1: \documentclass{emulateapj}

2: \usepackage{apjfonts}

3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

4: %\usepackage{epsfig}

5: %\usepackage{lscape}

6: %\usepackage{gensymb}

7: 

8: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.~}

9: \def\gsim{\lower 2pt \hbox{$\, \buildrel {\scriptstyle >}\over

10: {\scriptstyle \sim}\,$}}

11: \def\lsim{\lower 2pt \hbox{$\, \buildrel {\scriptstyle <}\over

12: {\scriptstyle \sim}\,$}}

13: \def\rosat{{\sl ROSAT}}

14: \def\ciao{{\sl CIAO~}}

15: \def\ROSAT{{\sl ROSAT}}

16: \def\fuse{{\sl FUSE}}

17: \def\asca{{\sl ASCA}}

18: \def\ASCA{{\sl ASCA}}

19: \def\chandra{{\sl Chandra~}}

20: \def\HI{H~{\scriptsize I}\ }

21: \def\hii{H~{\scriptsize II}\ }

22: \def\nv{N~{\scriptsize V}}

23: \def\nvi{N~{\scriptsize VI}}

24: \def\nvii{N~{\scriptsize VII}}

25: \def\civ{C~{\scriptsize IV}}

26: \def\oix{O~{\scriptsize IX}}

27: \def\oviii{O~{\scriptsize VIII}}

28: \def\ovii{O~{\scriptsize VII}}

29: \def\ovi{O~{\scriptsize VI}}

30: \def\oi{O~{\scriptsize I}}

31: \def\oii{O~{\scriptsize II}}

32: \def\oiv{O~{\scriptsize IV}}

33: \def\oiii{O~{\scriptsize III}}

34: \def\neviii{Ne~{\scriptsize VIII}}

35: \def\neix{Ne~{\scriptsize IX}}

36: \def\nex{Ne~{\scriptsize X}}

37: \def\aliii{Al~{\scriptsize III} }

38: \def\alii{Al~{\scriptsize II} }

39: \def\siiv{Si~{\scriptsize IV}}

40: \def\feii{Fe~{\scriptsize II}}

41: \def\fexvi{Fe~{\scriptsize XVI}}

42: \def\fexvii{Fe~{\scriptsize XVII}}

43: \def\fexviii{Fe~{\scriptsize XVIII}}

44: \newcommand{\as}{$^{\prime\prime}~$}

45: \newcommand{\am}{$^{\prime}~$}

46: \newcommand{\Fig}{Figure~}

47: \newcommand{\Tab}{Table~}

48: \newcommand{\NH}{N_{\rm H}}

49: \newcommand{\persqrcm}{{\rm cm}^{-2}}

50: \newcommand{\percubcm}{{\rm cm}^{-3}}

51: \newcommand{\kmpersec}{{\rm km~s}^{-1}}

52: \newcommand{\Kalpha}{{\rm K}_\alpha}

53: \newcommand{\Kbeta}{{\rm K}_\beta}

54: \newcommand{\logTK}{\log(T{\rm [K]})}

55: 

56: 

57: \def\xs{LMC~X--3}

58: 

59: \shortauthors{Yao \etal}

60: \shorttitle{X-ray and UV spectroscopy of Galatic diffuse hot gas}

61: 

62: \begin{document}

63: \slugcomment{\em Accepted for publication in the  Astrophysical Journal}

64: 

65: \title{X-ray and UV spectroscopy of Galactic diffuse hot gas along the 

66: LMC~X--3 sight line}

67: \author{Y. Yao\altaffilmark{1,2},

68:         Q. D. Wang\altaffilmark{3},

69:         T. Hagihara\altaffilmark{4},

70:         K. Mitsuda\altaffilmark{4}, 

71:         D. McCammon\altaffilmark{5}, and

72: 	N. Y. Yamasaki\altaffilmark{4}

73: }

74: 

75: \altaffiltext{1}{Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Kavli Institute

76:  for Astrophysics and Space Research, 70 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139;

77:  yaoys@space.mit.edu}

78: \altaffiltext{2}{University of Colorado, CASA, 389 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309; yaoys@colorado.edu}

79: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, 

80:   Amherst, MA 01003}

81: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of High Energy Astrophysics, Institute of Space and

82: Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), 3-1-1, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, 229-8510, Japan}

83: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1150 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706}

84: 

85: \begin{abstract}

86: We present {\sl Suzaku} spectra of X-ray emission in the fields just 

87: off the LMC~X--3 sight line. \ovii, \oviii, and \neix\ %K$\alpha$ 

88: emission lines are clearly detected, suggesting the presence of an 

89: optically thin thermal plasma

90: with an average temperature of 2.4 $\times 10^6$ K. This temperature

91: is significantly higher than that inferred from existing X-ray absorption line

92: data obtained with \chandra grating observations of \xs, 

93: strongly suggesting that the gas is not isothermal. We then jointly analyze 

94: these data to characterize the spatial and temperature distributions of the 

95: gas. Assuming a vertical exponential Galactic disk model, we estimate the gas 

96: temperature and density at the Galactic plane and their scale heights 

97: as $3.6(2.9, 4.7)\times10^6$ K and $1.4(0.3, 3.4)\times10^{-3}~{\rm cm^{-3}}$ 

98: and  $1.4(0.2, 5.2)$ kpc and $2.8(1.0, 6.4)$ kpc, respectively. This 

99: characterization can account for all the \ovi\ line absorption, as observed 

100: in a \fuse\ spectrum of LMC~X--3, but only predicts less than one tenth of 

101: the \ovi\ line emission intensity typically detected at high Galactic 

102: latitudes. The bulk of the \ovi\ emission most likely 

103: arises at interfaces between cool and hot gases.

104: 

105: \end{abstract}

106: 

107: \keywords{X-rays: diffuse background -- Galaxy: halo --- X-rays: ISM}

108: 

109: \section{Introduction }

110: \label{sec:intro}

111: 

112: The Galactic diffuse hot gas at temperatures $\sim10^6$ K can be effectively 

113: probed via its emission and absorption features in X-ray 

114: and far-ultraviolet (UV) wavelength bands.

115: The previous X-ray emission investigations were largely based on the 

116: broadband X-ray background data, e.g., {\sl ROSAT ALL Sky Survey} 

117: (RASS; Snowden \etal 1997). A high 

118: spectral resolution X-ray calorimeter abroad a sounding rocket, though 

119: providing little spatial resolution, clearly detected

120: the \ovii\ and \oviii\ emission lines, confirming that

121: much of the soft X-ray background (SXB) emission is thermal in origin 

122: \citep{mcc02}. Recently, several groups have attempted to study

123: the background emission with X-ray CCDs aboard {\sl Suzaku X-ray Observatory},

124: which, compared to those on {\sl XMM-Newton} and {\sl Chandra X-ray observatories},

125: have a significantly improved spectral resolution and a low instrument

126: background (e.g., Smith \etal 2007; Henley \& Shelton 2007). 

127: These later X-ray observatories, however, also carry the

128: high resolution grating instruments that allow for the detection of the 

129: X-ray absorption lines (e.g., from \ovii, \oviii, and \neix\ K$\alpha$ 

130: transitions) by diffuse hot gas

131: in and around the Galaxy. Indeed, such absorption lines 

132: are detected in grating spectra of nearly all Galactic and extragalactic 

133: sources as long as the spectral signal-to-noise ratio is high enough 

134: (e.g., Futamoto \etal 2004; Yao \& Wang 2005; Fang \etal 2006; 

135: Bregman \& Llyoid-Davis 2007). These X-ray absorption lines trace gas over 

136: a broad temperature range of $\sim 10^{5.5}-10^{6.5}$~K.

137: 

138: Gas at temperatures $\lsim 10^{5.5}$~K may be traced more sensitively in 

139: far-UV, via the

140: detection of the \ovi\ lines at $\lambda\lambda$1031.96 and 1037.62. Extensive

141: observations of the lines in absorption have been carried out with 

142: {\sl Copernicus} and {\sl Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopy Explorer} 

143: ({\sl FUSE}; Jenkins 1978; Savage \etal 2003; Bowen \etal 2008). In addition, 

144: the \ovi\ lines have also been detected in emission with {\sl FUSE}, 

145: although the sky is only sampled at various Galactic 

146: latitudes (e.g., Shelton \etal 2001; Otte \& Dixon 2006). The intensity

147: of the $\lambda$1031.96 line, for example, ranges from 1800 to 9100 LU 

148: (line unit; 1 ${\rm photon~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~sr^{-1}}$). However, 

149: the interpretation of the \ovi\ line(s) alone is not straight forward, because

150: in the collisional ionization equilibrium (CIE) state, the \ovi\ population 

151: sharply peaks at the intermediate temperature $\sim 10^{5.5}$~K where gas 

152: cools very efficiently \citep{sut93}. Thus such \ovi-bearing 

153: gas is expected to be rare and may preferentially reside at interfaces between 

154: cool gas clouds and thermally more stable hot gas. But this latter hot gas, 

155: which should be more abundant, distributed more widely, and effectively 

156: traced by the X-ray \ovii\ line,  could contribute significantly to 

157: the \ovi\ line as well. Currently, little is

158: known about the relative contributions from these two origins to the 

159: \ovi, either in absorption or in emission.

160: 

161: Clearly, a combined analysis of the X-ray and far-UV lines,

162: in both emission and absorption, will be the most beneficial. 

163: While an absorption line is proportional to the total column density of the 

164: gas integrated along a line of sight, an emission line depends on the emission 

165: measure (EM) of the gas. Furthermore, for a gas in the CIE state, 

166: both the ionic column density and the EM depend on the 

167: gas temperature, but in different manners (Fig.~\ref{fig:absVSemi}). 

168: Therefore a joint analysis of multiple

169: emission/absorption lines will enable us to constrain not only the temperature

170: and its distribution but also the size and density of the intervening gas 

171: (e.g., Shull \& Slavin 1994). When transitions from multiple elements 

172: (e.g., O and Ne) are detected, their relative abundances can also be 

173: estimated (Yao \& Wang 2006). Such a joint analysis 

174: has been tentatively applied to several sources 

175: (e.g., Yao \& Wang 2007; Shelton \etal 2007); but none of these sources has

176: high resolution emission and absorption data available in both X-ray and 

177: far-UV wavelength bands.

178: 

179: \begin{figure}

180:    \plotone{f1.eps}

181:    \caption{Ionization fraction (a) and the emissivity (b) of oxygen

182: 	ions as a function of temperature for a gas in the collisional

183: 	ionization equilibrium state \citep{sut93}. 

184: 	The emissivity is a summation of the doublet transitions

185: 	at 1031.96 \AA\ and 1037.62 \AA\ (\ovi), triplet transitions at

186: 	22.10 \AA, 21.80 \AA, and 21.60 \AA\ (\ovii), and K$\alpha$ plus 

187: 	K$\beta$ transitions at 18.97 \AA\ and 16.0 \AA\ (\oviii).

188: 	The emissivity of \ovi\ is scaled down by a 

189: 	factor of 1000 for demonstration purpose.

190:     \label{fig:absVSemi}

191:   }

192: \end{figure}

193: 

194: 

195: 

196: In this paper, we report our investigation of the hot gas along the sight line

197: toward LMC~X--3. \citet{wang05} have reported the detection of the

198: hot gas associated with our Galaxy, based on X-ray and far-UV 

199: absorption line spectra

200: from \chandra\ and \fuse\ observations. Here we present the 

201: {\sl Suzaku} CCD emission 

202: spectra of the X-ray background in two fields adjacent to

203: the LMC~X--3 sight line. This unique combination of the X-ray and far-UV 

204: spectral data toward essentially the same part of the sky further allows us to

205: constrain the spatial, thermal, and chemical properties of the hot gas. 

206: 

207: This paper is organized as follows.

208: We present the {\sl Suzaku} observations and the data calibration, 

209: as well as a brief description of the 

210: existing {\sl Chandra} and {\sl FUSE} data in \S~\ref{sec:obs}. 

211: In \S~\ref{sec:results}, we first analyze the X-ray 

212: emission ({\S~\ref{sec:emission})

213: and absorption ({\S~\ref{sec:abs}) data separately,

214: and then build a slab-like hot gas model to jointly analyze these 

215: X-ray data (\S~\ref{sec:model}). In \S~\ref{sec:fuse}, we compare the model

216: predicted \ovi\ absorptions with the \fuse\ detections, and then 

217: use the observed \ovi\

218: absorption line to further constrain our model. We discuss the 

219: implications of our results

220: in \S~\ref{sec:dis} and summarize our results and conclusions in \S~\ref{sec:sum}.

221: 

222: Throughout the paper, we assume the hot emitting/absorbing gas to be 

223: optically thin (see \S~\ref{sec:scattering} for further discussion) 

224: and in the CIE state. We adopt the solar abundances from \citet{and89}

225: and quote parameter errors at 90\% confidence levels

226: for a single varying parameter unless otherwise noted. 

227: We also refer the hot gas on scales of several 

228: kpc as the Galactic disk, in contrast to the Galactic halo on scales

229:  of $>10$ kpc (see \S~\ref{sec:location} for further discussion). 

230: Our spectral analysis uses the software package XSPEC (version 11.3.2).

231: 

232: \section{Observations and data reduction}

233: \label{sec:obs}

234: \subsection{{\sl Suzaku} observations}

235: \label{sec:suzaku}

236: 

237: We observed the emission of the hot diffuse gas toward off-fields of the

238: LMC~X--3 sight line once during the science working group (SWG) program and 

239: twice during the AO1 program (Table~\ref{tab:log_obs}), using the CCD camera 

240: XIS \citep{Koyama_etal_2007} on board {\sl Suzaku}  \citep{Mitsuda_etal_2007}.

241: To obtain the diffuse gas emission as close as to the LMC~X--3 sight line 

242: along which the X-ray \ovii\ absorption line has been detected

243: (see \S~\ref{sec:chandra}) but with a minimized confusion by stray lights 

244: from the point source, and to average out the possible spatial gradient of 

245: the diffuse emission intensity, we observed two fields that are in nearly 

246: opposite directions from LMC X--3 and $\sim30'$ away from it, 

247: as illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:suzakuFOV}.

248: With this configuration and the roll angle of the XIS field of view, we 

249: estimate that stray lights from LMC~X--3 contribute no more than 6\% to the 

250: observed X-ray emission in 0.3--1.0 keV energy range during our observations.

251: %even when the source is in its brightest state.

252: %I scaled the peak flux of the sources with the listed 20% w.r.t diff. obs.

253: The XIS was set to the normal clocking mode and the data format was either

254: $3 \times 3$ or $5 \times 5$, and the spaced-raw charge injection (SCI) was 

255: not applied to any of the data during the observations. 

256: 

257: \begin{figure}

258:    \plotone{f2.eps}

259:    \caption{{\sl RASS}\ 0.1-2keV band X-ray map in the vicinity of LMC X-3 

260: 	(the bright source at the center) and the XIS field of view of the 

261: 	three presented observations.

262:     \label{fig:suzakuFOV}

263:   }

264: \end{figure}

265: 

266: 

267: 

268: \begin{deluxetable*}{lccc}

269: %%%%\rotate

270: \tablewidth{0pt}

271: \tablecaption{{\sl Suzaku} observation log \label{tab:log_obs}}

272: \tablehead{

273: %%%%%Observation & SWG & 1st AO1 &2nd AO1}

274: & SWG & 1st AO1 &2nd AO1}

275: \startdata

276: Aim point   \tablenotemark{a} (J2000)  & (83.4720,-63.9000) &(85.5500,-64.5500) &(85.5500,-64.5500) \\

277: Observation start  times (UT) &14:06:44, 17 March 2006&  03:27:42, 22 April

278: 	 2006& 07:35:00, 31 October 2006\\

279: Observation end times (UT) &21:48:52, 19  March 2006&  00:14:19, 23 April, 2006&

280: 		 18:01:24, 31 October 2006\\

281: Exposure time &  80  ks &  50  ks & compensation for 1st AO1\\

282: Exposure after data selection & 83.9 ks & 22.5 ks  &  14.5 ks 

283: \enddata

284: %%\end{tabular}

285: \tablecomments{$^a$ Aim point on the focal plane is the XIS nominal position.}

286: %\end{center}

287: \end{deluxetable*}

288: %\end{table*}

289: 

290: 

291: 

292: We used processed data version 1.0.1.1 for the SWG observation and

293: version 2.0.6.13 for the two AO1 observations. 

294: We adopted the standard data selection criteria to obtain the good time

295: intervals (GTIs), i.e., excluding exposures when the {\sl Suzaku}'s line of 

296: sight is elevated above the Earth rim by less than 10$^\circ$ and

297: exposures with the ``cut-off rigidity'' less than 6 GV

298: (please refer to Smith \etal 2007 for further information).

299: We checked the column density of the Sun-lit atmosphere 

300: during the selected GTIs, and found that it is always below 

301: $1.0 \times 10^{15}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$, which is the criterion for no 

302: significant neutral oxygen emission from the Earth's atmosphere 

303: \citep{smith07}. We also converted the pulse-height-analysis (PHA) channels

304: of X-ray events to pulse-invariant (PI) ones by using the {\sl xispi} script 

305: (version 2006-5-16 for SWG and version 2007-05-30 for AO1 observations).

306: 

307: We created X-ray images in 0.3--2.0 keV energy range for 

308: the three observations, and found three discrete X-ray sources in the SWG 

309: data. To obtain the ``true'' diffuse emission, we removed those

310: events within circular regions centered at the sources with

311: a radius of $1'$ for the two faint sources and $3'$ for the

312: bright one. Modeling these discrete sources we estimated the 

313: contamination of their stray lines to the diffuse emission to be

314: less than 5\% in 0.3--2.0 keV energy band.

315: 

316: % determined so that the surface brightness of the X-ray sources becomes 

317: %well below the diffuse X-ray background level ($<$ 1 $\sigma$ of the statistical error). They are 1' or 3'. 

318: 

319: %(f). Evaluate the contamination from the SWCX.

320: %We then checked the solar wind proton flux.  

321: 

322: In the last step, we excluded those events severely affected 

323: by the solar activity. The diffuse X-ray emission below 1 keV 

324: could be contaminated by X-ray emission of the 

325: solar wind charge exchange (SWCX) if the proton flux exceeds 

326: $3 \times 10^8 {\rm  ~ s}^{-1} \persqrcm$ in the wind

327: \citep{Mitsuda_etal_2008}. The probability of such contamination 

328: increases if the shortest Earth-to-magnetopause (ETM) distance is

329: $\lsim10$ Earth radius ($R_{\rm E}$)  \citep{Fujimoto_etal_2007}.  

330: Here, the magnetopause is  defined as the lowest position along the line 

331: of sight where geomagnetic field is open to interplanetary space.  

332: We used solar wind data obtained with the Solar Wind Electron, Proton,

333: and Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) aboard the {\it Advanced Composition Explorer} ({\it ACE}) 

334: \footnote{See http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ASC/level2.}.

335: We found that there are some time intervals with proton flux 

336: exceeding the above limit during the SWG and the first AO1 observations. 

337: We thus sub-divided the observations %according to the solar wind flux at 1AU, 

338: and constructed X-ray spectra for various flux levels,  

339: and found that, for the SWG observation, the spectra are consistent with 

340: each other, while for the first AO1 observation the \ovii\ and \oviii\

341: intensities are enhanced in the high flux subsets.

342: We then calculated the ETM distance, and found that during the SWG 

343: observation, it is always longer than 5 $R_{\rm E}$ when the magnetic field 

344: is open to the Sun direction and that it becomes as short as 1.4 $R_{\rm E}$ 

345: when the magnetic field is open to anti-Sun direction during which however 

346: solar-wind particles cannot penetrate. In contrast, during the first AO1 

347: observation the ETM distance varies significantly and some times becomes 

348: shorter than 3 $R_{\rm E}$ even when the magnetic field is open to the Sun 

349: direction. We further sorted the first AO1 data according to

350: this distance and the solar wind flux, %and checked the X-ray spectra.

351: and decided to use only those time intervals with the proton flux

352: $<3 \times 10^8~ {\rm s}^{-1} \persqrcm$ or the ETM distance

353: $>3R_{\rm E}$, during which spectra of the SWG and the AO1 data

354: are all consistent.

355: 

356: %(e). How the non-cosmic X-ray background was obtained. \\

357: We estimated the non-X-ray background from the night Earth database 

358: using the method described in \citet{Tawa_etal_2008}. We found that

359: for XIS1, the count rate discrepancy between 

360: the database and our observations is about 5\% above 10 keV,  

361: which indicates the background uncertain level.  

362: Since the non-X-ray background is only 10\% of the diffuse 

363: emission for the energies below 1 keV, this uncertainty is negligible.

364:  

365: We constructed instrumental response files (rmf) and effective area (arf)

366: by running the scripts {\sl xisrmfgen} and {\sl xissimarfgen} 

367: (version 2006-10-26; Ishisaki \etal 2007).

368: To take into account of the diffuse stray light effects, we  

369: used a 20$'$-radius flat field as the input emission in calculating

370: the arf.  We also included in the arf file

371: the degradation of low energy efficiency due to the contamination on the XIS

372: optical blocking filter.

373: 

374: In this work, we only used the spectra obtained with XIS1, which is a

375: backside-illuminated CCD chip and is of high sensitivity at photon energies

376: below 2 keV compared to the other three 

377: frontside-illuminated CCDs, XIS0 and XIS2-3 

378: \citep{Koyama_etal_2007}. We grouped the spectra to a signal-to-noise 

379: ratio of $\geq10$ in each channel, and used energy range of 0.4-3.0 keV in our 

380: analysis. This range is broad enough for constraining the continuum 

381: and also covers the H- and He-like emission lines of nitrogen, oxygen, neon, 

382: magnesium, and L transition of \fexvii. The \nvii, \ovii, \oviii, and \neix\ 

383: lines are clearly visible in the spectra (Fig.~\ref{fig:suzaku}).  

384: 

385: \begin{figure}

386: % \centerline{

387: %%% \includegraphics[height=0.9\textheight]{f3.eps}}

388:    \plotone{f3.eps}

389:    \caption{The background emission spectra in the off-fields of the LMC~X--3 

390: 	sight line obtained with {\sl Suzaku} XIS1 in the SWG ({\sl a}), the 

391: 	first AO1 ({\sl b}), and the second AO1 ({\sl c}) observations, 

392: 	respectively. The spectra were re-grouped to be with a signal-to-noise 

393: 	ratio of $\geq10$.

394:     \label{fig:suzaku}

395:   }

396: \end{figure}

397: 

398: 

399: 

400: The observed diffuse X-ray emission is mainly from the Galactic gas and 

401: confusion from the LMC is little. The targeted sight lines are well outside the

402: main body of the LMC and is $\sim5^\circ$ away from the active star-forming 30

403: Doradus region (see Fig.~1 in Wang et al. 2005). Toward these sight lines, 

404: there is no evidence for the present of a large-scale halo; the hot halo gas 

405: producing the observed \ovii\ and \oviii\ emission could be at too 

406: high temperatures to be confined by the LMC. Furthermore, comparing to the 

407: AO1 pointings, the SWG pointing is $\sim1^\circ$ degree further away from the 

408: LMC (Fig.~\ref{fig:suzakuFOV}). The consistent measurements between the 

409: observations 

410: (see \S~\ref{sec:emission}) indicate a lack of a radial gradient that 

411: could be expected in any LMC emission contribution. We therefore conclude 

412: that the LMC contribution to the observed emission, if any, is negligible.

413: 

414: \subsection{{\sl Chandra} and {\sl FUSE} observations}

415: \label{sec:chandra}

416: 

417: {\sl Chandra} and {\sl FUSE} observed LMC~X--3 with exposures of $\sim100$ 

418: and 120 ks, respectively. Based on these observations, \citet{wang05} reported

419: the detection of \ovii, \neix, and \ovi\ absorption lines along the

420: sight line. For ease of reference, we list these detection in 

421: Table~\ref{tab:line}. A joint analysis of the detected \ovii\ 

422: and \neix\ K$\alpha$ absorption lines, together with the non-detection lines 

423: of \ovii\ K$\beta$ and \oviii\ K$\alpha$, allowed for the measurements of the 

424: characteristic temperature, velocity dispersion, and oxygen column density of 

425: hot gas along the sight line with little confusion with extragalactic gas 

426: \citep{wang05}. We adopted the same co-added spectra 

427: and the corresponding calibration files as obtained in \citet{wang05}. 

428: Because the {\sl Chandra} observation was carried out with the high resolution 

429: camera (HRC) that has very little energy resolution itself, the spectrum 

430: therefore needs to be fitted in a broad spectral range with an 

431: order-combined response file in order to take into account the grating-order 

432: overlapping (please refer to Wang \etal 2005). To easily

433: implement, we further extracted the first grating order spectrum by doing

434: the following. We first obtained a ``global'' best fit to the spectrum over the

435: wavelength range of 2-30 \AA, and then subtracted the spectrum channel by 

436: channel by the difference of the model-predicted counts between based on the 

437: order-combined response file and based on the first-order response file.

438: We used the first-order spectrum in ranges of 12-22, and 24-29.5 \AA, 

439: covering the L transition of the \fexvii\ as well as the K transitions 

440: of the H- and He-like neon, oxygen, and nitrogen ions. To facilitate a joint 

441: analysis of the X-ray absorption and emission spectra with the \ovi\ absorption

442: line measurement, we re-wrote the {\sl FUSE} spectral 

443: file produced with the CALFUSE 

444: pipeline in a format that can be read into the XSPEC.

445: A Gaussian profile with a full-width-half-maximum of $20~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$ 

446: was used to mimic the instrumental response of the {\sl FUSE} data. 

447: 

448: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}

449: \tablewidth{0pt}

450: \tablecaption{Line measurements \label{tab:line}}

451: \tablehead{

452:  	& \ovi & \ovii & \oviii & \neix & \nvii }

453: \startdata	

454: EW (m\AA)$^a$ 	& $235.8\pm37.5$ & $20\pm6$    & $<4.1$ & $6.3\pm2.6$ & $<1.7$\\

455: I (LU)$^b$      & $\cdots$	 & $5.0\pm0.8$ & $2.5\pm0.4$ & $1.0\pm0.2$ & $2.9\pm2.0$   

456: \enddata

457: \tablecomments{

458: 	$^a$ Equivalent width of the absorption lines reported in  

459: 	\citet{wang05}, except for \nvii\ that is measured

460: 	in this work. 

461: 	$^b$ Line intensity (1 LU = 1 ${\rm photon~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~sr^{-1}}$) 

462: 	measured from the unresolved triplet of \ovii\ and \neix, and 

463: 	K$\alpha$ of \oviii\ and \nvii\ in \S~\ref{sec:emission}.

464: }

465: %\end{center}

466: \end{deluxetable}

467: 

468: \citet{wang05} argued that the observed absorption lines trace the 

469: Galactic gas rather than any intrinsic material associated with LMC~X--3. 

470: Here we recapitulate their argument in the following. LMC~X--3 has a 

471: systematic velocity of $\sim300~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$. However, with the typical 

472: velocity resolution of $\sim20~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$ offered by {\sl FUSE}, the 

473: centroid of the \ovi\ absorption line was measured as 

474: $55\pm11~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$ (1$\sigma$ error), which is $>10~\sigma$ smaller

475: than the velocity of LMC~X--3. The consistent measurements of this line in two

476: observations with different source flux also indicate a Galactic origin. 

477: In measuring the absolute wavelength, current X-ray instruments can not offer 

478: a significantly better resolution

479: than that systematic velocity, but {\sl Chandra} grating 

480: observations can provide a relative wavelength measurement as accurate

481: as several tens kilometer per second. Wang et al. found that the velocity 

482: shifts of the \ovii, the low ionization \oi\ K$\alpha$ lines, and the

483: wavelength interval between these two lines are consistent with those 

484: observed toward a Galactic source 4U~1820--303 and two extragalactic

485: sources Mrk~421 and PKS~2155--304; the lines along the latter three

486: sight lines are believed to have a Galactic origin. On the other hand, if 

487: the absorptions are associated with the LMC~X--3 as in a photo-ionized wind

488: scenario, the line width and velocity shift are expected to be on the order of

489: the escaping velocity of the system ($\sim10^3~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$), which is

490: inconsistent with the narrowness and rest-frame velocity of the observed

491: \ovii\ and \ovi\ lines. They then attributed the observed absorptions to

492: the Galactic gas, which is also assumed in this work.

493: 

494: In the {\sl FUSE} spectra of LMC~X--3, \citet{hut03} and \citet{wang05} also

495: found an \ovi\ emission line whose velocity centroid varies as a function of 

496: the binary phase. This phase dependency could be explained if the emission

497: arises from the companion star illuminated by the X-ray primary

498: (L. Song et al. in preparation). The similar X-ray \ovii\

499: emission has not been observed. The lines of our interests in this work are 

500: all very narrow (with a FWHM of $\sim10^2~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$) 

501: and their measurements depend on the local continuum.

502: The observed emission line is very broad (with a half-width 

503: of $\sim10^3~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$) and therefore will not affect our

504: measurements herein presented. 

505: 

506: \section{Analysis and results}

507: \label{sec:results}

508: 

509: \subsection{Fit to X-ray emission data}

510: \label{sec:emission}

511: 

512: The SXB emission is a composite of various components. Chiefly among them

513: are the diffuse hot gas associated with the large-scale Galactic disk/halo, 

514: the Local Hot Bubble (LHB), the SWCX,

515: and the extragalactic (primarily from unresolved AGNs) and the Galactic 

516: (mainly unresolved stars) discrete sources. Recent X-ray shadowing 

517: experiments with {\sl Suzaku} and {\sl XMM-Newton} indicate

518: that the combined contribution from the LHB and the SWCX can be described 

519: with an emitting plasma at a temperature of $\sim1.2\times10^6$ K 

520: with an EM of $0.0075~{\rm cm^{-6}~pc}$ \citep{smith07, gal07, hen07},

521: which is equivalent to the line intensities of 3.5 and 0.04 LU

522: % (LU = ${\rm count~s^{-1}~cm^{-1}~sr^{-1}}$) 

523: for \ovii\ triplet and \oviii, respectively. The contribution from unresolved 

524: stellar sources is expected to be negligible at high galactic latitudes 

525: ($|b|>30^\circ$; Kuntz \& Snowden 2001) and is not further considered in this 

526: work. The extragalactic emission contribution can be 

527: approximated as a power-law (PL) with an index of $\sim1.4$ and a 

528: normalization of $\sim10.9~{\rm photons~cm^{-2}~kev^{-1}~s^{-1}~sr^{-1}}$ 

529: at 1 keV (e.g., Hickox \& Markevitch 2006; see \S~\ref{sec:cxb} for further 

530: discussion). 

531: 

532: We decompose the SXB emission in the \xs\ off-fields by jointly fitting

533: the three {\sl Suzaku} emission spectra. We first fit the spectra  with

534: an XSPEC model combination of mekal${\rm_{LHB}}$ + 

535: wabs(powerlaw${\rm_{exg}}$ + vmekal${\rm_{disk})}$. 

536: We fix the cool gas absorption (wabs)

537: to be $N_{\rm H}^c=3.8\times10^{20}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$, derived from the neutral

538: absorption edge study \citep{page03}. We assume the Galactic diffuse hot gas

539: (as denoted by vmekal$_{\rm disk}$) to be isothermal, let the 

540: abundances of nitrogen, neon, and iron to be fitting parameters, and

541: fix the abundance ratios between other metal elements and oxygen to the solar 

542: values. We also fix the LHB component to the values mentioned above

543: (but see \S~\ref{sec:LHB} for further discussion) and allow the normalization

544: of the extragalactic PL component (powerlaw${\rm_{exg}}$) to vary in the fit 

545: (accounting for the cosmic variance). This simple model combination 

546: fits the emission data well. The fitting parameters are consistent  

547: among the three observations except for slightly higher 

548: nitrogen abundance and PL normalization values for the SWG data.

549: The discrepancy in the nitrogen abundance is probably due to the calibration 

550: uncertainty of the XIS1 for the SWG observation taken at early stage

551: (see \S~\ref{sec:abs}), while the high PL normalization is likely caused by 

552: the residual contamination (the wing of the point spread function) of the

553: relatively bright field source that cannot be completely excluded from the SWG 

554: data (\S~\ref{sec:suzaku}). We then link all fitting parameters among three 

555: observations except for nitrogen abundance, the PL index, and PL 

556: normalization, which are linked within 

557: the two AO1 observations but are allowed to vary between AO1 and SWG ones. 

558: The fit is acceptable with $\chi^2/dof=194/179$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:suzaku}).

559: The fitting parameters are presented in the first row of 

560: Table~\ref{tab:results}. By setting the abundances of nitrogen, oxygen, and 

561: neon in the Galactic disk component to be zero, and using Gaussian profiles 

562: to fit the \nvii, \ovii, \oviii\ and \neix\ lines at 0.50, 0.56, 

563: 0.65, and 0.91 keV, we measure the intrinsic (cool-gas-absorption corrected) 

564: emission line intensities of the diffuse hot gas (Table~\ref{tab:line}).

565: 

566: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcccccccccc}

567: %%\rotate

568: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

569: \tablewidth{0pt}

570: \tablecaption{

571:  Spectral fitting results \label{tab:results} }

572: \tablehead{

573: & T$^a$ & EM & $N_{\rm H}^b$ &  & $h_{\rm n}$ &&&& & \\

574: & ($10^6$ K) & 

575: ($10^{-3}~{\rm cm^{-6}~pc}$) & 

576: ($10^{19}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$) & 

577: $\gamma$ & 

578: (kpc) & 

579: N/O$^c$  & 

580: Ne/O$^c$ & 

581: Fe/O$^c$ & 

582: $\Gamma$$^d$ &

583: norm$^e$ }

584: \startdata

585: %%\multicolumn{10}{l}{\underline{emission data}} \\

586: 1 & %% combine of SWG, AO1, and AO1p, but only AO is reported, ne is linked

587: %% most useful one

588: 2.4(2.2, 2.5) & 3.5(3.1, 3.9) & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ &

589: $<2.7$        & 2.6(1.9, 3.4) & 1.5(1.1, 2.1) & 

590: 1.6(1.5, 1.8) & 13(12, 14) \\

591: %% For SWG N: 4.8(3.3, 6.5), gamma: 1.5(1.4, 1.6) 

592: %% Norm: 1.67(1.59, 1.76) or 16(15, 17)

593: 2 & %% here are absorption results

594: 1.3(0.8, 2.0) &

595: $\cdots$ & 

596: 2.3(1.5, 3.7) & 

597: $\cdots$ & 

598: $\cdots$ & 

599: $<2.2$ & %$<2.17$ & 

600: 1(fix) & 

601: 1(fix) & 

602: $\cdots$ & 

603: $\cdots$ 

604: \\

605: 3 & %% here are joint analysis results

606: %% the emission data are set to the case of 7

607: 3.6(2.9, 4.7) & $\cdots$      & 2.3(1.4, 3.8) & 0.5(0.1, 1.7) & 

608: 2.8(1.0, 6.4) & $<2.1$  &

609: 1.7(1.3, 2.3) & 0.9(0.7, 1.1) & 1.6(1.4, 1.7) & 12(11, 13) \\

610: %% For SWG N: 4.9(3.4, 6.6), gamma: 1.4(1.3, 1.5) Norm: 1.62(1.53, 1.71)

611: 4 & %% add the FUSE OVI absorption data in

612: 3.5(2.9, 3.9) & $\cdots$      & 2.0(1.4, 2.4) & 0.8(0.4, 1.1) & 

613: 2.6(1.1, 5.8) & $<2.1$  & 1.7(1.3, 2.3)

614: & 0.9(0.7, 1.3) & 1.6(1.4, 1.7) & 11(11, 13) \\

615: 5 & % %% The same as row 1, but allow 50% uncertainty on LHB EM

616: 2.8(2.1, 3.1) & 3.0(2.6, 3.4) & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ &

617: $<3.3$        & 2.0(1.2, 3.3) & 1.0(0.7, 2.1) &

618: 1.6(1.4, 1.7) & 13(11, 14) \\

619: 6 & %% The same as row 4, but allow 50% uncertain on LHB EM

620: 3.0(2.6, 4.3) & $\cdots$      & 2.0(1.4, 2.8) & 0.9(0.5, 1.3) &

621: 2.1(0.6, 6.9) & $<2.1$  & 2.2(1.7, 2.9) & 1.3(1.0, 1.6) &

622: 1.6(1.5, 1.8) & 12(11, 13) \\

623: 7 & %% here are joint analysis results

624: %% the emission data are set to the case of 7

625: %% for the broken-PL cosmic background

626: 3.5(3.0, 4.1) & $\cdots$      & 2.0(1.7, 2.3) & 0.8(0.4, 1.0) & 

627: 2.8(1.4, 4.5) & $<1.2$  & 2.0(1.5, 2.7) 

628: & 0.9(0.7, 1.2) & 1.7(1.3, 2.0) & 11(10, 12) 

629: %% For the second PL: 1.4(1.3, 1.5) 

630: %% SWG (two PL index linked as AO) N: 3.4(1.5, 5.7) PL Norm: 1.64(1.55, 1.72)

631: \enddata

632: \tablecomments{$^a$ For rows 1, 2, and 5, $T$ is gas temperature for the 

633: 	isothermal case, and for rest rows, it is the gas temperature at the 

634: 	Galactic plane $T_0$. 

635:   $^b$ The equivalent hydrogen column density in the hot ISM under the 

636: 	assumption of the solar abundance of oxygen. 

637:   $^c$ Element abundance ratios in units of the solar values. 

638:   $^d$ The power-law index. 

639:   $^e$ The normalization of the power-law component, in unit of

640: 	${\rm photons~s^{-1}~cm^{-2}~keV^{-1}~sr^{-1}}$. 

641:   	The listed $N/O$, $\Gamma$, and $norm$ are

642: 	constrained from AO1 observations, and the values from SWG data

643: 	are given separately in the following. 

644: 	The horizontal dotted symbols indicate that the constraints are not 

645: 	applicable in the fitting. See text for details.\\

646:   Row 1: Results from fitting the emission data 

647: 	(\S~\ref{sec:emission}). Values of $N/O$, $\Gamma$, and $norm$

648: 	from SWG data are

649: 	5.9(3.7, 7.8), 1.5(1.4, 1.6), and 15.4(14.5, 16.5), respectively. \\

650:   Row 2: Results from fitting the absorption data (\S~\ref{sec:abs}). \\

651:   Row 3: Results from the joint analysis of the X-ray absorption and 

652: 	emission data (\S~\ref{sec:model}). 

653: 	Values of $N/O$, $\Gamma$, and $norm$ from the SWG data

654: 	are 4.9(3.4, 6.6), 1.4(1.3, 1.5), and 15.2(14.4, 16.1) respectively. \\

655:   Row 4: Results from joint analysis of all observations with

656: 	{\sl Chandra}, {\sl Suzaku}, and {\sl FUSE} (\S~\ref{sec:fuse}). \\

657:   Rows 5 and 6: The same as rows 1 and 4, respectively, except for allowing 

658: 	the EM of the LHB plus the SWCX component to vary from 

659: 	0 to 0.00113 ${\rm cm^{-6}~pc}$	(\S~\ref{sec:LHB}). \\

660:   Row 7: Results of using a broken-PL to approach the extragalactic emission

661: 	(\S~\ref{sec:cxb}). 

662: 	The $\Gamma$ value listed here is for $E<1.0$ keV, 

663: 	and for $E\geq1.0$ keV $\Gamma=1.4(1.3, 1.5)$. 

664: 	For SWG data, $N/O=3.4(1.5, 5.7)$ and $norm=15.2(14.7, 16.2)$. \\

665: }

666: \end{deluxetable*}

667: 

668: 

669: %4.99(4.23, 5.75) and 2.49(2.12, 2.87) LU, respectively.

670: 

671: %%gas as 3.55 and 2.14 LU, respectively. those values are obtained from 

672: %% directly integrating spectrum, in fact, are the observed ones.

673: %% OVII: 5.291840E-04 ( 4.481246E-04    6.088631E-04)

674: %% OVIII: 2.638422E-04 (2.243556E-04    3.041126E-04)

675: %

676: %

677: 

678: \subsection{Fit to X-ray absorption data}

679: \label{sec:abs}

680: Assuming the intervening gas to be isothermal and adopting the ISM metal 

681: abundances from \citet{wil00}, \citet{wang05} constrained the gas 

682: temperature, velocity dispersion, and 

683: \ovii\ (or equivalent hydrogen) column density,

684: by jointly analyzing the detected \ovii\ and \neix\ K$\alpha$ absorption lines

685: with the non-detections of \ovii\ K$\beta$ and \oviii\ K$\alpha$ lines.

686: Following the same procedure, we have re-fitted the spectrum reduced 

687: in \S~\ref{sec:chandra} and obtained nearly identical results to 

688: those obtained by Wang et al. (the second row in Table~\ref{tab:results}),

689: except for the equivalent hydrogen 

690: column density $N_H$ due to the different oxygen abundance

691: adopted here. In order to compare with the {\sl Suzaku} result

692: on the relative abundance of N/O, we further included 

693: the non-detected \nvi\ and \nvii\ K$\alpha$ absorption lines 

694: in our fit (Fig.~\ref{fig:N}; Table~\ref{tab:line}).

695: The fit gives a 95\% upper limit, N/O$<$2.2, which

696: is consistent with the value constrained from the {\sl Suzaku} AO1 data, but 

697: is lower than that inferred from the SWG data. We therefore attribute

698: the apparent super-solar nitrogen abundance observed in the SWG data to 

699: the instrumental calibration uncertainty. 

700: 

701: \begin{figure}

702: \plotone{f4.eps}

703:    \caption{The {\sl Chandra}

704: 	count spectrum around \nvi\ and \nvii\ K$\alpha$ absorption

705: 	lines. The dotted lines mark the rest-frame wavelength positions.

706: 	The solid line represents the best-fit continuum and the

707: 	predicted absorptions, assuming the solar value of

708: 	N/O. The binsize is 25 m\AA.

709:     \label{fig:N}

710:   }

711: \end{figure}

712: 

713: 

714: From now on, we let the normalization of the extragalactic PL component and 

715: the N/O ratio for the SWG observation vary independently from those for the AO 

716: ones in our data analysis. 

717: We will not further discuss these values in the text but still list them in 

718: our resulting Table~\ref{tab:results} for references.

719: 

720: The gas temperature inferred from the above absorption line

721: fits is a factor of $\sim2$ lower than that constrained from the emission 

722: spectral analysis (\S~\ref{sec:emission}; Table~\ref{tab:results}).  We note 

723: that the temperature would be even lower if a super-solar Ne/O value as 

724: indicated in the emission spectral analysis (\S~\ref{sec:emission})

725: were adopted in our absorption line fits. This temperature 

726: inconsistency clearly indicates that the X-ray emitting/absorbing gas

727: is not isothermal. In this case, the emission and absorption arise 

728: preferentially in different temperature ranges. 

729: 

730: \subsection{Non-isothermal model and joint fit}

731: \label{sec:model}

732: 

733: Motivated by the observed morphology of diffuse X-ray emission around 

734: the nearby disk galaxies, \citet{yao07} constructed a non-isothermal 

735: model for the Galactic disk hot gas. In the following, we first 

736: briefly formulize this model and then constrain it using the obtained

737: absorption and emission data along the \xs\ sight line.

738: 

739: Assuming that the hydrogen number density and temperature of the hot gas

740: can be characterized as 

741: \begin{equation} \label{equ:expHT}

742:   n  =  n_0 e^{-z/(h_{\rm n}\xi)}~{\rm and}~

743:   T  =  T_{\rm 0} e^{-z/(h_{\rm T}\xi)},

744: \end{equation}

745: where  $z$ is the vertical distance away from the Galactic plane, 

746: $n_{\rm 0}$ and $T_{\rm 0}$ are the mid-plane values, 

747: and $h_{\rm n}$ and $h_{\rm T}$ are the scale heights,

748: and $\xi$ is the volume filling factor that is assumed to be 1 in the paper,

749: we can derive

750: \begin{equation} 

751: n=n_{\rm 0}(T/T_{\rm 0})^\gamma,

752: \end{equation}

753: where $\gamma=h_{\rm T}/h_{\rm n}$.

754: Therefore, the differential 

755: hydrogen column density distribution is also a power law function of $T$,

756: \begin{equation} \label{equ:PL}

757: %  \begin{array}{rl}

758: %    dN_H = & n dL \\

759: %       = & \frac{N_{\rm H}\gamma}{T_{\rm 0}} (T/T_{\rm 0})^{\gamma-1} dT,

760: %    \end{array}

761:     dN_H =  n dL 

762:        =  \frac{N_{\rm H}\gamma}{T_{\rm 0}} (T/T_{\rm 0})^{\gamma-1} dT,

763: \end{equation}

764: and the corresponding ionic column density along a sight line with a

765: Galactic latitude $b$ can  be expressed as

766: \begin{equation} \label{equ:NH}

767:   N_{\rm i} = \frac{N_{\rm H} \gamma A_{\rm e} }{T_{\rm 0}}

768:   \int^{T_{\rm 0}}_{T_{\rm min}} 

769:   \left( \frac{T}{T_{\rm 0}} \right)^{\gamma-1} f_{\rm i}(T)dT,

770: \end{equation}

771: where $N_{\rm H}=n_{\rm 0} h_{\rm n}\xi/\sin b$, and 

772: $A_{\rm e}$ and $f_{\rm i}(T)$ are the element abundance 

773: and ionization fraction for the ion, and $T_{\rm min} =10^5$ K

774: is the minimum temperature assumed (line emission and absorption 

775: below this temperature are negligible; Fig.~\ref{fig:absVSemi}).

776: 

777: Similarly, the emission intensity (from a single line or a continuum) is 

778: \begin{equation} 

779: \label{equ:eline}

780: %\begin{array}{lll}

781: %  I [{\rm ph\ cm^{-2}\ s^{-1}\ sr^{-1}}] &   = &

782: %	\frac{A_{\rm e}}{4\pi} \int_0^L \Lambda(T) n_e n dL \\

783: % & = &\frac{A_e}{4\pi}\int^{T_{\rm 0}}_{T_{\rm min}}

784: %	\Lambda(T) \frac{dEM}{dT}dT,

785: %\end{array}

786:   I  = 

787: 	\frac{A_{\rm e}}{4\pi} \int_0^L \Lambda(T) n_e n dL 

788:   = \frac{A_e}{4\pi}\int^{T_{\rm 0}}_{T_{\rm min}}

789: 	\Lambda(T) \frac{dEM}{dT}dT,

790: \end{equation}

791: where $\Lambda(T)$ is the corresponding emissivity of the hot gas. The

792: differential EM is  

793: \begin{equation} \label{equ:EMpl}

794:   \frac{dEM}{dT} = \frac{1.2 N_{\rm H}^2 \gamma}{T_{\rm 0 }L}

795:   \left( \frac{T}{T_{\rm 0}} \right)^{2\gamma-1},

796: \end{equation}

797: where the factor 1.2 accounts for the helium 

798: contribution to the electron density, and $L=h_{\rm n}\xi/\sin b$, is the

799: effective pathlength of the hot gas.

800: 

801: Both the emission and absorption data can be used independently to constrain 

802: the parameters $N_H$, $T_0$, $\gamma$, and the relative element abundances 

803: (e.g., Ne/O; Eqs.~\ref{equ:NH} and \ref{equ:eline}). A simultaneous fit to the

804: emission and absorption further allows for the estimate of the $L$ parameter 

805: (Eq.~\ref{equ:EMpl}). We have revised our 

806: absorption line model developed in \citet{yao05} and the thermal emission 

807: model $cevmkl$ in XSPEC to facilitate the use of the ionic column density 

808: $N_i$ and the EM as a power law function of $T$ 

809: (Eqs.~\ref{equ:NH}, \ref{equ:eline}, and \ref{equ:EMpl}; Yao \& Wang 2007). 

810: 

811: These revised models are then used to jointly fit the absorption and emission 

812: data. For the absorption data, the fit includes not only the significantly

813: detected \ovii\ and \neix\ K$\alpha$ lines, but also the key non-detections

814: of the \ovii\ K$\beta$, \fexvii\ L, and K$\alpha$ transitions of

815: \oviii, \nex, \nvii, and \nvi\ at 18.626, 15.010, 18.967, 12.134, 24.779, 

816: and 28.787 \AA, respectively, which provide useful constraints

817: on the physical and chemical properties of the absorbing gas.

818: The revised  $cevmkl$ model is used to fit the Galactic disk component

819: of the emission spectra (vmekal$_{\rm disk}$ in \S~\ref{sec:emission}). 

820: The abundance ratios of N/O, Ne/O, and Fe/O, which are linked together

821: between the absorption and emission models, are allowed to vary in our fit.

822: This joint fit is satisfactory; the directly constrained model parameters 

823: are reported in the third row of Table~\ref{tab:results}. We then infer

824: the temperature scale height as $h_T=1.4(0.2, 5.2)$ kpc and the gas density 

825: at the

826: Galactic plane as $n_0=1.4(0.3, 3.4)\times10^{-3}~{\rm cm^{-3}}$.  

827: The confidence contours of $h_n$, $T_0$, and $N_H$ vs. 

828: $\gamma$ are plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:contours}.

829: 

830: \begin{figure}

831: %\plotone{f5.eps}

832: % \centerline{

833: % \includegraphics[height=0.9\textheight]{f5.eps}}

834:    \plotone{f5.eps}

835:    \caption{The 68\%, 90\%, and 99\% confidence contours of $h_{\rm n}$,

836: 	$T_{\rm 0}$, and $N_{\rm H}$ vs. $\gamma$, obtained in a joint

837: 	fit to the X-ray absorption and emission data (\S~\ref{sec:model}).

838:     \label{fig:contours}

839:   }

840: \end{figure}

841: 

842: 

843: \subsection{Comparison with the \ovi\ $\lambda$1031.96 absorption line}

844: \label{sec:fuse}

845: 

846: From the non-isothermal Galactic disk model constrained with the X-ray 

847: emission and absorption

848: data, we estimate the total \ovi\ contained in the diffuse hot gas as

849: $N_{\rm OVI} \sim 3.4\times10^{14}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$, which is consistent with

850: %{\rm log[OVI(cm^{-2})] \sim14.5365

851: that inferred from the observed \ovi\ $\lambda$1031.96 line absorption

852: (Fig.~\ref{fig:fuse}; see also Wang \etal 2005; \S~\ref{sec:chandra}).

853: % which is 14.5\pm0.07, 1 \sigma, \citep{wang05}

854: Including the \ovi\ line in our joint analysis tightens

855: the constraints on the model parameters 

856: (the forth row of Table~\ref{tab:results}), especially on the 

857: temperature distribution.

858: 

859: \begin{figure}

860: \plotone{f6.eps}

861:    \caption{\ovi\ absorption line at 1031.96 \AA\ observed with {\sl FUSE}

862: 	and the best-fit model ({\sl solid histogram}). The dotted histogram 

863: 	represents the predicted absorption from the X-ray data constrained

864: 	non-isothermal disk model.

865:     \label{fig:fuse}

866:   }

867: \end{figure}

868: 

869: 

870: \section{Discussion}

871: \label{sec:dis}

872: 

873: We have presented the high quality {\sl Suzaku} emission 

874: observations of the diffuse hot gas toward two off-fields of the 

875: LMC~X--3 sight line. In particular, the \ovii\ and 

876: \oviii\ emission lines are clearly resolved. Modeling these emission

877: spectra yields a

878: gas temperature that is about two times higher than that inferred from the 

879: high resolution absorption data. We find that our non-isothermal 

880: thick Galactic gaseous disk model can account for this discrepancy as

881: well as the far-UV \ovi\ absorption data. A joint fit to these data indicates 

882: that both the X-ray absorption and emission and the far-UV absorption 

883: are consistent with being

884: produced from hot gas in a region of several kpc around the Galactic plane.

885: In the following, we first discuss how our results are potentially

886: affected by caveats in our data analysis, and then discuss the 

887: implications of our results on the origin and cooling 

888: of the \ovii- and \ovi-bearing gases.

889: 

890: \subsection{Uncertainty of the LHB and the SWCX}

891: \label{sec:LHB}

892: 

893: The biggest uncertainty in modeling the SXB emission is 

894: the estimate of the contributions from the LHB and SWCX. 

895: Our understanding for both components is still very poor because it is very

896: hard to decompose their contributions. The SWCX emission could in 

897: principle be estimated by tracing the solar wind flux and the neutral atoms 

898: in the Earth's atmosphere and in the local ISM (e.g., Lallement \etal 2004). 

899: However, such an estimation is model dependent. 

900: For instance, for the line of sight with Galactic coordinates 

901: $(l, b)=(278.65^\circ, -45.30^\circ)$ observed on 2003 March 3, 

902: the \ovii\ emission is estimated to be 0.83 and 3.7 LU by 

903: \citet{kou07} and by \citet{hen08}, respectively. Recent comparisons of the

904: observed X-ray emission with models for the SWCX suggest that the foreground 

905: emission in the shadowing experiments can be mainly attributed to 

906: the SWCX and that the LHB emission is negligible (Koutroumpa \etal 2007; 

907: Rocks \etal 2007; but also see Shelton 2008). The 

908: total \ovii\ intensity of the SXB toward a high Galactic latitude sight line 

909: ($l, b = 272^\circ, -58^\circ$) is 2.7(2.0, 3.4) LU (1$\sigma$ range), 

910: obtained from a recent {\sl Suzaku} observation \citep{mit06}.

911: If emission from both the LHB and the SWCX is isotropic and independent of 

912: Galactic latitude, this value can be regarded as the upper limit of the 

913: combined contribution of these two components.

914: 

915: Our results are not qualitatively affected by above 

916: discussed uncertainties. To be more quantitative in assessing the effect,

917: we allow EM of the LHB plus SWCX component to vary from 

918: 0 to 0.0113 ${\rm cm^{-6}~pc}$ (\S~\ref{sec:emission}), representing two

919: extreme cases. The low boundary corresponds {\it zero} emission of the

920: LHB and the SWCX components, whereas the high boundary corresponds to the

921: 3$\sigma$ upper limit of the observed \ovii\ intensity (i.e., 4.8 LU) 

922: toward the high Galactic latitude sight line. We then 

923: re-perform our spectral analysis described in 

924: \S\S~\ref{sec:emission} and \ref{sec:fuse}. We find that 

925: new constrained gas temperature in modeling the emission data alone under the 

926: isothermal assumption is still about two times higher than that constrained 

927: from the absorption data (refer to the first and the fifth rows 

928: in Table~\ref{tab:results}), which still 

929: necessitates the non-isothermal model developed in \S~\ref{sec:model}.

930: The new results constrained in the joint analysis are also consistent

931: with the old values, except for with a slightly broader uncertain range

932: (refer to the forth and the sixth rows in Table~\ref{tab:results}).

933: 

934: %For ST fit: 6.443379(6.33, 6.493): 2.8(2.1, 3.1)E6

935: %halo EM: 2.99E-3(2.58E-3, 3.41E-3)

936: %Ne: 2.0(1.2, 3.3)

937: %Fe: 1.0(0.7, 2.1)

938: %N: < 3.3

939: %index: 1.5665(1.3961, 1.718)

940: %Norm: 1.3266(1.2155, 1.4644)E-3: 12.52(11.47, 13.82)

941: 

942: %Disk model:

943: %T: 6.48(6.41920, 6.630) % 3.0(2.6, 4.3)E6

944: %NH: 19.29(19.1525, 19.44) % 

945: %gamma in fit: 0.797737(-0.0475, 1.59)% 0.9(0.5, 1.3)

946: %L: 4.005(1.2, 13) % 2.12(0.64, 6.91)

947: %N: < 2.05

948: %Ne: 2.23108(1.7, 2.85)

949: %Fe: 1.25(0.97, 1.63)

950: %index: 1.62744(1.467, 1.762)

951: %norm: 1.320747E-03(1.21E-3, 1.42E-3)

952: %SWG: index 1.43103(1.335, 1.535)

953: %norm: 1.678091E-03(1.6, 1.8E-3)

954: 

955: \subsection{Uncertainty of the extragalactic power-law component}

956: \label{sec:cxb}

957: 

958: In modeling the emission spectra, we used a simple PL function to approximate 

959: the extragalactic contribution (\S~\ref{sec:emission}). Recent {\sl Chandra} 

960: and {\sl XMM-Newton} deep surveys for the cosmic X-ray background

961: have resolved $\gsim80\%$ of the background emission at 1-8 keV into

962: extragalactic discrete sources (e.g., Hickox \& Makevitch 2006). 

963: Optically bright sources tend to be spectrally hard while faint sources tend 

964: to be spectrally soft (e.g., Mushotzky \etal 2000). 

965: To examine the goodness of our 

966: approximation, we replace the simple PL with a broken PL and fix the break 

967: energy at 1 keV to model the extragalactic component in our joint 

968: analysis described in \S~\ref{sec:model}. We obtain the photon indices

969: as 1.7(1.3, 2.0) and 1.4(1.3, 1.5) below and above 1 keV, respectively,

970: and find that the parameters of the Galactic hot gas are barely affected

971: (the seventh row of Table~\ref{tab:results}). 

972: 

973: \subsection{Effect of resonant scattering of the \ovii\ line emission} 

974: \label{sec:scattering}

975: 

976: In this work, we have assumed the emitting/absorbing gas to be optically thin,

977: i.e., we have neglected the resonant scattering effect of the hot gas. To 

978: qualitatively assess the validity of our assumption, we assume the hot gas 

979: density to be uniform for easy of analysis. The observed \ovii\ emission line 

980: consists of unresolved triplet transitions, resonance, forbidden, and

981: intercombination lines at 21.60 \AA, 22.10 \AA, and 21.80 \AA, respectively.

982: Since the oscillation strength is essentially zero for the latter two

983: transitions, we consider the ``scattering'' only for the resonant line.

984: The absorbed resonant photons should be re-emitted isotropically;

985: half of these re-emitted photons are expected to favor the observing 

986: direction. Taking all these into account, 

987: we obtain the observed line intensity as 

988: \begin{equation}

989: I = (1 - f) I_0 + 0.5fI_0 \left( 1 + \frac { 1 - e^{-\tau} }{\tau} \right ),

990: \end{equation}

991: where $\tau$ is the (max) absorption optical depth at center wavelength

992: of the resonant transition, and

993: $I_0$ is the ``intrinsic'' (without the scattering) line intensity. Here, 

994: $f$ is the resonant transition fraction of the \ovii\ triple, which is a 

995: function of gas temperature. Taking the (max) temperature at the Galactic

996: plane $T_0\sim3\times10^6$ K (Table~\ref{tab:results}), which favors 

997: more to the resonant transition and gives $f=0.65$, we get 

998: $I \gsim 0.675I_0$ for any value of $\tau$. This indicates that the observed

999: intensity should not be different from the intrinsic value by a factor 

1000: larger than 1.5. In reality, the ``background'' gas cloud also scatters the 

1001: photons emitted by the ``foreground'' cloud to the observing direction. If 

1002: this effect is further considered, the difference should largely disappear.

1003: Therefore we conclude that the resonance scattering should not significantly 

1004: affect our results, although a more detailed modeling needs to be performed

1005: to account for a more realistic geometry of the hot gas distribution.

1006: 

1007: \subsection{Origin of the \ovii-bearing gas in general}

1008: \label{sec:location}

1009: 

1010: Our analysis indicates that the gas responsible for the observed  

1011: X-ray absorption/emission along the LMC~X--3 sight line

1012: has a pathlength about a few kpc and is consistent with 

1013: the Galactic disk in origin. This 

1014: result has important implications for understanding the structure and

1015: origin of hot gas around our Galaxy.  As described in \S~\ref{sec:intro}, 

1016: high ionization X-ray absorption lines with zero velocity shift

1017: have been observed along 

1018: many extragalactic sight lines, and the \ovii\ emission lines 

1019: are also detected at various high 

1020: Galactic latitudes. Several scenarios have been proposed for the origin 

1021: of the emitting/absorbing gas, including the intergalactic medium 

1022: (IGM) of the Local Group, the large-scale Galactic halo, and the thick

1023: Galactic gaseous disk (see Yao \& Wang [2007] for a review).

1024: These scenarios cannot be distinguished kinematically because of the limited 

1025: spectral resolution of current X-ray instruments. So currently the 

1026: most direct information about the location of the gas comes from 

1027: differential analysis of the X-ray absorption lines toward sources at

1028: different distances. \citet{wang05} find that the \ovii\ absorption 

1029: along the sight line toward LMC~X--3, at a distance of $\sim50$ kpc, is 

1030: comparable to those observed toward AGN sight lines.

1031: Therefore, if the LMC~X--3 sight line is representative, one can then

1032: conclude that the bulk of the X-ray absorption around the Galaxy is

1033: within $\sim50$ kpc. A similar conclusion has been reached based on 

1034: the estimate of the total baryonic matter contained in 

1035: the \ovii-bearing gas, and on the angular distribution of the 

1036: \ovii\ absorption \citep{fang06, bre07}. 

1037: A comparison of a Galactic sight line (4U~1957+11)

1038: with two extragalactic sight lines toward LMC~X--3 and Mrk~421 

1039: further indicates that there is

1040: no significant \ovii\ absorption in the extended Galactic halo beyond

1041: a few kpc \citep{yao08}, which is consistent with the conclusion drawn in

1042: this work.

1043: 

1044: The \ovii\ emission from the hot gas beyond LMC~X--3 is not expected to be

1045: important either. 

1046: \citet{yao08} obtained a 95\% upper limit to the \ovii\ absorption

1047: beyond LMC~X--3 as $N{\rm _{OVII}<3.7\times10^{15}~cm^{-2}}$. Assuming this

1048: much of \ovii\ uniformly distributed in a region 

1049: with an extension scale of $l$, we calculate its emission as 

1050: $I_{\rm OVII}<0.025/(A_{\rm O0.1}l_{\rm 100kpc})$ LU for the

1051: entire temperature range from $10^5$ to $10^7$ K, where 

1052: $A_{\rm O0.1}$ is the oxygen abundance in unit of 10\% solar value and

1053: $l_{\rm 100kpc}$ is in unit of 100 kpc. In contrast, the inferred the \ovii\

1054: intensity of the Galactic disk diffuse gas is 5.0 LU 

1055: (\S~\ref{sec:emission}; Table~\ref{tab:line}).

1056: 

1057: We have shown that the X-ray emission and absorption as well as 

1058: the far-UV \ovi\ absorption along the

1059: sight line toward \xs\ can be explained by the presence of a thick 

1060: Galactic hot gaseous disk. A similar explanation holds

1061: for the sight line toward Mrk~421, for which another 

1062: joint X-ray absorption/emission and UV-absorption has been

1063: carried out (the X-ray emission is, however, mostly based on the RASS

1064: broad-band measurements; Yao \& Wang 2007). The characteristic

1065: scale height of the disk is also consistent with the \neix\ column 

1066: density distribution in the Galaxy \citep{yao05}. The gas in the disk is

1067: shown to have a normal metal abundances \citep{wang05, yao06}

1068: and is clearly due to the heating by mechanical energy feedback from 

1069: stars in the Galaxy (e.g., Ferri\`ere [1998]). Such an interpretation is 

1070: also supported by the X-ray emission observations of 

1071: nearby disk galaxies like our own. The diffuse X-ray emission has been

1072: routinely observed in many late-type normal star-forming spirals and

1073: is confined to a region around galaxies with vertical extent no more than

1074: a few kpc (e.g., Wang \etal 2001, 2003; T\"ullmann \etal 2006a, 2006b).

1075: Both the intensity and the spatial extent appear to be scaled with

1076: galactic star formation rate (e.g., T\"ullmann \etal 2006b). Therefore,

1077: we conclude that the X-ray emitting/absorbing and \ovi-absorbing gas,

1078: as studied in this paper, arises primarily from the stellar feedback

1079: in the Galactic disk.

1080: 

1081: \subsection{Location of the \ovi-bearing gas}

1082: \label{sec:o6location}

1083: 

1084: Before discussing the \ovi-bearing gas location, let us look at the \ovi\ 

1085: emission properties first. In \S~\ref{sec:fuse} we have shown that the 

1086: observed \ovi\ absorption can be predicted from the X-ray-data-constrained

1087: non-isothermal gas model and have then 

1088: used the \ovi\ $\lambda$1031.96 absorption line to further constrain  

1089: our spectral model. With the fitted model parameters, we can estimate

1090: the intrinsic \ovi\ emission intensity of the diffuse hot gas toward LMC~X--3, 

1091: and then compare it with observations. The best-fit model gives

1092: 186 LU in total for the \ovi\ doublet $\lambda\lambda$1032 and 1038.

1093: Taking all the 90\% boundaries that favor more \ovi\ emission,

1094: we obtain a firm upper limit of 1612 LU.

1095: 

1096: There is no direct measurement of the \ovi\ emission within 1$^\circ$ of the 

1097: LMC~X--3 sight line. Within $\sim5^\circ$, some observations show measurable 

1098: \ovi~$\lambda1032$ emission as $2.1-5.7 \times10^3$ LU, while other  

1099: observations only yield upper limit even with longer exposures 

1100: \citep{ott06, dix06, dix08}. Since the \ovi\ emission could vary by a factor 

1101: of $>2.3$ at an angular 

1102: %% citing the sight line S50505 vs. S52301

1103: scale as small as $25'$ \citep{dix06}, it is nearly impossible to reliably

1104: estimate the \ovi\ emission toward LMC~X--3 sight line based on the few 

1105: existing nearby samples. However, if there were a measurable \ovi\ emission 

1106: toward

1107: the LMC~X--3 sight line (but see below), it must be in order of several 

1108: thousand LU, as typically observed at high galactic latitudes, which is  

1109: significantly larger than that predicted in the \ovii-bearing gas

1110: and therefore unlikely arises from the diffuse hot gas.

1111: 

1112: Where is the \ovi-bearing gas then? To answer this question, it 

1113: is important to

1114: compare the spatial distributions of the \ovi\ absorption and emission.

1115: In this work, we find that most of the \ovi\ absorption can arise from the 

1116: diffuse gas along a vertical scale of $\sim$3 kpc around the Galactic plane.

1117: Figure~\ref{fig:OVI_dis} shows the density and column density

1118: distributions of \ovi\ and \ovii\ as a function of the vertical distance,

1119: predicted from our constrained non-isothermal disk model.

1120: While compared to \ovii, \ovi\ is distributed in a relative 

1121: narrow region, which is mainly due to the sensitive dependence

1122: of \ovi\ population on temperature (Fig.~\ref{fig:absVSemi}),

1123: about 80\% of the \ovi\ column still spreads over as large as 1 

1124: (from 2.7 to 3.7) kpc. Observationally, \ovi\ absorption has been 

1125: detected toward essentially all sight lines, and 

1126: the characteristic scale height of the \ovi\ column densities

1127: is similar to that constrained in this work (e.g., Savage \etal 2003). 

1128: It has been

1129: suggested that \ovi\ could largely arise at interfaces between hot and

1130: cool interstellar media. However, for Mrk~421 sight line,

1131: \citet{sav05} counted the number of cool gas velocity components 

1132: and found that the interfaces can only account for at most 50\% of \ovi\ 

1133: absorption, leaving a bulk of the \ovi\ to other origins. In contrast, 

1134: the \ovi\ emission is measured toward only $\sim30\%$

1135: of the surveyed sky \citep{ott06, dix08}. 

1136: These results clearly indicate that the ``commonly'' observed \ovi-absorbing 

1137: gas in kpc scale is not primarily responsible for the detected \ovi\ emission.

1138: We propose that the low temperature regime of the kpc-scale diffuse gas could 

1139: contain a significant or even dominant fraction of the observed \ovi\ 

1140: absorption, as indicated in this work, and that the conductive interfaces

1141: between hot and cool gases, though could be another 

1142: reservoir of \ovi\ ion, is mainly responsible 

1143: for the observed \ovi\ emission. This picture not only explains the spatial 

1144: distribution of the \ovi\ absorption, but also naturally explains the 

1145: sight line to sight line \ovi\ variation in both absorption and emission.

1146: For LMC~X--3 sight line in particular, since all the observed \ovi\ 

1147: can be attributed to the diffuse gas, the \ovi\ emission is not

1148: expected to be strong.

1149: 

1150: \begin{figure}

1151: \plotone{f7.eps}

1152:    \caption{Spatial distribution of density (a) and column density (b) of 

1153: 	\ovi\ and \ovii, predicted

1154: 	with our constrained non-isothermal disk model. 

1155:     \label{fig:OVI_dis}

1156:   }

1157: \end{figure}

1158: 

1159: \subsection{Radiative energy loss rate of the hot gas}

1160: \label{sec:lossrate}

1161: 

1162: If hot gas toward the LMC~X--3 sight line represents reasonable well the hot 

1163: ISM of the Galactic disk as a whole, we can then use our non-isothermal gas 

1164: model to estimate the total radiative energy loss rate of the gas, and compare

1165: it to the expected energy input from SN explosions. It has long been observed

1166: that in the low $L{\rm_x}/L{\rm_B}$ ($L_{\rm B}$ is the blue luminosity)

1167: early-type galaxies, X-ray radiative energy loss rate of the diffuse hot 

1168: gas is far less than the expected SN energy input

1169: (e.g., Canizares \etal 1987; Brown \& Bregman 2000). However, all the

1170: previous studies were based on imaging observations in which decomposing

1171: different emission components is a complicated task (e.g., Li \etal 2007)

1172: and could make the inferred properties of the ``true'' diffuse hot gas very 

1173: uncertain. The LMC~X--3 sight line is so far the only sight line along which

1174: the high resolution X-ray emission/absorption and far-UV absorption 

1175: measurements with a minimal confusion are available, which allow us to tightly

1176: constrain the thermal and chemical properties as well as the global spatial 

1177: distribution of the 

1178: Galactic diffuse hot gas, as presented in this work. It is thus worthwhile

1179: reexamining the radiative power of the Galactic hot gas based on these 

1180: characterizations.

1181: 

1182: The energy loss rate of the hot gas can be expressed as

1183: \begin{equation} \label{equ:lossrate}

1184:     \frac{d^2U}{dsdt} = 2\times\int_0^\infty  1.2n^2\Lambda(T)~dz,

1185: \end{equation}

1186: where the factor 2 accounts for the two sides of the Galactic disk.

1187: With our model (Eq.~\ref{equ:expHT}), we can rewrite the 

1188: Eq.~\ref{equ:lossrate} as 

1189: \begin{equation} \label{equ:rate}

1190:  \frac{d^2U}{dtds} = 2\times\int^{T_0}_{T_{min}} 1.2n_0^2

1191: 	\left(\frac{T}{T_0}\right)^{2\gamma-1}\Lambda(T)

1192: 	(-h_T)~d\left(\frac{T}{T_0}\right). 

1193: \end{equation}

1194: Assuming the solar abundances, plugging in the best-fit $n_0$, $T_0$, 

1195: $\gamma$, and $h_T$ values (\S~\ref{sec:model}), and taking the 

1196: emissivity $\Lambda(T)$ from the 

1197: atomic database ATOMDB\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb},

1198: we obtain the local surface emissivity of the hot gas as 

1199: 3.1 and 16.1 $\times10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s^{-1}~kpc^{-2}}$ in 

1200: 0.1-10 and 0.01-10 keV bands, respectively. Including the additional 

1201: \ovi\ emission of $\sim$3000 LU from the interface component, 

1202: the total radiative energy loss rate is

1203: $\sim3\times10^{37}~{\rm ergs~s^{-1}~kpc^{-2}}$.

1204: 

1205: The radiative cooling of the Galactic disk hot gas only accounts for

1206: less than 10 per cent of the expected energy input of the stellar feedback.

1207: At Sun's galactocentric radius, the SN rate is 19 and 2.6 

1208: ${\rm Myr^{-1}~kpc^{-2}}$ for type II and type Ia, respectively

1209: \citep{fer98}. If on average each type II SN progenitor releases 

1210: $2\times10^{50}$ ergs of energy before it explodes and each SN explosion 

1211: releases $10^{51}$ ergs \citep{fer98, lei92}, the total energy input is then

1212: $8\times10^{38}~{\rm ergs~s^{-1}~kpc^{-2}}$, which is about

1213: 20 times higher than our estimated gas cooling rate.

1214: The ``missing'' energy could be either emitted in other wavelength bands 

1215: (e.g., infrared) or have been consumed in driving other Galactic activities

1216: (e.g., galaxy-size out flows).

1217: 

1218: Obviously, such an estimation is model dependent.

1219: \citet{she07} recently concluded that $\sim70\%$ of the SN energy input could

1220: be radiated away by the Galactic hot gas. In their model, they required the

1221: observed \ovi\ emission to be co-spatial with the \ovi\ absorption and assumed

1222: both the \ovi-bearing and the hotter \ovii-bearing gas to be isobaric. This

1223: requirement results in that most of the \ovi-bearing gas is confined 

1224: within a region

1225: of $<100$ pc in size, which favors to produce about ten times more thermal 

1226: emission in the energy range of 0.01-0.1 keV than our model. 

1227: %%%[[[ I can not see the following consequence .... ]]]

1228: %%This requires that most of the SN energy be injected directly into the 

1229: %%ISM over the corresponding temperature range without generating X-ray 

1230: %%emission. 

1231: In contrast, we 

1232: constrain our model with X-ray \ovii\ and \oviii\ emission and absorption,

1233: and find that the most of the \ovi\ absorption could arise from the

1234: kpc-scale diffuse gas. In our model, because of large 

1235: extent of the diffuse gas (therefore a low density), its emitting 

1236: power is at most as much as that of the observed/expected \ovi\ 

1237: emission lines, which presumably arise from the interfaces between

1238: the hot and cool interstellar media (\S~\ref{sec:o6location}).

1239: The scale size of the \ovii- and \ovi-bearing gas 

1240: derived in this work and utilized in our estimation,

1241: is consistent with that obtained in the recent \ovi\ absorption surveys 

1242: \citep{sav03, bow08}.

1243: 

1244: \subsection{Evidence for oxygen and iron depletion?}

1245: \label{sec:depletion}

1246: 

1247: In our analysis, we find that, while the relative abundance of Fe/O is 

1248: about the solar value, the Ne/O is about 2 times higher

1249: (Table~\ref{tab:results}). This overabundance of neon, if true, 

1250: is consistent with the interpretation of about 50 per cent of oxygen and

1251: iron being depleted into dust grains. However, because this overabundance

1252: is mainly derived from the emission data in which decomposing various

1253: components is still very uncertain, the depletion interpretation

1254: therefore may not be unique. For instance, \citet{hen08} suggest that the

1255: SWCX could also produce apparent non-solar abundance ratio. Furthermore, our 

1256: understanding of the chemical abundances in the solar system is still poor.

1257: For example, the oxygen value has recently been revised downward by $\sim35\%$ 

1258: \citep{asp05}, but this revision is still under debate \citep{ant06}.

1259: %The neon value is certainly not better constrained. 

1260: The abundance pattern in the ISM 

1261: is also suggested to be slightly different from that in the solar system

1262: \citep{wil00}. So it is more useful to list the 

1263: number density ratio of Ne/O derived in this work, which is 0.25(0.19, 0.33).

1264: We prefer to defer the interpretation of the apparent overabundance of neon 

1265: until a better understanding of both the SWCX and the solar chemical 

1266: abundances is reached.

1267: 

1268: \section{Summary}

1269: \label{sec:sum}

1270: 

1271: We have presented an extensive study of diffuse hot gas along the

1272: sight line toward LMC~X--3, based on new {\sl Suzaka}  X-ray CCD observations

1273: of the background emission as well as high resolution

1274: X-ray and far-UV absorption data. Our main results and

1275: conclusions are summarized in the followings:

1276: 

1277: 1. We have detected \ovii, \oviii, and \neix\ emission lines in the {\sl Suzaku}

1278: emission spectra. Modeling these emission data gives a characteristic 

1279: temperature for the emitting gas as $2.4(2.2, 2.5)\times10^6$ K, assuming

1280: the gas to be isothermal and in the collisional ionization equilibrium.

1281: This temperature is about two times higher than that inferred from

1282: the X-ray absorption data under the same assumptions.

1283: Adopting different neon to oxygen abundance ratio in

1284: analyzing the absorption data will not relieve this discrepancy.

1285: This inconsistency indicates the non-isothermality of the 

1286: emitting/absorbing gas.

1287: 

1288: 2. We find the X-ray emission/absorption data are consistent with

1289: a non-isothermal hot gas model, in which both the 

1290: gas temperature and the gas density decrease exponentially with the 

1291: vertical distance away from the Galactic plane. Jointly analyzing the

1292: X-ray emission and absorption data, we have constrained

1293: the scale heights and the middle plane values of the

1294: gas density and temperature as 

1295: 2.8(1.0, 6.4) kpc and $1.4(0.3, 3.4)\times10^{-3}~{\rm cm^{-3}}$, 

1296: 1.4(0.2, 5.2) kpc and $3.6(2.9, 4.7)\times10^6$ K, respectively. 

1297: These scale heights indicate that the bulk of \ovii\ absorption observed in the

1298: extragalactic sources (e.g., Mrk~421) is consistent with a Galactic in origin,

1299: although additional relatively small 

1300: extragalactic contribution can not be ruled out.

1301:  

1302: 3. We find that the above X-ray constrained non-isothermal hot gas model

1303: can naturally explain all the observed \ovi\ line absorption, but only

1304: accounts for less than 10 per cent of the \ovi\ emission typically observed

1305: at high galactic latitudes. We propose that most of the \ovi\ absorption 

1306: arises from the kpc-scale diffuse gas

1307: %is mixed with the hotter

1308: %\ovii-bearing gas, consistent with their similar vertical scale heights,

1309: and that the \ovi\ emission arises chiefly from interfaces between

1310: hot and cool media.

1311: 

1312: 4. The cooling of the Galactic disk hot gas described here is only 

1313: responsible for less than 10 per cent of the expected 

1314: total SN energy input. The bulk of the SN energy 

1315: is thus ``missing'' and may be radiated away in other wavelength 

1316: bands or may have been driven into a large-scale low-density

1317: Galactic halo or into the intergalactic space.

1318: 

1319: %6). Compare to emission data with the Rosat All-Sky Survey.

1320: %The 3/4-keV band intensity from the RASS map is 

1321: %$1.6\times10^{-4}~{\rm counts~s^{-1}~armin^{-2}}$. Folded the best fit emission

1322: %model(s) with the RASS instrument, we obtain the expected intensity to be

1323: %$1.4(1.5)\times10^{-4}~{\rm counts~s^{-1}~armin^{-2}}$, based on AO1(SWG)

1324: %observation(s), respectively. Good!

1325: 

1326: %10). To use the Mg II line in \citet{wang05} to estimate the total \ovi\

1327: %absorption and emission, interfaces.

1328: 

1329: \acknowledgements 

1330: We gratefully acknowledge extensive conversations with Blair Savage 

1331: on the resonant scattering issue and conversations with Robin Shelton 

1332: on the emission from the Local Hot bubble and the SWCX. 

1333: We are also grateful to Claude Canizares for useful discussions

1334: and the anonymous referee for comments, which helped to clarify our

1335: presentation. This work is supported by NASA through the 

1336: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory contract SV3-73016 to 

1337: MIT for support of the Chandra X-Ray Center under contract NAS 08-03060

1338: and NASA/GSFC grant NNX07AB06G to University of Massachusetts.

1339: 

1340: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1341: 

1342: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse (1989)] {and89} Anders, E., \& Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197 

1343: \bibitem[Antia \& Basu (2006)]{ant06} Antia, H. M., \& Basu, S. 2006, \apj, 644, 1292

1344: \bibitem[Asplund \etal (2005)]{asp05} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, J., 2005, ASPC, 336, 25

1345: \bibitem[Birnboim \& Dekel (2003)]{bir03} Birnboim, Y, \& Dekel, A. 2003, \mnras, 345, 349

1346: \bibitem[Brown \& Bregman (2000)]{bro00} Brown, B., \& Bregman, J. N. 2000, \apj, 539, 592

1347: \bibitem[Bowen \etal (2008)]{bow08} Bowen, D. V., \etal 2008, \apjs, 176, 59

1348: \bibitem[Bregman \& Lloyd-Davies (2007)]{bre07} Bregman, J. N., \& Lloyd-Davies, E. J. 2007, \apj, 669, 990 

1349: \bibitem[Burrows \& Mendenhall (1991)]{bur91} Burrows, D. N., \& Mendenhall, J. A. 1991, Nature, 351, 629

1350: \bibitem[Canizares \etal (1987)]{can87} Canizares, C. R., Fabbiano, G., \& Trinchieri, G. 1987, \apj, 312, 503

1351: \bibitem[Dixon \etal (2006)]{dix06} Dixon, W. V. D., Sankrit, R., \& Otte, B. 2006, \apj, 647, 328

1352: \bibitem[Dixon \& Sankrit (2008)]{dix08} Dixon, W. V. D., \& Sankrit, R. 2008, \apj, in press, astro-ph/0807.1237

1353: %%\bibitem[Fang \etal (2003)]{fang03} Fang, T., \etal 2003, \apj, 586, 49 

1354: \bibitem[Fang \etal (2006)]{fang06} Fang, T., \etal 2006, \apj, 644, 174 

1355: \bibitem[Ferri\`ere (1998)]{fer98} Ferri\`ere, K. 1998, \apj, 497, 759

1356: %%\bibitem[Ferri\`ere (1998b)]{fer98b} Ferri\`ere, K. 1998b, \apj, 503, 700

1357: \bibitem[Fujimoto et al. (2007)]{Fujimoto_etal_2007} Fujimoto,R.  et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S133

1358: \bibitem[Futamoto \etal (2004)]{fut04} Futamoto, K., \etal 2004, 605, 793 

1359: \bibitem[Galeazzi \etal (2007)]{gal07} Galeazzi, M., \etal 2007, \apj, 658, 1081

1360: \bibitem[Henley \etal (2007)]{hen07} Henley, D. B., Shelton, R. L., \& Kuntz, K. D. 2007, \apj, 661, 304

1361: \bibitem[Henley \& Shelton (2008)]{hen08} Henley, D. B., \& Shelton, R. L. 2008, \apj, 676, 335

1362: \bibitem[Hickox \& Markevitch (2006)]{hic06} Hickox, R. C., \& Markevitch, M. 2006, \apj, 645, 95

1363: \bibitem[Hutchings \etal (2003)]{hut03} Hutchings, J. B., \etal 2003, \apj, 126, 2368

1364: \bibitem[Ishisaki et al. (2007)]{Ishisaki_etal_2007} Ishisaki, K.  et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S53

1365: \bibitem[Jenkins (1978)]{jen78} Jenkins, E. B. 1978, \apj, 219, 845

1366: \bibitem[Juett \etal (2006)]{juett2006} Juett, A., \etal 2006, \apj, 648, 1066

1367: %%\bibitem[Kim \etal (2007)] {kim07} Kim, M., \etal 2007, \apj, 659, 29

1368: %%\bibitem[Koutroumpa \etal (2006)]{kou06} Koutroumpa, D., \etal 2006, A\&A, 460, 289

1369: \bibitem[Koutroumpa \etal (2007)]{kou07} Koutroumpa, D., \etal 2007, A\&A, 475, 901

1370: \bibitem[Koyama et al. (2007)]{Koyama_etal_2007} Koyama et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S23

1371: \bibitem[Kuntz \& Snowden (2001)]{kun01} Kuntz, K. D., \& Snowden, S. L. 2001, \apj, 554, 684

1372: \bibitem[Lallement \etal (2004)]{lal04} Lallement, R., \etal 2004, A\&A, 426, 875

1373: \bibitem[Leitherer \etal (1992)]{lei92} Leitherer, C., Bobert, C., \& Drissen, L 1992, \apj, 401, 596

1374: \bibitem[Li \etal (2007)]{li07} Li, Z., Wang, Q. D., \& Hameed, S. 2007, \mnras, 376, 960

1375: \bibitem[McCammon \etal (2002)]{mcc02} McCammon, D., \etal 2002, \apj, 576, 188

1376: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al. (2006)]{mit06} Mitsuda, K.  et al. 2006, AAS, 208, 3910

1377: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al. (2007)]{Mitsuda_etal_2007} Mitsuda, K.  et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S1

1378: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al. (2008)]{Mitsuda_etal_2008} Mitsuda, K.  et al. 2008, Prog. of  Theor.  Phys.  Suppl. , 169, 79

1379: \bibitem[Mushotzky \etal (2000)]{mus00} Mushotzky, R. F., \etal 2000, Nature, 404, 459

1380: %\bibitem[Nicastro \etal (2002)]{nic02} Nicastro, F., \etal 2002, \apj, 573, 157

1381: \bibitem[Otte \& Dixon (2006)]{ott06} Otte, B., \& Dixon, W. V. D 2006, \apj, 647, 312

1382: \bibitem[Page \etal (2003)]{page03} Page, M. J., \etal 2003, \mnras, 345, 639

1383: \bibitem[Park \etal (1997)]{park97} Park, S., \etal 1997, \apjl, 476, L77

1384: \bibitem[Rocks \etal (2007)]{roc07} Rocks, L. E., McCammon, D., Bauer, M., Fujimoto, R., \& Mitsuda, K. 2007, AAS, 20925418

1385: \bibitem[Savage \etal (2003)]{sav03} Savage, B. D., \etal 2003, \apjs, 146, 125

1386: \bibitem[Savage \etal (2005)]{sav05} Savage, B. D., \etal 2005, \apj, 619, 863

1387: \bibitem[Savate \& Lehener (2006)]{sav06} Savage, B. D., \& Lehener, N. 2006, \apjs, 162, 134

1388: \bibitem[Sembach \& Savage (1992)]{sem92} Sembach, K., \& B. D. Savage, 1992, \apjs, 83, 147

1389: %\bibitem[Sembach \etal (2003)]{sem03} Sembach, K., \etal 2003, ApJS, 146, 165 

1390: \bibitem[Shelton \etal (2001)]{she01} Shelton, R. L., \etal 2001, \apj, 560, 730

1391: \bibitem[Shelton \etal (2007)]{she07} Shelton, R. L., Shallmen, S. M., \& Jenkins, E. B. 2007, \apj, 659, 365

1392: \bibitem[Shelton (2008)]{she08} Shelton, R. L. 2008, SSRv, tmp, 69

1393: \bibitem[Shull \& Slavin (1994)]{shu94} Shull, J. M., \& Slavin, J. D. 1994, \apj, 427, 784

1394: \bibitem[Smith \etal (2007)]{smith07} Smith, R. K., \etal 2007, \pasj, 59, S141

1395: %%\bibitem[Snowden \etal (1990)]{sno90} Snowden, S. L., \etal 1990, \apj, 354, 211

1396: \bibitem[Snowden \etal (1997)]{sno97} Snowden, S. L., \etal 1997, \apj, 485, 125

1397: %\bibitem[Spitzer (1996)]{spi96} Spitzer, L. Jr. 1996, \apj, 458, L29

1398: \bibitem[Sutherland \& Dopita (1993)]{sut93} Sutherland, R. S., \& Dopita, M. A. 1993, \apjs, 88, 253

1399: \bibitem[Tawa et al. (2008)]{Tawa_etal_2008} Tawa et al.  2008, \pasj,  60, S11

1400: \bibitem[T\"ullmann \etal (2006a)]{tul06a} T\"ullmann, R., \etal 2006a, A\&A, 448, 43

1401: \bibitem[T\"ullmann \etal (2006b)]{tul06b} T\"ullmann, R., \etal 2006b, A\&A, 457, 779

1402: \bibitem[Wang \etal (2001)]{wang01}  Wang, Q. D., \etal 2001, \apjl, 555, L99

1403: \bibitem[Wang \etal (2003)]{wang02}  Wang, Q. D., \etal 2003, \apj, 598, 969

1404: \bibitem[Wang \etal (2005)]{wang05}  Wang, Q. D., \etal 2005, \apj, 635, 386

1405: \bibitem[Wilms \etal (2000)]{wil00} Wilms, J., Allen, A., \& McCray, R. 2000, \apj, 542, 914

1406: \bibitem[Yao \& Wang (2005)]{yao05} Yao, Y., \& Wang, Q. D., 2005, \apj, 624, 751 

1407: \bibitem[Yao \& Wang (2006)]{yao06} Yao, Y., \& Wang, Q. D., 2006, \apj, 641, 930 

1408: \bibitem[Yao \& Wang (2007)]{yao07} Yao, Y., \& Wang, Q. D., 2007, \apj, 658, 1088 

1409: \bibitem[Yao \etal (2008)]{yao08} Yao, Y., \etal 2008, \apjl, 672, L21

1410: \end{thebibliography}

1411: 

1412: 

1413: \clearpage

1414: 

1415: \clearpage

1416: 

1417: 

1418: \clearpage

1419: 

1420: \clearpage

1421: 

1422: 

1423: 

1424: 

1425: 

1426: 

1427: 

1428: 

1429: \end{document}

1430: