1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
10: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
12:
13:
14: \newcommand{\myemail}{shogo@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
15: \newcommand\ionn[2]{#1$\;${\small\rmfamily{#2}}\relax}%
16:
17: \newcommand{\uprule}{\rule{0pt}{3.5ex}}
18: \newcommand{\dorule}{\rule[-2ex]{0pt}{3.0ex}}
19:
20: \slugcomment{Version 080916}
21:
22: \shorttitle{GC Polarization}
23: \shortauthors{Nishiyama et al.}
24:
25: \begin{document}
26:
27: \title{Magnetic Field Configuration at the Galactic Center
28: Investigated by Wide Field Near-Infrared Polarimetry}
29:
30: \author{Shogo Nishiyama\altaffilmark{1,2},
31: Motohide Tamura\altaffilmark{2},
32: Hirofumi Hatano\altaffilmark{3},
33: Saori Kanai\altaffilmark{3},
34: Mikio Kurita\altaffilmark{3},
35: Shuji Sato\altaffilmark{3},
36: Noriyuki Matsunaga\altaffilmark{1},
37: Tetsuya Nagata\altaffilmark{1},
38: Takahiro Nagayama\altaffilmark{1},
39: Ryo Kandori\altaffilmark{2},
40: Yasushi Nakajima\altaffilmark{2},
41: Nobuhiko Kusakabe\altaffilmark{4},
42: Yaeko Sato\altaffilmark{4},
43: James H. Hough\altaffilmark{5},
44: Koji Sugitani\altaffilmark{6},
45: and Haruyuki Okuda\altaffilmark{7}
46: }
47:
48: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University,
49: Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; \myemail}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
52: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
53:
54: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astrophysics, Nagoya University,
55: Nagoya 464-8602, Japan}
56:
57: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomical Sciences,
58: Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai),
59: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
60:
61: \altaffiltext{5}{Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire,
62: Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK}
63:
64: \altaffiltext{6}{Graduate School of Natural Sciences, Nagoya City University,
65: Nagoya 467-8501, Japan}
66:
67: \altaffiltext{7}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science,
68: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,
69: Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}
70: %------------------------------------------------------
71:
72: \begin{abstract}
73:
74: We present a polarimetric map of a $20\arcmin \times 20\arcmin$ area
75: toward the Galactic center.
76: The polarization of point sources has been measured
77: in the $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ bands
78: using the near-infrared polarimetric camera SIRPOL on the 1.4 m telescope IRSF.
79: One percent or better accuracy
80: of polarization degree is achieved
81: for sources with $J<14.5$, $H<13.5$, and $K_S<12.0$.
82: Comparing the Stokes parameters between high extinction stars
83: and relatively low extinction ones,
84: we have obtained a polarization originating from magnetically aligned dust grains
85: at the central region of our Galaxy of at most 1$-$2 kpc.
86: The distribution of
87: the position angles shows a peak at $\sim$20\degr,
88: nearly parallel to the Galactic plane,
89: suggesting a toroidal magnetic configuration.
90: The derived direction of the magnetic field is in good agreement with
91: that obtained from far-infrared/submillimeter observations,
92: which detect polarized thermal emission from dust in the molecular clouds
93: at the Galactic center.
94: Our results show that
95: by subtracting foreground components,
96: near-infrared polarimetry allows investigation of
97: the magnetic field structure {\it at } the Galactic center.
98:
99: \end{abstract}
100:
101: \keywords{Galaxy:center --- dust,extinction--- polarization --- infrared:ISM --- ISM:magnetic fields}
102:
103: %------------------------------------------------------
104:
105: \section{INTRODUCTION}
106: \label{sec:Intro}
107:
108:
109: The discovery of polarized radio emission extending perpendicular
110: to the Galactic plane,
111: such as nonthermal radio filaments \citep{Yusef84}
112: and polarized plumes \citep{Tsuboi86},
113: has provided early evidence for
114: a substantial poloidal component of the magnetic field
115: in the central region of our Galaxy.
116: High resolution observations at radio wavelengths
117: have revealed more filaments of similar orientations
118: \citep[e.g.,][]{LaRosa04,Yusef04},
119: where the magnetic fields were found to be predominantly
120: aligned along the filaments.
121: The accumulation of these observational results has led to the hypothesis
122: that most of the volume of the Galactic center (GC) is permeated by a {\it poloidal} magnetic field.
123:
124:
125: Evidence for the existence of a {\it toroidal} magnetic structure
126: comes from far-infrared (FIR) and submillimeter (sub-mm) observations,
127: which detect polarized thermal emission from magnetically aligned dust grains.
128: The rotation axis of the dust grain aligns with the magnetic field, and thus
129: the polarization of the thermal emission indicates the magnetic field direction
130: (the measured direction of the E-vector is orthogonal to the magnetic field).
131: The magnetic fields inferred from these observations
132: \citep[e.g.,][]{Werner88,Morris92,Hildebrand93}
133: run parallel to the Galactic plane.
134: Recent linear polarization observations of the 450-$\mu$m continuum
135: suggest a large-scale toroidal magnetic field
136: extending over a region of $170 \times 30 $ pc \citep{Novak03}.
137:
138: \citet{Chuss03} found an interesting dependence of
139: the magnetic field direction on the sub-mm flux.
140: In low density regions, the field aligns generally
141: perpendicular to the Galactic plane,
142: while in high density regions, the field has a toroidal geometry.
143: One explanation for this is that
144: the global magnetic field in the early Galaxy
145: was initially in a poloidal configuration,
146: however the gravitational energy density in dense molecular clouds
147: was strong enough to distort the poloidal field
148: into a toroidal one,
149: though it was insufficient in the low density regions.
150:
151:
152: A model which can connect the poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields
153: was proposed by \citet{Uchida85},
154: and was extended to a more realistic case by \citet{Shibata86}.
155: This magnetohydrodynamic model was developed to explain
156: the GC lobes found by \citet{Sofue84}.
157: Since magnetic flux is generally frozen into matter,
158: differential rotation and infall can shear an initially poloidal field
159: into a toroidal one.
160: Consequently, a toroidal field is developed close to the Galactic plane,
161: while the field is vertical at high Galactic latitude.
162:
163:
164: The \citet{Uchida85} model predicts that
165: the toroidal component will generally be more dominant
166: closer to the Galactic plane.
167: A map of the direction of the magnetic field
168: could therefore be a simple indicator of
169: how well this model works in the GC.
170: However, dust emissivity is high in dense, warm clouds, and thus
171: observations of dust emission in FIR/sub-mm wavelengths
172: are strongly limited to such regions,
173: which show patchy distributions in the GC region.
174:
175:
176: In this paper, we present near-infrared (NIR) polarimetry
177: of point sources toward the GC
178: covering a much larger region of the sky than
179: previous observations of this region.
180: We demonstrate that NIR polarization
181: can provide information on the magnetic field structure
182: not only in the Galactic disk,
183: but also in the central region of our Galaxy.
184:
185:
186:
187: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%---------------------------
188: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
189: \label{sec:Obs}
190:
191: We conducted NIR polarimetric observations of the GC
192: with the SIRPOL camera on the night of 4 July 2006.
193: SIRPOL consists of a single-beam polarimeter
194: \citep[a half-wave plate rotator unit and a fixed wire-grid polarizer;][]{Kandori06}
195: and the NIR imaging camera SIRIUS
196: \citep[Simultaneous Infrared Imager for Unbiased Survey;][]{Nagas99, Nagay03},
197: and is attached to the 1.4-m telescope IRSF (Infrared Survey Facility).
198: SIRPOL provides images of a 7\farcm7 $\times$ 7\farcm7 area of sky
199: in three NIR wavebands, $J$ ($1.25\mu$m), $H$ ($1.63\mu$m),
200: and $K_S$ ($2.14\mu$m), simultaneously.
201: The detectors are three 1024 $\times$ 1024 HgCdTe arrays,
202: with a scale of 0\farcs45 pixel$^{-1}$.
203: The filter system of IRSF/SIRPOL is similar to
204: the MKO system \citep{Tok02}.
205:
206: We observed a $20\arcmin \times 20\arcmin$ area (nine SIRPOL fields)
207: centered at the position of Sgr A$^*$
208: ($17^{\mathrm{h}} 45^{\mathrm{m}} 40.0^{\mathrm{s}}$,
209: $-29\degr 00\arcmin 28\farcs0 $; J2000.0).
210: We took 10-s exposures each at 4 wave plate angles
211: ($0\fdg0$, $22\fdg5$, $45\fdg0$, $67\fdg5$)
212: at each of 10 dithered positions.
213: The weather condition was photometric, with a seeing of
214: $\sim$1\farcs2 ($J$),
215: $\sim$1\farcs1 ($H$),
216: and $\sim$1\farcs0 ($K_S$).
217: The IRAF (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility)\footnote{
218: IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
219: Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for
220: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with
221: the National Science Foundation.}
222: software package was used
223: to perform dark- and flat-field corrections,
224: followed by sky background estimation and subtraction.
225:
226:
227:
228: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%---------------------------
229: \section{DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS}
230:
231: \subsection{Polarization of Point Sources}
232: \label{sec:PolPoint}
233:
234:
235: To obtain the photometric magnitudes and errors in the three bands,
236: we used the DAOFIND task in the DAOPHOT package \citep{Stetson87}
237: to identify point sources
238: in Stokes $I$ images [$I=(I_{0\degr}+I_{22\fdg5}+I_{45\degr}+I_{67\fdg5})/2$].
239: The sources were then input
240: to the ALLSTAR task for PSF-fitting photometry.
241: About 10 sources were used to construct the PSF in each image.
242: Each Stokes $I$ image was calibrated with
243: the photometric image of the same position obtained in previous imaging observations
244: \citep{Nishi06a},
245: in which the standard star \#9172 \citep{Persson98} was used for calibration.
246: We assumed that \#9172 has magnitudes of
247: $J=12.48$, $H=12.12$, and $K_S=12.03$ in the IRSF/SIRIUS system.
248:
249: In Fig. \ref{fig:Col2}
250: we show the $H-K_S$ histogram (top panel) and
251: the $JHK_S$ color-color diagram (bottom panel)
252: for stars with photometric errors of less than 0.11 mag.
253: Also plotted are loci of unreddened giants and dwarfs.
254: The arrow is parallel to the reddening vector,
255: and its length corresponds to $A_{K_S}=1$ mag
256: \citep{Nishi06a}.
257: Considering large extinction toward the GC,
258: stars with small $H-K_S$ should be attributed to foreground (disk) stars,
259: and stars consisting of the strongest peak in the $H-K_S$ histogram
260: is attributed to ones in the Galactic bulge.
261:
262:
263:
264: \begin{figure}[h]
265: \begin{center}
266: \plotone{./f1.eps}
267: \caption{
268: $H-K_S$ histogram ({\it top}) and
269: $JHK_S$ color-color diagram ({\it bottom}) for point sources
270: with $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ photometric errors of less than 0.11 mag.
271: The thick and thin curves represent the loci
272: of giants and dwarfs, respectively \citep{Tokunaga00}.
273: The arrow indicates the $A_{K_S}=1$ mag reddening vector \citep{Nishi06a}.
274: }
275: \label{fig:Col2}
276: \end{center}
277: \end{figure}
278:
279:
280: Astrometric calibration was performed, field by field,
281: with reference to the positions of point sources
282: in the 2MASS point source catalog \citep{Skrutskie06}.
283: Sources with photometric errors of less than 0.05 mag
284: in 2MASS and our catalog were used for the calibration.
285: As a result of this astrometric calibration,
286: we obtained an rms of the positional difference of better than 0\farcs1
287: for sources with a $< 0.11$ mag photometric error.
288:
289: The Stokes parameters $I$, $Q$, and $U$ for point sources
290: were determined from aperture polarimetry of combined images as follows.
291: DAOFIND and APPHOT tasks were used for the point-source identification
292: and the aperture photometry.
293: We then obtained the intensity for each wave plate angle
294: ($I_{0\degr}$, $I_{22\fdg5}$, $I_{45\degr}$, $I_{67\fdg5}$).
295: Since aperture photometry with a small aperture radius
296: gives a better photometric result than PSF-fitting photometry,
297: aperture photometry was applied in the following procedure.
298: The size of the PSF is slightly different among the four images due to variations of the seeing,
299: hence we used different apertures for each image.
300: The aperture diameters were set to be equal to
301: $2 \times \mathrm{FWHMs}$ of the best fit Gaussian profile (GFWHM)
302: determined by the PSFMEASURE task.
303: The means of the adopted aperture sizes were
304: $\sim$1\farcs2 ($J$),
305: $\sim$1\farcs1 ($H$),
306: and $\sim$1\farcs0 ($K_S$).
307: The position angle offset of SIRPOL $\alpha$ was estimated to be $\alpha = 105\degr$ \citep{Kandori06}
308: which was set to the origin of the angles $0\degr$, $22\fdg5$, $45\degr$, and $67\fdg5$.
309: Based on the intensities of the four angles,
310: we calculated the total intensity $I$ and two ``raw'' Stokes parameters $Q'$ and $U'$ as
311: \[I = (I_{0\degr} + I_{22\fdg5} + I_{45\degr} + I_{67\fdg5})/2,\]
312: \[Q' = I_{0\degr} - I_{45\degr},\]
313: \[U' = I_{22\fdg5} - I_{67\fdg5}.\]
314: The polarization degree $P$ and the position angle $\theta$ were derived by
315: \[ P = \sqrt{(Q'^2+U'^2)}/I, \]
316: \[ \theta = \frac{1}{2} \arctan(U/Q), \]
317: where
318: \begin{eqnarray}
319: Q = Q' \cos(2 \alpha) - U' \sin(2 \alpha), U = Q' \sin(2 \alpha) + U' \cos(2 \alpha).
320: \label{eq:AngCor}
321: \end{eqnarray}
322: The debiased $P$ was finally derived by $P_{\mathrm{db}} = \sqrt{P^2-\delta P^2}$
323: where $\delta P$ is the error of $P$, given by
324: \begin{eqnarray}
325: \delta P = \frac{1}{P} \sqrt{ \left( \frac{Q'}{I} \right)^2 \left[ \delta \left( \frac{Q'}{I} \right) \right]^2 +
326: \left( \frac{U'}{I} \right)^2 \left[ \delta \left( \frac{U'}{I} \right) \right]^2 }.
327: \label{eq:PError}
328: \end{eqnarray}
329: We regard sources for which $(P^2-\delta P^2) \leq 0$
330: as non-polarized source,
331: and we do not consider such sources further in this paper.
332: The typical magnitudes for $\delta P = 1 \%$ are
333: 14.5 ($J$), 13.5 ($H$), and 12.0 ($K_S$).
334:
335:
336: Fig. \ref{fig:Vmap} plots
337: the degree and position angle of stars
338: with a degree of polarization determined to have an accuracy better than 1\%.
339: The orientation of each bar gives the inferred direction of polarization
340: and the length of the bar is proportional to the degree of polarization.
341: The coordinate offsets (\arcmin) were measured with respect to the location of Sgr A$^*$.
342:
343:
344: Histograms of debiased $P$ and $\theta$ in each band
345: are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:HistAP}.
346: The mean degree and angle are
347: 6.3 \% and 8\fdg0 in the $J$ band,
348: 6.2 \% and 13\fdg6 in the $H$ band,
349: and 4.3 \% and 14\fdg4 in the $K_S$ band.
350: \citet{Kob80} detected $K$-band emission of unresolved point sources
351: at the central $7\arcmin \times 7\arcmin$ region
352: and obtained an average degree of polarization of 5\%,
353: with position angles of 10\degr ~to 15\degr,
354: showing a good agreement with our results in the $K_S$ band.
355:
356:
357: The correlation between $\theta$ in the $K_S$ band
358: and $H - K_S$ color is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:DistHKPK}.
359: To clarify the dependence of $\theta$ on $H - K_S$,
360: we divided the $H - K_S$ data set in bins of equal size (0.5 mag)
361: and calculated the mean and the standard deviation of $\theta$ in each bin,
362: represented by red crosses in Fig. \ref{fig:DistHKPK}.
363: We can see a change of the mean position angle at $H - K_S \sim 1.0$:
364: the mean angle is $\sim 5\degr$ at $0 < H - K_S < 1.0$,
365: while it is $\sim 15\degr$ at $H - K_S > 1.0$.
366: Such a change has already been indicated by \citet{Kob83},
367: and is also in good agreement with their results.
368:
369:
370: We have identified two distinct populations in Fig. \ref{fig:HistAP}:
371: stars with small $P$ and small $\theta$
372: (typically $P_J \la 5\%$ and $\theta \la 0\degr$),
373: and stars with larger $P$ and $\theta \ga 10\degr$
374: (see also Fig. \ref{fig:DistHKPK}).
375: It is conceivable that the former are nearby stars,
376: and the latter are stars distributed in the Galactic bulge.
377: The stars that corresponds to
378: the strong peak in the $P_{J}$ histogram at $\sim 2\%$
379: have a color of $H-K_S \sim$ 0.1$-$0.2 (see also Fig. \ref{fig:Col2}) and $\theta_{J} \sim 0\degr$
380: and thus are most likely to be nearby dwarfs.
381: This peak can be found in the $H$ band around $P_H \sim 1 \%$,
382: but becomes invisible in the $P_{K_S}$ histogram.
383: In the $K_S$ band, most of the stars detected
384: are red giants in the Galactic bulge,
385: which constitute a strong peak
386: in the $P_{K_S}$ histogram.
387: The strong peak at $P_{K_S} \sim 4\%$
388: corresponds to those at $\sim 7\%$ in $P_{H}$,
389: and at $\sim 10\%$ in $P_{J}$,
390: because this change of degree of polarization can be explained by
391: the power law $P_{\lambda} \propto \lambda^{-2}$
392: of the interstellar polarization \citep{Nagata94}.
393: The distinct populations,
394: and the wavelength dependence of the polarization will be discussed in another paper
395: (H. Hatano et al., in preparation).
396:
397:
398:
399: Since the vector maps in Fig. \ref{fig:Vmap}
400: are crowded and thus almost illegible,
401: we show the $K_S$-band mean vector map in Fig. \ref{fig:VHmapCol}.
402: The mean degree and position angles were calculated
403: using stars in a $0\farcm8 \times 0\farcm8$ grid
404: with ${P_{K_S}}/\delta P_{K_S}>3.0$.
405: The vectors are superposed on
406: the three color ($J$, $H$, $K_S$) composite image of the same region.
407: At a first glance,
408: most of the vectors are in order,
409: which can also be seen in the $\theta_{K_S}$ histogram,
410: and are nearly parallel to the Galactic plane.
411: Moving north-eastward across the image,
412: the position angles slightly rotate clockwise.
413: At a few positions where the number density of stars is small,
414: and hence strong foreground extinction exists,
415: the vectors have irregular directions,
416: particularly at the northwestern corner.
417: These irregularities might be explained by
418: the inherent magnetic field configuration in foreground dark clouds.
419:
420:
421: %\newpage
422: \begin{figure}[]
423: \begin{center}
424: \epsscale{0.9}
425: \plotone{./f2a.eps}
426: \plotone{./f2b.eps}
427: \plotone{./f2c.eps}
428: \caption{
429: Polarization of the Galactic center
430: for stars with $P > 0\%$ and $\delta P < 1\%$.
431: 2243, 7963, and 9661 stars
432: in the $J$ (top), $H$ (middle), and $K_S$ (bottom) bands, respectively,
433: are plotted.
434: The coordinate offsets (\arcmin) were measured with respect to
435: the location of Sgr A$^*$.
436: Each bar is drawn parallel to the E-vector of the measured polarization.
437: Their length indicates the measured degree of polarization.
438: }
439: \label{fig:Vmap}
440: \end{center}
441: \end{figure}
442:
443:
444: %\newpage
445: \begin{figure}[h]
446: \begin{center}
447: \rotatebox{180}{
448: \plotone{./f3.eps}
449: }
450: \caption{
451: Histograms of degree of polarization (left) and position angle (right)
452: in the $J$ (top), $H$ (middle), and $K_S$ (bottom) bands,
453: for stars with $P > 0\%$ and $\delta P < 3\%$.
454: 5795 ($J$), 17356 ($H$), and 18632 ($K_S$) stars are employed in these histograms.
455: }
456: \label{fig:HistAP}
457: \end{center}
458: \end{figure}
459:
460:
461: %\newpage
462: \begin{figure}[h]
463: \begin{center}
464: \rotatebox{90}{
465: \plotone{./f4.eps}
466: }
467: \caption{
468: Position angle $\theta$ in the $K_S$ band vs. $H-K_S$ diagram
469: for stars with
470: $\delta H < 0.11$, $\delta K_S < 0.11, P_{K_S} > 0\%$ and $\delta P_{K_S} < 3\%$.
471: The red crosses represent the mean and standard deviations of $\theta$
472: in 0.5 mag width bins.
473: }
474: \label{fig:DistHKPK}
475: \end{center}
476: \end{figure}
477:
478:
479: \begin{figure}[h]
480: \begin{center}
481: \rotatebox{90}{
482: \plotone{./f5.eps}
483: }
484: \caption{
485: $K_S$-band polarization vector map superposed on
486: the three color ($J$, $H$, $K_S$) composite image of the Galactic center.
487: The Galactic center is the bright yellow blob in the center.
488: The mean $P_{K_S}$ and ${\theta}_{K_S}$ are calculated
489: for each $0\farcm8 \times 0\farcm8$ grid.
490: Note here that stars with
491: $P_{K_S} > 0\%$ and ${P_{K_S}}/\delta P_{K_S}>3.0$
492: are used for the calculation, so that
493: the mean $P_{K_S}$ might be overestimated.
494: }
495: \label{fig:VHmapCol}
496: \end{center}
497: \end{figure}
498:
499:
500: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%---------------------------
501: \subsection{Separating Foreground Polarization and Galactic Center Component}
502:
503: Polarization vectors of stars trace the plane-of-the-sky projection of the magnetic field,
504: and polarimetric measurements of stars of different distances reveal
505: the three-dimensional distribution of the magnetic field orientations.
506: %averaged along the line of sight.
507: In our observed fields, we can detect stars in the Galactic disk and bulge.
508: From the stars at the close side in the Galactic bulge
509: (referred to hereafter as ``blue stars'' due to their relatively small reddening),
510: we can obtain the degree of polarization and position angle,
511: which are affected mainly by interstellar dust in the Galactic disk.
512: The light from stars at the far side in the bulge
513: (hereafter ``red stars'')
514: is transmitted through the dust in the disk {\it and} the bulge.
515: Therefore, using both blue and red stars,
516: we can obtain the bulge (GC) component of the polarization.
517: The procedure is as follows.
518: (In the following process, only $K_S$-band polarization of stars
519: is used.)
520:
521:
522: As a first step,
523: we divided the field into $10 \times 10$ sub-fields
524: of $2\arcmin \times 2\arcmin$ and
525: drew $H-K_S$ histograms for each sub-field with stars of
526: $\delta H < 0.11$, $\delta K_S < 0.11$, and $H \leq 15.0$,
527: which are much brighter than the 10$\sigma$ limiting magnitude
528: in the $H$ band (16.7 mag).
529: One of the $H-K_S$ histograms is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:ProcGCMag},
530: upper left panel.
531: Using the histograms, we evaluated
532: a peak value of the histogram ${(H-K_S)}_{\mathrm{peak}}$
533: for each sub-field.
534: Fig. \ref{fig:CMDAll} is an $H$ vs. $H-K_S$ color-magnitude diagram (CMD)
535: for stars with $\delta H < 0.11$ and $\delta K_S < 0.11$.
536: This CMD shows that the criterion $H \leq 15.0$ is bright enough
537: to avoid the influence of the limiting magnitudes ($H \approx 16.7$, $K_S \approx 15.5$)
538: on the determination of ${(H-K_S)}_{\mathrm{peak}}$.
539:
540:
541: Using the $H-K_S$ color, we divided the stars
542: with $\delta P < 3\%$ into three sub-groups:
543: ``nearby'' stars and ``blue'' and ``red'' stars in the bulge.
544: We assume that nearby stars have a color of $H-K_S<1.0$,
545: because at $H-K_S \sim 1.0$
546: the number of stars drops and approaches a minimum (Fig. \ref{fig:Col2}, top panel)
547: and a clear change of position angles can be determined (Fig. \ref{fig:DistHKPK}).
548: The ``blue'' stars are redder than $H-K_S=1.0$ and
549: bluer than ${(H-K_S)}_{\mathrm{peak}}$.
550: The stars with $H-K_S > {(H-K_S)}_{\mathrm{peak}}$
551: are selected as ``red'' stars
552: (lower left panel in Fig. \ref{fig:ProcGCMag}).
553: The average and standard deviation of ${(H-K_S)}_{\mathrm{peak}}$
554: of the 100 sub-fields are 1.85 and 0.24, respectively;
555: Fig. \ref{fig:CMDRedBlue} shows
556: the $H - K_S$ histogram (top panel) of the red and blue stars,
557: and their location in the $K_S$ vs. $H - K_S$ CMD (bottom panel).
558: The blue stars have a peak at $H - K_S \approx 1.5$,
559: while the red stars have a peak at $H-K_S \approx 2.0$.
560: The red and blue stars of {\it all} sub-fields are plotted,
561: so their distribution is overlapped in the CMD of Fig. \ref{fig:CMDRedBlue}.
562: There are $\sim 60$ to $\sim 340$ stars with $\delta P$ better than 3\%
563: in each sub-field in the $K_S$ band.
564:
565:
566:
567: As a second step to subtract the polarization originating in the bulge,
568: $Q'/I$ and $U'/I$ histograms in the $K_S$ band were constructed
569: for the blue and red stars in each sub-field
570: (upper and lower right panels in Fig. \ref{fig:ProcGCMag}).
571: We calculated their means as
572: $<Q'/I>_{\mathrm B}$, $<Q'/I>_{\mathrm R}$,
573: $<U'/I>_{\mathrm B}$, and $<U'/I>_{\mathrm R}$.
574: We then obtained the degree of polarization and position angle for the blue stars,
575: \[
576: P_{\mathrm B} = \sqrt{ \left< \frac{Q'}{I} \right>^{2}_{\mathrm B}
577: + \left< \frac{U'}{I} \right>^{2}_{\mathrm B} },~~
578: \theta_{\mathrm B} = \frac{1}{2} \arctan \left(
579: \frac{\left< \frac{U}{I} \right>_{\mathrm B}}{\left< \frac{Q}{I} \right>_{\mathrm B}} \right),
580: \]
581: and for the red stars,
582: \[
583: P_{\mathrm R} = \sqrt{ \left< \frac{Q'}{I} \right>^{2}_{\mathrm R}
584: + \left< \frac{U'}{I} \right>^{2}_{\mathrm R} },~~
585: \theta_{\mathrm R} = \frac{1}{2} \arctan \left(
586: \frac{\left< \frac{U}{I} \right>_{\mathrm R}}{\left< \frac{Q}{I} \right>_{\mathrm R}} \right).
587: \]
588: where
589: $< U/I >_{\mathrm B}$ and $< Q/I >_{\mathrm B}$, and
590: $< U/I >_{\mathrm R}$ and $< Q/I >_{\mathrm R}$
591: are the Stokes parameters
592: whose position-angle offset are corrected [see equations (\ref{eq:AngCor})].
593: We obtained $P$ and $\theta$ for the red minus blue components
594: using the following equations \citep{Goodrich86}:
595: \[
596: P_{\mathrm {R-B}} = \sqrt{ \left( \left< \frac{Q'}{I} \right>_{\mathrm R} - \left< \frac{Q'}{I} \right>_{\mathrm B} \right)^{2}
597: + \left( \left< \frac{U'}{I} \right>_{\mathrm R} - \left< \frac{U'}{I} \right>_{\mathrm B} \right)^{2} },
598: \]
599: \[
600: \theta_{\mathrm {R-B}} = \frac{1}{2} \arctan \left(
601: \frac{\left< \frac{U}{I} \right>_{\mathrm R} - \left< \frac{U}{I} \right>_{\mathrm B}}
602: {\left< \frac{Q}{I} \right>_{\mathrm R} - \left< \frac{Q}{I} \right>_{\mathrm B}} \right),
603: \]
604: where
605: $(< U/I >_{\mathrm R} - < U/I >_{\mathrm B})$
606: and
607: $(< Q/I >_{\mathrm R} - < Q/I >_{\mathrm B})$
608: are also the Stokes parameters
609: whose position-angle offset are corrected [see equations (\ref{eq:AngCor})].
610: The errors of $<Q'/I>$ and $<U'/I>$ were calculated from the standard error on the mean
611: $\sigma/\sqrt{N}$ of the $Q'/I$ and $U'/I$ histograms,
612: where $\sigma$ is the standard deviation
613: and $N$ is the number of stars.
614: The error of $P_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ was then calculated by propagation of errors
615: [see equation (\ref{eq:PError})].
616:
617:
618: %\newpage
619: \begin{figure}[h]
620: \begin{center}
621: \rotatebox{-90}{
622: \epsscale{1.0}
623: \plotone{./f6.eps}
624: }
625: \caption{
626: Upper left: $H-K_S$ histogram of a sub-field ($l,b = +1\arcmin, -1\arcmin$)
627: with stars with $\delta H < 0.11$, $\delta K_S < 0.11$, and $H \leq 15.0$.
628: The arrow represents the peak of the histogram.
629: Lower left: $H-K_S$ histograms of the same sub-field
630: for blue (hatched) and red (dotted) stars
631: with $P_{K_S} > 0\%$ and $\delta P_{K_S} < 3\%$.
632: Upper and lower right: $Q'/I$ and $U'/I$ histograms for
633: the blue (hatched) and red (dotted) stars
634: shown in the lower left histogram.
635: }
636: \label{fig:ProcGCMag}
637: \end{center}
638: \end{figure}
639:
640: %\newpage
641: \begin{figure}[h]
642: \begin{center}
643: \plotone{./f7.eps}
644: \caption{
645: $H$ vs. $H - K_S$ color-magnitude diagram
646: for stars with $\delta H < 0.11$ and $\delta K_S < 0.11$.
647: The dashed line represents $H = 15.0$.
648: }
649: \label{fig:CMDAll}
650: \end{center}
651: \end{figure}
652:
653: %\newpage
654: \begin{figure}[h]
655: \begin{center}
656: \plotone{./f8.eps}
657: \caption{
658: $H - K_S$ histograms (top)
659: and $K_S$ vs. $H - K_S$ color-magnitude diagram (bottom)
660: for red and blue stars with $P_{K_S} > 0\%$ and $\delta P_{K_S} < 3\%$.
661: Theoretical isochrones for different extinctions
662: of $A_{K_S} = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,$ and 5 mag,
663: are shown by solid curves.
664: The arrow indicates the $A_{K_S}=1$ mag reddening vector \citep{Nishi06a}.
665: }
666: \label{fig:CMDRedBlue}
667: \end{center}
668: \end{figure}
669:
670:
671:
672: We show vector maps for $P_{\mathrm B}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm B}$ (blue bars) and
673: $P_{\mathrm R}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm R}$ (red bars) in Fig. \ref{fig:VmapFGRed},
674: and the same map for $P_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$
675: in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss}.
676: The average of $P_{\mathrm B}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm B}$ are
677: 3.8 \% and 15\fdg1,
678: and of $P_{\mathrm R}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm R}$ are
679: 4.3 \% and 15\fdg0, respectively
680: (Fig. \ref{fig:HistPAFGBG}, hatched and dotted histograms).
681: Those of $P_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ are
682: also obtained as 0.85 \% and 16\fdg0
683: (white histogram in Fig. \ref{fig:HistPAFGBG}),
684: only for grids where the polarization
685: is detected with $P_{\mathrm {R-B}}/\delta P_{\mathrm {R-B}} \geq 2$.
686: The averages for $\theta_{\mathrm B}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$
687: are similar, but their dispersions are different:
688: the standard deviation of $\theta_{\mathrm B}$ is 6\fdg0,
689: while that of $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ is 21\fdg5
690: (the average of $\delta \theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ is 7\fdg6.)
691: The small dispersion of $\theta_{\mathrm B}$ suggests that
692: the long axis of the interstellar dust grains in the Galactic disk is well aligned
693: perpendicular to the Galactic plane.
694: The histogram of $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ has a peak at $\sim 20\degr$,
695: which also roughly coincides with the angle of the Galactic plane.
696: A similar result is also obtained for the $H$-band polarization.
697:
698: In Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss},
699: our $P_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ and $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ are
700: plotted overlaid on the $B$-vectors derived from FIR/sub-mm observations
701: \citep{Dotson00,Novak00,Chuss03}.
702: Although the observations are restricted to the position of dense molecular clouds,
703: we find good agreement between the FIR/sub-mm and NIR observations
704: in spite of the difference of wavelengths and methods of deriving polarization.
705:
706:
707:
708: %\newpage
709: \begin{figure}[h]
710: \begin{center}
711: \plotone{./f9.eps}
712: \caption{
713: $K_S$-band polarization map derived from the blue-star component
714: ($P_{\mathrm B}$ \& $\theta_{\mathrm B}$ : {\it blue bars})
715: and red-star component
716: ($P_{\mathrm {R}}$ \& $\theta_{\mathrm {R}}$ : {\it red bars}).
717: }
718: \label{fig:VmapFGRed}
719: \end{center}
720: \end{figure}
721:
722:
723: \begin{figure}[h]
724: \begin{center}
725: \epsscale{0.9}
726: \plotone{./f10.eps}
727: \caption{
728: $K_S$-band polarization map derived from the Galactic center component
729: ($P_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ \& $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$, {\it red bars}),
730: where the polarization is detected with $P_{\mathrm {R-B}}/\delta P_{\mathrm {R-B}} \geq 2$.
731: The polarization map at the center of our Galaxy derived
732: from FIR/sub-mm observations ({\it blue bars}) is also shown.
733: The length of the bars is proportional to the measured
734: degree of polarization,
735: and their orientation is drawn parallel to the inferred
736: magnetic field direction.
737: The FIR/sub-mm wavelengths data sets are from
738: 60 $\mu$m \& 100 $\mu$m polarimetry by \citet{Dotson00},
739: and 350 $\mu$m polarimetry by \citet{Novak00} and
740: \citet[][see also their Fig. 1]{Chuss03}.
741: Some prominent radio filaments are shown as heavy dark lines.
742: }
743: \label{fig:PABGChuss}
744: \end{center}
745: \end{figure}
746:
747: \begin{figure}[h]
748: \begin{center}
749: \plotone{./f11.eps}
750: \caption{
751: Top: Histograms of degrees of polarization
752: for $P_{\mathrm B}$ ({\it hatched}),
753: $P_{\mathrm R}$ ({\it dotted}),
754: and $P_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ ({\it white}).
755: Bottom: Histograms of position angles
756: for $\theta_{\mathrm B}$ ({\it hatched}),
757: $\theta_{\mathrm R}$ ({\it dotted}),
758: and $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ ({\it white}).
759: }
760: \label{fig:HistPAFGBG}
761: \end{center}
762: \end{figure}
763:
764:
765:
766: \section{DISCUSSION}
767: \label{sec:Disc}
768:
769: \subsection{Previous Infrared Polarimetry toward the GC}
770: \label{subsec:PrevNIR}
771:
772:
773: NIR polarimetry for diffuse emission and point sources toward the GC
774: has been conducted since the 1970's \citep{Maihara73}.
775: From the polarization angle aligned nearly along the Galactic plane,
776: and the wavelength dependence of polarization
777: well fitted by a power law \citep{Nagata94},
778: it has been interpreted that the polarization is of interstellar origin
779: dominated by dust that lies in the Galactic disk
780: \citep[e.g.,][]{Hough78,Kob80,Lebofsky82}.
781:
782: One of the deepest NIR polarimetric observations toward the GC was carried out
783: by \citet{Eckart95}
784: for a small field of $\sim 13\arcsec \times 13\arcsec$.
785: They established significant polarization
786: for 160 sources fainter than 13 mag in the $K$ band.
787: The mean flux-weighted polarization is 4 \% at 25\degr,
788: %within $7\degr$ parallel to the Galactic plane.
789: nearly parallel to the Galactic plane.
790: A similar result, $4.1 \pm 0.6 \%$ at $30 \pm 10\degr$, was also obtained by \citet{Ott99}.
791: \citet{Eckart95} concluded that most of the polarizations are
792: caused via absorption by aligned dust grains in the Galactic plane.
793:
794:
795: A change of the magnetic field configuration
796: along the line of sight toward the GC
797: has been pointed out by \citet{Kob83}.
798: The diagram of position angles in the $K$ band versus $H-K$ for 15 discrete sources
799: \citep[Fig. 5,][]{Kob83} showed that
800: the position angles are smaller and less ordered
801: for sources with $H-K<1.0$,
802: while those with $H-K>1.0$ are confined to a relatively narrow range around $20\degr$.
803: They concluded that this may indicate a change
804: of the magnetic field direction at a distance corresponding to $H-K=1.0$
805: (5 kpc or more according to their calculation).
806:
807: We can also identify a change of the position angle
808: in the $K_S$ bands at $H-K_S \sim 1.0$
809: (see Fig. \ref{fig:DistHKPK}).
810: As shown in the color-color diagram in Fig. \ref{fig:Col2},
811: most of the stars with $H-K_S \ga 1.0$ have the color of giants
812: (i.e., their unreddened positions are on the locus of giants),
813: and the strong peak in the $H-K_S$ histogram (the top panel in Fig. \ref{fig:Col2})
814: suggests that they are distributed in the Galactic bulge.
815: Hence, this change of the position angle indicates
816: a transition of the magnetic field configuration along the line of sight,
817: between the Galactic disk and bulge.
818:
819:
820: \subsection{``Red'' and ``Blue'' Stars and Their Separation in the Line of Sight}
821:
822: To discriminate between foreground disk stars and those in the Galactic bulge,
823: the criterion $H-K_S=1.0$ is applied in our analysis
824: because most stars with $H-K_S>1.0$ are attributed as
825: giants in the Galactic bulge.
826: The histogram of $H-K_S$ and
827: the color-color diagram of point sources
828: with photometric errors of less than 0.1 mag in the three bands
829: are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:Col2}.
830: Nearby stars can be found around the giants' and dwarfs' loci
831: (thick and thin curves) without reddening,
832: while most of the redder stars,
833: which are located at $H-K_S \ga 1.0$ and $J-H \ga 2.5$,
834: have a color expected for reddened giants.
835: Toward the GC, the number of stars in the bulge is
836: larger than in the exponential disk by a factor of $\sim 50$ \citep{Wainscoat92},
837: and thus most of the stars
838: at $H-K_S \ga 1.0$ and $J-H \ga 2.5$
839: are giants in the Galactic bulge.
840:
841:
842: The bottom panel of Fig. \ref{fig:CMDRedBlue} shows
843: the location of the red and blue stars
844: in the $K_S$ vs. $H - K_S$ color-magnitude diagram.
845: The theoretical Padova isochrones \citep{Girar02} for solar metallicity
846: with an age of 10 Gyr are also plotted in the color-magnitude diagram.
847: The isochrones are put at the distance of the GC \citep[7.5 kpc;][]{Nishi06b}
848: and shifted along the reddening vector \citep[$A_{K_S}/E_{H-K_S} = 1.44$;][]{Nishi06a}
849: with $K_S$ extinctions of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mag.
850: The distances to the red and blue stars are difficult to estimate accurately,
851: since we do not know the distribution of the interstellar dust
852: along the line of sight;
853: however, most of the giants in the Galactic bulge
854: can be detected for at least $K_S < 15$,
855: and for these stars,
856: we can find a clear peak in the $H-K_S$ histograms.
857: Fig. \ref{fig:CMDAll} clearly shows that
858: our observations are essentially equally sensitive
859: to stars on the near ($H-K_S \la 2.0$) and far ($H-K_S \ga 2.0$) sides
860: of the Galactic bulge for $H \leq 15.0$.
861: The clear peaks found in the $H-K_S$ histograms
862: are thus due to the spatial distribution of stars,
863: not due to a distance effect.
864: This indicates that ${(H-K_S)}_{\mathrm{peak}}$ roughly
865: corresponds to a real peak of the spatial distribution of giants along the line of sight.
866: The color-magnitude diagram of Fig. \ref{fig:CMDRedBlue} also tells us that
867: a large number of blue stars are distributed around the distance
868: where $1.0 \la A_{K_S} \la 2.0$,
869: and most of the red stars are further than the distance
870: which suffers from the extinction of $A_{K_S} = 2.0$.
871:
872:
873:
874: From the distribution of $H-K_S$ color,
875: we estimate the depth of the region where
876: we have mapped the magnetic configuration shown in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss}.
877: For each sub-field,
878: we calculated $H-K_S$ color differences
879: between the peak in the $H-K_S$ histogram and the mean colors of blue and red stars,
880: i.e.,
881: $(H-K_S)_{\mathrm{peak}} - \langle (H-K_S)_{\mathrm{blue}} \rangle$ and
882: $\langle (H-K_S)_{\mathrm{red}} \rangle -(H-K_S)_{\mathrm{peak}}$.
883: These color differences and corresponding extinction
884: $A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{blue}}} = 1.44 \times [(H-K_S)_{\mathrm{peak}} - \langle (H-K_S)_{\mathrm{blue}} \rangle]$
885: and
886: $A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{red}}} = 1.44 \times [\langle (H-K_S)_{\mathrm{red}} \rangle - (H-K_S)_{\mathrm{peak}}]$,
887: where 1.44 comes from $A_{K_S}/E_{H-K_S} = 1.44$ \citep{Nishi06a},
888: show the amount of dust extinction in the region
889: where we have obtained polarimetric information.
890: First, the amount of extinction toward the peaks in the $H-K_S$ histograms
891: can be calculated to be
892: $A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{peak}}} = 1.44 \times [(H-K_S)_{\mathrm{peak}}-(H-K_S)_0]$,
893: where the mean intrinsic color $(H-K_S)_0$ of red giants is assumed to be $\sim 0.2$
894: (see Fig. \ref{fig:CMDRedBlue}).
895: This corresponds to the amount of extinction up to the GC in each sub-field.
896: Next, the extinctions $A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{blue}}}$ and $A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{red}}}$
897: are converted to the actual distances from the GC, using a simple model.
898: To make conservative estimates, we use the model by \citet{Davies97},
899: who derived a rather extended distribution of dust.
900: \citet{Davies97} showed that
901: the extinction to the GC
902: associated with cool diffuse interstellar dust
903: can be calculated using
904: \begin{eqnarray}
905: A = C \times \int_0^{R_0} e^{-r/\alpha_{\mathrm{d}}} dr,
906: \label{eq:Extinction}
907: \end{eqnarray}
908: where $\alpha_{\mathrm{d}} \approx 5.3$ kpc is
909: a scale-length of the dust distribution in the radial direction,
910: $C$ is a constant depending on the wavelength and dust density,
911: and $R_0$ is the distance between the GC and the Sun
912: \citep[$R_0 = 7.5$ kpc;][]{Nishi06b}.
913: The distances from the GC $x_{\mathrm{blue}}$ and $x_{\mathrm{red}}$
914: corresponding to $A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{blue}}}$ and $A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{red}}}$, respectively,
915: can be estimated with the equations
916: \[ \Bigl( \int_0^{x_{\mathrm{blue,red}}} e^{-r/\alpha_{\mathrm{d}}} dr \Bigr)
917: \Bigg/ \Bigl( \int_0^{R_0} e^{-r/\alpha_{\mathrm{d}}} dr \Bigr)
918: = A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{blue,red}}} \Big/ A_{{K_S}_{\mathrm{peak}}}.\]
919: We obtained the average and standard deviation of $x_{\mathrm{blue}}$ as 0.5 and 0.1 kpc,
920: and those of $x_{\mathrm{red}}$ as 1.0 and 0.5 kpc, respectively.
921: We found a long-side tail in the $x_{\mathrm{red}}$ histogram,
922: which enlarges the average and the standard deviation.
923: This estimation suggests that
924: the polarization shown in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss} occurs
925: between the average distances of $(R_0 - 0.5)$ kpc and $(R_0 + 1.0)$ kpc from the Sun,
926: arising probably from the central 1$-$2 kpc region of our Galaxy.
927:
928:
929: In reality, the central part of the Galaxy harbors
930: a strong concentration of gas and dust called
931: the ``Central Molecular Zone'' \citep[$R \la 200$ pc;][]{Morris96},
932: which approximately corresponds to the concentration of stars called
933: the ``Nuclear Bulge'' \citep[$R \la 300$ pc;][]{Mezger96,Serabyn96}.
934: According to \citet{Launhardt02}, stars belonging to the Nuclear Bulge
935: dominate in the central part of the Galaxy (see their Fig. 14).
936: Therefore, a large portion of the stars we have detected is
937: located in the Nuclear Bulge, and the polarization at the GC
938: originates mostly within the central few hundred pc.
939:
940:
941:
942: \subsection{Magnetic Field Configuration at the GC}
943:
944:
945: As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss},
946: we present the magnetic field configuration at the central region of our Galaxy
947: by discriminating between the polarizations due to the disk and GC origin.
948: The peak of the histogram of the position angle is $\sim 20\degr$
949: (see Fig. \ref{fig:HistPAFGBG}),
950: almost parallel to the Galactic plane.
951: This coincidence, and
952: the deficiency of $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$ around $-60\degr$,
953: the angle perpendicular to the Galactic plane,
954: %and the coincidence of direction
955: %between the Galactic plane and the peak of $\theta_{\mathrm {R-B}}$
956: show the basically toroidal geometry of the magnetic field.
957: We cannot find a clear systematic dependence of position angle
958: on Galactic latitude (from $b \approx -0\fdg27$ to $+0\fdg18$),
959: suggesting that there is no systematic transition of
960: the magnetic field direction in this region.
961:
962:
963: The direction of dust grain alignment at the GC has been investigated
964: from polarized dust emission in the mid- and far-infrared and sub-mm wavelengths.
965: The magnetic field implied by the emission
966: is generally parallel to the Galactic plane in the circumnuclear disk
967: \citep[e.g.,][]{Werner88,Morris92,Hildebrand93}.
968: As seen in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss},
969: the magnetic field configuration we obtained at the GC
970: shows a good agreement globally with those obtained by
971: \citet{Dotson00}, \citet{Novak00}, and \citet{Chuss03},
972: which are the highest angular resolution polarimetry data sets in the FIR/sub-mm wavelengths.
973: The local features also show an excellent agreement:
974: %``The X polarization feature'' \citep[described in \S 3.1.4,][]{Chuss03},
975: an X-shaped feature extends from $(\Delta \alpha, \Delta \delta) = (-3\arcmin, +10\arcmin)$
976: down through ($+5\arcmin, 0\arcmin$)
977: \citep[described in \S 3.1.4,][]{Chuss03}
978: is also confirmed in our map.
979: The configuration at M$-$0.13$-$0.08 around ($-1\arcmin, -5\arcmin$) is also reproduced.
980: The polarized FIR/sub-mm emission comes from molecular clouds,
981: which are known to be located in the GC.
982: Therefore we conclude that the position angles derived from our NIR polarimetry
983: represent the direction of the aligned dust grains {\it in} the GC.
984:
985:
986: \citet{Chuss03} has suggested that the magnetic field aligns generally
987: perpendicular to the Galactic plane in low density regions,
988: while the field has a toroidal configuration in high density regions.
989: They explain this correlation using the idea that
990: in underdense regions,
991: the magnetic field energy density can support itself against gravitational forces,
992: preserving a primordial poloidal magnetic field.
993: In overdense regions like molecular clouds, on the other hand,
994: the gravitational forces are strong enough to shear the magnetic field
995: into a direction parallel to the Galactic plane.
996: In this context, lower density regions should have a poloidal configuration.
997: However, in our vector map,
998: the field shows a predominantly toroidal direction
999: even at locations where the FIR/sub-mm emission is too weak for polarimetry
1000: [at the southeastern corner in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss},
1001: see also Fig. 1 in \citet{Chuss03} and Fig. 2 in \citet{Novak03}.]
1002: The weak FIR/sub-mm emission suggests
1003: a paucity of dense clouds along the lines of sight,
1004: and the polarization
1005: in this direction can be considered to be interstellar in origin.
1006: Hence the ``interstellar'' magnetic field at the GC
1007: is dominated by a toroidal configuration,
1008: and the primordial poloidal magnetic field, if it existed,
1009: is not preserved today in this region.
1010:
1011:
1012:
1013: Several radio filaments exist in our observed field,
1014: and three of them are prominent:
1015: the GC Radio Arc \citep{Yusef84},
1016: and the Northern and Southern Threads
1017: \citep[also known as G0.08+0.15 and G359.96+0.09;][]{Morris85},
1018: which are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss}.
1019: Polarization studies have confirmed that
1020: the emission from the filaments is strongly linearly polarized,
1021: and that the internal magnetic field orientations are
1022: parallel to the long axes of the filaments \citep{Tsuboi86,Lang99}.
1023: The simplest interpretation of these observations,
1024: combined with the discovery of more filaments \citep[e.g.,][]{LaRosa04,Yusef04},
1025: is that poloidal magnetic fields are
1026: pervasive throughout the central few hundred pc.
1027: Although the polarizations originating from the filaments cannot be detected in our observation,
1028: those toward the surrounding fields can be detected.
1029: The filaments have a width of less than $\sim 10\arcsec$ \citep{Lang99},
1030: and probably have a depth similar to their width.
1031: On the other hand, the size of the grids of our analysis is $2\arcmin \times 2\arcmin$,
1032: and the polarization shown in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss} is
1033: the average of $\sim$1$-$2 kpc from the GC along the line of sight.
1034: Hence most of the stars we detected do not show a polarization originating from the filaments.
1035: However, we can detect the average polarization near the line of sight toward the filaments.
1036: As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss},
1037: most of the position angles of the grids including the filaments
1038: align nearly perpendicular to them
1039: rather than parallel.
1040: Therefore, Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss} suggests that
1041: the average magnetic field has a toroidal configuration
1042: even around the sight-lines toward the filaments.
1043: We note again that the polarization is the average along the line of sight
1044: and does not originate from the area close to the filaments.
1045:
1046:
1047:
1048: \subsection{NIR Polarization as a New Tool for Mapping the GC Magnetic Field}
1049:
1050:
1051: We have shown that the polarization of starlight can be
1052: a probe of the magnetic field near the GC.
1053: \citet{Morris98} enumerated five different ways
1054: in which the magnetic field near the GC has been studied:
1055: morphology, polarization angle, Faraday rotation of the radio continuum,
1056: Zeeman effect, and polarized dust emission in FIR/sub-mm wavelengths.
1057: The polarization of starlight has not been employed
1058: for such investigations.
1059:
1060: The optical polarization of starlight can trace
1061: the structure of the local magnetic field,
1062: but cannot detect stars near the GC due to large extinction.
1063: NIR polarimetry has been carried out toward the GC prior to our observations
1064: (see \S \ref{subsec:PrevNIR}),
1065: but division of polarization into several components
1066: (e.g., originating from the Galactic disk and the central region)
1067: has not been done previously.
1068: The wide field-of-view of the NIR polarimeter SIRPOL,
1069: and the statistical treatment of tens of thousands of stars
1070: enable us to study the magnetic field near the GC;
1071: that is, the NIR polarimetry of starlight is a new way
1072: to investigate the magnetic field.
1073:
1074:
1075: NIR polarimetry has the advantage of
1076: providing information about the magnetic field
1077: at locations where FIR/sub-mm emission is weak.
1078: NIR polarization of starlight is attributed
1079: to extinction along the line of sight by aligned dust grains,
1080: while FIR/sub-mm polarization is due to emission from the aligned dust.
1081: Hence, NIR polarimetry can investigate the magnetic field in regions
1082: where FIR/sub-mm polarimetry is absent,
1083: if background stars exist.
1084: This advantage is clearly shown in Fig. \ref{fig:PABGChuss}.
1085: We have detected polarization at positions
1086: where blue bars are not shown.
1087: The distribution of the position angles including such low emission regions
1088: shows a globally toroidal magnetic configuration at the GC.
1089:
1090:
1091:
1092:
1093: \section{SUMMARY}
1094:
1095: We have measured the near-infrared polarization of point sources toward the Galactic center (GC)
1096: in the $20\arcmin \times 20 \arcmin$ region centered at Sgr A$^*$.
1097: The difference in the Stokes parameters
1098: between stars at the close and far sides of the GC
1099: reveals the polarization originating from the central 1$-$2 kpc region
1100: of our Galaxy.
1101: The distribution of the position angle for the central region shows
1102: good agreement with those obtained from polarized emission of dust in the GC,
1103: showing that the near-infrared polarization of point sources
1104: can be used as a tool to investigate the magnetic field configuration of the GC.
1105: The position angles have a peak at $\sim 20\degr$,
1106: which is almost parallel to the Galactic plane,
1107: suggesting a global toroidal magnetic field in the region.
1108:
1109:
1110:
1111:
1112: \acknowledgements
1113:
1114: We are grateful to Hiroshi Akitaya for his helpful comments,
1115: and Jun Hashimoto for his help with our analysis.
1116: We thank the staff of the South African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO)
1117: for their support during our observations.
1118: The IRSF/SIRIUS project was initiated and supported by Nagoya
1119: University and the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
1120: in collaboration with the SAAO.
1121: SN is financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
1122: through the JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists.
1123: This work was supported by KAKENHI,
1124: Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) 19740111,
1125: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) 19204018, and
1126: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas 15071204,
1127: and also supported in part
1128: by Grants-in-Aid for the 21st Century
1129: COE ``The Origin of the Universe and Matter:
1130: Physical Elucidation of the Cosmic History'' from the MEXT of Japan.
1131: This publication makes use of data from the Two Micron All Sky Survey,
1132: a joint project of the University of Massachusetts,
1133: the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center,
1134: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
1135: and the National Science Foundation.
1136:
1137:
1138: %--------------------------------------------------------
1139:
1140: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1141:
1142: \bibitem[Chuss et al.(2003)]{Chuss03}
1143: Chuss, D. T., et al. 2003, \apj, 599, 1116
1144:
1145: \bibitem[Davies et al.(1997)]{Davies97}
1146: Davies, J. I., Trewhella, M., Jones, H., Lisk, C., Madden, A., Moss, J.
1147: 1997, \mnras, 288, 679
1148:
1149: \bibitem[Dotson et al.(2000)]{Dotson00}
1150: Dotson, J. D., Davidson, J., Dowell, C. D., Schleuning, D. A.,
1151: \& Hildebrand, R. H. 2000, \apjs, 128, 335
1152:
1153: \bibitem[Eckart et al.(1995)]{Eckart95}
1154: Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Hofmann, R., Sams, B. J., \& Tacconi-Garman, L. E.
1155: 1995, \apj, 445, L23
1156:
1157: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2002)]{Girar02}
1158: Girardi, L., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C.,
1159: Groenewegen, M. A. T., Marigo, P., Salasnich, B., \& Weiss, A.
1160: 2002, \aap, 391, 195
1161:
1162: \bibitem[Hildebrand et al.(1993)]{Hildebrand93}
1163: Hildebrand, R. H., Davidson, J. A., Dotson, J.,
1164: Figer, D. F., Novak, G., Platt, S. R., \& Tao, L.
1165: 1993, \apj, 417, 565
1166:
1167: \bibitem[Goodrich(1986)]{Goodrich86}
1168: Goodrich, R. W. 1986, \apj, 311, 882
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Hough et al.(1978)]{Hough78}
1171: Hough, J. H., McCall, A., Adams, D. J., \& Jameson, R. F.
1172: 1978, \aap, 69, 431
1173:
1174: \bibitem[Kandori et al.(2006)]{Kandori06}
1175: Kandori, R., et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6269, 159
1176:
1177: \bibitem[Kobayashi et al.(1980)]{Kob80}
1178: Kobayashi, Y., Kawara, K., Kozasa, T., Sato, S., \& Okuda, J.
1179: 1980, \pasj, 32, 291
1180:
1181: \bibitem[Kobayashi et al.(1983)]{Kob83}
1182: Kobayashi, Y., Okuda, H., Sato, S., Jugaku, J., \& Dyck, H. M.
1183: 1983, \pasj, 35, 101
1184:
1185: \bibitem[Lang et al.(1999)]{Lang99}
1186: Lang, C. C., Morris, M., \& Echevarria, L.
1187: 1999, \apj, 526, 727
1188:
1189: \bibitem[LaRosa et al.(2004)]{LaRosa04}
1190: LaRosa, T. N., Nord, M. E., Joseph, T., Lazio, W., \& Kassim, N. E.
1191: 2004, \apj, 607, 302
1192:
1193: \bibitem[Launhardt et al.(2002)]{Launhardt02}
1194: Launhardt, R., Zylka, R., \& Mezger, P. G.
1195: 2002, \aap, 384, 112
1196:
1197: \bibitem[Lebofsky et al.(1982)]{Lebofsky82}
1198: Lebofsky, M. J., Rieke, G. H., Deshpande, M. R., \& Kemp, J. C.
1199: 1982, \apj, 263, L672
1200:
1201: \bibitem[Maihara et al.(1973)]{Maihara73}
1202: Maihara, T., Okuda, H., \& Sato, S.
1203: %1973, IAUS, 52, 191
1204: 1973, in IAU Symposium no. 52,
1205: Interstellar Dust and Related Topics,
1206: ed. Greenberg, J. M., \& van de Hulst, H. C., 191
1207:
1208: \bibitem[Mezger et al.(1996)]{Mezger96}
1209: Mezger, P. G., Duschl, W. J., \& Zylka, R.
1210: 1996, \aapr, 7, 289
1211:
1212: \bibitem[Morris \& Yusef-Zadeh(1985)]{Morris85}
1213: Morris, M., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F.
1214: 1985, \aj, 90, 2511
1215:
1216: \bibitem[Morris et al.(1992)]{Morris92}
1217: Morris, M., Davidson, J. A., Werner, M., Dotson, J., Figer, D. F., Hildebrand, R., Novak, G., Platt, S.
1218: 1992, \apj, 399, L63
1219:
1220: \bibitem[Morris \& Serabyn(1996)]{Morris96}
1221: Morris, M., \& Serabyn, E.
1222: 1996, \araa, 34, 645
1223:
1224: \bibitem[Morris(1998)]{Morris98}
1225: Morris, M. 1998, in IAU Symp. 184, The Central Regions of the Galaxy and
1226: Galaxies, ed. Y. Sofue (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 331
1227:
1228: \bibitem[Nagashima et al.(1999)]{Nagas99} Nagashima, C., et al. 1999,
1229: in Star Formation 1999, ed. T. Nakamoto
1230: (Nobeyama : Nobeyama Radio Obs.), 397
1231:
1232: \bibitem[Nagayama et al.(2003)]{Nagay03} Nagayama, T., et al. 2003,
1233: Proc. SPIE, 4841, 459
1234:
1235: \bibitem[Nagata et al.(1994)]{Nagata94}
1236: Nagata, T., Kobayashi, N., \& Sato, S.
1237: 1994, \apj, 423, L113
1238:
1239: \bibitem[Nishiyama et al.(2006a)]{Nishi06a}
1240: Nishiyama, S., et al. 2006b, \apj, 638, 839
1241:
1242: \bibitem[Nishiyama et al.(2006b)]{Nishi06b}
1243: Nishiyama, S., et al. 2006a, \apj, 647, 1093
1244:
1245: \bibitem[Novak et al.(2000)]{Novak00}
1246: Novak, G., Dotson, J. L., Dowell, C. D., Hildebrand, R. H., Renbarger, T., \& Schleuning, D. A.
1247: 2000, \apj, 529, 241
1248:
1249: \bibitem[Novak et al.(2003)]{Novak03}
1250: Novak, G., Chuss, D. T., Renbarger, T., Griffin, G. S., Newcomb, M. G.,
1251: Peterson, J. B., Loewenstein, R. F., Pernic, D., \& Dotson, J. L.
1252: 2003, \apj, 583, L83
1253:
1254: \bibitem[Ott et al.(1999)]{Ott99}
1255: Ott, T., Eckart, A., \& Genzel, R. 1999, \apj, 523, 248
1256:
1257: \bibitem[Persson et al.(1998)]{Persson98}
1258: Persson, S. E., Murphy, D. C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., \& Rieke, M. J.
1259: 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
1260:
1261: \bibitem[Serabyn \& Morris(1996)]{Serabyn96}
1262: Serabyn, E., Morris, M.
1263: 1996, \nat, 382, 602
1264:
1265: \bibitem[Shibata \& Uchida(1986)]{Shibata86}
1266: Shibata, K., \& Uchida, Y. 1986, \pasj, 38, 631
1267:
1268: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{Skrutskie06}
1269: Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
1270:
1271: \bibitem[Sofue \& Handa(1984)]{Sofue84}
1272: Sofue, Y., \& Handa, T. 1984, \nat, 310, 568
1273:
1274: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{Stetson87}
1275: Stetson, P. B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
1276:
1277: \bibitem[Tokunaga(2000)]{Tokunaga00}
1278: Tokunaga, A. T. 2000, Astrophysical Quantities, 4th edition,
1279: ed. Cox, A. (AIP Press), p.143
1280:
1281: \bibitem[Tokunaga et al.(2002)]{Tok02}
1282: Tokunaga, A. T., Simons, D. A., \& Vacca, W. D.
1283: 2002, \pasp, 114, 180
1284:
1285: \bibitem[Tsuboi et al.(1986)]{Tsuboi86}
1286: Tsuboi, M., Inoue, M., Handa, T., Tabara, H., Kato, T., Sofue, Y., \& Kaifu, N.
1287: 1986, \aj, 92, 818
1288:
1289: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(1985)]{Uchida85}
1290: Uchida, Y., Sofue, Y., \& Shibata, K.
1291: 1985, \nat, 317, 699
1292:
1293: \bibitem[Wainscoat et al.(1992)]{Wainscoat92}
1294: Wainscoat, R. J., Cohen, M., Volk, K., Walker, H. J., \& Schwartz, D.
1295: 1992, \apjs, 83, 111
1296:
1297: \bibitem[Werner et al.(1988)]{Werner88}
1298: Werner, M. W., Davidson, J. A., Morris, M., Novak, G., Platt, S. R., Hildebrand, R. H.
1299: 1988, \apj, 333, 729
1300:
1301: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(1984)]{Yusef84}
1302: Yusef-Zadeh, F., Morris, M., \& Chance, D.
1303: 1984, \nat, 310, 557
1304:
1305: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(2004)]{Yusef04}
1306: Yusef-Zadeh, F., Hewitt, J. W., \& Cotton, W.
1307: 2004, \apjs, 155, 421
1308:
1309:
1310: \end{thebibliography}
1311:
1312: \end{document}
1313: