1: %\documentclass[referee]{mn2e}
2: \documentclass[]{mn2e}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: \newcommand \um {\mu{\rm m}}
6: \newcommand \mum {\,{\rm \mu m}}
7: \newcommand \g {\,{\rm g}}
8: \newcommand \cm {\,{\rm cm}}
9: \newcommand \asil {a_{\rm sil}}
10: \newcommand \rsileq {a_{\rm sil}^{\rm eq}}
11: \newcommand \Cabs {C_{\rm abs}^{\rm totle}}
12: \newcommand \Camice {C_{\rm abs}^{\rm am+ice}}
13: \newcommand \Ccrice {C_{\rm abs}^{\rm cr+ice}}
14: \newcommand \fsil {f_{\rm sil}}
15: \newcommand \V {V_{\rm sil+ice}}
16: \newcommand \Vsil {V_{\rm sil}}
17: \newcommand \Vice {V_{\rm ice}}
18: \newcommand \Vcarb {V_{\rm carb}}
19: \newcommand \Y {\Delta {\rm Y}}
20: \newcommand \fcarb {f_{\rm carb}}
21: \newcommand \fice {f_{\rm ice}}
22: \newcommand \Cice {C_{\rm abs}^{\rm ice}}
23: \newcommand \water {\rm H_2O}
24: \newcommand \olv {\rm MgSiO4}
25: \newcommand \Cext {C_{\rm ext}}
26: \newcommand \qext {Q_{\rm ext}}
27: \newcommand \magni {\,{\rm mag}}
28: \newcommand \sgrA {{\rm Sgr}\,{\rm A}^{\ast}}
29: \newcommand \simali {{\sim\,}}
30: \newcommand \DeltaY {{\Delta Y}}
31: \newcommand \Cabsam {{C_{\rm abs}^{\rm am}}}
32: \newcommand \Cabscrst {{C_{\rm abs}^{\rm crys}}}
33: %\newcommand \simlt {\lesssim}
34: %\newcommand \simgt {\gtrsim}
35: %\newcommand \gtsim {\gtrsim}
36: %\newcommand \ltsim {\lesssim}
37: \newcommand \simlt {\leq}
38: \newcommand \simgt {\geq}
39: \newcommand{\figwidth}{4.0in}
40: %\newcommand{\figwidth}{6.0in}
41: \newcommand{\btdnote}[1]{{\bf[#1]}}
42: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
43:
44: %\title[Modelling the Astronomical Silicate Mineralogy]
45: % {Modelling the Astronomical Silicate Mineralogy:
46: % On the Effects of Ice Mantles}
47:
48: \title[On the Crystallinity of Interstellar Silicates]
49: {On the Crystallinity of Silicate Dust in the Interstellar Medium}
50:
51: \author[M.~P.~Li, G.~Zhao \& A.~Li]
52: {M.~P.~Li$^{1}$, G.~Zhao$^{1}$,
53: and Aigen Li$^{2}$\thanks{%
54: E-mail: lmp@bao.ac.cn, gzhao@bao.ac.cn,
55: lia@missouri.edu}\\
56: $^{1}$National Astronomical Observatories,
57: Chinese Academy of Sciences,
58: Beijing 100012, China\\
59: $^{2}$Department of Physics and Astronomy,
60: University of Missouri,
61: Columbia, MO 65211, USA}
62: \begin{document}
63: \date{Received date / Accepted date }
64: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2007}
65:
66: \maketitle
67:
68: \label{firstpage}
69: \begin{abstract}
70: %%
71: An accurate knowledge of the mineralogy
72: (chemical composition and crystal structure)
73: of the silicate dust in the interstellar medium (ISM)
74: is crucial for understanding its origin in evolved stars,
75: the physical and chemical processing in the ISM,
76: and its subsequent incorporation into protostellar
77: nebulae, protoplanetary disks and cometary nuclei
78: where it is subjected to further processing.
79: %
80: While an appreciable fraction of silicate dust
81: in evolved stars, in protoplanetary disks around
82: pre-main sequence stars, in debris disks
83: around main sequence stars, and in cometary nuclei
84: is found to be in crystalline form,
85: very recent infrared spectroscopic studies
86: of the dust along the sightline toward the Galactic
87: center source $\sgrA$ placed an upper limit of
88: $\simali$1.1\% on the silicate crystalline fraction,
89: well below the previous estimates of $\simali$5\%
90: or $\simali$60\% derived from the observed 10$\mum$
91: absorption profile for the local ISM toward Cyg OB2 No.12.
92: %
93: Since the sightline toward $\sgrA$ contains molecular
94: cloud materials as revealed by the detection of
95: the 3.1 and 6.0$\mum$ water ice absorption features,
96: we argue that by taking into account
97: the presence of ice mantles on silicate cores,
98: the upper limit on the degree of silicate crystallinity
99: in the ISM is increased to $\simali$3--5\%.
100: %
101: \end{abstract}
102:
103: \begin{keywords}
104: ISM: dust, extinction -- Galaxy: center -- infrared: ISM: line and
105: bands -- ISM: diffuse ISM, molecular clouds
106:
107: \end{keywords}
108:
109: \section{Introduction}
110: The mineralogical composition of dust contains
111: important information about its origin and evolution,
112: and may reveal the physical, chemical and evolutionary
113: properties of the astrophysical regions
114: where the dust is found. Silicate, one of the major
115: components of cosmic dust species, is ubiquitously
116: seen in various astrophysical environments,
117: ranging from the Galactic diffuse interstellar medium (ISM),
118: HII regions, and the dust torus around active galactic
119: nuclei to dust envelopes around evolved stars,
120: protoplanetary disks around pre-main sequence stars,
121: debris disks around main sequence stars,
122: cometary comae and interplanetary space.
123: Their chemical composition and crystal structure
124: vary with local environments.
125:
126: Interstellar spectroscopy provides
127: the most diagnostic information on dust composition.
128: In the infrared (IR), the strongest interstellar spectral
129: features are the 9.7 and 18$\mum$ absorption (or emission)
130: bands which are generally attributed to
131: the Si--O stretching and O--Si--O bending modes, respectively.
132: While the absorption profiles measured in laboratory
133: for crystalline olivine and pyroxene show many sharp features,
134: in the diffuse ISM, the observed 9.7 and 18$\mum$ silicate
135: features are broad and relatively featureless,
136: suggesting that interstellar silicates
137: are mainly amorphous rather than crystalline.
138: %
139: Since the crystallinity of silicate dust is intimately connected
140: to the energetic processing occurred in the evolutionary
141: life cycle of dust and depends on the environmental properties,
142: of particular interest to silicate astromineralogy is
143: the abundance of crystalline silicates in
144: different astrophysical environments,
145: especially in the diffuse ISM.
146:
147: Recently, a number of studies have been made to
148: determine the crystallinity degree of silicates
149: in the diffuse ISM.
150: From the observed 9.7$\mum$ absorption
151: profile for dust in the local ISM toward Cyg OB2 No.12,
152: Li \& Draine (2001) estimated the fraction
153: of Si in crystalline silicates to be $\simlt$5\%.
154: Demyk et al.\ (1999) derived an upper limit of
155: $\simali$1--2\% of crystalline silicates in mass
156: toward two massive protostars.
157: However, Bowey \& Adamson (2002) argued that
158: a complex mixture of crystalline silicates (60\% by mass)
159: and amorphous silicates (40\% by mass) could explain
160: the observed smooth silicate absorption profile
161: at 9.7$\mum$ toward Cyg OB2 No.12.
162: %
163: More recently, Kemper, Vriend \& Tielens (2004) placed
164: a more strict constraint of $\simlt 1.1\%$
165: on the crystallinity of interstellar silicates,
166: based on a detailed analysis of the 9.7$\mum$
167: feature obtained with the Short Wavelength Spectrometer (SWS)
168: on board the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO).
169: This upper limit $\simali$1.1\% of crystalline
170: silicates was derived from a direct comparison of
171: the $\sgrA$ spectrum with theoretical spectra
172: for pure silicates.
173:
174: However, it is evident from the detection
175: of the 3.1 and 6.0$\mum$ water ice features
176: respectively attributed to the O--H stretching
177: and bending modes that there are molecular cloud materials
178: along the line of sight toward $\sgrA$
179: (McFadzean et al.\ 1989; Tielens et al.\ 1996;
180: Chiar et al.\ 2000).
181: This is further confirmed by the detection of
182: solid CO$_2$ absorption toward $\sgrA$
183: (Lutz et al.\ 1996; de Graauw et al.\ 1996).
184: %
185: In order to infer the precise mineralogical composition
186: of dust, we have to take the grain ice mantles into account
187: when interpreting the observed silicate features.
188: %
189: Indeed, in this paper we show that ignoring the ice mantles
190: coated on the silicate cores can result in
191: an underestimation of the crystalline degree of silicate dust,
192: as much as $\simali$3--5\%.
193:
194: The purpose of this work is to address the question
195: how the ice mantles affect the determination of dust
196: mineralogical composition (i.e. whether and to what degree
197: the inclusion of ice mantles will hide the sharp features
198: of crystalline silicates
199: and lead to an underestimation of the silicate crystallinity),
200: not to model any specific astronomical objects.
201: Therefore, neither the specific choice of silicate dielectric
202: functions nor the precise constituents of the ice mantles
203: would affect our conclusion.
204:
205: \section{Volume Fraction of Water Ice}
206: %
207: The sightline toward the Galactic center source
208: $\sgrA$ suffers about $\simali$30$\magni$ of
209: visual extinction (e.g. see McFadzean et al.\ 1989),
210: to which molecular clouds may contribute as much as
211: $\simali$10$\magni$ (Whittet et al.\ 1997).
212: Except for $\water$ features, there are many
213: additional molecular absorption features,
214: attributed to ${\rm CO_2}$, ${\rm NH_3}$, CO,
215: ${\rm CH_3OH}$, ${\rm CH_4}$ and other species.
216: These icy molecules might accrete on the preexisting
217: silicate core inside dense molecular clouds
218: and form an ice mantle.
219: As for further evolution,
220: the accreted icy grain mantles could be
221: photoprocessed and converted into
222: organic refractory residues
223: (Greenberg et al.\ 1995).
224:
225: Assuming the 3.1$\mum$ water ice absorption results from
226: the water ice mantles uniformly coated on silicate
227: grains which produce the 9.7$\mum$ absorption,
228: we estimate the volume ratio of the ice mantles
229: to the silicate cores from the observed optical depths
230: -- $\tau_{3.1}$ for the 3.1$\mum$ O--H feature,
231: and $\tau_{9.7}$ for the 9.7$\mum$ Si--O feature.
232: Let $\Vsil$ and $\Vice$ respectively
233: be the volumes of the silicate cores and the ice mantles.
234: Let $A_{\rm ice}^{3.1}$ and $A_{\rm sil}^{9.7}$
235: be the integrated band strength for
236: the 3.1$\mum$ O--H feature
237: and the 9.7$\mum$ Si--O feature, respectively.
238: For spherical silicate core-ice mantle grains,
239: we use Mie theory (Bohren \& Huffman 1983) to obtain
240: $A_{\rm ice}^{3.1} = \int_{3.1\mum}
241: (C_{\rm ice}^{3.1}/V) d\lambda$
242: and
243: $A_{\rm sil}^{9.7} = \int_{9.7\mum}
244: (C_{\rm sil}^{9.7}/V) d\lambda$,
245: where $C_{\rm ice}^{3.1}$ ($C_{\rm sil}^{9.7}$)
246: is the continuum-subtracted absorption cross section
247: of the 3.1$\mum$ (9.7$\mum$) ice (silicate) feature,
248: and $V$ is the volume of a spherical grain with radius $a$.
249: %
250: For the $\sgrA$ sightline,
251: $\tau_{3.1}\approx 0.50$ and
252: $\tau_{9.7}\approx 3.52$
253: (Chiar et al.\ 2000).
254: We therefore obtain
255: $\Vice/\Vsil=\left(\tau_{3.1}/\tau_{9.7}\right)
256: \left(A_{\rm sil}^{9.7}/A_{\rm ice}^{3.1}\right)
257: \approx0.55$,
258: assuming that all silicate grains
259: are coated by a layer of ice mantle.\footnote{%
260: %We obtain $\Vice/\Vsil \approx0.55$
261: %by assuming that all silicate grains are coated
262: %by a layer of ice mantle.
263: In reality, a thicker
264: ice mantle would be expected for the silicate
265: dust in the molecular cloud component
266: which contributes about 10$\magni$ to
267: the total $\simali$30$\magni$ of
268: visual extinction toward $\sgrA$.
269: An ice mantle as thick as
270: $\Vice/\Vsil\approx 7.6$
271: was implied for the dust
272: in the dense molecular cloud
273: toward the field star Taurus Elias 16
274: (Bowey et al.\ 1998).
275: A thicker ice mantle would hide up a larger
276: fraction of crystalline silicates.
277: }
278:
279: \section{Spherical Grains}
280: %
281: We consider 3 types of dust materials: amorphous
282: olivine, crystalline olivine, and pure water ice. We adopt the
283: dielectric functions of Dorschner et al.\ (1995) for amorphous
284: olivine, of Li \& Draine (2001) for crystalline olivine, and of
285: Hudgins et al.\ (1993) for water ice.
286:
287: We first consider spherical
288: silicate core-water ice mantle grains.
289: We take the silicate core size to be $\asil$\,=\,0.1$\mum$,
290: a typical size for interstellar dust.
291: We should note that the choice of an exact
292: grain size is not critical since in the wavelength
293: range considered here submicron-sized
294: interstellar grains are in the Rayleigh regime.
295: Also because of this, we do not need to consider
296: dust size distributions.
297:
298: \begin{figure}
299: \centering
300: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f1.eps}
301: %\end{center}\vspace*{-1em}
302: \caption{
303: \label{fig:sphere}
304: Absorption cross sections of spherical grains
305: for $\Vice/\Vsil=0.55$. Dotted: amorphous silicate
306: core-ice mantle grains ($\Cabsam$);
307: dot-dashed: crystalline olivine silicate core-ice mantle
308: grains ($\Cabscrst$);
309: long-dashed: equal-volume ice spheres
310: for the ice mantles;
311: solid: $C_{\rm abs} = \Cabsam + \DeltaY \Cabscrst$
312: where $\DeltaY$\,=\,5\% is the crystalline olivine
313: silicate fraction;
314: short-dashed:
315: $C_{\rm abs} = \Cabsam + \DeltaY \Cabscrst$
316: with $\DeltaY$\,=\,3\%.
317: Note that water ice produces a shoulder
318: at $\lambda > 11\mum$. This should not
319: be interpreted as a crystalline silicate feature.
320: }
321: \end{figure}
322:
323: In Figure \ref{fig:sphere}
324: we plot the absorption cross sections for
325: amorphous olivine silicate core-$\water$ ice mantle grains and
326: for crystalline olivine silicate core-$\water$ ice mantle grains.
327: As shown in Figure \ref{fig:sphere},
328: the absence of narrow features
329: near 10.0 and 11.1$\mum$ in the absorption spectrum
330: suggests that the inclusion of water ice mantles
331: would hide up $\simali$3--5\% crystalline mass fraction
332: without being noticed.
333: %However, one should caution
334: %that the production of a shoulder at $\lambda > 11\mum$
335: %attributed to the water ice feature may mislead to
336: %the presence of crystalline silicate features.
337: Note that water ice has a broad absorption band
338: at $\simali$12.2$\mum$
339: (see Fig.\,\ref{fig:sphere};
340: L\'eger et al.\ 1983; Hudgins et al.\ 1993).
341: The inclusion of an ice mantle on silicate dust
342: (no matter it is amorphous silicate or crystalline silicate)
343: results in a weak shoulder at $\lambda > 11\mum$.
344: This is noticeable even in the model spectrum of
345: ice-coated pure amorphous silicate dust
346: %and the crystalline-silicate-added spectra
347: (see Fig.\,\ref{fig:sphere}).
348: One should caution that this should not be interpreted
349: as a crystalline silicate feature.
350:
351: We also consider a model in which only the molecular cloud
352: dust is coated with a layer of ice mantle. If we assume that
353: silicate dust and carbon dust equally contribute to
354: the $\simali$10\,mag visual extinction, the volume ratio
355: of the ice mantle to the silicate core for the molecular
356: cloud dust would be $\Vice/\Vsil \approx 0.83$.
357: The bare diffuse cloud dust is responsible for
358: the remaining $\simali$20\,mag visual extinction.
359: In Figure \ref{fig:real} we show the model cross sections
360: obtained by summing up 1/3 of that produced by
361: the molecular cloud dust and 2/3 of that produced by
362: the diffuse cloud dust. Similarly, $\simali$3--5\%
363: crystalline silicate would be hidden because of
364: the presence of an ice mantle on the molecular
365: cloud dust toward $\sgrA$.\footnote{%
366: Admittedly, the approach adopted here is simplified.
367: The molecular cloud silicate dust may differ from
368: that of the diffuse cloud (e.g. their 10$\mum$
369: Si--O features may have different line profiles
370: [particularly line widths],
371: see Bowey, Adamson, \& Whittet 2001
372: and references therein).
373: Their optical properties which are temperature-dependent
374: (Bowey et al.\ 2001) may also differ from each other
375: since the molecular cloud dust is generally
376: colder than the diffuse cloud dust
377: (e.g. see Greenberg \& Li 1996a).
378: Moreover, it is not clear if the molecular cloud
379: silicate dust has the same iron fraction
380: as the diffuse cloud silicate dust
381: (it is well recognized that, as most recently
382: experimentally demonstrated by Bowey et al.\ [2007],
383: the optical properties of silicate dust
384: are very sensitive to the proportion of iron).
385: }
386:
387: So far, we have only considered olivine silicate dust.
388: It is possible that there is a considerable
389: amount of pyroxene dust in the ISM
390: (see Bowey \& Adamson 2002 and references therein).
391: For illustration, we carry out similar calculations
392: for pyroxene and obtain similar conclusions
393: (see Fig.\,\ref{fig:real}).
394: Again, we should stress that the purpose of this work
395: is not to model any specific astronomical objects,
396: but to investigate the effects of ice mantles
397: on the silicate crystallinity estimation.
398: We do not expect either olivine or pyroxene
399: alone could closely reproduce the interstellar
400: silicate absorption feature observed toward $\sgrA$.
401: For comparison, we also show in Figure\,\ref{fig:real}
402: the ISO spectra of $\sgrA$ obtained by
403: Kemper et al.\ (2004) and Gibb et al.\ (2004).\footnote{%
404: %The red-wing of the $\sgrA$ spectrum of Gibb et al.\ (2004)
405: %differs from that of Kemper et al.\ (2004),
406: %probably because they observed different parts
407: %of $\sgrA$ (as shown in Smith et al.\ 2000,
408: %different lines of sight toward $\sgrA$ have
409: %different silicate absorption profiles).
410: We note that the ISO spectrum of $\sgrA$
411: appears to have a feature at $\simali$6.9$\mum$,
412: attributed to crystalline melilite
413: (Bowey \& Hofmeister 2005).
414: }
415: The fact that, while the 10$\mum$ feature of olivine
416: peaks at relatively longer wavelengths than the observed
417: spectra, pyroxene peaks at too short wavelengths,
418: suggests the co-existence of both olivine and
419: pyroxene in the ISM.
420:
421: \begin{figure}
422: \centering
423: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f2.eps}
424: %\end{center}\vspace*{-1em}
425: \caption{
426: \label{fig:real}
427: Comparison of the ISO spectra of $\sgrA$
428: (thick solid: Gibb et al.\ 2004;
429: thick dashed: Kemper et al.\ 2004)
430: and the absorption spectra of
431: olivine (thin solid)
432: and pyroxene (dot-long dashed) spheres
433: with 3\% crystallinity, with 1/3 of the dust
434: coated by a layer of ice mantle
435: ($\Vice/\Vsil = 0.83$) and 2/3 of the dust
436: being bare silicates.
437: The $\lambda>11\mum$ shoulder of
438: the model spectra arises from the ice mantles
439: (also see Fig.\,\ref{fig:sphere}).
440: Also shown is the absorption spectrum of
441: pure amorphous olivine dust without an
442: ice mantle (dot-short dashed).
443: }
444: \end{figure}
445:
446: \section{Spheroidal Grains}
447: However, interstellar grains must be nonspherical
448: as indicated by interstellar polarization.
449: We now consider spheroidal shape which can be exactly
450: solved in the Rayleigh limit
451: (see Li et al.\ 2002 and references therein).
452:
453: We consider confocal silicate core-ice mantle spheroidal
454: grains with a volume-equivalent sphere radius
455: $r_{\rm sil}^{\rm eq}={(ab^2)}^{1/3}=0.1\mum$,
456: where $a$ and $b$ are the semi-axis along and
457: perpendicular to the symmetry axis, respectively.
458: Again, we take the volume ratio of the ice mantles
459: to the silicate cores to be $\Vice/\Vsil = 0.55$.
460:
461: We first consider prolate grains with $r_{\rm sil}^{\rm
462: eq}=0.1\mum$ for the silicate cores
463: and $a/b=3$ for the ice mantles.\footnote{%
464: Greenberg \& Li (1996b) found that prolates of $a/b=3$
465: provide an almost prefect match to
466: the 10, 18$\mum$ silicate polarization features
467: of the Becklin-Neugebauer (BN) object.
468: }
469: %
470: In Figure \ref{fig:spheroid}a we plot the absorption
471: cross sections for ice coated-amorphous silicate
472: prolates and ice coated-crystalline prolates.
473: Just like spherical grains, the inclusion of
474: water ice mantles would hide up $\simali$3\%
475: crystalline mass fraction without being noticed.
476: Similarly, we perform the same calculations but for
477: oblate grains with $a/b=1/2$ for ice mantles.\footnote{%
478: Lee \& Draine (1985) and Hildebrand \& Dragovan (1995)
479: found that $a/b=1/2$ oblates fit well the 3.1$\mum$ ice
480: polarization and the 10$\mum$ silicate polarization of
481: the BN object.
482: }
483: As seen in Figure \ref{fig:spheroid}b,
484: a crystallinity degree of as much as
485: $\simali$3\% can be covered by the ice mantles.
486:
487: \begin{figure}
488: \centering
489: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{f3.eps}
490: %\end{center}\vspace*{-1em}
491: \caption{
492: \label{fig:spheroid}
493: Same as Figure \ref{fig:sphere}
494: but for (a) $a/b=3$ prolates
495: and (b) $a/b=1/2$ oblates.
496: }
497: \end{figure}
498:
499: \section{Grains with Distributions of Ellipsoidal Shapes}
500: %
501: The shape of a spheroidal grain is characterized
502: by its eccentricity $e$
503: (and the depolarization factors
504: $L^{\parallel}$, $L^{\bot}$ via eq.[4] of Li et al.\ 2002).
505: In \S4 we consider grains with a single shape.
506: We now consider an average of a distribution of shapes.
507: We assume two kinds of shape distribution functions:
508: 1) $dP/dL^{\parallel}$ = constant, i.e.,
509: all shapes are equally probable
510: (Bohren \& Huffman 1983);
511: 2) $dP/dL^{\parallel} = 12 L^{\parallel}[1-L^{\parallel}]^2$
512: (Ossenkopf, Henning, \& Mathis 1992).\footnote{%
513: This distribution peaks at spheres ($L^{\|}=L^{\bot}$=1/3)
514: and is symmetric about spheres with respect to
515: eccentricity $e$. It drops to zero for
516: the extreme cases:
517: for infinitely thin needles ($a\gg b$)
518: $L^{\parallel}\rightarrow 0$;
519: for infinitely flattened pancakes ($a\ll b$)
520: $L^{\parallel}\rightarrow 1$.
521: }
522:
523: Averaging over the shape distribution,
524: we have the resultant absorption cross section
525: $C_{\rm abs} = \int_{0}^{1} dL^{\parallel} dP/dL^{\parallel}
526: C_{\rm abs}(L^{\parallel})$,
527: where $C_{\rm abs}(L^{\parallel})$ is the absorption
528: cross section of a particular shape $L^{\parallel}$
529: (note $L^{\parallel}$ is for the mantle;
530: the core depolarization factor is derived
531: from eqs.[4-6] of Li et al.\ 2002).
532: Again, we assume confocal geometry for core-mantle grains,
533: with the above $dP/dL^{\parallel}$ (as well as $e$) applying
534: to the outer surface.
535:
536: The results are shown in Figure \ref{fig:cde}.
537: Similar to spherical grains and grains of a single
538: ellipsoidal shape, with $\simali$3\% crystalline silicates
539: included, the absorption profiles still do not seem to
540: exhibit the sharp features of crystalline silicates.
541:
542: \begin{figure}
543: \centering
544: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{f4.eps}
545: %\end{center}\vspace*{-1em}
546: \caption{
547: \label{fig:cde}
548: Same as Figure \ref{fig:sphere} but
549: (a) for grains with a uniform distribution
550: of ellipsoidal shapes
551: (i.e. $dP/dL^{\parallel}$=constant)
552: and
553: (b) for grains with
554: $dP/dL^{\parallel} = 12 L^{\parallel}[1-L^{\parallel}]^2$.
555: }
556: \end{figure}
557:
558: \section{Summary}
559: %
560: We have investigated the effects of ice mantles
561: coated on silicate cores of various shapes
562: on the determination of the crystallinity
563: degree of silicates. It is found that for
564: the dust in the line of sight toward the Galactic
565: center source $\sgrA$, $\simali$3\% crystalline
566: silicates could be hidden by ice mantles,
567: well exceeding the upper limit
568: $\simali$1.1\% of Kemper et al.\ (2004)
569: derived from the assumption of the absence of
570: dense molecular materials in this line of sight.
571: We take the standard approach by assuming that
572: the silicates are amorphous and then adding in
573: crystalline components.
574: But as shown in Kemper et al.\ (2004),
575: the smooth, featureless 10$\mum$ amorphous silicate
576: spectrum allows as much as $\simali$2.2\%
577: crystalline silicates (or even higher; see Bowey \& Adamson 2002).
578: Therefore, the total allowable degree of
579: crystallinity would be $\simali$5\%,
580: consistent with the earlier estimates
581: of Li \& Draine (2001).
582:
583: \section*{Acknowledgments}
584: We thank J.Y. Hu and S.L. Liang for helpful comments.
585: We thank the referee whose report improved
586: our paper significantly.
587: We thank J.E. Bowey and F. Kemper
588: for providing us with the ISO spectra of $\sgrA$.
589: ML and GZ are supported by
590: the NSFC Grants 10433010 and 10521001.
591: AL is supported in part
592: by the University of Missouri Research Board,
593: a NASA/HST Theory Program grant,
594: a NASA/Spitzer Theory Program grant,
595: and the NSFC Outstanding Oversea Young Scholarship.
596:
597: \begin{thebibliography}{}
598: %
599: \bibitem[]{}Bohren, C. F., \& Huffman, D. R.\ 1983,
600: Absorption and Scattering of Light by
601: Small Particles (New York: Wiley)
602: \bibitem[]{}Bowey, J. E., \& Adamson, A. J.\
603: 2002, MNRAS, 334,94
604: \bibitem[]{}Bowey, J.~E., \& Hofmeister, A.~M.\ 2005,
605: MNRAS, 358, 1383
606: \bibitem[]{}Bowey, J.~E., Adamson, A.~J., \& Whittet, D.~C.~B.\
607: 1998, MNRAS, 298, 131
608: \bibitem[]{}Bowey, J.~E., Adamson, A.~J., \& Yates, J.~A.\ 2003,
609: MNRAS, 340, 1173
610: \bibitem[]{}Bowey, J.~E., Rawlings, M.~G., \& Adamson, A.~J.\
611: 2004, MNRAS, 348, L13
612: \bibitem[]{}Bowey, J.~E., Morlok, A., K{\"o}hler, M.,
613: \& Grady, M.\ 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1367
614: \bibitem[]{}Bowey, J.~E., Lee, C., Tucker, C., Hofmeister, A.~M.,
615: Ade, P.~A.~R., \& Barlow, M.~J.\
616: 2001, MNRAS, 325, 886
617: %\bibitem[]{}Chiar, J. E., \& Tielens, A. G. G. M.\
618: % 2006, ApJ, 637, 774
619: \bibitem[]{}Chiar, J. E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Whittet, D. C. B.,
620: Schutte, W. A., Boogert, A. C. A., Lutz, D.,
621: Van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Bernstein, M. P.\
622: 2000, ApJ, 537, 749
623: \bibitem[]{}de Graauw, Th., et al.\ 1996, A\&A, 315, L345
624: \bibitem[]{}Demyk, K., Jones, A. P., Dartois, E., Cox, P.,
625: \& d'Hendecourt, L.\ 1999, A\&A, 349, 267
626: \bibitem[]{}Dorschner, J., Begemann, B., Henning, Th.,
627: J\"ager, C., \& Mutschke, H. 1995, A\&A, 300, 503
628: \bibitem[]{}Gibb, E.L., Whittet, D.C.B., Boogert, A.C.A.,
629: \& Tielens, A.G.G.M.\ 2004, ApJS, 151, 35
630: \bibitem[]{}Greenberg, J. M., \& Li, A.\ 1996a,
631: New Extragalactic Perspectives in the New South Africa,
632: ed. D. L. Block \& J. M. Greenberg
633: (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 118
634: \bibitem[]{}Greenberg, J. M., \& Li, A. 1996b, A\&A, 309, 258
635: \bibitem[]{}Greenberg, J.M., Li, A., Mendoza-G\'{o}mez, C.X.,
636: Schutte, W.A., Gerakines, P.A., \& de Groot, M.\
637: 1995, ApJ, 455, L177
638: %\bibitem[]{}Henning, Th., ed., 2003, Astromineralogy
639: % (Heidelberg: Springer)
640: \bibitem[]{}Hildebrand, R. H., \& Dragovan, M.\
641: 1995, ApJ, 450, 663
642: \bibitem[]{}Hudgins, D. M., Sandford, S. A., Allamandola, L. J.,
643: \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1993, ApJS, 86, 713
644: \bibitem[]{}Kemper, F., Vriend, W. J., \& Tielens, A.G.G.M.\
645: 2004, ApJ, 609, 826 (erratum: 2005, ApJ, 633, 534)
646: \bibitem[]{}Lee, H. M., \& Draine, B. T.\ 1985, ApJ, 290, 211
647: \bibitem[]{}L\'eger, A., Gauthier, S., Defourneau, D.,
648: \& Rouan, D.\ 1983, A\&A, 117, 164
649: \bibitem[]{}Li, A., \& Draine, B.T. 2001, ApJ, 550, L213
650: \bibitem[]{}Li, A., \& Greenberg, J. M. 2002, ApJ, 577, 789
651: \bibitem[]{}Li, A., Greenberg, J. M., \& Zhao, G.\
652: 2002, MNRAS, 334, 840
653: \bibitem[]{}Lutz, D., et al.\ 1996, A\&A, 315, L269
654: \bibitem[]{}McFadzean, A. D., Whittet, D. C. B., Longmore, A. J.,
655: Bode, M. F., \& Adamson, A. J. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 873
656: %\bibitem[]{}Min, M., Waters, L.~B.~F.~M., de Koter, A.,
657: % Hovenier, J.~W., Keller, L.~P.,
658: % \& Markwick-Kemper, F.\ 2007, A\&A, 462, 667
659: \bibitem[]{}Ossenkopf, V., Henning, Th., \& Mathis, J.S.\
660: 1992, A\&A, 261, 567
661: %\bibitem[]{}Smith, C.~H., Wright, C.~M., Aitken, D.~K.,
662: % Roche, P.~F., \& Hough, J.~H.\ 2000, MNRAS, 312, 327
663: \bibitem[]{}Tielens, A. G. G. M., Wooden, D. H., Allamandola, L. J.,
664: Bregman, J., \& Witteborn, F. C. 1996, ApJ, 461, 210
665: \bibitem[]{}Whittet, D. C. B., et al.\ 1997, ApJ, 490, 729
666: \end{thebibliography}
667: \bsp
668: \label{lastpage}
669:
670: \end{document}
671: