1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
5: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: \documentclass{emulateapj}
7:
8:
9: \usepackage{epsf}
10: \usepackage{graphics}
11: \usepackage{color}
12:
13:
14: %\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 150 30 translate
15: %0 rotate /Times-Roman findfont 40 scalefont setfont
16: %0 0 moveto 0.9 setgray (version 2007-08-07 12:00) show grestore}def end}
17:
18:
19:
20:
21: \newcommand{\bl}{$\bullet$}
22: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
23: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
25: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}
26: \newcommand{\cts}{cts s$^{-1}$}
27: \newcommand{\ax}{$\alpha_{\rm X}$}
28: \newcommand{\axs}{$\alpha_{\rm X, soft}$}
29: \newcommand{\axh}{$\alpha_{\rm X, hard}$}
30: \newcommand{\aox}{$\alpha_{\rm ox}$}
31: \newcommand{\cm}{cm$^{-2}$}
32: \newcommand{\rb}[1]{\raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{#1}}
33: \newcommand{\msun}{$M_{\odot}$}
34: \newcommand{\dM}{\dot M}
35: \newcommand{\dMM}{$\dot{M}/M$}
36: \newcommand{\dMedd}{\dot M_{\rm Edd}}
37: \newcommand{\plm}{$\pm$}
38: \newcommand{\nh}{$N_{\rm H}$}
39: \newcommand{\swift}{{\it Swift}}
40: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\it XMM-Newton}}
41: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it Chandra}}
42: \newcommand{\wpvs}{{WPVS~007}}
43:
44: %
45:
46: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
47:
48:
49:
50: %\shorttitle{Multi Multiplet Method}
51:
52: \shorttitle{Swift detection of WPVS 007}
53: \shortauthors{Grupe et al.}
54:
55:
56: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
57:
58: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
59:
60:
61: \begin{document}
62:
63:
64:
65: %\input DGrupe_clipfig.tex
66: %\useunitmm
67:
68:
69:
70:
71:
72: \def\etal{{\it et\thinspace al.}\ }
73: \def\alp{{$\alpha$}\ }
74: \def\al2{{$\alpha^2$}\ }
75:
76:
77:
78:
79:
80: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
81: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
82: %% you desire.
83:
84:
85: \title{First detection of hard X-ray photons in the soft X-ray
86: transient Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxy
87: WPVS 007: The X-ray photon distribution observed by \swift
88: }
89:
90:
91: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
92: %% author and affiliation information.
93: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
94: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
95: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
96: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
97:
98:
99: \author{Dirk Grupe\altaffilmark{1},
100: Karen M. Leighly\altaffilmark{2},
101: Stefanie Komossa\altaffilmark{3},
102: }
103:
104: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State
105: University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802; email: grupe@astro.psu.edu}
106:
107:
108: \altaffiltext{2}{Homer L. Dodge
109: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma,
110: 440 West Brooks Street, Norman, OK 73019; email: leighly@nhn.ou.edu}
111:
112: \altaffiltext{3}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstr., D-85748 Garching,
113: Germany; email: skomossa@mpe.mpg.de}
114:
115:
116:
117: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
118: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
119: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
120: %% affiliation.
121:
122: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observat}
123:
124:
125:
126: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
127: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
128: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
129: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
130: %% editorial office after submission.
131:
132:
133: \begin{abstract}
134: We report on the first detection of hard X-ray photons ($E>$2.5 keV) in
135: the X-ray transient Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxy WPVS 007
136: which was the AGN with the softest X-ray spectrum during the
137: ROSAT All-Sky Survey.
138: The AGN is clearly detected at a level of about 2$\times 10^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$
139: in the observed 0.3-10.0 keV band
140: by \swift\ in a 50 ks observation in 2007 September. For the first time
141: since the ROSAT All-Sky Survey observation in 1990 it was possible
142: to derive an
143: X-ray photon distribution by adding together all \swift\ observations
144: that have been performed so far
145: (85.5 ks in total). This photon distribution is consistent with an
146: X-ray spectrum of an AGN with a partial covering absorber with a column
147: density in the order of $\sim 1\times10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and a covering
148: fraction of about 90\%. A
149: comparison with the 2002 \chandra\ data suggests that WPVS 007 has become
150: brighter by a factor of about 4. The \swift\ data also
151: suggest
152: that the absorber which is causing the current low-state may have started to
153: disappear. This disappearance is indicated by a significant change in the hardness
154: ratio from a very soft X-ray state during the 2005 October to 2007 January observations
155: to a rather hard X-ray state in the 2007 September observations.
156: In the UV, WPVS 007 seems to become fainter by up to 0.5 mag over
157: the last two years.
158: The optical to X-ray spectral slope derived from the spectral
159: energy distribution is \aox=2.5 which classifies WPVS 007 as an X-ray weak
160: AGN. After correcting for reddening and X-ray absorption,
161: \aox\ becomes 1.9 and the luminosity in the Big-Blue-Bump is log
162: $L_{\rm BBB}$=37.7 [W], which translates into an Eddington ratio
163: $L/L_{\rm Edd}\approx 1$.
164: \end{abstract}
165:
166:
167:
168: \keywords{galaxies: active, galaxies: individual (WPVS 007)
169: }
170:
171:
172:
173: \section{Introduction}
174:
175:
176: The Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxy (NLS1) \wpvs\
177: \citep[1RXS J003916.6$-511701$, RBS 0088;
178: $\alpha_{2000}$ = $00^{\rm h} 39^{\rm m} 15.^{\rm s}8$,
179: $\delta_{2000}$ = $-51^{\circ} 17' 03 \farcs 0$, z=0.029; ][]{wamsteker85,grupe95}
180: is a unique X-ray transient AGN.
181: During the ROSAT All-Sky Survey \citep[RASS, ][]{voges99},
182: when WPVS 007 was in its X-ray high-state,
183: the X-ray-to-optical flux ratio was log
184: $f_{\rm x}/f_{\rm o}$\footnote{$f_{\rm x}/f_{\rm o}$ is defined by
185: \citet{beu99} as log($f_{\rm x}/f_{\rm o}$)= log CR + 0.4 V - 5.86, with CR =
186: the ROSAT PSPC count rate in the 0.1-2.0 keV range.}=0.22
187: which is typical
188: for a Seyfert 1 galaxy \citep[e.g. ][]{beu99, maccacaro88}.
189: Nevertheless, in all X-ray follow-up observations between 1993 and 2007
190: using ROSAT, \chandra\, and \swift\ WPVS 007 has been found in an extreme
191: X-ray low-state that made
192: WPVS 007 almost vanish from the X-ray sky \citep{gru01, grupe07}. It had
193: been last detected in 2002 August by Chandra with $1\times 10^{-3}$
194: ACIS-S counts s$^{-1}$ \citep{vaughan04}.
195: While this strange transient behavior had been a mystery for a
196: decade,
197: \citet{leighly05} and \citet{leighly08} discovered that
198: it is probably absorption that causes the extreme low-state in this AGN.
199: They found in a 2003 November {\it FUSE} observation that the UV
200: spectrum of WPVS 007 had changed dramatically compared with HST
201: observations obtained in 1996 July \citep{goodrich00,
202: constantin03}: the {\it FUSE} observation revealed the emergence of
203: a BAL flow. \citet{leighly08} concluded that WPVS 007 is a
204: low-luminosity, low black hole mass cousin of Broad Absorption Line
205: Quasars (BALQSOs). The relatively short timescale for the development
206: of the BAL inferred in WPVS 007 suggests that it could re-brighten at
207: any time on relatively short timescales.
208: We started a monitoring campaign using \swift\ in
209: 2005 October \citep{grupe07}. The purpose of this campaign is to detect a
210: possible rebrightening and therefore the disappearance of the absorber. By the end
211: of the second year of monitoring WPVS 007 with \swift\ in 2007 January, only a
212: 3$\sigma$ upper limit of the observed
213: X-ray flux could be derived at a level of $2.3\times
214: 10^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$ in the rest-frame 0.2-2.0 keV band.
215:
216: \citet{brandt00} found that about 10\% of optically selected quasars appear
217: to be X-ray weak with an optical to X-ray spectral slope
218: \aox\footnote{The X-ray loudness is defined by \citet{tananbaum79} as
219: \aox=--0.384 log($f_{\rm 2keV}/f_{2500\AA}$).}$>$2.0. X-ray weakness can either
220: be intrinsic, such as seen in e.g. PHL 1811
221: \citep[][]{leighly07}, or caused by intrinsic absorption.
222: Low X-ray flux states
223: have been found in several NLS1s, such as Mrk 1239, 1H 0707--495,
224: and most recently in Mrk 335 \citep{grupe04b, boller02, gallo04,
225: grupe07b}. In Mrk 335 \citet{grupe07b} showed that this dramatic drop in the
226: X-ray flux goes along with a strong change in the X-ray spectrum. One of the
227: possible scenarios to explain the X-ray spectra of low-state NLS1s is a partial
228: covering absorber. An alternative solution to the strange looking low-state
229: spectra of these NLS1s is reflection as suggested for example by
230: \citet{fabian89, fabian04}. The X-ray spectra by themselves do not
231: provide a definite
232: solution to distinguish between both models because with the quality
233: of the spectra typically obtained and the number of free model parameters,
234: both models fit the X-ray spectra
235: well and they are statistically indistinguishable.
236: In addition, the cases of several well-studied AGN
237: have shown that low X-ray flux states are temporary
238: events and not necessarily persistent \citep[e.g.][]{komossa97,
239: guainazzi98, costantini00, komossa01, bianchi05,
240: grupe07b, grupe08, ballo08a}.
241:
242: % That
243: % is, AGN can show transitions from a high into a low state or vice
244: % versa.
245: % -- just repeats previous sentence - not needed, I think.
246:
247:
248: The \swift\ Gamma-Ray Burst explorer mission \citep{gehrels04} was
249: launched on 2004 November 20. With its simultaneous
250: multi-wavelength capacity and its scheduling flexibility, \swift\ has
251: shown itself to be the ideal observatory to study highly variable
252: objects like AGN. Even though \swift's main purpose
253: is to detect and observe Gamma-Ray bursts, \swift\ has also done an
254: excellent job in observing AGN as fill-in targets or
255: Target-of-Opportunity (ToO) observations \citep[e.g. ][]{markwardt05,
256: grupe06, grupe07, grupe07b, kataoka07, sambruna07, giommi07}.
257: \swift's UV/Optical Telescope \citep[UVOT, ][]{roming04} and X-ray
258: Telescope \citep[XRT, ][]{burrows04} cover the electromagnetic
259: spectrum between 6500\AA\ on the low energy side to 10 keV at the
260: high energy end simultaneously.
261:
262: We started the WPVS 007 monitoring campaign again in 2007 July. On 2007 August 10
263: a failure of one of the \swift\ gyros forced the spacecraft into a safe-hold
264: \citep{gehrels07}. During the spacecraft recovery process, \swift\ was
265: slewing only around a small circle in the sky that included the
266: position of WPVS 007. We took advantage of this limited slewing
267: capacity and obtained about 50ks of X-ray observations of the field of
268: WPVS 007 in 2007 September. During these observations we were not
269: only able to clearly detect WPVS 007 in X-rays, but even more
270: importantly, we discovered a significant number of photons at hard
271: energies above 2 keV, and derived a photon distribution that gives us
272: information for the first time since the RASS about the X-ray
273: spectrum. In this paper we present and discuss these new
274: observations.
275:
276: The outline of this paper is as follows: in \S\,\ref{observe} we describe the
277: \swift\ observations and the data reduction, in \S\,\ref{results} we
278: present the results of the \swift\ XRT data,
279: and in \S\,\ref{discuss} we discuss the results.
280: Throughout the paper spectral indexes are denoted as energy spectral indexes
281: with
282: $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$. Luminosities are calculated assuming a $\Lambda$CDM
283: cosmology with $\Omega_{\rm M}$=0.27, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.73 and a Hubble
284: constant of $H_0$=75 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ using a luminosity distances D=118 Mpc
285: given by \citet{hogg99}. All errors are 1$\sigma$ unless stated otherwise.
286:
287:
288: \section{\label{observe} Observations and data reduction}
289:
290: Table\,\ref{xrt_log} presents the new
291: \swift~XRT observations of \wpvs\ starting on 2007
292: July 15, including the start and end times and the total exposure
293: times. A list of the previous \swift\ observations between 2005
294: October and 2007 January is given in \citet{grupe07}.
295: Due to the spacecraft recovery UVOT data
296: were only taken before the safe-hold on 2007 August 10, and after the
297: turn on of the UVOT by the end of 2007 October.
298: The XRT was operating in photon counting mode \citep{hill04} and the
299: data were reduced by the task {\it xrtpipeline} version 0.10.4.,
300: which is included in the HEASOFT package 6.1.
301: For creating an image of the 2007 September observations we used {\it XSELECT}
302: version 2.4. We ran the source detection algorithm {\it detect} in {\it XIMAGE}
303: version 4.4 with a signal-to-noise level set to 3.
304:
305: In order to obtain a source photon distribution from the WPVS 007
306: data, we co-added the data from all of the \swift\ observations
307: (85.5 ks in total) of WPVS
308: 007 \citep[except for segment005
309: for which the background was too high; ][]{grupe07}. From
310: these co-added data source photons were extracted
311: using {\it XSELECT} from a circle with r=$23\farcs4$ and background
312: photons from a source-free region close by with a radius r=$95\farcs0$.
313: Thirty six net source photons were obtained, too few to fit using the
314: usual $\chi^2$ statistics. Because the source photons account for only
315: 70\% of the total, even Cash statistics cannot be applied
316: in {\it XSPEC} \citep{arnaud96} to fit the photon distribution.
317: Therefore, the spectrum has to be reconstructed by hardness ratio
318: analysis. The hardness ration is defined as HR=(H-S)/(H+S) with S and
319: H are the number of source photons in the 0.3-2.0 and 2.0-10.0 keV
320: energy bands, respectively. The hardness ratios were calculated using
321: the program BEHR as described in \citet{park06} which uses Bayesian
322: statistics which is required for the small number of photons in WPVS
323: 007. The absorption column density of the z=0 absorber was set to the
324: Galactic value \citep[$N_{\rm H}=2.84\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ ][]{dic90}.
325:
326: The UVOT data were reduced and analyzed as described in \citet{grupe07}.
327: Due to UVOT calibration and software changes in June 2007 \citep{poole07}
328: we reanalyzed the UVOT data previously obtained by \swift\ with a
329: source extraction radius of $5\farcs0$. Primarily the values in the UV
330: filters changed in the order of about 0.3 mag. For consistency we
331: list the results and exposure times in Table\,\ref{uvot_log}
332: of all \swift\ UVOT observation, including those prior to June 2007,
333: previously published in \citet{grupe07}.
334:
335:
336: \section{\label{results} Results}
337:
338: \subsection{X-ray detection and analysis}
339:
340: Figure\,\ref{wpvs007_image} displays the image of the field of \wpvs\ during the
341: 50ks observations of 2007 September. The circle marks the position of \wpvs.
342: Using the {\tt detect} algorithm in {\it XIMAGE}, the
343: AGN is clearly detected at a level of (5.1\plm1.2)$\times 10^{-4}$
344: XRT counts s$^{-1}$. Adding all XRT data together that have
345: been obtained since 2005 October (85.5 ks in total) results in a 5$\sigma$
346: detection with (4.5\plm0.9)$\times 10^{-4}$ counts s$^{-1}$.
347: Figure\,\ref{wpvs007_image_all} displays the field of WPVS 007 in the
348: soft 0.3-2.0
349: keV and hard 2.0-10.0 keV bands on the left and right panels, respectively. While
350: there is only a marginal detection at the 2$\sigma$ level in the soft X-ray
351: band, the AGN is clearly detected at the 4.5$\sigma$ level in the hard X-ray
352: band. Note, that in the 2005 October to 2007 January data there is an enhanced
353: number of counts at the position of WPVS 007 (Table\,\ref{xrt_stat}).
354: However, there is no obvious clustering of photons at that position. Therefore we
355: only report a 3$\sigma$ upper limit for this time period.
356:
357: The biggest surprise of the \swift\ observations is the
358: detection of \wpvs\ at
359: hard X-ray energies. From the whole 85.5 ks data set
360: we detected 24 source photons with energies $E>$2.5 keV out of a total of 36
361: source photons.
362: This is surprising because during the RASS WPVS 007 was {\bf the} AGN with the
363: steepest X-ray spectrum (\ax=8.7) and with no X-ray photon with energies
364: above 0.5 keV \citep{grupe95}. During the 10ks \chandra\ observation on
365: 2002 August 02 out of
366: 10 photons only one was detected above 2 keV, at 2.3 keV.
367:
368:
369:
370:
371: Table\,\ref{xrt_stat} lists the number counts, count rates, and
372: hardness ratios
373: for the 2005 October to 2007 January, 2007 September, and 2005
374: October to 2008 January observations. The Hardness ratios between the
375: 2005 October to 2007 January observations with the 2007 September indicated a
376: dramatic change in the X-ray spectrum. While the hardness ratio in the 2005 October
377: to 2007 January observations is soft with HR=$-0.49^{+0.23}_{-0.50}$ which is
378: consistent with the hardness ratio during the 2002 Chandra observation
379: (HR=$-0.86^{+0.12}_{-0.14}$), WPVS 007 had become significantly harder with
380: HR=+0.63\plm0.20 in the 2007 September observations. Although comparing hardness
381: ratios of different detectors is difficult, X-ray CCDs are similar enough to
382: tell if the majority of photons is in the hard or the soft bands.
383:
384: As listed in Table\,\ref{xrt_stat},
385: the total number of source photons in the combined 85 ks \swift\
386: exposure\footnote{Note, as mentioned in \citet{grupe07}
387: the segment 005 data were excluded from the analysis due to a high detector
388: background during the observation.} is only about 36.
389: Although the number of source photons is small,
390: this photon distribution can be used to examine
391: what spectral model best represents the
392: current low-state X-ray spectrum of \wpvs\/.
393: Figure\,\ref{wpvs007_xspec} shows the observed and simulated photon
394: distribution (black circles and red triangles, respectively).
395: For presentation purposes only the spectrum was rebinned with 3
396: photons per bin.
397: Because only 68\% of the total number of photons in the
398: non-background subtracted spectrum are source photons, no spectral
399: fitting of the data is possible. In order to determine what spectral model can
400: represent the observed photon distribution we measured the number of source
401: photons in different energy bands and simulated several models in XSPEC to
402: reproduce these numbers. In the observed spectrum we found that 12 source
403: photons were at energies
404: E$<$ 2.0 keV, 24 source photons at E$>$2.0 keV (Table\,\ref{xrt_stat}),
405: 16 photons between 2 and 5 keV
406: and 8 photons between 5 and 10 keV. The spectrum that can reproduce these
407: numbers the best is an absorbed two power law model $wabs \times (zwabs \times
408: powl + zwabs \times powl)$. The absorption column density at z=0 was set to
409: the Galactic value. The column densities of the redshifted absorbers are $5
410: \times 10^{21}$ and $2 \times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ for the first and second
411: power law component, respectively and X-ray spectral slopes \ax=8.7 and \ax=3.0
412: for these components. The first power law spectral slope is that found during
413: the RASS \citep{grupe95}. Even though this model can reproduce the observed
414: photon distribution, a more physical model is a partial covering absorber with
415: a single power law. We found that a partial covering absorber with a column
416: density $N_{\rm H} = 1\times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and a high covering fraction of
417: $f_{\rm pc}$=0.95 and an X-ray spectral slope \ax=1.5 can also represent the
418: observed photon distribution quite well.
419: Figure\,\ref{wpvs007_xspec} shows a simulated 85 ks spectrum (red triangles)
420: using the partial
421: covering absorber model as described above.
422:
423:
424: \subsection{UVOT data}
425:
426:
427: Figure\,\ref{wpvs007_uvot_lc} displays the UVOT light curves in all 6 filters.
428: Note that during some of the observations only the UV filters have been used.
429: These light curves are similar to those shown in \citet{grupe07},
430: but all UVOT
431: data have been re-analyzed due to the most recent software and calibration
432: changes \citep{poole07}. WPVS 007 continues to be variable by about 0.3 mag in
433: the UV on timescales of months. The UV light curves also suggest that over the
434: period of about two years the AGN has become fainter by up to 0.5 mag (see
435: also Table\,\ref{uvot_log}) in the UV filters.
436:
437:
438: Because we can finally see hard X-ray photons in WPVS 007, it is possible to
439: construct the spectral energy distribution (SED) and derive the optical to X-ray
440: spectral slope \aox. The photon distribution of WPVS
441: 007 presented here is dominated by the 2007 September observations when it
442: appeared to be brighter compared to the previous observations. Taking this
443: into account we measure an optical to X-ray spectral slope \aox=2.5. This is
444: the \aox\ of the absorbed/reddened spectrum. Note that
445: \citet{leighly08} found an unusual reddening curve of WPVS 007 based on the HST
446: data in comparison with HST spectra of Mrk 493 and Mrk 335.
447: In order to estimate the unabsorbed \aox,
448: we assumed an optical/UV spectrum of an (almost) unabsorbed NLS1. Here we picked
449: the \swift\ observation of MS 0117-28 (Grupe et al. 2008 in prep). For the
450: X-ray spectrum we used the unabsorbed power law spectrum found from the
451: partial covering absorber model fit with \ax=1.5. Based on these assumptions
452: we found that the unabsorbed optical to X-ray spectral slope is in the order
453: of \aox=1.9. The UV spectrum of MS 0117-28 can also be used to estimate the
454: approximate intrinsic reddening in WPVS 007. We measured a reddening of about
455: 1 magnitude in the UVW2 filter which translates to an intrinsic reddening of
456: $E_{\rm B-V}$=0.1 mag.
457: This SED results in a
458: Big-Blue-Bump luminosity of log $L_{\rm BBB}$=37.7 [W] which is exactly the
459: Eddington luminosity of a $4 \times 10^6$ \msun black hole\footnote{The black
460: hole mass was determined using the relation given in \citep{kaspi00}.},
461: or in other words, the
462: Eddington ratio is $L/L_{\rm Edd}\approx1$, which is a typical value for NLS1s
463: \citep[e.g.][]{grupe04}.
464:
465:
466:
467:
468: \section{\label{discuss} Discussion}
469:
470: We presented new \swift\ observations on the X-ray transient NLS1 \wpvs.
471: We were able to detect the AGN in X-rays at a level of 5$\times 10^{-4}$
472: XRT counts s$^{-1}$ in the 0.3-10.0 keV band which is equivalent to an X-ray
473: flux of 2$\times 10^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$.
474: The most interesting aspect of this detection is that the majority of source
475: photons are detected at energies $E>$2 keV which is extremely surprising
476: considering that WPVS 007 used to be the AGN with the softest X-ray spectrum in
477: the sky, having no photon above 0.5 keV detected during the RASS.
478:
479: Compared with the ACIS-S
480: count rate measured during the 2002 \chandra\ observation
481: \citep[$1\times 10^{-3}$ ACIS-S counts s$^{-1}$;][]{vaughan04}
482: this
483: indicates that WPVS 007 has become brighter by a factor of a few.
484: This variability, however, only occurs in the hard band. The 0.2-2.0 keV flux
485: between the \chandra\ 2002 and \swift\ 2007 observations remains constant
486: within the errors.
487: The
488: non-variability of the optical spectra seen by \citet{winkler92} and
489: \citet{grupe95}
490: suggests that the intrinsic continuum spectrum may not
491: have changed. This non variability in the optical spectrum is somewhat
492: similar to Mrk 335 where the optical spectra taken in 1999 during the X-ray high
493: state and 2007 September during the low-state are identical \citep{grupe08}.
494: The non variability of the optical spectrum together
495: with the strong variability seen in X-rays and the UV may suggest that the
496: inclination angle in which we observe the nuclear region is
497: rather high assuming that the variability is a consequence of
498: variable absorption.
499: This is expected for BAL QSOs according to the AGN geometry model
500: presented by \citet{elvis00}. However, this is not exclusive. Recently there
501: have been reports by e.g. \citet{berrington07} and \citet{ghosh08} of BAL QSOs
502: with polar outflows.
503:
504:
505: Although the best-fit model is the partial covering absorber model, in principle
506: a reflection model \citep[e.g.][]{fabian89,fabian04} results in a similar shape
507: of the X-ray spectrum. While it is impossible with the current data set to
508: distinguish betwen the partial covering absorber and refelction models, the
509: presence of a strong absorber in the UV spectrum \citep{leighly08} makes the
510: partial covering absorber model more plausible as the explanation for the
511: observed \swift\ X-ray spectrum.
512:
513: One
514: question is if the X-ray spectrum has changed intrinsically, or whether the absorber has
515: become more transparent sometime
516: between 2002 and 2007. The strong UV absorption in the FUSE observations also
517: suggests that WPVS 007 was highly absorbed in 2003 November.
518: There was only one photon found
519: above 2 keV in the \chandra\ 2002 observation, but 24 in the combined \swift\
520: data.
521: In order to answer the question we simulated a 10 ks ACIS-S spectrum
522: using the spectral parameters of a partial covering absorber fit derived from
523: the \swift\ data. Using these parameters we expect to see 13 photons with
524: energies above 2 keV in the \chandra\ data. However, only one single photon
525: with $E>$2keV was found. This is a statistically significant lower value than
526: the expected number of photons. We performed another simulation assuming a
527: column density of the partial covering absorber of $N_{\rm H,pc} = 1\times
528: 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ and leaving all other spectral parameters at the same values.
529: This simulation showed that the hard X-ray photons could be suppressed
530: significantly down to one photon above 2 keV in a 10 ks Chandra ACIS-S observations.
531: Even though we are dealing with low number photon statistics,
532: the hardness ratios found from the \swift\ data prior 2007
533: January observations the Chandra 2002 data both indicate a rather soft X-ray
534: spectrum, while the 2007 September data suggest a rather hard spectrum.
535: Because the flux during the 2007 September \swift\ observation is a factor of
536: about 4 higher than during the 2002 \chandra observation, it suggests that the
537: column density of the
538: absorber of the high energy spectrum had decreased significantly
539: sometime in the time between 2007 January and September. This
540: result suggests that the absorber has started to disappear again.
541: Note, that a change in the absorber column density of a fully-covered absorber
542: has exactly the opposite effect on the hardness ratio than what a partial
543: covered absorber does: while in increase of the absorption column density of a
544: fully-covered absorber causes the hardness ratio to become harder, because
545: primarily soft X-ray photons are absorbed, an increase of the absorption column
546: density of a partial covering absorber causes the source to appear softer,
547: because the soft X-ray photons are dominated by the
548: unabsorbed fraction of the X-ray continuum
549: while the hard X-ray photons become suppressed.
550: Considering that we observed the flux to decrease significantly
551: between the RASS observation in 1990 and the pointed ROSAT observation
552: in 1993, we may suggest that we will be able to see WPVS 007 as a
553: bright X-ray NLS1 again within the next few years.
554:
555: The optical to X-ray spectral slope \aox=2.5 clearly classifies WPVS 007 as an
556: X-ray weak AGN following the definition by \citet{brandt00} who define 'X-ray
557: weak' AGN by \aox$\ge$2.0. The reddening-corrected
558: \aox=1.9 is at the borderline. Note
559: that this value has large uncertainties. Nevertheless, this result is consistent
560: with the findings by \citet{leighly04} that NLS1s with outflows seen in the
561: blueshifted emission lines have steeper \aox\ than NLS1s without outflows.
562:
563: One question remains: why was the X-ray spectral slope during the RASS
564: observation so steep? An energy index of \ax=8.7 as measured from a
565: single absorbed power law model to the RASS spectrum \citep{grupe95} can not
566: be explained by standard accretion disk models. We can also exclude a tidal
567: disruption event by a star orbiting closely to the central black hole. First,
568: the optical to X-ray flux ratio during the RASS was log
569: $f_{\rm X}/f_{\rm o}$=0.22\footnote{The typical optical to X-ray spectral slope
570: \aox\ cannot be applied to these data because no X-ray photons with $E>$0.5 keV
571: were detected in the RASS data making any estimate of \aox very uncertain.}
572: which is typical for a Seyfert
573: 1 galaxy \citep{beu99,maccacaro88},
574: and second we do not detect any significant changes in the optical spectrum.
575: This is different than what has been found in the X-ray transient Seyfert 2
576: galaxy IC 3599 \citep{grupe95a, brandt95} or as recently reported for
577: SDSS J095209.56+214313.3 by \citet{komossa08}
578: where strong changes in the optical
579: emission lines were found as a result of an X-ray outburst caused by a
580: dramatic accretion event. Note also that the X-ray to optical flux ratio of
581: IC 3599 during the RASS was log $f_{\rm X}/f_{\rm o}$=1.45.
582: One possible explanation for the absence of any photon above 0.5 keV during the
583: RASS observation is the presence of an ionized, 'warm', absorber in the line of
584: sight. This type of absorber is transparent at soft energies but absorbs at
585: intermediate energies, and therefore provides an efficient
586: mechanism to produce very steep soft X-ray spectra
587: (e.g., Komossa \& Meerschweinchen 2000, Done \& Nayakshin 2007).
588: Using {\it absori} within XSPEC we simulated a 300s
589: spectrum of WPVS 007 during the RASS with an absorber column density $N_{\rm
590: H}=5\times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ of the warm absorber with an ionization parameter
591: $\xi$=1000. Fitting this simulated spectrum with an absorbed single power law model
592: results in \ax=6.2$^{+2.0}_{-1.2}$, which is similar to what has been found
593: during the RASS \citep{grupe95}.
594:
595: Our detection of WPVS 007 with \swift\ and the extraction of a photon
596: distribution from the 2005 to 2007 data opens a new window in our understanding
597: of WPVS 007 and X-ray weak AGN in general.
598: While in the UV we were able to follow the increase of the
599: absorber column density \citep{leighly05, leighly08} we are now able to follow
600: the disappearance of the absorber in X-rays. This will need future follow-up
601: observations by \xmm\ or \chandra\ and \swift. While \xmm\ or \chandra\
602: will be able to obtain a detailed
603: low-state spectrum, \swift\ will continue monitoring \wpvs\ in order to
604: determine when it will become X-ray bright again. In addition, optical
605: polarimetry or spectropolarimetry is needed to
606: measure how much of the optical emission
607: is seen directly and how much is scattered (polarized) emission. Spectropolarimetry
608: will put strong constraints on the geometry of the AGN and will confirm (or not) the
609: assumption that WPVS 007 is viewed at a rather high inclination angle.
610: We also have an approved HST COS observation along with a Chandra observation
611: in order to study the developments in the UV absorption lines and in the X-ray
612: continuum.
613:
614: \acknowledgments
615:
616: First we want to thank Neil Gehrels for approving our ToO requests and
617: the \swift\ team for performing the ToO observations of
618: WPVS 007 and scheduling the AGN on a regular basis.
619: Many thanks also to Kim Page and the anonymous referee
620: for carefully reading the manuscript and helpful suggestions to improve the
621: paper.
622: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic
623: Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
624: Caltech, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
625: Administration.
626: \swift\ at PSU is supported by NASA contract NAS5-00136.
627: This research was also supported by NASA contract NNX07AH67G (D.G.).
628:
629:
630: \begin{thebibliography}{}
631: \bibitem[Arnaud (1996)]{arnaud96} Arnaud, K.~A., 1996, ASP
632: Conf.~Ser.~101: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 17
633: \bibitem[Ballo et al.(2008)]{ballo08a} Ballo, L.; Giustini, M.;
634: Schartel, N.; Cappi, M.; Jim\'enez-Bail\'on, E.; Piconcelli, E.;
635: Santos-Lle\'o, M.; Vignali, C., 2008, \aap, 483, 137
636: \bibitem[Berrington et al.(2007)]{berrington07} Berrington, R.C., et al., 2007,
637: AAS, 211, 64.05
638: \bibitem[Beuermann et al. (1999)]{beu99} Beuermann, K., Thomas, H.-C., Reinsch,
639: K., et al., 1999, \aap, 347, 47
640: \bibitem[Bianchi et al.(2005)]{bianchi05} Bianchi, S.; Guainazzi, M.; Matt, G.;
641: Chiaberge, M.; Iwasawa, K.; Fiore, F.; Maiolino, R., 2005, \aap, 442, 185
642: \bibitem[Boller et al., (2002)]{boller02} Boller, T., et al., 2002, \mnras, 329,
643: L1
644: \bibitem[Boroson \& Green (1992)]{bor92} Boroson, T.A., \& Green, R.F., 1992,
645: \apjs, 80, 109
646: \bibitem[Brandt et al.(1995)]{brandt95} Brandt, W.N., Pounds, K.A., \& Fink,
647: H.H., 19095, \mnras, 273, L47
648: \bibitem[Brandt et al.(2000)]{brandt00} Brandt, W.N., Laor, A., \& Wills,
649: B.J., 2000, \apj, 528, 637
650: %\bibitem[Brandt et al (1994)]{bra94} Brandt W.N., Fabian A.C., Nandra K.,
651: % Reynolds C.S., Brinkmann W., 1994, \mnras, 271, 958
652: \bibitem[Burrows et al. (2005)]{burrows04} Burrows, D., et al., 2005, Space
653: Science Reviews, 120, 165
654: \bibitem[Constantin \& Shields (2003)]{constantin03} Constantin, A., \& Shields,
655: J.C., 2003, \pasp, 115, 592
656: \bibitem[Costantini et al.(2000)]{costantini00} Costantini, E., et al., 2000,
657: \apj, 544, 283
658: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman (1990)]{dic90} Dickey, J.M., \& Lockman, F.J., 1990,
659: \araa, 28, 215
660: \bibitem[Done \& Nayakshin (2007)]{done07} Done, C., Nayakshin, S. 2007, \mnras, 377, L59
661: \bibitem[Elvis (2000)]{elvis00} Elvis, M., 2000, \apj, 545, 63
662: \bibitem[Fabian et al. (1989)]{fabian89} Fabian, A.C., Rees, M.J., Stella, L.,
663: \& White, N.E., 1989, \mnras, 238, 729
664: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2004)]{fabian04} Fabian, A.C., Miniutti, G., Gallo, L.C.,
665: Boller, T., Tanaka, Y., Vaughan, S., \& Ross, R.R., 2004. \mnras, 353, 1071
666: \bibitem[Gallo et al. (2004)]{gallo04} Gallo, L.C., Tanaka, Y., Boller, T.,
667: Fabian, A.C., Vaughan, S., \& Brandt, W.N., 2004, \mnras, 353, 1064
668: \bibitem[Gehrels et al. (2004)]{gehrels04} Gehrels, N., et al., 2004, ApJ, 611,
669: 1005
670: \bibitem[Gehrels(2007)]{gehrels07} Gehrels, N., 2007, GCN circ \# 6760
671: \bibitem[Ghosh \& Punsly (2008)]{ghosh08} Ghosh, K.K., \& Punsly, B., 2008,
672: \apj, 674, L69
673: \bibitem[Giommi et al.(2007)]{giommi07} Giommi, P., et al., 2007, aap, 468, 571
674: \bibitem[Goodrich (2000)]{goodrich00} Goodrich, R.W., 2000, New Astronomy
675: reviews, Vol 44, 519
676: %\bibitem[Grupe(1996)]{gru96} Grupe, D., 1996, PhD Thesis, Universit\"at
677: %G\"ottingen
678: \bibitem[Grupe (2004)]{grupe04} Grupe, D., 2004, \aj, 127, 1799
679: \bibitem[Grupe et al. (1995b)]{grupe95} Grupe, D., Beuermann, K., Mannheim, K.,
680: Thomas, H.-C., de Martino, D., \& Fink, H.H., 1995b, \aap, 300, L21
681: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(1995a)]{grupe95a} Grupe, D., et al., 1995a, \aap, 299,
682: L5
683: %\bibitem[Grupe et al. (1998a)]{gru98a} Grupe, D., Beuermann, K., Thomas, H.-C.,
684: %Mannheim, K., \& Fink, H.H., 1998, A\&A 330, 25
685: \bibitem[Grupe et al. (1998)]{gru98b} Grupe, D., Wills, B.J., Wills, D.,
686: Beuermann, K., 1998, \aap, 333, 827
687: %\bibitem[Grupe et al.(1999)]{gru99} Grupe, D., Beuermann, K., Mannheim, K.,
688: %\& Thomas, H.-C., 1999, \aap, 350, 805
689: %\bibitem[Grupe et al. (2000)]{gru00} Grupe, D., Leighly, K.M., Thomas, H.-C., \&
690: %Laurent-Muehleisen, S.A., 2000, \aap, 356, 11
691: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2001)]{gru01} Grupe, D., Thomas, H.-C., \& Beuermann, K.,
692: 2001, \aap, 367, 470
693: %\bibitem[Grupe et al. (2004a)]{gru04a} Grupe, D., Wills, B.J., Leighly, K.M., \&
694: % Meusinger, H., 2004a, \aj, 127, 156
695: %\bibitem[Grupe et al. (2004b)]{gru04b} Grupe, D., Leighly, K.M., Burwitz, V.,
696: %Predehl, P., \& Mathur, S., 2004b, \aj, 128, 1524
697: \bibitem[Grupe et al. (2004b)]{grupe04b} Grupe, D., Mathur, S.,
698: \& Komossa, S., 2004b, \aj, 127, 3161
699: %\bibitem[Grupe \& Mathur (2004)]{gru04c} Grupe, D., \& Mathur, S., 2004, \apj,
700: %606, L41
701: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2006)]{grupe06} Grupe, D., Leighly, K.M., Komossa, S.,
702: Schady, P., O'Brien, P.T., Burrows, D.N., \& Nousek, J.A., 2006, \aj, 132, 1189
703: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2007a)]{grupe07} Grupe, D., Schady, P., Leighly, K.M.,
704: Komossa, S., O'Brien, P.T., \& Nousek, J.A., 2007a, \aj, 133, 1988
705: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2007b)]{grupe07b} Grupe, D., Komossa, S., \& Gallo, L.C.,
706: 2007b, \apjl, 668, L111
707: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2008)]{grupe08} Grupe, D., Komossa, S., Gallo, L.C.,
708: Fabian, A.C., Larsson, J., Pradhan, A.K., Xu, D., \& Miniutti, G., 2008, ApJ,
709: 681, 982
710: \bibitem[Guainazzi et al.(1998)]{guainazzi98} Guainazzi, M.m et al., 1998,
711: \mnras, 301, L1
712: \bibitem[Hill et al. (2004)]{hill04} Hill, J.E., et al., 2004, SPIE, 5165, 217
713: \bibitem[Hogg (1999)]{hogg99} Hogg, D., 1999, astro-ph/9905116
714: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2000)]{kaspi00} Kaspi, S., Smith, P.S., Netzer, H., Maoz,
715: D., Jannuzi, B.T., \& Giveon, U., 2000, \apj, 533, 631
716: \bibitem[Kataoka et al.(2008)]{kataoka07} Kataoka, J., et al., 2008, \apj, 672,
717: 787
718: % \bibitem[Komossa et al. (2004)]{komossa04} Komossa, S., Halpern, J., Schartel,
719: % N., \& Hasinger, G., 2004, \apj, 603, L17
720: \bibitem[Komossa \& Fink(1997)]{komossa97} Komossa, S., \& Fink, H.H., 1997,
721: \aap, 327, 555
722: \bibitem[Komossa et al. (2000)]{komossa00} Komossa, S., Meerschweinchen, J. 2000, \aap, 354, 411
723: \bibitem[Komossa et al.(2001)]{komossa01} Komossa, S., Burwitz, V., Predehl,
724: P., \& Kaastra, J., ASPC, 249, 411
725: \bibitem[Komossa et al.(2008)]{komossa08} Komossa, S., et al., 2008, \apjl, 678, L13
726: %%%% arXiv:0804.2670
727: \bibitem[Kraft et al. (1991)]{kraft91} Kraft, R.P., Burrows, D.N., \& Nousek,
728: J.A., 1991, \apj, 374, 344
729: %\bibitem[Leighly (1999)]{lei99a} Leighly, K.M., 1999, \apjs, 125, 297
730: %\bibitem[Leighly (1999b)]{lei99b} Leighly, K.M., 1999b, \apjs, 125, 317
731: \bibitem[Leighly \& Moore(2004)]{leighly04} Leighly, K.M., \& Moore, J.R., 2004,
732: \apj, 611, 107
733: \bibitem[Leighly et al. (2005)]{leighly05} Leighly, K.M., Casebeer, D.A.,
734: Hamann, F., \& Grupe, D., 2005, AAS, 207, 1804
735: \bibitem[Leighly et al.(2007)]{leighly07} Leighly, K.M., Halpern, J.P., Jenkins,
736: E.B., Grupe, D., Choi, J., \& Prescott, K.B., 2007, \apj, 663, 103
737: \bibitem[Leighly et al.(2008)]{leighly08} Leighly, K.M.,
738: Hamann, F., Casebeer, D.A., \& Grupe, D., 2008, \apj, submitted
739: \bibitem[Maccacaro et al. (1988)]{maccacaro88} Maccacaro, T., Gioia, I.M.,
740: Wolter, A., Zamorani, G., \& Stocke, J.T., 1988, \apj, 326, 680
741: \bibitem[Markwardt et al. (2005)]{markwardt05} Markwardt, C.B., Tueller, J.,
742: Skinner, G.K., Gehrels, N., Barthelmy, S.D., \& Mushotzky, R.F., 2005, \apj,
743: 633, L77
744: %\bibitem[Osterbrock \& Pogge (1985)]{oster85} Osterbrock, D.E., \& Pogge, R.W.,
745: %1985, \apj, 297, 166
746: \bibitem[Park et al.(2006)]{park06} Park, T., Kashyap, V.L., Siemiginowska, A., van
747: Dyk, D.A., Zezas, A., Heinke, C., \& Wargelin, B.J., 2006, \apj, 652, 610
748: \bibitem[Poole et al.(2007)]{poole07} Poole, T.S., et al., 2007, \mnras,
749: submitted, arXiv:0708.2259
750: %\bibitem[Pounds et al. (1995)]{pounds95} Pounds, K.A., Done, C., \& Osborne, J.P.,
751: %1995, \mnras, 277, L5
752: \bibitem[Roming et al. (2005)]{roming04} Roming, P.W.A., et al., 2005, Space
753: Science Reviews, 120, 95
754: \bibitem[Sambruna et al.(2007)]{sambruna07} Sambruna, R., et al., 2007, \apj,
755: 669, 884
756: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sfd98} Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P.,
757: \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
758: \bibitem[Tananbaum et al. (1979)]{tananbaum79} Tananbaum, H., et al., 1979,
759: \apj, 234, L9
760: %\bibitem[Thomas et al. (1998)]{tho98} Thomas, H.-C., Beuermann, K., Reinsch, K.,
761: %et al., 1998, \aap, 335, 467
762: %\bibitem[Tr\"umper(1982)]{tru83} Tr\"umper, J., 1982, Adv. Space Res., 4, 241
763: %\bibitem[Turner et al. (1999)]{turner99} Turner T.J., George I.M., Netzer H.,
764: %1999, \apj, 526, 52
765: \bibitem[Vaughan et al. (2004)]{vaughan04} Vaughan, S., Edelson, R., \& Warwick, R.S., 2004,
766: \mnras, 349, L1
767: \bibitem[Voges et al. (1999)]{voges99} Voges, W., Aschenbach, B., Boller, T., et
768: al., 1999, \aap, 349, 389
769: \bibitem[Wamsteker et al. (1985)]{wamsteker85} Wamsteker, W., Prieto A.,
770: Vitores, A., Schuster, H.E., Danks, A.C., Gonzalez R., \& Rodriguez, G., 1985,
771: \aaps, 62, 255
772: \bibitem[Winkler et al. (1992)]{winkler92} Winkler, H., Stirpe, G.M., \&
773: Sekiguchi, K., 1992, \aaps, 94, 103
774: \end{thebibliography}
775:
776:
777: \clearpage
778:
779:
780: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
781:
782: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
783:
784:
785: \begin{figure}
786: \epsscale{0.6}
787: \plotone{f1.ps}
788: \caption{\label{wpvs007_image} Image of the 50 ks observation in 2007 September
789: of the field of WPVS 007 in the 0.3-10.0 keV energy band.
790: The black circle marks the position of WPVS 007.
791: }
792: \end{figure}
793:
794:
795: \begin{figure}
796: \epsscale{1.0}
797: \plottwo{f2a.ps}{f2b.ps}
798: \caption{\label{wpvs007_image_all} Images of the 0.3-2.0 keV and 2.0-10.0 keV
799: energy ranges (left and right panels, respectively) from all Swift observations
800: obtained on the field of WPVS 007 so far, 85.5 ks in total.
801: The black circle marks the position of WPVS 007.
802: }
803: \end{figure}
804:
805:
806: \begin{figure}
807: \epsscale{0.4}
808: \plotone{f3.ps}
809: \caption{\label{wpvs007_xspec} X-ray photon distribution
810: of WPVS 007. The black open circles displays the observed data,
811: containing all \swift\ observations with a total exposure time of 85.5 ks.
812: The red open triangles
813: display a simulated 85 ks spectrum using a partial covering
814: absorber with a single power law
815: model as described in the text to represent the observed photon distribution.
816: For clarity reasons the spectra were binned with 3 photons per bin.
817: }
818: \end{figure}
819:
820:
821: \begin{figure}
822: \epsscale{0.6}
823: \plotone{f4.ps}
824: \caption{\label{wpvs007_uvot_lc} UVOT light curves of WPVS 007 starting in 2005
825: October.
826: }
827: \end{figure}
828:
829:
830:
831:
832:
833: \clearpage
834:
835: \begin{deluxetable}{lccr}
836: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
837: \tablecaption{\swift~XRT Observation log of WPVS 007
838: \label{xrt_log}}
839: \tablewidth{0pt}
840: \tablehead{
841: \colhead{Segment} & \colhead{T-start\tablenotemark{1}} &
842: \colhead{T-stop\tablenotemark{1}} &
843: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{2}}
844: }
845: \startdata
846: 014 & 2007-07-15 01:35 & 2007-07-16 17:42 & 2372 \\
847: 015 & 2007-07-18 19:21 & 2007-07-18 19:46 & 1473 \\
848: 016 & 2007-08-10 14:13 & 2007-08-10 14:15 & 145 \\
849: 018 & 2007-09-06 23:03 & 2007-09-06 23:10 & 500 \\
850: 019 & 2007-09-08 00:40 & 2007-09-09 23:28 & 15830 \\
851: 020 & 2007-09-10 00:51 & 2007-09-10 23:34 & 7122 \\
852: 021 & 2007-09-11 01:01 & 2007-09-11 23:40 & 6118 \\
853: 022 & 2007-09-12 00:52 & 2007-09-12 23:32 & 5822 \\
854: 023 & 2007-09-13 01:15 & 2007-09-13 23:52 & 7197 \\
855: 024 & 2007-09-14 01:17 & 2007-09-14 24:00 & 7942 \\
856: 026 & 2007-10-07 00:44 & 2007-10-07 13:39 & 2155 \\
857: 027 & 2007-10-08 00:50 & 2007-10-08 13:45 & 2275 \\
858: 028 & 2007-11-09 00:23 & 2007-11-09 02:29 & 2270 \\
859: 029 & 2007-12-15 10:09 & 2007-12-15 23:18 & 1790 \\
860: 030 & 2008-01-12 17:56 & 2008-01-12 22:55 & 1528
861: \enddata
862:
863: \tablenotetext{1}{Start and End times are given in UT}
864: \tablenotetext{2}{Observing time given in s}
865: \end{deluxetable}
866:
867:
868:
869: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcrcrcrcrcrc}
870: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
871: \tablecaption{\swift~UVOT Observation of WPVS 007
872: \label{uvot_log}}
873: \tablewidth{0pt}
874: \tablehead{
875: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{V}
876: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{B}
877: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{U}
878: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{UV W1}
879: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{UV M2}
880: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{UV W2} \\
881: \colhead{\rb{Segment}} &
882: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$\rm Mag_{corr}$\tablenotemark{2}} &
883: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$\rm Mag_{corr}$\tablenotemark{2}} &
884: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$\rm Mag_{corr}$\tablenotemark{2}} &
885: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$\rm Mag_{corr}$\tablenotemark{2}} &
886: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$\rm Mag_{corr}$\tablenotemark{2}} &
887: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$\rm Mag_{corr}$\tablenotemark{2}}
888: }
889: \startdata
890: 001 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 646 & 14.17\plm0.01 & 675 & 14.09\plm0.01 & 686 & 14.19\plm0.01 \\
891: 002 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 550 & 14.18\plm0.01 & 588 & 14.11\plm0.01 & 588 & 14.19\plm0.01 \\
892: 003 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 1056 & 14.17\plm0.01 & 1171 & 14.08\plm0.01 & 1171 & 14.23\plm0.01 \\
893: 004 & 155 & 15.20\plm0.03 & 159 & 15.50\plm0.02 & 159 & 14.45\plm0.02 & 319 & 14.41\plm0.02 & 118 & 14.27\plm0.03 & 615 & 14.50\plm0.01 \\
894: 005 & 55 & 15.09\plm0.04 & 170 & 15.39\plm0.02 & 170 & 14.30\plm0.02 & 340 & 14.20\plm0.02 & 144 & 14.07\plm0.03 & 392 & 14.22\plm0.02 \\
895: 006 & 194 & 15.11\plm0.03 & 194 & 15.39\plm0.02 & 194 & 14.31\plm0.02 & 387 & 14.19\plm0.01 & 536 & 14.07\plm0.01 & 777 & 14.20\plm0.01 \\
896: 007 & 344 & 15.10\plm0.02 & 336 & 15.39\plm0.01 & 335 & 14.33\plm0.01 & 686 & 14.21\plm0.01 & 767 & 14.12\plm0.01 & 767 & 14.19\plm0.01 \\
897: 009 & 245 & 15.18\plm0.02 & 245 & 15.50\plm0.02 & 245 & 14.43\plm0.02 & 486 & 14.36\plm0.01 & 621 & 14.28\plm0.02 & 978 & 14.41\plm0.01 \\
898: 010 & 134 & 15.15\plm0.03 & 134 & 15.49\plm0.03 & 134 & 14.62\plm0.02 & 267 & 14.42\plm0.01 & 376 & 14.34\plm0.02 & 534 & 14.56\plm0.01 \\
899: 011 & 187 & 15.23\plm0.03 & 187 & 15.59\plm0.02 & 187 & 14.54\plm0.02 & 374 & 14.42\plm0.02 & 513 & 14.37\plm0.02 & 750 & 14.55\plm0.01 \\
900: 012+013 & 155 & 15.19\plm0.03 & 155 & 15.43\plm0.02 & 155 & 14.37\plm0.02 & 312 & 14.29\plm002 & 373 & 14.17\plm0.02 & 625 & 14.32\plm0.01\\
901: 014 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 19 & 14.65\plm0.05 & 37 & 14.46\plm0.05 & 111 & 14.47\plm0.04 & 50 & 14.65\plm0.05 \\
902: 015 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 145 & 14.58\plm0.02 & 290 & 14.48\plm0.02 & 436 & 14.44\plm0.02 & 560 & 14.56\plm0.01 \\
903: 016 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 16 & 14.47\plm0.04 & 31 & 14.31\plm0.04 & 46 & 14.24\plm0.05 & 35 & 14.41\plm0.05 \\
904: 028 & 189 & 15.39\plm0.03 & 189 & 15.73\plm0.02 & 187 & 14.75\plm0.01 & 374 & 14.63\plm0.02 & 510 & 14.59\plm0.02 & 745 & 14.73\plm0.01 \\
905: 029 & 152 & 15.40\plm0.03 & 153 & 15.78\plm0.02 & 153 & 14.76\plm0.02 & 124 & 14.67\plm0.03 & 375 & 14.59\plm0.02 & 248 & 14.74\plm0.02 \\
906: 030 & 144 & 15.25\plm0.03 & 156 & 15.58\plm0.02 & 156 & 14.54\plm0.01 & 310 & 14.45\plm0.02 & 260 & 14.33\plm0.02 & 623 & 14.44\plm0.01
907: \enddata
908: \tablenotetext{1}{Observing time given in s}
909: \tablenotetext{2}{Magnitude corrected for reddening with $E_{\rm B-V}$=0.012 given by
910: \citet{sfd98}. The errors given in this table are statistical errors}
911: \end{deluxetable}
912:
913:
914:
915:
916:
917:
918: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
919: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
920: \tablecaption{Count statistics of the WPVS 007 \swift\ observations
921: \label{xrt_stat}}
922: \tablewidth{0pt}
923: \tablehead{
924: & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{source+backgr} &
925: \multicolumn{2}{c}{background\tablenotemark{2}} \\
926: \colhead{\rb{Observations}} & \colhead{\rb{$T_{\rm exp}$\tablenotemark{1}}} &
927: \colhead{S\tablenotemark{3}} & \colhead{H\tablenotemark{3}} &
928: \colhead{S\tablenotemark{3}} & \colhead{H\tablenotemark{3}} &
929: \colhead{counts} &
930: \colhead{CR\tablenotemark{4}} &
931: \colhead{HR\tablenotemark{3}}
932: }
933: \startdata
934: 2005 October - 2007 January & 23105 & 7 & 4 & 30 & 33 & 7.2$^{+2.7}_{-3.8}$ &
935: 3.1$^{+1.2}_{-1.6}$ & $-0.49^{+0.23}_{-0.50}$ \\
936: 2007 September & 50531 & 8 & 24 & 46 & 50 & 25.9$^{+6.1}_{-6.3}$ & 5.1\plm1.2 &
937: +0.63\plm0.20 \\
938: 2005 October - 2008 January & 85508 & 18 & 30 & 92 & 105 & 35.7$^{+6.4}_{-6.7}$ & 4.2\plm0.8 &
939: +0.32\plm0.19
940: \enddata
941:
942: \tablenotetext{1}{Exposure times are given in s}
943: \tablenotetext{2}{The background area is 16 times larger than the source area}
944: \tablenotetext{3}{The hardness ratio is defined as HR=(H-S)/(H+S) with S and H are
945: background subtracted counts in the 0.3-2.0 and 2.0-10.0 keV bands, respectively. The
946: hardness ratio was calculated following the description in \citet{park06}. }
947: \tablenotetext{4}{Count rate is given in units of $10^{-4}$ counts s$^{-1}$.}
948:
949: \end{deluxetable}
950:
951:
952:
953:
954:
955:
956:
957:
958:
959:
960: \end{document}
961:
962:
963: %%
964:
965: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
966:
967:
968:
969:
970:
971:
972: