1: \documentclass[prd,twocolumn,amssymb,10pt]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb}
3: \usepackage{verbatim,graphicx,float}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{Multi-fluid potential in the loop cosmology}
8:
9: \author{Jakub Mielczarek}
10: \email{jakub.f.mielczarek@gmail.com}
11: \affiliation{Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, 30-244
12: Krak\'ow, Orla 171, Poland}
13:
14: %\date{\today}
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17: The scalar field can behave like a fluid with equation of state $p_{\phi}=w\rho_{\phi}$, where
18: $w \in [-1,1]$. In this Letter we derive a class of the scalar field potentials for which
19: $w=$ const. Scalar field with such a potential can mimic ordinary matter, radiation, cosmic strings, etc.
20: We perform our calculations in the framework of the loop cosmology
21: with holonomy corrections. We solve the model analytically for the whole parameter space.
22: Subsequently, we perform similar consideration for the model with a phantom field ($w<-1$).
23: We show that scalar field is monotonic function in both cases. This indicates that it can
24: be treated as a well-defined internal time for these models. Moreover we perform
25: preliminary studies of the scalar field perturbations with this potential. We indicate that
26: non-Gaussian features are present admitting for the possible observational constraints of the model.
27: \end{abstract}
28:
29: \maketitle
30:
31: \section{Introduction} \label{sec:intro}
32:
33: In the framework of Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC)\cite{Bojowald} one can introduce phenomenological
34: Hamiltonian \cite{Ashtekar:2006rx,Ashtekar:2006uz,Ashtekar:2006wn}
35: \begin{eqnarray}
36: \mathcal{H}_{\text{phen}} &=& - \frac{3}{8 \pi G \gamma^2} \sqrt{|p|} \left[ \frac{ \sin \left( \bar{\mu} c
37: \right) }{\bar{\mu}} \right]^2 \nonumber \\
38: &+& \frac{1}{2} \frac{ \pi_{\phi}^2}{ {|p|}^{3/2} } +{|p|}^{3/2}V(\phi).
39: \label{model}
40: \end{eqnarray}
41: Here effects of the quantum holonomies have been introduced. The classical limit corresponds to
42: the case $\bar{\mu}\rightarrow 0$, what gives $\sin \left( \bar{\mu} c \right)/\bar{\mu} \rightarrow c$.
43: The parameter $\bar{\mu}$ is in general function of the canonical variable $p$. In our considerations
44: we choose $\bar{\mu}=\sqrt{\Delta/|p|}$ where $\Delta=2\sqrt{3}\pi\gamma l^2_{\text{Pl}}$.
45: It was shown that this leads to the proper classical limit and can be treated as
46: a unique choice in the loop quantization class \cite{Corichi:2008zb}.
47: Based on the Hamilton equation $\dot{f} = \{f,\mathcal{H}_{\text{phen}}\}$ we can derive
48: equations of motion for the canonical
49: variables $(c,p,\phi,\pi_{\phi})$. The variables $(c,p)$ can be related to the standard FRW
50: variables $(c,|p|)=(\gamma \dot{a} V^{1/3}_0,a^2V^{2/3}_0 )$. Subsequently, with use of the
51: Hamiltonian constraint $\mathcal{H}_{\text{phen}}=0$ we can derive modified Friedmann equation
52: \begin{equation}
53: H^2\equiv \left( \frac{\dot{p}}{2p}\right)^2 =
54: \frac{\kappa}{3} \rho_{\phi} \left(1 -\frac{\rho_{\phi}}{\rho_{\text{c}}} \right)
55: \label{Friedmann}
56: \end{equation}
57: where $\kappa=8\pi G$ and
58: \begin{equation}
59: \rho_{\text{c}} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{16\pi^2 \gamma^3 l_{\text{Pl}}^4}.
60: \end{equation}
61: The equation of motion of the scalar field $\phi$ holds classical form
62: \begin{equation}
63: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+\frac{dV}{d\phi}= 0.
64: \label{fieldequation}
65: \end{equation}
66:
67: The special limit of the above theory is the case $V(\phi)=0$, then
68: $\mathcal{H}_{\text{phen}}\rightarrow \mathcal{H}_{\text{eff}}$. It means that
69: solution of the equation (\ref{Friedmann}) traces the mean value $\langle \hat{p} \rangle$
70: (for rigorous verification of the effective scenario in LQC see Ref. \cite{Taveras:2008ke}).
71: It is however not necessarily the true for the general case with $V(\phi) \neq 0$.
72: However, even when we are not sure whether theory is truly effective one, it is
73: interesting to investigate phenomenological consequences of the models with
74: potentials. Such studies have been performed for the broad class of potentials.
75: In Ref. \cite{Mielczarek:2008zv} model (\ref{model}) with constant potential
76: ($V=\Lambda/8\pi G$) has been solved analytically. Power law, cyclic and bicyclic potentials have been
77: numerically studied in Ref. \cite{Singh:2006im}. Recently model with exponential potential has
78: been studied, exhibiting sudden singularity behaviour \cite{Cailleteau:2008wu}.
79: Other examples can be found in Ref. \cite{Mielczarek:2008ps,Artymowski:2008sc}.
80:
81: In this Letter we perform restriction for the scalar field energy density and pressure
82: $p_{\phi}=w\rho_{\phi}$ with $w =$ const. In this situation scalar field can mimic
83: any matter with equation of state $p=w\rho$ where $w =$ const and $w \in [-1,1]$.
84: Based on this restriction we derive expression for the scalar field
85: potential which fulfills this condition. We repeat these considerations for the
86: case of phantom field $(w<-1)$.
87:
88: Subsequently we highlight possible applications of the model. In particular we consider
89: scalar field perturbations and indicate its non-Gaussian features. This can be
90: important from the point of observational constraints for the model. Namely
91: since the obtained potential is non-quadratic, interaction between different modes
92: is present, leading to the nonlinear effects in the CMB radiation.
93: Therefore presented model can be potentially verified with astronomical observations.
94:
95: We show that scalar field with derived potential is monotonic function of coordinate time.
96: This is important property since in quantum cosmological models we are looking for a well-defined
97: intrinsic time. This is necessary since the Hamiltonian constraint $\mathcal{H}=0$
98: leads to the time coordinate independent Wheeler-DeWitt equation $\hat{\mathcal{H}}|\Psi\rangle=0$.
99: Therefore wave function of the universe $|\Psi\rangle$ does not depend on time explicitly
100: and some new intrinsic time must be introduced to trace quantum evolution.
101: Monotonic scalar field is good candidate. Namely performing
102: canonical quantisation we replace $\pi_{\phi}\rightarrow \hat{\pi}_{\phi}=-i\partial_{\phi}$.
103: Then matter part of the Hamiltonian is
104: \begin{equation}
105: \hat{\mathcal{H}}_{\text{m}}=-\frac{1}{2{|p|}^{3/2} }\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \phi^2} +{|p|}^{3/2}V(\phi).
106: \end{equation}
107: Now $\phi$ plays a role of time in analogy with the Klein-Gordon equation.
108:
109: \section{Multi-fluid potential} \label{sec:Multi}
110:
111: Energy density and pressure of the homogeneous scalar field are expressed as follows
112: \begin{eqnarray}
113: \rho_{\phi} &=& \frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi), \label{defrhophi} \\
114: p_{\phi} &=& \frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2-V(\phi).
115: \end{eqnarray}
116: In this section we consider restriction $p_{\phi}=w\rho_{\phi}$ where $w=$ const.
117: This assumption leads to the expression $\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2=\frac{1+w}{1-w}V(\phi)$ which gives
118: \begin{eqnarray}
119: \rho_{\phi} &=& \frac{2}{1-w} V(\phi), \label{rhoV} \\
120: p_{\phi} &=& \frac{2w}{1-w}V(\phi) .
121: \end{eqnarray}
122: With use of equations (\ref{Friedmann}),(\ref{fieldequation}) and considered condition we obtain
123: \begin{equation}
124: \left(\frac{dV(\phi)}{d\phi}\right)^2 =3\kappa(1+w)V(\phi)^2\left( 1- \frac{2}{1-w}\frac{V(\phi)}{\rho_c}\right).
125: \end{equation}
126: The above equation has solution in the form
127: \begin{equation}
128: V(\phi) = \frac{V_*}{\cosh^2\left[\sqrt{6\pi G (1+w)}(\phi-\phi_0)\right] }
129: \label{Potential}
130: \end{equation}
131: where $V_*=\rho_c (1-w)/2$. It is worth to mention that for $\phi \rightarrow \infty$ we recover
132: $V(\phi) \propto \exp \{ -\sqrt{24\pi G (1+w)}\phi \}$ which is well-known classical limit.
133: In Fig. \ref{Pot} we draw potential (\ref{Potential}) for the different values of parameter $w$.
134: \begin{figure}[ht!]
135: \centering
136: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=0]{Pot.eps}
137: \caption{Multi-fluid potential with the different values of the parameter $w$. In the figure
138: the value $\phi_0=0$ was assumed.}
139: \label{Pot}
140: \end{figure}
141:
142: Particular situation corresponds to the case $p_{\phi}=-\rho_{\phi}$ $(w=-1)$.
143: Field can get such an equation of state only in the limit $\dot{\phi} \rightarrow 0$.
144: Therefore this particular case must be excluded from considerations. Namely, we
145: cannot mimic pure cosmological constant with time dependent scalar field.
146:
147: We must to stress that potential in the form $1/\cosh^2(x)$ has already appeared
148: in the different context in the loop cosmology. Namely, it was obtained by Singh
149: \cite{Singh:2006sg} for the scaling solutions in LQC
150: dual to those in Randall-Sundrum cosmology. These considerations were performed for the
151: model with a self-interacting scalar field and matter with a fixed equation of state $w$.
152:
153: \section{Analytical solutions} \label{sec:analytical}
154:
155: In this section we show analytical solution of the model with potential (\ref{Potential}).
156: For the considered case we can additionally derive equation
157: \begin{equation}
158: \dot{H}=-\frac{\kappa}{2}(1+w)\rho_{\phi}\left(1-2\frac{\rho_{\phi}}{\rho_c} \right).
159: \end{equation}
160: With use of continuity equation $\dot{\rho}_{\phi}+3H(\rho_{\phi}+p_{\phi})=0$
161: (or equivalently equation (\ref{fieldequation}) ) we directly obtain
162: \begin{equation}
163: \rho_{\phi} = \rho_c \left(\frac{p}{p_c}\right)^{-\frac{3}{2}(1+w)}.
164: \end{equation}
165: Comparing this to the expression (\ref{rhoV}) with (\ref{Potential}) we obtain
166: \begin{equation}
167: p(\phi) = p_c \left( \cosh^2\left[\sqrt{6\pi G (1+w)}(\phi-\phi_0)\right] \right)^{\frac{2}{3(1+w)}}. \label{Solp}
168: \end{equation}
169: Similar solution, however not in such an explicit form, has already been derived in Ref. \cite{Singh:2006sg}.
170: To obtain time $t$ dependence we use expression $\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2=\frac{1+w}{1-w}V(\phi)$
171: with potential (\ref{Potential}) to obtain
172: \begin{equation}
173: \cosh^2\left[\sqrt{6\pi G (1+w)}(\phi-\phi_0)\right] = 1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w)^2 (t-t_0)^2. \label{phi_t}
174: \end{equation}
175: This leads to
176: \begin{equation}
177: p(t) = p_c \left( 1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w)^2 (t-t_0)^2 \right)^{\frac{2}{3(1+w)}}. \label{solpt}
178: \end{equation}
179: This solution can be also found in Ref. \cite{Artymowski:2008sc}.
180: In case of the $w=-1$ solution has exponential form and can be found in the paper \cite{Mielczarek:2008zv}.
181:
182: In Fig. \ref{bounce} we show time dependence of the canonical variable $p$ for different
183: values of parameter $w$.
184: \begin{figure}[ht!]
185: \centering
186: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=0]{bounce.eps}
187: \caption{Evolution of the canonical variable $p$ for the different values of parameter $w$.}
188: \label{bounce}
189: \end{figure}
190: Resulting dynamics is singularity free bounce.
191:
192: The time derivative of the field $\phi$ can be obtained from the equation (\ref{phi_t}) and has a form
193: \begin{equation}
194: \frac{d\phi}{dt} =\pm \sqrt{\frac{\rho_c(1+w)}{1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w)^2(t-t_0)^2}}.
195: \end{equation}
196: From this we see that $\phi$ is monotonic function of time (growing or decreasing).
197: Choosing growing solution we have
198: \begin{equation}
199: \phi(t)=\phi_0+\frac{ \text{arcsinh} \left[ \sqrt{6\pi G \rho_c}(1+w) (t-t_0) \right]}{\sqrt{6\pi G(1+w)}}. \label{solphit}
200: \end{equation}
201: We draw this function in Fig. \ref{field}.
202: \begin{figure}[ht!]
203: \centering
204: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=0]{field.eps}
205: \caption{Evolution of the scalar field $\phi$ for the different values of parameter $w$.}
206: \label{field}
207: \end{figure}
208:
209: To complete above reasoning we verify obtained solutions in Appendix \ref{sec:appendix}.
210: Namely we show there how to solve equations of motion without imposing the condition $w =$ const in
211: equation of state. Instead of this we solve equations from scratch assuming the form of potential (\ref{Potential}).
212:
213: \section{Phantom field} \label{sec:phantom}
214:
215: In this section we perform analogous consideration for the case of phantom field \cite{Caldwell:1999ew,Singh:2003vx,
216: Dabrowski:2003jm}. For this kind of field energy density and pressure are expressed as follows
217: \begin{eqnarray}
218: \rho_{\phi} &=& -\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi), \\
219: p_{\phi} &=& -\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2 - V(\phi).
220: \end{eqnarray}
221: From this we see that $\rho_{\phi}+p_{\phi}< -\dot{\phi}^2$. The parameter $w$ in the equation of
222: state for the phantom field takes values $w<-1$.
223:
224: Phantom matter was introduced in loop quantum cosmology in Ref. \cite{Sami:2006wj}.
225: Subsequently phantom field in the loop quantum cosmology has been studied in Ref. \cite{Samart:2007xz}.
226: Also the models with interacting phantom field have been investigated \cite{Gumjudpai:2007fc,Fu:2008gh,Wu:2008db}.
227:
228: Based on the continuity equation we derive equation of motion
229: \begin{equation}
230: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}-\frac{dV}{d\phi}= 0.
231: \label{fieldequation2}
232: \end{equation}
233: Performing calculations in the same way like in the section \ref{sec:Multi} we obtain
234: \begin{equation}
235: V(\phi) = \frac{V_*}{\cosh^2\left[\sqrt{-6\pi G (1+w)}(\phi-\phi_0)\right] }
236: \label{Potential2}
237: \end{equation}
238: where $V_*=\rho_c (1-w)/2$.
239:
240: Solution for the scalar phantom field has a form
241: \begin{equation}
242: \phi(t)=\phi_0+\frac{ \text{arcsinh} \left[ \sqrt{6\pi G \rho_c}|1+w| (t-t_0) \right]}{\sqrt{-6\pi G(1+w)}}.
243: \label{phiphantom}
244: \end{equation}
245: It is monotonically growing function too. Therefore phantom field with potential (\ref{Potential2})
246: can be treated as internal time. The canonical parameter $p$ depends on value of the $\phi$ as follows
247: \begin{equation}
248: p(\phi) = p_c \left( \cosh^2\left[\sqrt{-6\pi G (1+w)}(\phi-\phi_0)\right] \right)^{\frac{2}{3(1+w)}}.
249: \end{equation}
250: Rewriting equation (\ref{phiphantom}) to the form
251: \begin{equation}
252: \cosh^2\left[\sqrt{-6\pi G (1+w)}(\phi-\phi_0)\right] = 1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w)^2 (t-t_0)^2
253: \end{equation}
254: one can obtain explicit time dependence of the parameter $p$. We show this function
255: in Fig. \ref{phan}.
256: \begin{figure}[ht!]
257: \centering
258: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=0]{phan.eps}
259: \caption{Evolution of the canonical variable $p$ for the different values of parameter $w$.}
260: \label{phan}
261: \end{figure}
262: We see that, in contrast to the bouncing behaviour, here universe shrinks to zero for $t \rightarrow \pm \infty$.
263: To investigate this state we consider time dependence of the energy density of the phantom field.
264: We have
265: \begin{equation}
266: \rho_{\phi} = \frac{\rho_{c}}{1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w)^2 (t-t_0)^2}
267: \end{equation}
268: what is shown in Fig. \ref{rho}.
269: \begin{figure}[ht!]
270: \centering
271: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=0]{rho.eps}
272: \caption{Evolution of the energy density of the phantom field $\rho_{\phi}$
273: for the different values of parameter $w$.}
274: \label{rho}
275: \end{figure}
276: We see that despite the variable $p$ tends to zero energy density decreases too.
277:
278: \section{Perturbations and non-Gaussianity} \label{sec:perturbations}
279:
280: In the previous part of this Letter we have considered models with a homogeneous scalar field.
281: Now we are going to take into account perturbations. We consider simplified model where
282: scalar field is perturbed while background geometry holds its homogeneity.
283: Moreover we aim rather to indicate further applications of the potential (\ref{Potential})
284: than to perform full analysis. Therefore considerations presented should be
285: seen as an invitation to the more detailed studies.
286:
287: We split the scalar field $\phi({\bf x },t)$ as
288: \begin{equation}
289: \phi({\bf x },t) = \bar{\phi}(t)+\delta\phi({\bf x },t).
290: \end{equation}
291: Here $\bar{\phi}(t)$ is homogeneous mode defined as
292: \begin{equation}
293: \bar{\phi}(t)=\frac{1}{V_0}\int_{V_0}d^3{\bf x} \phi({\bf x },t)
294: \end{equation}
295: where $V_0$ is some fixed fiducial volume.
296: Then equation for the background part is
297: \begin{equation}
298: \ddot{\bar{\phi}}+3H\dot{\bar{\phi}}+\frac{dV(\bar{\phi})}{d\bar{\phi}} = 0.
299: \end{equation}
300: Therefore solutions of equations of motion for the background part are those
301: derived in Section \ref{sec:analytical} with $\phi=\bar{\phi}$.
302: First order perturbation of the full
303: equation of motion leads to
304: \begin{equation}
305: \ddot{\delta\phi}+3H\dot{\delta\phi}-\frac{1}{a^2}\nabla^2 \delta\phi +m^2(t)\delta\phi = 0
306: \end{equation}
307: which is valid for $|\delta \phi/\phi|\ll 1$.
308: Here we have defined the mass term
309: \begin{equation}
310: m^2(t) = \left.\frac{d^2 V}{d\phi^2} \right|_{\phi=\bar{\phi}}= 6\pi G \rho_c (1-w^2) \frac{2B(t)-3}{B^2(t)}
311: \end{equation}
312: where
313: \begin{equation}
314: B(t) \equiv \cosh^2\left[\sqrt{6\pi G (1+w)}\bar{\phi}\right] = 1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w)^2 t^2. \label{phi_t}
315: \end{equation}
316: Performing Fourier transform
317: \begin{equation}
318: \delta \phi({\bf x },t) = \int \frac{d^3{\bf k}}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \frac{u({\bf k },t)}{a(t)} e^{i {\bf k \cdot x}}
319: \end{equation}
320: and introducing conformal time $d\eta = dt/a(t)$ we can write equation for the
321: mode functions $u({\bf k },\eta)$ as
322: \begin{equation}
323: \frac{d^2}{d\eta^2}u({\bf k },\eta)+\left[k^2+m^2_{\text{eff}} \right]u({\bf k },\eta)=0. \label{equ}
324: \end{equation}
325: Here we have defined effective mass
326: \begin{equation}
327: m^2_{\text{eff}}=a^2m^2-\frac{a^{''}}{a} = a^2\left[m^2-H^2-\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}\right]. \label{meffDef}
328: \end{equation}
329: Based on the equation (\ref{Solp}) we can write solution for the scale factor as follows
330: \begin{equation}
331: a(t) = a_c \left( 1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w)^2 t^2 \right)^{\frac{1}{3(1+w)}}.
332: \end{equation}
333: Applying this to the equation (\ref{meffDef}) we obtain
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: m^2_{\text{eff}} &=& a_c^2\frac{1}{8}\kappa^2\rho_c^2(1+w)^2(8+3w-9w^2)B(t)^{\alpha} \times \nonumber \\
336: &\times& \left[t^2-\frac{2}{3}\frac{\Delta\gamma^2(5+2w-3w^2)}{(1+w)^2(8+3w-9w^2)}\right]
337: \label{meff2}
338: \end{eqnarray}
339: where
340: \begin{equation}
341: \alpha =-\frac{2}{3} \frac{2+3w}{1+w}.
342: \end{equation}
343: The full analysis of the equation (\ref{equ}) with $m^2_{\text{eff}}$ given above is
344: behind the scope of this Letter. However we can immediately investigate its behaviour in the
345: pre-bounce phase $t\rightarrow -\infty$. In this limit
346: \begin{equation}
347: m^2_{\text{eff}} \rightarrow \frac{16+6w-18w^2}{(1+3w)^2} \frac{1}{\eta^2}
348: \end{equation}
349: where we have changed time for conformal. Advanced and normalised solution of the equation (\ref{equ}) in
350: considered limit is
351: \begin{equation}
352: u(k,\eta) = \sqrt{-k\eta} \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{4k}} e^{i\frac{\pi}{2}\left(|\nu|+\frac{1}{2}\right)} H^{(1)}_{|\nu|}(-\eta k)
353: \end{equation}
354: where
355: \begin{equation}
356: \nu^2=\frac{9}{4}\frac{(9w^2-2w-7)}{(1+3w)^2}.
357: \end{equation}
358: This solution is valid for $\nu^2\geq 0$ or equivalently for $w \in [-1,-7/9] \cup \{1\}$.
359: Therefore only in the small range. Power spectrum of perturbations is then given as
360: \begin{equation}
361: \mathcal{P}_{\delta\phi} = \frac{k^3}{2\pi^2} \left| \frac{u}{a} \right|^2 \propto (-k\eta)^{3-2|\nu|}
362: \end{equation}
363: where super-horizontal approximation
364: \begin{equation}
365: H^{(1)}_{n}(x) \simeq -\frac{i}{\pi} \Gamma(n) \left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{-n} \ \ \text{for} \ \ x \ll 1
366: \end{equation}
367: has been used. It is worth to mention that scale invariant spectrum $|\nu|=\frac{3}{2}$ is recovered only
368: for $w=-1$. Therefore duality investigated in Ref. \cite{Wands:1998yp} is broken here due
369: to additional mass term. In the range
370: $w \in (-7/9,1)$ ($\nu^2 < 0$) we can obtain solutions by the replacement $\nu=-i\tilde{\nu}$.
371: Then for $-k\eta \ll 1$ we have $\mathcal{P}_{\delta\phi} \propto k^3$ as discussed in
372: Ref. \cite{Riotto:2002yw}.
373:
374: Presented solutions are valid in the pre-bounce phase. Later when modes
375: cross the bounce solutions of the equation of motion have a different form.
376: Despite the fact that size of horizon diverges at the turning point
377: ($H\rightarrow 0$ $\Rightarrow$ $1/|H|\rightarrow \infty$)
378: the solutions evolve smoothly without any anomalies. In the context of loop cosmology such a
379: behaviour has been recently approved for gravitational waves based on the analytical and numerical
380: calculations \cite{Mielczarek:2009vi}. Interesting generic feature of
381: the bouncing cosmologies is suppression of power of the low energy models
382: \cite{Piao:2003zm,Mielczarek:2008pf}.
383: Therefore we can expect damping of the low energy modes also for the model studied here.
384: However it can depend whether condition $|\delta \phi/\phi|\ll 1$ for validity of
385: the linear approximation is conserved during the whole evolution.
386: If this condition is not satisfied then nonlinear effects should be also
387: taken into account. Otherwise suppression of power of the low energy modes
388: should be easily obtained. Such an effect is typically presented as a possible
389: explanation of the low CMB multipoles suppression \cite{Contaldi:2003zv}.
390: However it seems that fine tuning must occur to match energy scales of the bounce
391: with the cosmological ones at which suppression of the CMB modes is observed. These issues have to be
392: addressed in the further considerations.
393:
394: Scalar field with potential (\ref{Potential}) is non-Gaussian. Namely modes with different
395: wave numbers interact one another \cite{Bartolo:2004if}. Since observations suggest that primordial perturbations
396: were nearly Gaussian \cite{Komatsu:2008hk} the CMB nonlinearities can in principle be used to restrict
397: models with interacting potentials. In our case potential of interaction has
398: non-polynomial form therefore non-Gaussian features of the field should be significant.
399: However since we do not know how many perturbations originate from the
400: short quantum phase (where model studied here can be applied) we cannot infer about
401: their impact on the CMB nonlinearities. In principle contribution from the phase of bounce can be
402: affected by the succeed phase of inflation. Detailed studies of this issues are however beyond
403: the scope of this Letter. We devote for these issues another paper \cite{MielczarekX2009}
404: while now concentrate only on some preliminary estimations of nonlinear effects.
405:
406: The lowest order interacting term is given by
407: \begin{equation}
408: V_{\text{int}} = \frac{\Lambda(t)}{3!}(\delta \phi)^3+\mathcal{O}\left((\delta \phi)^4\right)
409: \end{equation}
410: where
411: \begin{eqnarray}
412: \Lambda(t) &=& \left.\frac{d^3 V}{d\phi^3} \right|_{\phi=\bar{\phi}}= 24 \ \text{sgn}(t) \sqrt{6} \pi ^{3/2}\rho_c(1-w)
413: \times \nonumber \\ &\times& ((1+w)G)^{3/2}\frac{3-B(t)}{B^2(t)}\sqrt{\frac{B(t)-1}{B(t)}}.
414: \end{eqnarray}
415: This term becomes important when dominates the mass one. Therefore ratio
416: \begin{equation}
417: \frac{\frac{\Lambda(t)}{3!}(\delta \phi)^3}{\frac{m^2(t)}{2!}(\delta \phi)^2} =
418: \frac{1}{3} \frac{\Lambda(t)}{m^2(t)} \delta \phi = \xi(t) \delta \phi
419: \end{equation}
420: can be seen as a measure of non-Gaussianity. Here we have defined parameter
421: \begin{equation}
422: \xi(t)= \text{sgn}(t) \sqrt{\frac{4}{3}\kappa(1+w)} \frac{3-B(t)}{2B(t)-3}\sqrt{\frac{B(t)-1}{B(t)}}.
423: \end{equation}
424: We show this function in Fig. \ref{Xi}.
425: \begin{figure}[ht!]
426: \centering
427: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=0]{Xi.eps}
428: \caption{Parameter of non-Gaussianity $\xi$ for $w=0$.}
429: \label{Xi}
430: \end{figure}
431: At the points where $B(t)=\frac{3}{2}$ non-Gaussian part becomes dominant since the mass vanishes there.
432: In the limits
433: \begin{equation}
434: \lim_{t\rightarrow\pm \infty}\xi(t)= \mp \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}\kappa(1+w)}
435: \end{equation}
436: the parameter $\xi$ stabilises.
437: Above results indicate that non-Gaussian effects can be in fact produced. Especially interesting
438: are points where $B(t)=\frac{3}{2}$, then nonlinear effects are dominant.
439: These regions could be an effective source of the cosmological non-Gaussianity.
440: It is therefore in principle possible to constraint this model from CMB nonlinearities.
441: This could bring observational bounds on parameter $\rho_c$ or equivalently
442: Barbero-Immirzi parameter $\gamma$ in this specific model. However to prove
443: this supposition further detailed analysis is required. In principle
444: bispectrum and resulting parameter of nonlinearities $f_{NL}$ have to be
445: determined.
446:
447: \section{Summary} \label{sec:summary}
448:
449: In this Letter we have considered self-interacting scalar field theory in the universe
450: with holonomy effects resulting from the Loop Quantum Cosmology. We have performed constraint for the
451: scalar field in the form $p_{\phi}=w\rho_{\phi}$ where $w=$const.
452: Based on this restriction we have derived expression for the scalar field
453: potential which fulfills this condition. This condition can be fulfilled for
454: $w\in (-1,1]$. The case $w=-1$ is excluded. Such a state can be obtained only in the
455: case $\dot{\phi} \rightarrow 0$ and cannot be mimicked with $\dot{\phi} \neq 0$.
456: We have solved considered model analytically. Subsequently, we have performed analogous
457: investigations for the phantom field $w <-1$. Potentials for scalar and phantom fields are
458: related by the symmetry $(1+w) \rightarrow -(1+w)$.
459:
460: We have shown how barotropic matter can be introduced in LQC in the well-defined manner.
461: In this approach matter content is mimicked by the scalar field with derived potential (\ref{Potential}).
462: We have shown that field $\phi$ is monotonic function of time in both considered cases. This result
463: indicates that scalar field (as well as phantom field) with derived potentials can
464: be moreover treated as intrinsic time. The models therefore seems to be good candidate
465: to the further purely quantum considerations.
466:
467: We have performed preliminary studies of the perturbations of the scalar field with
468: obtained multi-fluid potential. In the pre-bounce phase super-horizontal modes
469: are typically damped. Namely the power spectrum is $\mathcal{P}_{\delta\phi} \propto k^3$.
470: However to verify that this spectrum survives during the bounce phase further numerical
471: analysis should be performed. If super-horizontal spectrum does not change qualitatively this can
472: lead to the suppression of the low CMB multipoles. We have also indicated that non-Gaussian
473: perturbations are produced. Further analysis of this issue may provide observational
474: bounds on the model. Therefore beside the purely theoretical results as the method of introducing
475: barotropic mater in LQC also phenomenological consequences were found.
476:
477: \begin{acknowledgments}
478: Author would like to thank to anonymous referee for
479: useful remarks.
480: This work was supported in part by the Marie Curie Actions Transfer of
481: Knowledge project COCOS (contract MTKD-CT-2004-517186).
482: \end{acknowledgments}
483:
484: \appendix
485: \section{Solution of the equations of motion - verification} \label{sec:appendix}
486:
487: In this appendix we are going to verify obtained solutions (\ref{solpt},\ref{solphit}) solving
488: from scratch equations of motion (\ref{Friedmann},\ref{fieldequation}) with potential (\ref{Potential}).
489: Without loose of generality we assume here $\phi_0=0$. Therefore we consider a theory
490: with potential in the form
491: \begin{equation}
492: V(\phi) = \frac{V_*}{\cosh^2\left[\sqrt{6\pi G (1+w')}\phi\right]}
493: \label{AP0}
494: \end{equation}
495: where $V_*=\rho_c (1-w')/2$. Here we do not assume what is the interpretation of the parameter $w'$.
496: It is just some fixed parameter and its meaning will be clarified later.
497: Equation (\ref{fieldequation}) with potential (\ref{AP0}) takes the form
498: \begin{equation}
499: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}-2V_*\alpha \frac{\tanh(\alpha \phi) }{\cosh^2(\alpha\phi )} = 0 \label{AP1}
500: \end{equation}
501: where to simplify notation we have defined $\alpha=\sqrt{6\pi G (1+w')}$.
502: To solve this equation we postulate solution in the form
503: \begin{equation}
504: \phi(t)=\frac{1}{\alpha} \text{arcsinh} \left(\beta t \right) \label{AP2}
505: \end{equation}
506: where $\beta$ is some unknown constant. Applying this solution, we rewrite
507: equation (\ref{AP1}) to the form
508: \begin{equation}
509: H = \frac{t}{1+\beta^2t^2} \left[2 V_*\alpha^2+\beta^2 \right]\frac{1}{3}. \label{AP3}
510: \end{equation}
511: Now let us calculate expression for the energy density (\ref{defrhophi}). With use
512: of (\ref{AP2}) we obtain
513: \begin{equation}
514: \rho = \frac{t}{1+\beta^2t^2} \left[ \frac{\beta^2}{2\alpha^2}+V_* \right].
515: \end{equation}
516: Applying this to the modified Friedmann equation (\ref{Friedmann}) we have
517: \begin{equation}
518: H^2=\frac{\kappa}{3} \frac{\left[\beta^2\left(2\alpha^2\rho_ct^2-1\right)+2\alpha^2(\rho_c-V_*) \right] \label{AP5}
519: \left(\beta^2+2V_*\alpha^2 \right)}{4\alpha^4 (1+\beta^2t^2)}.
520: \end{equation}
521: One can easily verify than equations (\ref{AP3}) and (\ref{AP5}) are equivalent only if
522: \begin{equation}
523: \beta^2=2\alpha^2(\rho_c-V_*)=6\pi G \rho_c (1+w')^2.
524: \end{equation}
525: Therefore we obtain
526: \begin{equation}
527: \phi(t)=\frac{ \text{arcsinh} \left[ \sqrt{6\pi G \rho_c}(1+w') t \right]}{\sqrt{6\pi G(1+w')}}. \label{AP6}
528: \end{equation}
529: Moreover equation (\ref{AP3}) can be written now as
530: \begin{equation}
531: \frac{\dot{p}}{p} = \frac{4}{3}\frac{1}{(1+w')} \frac{6\pi G \rho_c (1+w')^2 t}{1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w')^2 t^2}
532: \end{equation}
533: with solution
534: \begin{equation}
535: p(t) = p_c \left( 1+6\pi G \rho_c (1+w')^2 t^2 \right)^{\frac{2}{3(1+w')}}.
536: \end{equation}
537: Now one can interpret the parameter $w'$. Namely let us calculate expression
538: for the coefficient
539: \begin{equation}
540: w = \frac{p_{\phi}}{\rho_{\phi}}= \frac{\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2-V(\phi)}{\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi)}.
541: \end{equation}
542: Applying potential (\ref{AP0}) together with solution (\ref{AP6}) we find
543: \begin{equation}
544: w = w'. \label{AP7}
545: \end{equation}
546: It is now transparent that solutions found in section \ref{sec:analytical} are recovered.
547: Thanks to relation (\ref{AP7}) we have $dw/dt=0$, therefore all found trajectories
548: follow the $w=$ const.
549:
550: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
551:
552: \bibitem{Bojowald}
553: M.~Bojowald, Living Rev. Relativity {\bf 11}, (2008), 4.
554:
555: %\cite{Ashtekar:2006rx}
556: \bibitem{Ashtekar:2006rx}
557: A.~Ashtekar, T.~Pawlowski and P.~Singh,
558: %``Quantum nature of the big bang,''
559: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 96} (2006) 141301
560: [arXiv:gr-qc/0602086].
561: %%CITATION = PRLTA,96,141301;%%
562:
563: %\cite{Ashtekar:2006uz}
564: \bibitem{Ashtekar:2006uz}
565: A.~Ashtekar, T.~Pawlowski and P.~Singh,
566: %``Quantum nature of the big bang: An analytical and numerical investigation.
567: %I,''
568: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73} (2006) 124038
569: [arXiv:gr-qc/0604013].
570: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D73,124038;%%
571:
572: %\cite{Ashtekar:2006wn}
573: \bibitem{Ashtekar:2006wn}
574: A.~Ashtekar, T.~Pawlowski and P.~Singh,
575: %``Quantum nature of the big bang: Improved dynamics,''
576: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 084003
577: [arXiv:gr-qc/0607039].
578: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,084003;%%
579:
580: %\cite{Corichi:2008zb}
581: \bibitem{Corichi:2008zb}
582: A.~Corichi and P.~Singh,
583: %``Is loop quantization in cosmology unique?,''
584: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 78} (2008) 024034
585: [arXiv:0805.0136 [gr-qc]].
586: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D78,024034;%%
587:
588: %\cite{Taveras:2008ke}
589: \bibitem{Taveras:2008ke}
590: V.~Taveras,
591: %``Corrections to the Friedmann Equations from LQG for a Universe with a Free
592: %Scalar Field,''
593: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 78} (2008) 064072
594: [arXiv:0807.3325 [gr-qc]].
595: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D78,064072;%%
596:
597: %\cite{Mielczarek:2008zv}
598: \bibitem{Mielczarek:2008zv}
599: J.~Mielczarek, T.~Stachowiak and M.~Szydlowski,
600: %``Exact solutions for Big Bounce in loop quantum cosmology,''
601: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77} (2008) 123506
602: [arXiv:0801.0502 [gr-qc]].
603: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,123506;%%
604:
605: %\cite{Singh:2006im}
606: \bibitem{Singh:2006im}
607: P.~Singh, K.~Vandersloot and G.~V.~Vereshchagin,
608: %``Non-singular bouncing universes in loop quantum cosmology,''
609: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 043510
610: [arXiv:gr-qc/0606032].
611: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,043510;%%
612:
613: %\cite{Cailleteau:2008wu}
614: \bibitem{Cailleteau:2008wu}
615: T.~Cailleteau, A.~Cardoso, K.~Vandersloot and D.~Wands,
616: %``Singularities in loop quantum cosmology,''
617: arXiv:0808.0190 [gr-qc].
618: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0190;%%
619:
620: %\cite{Mielczarek:2008ps}
621: \bibitem{Mielczarek:2008ps}
622: J.~Mielczarek and M.~Szydlowski,
623: %``Universe from vacuum in loop-string quantum cosmology,''
624: JCAP {\bf 0808} (2008) 014
625: [arXiv:0803.1742 [hep-th]].
626: %%CITATION = JCAPA,0808,014;%%
627:
628: %\cite{Artymowski:2008sc}
629: \bibitem{Artymowski:2008sc}
630: M.~Artymowski, Z.~Lalak and L.~Szulc,
631: %``Loop Quantum Cosmology corrections to inflationary models,''
632: arXiv:0807.0160 [gr-qc].
633: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0160;%%
634:
635: %\cite{Singh:2006sg}
636: \bibitem{Singh:2006sg}
637: P.~Singh,
638: %``Loop cosmological dynamics and dualities with Randall-Sundrum
639: %braneworlds,''
640: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73} (2006) 063508
641: [arXiv:gr-qc/0603043].
642: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D73,063508;%%
643:
644: %\cite{Caldwell:1999ew}
645: \bibitem{Caldwell:1999ew}
646: R.~R.~Caldwell,
647: %``A Phantom Menace?,''
648: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 545} (2002) 23
649: [arXiv:astro-ph/9908168].
650: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B545,23;%%
651:
652: %\cite{Singh:2003vx}
653: \bibitem{Singh:2003vx}
654: P.~Singh, M.~Sami and N.~Dadhich,
655: %``Cosmological dynamics of phantom field,''
656: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 023522
657: [arXiv:hep-th/0305110].
658: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,023522;%%
659:
660: %\cite{Dabrowski:2003jm}
661: \bibitem{Dabrowski:2003jm}
662: M.~P.~Dabrowski, T.~Stachowiak and M.~Szydlowski,
663: %``Phantom cosmologies,''
664: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 103519
665: [arXiv:hep-th/0307128].
666: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,103519;%%
667:
668: %\cite{Sami:2006wj}
669: \bibitem{Sami:2006wj}
670: M.~Sami, P.~Singh and S.~Tsujikawa,
671: %``Avoidance of future singularities in loop quantum cosmology,''
672: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 043514
673: [arXiv:gr-qc/0605113].
674: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,043514;%%
675:
676: %\cite{Samart:2007xz}
677: \bibitem{Samart:2007xz}
678: D.~Samart and B.~Gumjudpai,
679: %``Phantom field dynamics in loop quantum cosmology,''
680: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 043514
681: [arXiv:0704.3414 [gr-qc]].
682: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,043514;%%
683:
684: %\cite{Gumjudpai:2007fc}
685: \bibitem{Gumjudpai:2007fc}
686: B.~Gumjudpai,
687: %``Coupled phantom field in loop quantum cosmology,''
688: arXiv:0706.3467 [gr-qc].
689: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0706.3467;%%
690:
691: %\cite{Fu:2008gh}
692: \bibitem{Fu:2008gh}
693: X.~Fu, H.~Yu and P.~Wu,
694: %``Dynamics of interacting phantom scalar field dark energy in Loop Quantum
695: %Cosmology,''
696: arXiv:0808.1382 [gr-qc].
697: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.1382;%%
698:
699: %\cite{Wu:2008db}
700: \bibitem{Wu:2008db}
701: P.~Wu and S.~N.~Zhang,
702: %``Cosmological evolution of interacting phantom (quintessence) model in Loop
703: %Quantum Gravity,''
704: JCAP {\bf 0806} (2008) 007
705: [arXiv:0805.2255 [astro-ph]].
706: %%CITATION = JCAPA,0806,007;%%
707:
708: %\cite{Wands:1998yp}
709: \bibitem{Wands:1998yp}
710: D.~Wands,
711: %``Duality invariance of cosmological perturbation spectra,''
712: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 023507
713: [arXiv:gr-qc/9809062].
714: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D60,023507;%%
715:
716: %\cite{Riotto:2002yw}
717: \bibitem{Riotto:2002yw}
718: A.~Riotto,
719: %``Inflation and the theory of cosmological perturbations,''
720: arXiv:hep-ph/0210162.
721: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0210162;%%
722:
723: %\cite{Mielczarek:2009vi}
724: \bibitem{Mielczarek:2009vi}
725: J.~Mielczarek,
726: %``Tensor power spectrum with holonomy corrections in LQC,''
727: arXiv:0902.2490 [gr-qc].
728: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0902.2490;%%
729:
730: %\cite{Piao:2003zm}
731: \bibitem{Piao:2003zm}
732: Y.~S.~Piao, B.~Feng and X.~m.~Zhang,
733: %``Suppressing CMB quadrupole with a bounce from contracting phase to
734: %inflation,''
735: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 103520
736: [arXiv:hep-th/0310206].
737: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D69,103520;%%
738:
739: %\cite{Mielczarek:2008pf}
740: \bibitem{Mielczarek:2008pf}
741: J.~Mielczarek,
742: %``Gravitational waves from the Big Bounce,''
743: JCAP {\bf 0811} (2008) 011
744: [arXiv:0807.0712 [gr-qc]].
745: %%CITATION = JCAPA,0811,011;%%
746:
747: %\cite{Contaldi:2003zv}
748: \bibitem{Contaldi:2003zv}
749: C.~R.~Contaldi, M.~Peloso, L.~Kofman and A.~Linde,
750: %``Suppressing the lower Multipoles in the CMB Anisotropies,''
751: JCAP {\bf 0307} (2003) 002
752: [arXiv:astro-ph/0303636].
753: %%CITATION = JCAPA,0307,002;%%
754:
755: %\cite{Bartolo:2004if}
756: \bibitem{Bartolo:2004if}
757: N.~Bartolo, E.~Komatsu, S.~Matarrese and A.~Riotto,
758: %``Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations,''
759: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 402} (2004) 103
760: [arXiv:astro-ph/0406398].
761: %%CITATION = PRPLC,402,103;%%
762:
763: %\cite{Komatsu:2008hk}
764: \bibitem{Komatsu:2008hk}
765: E.~Komatsu {\it et al.} [WMAP Collaboration],
766: %``Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP\altaffilmark 1 )
767: %Observations:Cosmological Interpretation,''
768: arXiv:0803.0547 [astro-ph].
769: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0803.0547;%%
770:
771: %\cite{MielczarekX2009}
772: \bibitem{MielczarekX2009}
773: J.~Mielczarek, (In preparation)
774:
775: \end{thebibliography}
776:
777: \end{document}
778: