1: %%
2: %% Periodic Oscillations in the Intra-Day Optical Light Curves of the
3: %% Blazar S5 0716+714
4: %% Gupta, Srivastava, Wiita
5: %% v1: 05/07/08 (ACG + AKS)
6: %% v2: 10/07/08 (PJW) 15/07/08 (ACG) 16/07/08 (PJW)
7: %% 17/07/08 (ACG), 17/07/08 (PJW) 18/07/08 (ACG)
8: %% 18/07/08 (PJW), 21/07/08 (ACG), 22/07/08 (PJW)
9: %% 23/07/08 (ACG)
10: %% Revised: 18/08/08 (ACG), 19/08/08 (PJW)
11: %%
12: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
13: %%
14: %% Modified 2004 January 9
15: %%
16: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
17: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
18:
19: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
20: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
21: %% any data that comes before this command.
22:
23: %% The command below calls the preprint style
24: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
25: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
26: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
27: %%
28: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
29: %
30: %%% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
31: %
32: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
33: %
34: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
35: %
36: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
37: %
38: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
39: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
40: %% use the longabstract style option.
41:
42: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
43:
44: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
45: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
46: %% the \begin{document} command.
47: %%
48: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
49: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
50: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
51: %% for information.
52: %
53: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
54: %\newcommand{\myemail}{acgupta30@gmail.com}
55: %
56: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
57:
58: \slugcomment{Accepted to ApJ}
59:
60: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
61: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
62: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
63: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
64: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
65: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
66:
67: \shorttitle{Periodic Oscillations in S5 0716$+$714}
68: \shortauthors{Gupta et al.}
69:
70: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
71: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
72:
73: \begin{document}
74:
75: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
76: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
77: %% you desire.
78:
79: %
80: %\title{Black Hole Mass of the Blazar S5 0716$+$714 using \\
81: %Optical Intra-day Variability Time Scale}
82: %\title{Periodic Modulations in the Intra-day Optical Light Curves
83: %of the Blazar S5 0716+714}
84:
85: \title{Periodic Oscillations in the Intra-day Optical Light Curves
86: of the Blazar S5 0716+714}
87:
88: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
89: %% author and affiliation information.
90: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
91: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
92: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
93: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
94:
95: \author{Alok C. Gupta\altaffilmark{1}, A. K. Srivastava\altaffilmark{1},
96: and Paul J.\ Wiita\altaffilmark{2,3}}
97:
98: \altaffiltext{1}{Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES),
99: Manora Peak, \\
100: \hspace*{0.22in} Nainital $-$ 263129, India}
101: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta,
102: GA 30302--4106}
103: \altaffiltext{3}{School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study,
104: Princeton, NJ 08540}
105:
106: %\affil{Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES),
107: %Manora Peak, \\
108: %\hspace*{0.22in} Nainital $-$ 263129, India}
109: \email{acgupta30@gmail.com, aks@aries.ernet.in, wiita@chara.gsu.edu \\
110: Phone No. +91-9936683176, Fax No. +91-5942-233439}
111: %
112:
113: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
114: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
115: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
116: %% affiliation.
117: %
118: %\altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, Chinese
119: %Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 110, Kunming, Yunnan 650011, China.}
120: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
121: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
122: %Foundation.}
123: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
124: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
125: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
126: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
127: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
128: %
129: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
130: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
131: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
132: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
133: %% editorial office after submission.
134:
135: \begin{abstract}
136:
137: We present results of a periodicity search of 20 intra-day variable
138: optical light curves of the blazar S5 0716$+$714, selected from
139: a database of 102 light curves spanning over three years. We use a
140: wavelet analysis technique along with a randomization test and
141: find strong candidates for nearly periodic
142: variations in eight light curves, with probabilities ranging from
143: 95\% to $>$99\%. This is the first good evidence
144: for periodic, or more-precisely, quasi-periodic, components in the
145: optical intra-day variable light curves of any blazar.
146: Such periodic flux changes support the idea that
147: some active galactic nuclei variability, even in blazars, is based on accretion
148: disk fluctuations or oscillations. These intra-day variability time scales are
149: used to estimate that the central black hole of the blazar S5 0716$+$714
150: has a mass $> 2.5 \times 10^6$ M$_{\odot}$. As we did not find any correlations
151: between the flux levels and intra-day variability time scales, it appears that
152: more than one emission mechanism is at work in this blazar.
153:
154: \end{abstract}
155:
156: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
157: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
158: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
159: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
160:
161: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
162: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
163: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
164: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
165: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
166: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
167: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
168: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
169: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
170: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
171: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
172: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
173:
174: \keywords{galaxies: active -- BL Lacertae objects: general -- BL Lacertae objects:
175: individual (\objectname{S5 0716$+$714})}
176: %\object{0716+714})}
177:
178: %\keywords{AGN: blazar: optical: observations - blazars: individual: S5 0716$+$714}
179: %(\objectname{NGC 6397},
180: %\object{NGC 6624}, \objectname[M 15]{NGC 7078},
181: %\object[Cl 1938-341]{Terzan 8})}
182:
183: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
184: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
185: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
186: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
187: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
188: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
189: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
190: %% each reference.
191:
192: \section{Introduction}
193:
194: Blazars are the subclass of radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs) consisting
195: of BL Lacertae objects (BL Lacs) and flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs).
196: BL Lacs show largely featureless optical continua. All blazars exhibit strong
197: flux variability on diverse time scales varying from a few minutes to many years at
198: all accessible wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. For convenience,
199: blazar variability can be broadly divided into three classes, viz., intra-day
200: or intra-night variability, short-term variability and long-term
201: variability. Variations in flux of up to a few tenths of a magnitude over
202: the course of a night or less is variously known as intra-day variability (IDV)
203: (Wagner \& Witzel 1995), which is the term we adopt here, microvariability
204: (e.g., Miller, Carini \& Goodrich 1989), or intra-night optical
205: variability (e.g., Gopal-Krishna, Sagar \& Wiita 1995) . Short- and
206: long-term variabilities can amount to four or five magnitudes and are
207: usually defined to have time scales from weeks to several months and
208: several months to years, respectively.
209:
210: It is widely accepted that the central engines of AGNs fundamentally
211: are comprised of super massive black holes (SMBHs) along with the radiating
212: matter accreting onto them. In the case of radio-loud AGN such as blazars,
213: jets emerge from these central engines. IDV is most likely produced in close
214: proximity to the SMBH (e.g., Miller et al.\ 1989), although an origin further
215: away within a turbulent jet (e.g., Marscher, Gear \& Travis 1992)
216: is also possible. Minimum IDV time scales of blazars can be used to place
217: constraints on sizes of the emitting regions, and, if the radiation is
218: indeed emitted close to the center, on the masses of the SMBHs.
219: Detection of periodic or quasi-periodic oscillations in optical IDV light
220: curves of blazars would be strong evidence for the presence of a
221: single dominant orbiting hot-spot on accretion disk, or accretion disk
222: pulsation (e.g., Chakrabarti \& Wiita 1993; Mangalam \& Wiita 1993).
223: Hence the search for periodic or quasi-periodic oscillations in the IDV light
224: curves of blazars is of great interest; however, such variations have
225: not yet been well established. The motivation of the present research program
226: is to see if such periodic IDV patterns do indeed exist in the optical light
227: curves of blazars.
228:
229: For the present work, we extracted data from the published literature
230: for optical IDV of the BL Lac object S5 0716$+$714. It is one of the
231: brightest and therefore most well studied BL Lacs with respect
232: to optical IDV. The optical continuum of this blazar is so featureless
233: that many attempts made to determine its redshift have failed.
234: The non-detection of its host galaxy allowed a lower limit to its
235: redshift, $z > 0.3$ (Wagner et al.\ 1996), to be set and
236: a later non-detection led to a claim that $z > 0.52$
237: (Sbarufatti, Treves \& Falomo 2005). However, there has been a very recent
238: claim of a host galaxy detection which produces a ``standard candle''
239: value of $z = 0.31 \pm 0.08$ (Nilsson et al.\ 2008). The duty
240: cycle of the source is essentially unity, which implies that the
241: source is always in at least a moderately active state (Wagner \& Witzel 1995).
242: In the search for optical variability on diverse time scales
243: in this source, it has been observed intensely over at least the
244: last 15 years (e.g.\ Wagner \& Witzel 1995; Wagner et al.\ 1996;
245: Heidt \& Wagner 1996; Ghisellini et al.\ 1997; Sagar et al.\
246: 1999; Villata et al.\ 2000; Qian, Tau \& Fan 2002;
247: Raiteri et al.\ 2003; Wu et al.\ 2005, 2007;
248: Nesci et al.\ 2005; Stalin et al.\ 2006; Gu et al.\ 2006;
249: Montagni et al.\ 2006; Ostorero et al.\ 2006; Foschini et al.\ 2006;
250: Villata et al.\ 2008; Gupta et al.\ 2008 and references
251: therein). Five major optical outbursts were reported for this source;
252: they occurred at the beginning of 1995, in late 1997, in the fall of 2001,
253: in March 2004 and in the beginning of 2007 (Raiteri et al.\ 2003;
254: Foschini et al.\ 2006; Gupta et al.\ 2008). These
255: five outbursts indicate a timescale of long-term variability of
256: $\sim 3.0 \pm 0.3$ years (e.g., Raiteri et al.\ 2003).
257: Correlated radio/optical short-term variability measured over a month
258: seemed to reveal some quasi-periodicities for this blazar
259: (Quirrenbach et al.\ 1991; Wagner et al.\ 1996).
260:
261: This paper is structured as follows. In \S 2 we discuss the source of the data
262: we use and we describe the criteria employed to select the light curves for
263: this study. In \S 3 we describe the wavelet analysis and randomization
264: technique we employ in our analysis. Our results are presented in \S 4 and we
265: discuss them and draw conclusions in \S 5.
266:
267: \section{Data and Selection Criteria}
268:
269: There have been several attempts to search for optical IDV in the blazar
270: S5 0716$+$714 over the last decade or so, and a few of the most comprehensive
271: studies are by Sagar et al.\ (1999); Wu et al.\ (2005, 2007);
272: Montagni et al.\ (2006); Stalin et al.\ (2006); Pollock et al.\ (2007);
273: and Gupta et al.\ (2008). While examining these papers, we found that the
274: best quality data, in the sense of having a combination of the longest
275: nightly durations, the best time resolution, and nearly uniform sampling,
276: was published by Montagni et al.\ (2006).
277:
278: We downloaded the Montagni et al.\ (2006) data on 0716$+$714
279: taken on 102 nights between 1999 and 2003 from the SIMBAD
280: astronomical database\footnote{http://simbad.u-strasbf.fr/simbad/}.
281: We visually inspected all of these light curves (LCs) to decide which
282: might be most suitable for a periodicity search.
283:
284: First we rejected the 37 LCs that had observational gaps during that night.
285: Next, the 5 LCs that had median errors more than 0.015 mag.\ were rejected so
286: as to obtain a high quality data set.
287: For the remaining 60 LCs we obtained the intra-day variability amplitude, $A$,
288: defined as (Heidt \& Wagner 1996)
289: \begin{eqnarray}
290: A = 100 \times \sqrt {(A_{max} - A_{min})^{2} - 2\sigma^{2}} \hspace*{0.1in}\%,
291: \end{eqnarray}
292: where $A_{max}$ and $A_{min}$ are the maximum and minimum magnitudes in the
293: calibrated LC of the blazar and $\sigma$ is the averaged measurement error
294: of that blazar LC. So as to obtain LCs for which the presence of IDV is
295: unquestionable, we only tentatively accepted the 30 LCs with $A > 10$\%.
296: Finally, we rejected the 10 LCs with data extending over less than 7.5 hours.
297:
298: This entire set of selection criteria were satisfied on 20 nights for which the
299: LCs extend from 7.7 to 12.3 hours. The dates, filters used, LC durations
300: and variability amplitudes
301: for these selected datasets are given in the first four columns of Table 1.
302:
303:
304: \section{Wavelet Analysis and Randomization Technique}
305:
306: We use a wavelet plus randomization technique, which has certain advantages
307: over the commonly used periodogram and Fourier power spectra approaches in
308: searching for statistically significant real periodicities in IDV LCs.
309: The wavelet analysis computer code ``randomlet" was developed by E.\ O'Shea
310: in the environment of IDL (Interactive Data Language) software
311: (O'Shea et al.\ 2001). Using this code, we can find statistically significant
312: real periodicities (if they exist) in time series data. The program incorporates
313: a randomization test as an additional feature to the standard wavelet
314: analysis code of Torrence \& Compo (1998) which allows robust non-parametric
315: estimates of the probabilities that periodic components contribute to
316: a signal (e.g., Bradley 1968).
317:
318: Details of the randomization technique used to examine the existence of
319: statistically significant real oscillation periods were given by
320: Linnell Nemec \& Nemec (1985) for investigations of stellar
321: pulsation periods and by O'Shea et al.\ (2001) in the context of solar
322: coronal variability. This technique has led to
323: several important results in the context of solar physics
324: by analyzing approximately uniformly sampled
325: data (e.g., Banerjee et al.\ 2001; O'Shea et al.\ 2001, 2005;
326: Ugarte-Urra et al.\ 2004; Popescu et al.\ 2005; Srivastava et al.\ 2008a,b).
327: A similar technique was used by Mathioudakis et al.\ (2006) in
328: searching for periodic variations in the active star EQ PegB.
329:
330: Here we use this tool for the first time to search for
331: periodicity in blazar optical IDV data that
332: are also approximately uniformly sampled. We note that
333: there have been previous
334: efforts to study other types of blazar variability using variants
335: of the wavelet technique. For example, Kelly et al.\ (2003) used a
336: continuous wavelet transform
337: and cross-wavelet analysis to search for long time scale
338: variations in the multi-band radio LCs of 30 AGN;
339: they found a quasi-periodic variability in at least one of the radio
340: frequencies at which these AGN were monitored for a majority of them.
341: Examination of the radio variability of PKS B0048$-$097 with the same
342: technique found a quasi-period of $\sim$ 460 days that later was
343: replaced by a more
344: precise period of $\sim$ 585 days (Kadler et al.\ 2006).
345: A wavelet analysis of 19 X-ray LCs from 10 AGNs recently led to
346: the claim of the presence of a 3.3 ks quasi-period in one data train
347: from the quasar 3C 273 (Espaillat et al.\ 2008).
348: The ``randomlet'' approach gives
349: an easily understood way to employ wavelets along with a well-established
350: statistical test for the reality of
351: claimed periodicities in the time series data of the blazar 0716$+$714.
352:
353: In all wavelet analyses, the search for periodicities in light curves
354: is carried out through a time localized function that is continuous
355: in both frequency and time. The
356: wavelet used in this study is the Morlet function which is defined as
357: \begin{equation}
358: \psi_{t} (s) = \pi^{-1/4} \ {\rm exp}(i \omega t) \ {\rm exp} \left (\frac {-t^{2}}{2s^{2}} \right)~,
359: \end{equation}
360: where $t$, $s$, $\omega$ and $\pi^{-1/4}$ are the time parameter,
361: wavelet scale, oscillation frequency parameter, and the normalization constant, respectively.
362: A Morlet function involves the product of a sine wave with a
363: Gaussian envelope.
364: The non-dimensional oscillation frequency parameter ($\omega$)
365: is set equal to 6 in order to satisfy
366: the admissibility condition (Farge 1992).
367: The Fourier period $P$ is related to the wavelet scale $s$ in the
368: Morlet function by the simple relation, $P = 1.03 s$.
369:
370: The wavelet is convolved with the time series to determine the
371: contribution of that frequency
372: to the time series through matching the sinusoidal portion
373: by varying the scale of the wavelet
374: function. This method produces the power spectrum of the oscillations
375: in different light curves. We note that the Morlet wavelet suffers from an
376: ``edge effect''
377: that is typical of analyses of time series data. Fortunately, this
378: effect is only significant in regions that are
379: within a cone of influence (COI) that demarks where
380: possible periods that are too close to either the
381: measurement interval or the maximum length of the time series
382: cannot be convincingly detected.
383: The wavelet procedure, its noise filtering capabilities, and the impact
384: of COI effects are described in detail in Torrence \& Compo (1998).
385:
386: The randomlet software obtains measurements of the peak power
387: in the global wavelet spectrum,
388: which is the average peak power over time, and is
389: equivalent to a smoothed Fourier power spectrum.
390: In principle, the randomization technique compares the average
391: values of the actual time series to the peak powers evaluated
392: for $n!$ equally-likely permutations of the time series data,
393: using the assumption that the $n$ values of
394: measured intensities are independent of the $n$ measured times
395: if no periodic signal is present.
396: The fraction of permutations that provide peak values greater than or
397: equal to the original peak
398: power of the time series provides the probability ($p$) that
399: there is no periodic
400: component. Thus the acceptance percentage probability that real
401: periodic components are present in the
402: data is ($1-p$) $\times$ 100. To claim a statistically significant
403: oscillation period is present
404: the lowest acceptance probability we allow is 95\%, although it
405: might be better to call these candidate periodicities. We consider
406: really firm detections to have acceptance probabilities of $\ge$ 99\%.
407:
408: Because computing $n!$ permutations is computationally very expensive, we
409: calculate $m = 200$ permutations. This allows a reliable estimation
410: of $p$, as the 95\% confidence interval for the
411: true value of $p$ is $p \pm 2[p(1-p)/m]^{1/2}$ (Linnell Nemec \& Nemec 1985).
412: The estimated value of $p$ can have a value of zero, i.e., there is an
413: almost zero chance that the observed time series oscillations could
414: have occurred
415: by chance. In this case, the 95\% confidence interval can be obtained using the
416: binomial distribution and is given by 0.0 $< p <$ 0.01, that is, the probability
417: of a real period having been found is 99$-$100 \% (O'Shea et al. 2001).
418:
419: Since the blazar data are also approximately uniformly sampled we can
420: use O'Shea's code to produce the power spectra of the IDV on different
421: nights. It should be noted that there is no time gap in any of the
422: chosen data sequences. We use an average smoothing technique, based on
423: low-pass filtering methods, to reduce noise in the original signal before
424: searching for possible real periodicities. This
425: is accomplished through the ``running average"
426: process in O'Shea's wavelet tool that smooths the original signal by a
427: defined scalar width, taken to be 10. This process uses the ``smooth"
428: subroutine available with the IDL tool kit which returns a copy of
429: the array smoothed with a boxcar average of the specified width.
430: The smoothed signal is then subtracted from the original signal to
431: yield the resultant signal used for the wavelet analysis.
432:
433: \section{Results}
434:
435: \subsection{Wavelet Analysis Results for IDV Time Scales}% and their Probability}
436:
437: We used high quality optical IDV data of the blazar S5 0716$+$714 taken
438: on 20 nights during the period November 26, 1999 to March 23, 2003 from
439: Montagni et al.\ (2006). The data were available as magnitudes vs time.
440: We converted them into fluxes vs time and then performed the wavelet analysis
441: along with a randomization test described in \S 2 on these 20 IDV LCs to search
442: for periodicities and IDV time scales for each light curve.
443:
444: The LCs, plotted so as to show fractional deviations of intensities from
445: the nightly means, are given for several of the nights in the upper-left panels
446: of Figs.\ 1$-$4.
447: The wavelet power transforms of those LC are shown in the
448: middle-left panels of Figs.\ 1$-$4 while the dates the data were taken
449: are given in the
450: captions. Here we have plotted the wavelet analysis results of
451: the three out of the 20 nights during which
452: the probability a period (or quasi-period) is really present is 99$-$100\%,
453: as well as that for one night during which such a signal was
454: much weaker (Fig.\ 4).
455: In the middle-left panels of these figures
456: the darkest regions show the most enhanced
457: oscillatory power. The cross-hatched areas are the cone of
458: influence (COI), the region of
459: the power spectrum where edge effects, due to the finite lengths
460: of the time series, are likely to dominate. Because of this COI
461: the maximum possibly detectable periods range between
462: 10 and 16 ks for different nights.
463:
464: In our wavelet
465: analyses, we consider time scales that correspond to the
466: highest power peaks,
467: that lie below those COI thresholds and have full-night probability estimates
468: above 95\% to be have high significance and thus provide good
469: period candidates.
470: The middle-right panels in the figures show the global wavelet
471: power spectra of the LC time
472: series from which those periods can be selected. The width of
473: those peaks indicate that they are better characterized as
474: quasi-periods in most cases. We use the term quasi-period here
475: in the sense of Espaillat et al.\ (2008), i.e., the nominal period is
476: not crisply defined, as can be seen most clearly in Figs.\ 1 and 3;
477: however, these signals do not really resemble the QPOs seen in X-ray
478: binaries (e.g., Remillard \& McClintock 2006), and so, to avoid
479: confusion with them we will henceforth just use the word ``period''.
480:
481: Finally, the bottom-left panels show the probabilities of the
482: presence of two specific frequencies corresponding to the
483: first and second highest peaks
484: shown in the middle-right panels as functions of the time
485: after the start of the observations
486: that night. The numbers quoted for those periods at the bottom-right
487: of these figures give the maximum values of the probabilities
488: and not the global probability level given at the upper-right.
489: The solid line represents the probability corresponding to
490: the major power peak of
491: time series data, while the dotted line corresponds to the
492: secondary power peak. Note that the major power peak shows very
493: high probabilities for extended intervals during the night, while the
494: secondary peaks never do so for more than a short period.
495: We only consider the period corresponding to the first major power
496: peak in our analysis.
497:
498: The wavelet analysis results for IDV time scales (or
499: oscillation periods for a portion of the flux)
500: and their probabilities are given in
501: columns 5 and 6, respectively, of Table 1
502: for all 20 nights that satisfied the selection criteria
503: discussed in \S 3.
504: We have only presented in Figs.\ 1--3 the wavelet analysis results for the LCs which
505: have the highest probability (99$-$100\%) of the existence of statistically
506: significant time scales. For the sake of comparison, in Fig.\ 4 we
507: have also presented
508: the wavelet analysis result of a LC in which we
509: did not find any dominating and statistically significant time scale.
510: From the intensity wavelet spectrum of Fig.\ 1, we found that the first
511: oscillation period of $\sim$3.2 ks dominates over the $\sim$ 50--300 min
512: span, while
513: the second oscillation period of $\sim$5.0 ks dominates over the
514: $\sim$ 300 -- 500
515: min portion of the time series but not as strongly as did
516: the first one. In the global
517: wavelet spectrum, which is an average of the wavelet spectrum over time
518: (Torrence \& Compo 1998; O'Shea et al. 2001), the period
519: corresponding to the maximum power is $\sim$3.2 ks.
520: %The second weaker peak in
521: %the global wavelet spectrum is associated with a period of 4974 sec,
522: %however, the first one is considered as a statistically significant
523: %oscillation period associated with the maximum power and dominantly
524: %presented in the time series.
525: It is also clear from Fig.\ 2 that a period near 4.3 ks is present in the
526: whole night's time series and always dominates outside the COI.
527: In Fig.\ 3 we see that a period of $\sim$1.9 ks is nearly always
528: present and is very strong between $\sim$100 and 300 minutes and
529: again after 400 minutes that night.
530:
531: \subsection{Black Hole Mass Estimation}
532:
533: The mass of the central black hole (BH) in an AGN is probably
534: the single most important quantity to be known about its central engine.
535: The more reliable, or primary, black hole mass estimation methods include
536: stellar and gas kinematics, reverberation mapping and
537: megamaser kinematics (e.g.,
538: Vestergaard 2004). The stellar and gas kinematics
539: methods require high spatial resolution spectroscopy of the host
540: galaxy, the reverberation mapping method requires detection of
541: higher-ionization emission lines from gas close to the BH,
542: and megamasers, when present, are
543: only detectable in essentially edge-on sources.
544: Since the optical spectrum of the blazar 0716$+$714
545: is a featureless continuum it is not possible to determine the black hole
546: mass using the methods that require spectroscopy; and, as
547: blazars are nearly face-on sources, the megamaser technique is also moot.
548: Secondary black hole mass estimation methods are either
549: approximations to the reverberation mapping approach that still rely on
550: the presence of a well measured strong emission line or they employ well-known
551: empirical relations between the black hole mass and the velocity dispersion
552: or mass of the host galaxy's bulge. The marginal detection of the host of
553: 0716$+$714 (Nilsson et al.\ 2008) means that these approaches to the value
554: of its BH mass are also not useful in this case.
555:
556: Variability time scales can also provide estimates of the mass of an AGN's BH.
557: An observed variability
558: doubling time, $\Delta t_{obs}$, provides a crude bound on the mass if
559: the changing flux arises in the accretion flow close to the BH.
560: One could then use causality to limit
561: the size of the emitting region to
562: $R \le c \Delta t_{obs} $.
563: Combining this result with the expectation that the minimum size
564: for such an emitting region
565: is fairly closely related to the gravitational radius of the BH,
566: $R \ge R_g \equiv GM/c^2$ (e.g., Wiita 1985) one can obtain an estimate for
567: $M$. But if the source of the variable
568: blazar emission is instead from the jet and moving at a velocity
569: $v$ (e.g., Marscher \& Gear 1985) then
570: the intrinsic doubling time in the
571: rest frame of the blazar flow, $\Delta t_{in}$, is given by
572: $\Delta t_{in} = [\delta / (1+z)] \Delta t_{obs}$, where
573: $\delta = [\Gamma (1-\beta {\rm cos}\theta)]^{-1} $ is the Doppler
574: factor, with $\beta = v/c$, $\Gamma = (1 - \beta^2)^{-1/2}$
575: and $\theta$ is the viewing angle to the jet axis.
576: For typical blazars, $\delta \sim 10$, albeit with a substantial
577: range (e.g., Ghisellini et al.\ 1998).
578: Earlier measurements of the Lorentz factor for this source
579: from ejection velocities of radio knots showed a decrease in
580: the apparent superluminal speeds from $\sim 15c$ to $\sim 5c$ over
581: the course of a decade
582: (Bach et al.\ 2005). Those changes are consistent with a constant
583: $\Gamma \simeq 12$ but a
584: decreasing value of $\theta$ from $5^\circ$ to $0^{\circ}.5$ during that
585: period, leading to a rise in $\delta$ from $\sim 13$ to $\sim 25$
586: (Montagni et al.\ 2006). However, it must be stressed that
587: even when knot motions can be determined by VLBI measurements,
588: obtaining an accurate value of $\delta$ is very difficult, particularly
589: if the jet has a finite opening angle
590: (e.g., Gopal-Krishna, Dhurde \& Wiita 2004).
591:
592: In the case where an apparent periodic (or nearly periodic) signal is found,
593: as appears to be the case for 0716$+$714,
594: then there is some hope to be able to do better with mass estimates. In these
595: circumstances, it is probably most reasonable to assume that the period is
596: related to the orbital timescale of a blob or flare in the inner portion of
597: the accretion disk (e.g., Mangalam \& Wiita 1993). The minimum likely period
598: then corresponds to the orbital
599: period at the inner edge of the accretion disk, which is usually taken to
600: be given by the marginally stable orbit, $R_{ms}$, although it is conceivable
601: that emission can occur from matter at even smaller radii
602: (e.g., Abramowicz \& Nobili 1982).
603: For a non-rotating (Schwarzschild) BH,
604: $R_{ms} = 6 GM/c^2 = 6 R_g$,
605: while for a maximal
606: Kerr BH, with angular momentum parameter $a \rightarrow 1$,
607: $R_{ms} \rightarrow R_g$. However,
608: for a more realistic maximum angular momentum parameter of $a = 0.9982$
609: then $R_{ms} \simeq 1.2 R_g$ (e.g., Espaillat et al.\ 2008).
610:
611: The angular velocity of co-rotating matter orbiting a BH, as measured
612: by an inertial observer at infinity is given by (e.g., Lightman et al.\ 1975)
613: \begin{equation}
614: \Omega = \frac{ M^{1/2}} {r^{3/2} + a M^{1/2}}~,
615: \end{equation}
616: where geometrical units, $G = c = 1$, have been used,
617: and $r = R/R_g$.
618: This leads to an expression for the BH mass in terms of the observed
619: period, $P$, in seconds,
620: \begin{equation}
621: \frac {M} {M_{\odot}} = {\frac {3.23 \times 10^4 ~ P} {(r^{3/2} + a)(1+z)}}.
622: \end{equation}
623: The nominal masses obtained in this fashion for a Schwarzschild
624: BH (with $r = 6$ and $a = 0$) are column 7 of Table 1,
625: and those obtained for a maximal Kerr BH
626: (with $r = 1.2$ and $a = 0.9982$) are in column 8.
627: If the periodic perturbations in the inner part of the disk are
628: advected into the jet and the observed emission comes from a relativistic
629: flow directly affected by those perturbations then the value of $M$
630: would require the results obtained from
631: Eq.\ (4) to be multiplied by $\delta$, so these mass estimates are
632: really lower bounds.
633:
634: \subsection{Correlation between Flux and IDV Time Scale}
635:
636: In our sample of 20 clearly variable IDV LCs, 16 were measured in the
637: R band but 4 were taken using a V filter. Those V band measurements
638: have to be converted to R in order to investigate any correlation
639: between the flux level and quasi-periodic variation. Sagar et al.\
640: (1999) reported an average V$-$R color of this BL Lac to be
641: $\sim$ 0.4 mag.\ in their one month long BVRI optical monitoring campaign
642: in 1994.
643: We adopted this value of V$-$R and converted the V magnitudes
644: of the four LCs into R magnitudes and then calculated average nightly
645: fluxes in the R band for them.
646: We also computed the average fluxes of the 16 nights where the LCs are
647: already in the R band.
648:
649: In Fig.\ 5 we plot the average nightly flux vs highest probability
650: IDV time scales ($P$), noting however, that some of the timescales have rather
651: low probabilities of being real.
652: We see that there is no correlation between the average flux and the IDV
653: time scales of the blazar, regardless of whether all 20 points or the
654: 5 with the highest probabilities are considered. It is worth noting
655: that the most confident periods are only detected on nights when the
656: total flux is high. This is reasonable if larger mean fluxes correspond
657: to times when the periodic variable component is stronger.
658:
659: These 20 nights were spread over more than 3 years (November 26, 1999
660: to March 23, 2003). Since the source has shown long-term
661: quasi-periodicity on the time scale of
662: $3.0 \pm 0.3$ years (Gupta et al.\ 2008), this blazar has gone
663: through most, if not all, of its (so-far observed) long-term states
664: during the period in which the data for the present work was obtained.
665: It is generally
666: believed that in the pre-outburst, outburst and post-outburst states, even
667: the optical emission can be
668: attributed to the shock moving down the inhomogeneous medium in the jet
669: (e.g., Marscher et al.\ 1992). On the other hand,
670: in the low state of a blazar, IDV arising
671: from instabilities
672: in the accretion disk could more easily be detected
673: (e.g., Mangalam \& Wiita 1993).
674:
675: In blazars, the radiation emitted by the plasma in the jet, which has
676: bulk relativistic motion and is oriented at small viewing angles, will
677: be affected by relativistic beaming, which in
678: turn implies a shortening of the observed timescales by a factor
679: of $\delta^{-1}$.
680: A correlation between average flux and IDV
681: time scales should be expected if the variability arises from
682: changes in the
683: velocity of, and/or viewing angle to, the emitting region.
684: We do not see such a correlation, which implies that optical emission
685: from this blazar is not governed by this single mechanism and
686: thus that more than one source of the radiation is probably present
687: at these times.
688:
689: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
690:
691:
692: There are two major classes of models for AGN variability, those involving
693: shocks-in-jets and those invoking instabilities on or above accretion disks.
694: The former is expected to dominate in blazars and the latter is most important
695: when jets are absent or weak (e.g., Wagner \& Witzel 1995;
696: Urry \& Padovani 1995; Mangalam \& Wiita 1993). In another jet-based
697: variant it is argued that
698: for low-luminosity AGNs, the accretion disk is radiatively inefficient
699: and any small amplitude variation, even in the low-state of the source, will be
700: due to a weak jet (e.g., Chiaberge et al.\ 1999, 2006; Capetti et al.\ 2007,
701: and references therein). This variant may be able to explain
702: optical IDV in blazars. The detection of quasi-periodicity or periodicity
703: on IDV time scales can be most easily explained by the presence of a single
704: dominating hot-spot on the accretion disk (e.g., Mangalam \& Wiita 1993;
705: Chakrabarti \& Wiita
706: 1993) or perhaps by pulsational modes in the disk
707: (e.g., Espaillat et al.\ 2008).
708:
709: Together, the difficulties in obtaining lengthy, high quality, and essentially
710: evenly spaced data for ground based observations of AGN,
711: and the weaknesses of the standard analysis tools
712: (periodograms and Fourier transforms) under these circumstances, has
713: meant that
714: performing good searches for periods or quasi-periods in blazars
715: has been difficult
716: until recently. So it is not surprising that
717: there have been few strong claims of quasi-periodic variations in blazar
718: LCs. Carini et al.\ (1992) noted a weak peak in the power spectrum
719: of optical IDV observations of OJ 287 at
720: $\approx$ 32 minutes, but it was not statistically
721: significant. In the same blazar,
722: Carrasco et al.\ (1985) earlier claimed periodic variations on timescales
723: of tens of minutes but they were not convincing.
724: Earlier excellent optical data of the blazar 0716$+$714
725: has shown possible quasi-periodicity on the timescales of $\sim$ 1 day,
726: 4 days and 7 days, and some of these were in apparent synchrony with
727: radio variations, but the time series were too short to provide conclusive
728: evidence (Wagner 1992; Heidt \& Wagner 1996).
729: Very recently, using X-ray data for the blazar 3C 273,
730: Espaillat et al.\ (2008) have
731: reported quasi-periodicity on a timescale of 3.3 ks. If these
732: fluctuations represent orbital periods they would imply central BH masses
733: for 3C 273 some 10 to 100 times smaller than independent determinations
734: have found, so Espaillat et al.\ (2008) favor the hypothesis that the
735: variations they have seen arise from higher-order modes within the disk.
736: To our knowledge, no other members of the
737: blazar class have shown significant harmonic components
738: in the IDV or short-time scale LCs.
739:
740: Here we have used a wavelet plus randomization technique
741: (Linnell Nemec \& Nemec 1985; O'Shea et al.\ 2001) to search for
742: optical IDV time scales of the blazar S5 0716$+$714.
743: We selected 20 nights of IDV data that were characterized by long strings of
744: approximately uniformly sampled data with high IDV signals
745: and low noise from an initial database of 102 nights of
746: observations by Montagni et al.\ (2006).
747:
748: We found high probabilities ($ \ge 95$\%) of (at least quasi-) periodic
749: oscillations in
750: eight of these IDV LCs and very high probabilities ($ \ge 99$\%)
751: for five of them.
752: This is the first evidence of detection of periodic components
753: in blazar optical IDV LCs. We found quasi-periodic IDV time scales between
754: $\sim$ 25 and $\sim$ 73 minutes.
755:
756: These variability timescales lead to nominal BH masses ranging from
757: 2.47 -- 7.35 $\times$ 10$^{6}$ M$_{\odot}$
758: assuming the period
759: arises from a Schwarzschild BH, while for a rapidly rotating Kerr BH
760: these mass estimates rise to 1.57 --
761: 4.67 $\times$ 10$^{7}$ M$_{\odot}$.
762: However, if these variations arise from internal disk modes then the
763: corresponding BH mass can be substantially larger, by factors of
764: $\sim$10 to over 100. And if they do emerge
765: from an inner portion of the jet where they are induced by
766: disk fluctuations, the masses
767: would be increased by a factor of $\delta \sim 20$; however, if
768: they emerge from jets at large distances from the SMBH, then clearly
769: no information on the BH mass can be extracted from these timescales.
770:
771: We did not find
772: any correlation between average flux and IDV time scales,
773: which implies that optical emission from the
774: blazar is probably not governed by a single mechanism.
775: Our results appear to be most consistent with models in which accretion
776: disk variability plays a role in the optical emission of blazars.
777: Nonetheless, it is possible that emission from turbulet jet,
778: which is also precessing or swinging (e.g., Camenzind \& Krockenberger 1992;
779: Gopal-Krishna \& Wiita 1992) could also explain these observations.
780:
781: \acknowledgments
782:
783: We are extremely grateful to Dr.\ E.\ O'Shea for kindly providing
784: and allowing us to use his wavelet code for the present work.
785: We gratefully acknowledge Prof.\ M.\ H.\ P.\ M.\ van Putten
786: for carefully reading an earlier version of the manuscript and thank
787: the anonymous referee for suggestions that have improved the presentation.
788: This research made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at
789: CDS, Strasbourg, France. PJW's work is
790: supported in part by a subcontract to GSU from NSF grant AST 05-07529
791: to the University of Washington.
792:
793: \begin{thebibliography}{}
794:
795: \bibitem{} Abramowicz, M.\ A., \& Nobili, L. 1982, Nature, 300, 506
796: \bibitem{} Bach, U., Krichbaum, T.\ P., Ros, E., Britzen, S., Tian, W.\ W.,
797: Kraus, A., Witzel, A., \& Zensus, J.\ A. 2005, A\&A, 433, 815
798: \bibitem{} Banerjee, D., O'Shea, E., Doyle, J.\ G., \& Goossens, M. 2001, A\&A, 371, 1137
799: \bibitem{} Camenzind, M., \& Krockenberger, M. 1992, A\&A, 255, 59
800: \bibitem{} Capetti, A., Axon, D.\ J., Chiaberge, M., Sparks, W.\ B., Duccio
801: Macchetto, F., Cracraft, M. \& Celotti, A. 2007, A\&A, 471, 137
802: \bibitem{} Carini, M.\ T., Miller, H.\ R., Noble, J.\ C., \&
803: Goodrich, B.\ D. 1992, AJ, 104, 15
804: \bibitem{} Carrasco, L., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., \& Cruz-Gonzalez, I. 1985, Nature, 314, 146
805: \bibitem{} Chakrabarti, S.\ K., \& Wiita, P.\ J. 1993, ApJ, 411, 602
806: \bibitem{} Chiaberge, M., Capetti, A. \& Celotti, A. 1999, A\&A, 349, 77
807: \bibitem{} Chiaberge, M., Gilli, R., Macchetto, F.\ D., \& Sparks, W.\ B.
808: 2006, ApJ, 651, 728
809: \bibitem{} Espaillat, C., Bregman, J., Hughes, P., \& Lloyd-Davies, E. 2008, ApJ, 679, 182
810: \bibitem{} Farge, M. 1992, Ann.\ Rev.\ Fluid Mech., 24, 395
811: \bibitem{} Foschini, L., Tagliaferri, G., Pian, E., et al. 2006, A\&A, 455, 871
812: \bibitem{} Ghisellini, G., et al. 1997, A\&A, 327, 61
813: \bibitem{} Ghisellini, G., Celotti, A., Fossati, G., Maraschi, L, \&
814: Comastri, A. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 451
815: \bibitem{} Gopal-Krishna, \& Wiita, P.\ J. 1992, A\&A, 259, 109
816: \bibitem{} Gopal-Krishna, Dhurde, S., \& Wiita, P.\ J. 2004, ApJ, 615, L81
817: \bibitem{} Gopal-Krishna, Sagar, R., \& Wiita, P.\ J. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 701
818: \bibitem{} Gu, M.\ F., Lee, C.-U., Pak, S., Yim, H.\ S., \&
819: Fletcher, A.\ B. 2006, A\&A, 450, 39
820: \bibitem{} Gupta, A.\ C., Fan, J.\ H., Bai, J.\ M., \& Wagner, S.\ J. 2008, AJ, 135, 1384
821: \bibitem{} Heidt, J., \& Wagner, S.\ J. 1996, A\&A, 305, 42
822: \bibitem{} Kadler, M., Hughes, P.\ A., Ros, E., Aller, M.\ F., \&
823: Aller, H.\ D. 2006, A\&A, 456, L1
824: \bibitem{} Kelly, B. C., Hughes, P. A., Aller, H. D., \& Aller, M. F. 2003, ApJ, 591, 695
825: \bibitem{} Lightman, A.\ P., Press, W.\ H., Price, R.\ H., \& Teukolsky, S.\ A.
826: 1975, Problem Book in Relativity and Gravitation
827: (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p.\ 468.
828: \bibitem{} Linnell Nemec, A.\ F., \& Nemec, J.\ M. 1985, AJ, 90, 2317
829: \bibitem{} Mangalam, A.\ V., \& Wiita, P.\ J. 1993, ApJ, 406, 420
830: \bibitem{} Marscher, A.\ P. \& Gear, W.\ K. 1985, ApJ, 298, 114
831: \bibitem{} Marscher, A.\ P., Gear, W.\ K., \& Travis, J.\ P. 1992,
832: in Variability of Blazars, E.\ Valtaoja, M. Valtonen, eds.,
833: (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p.\ 85
834: \bibitem{} Mathioudakis, M., Bloomfield, D.\ S., Jess, D.\ B., Dhillon, V.\ S.,
835: \& Marsh, T.\ R. 2006, A\&A, 456, 323
836: \bibitem{} Miller, H.\ R., Carini, M.\ T., \& Goodrich, B.\ D. 1989, Nature, 337, 627
837: \bibitem{} Montagni, F., Maselli, A., Massaro, E., et al. 2006, A\&A, 451, 435
838: \bibitem{} Nesci, R., Massaro, E., Rossi, C., Sclavi, S., Maesano, M.,
839: \& Montagni, F. 2005, AJ, 130, 1466
840: \bibitem{} Nilsson, K., Pursimo, T., Sillanp$\ddot{a}\ddot{a}$, A.,
841: Takalo, L.\ O., \& Lindfors, E. 2008, A\&A, 487, L29
842: \bibitem{} Ostorero, L., et al. 2006, A\&A, 451, 797
843: \bibitem{} O'Shea, E., Banerjee, D., Doyle, J.\ G., Fleck, B., \&
844: Murtagh, F. 2001, A\&A, 368, 1095
845: \bibitem{} O'Shea, E., Banerjee, D., \& Doyle, J.\ G., 2005, A\&A, 436, L43
846: \bibitem{} Pollock, J.\ T., Webb, J.\ R., \& Azarnia, G. 2007, AJ, 133, 487
847: \bibitem{} Popescu, M.\ D., Banerjee, D., O'Shea, E., Doyle, J.\ G.,
848: \& Xia, L.\ D.. 2005, A\&A, 442, 1087
849: \bibitem{} Qian, B., Tao, J., \& Fan, J.\ H. 2002, AJ, 123, 678
850: \bibitem{} Quirrenbach, A., et al. 1991, ApJ, 372, L71
851: \bibitem{} Raiteri, C. M., et al. 2003, A\&A, 402, 151
852: \bibitem{} Remillard, R.\ A., \& McClintock, J.\ E. 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 49
853: \bibitem{} Sagar, R., Gopal-Krishna, Mohan, V., Pandey, A.\ K., Bhatt, B.\ C.,
854: \& Wagner, S.\ J. 1999, A\&AS, 134, 453
855: \bibitem{} Sbarufatti, B., Treves, A., \& Falomo, R. 2005, ApJ, 635, 173
856: \bibitem{} Srivastava, A.\ K., Kuridze, D., Zaqarashvili, T.\ V., \& Dwivedi, B. N. 2008a, A\&A, 481, L95
857: \bibitem{} Srivastava, A.\ K., Zaqarashvili, T. V., Uddin, W.,
858: Dwivedi, B.\ N., Kumar, P. 2008b, MNRAS, 388, 1899
859: \bibitem{} Stalin, C.\ S., Gopal-Krishna, Sagar, R., Wiita, P.\ J.,
860: Mohan, V., \& Pandey, A.\ K. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1337
861: \bibitem{} Torrence, C., \& Compo, G.\ P. 1998, BAMS, 79, 61
862: \bibitem{} Ugarte-Urra, I., Doyle, J.\ G., Madjarska, M. S., \& O'Shea, E. 2004, A\&A, 418, 313
863: \bibitem{} Urry, C.\ M., \& Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803
864: \bibitem{} Vestergaard, M. 2004, in AGN Physics with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 311, eds.
865: G.\ J.\ Richards, P.\ B.\ Hall (San Fransisco: ASP), p.\ 69
866: \bibitem{} Villata, M., et al. 2000, A\&A, 363, 108
867: \bibitem{} Villata, M., et al. 2008, A\&A, 481, L79
868: \bibitem{} Wagner, S.\ J. 1992, in Variability of Blazars, ed. E. Valtaoja \& M. Valtonen
869: (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p.\ 346
870: \bibitem{} Wagner, S.\ J., \& Witzel, A. 1995, ARA\&A, 33, 163
871: \bibitem{} Wagner, S.\ J., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 2187
872: \bibitem{} Wiita, P.\ J. 1985, Phys. Rep., 123, 117
873: \bibitem{} Wu, J., Peng, B., Zhou, X., Ma, J., Jiang, Z.,
874: \& Chen, J. 2005, AJ, 129, 1818
875: \bibitem{} Wu, J., Zhou, X., Ma, J., Wu, Z., Jiang, Z., \& Chen, J.
876: 2007, AJ, 133, 1599
877:
878: \end{thebibliography}
879:
880: \clearpage
881:
882: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
883: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
884: %\rotate
885: \tablecaption{Wavelet analyses for IDV of the blazar S5 0716$+$714
886: %\citet{treu03}
887: \label{tbl-1}}
888: \tablewidth{0pt}
889: \tablehead{
890: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{Band} & \colhead{Duration} & \colhead{Amplitude} &
891: \colhead{Time Scale} & \colhead{Probability}
892: & \colhead{BH Mass (Sch.)} & \colhead{BH Mass (Kerr)} \\
893: \colhead{(dd.mm.yyyy)} & & \colhead{(hours)} & \colhead{(\%)} &
894: \colhead{(seconds)} & \colhead{(\%)}
895: & \colhead{(10$^6$ M$_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{(10$^7$ M$_{\odot}$)}
896: }
897: \startdata
898: 26.11.1999 & V & 11.34 & 36 & 4295 & 95.0 & 7.21 & 4.58 \\
899: 12.01.2000 & V & 11.40 & 32 & 3205 & 82.0 & 5.38 & 3.42 \\
900: 25.01.2000 & V & 10.74 & 32 & 3301 & 92.0 & 5.54 & 3.52 \\
901: 27.10.2000 & V & ~7.72 & 19 & 1473 & 99.0 & 2.47 & 1.57 \\
902: 14.02.2001 & R & 10.55 & 11 & 1978 & 92.5 & 3.32 & 2.11 \\
903: 26.02.2001 & R & 10.00 & 29 & 2050 & 96.0 & 3.44 & 2.19 \\
904: 03.11.2001 & R & 10.04 & 15 & 1670 & 90.5 & 2.80 & 1.78 \\
905: 01.02.2002 & R & ~8.19 & 12 & 3039 & 91.5 & 5.10 & 3.24 \\
906: 13.03.2002 & R & ~8.77 & 10 & 3530 & 30.0 & 5.92 & 3.76 \\
907: 15.03.2002 & R & ~9.23 & 14 & 3004 & 58.5 & 5.04 & 3.20 \\
908: 20.03.2002 & R & ~9.32 & 10 & 2415 & 93.5 & 4.05 & 2.57 \\
909: 25.03.2002 & R & ~9.36 & 18 & 3226 & 99$-$100 & 5.41 & 3.44 \\
910: 22.04.2002 & R & ~7.68 & 22 & 4298 & 99$-$100 & 7.21 & 4.58 \\
911: 29.12.2002 & R & 12.25 & 53 & 1917 & 95.0 & 3.22 & 2.04 \\
912: 18.02.2003 & R & 10.92 & 21 & 3759 & 94.0 & 6.31 & 4.01 \\
913: 04.03.2003 & R & ~9.40 & 39 & 2041 & 83.0 & 3.42 & 2.18 \\
914: 18.03.2003 & R & ~8.63 & 15 & 1890 & 99$-$100 & 3.17 & 2.01 \\
915: 23.03.2003 & R & ~9.16 & 24 & 4380 & 99.5 & 7.35 & 4.67 \\
916: \enddata
917:
918: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
919: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
920: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
921:
922: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1}is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance
923: %regarding its form and content.}
924: %
925: %\tablenotetext{*} {V, PV and NV in the Variable column represent variable, possible variable and non variable
926: %respectively. N represents the number of data points.}
927: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
928: %with the deluxetable environment}
929: %\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}
930:
931: \end{deluxetable}
932:
933: \clearpage
934:
935: \begin{figure}
936: %\rotate
937: \plotone{f1.ps}
938: \caption{Wavelet analysis for the light curve of the blazar S5 0716$+$714 for
939: the date March 25, 2002. The top panel shows the variation of fluxes computed
940: from the data of Montagni et al.\ (2006) with the overall most significant
941: period described at the top right. The wavelet power spectrum is given in the
942: middle panels, with the shortest scales at the bottom. The probabilities
943: of the two strongest peaks being real at different times are plotted in the
944: bottom left panel with the maximum probabilities given at the bottom right.
945: See text for details. A color version of this figure will appear in the
946: electronic version of the Journal.}
947: \end{figure}
948:
949: \clearpage
950:
951: \begin{figure}
952: %\rotate
953: \plotone{f2.ps}
954: \caption{As in Fig.\ 1 for April 22, 2002.}
955: \end{figure}
956:
957: \clearpage
958:
959: \begin{figure}
960: %\rotate
961: \plotone{f3.ps}
962: \caption{As in Fig.\ 1 for March 18, 2003.}
963: \end{figure}
964:
965: \clearpage
966:
967: \begin{figure}
968: %\rotate
969: \plotone{f4.ps}
970: \caption{As in Fig.\ 1 for March 15, 2002.}
971: \end{figure}
972:
973: \clearpage
974:
975: \begin{figure}
976: %\rotate
977: \plotone{f5.ps}
978: \caption{Average nightly R band flux vs IDV timescale for the sample
979: of 20 LCs given in Table 1. Open triangles indicate that
980: the probability of detection of a periodic component in the variability is
981: $\geq$ 99\%.}
982: \end{figure}
983:
984: \end{document}
985: