1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: \newcommand{\myemail}{pc8s@virginia.edu}
5:
6:
7: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ}
8:
9:
10: \shorttitle{Radio observations of SN 1995N}
11: \shortauthors{Chandra et al.}
12:
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16:
17: \title{Eleven years of radio monitoring of the Type IIn supernova SN 1995N}
18:
19: \author{Poonam Chandra \altaffilmark{1,2},
20: Christopher J. Stockdale \altaffilmark{3},
21: Roger A. Chevalier \altaffilmark{2},
22: Schuyler D. Van Dyk \altaffilmark{4},
23: Alak Ray \altaffilmark{5},
24: Matthew T. Kelley \altaffilmark{6},
25: Kurt W. Weiler \altaffilmark{7},
26: Nino Panagia \altaffilmark{8}
27: Richard A. Sramek \altaffilmark{9}
28: }
29:
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Jansky Fellow, National Radio Astronomy Observatory}
31: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box
32: 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904}
33: \altaffiltext{3}{Marquette University, Physics Department, P.O. Box
34: 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53214-1881}
35: \altaffiltext{4}{Spitzer Science Center/Caltech, 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
36: \altaffiltext{5}{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,
37: Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India}
38: \altaffiltext{6}{University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Box 454002, Las Vegas,
39: NV 89154-4002}
40: \altaffiltext{7}{Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7210, Washington, DC
41: 20375-5351}
42: \altaffiltext{8}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,
43: Baltimore, MD 21218, USA and INAF/Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Via
44: S. Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy and Supernova Ltd., Olde Yard Village
45: \#131, Northsound Road, Virgin Gorda, British Virgin Islands}
46: \altaffiltext{9}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O.~Box 0, Socorro, NM 87801}
47:
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: We present radio observations of the optically bright Type IIn supernova SN
51: 1995N. We observed the SN at radio wavelengths with the
52: Very Large Array (VLA) for 11 years.
53: We also observed it at low radio frequencies with
54: the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) at various epochs
55: within $6.5-10$ years since explosion.
56: Although there are indications of an early optically thick phase,
57: most of the data are in the optically thin regime so it is
58: difficult to distinguish
59: between synchrotron self absorption (SSA) and free-free absorption (FFA)
60: mechanisms. However, the information from other wavelengths
61: indicates that the FFA is the dominant
62: absorption process. Model fits of radio emission
63: with the FFA give reasonable physical parameters.
64: Making use of X-ray and optical observations, we derive the
65: physical conditions of the shocked ejecta and the shocked CSM.
66: \end{abstract}
67:
68:
69: \keywords{circumstellar matter --- radiation mechanisms: non-thermal ---
70: radio continuum: stars --- stars: mass loss ---
71: supernovae: individual (SN 1995N)}
72:
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75: \label{sec:introduction}
76:
77:
78: Type IIn supernovae (hereafter SNe IIn) show narrow H$\alpha$
79: emission line atop a broad emission feature, with no broad absorption.
80: This classification was suggested by \citet{sch90} who noticed the above
81: properties in 8 supernovae (SNe).
82: The H$\alpha$ and bolometric luminosities of
83: most SNe IIn are large, which can be explained by the shock
84: interaction of supernova (SN) ejecta with a very
85: dense circumstellar (CS) gas \citep{chu90}.
86: Many SNe IIn also show an excess late time infrared emission,
87: which is a signature of dense CS
88: dust \citep{ger02}.
89: CS interaction in SNe is typically observed by radio and X-ray emission
90: \citep{che03}.
91: However, in many cases, radio emission from SNe IIn has not been
92: detected \citep{van96}.
93:
94: One of the important issues for SNe IIn is
95: their high presupernova mass loss rates. For example, for SN 1997ab
96: the derived mass loss rate
97: for a presupernova
98: wind velocity of $90\,{\rm km\, s^{-1}}$ is
99: $\sim 10^{-2}\, M_\odot\,{\rm yr^{-1}}$ \citep{sal98}. For SN 1994W
100: the mass loss rate
101: was $\sim 0.2\, M_\odot\,{\rm yr^{-1}}$ \citep{chu04},
102: and for SN 1995G $\sim 0.1\, M_\odot\,{\rm yr^{-1}}$ \citep{chu03}.
103: One possibility for these high mass loss rates is that they are
104: related to
105: an explosive event a few years before the SN
106: outburst \citep{chu03,pas07}.
107: Radio observations may put better
108: constraints on the mass loss of the progenitor stars.
109:
110: SN 1995N was discovered in MCG $-$02$-$38$-$017 (Arp 261) on 1995 May 5
111: \citep{pol95} at a distance of 24 Mpc \citep[see][]{fra02}.
112: \citet{pol95} estimated that the supernova was at least 10 months old upon
113: discovery by comparing it with spectroscopic chronometers, and
114: classified it as a Type IIn supernova. We
115: assume the date of explosion to be 1994 July 4 throughout the
116: paper \citep{fra02}.
117: SN 1995N turned out to be relatively bright at late times in most
118: wavebands. It was detected in the radio
119: with the Very Large Array
120: \citep[VLA,][]{van96}
121: and the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope \citep[GMRT,][]{cha05}.
122: In X-rays it was detected first by ROSAT in Aug 1996
123: and Aug 1997, and later by ASCA in Jan 1998
124: \citep{fox00}. In July 2003 XMM-Newton
125: \citep{zam05} and in March 2004 Chandra X-ray
126: Observatory \citep{cha05} detected the late time X-ray emission from the SN.
127: SN 1995N has declined very slowly in the optical band \citep{li02,pas05},
128: with only a 2.5 mag change in the V-band over
129: $\sim2500$ days after explosion. This is consistent with the
130: slow spectral evolution reported in \citet{fra02}.
131: Ground based optical and HST observations of the late-time spectral
132: evolution of SN 1995N were used by \citet{fra02} to argue
133: that the late-time evolution is most likely powered by the X-rays
134: from the interaction of the ejecta and the circumstellar medium
135: of the progenitor. They in turn proposed that the progenitors
136: of Type IIn supernovae are similar to red supergiants in their
137: superwind phases, when most of their hydrogen-rich gas is expelled
138: in the last $10^4\, \rm yr$ before explosion.
139:
140:
141: In this paper, we report extensive radio observations of SN 1995N
142: taken with the VLA and GMRT. We discuss the observations and data
143: analysis in \S \ref{sec:observations}. We fit various models to the data and
144: discuss the results in \S \ref{sec:absorption}. In
145: \S \ref{sec:interpretation}, we utilize the results from other wavelength observations
146: along with the radio bands to derive constraints on the physical parameters.
147: We summarize our results briefly in \S \ref{sec:conclusions}.
148:
149: \section{Observations}
150: \label{sec:observations}
151:
152: \subsection{VLA observations}
153: \label{sec:vla}
154:
155: The VLA followed SN 1995N for eleven years, from June 1995 until
156: September 2006. The observations were taken at 22.48 GHz (1.3 cm),
157: 14.96 GHz (2 cm), 8.46 GHz (3.6 cm), 4.86 GHz (6 cm),
158: 1.46 GHz (20 cm) and 0.33 GHz (90 cm) frequencies in standard continuum mode
159: with a total bandwidth of $2 \times 50$ MHz.
160: SN 1995N was observed in all the VLA array configurations.
161: For the first year of VLA observations, i.e. until May 1996,
162: J1507$-$168 was used as a
163: phase calibrator. From Oct 1996 until Jan 2004,
164: the VLA calibrator
165: J1504$-$166 was used for phase calibration.
166: For only one epoch, in Sep 2004 at 6 cm,
167: J1512$-$090 was used as the phase calibrator. After that until Sep 2006,
168: J1507$-$168 was used for phase calibration.
169: Table \ref{tab:phase}
170: gives the flux density values of the phase calibrators at each epoch.
171: Calibrators 3C48 and 3C286 were
172: used for flux calibration at various epochs.
173: In some cases, where no primary calibrator was observed, we
174: obtained those datasets which were having primary calibrators, and
175: most closely spaced data in time,
176: in most cases within a gap of one to two days.
177: We used those datasets to perform the
178: flux calibration on SN 1995N. We use the
179: Astrophysical Image Processing System (AIPS)
180: to analyze the VLA data.
181: Our A-configuration data on 1996 0ct 24 in 22.5 GHz band was the
182: highest resolution data, which led us to derive
183: the most accurate radio position of SN 1995N.
184: The B1950 position for SN 1995N from this dataset
185: is RA: $14^{\rm h}~46^{\rm m}~46.5946\pm0.0004^{\rm s}$, Dec:
186: $-09^{\rm o}~57'~49.5596\pm0.0006''$.
187:
188: \subsection{GMRT observations}
189: \label{sec:gmrt}
190:
191: We sampled the light curves of SN 1995N at
192: low frequencies between $6.5-10$ years after explosion using the
193: GMRT. We observed the SN on around fifteen occasions
194: in the 1420 (20 cm), 610 (50 cm), 325 (90 cm) and 235 (125 cm) MHz
195: bands \citep{cha05b}.
196: The total time spent at the SN field of view (FOV)
197: during the observations at various epochs ranged from
198: 2 to 4 hours. About
199: 17 to 29 good antennas could be used in the radio
200: interferometric setup at different observing epochs.
201: For 20 cm, 50 cm and 90 cm observations
202: the bandwidth was 16 MHz divided into 128 frequency channels
203: (the default for the GMRT correlator),
204: while a 6 MHz bandwidth was used for the 125 cm observations.
205: 3C286 was the main flux calibrator for all the
206: observations. On a single occasion at 50 cm, we also used 3C147 for flux
207: calibration.
208: In 20 cm observations,
209: we used J1432$-$180 as the phase calibrator
210: at most epochs. On a few occasions we used J1347$+$122,
211: J1445$+$099 and J1351$-$148 for phase calibration.
212: For the low frequency observations, in the 50 cm, 90 cm and 125 cm bands, we
213: used J1419$+$064 as phase calibrator at all epochs.
214: Table \ref{tab:phase}
215: gives the flux densities of the phase calibrators at each epoch.
216: We used the above flux calibrators and
217: phase calibrators for bandpass calibration as well.
218: Flux calibrators
219: were observed once or twice for $10-20$ minutes during each observing session.
220: Phase calibrators were observed for $5-6$ minutes after every 25 minute
221: observing run on the SN.
222:
223: AIPS was used to analyze all datasets with the standard GMRT data reduction.
224: Bad antennas and corrupted
225: data were removed using standard AIPS routines.
226: To take care of
227: the wide field imaging at low GMRT
228: frequencies, we divided the whole field of view into 5 subfields for the
229: 1420 MHz frequency datasets, and into $6-9$ subfields for the 610
230: MHz datasets. For the 325 MHz datasets, wide field imaging
231: was performed with $16-20$ subfields, while for the 245 MHz datasets
232: this was done with $25-30$ subfields.
233: Bandwidth smearing was taken care of by dividing the whole band of
234: 16 MHz into 6
235: subbands in the 325 MHz observations. In the 235 MHz data analysis, we
236: divided the 6 MHz band into 6 subbands. For the 1420 MHz and 610 MHz
237: bands, the bandwidth smearing was insignificant.
238: A few rounds of phase self-calibrations were also performed on
239: all the datasets to remove the phase variations due to the weather
240: and related causes.
241:
242: The details of each observation and the SN 1995N flux densities
243: at various epochs
244: are tabulated in Table \ref{tab:radio}.
245: In Fig. \ref{fig:full-lc} we plot the full dataset at all
246: frequencies.
247:
248: \section{Radio Absorption Process}
249: \label{sec:absorption}
250:
251: The radio emission in a SN is from the shocked interaction shell and is
252: non-thermal synchrotron in nature. In the simplest models, it can initially be
253: absorbed either by the internal medium due to synchrotron self
254: absorption (SSA) or by the external medium
255: through free-free absorption (FFA),
256: depending on the mass loss rate of the
257: presupernova star, magnetic field in the shocked shells, density
258: of the ejecta and the CS parameters.
259: Unfortunately, a clear distinction between
260: the two absorption processes lies in the optically thick part of
261: the light curve or spectrum, where the data for SN 1995N are quite sparse.
262: Therefore, before attempting detailed model fits,
263: we try to extract information about both absorption
264: processes from other wavebands.
265:
266: We can relate the free-free optical depth of the
267: external medium to the
268: hydrogen Balmer line luminosity,
269: which can be written as \citep{ost89}
270: \begin{equation}
271: L_{\rm H\beta}=4.2\times 10^{-26}\int_R^\infty n_R^2\left(\frac{r}{R}
272: \right)^{-4} 4 \pi r^2 \, dr.
273: \label{eq:hbeta}
274: \end{equation}
275: Here, cgs units are used and we assume the
276: electron temperature of the CSM to be 20,000 K, deduced
277: by \citet{fra02} using the optical narrow line emission for SN 1995N.
278: The radius $R$ is the outer radius of the shock and $n_R$ is the
279: CSM density at a distance $R$ from the explosion center.
280: \citet{fra02} estimate
281: the SN H$\beta$ luminosity to be $5.3 \times 10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
282: Thus, Eq. (\ref{eq:hbeta}) gives $n_R^2 R^3=10^{61}$ cm$^{-3}$.
283: The free-free optical depth for this medium is
284: $\tau_{\rm FFA}=\int_R^\infty \kappa_{ff} n_R^2 \left(\frac{r}{R}
285: \right)^{-4} dr$.
286: Substituting $n_R^2 R^3=10^{61}$ erg s$^{-1}$, this becomes
287: \begin{equation}
288: \tau_{\rm FFA}^{\rm H\beta}=0.5 \left(\frac{\nu}{5\,\rm GHz}\right)^{-2}
289: \left(\frac{T}{2 \times 10^4 \rm K}\right)^{-3/2}
290: \left(\frac{R}{10^{17}\,\rm cm}\right)^{-2}.
291: \end{equation}
292: Here $\tau_{\rm FFA}^{\rm H\beta}$ implies FFA optical depth
293: derived from H$\beta$ luminosity.
294: This exercise demonstrates that the
295: optical depth derived from the H$\beta$ luminosity in the
296: visual band reaches order unity at radio
297: wavelengths, indicating that the
298: FFA optical depth is sufficient to explain the radio absorption.
299:
300: \citet[][Fig. 7]{che03} plot the peak radio
301: luminosity vs the time of peak radio flux for various
302: supernovae, marking the lines of
303: constant shock velocity derived assuming SSA absorption process.
304: If we place SN 1995N in this plot, it falls close to a velocity of
305: 3000 km s$^{-1}$. However, the optical line emission observations
306: suggest ejecta velocities of at least 5000 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{fra02}.
307: Hence, the velocity of the radio-emitting region must be at least
308: be equal to or greater than 5,000~km~s$^{-1}$, an indication
309: that SSA is not a significant factor in the the radio
310: emission measured from SN~1995N.
311: The H$\beta$ luminosity and the inferred expansion
312: of the radio-emitting region suggest that FFA
313: is the dominant radio absorption mechanism.
314:
315: We now fit the FFA model to the data.
316: The model for FFA was given by \citet{che82} and
317: was formulated in detail by \citet{van94} and \citet{wei02}. The
318: radio flux density, $F(\nu,t)$, under the FFA
319: assumption can be written as:
320: \begin{eqnarray}
321: F(\nu,t)=A_1
322: \left(\frac{\nu}{5 \,{\rm GHz}}\right)^{-\alpha}
323: \left(\frac{t}{1000\, {\rm day}}
324: \right)^{-\beta}
325: \exp(-\tau_{\rm FFA}) \nonumber \\
326: \tau_{\rm FFA}=A_2 \left(\frac{\nu}{5 \,{\rm GHz}}\right)^{-2.1}
327: \left(\frac{t}{1000\, {\rm day}} \right)^{-\delta},
328: \label{eq:ffa}
329: \end{eqnarray}
330: where $\alpha$ is the frequency spectral index, which relates to electron
331: energy index $\gamma$ ($N(E) \propto E^{-\gamma}$) as
332: $\gamma=2 \alpha +1$. To determine the value of $\alpha$,
333: we plot spectral indices between 8.46 GHz and 4.86 GHz
334: bands ($\alpha[8.46/4.86]$)
335: as well as between 4.86 GHz and 1.46 GHz bands ($\alpha[4.86/1.46]$)
336: at various epochs (see Fig \ref{fig:alpha}). From Fig.
337: \ref{fig:full-lc}, it is evident that the light curves becomes optically
338: thin for these three bands after day $\sim 2500$. Thus we average
339: both $\alpha(4.86/1.46)$ and $\alpha(8.46/4.86)$ for all the
340: values after day 2500.
341: The average spectral index is $\alpha=0.59\pm0.07$.
342: Hence, we use $\alpha=0.6$ ($\gamma=2.2$) in the radio absorption models.
343: Here $A_1$ is the radio flux density normalization
344: parameter and $A_2$ is the FFA optical depth normalization parameter.
345: The parameter $\delta$ is related to the
346: expansion parameter $m$ in $R \propto t^{m}$ as $\delta=3 m$.
347: The assumption that the energy density in the
348: particles and the fields is proportional to the postshock energy density
349: leads to $\beta=(\gamma+5-6m)/2$ \citep{che82}.
350: For $\gamma=2.2$, this becomes $\beta=3.6-3m$.
351: Using these values, we fit the SN 1995N radio data to Eq. \ref{eq:ffa}.
352: The parameters for the best fit model are:
353: $A_1= 4.59 \pm 0.19$, $A_2=(4.58 \pm 0.80) \times 10^{-2}$,
354: and $m=0.84\pm0.02$.
355: The above fit parameters yield
356: $\delta=2.54\pm0.06$,
357: and $\beta=1.09\pm0.06$.
358: In the CS interaction model of \citet{che82}, the power law index of the supernova
359: density profile, $n$, is related to $m$ by $m=(n-3)/(n-2)$, so that the above
360: value of $m$ implies $n=8.3$.
361:
362: Although our fits for the FFA model are reasonable, we try to fit
363: other radio absorption models as well.
364: We use the formulation of \citet{che98} for the
365: radio flux density with SSA present:
366: \begin{eqnarray}
367: F(\nu,t)=P_1 \left(\frac{t}{1000\, {\rm day}}\right)^a \left(\frac{\nu}{5\, {\rm GHz}}\right)^{5/2}
368: \left(1-\exp(-\tau_{\rm SSA}) \right), \nonumber \\
369: \tau_{\rm SSA}=P_2 \left(\frac{t}{1000\, {\rm day}}\right)^{-(a+b)}
370: \left(\frac{\nu}{5\, {\rm GHz}}\right)^{-(\gamma+4)/2}.
371: \label{eq:ssa}
372: \end{eqnarray}
373: Here $a$ gives the time evolution of the radio flux density in the
374: optically thick phase ($F\propto t^a$)
375: and $b$ in the optically thin phase ($F\propto t^{-b}$).
376: Under the assumption that the energy density in the
377: particles and the fields is proportional to the postshock energy density,
378: these quantities are related with expansion parameter $m$
379: and electron energy index $\gamma$ as $a = 2m + 0.5$,
380: and $b=(\gamma+5-6m)/2$ (as before).
381: The estimation of
382: $b$ from the fits is expected to
383: be robust because there are ample data points in
384: the optically thin part of the light curve, whereas $a$
385: is determined by the optically thick regime and cannot be constrained
386: well due to sparse data in this region.
387: Here $P_1$ is the flux normalization parameter
388: and $P_2$ is the SSA optical depth normalization parameter.
389: The best fit model gives
390: $a=5.97\pm1.13$ and $b=1.12\pm0.07$.
391: For $\gamma=2.2$, the above value of $b$ corresponds to $m=0.83$.
392: The best fit value of $a$ corresponds to $m\gg 1$.
393: However, $a$ is not well constrained by the data, so we fix it to a value of
394: $a=2.16$, corresponding to $m=0.83$ and fit the data again.
395: The best fits in this case are:
396: $P_1=148.81\pm34.77$, $P_2=(2.85 \pm 0.68) \times 10^{-2}$,
397: and $b=1.12\pm0.06$.
398: As expected, the evolution deduced during the optically thin case
399: is similar to that found in the FFA model.
400:
401: We note that there are more complicated possibilities for the absorption,
402: but our data are not sufficient to test them.
403: In particular, \citet{wei90} found that the optically thick radio evolution
404: of the Type IIn SN 1986J could not be fit by a model with external FFA,
405: but could be fit by a model with internal FFA mixed with the synchrotron
406: emitting region.
407: Such a model is plausible for SNe IIn, because of the evidence for
408: clumping in the CS medium, but we cannot test it here.
409:
410:
411: Although both FFA and SSA give acceptable
412: fits due to the lack of data points in the optically thick regime,
413: the
414: SSA derived velocity and information using optical data suggest that FFA
415: is the most relevant
416: radio absorption process. We
417: produce light curves (see Fig. \ref{fig:lc}) and spectra (see
418: Fig. \ref{fig:spectra}) for both FFA and SSA processes.
419: In Fig. \ref{fig:lc}, there is a sudden rise in the
420: radio flux around day $\sim 1200$, plotted with grey dashed-dotted lines;
421: this is evident in all the frequency
422: bands almost at the same time.
423: This effect can also be see in the spectra on
424: days 1440 and 1812 (Fig. \ref{fig:spectra}).
425: We speculate that this feature is due to a density enhancement in the CSM.
426: However, if the time decay $\beta$ is somewhat shallower
427: at the early epoch, and there is a steepening in $\beta$ at later epochs,
428: this may also cause such a bump in the light curves. Such time
429: evolution in $\beta$ has been seen for
430: SN 1993J and a few other supernovae \citep{wei07}.
431: It is difficult to distinguish between the two possibilities
432: in view of the sparse data.
433:
434:
435: \section{Physical Conditions}
436: \label{sec:interpretation}
437:
438: SN 1995N was extensively observed in many wavebands of the electromagnetic
439: spectrum. We will utilize this information and
440: derive constraints on various physical parameters of SN 1995N.
441:
442: \subsection{Mass loss rate}
443: \label{sec:massloss}
444:
445: If FFA is the dominant absorption process, we
446: can estimate the mass-loss rate of the progenitor star before it underwent the
447: explosion phase using the radio
448: data. This can be written as \citep{wei86,van94}
449: \begin{equation}
450: \dot M= 2.11 \times 10^{-5}\left [ \frac{A_2}{10^{-2}}\right]^{0.5}\left
451: [\frac{V_{ej}}{5,000\, {\rm km/s}}\right]^{1.5}\left
452: [\frac{T_e}{20,000 \, {\rm K}}
453: \right]^{0.68} \left [\frac{u_{w}}{10 \, {\rm km/s}}\right]
454: \left[\frac{t}{1000\, {\rm day}}\right]^{3(1-m)/2}
455: {\rm M_\odot \, yr^{-1}},
456: \label{eq:massloss}
457: \end{equation}
458: where $V_{ej}$ is the ejecta velocity % at time $t_i$
459: and $T_e$ is the electron
460: temperature. $A_2$ is the best fit normalization constant in
461: the FFA model (see Eq. \ref{eq:ffa}).
462: The normalization values of $V_{ej}$ and $T_e$ are relevant for late time
463: observations, say around the epoch of {\it Chandra} observations on
464: day $\sim 3550$ (see \S \ref{sec:density}).
465: Assuming $u_w\approx 10$ km s$^{-1}$
466: gives a mass loss rate of $\dot M=(6.14 \pm 0.47) \times 10^{-5}$
467: ${\rm M_\odot \, yr^{-1}}$; the error in mass loss rate is
468: obtained using the best fit error in $A_2$. Uncertainties in the ejecta
469: velocity, electron temperature and wind velocity introduce more
470: uncertainty in the mass loss rate estimation.
471: In addition, equation (\ref{eq:massloss}) is based on the assumption that the
472: absorbing wind gas is smoothly distributed.
473: However, \citet{fra02} found that the density of ionized gas obtained from line
474: diagnostics is higher than would be expected for smoothly distributed gas.
475: With clumping, there is less matter for the same amount of absorption and
476: the mass loss rate is reduced.
477:
478: \subsection{Density and temperature}
479: \label{sec:density}
480:
481: SN 1995N was observed with XMM-Newton
482: in July 2003 \citep{zam05} and with {\it Chandra}
483: in March 2004 \citep{cha05}. We can use this
484: information to extract the density structure of the
485: SN ejecta around this time.
486: It was estimated in \citet{cha05} and \citet{zam05} that the
487: total X-ray emission for SN 1995N around the time of the XMM and
488: {\it Chandra} observations is
489: $L_{X}=1.1 \times 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
490: \citet{cha05} estimated that most of the
491: X-rays are coming from the reverse shock, and that
492: there is a cooled shell present at the boundary of the
493: reverse and forward shock with
494: a column density of the cooling shell to be $N_{cool}=(9.1 \pm 6.2)
495: \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.
496: In the case of cooling, the total luminosity from the reverse shock
497: can be written as
498: \citep{che03}
499: \begin{equation}
500: L_{rev}=2 \times 10^{40}\,\frac{(n-3)(n-4)}{(n-2)^3} \left[\frac{\dot M}
501: {10^{-5}{\rm\, M_\odot \, yr^{-1}}}\right] \left [\frac{u_{w}}{10 \,
502: {\rm km \, s^{-1}}}\right]^{-1}
503: \left [\frac{
504: V_{ej}}{5,000\, {\rm km\,s^{-1}}}\right]^3 \, {\rm erg\, s^{-1}},
505: \label{eq:lumin}
506: \end{equation}
507: where $n$ is the power law density index of the
508: SN ejecta ($\rho_{ej}\propto r^{-n}$, $\rho_{ej}$ ejecta density of the
509: SN).
510: Using the mass loss rate values derived in the above section (\S
511: \ref{sec:massloss}), Eq. \ref{eq:lumin} gives
512: the ejecta density index
513: $n\approx 8.5$.
514: This value of $n$ is consistent with the one obtained
515: from the radio evolution described in \S \ref{sec:absorption}.
516:
517: We can write the expression for the column density of the cooled shell in
518: terms of mass loss rate as \citep{che03}
519: \begin{equation}
520: N_{cool}=2\times 10^{20}\, (n-4) \left[\frac{\dot M} {10^{-5}
521: {\rm M_\odot \, yr^{-1}}}\right]
522: \left [\frac{u_{w}}{10 \, {\rm km \, s^{-1}}}\right]^{-1}
523: \left [\frac{V_{ej}}{5,000\, {\rm km\,s^{-1}}}\right]^{-1}
524: \left[\frac{t}{1000\,{\rm days}}\right]^{-1} \,{\rm cm^{-2}}.
525: \label{eq:ncool}
526: \end{equation}
527: At the epoch of the {\it Chandra} observation, this gives
528: $N_{cool}\approx 1.5 \times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, which is in agreement
529: with the value deduced from the X-ray observations
530: \citep[$(9.1 \pm 6.2)
531: \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$,][]{cha05}.
532:
533: Having an estimate for the mass loss rate and the density profile index,
534: one can estimate the temperatures in the shocked circumstellar shell and
535: the reverse shocked shell.
536: The temperature of the shocked CSM shell is \citep{che03}
537: \begin{equation}
538: T_{CS}=3.4\times 10^8 \frac{(n-3)^2}{(n-2)^2}\left
539: [\frac{{V_{ej}}}{5,000\, {\rm km\,s^{-1}}}\right]^2\,{\rm K}
540: \label{eq:tempcs}
541: \end{equation}
542: and the reverse shock temperature is
543: \begin{equation}
544: T_{rev}=\frac{T_{CS}}{(n-3)^2}\, \rm K
545: \label{eq:temprev}
546: \end{equation}
547: The above equations give $T_{CS}=2.4 \times 10^8$ K and
548: $T_{rev}=0.9 \times 10^7$ K. These estimates are derived assuming
549: cosmic abundances and equipartition between ions and electrons.
550: The equipartition time scale between electrons and ions is
551: $t_{eq}\approx290(T_e/10^9 \,\rm K)^{1.5}(n_e/10^7 \rm cm^{-3})^{-1}$ days.
552: \citet{cha05} estimate the electron density of the reverse shocked
553: shell to be $n_{rev}\approx 2 \times 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$. The density
554: of the shocked CSM shell is thus $n_{cs}=2n_{rev}/(n-4)(n-3)=3.3 \times 10^5$
555: cm$^{-3}$. This gives the estimates for equipartition time
556: scales in the reverse shocked and the forward shocked shells as
557: $1.3$ days and 1007.5 days, respectively. Hence, at the time of
558: {\it Chandra} and XMM observations, the epoch at which the above
559: parameters are derived, both the shocked
560: shells have most likely attained electron-ion
561: equilibrium.
562:
563:
564: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
565: \label{sec:conclusions}
566:
567: A useful way to characterize the radio emission from supernovae is by
568: considering their peak radio luminosity and time of the peak;
569: the more luminous Type II supernovae peak at a later time, indicating
570: that they have a denser circumstellar medium \citep{che06}.
571: In such a plot, SN 1995N is close to the Type IIL SN 1979C and Type IIn
572: SN 1978K, but is less luminous
573: that the Type IIn SNe 1986J and 1988Z \citep{wei90,wil02}.
574: However, it is more radio luminous than many of the SNe IIn observed
575: by \citet{van96}.
576:
577: The optically thin radio evolution of SN 1995N is fairly well defined
578: and yields a radio spectral index $\alpha\approx 0.6$.
579: This value is in the range found for Type II SNe and is smaller than
580: the values found for Type Ib/c SNe \citep{wei02}.
581: The rate of decline is also similar to that found for other SNe II
582: and, in a simple model for the emission, indicates an expansion
583: factor for the emitting region $m=0.83$.
584: Assuming interaction with a steady wind, the implied value of the
585: power law index of the outer supernova density profile is $n\approx8$.
586: The same value of $n$ is consistent with the X-ray properties of
587: SN 1995N.
588:
589: Although there are clear indications of early low frequency absorption
590: in the radio light curves of SN 1995N, there is little information on
591: the evolution during the optically thick phase so that the nature of
592: the absorption cannot be deduced from the radio light curves.
593: Based on the emission measure of the gas deduced from optical
594: observations and the late peak radio luminosity, we infer that
595: free-free absorption is the likely absorption mechanism.
596: The implied mass loss rate for the supernova progenitor is
597: $6 \times 10^{-5}\, {\rm M_\odot \, yr^{-1}}$, but this value has a number
598: of uncertainties.
599: The assumed velocity of the radio emitting region is $5000$ km s$^{-1}$;
600: however, there are some indications from the H$\alpha$ line that there are
601: higher velocities \citep{fra02}, which would lead to a higher value of $\dot M$.
602: The assumed wind velocity of 10 km s$^{-1}$ is lower than has been inferred
603: from the narrow H$\alpha$ lines observed in some SNe IIn, e.g., 90 km s$^{-1}$
604: in SN 1997ab \citep{sal98}, 160 km s$^{-1}$ in SN 1997eg \citep{sal02},
605: and 100 km s$^{-1}$ in SN 2002ic \citep{kot04}.
606: An order of magnitude increase in $u_w$ would increase $\dot M$ by an
607: order of magnitude.
608: Finally, the optical line emission suggests clumping of the ionized wind
609: gas \citep{fra02}, which would reduce the estimate of $\dot M$ found here.
610:
611: Regardless of the uncertainty in $\dot M$, the values deduced for SNe IIn
612: from optical observations listed in \S~1 are significantly larger than
613: the value deduced for SN 1995N.
614: In some of those cases, the mass loss may be a short lived event before the
615: supernova.
616: The long time coverage of SN 1995N, especially at radio wavelengths, shows
617: that the circumstellar gas is extended in this case, out to radii $\ga 2\times
618: 10^{17}$ cm.
619: The Type IIn supernovae are a heterogeneous group of objects.
620:
621: \acknowledgments
622: We thank the VLA staff for making radio observations,
623: without which this work was not possible.
624: For the GMRT observations, we thank the staff of the GMRT
625: which is run by the National Center
626: for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata Institute
627: of Fundamental Research (TIFR). We acknowledge
628: the use of AIPS, which was developed
629: by the staff of the National Radio Astronomical Observatory.
630: P.C. is a Jansky fellow at National Radio Astronomy
631: Observatory. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a
632: facility of the National
633: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
634: Universities, Inc.
635: R.A.C. was supported in part by NSF grant AST-0807727.
636: At Tata Institute this research formed a part of the projects
637: 10P-201 and 11P-904 of the Five Year Plans.
638:
639: \begin{thebibliography}{}
640:
641: \bibitem[Chandra et al.(2005)]{cha05} Chandra, P., Ray, A.,
642: Schlegel, E.~M., Sutaria, F.~K., \& Pietsch, W.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 933
643: \bibitem[Chandra et al.(2005b)]{cha05b} Chandra, P. 2005,
644: Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science
645: \bibitem[Chevalier(2006)]{che06} Chevalier, R.~A.\ 2006,
646: ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0607422
647: \bibitem[Chevalier
648: \& Fransson(2003)]{che03} Chevalier,
649: R.~A., \& Fransson, C.\ 2003, Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters,
650: Ed. K. Weiler, Lecture Notes in Physics,
651: 598, 171,
652: \bibitem[Chevalier(1998)]{che98} Chevalier, R.~A.\ 1998,
653: \apj, 499, 810
654: \bibitem[Chevalier(1982)]{che82} Chevalier, R.~A.\ 1982,
655: \apj, 259, 302
656: \bibitem[Chugai et al.(2004)]{chu04} Chugai, N.~N., et al.\
657: 2004, \mnras, 352, 1213
658: \bibitem[Chugai \& Danziger(2003)]{chu03}
659: Chugai, N.~N., \& Danziger, I.~J.\ 2003, Astronomy Letters, 29, 649
660: \bibitem[Chugai(1990)]{chu90} Chugai, N.~N.\ 1990, Soviet
661: Astronomy Letters, 16, 457
662: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2000)]{fox00} Fox, D. W., Lewin, W. H. G., Fabian, A.,
663: et al. 2000, \mnras, 319, 1154.
664: \bibitem[Fransson et al.(2002)]{fra02} Fransson, C., et al.\
665: 2002, \apj, 572, 350
666: \bibitem[Gerardy et al.(2002)]{ger02} Gerardy, C.~L., et al.\
667: 2002, \apj, 575, 1007
668: \bibitem[Kotak et al.(2004)]{kot04} Kotak, R., Meikle,
669: W.~P.~S., Adamson, A., \& Leggett, S.~K.\ 2004, \mnras, 354, L13
670: \bibitem[Li et al.(2002)]{li02} Li, W., Filippenko, A.~V.,
671: Van Dyk, S.~D., Hu, J., Qiu, Y., Modjaz, M.,
672: \& Leonard, D.~C.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 403
673: \bibitem[Osterbrook(1989)]{ost89} Osterbrook, D. E. 1989,
674: Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei, Publisher: University Science Books
675: \bibitem[Pastorello et al.(2005)]{pas05} Pastorello, A.,
676: Aretxaga, I., Zampieri, L., Mucciarelli, P.,
677: \& Benetti, S.\ 2005,
678: 1604-2004: Supernovae as Cosmological Lighthouses, 342, 285
679: \bibitem[Pastorello et al.(2007)]{pas07} Pastorello, A., et
680: al.\ 2007, \nat, 447, 829
681: \bibitem[Pollas et al.(1995)]{pol95} Pollas, C., Albanese, D.,
682: Benetti, S., Bouchet, P. \& Schwarz, H. 1995, \iaucirc, 6170.
683: \bibitem[Salamanca et al.(1998)]{sal98} Salamanca, I.,
684: Cid-Fernandes, R., Tenorio-Tagle, G., Telles, E., Terlevich, R.~J.,
685: \& Munoz-Tunon, C.\ 1998, \mnras, 300, L17
686: \bibitem[Salamanca et al.(2002)]{sal02} Salamanca, I., Terlevich, R.~J., \& Tenorio-Tagle, G.\ 2002, \mnras, 330, 844
687: \bibitem[Schlegel(1990)]{sch90} Schlegel, E.~M.\ 1990,
688: \mnras, 244, 269
689: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.(1996)]{van96} Van Dyk, S.~D., Weiler,
690: K.~W., Sramek, R.~A., Schlegel, E.~M., Filippenko, A.~V., Panagia, N.,
691: \& Leibundgut, B.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 1271
692: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.(1994)]{van94} Van Dyk, S.~D., Weiler,
693: K.~W., Sramek, R.~A., Rupen, M.~P., \& Panagia, N.\ 1994, \apjl, 432, L115
694: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(2007)]{wei07} Weiler, K.~W., Williams,
695: C.~L., Panagia, N., Stockdale, C.~J., Kelley, M.~T., Sramek, R.~A., Van
696: Dyk, S.~D., \& Marcaide, J.~M.\ 2007, \apj, 671, 1959
697: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(2002)]{wei02} Weiler, K.~W.,
698: Panagia, N., Montes, M.~J., \& Sramek, R.~A.\ 2002, \araa, 40, 387
699: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(1990)]{wei90} Weiler, K.~W., Panagia,
700: N., \& Sramek, R.~A.\ 1990, \apj, 364, 611
701: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(1986)]{wei86} Weiler, K.~W., Sramek, R.~A.,
702: Panagia,~N. et al.\ 1986, \apj, 301, 790
703: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2002)]{wil02} Williams, C.~L.,
704: Panagia, N., Van Dyk, S.~D., Lacey, C.~K., Weiler, K.~W.,
705: \& Sramek, R.~A.\ 2002, \apj, 581, 396
706: \bibitem[Zampieri et al.(2005)]{zam05} Zampieri, L.,
707: Mucciarelli, P., Pastorello, A., Turatto, M., Cappellaro, E.,
708: \& Benetti, S.\ 2005, \mnras, 364, 1419
709:
710: \end{thebibliography}
711:
712:
713: \clearpage
714:
715: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
716: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
717: \tablecaption{Details of phase calibration observations for SN 1995N
718: \label{tab:phase}}
719: \tablewidth{0pt}
720: \tablehead{
721: \colhead{Date of} & \colhead{Telescope} & \colhead{Array} &
722: \colhead{Frequency} & \colhead{Phase} & \colhead{Phase cal} \\
723: \colhead{observation} &
724: \colhead{} & \colhead{config.} &
725: \colhead{in GHz} & \colhead{calibrator} & \colhead{Flux (Jy)}
726: }
727: \startdata
728: 1995 Jun 16.19 & VLA & DnA & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 2.31\\
729: 1995 Sep 15.96 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 2.30\\
730: 1996 May 21.20 & VLA & CnD & 4.86 & 1507-168 & 2.25\\
731: 1996 May 21.20 & VLA & CnD & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 1.95\\
732: 1996 May 21.24 & VLA & CnD & 1.46 & 1507-168 & 2.83\\
733: 1996 May 21.24 & VLA & CnD & 14.96 & 1507-168 & 1.75\\
734: 1996 May 21.25 & VLA & CnD & 22.48 & 1507-168 & 1.59\\
735: 1996 Oct 24.71 & VLA & A & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.52\\
736: 1996 Oct 24.72 & VLA & A & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.12\\
737: 1996 Oct 24.73 & VLA & A & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.32\\
738: 1996 Oct 24.76 & VLA & A & 22.48& 1504-166 & 2.40\\
739: 1996 Oct 24.76 & VLA & A & 14.96& 1504-166 & 2.27\\
740: 1997 Jan 23.61 & VLA & BnA & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.46\\
741: 1997 Jan 23.62 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.21\\
742: 1997 Jan 23.63 & VLA & BnA & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.38\\
743: 1997 Jan 23.64 & VLA & BnA &14.96 & 1504-166 & 2.26\\
744: 1997 Jan 23.64 & VLA & BnA &22.48 & 1504-166 & 2.30\\
745: 1997 Jun 22.99 & VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.71\\
746: 1997 Jun 23.00 &VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.11\\
747: 1997 Jun 23.02 & VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.33\\
748: 1997 Jun 23.03 & VLA & BnC &14.96 & 1504-166 & 2.18\\
749: 1997 Jun 23.04 & VLA & BnC &22.48 & 1504-166 & 2.04\\
750: 1998 Feb 10.00 & VLA & DnA & 14.96 & 1504-166 & 2.91\\
751: 1998 Feb 10.00 & VLA & DnA & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.61\\
752: 1998 Feb 13.37 & VLA & DnA & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.68\\
753: 1998 Feb 13.49 & VLA & DnA & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.57\\
754: 1998 Jun 10.14 & VLA & BnA & 0.33 & 1504-166 & 1.63\\
755: 1998 Jun 10.16 & VLA & BnA & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 3.07\\
756: 1998 Jun 10.17 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 3.13\\
757: 1998 Jun 10.19 & VLA & BnA & 14.96 & 1504-166 & 3.84\\
758: 1998 Jun 10.20 & VLA & BnA & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.80\\
759: 1999 Jun 17.23 & VLA & DnA & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.77\\
760: 1999 Jun 17.25 & VLA & DnA & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.78\\
761: 1999 Jun 17.26 & VLA & DnA & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.68\\
762: 1999 Jun 17.27 & VLA & DnA &14.96 & 1504-166 & 2.90\\
763: 1999 Oct 01.89 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.82\\
764: 2000 Nov 08.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.42 & 1347+122 & 6.25\\
765: 2001 Mar 25.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 1419+064 & 16.07\\
766: 2002 Jan 19.65 & VLA & D & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.94 \\
767: 2002 Jan 19.67 & VLA & D & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.54\\
768: 2002 Jan 19.67 & VLA & D & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.13\\
769: 2002 Apr 07.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.41 & 1445+099 & 2.40\\
770: 2002 May 15.24 & VLA & A & 14.96 & 1504-166 & 1.70 \\
771: 2002 May 19.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 1419+064 & 16.17 \\
772: 2002 Aug 16.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.33 & 1419+064 & 29.65 \\
773: 2002 Sep 16.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 1419+064 & 16.17 \\
774: 2002 Sep 21.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.41 & 1351-148 & 1.12 \\
775: 2003 May 26.30 & VLA & A & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.99 \\
776: 2003 May 26.31 & VLA & A & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.34\\
777: 2003 May 28.22 & VLA & A & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.03\\
778: 2003 May 28.24 & VLA & A & 14.96 & 1504-166 & 1.64\\
779: 2003 Jun 13.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.30 & 1432-180 & 0.81 \\
780: 2003 Jun 16.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 1419+064 & 15.18 \\
781: 2003 Jun 16.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.24 & 1419+064 & 44.58 \\
782: 2004 Jan 29.48& VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 1504-166 & 2.99 \\
783: 2004 Jan 29.50& VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 1504-166 & 2.37 \\
784: 2004 Jan 29.51& VLA & BnC &14.96 & 1504-166 & 1.71 \\
785: 2004 Jan 29.52& VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 1504-166 & 2.05 \\
786: 2004 Feb 13.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.30 & 1432-180 & 1.01\\
787: 2004 Mar 29.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.30 & 1432-180 & 1.00 \\
788: 2004 Apr 01.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.33 & 1419+064 & 26.57 \\
789: 2004 Apr 08.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 1419+064 & 19.71 \\
790: 2004 Apr 08.00 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.24 & 1419+064 & 40.96 \\
791: 2004 Sep 06.99 & VLA & A & 22.460 & 1512-090 & 4.96 \\
792: 2004 Sep 12.94 & VLA & A & 1.46 & 1507-168 & 2.86 \\
793: 2004 Sep 12.95 & VLA & A & 4.86 & 1507-168 & 2.52 \\
794: 2004 Sep 12.96 & VLA & A & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 1.97 \\
795: 2004 Sep 12.97 & VLA & A &14.96 & 1507-168 & 1.66 \\
796: 2005 Jun 14.30 & VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 1507-168 & 2.93 \\
797: 2005 Jun 14.31 & VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 1507-168 & 2.40\\
798: 2005 Jun 14.32 & VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 2.09\\
799: 2005 Jun 14.33 & VLA & BnC &14.96 & 1507-168 & 1.75\\
800: 2006 Jan 23.60 & VLA & D & 1.46 & 1507-168 & 2.77\\
801: 2006 Jan 23.61 & VLA & D & 4.86 & 1507-168 & 2.24 \\
802: 2006 Jan 23.63 & VLA & D & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 1.87 \\
803: 2006 Jan 23.65 & VLA & D &14.96 & 1507-168 & 1.53\\
804: 2006 Feb 02.59 & VLA & A & 4.86 & 1507-168 & 2.16\\
805: 2006 Feb 02.60 & VLA & A & 1.46 & 1507-168 & 2.27\\
806: 2006 Feb 02.62 & VLA & A & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 1.91\\
807: 2006 Feb 02.63 & VLA & A &14.96 & 1507-168 & 0.77\\
808: 2006 Sep 26.00 & VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 1507-168 & 1.75\\
809: 2006 Sep 26.00 & VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 1507-168 & 2.62\\
810: 2006 Sep 26.01 & VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 1507-168 & 2.42\\
811: \enddata
812: \end{deluxetable}
813: \clearpage
814:
815: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
816: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
817: \tablecaption{Radio observations of the SN 1995N
818: \label{tab:radio}}
819: \tablewidth{0pt}
820: \tablehead{
821: \colhead{Date of} & \colhead{Days since} & \colhead{Telescope} & \colhead{Array} &
822: \colhead{Frequency} &
823: \colhead{RMS} & \colhead{Flux density}\\
824: \colhead{observation} & \colhead{explosion} &
825: \colhead{} & \colhead{config.} & \colhead{in GHz}
826: & \colhead{$\mu$Jy} & \colhead{mJy}
827: }
828: \startdata
829: 1995 Jun 16.19 & 350.19 & VLA & DnA & 8.46 & 210 & $ 3.90 \pm 0.29 $\\
830: 1995 Sep 15.96 & 441.96 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 220 &$ 3.98 \pm 0.30$ \\
831: 1996 May 21.20 & 688.76 & VLA & CnD & 4.86 & 66 & $ 4.69\pm 0.12$\\
832: 1996 May 21.20 & 688.76 & VLA & CnD & 8.46 & 58 & $ 4.45\pm 0.09$\\
833: 1996 May 21.24 & 688.80 & VLA & CnD & 1.46 & 167 & $ 4.37 \pm 0.77 $\\
834: 1996 May 21.24 & 689.02& VLA & CnD & 14.96 & 186 & $4.15 \pm 0.35$\\
835: 1996 May 21.25 & 689.03 & VLA & CnD & 22.48& 249 & $ 3.75\pm 0.35$\\
836: 1996 Oct 24.71 & 845.52 & VLA & A & 1.46 & 106 & $ 4.26\pm 0.19$\\
837: 1996 Oct 24.72 & 845.53 & VLA & A & 8.46 & 75 & $ 4.13\pm 0.12$\\
838: 1996 Oct 24.73 & 845.54 & VLA & A & 4.86 & 66 & $ 5.46\pm 0.12$\\
839: 1996 Oct 24.76 & 845.57 & VLA & A & 22.48 & 328 & $ 3.55\pm 0.55$\\
840: 1996 Oct 24.76 & 845.57 & VLA & A & 14.96 & 208 & $ 4.17\pm 0.39$\\
841: 1997 Jan 23.61 & 936.42 & VLA & BnA & 1.46 & 178 & $ 4.57\pm 0.30$\\
842: 1997 Jan 23.62 & 937.43 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 94 & $ 3.74\pm 0.16$\\
843: 1997 Jan 23.63 & 937.44 & VLA & BnA & 4.86 & 105 & $5.03 \pm 0.18$\\
844: 1997 Jan 23.64 & 937.45 & VLA & BnA &14.96 & 408 & $ 2.64\pm 0.71$\\
845: 1997 Jan 23.64 & 937.45 & VLA & BnA &22.48 & 622 & $ 2.46\pm 0.82$\\
846: 1997 Jun 22.99 & 1087.80 & VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 170 & $ 4.45\pm 0.96$\\
847: 1997 Jun 23.00 & 1087.81&VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 81 & $ 2.80\pm 0.04$\\
848: 1997 Jun 23.02 & 1087.83 & VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 55 & $4.77 \pm0.09 $\\
849: 1997 Jun 23.03 & 1087.84 & VLA & BnC &14.96 & 155 & $2.82 \pm0.26 $\\
850: 1997 Jun 23.04 & 1087.85 & VLA & BnC &22.48 & 320 & $1.95 \pm 0.63 $\\
851: 1998 Feb 10.00 & 1320.00 & VLA & DnA & 14.96& 233 & $2.94 \pm 0.32$\\
852: 1998 Feb 10.00 & 1320.00 & VLA & DnA & 8.46 & 37 & $ 3.75\pm 0.13$\\
853: 1998 Feb 13.37 & 1323.22 & VLA & DnA & 1.46 & 82 & $ 5.23\pm0.27 $\\
854: 1998 Feb 13.49 & 1323.35 & VLA & DnA & 4.86 & 71 & $ 3.99\pm0.21 $\\
855: 1998 Jun 10.14 & 1439.99 & VLA & BnA & 0.33 & 12504 & $ <25.00 $\\
856: 1998 Jun 10.16 & 1440.01 & VLA & BnA & 1.46 & 101 & $ 5.21\pm 0.17$\\
857: 1998 Jun 10.17 & 1440.03 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 41 & $ 3.91\pm 0.07$\\
858: 1998 Jun 10.19 & 1440.04 & VLA & BnA & 14.96& 160 & $ 2.96 \pm 0.26$\\
859: 1998 Jun 10.20 & 1440.05& VLA & BnA & 4.86 & 44 & $ 4.75\pm 0.08$\\
860: 1999 Jun 17.23 & 1812.08& VLA & DnA & 1.46 & 58 & $ 5.41\pm 0.12$\\
861: 1999 Jun 17.25 & 1812.10& VLA & DnA & 4.86 & 66 & $ 3.61\pm 0.11$\\
862: 1999 Jun 17.26 & 1812.11& VLA & DnA & 8.46 & 60 & $ 2.58\pm 0.10$\\
863: 1999 Jun 17.27 & 1812.12& VLA & DnA &14.96 & 195 & $ <2.2 $\\
864: 1999 Oct 01.89 & 1918.74 & VLA & BnA & 8.46 & 46 & $1.11 \pm 0.11$\\
865: 2000 Nov 08.00 & 2320.85 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.42 & 290 & $ 3.87\pm0.50 $\\
866: 2001 Mar 25.00 & 2457.85 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 130 & $ 3.26\pm 0.27$\\
867: 2002 Jan 19.65 & 2758.51& VLA & D & 1.46 & 91 & $ 2.37\pm 0.32$\\
868: 2002 Jan 19.67 & 2758.53 & VLA & D & 4.86 & 46 & $1.74 \pm 0.08$\\
869: 2002 Jan 19.67 & 2758.53 & VLA & D & 8.46 & 39 & $1.19 \pm0.07 $\\
870: 2002 Apr 07.00 & 2835.86 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.41 & 310 & $ 3.05\pm 0.52$\\
871: 2002 May 15.24 & 2874.09 & VLA & A & 14.96 & 232 & $<0.70 $\\
872: 2002 May 19.00 &2877.86 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 130 & $ 2.17\pm0.27 $\\
873: 2002 Aug 16.00 &2966.86 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.33 & 780 & $ <4.30 $\\
874: 2002 Sep 16.00 &2997.86 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 390 & $ 2.53\pm 0.72$\\
875: 2002 Sep 21.00 &3002.86 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.41 & 100 & $2.21 \pm 0.30$\\
876: 2003 May 26.30 & 3250.15 & VLA & A & 1.46 & 97 & $ 2.14\pm 0.18$\\
877: 2003 May 26.31 & 3250.16 & VLA & A & 4.86 & 51 & $ 1.17\pm 0.08$\\
878: 2003 May 28.22 & 3252.09 & VLA & A & 8.46 & 44 & $ 0.64\pm 0.14$\\
879: 2003 May 28.24 & 3252.11 & VLA & A & 14.96 & 166 & $ <0.50 $\\
880: 2003 Jun 13.00 & 3267.87 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.30 & 380 & $ 1.66\pm 0.47$\\
881: 2003 Jun 16.00 & 3270.87 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 190 & $ 2.29\pm 0.39$\\
882: 2003 Jun 16.00 & 3270.87 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.24 & 3030 & $ <5.00 $\\
883: 2004 Jan 29.48& 3498.23 & VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 115 & $ 1.53\pm0.20 $\\
884: 2004 Jan 29.50& 3498.25 & VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 43 & $ 1.17\pm0.07 $\\
885: 2004 Jan 29.51& 3498.26 & VLA & BnC &14.96 & 134 & $ 0.65\pm0.24 $\\
886: 2004 Jan 29.52& 3498.27 & VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 36 & $ 0.77\pm0.06 $\\
887: 2004 Feb 13.00 & 3512.75 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.30 & 210 & $1.59 \pm0.23 $\\
888: 2004 Mar 29.00 & 3557.75 & GMRT & $-$ & 1.30 & 140 & $ 1.61\pm 0.28$\\
889: 2004 Apr 01.00 & 3560.75 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.33 & 840 & $ <2.4 $\\
890: 2004 Apr 08.00 & 3567.75 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.61 & 140 & $ <2.42 $\\
891: 2004 Apr 08.00 & 3567.75 & GMRT & $-$ & 0.24 & 1740 & $ <3.50 $\\
892: 2004 Sep 06.99 & 3720.99 & VLA & A & 22.460 & 187 & $ <0.50 $\\
893: 2004 Sep 12.94 & 3726.94& VLA & A & 1.46 & 60 & $ 1.61\pm 0.14$\\
894: 2004 Sep 12.95 & 3726.95& VLA & A & 4.86 & 52 & $ 0.96\pm 0.07$\\
895: 2004 Sep 12.96 & 3726.96& VLA & A & 8.46 & 42 & $ 0.57\pm 0.05$\\
896: 2004 Sep 12.97 & 3726.97& VLA & A &14.96 & 189 & $ 0.57\pm 0.19$\\
897: 2005 Jun 14.30 & 4001.30& VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 184 & $ 1.98\pm 0.24$\\
898: 2005 Jun 14.31 & 4001.31& VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 56 & $ 0.74\pm 0.07$\\
899: 2005 Jun 14.32 & 4001.32& VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 44 & $ 0.56\pm 0.05$\\
900: 2005 Jun 14.33 & 4001.33& VLA & BnC &14.96 & 166 &$ 0.50\pm 0.17$ \\
901: 2006 Jan 23.60 & 4225.08 & VLA & D & 1.46 & 551 & $ <1.51 $\\
902: 2006 Jan 23.61 & 4225.09 & VLA & D & 4.86 & 80 & $ 0.54\pm 0.13$\\
903: 2006 Jan 23.63 & 4225.11 & VLA & D & 8.46 & 55 & $ 0.38\pm 0.08$\\
904: 2006 Jan 23.65 & 4225.13 & VLA & D &14.96 & 152 &$ <0.46 $ \\
905: 2006 Feb 02.59 & 4234.59 & VLA & A & 4.86 & 47 & $ 0.67\pm 0.06$\\
906: 2006 Feb 02.60 & 4234.60 & VLA & A & 1.46 & 52 & $ 1.03\pm 0.09$\\
907: 2006 Feb 02.62 & 4234.62 & VLA & A & 8.46 & 40 & $ 0.55\pm0.05 $\\
908: 2006 Feb 02.63 & 4234.63 & VLA & A &14.96 & 164 & $ 0.49\pm 0.16$\\
909: 2006 Sep 26.00 & 4470.00 & VLA & BnC & 8.46 & 40 & $ <0.32 $\\
910: 2006 Sep 26.00 & 4470.00 & VLA & BnC & 1.46 & 190 & $ 1.39 \pm 0.29 $\\
911: 2006 Sep 26.01 & 4470.01 & VLA & BnC & 4.86 & 83 & $ 0.25 \pm 0.08 $\\
912: \enddata
913: \end{deluxetable}
914:
915: \clearpage
916:
917:
918: \begin{figure}
919: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=\textwidth]{f1.eps}
920: \caption{Light curves of SN 1995N in
921: the 0.24 GHz, 0.33 GHz, 0.61 GHz, 1.46 GHz, 4.86 GHz, 8.46 GHz,
922: 14.96 GHz and 22.50 GHz bands.}
923: \label{fig:full-lc}
924: \end{figure}
925:
926: \clearpage
927:
928: \begin{figure}
929: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.79\textwidth]{f2a.eps}
930: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.79\textwidth]{f2b.eps}
931: \caption{Spectral index evolution between 8.46 GHz and 4.86 GHz (upper panel),
932: and between 4.86 GHz and 1.46 GHz.
933: The thick dashed line is plotted by averaging
934: all the values of the spectral index after day 2500.}
935: \label{fig:alpha}
936: \end{figure}
937:
938: \clearpage
939:
940: \begin{figure}
941: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.49\textwidth]{f3a.eps}
942: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.49\textwidth]{f3b.eps}
943: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.49\textwidth]{f3c.eps}
944: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.49\textwidth]{f3d.eps}
945: \caption{Light curves of SN 1995N in the 2 cm, 3.6 cm, 6 cm and
946: 1.46 cm bands. The FFA absorption model is shown in solid lines and
947: dashed lines represent the SSA absorption model. There
948: are hints of bumps in the
949: light curves
950: soon after day 1200 in all the frequency bands (dashed-dotted lines),
951: which may be due to the density clumps in the CSM.}
952: \label{fig:lc}
953: \end{figure}
954:
955: \clearpage
956:
957: \begin{figure}
958: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.47\textwidth]{f4a.eps}
959: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.47\textwidth]{f4b.eps}
960: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.47\textwidth]{f4c.eps}
961: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.47\textwidth]{f4d.eps}
962: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.47\textwidth]{f4e.eps}
963: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=.47\textwidth]{f4f.eps}
964: \caption{
965: Near simultaneous spectra of SN 1995N on various days.
966: FFA absorption is shown in solid lines and
967: dashed lines represent the SSA absorption.
968: Here filled circles represent VLA data and filled squares represent GMRT data.
969: Please note that models do not fit the
970: spectra well on days when bumps are seen in the light curves,
971: i.e. around day 1200.
972: }
973: \label{fig:spectra}
974: \end{figure}
975:
976:
977: \end{document}
978: