1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: % version 1 30/10/05 first draft
3: %
4: %\documentclass[11pt]{aastex}
5: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
6:
7: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
8:
9: %\usepackage{epsfig}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11:
12: % Constants & Symbols
13: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\;\buildrel>\over\sim\;$}}
14: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\;\buildrel<\over\sim\;$}}
15: \newcommand{\zsun}{\ensuremath{Z_\odot}}
16: \newcommand{\msun}{\ensuremath{~M_\odot}}
17: \newcommand{\lsun}{\ensuremath{~L_\odot}}
18: \newcommand{\hi}{\rm H {\sc i}}
19: \newcommand{\hii}{\rm H {\sc ii}}
20: \newcommand{\heii}{\rm He {\sc ii}}
21: \newcommand{\nuo}{{\ensuremath{\nu_0}}}
22: \newcommand{\alphant}{\ensuremath{\alpha_{\mathrm{nt}}}}
23: \newcommand{\tauff}{\ensuremath{\tau_{\mathrm{ff}}}}
24: \newcommand{\nion}{N$_{\rm ion}$}
25: \newcommand{\qlyc}{Q$_{\rm Lyc}$}
26: \newcommand{\htwo}{\rm H$_2$}
27: \newcommand{\nh}{N$_{\rm H}$}
28: \newcommand{\av}{A$_{\rm V}$}
29: \newcommand{\neii}{\rm [Ne\,{\sc ii}]}
30: \newcommand{\neiii}{\rm [Ne\,{\sc iii}]}
31: \newcommand{\arii}{\rm [Ar\,{\sc ii}]}
32: \newcommand{\ariii}{\rm [Ar\,{\sc iii}]}
33: \newcommand{\nev}{\rm [Ne\,{\sc v}]}
34: \newcommand{\siii}{\rm [S\,{\sc iii}]}
35: \newcommand{\sii}{\rm [S\,{\sc ii}]}
36: \newcommand{\SiII}{\rm [Si\,{\sc ii}]}
37: \newcommand{\siv}{\rm [S\,{\sc iv}]}
38: \newcommand{\oiv}{\rm [O\,{\sc iv}]}
39: \newcommand{\fev}{\rm [Fe\,{\sc v}]}
40: \newcommand{\feii}{\rm [Fe\,{\sc ii}]}
41: \newcommand{\feiii}{\rm [Fe\,{\sc iii}]}
42: \newcommand{\water}{\rm H$_2$O}
43: \newcommand{\jh}{{$J-H$}}
44: \newcommand{\hk}{{$H-K$}}
45: \newcommand{\jk}{{$J-K$}}
46:
47: %\newcommand{sfr5}{{\rm SFR}\ensuremath{_{\geq5M_\odot}}}
48:
49: \newcommand{\hst}{{\sl HST}}
50: \newcommand{\lnt}{$L_{\rm NT}$}
51: \newcommand{\lsyn}{$L_{\rm syn}$}
52: \newcommand{\lt}{$L_{\rm T}$}
53: \newcommand{\snr}{$\nu_{\rm SN}$}
54: \newcommand{\bra}{\ensuremath{{\rm Br}\alpha}}
55: \newcommand{\brg}{\ensuremath{{\rm Br}\gamma}}
56: \newcommand{\ha}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}\alpha}}
57: \newcommand{\hb}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}\beta}}
58: \newcommand{\lya}{\ensuremath{{\rm Ly}\alpha}}
59:
60: \newcommand{\Ho}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{H}_0}}
61: \newcommand{\LBsun}{\ensuremath{~\mathrm{L}_{B\odot}}}
62: \newcommand{\QH}{\ensuremath{Q(\mathrm{H})}}
63: % BHs
64: \newcommand{\Lopt}{\ensuremath{L_\mathrm{opt}}}
65: % Maths
66: \newcommand{\ten}[1]{\ensuremath{10^{#1}}}
67: \newcommand{\xten}[1]{\ensuremath{\times 10^{#1}}}
68: \newcommand{\1}{\ensuremath{^{-1}}}
69: \newcommand{\2}{\ensuremath{^{-2}}}
70: \newcommand{\3}{\ensuremath{^{-3}}}
71:
72: % Units
73: \newcommand{\CM}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~cm}}}
74: \newcommand{\KM}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~km}}}
75: \newcommand{\PC}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~pc}}}
76: \newcommand{\KPC}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~kpc}}}
77: \newcommand{\MPC}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~Mpc}}}
78: %\newcommand{\micron}{\mu{\rm m}}
79: \newcommand{\mic}{$\mu${\rm m}}
80:
81: \newcommand{\SEC}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~s}}}
82: \newcommand{\YR}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~yr}}}
83:
84: \newcommand{\kms}{\KM\SEC\1}
85: \newcommand{\ERG}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~erg}}}
86: \newcommand{\ARCSEC}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{~arcsec}}}
87:
88: \newcommand{\vel}{\ensuremath{\langle v\rangle}}
89: \newcommand{\vcirc}{\ensuremath{v_\mathrm{circ}}}
90: \newcommand{\velsq}{\ensuremath{\langle v^2\rangle}}
91:
92: %%
93: \newcommand{\mlr}{\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}
94: \newcommand{\I}{\ensuremath{i}}
95: \newcommand{\Th}{\ensuremath{\theta}}
96: \newcommand{\B}{\ensuremath{b}}
97: \newcommand{\So}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{s}_\circ}}
98: \newcommand{\Vsys}{\ensuremath{V_\mathrm{sys}}}
99: \newcommand{\chisq}{\ensuremath{\chi^2}}
100: \newcommand{\chisqr}{\ensuremath{\chi^2_\mathrm{red}}}
101: \newcommand{\chisqc}{\ensuremath{\chi^2_\mathrm{c}}}
102: %
103: \newcommand{\sbs}{SBS\,0335$-$052\,E}
104: \newcommand{\izw}{I\,Zw\,18}
105: \newcommand{\iizw}{II\,Zw\,40}
106: \newcommand{\hh}{Haro\,3}
107: \newcommand{\mrk}{Mrk\,996}
108: \newcommand{\spitzer}{{\sl Spitzer}}
109: \newcommand{\iso}{{\sl ISO}}
110: \newcommand{\iras}{{\sl IRAS}}
111: \newcommand{\mopex}{{\it MOPEX}}
112: \newcommand{\spice}{{\it SPICE}}
113: \newcommand{\dusty}{{\it DUSTY}}
114: %
115:
116: \shorttitle{The \spitzer\ View of \mrk}
117: \shortauthors{Thuan et al.}
118:
119:
120: %\received{2005 October 31}
121: \begin{document}
122:
123: \title{The \spitzer\ View of Low-Metallicity Star Formation: II. \mrk, a
124: Blue Compact Dwarf Galaxy with an Extremely Dense Nucleus}
125:
126: \author{
127: Trinh~X.~Thuan\altaffilmark{1},
128: Leslie~K.~Hunt\altaffilmark{2} and
129: Yuri~I.~Izotov\altaffilmark{3}
130: % and Marc~Sauvage\altaffilmark{4}
131: }
132: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Department, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325,
133: Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA: txt@virginia.edu}
134: \altaffiltext{2}{INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia-Sez.\ Firenze,
135: L.go Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy; hunt@arcetri.astro.it.}
136: \altaffiltext{3}{Main Astronomical Observatory, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
137: 03680 Kiev, Ukraine; izotov@mao.kiev.ua}
138: %\altaffiltext{4}{CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/Service d'Astrophysique, UMR AIM, CE Saclay,
139: %91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France: msauvage@cea.fr}
140:
141: \begin{abstract}
142: We present new \spitzer, UKIRT and MMT observations of the
143: blue compact dwarf galaxy (BCD) \mrk, with an oxygen abundance
144: of 12$+$log(O/H)\,=\,8.0. This galaxy has the peculiarity of possessing an
145: extraordinarily dense nuclear star-forming region, with a central density of
146: $\sim$ 10$^6$ cm$^{-3}$. The nuclear region of \mrk\ is characterized by
147: several unusual properties:
148: a very red color \jk\ = 1.8, broad and narrow emission-line components, and ionizing radiation
149: as hard as 54.9 eV, as implied by the presence of the \oiv\ 25.89\,\micron\
150: line.
151: %\mrk\ may represent a transition case between the
152: %starburst and AGN phases.
153: The nucleus is located within an exponential disk
154: with colors consistent with a single stellar population of age $\ga$ 1 Gyr.
155: The infrared morphology of \mrk\ changes with wavelength.
156: IRAC 4.5\,\micron\ images show extended stellar photospheric emission from the
157: body of the galaxy, and an extremely red nuclear point source, indicative of hot dust;
158: IRAC 8\,\micron\ images show extended PAH emission from the surrounding ISM
159: and a bright nucleus;
160: MIPS 24 and 70 images consist of bright point sources associated with the warm
161: nuclear dust; and 160 \,\micron\ images map the cooler extended dust
162: associated with older stellar populations.
163: %The optical spectrum shows unusually large He I line intensities,
164: %broad high-ionization and narrow low-ionization lines and strong broad Wolf-Rayet
165: %bumps.
166: The IRS spectrum shows strong narrow
167: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) emission, with
168: narrow line widths and equivalent widths that are high for the metallicity of
169: \mrk.
170: Gaseous nebular fine-structure lines are also seen.
171: A CLOUDY model which accounts for both the optical and mid-infrared (MIR)
172: lines requires that
173: they originate in two distinct \hii\ regions: a very dense
174: \hii\ region of radius $\sim$ 580 pc
175: with densities declining from $\sim$ 10$^6$ at the center
176: to a few hundreds cm$^{-3}$ at the outer radius, where most of
177: the optical lines arise; and a \hii\ region with a density of
178: $\sim$ 300 cm$^{-3}$ that is hidden in the optical but seen
179: in the MIR. We suggest
180: that the infrared lines arise mainly in the optically
181: obscured \hii\ region
182: while they are strongly suppressed by collisional deexcitation
183: in the optically visible one. The hard ionizing radiation needed to account for
184: the \oiv\ 25.89\,\micron\ line is most likely due to fast radiative
185: shocks propagating in an
186: %dense
187: interstellar medium. A hidden population of
188: Wolf-Rayet stars of type WNE-w or a hidden AGN as sources of hard
189: ionizing radiation are less likely possibilities.
190:
191:
192:
193: \end{abstract}
194:
195: \keywords{Galaxies: individual: Mrk\,996; Galaxies: compact; Galaxies: dwarf
196: Galaxies: starburst; (ISM:) dust, extinction; ISM: lines and bands; Infrared: galaxies
197: %\object{Mrk996}
198: }
199:
200: \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction}
201:
202: Among blue compact dwarf galaxies (BCDs), the dwarf emission-line
203: galaxy Mrk 996 ($M_B$\,=\,$-16.9$) occupies a place apart because of
204: the extreme electron
205: density at the center of its star-forming region.
206: {\sl HST} $V$ and $I$ images show that the bulk of
207: the star formation occurs in a compact roughly circular
208: high surface brightness
209: nuclear region of radius $\sim$ 340 pc, with evident dust patches to the
210: north of it \citep{thuan96}. The nucleus (n) is located
211: within an elliptically (E) shaped low surface brightness (LSB)
212: component,
213: so that Mrk 996 belongs to the relatively rare class of nE BCDs
214: \citep{loose85}. The extended envelope shows a distinct asymmetry,
215: being more extended to the
216: northeast side than to the southwest side, perhaps the sign of a past merger.
217: This asymmetry is also seen in the spatial distribution of the
218: globular clusters
219: around Mrk 996, these being seen mainly to the south of the galaxy.
220:
221: Mrk 996 has a heliocentric
222: radial velocity of 1622 km s$^{-1}$ which gives it a distance of 21.7 Mpc,
223: adopting a Hubble constant of 75 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-2}$
224: and including a very small correction for the Virgocentric flow \citep{thuanhi}.
225: At the adopted distance, 1 arcsec corresponds to a linear size of 105 pc.
226: \citet{thuan96} found the extended LSB component to possess
227: an exponential disk structure with a small scale length of 0.42 kpc.
228: While Mrk 996 does not show an obvious spiral structure in the disk,
229: there is a spiral-like pattern in the nuclear star-forming region, which
230: is no larger than 160 pc in radius.
231:
232: The UV and optical spectra of the nuclear star-forming region of Mrk 996
233: \citep{izotov92,thuan96}
234: show remarkable features, suggesting very unusual physical conditions. The
235: He {\sc i} line intensities are some 2 -- 4 times larger than those in
236: normal BCDs. In the UV range, the N {\sc iii}] $\lambda$1750 and C {\sc iii}] $\lambda$1909 are particularly intense.
237: Moreover, the line width depends on the degree of ionization
238: of the ion. Thus low-ionization
239: emission lines such as O$^+$,
240: S$^+$ and N$^+$ have narrow widths, similar to those in
241: other \hii\ regions, while high-ionization emission lines
242: such as the helium lines, the O$^{++}$ and
243: Ne$^{++}$ nebular lines and all auroral lines, show very broad line
244: widths, $\ga$ 500 km s$^{-1}$.
245: Such correlations of line widths with the degree of excitation
246: %are also observed in active galactic nuclei (AGN)
247: %\citep{derobertis84,whittle85}, and
248: suggest different
249: ionization zones with very distinct kinematical properties.
250: \citet{thuan96} found that the usual one-zone low-density ionization-bounded
251: \hii\ region model cannot be applied to the nuclear star-forming
252: region of Mrk 996 without leading to unrealistic helium and
253: heavy-element abundances. Instead, they showed that a two-zone
254: density-bounded
255: \hii\ region model, including an inner compact region with a
256: central density of $\sim$ 10$^6$ cm$^{-3}$, some 4 orders of magnitude
257: greater than the densities of normal \hii\ regions,
258: together with an outer region with a lower density of $\sim$ 450 cm$^{-3}$,
259: comparable to those of other \hii\ regions,
260: is needed to account for the
261: observed line intensities. The large density gradient is probably caused by
262: a mass outflow driven by the large population of Wolf-Rayet stars present in
263: the galaxy. The gas outflow motions may account for the much broader
264: line widths of the high-ionization lines originating in the
265: dense inner region as compared to the low-ionization lines which
266: originate in the less dense outer region. As for the high
267: N {\sc iii}] $\lambda$1750, C {\sc iii}] $\lambda$1909 and He {\sc i} line
268: intensities,
269: they can be understood by collisional excitation of these lines in the
270: high density region.
271: In the context of this model, the
272: oxygen abundance of Mrk 996 is 12+log(O/H) = 8.0. Adopting
273: 12+log(O/H) = 8.65 for the Sun \citep{asplund05},
274: then Mrk 996 has a metallicity of 0.22 solar.
275: Mrk 996 shows
276: enhanced helium and nitrogen abundances, which can be accounted for by
277: local pollution from Wolf-Rayet stars.
278:
279: We present in this paper \spitzer\ \citep{werner04} mid-infrared (MIR)
280: observations of Mrk 996. The extraordinary UV and optical properties
281: of this galaxy, along with
282: the evident presence of dust patches in the star-forming region
283: of Mrk 996 on {\sl HST} optical images, make it a prime candidate for our
284: Cycle 1 (PID 3139: P.I. Thuan) \spitzer\
285: observations. Our entire program consists of spectroscopic,
286: photometric and imaging observations of 23 BCDs with metallicities
287: ranging from 1/20 to 1/2 that of the Sun, and its main aim is to
288: study star formation in metal-poor environments
289: and to understand
290: how star formation and dust properties change as a function
291: of metallicity and other physical parameters.
292: This paper is the second of our \spitzer\ series,
293: the first paper being
294: on Haro 3, the most metal-rich BCD in our sample \citep{hunt06}.
295:
296: We present in \S2 our {\sl Spitzer} IRAC, MIPS and IRS
297: observations of Mrk 996 and their
298: reduction. We
299: discuss in \S3 new complementary UKIRT near-infrared (NIR) imaging
300: observations and optical MMT spectroscopic observations.
301: In \S4, we discuss our imaging results:
302: the IR morphology of the disk of old stars, and the
303: nature of the very red, bright and dense nuclear IR source in Mrk 996.
304: %which we suggest may be an AGN.
305: We also discuss
306: the extended PAH emission.
307: In \S5, we present our spectroscopic
308: results: the PAH features and the IR fine-structure lines. In \S6, we
309: use the CLOUDY photoionization code \citep{cloudy,ferland98}
310: to model the observed optical and IR emission-line
311: intensities. We show that it is necessary to postulate two \hii\ regions:
312: one which is optically visible where the optical lines arise, and one
313: which is optically hidden where the main part of the IR line emission
314: arises. We then
315: discuss possible sources of hard ionizing radiation --
316: fast shocks, WNE-w stars or an AGN -- to account
317: for the presence of
318: the [O {\sc iv}] $\lambda$25.9$\mu$m, line. We
319: summarize our conclusions in \S7.
320:
321: \section{Spitzer Observations}
322:
323: In the context of our guest-observer program, we acquired
324: \spitzer\ observations of \mrk:
325: IRAC images \citep{fazioirac} at 4.5 and 8 \micron, MIPS photometry
326: \citep{riekemips} at 24, 70 and 160 \micron\ and
327: low- and high-resolution IRS spectra \citep{houckirs}.
328: The data were obtained during the period from 16 December, 2004 to
329: 3 January, 2005.
330: As the data
331: reduction procedures have been described in detail in Paper I \citep{hunt06},
332: we give here only a summary.
333:
334: \subsection{\label{sec:iracdata}IRAC Imaging}
335:
336: We acquired four IRAC frames, with small-scale dithering in a cycling pattern,
337: giving a total of 120s spent in each of the 4.5 and 8.0 \micron\ channels.
338: The individual {\it bcd} frames were processed with
339: the S11.0.1 version of the SSC pipeline which
340: %(see the IRAC Data Handbook\footnote{Available from the SSC website
341: %\url{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/dh/}}).
342: removes the effects of
343: dark current, detector nonlinearity, flat field, multiplexer bleeding,
344: and cosmic rays, and performs flux calibration.
345: %However, in some cases, those with particularly bright sources in
346: %the field-of-view,
347: %the pipeline is unsuccessful at removing all artefacts.
348: %In the case of \hh, the bright point-like source at the center of the
349: %galaxy resulted in a ``banding'' effect in the 8\,\micron\ image, i.e.
350: %in an artificially enhanced brightness level in the rows and columns
351: %containing that bright source (see the IRAC Data Handbook).
352: %The 4.5\,\micron\ image was not affected by banding since it occurs only in the
353: %Si:As arrays (channels 3 and 4).
354: %Dithering does not eliminate the effect because the position of the
355: %bands on the array remains unchanged relative to the galaxy.
356: %Moreover, because the intensity of the brightness enhancement decreases with
357: %distance from
358: %the bright source, it is not straightforward to correct automatically.
359: %We eliminated the effect from each 8\,\micron\ frame by interpolating
360: %the feature across the affected rows,
361: %substituting the spurious pixel values with those of a typical background.
362: The {\it bcd} frames
363: %(corrected for ``banding'' effects in the case of the
364: %8\,\micron\ ones)
365: were then coadded using \mopex,
366: the image mosaicing and source-extraction package
367: provided by the SSC \citep{mopex}.
368: %Pixels flagged by the DCE masks and by the static bad-pixel masks (pmasks) were
369: %ignored.
370: %Additional inconsistent pixel values were removed by means of the \mopex\ outlier
371: %rejection algorithms.
372: %We relied on the dual-outlier technique, together with the multiframe algorithm,
373: %rather than using any spatial criteria for rejection.
374: The frames were corrected for geometrical distortion and
375: projected onto a fiducial coordinate system
376: with pixel sizes of 1\farcs20, roughly equivalent to the original pixels.
377: Standard linear interpolation was used for the mosaics.
378: %The noise levels in our post-pipeline \mopex\ mosaics are comparable to
379: %or lower than those in the SSC products.
380: The final coadded 4.5 and 8.0\,\micron\ images are shown
381: respectively in the left and right panels of Fig. \ref{fig:irac}.
382: Fig. \ref{fig:hstiracoverlay} shows 4.5\,\micron\ contours superimposed on
383: the \hst/WFPC2 F791W optical image of
384: \citet{thuan96} (left panel) and on the \hst\ 569W - F791W color image
385: from the same authors (right panel). In Fig. \ref{fig:iraccolor}, we show the
386: 4.5/8.0\micron\ flux ratio image on which have been overlayed the surface brightness
387: level contours of the 4.5\micron\ image. To construct the flux ratio image, the
388: two IRAC images have been aligned by cross-correlation after sky subtraction.
389:
390: We have performed aperture photometry on the IRAC images
391: with the IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by National Optical Astronomy
392: Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for
393: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
394: Science Foundation.}
395: photometry package APPHOT, taking care to convert
396: the MJy/sr flux units of the images to integrated flux.
397: The background level was determined by averaging several
398: adjacent empty sky regions. We give the growth curve for both IRAC images (filled circles
399: for the 4.5\micron\ image and filled squares for the 8.0\micron\ image)
400: in the left panel of Fig. \ref{fig:phot}.
401: We have also made photometric measurements
402: of the instrument point response functions (PRFs),
403: provided in the \mopex\ package;
404: %\footnote{We used the most recent determinations
405: %of the PRFs dated 5 October 2005.};
406: the dashed lines show the growth curve expected from a point source, normalized
407: to the total flux indicated by horizontal dotted lines in Fig. \ref{fig:phot}.
408: The 4.5 \micron\ and 8.0 \micron\ total fluxes are listed in Table
409: \ref{tab:photom}.
410:
411: We have derived radial surface brightness profiles by fitting ellipses
412: to both IRAC images.
413: The ellipse centers were held fixed, but the ellipse shape and orientation was
414: allowed to vary with radius.
415: The surface brightnesses were put on the Vega magnitude scale
416: by using the photometric calibration
417: of \citet{reach05}.
418: Figure \ref{fig:profile} (left panel) shows the radial profiles in units of
419: [4.5] and [8.0] magnitudes.
420: The average disk color of 1.5 corresponds to a flux ratio 4.5/8.0 of 0.7.
421: The red circumnuclear maximum in the lower panel at a radius of
422: $\sim$ 4\arcsec\ is an artifact due to the different
423: IRAC point-response functions at the two wavelengths.
424: This effect can also be seen in Fig. \ref{fig:iraccolor} where the crowding
425: of the 4.5\,\micron\ contours from the point source
426: coincides with a relatively low 4.5/8 flux ratio.
427:
428: \subsection{\label{sec:mipsdata}MIPS Imaging}
429:
430: %We next use MIPS images to discuss the presence of cool dust in \mrk.
431: %Our MIPS images were acquired in the Fixed Cluster-Offset mode in all
432: %three channels, with offsets of 12\arcsec\ in two additional
433: %pointings.
434: We have obtained for \mrk\
435: a total of 24 frames at 24\micron, 56 frames at 70\micron,
436: and 104 frames at 160\micron, using ramp times of 3s, 10s, and 10s
437: respectively,
438: with 1, 2, and 6 cycles in the three channels.
439: %This gave us a total of 32 frames at 24\micron, 56 frames at 70\micron,
440: %and 104 frames at 160\micron.
441: %Because the first data frame of each observation sequence at 24\micron\ has a shorter
442: %exposure time, we discarded those frames with keyword DCENUM\,=\,0;
443: %we also removed the second frame (DCENUM=1) because of
444: %increased data artefacts
445: %(see the MIPS Data Handbook\footnote{Available from the SSC website
446: %\url{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/dh/}});
447: %this left us with 24 frames at 24\micron.
448: The individual {\it bcd} frames were processed by the S11.4.0 version of the SSC pipeline,
449: which includes
450: %converts the integration ramps inherent to the MIPS detectors into
451: %slopes, and remediates temporal variation of the slope images
452: %\citep{gordon05}.
453: %The processing includes correcting for stimulator flashes on the MIPS-Ge detectors,
454: dark current subtraction, flat-fielding, and flux calibration.
455: As for the IRAC images, we processed the dithered {\it bcd} frames in
456: the spatial domain with \mopex.
457: %The DCE masks and the static masks were used to flag pixels, and subsequently ignore them.
458: %The \mopex\ outlier rejection was used to flag any additional spurious pixel
459: %values, with the dual-outlier and multiframe algorithm as for the IRAC frames.
460: Geometrical distortion was corrected before projecting the frames onto
461: a fiducial coordinate system with pixel sizes of 1\farcs2 for MIPS-24,
462: roughly half of the original pixel size of 2\farcs5.
463: Pixel sizes of the final mosaics at 70 and 160\micron\ are also
464: approximately half
465: of the originals, i.e. 4\farcs95 at 70\micron\ and 8\farcs0 at 160\micron.
466: Unlike the IRAC coadds,
467: we incorporated the sigma-weighting algorithm because we found
468: it gave less noisy MIPS mosaics than without.
469: Standard linear interpolation was used in all cases.
470: In all three channels, our post-pipeline \mopex\ mosaics are superior to
471: those provided by the automated post-pipeline reduction.
472: The final coadded images are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:mipsoverlay} as
473: contours superimposed on
474: the IRAC 4.5 \micron\ image. We have performed aperture photometry on the
475: MIPS images in the same way as on the IRAC images. The growth curves for the three
476: bands (filled circles for the 24 \micron\ band, open squares for the 70 \micron\ band
477: and crosses for 160 \micron\ band) are given in the right panel of
478: Fig. \ref{fig:phot}. The dashed lines represent the point-response function in each band.
479: The 24 \micron, 70 \micron\ and 160 \micron\ total fluxes are listed in Table
480: \ref{tab:photom}.
481:
482: \subsection{\label{sec:irsdata} IRS Spectra}
483:
484: Spectroscopy was performed in the staring mode with the Short Low module
485: in both orders (SL1, SL2)
486: and with both Short and Long High-resolution modules (SH, LH).
487: %The data were acquired during the
488: %period from 16 December, 2004 to 3 January, 2005. They
489: The data consist of
490: low-resolution spectra with a wavelength range from
491: 5.2 to 14.5\,\micron\ and a spectral resolution of $\simeq$64-128, and
492: of high-resolution spectra with a wavelength range
493: from 9.6 to 37.2\,\micron\ and a spectral resolution of $\simeq$600.
494: Total integration times of 30s$\times$4 cycles were
495: obtained for SH, 14s$\times$8 for LH,
496: 6s$\times$6 for SL1, and 6s$\times$6 for SL2.
497: The central region of
498: Mrk 996 was centered in the slits by peaking up on a nearby 2MASS star.
499: Individual {\it bcd} frames have been processed by the S13.2.0 version of the
500: SSC pipeline, which provides ramp fitting, dark current
501: subtraction, droop and linearity corrections,
502: flat-fielding, and wavelength and flux calibrations\footnote{See the IRS
503: Data Handbook, \url{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irs/dh}.}.
504:
505: However, the pipeline does not include background subtraction.
506: Hence, for the low-resolution spectra, we constructed a coadded
507: background frame from the
508: {\it bcd} observations
509: with the source in the opposing nod and off-order positions
510: \citep[see also][]{weedman05}.
511: %Coadding was performed with the sigma-clipping option
512: %of the IMCOMBINE task in IRAF.
513: %The inclusion of off-order and off-nod frames in the background image
514: %means that
515: %the integration time on the background is three times that on source,
516: %improving the signal-to-noise of the two-dimensional (2D) subtraction.
517: For the high-resolution SH and LH spectra,
518: a 2D background image could not be
519: constructed because of the small size of the slit.
520: Therefore we subtracted the background from the SH and LH observations
521: using the one-dimensional (1D) spectra.
522: The level of the background was determined by minimizing the difference
523: between the SL and SH$+$LH spectra over their overlap region ($\la$1\,\micron),
524: and the shape of the background was given by Spot.
525: %as described in \citet{hunt06}.
526: %The SH and LH 2D {\it bcd} images were coadded as for the SL modules,
527: %and successive corrections for sporadic bad pixels and cosmic ray
528: %hits were carried out manually by inspection of the images at
529: %the separate nod positions.
530:
531: We extracted the source spectra with \spice, the post-pipeline IRS package
532: provided by the SSC.
533: To maximize the calibration accuracy,
534: the automatic point-source extraction window was used for all modules.
535: For the SL spectra, this gives a 4-pixel (7\farcs2) length at 6\,\micron, and
536: an 8-pixel one (14\farcs4) at 12\,\micron;
537: the slit width is 3\farcs6 for both SL modules.
538: At high resolution, the \spice\ extraction is performed over the entire slit
539: (4\farcs7$\times$11\farcs3 SH; 11\farcs1$\times$22\farcs3 LH).
540: %Orders were spliced together by averaging, ignoring the noisy
541: %regions at the red end of each order \citep[e.g.][]{armus04}.
542: The individual spectra were then box-car smoothed to a resolution element,
543: and clipped in order to
544: eliminate any remaining spikes in the high-resolution data.
545: The spectra were also examined for bad pixel removal.
546: Finally, the two spectra for each module (one for each nod position)
547: were averaged.
548: The final averaged IRS
549: spectra obtained in
550: the short-wavelength low-resolution mode (SL) and in both short and
551: long wavelength
552: high-resolution modes (SH, LH) are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:irs}. A
553: blow-up of the spectral region around the [O {\sc iv}] line is shown in
554: Fig. \ref{fig:oiv}.
555:
556:
557: \section{Complementary Observations}
558:
559: \subsection{UKIRT Imaging}
560:
561: We have also acquired $J$ (1.2 \micron), $H$ (1.6 \micron), and $K$ (2.2 \micron)
562: images of \mrk,
563: with the 3.8 m UKIRT1 equipped with IRCAM3
564: %during the period XXX [Leslie,
565: % in October, 1998, but i would like to avoid mentioning this date if possible.
566: as part of our ongoing project of NIR imaging and spectroscopy of BCDs.
567: The IRCAM3 plate scale is 0\farcs28 pixel$^{-1}$,
568: with a total field of view of 72\farcs0 $\times$ 72\farcs0. Source and empty
569: sky positions were alternated, beginning and ending each observing sequence
570: with a sky position. Before the beginning of each sequence, dark exposures
571: were acquired with the same parameters as the subsequent science frames. Total
572: on-source integration times were 1040s in $K$,
573: 480s in $H$, and 240s in $J$. Individual frames were first dark-subtracted
574: and then flat-fielded with the average of adjacent empty sky frames, after editing
575: them for stars (to avoid``holes'' in the reduced frames) and applying an
576: average $\sigma$ clipping algorithm.
577: The reduced frames were then aligned and averaged. All data reduction was
578: carried out in the IRAF environment.
579:
580: Photometric calibration was performed by observing standard stars from
581: the UKIRT
582: Faint Standard List \citep{hawarden01} before and after the source
583: observations. Each standard star was measured in several different positions
584: on the array and flat-fielded by dividing the clipped mean of the remaining
585: frames in the sequence. To correct the standard-star photometry for
586: atmospheric extinction, we used the UKIRT mean extinction coefficients of
587: 0.102, 0.059, and 0.088 mag per air mass for $J$, $H$, and $K$, respectively.
588: Formal photometric accuracy, as measured by the dispersion in the
589: standard-star magnitudes, is 0.025 mag in $J$ and $H$ and 0.04 mag in $K$.
590: Color images were derived by registering the images to a few tenths of a pixel
591: with a cross-correlation algorithm, then subtracting the magnitude images.
592:
593: As for IRAC, we have fitted ellipses to the $J$, $H$ and $K$ images of \mrk,
594: and $J$, $H$, and $K$ elliptically-averaged radial profiles have been derived.
595: The $K$ surface brightness profile, which reaches
596: a limiting surface brightness of $\sim$ 24 mag arcsec$^{-2}$,
597: is shown in the top right panel of Fig. \ref{fig:profile}.
598: The lower three panels show the \jh, \hk\ and \jk\ radial color profiles,
599: constructed from the $J$, $H$ and $K$ surface brightness profiles. In the last
600: three panels,
601: the dotted line indicates the average color of the underlying disk.
602:
603: \subsection{\label{sec:mmt} MMT Optical Observations}
604:
605: %\subsection{An unusual optical spectrum}
606:
607: As the $HST$ optical spectra \citep{thuan96}
608: have somewhat low spectral resolution
609: ($\sim$ 6\AA\ in the blue or $\sim$ 350 km s$^{-1}$), higher
610: resolution optical spectra are needed to allow for a deconvolution
611: of the line profiles into narrow and broad components and better
612: study the gas motions in the inner and outer regions.
613: A new high signal-to-noise ratio
614: optical spectrum of Mrk 996 was obtained with the 6.5 m
615: MMT on the night of 2006 December 15.
616: Observations were made with the Blue Channel of the MMT spectrograph. We used
617: a 1\farcs5$\times$180\arcsec\ slit and a 800 grooves/mm grating in first order.
618: The above instrumental set-up gave a spatial scale along the slit of 0\farcs6
619: pixel$^{-1}$, a scale perpendicular to the slit of 0.75\AA\ pixel$^{-1}$,
620: a spectral range 3200 -- 5000\AA\ and a spectral resolution of 3\AA\ (FWHM).
621: The slit was oriented along the parallactic angle and the total exposure
622: time was 25 minutes. The observations were broken up into 3 subexposures to
623: %allow for removal of cosmic rays.
624: avoid saturation of the brightest lines.
625: The seeing was about 0\farcs8.
626: The Kitt Peak IRS spectroscopic standard stars Feige 110 and G191B2B
627: were observed for flux
628: calibration. Spectra of He-Ar comparison arcs were obtained
629: after the observations to calibrate the wavelength scale.
630:
631: The data reduction procedures are the same as described in
632: \citet{thuanizotov05}.
633: The two-dimensional spectra were bias subtracted and
634: flat-field corrected using IRAF.
635: We then use the IRAF
636: software routines IDENTIFY, REIDENTIFY, FITCOORD, TRANSFORM to
637: perform wavelength
638: calibration and correct for distortion and tilt for each frame.
639: Night sky subtraction was performed using the routine BACKGROUND.
640: The level of
641: night sky emission was determined from the closest regions to the galaxy
642: that are free of galaxian stellar and nebular line emission,
643: as well as of emission from foreground and background sources.
644: A one-dimensional spectrum was then extracted from the two-dimensional
645: frame using the APALL routine. Before extraction, the three
646: distinct two-dimensional spectra of Mrk 996
647: were carefully aligned using the spatial locations of the brightest part in
648: each spectrum, so that spectra were extracted at the same positions in all
649: subexposures.
650: We then summed the individual spectra
651: from each subexposure after manual removal of the cosmic rays hits.
652: The spectra obtained from each subexposure
653: were also checked for cosmic rays hits at the location of strong
654: emission lines, but none were found.
655:
656: Particular attention was paid to the derivation of the sensitivity curve.
657: It was obtained by
658: fitting with a high-order polynomial the observed spectral energy
659: distribution of the two standard stars.
660: Because the spectra of these stars have only a small number of a
661: relatively weak absorption features, their spectral energy distributions are
662: known with good accuracy ($\la$ 1\%).
663: Moreover, the response function of the CCD detector is smooth, so we could
664: derive a sensitivity curve with an accuracy better than 1\% over the
665: whole blue optical range.
666:
667: The resulting spectrum of Mrk 996 is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sp}.
668: The spectrum
669: is very rich in emission lines, which we have identified and labeled.
670: Because of its higher spectral resolution and signal-to-noise ratio,
671: the MMT spectrum shows many more weak emission lines than the
672: {\sl HST} spectrum, confirming, strenthening and extending
673: many of the findings of \citet{thuan96}: 1) the He {\sc i}
674: line intensities such as that of the He {\sc i}
675: $\lambda$4471 emission line are unusually large.
676: There are many weak He {\sc i} lines that are not ordinarily seen
677: such as the $\lambda$3820, $\lambda$4121, $\lambda$4143 and $\lambda$4388
678: lines;
679: 2) the widths of the emission lines of high-ionization stages
680: are broader than those of low-ionization stages; 3) there are strong,
681: broad Wolf-Rayet bumps at $\lambda$4640 and $\lambda$4686,
682: suggesting the presence of a large WN stellar population.
683: \citet{thuan96} have also
684: detected a C {\sc iv} WR bump at $\lambda$5808, indicative of WC stars.
685: In addition, the spectrum shows the presence of numerous weak [Fe {\sc ii}]
686: and [Fe {\sc iii}] lines. The spectrum goes far into the blue, which
687: allows us to check for the presence of the
688: [Ne {\sc v}] $\lambda$3426 line, an indicator of hard ionizing radiation
689: since its ionization potential is 7.1 Rydberg. It is not seen.
690: The [Fe {\sc v}] $\lambda$4227
691: with an ionization potential of 4 Rydberg is also absent.
692: The He {\sc ii} $\lambda$4686, also with an ionization potential of 4 Rydberg,
693: is seen but its broad width suggests that it originates in stellar
694: winds of WR stars, not from the ionized interstellar gas.
695: The Balmer jump, clearly seen at
696: $\lambda$3646, is useful for determining the temperature of the H$^+$
697: zone \citep{guseva06}.
698:
699: The observed line fluxes $F$($\lambda$) normalized to $F$(\hb) and multiplied by 100
700: and their errors, are given in
701: Table \ref{tabint}. They were measured using the IRAF SPLOT routine. The
702: line flux errors listed include statistical errors derived with SPLOT from
703: non flux-calibrated spectra, in addition to errors introduced in the standard
704: star absolute flux calibration. Since the differences between the
705: response curves derived for the two standard stars are not greater than 1\%,
706: we set the errors in flux calibration to 1\% of the line fluxes.
707: The line fluxes were corrected for both reddening \citep{w58}
708: and underlying hydrogen stellar absorption derived simultaneously by an
709: iterative procedure as described in \citet{itl94}. The corrected line fluxes 100 $\times$
710: $I$($\lambda$)/$I$(\hb) and equivalent widths EW($\lambda$) are also given in
711: Table \ref{tabint}.
712:
713: Comparison of the relative line intensities given in
714: Table \ref{tabint} with those measured by \citet{thuan96} shows general
715: good agreement. The largest deviation concerns the [O {\sc ii}] $\lambda$3727
716: line which is about 1.5 times larger. We attribute this difference
717: to an aperture effect: the {\sl HST} aperture is circular with a diameter
718: of 0\farcs86 while the MMT slit width is 1\farcs5. Since the low-ionization
719: ions are produced in the outer less dense regions, a larger aperture would
720: have a larger [O {\sc ii}] to \hb\ ratio.
721:
722:
723:
724: \section{Imaging Results: The Infrared Morphology of \mrk}
725:
726: We now use the UKIRT near-infrared and the
727: Spitzer IRAC and MIPS mid-infrared imaging data
728: to study the origin of the infrared emission in \mrk.
729:
730: \subsection{An exponential disk of $\ga$ 1 Gyr old stars}
731:
732: The top left and right panels of Fig. \ref{fig:profile} show respectively
733: the IRAC and $K$-band surface
734: brightness profiles of \mrk, which are very similar to the $V$ and $I$ profiles given by
735: \citet{thuan96}. In the radius range $r$ $\ge$ 4\arcsec, they can be fit by
736: an exponential law of the form $\mu_K$ = 17.1 + 0.29 $r$(\arcsec),
737: $\mu_{4.5}$ = 16.7 + 0.25 $r$(\arcsec),
738: corresponding to scale lengths $\alpha$$_K^{-1}$ $\sim$ $\alpha$$_{4.5}^{-1}$
739: $\sim$0.4\,kpc, similar
740: to the $V$ and $I$ scale lengths. This means that for $r$ $\ge$ 4\arcsec, there
741: is no $V-K$ color gradient, and hence no stellar population change in
742: the underlying extended low surface brightness component. This
743: is also consistent with the constant $V-I$ (= 0.80) \citep{thuan96},
744: \jh\ (=0.57) and \hk\ (=0.14) colors observed
745: for $r$ $\ge$ 4\arcsec\ (panels 2 and 3 of Fig.\ref{fig:profile}).
746: These colors have been corrected for Galactic extinction $A_V$=0.146\,mag
747: \citep{schlegel98} with the \citet{cardelli89} interstellar extinction curve.
748:
749: The colors correspond to a coeval stellar population formed about 1\,Gyr ago
750: %in a burst of infinitely
751: %short duration, with a Salpeter slope for the initial mass function and
752: %lower and upper mass limits of 0.15 $M_\odot$ and 120 $M_\odot$ respectively,
753: %based on the stellar population models of \citet{tantalo96} with $Z$= 0.0004,
754: %i.e. $Z_\odot$/50.
755: %The metallicity of the stars in the outer part
756: %of \mrk\ is not known,
757: %but is most likely less than the ionized gas metallicity of $Z_\odot$/5.
758: %In any case, the $Z_\odot$/5 models do not give a good fit to the observed
759: %colors, the $J-K$ color being too red for single stellar populations with
760: %ages between 1 and 20 Gyr.
761: according to the models of \citet{vazquez05}.
762: This age is fairly well constrained by the models for the optical colors,
763: but in the NIR, models are still unable to completely predict broadband
764: colors for intermediate-age stellar populations at sub-solar metallicities
765: \citep[e.g.,][]{origlia99,mouhcine02,vazquez05}.
766: The influence of red supergiants and asymptotic giant branch stars at
767: ages of $\la$1\,Gyr increase with decreasing metallicities, and predicted
768: NIR colors tend to be too blue in \jh\ and too red in \hk\ as compared to
769: the observed ones.
770: In any case, the observed NIR colors are clearly not those of
771: old stellar populations in spiral disks, dominated by low-mass giants
772: \citep[e.g.,][]{dejong96,peletier97,hunt97}.
773: The oldest stars are probably older than 1\,Gyr as
774: the star formation in \mrk\ is likely more spread out in time
775: as compared to the instantaneous star formation
776: models we have used.
777:
778: \subsection{A very red nucleus}
779:
780: Just like the $V$ and $I$ surface brightness profiles \citep{thuan96},
781: the $K$ profile shows a very steep gradient toward the nucleus.
782: While the $V-I$ profile becomes rather blue, in the near-infrared
783: the striking feature of the nuclear region is its
784: extremely red \jk\ color, equal
785: to $\simgt$1.8, as compared to the \jk\ color of the disk equal only to $\sim$0.7.
786: Examination of the lower right panels of
787: Fig. \ref{fig:profile} shows that the redness of the
788: nuclear region comes mainly from its \hk\ color (equal to $\sim$1.0 as compared
789: to the \hk\ = 0.1 of the disk),
790: and less from its \jh\ color.
791: The red colors cannot be produced by gaseous emission as
792: pure gaseous colors are \jh\ = 0.0 and \hk\ = 0.6 \citep{hunt03}.
793: The redness is more important at longer wavelengths,
794: suggesting that it may be caused by a very hot dust component
795: in the nucleus of \mrk,
796: similar to, although more extreme than, other star-forming galaxies
797: \citep{hunt02}.
798: %As seen later,
799: %we estimate the A$_V$ in the nuclear region to be only 3-4 mag.
800: %A hot dust component has been detected
801: % in another BCD, SBS 0335--052E \citep{vanzi00}. There,
802: %the NIR and MIR could be fitted by the sum of two dust components, a
803: %warm component at 226 K and a hot component at 668 K. However, the JHK
804: %colors of the star-forming regions of SBS 0335--052E (\jh\ = 0.2 and \hk\ =
805: %0.6) are not as extreme as those of the nucleus of \mrk, and it may be that
806: %even very hot dust (with a temperature of $\sim$ 1000 K) cannot account for
807: %the very red nuclear \jk\ color [Leslie, can you check this? Can
808: %a fit similar to Fig. 10 in Vanzi et al. 2000 be produced for Mrk 996?].
809: %The hypothesis of a significant amount of very hot dust appears
810: %to be ruled out by the shape of the
811: %spectral energy distribution (Fig. \ref{fig:sed}) which peaks longwards of
812: %160 \micron.
813:
814: Since the brightness gradient toward the nucleus is very steep, we have
815: checked whether variable seeing for different exposures
816: can be responsible for the very red colors observed. We found that
817: the red \jk\ color of $\geq$2 shown in the color profile is
818: slightly enhanced because of the better
819: seeing in the $K$ band image than in the $J$ band image.
820: However, the very red \hk\ color cannot be attributed to seeing effects.
821: The seeing was 0\farcs9 (FWHM) during the $H$ band observations, and
822: 0\farcs8 in the $K$ band observations.
823: We have convolved the $K$-band image to the $H$-band seeing, and
824: produced a new \hk\ color image. The
825: nuclear color in this new image is $\simeq$1.0,
826: just as in the profile shown in Fig. \ref{fig:profile}.
827: We have also checked the \jh\ color. The
828: registration process necessary to align the images
829: already degrades the $H$ band image to the seeing of the $J$-band image
830: of 1\farcs0.
831: The resulting nuclear \jh\ color is $\sim$0.8.
832: Thus,
833: %although better seeing in $K$ causes the apparent \jk\ color of $\sim$2.2
834: %in the profiles, after correcting for seeing effects
835: the nuclear colors are still very red after correction for seeing effects:
836: \hk\ = 1.0, and \jh\ = 0.8.
837: %Hence, we conclude that seeing differences in the three bands
838: %cannot be the cause of the red \hk\ nuclear color.
839:
840: %In \mrk, the \hk\ color is apparently too red to be
841: %simply hot dust heated by a starburst. %, without invoking peculiar grain properties.
842: Fig. \ref{fig:jhk} shows in a (\jh, \hk) diagram, as filled rectangles connected by a
843: dotted line and from right to left,
844: the colors of the nucleus, of a circumnuclear location,
845: and of a disk location in \mrk,
846: together with
847: those of IR-bright starburst galaxies \citep{hunt02} (open stars),
848: of selected BCDs (asterisks) including NGC 5253, SBS 0335--052 \citep{hunt02},
849: and Haro 3 \citep{johnson04}, and of Seyfert galaxies (filled circles)
850: \citep{alonso01}.
851: We have also shown in Fig. \ref{fig:jhk}
852: mixing curves that illustrate how adding various physical
853: components to the stellar component modify the $JHK$ colors of the disk
854: of \mrk, corrected for the K effect and Galactic
855: extinction. The five solid lines from top to bottom show respectively
856: the effects of dust extinction, of a hot dust component at 600\,K and 1000\,K,
857: of free-free gas emission and of an A-star
858: population.
859: It can be seen that the $JHK$ colors of the disk of \mrk\ are similar
860: to the colors of other BCDs, and
861: slightly bluer than those of normal (metal-rich) starbursts, but that
862: the \hk\ color of the nucleus of \mrk\ is considerably redder.
863: While other BCDs show a clear contribution from ionized gas,
864: the $JHK$ colors of \mrk\ show a significant component of
865: hot dust, with a dust temperature between 600 and 1000\,K.
866: %In that respect, the nuclear colors of \mrk\ are perhaps more
867: %similar to those of low-luminosity
868: %Seyfert galaxies than to those of most starbursts.
869: %Intriguingly, the very red colors are comparable to
870: %those of nuclei of bright Seyfert 1 galaxies \citep{enya02}.
871: %It is sufficiently red in \jk\ that \mrk\ would have been picked out
872: %by AGN surveys selecting objects with \jk$\geq$2 \citep{cutri01}.
873:
874: %We are thus led to invoke an AGN
875: %at the center of \mrk\ to explain its very red nuclear colors.
876:
877: What is the appearance of the nucleus at longer wavelengths?
878: Examination of the MIPS images (Fig. \ref{fig:mipsoverlay}) shows that
879: it is clearly detected at 24, 70 and 160\,\micron.
880: The emission at 24 and 70\,\micron\ is virtually point-like, as shown by
881: the characteristic Airy rings seen in the top two panels of
882: Fig. \ref{fig:mipsoverlay}, and from the growth curves in Fig. \ref{fig:phot}.
883: However, the emission at 160\,\micron\ appears to be more extended, as is
884: also evident from its growth curve, suggesting a significant contribution from
885: the galaxy disk.
886:
887: \subsection{The circumnuclear PAH emission}
888:
889: Examination of Fig. \ref{fig:irac} and of the growth curves shows that both the
890: 4.5 and 8.0 \micron\ emissions are more extended than that of a point source.
891: While the 8\,\micron\ emission comes mainly
892: from the nuclear and inner-disk regions (out to
893: a radius of $\sim$10\arcsec\ or 1.1\,kpc), the 4.5\,\micron\ image shows
894: extended emission out to a radius of $\sim$ 20\arcsec\ or 2.2\,kpc,
895: comparable in extent to the optical light (see the left panel of
896: Fig.\ref{fig:hstiracoverlay}). Because of the relative lack of
897: 8\,\micron\ emission in the outer disk, the flux ratio map
898: (Fig.\ref{fig:iraccolor}) is very noisy there. Examination of the right panel
899: Fig.\ref{fig:hstiracoverlay} shows that
900: the 4.5\micron\ peak coincides with the bright blue star-forming nucleus
901: of \mrk\ rather than with the red dust patch to the northwest
902: \citep[see Fig. 4a of][]{thuan96}.
903: This suggests that the MIR emission is mainly associated with
904: %the hot dust and/or the AGN
905: the source responsible for the very red {\it nuclear} \jk\ color.
906: %Inspection of Fig. \ref{fig:hstiracoverlay} shows that the 4.5/8 flux
907: %ratio varies by more than a factor of 8 over the galaxy, peaking at $\sim$ 0.8
908: %in the nuclear star-forming region and decreasing to $\sim$ 0.1 in the
909: %cicumnuclear regions.
910: Fig. \ref{fig:iraccolor} shows that the 4.5/8 flux
911: ratio is relatively constant ($\sim$0.7) outside the nuclear region
912: (see \S\ref{sec:iracdata}), although
913: beyond $r$ $\sim$18\arcsec, the color map becomes too noisy to give reliable
914: colors.
915: This can also be seen in the lower left panel of Fig. \ref{fig:profile}
916: where, for radii larger than $\sim$ 6\arcsec, the radial color profile shows a
917: relatively constant
918: [4.5]$-$[8.0] color of 1.5, corresponding to a 4.5/8 flux ratio of $\sim$0.7.
919: The apparent gradient in the circumnuclear region at the radius of
920: $\sim$ 4\arcsec\
921: is due to the mismatch of the diffraction-limited IRAC point-response functions
922: at 4.5 \mic\ and 8 \mic.
923: Because the 4.5/8 color of stellar populations is $\sim2.5$,
924: roughly independently of age and metallicity \citep{sb99},
925: it is clear that the infrared emission of \mrk\ is dominated by the ISM,
926: and not by stars.
927:
928: If we interpret the 8\,\micron\ emission in the
929: usual way and attribute it primarily to PAHs, then
930: the 4.5/8 ratio $\sim$0.7 %in the circumnuclear regions
931: implies a contribution from PAHs in the ISM around the
932: nuclear star-forming region of \mrk.
933: This interpretation is indeed supported by the detection of
934: strong PAH features in the IRS spectrum discussed in the next section.
935: These PAHs
936: are probably located in the outer low-density
937: region with 400 pc $\la$ $r$ $\la$ 1000 pc, since they
938: are likely destroyed by the strong UV radiation field in the
939: nuclear region.
940: However, our observations do not have sufficient spatial resolution
941: to verify this.
942: %So it is most
943: %probably a combination of the lack of PAH molecules
944: %in the nuclear region and of
945: %hot dust/AGN emission (which increases the continuum level at
946: %4.5 \micron\ relative to its level at 8\micron) that gives the nuclear region
947: %its high 4.5/8\micron\ ratio of $\sim$ 1 in Fig. \ref{fig:hstiracoverlay}.
948:
949:
950: \section{Spectroscopic results}
951:
952: \subsection{PAH features}
953:
954: The IRS spectra (Fig. \ref{fig:irs}) show clearly PAH features at 5.7, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.2 and 12.8
955: \micron. The flux, the equivalent width EW and the full width at half maximum
956: FWHM
957: of each PAH feature have been derived by fitting Lorentzian profiles
958: (Gaussian profiles do not give good fits) with
959: the SPLOT task in IRAF. They
960: are given in Table \ref{tab:pahs}. The continuum
961: was linearly interpolated in two sections, one
962: from 6-9\,\micron, and the other from 10.5-13.9\,\micron. Standard deviations
963: of repeated measurements are given in parentheses.
964: The relative strengths of the three main PAH emission features can
965: be used as diagnostics to
966: identify PAH sizes and infer the neutral-to-ionized gas ratio
967: \citep{draine01}.
968: According to the models of \citet{draine01}, the
969: observed PAH flux ratios $f_{11.2}/f_{7.7}$ equal to 0.40 and
970: $f_{6.2}/f_{7.7}$ equal to 0.27 indicate that
971: the PAHs in \mrk\ are predominantly neutral and small, containing a
972: few hundred carbon atoms, similar to the
973: normal galaxies studied by \citet{helou00}. In other words, just as \hh,
974: \mrk\ lies in
975: the ``normal galaxy'' region in the PAH diagnostic diagram rather than in the
976: starburst galaxy region which includes objects such as M\,82 and NGC\,253,
977: that are dominated by ionized PAHs.
978: This would imply, at face value, that the PAHs in \mrk\ arise
979: mainly from the normal cold and neutral ISM surrounding the nuclear region,
980: but not from the star-forming region itself.
981: However,
982: the PAH EWs are generally high, $\sim 3.6$\mic\ for the 7.7\,\micron\ line, which is
983: more typical of starburst galaxies \citep{brandl04} than of
984: BCDs. \citet{wu06} found that the EW of the 7.7\,\micron\ line of all
985: the BCDs in their sample to be less than 1 \micron, considerably smaller
986: than the value of 3.6 \micron\ in \mrk.
987: %Overall, \hh\ follows the metallicity trends of
988: %increasing PAH EW with increasing oxygen abundance reported by \citet{wu06}
989: %which are probably related to the metallicity effect suggested
990: %and discussed by \citet{hogg05} and \citet{engelbracht05}.
991: For the metallicity of \mrk,
992: the EWs of its 6.2 and 11.2 \micron\ PAH features exceed by more
993: one order of magnitude the values given by the mean EW (PAH) -- metallicity
994: relations given by \citet{wu06} for their BCD sample.
995:
996: Just as for \hh,
997: we find that the PAH emission features in \mrk\ are relatively narrow.
998: They are narrower than those predicted by
999: the model for the
1000: diffuse Galactic ISM at high latitudes \citep{li01}. While the
1001: 6.2 \micron\ and 7.7 \micron\ features have FWHMs similar to those of
1002: the starburst galaxies M 82 and NGC 253, the 8.6 \micron\ feature is
1003: about half as wide while the 11.3 \micron\ feature is twice as wide. The best
1004: matches to the
1005: FWHMs of the PAH features in \mrk\ appear to be those of
1006: the reflection nebulae region NGC\,2023. Thus, neither the diffuse
1007: Galactic ISM model nor the starburst model of \citet{li01} and \citet{draine01}
1008: can account fully for all the
1009: observed properties of the PAHs in \mrk. Even though the IRS spectrum of
1010: \mrk\ may contain a conspicuous
1011: ISM component, Galactic ISM spectra are not necessarily good templates
1012: for all PAH emission in this object.
1013: This suggests that there are many factors that determine the properties of
1014: PAH features (e.g., chemical abundance, ISM energetics, etc.)
1015: which are not yet taken into account fully in the models.
1016: A more definitive observational
1017: test of the models, with a fuller exploration of the
1018: parameter space, will be possible with our larger sample of
1019: 23 BCDs.
1020: % where the PAH parameters will be determined in an uniform manner
1021: %to avoid systematic effects \citep[e.g., {\it PAHFIT}\,:][]{pahfit06}.
1022:
1023:
1024:
1025: \subsection{Infrared Fine-Structure Lines \label{sec:lines}}
1026:
1027: The spectrum in Fig. \ref{fig:irs}
1028: also shows several fine-structure lines. The
1029: \siv $\lambda$10.51, \neii $\lambda$12.81,
1030: \neiii $\lambda$15.55, \siii $\lambda$18.71, 33.58, and
1031: \oiv $\lambda$25.89 \micron\ are seen.
1032: In the same way as for the PAH features, we used
1033: SPLOT to fit the IR fine-structure emission lines and obtain
1034: fluxes and EWs.
1035: A deblending procedure was adopted to accurately measure
1036: the emission lines at wavelengths near PAH features
1037: (e.g., \neii).
1038: The lines were best fit with Gaussian profiles.
1039: A single continuum was linearly interpolated from 10.5 to $\sim15$\,\micron.
1040: For the longer wavelengths, the local continuum was fit by linearly
1041: interpolating over adjacent line-free regions.
1042: The continuum 1$\sigma$ uncertainty in the SH module is
1043: $\simeq0.18\times10^{-17}$\,W\,m$^{-2}$, and
1044: $\simeq0.11\times10^{-17}$\,W\,m$^{-2}$ in LH.
1045: The fluxes and other parameters resulting from the fits
1046: are given in Table \ref{tab:lines}.
1047:
1048: Several fairly high-ionization lines are detected in \mrk.
1049: The \oiv$\lambda$25.89\,\micron\ line with an ionization potential of
1050: 54.9\,eV, just beyond the \heii\ edge at 54.4\,eV, is faint, but present
1051: at the 4$\sigma$ level.
1052: A blown-up view of the spectral region around the \oiv\ line is shown
1053: in Fig. \ref{fig:oiv}.
1054: %Its detection is consistent with the Wolf-Rayet population present
1055: %in \mrk 's nuclear starburst region \citep{thuan96}.
1056: However its presence raises a puzzle.
1057: As discussed before, the optical spectrum of \mrk\ does not show
1058: the presence of the high-ionization \fev\ $\lambda$4227 emission line
1059: which also has an ionization potential of 54.4\,eV.
1060: The \heii\ $\lambda$4686 emission line, also with an
1061: ionization potential of 54.4\,eV, is seen, but its broad width suggests that
1062: it originates in WR stellar winds rather than in the ionized
1063: interstellar gas.
1064: This implies that the ionizing radiation in the optical line-emitting
1065: region is less hard than that in
1066: the MIR line-emitting region.
1067: %This may suggest the presence of substantial extinction in the blue,
1068: %or indicate that the optical and MIR radiations come
1069: %from different locations in the star-forming region, or both.
1070: %(see also $\S$\ref{sec:cloudy} and $\S$\ref{sec:dust}).
1071:
1072: We can have some idea of the hardness of the
1073: radiation in the MIR-emitting region by using
1074: line ratios of different ionic species of the same element,
1075: such as \neiii\ and \neii, since these are sensitive to the shape of the
1076: spectrum of the ionizing radiation field.
1077: The ratio $F$(\neiii)/$F$(\neii) is 2.8, placing \mrk\
1078: near the high-excitation end of the starbursts studied by
1079: \citet{verma03}, similarly to NGC\,5253 and \hh.
1080: Because PAHs tend to be depleted in hard radiation fields,
1081: their EW would be expected to be negatively correlated with
1082: the \neiii/\neii\ line ratio.
1083: Such a trend was indeed found by \citet{wu06} for their BCD sample.
1084: The anticorrelation between the PAH strength and the hardness and
1085: luminosity of the UV radiation field was also discussed
1086: by \citet{b06} in the case the irregular galaxy NGC 5253 and by
1087: \citet{l07} in the case of the massive young cluster NGC 3603.
1088: However, as discussed before, compared to the \citet{wu06} correlation,
1089: the PAHs in \mrk\ have considerably higher EWs for their metallicity.
1090: This may again be due to a significant
1091: PAH component from the general ISM in \mrk\ as compared to the BCDs studied
1092: by \citet{wu06}, as
1093: the region of \mrk\ covered by the IRS slit is relatively large,
1094: about 700\,pc.
1095: The large EWs may also be the results of
1096: different measurement techniques, as \citet{wu06}
1097: fit a spline to the local underlying continuum, while we linearly interpolate over
1098: two wide sections of continua.
1099:
1100: The long-wavelength IRS spectrum (Fig. \ref{fig:irs})
1101: shows an emission feature at $\lambda$29.84\,\mic,
1102: the wavelength of
1103: one of the strongest \water\ lines in this spectral region.
1104: Such a detection would not perhaps be surprising,
1105: as water can form in shock-heated gas associated with outflows
1106: \citep[e.g.,][and references therein]{melnick08}.
1107: However, we would also expect to detect a wealth of \htwo\ lines
1108: which are not clearly seen in our spectrum (Fig. \ref{fig:irs}).
1109: Hence, it is not clear whether this is a real feature or not.
1110: We will investigate the frequency of water emission
1111: in a future paper on our larger BCD sample.
1112:
1113: %In principle, the electron density of the MIR-emitting region can be
1114: %estimated using the temperature-insensitive
1115: %\siii\ lines.
1116: %Taken at face value, the flux ratio $F$(33.48)/$F$(18.71) is 1.5, well into
1117: %the low-density limit \citep{draine06}.
1118: %The implied electron density is $\sim$100\,cm$^{-3}$, which is somewhat low.
1119: %This low density is probably due to the fact that $F$(18.71) and $F$(33.48)
1120: %are measured through differing apertures
1121:
1122:
1123:
1124: %Even with a maximum uncertainty on the \siii\ flux ratio of $\sim$20\%, these
1125: %two densities are inconsistent.
1126: %Beam dilution could be affecting the MIR line ratios,
1127: %since the IRS aperture is several times larger than the optical one.
1128: %Alternatively, this discrepancy could be again suggesting
1129: %that the optical emission comes from a different spatial location
1130: %in the star-forming region A as compared to the MIR emission.
1131:
1132:
1133:
1134: \subsection{The Infrared Spectral Energy Distribution}
1135:
1136: We combine the available photometric and spectroscopic data to
1137: construct the IR spectral energy distribution (SED) in Fig. \ref{fig:sed}.
1138: We have used the {\it total} emission from \mrk, integrated over
1139: the entire galaxy including the disk.
1140: The 8\,\micron\ IRAC point which is higher than the
1141: corresponding IRS point suggests that a significant part of the PAH emission
1142: in the disk lies in a region more extended than the one
1143: covered by the IRS SL slit.
1144: The coincidence of the MIPS 24\,\micron\ point with the IRS spectral one
1145: lends confidence to our data reduction procedures, including background
1146: subtraction and flux calibration.
1147:
1148: It can be seen that the SED has a broad peak from 80
1149: to 160\,\micron, implying that the dust in the disk of \mrk\ must be
1150: rather cool, $\la$20\,K.
1151: Indeed, this broad peak toward longer wavelengths is almost certainly due
1152: to the ``mixed morphology'' of \mrk.
1153: Up to $\la$70\,\micron, \mrk\ is
1154: virtually a point source,
1155: dominated by
1156: %either the AGN or
1157: the compact nuclear star-forming region;
1158: but at longer wavelengths, the disk dominates with its contribution of cooler
1159: dust.
1160: Hence, the SED does not show a well-defined spectral peak,
1161: but rather a smeared-out
1162: one, due to the contributions of dust at different temperatures from different
1163: regions.
1164: %This would imply that hot dust emission is not important.
1165:
1166: %As discussed before, to explain the very red color
1167: %of the nucleus, we need to invoke an AGN at the center of \mrk.
1168: %Hence, we have not attempted to fit its SED with embedded star-cluster
1169:
1170: We have compared in Fig. \ref{fig:sed} the SED of \mrk\ with
1171: model SEDs of starburst galaxies such as Arp\,220 and M\,82,
1172: taken from \citet{silva98}.
1173: These models, normalized to continuum emission between 20 and 30\,\micron,
1174: clearly do not fit the SED of \mrk\ \citep[see also the discussion of][]{hunt05}:
1175: \mrk\ shows no silicate absorption feature at $\sim$10\,\micron,
1176: relatively little PAH emission compared to a luminous solar-metallicity
1177: starburst galaxy, and a very different MIR continuum slope.
1178: Moreover, in \mrk,
1179: the unabsorbed emission that emerges at NIR and optical wavelengths
1180: is greater relative to the dust emission, when compared
1181: to the prototypical starburst galaxies M\,82 and Arp\,220.
1182: This is most probably due to a lower extinction and thus to a lower fraction
1183: of dust reprocessing, but could also be due to differing dust content
1184: relative to the stars.
1185: %We are investigating this topic in a future paper.
1186:
1187: %We have also attempted to fit the SED of \mrk\ with spherically symmetric
1188: %radiative transfer \dusty\
1189: %models \citep{elitzur}. We present two separate \dusty\ fits:
1190: %one normalized over the whole 8 \mic\ -- 1 mm SED
1191: %range (Fig. \ref{fig:dustyfull})
1192: %and one normalized only over the MIR range, from 9 to 15 \mic
1193: %(Fig. \ref{fig:dustymir}). The first \dusty\
1194: %model is
1195: %characterized by a starburst age of xx Myr, by dust grains
1196: %composed of xx\% silicate, xx\% graphite and xx\% amorphous carbon,
1197: %and with sizes varying between xx \mic\ and xx \mic. This model
1198: %gives an unrealistic extinction of nearly 50 mag because of the
1199: %unusual shape of the SED in the 80--160 \mic\ range (Fig. \ref{fig:dustyfull}).
1200: %The second \dusty\ model is
1201: %characterized by a starburst age of xx Myr,
1202: %by dust grains
1203: %composed of xx\% silicate, xx\% graphite and xx\% amorphous carbon,
1204: %and with sizes varying between xx \mic\ and xx \mic. It gives nearly
1205: %zero extinction. The residuals are low in the
1206: %normalization zone, but the model
1207: %fails to fit the SED at wavelengths longer than 20
1208: %\mic\ (Fig. \ref{fig:dustymir}).
1209: %We do not believe that either fit is realistic.
1210: We have also compared the SED of \mrk\ with that of the Seyfert 1 galaxy
1211: NGC\,4151 \citep{buchanan06},
1212: normalized over the 9 -15 \mic\ region (Fig. \ref{fig:agn}).
1213: While this SED gives low residuals in the normalization zone, il fails to
1214: fit the SED for wavelengths longer than 15 \mic. Clearly, dust reprocessing of
1215: the H {\sc ii} region radiation dominates the SED of \mrk\ at longer wavelengths.
1216: The surrounding cooler ISM also contributes significantly, resulting in
1217: a roughly constant (in flux density) SED from 70 to 160 \mic.
1218:
1219: In summary, like most other star-forming
1220: galaxies \citep[see the discussion of the BCD
1221: \hh\ in ][]{hunt06}, \mrk\ is a composite entity in the IR;
1222: different components and morphologies are seen
1223: at different wavelengths. In \mrk,
1224: at $JHK$ we see the clear signature of a very red nucleus,
1225: and the evolved extended underlying stellar population in the disk;
1226: similarly, at 4.5\,\micron\ we see a nuclear hot dust continuum
1227: %and/or probable AGN emission
1228: and the evolved stars in the disk;
1229: %circumstellar photospheric emission
1230: at 8\,\micron, we see mostly
1231: %hot dust continuum and/or probable AGN emission in the nucleus and
1232: extended PAH emission in the general ISM;
1233: at 24 and 70\,\micron, we see unresolved emission from warm dust
1234: associated with the nucleus; and
1235: %and/or probable AGN emission
1236: at 160\,\micron\ cooler extended dust emission in the disk.
1237: %This IR description of \mrk\ is remarkably similar to that of
1238: %\hh\ \citep{hunt06},
1239: %with the exception of the 8 \micron\ emission which is more extended in
1240: %\hh\ than in \mrk, coming
1241: %from hot dust and stars in the ISM surrounding the most active star-forming region
1242: %(region A) in \hh.
1243:
1244: \section{CLOUDY modeling of the emission-line fluxes \label{cloudy}}
1245:
1246: %We next use the CLOUDY code to model the line-emitting regions.
1247:
1248: \subsection{The narrow and broad line components of \mrk}
1249:
1250: Thanks to a higher
1251: spectral resolution than that of the IRS spectrum,
1252: it can be seen clearly from the MMT optical spectrum
1253: (Fig. \ref{fig:sp}) that some lines
1254: have two components: a narrow component at high intensity levels
1255: and a broad component at low intensity levels. We have used SPLOT to
1256: deconvolve the profiles of these lines into narrow and broad components.
1257: %fit first a
1258: %narrow profile to the high intensity part of each strong line.
1259: %The narrow profile is then subtracted from the line profile and
1260: %SPLOT is used to fit the remaining profile.
1261: The deconvolution results are shown in Table \ref{tabdeconv}. It
1262: gives for both components the line flux of each detected
1263: line normalized to the \hb\ flux and
1264: its
1265: %full width at half maximum (
1266: FWHM.
1267: %).
1268: The narrow
1269: component of the [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda$4363 line is negligible.
1270: Three facts are to be noticed in Table \ref{tabdeconv}. First, the narrow
1271: line component has FWHMs varying between 2.6 and 3.5 \AA,
1272: comparable to the spectral resolution. It is thus not resolved, giving
1273: upper limits of
1274: gas velocities between 87 and 135 km s$^{-1}$.
1275: On the other hand, the broad
1276: line component has FWHMs varying between 6.1 and 8.5 \AA,
1277: corresponding to gas velocities between
1278: 235 and 330 km s$^{-1}$. Second, the ratio of the auroral
1279: [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda$4363 line to that of the nebular
1280: [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda$4959 line for the
1281: broad component, equal to $\sim$ 0.45, is unusually high compared to its
1282: usual value of $\sim$ 0.1 for an electron temperature of 20 000 K,
1283: suggesting collisional deexcitation of the
1284: [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda$4959 line.
1285: Third, the intensities for the He {\sc i} lines relative to \hb\
1286: are different for the narrow and broad line components.
1287: For the
1288: He {\sc i} $\lambda$3889 line, the relative intensity of the broad component
1289: is smaller than that of the narrow component by a factor of 1.4, while for the
1290: He {\sc i} $\lambda$4471 line, the reverse is true, the broad component
1291: being more intense by a factor of 2.
1292:
1293: \citet{thuan96} have suggested that these observational features
1294: can be understood if the optical lines arise
1295: in two main regions: (1) the broad lines in a very dense inner region
1296: ($r$ $\la$ 100 pc)
1297: with large gas
1298: mass motions, most likely powered by stellar winds of the
1299: Wolf-Rayet stars, the presence of which is clearly indicated by the
1300: WR bump in the MMT spectrum (Fig. \ref{fig:sp})
1301: , and (2) the narrow lines in a considerably less dense outer
1302: region ($r$ $\ga$ several hundred pc),
1303: with a density more comparable to those in normal \hii\ regions,
1304: and smaller mass motions.
1305: In this type of model, the helium lines would arise in the dense inner
1306: region: the intensity of the He {\sc i} $\lambda$4471 emission line would
1307: be enhanced because of collisional excitation, while the intensity of
1308: the He {\sc i} $\lambda$3889 line which is
1309: sensitive to optical depth effects, would be decreased because of
1310: the higher optical depth.
1311: \citet{thuan96} were indeed able to construct an inhomogeneous
1312: two-zone CLOUDY model which
1313: accounts well for the observed line intensities of the UV and
1314: optical lines. Their best model has an inner region with
1315: a central electron density $N_e$ equal to 4.5 $\times$ 10$^6$ cm$^{-3}$
1316: and a density decreasing with radius $r$ as $r^{-2}$ out to a radius of 100 pc,
1317: and an outer region with a constant density
1318: $N_e$ = 450 cm$^{-3}$ for radii between 100 pc and
1319: 320 pc.
1320:
1321: %Thus, similar to an AGN,
1322: %Mrk 996 possesses both broad and narrow-line regions.
1323: %The
1324: %possible presence of an AGN in the dwarf galaxy is also suggested by the
1325: %very red \jk\ color of the nucleus as discussed before.
1326: In addition to the presence of distinct broad and narrow line regions,
1327: there is also a trend of increasing line width
1328: with ionization potential, similar to Seyfert galaxies
1329: \citep{derobertis84,whittle85}.
1330: However the gas clouds motions and densities in the broad-line region
1331: are not as large as in the case of an AGN. Also,
1332: the UV and optical spectra show no evidence of the very hard ionizing
1333: radiation that is usually present in an AGN. But, as discussed
1334: before, the detection of the
1335: [O {\sc iv}] $\lambda$25.9\mic\ emission line in the IRS spectrum
1336: (Fig. \ref{fig:irs}) does imply the presence of hard EUV radiation in the
1337: MIR-emitting region. However, hard ionizing radiation, as seen below,
1338: can be produced by shocks or by WNE-w stars, not necessarily by an AGN.
1339:
1340:
1341:
1342:
1343:
1344:
1345: %Even with a maximum uncertainty on the \siii\ flux ratio of $\sim$20\%, these
1346: %two densities are inconsistent.
1347: %Beam dilution could be affecting the MIR line ratios,
1348: %since the IRS aperture is several times larger than the optical one.
1349: %Alternatively, this discrepancy could be again suggesting
1350: %that the optical emission comes from a different spatial location
1351: %in the star-forming region A as compared to the MIR emission.
1352:
1353: \subsection{A hidden H {\sc ii} region}
1354:
1355: We now use CLOUDY to check
1356: whether the two-zone %density-bounded
1357: model constructed by
1358: \citet{thuan96} to account for the
1359: UV and optical line fluxes observed by {\sl HST}
1360: can also explain the MIR line fluxes observed by \spitzer.
1361:
1362: The parameters of the
1363: CLOUDY model used here
1364: are very similar to those of model 1 of \citet{thuan96}
1365: (the one with low nitrogen abundance). The slight differences are due to
1366: the updating of the CLOUDY code with new atomic parameters.
1367: %The model parameters are given in Table 3.
1368: However, since the {\sl Spitzer} and MMT spectra have been obtained through
1369: significantly larger apertures than the {\sl HST} aperture,
1370: we have
1371: increased the radius of the modeled \hii\ region to $\sim$ 580 pc in order
1372: to take into account the total H$\alpha$ emission of \mrk. This emission
1373: extends over an angular radius of $\sim$ 5\arcsec\ ($\sim$520\,pc)
1374: \citep{gildepaz03}, and is covered entirely by the LH IRS slits and
1375: mostly by the SH IRS slits.
1376: The model gives a \hb\ luminosity $L$(\hb) = 2.34$\times$10$^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$,
1377: corresponding to a
1378: number of ionizing photons per second, log $Q$(H) = 52.75.
1379: At the distance of 21.7 Mpc, this luminosity corresponds to a H$\beta$ flux
1380: $I$(H$\beta$) = 4.18$\times$10$^{-16}$ W m$^{-2}$. This flux is
1381: very similar to
1382: the H$\beta$ flux of 4.40$\times$10$^{-16}$ W m$^{-2}$ derived from the
1383: extinction-corrected H$\alpha$ flux measured for Mrk 996 by \citet{gildepaz03},
1384: adopting an extinction coefficient $C$(H$\beta$) = 0.53 and a
1385: H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ ratio of 2.8.
1386: As for the run of the number density with radius $r$,
1387: we have also adopted for the inner part
1388: (1 pc $\leq$ $r$ $\leq$ 100 pc) a $r$$^{-2}$ law, with a maximum
1389: log $N_e$ = 6.66
1390: at the inner boundary ($r$ = 1 pc), and a constant log $N_e$ = 2.645 for
1391: $r\geq$ 100 pc. The filling factor,
1392: log $f$ = $-$4.58, characteristic
1393: of a very clumpy interstellar medium, is the same as
1394: in \citet{thuan96}. Hereafter, this model will be referred to as Model I.
1395:
1396: \subsubsection{Comparison of observed and modeled optical line fluxes}
1397:
1398: First, we check that Model I is indeed
1399: able to reproduce the fluxes of the optical
1400: emission lines obtained from the MMT spectrum. Table \ref{tabcomparopt}
1401: lists the extinction-corrected observed fluxes
1402: and Model I fluxes of several strong
1403: optical lines along with their ratios. It is seen that
1404: the observed high-ionization [O {\sc iii}] and [Ne {\sc iii}] emission
1405: lines are well reproduced by the model, but that the observed fluxes of
1406: of the lower ionization [O {\sc ii}] $\lambda$3727 and H$\beta$ emission
1407: lines are significantly
1408: smaller (by factors of 2 and 1.7 respectively)
1409: than the modeled ones. Evidently, the difference is due to
1410: aperture effects because the aperture of the MMT spectrum does not
1411: cover all the emission from the \hii\ region, and
1412: the lower-ionization lines are produced further away from the
1413: nucleus than the high-ionization ones. Therefore, we have also calculated
1414: Model Ia, which has the same parameters as Model I,
1415: except that the radius of the modeled
1416: \hii\ region is equal to 410 pc instead
1417: of 580 pc. This radius was chosen so that the modeled H$\beta$ flux matches
1418: the observed H$\beta$ flux within the MMT aperture. Compared to
1419: Model I fluxes, the fluxes of the
1420: high-ionization lines in Model Ia remain unchanged, while the flux of the
1421: [O {\sc ii}] $\lambda$3727 emission line is considerably lower, bringing it
1422: into good agreement with the observed one, as
1423: shown in the last column of Table \ref{tabcomparopt}. Thus, we conclude that
1424: CLOUDY models with the parameters adopted above do indeed
1425: reproduce well the observed fluxes
1426: of the optical lines.
1427:
1428: \subsubsection{Comparison of observed and modeled MIR line fluxes}
1429:
1430: We next compare the observed MIR emission line fluxes with those
1431: predicted by Model I.
1432: Examination of columns 2 and 3 of
1433: Table \ref{tabcompar} shows that, despite similar
1434: observed and modeled fluxes of the optical lines,
1435: Model I predicts significantly
1436: lower MIR line fluxes, as compared to the observed ones,
1437: except for [Ne {\sc ii}]
1438: $\lambda$12.8 $\mu$m. There could be at least two explanations of
1439: this discrepancy: 1) aperture effects and 2)
1440: the presence of an additional obscured \hii\ region that is not seen in
1441: the optical range, but that contributes to the MIR emission.
1442:
1443: We consider first the possible role of aperture effects. The angular radius of
1444: the optical \hii\ region of $\sim$ 5\arcsec\ is significantly greater
1445: than half of the slit width used
1446: in the optical observations. It is greater than or
1447: comparable to half of the slit width used for the IRS spectra. Therefore,
1448: aperture effects may be important.
1449: In particular, these effects may play a role
1450: for the hydrogen lines and the low-ionization forbidden optical
1451: [O {\sc ii}] $\lambda$3727 and the MIR [Ne {\sc ii}] $\lambda$12.8\micron\
1452: lines because a significant fraction of emission in
1453: these lines comes from the outer zones of the \hii\ region. For
1454: higher-ionization lines, the aperture effects should be smaller
1455: because those
1456: lines arise in the inner zones of the \hii\ region. To check how aperture
1457: effects may influence the emission line fluxes, we show in Figure
1458: \ref{fig:aperture}
1459: the fluxes $F$ predicted by CLOUDY
1460: of different optical and MIR lines emitted by a \hii\ sphere with
1461: a varying radius $r$, keeping all other parameters equal to those
1462: of Model I. All fluxes are normalized to the
1463: fluxes $F_{max}$ from the sphere with the 580 pc outer radius of the \hii\
1464: region in Model I. We have also shown by vertical lines the ``equivalent''
1465: radii of the
1466: different apertures used in the optical and MIR observations,
1467: defined as $\sqrt{S/\pi}$, where $S$ is the area of the aperture. We
1468: also mark the location of the outer radius of the \hii\
1469: region in Model I. The
1470: $F/F_{max}$ ratios cannot be used directly for aperture corrections since they
1471: are derived for spheres, while the observed emission comes
1472: from a cylindric column with equivalent radius $r$. They
1473: provide however upper limits to the aperture corrections and
1474: Fig. \ref{fig:aperture} can be used for a qualitative analysis.
1475: It is seen from that figure that
1476: aperture corrections are important for some optical
1477: lines, especially the [O {\sc ii}] $\lambda$3727 line, as confirmed
1478: by comparison of the {\sl HST} and MMT fluxes: the MMT flux
1479: (Table \ref{tabint})
1480: is 1.5 times larger than the {\sl HST} flux \citep{thuan96}.
1481: The {\sl HST} and MMT H$\beta$ fluxes are respectively $\sim$ 3 and
1482: 2 times lower
1483: than the one inferred from
1484: the H$\alpha$ flux by \citet{gildepaz03}. On the other hand, the aperture
1485: correction is negligible for higher-ionization optical lines, such as
1486: [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007. The aperture corrections for the MIR lines are
1487: significantly lower because of the larger apertures used.
1488: Fig. \ref{fig:aperture} shows that the
1489: IRS SH aperture includes nearly all the \hii\ region emission and the
1490: IRS LH aperture includes all of it. Thus, aperture effects cannot
1491: account for
1492: the large differences between the observed and modeled fluxes of the
1493: MIR lines, except perhaps for the
1494: [Ne {\sc ii}]$\lambda$12.8$\mu$m emission line which has the largest
1495: aperture correction.
1496: %Slightly higher modeled flux for this line compared to
1497: %the observed one suggests that small aperture correction of the observed flux
1498: %is required.
1499: We conclude that, to account for the MIR emission,
1500: we need to postulate the existence of
1501: a hidden H {\sc ii} region in
1502: Mrk 996 that contributes to the MIR emission, but not to the optical emission.
1503:
1504: We have found that the best CLOUDY model of this obscured
1505: \hii\ region (hereafter Model II) is characterized by
1506: the following
1507: parameters: a number of ionizing photons log $Q$(H) = 52.425 -- $\sim$ 2 times
1508: lower than for Model I --, an effective temperature $T_{eff}$ = 50000 K,
1509: -- slightly higher than in Model I,
1510: suggesting a younger H {\sc ii} region --,
1511: a constant number density of 300 cm$^{-3}$, a filling factor log $f$ = --2,
1512: an H {\sc ii} region radius of $\sim$ 100 pc and
1513: the same chemical composition as in Model I.
1514: The predicted
1515: fluxes of the MIR lines for Model II are shown in Table \ref{tabcompar}. It is
1516: seen that, except for the
1517: [Ne {\sc ii}]$\lambda$12.8$\mu$m line,
1518: the predicted fluxes of the MIR lines in Model II (the hidden
1519: \hii\ region) are all significantly higher
1520: than those in Model I (the visible \hii\ region), despite a number of
1521: ionizing photons which is $\sim$2 times lower.
1522: The main reason is that, in Model I, the infrared fine-structure line
1523: fluxes are strongly reduced by collisional deexcitation of the upper
1524: levels in the very dense central part of the visible H {\sc ii} region.
1525: At the critical densities, the line ratios will change as some lines will
1526: be suppressed less strongly as compared to other lines that will be
1527: suppressed more strongly.
1528: The critical number densities for collisional
1529: deexcitation of the detected MIR lines are in the range $\sim$10$^3$ --
1530: 10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$ \citep{m02}, lower than the central number density.
1531: Collisional deexcitation is however not important for the
1532: [Ne {\sc ii}]$\lambda$12.8$\mu$m line because it has a very high
1533: critical density of 6.1$\times$10$^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$ and in addition it arises
1534: in the outer less dense zones of the \hii\ region in Model I.
1535: Adding the line fluxes from Models I and II (columns 3 and 4 of
1536: Table \ref{tabcompar}), we see that the modeled and observed fluxes
1537: of the MIR lines are in general good agreement, their ratios (column 8 of
1538: Table \ref{tabcompar}) being close to unity. How much dust extinction would
1539: it take to hide the \hii\ region of Model II ? If we set the upper limit
1540: of its H$\beta$ flux to be 10\% that of the visible region,
1541: then its $A_V$ would be $\ga$ 4 magnitudes.
1542:
1543:
1544: %The model line intensities for the inner part
1545: %are consistent with the line intensities observed in the HST spectrum
1546: %(Thuan et al 1996).
1547:
1548: %\subsection{The hard ionizing radiation in the hidden H {\sc ii} region}
1549:
1550: \subsection{A hidden source of hard ionizing radiation}
1551:
1552:
1553: There is, however, one glaring discrepancy in column 8 of
1554: Table \ref{tabcompar}:
1555: the model does not predict any
1556: [O {\sc iv}] $\lambda$25.9\mic\ emission, while this line is
1557: clearly detected in the IRS spectrum. The ionization potential of
1558: [O {\sc iv}] is 54.9 eV, just beyond the He {\sc ii} edge at 54.4 eV.
1559: As discussed before,
1560: we have searched the optical spectrum of Mrk 996 for the high-ionization
1561: [Fe {\sc v}] $\lambda$4227 and He {\sc ii} $\lambda$4686 nebular emission
1562: lines which both have an ionization potential of 54.4 eV, but none were seen.
1563: This implies that the hard ionizing radiation comes entirely from a
1564: %\hii\
1565: region that is optically hidden, which is not necessarily spatially
1566: coincident with the optically hidden H {\sc ii} region discussed before.
1567:
1568: %This suggests that dust extinction plays an
1569: %important role in \mrk.
1570: %The MIR observations probes deeper near the source of high ionization
1571: %radiation than the optical observations.
1572:
1573: Mrk 996 is not the only BCD to reveal harder ionizing radiation
1574: in the MIR than the optical. The same phenomenon occurs in
1575: the BCD Haro 3, the most metal-rich [12+log(O/H)= 8.32] BCD of
1576: our \spitzer\ sample.
1577: Haro 3 also shows a well detected [O {\sc iv}] $\lambda$25.9\mic\
1578: emission line in its IRS spectrum, while
1579: the [Fe {\sc v}] $\lambda$4227 and He {\sc ii} $\lambda$4686
1580: nebular emission lines are conspicuously absent
1581: from its optical spectrum \citep{hunt06}.
1582: We will have to wait for the analysis of our whole \spitzer\ BCD sample to tell
1583: whether that is a general property of BCDs, or whether this occurs only
1584: in exceptional cases.
1585:
1586: What is the origin of
1587: the hard ionizing radiation beyond 4 Ryd in \mrk?
1588: Can stellar radiation be responsible? We have run Costar models by
1589: \citet{schaerer97} with stars having
1590: the highest effective temperature (T$_{eff}$ = 53 000 K)
1591: and the hardest radiation possible (corresponding to the hottest O3 stars).
1592: We failed to reproduce the observed intensity of the
1593: [O {\sc iv}] $\lambda$25.9\mic\ by a factor of several.
1594: We have then considered Wolf-Rayet stars of type WNE-w. According to
1595: calculations by \citet{crowther99}, models for WNE-w stars (early
1596: nitrogen Wolf-Rayet stars with weak lines) show a strong
1597: ionizing flux above 4 Rydberg ($\lambda$ $\leq$ 228 \AA), in contrast
1598: to the WCE and WNL stars which show negligible fluxes above 3-4 Rydberg.
1599: These stars have transparent winds, and therefore their
1600: $Q$($>$ 4 Ryd)/$Q$ ($>$ 1 Ryd), where $Q$ is the ionizing flux, is some 100 times
1601: higher than the same ratio predicted for the hottest O stars
1602: by the Costar models \citep{schaerer97}. We have run CLOUDY models with
1603: the ionization spectrum of a WNE-w star \citep{crowther99}. We
1604: found that with a log $Q$(H) = 51.425, some 25 times less than that
1605: from the bright H {\sc ii} region, and some 10 times less than
1606: the $Q$(H) of the hidden H {\sc ii} region, the observed intensity of
1607: the [O {\sc iv}] line can be reproduced (Table \ref{tabcompar}).
1608: The fraction of WNE-w to O stars is several percent if the same
1609: $Q$(H) (log $Q$(H) $\sim$ 49) is assumed for single O and WNE-w stars.
1610: This estimate may be wrong by a factor of 10 because of the uncertainty in
1611: the $Q$(H) of WNE-w stars.
1612: The WNE-w stellar
1613: spectrum does not produce much of the lower-ionization
1614: species, so that
1615: the agreement obtained previously between observations and models for the line
1616: intensities of the lower-ionization
1617: species is not destroyed. A weak [Ne {\sc v}] $\lambda$24.3\mic\ line
1618: is predicted by CLOUDY, with an intensity some 9 times weaker
1619: than that of the [O {\sc iv}] line intensity, consistent with its
1620: non-detection.
1621: How plausible is the presence of such a WNE-w stellar population
1622: in the central star-forming region of \mrk?
1623: A ratio $N$(WNE)/$N$(O) of a few percent appears high because, at the metallicity
1624: of \mrk\, it is roughly equal to the number ratio of WR stars of all types to
1625: O stars \citep{guseva00}, and because WNE-w stars are rare among WR stars.
1626: Moreover, from the equivalent width of
1627: H$\beta$ (106.9 \AA), we estimate the age of the bright visible H {\sc ii}
1628: region to be 3-4 Myr. WNE stars are thought to result from mass transfer
1629: in close binary systems, so they dominate the stellar population at ages
1630: $\geq$ 10 Myr, when O stars and WR stars of other types are gone. Thus
1631: the visible H {\sc ii} region is too young to contain WNE stars.
1632: If one wishes to invoke WNE stars as the source of hard radiation,
1633: one would have to postulate that these stars are not visible in the optical
1634: range. All things considered, we do not consider the WNE-w hypothesis very likely.
1635:
1636: We have also considered the case of a non-stellar source of ionizing
1637: radiation, that emitted by an accretion disk around an
1638: intermediate-mass black hole in the
1639: center of \mrk. Thus, we have also run CLOUDY models with an ionization
1640: spectrum in the
1641: form of a power-law: $f$($\nu$) $\propto$ $\nu^{-1}$. We found that,
1642: in order to reproduce the line intensity of the [O {\sc iv}] line,
1643: the number of ionizing photons coming from the AGN has
1644: to be log Q (H) = 51.125, some 50 times smaller than that
1645: coming from the bright H {\sc ii} region. Again, the previous agreement between
1646: models and observations for
1647: the lower-ionization species is preserved.
1648: The results are also given in Table \ref{tabcompar}. Again,
1649: a weak [Ne {\sc v}] $\lambda$24.3\mic\ line is predicted, with an intensity
1650: some 3 times weaker than that of the [O {\sc iv}] line intensity. This
1651: line can be even weaker if the power-law spectrum has a slope steeper than $-1$.
1652: In any case, such a low-intensity line would be hard to detect. Because we
1653: have to postulate that the AGN is completely invisible in the optical, we
1654: do not favor the AGN hypothesis as the most probable one.
1655:
1656:
1657: Finally, we discuss a third possible source of hard
1658: ionizing radiation. \citet{izotov01}, \citet{izotov04} and
1659: \citet{thuanizotov05} have suggested that
1660: %massive evolved stars and
1661: fast radiative shocks moving through a dense
1662: interstellar medium with $N_e$ $\sim$100 cm$^{-3}$
1663: can be possible sources of photons with energy $\ga$54 eV,
1664: and be responsible for the [Ne {\sc v}] $\lambda$
1665: 3426 (ionization potential of 7.1 ryd), [Fe {\sc v}] $\lambda$
1666: 4227 (ionization potential of 4 ryd), and He {\sc ii} $\lambda$ 4686
1667: (ionization potential of 4 ryd) emission they observed in some BCDs.
1668: The ionizing spectrum of such fast shocks has been computed
1669: by \citet{dopita96} for a gas of solar metallicity and various shock
1670: velocities. Recently, this work has been extended to environments
1671: with lower metallicities by M. G. Allen et al. 2004 (in preparation).
1672: Thus, we have also run CLOUDY models with an
1673: ionizing spectrum taken from the ``Mapping'' III Shock
1674: model library ($http://cdswww.u-strasbg.fr/~allen/mappings{_-}page1.html$),
1675: and characterized by a metallicity equal to that of the Small Magellanic Cloud
1676: (closest to the metallicity of \mrk) and a shock velocity equal to
1677: 250 km s$^{-1}$. This
1678: velocity corresponds to the FWHM of $\sim$ 7 \AA\ observed
1679: for the broad component of the
1680: emission lines in Table \ref{tabdeconv}.
1681: The CLOUDY results are given in Table \ref{tabcompar} for the shock model
1682: with a number of ionizing photons log $Q$(H) = 51.425, the same as that
1683: for the model with the WNE-w stars. It can
1684: be seen that the predicted line intensities in the shock model are
1685: very similar to those in the WNE-w model, and thus can account equally
1686: well for the intensity of the [O {\sc iv}] line. Again a weak [Ne {\sc v}]
1687: $\lambda$24.3\mic\ line is predicted which would be undetectable.
1688: We favor the shock hypothesis as the most plausible explanation
1689: for the [O {\sc iv}] line, as
1690: \mrk\ contains many WR stars with
1691: outflowing stellar winds and, likely, supernova remnants
1692: which will no doubt cause radiative shocks.
1693:
1694:
1695: \section{Summary\label{sec:conclusions} }
1696:
1697: We have acquired {\sl Spitzer} MIR, UKIRT NIR and MMT optical observations
1698: of the blue compact dwarf galaxy \mrk\ to study its gas, dust and stellar content.
1699: This BCD, with a metallicity of about 1/5 that of the Sun,
1700: has the peculiarity of
1701: possessing an extremely dense nuclear star-forming region:
1702: its central density is
1703: $\sim$ 10$^6$ cm$^{-3}$, some 4 orders of magnitude greater than the densities
1704: of normal \hii\ regions.
1705: We have obtained the following results:
1706:
1707: \noindent
1708: (1) The nucleus of \mrk\ is extremely red, with \jk\ = 1.8, and
1709: \hk\ = 1.0, probably due to very hot dust with a temperature between 600
1710: and 1000 K.
1711: %This very red color cannot be
1712: %explained solely by hot dust without invoking very unusual properties
1713: %for the dust grain population. %as the SED of \mrk\ peaks longward of
1714: %160 \micron.
1715: The optical spectrum of the BCD shows the high-ionization lines to
1716: have both broad and narrow line components,
1717: and a trend of increasing line width with increasing ionization potential.
1718: %as in Seyfert 1 galaxies.
1719: %However the gas cloud motions ($v$ $\sim$ 500 km s$^{-1}$)
1720: %and densities
1721: %in the broad line region are not as large as in the case of Seyfert 1 galaxies.
1722: %The presence of a faint \oiv\ line at 25.89\,\micron\ in the IRS spectrum
1723: %indicates
1724: %the presence of radiation as hard as 54.9 eV in \mrk. This hard radiation
1725: %is most likely due to radiative shocks in the ISM caused by
1726: %outflowing stellar winds
1727: %from the large population of WCE and WNL stars in \mrk, and/or by
1728: %fast-moving supernova remnants.
1729: %An accretion disk around an intermediate-mass
1730: %black hole in the center of \mrk\
1731: %or a population of WNE-w stars may also be sources of hard
1732: %radiation, although we consider their presence in \mrk\ less likely.
1733: %All these observations suggest that \mrk\ may
1734: %represent a transition case between the starburst and AGN phases.
1735:
1736: \noindent
1737: (2) The $VIJHK$ colors of the underlying exponential disk are roughly
1738: consistent with the colors of a coeval stellar population with age $\ga$ 1 Gyr.
1739:
1740: %(1) The optical MMT spectrum confirms and extends many of the findings of
1741: %\citet{thuan96}: a) the He {\sc i} line intensities are unusually large;
1742: %b) the high-ionization
1743: %emission lines are broader than the low-ionization emission lines. Profile
1744: %decomposition shows that the optical lines can be decomposed into a narrow
1745: %component (FWHM $\sim$ 3 \AA, corresponding to a velocity of $\sim$
1746: %180 km s$^{-1}$)
1747: %and a broad component (FWHM $\sim$ 8 \AA, corresponding to a velocity of
1748: %$\sim$ 500 km s$^{-1}$)
1749: %; 3) there are strong broad Wolf-Rayet bumps,
1750: %suggesting a large WR stellar population in the nuclear region.
1751:
1752: \noindent
1753: (3) Like most star-forming galaxies, \mrk\ is a composite entity in the IR.
1754: We see extended photospheric emission from evolved stars,
1755: compact hot dust continuum
1756: %and perhaps AGN emission
1757: coming from the nuclear star-forming region at 4.5\,\micron,
1758: hot dust continuum
1759: %and perhaps AGN emission in the dense nuclear region,
1760: and extended PAH emission coming mainly from
1761: the surrounding less dense ISM at 8\,\micron,
1762: compact small grain warm dust
1763: %and perhaps AGN emission
1764: associated with
1765: the active star-forming nuclear region at 24\,\micron\ and 70\,\micron,
1766: and cooler extended dust
1767: emission associated with older stellar populations at 160\,\micron.
1768:
1769: \noindent
1770: (4) The IRS spectrum (Fig. \ref{fig:irs})
1771: shows strong Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) molecular
1772: emission, with features clearly detected at 5.7, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.2 and
1773: 12.7\,\micron. The PAHs in \mrk\ are predominantly neutral and
1774: small, similar to those found in normal spiral galaxies, suggesting that
1775: they reside in the general ISM and not in the star-forming region. The PAH
1776: emission features are relatively narrow and their equivalent widths are
1777: generally high for the metallicity of \mrk,
1778: exceeding by more than one order of magnitude
1779: the values given for the mean EW(PAH)-metallicity relation derived
1780: by previous investigators.
1781: % they are more typical of bright galaxies rather than of BCDs.
1782:
1783: \noindent
1784: (5) Gaseous nebular line emission is seen. The IRS spectrum
1785: shows several fine-structure forbidden lines, including
1786: \siv\ $\lambda$10.51, \neii\ $\lambda$12.81,
1787: \neiii\ $\lambda$15.55, \siii\ $\lambda$18.71, 33.48 and
1788: \oiv\ $\lambda$25.90\,\micron.
1789: %Molecular hydrogen emission is detected at 12.3, 17.0, and 28.2\,\micron.
1790:
1791: \noindent
1792: (6) We have used CLOUDY to model the line-emitting region.
1793: To account for both the optical and MIR lines, two \hii\ regions are
1794: required: a) a very dense \hii\ region that is seen in the optical
1795: range (Model I) and b) an optically obscured \hii\ region ($A_V$ $\ga$
1796: 4 mag) with a constant number density of $\sim$ 300 cm$^{-3}$,
1797: typical of other \hii\ regions (Model II).
1798: A two-zone model is required for the non-obscured \hii\ region (Model I):
1799: a) a very dense nuclear region where the broad
1800: optical line components arise; from a central value of $\sim$ 10$^6$
1801: cm$^{-3}$, the density decreases with
1802: distance as $r^{-2}$ until $r\sim$ 100 pc;
1803: b) an outer zone for 100 pc $<r<$ 580 pc, with constant number
1804: density of $\sim$ 400 cm$^{-3}$ . The density gradient is
1805: probably caused by large scale gas mass motions, powered by the stellar winds
1806: of Wolf-Rayet stars.
1807:
1808: \noindent
1809: (7) The UV and optical spectra show no evidence of the very hard ionizing radiation seen in AGN. The IRS spectrum does show however
1810: the presence of a faint \oiv\ line at 25.89\,\micron,
1811: indicating
1812: the presence of radiation as hard as 54.9 eV in \mrk.
1813: %This hard radiation
1814: %may be due to radiative shocks in the ISM caused by outflowing stellar winds from the WR stars.
1815: %However the high-ionization \fev $\lambda$4227
1816: %and \heii\ $\lambda$4686 nebular emission lines which both have an
1817: %ionization potential of 54.4\,eV, are not seen in the optical spectrum of \mrk.
1818: This hard radiation is most likely due to fast radiative shocks in
1819: the ISM caused by outflowing stellar winds from WCE and WNL stars
1820: and/or by supernova remnants. A
1821: hidden AGN, or a population of hidden
1822: Wolf-Rayet stars of type WNE-w are are less likely sources of hard ionizing
1823: radiation.
1824:
1825: %comes entirely from the region
1826: %hidden in the optical range.
1827:
1828:
1829: \acknowledgments
1830:
1831: This work is based on observations made with the {\sl Spitzer}
1832: Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
1833: California Institute of Technology, under NASA contract 1407.
1834: The MMT time was available thanks to a grant from the Frank Levinson Fund
1835: of the Peninsula Community Foundation to the Astronomy Department of the
1836: University of Virginia.
1837: We thank Jack Gallimore for providing us with the spectrum of NGC\,4151.
1838: We are grateful to the UKIRT Time Allocation Panel for a generous time allocation.
1839: Support for this work was provided by NASA through contract 1263707
1840: issued by JPL/Caltech.
1841: T.X.T. and Y.I.I. also acknowledge partial financial
1842: support from NSF grant AST 02-05785. L.K.H. and Y.I.I. are grateful to the
1843: hospitality of the Astronomy Department of the University of Virginia where part of
1844: this work was done.
1845:
1846: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1847: %\bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{anders89} Anders, E., \&
1848: %Grevesse, N.\ 1989, \gca, 53, 197
1849:
1850: \bibitem[Alonso-Herrero et al.(2001)]{alonso01} Alonso-Herrero, A.,
1851: Quillen, A. C., Simpson, C., Efstathiou, A., \& Ward, M. J. 2001,
1852: \aj, 121, 1369
1853:
1854: %\bibitem[Armus et al.(2004)]{armus04} Armus, L., et al.\ 2004,
1855: %\apjs, 154, 178
1856:
1857: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)]{asplund05} Asplund, M., Grevesse,
1858: N., \& Sauval, A.~J.\ 2005, ASP Conf.~Ser.~336: Cosmic Abundances as
1859: Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 336, 25
1860: %2006, Communications in Asteroseismology, 147, 76
1861: %2004,
1862: %Invited review presented at ``Cosmic abundances as records of stellar evolution
1863: %and nucleosynthesis'', F.N. Bash & T.G Barnes(editors). ASP conf. series, in
1864: %press ({\it astro-ph/0410214})
1865:
1866: %\bibitem[Bessel (1988)]{bessel88} Bessell, M.S., \& Brett, J. M., 1988,
1867: %PASP, 100, 1134
1868:
1869: \bibitem[Beirao et al.(2006)]{b06} Beirao, P., Brandl, B. R.,
1870: Devost, D., Smith, J. D., Hao, L., \& Houck, J. R. \apj, 643, L1
1871:
1872: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2004)]{brandl04} Brandl, B.~R., et al.\
1873: 2004, \apjs, 154, 188
1874:
1875: \bibitem[Buchanan et al.(2006)]{buchanan06} Buchanan, C. L., Gallimore, J. F., O'Dea, C. P., Baum, S. A., Axon, D. J., Robinson, A., Elitzur, M., \&
1876: Elvis, M. 2006, \aj, 132, 401
1877:
1878: %\bibitem[Calzetti et al.(1997)]{calzetti97} Calzetti, D., Meurer,
1879: %G.~R., Bohlin, R.~C., Garnett, D.~R., Kinney, A.~L., Leitherer, C., \&
1880: %Storchi-Bergmann, T.\ 1997, \aj, 114, 1834
1881:
1882: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{cardelli89} Cardelli, J.~A.,
1883: Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, \apj, 345, 245
1884:
1885: \bibitem[Crowther et al.(1999)]{crowther99} Crowther, P. A., Beck, S. C.,
1886: Willis, A. J., Conti, P. S., Morris, P. W., \& Sutherland, R. S. 1999,
1887: MNRAS, 304, 654
1888:
1889: %\bibitem[Cutri et al.(2001)]{cutri01} Cutri, R.~M., Nelson,
1890: %B.~O., Kirkpatrick, J.~D., Huchra, J.~P., \& Smith, P.~S.\ 2001, The New
1891: %Era of Wide Field Astronomy, 232, 78
1892:
1893: \bibitem[de Jong(1996)]{dejong96} de Jong, R.~S.\ 1996, \aap,
1894: 313, 377
1895:
1896: \bibitem[De Robertis \& Osterbrock(1984)]{derobertis84} De Robertis,
1897: M.~M., \& Osterbrock, D.~E.\ 1984, \apj, 286, 171
1898:
1899: \bibitem[Dopita \& Sutherland(1996)]{dopita96}
1900: Dopita, M. A., \& Sutherland, R. S. 1996, \apjs, 102, 161
1901:
1902: \bibitem[Draine(2006)]{draine06} Draine, B.~T. 2006, private communication
1903:
1904: \bibitem[Draine \& Li(2001)]{draine01} Draine, B.~T., \& Li, A.\
1905: 2001, \apj, 551, 807 1
1906:
1907: %\bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2005)]{engelbracht05} Engelbracht, C.~W.,
1908: %Gordon, K.~D., Rieke, G.~H., Werner, M.~W., Dale, D.~A., Latter, W.~B.
1909: %2005, \apjl, 628, 29
1910:
1911: \bibitem[Enya et al.(2002)]{enya02} Enya, K., Yoshii, Y., Kobayashi, Y.,
1912: Minezaki, T., Suganuma, M., Tomita, H., \& Peterson, B. A.,
1913: 2002, \apjs, 141, 23
1914:
1915: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazioirac} Fazio, G.~G., et al.\
1916: 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
1917:
1918: \bibitem[Ferland(1996)]{cloudy} Ferland, G. J. 1996, Hazy: A brief Introduction to CLOUDY
1919: (Univ. Kentucky Dept. Phys. Astron. Internal Rep.)
1920:
1921: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1998)]{ferland98} Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., Ferguson, J. W.,
1922: Kingdon, J. B., \& Verner, E. M. 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
1923:
1924: %\bibitem[Genzel \& Cesarsky(2000)]{genzel00}
1925: %Genzel, R., \& Cesarsky, C. 2000, \araa, 38, 761
1926:
1927: \bibitem[Gil de Paz et al.(2003)]{gildepaz03} Gil de Paz, A.,
1928: Madore, B.~F., \& Pevunova, O.\ 2003, \apjs, 147, 29
1929:
1930: %\bibitem[Gordon \& Gottesman(1981)]{gordon81}
1931: %Gordon, D., Gottesman, S. 1981, AJ, 86, 161
1932:
1933: %\bibitem[Gordon et al.(2005)]{gordon05} Gordon, K.~D., et al.\
1934: %2005, \pasp, 117, 503
1935:
1936: \bibitem[Guseva, Izotov \& Thuan (2000)]{guseva00}
1937: Guseva, N. G., Izotov, Y. I., \& Thuan, T. X. 2000, \apj, 531, 776
1938:
1939: \bibitem[Guseva, Izotov \& Thuan (2006)]{guseva06}
1940: Guseva, N. G., Izotov, Y. I., \& Thuan, T. X. 2006, \apj, 644, 890
1941:
1942: %\bibitem[Haas et al.(2002)]{haas02} Haas, M., Klaas, U., \&
1943: %Bianchi, S.\ 2002, \aap, 385, L23
1944:
1945: \bibitem[Hawarden et al.(2001)]{hawarden01} Hawarden, T. G., Leggett, S. K.,
1946: Letawsky, M. B., Ballantyne, D. R., \& Casali, M. M. 2001, \mnras, 325, 563
1947:
1948: \bibitem[Helou et al.(2000)]{helou00} Helou, G., Lu, N. Y.,
1949: Werner, M. W., Malhotra, S., \& Silbermann, N. 2000, \apj, 532, L21
1950:
1951: %\bibitem[Ho(1999)]{ho99}
1952: %Ho, L.~C.\ 1999, ApJ, 516, 672
1953:
1954: %\bibitem[Hogg et al.(2005)]{hogg05} Hogg, D.~W., Tremonti, C.~A.,
1955: %Blanton, M.~R., Finkbeiner, D.~P., Padmanabhan, N., Quintero, A.~D.,
1956: %Schlegel, D.~J., \& Wherry, N. 2005, \apj, 624, 162
1957:
1958: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{houckirs} Houck, J.~R., et al.\
1959: 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
1960:
1961: %\bibitem[Houck et al.(2004b)]{houck04}
1962: %Houck, J.~R., et al.\ 2004b, \apjs, 154, 211
1963:
1964: %\bibitem[Hughes et al.(1998)]{hughes98}
1965: %Hughes, D.H., et al. 1998, \nat, 394, 241
1966:
1967: \bibitem[Hunt \& Giovanardi(1992)]{hg92}
1968: Hunt, L.K., \& Giovanardi, C. 1992, \aj, 104, 1018
1969:
1970: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(2002)]{hunt02} Hunt, L.~K., Giovanardi,
1971: C., \& Helou, G.\ 2002, \aap, 394, 873
1972:
1973: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(1997)]{hunt97} Hunt, L.~K., Malkan,
1974: M.~A., Salvati, M., Mandolesi, N., Palazzi, E., \& Wade, R.\ 1997, \apjs,
1975: 108, 229
1976:
1977: \bibitem[Hunt, Thuan, \& Izotov (2003)]{hunt03}
1978: Hunt, L.K., Thuan, T. X., \& Izotov, Y. I. 2003, \apj, 588, 281
1979:
1980: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(2005)]{hunt05} Hunt, L. K., Bianchi, S., \&
1981: Maiolino, R.\ 2005, \aap, 434, 849
1982:
1983: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(2006)]{hunt06}
1984: Hunt, L. K., Thuan, T. X., Sauvage, M., \& Izotov, Y. I. 2006,
1985: \apj, 653, 222
1986:
1987: %\bibitem[Hunt \& Maiolino(2005)]{hunt05b} Hunt, L.~K., \&
1988: %Maiolino, R.\ 2005, \apjl, 626, L15
1989:
1990: %\bibitem[Hunt, Vanzi, \& Thuan(2001)]{hunt01}
1991: %Hunt, L.K., Vanzi, L., \& Thuan, T.X. 2001, \aap, 377, 66
1992:
1993: %\bibitem[Ivezi\'c et al.(1999)]{dusty} Ivezi\'c, Z., Nenkova, M., \& Elitzur,
1994: %M. 1999, User Manual for DUSTY, University of Kentucky Internal Report,
1995: %accessible at {\tt http://www.pa.uky.edu/~moshe/dusty}
1996:
1997: \bibitem[Ivezi\'c \& Elitzur(1997)]{elitzur} Ivezi\'c, Z.~\&
1998: Elitzur, M.\ 1997, MNRAS, 287, 799
1999:
2000: \bibitem[Izotov et al. (1992)]{izotov92}
2001: Izotov, Y. I., Lipovetsky, V. A., Guseva, N. G., \& Kniazev, A. Y. 1992,
2002: in The Feedback of Chemical Evolution on the Stellar Content of
2003: Galaxies, ed. D. Alloin \& G. Stasi\'nska (Paris: Paris Obs. Publ.), p. 138
2004:
2005: \bibitem[Izotov, Thuan \& Lipovetsky (1994)]{itl94}
2006: Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., \& Lipovetsky, V. A. 1994, \apj, 435, 647
2007:
2008: \bibitem[Izotov et al. (2001)]{izotov01} Izotov, Y. I., Chaffee, F. H.,
2009: \& Schaerer, D. 2001, \aap, 378, L45
2010:
2011: \bibitem[Izotov et al. (2004)]{izotov04} Izotov, Y. I., Noeske, K. G.,
2012: Guseva, N. G., Papaderos, P., Thuan, T. X., \& Fricke, K. J.
2013: 2004, \aap, 415, L27
2014: %\bibitem[Izotov \& Thuan (2004)]{izotovthuan04} Izotov, Y.I., \& Thuan, T.~X.\
2015: %2004, \apj, 602, 200
2016:
2017: \bibitem[Johnson et al.(2004)]{johnson04} Johnson, K.~E.,
2018: Indebetouw, R., Watson, C., \& Kobulnicky, H.~A.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 610
2019:
2020: \bibitem[Lebouteiller et al.(2007)]{l07} Lebouteiller, V., Brandl, B.,
2021: Bernard-Salas, J., Devost, D., \& Houck, J. R. 2007, \apj, 665, 390
2022:
2023: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1999)]{sb99} Leitherer, C., et al.\ 1999, \apjs, 123, 3
2024:
2025: \bibitem[Li \& Draine(2001)]{li01} Li, A., \& Draine, B.~T.\
2026: 2001, \apj, 554, 778
2027:
2028: %\bibitem[Lira et al.(2002)]{lira02}
2029: %Lira, P., Ward, M., Zezas, A., Alonso-Herrero, A., \& Ueno, S.\ 2002, MNRAS, 330, 259
2030:
2031: \bibitem[Loose \& Thuan(1985)]{loose85} Loose, H.-H. \& Thuan, T. X. 1985,
2032: in Star-Forming Dwarf Galaxies
2033: and related objects, eds. D. Kunth, T.X. Thuan \& J.T.T. Van (Gif-sur-Yvette:
2034: Editions Frontieres), p. 73
2035:
2036: %\bibitem[Lutz et al.(1998)]{lutz98}
2037: %Lutz, D., Kunze, D., Spoon, H.~W.~W., \& Thornley, M.~D.\ 1998, A\&A, 333, L75
2038:
2039: \bibitem[Makovoz \& Marleau(2005)]{mopex} Makovoz, D., \&
2040: Marleau, F.~R.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 1113
2041:
2042: \bibitem[Mart\'in-Hern\'andez et al. (2002)]{m02} Mart\'in-Hern\'andez, N. L.,
2043: et al. 2002, \aap, 381, 606
2044:
2045: \bibitem[Melnick et al.(2008)]{melnick08} Melnick, G.~J., Tolls,
2046: V., Neufeld, D.~A., Yuan, Y., Sonnentrucker, P., Watson, D.~M., Bergin,
2047: E.~A., \& Kaufman, M.~J.\ 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 805, arXiv:0805.0573
2048:
2049:
2050: \bibitem[Mouhcine \& Lan{\c c}on(2002)]{mouhcine02} Mouhcine, M.,
2051: \& Lan{\c c}on, A.\ 2002, \aap, 393, 149
2052:
2053: %\bibitem[Mathis et al.(1977)]{mrn} Mathis, J.~S., Rumpl,
2054: %W., \& Nordsieck, K.~H.\ 1977, \apj, 217, 425
2055:
2056: %\bibitem[Meier et al.(2001)]{meier01}
2057: %Meier, D. S., Turner, J. L., Crosthwaite, L. P., Beck, S. C. 2001, \aj, 121,
2058: %740
2059:
2060: %\bibitem[Men'shchikov et al.(2002)]{men02}
2061: %Men'shchikov, A. B., Schertl, D., Tuthill, P. G., Weigelt, G., Yungelson,
2062: %L. R. 2002, \aap 393, 867
2063:
2064: %\bibitem[Metcalfe et al.(1996)]{metcalfe96} Metcalfe, L., et al.\
2065: %1996, \aap, 315, L105
2066:
2067: %\bibitem[Neff, Ulvestad \& Campion(2003)]{neff03}
2068: %Neff, S.~G., Ulvestad, J.~S., \& Campion, S.~D.\ 2003, ApJ, 599, 1043
2069:
2070: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(1999)]{origlia99} Origlia, L., Goldader,
2071: J.~D., Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., \& Oliva, E.\ 1999, \apj, 514, 96
2072:
2073: \bibitem[Peletier \& Balcells(1997)]{peletier97} Peletier, R.~F.,
2074: \& Balcells, M.\ 1997, New Astronomy, 1, 349
2075:
2076: %\bibitem[Plante \& Sauvage(2002)]{plante02}
2077: %Plante, S., \& Sauvage, M. 2002, \aj, 124, 1995
2078:
2079: %\bibitem[Ptak \& Colbert(2004)]{ptak04}
2080: %Ptak, A., \& Colbert, E.\ 2004, ApJ, 606, 291
2081:
2082: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{reach05} Reach, W.~T., et al.\
2083: 2005, \pasp, 117, 978
2084:
2085: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{riekemips} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\
2086: 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
2087:
2088: %\bibitem[Sanders \& Mirabel(1996)]{sanders96}
2089: %Sanders, D. B., Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA\&A 34, 749
2090:
2091: \bibitem[Schaerer \& de Koter (1997)]{schaerer97}
2092: Schaerer, D., \& de Koter, A. 1997,\aap, 322, 598
2093:
2094: %\bibitem[Smith et al.(2006)]{pahfit06}
2095: %Smith, J.D., Draine, B. T., et al. 2006, \apj, submitted
2096:
2097: %\bibitem[Steel et al.(1996)]{steel96} Steel, S.~J., Smith, N.,
2098: %Metcalfe, L., Rabbette, M., \& McBreen, B.\ 1996, \aap, 311, 721
2099:
2100: %\bibitem[Steidel et al.(2003)]{steidel03}
2101: %Steidel, C.C., Adelberger, K.L., Shapley, A.E., et al. 2003, \apj, 592, 728
2102:
2103: %\bibitem[Sturm et al.(2002)]{sturm02}
2104: %Sturm, E., Lutz, D., Verma, A., Netzer, H., Sternberg, A., Moorwood, A.~F.~M., Oliva, E., \& Genzel, R.\ 2002, A\&A, 393, 821
2105:
2106: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schlegel98} Schlegel, D.~J.,
2107: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
2108:
2109: \bibitem[Silva et al.(1998)]{silva98} Silva, L., Granato,
2110: G.~L., Bressan, A., \& Danese, L.\ 1998, \apj, 509, 103
2111:
2112: \bibitem[Tantalo et al. (1996)]{tantalo96} Tantalo, R., Chiosi, C., Bressan,
2113: A., \& Fagotto, F. 1996, \aap, 311, 361
2114:
2115:
2116: \bibitem[Thuan \& Izotov(2005)]{thuanizotov05} Thuan, T. X., \& Izotov, Y. I. 2005, \apjs, 161, 240
2117:
2118: \bibitem[Thuan et al.(1996)]{thuan96} Thuan, T.~X., Izotov,
2119: Y.~I., \& Lipovetsky, V.~A.\ 1996, \apj, 463, 120
2120:
2121: %\bibitem[Thuan, Sauvage, \& Madden(1999)]{thuan99}
2122: %Thuan, T.X., Sauvage, M., \& Madden, S. 1999, \apj, 516, 783
2123:
2124: \bibitem[Thuan et al.(1999)]{thuanhi}
2125: Thuan, T. X., Lipovetsky, V. A., Martin, J.-M., \& Pustilnik, S. A. 1999, \aaps,
2126: 139, 1
2127:
2128: %\bibitem[Vanzi \& Sauvage(2004)]{van04}
2129: %Vanzi, L., Sauvage, M. 2004, \aap, 509,
2130:
2131: %\bibitem[Vanzi et al.(2000)]{vanzi00}
2132: %Vanzi, L., Hunt, L. K., Thuan, T. X., \& Izotov, Y. I. 2000, \aap, 363, 493
2133:
2134: \bibitem[V{\'a}zquez \& Leitherer(2005)]{vazquez05} V{\'a}zquez,
2135: G.~A., \& Leitherer, C.\ 2005, \apj, 621, 695
2136:
2137: \bibitem[Verma et al.(2003)]{verma03} Verma, A., Lutz, D.,
2138: Sturm, E., Sternberg, A., Genzel, R., \& Vacca, W.\ 2003, \aap, 403, 829
2139:
2140: %\bibitem[Weedman et al.(2005)]{weedman05}
2141: %Weedman, D. W., Le Floc'h, E., Higdon, S. J. U., Higdon, J. L.,
2142: %\& Houck, J. R. 2006, \apj, in press ({\it astro-ph/0510621})
2143:
2144: \bibitem[Weedman et al.(2005)]{weedman05}
2145: Weedman, D.~W., et al. 2005, \apj, 633, 706
2146:
2147: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{werner04} Werner, M.~W., et al.\
2148: 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
2149:
2150: \bibitem[Whitford(1958)]{w58}
2151: Whitford, A. E. 1958, \aj, 63, 201
2152:
2153: %\bibitem[Whitmore \& Zhang(2002)]{whitmore02}
2154: %Whitmore, B. C., Zhang, Q. 2002, \aj, 124, 1418
2155:
2156: \bibitem[Whittle(1985)]{whittle85} Whittle, M.\ 1985, \mnras,
2157: 216, 817
2158:
2159: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2006)]{wu06} Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V. Hao, L., Brandl, B. R.,
2160: Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H. W. W., \& Houck, J. R. 2006, \apj, 639, 157
2161:
2162:
2163: \end{thebibliography}
2164:
2165:
2166:
2167:
2168:
2169:
2170:
2171:
2172: \clearpage
2173:
2174: \begin{figure}
2175: \vspace{0.2cm}
2176: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\linewidth]{f1a.eps}
2177: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.45\linewidth]{f1b.eps} }
2178: \caption{The 4.5\micron\ (IRAC2) image (left panel) and
2179: the 8.0\micron\ (IRAC4) image (right panel) of \mrk.
2180: The units given in the colorbar are MJy/sr, and the grey scale is logarithmic.
2181: The contours in both panels correspond to the 4.5\micron\ image.
2182: The outermost contour corresponds to
2183: the sky level + 10$\sigma$ ($\sigma$ = 0.0028 MJy/sr).
2184: \label{fig:irac}}
2185: \end{figure}
2186:
2187: %\begin{figure}
2188: %\vspace{0.2cm}
2189: %\hbox{ \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.47,bb=14 14 325 325,width=0.5\linewidth]{haro3_irsslits_hst_slt.ps}
2190: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\linewidth]{haro3_irsslits_ha_slt.ps} }
2191: %\caption{The IRS slit positions overlaid on the \hst /WFPC2 image (left panel,
2192: %\citet{mgt}) and the \ha\ image (right panel, \citealt{gildepaz03}) of \mrk.
2193: %Images are oriented North up, East left;
2194: %the long (SL) IRS slit is $57\arcsec\times3\farcs6$ (blue, red),
2195: %the SH slit $4\farcs7\times11\farcs3$ (green),
2196: %and the LH slit $11\farcs1\times22\farcs3$ (yellow).
2197: %\label{fig:slits}}
2198: %\end{figure}
2199:
2200: \clearpage
2201:
2202: \begin{figure}
2203: \vspace{0.2cm}
2204: \centerline{ \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\linewidth]{f2a.eps}
2205: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.45\linewidth]{f2b.eps} }
2206: \caption{The 4.5\micron\ IRAC image of \mrk\
2207: contoured on: (left panel) the \hst /WFPC2 F791W image \citep{thuan96}
2208: and (right panel) the \hst\ F569W$-$F791W color image \citep{thuan96}.
2209: The units in the color bar are counts (left) and magnitudes (right),
2210: and the grey scale is logarithmic.
2211: The contours in both panels correspond to the 4.5\micron\ image (see Fig. \ref{fig:irac}). The outermost contour corresponds to
2212: the sky level + 10$\sigma$ ($\sigma$ = 0.0028 MJy/sr).
2213: The IRAC 4.5\micron\ brightness peak is centered on the
2214: blue nucleus (F569W$-$F791W$\simlt$0) of the galaxy, rather than on
2215: the red dust patch (F569W$-$F791W$\sim$3) to the northwest.
2216: \label{fig:hstiracoverlay}}
2217: \end{figure}
2218:
2219: \begin{figure}
2220: \vspace{0.2cm}
2221: \centerline{
2222: %\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.9\linewidth]{f3.eps} }
2223: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.9\linewidth]{f3.eps} }
2224: \caption{The 4.5\micron\ IRAC image of \mrk\
2225: contoured on the IRAC 4.5/8.0\micron\ flux ratio image.
2226: The flux ratio units given in the color bar are in MJy/sr.
2227: As in Fig. \ref{fig:irac}, the outermost contour corresponds to
2228: the sky level + 10$\sigma$ ($\sigma$ = 0.0028 MJy/sr).
2229: The local maximum of the 4.5/8.0\micron\ flux ratio
2230: is on top of the 4.5\micron\ brightness peak, which also coincides
2231: with the blue nucleus (F569W$-$F791W$\simlt$0) of the galaxy.
2232: There is very little 8\,\micron\ emission outside the circumnuclear
2233: region, so the color ratio map is considerably more
2234: noisy in the outer parts of the disk.
2235: \label{fig:iraccolor}}
2236: \end{figure}
2237:
2238: \begin{figure}
2239: \vspace{0.2cm}
2240: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\linewidth]{f4a.eps}
2241: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\linewidth]{f4b.eps} }
2242: \caption{Growth curves for IRAC (left panel) and MIPS (right) photometry of \mrk.
2243: In both panels, for each wavelength, the horizontal dotted line shows the adopted total
2244: flux of \mrk, and
2245: the dashed line represents the point-source response function.
2246: In the left panel, the 4.5 \micron\ IRAC photometry is indicated by filled circles,
2247: and the 8.0 \micron\ photometry by filled squares.
2248: In the right panel, the MIPS-24\micron\ photometry is shown by filled circles,
2249: the MIPS-70\micron\ photometry by open squares, and the MIPS-160\micron\ photometry
2250: by $\times$.
2251: \mrk\ is extended at shorter wavelengths and possibly at 160\micron, but
2252: appears essentially point-like at 24 and 70\micron.
2253: \label{fig:phot}}
2254: \end{figure}
2255:
2256: \clearpage
2257:
2258: \begin{figure}
2259: \vspace{0.2cm}
2260: \hbox{
2261: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\linewidth,bb=48 285 590 679]{f5a.eps}
2262: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\linewidth,bb=48 140 566 653]{f5b.eps} }
2263: \caption{(a) Left panels: (top) IRAC 4.5 \mic\ and 8.0 \mic\
2264: surface brightness profiles,
2265: averaged over elliptical contours;(bottom)
2266: color profile in units of [4.5]-[8.0] magnitudes.
2267: In the top panel, the 4.5 \mic\
2268: profile is shown as filled circles, and the 8.0 \mic\
2269: one as open circles.
2270: The exponential disk fit for $R>4$\,\arcsec\ described in the text
2271: is shown as a solid line in the top panel,
2272: and the average disk color as a dotted line in the bottom one.
2273: The circumnuclear red ``peak'' at $R$ $\sim$ 4 \arcsec\
2274: is an artifact due to the mismatch of the IRAC 4.5 \mic\ and 8.0 \mic\
2275: point-response functions.
2276: (b) Right panels: The {\it K}-band surface brightness profile of \mrk, averaged over
2277: elliptical contours (top panel). The three bottom panels show the \jh, \hk, and \jk\
2278: color profiles.
2279: In these panels, the horizontal dotted line indicates the average
2280: color of the disk.
2281: The \jk\ color of the nuclear region is extremely red; most of this redness
2282: comes from the \hk\ color and less from the \jh\ color.
2283: %The very red \hk\ color may be due to an AGN.
2284: %extremely red suggesting that hot dust is responsible for the nuclear \jk\ red color
2285: %rather than extinction.
2286: \label{fig:profile}}
2287: \end{figure}
2288:
2289:
2290:
2291:
2292: \clearpage
2293:
2294:
2295:
2296: \begin{figure}
2297: \vspace{0.2cm}
2298: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\linewidth]{f6a.eps}
2299: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\linewidth]{f6b.eps} }
2300: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\linewidth]{f6c.eps} }
2301: %\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.45\linewidth]{mrk996_m2_4_bw.ps} }
2302: %\hbox{\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\linewidth]{mrk996_m3_hst_bw.ps}
2303: %\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.45\linewidth]{mrk996_m3_4_bw.ps} }
2304: \caption{The 24 \micron\ (top left panel), 70 \micron\ (top right), and 160 \micron\
2305: (bottom) MIPS images of \mrk\
2306: contoured on the 4.5\micron\ IRAC image.
2307: Contours run from the sky level + $n$$\sigma$ to the maximum intensity,
2308: where $n$\,=\,12, 5, and 3 for MIPS-24, MIPS-70, and MIPS-160, respectively.
2309: The signature of the Airy ring, associated with a dominant point source, is evident
2310: in the 24 and 70\,\micron\ contours.
2311: \label{fig:mipsoverlay}}
2312: \end{figure}
2313:
2314: \clearpage
2315:
2316: \begin{figure}
2317: \vbox{
2318: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\linewidth,bb=18 165 590 548]{f7a.eps}
2319: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\linewidth,bb=18 165 590 548]{f7b.eps}
2320: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\linewidth,bb=18 165 590 543]{f7a.eps}
2321: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\linewidth,bb=18 165 590 543]{f7b.eps}
2322: }
2323: \caption{The IRS spectrum of \mrk\ taken in the short-wavelength low-resolution mode
2324: and in both high-resolution modes:
2325: SL$+$SH spectra are shown in the upper panel, and the LH spectrum
2326: in the lower one.
2327: The PAH features at 5.7, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.2 \micron\
2328: are clearly detected, as are several fine-structure emission lines:
2329: \siv, \neii, \neiii, \siii, \oiv.
2330: \label{fig:irs}}
2331: \end{figure}
2332:
2333:
2334: \clearpage
2335:
2336: \begin{figure}
2337: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\linewidth,bb=18 165 590 543]{f8.eps}
2338: \caption{A blow-up of the IRS spectrum of \mrk\ around the \oiv\ 25.89 \mic\ line.
2339: \feii\ may be present, but is below the detection limit of the spectrum.
2340: \label{fig:oiv}}
2341: \end{figure}
2342:
2343: \begin{figure}
2344: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\linewidth]{f9.eps} }
2345: \caption{MMT spectrum of Mrk 996.
2346: \label{fig:sp}}
2347: \end{figure}
2348:
2349: \clearpage
2350:
2351: \begin{figure}
2352: \vspace{0.2cm}
2353: \hbox{
2354: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=1.0\linewidth]{f9.eps} }
2355: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=1.0\linewidth]{f10.eps} }
2356: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.5\linewidth,bb=48 285 590 679]{f9.eps}}
2357: \caption{The (\jh,\hk) diagram. The colors of the nucleus of Mrk 996
2358: and of two locations outside of it (filled squares from right to left
2359: connected by a dotted line)
2360: are compared to those of starburst galaxies (stars)
2361: \citep{hunt02}, blue compact
2362: dwarf galaxies (asterisks) \citep{hunt02} and Seyfert galaxies (filled
2363: circles) \citep{alonso01}. Mixing curves show how the colors change
2364: when various
2365: physical components contribute in increasing amounts to the observed
2366: disk emission
2367: \citep[see][]{hg92}. From top to bottom, the curves show the
2368: influence of extinction, of hot dust at 600\,K, and at 1000\,K, and of
2369: A stars;
2370: the end points of
2371: the mixing curves correspond to equal $K$-band contributions from stars
2372: and from the various components.
2373: The tick marks on the extinction line show magnitude
2374: increments in $A_V$ units.
2375: \label{fig:jhk}}
2376: \end{figure}
2377:
2378:
2379: \clearpage
2380:
2381: \begin{figure}
2382: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=1.0\linewidth]{f11.eps} }
2383: \caption{The SED of \mrk\ obtained by combining our UKIRT and \spitzer\
2384: data with published data.
2385: The broadband data points are given by filled circles with error bars,
2386: upper limits
2387: by open circles, and IRS spectral points by $\times$;
2388: the IRS spectrum has been rebinned into 1\,\micron\ intervals.
2389: The global optical fluxes are taken from \citet{thuan96}, assuming
2390: colors within a 9\arcsec\ aperture centered on the nucleus.
2391: Also shown are GRASIL \citep{silva98} models of Arp\,220 (as a long-dashed
2392: curve) and M\,82 (dotted),
2393: scaled to the MIR flux between 20 and 30\,\micron.
2394: %including IRAS fluxes (open circles).
2395: \label{fig:sed}}
2396: \end{figure}
2397:
2398: %\clearpage
2399:
2400: %\begin{figure}
2401: %\hbox{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=1.0\linewidth]{f11.eps} }
2402: %\caption{\dusty\ model normalized to the SED of \mrk\ over the
2403: %extended 8 \mic\ -- 1 mm region.
2404: %including IRAS fluxes (open circles).
2405: %\label{fig:dustyfull}}
2406: %\end{figure}
2407:
2408: %\clearpage
2409:
2410: %\begin{figure}
2411: %\hbox{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=1.0\linewidth]{f12.eps} }
2412: %\caption{\dusty\ model normalized to the SED of \mrk\ over the 9--15 \mic\
2413: % MIR region.
2414: %including IRAS fluxes (open circles).
2415: %\label{fig:dustymir}}
2416: %\end{figure}
2417:
2418: \clearpage
2419:
2420: \begin{figure}
2421: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=1.0\linewidth]{f12.eps} }
2422: \caption{Comparison of the \mrk\ SED with that of the Seyfert I galaxy NGC\,4151
2423: \citep{buchanan06}.
2424: %including IRAS fluxes (open circles).
2425: \label{fig:agn}}
2426: \end{figure}
2427:
2428:
2429: \clearpage
2430:
2431: \begin{figure}
2432: \hbox{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\linewidth]{f13.eps} }
2433: \caption{Fluxes $F$ of the infrared lines (solid lines) listed in Table
2434: \ref{tab:photom} and of some optical
2435: lines (dotted lines) computed
2436: with CLOUDY for a spherical high-density \hii\ region
2437: with radius $r$. They are normalized to $F_{max}$,
2438: the flux at log $r$ = 21.25, where
2439: $r$ is in cm.
2440: \label{fig:aperture}}
2441: \end{figure}
2442:
2443:
2444: % from Marc 7/6/2006
2445: %\begin{figure}
2446: %\hbox{\includegraphics[angle=90,width=1.0\linewidth]{haro3_fig11.ps} }
2447: %\caption{
2448: %The \dusty\ fit to the spectral energy distribution of region A
2449: %in $\nu F_\nu$ vs. $\lambda$. The
2450: %thick continuous line in the model spectrum has been normalized by the median
2451: %ratio between the observed and model fluxes. The open squares
2452: %represent the NIR photometry while the open triangles represent
2453: %MIPS. For both datasets, the horizontal bar shows the
2454: %width of the filter while the vertical bar, generally smaller than
2455: %the symbol, is the error bar. The dotted line is the IRS spectrum
2456: %from which the PAH features and main ionic lines have been subtracted.
2457: %\label{fig:dusty}}
2458: %\end{figure}
2459:
2460:
2461:
2462: \clearpage
2463:
2464: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
2465: \tablecaption{IRAC and MIPS total fluxes of \mrk\ with Other
2466: Published Photometry \label{tab:photom} }
2467: \tablewidth{0pt}
2468: \tablehead{
2469: \colhead{Telescope/Instrument} & \colhead{Wavelength} & \colhead
2470: {Total flux} \\
2471: \colhead{} & \colhead{(\mic)} & \colhead{(mJy)} \\
2472: }
2473: \startdata
2474: Spitzer/IRAC & 4.51 & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.29 \\
2475: " & 7.98 & 12.7 $\pm$ 0.64 \\
2476: Spitzer/MIPS & 23.7 & 84 $\pm$ 4 \\
2477: " & 71.0 & 381 $\pm$ 10 \\
2478: " & 156.0& 442 $\pm$ 12 \\
2479: \hline
2480: IRAS\tablenotemark{a} & 12 & $<$ 108 \\
2481: " & 25 & $<$ 159 \\
2482: " & 60 & 417 $\pm$ 50 \\
2483: " & 100 & $<$ 713 \\
2484: \hline
2485: Optical\tablenotemark{b} & 0.36 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
2486: " & 0.44 & 3.7 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
2487: " & 0.55 & 4.7 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
2488: " & 0.64 & 6.9 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
2489: " & 0.79 & 6.6 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
2490: \hline
2491: IRCAM/UKIRT\tablenotemark{c} & 1.26 & 9.6 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
2492: " & 1.65 & 10.8 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
2493: " & 2.12 & 8.9 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
2494: \hline
2495: 2MASS\tablenotemark{a} & 1.2 & 10.2 $\pm$ 1 \\
2496: " & 1.6 & 12.6 $\pm$ 1 \\
2497: " & 2.2 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1 \\
2498: \enddata
2499: \tablenotetext{a}{From NED.}
2500: \tablenotetext{b}{From \citet{thuan96}, with colors defined
2501: within a 9\arcsec\ aperture centered on the nucleus.}
2502: \tablenotetext{c}{In an aperture of 20\arcsec\ diameter.}
2503: \end{deluxetable}
2504:
2505: \clearpage
2506:
2507: %\input{tabint_2.tex}
2508:
2509: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrr}
2510: % \tablenum{1}
2511: % \rotate
2512: \tablecolumns{4}
2513: \tablewidth{0pc}
2514: % \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2515: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2516: % \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2517: % \tabletypesize{\small}
2518: \tablecaption{Optical emission line intensities\tablenotemark{a}\label{tabint}}
2519: \tablehead{
2520: \colhead{Line} &
2521: \colhead{100$\times$$F(\lambda)/F({\rm H}\beta)$} &
2522: \colhead{100$\times$$I(\lambda)/I({\rm H}\beta)$} &
2523: \colhead{EW(H$\beta$)}
2524: }
2525: \startdata
2526: 3697 H17 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 \\
2527: 3704 H16 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.9 \\
2528: 3712 H15 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.2 $\pm$ 0.3& 0.7 \\
2529: 3727 [O {\sc ii}] & 99.1 $\pm$ 1.4&144.4 $\pm$ 1.8& 86.4 \\
2530: 3750 H12 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.9 $\pm$ 0.3& 1.8 \\
2531: 3771 H11 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 3.5 $\pm$ 0.2& 2.2 \\
2532: 3797 H10 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.1& 4.7 $\pm$ 0.2& 2.9 \\
2533: 3820 He {\sc i} & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.5 \\
2534: 3835 H9 & 5.3 $\pm$ 0.1& 7.3 $\pm$ 0.2& 4.7 \\
2535: 3868 [Ne {\sc iii}] & 44.7 $\pm$ 0.7& 61.7 $\pm$ 0.8& 38.1 \\
2536: 3889 He {\sc i}+H8 & 13.8 $\pm$ 0.2& 18.9 $\pm$ 0.3& 11.9 \\
2537: 3968 [Ne {\sc iii}]+H7 & 24.7 $\pm$ 0.4& 32.9 $\pm$ 0.5& 21.4 \\
2538: 4009 He {\sc i} & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.3 \\
2539: 4026 He {\sc i} & 2.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 3.1 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.0 \\
2540: 4038 N {\sc ii}+N {\sc ii}& 0.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.2 \\
2541: 4068 [S {\sc ii}] & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.8 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.2 \\
2542: 4076 [S {\sc ii}] & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.2 \\
2543: 4102 H$\delta$ & 21.8 $\pm$ 0.3& 27.8 $\pm$ 0.4& 19.2 \\
2544: 4121 He {\sc i} & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.3 \\
2545: 4143 He {\sc i} & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.0 \\
2546: 4181 N {\sc ii} & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.3 \\
2547: 4207 ? & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 \\
2548: 4232 O {\sc i} & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 \\
2549: 4244 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.7 \\
2550: 4267 C {\sc ii} & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 \\
2551: 4276 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 \\
2552: 4287 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.7 \\
2553: 4318 O {\sc ii} & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 \\
2554: 4340 H$\gamma$ & 42.7 $\pm$ 0.6& 50.2 $\pm$ 0.7& 40.6 \\
2555: 4363 [O {\sc iii}] & 14.3 $\pm$ 0.2& 16.7 $\pm$ 0.3& 13.6 \\
2556: 4388 He {\sc i} & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 \\
2557: 4415 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.0 \\
2558: 4452 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 \\
2559: 4471 He {\sc i} & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.1& 6.8 $\pm$ 0.1& 5.9 \\
2560: 4520 Si {\sc ii} & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 \\
2561: 4658 [Fe {\sc iii}] & 2.8 $\pm$ 0.1& 3.0 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.6 \\
2562: 4702 [Fe {\sc iii}] & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 \\
2563: 4713 [Ar {\sc iv}]+He {\sc i}& 1.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 1.1 \\
2564: 4734 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 \\
2565: 4755 [Fe {\sc iii}] & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 \\
2566: 4770 [Fe {\sc iii}] & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.2 \\
2567: 4778 [Fe {\sc iii}] & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.3 \\
2568: 4815 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 \\
2569: 4861 H$\beta$ &100.0 $\pm$ 1.5&100.0 $\pm$ 1.5&106.9 \\
2570: 4881 [Fe {\sc ii}] & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.4 \\
2571: 4903 [Fe {\sc ii}]+Si {\sc ii}& 2.0 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.0 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.2 \\
2572: 4922 He {\sc i} & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.2 $\pm$ 0.1& 2.4 \\
2573: 4959 [O {\sc iii}] &100.9 $\pm$ 1.5& 98.2 $\pm$ 1.4&110.3 \\
2574: 4987 [Fe {\sc iii}] & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1& 0.6 \\
2575: 5007 [O {\sc iii}] &300.0 $\pm$ 4.3&287.9 $\pm$ 4.2&328.4 \\
2576: \enddata
2577: \tablenotetext{a}{$C$(H$\beta$) = 0.53,
2578: $F$(H$\beta$) = 7.5$\times$10$^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$,
2579: $I$(H$\beta$) = 25.4$\times$10$^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$,
2580: EW$_{abs}$ = 0 \AA.}
2581: %$T_e$=$T_e$(O {\sc iii}).}
2582: %\tablenotetext{b}{Abundance are calculated adopting
2583: %$T_e$=$T_e$(He$^+$).}
2584: %\tablenotetext{c}{In units 10$^{-5}$.}
2585: %\tablenotetext{d}{In units 10$^{-6}$.}
2586: \end{deluxetable}
2587:
2588:
2589:
2590: \clearpage
2591:
2592: \begin{deluxetable}{rccl}
2593: \footnotesize
2594: \tablecaption{PAH Parameters Obtained by Fitting Lorentzian Profiles\label{tab:pahs}}
2595: \tablewidth{0pt}
2596: \tablehead{
2597: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Wavelength\tablenotemark{a}} &
2598: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Integrated\tablenotemark{b}} &
2599: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Equivalent\tablenotemark{b}} &
2600: \multicolumn{1}{c}{FWHM\tablenotemark{b}} \\
2601: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Flux} &
2602: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Width} \\
2603: \colhead{(\micron)}&\colhead{($10^{-17}$\,W\,m$^{-2}$)}
2604: &\colhead{(\micron)}&\colhead{(\micron)}}
2605: \startdata
2606: 5.759 & ~~3.3 (0.1) & 0.245 (0.029) & 0.044 (0.002) \\
2607: 6.225 & ~14.8 (0.4) & 1.030 (0.046) & 0.172 (0.005) \\
2608: 7.771 & ~54.8 (2.6) & 3.640 (0.427) & 0.837 (0.025) \\
2609: 8.664 & ~~6.1 (0.4) & 0.415 (0.064) & 0.200 (0.008) \\
2610: 11.278 & ~21.9 (1.0) & 1.360 (1.011) & 0.450 (0.260) \\
2611: %12.814 & ~~6.3 (1.3) & 0.32 (0.07) & 0.13 (0.015) \\
2612: %16.424 & ~~1.2 (0.1) & 0.06 (0.01) & 0.18 (0.007) \\
2613: \enddata
2614: \tablenotetext{a}{Rest wavelength, corrected
2615: for $z=0.00541$.}
2616: \tablenotetext{b}{Standard deviations of the repeated measurements
2617: are given in parentheses.
2618: The true uncertainty including calibration is probably $\sim$20\%.}
2619: \end{deluxetable}
2620:
2621:
2622:
2623: \clearpage
2624:
2625: \begin{deluxetable}{crccccc}
2626: \footnotesize
2627: \tablecaption{Fine Structure Line Parameters
2628: Obtained by Fitting Gaussian Profiles\label{tab:lines}}
2629: \tablewidth{0pt}
2630: \tablehead{
2631: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Line\tablenotemark{a}} &
2632: \multicolumn{1}{c}{E$_{\rm ion}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
2633: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Nominal} &
2634: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Fitted\tablenotemark{c}} &
2635: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Integrated\tablenotemark{d}} &
2636: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Equivalent\tablenotemark{d}} &
2637: \multicolumn{1}{c}{FWHM\tablenotemark{d}} \\
2638: && \multicolumn{1}{c}{Wavelength} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Wavelength}
2639: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Flux} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Width} \\
2640: &\colhead{(eV)} & \colhead{(\micron)} & \colhead{(\micron)} &
2641: \colhead{($10^{-17}$\,W\,m$^{-2}$)}
2642: &\colhead{(\micron)} & \colhead{(\micron)}}
2643: \startdata
2644: \siv & 34.8 & 10.511 & 10.512 & ~~3.4 (0.15) & 0.27 (0.14) & ~0.026 (0.0004) \\
2645: \neii & 21.6 & 12.814 & 12.814 & ~~3.8 (0.3) & 0.14 (0.04) & 0.082 (0.062) \\
2646: \neiii & 41.0 & 15.555 & 15.556 & 10.77 (0.5) & 0.22 (0.01) & 0.035 (0.005) \\
2647: \siii & 23.3 & 18.713 & 18.714 & ~~7.4 (0.5) & 0.13 (0.01) & ~0.039 (0.0006) \\
2648: \oiv & 54.9 & 25.890 & 25.901 & ~~1.2 (0.3) & 0.02 (0.01) & 0.026 (0.005) \\
2649: \siii & 23.3 & 33.481 & 33.480 & 10.85 (4.8) & 0.24 (0.10) & 0.055 (0.035) \\
2650: %\SiII & ~~8.2 & 34.815 & 34.800 & ~~4.80 (0.01) & 0.10 (0.01) & 0.056 (0.001) \\
2651: %\neiii & 41.0 & 36.014 & 36.000 & ~~1.27 (0.07) & 0.31 (0.02) & 0.66 (0.11) \\
2652: \enddata
2653: \tablenotetext{a}{Because \ariii\ and \arii\ are seen only in the low-resolution
2654: spectra, we do not give their parameters here.}
2655: \tablenotetext{b}{Ionization potential.}
2656: %(lower) of the stage leading to the transition.}
2657: \tablenotetext{c}{Rest wavelength, corrected for $z=0.00541$.}
2658: \tablenotetext{d}{Standard deviations of repeated measurements
2659: are given in parentheses.
2660: The true uncertainty including calibration is probably $\sim$20\%.}
2661: \end{deluxetable}
2662:
2663: \clearpage
2664:
2665: %\input{tabdeconv.tex}
2666:
2667:
2668: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrcrr}
2669: % \tablenum{2}
2670: % \rotate
2671: \tablecolumns{6}
2672: \tablewidth{0pc}
2673: % \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2674: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2675: % \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2676: % \tabletypesize{\small}
2677: \tablecaption{Parameters of narrow and broad emission lines\tablenotemark{a}
2678: \label{tabdeconv}}
2679: \tablehead{
2680: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Narrow component}&&
2681: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Broad component} \\ \cline{2-3} \cline{5-6}
2682: \colhead{Line} &
2683: \colhead{100$\times$$F(\lambda)/F({\rm H}\beta)$} &
2684: \colhead{FWHM (\AA)} &&
2685: \colhead{100$\times$$F(\lambda)/F({\rm H}\beta)$} &
2686: \colhead{FWHM (\AA)}
2687: }
2688: \startdata
2689: 3868 [Ne {\sc iii}] & 38.1 & 3.5 && 52.5 & 8.5 \\
2690: 3889 He {\sc i}+H8 & 16.6 & 2.6 && 11.8 & 6.1 \\
2691: 4102 H$\delta$ & 23.8 & 2.6 && 20.7 & 6.7 \\
2692: 4340 H$\gamma$ & 42.2 & 2.6 && 42.5 & 6.7 \\
2693: 4363 [O {\sc iii}] & \nodata & \nodata && 31.2 & 7.6 \\
2694: 4471 He {\sc i} & 4.3 & 2.8 && 8.6 & 8.4 \\
2695: 4686 He {\sc ii} & \nodata & \nodata && 11.4 &31.7 \\
2696: 4861 H$\beta$ &100.0 & 2.6 &&100.0 & 7.6 \\
2697: 4959 [O {\sc iii}] &126.0 & 2.7 && 69.2 & 6.6 \\
2698: 5007 [O {\sc iii}] &399.6 & 2.9 &&175.9 & 7.5 \\
2699: \enddata
2700: \tablenotetext{a}{
2701: $F$(H$\beta$)$_{nar}$ = 4.0$\times$10$^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$,
2702: $F$(H$\beta$)$_{br}$ = 3.5$\times$10$^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$.}
2703: \end{deluxetable}
2704:
2705:
2706:
2707:
2708:
2709: \clearpage
2710:
2711: %\input{tabcomparopt.tex}
2712:
2713: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}
2714: % \tablenum{3}
2715: % \rotate
2716: \tablecolumns{6}
2717: \tablewidth{0pc}
2718: % \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2719: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2720: % \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2721: % \tabletypesize{\small}
2722: \tablecaption{Comparison of observed and modeled optical emission line
2723: fluxes\tablenotemark{a} \label{tabcomparopt}}
2724: \tablehead{
2725: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{CLOUDY Models\tablenotemark{b}} \\ \cline{3-4}
2726: \colhead{Line} &
2727: \colhead{Observ.} & \colhead{Model I} & \colhead{Model Ia\tablenotemark{c}}
2728: & \colhead{Model I/Obs.} & \colhead{Model Ia/Obs.}
2729: }
2730: \startdata
2731: 3727 [O {\sc ii}] & 36.7& 73.3& 33.8& 2.00& 0.92 \\
2732: 3868 [Ne {\sc iii}] & 15.7& 15.0& 14.5& 0.95& 0.93 \\
2733: 4363 [O {\sc iii}] & 4.3& 5.1& 5.1& 1.18& 1.18 \\
2734: 4861 H$\beta$ & 25.4& 41.8& 28.4& 1.65& 1.11 \\
2735: 5007 [O {\sc iii}] & 73.1& 64.7& 64.2& 0.89& 0.88 \\
2736: \enddata
2737: \tablenotetext{a}{Fluxes are in units of 10$^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$.}
2738: \tablenotetext{b}{Fluxes are calculated assuming the distance $D$ = 21.7 Mpc.}
2739: \tablenotetext{c}{Model Ia is the same as Model I except that the
2740: radius of the modeled H {\sc ii} region is 410 pc (log $r$ = 21.1)
2741: instead of 580 pc.}
2742: %\tablenotetext{c}{Observed $I$(H$\beta$) is the
2743: %extinction-corrected flux, calculated from the
2744: %H$\alpha$ flux by \citet{gildepaz03} with $C$(H$\beta$) = 0.53.}
2745: \end{deluxetable}
2746:
2747:
2748:
2749: \clearpage
2750:
2751: %\input{tabcompar.tex}
2752:
2753:
2754: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrrrrr}
2755: % \tablenum{3}
2756: % \rotate
2757: \tablecolumns{12}
2758: \tablewidth{0pc}
2759: % \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
2760: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2761: % \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2762: % \tabletypesize{\small}
2763: \tablecaption{Comparison of observed and modeled MIR emission line
2764: fluxes\tablenotemark{a} \label{tabcompar}}
2765: \tablehead{
2766: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{CLOUDY Models\tablenotemark{b}} && \multicolumn{4}{c}{Model/Observ.} \\ \cline{3-7} \cline{9-12}
2767: \colhead{Line} &
2768: \colhead{Obs.} & \colhead{Mod.I} & \colhead{Mod.II}
2769: & \colhead{AGN} & \colhead{WNE-w}& \colhead{Shock\tablenotemark{c}} && \colhead{A\tablenotemark{d}}&\colhead{B\tablenotemark{e}}
2770: &\colhead{C\tablenotemark{f}}&\colhead{D\tablenotemark{g}}
2771: }
2772: \startdata
2773: 10.5 [S {\sc iv}] & 3.42& 0.19& 2.49& 0.65& 0.80&0.62&& 0.78& 0.97& 1.02& 0.96 \\
2774: 12.8 [Ne {\sc ii}] & 3.81& 4.21& 0.54& 0.39& 0.03&0.05&& 1.25& 1.35& 1.25& 1.26 \\
2775: 15.6 [Ne {\sc iii}] &10.77& 3.32& 6.88& 1.08& 1.02&0.88&& 0.95& 1.05& 1.04& 1.03 \\
2776: 18.7 [S {\sc iii}] & 7.39& 2.90& 3.66& 0.66& 0.38&0.39&& 0.89& 0.98& 0.94& 0.94 \\
2777: 24.3 [Ne {\sc v}] & ... & 0& 0& 0.34& 0.12&0.18&& ...& ...& ...& ... \\
2778: 25.9 [O {\sc iv}] & 1.19& 0& 0& 1.12& 1.05&0.93&& 0& 0.94& 0.88& 0.78 \\
2779: 33.5 [S {\sc iii}] &10.85& 3.33& 5.21& 0.88& 0.55&0.56&& 0.79& 0.87& 0.84& 0.84 \\
2780: %$I$(H$\beta$) &43.97\tablenotemark{c}&41.76&\nodata&\nodata& 0.95 \\
2781: %$I$(H$\beta$) &43.97\tablenotemark{c}&41.76&21.61&63.37&1.44 \\
2782: \enddata
2783: \tablenotetext{a}{Fluxes are in units of 10$^{-17}$ W m$^{-2}$.}
2784: \tablenotetext{b}{Fluxes are calculated assuming the distance $D$ = 21.7 Mpc.}
2785: \tablenotetext{c}{Shock velocity is 250 km s$^{-1}$.}
2786: \tablenotetext{d}{A=I+II.}
2787: \tablenotetext{e}{B=I+II+AGN.}
2788: \tablenotetext{f}{C=I+II+WNE-w.}
2789: \tablenotetext{g}{D=I+II+Shock.}
2790: %\tablenotetext{c}{Observed $I$(H$\beta$) is the
2791: %extinction-corrected flux, calculated from the
2792: %H$\alpha$ flux by \citet{gildepaz03} with $C$(H$\beta$) = 0.53.}
2793: \end{deluxetable}
2794:
2795:
2796:
2797:
2798:
2799:
2800:
2801:
2802: %\begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
2803: %\tablecaption{Results from the \dusty\ Fit \label{tab:dusty} }
2804: %\tablewidth{0pt}
2805: %\tablehead{
2806: %\colhead{Parameter Name} & \colhead{Unit} & \colhead{Best fit value} & \colhead%{Confidence range} \\
2807: %\colhead{(1)\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{(2)\tablenotemark{b}} &
2808: %\colhead{(3)\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{(4)\tablenotemark{d}}
2809: %}
2810: %\startdata
2811: %Starburst age & Myr & 5 & $-$\\
2812: %Silicates abundance & \% & 0 & 0$-$5\\
2813: %Graphite abundance & \% & 67 & 55$-$77\\
2814: %Amorphous Carbon abundance & \% & 33 & 23$-$45\\
2815: %a(min) & \mic & 0.008 & 0.006$-$0.010\\
2816: %a(max) & \mic & 40.0 & $>$10.8\\
2817: %Size distribution exponent & n.a. & 4 & $-$\\
2818: %R$^{\rm out}$ & pc & 430 & 353$-$453\\
2819: %Density exponent in shell & n.a. & 0 & $-$\\
2820: %T$_{\rm int}$ & K & 500 & 479$-$523\\
2821: %$\tau_{\rm V}$ & & 3 & 2.8$-$3.3\\
2822: %\enddata
2823: %\tablenotetext{a}{Parameter name.}
2824: %\tablenotetext{b}{Physical units of this parameter.}
2825: %\tablenotetext{c}{Best-fit value (mean error per pseudo-filter band is 7\%).}
2826: %\tablenotetext{c}{Range within which the change of this parameter only will
2827: %result in a mean error per pseudo-filter band of 10\%.
2828: %A $-$ corresponds to values which are so tightly constrained by our fit
2829: %that any change in them results in a mean error of $>$10\%.}
2830: %\end{deluxetable}
2831:
2832: \end{document}
2833: