1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: \documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \newcommand{\up}[1]{\ifmmode^{\rm #1}\else$^{\rm #1}$\fi}
6: \newcommand{\zdot}{\makebox[0pt][l]{.}}
7: \newcommand{\upd}{\up{d}}
8: \newcommand{\uph}{\up{h}}
9: \newcommand{\upm}{\up{m}}
10: \newcommand{\ups}{\up{s}}
11: \newcommand{\arcd}{\ifmmode^{\circ}\else$^{\circ}$\fi}
12: \newcommand{\arcm}{\ifmmode{'}\else$'$\fi}
13: \newcommand{\arcs}{\ifmmode{''}\else$''$\fi}
14:
15: \title{
16: The Araucaria Project: The Distance to the Sculptor Group Galaxy
17: NGC 247 from Cepheid Variables Discovered in a Wide-Field
18: Imaging Survey
19: \footnote{Based on observations obtained with the 1.3~m
20: telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory, the 2.2 m ESO/MPI telescope at the European Southern Observatory
21: for Large Programme 171.D-0004, and the
22: 4.0 m Blanco telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory. This work is part
23: of the PhD thesis of AGV.}
24: }
25:
26: \author{Alejandro Garc\'{\i}a-Varela}
27: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy
28: Group,Casilla 160-C,
29: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
30: \authoremail{agarcia@astro-udec.cl}
31: \author{Grzegorz Pietrzy{\'n}ski}
32: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy
33: Group,
34: Casilla 160-C,
35: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
36: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4,00-478, Warsaw,
37: Poland}
38: \authoremail{pietrzyn@astrouw.edu.pl}
39: \author{Wolfgang Gieren}
40: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy Group,
41: Casilla 160-C,
42: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
43: \authoremail{wgieren@astro-udec.cl}
44: \author{Andrzej Udalski}
45: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478,
46: Warsaw,Poland}
47: \authoremail{udalski@astrouw.edu.pl}
48: \author{Igor Soszy{\'n}ski}
49: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy
50: Group, Casilla 160-C, Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
51: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4,
52: PL-00-478,Warsaw, Poland}
53: \authoremail{soszynsk@astrouw.edu.pl}
54: \author{Alistair Walker}
55: \affil{Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena Chile}
56: \authoremail{awalker@ctio.noao.edu}
57: \author{Fabio Bresolin}
58: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2680 Woodlawn
59: Drive,
60: Honolulu HI 96822, USA}
61: \authoremail{bresolin@ifa.hawaii.edu}
62: \author{Rolf-Peter Kudritzki}
63: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2680 Woodlawn
64: Drive, Honolulu HI 96822, USA}
65: \authoremail{kud@ifa.hawaii.edu}
66: \author{Olaf Szewczyk}
67: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy Group,
68: Casilla 160-C, Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
69: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478,
70: Warsaw,Poland}
71: \authoremail{szewczyk@astro-udec.cl}
72: \author{Micha{\l} Szyma{\'n}ski}
73: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478,
74: Warsaw, Poland}
75: \authoremail{msz@astrouw.edu.pl}
76: \author{Marcin Kubiak}
77: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478,
78: Warsaw, Poland}
79: \authoremail{mk@astrouw.edu.pl}
80: \author{{\L}ukasz Wyrzykowski}
81: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478,
82: Warsaw,Poland}
83: \affil{Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, CB3 0HA, UK}
84: \authoremail{wyrzykow@astrouw.edu.pl}
85:
86: \begin{abstract}
87: We report on the discovery of a Cepheid population in the Sculptor Group
88: spiral galaxy NGC 247 for the first time.
89: On the basis of wide-field images collected in photometric surveys in V and
90: I bands which were conducted with three different telescopes and cameras,
91: 23 Cepheid variables were
92: discovered with periods ranging from 17 to 131 days. We have constructed
93: the period-luminosity relations from these data and obtain distance moduli to
94: NGC 247 of 28.20 $\pm$ 0.05 mag (internal error) in V, 28.04 $\pm$ 0.06
95: mag in I, and 27.80 $\pm$ 0.09 mag in the reddening-independent Wesenheit
96: index. From our optical data we have determined the total mean reddening of the
97: Cepheids in NGC 247 as E(B-V)=0.13 mag, which brings the true distance modulus
98: determinations from the V and I bands into excellent agreement with the
99: distance determination in the Wesenheit index. The best
100: estimate for the true distance modulus of NGC 247 from our optical Cepheid photometry
101: is 27.80 $\pm$0.09 (internal error) $\pm$ 0.09 mag (systematic error) which is in
102: excellent agreement with other recent distance determinations for NGC 247
103: from the Tip of the Red Giant branch method, and from the Tully-Fisher relation.
104: The distance
105: for NGC 247 places this galaxy at twice the distance of two other Sculptor
106: Group galaxies, NGC 300 and NGC 55, yielding supporting evidence for the
107: filament-like structure of this group of galaxies.
108: The reported distance value
109: is tied to an assumed LMC distance modulus of 18.50 mag. \\
110: \end{abstract}
111:
112: \keywords{Cepheids - galaxies: distances and redshifts - galaxies:
113: individual (NGC 247) - galaxies: stellar content - techniques: photometric }
114:
115: \section{Introduction}
116: In order to improve the extragalactic distance scale using stellar
117: standard candles observable in nearby galaxies, the Araucaria
118: Project\footnote{http://ezzelino.ifa.hawaii.edu/$\sim$bresolin/Araucaria/index.html}
119: (Gieren et al. 2001) has been investigating the most promising stellar
120: distance indicators: Cepheid variables, RR Lyr{\ae} stars, red clump
121: stars, blue supergiants and the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB).
122: The main goal of our project is to obtain an accurate
123: calibration, better than 5\%, of these primary distance indicators as a
124: function of the environmental properties of the host galaxy: metallicity,
125: age and star formation history. To achieve this goal, the Araucaria
126: Project studies galaxies of different morphological types, ages and
127: metallicities in the Local Group,
128: and in the more distant Sculptor Group which contains a number of
129: spiral galaxies easily accesible from the southern hemisphere.
130:
131: One of the Araucaria target galaxies is the spiral
132: galaxy NGC 247 (Fig. 1), member of the Sculptor Group (Jerjen et al. 1998;
133: Karachentsev 2005). This spiral classified as SAB(s)d in the
134: NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database and located in the constellation of
135: Cetus near the Galactic South Pole and is far from the Galactic Plane,
136: as indicated by its galactic coordinates $\ell = 113.95 \deg$, $b =-83.56 \deg$.
137: In the following, we give a brief overview about previous studies of
138: NGC 247 which have measured the most important properties of this galaxy.\\
139: The first authors conducting a photoelectric study of bright stars in
140: NGC 247 in the U, B, V, R and I bands were Alcaino \& Liller (1984) who
141: provided a fundamental reference for the subsequent photometric
142: calibration of resolved stellar populations of this galaxy.\\
143: >From Schmidt plates, Carignan (1985) studied the surface brightness of NGC 247
144: and computed a distance modulus of 27.01 mag for the galaxy. It was also possible to
145: establish that NGC 247 has an inclination of 75.4 $\deg$, indicating the
146: difficulty involved in the study of its stellar populations due to the
147: problems of crowding and blending accentuated by this high inclination.
148:
149: Through a study of the properties of the neutral hydrogen and the mass
150: distribution using VLA data, Carignan \& Puche (1990) established that the
151: HI disk of NGC 247 is relatively limited in extension. Based on their distance of 2.52 Mpc
152: (Carignan 1985), these authors determined the total mass in HI as (8.0$
153: \pm$ 0.3) $\times 10^{8} M_{\odot}$, which corresponds to a
154: mass-luminosity ratio of $M_{H_I}/L_B=$0.34.
155:
156: Str\"assle et al. (1999) made a study in the X-ray energy range between
157: 0.25 and 2 Kev using ROSAT data. They found that the mass of the hot gas of
158: NGC 247, which emits mainly in the band of 0.25 Kev, is 0.7 $\times 10^{8}
159: M_{\odot}$. Taking the model for dwarf galaxies of Burlak (1996), which
160: integrates three components of the galaxy: stellar disk, gaseous disk and
161: dark halo, these authors found that the total mass of NGC 247 is 7.5
162: $\times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$, a value consistent with their measurements of
163: the rotation curve for this galaxy. Based on these data, Str\"assle et al.
164: (1999) found a mass-luminosity ratio of $M/L_x$=28.4, which is in
165: agreement with determinations of the same ratio for other Sculptor
166: galaxies.
167:
168: Using the MOSAIC II camera at the 4.0 m Blanco
169: telescope at Cerro Tololo, Olsen et al. (2004) conducted a modern study of
170: globular clusters in the Sculptor galaxies. These authors were able to detect
171: a very small population of three globular clusters in NGC 247.
172:
173: Karachentsev et al. (2006) were the first to measure the distance to NGC 247
174: from the Tully-Fisher method and obtained a value of 27.87 $\pm$ 0.21 mag,
175: in significant disagreement with the earlier, shorter distance value obtained by
176: Carignan.
177: In their infrared study of the central regions of nearby galaxies, Davidge
178: \& Courteau (2002) had adopted a distance modulus of 27.3 mag for NGC 247.
179: The most recent study reporting a measurement of the distance of NGC 247
180: from a stellar population was performed by Davidge (2006). Based on the I-band
181: magnitude of the TRGB, he obtained a distance modulus of 27.9 $\pm$
182: 0.1 mag , which implies a distance of 3.80 $\pm$ 0.18 Mpc, making this
183: galaxy one of the most distant targets of the Araucaria Project. Taking
184: into account the inclination of the NGC 247 disk, Davidge stressed that
185: variable internal extinction is expected, since the galaxy inclination
186: favors the possibility that the line of sight passes through dust clouds
187: more than once.
188: Freedman et al. (1988), and Catanzarite et al. (1994) were the first to
189: mention the discovery of a number of Cepheid variables in NGC 247. They reported that
190: twelve Cepheids
191: had been found from optical surveys in B, V, R and I bands conducted at
192: CTIO and LCO. Unfortunately, a catalog and/or photometric data for these Cepheids
193: were never published.
194:
195: This paper is the first study which reports the discovery of a sizeable Cepheid
196: population in NGC 247 in a verificable catalog. The paper is structured as
197: follows: details of the observations, data reductions, and calibrations
198: are described in \S 2. The catalog of photometric properties of the 23
199: Cepheid variables in NGC 247 we have discovered is presented in \S 3. The determination
200: of the distance of NGC 247 from the observed period-luminosity relations in the V and I bands, and in the
201: reddening-independent Wesenheit index is the subject of \S 4. We discuss our results
202: in \S 5 and summarize our conclusions in \S6.
203:
204:
205: \section{Observations, Reductions and Calibrations}
206: NGC 247 was observed with the 1.3 m Warsaw telescope at LCO, the 2.2 m
207: MPG/ESO telescope at La Silla Observatory and the 4.0 m Blanco telescope at CTIO.
208: Each telescope was equipped with a mosaic 8k $\times$ 8k detector with a
209: field of view (FOV) and a scale factor (SF) as indicated in the Table 1.
210: For more instrumental details on these cameras, the reader is referred to
211: the camera Web
212: sites.\footnote{http://ogle.astrouw.edu.pl/~ogle/index.html,
213: http://www.ls.eso.org/lasilla/sciops/2p2/E2p2M/WFI/ and
214: http://www.ctio.noao.edu/mosaic/}
215:
216: The observations of NGC 247 with the 1.3 m Warsaw telescope were conducted in
217: service mode. The collection of data began on 2003 August 5, and ended on
218: 2004 December 18. We obtained 40 epochs in the V-band and 38
219: epochs in the I band. With the 2.2 m telescope at La Silla, service mode observations
220: in the V band were obtained for 19 epochs between 2003
221: June 23 and 2005 November 6. With the CTIO 4.0 m telescope, we obtained
222: data in the V and I bands during 9 epochs.
223: These observations were conducted in visitor mode between 2002 October 30 and 2005 January
224: 17. Table 2 summarizes the information about the observations for each
225: telescope.
226:
227: For all images, the debiasing and flat-fielding
228: reductions were done with the IRAF\footnote{ IRAF is distributed by the
229: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the
230: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
231: cooperative agreement with the NSF.} package. Then, point-spread function
232: photometry was obtained for all stars in the same way described by
233: Pietrzy\'nski et al. (2002a). Independently, data taken with the 1.3 m
234: Warsaw telescope were reduced with the OGLE-III pipeline based on the
235: image subtraction technique (Udalski 2003; Wo\'zniak 2000). \\
236: In order to perform an accurate calibration of our instrumental photometry
237: obtained with the 1.3 m Warsaw telescope onto the standard system, this
238: galaxy was observed on an excellent photometric night, 2006 January 26, in V and
239: I bands, along with 25 Landolt standard stars which were monitored at
240: very different air masses, and covered a wide range of colors (-0.14 $< V-I
241: <$ 1.43). Because the transformation equations for each chip can have
242: different zero points, the standard star sample was observed on each
243: chip individually. The transformation equations which were obtained for
244: each chip on which the galaxy was recorded (chips 2 and 3) are given in Table 3.
245: Lower case letters $v$ and $i$ refer to the aperture instrumental
246: magnitudes, standardized to one second exposure time. Capital letters
247: refer to the magnitudes calibrated onto the standard system. The computed
248: color coefficients are consistent with those which were derived to calibrate our
249: earlier mosaic data from the same telescope and camera for NGC 6822 (Pietrzynski
250: et al. 2004), NGC 3109 (Pietrzynski et al. 2006a), NGC 55 (Pietrzynski et
251: al. 2006b) and WLM (Pietrzynski et al. 2007), all these galaxies being targets of the
252: Araucaria Project.
253:
254: To correct the possible small variation of the photometric zero points in
255: V and I over the mosaic, the maps established by Pietrzy\'nski et al.
256: (2004) were used. Comparison with studies in the other Araucaria papers
257: revealed that these maps allow us to correct the zero-point variations
258: across the mosaic field in such a way that the residuals do not exceed
259: 0.02-0.03 mag.
260:
261: In order to perform an external check of our photometry, we compared it to
262: the photoelectric measurements obtained by
263: Alcaino \& Liller (1984), who established a sequence of secondary
264: standards in the field of NGC 247. In our database four stars were found
265: to be common to this sequence. The remaining ones were either saturated or
266: located outside our field of view. In Table 4, the first column gives the
267: identification of the stars according to the Alcaino \& Liller (1984) system.
268: The second column is the V magnitude measured by Alcaino \& Liller. The
269: third column reports the V magnitude obtained in this work.
270: The comparison of our V-band photometry for these objects with that of
271: Alcaino \& Liller demonstrates that the zero points of the two data sets
272: agree within 0.02 mag.
273:
274: In order to calibrate the instrumental photometry obtained with the 2.2 m
275: and 4.0 m telescopes, linear offsets were applied to the photometric zero
276: points of the data since the magnitudes did not show any dependence on the
277: color terms. We developed an internal test to estimate the zero point
278: photometry accuracy of the final data set obtained by joining data of the three
279: telescopes. Computing the mean magnitudes of bright stars observed with
280: each telescope, and comparing the values with those obtained by combining
281: data of the three telescopes, we were able to establish that the accuracy of
282: the V and I zero points of the photometry is 0.02 mag and 0.01 mag,
283: respectively. This is borne out in the Cepheid light curves obtained
284: from the combined datasets, where in no case evidence for systematic offsets
285: between the datasets from the different cameras is observed (see Fig. 2).
286:
287:
288: \section{The Cepheid Catalog}
289: The photometric database was made with the 2.2 m and 4.0 m telescopes
290: data. This database was constructed using the DAOMASTER and DAOMATCH
291: programs (Stetson 1994). A search for variable stars with periods
292: between 0.2 and 150 days was conducted using the analysis of variance algorithm
293: (Schwarzenberg-Czerny 1989) and FNPEAKS software (Kolaczkowski private information).
294: In order to distinguish Cepheids from other types of variable
295: stars, the same criteria used by Pietrzy\'nski et al.
296: (2002b) were adopted.
297: All light curves showing the typical shape of Cepheid variables were
298: approximated by Fourier series of order less than 5 and 4 for
299: photometric time-series in the V and I bands, respectively. Then we
300: rejected all candidates whose amplitudes in the V band were smaller than 0.4
301: mag, which is approximately the lower limit amplitude for normal classical
302: Cepheids. For the variable stars passing our selection criteria, mean V
303: and I magnitudes were derived by integrating their light curves which had
304: been previously converted onto an intensity scale, and converting the
305: results back to the magnitude scale. The quality and phase coverage of the
306: light curves allowed us to obtain a statistical accuracy of the derived
307: mean magnitudes in the V band as typically 0.01 mag for the brightest
308: variables, increasing to 0.03 mag for the faintest Cepheids in our sample. Our
309: Cepheid catalog consists of 23 members. Table 5 presents their
310: identifications, equatorial coordinates, periods, V and I mean magnitudes,
311: and their Wesenheit index magnitudes defined as $W_I$ = I - 1.55($<V> -
312: <I>$) (see Udalski et al. (1999)). Other variables in NGC 247 discovered in our search
313: for photometric variability and not classified as Cepheids will be studied in a
314: forthcoming paper. In Fig. 3, we show the V and I light curves of a typical
315: Cepheid we have discovered in NGC 247, cep015 with a period of 41.4 days, as obtained
316: from the combined datasets. It can be seen that the different datasets match each
317: other very well indeed, and that the light variations of this (and the other) Cepheid
318: in our catalog in the V and I bands are very well determined.
319:
320: The relatively small number of Cepheids detected from our images in NGC 247 is not
321: surprising, given the distance to this galaxy and the fact that most of the frames
322: were obtained on small telescopes (there were only 9 epochs obtained on the Blanco
323: 4-m telescope),
324: which restrict the detection to the bright, long-period Cepheid population
325: in this galaxy. On the other hand, this is the population most useful for the
326: distance determination, which is the primary purpose of our project, and a sample
327: of 23 Cepheids with a period baseline of more than 100 days is very well
328: suited for an accurate distance determination.
329:
330: In Fig. 2, we show the locations of the NGC 247 Cepheids in the V, V-I color-magnitude
331: diagram (CMD), where they delineate the expected Cepheid instability strip (Chiosi
332: et al. 1992; Simon \& Young 1997). Three stars in Table 5 are missing in this plot
333: because we could not measure their I-band light curves (objects cep001, cep002 and cep013).
334: While the eighteen brightest Cepheids in our sample delineate the instability strip
335: very well, supporting their correct identification as Cepheid variables, the two faintest
336: Cepheids in our sample appear too blue for their periods and seem to be placed beyond
337: the blue edge of the Cepheid instability strip. While this is likely to be attributed
338: to the relatively low accuracy of the photometric data for these two stars, it could
339: also mean that these objects are not Cepheids, which we consider very unlikely however
340: from an inspection of their light curves. In any case, as discussed in the following
341: section of this paper, these two variables are excluded from our distance determination
342: for NGC 247.
343:
344: In Table 6, we report our individual V and I band observations of the
345: discovered Cepheids. The full Table 6
346: is available in the electronic edition of the journal.
347:
348:
349:
350: \section{Period-Luminosity Relations and Distance Determination}
351:
352: In Figures 4, 5 and 6 we show the PL relations in the V, I and Wesenheit bands (the latter
353: defined in the usual way) resulting from the data
354: from Table 5. For the distance determination from these diagrams, we adopt the eighteen
355: Cepheids in the period range from 27.8 to 73.3 days. The variables with smaller
356: periods in Table 5 were excluded from the distance analysis because they might be
357: affected by a Malmquist bias, given that their mean magnitudes are relatively close
358: to the cutoff in our photometry (see Fig. 2). We also exclude the one very long-period
359: variable at 131.3 days because such very luminous Cepheids might not obey the
360: linear PL relation defined by the shorter period (less than 100 days) variables (e.g.
361: Freedman et al. 1992; Gieren et al. 2004). Such an effect is also predicted from
362: theoretical models (Bono et al. 2002).
363: Although the 131.3 day Cepheid in NGC 247 seems to perfectly
364: fit the linear extension of the PL relation in both V and I, it carries a strong
365: weight in the solution and we prefer not to use it in the distance calculation.
366:
367: As in the previous papers in this series, we adopt the slopes of the Cepheid PL
368: relations as given by the OGLE-II project for the Cepheids in the LMC (Udalski 2000).
369: These slopes are extremely well determined, with 1 $\sigma$ errors of 0.021, 0.014 and
370: 0.008 in the V, I and the reddening-free Wesenheit bands, respectively.
371: Least-squares fits to the observed PL relations in NGC 247 from our data yield slopes of
372: -2.571 $\pm$ 0.261 in V, -2.685 $\pm$ 0.214 in I and -3.497 $\pm$ 0.421 in ${\rm W}_{\rm I}$,
373: which are all consistent with the OGLE LMC slopes within about 1 $\sigma$. This supports
374: our adopted procedure to use the well-measured LMC Cepheid PL relation slopes
375: for the distance determination of NGC 247.
376:
377:
378: Fitting the LMC Cepheid PL relation slopes to our data of the 18 adopted
379: Cepheids (indicated as filled circles in Figs. 4-6) yields the following equations: \\
380:
381: V = -2.775 log P + (26.766 $\pm$ 0.048) $\sigma$ = 0.199 \\
382:
383: I = -2.977 log P + (26.131 $\pm$ 0.056 $\sigma$ = 0.229 \\
384:
385: ${\rm W}_{\rm I}$ = -3.300 log P + (25.163 $\pm$ 0.086) $\sigma$ = 0.355 \\
386:
387: If we fit the data of {\it all} Cepheids in Table 5 (23 stars) with the same slopes,
388: the zero points in the above PL relations change to 26.735, 26.134 and 25.219
389: in V, I and the Wesenheit index, respectively.
390: This shows that our distance result for NGC 247 changes
391: by less than 3\% if we replace our adopted sample of 18 Cepheids by the full
392: sample of Cepheids we detected and measured in NGC 247, in any filter. If we take
393: into account the small errors on the adopted LMC PL relation slopes in our calculation,
394: the effect on the zero points of the NGC 247 PL relations is less tha 0.01 mag
395: in each band, and therefore insignificant.
396:
397: Adopting, as in our previous papers, a value of 18.50 for the true distance
398: modulus of the LMC, a value of 0.02 mag for the foreground reddening toward NGC 247
399: (Schlegel et al. 1998), and the reddening law of Schlegel et al. (1998)
400: ( ${\rm A}_{\rm V}$ = 3.24 E(B-V), ${\rm A}_{\rm I}$ = 1.96 E(B-V)) we obtain
401: the following absorption-corrected distance moduli for NGC 247 in the three
402: different bands:\\
403:
404: $(m-M)_{0}$ (V) = 28.135 $\pm$ 0.048 \\
405:
406: $(m-M)_{0}$ (I) = 27.998 $\pm$ 0.056 \\
407:
408: $(m-M)_{0}$ (${\rm W}_{\rm I}$) = 27.795 $\pm$ 0.086 \\
409:
410:
411: These values suggest that in addition to the foreground reddening towards
412: our target galaxy, there is substantial intrinsic reddening in NGC 246 affecting
413: the Cepheid magnitudes in V and I. We will determine this intrinsic component
414: of the total reddening affecting the NGC 247 Cepheids with high accuracy
415: in a future study which
416: will provide near-infrared photometry for the Cepheids and combine it with the
417: present optical VI data, as we did in previous papers of the Araucaria Project
418: (e.g Gieren et al. 2005a). From the distance moduli derived in the V and I bands,
419: our current best estimate for the {\it total} mean reddening of the NGC 247 Cepheids,
420: including that produced in the galaxy itself,is E(B-V)=0.13 mag. This value of
421: the total reddening brings the true distance moduli in the V and I bands
422: in very good agreement with the value derived from the ${\rm W}_{\rm I}$. As our present
423: best determination of the true distance modulus of NGC 247, we adopt the value
424: 27.80 $\pm$ 0.09 mag (random error) derived from the reddening-free Wesenheit magnitude.
425: The corresponding distance of NGC 247 is ( 3.63 $\pm$ 0.15) Mpc and places
426: the galaxy at about twice the distance of the other two Sculptor Group galaxies
427: for which our project has provided accurate Cepheid distances so far, NGC 300
428: (Gieren et al. 2004, 2005a) and NGC 55 (Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al. 2007,
429: Gieren et al. 2008). We will discuss our distance determination for NGC 247
430: and estimate its total uncertainty, including systematic errors, in the following
431: section.
432:
433:
434: \section{Discussion}
435: The current distance determination to NGC 247 is the first one based on
436: Cepheid variables discovered in our present wide-field imaging survey. It
437: is affected to some extent by the well-known sources of systematic error inherent
438: in such studies which have been discussed in some detail in our previous
439: wide-field Cepheid surveys of Araucaria galaxies mentioned in the Introduction.
440: These systematic error sources include the zero point of our photometry,
441: possible problems with the Cepheid sample itself (overtone pulsators, Malmquist
442: bias, filling of the instability strip), blending of the Cepheids with objects
443: not resolved in the images, possible metallicity effects on the PL relation,
444: reddening, and the adopted distance of the LMC to which the NGC 247 distance is tied.
445: We will in turn discuss these factors and estimate their influence on our
446: current distance determination.
447:
448: As discussed in section 2, we have been very careful to determine the photometric
449: zero points of the different sets of photometric data used in this study with
450: the highest possible accuracy. Our tests and discussion in section 2 lead us
451: to believe that the photometric zero points of the common datasets in V and I
452: are determined to better then $\pm$ 0.03 mag in both bands. This is in
453: agreement with our previous experience with datasets obtained with the same
454: instruments and reduced and calibrated in the same way,
455: which always led to photometric zero points whose accuracy
456: was better than 2\%.
457:
458: While the Cepheid sample used in this study of about 20 stars is relatively
459: small as compared to our previous surveys of other (and nearer) Araucaria
460: galaxies, it is still large enough to expect that an inhomogeneous filling
461: of the instability strip is not a significant problem in the present case
462: of NGC 247. Indeed, the dispersion of the positions of the Cepheids in
463: Fig. 3 seems to indicate that the distribution of the Cepheids in the
464: instability strip is approximately random. This idea is supported by the fact
465: that the effect of sample size, or adopted cutoff period
466: on the distance solution is only $\sim$ 2\% in
467: all bands, as discussed in the previous section. This same result also
468: suggests that there is no significant Malmquist bias affecting our distance
469: result, in agreement with the fact that even the faintest Cepheids in our
470: sample are still about one magnitude brighter than the faintest stars in
471: NGC 247 detected and measured from our images. Also, we can clearly assume
472: that our adopted Cepheid sample has only fundamental mode pulsators, given that
473: many studies have shown that overtone Cepheids are restricted to periods
474: smaller than about 6 days (e.g. Udalski et al. 1999; Gieren et al. 1993).
475:
476: Blending of the Cepheids in NGC 247 used for the distance determination is potentially
477: a more serious problem. In extrapolation of our result of the effect of blending
478: on the Cepheid-based distance of NGC 300 (Bresolin et al. 2005), which
479: was found less than 2\%, we would expect a slightly larger effect for NGC 247 due to its
480: larger inclination as compared to NGC 300, and the larger distance which both tend to
481: increase the probability of significant blending with unresolved and relatively
482: bright nearby stars. On the other hand, the relative effect of blending
483: decreases with the period of the Cepheids; longer-period Cepheids are more
484: luminous, and therefore the relative effect of a given unresolved companion star
485: on its observed flux tends to be less important. Since all Cepheids in our
486: sample used for the distance determination have periods longer than 27 days,
487: and the mean period of the sample is about 50 days, our NGC 247 sample should be
488: less affected in this regard than the sample in NGC 300 for which the mean period
489: is considerably shorter (about 30 days; Gieren et al. 2004). From
490: these considerations, we expect that any residual
491: systematic effect on the NGC 247 distance due to blending of the Cepheids
492: should not exceed 4\%, or 0.08 mag in the distance modulus. It should be noted
493: that the sign of this error is to {\it underestimate} the true distance of the
494: galaxy by such an amount.
495:
496: The effect of metallicity on the PL relations in different bands has been
497: discussed in some detail in the previous papers of this series. Here we just
498: note that for any of the Araucaria target galaxies we have studied so far
499: the observed slopes of the Cepheid PL relations in the VIJK bands were
500: consistent with the respective slopes found in the LMC by the OGLE-II project in VI bands,
501: and by Persson et al. (2004) in the near-infrared bands. NGC 247 is no exception,
502: as evident from Figs. 4, 5 and 6, although the slope is less well determined
503: in the present case of NGC 247 due to the relatively small Cepheid sample
504: we were able to detect. The recent work of
505: Gieren et al. (2005b), and of Fouqu{\'e} et al. (2007) on Galactic and LMC Cepheid
506: distances measured from the infrared surface brightness
507: technique (Fouqu{\'e} \& Gieren 1997) has confirmed that the slope of the
508: Cepheid PL relation does not change significantly with metallicity even for
509: a solar abundance sample of Cepheid variables. The effect of a possible nonlinearity
510: of the PL relation at a period of 10 days discussed by Ngeow et al. (2008)
511: does not affect the determination of distances of galaxies in any significant way.
512: The question of the effect of metallicity on the zero point of the PL relation
513: is less clear, at the present time, and it is one of the main goals to
514: determine this effect by comparison of the Cepheid distances of our target
515: galaxies with those derived from other methods. However, the effect of
516: metallicity on the PL relation zero points in VIJK is certainly not dramatic
517: and likely less than $\sim$ 3\% (e.g. Storm et al. 2004; Sakai et al. 2004;
518: Macri et al. 2006).
519: The generally very good agreement of our Cepheid distances with those derived
520: from the TRGB method (e.g. Rizzi et al. 2006, 2007) for common galaxies seems
521: to support the idea that the effect of metallicity on the PL zero point is
522: small. For NGC 247, the agreement of the TRGB distance of 27.9 $\pm$ 0.1 mag
523: of Davidge (2006) with our present value of 27.80 mag is clearly excellent.
524: Although we do not have any detailed information on the metallicity of
525: the young stellar population in NGC 247, it is likely more metal-rich than
526: that of the less massive Local Group irregular galaxies WLM, NGC 3109 and IC 1613
527: for which the metallicity of young stars is about -1.0 dex (Bresolin et al. 2006,2007;
528: Evans et al. 2007), suggesting that Cepheid and TRGB distances do agree
529: well over a range of metallicities, and not only for very metal-poor galaxies.
530: A detailed quantitative discussion of this issue will be given in a
531: forthcoming paper of the Araucaria Project.
532:
533: Any residual systematic effect of reddening on our present distance result adopted
534: from the Wesenheit PL relation should be small. In our previous Cepheid
535: studies, we have usually found that the distance of a galaxy derived from the
536: ${\rm W}_{\rm I}$ magnitude PL relation agreed to within 2\% with the one
537: derived from our combined optical-near infrared technique (Gieren et al. 2005a,
538: 2006, 2008a; Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al. 2006c; Soszy{\'n}ski et al. 2006). This is in principle
539: expected due to the reddening-free nature of the Wesenheit magnitudes. However,
540: the Wesenheit band PL relations for more distant galaxies tend to show an increasing
541: dispersion which is in the
542: order of, or even surpasses the one observed in V and/or I, which is likely
543: due to the combined effect of photometric errors and blending with unresolved
544: nearby stars which affect the Wesenheit magnitudes by increasing amounts.
545: In our recent
546: study of the WLM galaxy (Gieren et al. 2008b), we find a distance from near-infrared
547: data which is 0.09 mag shorter than the one we had previously obtained from
548: the Wesenheit index. In the case of NGC 247, there might be an effect of similar
549: order. Future, planned infrared photometry of the Cepheids in NGC 247 will allow
550: to investigate this question and provide a more accurate distance determination
551: to the galaxy. We estimate that the remaining systematic effect due to
552: reddening on the present distance modulus determination for NGC 247 should
553: not be larger than 4\%. Our planned infrared work on the NGC 247 Cepheids
554: will definitively prove or disprove the validity of our current estimation
555: of the effect of reddening on the distance of NGC 247.
556:
557: Finally, there is the problem of the adopted LMC distance, which has been most
558: recently discussed by Schaefer (2008). We do not wish to add to the discussion here,
559: but just mention that some recent results for the distance modulus of the LMC
560: using local open clusters (An et al. 2007), revised Hipparcos Cepheid parallaxes
561: (van Leeuwen et al. 2007),
562: and the infrared surface brightness technique (Fouqu{\'e} et al. 2007) have
563: yielded a somewhat shorter LMC distance, with values close to 18.40 mag.
564: Since all galaxy distance moduli reported in previous papers of the Araucaria Project
565: have been tied to the same, assumed LMC distance modulus of 18.50, we will retain this
566: value here. Therefore,
567: their {\it relative} distances will not be affected should future work definitively change
568: the adopted 18.50 mag value of the LMC distance.
569:
570: The distance of NGC 247 seems very well determined now. Within their respective
571: uncertainties, the TRGB distance of 27.9 $\pm$ 0.1 mag
572: of Davidge (2006) and the Tully-Fisher distance determination of 27.87 $\pm$ 0.21 mag
573: of Karachentsev et al. (2006) agree with the present, first
574: distance determination of the galaxy from Cepheid variables. The new Cepheid distance
575: to NGC 247 reported in this paper has an uncertainty which is similar to the
576: TRGB measurement of the distance, but more accurate than the distance of
577: this spiral derived from the Tully-Fisher method.
578:
579:
580: From the previous
581: discussion, we estimate that the systematic uncertainty of our present
582: distance determination is about 0.09 mag. This leads to a final, adopted
583: value for the true distance modulus of NGC 247 of $(m-M)_{0}$ = 27.80 $\pm$ 0.09
584: (random) $\pm$ 0.09 (systematic) mag, corresponding to 3.63 Mpc, with a total
585: uncertainty of about 6\%. We expect to improve on this value, and significantly
586: reduce its uncertainty, with our planned near-infrared work on the NGC 247
587: Cepheids.
588:
589:
590: \section{Conclusions}
591: The main conclusions of this paper can be summarized as follows:
592:
593: 1. We have conducted an extensive wide-field imaging survey in the Sculptor
594: Group spiral galaxy NGC 247 in the optical V and I bands which has led
595: to the discovery of 23 Cepheid variables with periods between 17 and 131 days.
596: These are the first Cepheid variables with published data reported in this
597: galaxy.
598:
599: 2. From the periods and mean magnitudes of the Cepheids derived from our photometry,
600: we have constructed PL relations in the V, I and ${\rm W}_{\rm I}$ bands. The
601: data define tight PL relations which are well fitted with the slopes of
602: the corresponding LMC Cepheid PL relations adopted from the OGLE-II project.
603: We have derived reddened distances for the 3 bands, which lead to a determination
604: of the total mean reddening of the NGC 247 Cepheids of E(B-V) = 0.13 mag.
605: With an adopted foreground reddening towards NGC 247 of 0.02 from Schlegel et
606: al. (1998), we determine a reddening value of 0.11 produced {\it inside} NGC 247
607: and affecting its Cepheid population. We adopt a final true distance modulus of
608: 27.80 mag for NGC 247 from the reddening-free Wesenheit magnitude PL relation,
609: in very good agreement with the reddening-corrected values coming from the
610: V and I bands. The total uncertainty on this distance value, including the
611: contribution from systematic errors, is estimated to be $\pm$ 6\%.
612:
613: 3. The Cepheid distance to NGC 247 derived in this paper agrees very well,
614: within the respective 1 $\sigma$ uncertainties, with the recent determinations of
615: Davidge (2006) from the I-band TRGB method, and of Karachentsev et al. (2006)
616: from the Tully-Fisher method.
617:
618: 4. The distance of NGC 247 of 3.63 Mpc is about twice as large as the respective
619: distances of two other Sculptor Group galaxies, NGC 300 (Gieren et al. 2005a)
620: and NGC 55 (Gieren et al. 2008a). This supports the evidence that the Sculptor Group
621: has a filament-like structure (Jerjen et al. 1998) with a large depth extension
622: in the line of sight.
623:
624:
625:
626: \acknowledgements
627: JAGV acknowledges financial support from MECESUP grant USA0108
628: to the Universidad de Concepci\'on.
629: JAGV, GP and WG acknowledge
630: financial support from the Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP
631: 15010003. WG also acknowledges support from the BASAL Centro de Astrofisica y
632: Tecnologias Afines (CATA) for this work.
633: GP acknowledges support from the Polish grant N203 002 31/046
634: and the FOCUS
635: subsidy of the Fundation for Polish Science (FNP). We are grateful
636: for generous amounts of observing time allotted to this project
637: at ESO-La Silla, CTIO and LCO and thank the respective staffs for their
638: expert help in conducting the observations.
639:
640:
641: \begin{references}
642:
643: \reference{} Alcaino, G. \& Liller, W. 1984, \apj, 89, 814
644:
645: \reference{} An, D., Terndrup, D.M. and Pinsonneault, M.H. 2007, \apj, 671, 1640
646:
647: \reference{} Bono, G., Groenewegen, M.A.T., Marconi, M. and Caputo, F. 2002, \apj, 574, L33
648:
649: \reference{} Bresolin, F., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W. and Kudritzki, R.P. 2005, \apj, 634, 1020
650:
651: \reference{} Bresolin, F., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Urbaneja, M.A., Gieren, W., Kudritzki, R.P.
652: and Venn, K. 2006, \apj, 648, 1007
653:
654: \reference{} Bresolin, F., Urbaneja, M.A., Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G. and Kudritzki, R.P. 2007,
655: \apj, 671, 2028
656:
657: \reference{} Burlak, A.N. 1996, Astronomy Reports, 40, 621
658:
659: \reference{} \reference{} Carignan, C. 1985, ApJS, 58, 107
660:
661: \reference{} Carignan, C. \& Puche, D. 1990, \apj, 100, 641
662:
663: \reference{} Catanzarite, J., Freedman, W., Horowitz, I., Madore, B. 1994, BAAS, 26, 1351
664:
665: \reference{} Chiosi, C., Wood, P., Bertelli, G. and Bressan, A. 1992, \apj, 387, 320
666:
667: \reference{} Davidge, T. 2006, \apj, 641, 822
668:
669: \reference{} Davidge, T. \& Courteau, S. 2002, AJ, 123, 1438
670:
671: \reference{} Evans, C.J., Bresolin, F., Urbaneja, M.A., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W.
672: and Kudritzki, R.P. 2007, \apj, 659, 1198
673:
674: \reference{} Fouqu{\'e}, P. and Gieren, W. 1997, A\&A, 320, 799
675:
676: \reference{} Fouqu{\'e}, P., Arriagada, P., Storm, J., et al. 2007, A\&A, 476, 73
677:
678: \reference{} Freedman, W., Horowitz, I., Madore, B., et al. 1988, in: The Extragalactic
679: Distance Scale; Proceedings of the ASP 100th Anniversary Symposium, Victoria, Canada,
680: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1988, p.207
681:
682: \reference{} Freedman, W.L., Madore, B.F., Hawley, S.L., Horowitz, I.K., Mould, J.,
683: Navarrete, M. and Sallmen, S. 1992, \apj, 396, 80
684:
685: \reference{} Gieren, W., Barnes, T.G. and Moffett, T.J. 1993, \apj, 418, 135
686:
687: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy\'nski, G., Walker, A., et al. 2004, \aj, 128, 1167
688:
689: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.P.,
690: Minniti, D. and Storm, J. 2005a, \apj, 628, 695
691:
692: \reference{} Gieren, W., Storm, J., Barnes, T.G., Fouqu{\'e}, P., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G.
693: and Kienzle, F. 2005b, \apj, 627, 224
694:
695: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Bresolin, F., et al. 2005c, The Messenger, 121, 23
696:
697: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Nalewajko, K., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Bresolin, F.,
698: Kudritzki, R.P., Minniti, D. and Romanowsky, A. 2006, \apj, 647, 1056
699:
700: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.P.,
701: Storm, J. and Minniti, D. 2008a, \apj, 672, 266
702:
703: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Szewczyk, O., et al. 2008b, \apj, in press
704:
705: \reference{} Jerjen, H., Freeman, K. C. \& Binggeli, B. 1998, \aj, 116, 2873
706:
707: \reference{} Karachentsev, I. 2005, \aj, 129, 178
708:
709: \reference{} Karachentsev, I., Dolphin, A., Tully, R.B., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1361
710:
711: \reference{} Macri, L.M., Stanek, K.Z., Bersier, D., Greenhill, L.J. and Reid, M.J. 2006,
712: \apj, 652, 1133
713:
714: \reference{} Ngeow, C.C., Kanbur, S.M. and Nanthakumar, A. 2008, A\&A, 477, 621
715:
716: \reference{} Olsen, K. A. G., Miller, B. W., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 2004, \aj, 127, 2674
717:
718: \reference{} Persson, S.E., Madore, B.F., Krzeminski, W., Freedman, W.L., et al. 2004, \aj, 128, 2239
719:
720: \reference{} Pietrzy\'nski, G., Gieren, W. \& Udalski, A. 2002a, PASP, 114, 298
721:
722: \reference{} Pietrzy\'nski, G., Gieren, W., Fouqu\'e, P. \& Pont, F. 2002b, \aj, 123, 789
723:
724: \reference{} Pietrzy\'nski, G., Gieren, W., Udalski, A., et al. 2004, \aj, 128, 2815
725:
726: \reference{} Pietrzy\'nski, G., Gieren, W., Udalski, A., et al. 2006a, \apj, 648, 366
727:
728: \reference{} Pietrzy\'nski, G., Gieren, W., Soszy\'nski, I., et al. 2006b, \aj, 132, 2556
729:
730: \reference{} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., et al. 2006c, \apj, 642, 216
731:
732: \reference{} Pietrzy\'nski, G., Gieren, W., Udalski, A., et al. 2007, \aj, 134, 594
733:
734: \reference{} Rizzi, L., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.P., Gieren, W. and Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G. 2006,
735: \apj, 638, 766
736:
737: \reference{} Rizzi, L., Tully, R.B., Makarov, D., et al. 2007, \apj, 661, 815
738:
739: \reference{} Sakai, S., Ferrarese, L., Kennicutt, R.C. and Saha, A. 2004, \apj, 608, 42
740:
741: \reference{} Schaefer, B.E. 2008, \aj, 135, 112
742:
743: \reference{} Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P. and Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
744:
745: \reference{} Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 153
746:
747: \reference{} Simon, N.R. and Young, T.S. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 267
748:
749: \reference{} Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.P.
750: and Storm, J. 2006, \apj, 648, 375
751:
752: \reference{} Stetson, P. 1994, \pasp, 106, 250
753:
754: \reference{} Storm, J., Carney, B.W., Gieren, W., Fouqu{\'e}, P., Fry, A.M.
755: and Latham, D.W. 2004, A\&A, 415, 531
756:
757: \reference{} Str\"assle, M., Huser, M., Jetzer, P., De Paolis, F. 1999, A\&A, 349, 1
758:
759: \reference{} Udalski, A., Szyma\'nski, M. Kubiak, M., et al. 1999, Acta Astron., 49, 201
760:
761: \reference{} Udalski, A. 2000, Acta Astron., 50, 279
762:
763: \reference{} Udalski, A. 2003, Acta Astron., 53, 291
764:
765: \reference{} van Leeuwen, F., Feast, M.W., Whitelock, P.A. and Laney, C.D. 2007,
766: MNRAS, 379, 723
767:
768: \reference{} Wo\'zniak, P. 2000, Acta Astron., 50, 421
769:
770:
771: \end{references}
772:
773:
774: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c}
775: \tablecaption{Camera Properties}
776: %\tablewidth{0pt}
777: \tablehead{
778: \colhead{Telescope} & \colhead{FOV} & \colhead{SF ($^{\prime \prime} / pixel$)} \\
779: }
780: \startdata
781: 1.3 m & 35$^\prime$ $\times$ 35$^\prime$ & 0.26 \\
782: 2.2 m & 34$^\prime$ $\times$ 33$^\prime$ & 0.24 \\
783: 4.0 m & 36$^\prime$ $\times$ 36$^\prime$ & 0.27 \\
784: \enddata
785: \end{deluxetable}
786:
787:
788: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c c}
789: \tablecaption{Summary of Observations}
790: %\tablewidth{0pt}
791: \tablehead{
792: \colhead{Telescope} & \colhead{$t_{exp}$} & \colhead{Time Base-} & \colhead{Seeing} & \colhead{Band} \\
793: & \colhead{(sec)} & \colhead{Line (yr)} & \colhead{(arcsec)}
794: }
795: \startdata
796: 1.3 m & 900 & 1.3 & 0.8-1.4 & V, I \\
797: 2.2 m & 700 & 2.3 & 0.7-1.5 & V \\
798: 4.0 m & 300, 720 & 2.2 & 1.0-1.7 & V \\
799: 4.0 m & 300, 360 & 2.2 & 1.0-1.7 & I \\
800: \enddata
801: \end{deluxetable}
802:
803:
804: \begin{deluxetable}{c c}
805: \tablecaption{Photometric Calibration for the 1.3 m Warsaw Telescope Data}
806: %\tablewidth{0pt}
807: \tablehead{
808: \colhead{Chip 2} & \colhead{Chip 3} \\
809: }
810: \startdata
811: $V=v-0.032(V-I)-2.339$&$V=v-0.030(V-I)-1.898$\\
812: $I=i+0.031(V-I)-2.572$&$I=i+0.037(V-I)-2.283$\\
813: $V-I=0.939(v-i)+0.226$&$V-I=0.936(v-i)+0.365$\\
814: \enddata
815: \end{deluxetable}
816:
817: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c}
818: \tablecaption{Photometry Comparison}
819: %\tablewidth{0pt}
820: \tablehead{
821: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{$V_{A\&L}$} & \colhead{V} \\
822: }
823: \startdata
824: J&12.58&12.585\\
825: M&13.47&13.490\\
826: N&14.25&14.287\\
827: O&13.83&13.841\\
828: \enddata
829: \end{deluxetable}
830:
831: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c c c c c}
832: \tablecaption{Catalog of Cepheid Variables in NGC 247}
833: %\tablewidth{0pt}
834: \tablehead{
835: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{R.A.} & \colhead{Decl.} & \colhead{\textit{P}} &
836: \colhead{${\rm T}_{0}-2,450,000$}
837: & \colhead{$<V>$} & \colhead{$<I>$} & \colhead{$<W_{\rm I}>$}\\
838: & \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(J2000)} &
839: \colhead{(days)} & \colhead{(days)} &
840: \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)}
841: }
842: \startdata
843: cep001 & 0:47:29.60 & -20:45:28.3 & 15.949 & 2,807.3298 & 23.372 & &
844: \\
845: cep002 & 0:46:51.06 & -20:33:18.4 & 17.837 & 2,805.8816 & 23.357 &
846: & \\
847: cep003 & 0:46:59.67 & -20:39:30.0 & 17.966 & 2,576.1692 & 22.951 &
848: 22.389 & 22.389\\
849: cep004 & 0:47:06.69 & -20:37:10.2 & 18.424 & 2,821.5388 & 22.830 &
850: 22.402 & 22.402\\
851: cep005 & 0:47:07.59 & -20:37:51.4 & 27.821 & 2,586.0627 & 22.431 &
852: 21.603 & 21.603\\
853: cep006 & 0:47:11.60 & -20:44:08.2 & 29.585 & 2,799.9832 & 22.601 &
854: 21.726 & 21.726\\
855: cep007 & 0:47:03.39 & -20:44:47.7 & 29.977 & 2,582.8054 & 22.604 &
856: 21.456 & 21.456\\
857: cep008 & 0:47:03.46 & -20:47:58.5 & 30.978 & 2,559.6931 & 22.609 &
858: 21.713 & 21.713\\
859: cep009 & 0:47:09.93 & -20:39:28.6 & 32.114 & 2,587.5518 & 22.496 &
860: 21.599 & 21.599\\
861: cep010 & 0:47:00.54 & -20:37:09.7 & 33.023 & 2,811.5498 & 22.646 &
862: 21.819 & 21.819\\
863: cep011 & 0:47:10.11 & -20:48:45.1 & 33.172 & 2,558.3767 & 22.514 &
864: 21.481 & 21.481\\
865: cep012 & 0:47:17.14 & -20:44:18.8 & 35.809 & 2,580.2461 & 22.145 &
866: 21.239 & 21.239\\
867: cep013 & 0:47:09.62 & -20:51:38.2 & 36.192 & 2,803.8462 & 22.415 &
868: & \\
869: cep014 & 0:46:56.65 & -20:41:34.7 & 39.747 & 2,569.9172 & 22.129 &
870: 21.177 & 21.177\\
871: cep015 & 0:46:58.44 & -20:44:02.9 & 41.393 & 2,579.1355 & 22.143 &
872: 21.156 & 21.156\\
873: cep016 & 0:47:10.52 & -20:47:21.3 & 44.481 & 2,566.2730 & 22.351 &
874: 21.186 & 21.186\\
875: cep017 & 0:47:03.82 & -20:41:04.0 & 48.663 & 2,583.7842 & 21.968 &
876: 21.035 & 21.035\\
877: cep018 & 0:47:04.28 & -20:47:42.2 & 63.505 & 2,581.4636 & 22.047 &
878: 20.952 & 20.952\\
879: cep019 & 0:47:10.19 & -20:42:11.7 & 64.889 & 2,597.1514 & 22.034 &
880: 21.245 & 21.245\\
881: cep020 & 0:47:10.64 & -20:40:11.0 & 65.862 & 2,589.5732 & 21.983 &
882: 21.114 & 21.114\\
883: cep021 & 0:47:04.85 & -20:44:22.6 & 69.969 & 2,595.1423 & 21.661 &
884: 20.536 & 20.536\\
885: cep022 & 0:47:09.29 & -20:51:11.9 & 73.300 & 2,564.7302 & 21.850 &
886: 20.791 & 20.791\\
887: cep023 & 0:47:08.91 & -20:43:21.4 &131.259 & 2,563.3052 & 21.019 &
888: 19.855 & 19.855\\
889: \enddata
890: \end{deluxetable}
891:
892:
893: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
894: \tablecaption{Individual V and I Observations}
895: \tablehead{
896: \colhead{object} & \colhead{filter} &
897: \colhead{HJD-2450000} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{$\sigma_{mag}$}\\
898: }
899: \startdata
900: cep001 & V & 2814.91283 & 23.616 & 0.119\\
901: cep001 & V & 2931.81538 & 23.508 & 0.128\\
902: cep001 & V & 2931.82500 & 23.644 & 0.158\\
903: cep001 & V & 2934.62648 & 22.706 & 0.038\\
904: cep001 & V & 2937.78340 & 22.939 & 0.112\\
905: cep001 & V & 2966.63869 & 22.640 & 0.056\\
906: cep001 & V & 2966.65743 & 22.721 & 0.077\\
907: cep001 & V & 2968.58759 & 23.074 & 0.095\\
908: cep001 & V & 2968.59719 & 23.021 & 0.074\\
909: cep001 & V & 2968.60686 & 23.086 & 0.073\\
910: cep001 & V & 2968.62680 & 22.936 & 0.067\\
911: cep001 & V & 2968.63630 & 23.052 & 0.063\\
912: cep001 & V & 2970.65025 & 23.190 & 0.085\\
913: cep001 & V & 2970.65964 & 23.140 & 0.076\\
914: cep001 & V & 2970.66902 & 23.229 & 0.096\\
915: cep001 & V & 3270.88984 & 22.811 & 0.090\\
916: cep001 & V & 3295.68266 & 23.965 & 0.119\\
917: cep001 & V & 3295.69197 & 23.927 & 0.136\\
918: cep001 & V & 3327.61168 & 23.930 & 0.244\\
919: cep001 & V & 3376.55724 & 23.822 & 0.130\\
920: cep001 & V & 3639.79773 & 23.201 & 0.082\\
921: cep001 & V & 3639.80704 & 23.283 & 0.096\\
922: cep001 & V & 3651.77611 & 22.852 & 0.061\\
923: cep001 & V & 3651.78545 & 22.851 & 0.065\\
924: cep001 & V & 3651.79484 & 22.807 & 0.059\\
925: cep001 & V & 3681.73375 & 23.472 & 0.117\\
926: cep001 & V & 3681.75232 & 23.540 & 0.135\\
927: \enddata
928: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the electronic
929: edition of the Journal. The printed edition contains only
930: the measurements in the V band for the Cepheid variable cep001.}
931:
932: \end{deluxetable}
933:
934: \begin{figure}[htb]
935: \vspace*{22cm}
936: \special{psfile=fig1.eps hoffset=-20 voffset=120 hscale=50
937: vscale=50}
938: \caption{DSS map of the observed region centered on NGC 247 galaxy.
939: The field of view is 35 x 35 arcmin.
940: }
941: \end{figure}
942:
943:
944: \begin{figure}[htb]
945: \vspace*{18cm}
946: \special{psfile=fig2.ps hoffset=-50 voffset=-70 hscale=80
947: vscale=80}
948: \caption{V, V-I color-magnitude diagram for stars in NGC 247 observed with the 1.3 m
949: Warsaw telescope. The detected Cepheid candidates are marked with filled circles. With the
950: exception of the two faintest variables which are very blue for their periods,
951: the Cepheids populate the expected region in this diagram, supporting their
952: correct identification as Cepheid variables.
953: }
954: \end{figure}
955:
956:
957: \begin{figure}[htb]
958: \vspace*{18cm}
959: \special{psfile=fig3.ps hoffset=0 voffset=-50 hscale=80
960: vscale=80}
961: \caption{Phased V and I band light curves for one of the Cepheids
962: (cep015) discovered in NGC 247. Open circles, triangles and filled
963: squares correspond to the data obtained with the Warsaw 1.3 m, ESO 2.2m
964: and CTI 4m telescopes, respectively. The good agreement of the
965: different data sets is demonstrated.
966: }
967: \end{figure}
968:
969:
970:
971: \begin{figure}[htb]
972: \vspace*{15cm}
973: \special{psfile=fig4.ps hoffset=0 voffset=-30 hscale=70 vscale=70}
974: \caption{The V-band period-luminosity relation defined by the Cepheid variables
975: in NGC 247. Open circles denote stars not used for the distance
976: determination.
977: }
978: \end{figure}
979:
980:
981: \begin{figure}[htb]
982: \vspace*{15cm}
983: \special{psfile=fig5.ps hoffset=0 voffset=-30 hscale=70 vscale=70}
984: \caption{Same as Fig. 4, for the I band.
985: }
986: \end{figure}
987:
988: \begin{figure}[htb]
989: \vspace*{15cm}
990: \special{psfile=fig6.ps hoffset=0 voffset=-30 hscale=70 vscale=70}
991: \caption{Same as Fig. 4, for the reddening-independent (V-I) Wesenheit
992: magnitudes.
993: }
994: \end{figure}
995:
996:
997: \end{document}
998:
999:
1000: