1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \usepackage{rotating}
4: \usepackage{color}
5: \textwidth6.5in \textheight9in \evensidemargin0pt \oddsidemargin0pt
6: %The following command is needed for papers submitted to the archive
7: \topmargin-1.1cm
8:
9: %\newcommand{\gtap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
10: %\newcommand{\ltap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
11: \def\br(#1,#2){\left\langle#1#2\right\rangle}
12: \def\sq(#1,#2){\left[#1#2\right]}
13: \def\s(#1,#2){s_{#1 #2}}
14: \def\t(#1,#2,#3){s_{#1 #2 #3}}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \begin{titlepage}
19:
20: \hspace*{\fill}\parbox[t]{5.2cm}
21: {%\preprint{hep-ph/yymmnnn}\\
22: FERMILAB-PUB-08-357-T \\
23: UCLA/08/TEP/27 \\
24: CP3-08-38 \\
25: FSU-HEP-080731 \\
26: ILL-(TH)-08-04 \\
27: %
28: \today} \vskip 2cm
29: \begin{center}
30: {\Large \bf Associated Production of a $W$ Boson and One $b$ Jet} \\
31: \medskip
32: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
33: {\large {\bf J.~Campbell},$^1$
34: {\bf R.~K.~Ellis},$^2$
35: {\bf F.~Febres Cordero},$^3$
36: {\bf F.~Maltoni},$^4$ \\ \bigskip
37: {\bf L.~Reina},$^5$
38: {\bf D.~Wackeroth}$^6$,
39: and {\bf S.~Willenbrock}$^7$} \\
40: \bigskip\bigskip\medskip
41: $^{1}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow \\
42: Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom \\
43: \bigskip
44: $^{2}$Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory \\
45: P.~O.~Box 500, Batavia, IL\ \ 60510 \\
46: \bigskip
47: $^{3}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA \\
48: Los Angeles, CA\ 90095-1547 \\
49: \bigskip
50: $^{4}$Institut de Physique Th\'{e}orique and \\
51: Centre for Particle Physics and Phenomenology (CP3) \\
52: Universit\'{e} Catholique de Louvain\\[1mm]
53: Chemin du Cyclotron 2 \\
54: B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium \\
55: \bigskip
56: $^{5}$Physics Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL\
57: \ 32306-4350 \\
58: \bigskip
59: $^{6}$Department of Physics, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY\
60: \ 14260-1500 \\
61: \bigskip
62: $^{7}$Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign \\
63: 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL\ \ 61801 \\ \bigskip
64: \end{center}
65: \vfill
66: \newpage
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: We calculate the production of a $W$ boson and a single $b$ jet to
70: next-to-leading order in QCD at the Fermilab Tevatron and the CERN
71: Large Hadron Collider. Both exclusive and inclusive cross sections
72: are presented. We separately consider the cross section for jets
73: containing a single $b$ quark and jets containing a $b\bar b$ pair.
74: There are a wide variety of processes that contribute, and it is
75: necessary to include them all in order to have a complete
76: description at both colliders.
77: \end{abstract}
78:
79: \end{titlepage}
80:
81: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
82:
83: Many signals of new physics at hadron colliders involve a weak
84: vector boson ($W,Z$) plus jets containing heavy quarks ($c,b$). For
85: example, the top quark was discovered via the signal $W+4j$, with at
86: least one $b$ jet \cite{Abe:1995hr,Abachi:1995iq}. More recently,
87: evidence for single top production has been presented via the signal
88: $W+2j$, with at least one $b$ jet
89: \cite{Abazov:2006gd,Abazov:2008kt,Acosta:2004bs,CDF:single}. The
90: Higgs boson could manifest itself via the same signal, from the
91: production process $q\bar q\to Wh$, followed by $h\to b\bar b$
92: \cite{Aaltonen:2007wx,Aaltonen:2008zx,:2007hk}. The Higgs boson
93: could also appear in the signal $Z+2j$ with at least one $b$ jet,
94: via $q\bar q\to Zh$ \cite{Abazov:2007pj,Aaltonen:2008mi}.
95:
96: Most calculations of the background processes that give rise to
97: $W,Z+nj$ ($n=1,2$), where one or more jets contain heavy quarks
98: ($Q=c,b$), have been completed at next-to-leading order (NLO)
99: \cite{Bern:1996ka,Bern:1997sc}. There exist NLO calculations of $ZQ$
100: \cite{Campbell:2003dd}, $ZQ\bar Q$
101: \cite{Campbell:2000bg,FebresCordero:2008ci}, $ZQj$
102: \cite{Campbell:2005zv}, $Wc$ \cite{Giele:1995kr,Campbell:2008},
103: $Wb\bar b$ \cite{Ellis:1998fv,FebresCordero:2006sj}, and $Wbj$
104: \cite{Campbell:2006cu}. An obvious omission from this list is $Wb$,
105: that is, $W+1j$ with at least one $b$ jet at NLO. It is the goal of
106: this paper to fill in that gap. This NLO calculation can be used to
107: normalize the cross section from a leading-order event generator
108: such as ALPGEN \cite{Mangano:2002ea} or MadEvent
109: \cite{Maltoni:2002qb}.
110:
111: It may seem surprising that the NLO calculation of $Wb$ has not
112: already been done, given all the other NLO calculations listed
113: above. The reason for this, as we will discuss shortly, is that it
114: is essential to do this calculation with a finite $b$-quark mass. In
115: contrast, most of the above-mentioned calculations were done with a
116: vanishing heavy-quark mass, with the justification that the quark
117: mass is negligible at high transverse momentum ($p_T$). The ability
118: to do NLO calculations with a finite heavy-quark mass for this class
119: of processes was only recently demonstrated, for $Wb\bar b$, in
120: Ref.~\cite{FebresCordero:2006sj} (and for $Zb\bar b$ in
121: Ref.~\cite{FebresCordero:2008ci}). We will use this calculation,
122: together with the NLO calculation of $Wbj$ \cite{Campbell:2006cu},
123: to generate the NLO calculation of $Wb$, including the effect of the
124: $b$-quark mass.
125:
126: We discuss the details of the calculation in Section \ref{sec:Wb}.
127: We then present results in Section \ref{sec:results} and conclusions
128: in Section \ref{sec:conclusions}.
129:
130: \section{$Wb$ at NLO}\label{sec:Wb}
131:
132: The leading-order (LO) processes for the production of a $W$ boson
133: and one jet containing a $b$ quark are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}.
134: In both cases there are two partons in the final state, but we
135: require that only one of them (which contains a $b$ quark) reside at
136: high transverse momentum, with $p_{Tj}> 15$ GeV at the Fermilab
137: Tevatron ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$) and $p_{Tj}>25$ GeV at the
138: CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC, $\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). We also
139: require this parton to lie within a pseudorapidity of $|\eta_j|<2$
140: at the Tevatron and $|\eta_j|<2.5$ at the LHC. Furthermore, we
141: demand that two partons be separated by $|\Delta R|>0.7$; if they
142: are not, then their four-momenta are added and they are considered
143: as occupying a single jet with this four-momentum. These
144: requirements are made to crudely simulate the acceptance and
145: resolution of the detectors. They are listed in
146: Table~\ref{tab:parameters}, along with the parameters used in the
147: calculations. In all calculations, the light quarks are summed over
148: $q=u,d,s,c$, including CKM mixing.
149:
150: \begin{table} \begin{center} \caption[fake]{Cuts used
151: to simulate the acceptance and resolution of the detectors, and
152: parameters used in the calculations.}\label{tab:parameters}
153: \bigskip \begin{tabular} {ll}
154: Tevatron: $p_{Tj}>15$ GeV & $|\eta_j|<2$ \\
155: LHC: $\;\;\;\;\;\,$ $p_{Tj}>25$ GeV & $|\eta_j|<2.5$ \\
156: $|\Delta R_{b\bar b}|>0.7$ & $|\Delta R_{bj}|>0.7$ \\ \\
157: $M_W=80.44$ GeV & $m_b=4.7$ GeV \\
158: LO: CTEQ6L1 & NLO: CTEQ6M \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}\\
159: $\mu_F = M_W$ & $\mu_R = M_W$ \\
160: $\alpha_S^{LO}(M_Z)=0.130$ & $\alpha_S^{LO}(M_W)=0.132$ \\
161: $\alpha_S^{NLO}(M_Z)=0.118$ & $\alpha_S^{NLO}(M_W)=0.120$ \\
162: $g^2=8M_W^2G_F/\sqrt 2$ & $G_F=1.16639\times 10^{-5}$ GeV$^{-2}$ \\
163: $V_{ud}=V_{cs}=0.975$ & $V_{us}=V_{cd}=0.222$ \\
164: \end{tabular} \end{center}
165: \end{table}
166:
167: \begin{figure}[ht]
168: \begin{center}
169: \epsfxsize=5cm \epsfbox{wbb.eps} \hspace*{1cm}
170: \epsfxsize=5cm \epsfbox{wbj.eps} \\
171: (a) \hspace*{6cm} (b)
172: \end{center}
173: \caption{Leading-order processes for the production of a $W$ boson
174: and one jet, which contains a $b$ quark.} \label{fig:Wbb}
175: \end{figure}
176:
177: The LO process shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b) contains a $b$ quark
178: in the initial state, and requires further discussion
179: \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz}. To understand the usefulness
180: of this approach, consider the alternative approach, shown in
181: Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj} \cite{Mangano:2001xp}. In that approach the
182: $b$-quark mass is kept nonzero, so one obtains a finite result even
183: when one of the $b$ quarks is emitted at zero $p_T$. However,
184: although the collinear singularity is regulated by the $b$ mass, one
185: obtains an enhancement factor of $\ln M_W/m_b$. Another power of
186: this factor appears at each order of perturbation theory, degrading
187: the convergence of the series. To ameliorate this, one sums this
188: enhancement factor to all orders into a $b$ distribution function,
189: and uses this function in the LO calculation of
190: Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b). The other big advantage of this approach is
191: that the LO process of Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b) is simpler than that of
192: Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj}, and hence a NLO calculation becomes tractable.
193: This effectively allows to include a set of higher order
194: corrections to the process of Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj} that would appear
195: only at NNLO in the fixed order calculation and will probably not be
196: available for quite some time.
197:
198: \begin{figure}[ht]
199: \begin{center}
200: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=7cm \epsfbox{wbbj.eps}
201: \vspace*{-.8cm}
202: \end{center}
203: \caption{An alternative way of calculating the process in
204: Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b).} \label{fig:Wbbj}
205: \end{figure}
206:
207: There are a variety of processes that must be calculated at NLO:
208: \begin{enumerate}
209: \item $q\bar q'\to Wb\bar b$ at tree level [Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(a)] and one
210: loop ($m_b\neq 0$)
211: \item $q\bar q'\to Wb\bar bg$ at tree level ($m_b\neq 0$)
212: \item $bq\to Wbq'$ at tree level [Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b)] and one
213: loop ($m_b=0$)
214: \item $bq\to Wbq'g$ at tree level ($m_b=0$)
215: \item $bg\to Wbq'\bar q$ at tree level ($m_b=0$)
216: \item $gq\to Wb\bar bq'$ at tree level (Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj})
217: ($m_b\neq 0$)
218: \end{enumerate}
219: Processes 1 and 2 are calculated with a non-zero $b$-quark mass, using
220: the code developed in Ref.~\cite{FebresCordero:2006sj}. Processes
221: 3--5, which involve an initial-state $b$ quark, are calculated with
222: $m_b=0$, using the code developed in Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2006cu}.
223: Process 6, calculated with a non-zero $b$-quark mass, can be taken
224: from either code. We used this process to cross-check the two
225: codes. We notice that the counterterm that subtracts from
226: Process 6 the logarithmic terms already included in Process
227: 3 has been added, in our calculation, to Processes 3-5, since it
228: shares the same final state phase space configuration.
229:
230:
231: In the formalism that our calculation is based upon
232: \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz}, the $b$-quark mass is set to
233: zero in any process in which the $b$ quark appears in the initial
234: state (Processes 3--5). This is not a limitation of the formalism,
235: nor is it an approximation. In all other processes, where the $b$
236: quark appears only in the final state, the $b$-quark mass is kept
237: nonzero, although it is often a good approximation to set it to
238: zero. For the calculation we are performing, it is essential to keep
239: the $b$-quark mass nonzero. This is because we demand that only one
240: $b$ jet be at high $p_T$, and we do not restrict the other $b$
241: quark. Thus there are regions of phase space where the $b\bar b$
242: invariant mass is not much greater than $2m_b$, in which case it is
243: very inaccurate to neglect the $b$-quark mass
244: \cite{Campbell:2006cu}. This issue arises already at leading order,
245: as evidenced by Fig.~\ref{fig:tev-b}, where we show the $b\bar b$
246: invariant mass from Process 1 for the $Wb$ exclusive cross section
247: at the Tevatron for both $m_b=0$ and $m_b=4.7$ GeV (with $\Delta
248: R_{jj}>0.7$). We see that the cross section (the area under the
249: curve) is very sensitive to the $b$-quark mass, even with the
250: required separation of the two $b$ quarks.
251:
252: \begin{figure}[ht]
253: \begin{center}
254: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm}
255: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=14cm]{tev-b.ps}
256: \caption{The differential cross section for $W$ plus one $b$ jet
257: ($p_{Tj}>15$ GeV, $|\eta_j|<2$), {\it vs}.\ the invariant mass of
258: the $b$ quark and the other $b$ quark (outside the fiducial region and
259: separated by $\Delta R_{jj}>0.7$),
260: at the Fermilab Tevatron ($\sqrt S=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$).
261: Only the contribution from the LO subprocess $q\bar q\to Wb\bar b$
262: is shown. The (solid, blue) curve includes the $b$ quark mass, while
263: the (dashed, red) curve does not.}\label{fig:tev-b}
264: \end{center}
265: \end{figure}
266:
267: All NLO calculations are done in the $\overline {\rm MS}$ scheme.
268: When we refer to the NLO Processes 2, 4--6, it is understood that
269: initial-state collinear singularities are subtracted in this scheme.
270: For massless quarks, the collinear singularities are regulated
271: dimensionally, while for massive $b$ quarks (Processes 2 and 6) they are
272: regulated using a finite $b$ mass
273: \cite{Campbell:2006cu,Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz}. The
274: calculation of Processes 3--6 was done using the Monte Carlo code
275: MCFM \cite{Ellis:1999ec,MCFM}.
276:
277: \section{Results}\label{sec:results}
278:
279: In Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc}, we give the exclusive cross section
280: for $W+1$ jet, where the jet contains a $b$ quark, and there are no
281: other jets present within the acceptance (listed in
282: Table~\ref{tab:parameters}). We list the cross section for the case
283: where there is only one $b$ in the jet (denoted $Wb$), and when there
284: are two $b$'s in the jet (denoted $W(b\bar b)$). The tagging
285: probability for a jet with two $b$'s differs from that of a jet with
286: one $b$ \cite{Acosta:2004nj}. We notice that in the
287: $W(b\bar{b})$ case the two $b$ quarks can be collinear and give
288: origin to large logarithms of the form $\ln(p_T^b/m_b)$. Our
289: results do not contain a resummation of these logarithms and are
290: therefore subject to some degree of uncertainty. We could have
291: rejected the $W(b\bar{b})$ configuration in our $W+b$-jet NLO
292: results or used a different jet algorith as suggested, for instance,
293: in Ref.~\cite{Banfi:2007gu}. We prefer to keep it and quote it
294: separately in order to make it available to different kinds of
295: experimental analyses. Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc} gives both the
296: LO cross section (in square brackets)\footnote{The
297: contribution from Process 1 to the $Wb$ cross section at the
298: Tevatron corresponds, at LO, to the area under the
299: (solid, blue) curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:tev-b}.} and the NLO cross
300: section. The first number given is from Processes 1--2; the second
301: from Processes 3--6; and the third is their sum. In the
302: case of $Wb$ we also quote, in parenthesis, the contribution of
303: Process 6 by itself. Indeed Process 6 is part of both the fixed
304: order ($1+2+6$) and resummed ($3+4+5+6$)
305: calculations\footnote{As explained in
306: Section~\ref{sec:Wb}, Process 6 is the same in both the resummed
307: and fixed order calculations, i.e. it does not include any
308: counterterm to subtract the logarithmic terms that have been
309: resummed in Process 3. Such counterterm has been included with
310: Process 3 since it shares the same final state phase space.} and
311: results could be quoted grouping Processes either way. In order to
312: assess the impact of resumming initial state collinear logarithms,
313: however, one needs to compare the sum of Processes 1,2, and 6 to the
314: sum of process 3, 4, and 5. This can be easily deduced from our
315: Tables knowing Process 6 independently. In the case of $W(b\bar
316: b)$, only Process 1 contributes at LO, and only Processes 1--2,6 at
317: NLO. Thus we do not need to quote Process 6 separately.
318: The NLO results correspond to a pure fixed order calculation. We
319: see that at the Tevatron, Processes 1--2 make a much larger
320: contribution to $Wb$ than Processes 3--6, while at the LHC the two
321: sets of processes make comparable contributions. This mirrors the
322: results for the $Wbj$ final state \cite{Campbell:2006cu}, first noted
323: in Ref.~\cite{Mangano:2001xp}. The fixed order
324: calculation (Processes $1+2+6$) dominates at both the Tevatron and
325: the LHC, but the corrections included in Processes 3+4+5 are as much
326: as 25\% at the LHC and therefore very relevant. We also notice that
327: for both $Wb$ and $W(b\bar b)$ Processes 1--2 dominate at the
328: Tevatron, while at the LHC Process 6 is nearly half the size of
329: Processes 1--2. Therefore it is very important to include
330: higher order corrections to this process, as it is achieved by
331: adding to the fixed order result Process 3, 4 and 5 (see discussion
332: in Sec.~\ref{sec:Wb}). Finally, we notice that for $W(b\bar b)$,
333: the NLO cross section is significantly larger than the LO cross
334: section, while the NLO correction is modest for $Wb$.
335:
336: Also given in Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc} is the exclusive cross
337: section for $Wj$ ($j=u,d,s,c,g$), both at LO and NLO
338: \cite{Giele:1993dj,Campbell:2002tg}. These numbers are useful to
339: compute the fraction of $W+1j$ events in which the jet contains a
340: $b$ quark. This fraction is around 0.7\% at the Tevatron and 0.8\%
341: at the LHC.
342:
343: We give in Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_inc} the inclusive cross sections
344: for $W+1j+X$, where the jet contains a $b$ quark, and where there may
345: be other jets present (up to two additional jets at NLO). The relative
346: importance of Processes 3--6 is significantly increased compared with
347: the exclusive cross sections, especially at the LHC, due
348: in particular to Process 6. This is expected since Process 6 is more
349: effectively cut in the exclusive cross section where the NLO cross
350: section is required to have the same number of jets as the LO cross
351: section. The fixed order cross section (Processes 1+2+6) dominates
352: at both the Tevatron and LHC, but corrections coming from Processes
353: 3+4+5 are large and of the order of 50\% at the LHC. Moreover, given
354: the relevance of Process 6, having included part of the NLO
355: corrections to Process 6 by calculating Process 3 at NLO in QCD
356: increases the stability and therefore the validity of the
357: theoretical prediction. The NLO cross sections are also increased
358: by a larger factor than in the exclusive cross sections. The fraction
359: of $W+1j+X$ events in which the jet contains a $b$ quark is around
360: 0.9\% at the Tevatron and 1.2\% at the LHC.
361: %
362: \begin{table}[t]
363: \begin{center}
364: \caption{Exclusive cross sections (pb) for $W$ boson plus one jet,
365: which contains at least one $b$ quark, at the Tevatron
366: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$) and LHC ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). No
367: branching ratios or tagging efficiencies are included. The labels on
368: the columns have the following meaning: $Wb=$ exactly one jet, which
369: contains a $b$ quark; $W(b\bar b)=$ exactly one jet, which contains
370: two $b$ quarks; $Wj=$ exactly one jet, including both light quarks
371: ($u,d,s,c$) and gluons. Both the leading-order (in
372: square brackets) and next-to-leading-order cross
373: sections are given. The first number given is from Processes 1--2;
374: the second number is from Processes 3--6 (with Process
375: 6 given separately in parenthesis); and the third number is their
376: sum.}\label{tab:WbXsecs_exc}
377: \bigskip\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline\hline
378: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Exclusive cross sections (pb)}\\
379: \hline
380: Collider & $Wb$ & $W(b\bar{b})$ \\
381: \hline
382: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & [5.28+0.75=6.03] 8.02+0.62(-0.05)=8.64 & [2.66] 3.73-0.02=3.71\\
383: LHC $W^+$ & [30.2+54.3=84.5] 40.0+48.4(22.6)=88.4 & [17.6] 22.7+11.7=34.4\\
384: LHC $W^-$ & [21.6+31.4=53.0] 29.8+29.4(12.6)=59.2 & [12.9] 17.2+6.5=23.7\\
385: \hline
386: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Wj$}\\
387: \hline
388: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{[1410] 1790}\\
389: LHC $W^+$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{[14240] 15810}\\
390: LHC $W^-$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{[11040] 12040}\\
391: \hline
392: \end{tabular}
393: \end{center}
394: \end{table}
395: %
396: \begin{table}[h]
397: \begin{center}
398: \caption{Inclusive cross sections (pb) for $W$ boson plus one jet,
399: which contains at least one $b$ quark, at the Tevatron
400: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$) and LHC ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). No
401: branching ratios or tagging efficiencies are included. The labels on
402: the columns have the following meaning: $Wb+X=$ one or more jets, at
403: least one of which contains a $b$ quark; $W(b\bar b)+X=$ one or more
404: jets, one of which contains two $b$ quarks; $Wj+X=$ one or more
405: jets, including both light quarks ($u,d,s,c$) and gluons. Both the
406: leading-order (in square brackets) and
407: next-to-leading-order cross sections are given. The first number
408: given is from Processes 1--2; the second number is from Processes
409: 3--6 red (with Process 6 given separately in parenthesis);
410: and the third number is their sum.}\label{tab:WbXsecs_inc}
411: \bigskip\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
412: \hline\hline
413: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Inclusive cross sections (pb)}\\
414: \hline
415: Collider & $Wb+X$ & $W(b\bar{b})+X$ \\
416: \hline
417: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & [7.56+1.81=9.37] 11.77+2.40(0.77)=14.17 & [2.66] 4.17+0.39=4.56\\
418: LHC $W^+$ & [39.3+106.0=145.3] 53.6+136.1(68.9)=189.7 & [17.6] 25.1+35.9=61.0 \\
419: LHC $W^-$ & [27.9+67.0=94.9] 39.3+88.2(44.6)=127.5 & [12.9] 18.9+23.6=42.5 \\
420: \hline
421: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Wj+X$}\\
422: \hline
423: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{[1410] 2030}\\
424: LHC $W^+$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{[14240] 20000}\\
425: LHC $W^-$ & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{[11040] 15220}\\
426: \hline
427: \end{tabular}
428: \end{center}
429: \end{table}
430: %\newpage
431: %
432: \begin{table}[t]
433: \begin{center}
434: \caption{Exclusive cross sections (pb) for $W$ boson plus one jet,
435: which contains at least one $b$ quark, with the
436: theoretical uncertainty due to renormalization (first uncertainty) and
437: factorization (second uncertainty) scale dependence. The uncertainty due
438: to the renormalization scale ($\mu_R$) dependence is estimated by
439: varying $\mu_R$ by a factor of two with respect to its central
440: value $\mu_R=M_W$, while keeping the factorization scale ($\mu_F$)
441: fixed at its central value $\mu_F=M_W$. The uncertainty due to the
442: factorization scale is estimated analogously, i.e. varying $\mu_F$
443: by a factor of two about its central value $\mu_F=M_W$, while
444: keeping $\mu_R$ fixed at $\mu_R=M_W$. The central values are
445: extracted from Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc}. The labeling of
446: columns and rows are as described in the caption of
447: Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc}. Results within brackets are
448: LO, results with no brackets are NLO.}\label{tab:WbXsecs_exc_mudep}
449: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline\hline
450: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Exclusive cross sections (pb)}\\
451: \hline
452: Collider & $Wb$ & $W(b\bar{b})$ \\
453: \hline TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ &
454: \big[6.03$\times(1^{+0.27+0.02}_{-0.19-0.03})$\big]
455: 8.64$\times(1^{+0.13+0.004}_{-0.12-0.003})$ &
456: \big[2.66$\times(1^{+0.27+0.04}_{-0.19-0.04})$\big] 3.71$\times(1^{0.12+0.01}_{-0.11-0.01})$\\
457: LHC $W^+$ & \big[84.5$\times(1^{+0.27+0.11}_{-0.19-0.14})$\big]
458: 88.4$\times(1^{+0.11+0.08}_{-0.11-0.10})$ &
459: \big[17.6$\times(1^{+0.27+0.09}_{-0.19-0.10})$\big] 34.4$\times(1^{+0.23+0.03}_{-0.16-0.04})$\\
460: LHC $W^-$ & \big[53.0$\times(1^{+0.27+0.12}_{-0.19-0.14})$\big]
461: 59.2$\times(1^{+0.12+0.08}_{-0.11-0.10}$ &
462: \big[12.9$\times(1^{+0.27+0.09}_{-0.19-0.11})$\big] 23.7$\times(1^{+0.21+0.03}_{-0.15-0.04})$\\
463: \hline
464: \end{tabular}
465: \end{center}
466: \end{table}
467: %
468: \begin{table}[h]
469: \begin{center}
470: \caption{Inclusive cross sections (pb) for $W$ boson plus one jet,
471: which contains at least one $b$ quark, with the
472: theoretical uncertainty due to renormalization (first uncertainty) and
473: factorization (second uncertainty) scale dependence. The uncertainty due
474: to the renormalization scale ($\mu_R$) dependence is estimated by
475: varying $\mu_R$ by a factor of two with respect to its central
476: value $\mu_R=M_W$, while keeping the factorization scale ($\mu_F$)
477: fixed at its central value $\mu_F=M_W$. The uncertainty due to the
478: factorization scale is estimated analogously, i.e. varying $\mu_F$
479: by a factor of two about its central value $\mu_F=M_W$, while
480: keeping $\mu_R$ fixed at $\mu_R=M_W$. The central values are
481: extracted from Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_inc}. The labeling of
482: columns and rows are as described in the caption of
483: Table~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_inc}. Results within brackets are
484: LO, results with no brackets are NLO.}\label{tab:WbXsecs_inc_mudep}
485: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline\hline
486: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Inclusive cross sections (pb)}\\
487: \hline
488: Collider & $Wb$ & $W(b\bar{b})$ \\
489: \hline
490: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & \big[9.37$\times(1^{+0.27+0.02}_{-0.19-0.03})$\big] 14.17$\times(1^{+0.15+0.0002}_{-0.13-0.001})$ & \big[2.66$\times(1^{+0.27+0.04}_{-0.19-0.04})$\big] 4.56$\times(1^{+0.17+0.03}_{-0.14-0.02})$\\
491: LHC $W^+$ & \big[145.3$\times(1^{+0.27+0.12}_{-0.19-0.14})$\big]
492: 189.7$\times(1^{+0.16+0.07}_{-0.13-0.10})$ &
493: \big[17.6$\times(1^{+0.27+0.09}_{-0.19-0.10})$\big] 61.0$\times(1^{+0.33+0.02}_{-0.21-0.02})$ \\
494: LHC $W^-$ & \big[94.9$\times(1^{+0.27+0.12}_{-0.19-0.15})$\big]
495: 127.5$\times(1^{+0.16+0.08}_{-0.13-0.10})$ &
496: \big[12.9$\times(1^{+0.27+0.09}_{-0.19-0.11})$\big] 42.5$\times(1^{+0.32+0.02}_{-0.21-0.03})$ \\
497: \hline
498: \end{tabular}
499: \end{center}
500: \end{table}
501: \newpage
502: %
503: We estimate the theoretical uncertainty in the exclusive and
504: inclusive LO and NLO cross sections by varying the renormalization
505: ($\mu_R$) and factorization ($\mu_F$) scales independently. We vary
506: $\mu_R$ in the $(0.5-2)M_W$ range while keeping $\mu_F$ fixed at its
507: central value, $\mu_F=M_W$. Similarly we vary $\mu_F$ in the
508: $(0.5-2)M_W$ range keeping $\mu_R=M_W$. The results are illustrated
509: in Figs.~\ref{fig:WbXsecs_exc_mudep} and
510: \ref{fig:WbXsecs_inc_mudep}, where the plots on the l.h.s.\
511: correspond to $W$ production with a $b$ jet ($Wb$) while the plots
512: on the r.h.s.\ correspond to $W$ production with a double-$b$ jet
513: ($W(b\bar{b})$). The upper plots refer to
514: $W^+b/W^+(b\bar{b})=W^-b/W^-(b\bar{b})$ production at the Tevatron,
515: the middle plots to $W^+b/W^+(b\bar{b})$ production at the LHC, and
516: the lower plots to $W^-b/W^-(b\bar{b})$ production at the LHC. The
517: cross sections in Figs.~\ref{fig:WbXsecs_exc_mudep} and
518: \ref{fig:WbXsecs_inc_mudep} have been normalized to their
519: $\mu_R=\mu_F=M_W$ value. The horizontal axis represents the
520: variation of either $\mu_R$ or $\mu_F$, depending on the curve (see
521: figure captions), normalized to the central value $\mu_0=M_W$. In
522: Tables~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc_mudep} and \ref{tab:WbXsecs_inc_mudep}
523: we quantitatively give the variation with $\mu_R$ and $\mu_F$ as
524: (asymmetric) uncertainties on the central value, corresponding to
525: the choice $\mu_R=\mu_F=M_W$ used to obtain the results of
526: Tables~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc} and \ref{tab:WbXsecs_inc}.
527: We have not included in the theoretical uncertainties reported in
528: this paper the uncertainty coming from the parton distribution
529: functions.
530:
531: From Figs.~\ref{fig:WbXsecs_exc_mudep} (and
532: \ref{fig:WbXsecs_inc_mudep} and Tables~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc_mudep}
533: and \ref{tab:WbXsecs_inc_mudep}) we see that the theoretical
534: uncertainty due to the dependence on the renormalization scale is
535: larger than the corresponding uncertainty from the
536: factorization-scale dependence. The decrease in the
537: factorization-scale dependence in going from LO to NLO is mild,
538: while the decrease in the renormalization-scale dependence is
539: significant. An exception is the inclusive $W(b\bar{b})$
540: cross-sections at the LHC, where the renormalization-scale
541: dependence slightly increases at NLO. Even in the exclusive case,
542: the improvement in the renormalization-scale dependence in going
543: from LO to NLO for $W(b\bar{b})$ is mild at the LHC. These
544: exceptions can be explained by the fact that only Processes 1--2,6
545: contribute to $W(b\bar{b})$ production at NLO and, among those,
546: Process 6 opens a new initial state, namely $qg$, and is effectively
547: a LO process. The effect is larger at the LHC because, due to the
548: large gluon density, the $qg$ channel is more relevant. The effect
549: is also larger for inclusive rather than exclusive cross sections
550: because the exclusive final state suppresses the contribution of
551: Process 6 (which is a $2\rightarrow 4$ process), as evidenced by the
552: numerical results in Tables~\ref{tab:WbXsecs_exc} and
553: \ref{tab:WbXsecs_inc}.
554:
555: In Figs.~\ref{fig:dist_signature3}--\ref{fig:dist_signature2} we show
556: the differential cross sections with respect to the transverse
557: momentum of the $b$ jet and of the $W$ boson, for $W^+b$
558: inclusive/exclusive and $W^+(b\bar{b})$ inclusive/exclusive
559: production. If there is more than one $b$ jet in the final state, the
560: $p_T$ of the highest-$p_T$ $b$ jet is chosen. We do not show
561: distributions for $W^-b$ and $W^-(b\bar{b})$ production at the LHC,
562: since they resemble the ones for $W^+b$ and $W^+(b\bar{b})$ production
563: at the LHC illustrated here. For all final states, the NLO QCD
564: corrections modify the shape of both the $b$-jet and $W$-boson
565: transverse momentum distributions.
566:
567:
568: \section{Conclusions}\label{sec:conclusions}
569:
570: In this paper we report on a NLO calculation of the production of a
571: $W$ boson with one $b$ jet. We present both inclusive and exclusive
572: cross sections, as well as cross sections where the jet contains one
573: or two $b$ quarks. We show that it is essential to keep the
574: $b$-quark mass finite throughout the calculation, and we are able to
575: overcome this technical hurdle. The calculation is performed by
576: combining two previous NLO calculations of $Wb\bar b$
577: \cite{FebresCordero:2006sj} and $Wbj$ \cite{Campbell:2006cu}, taking
578: care to treat their overlap consistently. The calculation that we
579: present thus represents the state of the art prediction
580: for $W$ plus one $b$ jet production at NLO in QCD.
581:
582: These calculations can be compared with the large amount of data on
583: $W$ plus $b$ jets already gathered at the Tevatron, and soon to be
584: produced at the LHC. They can also be compared with the inclusive
585: samples obtained by merging matrix-element calculations with parton
586: showers.
587:
588: \section*{Acknowledgments}
589:
590: \indent\indent We are grateful for conversations and correspondence
591: with Ann Heinson and Tony Liss. F.~M.\ and L.~R.\ thank the Aspen
592: Center for Physics for hospitality while this work was being
593: completed. This work was supported in part by the U.~S.~Department of
594: Energy under contracts Nos.~DE-AC02-76CH03000, DE-FG02-91ER40662,
595: DE-FG02-91ER40677, and DE-FG02-97IR4102. The work of D.~W.\ was
596: supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grants
597: NSF-PHY-0456681 and NSF-PHY-0547564.
598:
599:
600: \begin{figure}[htp]
601: \begin{center}
602: \includegraphics*[scale=0.58,angle=-90]{Wb_exc_mur_muf_L}
603: \caption{Renormalization- and factorization-scale dependence of $Wb$
604: (l.h.s.) and $W(b\bar{b})$ (r.h.s.) exclusive production. The upper
605: plots correspond to both $W^+b/W^+(b\bar{b})$ and
606: $W^-b/W^-(b\bar{b})$ production at the Tevatron. The middle plots
607: correspond to $W^+b/W^+(b\bar{b})$ production at the LHC and the lower
608: plots correspond to $W^-b/W^-(b\bar{b})$ production at the LHC. The
609: black dashed (LO) and red solid (NLO) curves represent the
610: dependence on the renormalization scale ($\mu_R$) when $\mu_R$ is
611: varied with respect to its central value
612: $\mu_0=M_W$, while the factorization scale ($\mu_F$) is fixed
613: at $\mu_F=M_W$. In a similar way, the magenta dotted (LO) and blue
614: dot-dashed (NLO) curves represent the dependence on $\mu_F$ when
615: $\mu_F$ is varied with respect to its central
616: value $\mu_0=M_W$, while $\mu_R$ is fixed at $\mu_R=M_W$. The
617: cross sections have been normalized to their $\mu_R=\mu_F=M_W$
618: value.}\label{fig:WbXsecs_exc_mudep}
619: \end{center}
620: \end{figure}
621: %
622: \begin{figure}[htp]
623: \begin{center}
624: \includegraphics*[scale=0.58,angle=-90]{Wb_inc_mur_muf_L}
625: \caption{Renormalization- and factorization-scale dependence of $Wb$
626: (l.h.s.) and $W(b\bar{b})$ (r.h.s.) inclusive production. The upper
627: plots correspond to both $W^+b/W^+(b\bar{b})$ and
628: $W^-b/W^-(b\bar{b})$ production at the Tevatron. The middle plots
629: correspond to $W^+b/W^+(b\bar{b})$ production at the LHC and the lower
630: plots correspond to $W^-b/W^-(b\bar{b})$ production at the LHC. The
631: black dashed (LO) and red solid (NLO) curves represent the
632: dependence on the renormalization scale ($\mu_R$) when $\mu_R$ is
633: varied with respect to its central value
634: $\mu_0=M_W$, while the factorization scale ($\mu_F$) is fixed
635: at $\mu_F=M_W$. In a similar way, the magenta dotted (LO) and blue
636: dot-dashed (NLO) curves represent the dependence on $\mu_F$ when
637: $\mu_F$ is varied with respect to its central
638: value $\mu_0=M_W$, while $\mu_R$ is fixed at $\mu_R=M_W$. The
639: cross sections have been normalized to their $\mu_R=\mu_F=M_W$
640: value.}
641: \label{fig:WbXsecs_inc_mudep}
642: \end{center}
643: \end{figure}
644: %
645: \newpage
646:
647: \begin{figure}[htp]
648: \begin{center}
649: \begin{tabular}{cc}
650: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature3tev} &
651: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature3lhcp}\\
652: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature3tev} &
653: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature3lhcp}
654: \end{tabular}
655: \caption{$p_T(b)$ (upper plots) and $p_T(W)$ (lower plots)
656: distributions for $W^+b$ \emph{exclusive} production, at the Tevatron
657: (l.h.s.\ plots) and at the LHC (r.h.s.\ plots). }
658: \label{fig:dist_signature3}
659: \end{center}
660: \end{figure}
661: %
662: \begin{figure}[htp]
663: \begin{center}
664: \begin{tabular}{cc}
665: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature4tev}&
666: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature4lhcp}\\
667: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature4tev}&
668: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature4lhcp}
669: \end{tabular}
670: \caption{$p_T(b)$ (upper plots) and $p_T(W)$ (lower plots)
671: distributions for $W^+(b\bar{b})$ \emph{exclusive} production, at
672: the Tevatron (l.h.s.\ plots) and at the LHC (r.h.s.\ plots).}
673: \label{fig:dist_signature4}
674: \end{center}
675: \end{figure}
676: %
677: \begin{figure}[htp]
678: \begin{center}
679: \begin{tabular}{cc}
680: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature1tev} &
681: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature1lhcp}\\
682: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature1tev} &
683: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature1lhcp}
684: \end{tabular}
685: \caption{$p_T(b)$ (upper plots) and $p_T(W)$ (lower plots)
686: distributions for $W^+b$ \emph{inclusive} production, at the Tevatron
687: (l.h.s.\ plots) and at the LHC (r.h.s.\ plots). }
688: \label{fig:dist_signature1}
689: \end{center}
690: \end{figure}
691: %
692: \begin{figure}[htp]
693: \begin{center}
694: \begin{tabular}{cc}
695: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature2tev} &
696: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptb_Signature2lhcp}\\
697: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature2tev} &
698: \includegraphics*[scale=0.4,angle=90]{Wb_ptW_Signature2lhcp}
699: \end{tabular}
700: \caption{$p_T(b)$ (upper plots) and $p_T(W)$ (lower plots)
701: distributions for $W^+(bb)$ \emph{inclusive} production, at the Tevatron (l.h.s.\ plots)
702: and at the LHC (r.h.s.\ plots).}
703: \label{fig:dist_signature2}
704: \end{center}
705: \end{figure}
706: %
707: \newpage
708: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
709:
710: \bibitem{Abe:1995hr}
711: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
712: %``Observation of top quark production in anti-p p collisions,''
713: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2626 (1995)
714: [arXiv:hep-ex/9503002].
715: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503002;%%
716:
717: \bibitem{Abachi:1995iq}
718: S.~Abachi {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
719: %``Observation of the top quark,''
720: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2632 (1995)
721: [arXiv:hep-ex/9503003].
722: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503003;%%
723:
724: \bibitem{Abazov:2006gd}
725: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
726: %``Evidence for production of single top quarks and first direct measurement
727: %of |V(tb)|,''
728: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 98}, 181802 (2007)
729: [arXiv:hep-ex/0612052].
730: %%CITATION = PRLTA,98,181802;%%
731:
732: \bibitem{Abazov:2008kt}
733: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
734: %``Evidence for production of single top quarks,''
735: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 78}, 012005 (2008)
736: [arXiv:0803.0739 [hep-ex]].
737: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D78,012005;%%
738:
739: \bibitem{Acosta:2004bs}
740: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
741: %``Search for electroweak single top quark production in p anti-p collisions
742: %at s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV,''
743: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 012005 (2005)
744: [arXiv:hep-ex/0410058].
745: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410058;%%
746:
747: \bibitem{CDF:single} http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/top/public\_singletop.html
748:
749: \bibitem{Aaltonen:2007wx}
750: T.~Aaltonen {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
751: %``Search for Standard Model Higgs Bosons Produced in Association with W
752: %Bosons,''
753: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 100}, 041801 (2008)
754: [arXiv:0710.4363 [hep-ex]].
755: %%CITATION = PRLTA,100,041801;%%
756:
757: \bibitem{Aaltonen:2008zx}
758: T.~Aaltonen {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
759: %``Search for Standard Model Higgs Boson Production in Association with a W
760: %Boson at CDF,''
761: arXiv:0803.3493 [hep-ex].
762: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0803.3493;%%
763:
764: \bibitem{:2007hk}
765: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
766: %``A combined search for the standard model Higgs boson at sqrt{s}=1.96 TeV,''
767: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 663}, 26 (2008)
768: [arXiv:0712.0598 [hep-ex]].
769: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B663,26;%%
770:
771: \bibitem{Abazov:2007pj}
772: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
773: %``Search for a Higgs boson produced in association with a $Z$ boson in $p
774: %\bar{p}$ collisions,''
775: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 655}, 209 (2007)
776: [arXiv:0704.2000 [hep-ex]].
777: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B655,209;%%
778:
779: \bibitem{Aaltonen:2008mi}
780: T.~Aaltonen {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
781: %``Search for the Higgs boson in events with missing transverse energy and b
782: %quark jets produced in proton-antiproton collisions at s**(1/2)=1.96 TeV,''
783: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 100}, 211801 (2008)
784: [arXiv:0802.0432 [hep-ex]].
785: %%CITATION = PRLTA,100,211801;%%
786:
787: \bibitem{Bern:1996ka}
788: Z.~Bern, L.~J.~Dixon, D.~A.~Kosower and S.~Weinzierl,
789: %``One-loop amplitudes for e+ e- --> anti-q q anti-Q Q,''
790: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 489}, 3 (1997)
791: [arXiv:hep-ph/9610370].
792: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B489,3;%%
793:
794: \bibitem{Bern:1997sc}
795: Z.~Bern, L.~J.~Dixon and D.~A.~Kosower,
796: %``One-loop amplitudes for e+ e- to four partons,''
797: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 513}, 3 (1998)
798: [arXiv:hep-ph/9708239].
799: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B513,3;%%
800:
801: \bibitem{Campbell:2003dd}
802: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
803: %``Associated production of a Z boson and a single heavy-quark jet,''
804: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 074021 (2004)
805: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312024].
806: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312024;%%
807:
808: \bibitem{Campbell:2000bg}
809: J.~M.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
810: %``Radiative corrections to Z b anti-b production,''
811: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 114012 (2000)
812: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006304].
813: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006304;%%
814:
815: \bibitem{FebresCordero:2008ci}
816: F.~Febres Cordero, L.~Reina and D.~Wackeroth,
817: %``NLO QCD corrections to Z b anti-b production with massive bottom quarks at
818: %the Fermilab Tevatron,''
819: arXiv:0806.0808 [hep-ph].
820: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.0808;%%
821:
822: \bibitem{Campbell:2005zv}
823: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
824: %``Production of a Z boson and two jets with one heavy-quark tag,''
825: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 054007 (2006)
826: [arXiv:hep-ph/0510362].
827: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510362;%%
828:
829: \bibitem{Giele:1995kr}
830: W.~T.~Giele, S.~Keller and E.~Laenen,
831: %``QCD Corrections to W Boson plus Heavy Quark Production at the Tevatron,''
832: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 372}, 141 (1996)
833: [arXiv:hep-ph/9511449].
834: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B372,141;%%
835:
836: \bibitem{Campbell:2008}
837: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis and R.~Mahbubani, in preparation.
838:
839: \bibitem{Ellis:1998fv}
840: R.~K.~Ellis and S.~Veseli,
841: %``Strong radiative corrections to W b anti-b production in p anti-p
842: %collisions,''
843: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 011501 (1999)
844: [arXiv:hep-ph/9810489].
845: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810489;%%
846:
847: \bibitem{FebresCordero:2006sj}
848: F.~Febres Cordero, L.~Reina and D.~Wackeroth,
849: %``NLO QCD corrections to W boson production with a massive b-quark jet pair
850: %at the Tevatron p anti-p collider,''
851: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 034007 (2006)
852: [arXiv:hep-ph/0606102].
853: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606102;%%
854:
855: \bibitem{Campbell:2006cu}
856: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
857: %``Production of a W boson and two jets with one b-quark tag,''
858: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 75}, 054015 (2007)
859: [arXiv:hep-ph/0611348].
860: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,054015;%%
861:
862: \bibitem{Mangano:2002ea}
863: M.~L.~Mangano, M.~Moretti, F.~Piccinini, R.~Pittau and A.~D.~Polosa,
864: %``ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic
865: %collisions,''
866: JHEP {\bf 0307}, 001 (2003)
867: [arXiv:hep-ph/0206293].
868: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0307,001;%%
869:
870: \bibitem{Maltoni:2002qb}
871: F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer,
872: %``MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph,''
873: JHEP {\bf 0302}, 027 (2003)
874: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208156].
875: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0302,027;%%
876:
877: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
878: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
879: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD
880: %analysis,''
881: JHEP {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002)
882: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201195].
883: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%
884:
885: \bibitem{Aivazis:1993pi}
886: M.~A.~G.~Aivazis, J.~C.~Collins, F.~I.~Olness and W.~K.~Tung,
887: %``Leptoproduction of heavy quarks. 2. A Unified QCD formulation of charged
888: %and neutral current processes from fixed target to collider energies,''
889: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 3102 (1994)
890: [arXiv:hep-ph/9312319].
891: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9312319;%%
892:
893: \bibitem{Collins:1998rz}
894: J.~C.~Collins,
895: %``Hard-scattering factorization with heavy quarks: A general treatment,''
896: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 094002 (1998)
897: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806259].
898: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806259;%%
899:
900: \bibitem{Mangano:2001xp}
901: M.~L.~Mangano, M.~Moretti and R.~Pittau,
902: %``Multijet matrix elements and shower evolution in hadronic collisions: W b
903: %anti-b + (n)jets as a case study,''
904: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 632}, 343 (2002)
905: [arXiv:hep-ph/0108069].
906: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108069;%%
907:
908: \bibitem{Ellis:1999ec}
909: R.~K.~Ellis {\it et al.} [QCD Tools Working Group],
910: %``Report of the QCD tools working group,''
911: arXiv:hep-ph/0011122.
912: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011122;%%
913:
914: \bibitem{MCFM}
915: J.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis, MCFM - Monte Carlo for FeMtobarn
916: processes, http://mcfm.fnal.gov/.
917:
918: \bibitem{Acosta:2004nj}
919: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
920: %``Measurements of bottom anti-bottom azimuthal production correlations in
921: %proton antiproton collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
922: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 092001 (2005)
923: [arXiv:hep-ex/0412006].
924: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0412006;%%
925:
926: \bibitem{Banfi:2007gu}
927: A.~Banfi, G.~P.~Salam and G.~Zanderighi,
928: %``Accurate QCD predictions for heavy-quark jets at the Tevatron and LHC,''
929: JHEP {\bf 0707}, 026 (2007)
930: [arXiv:0704.2999 [hep-ph]].
931: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0707,026;%%
932:
933: \bibitem{Giele:1993dj}
934: W.~T.~Giele, E.~W.~N.~Glover and D.~A.~Kosower,
935: %``Higher Order Corrections To Jet Cross-Sections In Hadron Colliders,''
936: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 403}, 633 (1993)
937: [arXiv:hep-ph/9302225].
938: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B403,633;%%
939:
940: \bibitem{Campbell:2002tg}
941: J.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
942: %``Next-to-leading order corrections to W + 2jet and Z + 2jet production at
943: %hadron colliders,''
944: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 113007 (2002)
945: [arXiv:hep-ph/0202176].
946: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202176;%%
947:
948: \end{thebibliography}
949:
950: \end{document}
951: