1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\usepackage{natbib}
4: %\usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{Dusty Cometary Globules in W5}
9:
10: \author{X.~P. Koenig,\altaffilmark{1} L.~E. Allen,\altaffilmark{1} S.~J. Kenyon,\altaffilmark{1} K.~Y.~L. Su,\altaffilmark{2} Z. Balog\altaffilmark{2}}
11: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
12: Cambridge, MA 02138}
13: \altaffiltext{2}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721}
14:
15: \begin{abstract}
16: We report the discovery of four dusty cometary tails around low mass
17: stars in two young clusters belonging to the W5 star forming
18: region. Fits to the observed emission profiles from 24 $\micron$
19: observations with the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope give tail
20: lifetimes $<$ 30 Myr, but more likely $\lesssim$ 5 Myr. This result
21: suggests that the cometary phase is a short lived phenomenon,
22: occurring after photoevaporation by a nearby O star has removed gas
23: from the outer disk of a young low mass star \citep[see
24: also][]{balog06,balog08}.
25: \end{abstract}
26:
27: \keywords{Circumstellar matter --- stars: pre-main sequence --- stars: winds, outflows --- infrared: stars}
28:
29: \section{Introduction}
30: Recent observations with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for {\it
31: Spitzer} (MIPS) have discovered dusty nebulae associated with
32: several young stars in three Galactic star forming regions
33: \citep{balog06}. Appearing as extended, cometary objects pointing away
34: from nearby O stars at 24 $\micron$, (and sometimes at 8 $\micron$),
35: they resemble the proplyds seen in Orion with HST
36: \citep{odell93,odell94}. \citet{balog06} show that these cometary
37: tails are probably dust swept out of a young circumstellar disk by an
38: O star.
39:
40: \citet{balog06} show that the emission profiles at 24 and 8 $\micron$
41: can be explained by a model where gas is photoevaporated from a young
42: protoplanetary disk. As the gas leaves, entrained dust also escapes
43: and is then blown away from the disk by radiation pressure from nearby
44: O stars. The dust is swept into a cometary morphology which glows in
45: the mid-IR thermally as it reprocesses the incident UV radiation to
46: longer wavelengths. \citet{balog06} cite \citet{johnstone98},
47: \citet{richling00}, \citet{hollenbach04} and \citet{matsuyama03}, who
48: find that the portion of a protoplanetary disk likely responsible for
49: emission at 24 $\micron$ ($\sim$2--50 AU from the star) is removed on
50: timescales $\sim$3$\times 10^5$ yr.
51:
52: We have recently discovered four dusty cometary structures in the W5
53: star forming region. Here we expand on the work of \citet{balog06} and
54: place constraints on the lifetimes and physical nature of these
55: interesting objects.
56:
57: \section{Observations}
58: \citet{koenig08} describe our observations of W5. We observed a
59: 2$\degr \times$1.5$\degr$ field with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC)
60: and MIPS in 2006 and 2007. Figure 1 shows the MIPS 24 $\micron$ image
61: mosaic. Images were taken in scan map mode using the medium scan speed
62: for an average exposure time of 41.9 seconds per pixel for the
63: combined frames. The raw MIPS data were processed with pipeline
64: version S13.2.0. The final mosaics were produced using the MIPS
65: instrument team Data Analysis Tool, which calibrates the data and
66: applies a distortion correction to each individual exposure before
67: combining \citep{gordon05}. We used the {\it clustergrinder} software
68: tools \citep[described in][]{gutermu08} to produce final image mosaics
69: from the IRAC data in each of the four wavelength bands.
70:
71: Figure 2 shows the 24 $\micron$ cometary objects at larger scale. At
72: wavelengths shorter than 24 $\micron$, these objects are point-like or
73: not detected. At 70 and 160 $\micron$, these objects are also
74: invisible. Table 1 summarises the properties of the four objects in
75: W5. The quoted 24 $\micron$ flux is for the heads of the cometary
76: features alone.
77:
78: \section{Analysis}
79: We follow \citet{balog06} and analyze these objects using an
80: adaptation of the Vega debris disk model of \citet{su05}. We assume
81: the outward flow has roughly constant radial density: $n(r) \sim$
82: constant. We fit the emission profile of a 5 pixel (6.23$\arcsec$)
83: wide strip along the symmetric axis of the tail. To estimate and
84: subtract the background, we extend the strip to reach regions free of
85: diffuse emission and point sources.
86:
87: The fit to the resultant surface brightness profile is based on
88: optically thin emission from dust at its equilibrium temperature. The
89: emission depends on dust composition, dust grain size, and the angle
90: that the tail makes with the plane of the sky (inclination), where
91: 0$\degr$ corresponds to a tail in the plane of the sky. We adopt
92: astronomical silicates for the dust composition. Due to the degeneracy
93: between tail inclination and dust grain size \citep{balog06}, and the
94: lack of reliable constraints on these parameters, we assume an
95: inclination of 0$\degr$ and fit the profile adopting a single grain
96: size.
97:
98: The fits to the 24 $\micron$ emission profiles are shown in Figure
99: 3. Error bars on the profile points are derived by extracting the
100: emission profile to either side of the main axis and taking the
101: difference between the two extractions as the error at each
102: point. Tails A, B and C are formed by the multiple O star system HD
103: 17505 which contains at least four O stars \citep{hillwig06}. We model
104: the radiation output of this system as a single star with effective
105: temperature $T_{eff}$ = 35000 K and radius $R = 21 R_{\odot}$. Tail D
106: is most likely formed by the O7V star HD 18326. We adopt $T_{eff}$ =
107: 36000 K and $R = 9.4 R_{\odot}$. The model provides reasonable fits to
108: the dust emission profiles at 24 $\micron$, however all of the fits
109: diverge from the data at either end due to contamination from nearby
110: stars.
111:
112: At 8 $\micron$, our model predicts a flux of 0.0025 mJy for tail
113: A. This flux is consistent with the upper limit listed in Table 1. For
114: tails B and D the model underpredicts the 8 $\micron$ flux by more
115: than an order of magnitude. Tail C is a more complex case. Due to
116: crowding, we could not derive a precise flux for this object. The
117: model predicts a flux $>$5 times the upper limit quoted in Table 1 for
118: tail C. For tails B and D, the enhanced level of 8 $\micron$ emission
119: in our data is probably produced by stochastically heated small
120: grains, $\sim$10$\textrm{\AA}$ in size as suggested by
121: \citet{balog06}. To test whether this is also true for tails A and C
122: requires improved measurements of the flux at 8 $\micron$.
123:
124: Optical and near infrared observations of the dusty tails in NGC 2264,
125: IC 1396 and NGC 2244 (Balog et al. 2008) suggest that these tail
126: structures are strongly deficient in gas. If gas does not entrain the
127: dust away from the circumstellar disk, another mechanism must produce
128: these structures. We propose that radiation pressure from nearby O
129: stars ejects the dust directly. To test this idea, we calculate the
130: radius, $r_{evac}$ within the stellar disk where radiation pressure
131: exceeds the gravitational binding energy or dust in orbit around its
132: host star \citep[see][]{burns79}. For a star of mass $m_{star}$:
133:
134: \begin{equation}
135: r_{evac} = \sqrt{\frac{8 G \rho \pi d^2\textrm{ } c \textrm{ } a\textrm{ } m_{star}}{3 L_O \overline{Q_{pr}}}}
136: \end{equation}
137:
138: \noindent where $d$ is the distance from the tail head to an O star
139: with luminosity $L_O$, and $\overline{Q_{pr}}$ is the frequency
140: averaged radiation pressure coefficient ($\overline{Q_{pr}}\approx$1
141: for an O star and astronomical silicate dust grains; Laor \& Draine
142: 1993)\footnote{The expression for $r_{evac}$ assumes grains produced
143: from collisions of larger objects. For primordial grains orbiting
144: the central star, $r_{evac}$ is a factor of $\sqrt{2}$ larger.}. For
145: a 1 M$_{\sun}$ host star and grains of size $a$ = 0.01 $\micron$, and
146: density $\rho$ = 3.3 g cm$^{-3}$, $r_{evac}$ = 9--35 AU. For 10
147: $\micron$ grains, $r_{evac} \gtrsim$ 500 AU, the typical protostellar
148: disk radius \citep{andrews07}. Thus radiation pressure can eject
149: grains with $a \lesssim$3 $\micron$.
150:
151: Table 2 lists two values for the tail mass. The lower limit assumes a
152: single grain size of 0.01 $\micron$. The upper limit assumes a size
153: distribution from 0.01 $\micron$ up to the grain size at which
154: $r_{evac}\sim350$ AU. We adopt the size distribution of
155: \citet{dohnan69} and \citet{tanaka96}, $N(a) \propto a^{-3.5}$ for a
156: grain population formed by a collisional fragmentation cascade in a
157: protoplanetary disk, normalize the mass in 0.1 $\micron$ grains
158: required to fit the surface brightness distribution (Fig. 3) and
159: integrate over grain size. Recently, \citet{jorda07} and
160: \citet{holsapple07} found a different power law ($-3.1$) for dust
161: grains in the Deep Impact ejecta experiment, which would result in a
162: factor $\sim$10 greater tail mass.
163:
164: To derive a simple mass-loss rate for each tail, we divide the
165: estimated tail mass by the projected tail length over the flow
166: velocity \citep[following Balog et~al. 2008 we use the drift velocity
167: given by eqn. B.4 of][]{aberg02}. To derive an expected lifetime, we
168: adopt a minimum mass solar nebula as specified by \citet{weiden77} and
169: \citet{hayashi85} as a dust reservoir and find a total mass $M_{tot}$
170: = 0.034 M$_{\sun}$ between radii 20--350 AU. Assuming the dust mass is
171: a factor 100 smaller, the mass loss rates yield lifetimes of 0.3--30
172: Myr (Table 2). We note that \citet{andrews07} find a range in disk
173: masses around young stars, such that $M_{tot}$ could be as much as a
174: factor 10 larger.
175:
176: \section{Discussion}
177: The initial phase of a young stellar disk's evolution is the
178: optically-thick phase. This period lasts a few to $\sim$10 Myr; during
179: this time, excess emission from dust in the circumstellar disk in the
180: {\it Spitzer} IRAC bands (3--8 $\micron$) is visible, as are
181: signatures of accretion onto the star \citep{aguilar05,aguilar06}. The
182: cometary tails in W5 are unlikely to be older than 5 Myr. Since
183: massive O stars are present and non-thermal radiation is largely
184: absent (which would be the signature of a supernova having previously
185: occurred), 5 Myr is a conservative age upper limit for W5
186: \citep{karr03,vallee79}. During this early phase, UV radiation from
187: nearby O stars will photoevaporate the outer disk of stars in their
188: clusters, creating proplyds such as those seen in Orion
189: \citep{odell93,odell94}. \citet{balog08} suggest that after this part
190: of the disk is removed, micron-size dust grains are replenished by
191: collisions between already-formed planetesimals and then blown out by
192: radiation pressure, creating the cometary tails seen at 24
193: $\micron$. We consider this scenario somewhat unlikely in such young
194: disks. \citet{kenyon01} find that a size distribution of bodies can
195: stir up planetesimals enough to begin a collisional cascade capable of
196: making small dust grains in the outer 30--150 AU of a disk, only if it
197: contains objects of 500 km radius or larger, which need at least
198: $\sim$10 Myr to form at this distance from the star
199: \citep{kenyon08}. Since we find that the dust grains that create the
200: tails come from beyond $\sim$10 AU they must have remained in the disk
201: and survived being completely dragged out as the gas departs during
202: photoevaporation.
203:
204: We note that some of the objects could be older than the O stars and
205: have migrated in to their present location. This scenario requires an
206: earlier generation of stars (5--10 Myr ago) to have formed in a
207: cluster of $\sim$1000 stars within $\approx$5 pc of HD 17505 or HD
208: 18326. In addition, faster planet formation \citep[e.g. by disk
209: instability, or induced by the radiative
210: environment][]{boss06,throop05} might allow the planetesimal stirring
211: and collisional cascade mechanism to operate and create the small dust
212: grains that make up the cometary tails. The dust may not remain long
213: enough in such a disk to make detection likely however
214: \citep{kenyon08}.
215:
216: Tails A, B and C belong to the large double cluster of young stellar
217: objects (YSO) surrounding O stars HD 17505 and HD 17520. This cluster
218: has a projected radius on the sky of 3 pc, within which are 146 stars
219: classified by \citet{koenig08} as class II stars with disks,
220: i.e. stars in the optically thick disk phase, including tails A, B and
221: C. If the cluster is spherical and uniformly distributed we would
222: expect 1.54 objects within a spherical radius 0.67 pc (the distance of
223: tail A from HD 17505). Similarly tail D belongs to the cluster around
224: HD 18326 which has a radius of 1.8 pc and 87 YSO/optically thick disk
225: objects. Within a 0.22 pc radius (that would encompass tail D) we
226: would predict 0.16 objects. Given that projection effects mean we
227: should see only one third of these objects as extended, it is likely
228: that all objects with disks capable of producing cometary tails within
229: 0.7 pc of an O star are doing so.
230:
231: Not all O stars appear to create tails however. Within W5, 2 O star
232: systems (several are binary or multiple) out of 5 possess cometary
233: objects at 24 $\micron$. {\it Spitzer} observations of star forming
234: regions with MIPS (GTO program ID 58) have found 3 more out of a
235: sample of 20 O stars \citep{balog06}. This sample includes the Orion
236: Trapezium region which is saturated at 24 $\micron$ but does contain
237: the well known optically visible proplyds \citep{odell93}. The
238: timescale of the mid-infrared cometary phase may thus be closer to the
239: short end of our estimated range.
240:
241: \section{Conclusions}
242: We have discovered four dusty cometary tails in W5 at 24 $\micron$
243: with {\it Spitzer} MIPS. An apparent deficit of gas suggests an origin
244: in radiation pressure blowout of dust from a young stellar disk by
245: nearby O stars. Future observations with high sensitivity, high
246: spatial resolution mid-infrared and sub-millimeter instruments will
247: help constrain their nature.
248:
249: {\it Facilities:} \facility{2MASS ($JHK_S$)}, \facility{Spitzer (IRAC, MIPS)}
250:
251: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
252: %\bibliography{koenig}
253: \begin{thebibliography}{3}
254: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
255:
256: \bibitem[{{Abergel} {et~al.}(2002){Abergel}, {Bernard}, {Boulanger}, {Cesarsky}, {Falgarone}, {Jones}, {Miville-Deschenes}, {Perault}, {Puget}, {Huldtgren}, {Kaas}, {Nordh}, {Olofsson}, {Andr{\'e}}, {Bontemps}, {Casali}, {Cesarsky}, {Copet}, {Davies}, {Montmerle}, {Persi}, \& {Sibille}}]{aberg02}
257: {Abergel}, A., et~al.\ 2002, \aap, 389, 239
258:
259: \bibitem[{{Andrews} \& {Williams}(2007)}]{andrews07}
260: {Andrews}, S.~M., \& {Williams}, J.~P. 2007, \apj, 659, 705
261:
262: \bibitem[{{Balog} {et~al.}(2006){Balog}, {Rieke}, {Su}, {Muzerolle}, \& {Young}}]{balog06}
263: {Balog}, Z., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Su}, K.~Y.~L., {Muzerolle}, J., \& {Young}, E.~T. 2006, \apjl, 650, L83
264:
265: \bibitem[{{Balog} {et al.}(2008){Balog}, {Rieke}, {Muzerolle}, {Bally}, {Su}, {Misselt}, \& {Gasp\'ar}}]{balog08}
266: {Balog}, Z., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Muzerolle}, J., {Bally}, J., {Su}, K.~Y.~L., {Misselt}, K., \& {G\'asp\'ar}, A. 2008, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0807.3724)
267:
268: \bibitem[{{Boss} (2006)}]{boss06}
269: {Boss}, A.~P. 2006, \apjl, 644, L79
270:
271: \bibitem[{{Burns} {et~al.}(1979){Burns}, {Lamy}, \& {Soter}, S.}]{burns79}
272: {Burns}, J.~A., {Lamy}, P.~L., \& {Soter}, S. 1979, Icarus, 40, 1
273:
274: \bibitem[{{Carpenter} (2000)}]{carpenter00}
275: {Carpenter}, J.~M. 2000, \aj, 120, 3139
276:
277: \bibitem[{{Currie} {et~al.}(2008){Currie}, {Kenyon}, {Balog}, {Rieke}, {Bragg}, \& {Bromley}}]{currie08}
278: {Currie}, T., {Kenyon}, S.~J., {Balog}, Z., {Rieke}, G., {Bragg}, A., \& {Bromley}, B. 2008, \apj, 672, 558
279:
280: \bibitem[{{Dohnanyi}(1969)}]{dohnan69}
281: {Dohnanyi}, J.~W. 1969, \jgr, 74, 2531
282:
283: \bibitem[{{Gordon} {et~al.}(2005){Gordon}, {Rieke}, {Engelbracht}, {Muzerolle},
284: {Stansberry}, {Misselt}, {Morrison}, {Cadien}, {Young}, {Dole}, {Kelly},
285: {Alonso-Herrero}, {Egami}, {Su}, {Papovich}, {Smith}, {Hines}, {Rieke},
286: {Blaylock}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Le Floc'h}, {Hinz}, {Latter},
287: {Hesselroth}, {Frayer}, {Noriega-Crespo}, {Masci}, {Padgett}, {Smylie}, \&
288: {Haegel}}]{gordon05}
289: {Gordon}, K.~D., et~al.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
290:
291: \bibitem[{{Gutermuth} {et~al.}(2008){Gutermuth}, {Myers}, {Megeath}, {Allen},
292: {Pipher}, {Muzerolle}, {Porras}, {Winston}, \& {Fazio}}]{gutermu08}
293: {Gutermuth}, R.~A., et~al.\ 2008, \apj, 674, 336
294:
295: \bibitem[{{Hayashi} {et~al.}(1985){Hayashi}, {Nakazawa}, \& {Nakagawa}}]{hayashi85}
296: {Hayashi}, C., {Nakazawa}, K., \& {Nakagawa}, Y. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II, ed. D.~C. Black \& M.~S. Mathews (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 1100
297:
298: \bibitem[{{Hillwig} {et~al.}(2006){Hillwig}, {Gies}, {Bagnuolo}, {Huang},
299: {McSwain}, \& {Wingert}}]{hillwig06}
300: {Hillwig}, T.~C., {Gies}, D.~R., {Bagnuolo}, Jr., W.~G., {Huang}, W.,
301: {McSwain}, M.~V., \& {Wingert}, D.~W. 2006, \apj, 639, 1069
302:
303: \bibitem[{Hollenbach} \& {Adams}(2004)]{hollenbach04}
304: {Hollenbach}, D., \& {Adams}, F.~C. 2004, in ASP Conf. Ser. 324, Debris Disks and the Formation of Planets, ed. L. Caroff et~al. (San Francisco: AP), 168
305:
306: \bibitem[{{Holsapple} \& {Housen}(2007)}]{holsapple07}
307: {Holsapple}, K.~A. \& {Housen}, K.~R. 2007, Icarus, 191, 586
308:
309: \bibitem[{{Johnstone} {et~al.}(1998){Johnstone}, {Hollenbach}, \& {Bally}}]{johnstone98}
310: {Johnstone}, D., {Hollenbach}, D., \& {Bally}, J. 1998, \apj, 499, 758
311:
312: \bibitem[{{Jorda} {et~al.}(2007){Jorda}, {Lamy}, {Faury}, {Keller}, {Hviid}, {K{\"u}ppers}, {Koschny}, {Lecacheux}, {Guti{\'e}rrez}, \& {Lara}}]{jorda07}
313: {Jorda}, L., et~al.\ 2007, Icarus, 187, 208
314:
315: \bibitem[{{Karr} \& {Martin}(2003)}]{karr03}
316: {Karr}, J.~L., \& {Martin}, P.~G. 2003, \apj, 595, 900
317:
318: \bibitem[{{Kenyon} \& {Bromley}(2001)}]{kenyon01}
319: {Kenyon}, S.~J., \& {Bromley}, B.~C. 2001, \aj, 121, 538
320:
321: \bibitem[{{Kenyon} \& {Bromley}(2008)}]{kenyon08}
322: {Kenyon}, S.~J. \& {Bromley}, B.~C. 2008, preprint (astro-ph/0807.1134)
323:
324: \bibitem[{{Koenig} {et~al.}(2008){Koenig}, {Allen}, {Gutermuth}, {Hora}, {Brunt}, \& {Muzerolle}}]{koenig08}
325: {Koenig}, X.~P., {Allen}, L.~E., {Gutermuth}, R.~A., {Hora}, J.~L., {Brunt}, C.~M., \& {Muzerolle}, J. 2008, \apj, submitted
326:
327: \bibitem[{{O'Dell} {et~al.}(1993){O'Dell}, {Wen}, \& {Hu}}]{odell93}
328: {O'Dell}, C.~R., {Wen}, Z., \& {Hu}, X. 1993, \apj, 410, 696
329:
330: \bibitem[{{O'Dell} \& {Wen}(1994)}]{odell94}
331: {O'Dell}, C.~R., \& {Wen}, Z. 1994, \apj, 436, 194
332:
333: \bibitem[{{Lada} \& {Lada}(2003)}]{lada03}
334: {Lada}, C.~J., \& {Lada}, E.~A. 2003, \araa, 41, 57
335:
336: \bibitem[{{Laor} \& {Draine}(1993)}]{laor93}
337: {Laor}, A., \& {Draine}, B.~T. 1993, \apj, 402, 441
338:
339: \bibitem[{{Matsuyama} {et~al.}(2003){Matsuyama}, {Johnstone}, \& {Murray}}]{matsuyama03}
340: {Matsuyama}, I., {Johnstone}, D., \& {Murray}, N. 2003, \apjl, 585, L143
341:
342: \bibitem[{{Porras} {et~al.}(2003){Porras}, {Christopher}, {Allen}, {Di Francesco}, {Megeath}, \& {Myers}}]{porras03}
343: {Porras}, A., {Christopher}, M., {Allen}, L., {Di Francesco}, J., {Megeath}, S.~T., \& {Myers}, P.~C. 2003, \aj, 126, 1916
344:
345: \bibitem[{{Richling} \& {Yorke}(2000)}]{richling00}
346: {Richling}, S., {Yorke}, H.~W. 2000, \apj, 539, 258
347:
348: \bibitem[{{Rieke} {et~al.}(2005){Rieke}, {Su}, {Stansberry}, {Trilling}, {Bryden}, {Muzerolle}, {White}, {Gorlova}, {Young}, {Beichman}, {Stapelfeldt}, \& {Hines}}]{rieke05}
349: {Rieke}, G.~H. et~al.\ 2005, \apj, 620, 1010
350:
351: \bibitem[{{Sicilia-Aguilar} {et~al.}(2005){Sicilia-Aguilar}, {Hartmann}, {Hern{\'a}ndez}, {Brice{\~n}o}, \&{Calvet}}]{aguilar05}
352: {Sicilia-Aguilar}, A., {Hartmann}, L.~W., {Hern{\'a}ndez}, J., {Brice{\~n}o}, C. \& {Calvet}, N. 2005, \aj, 130, 188
353:
354: \bibitem[{{Sicilia-Aguilar} {et~al.}(2006){Sicilia-Aguilar}, {Hartmann}, {Calvet}, {Megeath}, {Muzerolle}, {Allen}, {D'Alessio}, {Mer{\'{\i}}n}, {Stauffer}, {Young}, \& {Lada}}]{aguilar06}
355: {Sicilia-Aguilar}, A. et~al.\ 2006, \apj, 638, 897
356:
357: \bibitem[{{Skrutskie} {et~al.}(2006){Skrutskie}, {Cutri}, {Stiening},
358: {Weinberg}, {Schneider}, {Carpenter}, {Beichman}, {Capps}, {Chester},
359: {Elias}, {Huchra}, {Liebert}, {Lonsdale}, {Monet}, {Price}, {Seitzer},
360: {Jarrett}, {Kirkpatrick}, {Gizis}, {Howard}, {Evans}, {Fowler}, {Fullmer},
361: {Hurt}, {Light}, {Kopan}, {Marsh}, {McCallon}, {Tam}, {Van Dyk}, \&
362: {Wheelock}}]{skrut06}
363: {Skrutskie}, M.~F., et~al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
364:
365: \bibitem[{{Su} {et~al.}(2005){Su}, {Rieke}, {Misselt}, {Stansberry}, {Moro-Martin}, {Stapelfeldt}, {Werner}, {Trilling}, {Bendo}, {Gordon}, {Hines}, {Wyatt}, {Holland}, {Marengo}, {Megeath}, \& {Fazio}}]{su05}
366: {Su}, K.~Y.~L., et~al.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 487
367:
368: \bibitem[{{Tanaka} {et~al.}(1996){Tanaka}, {Inaba}, \& {Nakazawa}}]{tanaka96}
369: {Tanaka}, H., {Inaba}, S., \& {Nakazawa}, K. 1996, Icarus, 123, 450
370:
371: \bibitem[{{Throop} \& {Bally}(2005)}]{throop05}
372: {Throop}, H.~B., \& {Bally}, J. 2005, \apjl, 623, L149
373:
374: \bibitem[{{Vall{\'e}e} {et~al.}(1979){Vall{\'e}e}, {Hughes}, \& {Viner}}]{vallee79}
375: {Vall{\'e}e}, J.~P., {Hughes}, V.~A., \& {Viner}, M.~R. 1979, \aap, 80, 186
376:
377: \bibitem[{{Weidenschilling}(1977)}]{weiden77}
378: {Weidenschilling}, S.~J. 1977, \apss, 51, 153
379:
380: \end{thebibliography}
381:
382: \clearpage
383:
384: \input{tab1.tex}
385:
386: \input{tab2.tex}
387:
388: \clearpage
389:
390: \begin{figure}
391: \plotone{f1.eps}
392: \caption{24 $\micron$ mosaic of W5, as imaged by {\it
393: Spitzer}/MIPS. Two bubbles are seen in projection on the
394: sky. Cometary sources are seen in the vicinity of the primary
395: ionizing O stars. Expanded views of the 2 boxed regions are shown in
396: Figure 2. The left hand box covers HD 18326, and the right hand box
397: HD 17505.}
398: \end{figure}
399:
400: \begin{figure}
401: \begin{center}
402: \includegraphics*[width=3.3in]{f2a.eps}
403: \includegraphics*[width=3.3in]{f2b.eps}
404: \caption{Expanded views of the boxed regions in Figure 1 in
405: exaggerated color to show the cometary sources (marked with crosses)
406: and ionizing stars (marked by tics). Several cometary sources point
407: to the multiple O star system HD 17505 (upper panel, see Hillwig et
408: al. 2006). One cometary object is evident near HD 18326 (lower
409: panel).}
410: \end{center}
411: \end{figure}
412:
413: \begin{figure}
414: \begin{center}
415: \includegraphics*[width=3.2in]{f3a.eps}
416: \includegraphics*[width=3.2in]{f3b.eps}
417: \includegraphics*[width=3.2in]{f3c.eps}
418: \includegraphics*[width=3.2in]{f3d.eps}
419: \caption{Fits to the 24 $\micron$ brightness distributions of the four
420: cometary tails in W5. Contamination from neighboring sources and
421: surrounding diffuse emission likely causes much of the discrepancy
422: between the data and the fits to tails B, C and D. Data points are
423: shown by diamond points with error bars. The best fit is the solid
424: blue line passing through the points.}
425: \end{center}
426: \end{figure}
427:
428: \end{document}
429: