1: %% paper draft

2: %% Version 1.0: October 30, 2007

3: %% Version 2.0: December 3, 2007

4: %% added the sources Arp 220 and $F$08572+3915

5: %% Version 2.1: January 1, 2008

6: %% modified based on comments from SV

7: %% also redid the spectral fitting due to new info on the backgrounds (v 1.2)

8: %% Version 2.2: March 5, 2008 (SV)

9: %% Version 2.3: March 10, 2008

10: %% minor adjustments based on suggestions from SV

11: %% Version 2.4: March 13, 2008

12: %% minor adjustments; major changes to Mrk273 discussion section

13: %% Version 3.0: April 3, 2008

14: %% changes to the HXD of F05189 and F08572 and comments from co-authors

15: %% Version 4.0: April 28, 2008

16: %% changes to the manuscript based on comments from ASW and Terashima

17: %% Version 5.0: May 13, 2008

18: %% added the PKS1345 section

19: %% Version 6.0: August 22, 2008

20: %% revisions from referee's report

21: 

22: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

23: %%\documentclass{aastex}

24: %%\usepackage{emulateapj5} 

25: 

26: %Luis's definitions

27: \def\aa{{A\&A}}

28: \def\aas{{ A\&AS}}

29: \def\aj{{AJ}}

30: \def\annrev{{ARA\&A}}

31: \def\apj{{ApJ}}

32: %%\def\apjl{{ApJL}}

33: \def\apjl{{ApJ}}

34: \def\apjs{{ApJS}}

35: \def\baas{{BAAS}}

36: \def\mnras{{MNRAS}}

37: \def\nat{{Nature}}

38: \def\pasp{{PASP}}

39: 

40: %Stacy's definitions

41: \def\fka{{Fe~K$\alpha$ }}

42: \def\fkb{{Fe~K$\beta$ }}

43: \def\teng{{Paper~I}}

44: 

45: %\received{}

46: %\accepted{}

47: \slugcomment{Draft, v. re-submitted to ApJ}

48: \shorttitle{{\it Suzaku} View of Local ULIRGs}

49: \shortauthors{Teng et al.}

50: %\journalid{}{}

51: %\articleid{}{}

52: 

53: \begin{document}

54: 

55: \title{{\it Suzaku} Observations of Local Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies}

56: 

57: \author{Stacy H. Teng \altaffilmark{1,2}, Sylvain Veilleux \altaffilmark{2},

58:   Naohisa Anabuki \altaffilmark{3}, Charles D. Dermer \altaffilmark{4},

59:   Luigi~C.~Gallo \altaffilmark{5}, Takao~Nakagawa \altaffilmark{6},

60:   Christopher S. Reynolds \altaffilmark{2},  D.B. Sanders

61:   \altaffilmark{7}, Yuichi~Terashima \altaffilmark{8}, and Andrew~S.~Wilson

62:   \altaffilmark{2}}

63: 

64: \altaffiltext{1}{Contacting author: stacyt@astro.umd.edu.}

65: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland,

66:   College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.}

67: %%\altaffiltext{2}{Contacting author.}

68: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka

69:   University, 1-1 Machikaneyama Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan}

70: \altaffiltext{4}{Space Science Division, Code 7653, U.S. Naval

71:   Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375-5352, U.S.A.}

72: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy and Physics, Saint Mary's University,

73: Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada}

74: \altaffiltext{6}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace

75: Exploration Agency, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}

76: \altaffiltext{7}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680

77:   Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, U.S.A.}

78: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics, Ehime University, Matsuyama,

79:   Ehime 790-8577, Japan}

80: 

81: \begin{abstract}

82: 

83:   We report the results from our analysis of {\it Suzaku} XIS

84:   (0.5--10~keV) and HXD/PIN (15--40~keV) observations of five

85:   well-known local ULIRGs: {\em IRAS} $F$05189--2524, {\em IRAS}

86:   $F$08572+3915, Mrk~273, PKS~1345+12, and Arp~220.  The XIS

87:   observations of $F$05189--2524 and Mrk~273 reveal strong iron lines

88:   consistent with Fe~K$\alpha$ and changes in spectral shapes with

89:   respect to previous {\it Chandra} and {\it XMM-Newton} observations.

90:   Mrk~273 is also detected by the HXD/PIN at $\sim$1.8-$\sigma$.  For

91:   $F$05189--2524, modeling of the data from the different epochs

92:   suggests that the change in spectral shape is likely due to the

93:   central source switching off, leaving behind a residual reflection

94:   spectrum, or an increase in the absorbing column.  An increase in the covering fraction of the absorber can

95:   describe the spectral variations seen in Mrk~273, although a

96:   reduction in the intrinsic AGN luminosity cannot be formally ruled

97:   out.  The {\it Suzaku} spectra of Mrk~273 are well fit by a $\sim$94\% covering

98:   fraction model with a column density of $\sim$10$^{24}$~cm$^{-2}$.

99:   The absorption-corrected log[$L_{\rm 2-10~keV}$/$L_{\rm IR}$] ratio

100:   is consistent with those found in PG Quasars.  The change

101:   in the spectral shape on a time scale of a few years implies that

102:   the absorbing matter must be near the AGN ($\sim$1~pc).  The

103:   0.5--10~keV spectrum of PKS~1345+12 and Arp~220 seem unchanged from

104:   previous observations and their hard X-ray emission is not

105:   convincingly detected by the HXD/PIN.  The large column density

106:   derived from CO observations and the large equivalent width of an

107:   ionized Fe line in Arp 220 can be reconciled by an ionized

108:   reflection model.  $F$08572+3915 is undetected in both the XIS and

109:   HXD/PIN, but the analysis of unpublished {\em Chandra} data provides

110:   a new measurement at low energies.

111: 

112: \end{abstract}

113: 

114: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: individual: {\em

115:     IRAS}~$F$05189--2524, {\em IRAS}~$F$08572+3915, Mrk~273, PKS~1345+12, Arp~220

116:   --- galaxies: starburst --- X-rays: galaxies}

117: 

118: 

119: \section{Introduction}

120: \label{sec:intro}

121: 

122: Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs) are galaxies with $L_{\rm

123:   IR}$ = $L_{8-1000 \mu {\rm m}}$ $\ge$ 10$^{12} L_{\odot}$,

124:   equivalent to the minimum bolometric luminosity of QSOs.  The

125:   discovery of a large population of local ULIRGs is one of the most

126:   important legacies of the {\em IRAS} satellite.  At luminosities

127:   above 10$^{12} L_{\odot}$, the space density of ULIRGs in the local

128:   universe is greater than that of optically selected quasars with

129:   similar bolometric luminosity by a factor of $\sim$1.5 (Sanders \&

130:   Mirabel 1996). Thus ULIRGs represent the most common type of galaxy

131:   at these high luminosities. Systematic ground-based and space-based

132:   optical and near-infrared imaging studies have shown that local

133:   ULIRGs are almost always undergoing mergers (e.g., Sanders et al.

134:   1988; Veilleux et al. 2002, 2006).  Sanders et al. (1988) suggested

135:   that these objects represent a dust-enshrouded phase that eventually

136:   evolves into optically-selected quasars. If this is true, ULIRGs

137:   take on a fundamental importance for the origin and evolution of

138:   quasars.

139: 

140: The primary energy source --- active galactic nucleus (AGN) versus

141: starburst activity --- of ULIRGs is still under debate.  Optical and

142: infrared observations show that most local ULIRGs are dominated by

143: starbursts, but about 30\% show evidence of AGNs \citep{vei99a,

144:   vei99b}.  Furthermore, the ``warm'' infrared colors ($f_{25~\mu {\rm

145:     m}}$/$f_{60~\mu {\rm m}}$ $>$ 0.2) and quasar-like spectra of the

146: more luminous objects imply that active nuclei are significant in

147: these objects (e.g., Veilleux et al. 1995, 1999a,b, 2008; Genzel et

148: al. 1998; Tran et al. 2001; Armus et al. 2007).  These results would

149: be definitive if it were not for the possibility of severe

150: obscuration. 

151: 

152: Galaxy mergers cause massive in-falls of gaseous material towards the

153: center of ULIRGs (e.g., Rupke, Veilleux, \& Baker 2008), and column

154: densities $\ga$ 10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ have been deduced from CO

155: measurements (e.g., Downes \& Solomon 1998; Evans et al. 2002).

156: Observations at UV, optical, near-infrared, and even mid-infrared wavelengths may

157: therefore not always probe the cores of these objects. High resolution

158: ($\ll$ 1''), high frequency radio observations can penetrate high

159: columns and are an excellent probe of whether an AGN is present (e.g.,

160: Lonsdale, Smith, \& Lonsdale 1993).  However, the bolometric

161: luminosity in the radio band is insignificant, so radio data cannot

162: test whether accretion onto a supermassive black hole (SMBH) is the dominant energetic process.

163: We are left with hard X-rays.

164: 

165: Recent surveys with {\it XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra} (e.g. Ptak et

166: al. 2003; Franceschini et al. 2003; Teng et al. 2005) have found that

167: $\sim$40\% of observed ULIRGs show signatures of AGNs.  The

168: observed 2--10~keV luminosity of the surveyed sample is

169: $\sim$10$^{40}$--10$^{43}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$, with a majority of the

170: sources having luminosities below 10$^{42}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$.  While the

171: ratio log[$L_{\rm 2-10~keV}$/$L_{\rm IR}$] is small in nearby ULIRGs

172: (from $-$4 to $-1$; e.g., Teng et al. 2005), this is not much smaller

173: than that found in radio-quiet QSOs (from $-$3 to $-$1).  Moreover,

174: absorption may be a factor even at these energies.  If the absorbing

175: column exceeds $\sim$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$, the primary continuum

176: emission is suppressed significantly by absorption and Compton

177: down-scattering.  Thus observations at $\ga$ 10 keV are best to detect

178: Compton-thick AGNs. The sensitivity of {\it Suzaku} at these high

179: energies is well suited for the study of highly obscured sources like

180: ULIRGs.  

181: 

182: In this paper, we present {\it Suzaku} XIS (0.5--10~keV) and HXD/PIN

183: (15--40~keV) observations of five well-known local ULIRGs. In \S 2, we

184: discuss our sample. In \S 3, we report the observations and describe

185: the methods we used to reduce the data. In \S 4, the results from our

186: spectral analysis of the {\em Suzaku} data are discussed. In \S 5, we

187: combine the {\em Suzaku} data with earlier published and unpublished

188: {\em XMM-Newton} and {\em Chandra} data to fine tune our spectral

189: models.  The results of this study are summarized in \S 6.  Throughout

190: this paper, we adopt the cosmology of

191: H$_0$=75~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega _{\rm M}$=0.3, and $\Omega

192: _\Lambda$=0.7.

193: 

194: 

195: \section{Sample}

196: \label{sec:sample}

197: 

198: The five ULIRGs in the present study are $F$05189--2524,

199: $F$08572+3915, Mrk~273, PKS~1345+12, and Arp~220. They were selected because they

200: have readily available {\em Suzaku} data, either from our own program

201: (PI: Veilleux) or from the public archive.

202: They are among the nearest, brightest, and best-studied ULIRGs in the

203: {\em IRAS} Bright Galaxy Survey \citep{sanders03}.

204: Table~\ref{tab:sample} lists the basic properties of these sources. Here

205: we briefly review the relevant literature on each source.

206: 

207: $F$05189--2524 is an unresolved late stage merger surrounded by tidal

208: debris (Veilleux et al. 2002, 2006) with ``warm'' infrared colors.  It

209: is optically classified as a Seyfert~2, but near-infrared spectroscopy

210: of this source reveals the presence of an obscured broad line region

211: (BLR) at Pa$\alpha$ (Veilleux et al. 1999a, b).  Spectra from previous

212: {\it ASCA} \citep{risaliti00, severgnini}, {\it XMM-Newton} \citep{iman04},  and {\it Chandra} \citep{ptak}

213: observations flatten out above 2~keV and are best fit by an absorbed

214: power law with $N_{\rm H} \sim 0.5-1 \times $10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$, $\Gamma

215: \sim$1.0--1.9, and a thermal component with kT$\sim$0.1--0.9~keV.  The

216: absorption-corrected 2--10~keV luminosity derived from the published {\it

217:   XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra} data is $\sim$10$^{43}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.

218: 

219: $F$08572+3915 is another ``warm'' ULIRG, consisting of a pair of

220: interacting galaxies with nuclear separation of $\sim$6~kpc \citep[and

221: references therein]{vei02}. The northwestern nucleus is classified as

222: a LINER.  A 2-cm radio core coincides with the northwestern nucleus

223: \citep{nagar}.  However, only an upper limit on its 2--10~keV flux

224: exists in the literature -- $7.6 \times 10^{-12}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$

225: s$^{-1}$ -- from the {\it HEAO} satellite \citep{heao}.

226: 

227: Mrk~273 is in the early phase of a merger where the nuclei are

228: separated by 680 pc \citep{vei02} and is optically classified as a

229: Seyfert~2 \citep{vei99a}.  A [Si~VI] 1.96 $\mu$m feature, a strong

230: indicator of AGN activity, is detected in this ``cool'' ULIRG

231: \citep{vei99b}.  Its radio flux falls above the radio-to-FIR

232: correlation of starbursts and a bright AGN-like radio core is detected

233: on VLBA scale in this object \citep{lonsdale}.  The {\it Chandra}

234: 0.5--2~keV X-ray spectrum of Mrk~273 is best explained with a MEKAL

235: plasma with kT $\sim$1.3~keV and its 2--10~keV spectrum is best fit by

236: an absorbed power law with $\Gamma \sim$1.0 and $N_{\rm H}

237: \sim$10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ \citep{ptak}.  The flat slope of the

238: 2--10~keV continuum may be a result of reflection, but the {\it

239:   Chandra} observation of \citet{ptak} shows a very weak Fe~K$\alpha$

240: emission line with an equivalent width of $\sim$0.09--0.44~keV.  Comparisons of observations by {\it ASCA}, {\it BeppoSAX}, and {\it Chandra} show that this source exhibits possible long term flux variability \citep{xia}. 

241: 

242: PKS~1345+12 is yet another ``warm'' ULIRG.  It is in the early stage

243: of a merger with two nuclei separated by 4.0~kpc \citep{vei02}.

244: Optically classified as a Seyfert~2 galaxy \citep{bgs, kim98},

245: infrared observations by \citet{vei97} suggest a buried BLR at

246: Pa$\alpha$.  Observations by \citet{evans99} have shown that the

247: eastern nucleus has colors consistent with reddened starlight while

248: the the western nucleus has extremely red colors indicative of an

249: optical quasar.  The western nucleus is also coincident with peak CO

250: emission \citep{evans99}, a radio core \citep{nagar}, and 0.5--8~keV

251: X-ray emission \citep{iman04}.  According to \citet{iman04}, the {\it

252: Chandra} continuum is consistent with that of an absorbed AGN (power

253: law $\Gamma$=1.8 with $N_{\rm H} \sim$4.5$\times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$).

254: The {\it Chandra} data also showed a narrow Fe~K$\alpha$ emission line

255: with an equivalent width of $\sim$0.13~keV.

256: 

257: Finally, Arp~220 is by far the best-studied ULIRG due to its vicinity.

258: Optically classified as a LINER, this ``cool'' ULIRG is also an early

259: merger with nuclei separated by $\sim$0.4~kpc \citep{vei02}.

260: Multi-wavelength data suggest the presence of a black hole in the

261: western nucleus \citep[and references therein]{downes07}.  Previous

262: {\it Chandra} observations detected both nuclei as well as extended

263: soft X-ray emission from lobes and plumes that extend beyond the

264: optical galaxy \citep{arp220a, arp220b}.  The full {\it Chandra} band

265: nuclear spectrum is best

266: fit by a thermal MEKAL component with $kT$ $\sim$0.8~keV and a flat

267: power law with $\Gamma \sim$1.1 absorbed by a column of

268: $\sim$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ \citep{ptak}.  Analysis of {\em XMM-Newton}

269: data by \citet{iwasawa} suggests the presence of an Fe~K emission line

270: with equivalent width of $\sim$1.9~keV emanating from the western

271: nucleus.

272: 

273: 

274: \section{Observations and Data Reduction} 

275: \label{sec:obs}

276: 

277: The details of the {\it Suzaku} observations are listed in

278: Table~\ref{tab:obs}.  Three of the sources ($F$05189--2524, Mrk~273, and PKS~1345+12) were of our own program (PI:

279: Veilleux, Anabuki was co-PI for $F$05189--2524) and the other two,

280: $F08572+3915$ (PI: Gallagher) and Arp~220 (PI: the {\it Suzaku}

281: Science Working Group, or SWG), were

282: downloaded from the public archive.  All of the observations were performed at the HXD aim point to

283: increase the sensitivity of the HXD.   The analysis of the data on $F$05189--2524, $F$08572+3915, Mrk~273, and Arp~220 was performed with version 6.3.1 of HEASoft and CALDB version 20071016.  PKS~1345+12 was observed at the end of Cycle~2 and after the completion of the data analysis on the other objects in the sample.  Thus, the analysis of the data on PKS~1345+12 was performed with the more up-to-date version 6.4 of HEASoft and CALDB version 20080401.  

284: 

285: \subsection{XIS Data Reduction}

286: \label{sec:xisobs}

287: 

288: The XIS data reduction followed the guidelines provided in the {\it

289:   Suzaku} Data Reduction Guide\footnote{See

290:   http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/suzaku/analysis/abc/.}.  The data

291: were screened following the version 2 data screening criteria.

292: Due to nearby field sources, cleaned events for all objects except PKS~1345+12 were then extracted in circular regions with 1$\arcmin$

293: radii (the minimum recommended region size) centered on the targets

294: wherever possible.  The PKS~1345+12 field is rather empty, so the extraction region has a radius of $\sim$3.1$\arcmin$.  Since the extraction regions are so large, {\it

295:   Chandra} ACIS data were used as a check to ensure no other X-ray

296: sources were included in the extraction regions. 

297: Background events were extracted in same-sized nearby source-free regions.  The source spectra were binned to at

298: least 50 counts bin$^{-1}$ for PKS~1345+12 and at least 15 counts

299: bin$^{-1}$ for the others so that $\chi ^2$ statistics can be used

300: when modeling the spectra.

301: 

302: The response (RMF) and auxiliary (ARF) files were produced using {\tt

303:   xisrmfgen} and {\tt xissimarfgen}.  The ARF files were generated

304: assuming 400,000 incident photons and the default grid spacing.  

305: 

306: In the modeling of the XIS data, the XIS1, XIS2, and XIS3 detectors

307: are assumed to have the data processing version 2.0

308: cross-normalization factors of 1.065, 1.035, and 1.067 with respect to

309: the XIS0 detector, respectively\footnote{See:

310:   ftp://legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov/suzaku/doc/xrt/suzakumemo-2007-11.pdf.}.

311: 

312: 

313: \subsection{HXD/PIN Data Reduction}

314: \label{sec:hxdobs}

315: 

316: The HXD/PIN data were reduced following the guidelines provided by the

317: {\it Suzaku} team.  The HXD/PIN spectra for both sources were

318: extracted after the selection of good time intervals (the ``ANDed

319: GTI'' from both the data and the non-X-ray background provided by the

320: {\it Suzaku} HXD team).  Dead-time corrections (on the order of about

321: 5\%) were applied to the extracted source spectra. The extracted

322: spectra were binned using {\tt grppha}\footnote{We binned the data

323:   using group 0 31 2 32 63 4 64 95 8 96 127 32 128 255 64.  Each set of three numbers represent the channel range grouped and the number of channel bins in each group.

324: This choice of grouping was used so that each bin contains approximately the same number of photons.}.

325: 

326: The response files were provided by the HXD team.  Due to changes in

327: the bias voltages and the threshold over time, we used the first-epoch

328: response file for observations of $F$05189--2524, $F$08572+3915, and

329: Arp~220, second-epoch for Mrk~273, and fourth-epoch for PKS~1345+12.

330: 

331: As its name implies, the non-X-ray backgrounds (NXB) from charged

332: particles modeled by the

333: HXD team do not include the cosmic X-ray background (CXB) which peaks

334: within the energy range of the HXD/PIN.  The CXB for each galaxy was

335: modeled following a recipe\footnote{See: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/suzaku/analysis/pin\_cxb.html.} provided by the HXD team.  The simulated

336: CXB is approximately 5\% of the NXB.  The NXB and CXB were added

337: together using {\tt mathpha} to provide total backgrounds for the

338: HXD/PIN data.

339: 

340: At the time of this writing, the accuracy of the processing version

341: 2.0 HXD/PIN background model is 3.8\%\footnote{This is the 1-$\sigma$

342:   statistical plus systematic error in the 15--40~keV band for a net

343:   integration time of 10~ksec.  See:

344:   ftp://legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov/suzaku/doc/hxd/suzakumemo-2007-09.pdf.}.

345: However, a $\sim$10\% offset in the version 2.0 background model was

346: discovered for data taken between March and May of 2006 due to changes

347: in the PIN observing mode.  For the affected data ($F$05189--2524 and

348: $F$08572+3915), processing version 1.2 HXD/PIN background were used as

349: recommended by the {\it Suzaku} team.  Dead time corrections were also

350: performed on the backgrounds for the affected data\footnote{See:

351:   http://www.astro.isas.ac.jp/suzaku/analysis/hxd/v1/pinnxb/}.  The

352: reproducibility of the version 1.2 background is between 5 and

353: 10\%\footnote{See:

354:   ftp://legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov/suzaku/doc/hxd/suzakumemo-2006-43.pdf.}.

355: For the modeling of the data, the cross-normalization of the PIN with

356: respect to XIS0 is 1.16 and 1.13 for the version 1.2 and 2.0

357: backgrounds, respectively\footnote{See:

358:   ftp://legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov/suzaku/doc/xrt/suzakumemo-2006-40.pdf for

359:   version 1.2 backgrounds and suzakumemo-2007-11.pdf for version 2.0

360:   backgrounds.}.

361: 

362: 

363: \section{{\it Suzaku} Results}

364: \label{sec:results}

365: 

366: The spectra were analyzed using the XSPEC package (version 11.3.2ag).

367: The energy range of the detectors were limited to 0.5--10~keV for the

368: XIS detectors and 15--40~keV for the PIN detector to avoid calibration

369: problems.  All the errors in the parameters are at the 90\% level for

370: one parameter of interest ($\Delta \chi ^2 = 2.7$).  

371: 

372: In the modeling of the spectra, a simple power-law distribution

373: absorbed only by the Galactic column is first assumed.  If the model

374: is not a satisfactory fit to the data, then more components are added

375: on to the model until a satisfactory fit is achieved.  The continuum

376: model components considered in this paper are: (1) an absorbed

377: power-law model which represents emission from an AGN (model

378: parameters fitted include a column density, $N_{\rm H}$, a power law

379: index, $\Gamma$, and a normalization factor), (2) a thermal MEKAL

380: model representing emission from stars or galactic winds (with a gas

381: temperature, $kT$, and a normalization factor), (3) a partial-covering

382: fraction model where some fraction, $f_{\rm cover}$, of the intrinsic

383: nuclear radiation is absorbed and the rest goes through unimpeded.

384: The other parameters fitted are the equivalent column density, $N_{\rm

385: H}$, $\Gamma$, and a normalization factor.  (4) a scattering model

386: where an absorbed power law represents the direct transmitted

387: component and an unabsorbed power law of the same photon index

388: represents a scattered component ($N_{\rm H}$, $\Gamma$, and a

389: normalization factor for each of the direct and scattered components),

390: (5) a neutral reflection model\footnote{The reflection component is represented by the {\tt PEXRAV} model in {\tt XSPEC}.  For the spectral fitting, the metal abundance, iron abundance, and inclination angle are fixed at the default value.  The relative reflection parameter is fixed at --1, thus modeling only the reflection component.  No energy cut off is assumed.  Therefore, only $\Gamma$ and the normalization factor are free parameters.} with an unabsorbed power law

391: representing the direct component and a reflection component with the

392: same photon index as the direct component ($\Gamma$ and a

393: normalization factor for each of the reflected and transmitted

394: components), and finally, (6) a pure ionized reflection model as

395: proposed by \citet{reflion} without any direct transmitted component

396: ($\Gamma$ and a normalization factor).

397: 

398: 

399: \subsection{{\em IRAS}~$F$05189--2524}

400: \label{sec:f05189}

401: 

402: \subsubsection{XIS Spectrum}

403: \label{sec:f05189xis}

404: 

405: The XIS spectrum of $F$05189--2524 is shown in

406: Figure~\ref{fig:xisfig}.  First, we find that it is well-modeled by a

407: simple power-law model plus a MEKAL component with abundances fixed at

408: solar all modified by Galactic absorption ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.57$ for 124

409: degrees of freedom).  An additional Gaussian component is needed

410: ($\Delta \chi ^2$=22.8 for a change in d.o.f. of 3) to

411: reproduce the emission line at $\sim$6.4~keV ({\em i.e.} the

412: Fe~K$\alpha$ line; equivalent width, or EW, $\sim$1.84~keV).  While

413: the spectrum shows excess emission at around 1.3 and 1.9~keV (Si~XIII

414: emission features), the addition of a second and a third Gaussian

415: component to the model does not significantly improve the fit ($\Delta

416: \chi ^2$=0.05 for a change in d.o.f. of 3).  The excess

417: emission at 1.9~keV may be a calibration feature associated with

418: absorption edges from the mirror.  The relatively flat

419: spectral index and the large equivalent width of the iron line suggest

420: that the spectrum may be reflection dominated.  The addition of a

421: reflection component to the continuum model results in a better fit

422: ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.49$ for 123 d.o.f.).  The $F$-test

423: probability for the addition of one parameter (the normalization of

424: the reflected component) is relatively small, at $1.6 \times 10^{-2}$,

425: implying that it is reasonable to add the extra component.  While the

426: spectral index required for this fit, $\Gamma = 2.68^{+0.30}_{-0.13}$,

427: is unusually steep for an AGN where the canonical value for $\Gamma$

428: is $\sim$1.8, it is not too different from the range seen in PG

429: quasars \citep[1.3--2.48;][]{p05}.  The best-fit reflection model

430: parameters to the XIS spectrum are listed in Table~\ref{tab:fitxis}

431: and the best-fit model is shown with the spectrum in

432: Figure~\ref{fig:xisfig}.

433: 

434: \subsubsection{HXD/PIN Data}

435: \label{sec:f05189hxd}

436: 

437: $F$05189--2524 is undetected by the HXD/PIN.  As mentioned in

438: \S~\ref{sec:hxdobs}, the documentation provided by the {\it Suzaku}

439: team state that the reproducibility of the version 1.2 HXD/PIN

440: backgrounds are on average $\sim$5--10\%.  Here we estimate the

441: systematic and statistical error of the HXD/PIN data for our specific

442: observation.  The standard deviation of the histogram of the

443: 15--40~keV residuals from the 1-day (40 ksec) observations in the

444: documentation imply that the systematic error of the NXB is

445: $\sim$2.4\%.  Considering the net HXD/PIN integration time and the

446: 15--40~keV total background count rate for observations with

447: integration times longer than 40 ksec, the statistical error of the

448: $F$05189-2524 observation is $\sim$0.9\%.  Thus, the total 1-$\sigma$

449: error (systematic and statistical errors added in quadrature) for the

450: HXD/PIN observation of $F$05189-2524 is $\sim$2.6\%.  Therefore, the

451: 15--40~keV 3-$\sigma$ detection limit for this observation is

452: $\sim$0.020 counts per second (cps).

453: 

454: \subsection{{\em IRAS}~$F$08572+3915}

455: \label{sec:f08572}

456: 

457: \subsubsection{XIS Non-Detection and {\em XMM-Newton} and {\em Chandra} Data}

458: \label{sec:f08572xis}

459: 

460: As mentioned previously in \S~\ref{sec:sample}, there has never been a

461: published X-ray detection of $F$08572+3915 in the X-ray energy range.  It is

462: also undetected by the XIS. 

463: A constraint on the limiting flux of $F$08572+3915 can be derived from the background.

464: The average background count rate from the XIS front illuminated detectors

465: (XIS0, 2, 3) is $\sim$1.3$\times 10^{-3}$ cps.

466: Assuming an ideal, flat background ($\Gamma \sim$1), the {\tt

467: WebPIMMS}\footnote{http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Tools/w3pimms.html} application was used to estimate the observed flux of the background

468: spectrum.  The application yields a flux of $\sim$4$\times 10^{-14}$

469: ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, more than two orders of

470: magnitude better than the upper limit placed on this object by {\it

471:   HEAO}.

472: 

473: $F$08572+3915 was observed with both {\em XMM-Newton} and {\it

474:   Chandra}, but the results of the analysis were never published. 

475: $F$08572+3915 is undetected in the archived {\em XMM-Newton}

476: data (ObsID: 0200630101, PI: Imanishi, t$_{\rm effective}$=13 ksec).

477: But the lower background and better spatial resolution of the {\it

478: Chandra} ACIS-S archival data (ObsID: 6862, PI: Komossa, t$_{\rm

479: effective}$=15 ksec) provide a conclusive detection of nine counts in

480: the 0.5--8~keV band.  The {\it Chandra} detection coincides with the

481: optical northwestern nucleus ({\it i.e.} the LINER/Seyfert~2

482: nucleus).  Assuming a canonical AGN power law spectrum ($\Gamma$=1.8)

483: modified by Galactic absorption for the Seyfert~2 nucleus, the detected count rate of $F08572+3915$ in the {\it

484:   Chandra} band corresponds to an observed 0.5--10~keV flux of $\sim 5 \times 10^{-15}$ ergs

485: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$.  This estimate is consistent with the upper limit derived from the XIS observations.   

486: 

487: The {\it Chandra} detection implies that the Seyfert nucleus may be a weak X-ray source or a heavily obscured AGN.

488: If we

489: assume no intrinsic absorption, the 0.5--10~keV flux from the {\it

490:   Chandra} observation of this object implies an intrinsic luminosity

491: of $\sim$5$\times 10^{40}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.  This luminosity falls

492: within the range of X-ray luminosities of LINERs as measured by

493: \citet{llagn} and is consistent with LINERs being powered by

494: low-luminosity AGNs.

495: 

496: However, like many other LINER~2s \citep{llagn}, $F$08572+3915 is

497: likely to be affected by absorption. Infrared observations of this

498: object do show strong absorption features and weak PAH emission

499: characteristic of deeply buried AGNs with a line-of-sight extinction

500: of $A_V \geq$~78 mag.\ (Imanishi et al. 2006; Armus et al. 2007;

501: Veilleux et al. 2008).  A CO-based estimate of the column density by

502: \citet{evans02} is in the range of $\sim$3--10$\times 10^{24}$

503: cm$^{-2}$.  The hardness ratio of the $F$08572+3915 detection is 0.56.

504: Following the hardness ratio method presented in \citet{teng}, a

505: single power law with an estimated photon index of $\sim$--0.43 would

506: fit the data.  The inverted power law spectrum may be an indication of

507: a large column density since the softer 0.5--2~keV photons are more

508: readily affected by absorption.  The estimated 0.5--10~keV flux from

509: the hardness ratio method, which assumes Galactic absorption only, is

510: $2.61 \times 10^{-13}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, corresponding to a

511: luminosity of $\sim 2 \times 10^{42}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.

512: 

513: 

514: \subsubsection{HXD/PIN Data}

515: \label{sec:f08572hxd}

516: 

517: $F$08572+3915 is not detected by the HXD/PIN above the total

518: background.  Following the procedure outlined in \S~\ref{sec:f05189hxd}, the HXD/PIN

519: 3-$\sigma$ detection limit was used to approximate the limiting count

520: rate and observed flux in the 15--40~keV band.  The 3-$\sigma$ upper limit on the count

521: rate for $F$08572+3915 in the HXD/PIN band is $\sim$0.020 cps.  

522: 

523: 

524: \subsection{Mrk~273}

525: \label{sec:m273}

526: 

527: \subsubsection{XIS Spectrum}

528: \label{sec:m273xis}

529: 

530: Mrk~273 is detected by the XIS.  We first tried to model the XIS

531: spectrum with a MEKAL component describing the starburst and a heavily

532: absorbed power-law distribution which does not fit the 2--10~keV

533: spectrum properly.  Rather, the XIS spectrum is well modeled by the

534: scattering model plus a MEKAL component with abundances fixed at solar

535: and all components modified by Galactic absorption.  Approximately 9\%

536: of the intrinsic AGN emission is scattered.  An additional Gaussian

537: component is needed to model the emission line at $\sim$6.4~keV

538: (EW$\sim$0.56~keV).  While the spectrum shows excess emission at

539: around 1.9~keV (Si~XIII emission), the addition of a second Gaussian

540: component to the model does not significantly improve the fit ($\Delta

541: \chi ^2$=1 with $\Delta$d.o.f.=3).  Again, the feature at 1.9~keV may

542: be a calibration feature associated with absorption edges from the

543: mirror.  A reflection model was also tested on the XIS spectrum, but

544: this results in a worse fit ($\chi _\nu ^2 =1.52$ for 187 d.o.f.) than

545: the scattering model ($\chi _\nu ^2 =1.25$ for 187 d.o.f.).  The

546: best-fit parameters to the XIS spectrum are listed in

547: Table~\ref{tab:fitxis} and the XIS spectrum with the best-fit model is

548: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:xisfig}.

549: 

550: \subsubsection{ HXD/PIN Data \& Contaminants}

551: \label{sec:m273amb}

552: 

553: Mrk~273 is marginally detected by the HXD/PIN.  The net (observed

554: minus background) HXD/PIN spectrum of Mrk~273 is $\sim$5.4\% of the

555: total (NXB+CXB) background.  Figure~\ref{fig:speccomp} is a comparison of

556: the spectrum, total background, and net spectrum.  The current

557: best estimate for the error in the version 2.0 NXB background is 3.8\%

558: for observations with net integration time of 10 ksec.  We estimate

559: the error on our Mrk~273 observation following the steps outlined in

560: \S\ref{sec:f05189hxd}.  The total systematic plus statistical error

561: for the Mrk~273 observation is $\sim$3.0\%, implying the HXD/PIN

562: detection of Mrk~273 is at $\sim$1.8-$\sigma$ (or with $\sim$93\%

563: confidence).

564: 

565: Because the PIN is not an imaging detector and has a very large field

566: of view (34$\arcmin \times 34\arcmin$, $\sim$3.5 times the area of the

567: XIS field of view), there may be sources of contamination in the

568: HXD/PIN signal.  While hard X-ray and soft gamma ray catalogs

569: (e.g. the INTEGRAL reference catalog; Ebisawa et al. 2003) do not list

570: any sources of comparable flux within the PIN field of view and energy

571: range, most of these flux values are based on modeling of previous

572: observations at lower energies.  There remains a possibility that the

573: signal may come from a previously unobserved nearby source.  Three

574: likely candidates are detected within the field of view of the XIS.

575: Mrk~273x is an unabsorbed Seyfert~2 galaxy at a redshift of 0.458

576: located approximately 1.2\arcmin\ northeast of Mrk~273.  The XIS

577: spectrum of Mrk~273x is well fit by a power-law component modified

578: only by Galactic absorption ($\Gamma \sim$1.69$^{+0.11}_{-0.12}$;

579: $\chi ^2 _\nu \sim$1.21 for 77 d.o.f.).  The observed 0.5--10~keV flux

580: of Mrk~273 is approximately 2.9 times that of Mrk~273x.  SBS~1342+560

581: is a background QSO at a redshift of 0.937 located approximately

582: 6.3\arcmin\ south of Mrk~273.  The XIS spectrum of this source is also

583: well fit by a power-law component modified only by Galactic absorption

584: ($\Gamma \sim$2.03$\pm 0.05$; $\chi ^2 _\nu \sim$1.28 for 242 d.o.f.).

585: The observed 0.5--10~keV flux of Mrk~273 is approximately 1.5 times

586: that of this source.  Lastly, SDSS~J1342512.06+554759.6 is a

587: background QSO at a redshift of 1.17 located approximately 7\arcmin\

588: southeast of Mrk~273.  Its XIS spectrum is once again well fit by a

589: power-law component modified only by Galactic absorption ($\Gamma

590: \sim$1.62$\pm0.07$; $\chi ^2 _\nu \sim$1.29 for 139 d.o.f.).  The

591: observed 0.5--10~keV flux of Mrk~273 is approximately 1.9 times that

592: of this source.

593: 

594: Thus, none of the objects within the XIS field of view shows evidence

595: of being highly obscured.  One would therefore expect their spectral

596: energy distributions at higher energies to follow the power law seen at

597: low energies.  If that is indeed the case, their contributions to the

598: overall PIN signal of Mrk~273 are negligible; this is explained in the

599: next section.

600: 

601: \subsubsection{Combined XIS-HXD/PIN Spectral Modeling}

602: \label{sec:m273fit}

603: 

604: We modeled the combined XIS and PIN spectrum of Mrk~273 with the

605: scattering model.  All of the best-fit parameters are

606: consistent with the values obtained from the fit of the XIS spectrum

607: alone with the exception of the column density which increased by

608: a factor of $\sim$2.  The HXD/PIN contributions from the neighboring

609: sources have been taken into account by adding the best-fit XIS model

610: of the contaminants to the HXD/PIN component of the Mrk~273 model (see

611: Figure~\ref{fig:hxdcontams}).  The best-fit model to the full-band

612: Mrk~273 spectrum in this case has parameter values listed in

613: Table~\ref{tab:fithxd} and the spectrum is shown in

614: Figure~\ref{fig:hxdfig} with the XIS-HXD/PIN spectrum.  While the photon index value of $\sim$1.4 may suggest flattening of the spectrum due to reflection, the addition of a reflection component resulted in a statistically worse fit ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.66$ for 197 d.o.f.) relative to that obtained from the scattering model ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.35$ for 199 d.o.f.).  Approximately 5\% of the intrinsic AGN

615: flux is scattered.   The gas

616: temperature of $\sim$0.7~keV is consistent with the range found in

617: ULIRGs \citep{grimes}.   Overall, the best-fit model of Mrk~273 agrees well with X-ray observations of

618: other ULIRGs \citep[e.g.][]{ptak, frances, teng, teng08}.  The comparison of the XIS data with published results is postponed

619: until \S~\ref{sec:dis273}.    

620: 

621: \subsection{PKS~1345+12}

622: \label{sec:pks1345}

623: 

624: \subsubsection{XIS Spectrum}

625: \label{sec:pks1345xis}

626: 

627: The XIS spectrum of PKS~1345+12 is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:xisfig}.

628: It is best modeled by a scattering continuum model

629: (\S~\ref{sec:results}) modified by Galactic absorption. The

630: transmitted AGN flux is $\sim$2\% of the intrinsic AGN flux.  Unlike

631: other ULIRGs, the 0.5--2~keV spectrum does not require a MEKAL thermal

632: component.  The best-fit parameters are listed in

633: Table~\ref{tab:fitxis}.  These best-fit values and the model of the

634: 0.5--10~keV continuum are consistent with {\it Chandra} measurements

635: reported by \citet{iman04}.  The \citet{iman04} model for the {\it

636: Chandra} data includes a narrow Fe line at 6.4~keV.  This emission

637: line also appears in the XIS spectrum, but is statistically

638: insignificant ($\Delta \chi^2$=2.0 for a change in d.o.f.

639: of 2).  This is also consistent with the fact that the lower limit to

640: the equivalent width of the Fe line in the \citet{iman04} model is

641: 0~keV.  No flux or spectral variation were detected

642: over the 0.5--10~keV energy range between the {\it Chandra} and {\it

643: Suzaku} observations.

644: 

645: The unabsorbed 0.5--10~keV flux for PKS~1345+12 is $\sim$6.0$\times

646: 10^{43}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ and the absorption corrected ratio log[$L_{\rm

647:   2-10~keV}$/$L_{\rm IR}$] is $\sim$--2.3, consistent with the range

648: found in PG quasars.  This and the lack of a thermal component in 

649: the 0.5--2~keV spectrum suggest that the X-ray spectrum is dominated

650: by an AGN.

651: 

652: 

653: \subsubsection{HXD/PIN Data}

654: \label{sec:pks1345hxd}

655: 

656: The net HXD/PIN spectrum of PKS~1345+12 lies $\sim$3.4\% above the

657: total background (Figure~\ref{fig:speccomp}).  Accounting for the

658: uncertainties in the PIN background of $\sim$3.1\% (see

659: \S~\ref{sec:f05189hxd} on how this was calculated), the detection is

660: at only 1.1$\sigma$.  There are not enough net counts for a meaningful

661: spectral fitting of the full-band (XIS+HXD/PIN) spectrum.  However,

662: assuming no contamination from nearby sources, the net observed

663: 15--40~keV count rate for PKS~1345+12 is 9.9$\pm$2.8$\times

664: 10^{-3}$~cps.  Using the XIS best-fit model, given the lack of an

665: obvious reflection component, the 15--40~keV count rate translates to

666: a flux of $\sim$4.4$^{+1.1}_{-1.3} \times 10^{-12}$ ergs s$^{-1}$

667: cm$^{-2}$.

668: 

669: \subsection{Arp~220}

670: \label{sec:arp220}

671: 

672: \subsubsection{XIS Spectrum}

673: \label{sec:arp220xis}

674: 

675: Arp~220 is detected by the XIS. At first, the XIS spectrum was modeled by

676: a simple power-law model plus a MEKAL component for the thermal

677: contribution from the starburst.  An additional Gaussian component is needed to

678: reproduce the emission line at $\sim$6.7~keV (EW$\sim$1.98~keV), which is consistent with

679: emission from Fe~XX--Fe~XXVI.  This model with only Galactic absorption is a satisfactory fit to the XIS data ($\chi _\nu ^2 \sim$1.03 for 174 d.o.f.).  

680: The XIS extraction window encompasses the two nuclei of Arp~220 and a

681: significant fraction of the extended soft X-ray emission \citep{arp220b}.  Nevertheless, the power-law plus MEKAL model to the XIS-only data are

682: consistent with the results from the {\it Chandra} observation of the

683: nuclear binary source \citep{arp220a}.  There is, therefore, no obvious sign of spectral or flux variability in Arp~220.

684: 

685: The {\it Suzaku} data on Arp~220 can be interpreted in several ways:

686: (1) an AGN is not present, (2) there is a low-luminosity, unobscured

687: AGN, or (3) there is a heavily obscured AGN.  

688: 

689: In the first case where

690: an AGN is not present, the detected Fe line at $\sim$6.7~keV would

691: originate from hot gas heated by the heavy starburst activity.

692: However, the measured equivalent width for the line of

693: 1.98$^{+0.99}_{-0.57}$~keV seems too large for an Fe emission line

694: arising from a pure starburst.  

695: \citet{iwasawa} fitted the 2.5--10~keV continuum of the {\it XMM-Newton} data with

696: a collisionally ionized plasma model.  The model requires a gas

697: temperature of $\sim$7~keV and a metallicity of $\sim$2 times solar in

698: order to reproduce the 6.7~keV Fe feature (EW$\sim$2~keV).  

699: This temperature is inconsistent with the detected Ca XIX line in the

700: {\it XMM-Newton} data.  The XIS data do suggest the presence of an

701: emission feature at $\sim$3.9 keV consistent with Ca XIX, but this

702: detection is not statistically significant.

703: 

704: The weak but unobscured AGN case is unlikely based on CO observations

705: by \citet{downes07}.  Their observations with IRAM imply a column

706: density of $\sim 1.3 \times 10^{25}$ cm$^{-2}$ for the western nucleus

707: of Arp~220.  Unless the covering fraction of the absorber is much less

708: than unity, the unobscured AGN interpretation of the data is

709: inconsistent with the CO observations.  

710: 

711: In contrast, the third scenario of a heavily obscured AGN is

712: consistent with the Fe line detection and the CO observation of a

713: large column density.  The ionized reflection model as proposed by

714: \citet[][and references therein]{reflion} can reconcile the large

715: equivalent width of the highly ionized iron line as well as the large

716: absorbing column.  Since the absorbing column is so large, the

717: observed spectrum is purely reflected.  The XIS data is best fit by a

718: MEKAL plus an ionized reflection model with the ionization parameter

719: ($\xi$) fixed at 10$^3$ ergs cm s$^{-1}$ ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.03$ for 176

720: d.o.f.; see Table~\ref{tab:fitxis} and Figure~\ref{fig:xisfig}).  Thus

721: the third scenario for explaining the {\it Suzaku} data on Arp~220 is

722: favored.

723: 

724: Based solely on the XIS data, the unabsorbed 0.5--10~keV luminosity of

725: Arp~220 is only $\sim 1.8 \times 10^{41}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$,

726: much lower than that found in quasars.  The absorption-corrected ratio

727: log[$L_{\rm 2-10~keV}$/$L_{\rm IR}$] is $\sim$--4.9, consistent with

728: those found in some nearby ULIRGs \citep{teng}, but lower than those

729: of radio-quiet quasars.  Of course, if Arp220 is highly absorbed then

730: the intrinsic log[$L_{\rm 2-10~keV}$/$L_{\rm IR}$] is higher and may

731: be within the range for PG quasars.  The thermal component of the

732: spectrum has a 0.5--2~keV luminosity of $\sim 3 \times 10^{40}$ ergs

733: s$^{-1}$.  If this luminosity is completely due to thermal

734: bremsstrahlung, then applying this to Equation (1) of \citet{teng08},

735: the spatial extent of the emitting region is $\sim 2-11$ kpc, depending

736: on the choice of filling factor ($10^{-3} < f_{gas} < 10^{-1}$) and assuming an electron density of 1 cm$^{-3}$.

737: 

738: 

739: \subsubsection{HXD/PIN Data}

740: \label{sec:arp220hxd}

741: 

742: As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:speccomp}, the net HXD/PIN spectrum of

743: Arp~220 is only $\sim$2.2\% above the (NXB+CXB) background , so it is

744: within the uncertainties of the PIN background modeling ($\sim$3.0\%,

745: calculated following procedures in \S~\ref{sec:f05189hxd}).  Thus, the

746: estimated 15--40~keV count rate for Arp~220 is $\sim$0.025 cps.

747: 

748: 

749: \section{The Long-term Variability of {\em IRAS}~$F$05189--2524 and Mrk~273}

750: \label{sec:var}

751: 

752: Within the span of the {\it Suzaku} observations ($\sim$80~ksec each),

753: no significant variability is detected in the XIS data for both

754: $F$05189--2524 and Mrk~273.  However, there is evidence for long-term

755: variability in both sources when the {\it Suzaku} data are compared

756: with previous {\it ASCA, BeppoSax, Chandra,} and {\em XMM-Newton}

757: data. In this section, we discuss the results of these comparisons and

758: their implications for the spectral models. 

759: 

760: \subsection{{\em IRAS}~$F$05189--2524}

761: \label{sec:dis05189}

762: 

763: $F$05189--2524 was observed by {\em XMM-Newton} in March 2001 and then

764: by {\it Chandra} in October 2001 and January 2002.  We extracted the

765: spectra from the {\em XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra} archives.

766: There do not appear to be significant variations in the 0.5--2~keV flux

767: of $F$05189--2524.  The 2006 {\it Suzaku} measurement is within a

768: standard deviation of the weighted average of the previous

769: measurements.  In contrast, the {\it Suzaku} 2--10~keV flux is a

770: factor of $\sim$30 lower than the measurements made by other

771: observatories, $\sim$4 standard deviations away from the weighted

772: average of the previous measurements (see Figure~\ref{fig:05189var}

773: and \ref{fig:05189uf}).

774: 

775: 

776: None of the {\it XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra} data shows a

777: significant iron feature near 6.4~keV, in contrast to our more recent

778: {\em Suzaku} data, so we did not consider reflection models for these

779: archived data.  The scattering model (\S~\ref{sec:results}) with a

780: thermal MEKAL component gave adequate fits to the spectra.  In the

781: modeling of these data, we allowed the internal column density and the

782: parameters for the power-law component describing the AGN within the

783: source to vary freely.  The models suggest that the archived {\em

784: XMM-Newton} and the two sets of {\em Chandra} spectra are absorbed by

785: a column density of 7.6$\times 10^{22}$, 6.8$\times 10^{22}$, and

786: 6.1$\times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, respectively.  We also deduce that the

787: observed 2--10~keV flux of the AGN has decreased from 3$\times

788: 10^{-12}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ in the 2001 {\em XMM-Newton} data to

789: 1$\times 10^{-13}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ in the 2006 {\it Suzaku}

790: data {\em i.e.} a reduction of a factor of $\sim$30.

791: 

792: The decrease in flux and the change in spectral shape may be due to a

793: number of reasons.  Here, we test three scenarios by modeling the

794: multiple epoch data simultaneously with a single model.  The three

795: scenarios considered are: (1) a change in the column density while the

796: properties of the AGN remain the same, (2) a

797: change in the covering fraction of the absorber while the properties

798: of the AGN remain the same, and (3) the column density and covering

799: fraction remain the same while the intrinsic AGN luminosity is

800: changed.  In this scenario, a reflection component is visible in the ``low-state'' AGN.

801: 

802: The first scenario is tested by modeling all four data sets

803: simultaneously by a single scattering model plus a MEKAL component

804: modified only by Galactic absorption and a Gaussian describing the

805: iron line.  All of the model parameters are set to be the same for

806: each of the data groups, except for the column density parameter which

807: is allowed to vary independently.  This results in a satisfactory fit

808: to the data ($\chi ^{2}_\nu$ = 1.26 for 503 d.o.f.).  This model and

809: the multi-epoch data are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:05189multi} and the

810: best-fit parameters are listed in Table~\ref{tab:fitmulti}.

811: 

812: For the second scenario, the multi-epoch data are simultaneously fit

813: by a single partial covering fraction model.  All of the model

814: parameters are set to be the same between epochs, except for the

815: covering fraction.  The modeling of this scenario results in an

816: unacceptable fit with $\chi ^2_\nu \sim 8$.  The addition of another

817: partial-covering absorber to this model results in a still

818: unsatisfactory fit with $\chi^2_\nu = 2.2$ for 498 degrees of freedom.

819: Thus the partial-covering model is not a good description of the data.

820: 

821: Lastly, the third scenario is examined.  In this scenario, the active

822: nucleus has switched off prior to the final set of observations,

823: leaving behind a residual reflection component visible in the ``low''

824: state.  This has been observed previously in NGC~4051 \citep{n4051} and NGC~1365 \citep{n1365}.  The model for

825: this scenario is a combination of a MEKAL component, plus a reflection

826: component on top of a scattering model.  A Gaussian is also added to

827: model the Fe line seen in the {\it Suzaku} data.  For the {\it

828: Suzaku}-epoch, the scattered component normalization is held fixed at

829: zero.  Similarly, for the non-{\it Suzaku}-epochs, the reflected

830: component normalization is fixed at zero.  Additionally, the

831: absorption parameter in each of the non-{\it Suzaku}-epochs is

832: allowed to vary independently while the {\it Suzaku}-epoch absorption

833: parameter is held fixed at zero.  Since the intrinsic

834: AGN luminosity has changed, the normalization factors for the direct

835: component are different for the {\it Suzaku}- and non-{\it

836: Suzaku}-epochs.  The modeling of the data with this scenario is rather

837: successful with $\chi^2_\nu = 1.30$ for 502 degrees of freedom.  The

838: best-fit parameters to this model are listed in

839: Table~\ref{tab:fitmulti} and the model shown in

840: Figure~\ref{fig:05189multi}.

841: 

842: Both the increase in column density and the decrease in intrinsic

843: luminosity of the AGN appear to be equally good descriptions of the

844: data.  However, in the first scenario, the $N_{\rm H}$ value required

845: to explain the data is $> 2 \times 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$.  At this limit,

846: we can no longer model it as a pure

847: absorption spectrum since scattering both in and out of the line of sight are becoming

848: important. 

849: 

850: The thermal 0.5--2~keV luminosity is $\sim 1 \times 10^{41}$ ergs

851: s$^{-1}$.  Following the methods presented in \S~\ref{sec:arp220xis},

852: the physical extent of the emitting region is $\sim$4--17~kpc).  The absorption-corrected 0.5--10~keV

853: luminosity of the AGN detected in $F$05189--2524 at its ``high'' state (2000--2002 observations)

854: is $\sim$3$\times 10^{43}$ ergs s$^{-1}$, almost as luminous as some

855: quasars \citep{elvis}.  The absorption-corrected ratio log[$L_{\rm

856: 2-10~keV}$/$L_{\rm IR}$] is $\sim$--2.5, consistent with that found in

857: radio-quiet PG quasars.  The corresponding numbers for the ``low'' state as observed by {\it Suzaku} are $\sim$8$\times 10^{41}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ and --4.1, respectively, well below that of radio-quiet PG quasars.

858:   

859: 

860: \subsection{Mrk~273}

861: \label{sec:dis273}

862: 

863: 

864: \citet{xia} compiled a list of observed fluxes of Mrk~273 and Mrk~273x

865: from {\it ASCA, BeppoSax,} and {\it Chandra} dating from 1994 to

866: 2000\footnote{Although the authors tabulated the fluxes from 1996 to

867:   2000, the {\it ASCA} observation date was mis-identified and the

868:   data set was actually taken in December of

869:   1994 \citep[see][]{iwasawa99}.}.

870: We add to this list the {\em XMM-Newton} observation from 2002

871: analyzed by \citet{balestra} and our {\it Suzaku} observation from

872: 2006.  

873: Figure~\ref{fig:273var} shows the observed fluxes of Mrk~273 and Mrk~273x over the 12-year period.  Since {\it

874:   ASCA} and {\it BeppoSax} did not have the spatial resolution to

875: separate Mrk~273 from Mrk~273x, the flux points from 1994 and 1998

876: represent the sum of the two galaxies.  As the figure shows, the total flux between Mrk~273 and Mrk~273x appears to have increased in 2006 in the 0.5--2~keV band and appears to be in a ``high'' flux state in 2000 relative to all the other measurements.

877: 

878: Although Mrk~273x was once thought to be a BL Lacertae object because

879: of its high X-ray to optical B-band flux ratio \citep{xia98}, its

880: 2--10~keV flux has never shown dramatic variability.  The {\it Suzaku}

881: data support the assessment of \citet{xia} that Mrk~273x is

882: unlikely to be a BL Lac object.  As discussed in \S 4.3.2, its

883: spectrum is well fit by a simple power law modified only by Galactic

884: absorption, in agreement with the findings in \citet{balestra}.

885: 

886: Assuming a constant flux for Mrk~273x implies that the nominal observed

887: 2--10~keV flux from Mrk~273 dropped by about a factor of two from

888: 1994 to 1998, then increased by a factor of $\sim$2.5 from 1998 to

889: 2000, and then again dropped by a factor of more than two from 2000 to

890: 2002. It appears to have remained roughly the same from 2002 to 2006.  This variability in flux is not very significant when considering the uncertainties of the measurements.  However, the spectral variability is clearly seen when comparing the spectra of Mrk~273 from {\it Chandra}, {\it XMM-Newton}, and {\it Suzaku} (Figure \ref{fig:m273uf}).  The higher 0.5--2~keV flux in 2006 and the higher 2--10~keV flux in 2000 as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:273var} correlate with the difference in the spectral shapes of the source in each of these epochs.  

891: 

892: \subsubsection{Modeling the Multiple Epoch Data}

893: \label{sec:273epochs}

894: 

895: As with the multiple data sets of $F$05189--2524, we first modeled the

896: archived {\it Chandra} and {\em XMM-Newton} spectra of Mrk~273

897: individually. These data sets were each best fit by the scattering model.  The fits to the {\it Chandra} ({\em XMM-Newton})

898: data imply an intrinsic column density of 4.1 (6.8) $\times 10^{23}$

899: cm$^{-2}$ and an intrinsic 2--10~keV flux of 2.5 (2.0) $\times

900: 10^{-12}$ ergs s$^{-2}$ cm$^{-2}$. A comparison of the {\it Chandra}

901: ({\it XMM-Newton}) data with the fits to the

902: 2006 {\it Suzaku} XIS data in Table~\ref{tab:fitxis} suggests that the intrinsic column density has

903: increased by $\sim$110\% ($\sim$27\%) while the intrinsic 2--10~keV luminosity has

904: decreased by $\sim$80\% (0\%) if we were to compare data only over the

905: 0.5--10~keV range.  However, the addition of the HXD/PIN data

906: (Table~\ref{tab:fithxd}) implies

907: that the column density has increased by a factor of $\sim$4 ($\sim$2) and the

908: intrinsic 2--10~keV luminosity has increased by a factor of $\sim$3 ($\sim$4).

909: 

910: Next, all three data sets are modeled with a

911: single model simultaneously to determine whether the change in the

912: spectral shape is due to the change in column density or the intrinsic

913: AGN luminosity.  Three scenarios are considered: the change in

914: spectral shape is

915: due to (1) a change in the absorbing column and the intrinsic AGN

916: flux remains the same, (2) a

917: change in the intrinsic AGN luminosity with the absorbing column

918: remaining constant, and (3) a change in the covering fraction of the absorber with the column density and intrinsic

919: luminosity remaining constant.

920: 

921: To evaluate the first scenario, all three data sets are

922: simultaneously modeled by a scattering plus MEKAL model

923: modified only by Galactic absorption and a Gaussian describing the

924: iron line.  All of the model parameters

925: are set to be the same for all of the data groups, but the column density

926: for data sets from each epoch is allowed to vary (assuming the intrinsic luminosity

927: remains the same).  As before, the contaminants in the HXD/PIN field

928: of view are taken into account in the modeling.  This interpretation of

929: the data results in a poor fit ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.76$ for 380 d.o.f.), much worse than the modeling to each data set alone and underestimates the flux of the HXD/PIN data (see Figure~\ref{fig:273multi}).  

930: 

931: The second scenario is explored by again modeling the multi-epoch data simultaneously

932: with a single model.  The model is the same as that used in the first

933: scenario.  However, in this case, the model parameters for each epoch are set to be the same except

934: for the normalization of the power law.  In this case, we are testing

935: whether the change in the intensity of the power-law component can

936: describe the observations.  The best-fit model for this scenario takes

937: into account the contributions from the nearby contaminants.  While the model describes the

938: 0.5--10~keV data for each epoch well ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.53$ for 378 d.o.f.), it fits the HXD/PIN data very

939: poorly, severely under-estimating the HXD/PIN flux (see Figure~\ref{fig:273multi}).  

940: 

941: To test the third scenario, the {\it Chandra}, {\it

942:   XMM-Newton}, and {\it Suzaku} spectra are modeled using two absorbers with the

943:   same column densities for data from each epoch but with covering fractions that are allowed

944:   to vary freely. The contributions to the HXD/PIN flux from the

945:   neighboring XIS sources are taken into account in the fitting of

946:   the {\em Suzaku} data.  The best-fit model ($\chi^2_\nu = 1.39$ for 376 d.o.f.) is shown in

947:   Figure~\ref{fig:273multi} and the best-fit parameter values are

948:   listed in Table~\ref{tab:fitmulti}.  Based on Figure~\ref{fig:273multi}, the third scenario is the preferred

949:   model for the multiple epoch data.

950: 

951: Using the parameters derived for this third scenario, the

952: absorption-corrected luminosity from the AGN is $4.0 \times

953: 10^{43}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5--10~keV band and $2.3 \times

954: 10^{43}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ in the 15--40~keV band.  The ratio log[$L_{\rm 2-10~keV}$/$L_{\rm IR}$] is $\sim$--2.3,

955: within the range found in radio-quiet PG quasars.  The

956: thermal 0.5--2~keV luminosity is $\sim 1 \times 10^{40}$ ergs

957: s$^{-1}$.  Following the methods discussed in \S~\ref{sec:arp220xis},the emission region is $\sim$4--17~kpc in

958: size. 

959: 

960: Given the lack of knowledge of the detailed geometry of the nuclear region, it is difficult to derive a quantitative measure of the distance from the central source to the absorber.  However, the year-to-year time variability suggests that the absorber is close ($\sim$1~pc) to the nucleus.

961: 

962: 

963: \subsubsection{Comparison with OSSE Data}

964: \label{sec:273comp}

965: 

966: \citet{dermer} observed Mrk~273 with the OSSE instrument on-board the

967: {\it Compton Gamma Ray Observatory}.  Though their observations

968: resulted in a non-detection, they placed upper limits on the

969: 50--100~keV band flux and the column density.  Possible explanations suggested by

970: \citet{dermer} for the non-detection include the possibility that this ULIRG is gamma-ray weak or the AGN

971: source is highly variable in gamma-rays and they happened to have

972: observed the object in the low-flux state.  

973: 

974: Another explanation for

975: the non-detection is that the AGN in Mrk~273 is hidden behind a large and patchy

976: column of gas $\gtrsim 10^{24}$~cm$^{-2}$.  This is not inconsistent

977: with the upper limit derived from previous CO measurements ($\lesssim

978: 2 \times 10^{24}$~cm$^{-2}$, assuming a covering fraction of unity;

979: see Dermer et al. 1997 for more detail).  These limits on the column

980: density are consistent with our partial covering absorption model

981: ($N_{\rm H} \sim 1.6 \times 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$).  From an

982: extrapolation of the HXD/PIN observation and model, we derive an upper

983: limit to the 50--100~keV photon flux of $6.2 \times

984: 10^{-5}$~photons~cm$^{-2}$ or $6.9 \times

985: 10^{-12}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.  This value is more stringent by a

986: factor of $\sim$2 than the OSSE value ($1.5 \times

987: 10^{-4}$~photons~cm$^{-2}$).   

988: 

989: 

990: \section{Summary}

991: \label{sec:summary}

992: 

993: The results of our analysis of {\it Suzaku} XIS (0.5--10~keV) and

994: HXD/PIN (15--40~keV) observations of five of the brightest and

995: best-known local ULIRGs ($F$05189--2524, $F$08572+3915, Mrk~273,

996: PKS~1345+12, and Arp~220)

997: have been presented and compared with earlier {\em Chandra} and {\em

998:   XMM}-Newton data. The results can be summarized as follows:

999: 

1000: \begin{enumerate}

1001: 

1002: 

1003: \item The XIS observations of $F$05189--2524 reveal a significant change in the observed 2--10~keV

1004:   spectrum relative to previous {\it Chandra} and {\em XMM-Newton}

1005:   observations.  The spectral

1006:   variation in $F$05189--2524 suggests that the central source may have turned off, leaving behind a residual reflection component.  However, an increase in column density cannot be completely ruled out. 

1007:    The absorption-corrected 2--10~keV

1008:   luminosity to infrared luminosity ratios of $F$05189--2524 during its ``high'' state is consistent with values observed in PG quasars.

1009: 

1010: 

1011: \item The XIS spectrum of Mrk~273 contains a strong Fe~K$\alpha$ line

1012:   and shows a change in the observed 2--10~keV spectrum relative to

1013:   previous {\it Chandra} and {\em XMM-Newton} observations.  Mrk~273

1014:   is marginally (1.8-$\sigma$) detected at high energies, with the

1015:   HXD/PIN spectrum $\sim$5.4\% above the background.  A change in the

1016:   covering fraction of the absorber best explains the spectral

1017:   variations in Mrk~273, although a drop in the intrinsic AGN

1018:   luminosity cannot be formally ruled out.  A column density of

1019:   $\sim$10$^{24}$~cm$^{-2}$ is derived from the {\em Suzaku} data.

1020:   The changes in spectral shape and covering fraction on a time scale

1021:   of a few years suggest that the absorbing matter is $\sim$1 pc

1022:   from the central source.  The Mrk~273 spectrum is best modeled by a

1023:   $\sim$94\% covering fraction model.  The absorption-corrected

1024:   2--10~keV luminosity to infrared luminosity ratios of Mrk~273 is

1025:   consistent with values observed in PG quasars.

1026: 

1027: \item $F$08572+3915 is undetected in the {\it Suzaku} XIS and HXD/PIN

1028:   observations.  The low X-ray count rate derived from unpublished

1029:   {\it Chandra} observations, combined with mid-infrared observations, suggests that this source is highly obscured.

1030: 

1031: \item PKS~1345+12 is detected by the XIS.  No

1032:   apparent flux or spectral variability is detected in its 0.5--10~keV

1033:   spectrum relative to previous {\it Chandra} observations.  The net 

1034:   15--40~keV HXD/PIN spectrum is only 1.1$\sigma$ above the total background, not

1035:   strong enough for a meaningful full-band (XIS+HXD/PIN) spectral

1036:   fitting.  Unlike other ULIRGs, the 0.5--2~keV spectrum of this

1037:   source does not contain an obvious thermal MEKAL component.  Combining this

1038:   result and the fact that the absorption-corrected 2--10~keV

1039:   to infrared luminosity ratio of PKS 1345+12 is in agreement with those

1040:   of PG quasars, the data suggest that the X-ray luminosity of this object is dominated by an AGN.

1041: 

1042: \item Arp~220 is detected by the XIS, but not by the HXD/PIN.  Its

1043:   0.5--10~keV spectrum, including the iron complex, appears unchanged

1044:   since previous {\it Chandra} observations.  The X-ray continuum

1045:   emission is in agreement with the possibility that a highly obscured

1046:   AGN is present.  This interpretation of the data is consistent with previous CO

1047:   observations.  The measurements of the iron emission line at 6.7~keV can be reconciled by the ionized reflection model.

1048:   

1049: \item In all three cases where an optically thin thermal component is contributing to

1050:   the soft X-ray emission detected by XIS

1051:   ($F$05189--2524, Mrk~273, Arp~220), the temperature, $kT$

1052:   $\sim$0.3--0.8~keV, is consistent with previous

1053:   observations of ULIRGs.

1054: 

1055: \end{enumerate}

1056: 

1057: \acknowledgements

1058: 

1059: We are grateful to the anonymous referee for providing very useful comments and suggestions that have greatly improved this paper.  We would like to acknowledge Dr.\ Coleman Miller for useful

1060: discussions.  We are also grateful for the extensive help on data

1061: reduction provided by the NASA/HEASARC {\it Suzaku} GOF team.  The

1062: data reduction for this paper made use of a module in the Beowulf

1063: cluster (``the Borg'') in the Department of Astronomy, University of

1064: Maryland.  This research also utilized the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic

1065: Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

1066: Caltech, under contract with NASA.  We acknowledge support from the

1067: NASA/{\it Suzaku} Guest Observer Program under grant NNX06AI39G.  This

1068: research has made use of data obtained from the {\it Suzaku} satellite, a collaborative mission between the space agencies of Japan (JAXA) and the USA (NASA).

1069: 

1070: 

1071: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1072: 

1073: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2007)]{armus07} Armus, L. et al. 2007, \apj, 656 148

1074: 

1075: \bibitem[Balestra et al.(2005)]{balestra} Balestra, I., Boller, Th.,

1076:   Gallo, L., Lutz, D., \& Hess, S. 2005, A\&A, 442, 469

1077: 

1078: \bibitem[Clements et al.(2002)]{arp220a} Clements, D.L., McDowell,

1079:   J.C., Shaked, S., Baker, A.C., Borne, K., Colina, L., Lamb, S.A., \&

1080:   Mundell, C. 2002, \apj, 581, 974

1081: 

1082: \bibitem[Dermer et al.(1997)]{dermer} Dermer, C.D., Bland-Hawthorn,

1083:   J., Chiang, J., \& McNaron-Brown, K. 1997, \apj, 484, L121

1084: 

1085: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{nh} Dickey \& Lockman 1990, ARAA,

1086:   28, 215

1087: 

1088: \bibitem[Downes \& Eckart(2007)]{downes07} Downes, D. \& Eckart,

1089:   A. 2007, A\&A, 468, L57

1090: 

1091: \bibitem[Downes \& Solomon (1998)]{downes98} Downes, D., \& Solomon,

1092: P. M. 1998, \apj, 507, 615

1093: 

1094: \bibitem[Ebisawa et al.(2003)]{integral} Ebisawa, K., Bourban, G.,

1095:   Bodaghee, A., Mowlavin, N., \& Courvoisier, T.J.-L. 2003, A\&A, 411,

1096:   L49

1097: 

1098: \bibitem[Elvis et al.(1994)]{elvis} Elvis, M., Wilkes, B.J., McDowell,

1099:   J.C., Green, R.G., Bechtold, J., Willner, S.P. Oey, M.S., Polomski,

1100:   E., \& Cutri, R. 1994, ApJS, 95, 1

1101: 

1102: \bibitem[Evans et al.(1999)]{evans99} Evans, A.S., Kim, D. C., Mazzarella, J. M., Scoville, N. Z., \& Sanders, D. B., 1999, \apj, 521, L107

1103: 

1104: \bibitem[Evans et al.(2002)]{evans02} Evans, A.S., Mazzarella, J.M.,

1105:   Surace, J.A., \& Sanders, D.B. 2002, \apj, 580, 749

1106: 

1107: \bibitem[Franceschini et al.(2003)]{frances} Franceschini, A., Braito,

1108:   V., Persic, M., Della Ceca, R., Bassani, L., Cappi, M., Malaguti,

1109:   P., Palumbo, G.G.C., Risaliti, G., Salvati, M., \& Severgnini,

1110:   P. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1181

1111: 

1112: \bibitem[Grimes et al.(2005)]{grimes} Grimes, J.P., Heckman, T., Strickland, D., \& Ptak, A., 2005, \apj, 628, 187

1113: 

1114: \bibitem[Guainazzi et al.(1998)]{n4051} Guainazzi et al., 1998, \apj, 301, L1

1115: 

1116: \bibitem[Imanishi \& Terashima(2004)]{iman04} Imanishi, M. \& Terashima, Y. 2004, \apj, 127, 758

1117: 

1118: \bibitem[Imanishi et al.(2006)]{iman06} Imanishi, M., Dudley, C.C., \&

1119:   Maloney, P.R. 2006, \apj, 637, 114

1120: 

1121: \bibitem[Iwasawa (1999)]{iwasawa99} Iwasawa, K. 1999, MNRAS, 302, 96

1122: 

1123: \bibitem[Iwasawa et al.(2001)]{beppo} Iwasawa, K., Matt, G.,

1124:   Guainazzi, M., \& Fabian, A.C. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 894

1125: 

1126: \bibitem[Iwasawa et al.(2005)]{iwasawa} Iwasawa, K., Sanders, D.B.,

1127:   Evans, A.S., Trentham, N., Miniutti, G., \& Spoon, H.W.W. 2005,

1128:   MNRAS, 357, 565

1129: 

1130: \bibitem[Kim et al.(1998)]{kim98} Kim, D.-C., Veilleux, Sylvain, \& Sanders, D.B. 1998, ApJ, 508, 627

1131: 

1132: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al.(1993)]{lonsdale} Lonsdale, C.J., Smith, H.J.,

1133:   \& Lonsdale, C.J. 1993, \apj, 405, L9

1134: 

1135: \bibitem[Matt et al.(1999)]{matt99} Matt, G., Pompilio, F., \& La Franca, F., 1999, New Astronomy, 4, 191

1136: \bibitem[McDowell et al.(2003)]{arp220b} McDowell, J.C., Clements,

1137:   D.L., Lamb, S.A., Shaked, S., Hearn, N.C., Colina, L., Mundell, C.,

1138:   Borne, K., Baker, A.C., \& Arribas, S. 2003, \apj, 591, 164

1139: 

1140: \bibitem[Nagar et al.(2003)]{nagar} Nagar, N.M., Wilson, A.S., Falcke, H., Veilleux, S., \& Maiolino, R., 2003, A\&A, 409, 115

1141: 

1142: \bibitem[Piconcelli et al.(2005)]{p05} Piconcelli, E., Jimenez-Bailon, E., Guainazzi, M., Schartel, N., Rodriguez-Pascual, P.M. \& Santos-Lleo, M., 2005, A\&A, 432, 15

1143: 

1144: \bibitem[Polletta et al.(1996)]{heao} Polletta, M., Bassani, L.,

1145:   Malaguti, G., Palumbo, G.G.C., \& Caroli, E. 1996, \apjs, 106, 399

1146: 

1147: \bibitem[Ptak et al.(2003)]{ptak} Ptak, A., Heckman, T., Levenson, N.A., Weaver, K., \& Strickland, D. 2003, \apj, 592, 782

1148: 

1149: 

1150: \bibitem[Risaliti et al.(2000)]{risaliti00} Risaliti, G., Gilli, R.,

1151:   Maiolino, R., \& Salvati, M. 2000, A\&A, 357, 13

1152: 

1153: \bibitem[Risaliti et al.(2005)]{n1365} Risaliti, G., Elvis, M., Fabbiano, G., Baldi, A., \& Zezas, A., 2005, \apj, 623, L93

1154: 

1155: \bibitem[Ross \& Fabian (2005)]{reflion} Ross, R.R. \& Fabian, A.C. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 211

1156: 

1157: \bibitem[Rupke, Veilleux, \& Baker (2008)]{rvb} Rupke, D. S. N.,

1158:   Veilleux, S., \& Baker, A. J. 2008, \apj, 674, 172

1159: 

1160: \bibitem[Sanders \& Mirabel (1996)]{sm96} Sanders, D.B.,  \& Mirabel,

1161:   I. N. 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 749

1162: 

1163: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988)]{bgs} Sanders, D.B.,  Soifer, B. T.,

1164:   Elias, J. H., Madore, B. F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., \& Scoville,

1165:   N. Z. 1988, \apj, 325, 74

1166: 

1167: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{sanders03} Sanders, D.B., Mazzarella, J.M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J.A., \& Soifer, B.T. 2003, AJ, 126, 1607

1168: 

1169: 

1170: \bibitem[Severgnini et al.(2001)]{severgnini} Severgnini, P.,

1171:   Risaliti, G., Marconi, A., Maiolino, R., \& Salvati, M. 2001, A\&A,

1172:   368, 44

1173: 

1174: \bibitem[Teng et al.(2005)]{teng} Teng, S.H., Wilson, A.S., Veilleux,

1175: S., Young, A.J., Sanders, D.B., \& Nagar, N.M. 2005, \apj, 633, 664

1176: 

1177: \bibitem[Teng et al.(2008)]{teng08} Teng, S.H., Veilleux, S., Wilson, A.S. Young, A.J., Sanders, D.B., \& Nagar, N.M., 2008, ApJ, 674, 133

1178: 

1179: \bibitem[Terashima \& Wilson(2003)]{llagn} Terashima, Y. \& Wilson,

1180:   A.S. 2003, AJ, 583, 145

1181: 

1182: \bibitem[Turner \& Pounds(1989)]{agnpl} Turner, T.J. \& Pounds,

1183:   K.A. 1989, MNRAS, 240, 833

1184: 

1185: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(1997)]{vei97} Veilleux, Sylvain, Sanders, D.B., \& Kim, D.-C., 1997, ApJ, 484, 92

1186: 

1187: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(1999a)]{vei99a} Veilleux, S., Kim, D.-C., \&

1188: Sanders, D.B. 1999a, \apj, 522, 113

1189: 

1190: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(1999b)]{vei99b} Veilleux, S., Sanders, D.B.,

1191: \& Kim, D.-C. 1999b, \apj, 522, 139

1192: 

1193: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(2002)]{vei02} Veilleux, S., Kim, D.-C., \&

1194: Sanders, D.B. 2002, \apjs, 143, 315

1195: 

1196: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(2006)]{vei06} Veilleux, S. et al., 2006,

1197:   \apj, 643, 707

1198: 

1199: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(2008)]{vei08} Veilleux, S. et al., 2008, \apj, submitted.

1200: 

1201: 

1202: \bibitem[Xia et al.(1998)]{xia98} Xia, X.Y., Boller, Th., Wu, H.,

1203:   Deng, Z.G., Gao, Y., Zou, Z.L., Mao, S., \& Borner, G. 1998, \apj,

1204:   496, L9(erratum 507, L99)

1205: 

1206: \bibitem[Xia et al.(2002)]{xia} Xia, X.Y., Xue, S.J., Mao, S., Boller,

1207:   Th., Deng, Z.G., \& Wu, H. 2002, \apj, 564, 196

1208: 

1209: \end{thebibliography}

1210: 

1211: \clearpage

1212: 

1213: %% Tables

1214: \input{tab1.tex}

1215: 

1216: \input{tab2.tex}

1217: 

1218: \input{tab3.tex}

1219: 

1220: \input{tab4.tex}

1221: 

1222: %% Figures

1223: \clearpage

1224: 

1225: \begin{figure}

1226: \figurenum{1}

1227: \epsscale{1}

1228: \plotone{f1.eps}

1229: \caption{Spectra of $F$05189--2524 (top left), Mrk~273 (top right), PKS~1345+12 (bottom left) and

1230:   Arp~220 (bottom right) with their respective best-fit models for all four

1231:   XIS detectors.  $F08572+3915$ is not detected by the XIS.  The data are binned to at least 50 counts bin$^{-1}$ for PKS~1345+12 and at least 15 counts bin$^{-1}$ for the others.

1232:   The horizontal axis is energy in the observer's frame. In

1233:   $F$05189--2524, Mrk~273, and Arp~220, an emission line is detected

1234:   near 6.4--6.7~keV, consistent with emission arising from neutral or

1235:   ionized iron.  The same emission line also appears to be present in

1236:   PKS~1345+12, but the detection is not statistically significant

1237:   ($\Delta \chi^2$=2.0 for $\Delta$d.o.f=2).

1238:   Other than PKS~1345+12, the 0.5--2~keV spectrum for each object has a thermal component with temperatures of

1239:   $\sim$0.7--0.8~keV, consistent with earlier results on ULIRGs. 

1240:   The best-fit parameters are listed in  Table~\ref{tab:fitxis}.  }

1241: \label{fig:xisfig}

1242: \end{figure}

1243: 

1244: \begin{figure}

1245: \figurenum{2}

1246: \epsscale{0.5}

1247: \plotone{f2.eps}

1248: \caption{HXD/PIN spectrum (open circles), together with the background

1249:   spectrum (NXB+CXB; small crosses) and the net spectrum (open

1250:   squares) of Mrk~273, PKS~1345+12, and Arp~220. The net spectrum for

1251:   Mrk~273, PKS~1345+12, and Arp~220 is 5.4\%, 3.4\%, and 2.2\% above the background,

1252:   respectively.  Mrk~273 is the only source that is

1253:   detected above the background beyond the uncertainties of the background

1254: modeling (at the 1.8-$\sigma$ level).  The spectra of $F$05189--2524 and

1255:   $F$08572+3915 do not lie above the background, so they are not shown here.}

1256: \label{fig:speccomp}

1257: \end{figure}

1258: 

1259: \begin{figure}

1260: \figurenum{3}

1261: \epsscale{0.6}

1262: \rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f3.eps}}

1263: \caption{The net background-subtracted 15--40~keV HXD/PIN spectrum of

1264:   Mrk~273 compared with the spectral models of possible contaminants in the PIN field of view.  The solid line represents the best-fit model from the

1265:   XIS-HXD/PIN spectral fitting and is a sum of the flux from Mrk~273 and the contaminants.  The dashed lines represent

1266:   the best-fit XIS models of the contaminants extrapolated to the

1267:   HXD/PIN energy range.  The contributions from these contaminants to

1268:   the overall PIN signals are negligible.}

1269: \label{fig:hxdcontams}

1270: \end{figure}

1271: 

1272: 

1273: \begin{figure}

1274: \figurenum{4}

1275: \epsscale{0.6}

1276: \rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f4.eps}}

1277: \caption{The combined XIS-HXD/PIN spectrum of Mrk~273 with the best-fit scattering model.  The

1278:   horizontal axis is energy in the observer's frame. The directly

1279:   transmitted AGN flux is $\sim$5\% of the intrinsic flux.

1280:   The iron line at $\sim$6.4~keV is detected and a

1281:   MEKAL model with gas temperature $\sim$0.7~keV is needed to reproduce

1282:   the soft X-rays. The cross-normalization of the HXD/PIN with respect

1283:   to XIS0 is assumed to be 1.13.  The best-fit parameters for the full band (XIS+HXD/PIN)

1284:   modeling are listed in Table~\ref{tab:fithxd}.  }

1285: \label{fig:hxdfig}

1286: \end{figure}

1287: 

1288: \begin{figure}

1289: \figurenum{5}

1290: \epsscale{1}

1291: \plotone{f5.eps}

1292: \caption{Observed 0.5--2~keV (top) and 2--10~keV (bottom) fluxes of

1293:   $F$05189--2524 from 1995 to 2006 as

1294:   determined from {\it ASCA}, {\it BeppoSAX}, {\it XMM-Newton}, {\it

1295:   Chandra}, and {\it Suzaku} data.  While there has been little change

1296: in the 0.5--2~keV flux, the nominal 2--10~keV flux of $F$05189--2524 has 

1297: decreased by a factor of $\sim$30 since previous observations.  The dashed line represents the average ``high'' state flux (measurements made prior to {\it Suzaku}) as weighted by the measurement errors while the dotted lines denote one standard deviation away from the mean.  The 2--10~keV flux value as measured by {\it Suzaku} is $\sim$4 standard deviations away from the weighted mean.  The

1298: {\it ASCA} (1995) and {\it BeppoSAX} (1999) values are drawn from

1299: \citet{severgnini}; the {\it XMM-Newton} (2001) and {\it Chandra} (2002)

1300: values are drawn from our modeling of the archived spectra with

1301: the scattering model in this work (see \S\ref{sec:dis05189}).  The error bars for the 2006 value are within the data point.}

1302: \label{fig:05189var}

1303: \end{figure}

1304: 

1305: \begin{figure}

1306: \figurenum{6}

1307: \epsscale{.8}

1308: \rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f6.eps}}

1309: \caption{Comparison of the unfolded spectra of $F$05189--2524 from the 2001 March {\it XMM-Newton} (open triangles), 2001 October {\it Chandra} (open squares), 2002 January {\it Chandra} (open circles), and 2006 April {\it Suzaku} (closed squares) observations.  The unfolded spectra were created using the best-fit models to each individual spectrum.  Below $\sim$1.3~keV, there appears to have been negligible change in flux or spectral shape between the different observations.  However, above $\sim$1.3~keV, the spectral change is obvious.  The iron line is prominent in the {\it Suzaku} data, but is not noticeable in the other observations.  The best-fit models to the spectrum changed from a scattering-dominated scenario in 2001 and 2002 to a reflection-dominated scenario in 2006.  This may be an indication that the central source has faded prior to 2006 or variations in the column density.}

1310: 

1311: \label{fig:05189uf}

1312: \end{figure}

1313: 

1314: \begin{figure}

1315: \figurenum{7}

1316: \epsscale{0.7}

1317: \plotone{f7.eps}

1318: \caption{The two models to the {\em Chandra}-ACIS, {\em

1319:     XMM}-Newton-EPIC pn, and {\it Suzaku}-XIS/PIN data used to explain

1320:   the change in the 2--10~keV spectral shape of $F$05189--2524:

1321:   (top) change in the absorbing column alters the spectral shape of the source, and (bottom) the AGN has switched off and has left behind a residual reflection component (see \S\ref{sec:dis05189} for details).  The response

1322:   from each detector is folded in with the data.  The horizontal axis

1323:   is energy in the observer's frame. The cross-normalization factor is

1324:   assumed to be unity for {\em XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra} with

1325:   respect to {\it Suzaku}-XIS0.  Both models have comparable

1326:   reduced $\chi ^2$ values (1.27 for 503 d.o.f. versus 1.30 for 502 d.o.f.) and appear to fit the

1327:   overall 0.5--10~keV spectrum well.  Neither model can be ruled out by the data.  Table~\ref{tab:fitmulti} lists the results from this modeling.}

1328: \label{fig:05189multi}

1329: \end{figure}

1330: 

1331: 

1332: \begin{figure}

1333: \figurenum{8}

1334: \epsscale{.8}

1335: \plotone{f8.eps}

1336: \caption{Observed 0.5--2~keV (top) and 2--10~keV (bottom) fluxes of

1337:   Mrk~273 (crosses) and Mrk~273x (open circles) from 1994 to 2006 as

1338:   determined from {\it ASCA}, {\it BeppoSAX}, {\it XMM-Newton}, {\it

1339:   Chandra}, and {\it Suzaku} data.  Each asterisk represents the sum of

1340:   the fluxes from Mrk~273 and Mrk~273x.  In the top panel, the dashed line represents the weighted average of the data points for Mrk~273 and Mrk~273x from 1994, 2000, and 2002 and the dotted lines represent a single standard deviation away from that mean.  In the bottom panel, the dashed line represents the weighted average of the data points for Mrk~273 and Mrk~273x from 1994, 1998, 2002, and 2006 and the dotted lines denote one standard deviation away from the mean.  Small flux increases

1341:   in Mrk~273 may be observed in 2006 in the 0.5--2~keV band and in 2000 in the 2--10~keV band. 

1342: The {\it ASCA} (1994) and {\it BeppoSAX} (1998)  values are drawn from

1343:   \citet{iwasawa99} and \citet{risaliti00}, respectively.  The {\it

1344:     Chandra} (2000) and {\it XMM-Newton} (2002) values are derived

1345:   from our modeling of the archived spectra with the

1346:   scattering model (see \S\ref{sec:dis273}).  The error bars to the total flux

1347:   are the sums of the errors in the measured fluxes of Mrk~273 and

1348:   Mrk~273x added in quadrature.  A small horizontal offset was applied to the Mrk~273 data points to better display the measurement errors.  Since the errors on the {\it

1349:     BeppoSAX} measurements are not published, they are assumed to be

1350:   $\pm$20\% based on the results on $F05189-2524$ by

1351:   \citet{severgnini}.}

1352: \label{fig:273var}

1353: \end{figure}

1354: 

1355: \begin{figure}

1356: \figurenum{9}

1357: \epsscale{.8}

1358: \rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f9.eps}}

1359: \caption{Comparison of the unfolded spectra of Mrk 273 from the 2000

1360: {\it Chandra} (open circles), 2002 {\it XMM-Newton} (open triangles),

1361: and 2006 {\it Suzaku} (closed squares) observations.  The unfolded

1362: spectra were created using the best-fit models to each individual

1363: spectrum.  The shapes of the spectra appear consistent between 1 and

1364: 2~keV.  The flux of the {\it Suzaku} spectrum is higher than that of

1365: the others below 1~keV, while the {\it Chandra} spectrum appears to be

1366: higher than the others between 4 and 6~keV.  These differences are

1367: correlated with the flux variability as shown in

1368: Figure~\ref{fig:273var}.  This comparison also shows that the iron

1369: line at 6.4~keV is detected in all three observations.  While the

1370: 2--10~keV flux variability is not very significant, the spectral shape

1371: of the source has changed between 2000 and 2006.  This change may be

1372: due to the variations in the column density.}

1373: \label{fig:m273uf}

1374: \end{figure}

1375: 

1376: \begin{figure}

1377: \figurenum{10}

1378: \epsscale{0.5}

1379: \plotone{f10.eps}

1380: \caption{The three models to the {\em Chandra}-ACIS, {\em

1381:     XMM}-Newton-EPIC pn, and {\it Suzaku}-XIS/PIN data used to explain

1382:   the changes in the 2--10~keV spectral shape of Mrk~273: scenario 1

1383:   (top) tests only a change in the absorbing column, scenario 2

1384:   (middle) tests only a change in the intrinsic luminosity of the AGN,

1385:   and scenario 3 (bottom) tests the change in the covering fraction of

1386:   the absorber (see \S\ref{sec:dis273} for details).  The response

1387:   from each detector is folded in with the data.  The horizontal axis

1388:   is energy in the observer's frame. The cross-normalization factor is

1389:   assumed to be unity for {\em XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra} with

1390:   respect to {\it Suzaku}-XIS0.  While all three models have similar

1391:   reduced $\chi ^2$ values (1.76, 1.53, and 1.39 respectively), the

1392:   third model provides the best-fit to the overall 0.5--40~keV

1393:   spectrum.  Thus, we favor the third scenario (change in the covering

1394:   fraction of the absorbers) as the best explanation for the change in

1395:   the 2--10~keV spectral shape of Mrk~273.  Table~\ref{tab:fitmulti}

1396:   lists the results from this modeling.}

1397: \label{fig:273multi}

1398: \end{figure}

1399: 

1400: \end{document}

1401: 

1402: 

1403: