1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{epsfig}
3: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
4: \begin{document}
5:
6:
7:
8: \title{The Highly Eccentric Pre$-$Main Sequence Spectroscopic Binary RX~J0529.3$+$1210}
9:
10: \author{G. N. Mace\altaffilmark{1,2}, L. Prato\altaffilmark{1},
11: L.H. Wasserman\altaffilmark{1}, G. H. Schaefer\altaffilmark{3},
12: O.G. Franz\altaffilmark{1}, and M. Simon\altaffilmark{4}}
13:
14: \altaffiltext{1}{Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road,
15: Flagstaff, AZ 86001; gmace@lowell.edu}
16:
17: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northern
18: Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011}
19:
20: \altaffiltext{3}{The CHARA Array of Georgia State University, Mount Wilson
21: Observatory, Mount Wilson, CA 91023}
22:
23: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New
24: York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800}
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27:
28: The young system RX~J0529.3$+$1210 was initially identified as a single$-$lined
29: spectroscopic binary. Using high$-$resolution infrared spectra,
30: acquired with NIRSPEC on Keck II, we measured radial velocities for the
31: secondary. The method of using the infrared regime to convert
32: single$-$lined spectra into double$-$lined spectra, and derive the mass ratio
33: for the binary system, has been successfully used for a number of young,
34: low-mass binaries. For RX~J0529.3$+$1210, a long-period (462
35: days) and highly eccentric (0.88) binary system, we determine
36: the mass ratio to be 0.78 $\pm$ 0.05 using the infrared double-lined
37: velocity data alone, and
38: 0.73 $\pm$ 0.23 combining visible light and infrared data in a full
39: orbital solution. The large uncertainty in the latter is the result
40: of the sparse sampling in the infrared and the high eccentricity: the stars
41: do not have a large velocity separation during most of their $\sim$1.3 year
42: orbit. A mass ratio close to unity, consistent with the high end of
43: the 1$\sigma$ uncertainty for this mass ratio value, is inconsistent
44: with the lack of a visible light detection of the secondary
45: component. We outline several scenarios for a color difference in the
46: two stars, such as one heavily spotted component,
47: higher order multiplicity, or a unique evolutionary stage, favoring detection
48: of only the primary star in visible light, even in a mass ratio $\sim$1
49: system. However, the evidence points to a lower ratio. Although RX~J0529.3$+$1210
50: exhibits no excess at near-infrared wavelengths, a small 24~$\mu$m excess
51: is detected, consistent with circumbinary dust. The properties of this
52: binary and its membership in $\lambda$ Ori versus a new nearby stellar
53: moving group at $\sim$90~pc are discussed. We speculate on the origin of
54: this unusual system and on the impact of such high eccentricity, the largest
55: observed in a pre$-$main sequence double$-$lined system to date, on the
56: potential for planet formation.
57:
58:
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \keywords{Stars: Binaries: Spectroscopic, Stars: Evolution, Stars: Pre-Main-Sequence}
62:
63: \section{Introduction}
64:
65: Understanding the process of star formation requires
66: reliable observations of fundamental stellar properties so that theoretical models can be tested. The copious population of young binary systems, however, complicates the problem. The binary fraction can be high \citep{2000prpl.conf..703M}, and may depend on the density of the star forming region \citep{2003ApJ...583..358B} and spectral type of the primary \citep{2006ApJ...640L..63L}, underscoring the importance of their study. Fortuitously, binary stars serve two purposes. One, characterization of their frequency, separation distribution, and mass ratio distribution for a given
67: star forming region (SFR) provides clues to the broad star forming
68: properties (angular momentum, density, turbulence, etc.) of the parent
69: molecular cloud. Two, the special class of very small separation
70: spectroscopic binaries with periods sufficiently short to enable the measurement of the individual
71: stellar velocities, and thus the system's mass ratio, are potential targets
72: for the dynamical determination of individual component stellar masses (e.g., Steffen et al. 2001; Prato et al. 2002a; Boden et al. 2005; Stassun et al. 2007). Knowledge of absolute masses and observable properties, such as effective temperature and luminosity, plays a key
73: role in the improvement of pre-main sequence (PMS) evolutionary models \citep{2001ApJ...553..299P}.
74:
75: Once spectroscopic binaries have been identified, it is necessary to
76: characterize their properties. It is often the case with low mass-ratio
77: systems that they are identified as single$-$lined spectroscopic binaries when observed
78: in visible light (Mazeh et al. 2002), in which case the large
79: difference in flux between the primary and secondary at short wavelengths
80: prevents detection of the secondary component and thus the measurement of
81: the mass ratio for the system. In the Raleigh-Jeans regime, however, flux scales much less
82: steeply as a function of mass. Thus, by observing single-lined spectroscopic binaries
83: with infrared (IR) spectroscopy we are able to improve our chances of
84: detecting the lower-mass secondary not seen in visible light. This technique was
85: initially outlined in Prato et al. (2002b) and Mazeh et al. (2002, 2003). Our
86: primary motivation for observing RX~J0529.3$+$1210 was to use this IR approach to
87: determine the mass ratio of the system by converting it into a double-lined
88: spectroscopic binary. Given that the secondary had not been detected in visible light,
89: we anticipated a relatively low mass ratio for RX~J0529.3$+$1210.
90:
91: With the advent of the {\it R\"ontgensatellit (ROSAT)} all-sky
92: survey, a number of researchers began a search for X-ray sources with
93: optical counterparts of brightness consistent with membership in nearby
94: SFRs, motivated in part by the goal of detecting the ``post-T Tauri''
95: population postulated by Herbig (1978). In follow up observations of X-ray sources near Taurus, RX~J0529.3$+$1210 was identified variously as a PMS star (Neuhauser et al. 1997;
96: Magazz\`u et al. 1997) and a post-T Tauri star (Magazz\`u et al. 1999);
97: high-resolution visible light spectroscopy revealed its spectroscopic binary nature
98: \citep{neu97}. \citet{tor02} undertook a seven year campaign to characterize
99: the orbits of all spectroscopic binaries identified in the X-ray sample
100: of \citet{neu95} and \citet{neu97}, including RX~J0529.3$+$1210. Table 1 summarizes
101: the general properties of this system. The $\sim$3 dozen high-resolution
102: visible light spectra taken
103: of this binary suggested the presence of a secondary star; however, a conclusive
104: identification was not possible. A single-lined orbital solution was determined, although,
105: probably owing to the extremely high eccentricity of the system the
106: uncertainties are relatively large.
107:
108: This paper describes the results of using high resolution IR spectroscopy to
109: observe RX~J0529.3$+$1210 and determine the component radial
110: velocities. RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is the most eccentric pre$-$main sequence spectroscopic binary known to date. This provides a unique context in which to speculate
111: on the formation of the system and on the impact of the stellar dynamics on potential planet
112: formation. In \S2 we briefly describe our observations and data reduction.
113: Our analysis and results appear in \S3. Section 4 provides a discussion,
114: and \S5 summarizes our findings.
115:
116: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
117:
118: Our observations were made during six epochs between 2002 January and 2004
119: December with the Keck~II 10-m telescope on Mauna Kea. The UT dates of
120: observation are listed in Table 2.
121: $H$-band data, at a central wavelength of $\sim$1.555 $\mu$m, were
122: obtained using the facility near-infrared, cross-dispersed, cryogenic
123: spectrograph NIRSPEC (McLean et al. 1998; 2000). NIRSPEC employs a 1024
124: $\times$ 1024 ALADDIN InSb array detector. We used the 0.288$''$ (2 pixel)
125: $\times$ 24$''$ slit, yielding an OH night sky emission line determined resolution of R$=$25,000. Source acquisition was accomplished with the slit viewing camera, SCAM, which utilizes a 256 $\times$ 256 HgCdTe detector with 0.18$''$ pixels. RX~J0529.3$+$1210 has a 2MASS $H$-band magnitude of 9.40; integration times for individual frames were between 60 and 240~s. We nodded the telescope
126: 10$''$ between two positions on the slit to allow for background subtraction between sequential spectra.
127:
128: All spectroscopic reductions were made with the REDSPEC package, software written at
129: UCLA by S. Kim, L. Prato, and I. McLean specifically for the analysis of
130: NIRSPEC data\footnote{See: http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/inst/nirspec/redspec/index.html},
131: following the procedures outlined by Prato et al. (2002a). We used the central
132: order, 49, which covers 1.545 to 1.567 $\mu$m at our setting; this order has three advantages. One, it is rich in both atomic and molecular lines and is therefore suitable for identifying
133: spectra of both warm and cool stars. Two, the OH night sky emission lines
134: across order 49 are numerous and well-distributed, yielding accurate and precise dispersion
135: solutions. Three, this order has the advantage of lacking prominent telluric absorption lines. Consequently, we did not have to divide by telluric standard star spectra.
136:
137: On UT dates 2004 December 24 and 2008 January 17 images were taken of
138: RX~J0529.3$+$1210, point spread function (PSF) stars,
139: and photometric standards at the Keck II telescope
140: with the NIRC2 camera behind the adaptive optics (AO) system \citep{2000SPIE.4007....2W}.
141: The plate scale was 0.01$''$ per pixel and integration times were 0.18 s for
142: the L' filter, 0.20 s for the K' filter, and 1.0 s for the narrow K-continuum
143: filter. Ten coadds were made per image,
144: and two images were obtained at each location in a five-point box dither pattern. Seeing conditions were excellent for both nights.
145: With the use of customized IDL reduction and analysis routines,
146: images were flat-fielded, cleaned of bad pixels, and
147: compared with PSF stars to search for higher order multiplicity
148: and evidence for extended sources. L' and K-continuum filter data from
149: 2008 January 17 (UT) were reduced with standard photometric techniques,
150: including flat-fielding, background subtraction, aperture photometry, and
151: airmass correction.
152:
153:
154: \section{Analysis and Results}
155:
156: The spectra from the six epochs of observation are shown in Figure 1.
157: Individual stellar radial velocities were measured by using two-dimensional cross
158: correlation (e. g., Zucker \& Mazeh 1994); observed or synthetic
159: spectral templates were shifted in relative velocity to maximize the correlation with the observed binary spectrum, thus identifying the component radial velocities. The observed template spectra \citep{pra02a} that best matched our data were BS 8086 and GL 436, spectral types K7 and M2.5, consistent with \citet{tor02}. The corresponding best rotational velocities were 20 km s$^{-1}$ for the primary and 25 km s$^{-1}$ for the secondary. Flux ratios determined by cross-correlation range from 0.50 to 0.69 and have an average value of $\sim$0.6.
160:
161: \citet{2008AJ....135.1659S} employ synthetic spectra in their final radial velocity
162: analysis of the components of the young spectroscopic binary, Haro 1-14c. In
163: addition to using observed templates, we also fit the components of
164: RX~J0529.3$+$1210 with synthetic template spectra, calculated from the
165: updated NextGen models \citep{1999ApJ...512..377H}. This is desirable because
166: observed template spectra have inherent radial velocity uncertainties, whereas
167: the synthetic template spectra have no
168: associated velocity measurement uncertainties. Thus, by using synthetic templates, the
169: uncertainties in the component radial velocities of a spectroscopic binary
170: are likely attributable to factors such as the signal to noise ratio of the
171: observed spectroscopic binary spectra and imperfect matches to model stellar
172: atmosphere spectra. For RX~J0529.3$+$1210 we were unable to determine consistent
173: velocity solutions using synthetic templates for both the
174: primary and secondary stars because of the poor fit of a synthetic secondary to the
175: observed spectra. However, the combination of a synthetic spectrum
176: for the primary component (rotated to 30 km s$^{-1}$) and the GL~436 observed
177: template for the secondary (rotated to 25$-$30 km s$^{-1}$) was successful.
178: The velocities derived from this approach appear
179: in Table 2, columns (3) and (4). The velocity uncertainties associated with the
180: primary star are 0.5~km s$^{-1}$ and with the secondary star
181: are 2.0~km s$^{-1}$. Analysis of the spectra with only the observed templates yields results
182: that are consistent to within 1$\sigma$ with the mixed approach presented here.
183:
184: Following Wilson (1941), we plot the six epochs of the
185: primary versus secondary radial velocities (Figure 2), extracted from our IR
186: spectra, and derive a mass ratio of q$=$0.78$\pm$0.05 and a center-of-mass
187: velocity of $\gamma=+$19.01 $\pm$ 0.87~km~s$^{-1}$. We combined our radial
188: velocities for the primary and secondary stars with the 34 measurements
189: for the primary star presented in \citet{tor02}
190: and solved for the best-fit orbital elements in the $\chi^2$ sense. The
191: orbital fit is a standard least-squares program using the Levenberg-Marquardt
192: method taken from \citet{1992nrfa.book.....P}. Initial guesses for the
193: solution are found by using an amoeba search routine also from
194: \citet{1992nrfa.book.....P}. The orbital elements are given in Table 3. The
195: mass ratio and the center-of-mass velocity found from the single- and
196: double-lined velocities together are consistent with those derived from
197: Figure 2 to within 1$\sigma$, although the mass ratio calculated from the
198: full orbital solution, 0.73$\pm$0.23, has a large associated
199: uncertainty. Because the
200: primary star velocity measurements dominate the data set, the orbital
201: parameters are similar to those found in \citet{tor02}. Determination
202: of the orbital solution from only the double-lined velocities yields
203: results consistent with the combined single- and double-lined solution
204: but with much larger uncertainties. We describe future work to improve
205: our orbital fit in \S4.4.
206:
207: Figure 3 shows the primary star velocities from \citet{tor02} along with IR
208: determined radial velocities for both the primary and secondary stars
209: plotted as a function of phase. The phases for the IR observations were
210: computed by taking the difference in the heliocentric Julian Day (HJD) from
211: the last observation made by Torres et al. (2002) and the HJDs of our
212: observations and dividing by our period (Table 3). The errors associated with the
213: velocities are typically a few km~s$^{-1}$ for the \citet{tor02} data,
214: 0.5 km~s$^{-1}$ for our primary star data, and 2.0 km~s$^{-1}$ for our
215: secondary data. Our orbital solution is also plotted. Clearly there is
216: scatter of up to several sigma in many of the data points, particularly among the
217: visible light data with velocities closer to the center-of-mass velocity of the system,
218: compared to the orbital solution. \citet{tor02} give a typical radial velocity uncertainty
219: for all their targets of 0.5~km~s$^{-1}$, probably an underestimate in the case of
220: RX~J0529.3$+$1210. The IR data are within 1$-$2~$\sigma$ of the orbital solution.
221: The sample of PMS spectroscopic binary star eccentricities as a function of period,
222: based on data from \citet{mel01}, is plotted in Figure 4 and indicates that
223: RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is the most eccentric PMS spectroscopic binary known
224: to date. The combination of the system orientation and high eccentricity
225: results in fairly low velocity amplitudes during the majority of the
226: orbital period. Until the high-velocity cusp of the radial
227: velocity versus phase curve is well-sampled, the
228: uncertainty in the elements of this system will remain large.
229:
230: Near-IR J$-$H and H$-$K colors for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 were calculated
231: from 2MASS JHK magnitudes and plotted on a color-color diagram. The
232: location in the color-color plane of this source is consistent with that of a
233: late K or early M dwarf. There is no near-IR excess evident. From our
234: Keck$+$NIRC2 data we determine a K-continuum magnitude of 9.23$\pm$0.27,
235: consistent with 2MASS measurements (Table 1), and an L'-band magnitude
236: of 9.05$\pm$0.11 from our 2008 Keck AO images. The resultant K$-$L' color
237: is thus 0.18$\pm$0.29 magnitudes.
238:
239: In the AO images from 2008 January 17, RX~J0529.3$+$1210 appears to be extended in comparison with the observed single star PSFs. Modeling RX~J0529.3$+$1210 as a binary with the single star DN Tau used as a PSF yields a separation of $0.018''\pm0.006''$ at a position angle of $223^\circ\pm18^\circ$ and a secondary-to-primary K-band flux ratio of $0.66\pm0.18$. The reliability of the solution is likely to be low because of the difficulty in measuring separations this far below the diffraction limit. We also note the possibility that RX~J0529.3$+$1210 could be broadened by a lower AO correction rate during the observations as compared with that of the single star. However, the consistency of the flux ratio with the H-band spectroscopic values determined by cross-correlation provides support that we are seeing evidence of the companion in RX~J0529.3$+$1210. We do not see any extension in the 2004 December 24 images of RX~J0529.3$+$1210, which is consistent with the binary being near periastron, whereas in 2008 January the companion was approaching apastron.
240:
241: \section{Discussion}
242:
243: \subsection{Where and How Old is RX~J0529.3$+$1210?}
244:
245: The projected location of RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is associated with a high-density
246: area in the
247: CO maps of \citet{dol01} for the $\lambda$ Ori region. However, \citet{dol01}
248: find a mean radial velocity for the strong lithium sources identified in
249: $\lambda$ Ori of 24.5~km~s$^{-1}$, with a dispersion of only 2.3~km~s$^{-1}$.
250: Our center-of-mass velocity for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is 18.38~km~s$^{-1}\pm0.30$,
251: indistinguishable from that found by \citet{tor02}. Thus,
252: on the basis of radial velocities alone, it seems unlikely
253: that the system is associated with $\lambda$ Ori since RX~J0529.3$+$1210's
254: center-of-mass velocity is inconsistent with that of $\lambda$ Ori at the 3$\sigma$ level.
255:
256: Using the 2MASS JHK magnitudes of RX~J0529.3$+$1210, an effective temperature
257: (T$_{eff}$) for a K7/M0 of 3900~K \citep{2003ApJ...593.1093L,bro06}, and the nominal distance to $\lambda$ Ori (400~pc; Barrado y Navascu\'es 2005) we have estimated the luminosity and placed the system on an H-R diagram. We find L $=$ 3.44 $\pm$ 0.01 L$_{\odot}$, yielding an age of $\sim$0.1 Myr using the PMS tracks of \citet{pal99}. Accounting for a companion star with luminosity equal to
258: that of the primary results in an age of $\sim$0.5~Myr. Using the tracks of \citet{bar98}, or absolute K magnitude and the tracks of \citet{2000A&A...358..593S}, we obtain similar age estimates.
259:
260: \citet{bar05} estimates the age of $\lambda$ Ori to be between
261: 3 and 10 Myr, \citet{bar07} find an age of 5~Myr, and \citet{dol01} describe a
262: spread in ages from 1 to 10 Myr.
263: A $<<$1~Myr object is expected to be at least somewhat embedded in its natal
264: cloud and associated with circumstellar material,
265: yet near-IR colors from 2MASS magnitudes
266: indicate zero extinction, no veiling is detected in the spectra, and the
267: H$\alpha$ emission line equivalent width (Table 1) is only 2\AA. We
268: consider two possible mechanisms for disk dissipation in this system,
269: photoevaporation from nearby hot stars and the orbital dynamics of
270: RX~J0529.3$+$1210 itself.
271:
272: The projected separation of the
273: B8 star HD 36104 \citep{dol01} from RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is $\sim$1~pc if
274: both are assumed to be at a distance of 400~pc. \citet{dol01}
275: discuss the surprising lack of evidence for accretion disks around the PMS
276: stars in the central $\lambda$ Ori cluster and suggest that photoevaporation
277: and/or possibly a supernova event 1$-$2 Myr ago played a role in the dispersion
278: of disks in the local young low-mass stellar population. RX~J0529.3$+$1210,
279: located just north of the central cluster in the Barnard 30 dark cloud, could
280: have experienced photoevaporation from the nearby B star at a young age,
281: obliterating circumstellar material, although this is probably unlikely given the long survival time of proplyds in the Trapezium \citep{1998AJ....115..263O}.
282:
283: Given the extremely high eccentricity of this binary, however, the
284: action of the companion star may have precluded formation of, or
285: dissipated any, circumstellar
286: material. With an assumed primary star mass of 0.75 M$_{\odot}$
287: and the mass function from Torres et al. (2002), we find
288: a minimum secondary star mass of 0.40 M$_{\odot}$, and
289: thus a minimum total mass of 1.15 M$_{\odot}$. In conjunction
290: with the 461.89 day period, this yields a periastron separation
291: of 0.15~AU and an apastron separation of 2.30~AU. It is unknown if orbital evolution may have occurred, or even
292: whether it is possible that this unusual system formed by capture,
293: but if RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is located in $\lambda$ Ori with an age of
294: $<$1~Myr, then it seems likely that the system formed in a similar
295: configuration to its present one.
296:
297: Independent of the potentially harsh $\lambda$ Ori environment and the
298: orbital dynamics of RX~J0529.3$+$1210, the system manifests spectra
299: of similar surface gravity to dwarf stars, as well as a relatively
300: small lithium equivalent width, in comparison to classical T Tauri stars \citep{1989AJ.....98.1444S,2005fost.book.....S}. The lithium and H$\alpha$ equivalent widths of \citet{dol01} for $\lambda$ Ori average greater than twice what is found for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 and are consistent with the classical and weak-lined T-Tauri limits defined by \citet{1998AJ....115..351M}. According to these limits, RX~J0529.3$+$1210 would be a post-T Tauri star and have one of the lowest lithium and H$\alpha$ equivalent widths in the $\lambda$ Ori region. These characteristics are inconsistent
301: with an age of $<$1~Myr.
302:
303: Alternatively, RX~J0529.3$+$1210 could be an older, closer object.
304: \citet{mam07} describes a new candidate moving group, 32 Ori, consisting of
305: a small cluster of X-ray bright, late type stars. The
306: $\sim$10 young stars identified in the group are located
307: around 5$^h$ 20$^m$ to 5$^h$ 30$^m$ and $+6\deg$, at
308: the proposed distance of $\sim$90~pc. RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is about 9~pc from the central
309: clump of objects in 32 Ori and is one of the members
310: used by Mamajek to define the common proper motion group (E. Mamajek 2008,
311: private communication). Given the proper motion of RX~J0529.3$+$1210,
312: pmRA $=$ 4.1 $\pm$ 5.8 mas/yr and pmDec $=$ $-$30.7 $\pm$ 5.8 mas/yr,
313: compared to the proper motions of the stars $\lambda$ Ori (pmRA $=$ 0.8 $\pm$ 1.5,
314: pmDec $=$ $-$2.3 $\pm$ 1.5) and 32 Ori (pmRA $=$ 6.57 $\pm$ 1.15,
315: pmDec $=$ $-$32.45 $\pm$ 0.48), evidence in support of membership in the 32~Ori
316: group is compelling \citep{1997A&A...323L..49P, 2004AJ....127.3043Z}.
317:
318: Again combining the 2MASS JHK magnitudes of RX~J0529.3$+$1210,
319: an effective temperature of 3900~K, and a distance now of 90~pc, we find L $=$ 0.17 $\pm$ 0.02 L$_{\odot}$, giving an age for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 on the tracks of \citet{pal99} of $\sim$15$\pm$5~Myr,
320: consistent with the 25$\pm$10~Myr age derived by \citet{mam07} for the
321: candidate group members. \citet{mam07} lists a group radial velocity of 18~km~s$^{-1}$, in excellent agreement with our measured center-of-mass velocity (Table 2).
322:
323: Morales Calderon (2008, in prep) has observed the $\lambda$ Ori region with
324: the {\it Spitzer} space telescope and finds a 3~$\sigma$ detection of RX~J0529.3$+$1210
325: at 24~$\mu$m with a 20~\% excess above a 3900~K photosphere. For a star
326: with L$=$0.17~L$_{\odot}$, the equilibrium temperature of a black-body
327: grain with peak emission at 24~$\mu$m corresponds to a distance of 4.36~AU.
328: A more realistic treatment of the dust grain distribution would necessarily
329: take into account the additional flux from the secondary star, yielding a
330: larger distance from the center-of-mass of the system to the putative dust.
331: However, given the estimated apastron separation of 2.30~AU, a lower limit
332: of 4.36~AU for the dust radius from the system center illustrates the plausibility of a
333: circumbinary debris disk. Additional {\it Spitzer} observations at
334: shorter wavelengths have been taken and should reveal more information
335: regarding the extent and location of the dust (Mamajek 2008, in preparation).
336:
337: The lack of J$-$H, H$-$K, and K$-$L excesses is hardly surprising. For
338: black-body grains with a peak wavelength in the L band, the corresponding
339: disk temperature occurs at a distance of $\sim$0.1~AU, nearly coincident with the
340: binary periastron. Stable dust in this system is most likely to
341: be located in a circumbinary distribution. Furthermore, if the closer
342: distance and therefore older age for this system implied by
343: membership in 32 Ori are correct, then
344: the presence of an evolved debris disk would not be unusual \citep[e.g.,][]{tri08}.
345:
346: Finally, the fact that the RX~J0529.3$+$1210 secondary was possibly detected in our AO
347: images strongly supports the $\sim$90~pc distance. For the projected separation
348: of 0.018", determined using PSF fitting, and a distance of 90~pc, the corresponding
349: distance in AU is 1.6$\pm$0.54, not too different from
350: our estimated apastron of 2.30~AU. For
351: a distance of 400~pc the separation would be 7.2$\pm$2.4 AU.
352: Based on the currently available data, it therefore appears that RX~J0529.3$+$1210
353: is associated with the new 32 Ori group, not with $\lambda$ Ori, and
354: has an age of $\sim$15~Myr.
355:
356:
357: \subsection{The Mass and Flux Ratios of RX~J0529.3$+$1210}
358:
359: \citet{tor02} note that the appearance of the velocity correlation function for
360: RX~J0529.3$+$1210 suggests the presence of at least one other star in the system.
361: For a primary star mass of 0.75~M$_{\odot}$, the mass function implies a minimum
362: secondary star mass of 0.40~M$_{\odot}$ and a
363: minimum mass ratio of 0.53, consistent to within 1$\sigma$ of the mass ratio found
364: from the full orbital solution for the system, 0.73$\pm$0.23. The
365: approximate H-band flux ratio measured from the cross-correlation is 0.6$\pm$0.1.
366: The K-band flux ratio found in the best PSF fit to the January, 2008
367: AO images is 0.66$\pm$0.18.
368: For a M2.5 $+$ K7 pair, the spectral types which provided the best correlation (\S 3), models of \citet{pal99} and \citet{bar98} imply an H-band flux ratio of 0.4$\pm$0.1 based on components with a primary T$_{eff}=$3900~K and a secondary T$_{eff}=$3400~K \citep{2003ApJ...593.1093L,joh66}. Taken together, these properties suggest a relatively red color for the secondary star, hindering detection in visible light.
369:
370: The IR primary and secondary velocities, presented in the Wilson plot
371: (Figure 2), imply a range of mass ratios, from 0.73$-$0.83, well within
372: the range we obtain by combining the IR and visible light data in a full
373: orbital solution, $\sim$0.50$-$0.93.
374: Because the full solution includes phase information, it is generally
375: more reliable, although for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 the sparse
376: phase coverage during the epochs of largest velocity separation yields large
377: uncertainties in the orbital solution. Clearly more data are merited.
378: For the case of a mass ratio relatively
379: close to unity in this system (i.e. 0.8$-$1.0), it is necessary to
380: explain the lack of a visible light detection of the secondary star.
381: In the following paragraphs we outline several scenarios that would account
382: for this.
383:
384: A relatively red secondary and yet a mass ratio close to unity is possible
385: if a third component is present, as first suggested by \citet{tor02}. If
386: the secondary star is actually a binary
387: pair, with a very small separation and similar component masses, then the
388: spectral types could be consistent with the best-fitting TODCOR templates.
389: This inner binary pair would necessarily
390: be in an orbit in a plane relatively perpendicular to our line of sight, such
391: that the large velocity changes would not be obvious. This scenario
392: would imply a near-unity mass ratio yet a smaller near-IR
393: flux ratio, and a red enough
394: secondary system to evade visible light detection. The drawback is
395: that it requires a very specific geometry. Such a companion might
396: also account for the 24~$\mu$m excess.
397:
398: A heavily spotted secondary star could mimic a lower temperature source,
399: resulting in a best fitting secondary M2.5 template, a mass ratio close to 1.0, and a flux ratio $<$1 in the near-IR. Again, the reddening effect of the cooler temperature in the spot covered areas would increase the difficulty of visible light detection. For two T$_{eff}=$3900~K stars, if one
400: has 50\% of its surface covered with a 2900~K spot \citep{bou89}, the secondary/primary bolometric flux ratio would be $\sim$0.7.
401:
402: For objects with ages between 10 and 30 Myr, some models \citep{bar98,pal99} of PMS
403: evolution indicate that targets in the mass range of the RX~J0529.3$+$1210
404: primary star, 0.6$-$0.8~M$_{\odot}$, are located near the transition between
405: the convective Hyashi track and the radiative Henyey track. As a result,
406: models show a sharp turn in the mass tracks towards higher temperatures.
407: A similar but slightly lower mass secondary star that has not yet turned
408: this corner off of the Hyashi track, and indeed, objects with masses lower
409: than $\sim$0.5~M$_{\odot}$ never will, may have a similar mass as the
410: primary star but a much lower temperature.
411:
412: These models for the system behavior are highly speculative. The
413: absence of an unambiguous secondary star detection in visible light
414: suggests that the mass ratio is {\it not} close to unity.
415: A value in the 0.7 to 0.8 range is most likely based on data to date.
416:
417: \subsection{Binary Formation Scenarios and the Potential for Planets}
418:
419: The formation of such a highly eccentric multiple is challenging to
420: understand as a primordial event given current theories of star formation
421: \citep{2005fost.book.....S}. Figure 4 shows that pre$-$main sequence spectroscopic
422: binaries are observed over a wide range of eccentricities. Although RX~J0529.3$+$1210
423: represents the maximum of that range, it does not stand out particularly from the
424: eccentricity distribution. Thus, some form of dynamical evolution may have taken place in
425: this system, but, if so, it is not distinguished by an outlying eccentricity.
426: Possibilities for dynamical evolution range from an improbable capture event to
427: disk excitation of stellar eccentricity \citep{mat92}. If indeed this system
428: is $>$10~Myr old, only fossil evidence, such
429: as the detected 24~$\mu$m excess, might remain of the primordial, presumably
430: massive disk(s) responsible. In a variation of the interactions proposed
431: by \citet{rei00}, a three body dynamical encounter between an object
432: from outside of the binary and a companion short period binary could have
433: stimulated the eccentricity of the system and tightened the orbit of a
434: close (secondary) pair (\S 4.2). The eventual formation of a circumbinary (or
435: circumtriple) debris disk could have been stimulated by dynamical
436: disruption of the disks in the system in any one of these scenarios.
437:
438: The formation of planets in binary systems has been observationally supported
439: in recent years and is of primary significance since a majority of stars have
440: companions \citep{egg07}. \citet{cun07} have
441: determined the strict criteria for classifying stable and unstable planetary
442: orbits in binary systems, however, their analysis is restricted to circular
443: orbits. Many of the extra-solar planets observed in binaries are in wide
444: separation systems, where the mass ratio for the stellar components is near
445: unity and the eccentricity of the system is low. \citet{qui07} have modeled the
446: formation of terrestrial planets around individual stars in binaries and
447: find that, for periastron
448: distances of $<$5~AU, such planet formation is restricted. Considering that the
449: periastron distance in the RX~J0529.3$+$1210 system is only 0.15~AU, we
450: conclude that the probability of even a low-mass
451: circumstellar planet in RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is remote. The trend determined
452: by \citet{qui06} towards the formation of fewer circumbinary
453: terrestrial planets in systems with apastron distances of $>$0.2~AU and
454: non-zero eccentricities also bodes for poor circumbinary planetary stability around
455: the stars in RX~J0529.3$+$1210.
456:
457: \subsection{Improving our Understanding of the RX~J0529.3$+$1210 System: Future Work}
458:
459: Clearly it is imperative to improve the orbital solution for RX~J0529.3$+$1210,
460: particularly the measurement of the mass ratio. Visible light and especially
461: infrared data are critical to obtain, preferably at high precisions.
462: RX~J0529.3$+$1210 passes through its next maximum velocity separation in
463: late December, 2009. Densely sampled
464: high signal-to-noise spectra taken during these epochs will yield a
465: greatly improved precision for the orbital solution.
466:
467: If RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is located at a distance of only 90~pc, an apastron
468: separation of 2.30~AU implies a maximum projected separation on the sky of
469: $\sim$0.03$''$. Much of the orbit of this system lies within reach of the
470: diffraction limit of the 85~m baseline of the Keck Interferometer, 0.005$''$.
471: Although the K$-$band magnitude of RX~J0529.3$+$1210, 9.2, is relatively faint
472: for observations with this facility, planned improvements to the system
473: may eventually enable resolved observations of this unusual binary,
474: permitting the determination of individual component masses. The 90~pc distance
475: may also be confirmed by measuring the parallax, which is slightly greater than 10 mas
476: at this distance, and is at the achievable limit of current instrumentation.
477:
478: \section{Summary}
479:
480: \citet{tor02} reported the orbital solution for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 based on single-lined
481: spectroscopic data; we have elaborated on this solution using near-IR data to identify the
482: spectrum of the secondary star and determine the mass ratio of the system.
483: The IR data alone presented in a primary vs. secondary velocity plot (Figure 2) indicate a
484: mass ratio of 0.78$\pm$0.05. In concert with the visible light data, the full orbital
485: solution yields a more uncertain
486: mass ratio of 0.73$\pm$0.23 (Table 3). Other orbital parameters are in good agreement
487: with the results of \citet{tor02}. This system is the most eccentric pre$-$main
488: sequence double$-$lined binary known to date (Figure 4) and thus presents challenges to
489: observation. It is an unlikely site for the formation of circumstellar
490: planets, or of circumbinary planets with orbits within several AU of the stars.
491:
492: The fact that the secondary component was not identified in visible light
493: suggests a relatively faint and/or red companion. For an estimated primary mass
494: of 0.75~M$_{\odot}$ the minimum mass of the secondary is 0.40~M$_{\odot}$. This
495: implies a minimum mass ratio of 0.53, consistent with the value in Table 3. A robust
496: determination of the mass ratio along with the best estimate for the primary star
497: mass will eventually provide an improved estimate
498: for the secondary mass.
499:
500: On the basis of the center-of-mass velocity, common proper motion, a lack of near-IR
501: excess, a tentative K-band AO detection of the secondary, lithium equivalent width,
502: and 24~$\mu$m {\it Spitzer} excess evidence for a debris disk, we argue that the
503: RX~J0529.3$+$1210 system is a member of the 32 Ori moving group, recently
504: identified by \citet{mam07}. Assuming a distance of
505: 90~pc, we estimate an age for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 of 15$\pm$5~Myr, consistent with that
506: of \citet{mam07} for 32 Ori.
507:
508: It is imperative to improve the orbital elements of RX~J0529.3$+$1210 in
509: order to determine a precise mass ratio for the system. In conjunction
510: with future interferometric observations, this will ultimately yield
511: component masses for this system. Given its unusual eccentricity,
512: proximity, young age, and debris disk, such observations are likely to reveal
513: clues to the formation of this unique binary system as well as additional data
514: for the improvement of pre-main sequence models.
515:
516:
517: \begin{acknowledgments}
518: The authors are grateful to K. Kilts for conducting the preliminary
519: reduction of these data, to T. Barman and C. Johns-Krull for helpful discussions,
520: and to G. Torres for catching an error in our original manuscript.
521: We thank M. Morales Calderon, D. Barrado y Navascu\'es, and J. Stauffer for
522: sharing the results of their {\it Spitzer} MIPS data in advance of publication.
523: We appreciate the input of E. Mamajek, on the traits of the 32 Ori moving group,
524: and we are grateful to the anonymous referee for detailed and thoughtful
525: recommendations which improved this paper. This research was funded by
526: NSF grant AST 04-44017 (to LP) and the associated REU supplement, and by
527: NASA Space Grant, through Northern Arizona University, which has provided
528: support for GNM, as well as NSF grant AST 06-07612 (to MS).
529: This work made use of the SIMBAD reference database, the NASA
530: Astrophysics Data System, and the data products from the Two Micron All
531: Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts
532: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute
533: of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
534: Administration and the National Science Foundation.
535: Data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck
536: Observatory from telescope time allocated to the National Aeronautics
537: and Space Administration through the agency's scientific partnership
538: with the California Institute of Technology and the University of
539: California. The Observatory was made possible by the generous
540: financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.
541: We recognize and acknowledge the
542: significant cultural role that the summit of Mauna Kea
543: plays within the indigenous Hawaiian community and are
544: grateful for the opportunity to conduct observations
545: from this special mountain.
546: \end{acknowledgments}
547:
548: \clearpage
549: \begin{thebibliography}{}
550:
551: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s(2005)]{bar05} Barrado Y
552: Navascu{\'e}s, D.\ 2005, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica
553: Conference Series, 24, 217
554:
555: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s et al.(2007)]{bar07} Barrado
556: y Navascu{\'e}s, D., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 664, 481
557:
558: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{bar98} Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G.,
559: Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
560:
561: \bibitem[Beck et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...583..358B} Beck, T.~L., Simon, M.,
562: \& Close, L.~M.\ 2003, \apj, 583, 358
563:
564: \bibitem[Boden et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...635..442B} Boden, A.~F., et al.\
565: 2005, \apj, 635, 442
566:
567: \bibitem[Bouvier \& Bertout(1989)]{bou89} Bouvier, J., \& Bertout, C.\ 1989, \aap,
568: 211, 99
569:
570: \bibitem[Broeg et al.(2006)]{bro06} Broeg, C., Joergens, V., Fern\'{a}ndez,
571: M., Husar, D., Hearty, T., Ammler, M., \& Neuhauser, R. 2006, \aap, 450, 1135
572:
573: \bibitem[Cuntz et al. (2007)]{cun07} Cuntz, M., Eberle, J., \& Musielak,
574: Z.E. 2007, \apj, 669, L105
575:
576: \bibitem[Dolan \& Mathieu(2001)]{dol01} Dolan, C.~J., \& Mathieu, R.~D.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 2124
577:
578: %\bibitem[Ducourant et al.(2005)]{duc05} Ducourant, C., Teixeira, R.,
579: % P\'{e}ri\'{e}, J. P., Lecampion, J. F., Guibert, J., \& Sartori, M. J. 2005,
580: % \aap, 438, 769
581:
582: \bibitem[Eggenberger \& Udry (2007)]{egg07} Eggenberger, A., \& Udry, S. 2007, in
583: Planets in Binary Star Systems, ed. N. Haghighipour (New York: Springer), in
584: press (astro-ph/0705.3173)
585:
586: %\bibitem[Hartmann et al.(1986)]{har86} Hartmann, L., Hewett,
587: %R., Stahler, S., \& Mathieu, R.~D.\ 1986, \apj, 309, 275
588:
589: \bibitem[Hauschildt et al.(1999)]{1999ApJ...512..377H} Hauschildt, P.~H.,
590: Allard, F., \& Baron, E.\ 1999, \apj, 512, 377
591:
592: \bibitem[Herbig(1978)]{her78} Herbig, G.~H.\ 1978, in Problems
593: of Physics and Evolution of the Universe, ed. L.V. Mirzoyan (Yerevan: Armenian Acad. Sci.), 171
594:
595: \bibitem[Johnson(1966)]{joh66} Johnson, H.~L.\ 1966, \araa, 4, 193
596:
597: \bibitem[Lada(2006)]{2006ApJ...640L..63L} Lada, C.~J.\ 2006, \apjl, 640,
598: L63
599:
600: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...593.1093L} Luhman, K.~L., Stauffer,
601: J.~R., Muench, A.~A., Rieke, G.~H., Lada, E.~A., Bouvier, J.,
602: \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2003, \apj, 593, 1093
603:
604: \bibitem[Magazzu{\`u} et al.(1997)]{mag97} Magazz{\`u}, A., Mart\'{i}n, E. L., Sterzik,
605: M. F., Neuhauser, R., Covino, E., \& Alcala, J.M. 1997, \aap, 124, 449
606:
607: \bibitem[Magazz{\`u} et al.(1999)]{mag99} Magazz{\`u}, A., Umana, G.,
608: \& Mart{\'{\i}}n, E.~L.\ 1999, \aap, 346, 878
609:
610: \bibitem[Mamajek(2007)]{mam07} Mamajek, E.~E.\ 2007, IAU
611: Symposium, 237, 442
612:
613: \bibitem[Mart{\'{\i}}n(1998)]{1998AJ....115..351M} Mart{\'{\i}}n, E.~L.\
614: 1998, \aj, 115, 351
615:
616: \bibitem[Mathieu(1992)]{mat92} Mathieu, R.~D.\ 1992, in Binaries
617: as Tracers of Stellar Formation.~Proceedings of a Workshop held in
618: Bettmeralp, Switzerland, Sept.~1991. (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 155
619:
620: \bibitem[Mathieu et al.(2000)]{2000prpl.conf..703M} Mathieu, R.~D., Ghez,
621: A.~M., Jensen, E.~L.~N., \& Simon, M.\ 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A.P. Boss \& S.S. Russell (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 703
622:
623: \bibitem[Mazeh et al.(2002)]{maz02} Mazeh, T., Prato, L., Simon, M.,
624: Goldberg, E., Norman, D., \& Zucker, S. 2002, \apj, 564, 1007
625:
626: \bibitem[Mazeh et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...599.1344M} Mazeh, T., Simon, M.,
627: Prato, L., Markus, B., \& Zucker, S.\ 2003, \apj, 599, 1344
628:
629: \bibitem[McLean et al.(1998)]{mcl98} McLean, I. S., et al. 1998,
630: SPIE, 3354, 566
631:
632: \bibitem[McLean et al.(2000)]{mcl00} McLean, I. S., Graham, J. R.,
633: Becklin, E. E., Figer, D. F., Larkin, J. E., Levenson, N. A., \& Teplitz,
634: H. I. 2000, SPIE, 4008, 1048
635:
636: \bibitem[Melo et al. (2001)]{mel01} Melo, C.H.F., Covino, E., Alcal\'{a},
637: J.M., \& Torres, G. 2001, \aap, 378, 898
638:
639: \bibitem[Neuhauser et al.(1995)]{neu95} Neuhauser, R., Sterzik, M.~F.,
640: Torres, G., \& Martin, E.~L.\ 1995, \aap, 299, L13
641:
642: \bibitem[Neuhauser et al.(1997)]{neu97} Neuhauser, R., Torres, G.,
643: Sterzik, M.~F., \& Randich, S.\ 1997, \aap, 325, 647
644:
645: \bibitem[O'Dell(1998)]{1998AJ....115..263O} O'Dell, C.~R.\ 1998, \aj, 115,
646: 263
647:
648: \bibitem[Palla \& Stahler(1999)]{pal99} Palla, F., \& Stahler, S.~W.\ 1999, \apj, 525, 772
649:
650: \bibitem[Palla \& Stahler(2001)]{2001ApJ...553..299P} Palla, F., \& Stahler, S.~W.\ 2001, \apj, 553, 299
651:
652: \bibitem[Perryman et al.(1997)]{1997A&A...323L..49P} Perryman, M.~A.~C., et al.\ 1997, \aap, 323, L49
653:
654: \bibitem[Prato et al.(2002a)]{pra02a} Prato, L., Simon, M., Mazeh, T., Zucker, S., \& McLean, I. S. 2002a, \apjl, 579, L99
655:
656: \bibitem[Prato et al.(2002b)]{pra02b} Prato, L., Simon, M.,
657: Mazeh, T., McLean, I. S., Norman, D., \& Zucker, S. 2002b, \apj, 569, 863
658:
659: %\bibitem[Prato (2007)]{pra07} Prato, L. 2007, \apj, 657, 338
660:
661: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{1992nrfa.book.....P} Press, W.~H., Teukolsky,
662: S.~A., Vetterling, W.~T., \& Flannery, B.~P.\ 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing, (2nd edn.; Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
663:
664: \bibitem[Quintana \& Lissauer(2006)]{qui06} Quintana, E.~V.,
665: \& Lissauer, J.~J.\ 2006, Icarus, 185, 1
666:
667: \bibitem[Quintana et al.(2007)]{qui07} Quintana, E.~V.,
668: Adams, F.~C., Lissauer, J.~J., \& Chambers, J.~E.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 807
669:
670: \bibitem[Reipurth(2000)]{rei00} Reipurth, B.\ 2000, \aj, 120,
671: 3177
672:
673: \bibitem[Schaefer et al.(2008)]{2008AJ....135.1659S} Schaefer, G.~H., Simon, M., Prato, L., \& Barman, T.\ 2008, \aj, 135, 1659
674:
675: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{2000A&A...358..593S} Siess, L., Dufour, E., \& Forestini, M.\ 2000, \aap, 358, 593
676:
677: \bibitem[Stahler \& Palla(2005)]{2005fost.book.....S} Stahler, S.~W., \&
678: Palla, F.\ 2005, The Formation of Stars.~Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
679:
680: \bibitem[Stassun et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...664.1154S} Stassun, K.~G.,
681: Mathieu, R.~D., \& Valenti, J.~A.\ 2007, \apj, 664, 1154
682:
683: \bibitem[Steffen et al.(2001)]{2001AJ....122..997S} Steffen, A.~T., et al.\
684: 2001, \aj, 122, 997
685:
686: %\bibitem[Sterzik et al.(1997)]{ste97} Sterzik, M. F., Durisen, R. H.,
687: % Brandner, W., Jurevic, J., \& Honeycutt, R. K. 1997, \aj, 114, 1555
688:
689: \bibitem[Strom et al.(1989)]{1989AJ.....98.1444S} Strom, K.~M., Wilkin,
690: F.~P., Strom, S.~E., \& Seaman, R.~L.\ 1989, \aj, 98, 1444
691:
692: \bibitem[Torres et al.(2002)]{tor02} Torres, G., Neuhauser, R., \& Guenther,
693: E. W. 2002, \aj, 123, 1701
694:
695: \bibitem[Trilling et al.(2008)]{tri08} Trilling, D.~E., et
696: al.\ 2008, \apj, 674, 1086
697:
698: \bibitem[Wilson(1941)]{wil41} Wilson, O. C. 1941, \apj, 93, 29
699:
700: \bibitem[Wizinowich et al.(2000)]{2000SPIE.4007....2W} Wizinowich, P.~L., Acton, D.~S., Lai, O., Gathright, J., Lupton, W., \& Stomski, P.~J.\ 2000, \procspie, 4007, 2
701:
702: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....127.3043Z} Zacharias, N., Urban,
703: S.~E., Zacharias, M.~I., Wycoff, G.~L., Hall, D.~M., Monet, D.~G.,
704: \& Rafferty, T.~J.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 3043
705:
706: \bibitem[Zucker \& Mazeh(1994)]{zuc94} Zucker, S.,
707: \& Mazeh, T. 1994, \apj, 420, 806
708:
709: \end{thebibliography}
710:
711: \clearpage
712:
713: \pagestyle{empty}
714:
715: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
716: \tablewidth{0pt}
717: \tablecaption{Properties of RX~J0529.3$+$1210
718: \label{tbl-1}}
719: \tablehead{}
720: \startdata
721: R.A.(J2000) = 05:29:18.8\\
722: Dec.(J2000) = +12:09:30\\
723: V (mag) = 12.86\\
724: J (mag) = 10.05 $\pm$ 0.020\\
725: H (mag) = 9.40 $\pm$ 0.023\\
726: K (mag) = 9.19 $\pm$ 0.020\\
727: SpT\tablenotemark{a} = K7-M0\\
728: H$\alpha$ EW\tablenotemark{b} (\AA) = $-$2.0\\
729: Li EW (\AA) = 0.27\tablenotemark{a}, 0.35\tablenotemark{b}\\
730: v$_A$sin$i$\tablenotemark{a} $= $18 $\pm$ 3 km s$^{-1}$\\
731: \enddata
732:
733: \tablenotetext{a}{Torres et al. (2002)}
734: \tablenotetext{b}{Magazz\`{u} et al. (1997)}
735:
736: \end{deluxetable}
737:
738: \clearpage
739:
740: \pagestyle{empty}
741:
742: \begin{deluxetable}{lccrrl}
743: \tablewidth{0pt}
744: \tablecaption{Summary of Observations and Analysis\label{tbl-2}}
745: \tablehead{
746: \colhead{UT Date of} & \colhead{$~$} &
747: \colhead{$v_1$} & \colhead{$v_2$ } & \colhead{$~$} \\
748: \colhead{Observations} & \colhead{Heliocentric Julian Day} &
749: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{Phase}}
750: \startdata
751: 2002 Jan 1 & 2452275.88 & 24.7 & 12.3 & 0.183 \\
752: 2002 Feb 5 & 2452310.87 & 26.9 & 13.9 & 0.258 \\
753: 2002 Dec 14 & 2452622.97 & 19.5 & 14.9 & 0.933 \\
754: 2004 Jan 28 & 2453032.76 & 15.4 & 19.7 & 0.818 \\
755: 2004 Dec 26 & 2453365.99 & 2.3 & 42.3 & 0.538 \\
756: 2008 Sep 15 & 2454725.15 & 15.3 & 17.9 & 0.498 \\
757: \enddata
758:
759: \end{deluxetable}
760:
761: \clearpage
762:
763: \pagestyle{empty}
764:
765:
766: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
767: \tablewidth{0pt}
768: \tablecaption{Orbital Elements and Derived Properties \label{tbl-3}}
769: \tablehead{}
770: \startdata
771: $P = 461.89 \pm 0.15$ days\\
772: $\gamma = 18.38 \pm 0.30$ km s$^{-1}$\\
773: $K_1 = 22.76 \pm 1.59 $ km s$^{-1}$\\
774: $K_2 = 31.25 \pm 9.44 $ km s$^{-1}$\\
775: $e = 0.88 \pm 0.02$ \\
776: $\omega = 108 \pm 4$ degrees\\
777: $T = 2455187.1 \pm 0.46$ MJD\\
778: $M_1$ sin$^3 i = 0.454 \pm 0.312$ \\
779: $M_2$ sin$^3 i = 0.330 \pm 0.317$ \\
780: $q = M_2/M_1 = 0.73 \pm 0.23 $ \\
781: $a_1$ sin $i = (67.98 \pm 2.05) \times 10^6$ km\\
782: $a_2$ sin $i = (93.32 \pm 27.57) \times 10^6$ km\\
783: \enddata
784: \end{deluxetable}
785:
786: \clearpage
787:
788: \begin{figure*}
789: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=5.5in]{f1.eps}
790: \caption{Five epochs of spectra for RX~J0529.3$+$1210, with heliocentric
791: corrections applied; UT dates of the observations are indicated. Note the similarity between observations resulting from small radial velocity separations.}
792: \label{fig:rxj05293}
793: \end{figure*}
794:
795: \begin{figure*}
796: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=5.5in]{f2.eps}
797: \caption{Linear fit to the primary versus secondary
798: radial velocities for RX~J0529.3$+$1210 following \citet{wil41}. The mass ratio, q, is the negative of the slope of the fit and the center-of-mass velocity is determined by the equation $\gamma$=(y-intercept)/(1$+$q).}
799: \label{fig:W41_rxj05293}
800: \end{figure*}
801:
802: \begin{figure*}
803: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6.0in]{f3.eps}
804: \caption{Radial velocity as a function of phase for RX~J0529.3$+$1210.
805: The circles represent the primary star data, and the triangles secondary star
806: data. Filled symbols are data from our observations, and hollow symbols are data
807: from Torres et al. (2002). The full orbital solution is represented with a solid line
808: for the primary star and a dashed line for the secondary star. The dotted horizontal
809: line indicates the system's center-of-mass velocity. Uncertainties in the primary star
810: RVs are 0.5~km~s$^{-1}$, smaller than the symbols used. The secondary
811: star RV uncertainties are 2.0~km~s$^{-1}$, as shown.}
812: \label{fig:tprv}
813: \end{figure*}
814:
815: \begin{figure*}
816: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6.0in]{f4.eps}
817: \caption{Eccentricities of pre-main sequence spectroscopic binaries
818: as a function of period. RX~J0529.3$+$1210 is indicated by the filled triangle. Data from Table 3 of Melo et al. (2001) are indicated by diamonds.}
819: \label{fig:melo}
820: \end{figure*}
821:
822: \end{document}
823:
824: