$\pm$0.3
845: & $0\rlap.{''}20 \pm 0\rlap.{''}05 \times \leq 0\rlap.{''}04;~ +116^\circ
846: \pm 7^\circ$ \\
847: \br
848: \end{tabular}
849: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
850: $^{\rm a}$ Units of right
851: ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds
852: and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. Absolute positional accuracy
853: is estimated to be $0\rlap.{''}01$.
854:
855: $^{\rm b}$ Major axis $\times$ minor axis; position angle of major axis.
856: %\tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
857: %material to a table.
858: %\end{indented}
859: \end{table}
860: \normalsize
861:
862: \clearpage
863:
864: \begin{table}
865: \small
866: %\begin{center}
867: \caption{Total Flux Densities for the Core of the HH 111/121 Quadrupolar Outflow.\label{tbl-2}}
868: %\begin{tabular}{lcc}
869: %\begin{indented}
870: %\item[]\begin{tabular}{@{}lccccc}
871: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
872: \br
873: Frequency & Flux Density & VLA & Angular & VLA & Epoch of & \\
874: (GHz) & (mJy) & Configuration & Resolution ($''$) & Project Code & Observation & Reference \\
875: \br
876: 4.86 & 0.83$\pm$0.09 & CnB & $\sim$4.0 & AA183 & 1994 Sep 21 & VLA archive$^a$ \\
877: 8.44 & 1.01$\pm$0.11 & A & $\sim$0.25 & AR277/8 & 1992 Nov 02 + 1994 Apr 30 & Reipurth et al. (1999)$^a$ \\
878: 14.94 & 1.94$\pm$0.40 & D & $\sim$5.7 & AR241 & 1991 May 17 & Rodr\'\i guez \& Reipurth (1994)$^a$ \\
879: 43.34 & 5.15$\pm$0.52 & A & $\sim$0.05 & AT325 & 2006 Feb 10+15 & This paper \\
880: 110.2 & 46.0$\pm$7.0 & --$^b$ & $\sim$7.0 & --$^b$ & 1989 Dec - 1990 May & Stapelfeldt \& Scoville (1993) \\
881: \br
882: \end{tabular}
883: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
884: $^{\rm a}$ Flux densities from our analysis of the data.
885:
886: $^{\rm b}$ Data taken with the Owens Valley Radio Observatory Millimeter Interferometer.
887: %\tablenotetext{a}{Units of right
888: %ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds
889: %and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. Positional accuracy
890: %is estimated to be $0\rlap.{''}05$.}
891: %\tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
892: %material to a table.}
893: %\end{indented}
894: \end{table}
895: \normalsize
896:
897:
898: %If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
899: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
900: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
901: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
902: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
903: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
904: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
905: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
906:
907: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
908: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
909:
910: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
911: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
912: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
913: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
914: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
915: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
916: %% to include it in this document.)
917:
918: %% \input{table}
919:
920: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
921: %% that appears after it.
922:
923: \end{document}
924:
925: %%
926: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
927: