1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: \usepackage{apjfonts,lscape}
5: %\usepackage{lscape}
6: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
7: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
8:
9: %\slugcomment{To appear in ApJ}
10:
11: \shorttitle{\sc A cosmic abundance standard}
12: \shortauthors{\sc Przybilla et al.}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{
17: A cosmic abundance standard: chemical homogeneity of the solar neighbourhood\\
18: and the ISM dust-phase composition
19: \altaffilmark{1}
20: }
21:
22: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
23: %% author and affiliation information.
24: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
25: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
26: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
27: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
28:
29: \author{Norbert Przybilla\altaffilmark{2}, Maria-Fernanda
30: Nieva\altaffilmark{2,3}
31: and Keith Butler\altaffilmark{4}}
32: \email{przybilla@sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de}
33: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at the European Southern
34: Observatory, proposal 074.B-0455(A).}
35: \altaffiltext{2}{Dr. Remeis-Observatory,
36: %University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,
37: Sternwartstr.\,7, D-96049 Bamberg, Germany}
38: \altaffiltext{3}{MPI for Astrophysics,
39: Postfach 1317, D-85741 Garching, Germany}
40: \altaffiltext{4}{University Observatory, Scheinerstr. 1, D-86179 Munich, Germany}
41:
42: %\and
43: %\author{}
44: %\affil{}
45: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
46: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
47: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
48: %% affiliation.
49:
50: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
51: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
52: %Foundation.}
53:
54: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
55: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
56: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
57: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
58: %% editorial office after submission.
59:
60: \begin{abstract}
61: A representative sample of unevolved early B-type stars in nearby OB associations
62: and the field is analysed to unprecedented precision using NLTE techniques.
63: The resulting chemical composition is found to be more metal-rich and much more
64: homogeneous than indicated by previous work. A rms scatter of $\sim$10\% in
65: abundances is found for the six stars (and confirmed by six
66: evolved stars), the same as reported for ISM gas-phase abundances.
67: A cosmic abundance standard
68: for the present-day solar neighbourhood
69: is proposed, implying mass fractions for hydrogen, helium and
70: metals of $X$\,$=$\,0.715, $Y$\,$=$\,0.271 and $Z$\,$=$\,0.014. Good
71: agreement with solar photospheric abundances as reported from recent 3D
72: radiative-hydrodynamical simulations of the solar atmosphere is obtained.
73: As a first application we use the cosmic abundance standard as a proxy for the
74: determination of the local ISM dust-phase composition,
75: putting tight observational constraints on dust models.
76: \end{abstract}
77:
78: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
79: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
80: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
81: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
82:
83: \keywords{stars: abundances --- stars: early-type --- stars: fundamental
84: parameters --- ISM: abundances --- dust, extinction --- solar neighbourhood}
85:
86: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
87: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
88: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
89: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
90: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
91: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
92: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
93: %% each reference.
94:
95:
96: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
97: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
98: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
99: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
100: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
101: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
102: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
103: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
104: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
105: %%
106: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
107: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
108: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
109: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
110:
111:
112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
113:
114:
115: \section{Introduction}\label{intro}
116: %\setcounter{footnote}{4}
117: The Sun is unique among the stars because independent~in\-dicators allow its
118: chemical composition to be constrained with a precision unmatched for any
119: other star. This can
120: be done by spectroscopic analysis of its photosphere and by
121: measurement of solar wind and solar energetic particles. Solar nebula
122: abundances can be determined from CI
123: chon\-drites, which are unaltered since the formation of the system.
124: The wealth of information established the Sun~as~the principal
125: standard for the chemical composition of cosmic matter
126: (e.g. Grevesse \& Sauval 1998, GS98; Holweger 2001; Asplund et al 2005,
127: AGS05). %, and references therein).
128: However, is a 4.6\,Gyr old star indeed representative of the cosmic matter in its
129: neighbourhood\footnote{
130: We consider the region
131: at distances shorter than $\sim$1\,kpc (and $\pm$500 pc in
132: Galactocentric direction)
133: as solar neighbourhood in order to minimize bias
134: due to Galactic abundance gradients, see Fig.~\ref{evol} for a schematic
135: overview.}
136: at present?
137:
138: Ideal indicators for pristine abundances
139: are unevolved early B-stars of spectral types B0--B2.
140: Slowly rotating stars are preferred as
141: their photospheres should be essentially unaffected by mixing of
142: CN-processed material
143: \citep[][]{maeder00}. The
144: atmospheres of early B-stars are also unaffected by atomic diffusion
145: that gives rise to peculiarities of metal abundances in many
146: later-type stars \citep[e.g.][]{smith96}.
147: A major practical advantage is also their relatively simple photospheric
148: physics, which is represented well by
149: classical model atmospheres,
150: unaffected by complications such as stellar winds
151: or convection.
152:
153: As a consequence, early B-stars in the solar neighbourhood were subject of
154: several NLTE studies in the past
155: \citep[e.g.][]{gies92,kilian92,kilian94,cunha94,daflon99,daflon01a,daflon01b,daflon03,lyubimkov04,lyubimkov05}.
156: Overall, they found a wide range of abundances, by about a factor $\sim$10,
157: and an average metallicity of only $\sim$2/3 solar (GS98).
158: Hence, the impression arose that the solar neighbourhood is chemically highly
159: heterogeneous, and the Sun anomalously metal-rich compared to young stars.
160:
161: Both findings are problematic in
162: terms of Galactic chemical evolution. Dispersal of stellar nucleosynthesis
163: products increases the metallicity
164: over time \citep[e.g.][]{chiappini03} and hydrodynamic mixing tends to
165: homogenize the interstellar medium (ISM)
166: locally \citep{edmunds75}. Characteristic timescales
167: for homogenization are short, ranging from 10$^6$--10$^8$\,yrs on scales of
168: 100-1000\,pc \citep{roy95}.
169:
170: In contrast to the young stars the interstellar gas shows a high
171: degree of chemical homogeneity in the solar neighbourhood \citep{sofia04},
172: with the
173: rms scatter of mean abundances being $\sim$10\%.
174: However, the ISM gas phase is not suitable as a tracer for cosmic
175: abundances because of selective depletion
176: of elements onto dust grains.
177: Here we reinvestigate the conundrum of inhomogeneous stellar vs. homogeneous
178: ISM gas-phase abundances in the solar neighbourhood, motivated by the
179: finding of homogeneous B-star abundances for carbon
180: \citep[see detailed analysis by][NP08]{nieva08}.
181: %A precision analysis of
182: %a sample of early B-type stars in the solar neighbourhood
183: %will be used to establish a cosmic abundance standard and to determine the
184: %ISM dust-phase composition in a first application.
185:
186:
187:
188: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
189:
190:
191: \section{Sample Analysis}
192: Six bright and apparently slow-rotating early B stars in the solar
193: neighbourhood -- randomly distributed in
194: OB associations and in the field, and covering a wide range of stellar parameters --
195: were observed in early 2005 at ESO/La Silla,
196: % the European Southern Observatory on La Silla, Chile,
197: using FEROS on the 2.2\,m telescope.
198: Spectra with broad wavelength coverage and resolving power $\lambda/\Delta
199: \lambda$\,$\approx$\,48\,000 were
200: obtained, at very high-S/N (up to $\sim$800 in the $B$-band).
201:
202: %\begin{landscape}
203: %\begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}
204: %\tablecaption{Stellar parameters \& elemental abundances\label{params}}
205: %\startdata
206: {%\rotate
207: \begin{table*}
208: \footnotesize
209: \caption{Stellar parameters \& elemental abundances\label{params}}
210: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{1.5mm}
211: \begin{center}
212: \vspace{-5mm}
213: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr}
214: \tableline\\[-2.5mm]
215: \tableline
216: & \object[HR 6165]{HR\,6165} & \object[HR 3055]{HR\,3055} & \object[HR 1861]{HR\,1861} & \object[HR 2928]{HR\,2928} & \object[HR 3468]{HR\,3468} & \object[HR 5285]{HR\,5285}\\
217: \tableline
218: Sp. Type & B0.2\,V & B0\,III & B1\,IV & B1\,IV & B1.5\,III & B2\,V\\
219: Association & Sco Cen & Field & Ori OB1b & Field & Field & Sco Cen\\[.5mm]
220: %$V$\,(mag) & 2.81 & 4.09 & 5.33 & 5.69 & 3.68 & 4.34 \\
221: $d$\,(pc) & 152$\pm$20 & 438$\pm$57 & 450$\pm$59 & 481$\pm$63 & 319$\pm$41 & 155$\pm$20 \\
222: $T_{\rm eff}$\,(K) & 32000$\pm$300 & 31200$\pm$300 & 27000$\pm$300 & 26300$\pm$300 & 22900$\pm$300 & 20800$\pm$300\\
223: $\log g$\,(cgs) & 4.30$\pm$0.05 & 3.95$\pm$0.05 & 4.12$\pm$0.05 & 4.15$\pm$0.05 & 3.60$\pm$0.05 & 4.22$\pm$0.05\\
224: $\xi$\,(km\,s$^{-1}$) & 5$\pm$1 & 8$\pm$1 & 3$\pm$1 & 3$\pm$1 & 5$\pm$1 & 3$\pm$1\\
225: $v\sin i$\,(km\,s$^{-1}$) & 4$\pm$4 & 29$\pm$4 & 12$\pm$1 & 14$\pm$1 & 11$\pm$2 & 18$\pm$1\\
226: $\zeta$\,(km\,s$^{-1}$) & 4$\pm$4 & 37$\pm$8 & \nodata & 20$\pm$2 & 20$\pm$1 & \nodata\\
227: \tableline
228: $\varepsilon$(He)$^{\rm a}$ & 10.99$\pm$0.05~(20) & 10.94$\pm$0.05~(16) & 10.99$\pm$0.05~(14) & 10.99$\pm$0.05~(14) & 10.99$\pm$0.05~(14) & 10.99$\pm$0.05~(13)\\
229: $\varepsilon$(C\,{\sc ii})$^{\rm b}$ & 8.27$\pm$0.14~(13) & 8.35$\pm$0.08~(10) & 8.32$\pm$0.10~(19) & 8.28$\pm$0.08~(18) & 8.36$\pm$0.10~(17) & 8.32$\pm$0.08~(20)\\
230: $\varepsilon$(C\,{\sc iii})$^{\rm b}$ & 8.31$\pm$0.11~(17) & 8.30$\pm$0.05~~~(7) & 8.36$\pm$0.03~(11) & 8.27$\pm$0.02~~~(5) & 8.47$\pm$0.04~~~(2) & 8.42$\pm$0.06~~~(2) \\
231: $\varepsilon$(C\,{\sc iv})$^{\rm b}$ & 8.34~~~(2) & 8.45~~~(2) & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata\\
232: $\varepsilon$(N\,{\sc ii})$^{\rm c}$ & 8.16$\pm$0.12~(73) & 7.77$\pm$0.08~(23) & 7.75$\pm$0.09~(61) & 8.00$\pm$0.12~(61) & 7.92$\pm$0.10~(56) & 7.76$\pm$0.08~(47) \\
233: $\varepsilon$(O\,{\sc i})$^{\rm d}$ & \nodata & \nodata & 8.82$\pm$0.03~~~(3) & 8.83$\pm$0.05~~~(5) & 8.82$\pm$0.03~~~(7) & 8.79$\pm$0.05~~~(7) \\
234: $\varepsilon$(O\,{\sc ii})$^{\rm e}$ & 8.77$\pm$0.08~(51) & 8.79$\pm$0.10~(41) & 8.74$\pm$0.11~(52) & 8.74$\pm$0.09~(46) & 8.80$\pm$0.09~(40) & 8.71$\pm$0.05~(45) \\
235: $\varepsilon$(Ne\,{\sc i})$^{\rm f}$ & 8.12$\pm$0.05~~~(2) & \nodata & 8.12$\pm$0.08~~~(9) & 8.11$\pm$0.09~~~(9) & 8.05$\pm$0.09~(10) & 8.07$\pm$0.07~(14)\\
236: $\varepsilon$(Ne\,{\sc ii})$^{\rm f}$ & 8.14$\pm$0.07~(16) & 8.07$\pm$0.07~~~(8) & 8.08$\pm$0.09~(14) & 8.03$\pm$0.12~~~(8) & 8.06$\pm$0.03~~~(2) & \nodata\\
237: $\varepsilon$(Mg\,{\sc ii})$^{\rm g}$ & 7.62$\pm$0.03~~~(3) & 7.60$\pm$0.01~~~(2) & 7.58$\pm$0.10~~~(6) & 7.56$\pm$0.03~~~(3) & 7.51$\pm$0.10~~~(6) & 7.50$\pm$0.05~~~(4) \\
238: $\varepsilon$(Si\,{\sc ii})$^{\rm h}$ & \nodata & \nodata & 7.47$\pm$0.17~~~(2) & 7.56$\pm$0.08~~~(2) & 7.51$\pm$0.10~~~(5) & 7.22$\pm$0.13~~~(6) \\
239: $\varepsilon$(Si\,{\sc iii})$^{\rm h}$& 7.50$\pm$0.08~~~(8) & 7.48$\pm$0.08~~~(6) & 7.46$\pm$0.11~~~(9) & 7.52$\pm$0.11~~~(8) & 7.53$\pm$0.17~~~(7) &7.29$\pm$0.05~~~(9) \\
240: $\varepsilon$(Si\,{\sc iv})$^{\rm h}$ & 7.50$\pm$0.04~(10) & 7.51$\pm$0.18~~\,(5) & 7.50$\pm$0.08~~\,(3) & 7.48$\pm$0.14~~\,(2) & 7.50$\pm$0.04~~\,(2) & \nodata \\
241: $\varepsilon$(Fe\,{\sc ii})$^{\rm i}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 7.38~~~(1) & 7.38~~~(1) \\
242: $\varepsilon$(Fe\,{\sc iii})$^{\rm j}$& 7.38$\pm$0.12~(17) & 7.49$\pm$0.12~~~(5) & 7.44$\pm$0.09~(33) & 7.48$\pm$0.10~(30) & 7.42$\pm$0.12~(36) & 7.40$\pm$0.09~(32) \\
243: %\enddata
244: %\end{deluxetable}
245: \tableline
246: \end{tabular}
247: \end{center}
248: \vspace{-3mm}
249: $\varepsilon({\rm El})$\,$=$\,$\log({\rm El}/{\rm H})$\,$+$\,12, with rms uncertainties and number of analysed lines in parentheses.
250: NLTE model atoms: H: \citet{przybilla04};
251: $^{\rm a}$\,\citet{przybilla05};
252: $^{\rm b}$\,\citet{nieva06,nieva08}; $^{\rm c}$\,\citet{przybilla01}; $^{\rm
253: d}$\,\citet{przybillaetal00}; $^{\rm e}$\,\citet{becker88},updated; $^{\rm
254: f}$\,\citet{morel08}, $gf$-values of \citet{fft04} for \ion{Ne}{1}; $^{\rm g}$\,\citet{przybillaetal01}; $^{\rm
255: h}$\,\citet{becker90}, extended \& updated; $^{\rm i}$\,\citet{becker98};
256: $^{\rm j}$\,\citet{morel07}\\
257: \end{table*}}
258: %\end{landscape}
259:
260:
261: The quantitative analysis of the sample stars was carried
262: out following the hybrid NLTE approach discussed by
263: \citet[][NP07]{nieva07} and NP08.
264: In brief, line-blanketed LTE model atmospheres were computed with ATLAS9
265: \citep{kurucz93} and NLTE line-formation calculations were performed using updated
266: versions of our codes {\sc Detail} and {\sc Surface}. %\citep{giddings81, butler85}.
267: State-of-the-art model atoms were adopted (see Table~\ref{params}), which
268: allow atmospheric parameters and
269: elemental abundances to be obtained with high accuracy.
270:
271: \begin{figure}[b]
272: %\epsscale{0.85}
273: \plotone{f1.eps}
274: \caption{Comparison with stellar evolution tracks \citep{meynet03}. Observed
275: and predicted N/C ratios (by mass) are indicated. The inset shows the
276: location of the sample stars as projected on the Galactic plane, with the
277: solar neighbourhood (as considered here) schematically outlined.
278: Crosses denote positions of BA-SGs from the control sample (see text).
279: \label{evol}}
280: \end{figure}
281:
282:
283: Multiple independent spectroscopic indicators were considered simultaneously
284: for the determination of the atmospheric parameters, effective temperature
285: $T_{\rm eff}$ and
286: surface gravity $\log g$: all Stark-broadened Balmer lines
287: and 4--6 ionization equilibria, of \ion{He}{1/II},
288: \ion{C}{2/III/IV}, \ion{O}{1/II}, \ion{Ne}{1/II}, \ion{Si}{2/III/IV}
289: and \ion{Fe}{2/III}. Also, the observed spectral energy distributions
290: were reproduced \citep{nieva06}. The %resulting
291: redundancy
292: helps to avoid systematic errors. The microturbulent velocity $\xi$ was determined
293: %in the standard way
294: by demanding that abundances be independent of line
295: equivalent widths. Elemental abundances $\varepsilon$(El),
296: rotational velocity $v \sin i$ and macroturbulence $\zeta$ were determined from
297: fits to individual line profiles. The results are summarized in
298: Table~\ref{params}. Stellar parameters and He and C abundances
299: are identical with those derived by NP07/NP08,
300: except for HR\,5285, where consideration of additional ionization equilibria
301: indicated small revisions, though agreement is obtained
302: within the mutual uncertainties. Spectral types
303: and spectroscopic distances are also given in Table~\ref{params},
304: agreeing well with HIPPARCOS parallaxes (HR\,6165, HR\,5285)
305: or with the association distance (HR\,1861).
306: The positions of the stars in the $T_{\rm
307: eff}$--$\log g$-plane are indicated in Fig.~\ref{evol}, where a comparison with
308: evolution tracks
309: is made. An overview of the location of the stars
310: in the solar vicinity is also given there.
311:
312:
313: The uncertainties in the atmospheric parameters were determined from the
314: quality of the simultaneous fits to all diagnostic indicators. Statistical
315: uncertainties for abundances were obtained from the
316: individual line data (rms values). Systematic errors in the abundances due
317: to uncertainties in atmospheric parameters, atomic data and the quality of the
318: spectrum are $\sim$0.1\,dex \citep[NP08,][]{przybillaetal06}, i.e. about as large
319: as the statistical errors.
320:
321: \begin{figure*}
322: \centering
323: \includegraphics[width=.97\linewidth]{f2.eps}
324: \caption{Comparison of chemical abundance studies (NLTE) of B-stars in the
325: solar neighbourhood.
326: Red bars: present work; full line and thick full line (for the same stars
327: as in our work): \citet{kilian92,kilian94}; dotted: \citet{cunha94},
328: \citet{cunha06} for Ne;
329: short-dashed: \citet{gies92}, excluding bright giants and SGs;
330: long-dashed: \citet{daflon99,daflon01a,daflon01b,daflon03}; dot-dashed:
331: \citet{morel08};
332: triple-dot-dashed: \citet{lyubimkov04,lyubimkov05}. Bin width is $\sigma$/2
333: of the individual studies. Iron abundances in LTE in all
334: previous work. HR\,5285 is Si-peculiar and therefore excluded from the
335: silicon mean abundance. Solar abundances ($\odot$): GS98 \& AGS05 (lower values).
336: The panel for C is reproduced from NP08 for completeness.
337: See the text for details.\\ \label{histograms}}
338: \end{figure*}
339:
340:
341: Our analysis of each {\em individual} star differs from standard studies
342: %(Sect.~\ref{intro})
343: in two main respects: {\sc i}) practically all (un\-blen\-ded) lines of
344: the ion spectra are analyzed instead of a few selected `good' lines
345: thus avoiding selection effects, and
346: {\sc ii}) all parameter indicators (in particular the
347: ionization equilibria) are closely matched simultaneously,
348: which has never been achieved before. As a result, practically the {\em entire} observed
349: stellar spectrum is reproduced closely by the spectral synthesis,
350: see NP07, NP08, \citet{przybillaetal08} for examples.
351: This is facilitated by the use of critically evaluated data in the model
352: atom construction and a (time-consuming) iterative approach for a precise determination of
353: the stellar parameters
354: (NP08).
355: Less accurate photometric $T_{\rm eff}$-estimates as adopted in most previous work
356: are avoided, as
357: $T_{\rm eff}$-uncertainties are often the most important sources of systematic
358: error in the abundance derivation, next to ill-chosen atomic data (NP08) and
359: $\log g$-uncertainties (NP07).
360:
361:
362:
363:
364: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
365:
366:
367:
368: \section{Chemical homogeneity of the solar vicinity}
369: The status of previous NLTE abundance studies of early B-stars in the solar
370: neighbourhood (covering clusters, associations and field stars)
371: is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{histograms}. A wide range of abundance values
372: is found for most elements, typically spanning $\sim$1\,dex
373: \citep[for comparison, such a range is bridged by
374: the cumulative effect of $\sim$13\,Gyrs of Galactochemical
375: evolution, see e.g. Fig.~2 of][]{chiappini03}. Moreover,
376: the abundance distributions peak in most cases at sub-solar values, in particular
377: when referring to
378: the solar composition of GS98.
379: Exceptions are He, where most previous studies find values on average larger than
380: solar, and Ne (about solar, GS98, from two very recent studies; see also
381: Lanz et al. 2008 for the case of Ar).
382: Several of these older B-star studies were combined by \citet{snow96} and
383: Sofia \& Meyer (2001, SM01, see Table~\ref{abus}) to derive a reference composition,
384: inevitably resulting in sub-solar average values and a large rms scatter.
385: The former
386: discrepancy has since been largely removed from a re-evaluation of solar abundances
387: (AGS05). However, the status quo in
388: terms of Galactochemical evolution can only be understood by invoking and fine-tuning extra
389: processes such as infall/outflow of material and local retention of supernova
390: products by large~amounts.
391:
392: On the other hand, our sample of early B-stars implies a high degree of homogeneity
393: for elemental abundances in the solar neighbourhood, with a scatter of $\sim$10\%,
394: and absolute values of about solar (GS98 and/or AGS05, see Fig.~\ref{histograms} and
395: Table~\ref{abus}). The only
396: exception is N, which is most sensitive to mixing of the atmospheric
397: layers with CN-processed material
398: \citep[e.g.][]{maeder00}. In this case the
399: pristine N abundance may be indicated by the 3 objects with the lowest
400: value, implying a pristine N/C ratio of 0.31$\pm$0.05 (by mass; error bar
401: accounts for additional uncertainties).
402:
403: Although our sample is small, we regard it as representative for the early
404: B-star population in the solar neighbourhood.
405: The stars sample the relevant portion of the H-burning phase of the objects in
406: the HRD in terms of $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log g$ (see Fig.~\ref{evol}). They also sample
407: one hemisphere of the solar neighbourhood (inset of Fig.~\ref{evol}), half of them
408: located in OB associations and the other half in the field.
409: All six stars were analyzed by \citet{kilian92,kilian94} before,
410: typically spanning the entire abundance range in her sample of 21 stars (see
411: Fig.~\ref{histograms}). We therefore also find a chance
412: selection of stars with similar chemical composition for our sample unlikely.
413: The wide abundance ranges found in previous work reflect the lower
414: accuracy of the analyses, while shifts of the abundance distributions
415: relative to each other reflect systematics, with different temperature
416: scales being the most important among these.
417: Our results are supported further by a control sample of six BA-type
418: supergiants (BA-SGs, Fig.~\ref{evol}), for which mean
419: values of $\varepsilon$(O)\,=\,8.80$\pm$0.02 and
420: $\varepsilon$(Mg)\,=\,7.55$\pm$0.07
421: were derived using the same analysis methodology as applied
422: here \citep{przybillaetal06,firnstein06}.
423:
424: The finding of chemical homogeneity for our sample is in
425: excellent accordance with results from the analysis of the ISM gas-phase in
426: the solar neighbourhood \citep[][and references therein]{sofia04} and with theory regarding the
427: efficiency of hydrodynamic mixing in the ISM \citep[][]{edmunds75,roy95}.
428: Excellent agreement is also obtained with elemental abundances in the Orion
429: nebula \citep[][E04, see Table~\ref{abus}]{esteban04}, with the exception of
430: C, which may be a consequence of the atomic data used in the Orion analysis
431: (see NP08 for the stellar case) plus overestimated dust corrections.
432:
433: In the following we briefly investigate the impact of this {\em cosmic abundance standard}
434: on important topics of contemporary astrophysics.
435:
436:
437: %\clearpage
438: %\begin{landscape}
439: {%\rotate
440: \begin{table*}
441: \footnotesize
442: %\begin{deluxetable}{lr@{\,/\,}r@{~~~~~~~}rrrrrrr@{\,/\,}r}
443: \caption{Chemical composition of different object classes in the solar neighbourhood and of the Sun\label{abus}}
444: \begin{center}
445: \vspace{-5mm}
446: \begin{tabular}{lr@{/}r@{~~~~~~~}rrrrrr@{/}r}
447: %\startdata
448: \tableline\\[-2.5mm]
449: \tableline
450: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{cosmic standard} & Orion & & Young & ISM & ISM\\
451: Elem. & \multicolumn{2}{c}{B stars -- this work}& gas+dust$^{\rm b}$ & B stars$^{\rm c}$ & F\&G stars$^{\rm c}$ & gas & dust$^{\rm d}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Sun$^{\rm e/f}$}\\
452: \tableline
453: He & 10.98$\pm$0.02 & \nodata$^{\rm a}$ & 10.988$\pm$0.003 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \multicolumn{2}{c}{10.99$\pm$0.02}\\
454: C & 8.32$\pm$0.03 & 209$\pm$15 & 8.52$\pm$0.02 & 8.28$\pm$0.17 & 8.55$\pm$0.10 & 8.15$\pm$0.06$^{\rm g}$ & 68$\pm$26 & 8.52$\pm$0.06 & 8.39$\pm$0.05\\
455: N & 7.76$\pm$0.05 & 58$\pm$\phantom{4}7 & 7.73$\pm$0.09 & 7.81$\pm$0.21 & \nodata & 7.79$\pm$0.03$^{\rm h}$ & \nodata & 7.92$\pm$0.06 & 7.78$\pm$0.06\\
456: O & 8.76$\pm$0.03 & 575$\pm$41 & 8.73$\pm$0.03 & 8.54$\pm$0.16 & 8.65$\pm$0.15 & 8.59$\pm$0.01$^{\rm i}$ & 186$\pm$42 & 8.83$\pm$0.06 & 8.66$\pm$0.05\\
457: Ne & 8.08$\pm$0.03 & 120$\pm$\phantom{4}9 & 8.05$\pm$0.07 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 8.08$\pm$0.06 & 7.84$\pm$0.06\\
458: Mg & 7.56$\pm$0.05 & 36$\pm$\phantom{4}4 & \nodata & 7.36$\pm$0.13 & 7.63$\pm$0.17 & 6.17$\pm$0.02$^{\rm j}$ & 34.8$\pm$4.4 & 7.58$\pm$0.05 & 7.53$\pm$0.09\\
459: Si & 7.50$\pm$0.02 & 32$\pm$\phantom{4}1 & \nodata & 7.27$\pm$0.20 & 7.60$\pm$0.14 & 6.35$\pm$0.05$^{\rm j}$ & 29.6$\pm$2.2 & 7.55$\pm$0.05 & 7.51$\pm$0.04\\
460: Fe & 7.44$\pm$0.04 & 28$\pm$\phantom{4}3 & \nodata & 7.45$\pm$0.26 & 7.45$\pm$0.12 & 5.41$\pm$0.04$^{\rm j}$ & 27.3$\pm$2.7 & 7.50$\pm$0.05 & 7.45$\pm$0.05\\
461: %\enddata
462: \tableline
463: \end{tabular}
464: \end{center}
465: \vspace{-3mm}
466: $^{\rm a}$\,in units of $\log ({\rm El}/{\rm H})+12$\,/\,atoms per 10$^6$ H
467: nuclei -- computed from average star abundances (mean values over all individual
468: lines {\em per element}, equal weight per line);
469: $^{\rm b}$\,E04;
470: $^{\rm c}$\,SM01;
471: $^{\rm d}$\,difference between the cosmic standard
472: and ISM gas-phase abundances, in units of atoms per 10$^6$ H nuclei;
473: %\,N: \citet{meyer97}, corrected according to \citet{jensen07}, O: \citet{cartledge04};
474: $^{\rm e/f}$\,GS98/AGS05, photospheric values; %abundances for refractory elements;
475: $^{\rm g}$\,\citet{sofia04};
476: $^{\rm h}$\,\citet{meyer97}, corrected accordingly to \citet{jensen07};
477: $^{\rm i}$\,\citet{cartledge04};
478: $^{\rm j}$\,\citet{cartledge06}\\
479: %\end{deluxetable}
480: \end{table*}}
481: %\end{landscape}
482:
483:
484: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
485:
486:
487: \section{The cosmic abundance standard: first applications} %, solar abundances \& the dust-phase composition}
488: In general, excellent agreement of our B-star abundances with solar values from recent
489: 3D radiative-hydrodynamical simulations of the solar atmosphere
490: (AGS05) is obtained. The oxygen value falls between GS98 and AGS05 values
491: %\citep[see also][]{caffau08}
492: and neon is compatible with GS98.
493: %Assuming our O and Ne abundances to be also
494: %representative for the Sun, this could largely resolve the discrepancies
495: %between helioseismic constraints and the solar interior model based on
496: %photospheric abundances of AGS05 as reviewed by \citet{basu08}.
497: This opens up new perspectives in the ongoing discussion on helioseismic constraints,
498: chemical abundances and the solar interior model as reviewed by \citet{basu08}.
499:
500: Our cosmic abundance standard also facilitates a precise determination of
501: dust depletion in the local ISM for the primary constituents.
502: The amount of material incorporated into
503: dust grains is determined by the difference between our B-star abundances and
504: the ISM gas-phase abundances,
505: see Table~\ref{abus}. Accordingly, a composition poor in carbon but rich in oxygen
506: and refractory elements is indicated.
507:
508: Such studies were undertaken previously,
509: using e.g.\ abundances of the Sun, of B stars and of young F \& G stars
510: \citep[e.g.][SM01, see Table~\ref{abus}]{snow96} as proxies for the determination
511: of the dust-phase composition, however with mixed success.
512: In particular, B stars were rejected as reliable indicators as the derived
513: abundances of material in dust at that time were too low to produce the
514: observed interstellar extinction. Our study revives B stars as proxies of
515: the ISM dust-phase composition, and even more so because of the extremely
516: low abundance scatter compared to all other standards considered so far,
517: except for the Sun.
518:
519: The present results imply tight observational constraints on dust models in terms of
520: carbon abundance. The observed properties of dust grains, as
521: inferred from the interstellar extinction law, have to be produced by a
522: rather small amount of carbon, posing a challenge to most dust models
523: \citep[see e.g.][]{snow95}.
524: We can carry out an important consistency check, following
525: \citet{cartledge06}:
526: the O predicted to be incorporated in grains
527: from the observed Mg, Si and Fe dust abundances and a
528: rudimentary dust model agrees with the derived O dust abundance within
529: the mutual (small) uncertainties. For the rudimentary dust model we assume
530: silicates to be predominantly MgSiO$_3$, with only a small fraction of Fe
531: bound in silicates and only a small fraction being of olivine-like
532: composition. The remaining Mg and Fe fraction~is considered to be
533: in oxide form (MgO, FeO, Fe$_2$O$_3$, Fe$_3$O$_4$), see e.g. \citet{draine03} for a
534: discussion of observational evidence.
535:
536: Finally, we combine our B-star abundances with data for S, Cl and Ar
537: from the analysis of the Orion nebula (E04) and solar meteoritic
538: values for other abundant refractory elements (with
539: $\varepsilon$(El)\,$\gtrsim$\,5, AGS05)
540: to derive mass fractions for hydrogen, helium and the metals.
541: Values of $X$\,$=$\,0.715, $Y$\,$=$\,0.271, $Z$\,$=$\,0.014 and
542: $Z/X$\,$=$\,0.020 characterize the present-day cosmic matter in the
543: solar neighbourhood \citep[to be compared to protosolar values
544: $X_0$\,=\,0.7133, $Y_0$\,=\,0.2735 and $Z_0$=0.0132,][]{GAS07}.
545: These combined abundances are our recommended values
546: for a wide range of applications requiring an accurate knowledge of the
547: chemical composition at present (e.g.\ for opacity calculations), examples
548: being models of star/planet formation or stellar evolution (in particular of
549: short-lived massive stars), or for the empirical calibration of
550: Galactochemical evolution models.
551:
552:
553: \acknowledgments
554: We express our deep gratitude to U. Heber for support and useful
555: comments on the manuscript, and thank
556: M. Asplund and A. Serenelli
557: for stimulating discussion.
558: M.F.N. acknowledges support by DFG (grant HE\,1356/45-1).
559:
560: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{ESO 2.2m/FEROS}.
561:
562: \begin{thebibliography}{}
563:
564: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)]{asplund05}
565: Asplund, M., et al.
566: 2005, ASP Conf. Ser., 336, 25 (AGS05)
567:
568: \bibitem[Basu \& Antia(2008)]{basu08}
569: Basu, S., \& Antia, H. M. 2008, \physrep, 457, 217
570:
571: \bibitem[Becker(1998)]{becker98}
572: Becker, S. R.~1998, ASP Conf. Ser., 131, 137
573:
574: \bibitem[Becker \& Butler(1988)]{becker88}
575: Becker, S. R., \& Butler, K. 1988, \aap, 201, 232
576:
577: \bibitem[Becker \& Butler(1990)]{becker90}
578: Becker, S. R., \& Butler, K. 1990, \aap, 235, 326
579:
580: %\bibitem[Butler \& Giddings(1985)]{butler85}
581: %Butler, K. \& Giddings, J.R.~1985, in
582: %Newsletter of Analysis of Astronomical Spectra, No. 9 (Univ. London)
583:
584: %\bibitem[Caffau et al.(2008)]{caffau08}
585: %Caffau, E., Ludwig, H.-G., Steffen, M., et al. 2008, A\&A, 488, 1031
586:
587: \bibitem[Cartledge et al.(2004)]{cartledge04}
588: Cartledge, S. I. B., Lauroesch, J. T., et al.
589: 2004, \apj, 613, 1037
590:
591: \bibitem[Cartledge et al.(2006)]{cartledge06}
592: Cartledge, S. I. B., Lauroesch, J. T., et al.
593: 2006, \apj, 641, 327
594:
595: \bibitem[Chiappini et al.(2003)]{chiappini03}
596: Chiappini, C., Romano, D., \& Matteucci, F. 2003, \mnras, 339, 63
597:
598: \bibitem[Cunha \& Lambert(1994)]{cunha94}
599: Cunha, K., \& Lambert, D. L.~1994, \apj, 426, 170
600:
601: \bibitem[Cunha et al.(2006)]{cunha06}
602: Cunha, K., Hubeny, I., \& Lanz, T. 2006, ApJ, 647, L143
603:
604: \bibitem[Daflon et al.(1999)]{daflon99}
605: Daflon, S., Cunha, K., \& Becker, S. R.~1999, \apj, 522, 950
606:
607: \bibitem[Daflon et al.(2001a)]{daflon01a}
608: Daflon, S., Cunha, K., Becker, S. R., \& Smith, V. V. 2001a, \apj, 552, 309
609:
610: \bibitem[Daflon et al.(2001b)]{daflon01b}
611: Daflon, S., Cunha, K., Butler, K., \& Smith, V. V. 2001b, \apj, 563, 325
612:
613: \bibitem[Daflon et al.(2003)]{daflon03}
614: Daflon, S., Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., \& Butler, K. 2003, \aap, 399, 525
615:
616: \bibitem[Draine(2003)]{draine03}
617: Draine, B. T. 2003, \araa, 41, 241
618:
619: \bibitem[Edmunds(1975)]{edmunds75}
620: Edmunds, M. G. 1975, \apss, 32, 483
621:
622: \bibitem[Esteban et al.(2004)]{esteban04}
623: Esteban, C., et al. 2004, \mnras, 355, 229 (E04)
624:
625: \bibitem[Firnstein(2006)]{firnstein06}
626: Firnstein, M. 2006, Diploma Thesis, Univ. Erlangen-Nuremberg
627:
628: \bibitem[Froese Fischer \& Tachiev(2004)]{fft04}
629: Froese Fischer, C., \& Tachiev, G. 2004, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 87, 1
630:
631: %\bibitem[Giddings(1981)]{giddings81}
632: %Giddings, J. R.~1981, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London
633:
634: \bibitem[Gies \& Lambert(1992)]{gies92}
635: Gies, D. R., \& Lambert, D. L.~1992, \apj, 387, 673
636:
637: \bibitem[Gre\-vesse \& Sau\-val(1998)]{grevesse98}
638: Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A. J. 1998, \ssr, 85, 161 (GS98)
639:
640: \bibitem[Grevesse et al.(2007)]{GAS07}
641: Grevesse, N., Asplund, M., \& Sauval, A. J.~2007, \ssr, 130, 105
642:
643: \bibitem[Holweger(2001)]{holweger01}
644: Holweger, H. 2001, AIP Conf. Proc., 598, 23
645:
646: \bibitem[Jensen et al.(2007)]{jensen07}
647: Jensen, A. G., Rachford, B. L., \& Snow, T. P. 2007, \apj, 654, 955
648:
649: \bibitem[Kilian(1992)]{kilian92}
650: Kilian, J.~1992, \aap, 262, 17
651:
652: \bibitem[Kilian(1994)]{kilian94}
653: Kilian, J.~1994, \aap, 282, 867
654:
655: \bibitem[Kurucz(1993)]{kurucz93}
656: Kurucz, R. L.~1993, CD-ROM 13
657: (Cambridge: SAO)
658:
659: \bibitem[Lanz et al.(2008)]{lanz08}
660: Lanz, T., Cunha, K., Holtzman, J., \& Hubeny, I. 2008, \apj, 678, 1342
661:
662: \bibitem[Lyubimkov et al.(2004)]{lyubimkov04}
663: Lyubimkov,\,L.\,S.,\,Rostopchin,\,S.\,I.,\,Lambert,\,D.\,L.~2004,\,\mnras,\,351,\,745
664:
665: \bibitem[Lyubimkov et al.(2005)]{lyubimkov05}
666: Lyubimkov, L. S., Rostopchin, S. I., et al.
667: 2005, \mnras, 358, 193
668:
669: \bibitem[Maeder \& Meynet(2000)]{maeder00}
670: Maeder, A., \& Meynet, G. 2000, \araa, 38, 143
671:
672: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(1997)]{meyer97}
673: Meyer, D. M., Cardelli, J. A., \& Sofia, U. J. 1997, \apj, 490, L103
674:
675: \bibitem[Meynet \& Maeder(2003)]{meynet03}
676: Meynet, G., \& Maeder, A. 2003, \aap, 404, 975
677:
678: \bibitem[Morel \& Butler(2008)]{morel08}
679: Morel, T., \& Butler, K. 2008, \aap, 487, 307
680:
681: \bibitem[Morel et al.(2007)]{morel07}
682: Morel, T., Butler, K., Aerts, C., et al.
683: 2007, \aap, 457, 651
684:
685: \bibitem[Nieva \& Przybilla(2006)]{nieva06}
686: Nieva, M. F., \& Przybilla, N. 2006, \apj, 639, L39
687:
688: \bibitem[Nieva \& Przybilla(2007)]{nieva07}
689: Nieva, M. F., \& Przybilla, N.~2007, \aap, 467, 295 (NP07)
690:
691: \bibitem[Nieva \& Przybilla(2008)]{nieva08}
692: Nieva, M. F., \& Przybilla, N.~2008, \aap, 481, 199 (NP08)
693:
694: \bibitem[Przybilla(2005)]{przybilla05}
695: Przybilla, N. 2005, \aap, 443, 293
696:
697: \bibitem[Przybilla \& Butler(2001)]{przybilla01}
698: Przybilla, N., \& Butler, K.~2001, \aap, 379, 955
699:
700: \bibitem[Przybilla \& Butler(2004)]{przybilla04}
701: Przybilla, N., \& Butler, K.~2004, \apj, 609, 1181
702:
703: \bibitem[Przy\-billa et al.(2000)]{przybillaetal00}
704: Przybilla, N., Butler, K., Becker, S. R., et al. 2000, \aap, 359, 1085
705:
706: \bibitem[Przybilla et al.(2001)]{przybillaetal01}
707: Przybilla, N., Butler, K., Becker, S.\,R., Kudritzki, R.\,P. 2001, \aap, 369, 1009
708:
709: \bibitem[Przybilla et al.(2006)]{przybillaetal06}
710: Przybilla, N., Butler, K., Becker, S.\,R., Kudritzki, R.\,P. 2006, \aap, 445, 1099
711:
712: %\bibitem[Przybilla et al.(2008a)]{przybillaetal08a}
713: %Przybilla, N., Nieva, M.\,F., Heber, U., et al. 2008a, \aap, 480, L37
714:
715: \bibitem[Przybilla et al.(2008)]{przybillaetal08}
716: Przybilla, N., Nieva, M.\,F., Heber, U., Butler, K. 2008, ApJ, 684, L103
717:
718: \bibitem[Roy \& Kunth(1995)]{roy95}
719: Roy, J.-R., \& Kunth, D. 1995, \aap, 294, 432
720:
721: \bibitem[Smith(1996)]{smith96}
722: Smith, K. C. 1996, \apss, 237, 77
723:
724: \bibitem[Sofia(2004)]{sofia04}
725: Sofia, U. J. 2004, ASP Conf. Ser., 309, 393
726:
727: \bibitem[Sofia \& Meyer(2001)]{sofia01}
728: Sofia, U. J., \& Meyer, D. M.~2001, \apj, 554, L221 (SM01)
729:
730: \bibitem[Snow \& Witt(1995)]{snow95}
731: Snow, T. P., \& Witt, A. N. 1995, Science, 270, 1455
732:
733: \bibitem[Snow \& Witt(1996)]{snow96}
734: Snow, T. P., \& Witt, A. N. 1996, \apj, 468, L65
735:
736: \end{thebibliography}
737:
738:
739: \end{document}
740:
741: