1: \documentclass[prl,twocolumn,showpacs,nofootinbibs,superscriptaddress
2: ]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{epsf}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{amsmath}
6:
7: %\topmargin = 0cm
8:
9: % MACROS:--------------------------------------------
10: % equations
11: \newcommand{\im}{{\rm Im}}
12: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
13: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
14: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}
15: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
16: \newcommand{\tr}{\mbox{\rm tr}}
17: %
18: \newcommand{\half}{{\textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}}}
19: \newcommand{\quarter}{{\textstyle{\frac{1}{4}}}}
20: \newcommand{\textfrac}[2]{{\textstyle{\frac{#1}{#2}}}}
21: \newcommand{\displayfrac}[2]{\displaystyle{\frac{#1}{#2}}}
22: \newcommand{\fourint}[1]{\int\!\frac{d^4 #1}{(2\pi)^4}}
23: \newcommand{\cM}{{\cal M}}
24: \newcommand{\cA}{{\cal A}}
25: \newcommand{\partialslash}{\partial\hspace{-.5em}/\hspace{.15em}}
26: %
27: \newcommand{\pz}{p\!\cdot\! z}
28: \newcommand{\rz}{r\!\cdot\! z}
29: \newcommand{\partialboth}{\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}}
30: \newcommand{\nablaboth}{\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\nabla}}
31: %
32:
33:
34: \begin{document}
35: \preprint{}
36:
37:
38: \title{Chiral Logarithms Tamed}
39:
40: \author{Nikolai Kivel}
41: %\email{}
42: \affiliation{Petersburg Nuclear Physics
43: Institute, Gatchina, St.\ Petersburg 188350, Russia}
44: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik II,
45: Ruhr--Universit\"at Bochum, D--44780 Bochum, Germany}
46:
47: \author{Maxim V. Polyakov}
48: %\email{}
49: \affiliation{Petersburg Nuclear Physics
50: Institute, Gatchina, St.\ Petersburg 188350, Russia}
51: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik II,
52: Ruhr--Universit\"at Bochum, D--44780 Bochum, Germany}
53:
54: \author{Alexei Vladimirov}
55: %\email{}
56: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik II,
57: Ruhr--Universit\"at Bochum, D--44780 Bochum, Germany}
58: \affiliation{Bogolubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR, 141980 Dubna, Russia}
59:
60:
61: \date{\today}
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: We derive non-linear recursion relations for the leading chiral
65: logarithms (LLs). These relations not only provide a very
66: efficient method of computation of LLs (e.g. the 33-loop
67: contribution is calculated in a dozen of seconds on a PC) but also
68: equip us with a powerful tool for the summation of the LLs. Our
69: method is not limited to the chiral perturbation theory only, it
70: is pertinent for any non-renormalizable effective field theory
71: such as, for instance, the theory of critical phenomena,
72: the low-energy
73: quantum gravity, etc.
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \pacs{}
77:
78: \maketitle
79: \thispagestyle{empty}
80:
81: The very fact of the spontaneous breakdown of the approximate
82: chiral symmetry in strong interactions leads to the possibility of
83: the systematic expansion of hadronic amplitudes and correlation
84: functions at low energies. The expansion is organized in powers of
85: external momenta and the masses of pseudo-Goldstone bosons
86: (pions). We denote the corresponding expansion parameter
87: generically as $p^2$. An efficient method to perform the chiral
88: expansion is based on the technique of effective chiral Lagrangian
89: \cite{weinberg79}. The leading $O(p^2)$ hadronic amplitudes can
90: be obtained from the tree diagrams of the famous Weinberg Lagrangian \cite{weinberg68}:
91:
92: \be
93: \label{L2}
94: \mathcal{L}_{2}=\frac{F^{2}}{4}\text{~} \text{tr}\left[ \left( \partial_\mu U\partial_\mu
95: U^{\dagger}\right) +m^{2}\left( U+U^{\dagger}\right) \right]\, ,
96: \ee
97: where $F$ is the pion decay constant in the chiral limit, and $m$ is the pion mass. The chiral corrections of the order $O(p^4 \ln p^2)$ can be obtained from the
98: one-loop calculation with the Weinberg Lagrangian (\ref{L2}) \cite{Pagels,weinberg79}. In order to compute higher corrections, e.g. $O(p^4)$,
99: $O(p^6 \ln p^2)$, etc., one has to include terms with four and higher derivatives in the effective chiral Lagrangian \cite{gasser}.
100: Note, however, that the leading chiral logarithms (LLs), i.e. the correction of the form $O(p^2[p^2\ln p^2]^n)$ can be obtained
101: from the $n$-loop diagrams generated by the Weinberg Lagrangian (\ref{L2}). The conciseness and beauty of the leading logarithm approximation lies
102: in the fact that LL corrections depend only on one basic low-energy constant -- $F$. In this approximation one avoids rapid proliferation of the
103: low-energy constant with increasing of the chiral order.
104: The calculation of LLs is a herculean task -- it requires the computation of $n$-loop diagrams in the
105: {\it non-renormalizable} field theory (\ref{L2}). Presently, the LLs are computed to the two-loop accuracy for the $\pi\pi$-scattering amplitude \cite{colangelo1},
106: to the five-loop accuracy for the correlator of scalar currents \cite{bissegger}, and to the three-loop accuracy for the generalized parton
107: distributions (GPDs) \cite{my}. We note that for the case of the chiral corrections to GPDs the summation of LLs is indispensable \cite{my,Kivel08}, because
108: the smallness of the chiral expansion parameter is compensated by $1/x_{\rm Bj}^n$.
109:
110: In this Letter we present an efficient method to compute LLs. This method reduces the task of LLs computation to a simple algebraic problem, and paves a way towards
111: the summation of LLs.
112:
113: We discuss details of the method for the
114: massless $O(N+1)$ $\sigma$-model defined by the Lagrangian:
115:
116: \be
117: \label{ON}
118: \mathcal{L}_{2}&=&\text{~}\frac{1}{2}\left[ \partial_{\mu}\sigma\partial_{\mu
119: }\sigma+\partial_{\mu}\pi^{a}\partial_\mu\pi^{a}\right] \, ,
120: \ee
121: where the fields are constrained by the relation $\sigma^{2}+\sum_{a=1}^{N}\pi^{a}\pi^{a}=F^{2}\, .$
122: We consider the $O(N+1)$ $\sigma$-model for the following reasons:
123: \begin{itemize}
124: \item
125: It is equivalent to the massless two-flavour Weinberg Lagrangian
126: (\ref{L2}) for $N=3$.
127: \item
128: It is a free field theory for $N=1$, which can be used as a check of our calculations
129: \item
130: It can be solved in the large-$N$ limit,
131: which provides a check of our calculations and allows us to asses the accuracy of the $1/N$ expansion
132: without tedious calculations.
133: \end{itemize}
134: For simplicity,
135: we consider LLs for the forward $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitude in the massless $O(N+1)$ $\sigma$-model (\ref{ON}).
136: The reader can easily apply our method to an observable in a field theory of her/his choice.
137: The forward amplitude computed at Mandelstam $t=0$ has the form:
138:
139: %\begin{widetext}
140: \be
141: \label{amp}
142: T^{abcd}(s)=\delta^{ab}\delta^{cd}A(s)+\delta^{cb}\delta^{da}B(s)+\delta^{bd}\delta^{ac}C(s).
143: \ee
144: %\end{widetext}
145: The chiral expansion of the functions $A(s),B(s),C(s)$ has the following structure
146: \be
147: \label{struktura}
148: A(s)&=&(4\pi)^2 S\ \sum_{n=0}^\infty \sum_{k=0}^n A_n^{(k)} S^n\ L^k \, ,\\
149: \nonumber
150: B(s)&=&(4\pi)^2 S\ \sum_{n=1}^\infty \sum_{k=0}^n B_n^{(k)} S^n\ L^k ,~~C(s)=A(-s)\, ,
151: \ee
152: where we introduce a dimensionless invariant energy $S\equiv s/(4\pi F)^2$ and $L$ denotes the chiral logarithms,
153: $L\equiv \ln(\mu^2/s)$, $\mu$ is the renormalization scale. The first
154: $A_0^{(0)}$-term in the expression for $A(s)$
155: corresponds to the tree contribution to the scattering amplitude
156: in the $O(N+1)$ $\sigma$-model (\ref{ON}). The other terms are higher chiral order corrections. Our aim consists in the
157: calculation of the LL coefficients $A_n^{(n)}\equiv A_n$ and $B_n^{(n)}\equiv B_n$
158: appeared in Eq.~(\ref{struktura}).
159:
160: Simple power counting \cite{weinberg79}
161: shows that the coefficient $A_n^{(k)}$ originates from the $k$-loop diagram with vertices from the chiral Lagrangian
162: $\mathcal{L}_p$ with the number of derivatives of the pion fields $p\leq 2(n+1-k)$. We see that the
163: $n$-th order LL coefficient
164: receives contribution from the $n$-loop diagrams with vertices generated by the leading Lagrangian (\ref{ON}).
165: The UV divergencies in a $n$-loop diagram are removed by the subtraction of lower-loop graphs with
166: insertion of the local counterterms corresponding to the subdivergencies of the original $n$-loop diagram. See detailed
167: discussion of the structure of the subtractions in Refs.~\cite{colangelo,Kivel08}. The local counterterms
168: relevant
169: for our calculations renormalize
170: the couplings the all-order Lagrangian, which encodes the structure of counterterms:
171:
172: \be
173: \label{ct}
174: \mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{8} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{j=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{n}
175: \frac{g_{nj}(\mu)}{(4\pi F)^{2n}}\partial^{2n}P_{j}\left(\frac{\partial_1 \partial_2}{\partial^2} \right).
176: \ee
177: Here $P_{j}$ are Legendre polynomials and
178: a convenient notation
179: for the operator monomials is introduced:
180:
181: \begin{widetext}
182: \be
183: \partial^{2n}\left(\frac{\partial_1 \partial_2}{\partial^2} \right)^{j}\equiv
184: \left(\pi^a \overleftrightarrow{\partial}_{\nu_1}\ldots \overleftrightarrow{\partial}_{\nu_{j}}\pi^a\right)
185: \partial^{2(n-j)}
186: \left(\pi^b \overleftrightarrow{\partial}_{\nu_1}\ldots \overleftrightarrow{\partial}_{\nu_{j}}\pi^b\right)\,.
187: \ee
188: \end{widetext}
189: The coupling constants $g_{nj}(\mu)$ are enumerated by two indices. The index $n$ indicates the number of
190: derivatives of the pion fields ( equal to $2n$) in the corresponding counterterm. We refer to the index $n$ as ``principal index".
191: The second index $j$ corresponds to the ``exchanged spin" of the counterterm.
192: The tree level contribution of the vertices (\ref{ct}) to the amplitude can be easily computed with the result:
193: \be
194: \label{ampct}
195: A_{\rm tree}(s)&=&-\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-S)^n\sum_{j=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{n}g_{nj}(\mu)\, ,\\
196: \nonumber
197: B_{\rm tree}(s)&=&-\sum_{n=2\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^\infty (S)^{n} g_{n n}(\mu)\ \frac{(2n)!}{n!n!}\, .
198: \ee
199: The expansion coefficients $A_n^{(k)}$ and $B_n^{(k)}$ of the amplitude (\ref{struktura}) are functions of the infinite
200: set of couplings $g_{nj}(\mu)$, denoted by $\bf g$. These coefficients depend on the renormalization scale $\mu$
201: through $\mu$-dependence of the couplings $\bf g$. The renormalized (physical) amplitude is given by the sum of
202: Eq.~(\ref{struktura}) and Eq.~(\ref{ampct}) and it must be independent of $\mu$.
203: Thus, imposing the requirement that
204: $\mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} (A(s)+A_{\rm ct}(s))=0$ we obtain\footnote{Below we discuss the amplitude $A$ only, the discussion
205: for the amplitudes $B$ and $C$ is analogous. For the latter we provide only the final result} the following set of equations:
206:
207: \be
208: \label{uravn}
209: A_n^{(1)}({\bf g})+(-1)^{n}\sum_{j=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{n+1}
210: \beta_{n+1j}({\bf g})=0\\
211: \nonumber \hat{H} A_n^{(k)}({\bf g})+(k+1)A_n^{(k+1)}({\bf
212: g})=0\,. \ee
213: Here the $\beta$-functions are defined as
214: $\beta_{nj}({\bf g})\equiv \mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} g_{nj}(\mu)$. Also we have introduced
215: the differential operator $\hat{H}$ acting on the space of the
216: coupling constants:
217: \be \label{H}
218: \hat{H}\equiv \sum_{n=1}^\infty \sum_{j=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm
219: even}}^{n}\beta_{nj}({\bf g})\frac{\partial}{\partial g_{nj}}\, .
220: \ee The set of equations (\ref{uravn}) has the following solution:
221: \be
222: \label{solu} A_n^{(k)}({\bf g})=\frac{(-1)^{n+k}}{k!}\hat{H}^k
223: \sum_{j=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{n+1} g_{n+1j}. \ee
224: The
225: lowest constant $A_0^{(0)}=g_{10}=1$ is fixed by the tree level
226: calculations with the Lagrangian (\ref{ON}). We see from the
227: solution (\ref{solu}) that, in order to obtain the LLs (constants
228: $A_n^{(n)}$), we have to apply the operator $\hat H$ $n$ times to a
229: linear combination of the coupling constants $g_{nj}$. This at
230: first glance formidable problem can be solved if one notes the
231: following crucial property of the operator $\hat{H}$: \be
232: \label{crucial} \hat{H}^n\ g_{mj}=0,~~ {\rm if}~~m < n\, . \ee
233: Indeed, the loop diagrams contributing to the renormalization of the
234: constant $g_{mj}$ include vertices with constants $g_{pl}$ with
235: $p < m$ only. It implies that the $\beta_{mj}(\bf g)$-functions
236: depend only on the subset of the low-energy constants $g_{pl}$
237: with $p< m$. Hence, it is easy to see that the application of
238: the operator $\hat H$ to $g_{mj}$ leads to the lowering of the
239: principal index $m$ by one unit, i.e. we can write the general
240: form of the action of $\hat{H}^n$ on $g_{n+1j}$: \be
241: \label{uravneniedlyomega} \hat{H}^n g_{n+1j}= n!\ \omega_{nj}
242: g_{10}^{n+1}= n!\ \omega_{nj}\, . \ee The expression (\ref{uravneniedlyomega}) simultaneously presents the
243: definition of quantities $\omega_{nj}$ ($n$ is the number of
244: loops and $j\leq (n+{\rm Mod}(n,2))$),
245: which
246: determine the LL coefficients $A_n\equiv A_n^{(n)}$ (see Eq.~(\ref{solu}) with $k=n$).
247:
248: Now our aim is to calculate $\omega_{nj}$ from Eq.~(\ref{uravneniedlyomega}). Due to the
249: property (\ref{crucial}) only one-loop piece of $\beta_{nj}$-functions, which is quadratic in couplings $g_{nj}$, contribute to Eq.~(\ref{uravneniedlyomega}).
250: This observation is in accordance with general RG analysis of Ref.~\cite{colangelo}. The general structure of the one-loop
251: $\beta_{nj}$-function is the following:
252: %\begin{widetext}
253: \be
254: \label{1loop}
255: \beta_{nj}^{\rm 1-loop}({\bf g})=
256: \sum_{m=1}^{n-1}\sum_{i=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{m}\sum_{l=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{n-m}
257: {\mathcal B}_{j}^{(m,i)(n-m,l)}\ g_{mi} g_{(n-m)l}
258: \ee
259: Here ${\cal B}_{j}^{(m,i)(n-m,l)}$ are numerical coefficients which can be obtained from the calculation of one-loop diagrams
260: shown in Fig.~1.
261: \begin{figure}
262: \includegraphics[width =7.cm]{pipi_loops.eps}
263: \caption{One loop diagrams contributing to the $\beta$-functions coefficients (\ref{bety}). Filled squares denote the
264: counterterms $(mi)$ and $(pl)$ introduced in Eq.~(\ref{ct}). }
265: \label{fig:halla}
266: \end{figure}
267: The result of calculations gives the following result:
268: \begin{widetext}
269: \be
270: \label{bety}
271: {\mathcal B}_{j}^{(m,i)(p,l)}=\frac{1}{2j+1}\left[\frac{N}{2}\delta_{ij}\delta_{lj}+\delta_{ij} \Omega^{li}_{p}
272: +\delta_{l j} \Omega^{il}_{m}
273: \right]+\left(1+(-1)^j\right)\sum_{k=0}^{{\rm min }[p,m]} \frac{\Omega_m^{ik} \Omega_{p}^{lk} \Omega_{m+p}^{kj}}{2 k+1}\, ,
274: \ee
275: \end{widetext}
276: where constants $\Omega_n^{AB}$ are computed as the following integral with Legendre polynomials:
277: \be
278: \label{omega}
279: \Omega_n^{AB}=\frac{2 B+1}{2^{n+1}}\int_{-1}^1 dx P_A\left(\frac{x+3}{x-1}\right) P_B(x) (x-1)^n.
280: \ee
281: The $(n+1)\times (n+1)$ matrix $\hat{\Omega}_n$ with matrix elements given by Eq.~(\ref{omega}), posses
282: many beautiful and intriguing properties. For example,
283: $\hat{\Omega}_n^2=1$ and $\tr(\hat{\Omega}_n)=\sin(\pi n) $, which follow from the fact that the matrix $\hat{\Omega}$ represents
284: $SL(2,R)$ transformations.
285: The relation of this symmetry group to the general structure of the renormalization procedure in a wide class of effective quantum field theories will be discussed elsewhere.
286:
287:
288: Now substituting the one-loop $\beta$-function (\ref{1loop}) into Eq.~(\ref{uravneniedlyomega}) we obtain
289: the following nonlinear recursive relations for desired coefficients $\omega_{nj}$:
290: \be
291: \label{main}
292: \omega_{nj}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{m=0}^{n-1}\sum_{i=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{m+1}\sum_{l=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{n-m}
293: {\mathcal B}_{j}^{(m+1,i)(n-m,l)} \omega_{mi}\omega_{(n-m-1) l},
294: \ee
295: The recursion (\ref{main}) allows to express the higher coefficients $\omega_{nj}$ through that with lower principal indices, starting with $\omega_{00}=1$.
296: [We remind that $n$ enumerates the loop order and $j\leq (n+{\rm Mod}(n,2))$]
297: The coefficients of the $\beta$-functions ${\mathcal B}_{j}^{(m+1,i)(n-m,l)}$ are given by Eq.~(\ref{bety}). The LLs for the amplitudes $A(s), B(s)$
298: [($C_n=(-1)^{n+1} A_n$)]
299: can be computed in terms of $\omega_{nj}$ as follows:
300: \be
301: A_n=\sum_{j=0\atop \scriptstyle{\rm even}}^{n+1} \omega_{nj}\,,~~B_n=\frac{(2n+2)!}{[(n+1)!]^2} \omega_{nn+1}
302: \ee
303:
304: The recursive relation (\ref{main}) is the main result of the
305: present paper. It allows a very fast computation of LLs. For
306: example, the 33-loop chiral LL is computed in a dozen of seconds
307: on a PC \footnote{Mathematica notebook for computing LLs is
308: available at
309: http://www.tp2.rub.de/$\sim$maximp/research/research.html}. The
310: 6-loop results for LLs are presented \footnote{We are limited in
311: the presentation of the results by the page size only.} in Table~A
312: for the amplitude $A(s)$ and 7-loop results in Table~B
313: for the amplitude $B(s)$.
314:
315:
316:
317: Our results for LLs for $N=3$ agree with two-loop calculations of
318: $\pi\pi$ amplitude \cite{colangelo1} and with five-loop results
319: for the correlator of the scalar currents \cite{bissegger}.
320: Additional check of our method is provided by the case of $N=1$.
321: Indeed, for that value of $N$ the Lagrangian (\ref{ON})
322: corresponds to a free field theory, therefore we should obtain
323: nullification of LLs. For $N=1$ the scattering amplitude is given
324: by the sum $A(s)+B(s)+C(s)$, it is easy to see that all LLs are
325: cancelled in this case.
326:
327: The non-linear recursion relation (\ref{main}) for LLs is valuable
328: not only because it renders a breakthrough in the calculations of
329: LLs, it also allows general theoretical studies of LLs anatomy in
330: wide class of effective theories. As an example, let us consider
331: the behaviour of LLs in the large-$N$ limit of $O(N+1)$
332: $\sigma$-model. In this limit we can neglect all terms in the
333: expression (\ref{bety}) but the first one. Then, the recursion
334: relation (\ref{main}) for large $N$ LLs is simplified
335: considerably: \be \omega_{nj}^{\rm LN}=\frac{1}{2 n
336: }\sum_{m=1}^{n-1} \frac{N}{2 j+1}\ \omega_{mj}^{\rm
337: LN}\omega_{(n-m-1)j}^{\rm LN}. \ee The solution of this recursion
338: is obvious: \be \label{LNLL} \omega_{nj}^{\rm
339: LN}=\left(\frac{N}{2}\right)^n\ \delta_{j0}. \ee This solution is
340: in agreement with the direct large-$N$ calculations in the
341: $O(N+1)$ $\sigma$-model, see e.g. \cite{Coleman}. In order to
342: compute the $1/N$ corrections to the leading result (\ref{LNLL})
343: we substitute the LLs in the form: \be
344: \omega_{nj}=\left(\frac{N}{2}\right)^n\left[ \delta_{j0}+
345: \frac{c_{nj}^{(1)}}{N}+\ldots\right]\, \ee into the recursion
346: relation (\ref{main}) and obtain the linear equation for the
347: coefficients $c_{nk}^{(1)}$. This equation has a solution in terms
348: of the Lerch function. The corresponding expression is rather
349: long, instead we give the result for the LL coefficients $A_n$ for
350: the leading and subleading $1/N$ orders in the case of large
351: number of loops $n\gg 1$. The leading $1/N$ asymptotic of the
352: amplitude $B$ we compute without any assumptions about $n$. The
353: result is: \be \nonumber A_n &=& \left(\frac{N}{2} \right)^n
354: \left[1-\left(\frac{\pi^2}{3}-8(1-\ln 2)\right)
355: \frac{n}{N}+\ldots\right]\, ,\\
356: \nonumber
357: B_n&=&\left(\frac{N}{2}\right)^{n-1} \frac{2}{2+n}\left[1+O\left(\frac{1}{N}\right)\right].
358: \ee
359: It is a remarkable
360: result! It shows that the $1/N$ expansion for $O(N+1)$
361: $\sigma$-model fails in the chiral order $n\sim N$ and the
362: expansion requires reordering.
363:
364: In summary, we have developed the method of
365: non-linear recursion relations (\ref{main}) which allows a calculation the leading chiral logarithms to essentially unlimited order.
366: Furthermore, this method presents a puissant tool
367: for study of general structure of infrared logarithms. It can be applied to any physics problem described by a non-renormalizable
368: effective low-energy Lagrangian, e.g. theory of critical phenomena, low-energy quantum gravity,
369: theory of magnetics, etc.
370:
371: \begin{acknowledgments}
372:
373: This work was supported in parts by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, by BMBF,
374: by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,
375: the Heisenberg--Landau Programme grant,
376: and the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research
377: grants No.\ 06-02-16215 and 07-02-91557
378:
379: \end{acknowledgments}
380:
381:
382: \begin{widetext}
383: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.2}
384: \be\label{table1}
385: \scriptsize
386: \nonumber
387: \text{Table A}\\
388: \scriptsize
389: \nonumber
390: \begin{array}{c|l|l}
391: \hline
392: \hline
393: \# \text{ loops} & N=3 & \text{ Arbitrary}~~ N \\
394: \hline
395: 1 & \frac{2}{3} & \frac{N}{2}\left(1-\frac{5 }{3N}\right) \\
396: \hline
397: 2 & \frac{25}{18} & \frac{N^2}{4}\left(1-\frac{37}{18 N}+\frac{49}{18 N^2}\right) \\
398: \hline
399: 3 & \frac{577}{540} & \frac{N^3}{8}\left(1-\frac{287}{90 N}+\frac{407}{90 N^2}-\frac{448}{135 N^3}\right)
400: \\ \hline
401: 4 & \frac{1481}{864} & \frac{N^4}{16}\left(1-\frac{20753}{5400 N}+\frac{363091}{48600 N^2}-\frac{17849}{2430 N^3}+\frac{404}{81 N^4}\right)
402: \\ \hline
403: 5 & \frac{28943}{19440} &\frac{N^5}{32}\left(1-\frac{12533}{2625 N}+\frac{7655843}{708750 N^2}-\frac{1319666}{91125 N^3}+\frac{38082031}{3189375 N^4}-\frac{2449121}{425250 N^5}\right)
404: \\ \hline
405: 6 & \frac{33744493}{15876000} & \frac{N^6}{64}\left(1-\frac{3632171}{661500 N}+\frac{3511547989}{238140000 N^2}-\frac{2119277851}{89302500 N^3}+\frac{6141878783}{238140000
406: N^4}-\frac{6249981863}{357210000 N^5}+\frac{954322601}{119070000 N^6}\right)
407: \\ \hline
408: %7 & \frac{15149979225613}{7561421280000} & \frac{N^7}{128}\left(1-\frac{19619647}{3087000 N}+\frac{151108200961}{7779240000 N^2}-\frac{1932361048417}{52509870000 N^3}+\frac{89462519644649}{1890355320000
409: % N^4}-\frac{40057482076643}{945177660000 N^5}+\frac{532452359791}{21003948000 N^6}-\frac{861566561867}{94517766000 N^7}\right)
410: %\\ \hline
411: \end{array}
412: \ee
413: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.2}
414: \be\label{table2}
415: \scriptsize
416: \nonumber
417: \text{Table B}\\
418: \scriptsize
419: \nonumber
420: \begin{array}{c|l|l}
421: \hline
422: \hline
423: \# \text{ loops} & { N=3} & \text{ Arbitrary}~~ N \\
424: \hline
425: 1 & \frac{2}{3} & \frac{2}{3} \\
426: \hline
427: 3 & \frac{181}{270} & \frac{N^2}{10}-\frac{203 N}{1080}+\frac{361}{1080} \\
428: \hline
429: 5 & \frac{3320747}{5103000} & \frac{N^4}{56}-\frac{8609 N^3}{126000}+\frac{892579 N^2}{5670000}-\frac{17367061 N}{102060000}+\frac{2914931}{20412000} \\
430: \hline
431: 7 & \frac{2433747559349}{3780710640000} & \frac{N^6}{288}-\frac{209635 N^5}{10668672}+\frac{266068577671 N^4}{4480842240000}-\frac{1616650409063
432: N^3}{15122842560000}+\frac{16393400307287 N^2}{120982740480000}-\frac{179751202247 N}{1728324864000}+\frac{3414208728293}{60491370240000}
433: \\ \hline
434: \end{array}
435: \ee
436: \end{widetext}
437:
438:
439:
440:
441: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
442: \bibitem{weinberg79}
443: S.~Weinberg,
444: %``Phenomenological Lagrangians,''
445: Physica A {\bf 96} (1979) 327.
446: %%CITATION = PHYSA,A96,327;%%
447: \bibitem{weinberg68}
448: S.~Weinberg,
449: %``Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry,''
450: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 166} (1968) 1568.
451: %%CITATION = PHRVA,166,1568;%%
452: \bibitem{Pagels}
453: P.~Langacker, H.~Pagels,
454: %``Chiral perturbation theory,''
455: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 8} (1973) 4595.
456: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D8,4595;%%
457: \bibitem{gasser}
458: J.~Gasser, H.~Leutwyler,
459: %``Chiral Perturbation Theory To One Loop,''
460: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 158} (1984) 142.
461: %%CITATION = APNYA,158,142;%%
462: \bibitem{colangelo1}
463: J.~Bijnens, G.~Colangelo, G.~Ecker, J.~Gasser and M.~E.~Sainio,
464: %``Pion pion scattering at low energy,''
465: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 508} (1997) 263
466: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 517} (1998) 639]
467: [arXiv:hep-ph/9707291].
468: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B508,263;%%
469: \bibitem{bissegger}
470: M.~Bissegger and A.~Fuhrer,
471: %``Chiral logarithms to five loops,''
472: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 646}, 72 (2007)
473: [arXiv:hep-ph/0612096].
474: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B646,72;%%M.~Bissegger and A.~Fuhrer,
475:
476: \bibitem{Kivel08}
477: N.~Kivel, M.~V.~Polyakov and A.~Vladimirov,
478: %``Large-N Summation of Chiral Logs for Generalized Parton Distributions,''
479: arXiv:0809.2064 [hep-ph].
480: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.2064;%%
481: \bibitem{my}
482: N.~Kivel and M.~V.~Polyakov,
483: %``Breakdown of chiral expansion for parton distributions,''
484: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 664}, 64 (2008)
485: [arXiv:0707.2208 [hep-ph]].
486: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B664,64;%%
487: \bibitem{colangelo}
488: M.~Buchler and G.~Colangelo,
489: %``Renormalization group equations for effective field theories,''
490: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 32}, 427 (2003)
491: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309049].
492: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C32,427;%%
493: \bibitem{Coleman}
494: S.~R.~Coleman, R.~Jackiw and H.~D.~Politzer,
495: %``Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking In The O(N) Model For Large N*,''
496: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 10} (1974) 2491.
497: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D10,2491;%%
498: \end{thebibliography}
499:
500: \end{document}
501: \begin{equation}\label{table}
502: \nonumber
503: \begin{array}{c|c|c}
504: \# \text{loops} & N=3 & \text{Arbitrary} N \\
505: 1 & \frac{2}{3} & \frac{N}{2}\left(1-\frac{5 \epsilon }{3}\right) \\
506: \hline
507: 2 & \frac{25}{18} & \frac{N^2}{4}\left(1-\frac{37 \epsilon }{18}+\frac{49 \epsilon ^2}{18}\right) \\
508: \hline
509: 3 & \frac{577}{540} & \frac{N^3}{8}\left(1-\frac{287 \epsilon }{90}+\frac{407 \epsilon ^2}{90}-\frac{448 \epsilon ^3}{135}\right)
510: \\ \hline
511: 4 & \frac{1481}{864} & \frac{N^4}{16}\left(1-\frac{20753 \epsilon }{5400}+\frac{363091 \epsilon ^2}{48600}-\frac{17849 \epsilon ^3}{2430}\frac{404 \epsilon ^4}{81}\right)
512: \\ \hline
513: 5 & \frac{28943}{19440} &-\frac{N^5}{32}\left(1-\frac{12533 \epsilon }{2625}
514: +\frac{7655843 \epsilon
515: ^2}{708750}-\frac{1319666 \epsilon ^3}{91125}+\frac{38082031 \epsilon ^4}{3189375}-\frac{2449121 \epsilon ^5}{425250}\right)
516: \\ \hline
517: 6 & \frac{33744493}{15876000} & \frac{N^6}{64}\left(1
518: -\frac{3632171 \epsilon }{661500}+\frac{3511547989 \epsilon ^2}{238140000}-\frac{2119277851
519: \epsilon ^3}{89302500}+\frac{6141878783 \epsilon ^4}{238140000}-\frac{6249981863 \epsilon ^5}{357210000}+\frac{954322601 \epsilon ^6}{119070000}\right)
520: \\ \hline
521: 7 & \frac{15149979225613}{7561421280000} & \frac{N^7}{128}\left(1-\frac{19619647}{3087000 N}+\frac{151108200961}{7779240000 N^2}-\frac{1932361048417}{52509870000 N^3}+\frac{89462519644649}{1890355320000
522: N^4}-\frac{40057482076643}{945177660000 N^5}+\frac{532452359791}{21003948000 N^6}-\frac{861566561867}{94517766000 N^7}\right)
523: \\ \hline
524: \end{array}
525: \end{equation}
526: