1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,epsfig,youngtab}

3: %\usepackage{refcheck}

4: %\usepackage{floatflt,graphicx}

5: %\documentstyle[12pt,epsfig,showkeys]{article}

6: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}

7: %

8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  NEWCOMMANDS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9: %\newlength{\dinwidth}

10: %\newlength{\dinmargin}

11: %\setlength{\dinwidth}{21.0cm}

12: %\textheight23.2cm \textwidth17.0cm

13: %\setlength{\dinmargin}{\dinwidth}

14: %\addtolength{\dinmargin}{-\textwidth}

15: %\setlength{\dinmargin}{0.5\dinmargin}

16: %\oddsidemargin -1.0in

17: %\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{\dinmargin}

18: %\setlength{\evensidemargin}{\oddsidemargin}

19: %\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.9\dinmargin}

20: %\marginparsep 8pt \marginparpush 5pt

21: %\topmargin -42pt

22: %\headheight 12pt

23: %\headsep 30pt \footheight 12pt \footskip  24pt

24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

25: % to make the paper format is more like harvac's

26: %%%%% number equations by section %%%%%%%%

27: \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother

28: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

30: \addtolength{\textwidth}{3cm}

31: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-1.5cm}

32: \addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-1.5cm}

33: \addtolength{\textheight}{3.0cm}

34: \addtolength{\topmargin}{-1.5cm}

35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

36: % end dina4 format from DESY

37: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

38: \newcommand{\epsl}{\varepsilon \hspace{-5pt} / }

39: \newcommand{\rsl}{r \hspace{-5pt} / }

40: \newcommand{\qsl}{q \hspace{-5pt} / }

41: \newcommand{\pbsl}{p \hspace{-5pt} / }

42: \newcommand{\pssl}{p' \hspace{-7pt} / }

43: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

44: %\def\Kop{\mathop{K}^{\!\circ}{}}

45: %\def\Gop{\mathop{g}^{\!\circ}{}}

46: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}

47: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}

48: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

49: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

50: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

51: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

52: % Bra-Kets:

53: \def\bra{\langle}

54: \def\ket{\rangle}

55: % Greek letters:

56: %\def\a{\alpha}

57: %\def\g{\gamma}

58: %\def\d{\delta}

59: %\def\e{\epsilon}

60: %\def\p{\pi}

61: %\def\ve{\varepsilon}

62: %\def\ep{\varepsilon}

63: %\def\et{\eta}

64: %\def\l{\lambda}

65: \def\m{\mu}

66: \def\n{\nu}

67: %\def\G{\Gamma}

68: %\def\D{\Delta}

69: %\def\L{\Lambda}

70: \def\parallel{| \hskip-0.03cm |}

71: %\def\S{{\bf S}}

72: \def\C{{\bf C}}

73: \def\bce{\begin{center}}

74: \def\ece{\end{center}}

75: \def\nn{\noindent}

76: \def\nonu{\nonumber}

77: \def\pbx{\partial_x}

78: \def\pa{\partial}

79: \def\al{\alpha}

80: \def\be{\beta}

81: \def\ga{\gamma}

82: \def\Ga{\Gamma}

83: \def\de{\delta}

84: \def\De{\Delta}

85: \def\ep{\epsilon}

86: \def\vep{\varepsilon}

87: \def\ze{\zeta}

88: \def\et{\eta}

89: \def\th{\theta}

90: \def\Th{\Theta}

91: \def\vth{\vartheta}

92: \def\io{\iota}

93: \def\ka{\kappa}

94: \def\la{\lambda}

95: \def\La{\Lambda}

96: \def\rh{\rho}

97: \def\si{\sigma} \def\Si{\Sigma}

98: \def\ta{\tau}

99: \def\up{\upsilon}

100: \def\Up{\Upsilon}

101: \def\ph{\phi}

102: \def\Ph{\Phi}

103: \def\vph{\varphi}

104: \def\ch{\chi}

105: \def\ps{\psi}

106: \def\Ps{\Psi}

107: \def\om{\omega}

108: \def\Om{\Omega}

109: \def\lbr{\left(}

110: \def\rbr{\right)}

111: \def\half{\frac{1}{2}}

112: \def\vol#1{{\bf #1}}

113: \def\R{{\bf R}}

114: \def\Z{{\bf Z}}

115: \def\RP{{\bf RP}}

116: \def\S{{\bf S}}

117: \def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}}

118: \newcommand{\tr}{\mbox{Tr}}

119: \newcommand{\p}{\hat{p}}

120: \newcommand{\q}{\hat{q}}

121: %\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

122: %\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

123: %\newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

124: %\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

125: \newcommand{\vD}{{\bf D}}

126: \newcommand{\vW}{{\bf W}}

127: \newcommand{\vWp}{{\bf W}_{\perp}}

128: \newcommand{\ce}{\widehat{e}}

129: \newcommand{\te}{\widetilde{e}}

130: \newcommand{\tf}{\widetilde{f}}

131: \newcommand{\tW}{\widetilde{W}}

132: \newcommand{\tD}{\widetilde{D}}

133: %\newcommand{\dfrac}[2]{\displaystyle\frac

134: %{\mathstrut #1}{\mathstrut #2}}

135: \newcommand{\dsqrt}[1]{\sqrt{\mathstrut #1}}

136: \def\Kop{{\displaystyle \mathop{K}^{\circ}}{}}

137: \def\Gop{{\displaystyle \mathop{g}^{\circ}}{}}

138: \def\eop{{\displaystyle \mathop{e}^{\circ}}{}}

139: \def\epsop{{\displaystyle \mathop{\epsilon}^{\circ}}{}}

140: \def\eps6{{\displaystyle \mathop{\epsilon}^{6}}{}}

141: \def\nabop{{\displaystyle \mathop{\nabla}^{\circ}}{}}

142: \def\nab6{{\displaystyle \mathop{\nabla}^{6}}{}}

143: % Specials:

144: \def\to{\rightarrow}

145: 

146: 

147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%JustinNotation%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

148: 

149: \def\ft#1#2{{\textstyle{\frac{\scriptstyle #1}{\scriptstyle #2}}}}

150: \def\fft#1#2{\frac{#1}{#2}}

151: \def\0{{\sst{(0)}}}

152: \def\1{{\sst{(1)}}}

153: \def\2{{\sst{(2)}}}

154: \def\3{{\sst{(3)}}}

155: \def\4{{\sst{(4)}}}

156: \def\5{{\sst{(5)}}}

157: \def\6{{\sst{(6)}}}

158: \def\7{{\sst{(7)}}}

159: \def\8{{\sst{(8)}}}

160: \def\n{{\sst{(n)}}}

161: \def\td{\tilde}

162: \def\nnn{\nonumber}

163: \def\CP{{{\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}}}

164: 

165: 

166: 

167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FengNotation%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

168: 

169: 

170: 

171: \def\Pf{\mathop{\rm Pf}}

172: \def\Im{\mathop{\rm Im}}

173: \def\IZ{\mathbb{Z}}

174: \def\IR{\mathbb{R}}

175: \def\IQ{\mathbb{Q}}

176: \def\IC{\mathbb{C}}

177: \def\IP{\mathbb{P}}

178: 

179: 

180: \def\p{\partial}

181: \def\O #1{\overline{#1}}

182: \def\W #1{\widetilde{#1}}

183: \def\D #1{\dot{#1}}

184: \def\rightaction#1{\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\partial

185: \over \partial #1}}

186: \def\leftaction#1{\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\partial \over \partial #1}}

187: 

188: \def\func#1{\mathop{\rm #1}\nolimits}

189: \def\abs#1{\left| #1\right|}

190: \def\ba{\begin{array}}

191: \def\ea{\end{array}}

192: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

193: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

194: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

195: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

196: \def\braket#1{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}

197: \def\bra#1{\left\langle #1\right|}

198: \def\ket#1{\left| #1\right\rangle}

199: \def\bbar#1{ \overline #1}

200: 

201: \def\Tr{\mathop{\rm Tr}}

202: \def\tr{\mathop{\rm tr}}

203: \def\det{\mathop{\rm det}}

204: \def\sign{\mathop{\rm sign}}

205: \def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}}

206: 

207: %\newcommand{\fref}[1]{Figure~\ref{#1}}

208: \def\eref#1{(\ref{#1})}

209: \def\bit#1{\begin{array}{c} \\ \\ \end{array} \hspace{#1 cm}}

210: \def\to{\rightarrow}

211: \def\d{\partial}

212: \def\la{\lambda}

213: \def\eps{\epsilon}

214: \def\lblb{({\bar\la}{\bar\la})}

215: \def\ald{{\dot\alpha}}

216: \def\bed{{\dot\beta}}

217: \def\gad{{\dot\gamma}}

218: \def\sid{{\dot\rho}}

219: 

220: \def\a{{\alpha}}

221: \def\b{{\beta}}

222: \def\c{{\gamma}}

223: \def\d{{\rm d}}

224: \def\da{{\dot{\alpha}}}

225: \def\db{{\dot{\beta}}}

226: \def\dc{{\dot{\gamma}}}

227: \def\th{{\theta}}

228: \def\bth{{\overline{\theta}}}

229: \def\tp{{(2 \pi)}}

230: \def\half{{1 \over 2}}

231: \def\Th{{\Theta}}

232: \def\IZ{\mathbb{Z}}

233: \def\IR{\mathbb{R}}

234: \def\IQ{\mathbb{Q}}

235: \def\IC{\mathbb{C}}

236: \def\IP{\mathbb{P}}

237: 

238: 

239: \def\p{\partial}

240: \def\O #1{\overline{#1}}

241: \def\W #1{\widetilde{#1}}

242: \def\D #1{\dot{#1}}

243: \def\rightaction#1{\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\partial

244: \over \partial #1}}

245: \def\leftaction#1{\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\partial \over \partial #1}}

246: 

247: \def\func#1{\mathop{\rm #1}\nolimits}

248: \def\abs#1{\left| #1\right|}

249: \def\ba{\begin{array}}

250: \def\ea{\end{array}}

251: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

252: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

253: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

254: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

255: \def\braket#1{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}

256: \def\bra#1{\left\langle #1\right|}

257: \def\ket#1{\left| #1\right\rangle}

258: \def\bbar#1{ \overline #1}

259: 

260: \def\Tr{\mathop{\rm Tr}}

261: \def\tr{\mathop{\rm tr}}

262: \def\det{\mathop{\rm det}}

263: \def\sign{\mathop{\rm sign}}

264: \def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}}

265: %\newcommand{\fref}[1]{Figure~\ref{#1}}

266: \def\eref#1{(\ref{#1})}

267: \def\bit#1{\begin{array}{c} \\ \\ \end{array} \hspace{#1 cm}}

268: \def\to{\rightarrow}

269: \def\d{\partial}

270: \def\la{\lambda}

271: \def\eps{\epsilon}

272: \def\lblb{({\bar\la}{\bar\la})}

273: \def\ald{{\dot\alpha}}

274: \def\bed{{\dot\beta}}

275: \def\gad{{\dot\gamma}}

276: \def\sid{{\dot\rho}}

277: 

278: \def\a{{\alpha}}

279: \def\b{{\beta}}

280: \def\c{{\gamma}}

281: \def\d{{\rm d}}

282: \def\da{{\dot{\alpha}}}

283: \def\db{{\dot{\beta}}}

284: \def\dc{{\dot{\gamma}}}

285: \def\th{{\theta}}

286: \def\bth{{\overline{\theta}}}

287: \def\tp{{(2 \pi)}}

288: \def\half{{1 \over 2}}

289: \def\Th{{\Theta}}

290: 

291: \newcommand{\bean}{\begin{eqnarray*}}

292: \newcommand{\eean}{\end{eqnarray*}}

293: 

294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

295: \begin{document}

296: \thispagestyle{empty} \addtocounter{page}{-1}

297:    \begin{flushright}

298: %KIAS-P08nnn \\

299: %CALT-68-nnnn \\

300: %{\tt hep-th/yymmnnn}\\

301: \end{flushright}

302: 

303: \vspace*{1.3cm}

304: 

305:  \centerline{ \Large \bf  Squashing Gravity Dual of } 

306: \vspace{.3cm} 

307: \centerline{ \Large \bf  

308: ${\cal N}=6$ Superconformal Chern-Simons Gauge Theory   } 

309: \vspace*{1.5cm}

310: \centerline{{\bf Changhyun Ahn }

311: %, {\bf Kazuo Hosomichi $^{2}$}

312: %and {\bf Sungjay Lee $^{2}$} 

313: } 

314: \vspace*{1.0cm} 

315: \centerline{\it  

316: Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Taegu

317: 702-701, Korea} 

318: %\centerline{\it $^{2}$ Korea Institute for 

319: %Advanced Study, Seoul 130-012, Korea }

320: \vspace*{0.8cm} 

321: \centerline{\tt ahn@knu.ac.kr

322: %, \qquad

323: %hosomiti@kias.re.kr, \qquad sjlee@kias.re.kr

324: } 

325: \vskip2cm

326: 

327: \centerline{\bf Abstract}

328: \vspace*{0.5cm}

329: 

330: Four-dimensional field equations are determined for perturbations of

331: the quotient seven-sphere size and squashing parameter in eleven-dimensional 

332: supergravity. The quotient seven-sphere   

333: is a ${\bf S}^1$-bundle over the

334: ${\bf CP}^3$ which is regarded as a ${\bf S}^2$-fibration 

335: over the base ${\bf S}^4$.

336: By analyzing the $AdS_4$ supergravity scalar potential, 

337: the holographic supersymmetric(or nonsupersymmetric) 

338: renormalization group(RG) flow 

339: from ${\cal N}=1$(or 

340: ${\cal N}=0$) $SO(5) \times U(1)$-invariant UV fixed

341: point to ${\cal N}=6$(or ${\cal N}=0$) 

342: $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$-invariant IR fixed point 

343: is obtained. The three-dimensional boundary theories are described by 

344: superconformal Chern-Simons matter theories and a dual operator

345: corresponding to this RG flow is described.  

346: 

347: \baselineskip=18pt

348: \newpage

349: \renewcommand{\theequation}

350: {\arabic{section}\mbox{.}\arabic{equation}}

351: 

352: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

353: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

354: \section{Introduction}

355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

356: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

357: 

358: The three-dimensional Chern-Simons matter theory

359: with gauge group $U(N) \times U(N)$ at level $k$ 

360: which has ${\cal N}=6$

361: superconformal symmetry is constructed recently in \cite{ABJM}.

362: They describe this gauge theory 

363: as the low energy limit of $N$ M2-branes probing 

364: ${\bf C}^4/{\bf Z}_k$ singularity.

365: At large $N$-limit, this theory is dual to the M-theory on 

366: $AdS_4 \times {\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$. 

367: In order to perform the ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient 

368: explicitly \footnote{

369: There exists a variety of orbifolds with free or nonfree

370: actions on ${\bf S}^7$ leading to different amount of supersymmetry 

371: \cite{MP}. Let us consider

372: M2 branes at ${\bf C}^4/\Gamma$ singularity where

373:  the group $\Gamma$ is generated by $\mbox{diag}( 

374:  e^{\frac{2\pi i}{k}}, e^{-\frac{2 \pi i}{k}}, e^{\frac{2 \pi i a}{k}},

375: e^{-\frac{2\pi i a}{k}})$ for some relatively prime intergers $a$ and $k$.

376: If $a=1, k=2$ we get maximal case ${\cal N}=8$ with horizon manifold

377: ${\bf RP}^7$.

378: For $a=\pm 1, k > 2$, one gets ${\cal N}=6$ 

379: theory \cite{Halyo} where the corresponding field theory duals are present.

380: When $a \neq \pm 1$, the theory has ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetry.

381: Similar ${\cal N}=4$ theory \cite{FKPZ} can be obtained from the different

382: orbifold ${\bf C}^2/\Gamma \times {\bf C}^2/\Gamma'$(See also \cite{Gomis}).

383: The orbifold ${\bf C} \times {\bf C}^3/\Gamma$ provides the ${\cal

384:   N}=2$ theory \cite{AOT}.

385: When $\Gamma$ is a binary dihedral group where ${\bf C}^2/\Gamma$ has

386: a $D$ type singularity and we embed

387: $\Gamma$ into $SU(2) \times SU(2)$, we get ${\cal N}=5$ theory.

388: }, 

389: it is natural to write

390: the seven-sphere ${\bf S}^7$ metric as an ${\bf S}^1$-fibration over ${\bf

391: CP}^3$ \cite{NP}.

392: When $N=2$ with $k=1,2$, the theory is equivalent to Bagger-Lambert 

393: theory \cite{BL,BL1,BL2}. 

394: 

395: It is known in \cite{AR} that 

396: deformation from ``round'' seven-sphere ${\bf S}^7$ to ``squashed'' one 

397: $\widetilde{{\bf S}}^7$ \cite{Jensen,BK}(See also \cite{ADP,DNP}) 

398: can be interpreted

399: as

400: renormalization group(RG) flow from UV fixed point to IR fixed point,

401: via AdS/CFT correspondence \cite{Maldacena,Witten,GKP}, by

402: analyzing the four-dimensional effective Lagrangian from

403: eleven-dimensional supergravity solution found in \cite{Page}.  

404: The RG flow along the squashing deformation

405: trajectory interpolates between ${\cal N}=8$ $SO(8)$-invariant

406: conformal fixed point at the

407: IR and ${\cal N}=1$(or ${\cal N}=0$ for different orientation) 

408: $SO(5) \times SO(3)$-invariant

409: conformal fixed point

410: at the UV. 

411: 

412: Then it is natural to ask what happens when we perform 

413: ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient \cite{ABJM} along the above whole RG flow \cite{AR}? 

414: At the IR fixed point, since the ``round'' ${\bf S}^7$ metric 

415: is represented by 

416: a twisted ${\bf S}^1$-bundle over ``round'' ${\bf CP}^3$ characterized by

417: Fubini-Study Einstein metric \cite{PW,CPW,AI02-1}, one can easily perform 

418: the ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient. What about at the UV fixed point?

419: Is there any ``squashed'' ${\bf CP}^3$?

420: Nilsson and Pope \cite{NP} have realized that 

421: the ``squashed'' ${\bf CP}^3$ metric can be obtained by taking 

422: the Hopf fibration of ``round'' ${\bf S}^7$ with its squashed metric from

423: the observation by Ziller \cite{Ziller}.

424: However, the explicit form for  the ``squashed'' ${\bf CP}^3$

425: metric is not presented in \cite{NP} as far as I know and it is not clear how 

426: one parameter family of ``squashed'' ${\bf CP}^3$ metric, contrary to 

427: ``squashed'' ${\bf S}^7$, arises in order to check the correct

428: behavior of Ricci tensor in seven-dimensions.

429: 

430: Luckily,

431: in \cite{AF}, by viewing the ${\bf CP}^3$ as an ${\bf S}^2$-bundle

432: over ${\bf S}^4$ with the self-dual $SU(2)$ instanton, they reproduced

433: the generic Ricci tensor for the ${\bf CP}^3$ \cite{NP} and the standard

434: Fubini-Study Einstein metric(which is Kahler) arises when $\lambda^2=1$ where 

435: $\lambda$ is a squashing parameter while the second ``squashed'' Einstein

436: metric(which is nearly Kahler) arises when $\lambda^2=\frac{1}{2}$:

437: one parameter family of ``squashed'' ${\bf CP}^3$. 

438: 

439: In this paper, we consider the general, one parameter-family, 

440: metric for ${\bf CP}^3$ 

441: described in \cite{AF}, 

442: study its seven-dimensional uplift metric on an ${\bf S}^1$-bundle over this

443: ${\bf CP}^3$, and construct the full eleven-dimensional metric with 

444: appropriate warp factors describing both breathing mode and squashing

445: mode.

446: By analyzing   the scalar potential, 

447: the holographic supersymmetric(or nonsupersymmetric) 

448: RG flow 

449: from ${\cal N}=1$(or ${\cal N}=0$) 

450: $SO(5) \times U(1)$-invariant UV fixed

451: point to ${\cal N}=6$(or ${\cal N}=0$ for the opposite orientation) 

452: $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$-invariant IR fixed point is described

453: \footnote{Recently, the ${\cal N}=1$ superconformal

454: Chern-Simons matter theory with $SO(5)\times U(1)$ global symmetry

455: is constructed in \cite{OP} and they conjecture that 

456: this is dual to the M-theory on $AdS_4 \times

457: \widetilde{{\bf S}}^7/{\bf Z}_k$.  }. 

458: 

459: In section 2, we describe the round-quotient(${\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$) and 

460: squashed-quotient($\widetilde{\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$)  

461: seven spheres compactification vacua in

462: eleven-dimensional

463: supergravity. 

464: In section 3,

465: the squashing deformation of  each vacua

466: is described by an irrelevant operator at the ${\cal N}=6$(or ${\cal N}=0$) 

467: conformal

468: fixed point and a relevant operator at the ${\cal N}=1$(or ${\cal N}=0$)

469: conformal fixed points. The RG flow is described in $AdS_4$

470: supergravity by a static domain wall interpolating between 

471: these two vacua. We identify the corresponding operator 

472: in the boundary conformal field theory.

473: In appendix A, we present the details for the computations of Ricci

474: tensor and corresponding field equations.

475: 

476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

478: \section{Round-quotient and squashed-quotient seven spheres }

479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

480: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

481: 

482: Let us consider an eleven-dimensional supergravity on $AdS_4 \times

483: {\bf X}^7$ where ${\bf X}^7$ is a seven-dimensional compact 

484: Einstein manifold. When the fermion field is set equal to zero, 

485: the bosonic field equations are given by eleven-dimensional

486: Einstein equation and Maxwell equation, as usual. 

487: In order to solve eleven-dimensional Einstein equation for the

488: Freund-Rubin \cite{FR} form for the gauge field strength, the Ricci

489: tensor has nonzero components for the indices of four-dimensional

490: spacetime and the indices of seven-dimensional internal space 

491: \cite{Page}. For example, see the equations (\ref{result1}).   

492: On the other hand, one also obtains the Ricci tensor from the 

493: eleven-dimensional metric (\ref{result}). 

494: 

495: Before we describe the eleven-dimensional metric directly, 

496: we need to understand the structure of the 

497: ${\bf CP}^3$ internal space metric first. Since we are interested in 

498: the RG flow connecting two conformal fixed points, it is necessary to 

499: obtain one parameter family of squashed ${\bf CP}^3$ metric which

500: allows us to have both round and squashed ${\bf CP}^3$'s we described

501: in the previous section.  

502: For the standard Fubini-Study 

503: metric on the round ${\bf CP}^3$, it contains 

504: ${\bf CP}^2$ \cite{PW,CPW,AI02-1} or ${\bf CP}^1 \times {\bf CP}^1$ 

505: \cite{CLP,CPW} inside of ${\bf CP}^3$.   

506: At first sight, it is natural to generalize this standard round 

507: ${\bf CP}^3$ metric to the general one-parameter family ${\bf CP}^3$

508: by putting the warp factors in front of each orthonormal basis of 

509: six-dimensional metric. 

510: However, it does not produce the correct, general 

511: Ricci tensor components found

512: in \cite{NP} and there exists only one critical point in the scalar 

513: potential. 

514: 

515: There is an alternative description for the squashed-seven sphere by 

516: the fact that  the ${\bf S}^7$ as an ${\bf S}^3$-bundle

517: over ${\bf S}^4$ with gauge potential for the self-dual $SU(2)$ 

518: instanton \cite{DNP86,CFLMN}.

519: Then the squashing is related to the size of the ${\bf S}^3$-fibers

520: relative to the base ${\bf S}^4$. After an inverse Kaluza-Klein

521: construction, the seven-dimensional metric consists of

522: four-dimensional metric plus $SU(2)$ gauge field and 

523: this metric leads to the metric \cite{ADP,DNP} 

524: from other approach with quaternionic

525: projective plane.

526: Aldazabal and Font \cite{AF}(See also \cite{Tomasiello,KLT}) 

527: have constructed the family of squashed 

528: ${\bf CP}^3$ metric 

529: by viewing the ${\bf CP}^3$ as an ${\bf S}^2$-bundle

530: over ${\bf S}^4$ with the self-dual $SU(2)$ instanton, in the context

531: of flux compactification on $AdS_4 \times {\bf CP}^3$.

532: The squashing corresponds to the size of the ${\bf S}^2$-fibers

533: relative to the base ${\bf S}^4$ which has the line element of

534: standard Einstein metric on ${\bf S}^4$.

535: The self-dual $SU(2)$ instanton gauge potential appears 

536: in the ${\bf S}^2$-bundle.

537: It turns out that 

538: the standard

539: Fubini-Study Einstein metric(which is Kahler) occurs when $\lambda^2=1$ 

540: while the second squashed Einstein

541: metric(which is nearly Kahler) occurs when $\lambda^2=\frac{1}{2}$. 

542: The isometry group corresponding to ${\bf S}^4$ 

543: in this case is given by $SO(5)$.

544: See also the relevant paper \cite{GNP} which discusses about the metric

545: on the higher dimensional case 

546: ${\bf CP}^{2n+1}$ with the quaternionic projective 

547: space ${\bf HP}^n$.

548: 

549: As noticed in \cite{NP}, the uplift to the seven-dimensional metric

550: can be done from the expectation that the ${\bf CP}^3$ solution in 

551: ten-dimensions is originated from the 

552: seven-sphere ${\bf S}^7$ solution in 

553: eleven-dimensional supergravity.

554: By writing the seven-dimensional metric 

555: on an ${\bf S}^1$-fibration over squashed ${\bf

556: CP}^3$, one obtains  

557: the squashed seven-sphere $\widetilde{{\bf S}}^7$ metric.

558: The gauge potential in the ${\bf S}^1$-fibration  is related to 

559: the RR 2-form flux \cite{AF}. 

560: The standard round seven-sphere metric arises when $\lambda^2=1$ 

561: while the squashed Einstein

562: metric arises when $\lambda^2=\frac{1}{5}$.

563: Note that this value is different from the one $\lambda^2=\frac{1}{2}$ 

564: in squashed 

565: ${\bf CP}^3$.

566: One can explicitly check that 

567: the squashed-seven sphere  

568: $\widetilde{{\bf S}}^7$ metric described as an ${\bf S}^3$-bundle

569: over ${\bf S}^4$ with gauge potential as we mentioned before

570: is equivalent to the one on an ${\bf S}^1$-fibration over squashed ${\bf

571: CP}^3$. This observation is also found in section 4 of \cite{AF}.

572: 

573: Now a general metric that is locally the direct sum of an arbitrary

574: four-dimensional 

575: spacetime metric and a squashed seven-sphere metric(obtained before) 

576: with appropriate

577: warp factor for the breathing mode \cite{LS}, interpolating between 

578: round-quotient and squashed-quotient seven spheres,  

579: may be written as 

580: \bea

581: \frac{\overline{ds}^2}{R^2} & = &   

582: e^{- 7u(x)} g_{\alpha \beta}(x) d x^\alpha d x^\beta

583:  +      \frac{1}{4} e^{2u(x)+3v(x)}  \left( d \theta^2 + 

584: \frac{1}{4} \sin^2 \theta 

585: ( \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2 +\sigma_3^2 )   \right) 

586:  \nonu \\

587: & + &    \frac{1}{4} e^{2u(x) -4v(x)} \left( d\mu -\sin \phi A^1 + 

588: \cos \phi  A^2 

589: \right)^2 \nonu \\

590: & + &   \frac{1}{4} e^{2u(x)-4v(x)} 

591:  \sin^2 \mu \left( d \phi - \cot \mu \cos \phi A^1- \cot \mu \sin \phi

592:  A^2 + A^3 \right)^2 \nonu \\ 

593: &+ &   \frac{1}{4} e^{2u(x)-4v(x)} \left( \frac{d \psi}{k} -  

594: \sin \mu \cos \phi A^1 -

595:    \sin \mu \sin \phi A^2- \cos \mu A^3 

596:    -\cos \mu d \phi \right)^2, 

597: \label{11dmetric}

598: \eea

599: where the three real one-forms satisfy the $SU(2)$ algebra

600: $

601: d \sigma_i = -{1 \over 2} \epsilon_{ijk} \sigma_j \wedge \sigma_k$ and

602: the self-dual $SU(2)$ instanton gauge potential appearing

603: in the ${\bf S}^2$-bundle is as follows:

604: \bea

605: A^i \equiv \cos^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) \; \sigma_i, \qquad i = 1, 2, 3.

606: \nonu

607: \eea

608: The ${\bf S}^4$ that can be parametrized as $x^5(=\theta),x^6,x^7$ and $x^8$ 

609: directions has the line element of

610: standard Einstein metric given in the second term of the first line of 

611: (\ref{11dmetric}) \footnote{

612:  The variables we use in this paper can be compared with

613:   those in \cite{AF} as follows: $\mu \leftrightarrow \theta, 

614: \phi \leftrightarrow \varphi, \psi \leftrightarrow \tau, 

615: \theta \leftrightarrow \psi, 

616: \sigma_i \leftrightarrow \Sigma^i$ and $A^i \leftrightarrow {\cal

617:   A}^i$. 

618: By using the relations 

619: $\Sigma_1 = \sin \phi d \mu + \sin \mu \cos \phi d \psi, \Sigma_2 =

620:  -\cos \phi d \mu + \sin \mu \sin \phi d \psi$ and 

621: $ \Sigma_3 = - d \phi + \cos \mu d \psi$ with $k=1$ \cite{AF}, 

622: one can reexpress the

623: three-dimensional metric parametrized by $(\mu, \psi, \phi)$ 

624: as follows: $\lambda^2 

625: \left( \Sigma_i - A^i \right)^2$. Then it is easy to see that the

626: whole seven-dimensional metric by adding the other four-dimensional

627: metric parametrized by $(\theta, x^6, x^7, x^8)$ to this

628: three-dimensional one gives rise to the usual squashed seven-sphere

629: metric. 

630: According to the observation of 

631: \cite{DNP86}, the squashed-seven sphere  

632: metric described above as an ${\bf S}^3$-bundle

633: over ${\bf S}^4$ is equivalent to the standard one found by 

634: \cite{ADP,Page,AR} 

635: via the following identifications $\Sigma_i  \leftrightarrow 

636: \sigma_i$ and $i

637: \sigma_1 + j \sigma_2 + k \sigma_3 \leftrightarrow 

638: V( i \omega_1 + j \omega_2 + k

639: \omega_3) 

640: V^{-1}$ with quaternion $V$ of unit modulus which can be parametrized

641: by three Euler angles. Here $i,j,k$ are imaginary quaternions. }. 

642: The isometry corresponding to ${\bf S}^4$ is given by $SO(5)$.

643: The ${\bf S}^2$-bundle given in the second 

644: and the third lines

645: specifies  the two

646: coordinates $(\mu, \phi)$ that play the role of $(x^9, x^{10})$ respectively. 

647: When $v(x)=0$, the isometry corresponding to 

648: ${\bf CP}^3$ becomes $SU(4)$ which is reduced to $SO(5)$ for nonzero $v(x)$.

649: In the last line, we do the ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient by writing 

650: \bea

651: \psi \rightarrow \psi/k, \qquad k > 2.

652: \label{quo}

653: \eea

654: Note that for $k=1$ and $k=2$, the supersymmetry of the IR theory 

655: is enhanced to ${\cal N}=8$ supersymmetry.

656: The parameter $R$ measures the overall radius of curvature and the scalar fields 

657: $u(x)$ and 

658: $v(x)$ parametrize ``size'' where 

659: \bea 

660: \mbox{Vol}({\bf X}^7) = {1 \over 3k} \pi^4 e^{7u} R^7

661: \label{vol}

662: \eea 

663: and ``squashing'' deformation of ${\bf

664:   X}^7$ over four-dimensional spacetime \footnote{The

665:   $x$-dependence on $u(x)$ and $v(x)$ only refers to the

666:   four-dimensional spacetime $x^{\alpha}$ where $\alpha =1, \cdots, 4$.}. 

667: The squashing is parametrized by 

668: \bea

669: \lambda^2(x) \equiv e^{- 7v(x)}.

670: \label{squ}

671: \eea

672: 

673: Spontaneous compactification of M-theory to $AdS_4 \times {\bf S}^7$

674: before ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient is 

675: obtained from near-horizon geometry of $N$ coincident M2-branes. 

676: Through the seven-sphere before the ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient,  

677: the M2-branes thread 

678: nonvanishing flux of four-form field strength of the Freund-Rubin 

679: form \cite{FR}:

680: \bea

681: \overline{F}_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta}

682: = Q' e^{-7 u(x) } \overline{\epsilon}_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta}

683: = Q' e^{-21 u(x)} \epsilon_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta}. 

684: \label{fieldstrength}

685: \eea

686: The Page charge \cite{Page} defined by

687: \bea

688: Q' \equiv \pi^{-4} 

689: \int_{X^7} ({}^*\overline{F} + \overline{C} \wedge \overline{F})

690: \nonu

691: \eea 

692: in the convention of \cite{DNP86}

693: is related to the total number of

694: M2-branes, $N'$, as \cite{ABJM} 

695: \bea

696: Q' = 96 \pi^2 N' \ell_{\rm p}^6.

697: \nonu

698: \eea

699: Note that the  $\int_{X^7} \overline{C} \wedge \overline{F}$ term above 

700: vanishes in the Freund-Rubin compactification.

701: The final number of flux quanta on the ${\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$ after

702: the ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient (\ref{quo}) is given by \cite{ABJM}

703: \bea

704: N = \frac{N'}{k},

705: \nonu

706: \eea

707: because the volume with ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient is smaller by a factor of

708: $k$ (\ref{vol}) than the original volume without ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient.  

709: Then the Page charge can be written as

710: \bea

711: Q' =  96 \pi^2 N' \ell_{\rm p}^6 =  96 \pi^2  k N \ell_{\rm p}^6 

712: \equiv k Q, \qquad \mbox{where} \qquad Q = 96 \pi^2 N \ell_{\rm p}^6.

713: \label{q}

714: \eea

715: 

716: The four-dimensional field equations from the appendix A can be

717: obtained from the effective Lagrangian

718: \bea

719: {\cal L}= \sqrt{-g} \left[ R - \frac{63}{2} ( \pa u )^2 -

720: 21 ( \pa v )^2 -V(u, v) \right],

721: \label{Lag}

722: \eea

723: where the supergravity scalar potential is given by

724: \bea

725: V(u, v)= e^{-9u(x)} \left[ - 6 e^{4v(x)} -48 e^{-3v(x)}+12 e^{-10v(x)} 

726: +  2 k^2 Q^2 e^{-12u(x)} \right],

727: \label{potential}

728: \eea

729: which depends on $u(x), v(x), k$ and $Q$ with (\ref{q}). 

730: The $AdS_4$-invariant ground state solutions  

731: correspond to setting $u=\mbox{const}, v=\mbox{const}$ and the

732: four-dimensional spacetime curvature is maximally symmetric and 

733: $R^{\alpha}_{\beta}=\Lambda \delta^{\alpha}_{\beta}$.  

734: 

735: The two vacua with explicit $k$-dependence can be summarized by 

736: \bea

737: {\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k \,\, \quad : \quad u = u_1 &=& {1 \over 12} \ln

738: (3^{-2} k^2 Q^2 ),

739: \qquad v = v_1 = 0, \qquad \qquad(\lambda^2 = 1),

740: \nonu \\

741: \Lambda_1 &=& -12 \left\vert { k Q \over 3} \right\vert^{-3/2},

742: \nonu

743: \eea

744: and 

745: \bea

746: \widetilde{\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k \quad : \quad 

747: u = u_2 &=& {1 \over 12} \ln (3^{-4} 5^{10/7} k^2 Q^2 ), \qquad

748: v = v_2 = {1 \over 7} \ln 5, \qquad \left(\lambda^2 = {1 \over 5} \right), 

749: \nonu \\

750: \Lambda_2 &=& - 12 \cdot 3^{7/2} 5^{-5/2}

751: \left\vert {k Q \over 3} \right\vert^{-3/2}.

752: \nonu

753: \eea

754: The two supergravity solutions are classically stable under the

755: changes of the size and squashing parameter (\ref{squ}) of seven-sphere by

756: following the analysis found in \cite{Page}.

757: Note that $u_1$ and $u_2$ depend on $k$ explicitly while 

758: $v_1$ and $v_2$ do not depend on it.

759: Obviously, for $k=1$, the theory becomes the original theory without

760: ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient. 

761: The ${\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$ is a saddle point,  corresponds to a

762: minimum along the $v$-direction and is invariant under the $SU(4)_R

763: \times U(1)$ isometry group while $\widetilde{\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$

764: is a maximum and is invariant under $SO(5) \times U(1)$ subgroup.

765: Since the ${\bf 8}_s$ of massless gravitini breaks into 

766: \bea

767: {\bf 8}_s

768: \rightarrow {\bf 6}_0 \oplus {\bf 1}_2 \oplus {\bf 1}_{-2} 

769: \nonu

770: \eea

771: under the 

772: $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$ for the left-handed orientation of the

773: seven-sphere ${\bf S}^7_L/{\bf Z}_k$,

774: the near-horizon geometry preserves ${\cal N}=6$ supersymmetry 

775: \cite{NP,DLP}  because there are six ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient

776: invariant states.

777: On the other hand,  the ${\bf 8}_s$ of massless gravitini 

778: breaks into 

779: \bea

780: {\bf 8}_s

781: \rightarrow {\bf 4}_{-1} \oplus \overline{{\bf 4}}_{1}

782: \nonu

783: \eea 

784: under the 

785: $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$ for the right-handed orientation of the

786: seven-sphere  ${\bf S}^7_R/{\bf Z}_k$,

787: the near-horizon geometry preserves no supersymmetry(${\cal N}=0$) 

788: at all \cite{NP,DLP} because there is no ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient

789: invariant state.

790: Since the left-handed squashed seven-sphere $\widetilde{\bf S}^7_L$ 

791: gives rise to a theory 

792: with ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetry \cite{DNP86}(space invader

793: scenario-level crossing phenomena among massless and massive

794: Kaluza-Klein states) and the massless 

795: gravitino is a singlet under the $U(1)$ in the squashed ${\bf CP}^3$ 

796: compactification, it will also have ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetry at

797: $\widetilde{\bf S}^7_L/{\bf Z}_k$.   

798: For the right-handed orientation of squashed

799: seven-sphere $\widetilde{\bf S}^7_R/{\bf Z}_k$,

800: the near-horizon geometry preserves no 

801: supersymmetry(${\cal N}=0$) at all.

802: 

803: As stressed in the introduction,  by starting from 

804: the general, one parameter-family, 

805: metric for ${\bf CP}^3$ 

806: described in \cite{AF}, 

807: and studying its seven-dimensional uplift metric on an ${\bf

808: S}^1$-bundle 

809: over this

810: ${\bf CP}^3$, the construction of the full eleven-dimensional metric 

811: (\ref{11dmetric}) which contains the ``squashed'' ${\bf CP}^3$ with 

812: appropriate warp factors together is new.

813: For example, the observation for the nonzero RR 2-form in the 

814: gauge potential, in the appendix A, 

815: is not so obvious without knowing the full information

816: of eleven-dimensional metric. 

817: 

818: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

819: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

820: \section{(Super)conformal field theories in three dimensions }

821: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

822: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

823: 

824: Using the results of previous section on the Kaluza-Klein spectrum

825: under squashing deformations, 

826: an operator giving rising to a RG flow

827: associated with the symmetry breaking $SU(4)_R \times U(1) \rightarrow

828: SO(5)

829: \times U(1)$ will be identified and 

830: it turns out the operator is relevant at the 

831: $\widetilde{\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$ fixed point and irrelevant at the

832: ${\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$ fixed point.

833: 

834: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

835: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

836: $\bullet$ $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$-invariant conformal fixed point

837: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

838: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

839: 

840: Let us consider the harmonic 

841: fluctuations of spacetime metric and $u(x)$ and $v(x)$ scalar fields

842: around $AdS_4 \times {\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$.

843: Following \cite{Page}, it turns out more convenient 

844: to rewrite (\ref{Lag}) in terms of the un-rescaled, 

845: M-theory metric $\overline{g_{\alpha \beta}} = 

846: e^{-7u} g_{\alpha \beta}$  in (\ref{11dmetric}) \cite{AR}:

847: \bea

848: {\cal L} 

849:  =   \sqrt{-\overline{g}} e^{7u(x)} \left[ \, \overline{R} -

850: 2\overline{\La_1} - 

851: 105 ( \pa u )^2 - 21 ( \pa v )^2 -2 \overline{V_1}(u, v) \, \right],   

852: \nonu

853: \eea 

854: where the scalar potential is 

855: \bea

856: \overline{V_1}(u, v)= 

857: -\overline{\La_1} \left[ 1-\frac{1}{4} e^{-2(u(x)-u_1)} ( e^{4v(x)}+8e^{-3v(x)}-

858: 2e^{-10v(x)} ) +\frac{3}{4} e^{-14(u(x)-u_1)} \right],

859: \nonu

860: \eea

861: in which the un-rescaled cosmological constant $\overline{\La_1}

862: = e^{7u_1} \La_1 =  \frac{1}{2} e^{7u_1} V(u_1,v_1)$ is given by 

863: \bea

864: \overline{\La_1} \equiv - 12 m_1^2 {1 \over \ell_p^2}= 

865: -12 \left( \frac{|k Q|}{3} \right)^{-1/3} {1 \over \ell_p^2}

866: \qquad {\rm where} \qquad m_1 = {1 \over \overline{r_{\rm IR}}}.

867: \label{lambda}

868: \eea

869: Here

870: $\overline{r_{\rm IR}}$ is related to $N$, $k$ 

871: and Planck scale $\ell_{\rm p}$ as 

872: $\overline{r_{\rm IR}} = \ell_{\rm p} {1 \over 2} ( 32 \pi^2 k N)^{1/6}$.

873: By rescaling the scalar fields as 

874: \bea

875: \sqrt{210} u \equiv \overline{u}, \qquad

876: \sqrt{42} v \equiv \overline{v},

877: \nonu

878: \eea 

879: one obtains that the

880: fluctuation spectrum for $\overline{v}$-field 

881: around the ${\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$ 

882: takes a positive value:

883: \bea

884: M_{\overline{v} \overline{v}}^2 ({\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k) 

885: = \left[ \frac{\pa^2} {\pa \overline{v}^2} 2 \overline{V_1}

886: \right]_{\overline{u}=\overline{u_1}, \overline{v}=\overline{v_1}} = 

887: -

888: \frac{4}{3} \overline{\La_1} \ell_p^2=  16 m_1^2.

889: \label{massmass}

890: \eea

891: 

892: Recall that before the ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient, 

893: the $\overline{v}$-field represents squashing of ${\bf

894:   S}^7$ and hence, under $SO(8)$

895: isometry group, ought to correspond to ${\bf 300}$ that is the

896: Young tableaux $\tiny\yng(2,2)$ of $SO(8)$, the lowest mode of the 

897: transverse, traceless symmetric tensor representation where the  $SO(8)$

898: Dynkin label is given by $( {\bf 0, 2, 0, 0})$.

899: The spectrum of supergravity fields is simply the projection of 

900: the original spectrum on $AdS_4 \times {\bf S}^7$ onto the ${\bf

901:   Z}_k$-invariant states \cite{NP,Halyo}.

902: The branching rule of an $SO(8)$ Dynkin label $( {\bf 0, 2, 0, 0}) $ in

903: terms of ${\bf Z}_k$-invariant 

904: $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$ Dynkin labels is given

905: by \cite{NP,Slansky,Petera}  

906: \bea

907: ({\bf 0, 2, 0, 0})   \rightarrow  ({\bf 0, 0, 0 })\oplus ({\bf

908:   1, 0, 1} )

909: \oplus ({\bf 0, 2, 0 }) \oplus ({\bf 2, 0, 2 }) \oplus \cdots, 

910: \nonu 

911: \eea

912: or $SO(8)$ representation ${\bf 300}$ decomposes into 

913: \bea

914: {\bf 300}(\tiny\yng(2,2))  \rightarrow   

915: {\bf 1}(\tiny\yng(1,1,1,1)) \oplus {\bf 15}(\tiny\yng(2,1,1)) 

916: \oplus {\bf 20'}(\tiny\yng(2,2)) \oplus

917: {\bf 84}(\tiny\yng(4,2,2)) \oplus \cdots,

918: \label{su4}

919: \eea

920: under the ${\bf Z}_k$-invariant $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$. 

921: Here, the expressions for $\cdots$ have nonzero $U(1)$ charges and

922: they are projected out by ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient.

923: The singlet ${\bf 1}$ corresponds to an overall scaling of the metric, 

924: $u(x)$. 

925: Since the ${\bf 20'}$(that is the

926: Young tableaux $\tiny\yng(2,2)$ of $SU(4)_R$) is represented by a 

927: traceless symmetric matrix, 

928: the squashing with ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient

929: corresponds to nonzero expectation value for the ${\bf 20'}$.

930: From the mass formula for ${\bf 300}$ \cite{BCERS,AR} from the

931: eigenvalues of the Lichnerowicz operator, one gets 

932: \bea 

933: M_{\bf 20'}^2 = 16 m_1^2,

934: \nonu

935: \eea

936: which is equal to (\ref{massmass}) and note that $m_1^2$ contains 

937: $k$-dependence from (\ref{lambda}).

938: 

939: One concludes that, in three-dimensional conformal field 

940: theory with ${\cal N} = 6$ supersymmetry, the $SO(5) \times U(1)$ symmetric 

941: left-handed squashing should be an irrelevant perturbation 

942: of conformal dimension 

943: $\Delta = 4$. Note that this gives a nonsupersymmetric  theory for the 

944: right-handed squashing seven-sphere orientation ${\bf S}_R^7/{\bf Z}_k$.

945: 

946: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

947: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

948: $\bullet$ $SO(5) \times U(1)$-invariant conformal fixed point

949: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

950: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

951: 

952: Due to the skew-whipping, the theory will be either 

953: left squashed quotient $\widetilde{\bf S}^7_L/{\bf Z}_k$ with ${\cal

954:   N}=1$ supersymmetry or 

955: right squashed quotient $\widetilde{\bf S}^7_R/{\bf Z}_k$ with ${\cal

956:   N}=0$ supersymmetry.

957: Note that the ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient acts on the $U(1)$ subgroup 

958: of $SU(2)$ which is present when there is no ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient. 

959: The isometry of the squashed seven-sphere is $SO(5) \times

960: SU(2)$ and this is broken to $SO(5) \times U(1)$ 

961: by the ${\bf Z}_k$ quotient.

962: In terms of the un-rescaled M-theory metric, the Lagrangian 

963: (\ref{Lag}) may be rewritten as

964: \bea

965: {\cal L}  = 

966: \sqrt{-\overline{g}} e^{7u(x)} \left[ \, \overline{R} -

967: 2\overline{\La_2}  - 

968: 105 ( \pa u )^2 -

969: 21 ( \pa v )^2 -2 \overline{V_2}(u, v) \, \right],   

970: \nonu

971: \eea 

972: where the scalar potential is given by

973: \bea

974: \overline{V_2}(u, v)  = 

975:  -\overline{\La_2} \left[ 1-\frac{1}{36} e^{-2(u(x)-u_2)} 

976: \left( 25 e^{4(v(x)-v_2)}+ 40 e^{-3(v(x)-v_2)}- 2 e^{-10(v(x)-v_2)} \right)  

977: +\frac{3}{4} e^{-14(u(x)-u_2)} \right],

978: \nonu

979: \eea

980: and the un-rescaled cosmological constant $\overline{\La_2} =

981: e^{7 u_2} \La_2 =\frac{1}{2} e^{7u_2} V(u_2,v_2)$ is given by

982: \bea

983: \overline{\La_2}  &\equiv& - 12 m_2^2 {1 \over \ell_{\rm p}^2}

984: = - 12 \cdot 3^{7/3} 5^{-5/3}  \left( {\vert k Q \vert  \over 3} \right)^{-1/3} 

985: {1 \over \ell_{\rm p}^2}, \quad {\rm where}

986: \quad m_2 = {1 \over \overline{ r_{\rm UV}}   }.

987: \nonu

988: \eea

989: Once again, the mass spectrum of the $\overline{v}(x)$ field is calculated 

990: straightforwardly:

991: \bea

992: M^2_{\overline{v} \overline{v}}[\widetilde{\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k] 

993: \equiv \left[ \frac{\pa^2}

994: {\pa \overline{v}^2} 2 \overline{V_2} \right]_{\overline{u}=

995: \overline{u_2}, \overline{v}=\overline{v_2}} \,\, = \,\,  

996: \frac{20}{27} \overline{\La_2} \ell^2_{\rm p} = -\frac{80}{9} m_2^2.

997: \label{mass2}

998: \eea

999: 

1000: The branching rule of the ${\bf Z}_k$-invariant 

1001: $SU(4)_R$ representations appearing in the right hand side of (\ref{su4}) in

1002: terms of $SO(5)$ representation is given by  

1003: \bea

1004: {\bf 1} & \rightarrow & {\bf 1}, \nonu \\

1005: {\bf 15} & \rightarrow & {\bf 5} \oplus {\bf 10}, \nonu \\

1006: {\bf 20'} & \rightarrow & {\bf 1} \oplus {\bf 5} \oplus {\bf 14},

1007: \nonu \\ 

1008: {\bf 84} & \rightarrow & {\bf 14} \oplus {\bf 35} \oplus {\bf 35}.

1009: \nonu

1010: \eea

1011: Similar aspect in the branching rule of ${\bf 20'}$ 

1012: for $AdS_5 \times {\bf S}^5$ compactification 

1013: has been found in \cite{GPPZ,DZ} in the context of gauged supergravity.

1014: In particular, the singlet ${\bf 1}$ in the decomposition of 

1015: ${\bf 20'}$ corresponds to $\overline{v}(x)$ field we turned on. From the 

1016: mass formula for the $SO(5) \times SU(2)$ 

1017: representation(before ${\bf Z}_k$-quotient)

1018: \cite{DNP86,AR}

1019: from the

1020: eigenvalues of the Lichnerowicz operator, 

1021: one obtains the mass-squared for the singlet ${\bf 1}$ 

1022: as follows:

1023: \bea

1024: M_{\bf 1}^2 =  -\frac{80}{9} m_2^2,

1025: \nonu

1026: \eea

1027: and this coincides with (\ref{mass2}).

1028: The perturbation that corresponds to squashing

1029: around $\widetilde{ \bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$ has a scaling dimension either 

1030: $\Delta = 4/3$ or $5/3$ and hence corresponds to a relevant operator.

1031: 

1032: We gave a nonzero expectation value to a supergravity scalar in the 

1033: ${\bf 20'}$ of $SU(4)_R$. Using the AdS/CFT correspondence, one

1034: identifies this perturbation with a composite operator of 

1035: ${\cal N}=6$ superconformal Chern-Simons matter theory with a mass

1036: term for the symmetric and traceless product between 

1037: two ${\bf 6}$'s: $\lambda_{AB} \int d^3 x {\cal O}^{AB}$ where 

1038: $\lambda_{AB}$ is in the ${\bf 20'}$ of ${\bf Z}_k$-invariant $SU(4)_R$. 

1039: Note that the tensor product of these leads to

1040: \bea

1041: {\bf 6}(\tiny\yng(1,1)) \times {\bf 6}(\tiny\yng(1,1)) = 

1042: {\bf 1}(\tiny\yng(1,1,1,1)) 

1043: \oplus {\bf 15}(\tiny\yng(2,1,1)) \oplus {\bf 20'}(\tiny\yng(2,2))

1044: \nonu

1045: \eea 

1046: in $SU(4)_R$ 

1047: representation. Then one can construct a ${\bf 6}$(that is the

1048: Young tableaux $\tiny\yng(1,1)$)

1049: representation by

1050: using the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient $\Gamma^A_{IJ}(A=1, \cdots, 6)$ 

1051: \cite{BLS1,OP} 

1052: which transforms

1053: two ${\bf 4}$'s into ${\bf 6}$ of $SU(4)_R$ together with matter field

1054: $C^I$: 

1055: \bea

1056: \Gamma^A_{IJ} C^I C^J

1057: \nonu

1058: \eea

1059: where

1060: $C^I(I=1, \cdots, 4)$ are four

1061: complex scalars(${\bf 4}$ under the $SU(4)_R$) 

1062: transforming as $({\bf N, \overline{N}})$ with gauge

1063: group $U(N) \times U(N)$ in ${\cal N}=6$ superconformal Chern-Simons

1064: gauge theory \cite{ABJM}.  

1065: The perturbation breaking $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$ to 

1066: $SO(5) \times U(1)$ is given by 

1067: \bea

1068: {\cal O}^{AB} = \Tr \Gamma^A_{IJ} C^I

1069: C^J \Gamma^B_{KL} C^K C^L - \frac{1}{6} \delta^{AB}  \Tr \Gamma^C_{IJ} C^I

1070: C^J \Gamma^C_{KL} C^K C^L.

1071: \label{operator}

1072: \eea

1073: The singlet ${\bf 1}$ 

1074: of this operator ${\cal O}^{AB}$ which is ${\bf 20'}$ 

1075: of $SU(4)_R$ corresponds to the

1076: supergravity

1077: field $v(x)$(or $\overline{v}(x)$) and the conformal dimensions are

1078: given by $\Delta_{UV} = \frac{4}{3}$(or $\frac{5}{3}$) and $\Delta_{IR}=4$  

1079: respectively as we computed before.

1080: 

1081: The massless supermultiplets 

1082: contain $(2-\frac{3}{2})$-supermultiplet in the $SU(4)$ singlet,

1083: $(1-\frac{1}{2})$-supermultiplet in the ${\bf 10} \oplus {\bf 1}$ of

1084: $SU(4)$ \cite{NP}.

1085: The full spectrum of massive supermultiplets is the subset of 

1086: the multiplets on the left squashed seven sphere that are neutral 

1087: when $SU(2)$ breaks to $U(1)$. 

1088: There exist ${\bf 35} \oplus {\bf 30}$ of $SO(5)$ massless scalars

1089: in massive supermultiplets which are the members of massive

1090: Wess-Zumino multiplets.  

1091: 

1092: Since the scalar potential we are considering is almost the same as

1093: the one in \cite{AR} by replacing $Q$ with $k Q$, 

1094: the non-perturbative analysis for the stability 

1095: given in \cite{AR}, besides the perturbative analysis considered so far,

1096: appears as a static domain wall. 

1097: With the equations of motion for the metric, $u$ and $v$, the

1098: four-dimensional metric ansatz satisfies  the correct boundary

1099: conditions at UV and IR regions. Then the Ricci tensor and the Ricci

1100: scalar can be determined in this background. Using the asymptotics, 

1101: one can check the consistency of the $SO(3)$ symmetric domain-wall

1102: configuration.

1103: One sees the rescaled $u$ field has $Q$ dependence which can be

1104: rescaled by $k Q$ at the UV and IR regions. One obtains the regular

1105: asymptote

1106: of the ratio of the scalar potential at two fixed points with

1107: monotonic rescaling of the curvature of radius. This monotonic 

1108: radial behavior of the static $SO(3)$ domain-wall configuration is the 

1109: holographic representation of the renormalization group flow 

1110: \cite{GPPZ,PS,FGPW}.

1111: 

1112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1113: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1114: $\bullet$ $SU(2) \times SU(2) \times U(1)$-invariant conformal fixed point

1115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1117: 

1118: So far, we have considered a particular one-parameter RG

1119: flow between

1120: conformal fixed points of M2-brane worldvolume theory. Geometrically,

1121: the flow is induced from varying the position of M2-brane when placed 

1122: near a conical singularity of an eight-dimensional manifold with 

1123: $Spin(7)$ holonomy. In the IR limit, the conical singularity and

1124: hence squashing of M2-brane horizon are washed out completely. 

1125: 

1126: At the IR fixed point with $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$ 

1127: symmetry, one may flow further into 

1128: another fixed points by turning on a set of relevant operators. 

1129: It includes 

1130: scalar operators of Dynkin label $({\bf n, 0, 0, 0})$ with ${\bf n} \geq 2$

1131: and pseudoscalar operators of Dynkin label $({\bf n, 0, 2, 0})$ with

1132: ${\bf n} \geq 0$. 

1133: Among them are 70 scalar fields ${\bf 35}_{\rm v}(\tiny\yng(2)) \oplus

1134: {\bf 35}_{\rm c}(\tiny\yng(1,1,1,1))$ 

1135: of $SO(8)$ in the massless gravity supermultiplet,

1136: parametrizing the coset space $E_{7(7)}/SU(8)$ in ${\cal N}=8$ gauged 

1137: supergravity. 

1138: Decomposing them under the ${\bf Z}_k$-invariant 

1139: $SU(4)_R \times U(1) \subset SO(8)_R$ \cite{NP,DLP},

1140: \bea

1141: {\bf 35}_{\rm v} \oplus {\bf 35}_{\rm c} \rightarrow

1142: {\bf 15} \oplus {\bf 15} \oplus \cdots 

1143: \nonu

1144: \eea 

1145: where we present only the

1146: representations with vanishing $U(1)$ charge. 

1147: Turning on the two relevant operators

1148: ${\bf 15}$'s breaks ${\bf Z}_k$-invariant 

1149: $SU(4)_R \times U(1) \rightarrow SU(2) \times SU(2)

1150: \times U(1)$ and they have the following branching rule

1151: \bea

1152: {\bf 15} \oplus {\bf 15} 

1153: \rightarrow ({\bf 1, 1}) \oplus ({\bf 1, 1}) \oplus \cdots

1154: \nonu

1155: \eea

1156: where we write only the representations with vanishing $U(1)$ charge.

1157: Utilizing

1158: on the known result, in \cite{DZ}, they

1159: have studied RG flow to a nonsupersymmetric vacuum 

1160: with $SU(2) \times SU(2) \times U(1)$ global symmetry.  

1161: 

1162: Moreover, in the context of three-dimensional boundary theory 

1163: \cite{GRVV}, 

1164: the $SU(2) \times SU(2)$ singlet $({\bf 1, 1})$ is found from

1165: the operator ${\bf 15}$(which is the Young tableaux $\tiny\yng(2,1,1)$),

1166: appearing in the branching rule of ${\bf 35}_v$, that corresponds to 

1167: \cite{ABJM} 

1168: \bea

1169: {\cal P}^{I}_{J} \sim \Tr C^I 

1170: C^{\dagger}_{J} + \cdots.

1171: \label{15}

1172: \eea

1173: Here

1174: $C^{\dagger}_J(J=1, \cdots, 4)$ are four

1175: complex scalars(${\bf \overline{4}}$ under the $SU(4)_R$) 

1176: transforming as $({\bf \overline{N}, N})$ with gauge

1177: group $U(N) \times U(N)$ in ${\cal N}=6$ superconformal Chern-Simons

1178: gauge theory \cite{ABJM}.

1179: On the other hand,

1180: the other $SU(2) \times SU(2)$ singlet $({\bf 1, 1})$ is 

1181: found from the operator ${\bf 15}$,

1182: appearing in the branching rule of ${\bf 35}_c$, written as \cite{GRVV}

1183: \bea

1184: {\cal O}^{I}_{J} \sim \Tr C^K C^{\dagger}_{[K} C^I 

1185: C^{\dagger}_{J]} + \cdots. 

1186: \nonu

1187: \eea

1188: This is obtained from the one (\ref{15}) by acting two supersymmetry

1189: transformations which are in the ${\bf 6}$ of $SU(4)_R$. 

1190: 

1191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1192: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1193: \section{

1194: Conclusions and outlook }

1195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1196: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1197: 

1198: We have constructed the full eleven-dimensional metric given by 

1199: (\ref{11dmetric}) and obtained  the scalar potential in 

1200: (\ref{potential}) by using the Freund-Rubin ansatz

1201: (\ref{fieldstrength}) with the help of appendix A.  

1202: The holographic supersymmetric(or nonsupersymmetric) RG flow 

1203: from ${\cal N}=1$(or ${\cal N}=0$) 

1204: $SO(5) \times U(1)$-invariant UV fixed

1205: point to ${\cal N}=6$(or ${\cal N}=0$) 

1206: $SU(4)_R \times U(1)$-invariant IR fixed point was described.

1207: The corresponding operator in three-dimensional 

1208: Chern-Simons matter theories is characterized by (\ref{operator}).

1209: 

1210: When there are gauge potential components which are proportional to

1211: totally antisymmetric torsion tensor on the seven sphere as well as

1212: the Freund-Rubin components we have discussed so far, 

1213: there is a Lorentz scalar field $w=w(x)$ providing these gauge potential

1214: components \cite{Page}. 

1215: After analyzing the eleven-dimensional Maxwell and Einstein 

1216: equations, the effective four-dimensional scalar potential is obtained.

1217: However, this has no extremum at finite $u(x), w(x)$ if $Q'$ is

1218: positive

1219: but if $Q'$ is negative, there exists a single extremum at nonzero

1220: $u(x)$

1221: and $w(x)=0$.  

1222: One finds that there is no extra critical point except this single

1223: extremum and concludes that there ought to be no nontrivial RG group

1224: flow in the dual three-dimensional conformal field theory. 

1225: Similar phenomena can be found in \cite{AR1}.

1226: 

1227: For the seven-dimensional metric, we have considered $SU(2)$-bundle over

1228: the base ${\bf S}^4$ in (\ref{11dmetric}). 

1229: Also one replaces the $SU(2)$-bundle with 

1230: $SO(3)$-bundle or the base ${\bf S}^4$ can be replaced by either ${\bf

1231: CP}^2$ or ${\bf CP}^1 \times {\bf CP}^1$. It is interesting to 

1232: find out whether these metrics provide the nontrivial eleven-dimensional 

1233: solutions and whether there exist nontrivial critical points in the effective 

1234: four-dimensional theory.  

1235: When the ${\bf CP}^3$ in \cite{PW,CPW,AI02-1} is generalized to the

1236: present form, a family of squashed ${\bf CP}^3$, 

1237: what happens for the eleven-dimensional solutions in the

1238: gauged supergravity?

1239: 

1240: So far, it is known that 

1241: there exist only for ${\cal N}=1, 2$ supersymmetric RG flows 

1242: \cite{Ahn08-1,Ahn08} dual to the Chern-Simons gauge theories with mass

1243: deformation. It is an open problem whether 

1244: ${\cal N}=3, 4, 5, 6, 8$ supersymmetric \cite{AFHS,MP} 

1245: RG flows exist in the context of 

1246: ${\cal N}=8$ gauged supergravity. 

1247: Are there any new general $AdS_4$ vacua? Are there any new critical

1248: points in the context of $SO(5)$ gauged supergravity 

1249: which might be related to 

1250: ${\cal N}=5$ Chern-Simons matter theory or 

1251: $SO(6)$ gauged supergravity?

1252: Are there any flows connecting $AdS_4 \times {\bf S}^7/{\bf Z}_k$ to 

1253: $AdS_5 \times T^{1,1}$ which was suggested in \cite{ABJM}?

1254: 

1255: There are much progress \cite{FHPR}-\cite{BLS} 

1256: on the direction of \cite{ABJM}. It would be

1257: interesting to apply the findings of this paper to them and see

1258: whether there exist any nontrivial aspects. 

1259: For example, one considers the general family of 

1260: squashed ${\bf CP}^3$ metric described

1261: in this paper and it is interesting to see how the squashing parameter 

1262: $\lambda$(or $v(x)$) 

1263: arises in the $AdS_4 \times {\bf CP}^3$ compactification.

1264: 

1265: \vspace{.7cm}

1266: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1267: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1268: \centerline{\bf Acknowledgments}

1269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1271: 

1272: I would like to thank 

1273: K. Woo for mathematica computations and

1274: O. Lunin  and D. Kutasov for discussions.

1275: This work was supported by grant No.

1276: R01-2006-000-10965-0 from the Basic Research Program of the Korea

1277: Science \& Engineering Foundation.  

1278: I acknowledge warm hospitality of 

1279: Particle Theory Group, Enrico Fermi Institute 

1280: at University of Chicago

1281: where this work was initiated.

1282: 

1283: \appendix

1284: 

1285: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\large \bf \mbox{Appendix~}\Alph{section}}

1286: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{section}\mbox{.}\arabic{equation}}

1287: 

1288: 

1289: \section{The Ricci tensor and field equations}

1290: 

1291: The Ricci tensor \cite{DNP86}

1292: can be obtained from connection one-form and curvature two-form in the

1293: following orthonormal basis for the metric (\ref{11dmetric})

1294: \bea

1295: e^1 & = &   e^{- \frac{7}{2} u(x)} \sqrt{g_{11}(x)} dx^1, \nonu \\

1296: e^2 & = &  e^{- \frac{7}{2} u(x)} \sqrt{g_{22}(x)} dx^2, \nonu \\

1297: e^3 & =  &  e^{- \frac{7}{2} u(x)} \sqrt{g_{33}(x)} dx^3, \nonu \\

1298: e^4 & = &   e^{- \frac{7}{2} u(x)} \sqrt{g_{44}(x)} dx^4, \nonu \\

1299: e^5 & = &  \frac{1}{2} e^{u(x)+\frac{3}{2} v(x)}  d \theta, \nonu \\

1300: e^6 & = &  \frac{1}{2} e^{u(x)+\frac{3}{2} v(x)} 

1301: \sin \theta \sigma_1, \nonu \\

1302: e^7 & = &  \frac{1}{2} e^{u(x)+\frac{3}{2} v(x)} \sin \theta 

1303: \sigma_2, \nonu \\

1304: e^8 & = &  \frac{1}{2} e^{u(x)+\frac{3}{2} v(x)} \sin \theta 

1305: \sigma_3, \nonu \\  

1306: e^9 & = & \frac{1}{2} e^{u(x) -2v(x)} 

1307: \left( d\mu -\sin \phi A^1 + \cos \phi  A^2 \right), \nonu \\

1308: e^{10} & = & \frac{1}{2} e^{u(x)-2v(x)} \sin \mu 

1309: \left( d \phi - \cot \mu \cos \phi A^1- \cot \mu \sin \phi A^2 + A^3

1310: \right), 

1311: \nonu \\

1312: e^{11} & = & \frac{1}{2} e^{u(x)-2v(x)} 

1313: \left( \frac{d \psi}{k} -  \sin \mu \cos \phi A^1 - \sin \mu \sin 

1314: \phi A^2- \cos \mu A^3 

1315:    -\cos \mu d \phi \right), 

1316: \label{frame}

1317: \eea

1318: where  the three real one-forms are 

1319: \bea

1320: \sigma_1  & = & \cos x^8 d x^6 + \sin x^8 \sin x^6 d x^7, \nonu \\ 

1321: \sigma_2  & = & -\sin x^8 d x^6 + \cos x^8 \sin x^6 d x^7, \nonu \\

1322: \sigma_3  & = & d x^8 + \cos x^6 d x^7,

1323: \nonu

1324: \eea

1325: and 

1326: the self-dual $SU(2)$ instanton gauge potential is 

1327: $ A^i \equiv \cos^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) 

1328: \; \sigma_i$. Intentionally, we inserted the overall factor

1329: $\frac{1}{2}$ in the seven-dimensional internal space. 

1330: The RR 2-form is given by the gauge potential in $e^{11}$ through 

1331: \bea

1332: && d(  \lambda \sin \mu \cos \phi A^1 + \lambda 

1333: \sin \mu \sin \phi A^2+ \lambda \cos \mu A^3 

1334:    +\lambda \cos \mu d \phi)= 

1335:  -\lambda \sin \mu \cos \phi (e^1 \wedge e^2+e^3

1336:    \wedge e^4) \nonu \\

1337: && -\lambda \sin \mu \sin \phi(e^1 \wedge e^3 -e^2 \wedge

1338:    e^4)-\lambda \cos \mu (e^1 \wedge e^4 + e^2 \wedge

1339:    e^3)-\frac{1}{\lambda} e^5 \wedge e^6,

1340: \nonu

1341: \eea

1342: where the nonzero components for $F_{13}, F_{24}, F_{14}$ and $F_{23}$ 

1343: also occur, contrary to the case of \cite{NP} in which there exist

1344: only nonzero components for $F_{12}, F_{34}$ and $F_{56}$.

1345: 

1346: Starting from the gauge field strength (\ref{fieldstrength}), 

1347: the eleven-dimensional Einstein equation implies the following Ricci

1348: tensor components:

1349: \bea

1350: \overline{R}^{\alpha}_{\beta} = -\frac{4}{3} Q'^2 e^{-14 u(x)} 

1351: \delta^{\alpha}_{\beta}, \qquad 

1352: \overline{R}^{a}_{b} = \frac{2}{3} Q'^2 e^{-14 u(x)} 

1353: \delta^{a}_{b},  \qquad

1354: \overline{R}^{\alpha}_{b} = \overline{R}^{a}_{\beta} = 0.

1355: \label{result1}

1356: \eea

1357:  

1358: Instead of using the differential forms in orthonormal basis 

1359: in order to get the 

1360: Ricci tensor components by hands, we compute them by using a

1361: mathematica in the basis $dx^i$

1362: where $i=1, 2, \cdots, 11$ and then convert them into the orthonormal 

1363: basis (\ref{frame}).  

1364: The metric connection can be obtained from the eleven-dimensional

1365: metric and Riemann tensor can be determined from this metric

1366: connection.

1367: Finally, the Ricci tensor is defined by the contraction between this

1368: Riemann tensor and eleven-dimensional metric.

1369: Furthermore, using the orthonormal basis (\ref{frame}), one obtains

1370: the following Ricci tensor components in the orthonormal basis 

1371: (\ref{frame})  

1372: \bea

1373: \overline{R}^{\alpha}_{\beta}  & = &  e^{7u(x)} \left[ R^\alpha_\beta +

1374: \frac{7}{2} \delta_{\beta}^{\alpha} u^{;\gamma}_{;\gamma}(x)

1375: -\frac{63}{2}

1376: u^{;\alpha}(x) u_{;\beta}(x) -21 v^{;\alpha}(x) v_{;\beta}(x) \right],

1377: \nonu \\

1378: \overline{R}^{5}_{5} & = & 12 e^{-2u(x)-3v(x)} - 6 e^{-2u(x)-10v(x)} -

1379: e^{7u(x)} \left[ u^{;\alpha}_{;\alpha}(x) +

1380: \frac{3}{2} v^{;\alpha}_{;\alpha}(x) \right]

1381: =\overline{R}^{6}_{6} =\overline{R}^{7}_{7}=\overline{R}^{8}_{8},

1382: \nonu \\

1383: \overline{R}^{9}_{9} & = & 2 e^{-2u(x)+4v(x)} + 4 e^{-2u(x)-10v(x)} -

1384: e^{7u(x)} \left[ u^{;\alpha}_{;\alpha}(x) -2 v^{;\alpha}_{;\alpha}(x) \right]

1385: =\overline{R}^{10}_{10} =\overline{R}^{11}_{11}.

1386: \label{result}

1387: \eea

1388: All these expressions are the same as the one in \cite{Page}. Here 

1389: $ u^{;\alpha} = g^{\alpha \beta} u_{;\beta}$ where the semicolon stands

1390: for the covariant

1391: derivative which contains the metric connection, as usual. 

1392: When $u(x)$ and $v(x)$ are constant, then 

1393: \bea

1394: \overline{R}^{5}_{5} & = & 3 - \frac{3}{2} e^{-7v}=3 - 

1395: \frac{3}{2} \lambda^2 =\overline{R}^{6}_{6} =\overline{R}^{7}_{7}=

1396: \overline{R}^{8}_{8},  \nonu \\

1397: \overline{R}^{9}_{9} & = & e^{-7v} +\frac{1}{2} e^{7v} = \lambda^2 +

1398: \frac{1}{2\lambda^2} = \overline{R}^{10}_{10} =\overline{R}^{11}_{11},

1399: \label{constRicci}

1400: \eea 

1401: except the

1402: overall factor $4 e^{-2u-3v}$.

1403: These (\ref{constRicci}) 

1404: are the same as the one in \cite{ADP,DNP}.

1405: The overall factor comes from different normalization in the metric.

1406: If we substitute $e^{2u} = \frac{1}{4} e^{-3v}$ into

1407: (\ref{11dmetric}), 

1408: then this factor becomes one and the normalization for the

1409: seven-dimensional metric here becomes the standard one \cite{ADP,DNP}.

1410: Then the Einstein condition is satisfied by two values of $\lambda^2$.

1411: The round sphere has $\lambda^2=1$ while the squashed sphere has 

1412: $\lambda^2=\frac{1}{5}$ \footnote{Let us recall that the Ricci tensor

1413: of the ${\bf CP}^3$  has the following components:

1414: $\overline{R}^{5}_{5} = 3 - \lambda^2 =\overline{R}^{6}_{6} =\overline{R}^{7}_{7}=

1415: \overline{R}^{8}_{8}$ and $\overline{R}^{9}_{9} = \lambda^2 +

1416: \frac{1}{\lambda^2} = \overline{R}^{10}_{10}$ \cite{NP,AF} when we

1417: consider the six-dimensional internal space only.  The standard

1418: Fubini-Study Einstein metric arises when $\lambda^2=1$ 

1419: while the second squashed Einstein

1420: metric arises when $\lambda^2=\frac{1}{2}$ as we mentioned in section 1.}. 

1421: 

1422: Now substituting the last two relations of (\ref{result}) into 

1423: the first two relations of (\ref{result1}) leads to 

1424: the field equations for $u(x)$ and $v(x)$

1425: \bea

1426:  u^{;\alpha}_{;\alpha}(x)  & = & 

1427: \frac{6}{7} e^{-9u(x)+4v(x)} +\frac{48}{7} e^{-9u(x)-3v(x)} -

1428: \frac{12}{7} e^{-9u(x)-10v(x)}-

1429: \frac{2}{3} Q'^2 e^{-21u(x)}, \nonu \\

1430: v^{;\alpha}_{;\alpha}(x)  & = & -\frac{4}{7} e^{-9u(x)+4v(x)} +\frac{24}{7} 

1431: e^{-9u(x)-3v(x)} -\frac{20}{7} e^{-9u(x)-10v(x)}.

1432: \label{result2}

1433: \eea

1434: The second equation of (\ref{result2}) implies 

1435: that either $v_1=0$ or $v_2=\frac{1}{7} \ln 5$ in section 2.

1436: Moreover, plugging the first equation of 

1437: (\ref{result2}) into the first equation of (\ref{result}) and equating

1438: this to the right hand side of the first equation of (\ref{result1}) provides 

1439: \bea

1440: R^{\alpha}_{\beta} & = & {63 \over 2} u^{;\alpha}(x) u_{;\beta}(x)

1441: + 21 v^{;\alpha}(x) v_{;\beta}(x) \nonu \\

1442: &+& \delta^{\alpha}_{\beta} e^{-9u(x)}

1443: \left[ - 3 e^{+4v(x)} - 24 e^{-3v(x)} +6 e^{- 10v(x)} + 

1444: Q'^2 e^{-12u(x)} \right].

1445: \label{result3}

1446: \eea

1447: Then it is easy to see that the field equations (\ref{result2}) and 

1448: (\ref{result3}) are equivalent to the Euler-Lagrange equations for the 

1449: effective Lagrangian (\ref{Lag}).

1450: When $u(x)$ and $v(x)$ are constant, then $R^{\alpha}_{\beta}  

1451: =\Lambda \delta^{\alpha}_{\beta}=\frac{1}{2} V  \delta^{\alpha}_{\beta}$.

1452: 

1453: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1454: 

1455: %\cite{Aharony:2008ug}

1456: \bibitem{ABJM}

1457:   O.~Aharony, O.~Bergman, D.~L.~Jafferis and J.~Maldacena,

1458: %  ``N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their

1459: %  gravity duals,''

1460:   arXiv:0806.1218 [hep-th].

1461:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.1218;%%

1462: 

1463: %\cite{Morrison:1998cs}

1464: \bibitem{MP}

1465:   D.~R.~Morrison and M.~R.~Plesser,

1466:   %``Non-spherical horizons. I,''

1467:   Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 3}, 1 (1999).

1468: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9810201].

1469:   %%CITATION = 00203,3,1;%%

1470: 

1471: %\cite{Halyo:1998pn}

1472: \bibitem{Halyo}

1473:   E.~Halyo,

1474:   %``Supergravity on AdS(5/4) x Hopf fibrations and conformal field  theories,''

1475:   Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\  A {\bf 15}, 397 (2000).

1476: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9803193].

1477:   %%CITATION = MPLAE,A15,397;%%

1478: 

1479: %\cite{Ferrara:1998vf}

1480: \bibitem{FKPZ}

1481:   S.~Ferrara, A.~Kehagias, H.~Partouche and A.~Zaffaroni,

1482:   %``Membranes and fivebranes with lower supersymmetry and their AdS

1483:   %supergravity duals,''

1484:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 431}, 42 (1998).

1485: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9803109].

1486:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B431,42;%%

1487: 

1488: %\cite{Gomis:1998xj}

1489: \bibitem{Gomis}

1490:   J.~Gomis,

1491:   %``Anti de Sitter geometry and strongly coupled gauge theories,''

1492:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 435}, 299 (1998).

1493: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9803119].

1494:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B435,299;%%

1495: 

1496: %\cite{Ahn:1998sv}

1497: \bibitem{AOT}

1498:   C.~Ahn, K.~Oh and R.~Tatar,

1499:   %``Branes, orbifolds and the three dimensional N = 2 SCFT in the large N

1500:   %limit,''

1501:   JHEP {\bf 9811}, 024 (1998).

1502: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9806041].

1503:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,9811,024;%%

1504: 

1505: %\cite{Nilsson:1984bj}

1506: \bibitem{NP}

1507:   B.~E.~W.~Nilsson and C.~N.~Pope,

1508: %  ``Hopf Fibration Of Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity,''

1509:   Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\  {\bf 1}, 499 (1984).

1510:   %%CITATION = CQGRD,1,499;%%

1511: 

1512: %\cite{Bagger:2007vi}

1513: \bibitem{BL}

1514:   J.~Bagger and N.~Lambert,

1515:   %``Comments On Multiple M2-branes,''

1516:   JHEP {\bf 0802}, 105 (2008).

1517:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0802,105;%%

1518: 

1519: %\cite{Bagger:2007jr}

1520: \bibitem{BL1}

1521:   J.~Bagger and N.~Lambert,

1522:   %``Gauge Symmetry and Supersymmetry of Multiple M2-Branes,''

1523:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 77}, 065008 (2008).

1524:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,065008;%%

1525: 

1526: %\cite{Bagger:2006sk}

1527: \bibitem{BL2}

1528:   J.~Bagger and N.~Lambert,

1529:   %``Modeling multiple M2's,''

1530:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 75}, 045020 (2007).

1531:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,045020;%%

1532: 

1533: %\cite{Ahn:1999dq}

1534: \bibitem{AR}

1535:   C.~Ahn and S.~J.~Rey,

1536: %  ``Three-dimensional CFTs and RG flow from squashing M2-brane horizon,''

1537:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 565}, 210 (2000).

1538:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B565,210;%%

1539: 

1540: \bibitem{Jensen} G. Jensen, J. Diff. Geom. {\bf 8} (1973) 599.

1541: 

1542: \bibitem{BK}

1543: J.~P.~Bourguignon and H. Karcher, Ann. Sci. Normale Sup. {\bf 11}

1544: (1978) 71.

1545: 

1546: %\cite{Awada:1982pk}

1547: \bibitem{ADP}

1548:   M.~A.~Awada, M.~J.~Duff and C.~N.~Pope,

1549: %  ``N = 8 supergravity breaks down to N = 1,''

1550:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 50}, 294 (1983).

1551:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,50,294;%%

1552: 

1553: %\cite{Duff:1983nu}

1554: \bibitem{DNP}

1555:   M.~J.~Duff, B.~E.~W.~Nilsson and C.~N.~Pope,

1556: %  ``Spontaneous Supersymmetry Breaking By The Squashed Seven Sphere,''

1557:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 50}, 2043 (1983); {\bf 51}, 846 (1983) (errata).

1558:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,50,2043;%%

1559: %M.J. Duff, B.E.W. Nilsson and C.N. Pope, 

1560: %Phys.\Rev.\Lett. {\bf 50} (1983) 2043;

1561: 

1562: %\cite{Maldacena:1997re}

1563: \bibitem{Maldacena}

1564:   J.~M.~Maldacena,

1565:   %``The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,''

1566:   Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 2}, 231 (1998)

1567:   [Int.\ J.\ Theor.\ Phys.\  {\bf 38}, 1113 (1999)].

1568:   %%CITATION = IJTPB,38,1113;%%

1569: 

1570: %\cite{Witten:1998qj}

1571: \bibitem{Witten}

1572:   E.~Witten,

1573:   %``Anti-de Sitter space and holography,''

1574:   Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 2}, 253 (1998).

1575:   %%CITATION = 00203,2,253;%%

1576: 

1577: %\cite{Gubser:1998bc}

1578: \bibitem{GKP}

1579:   S.~S.~Gubser, I.~R.~Klebanov and A.~M.~Polyakov,

1580:   %``Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,''

1581:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 428}, 105 (1998).

1582:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B428,105;%%

1583: 

1584: %\cite{Page:1984qv}

1585: \bibitem{Page}

1586:   D.~N.~Page,

1587: %  ``Classical Stability Of Round And Squashed Seven Spheres In

1588: %  Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity,''

1589:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 28}, 2976 (1983).

1590:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D28,2976;%%

1591: 

1592: %\cite{Pope:1984bd}

1593: \bibitem{PW}

1594:   C.~N.~Pope and N.~P.~Warner,

1595: %  ``An SU(4) Invariant Compactification Of D = 11 Supergravity On A Stretched

1596: %  Seven Sphere,''

1597:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 150}, 352 (1985).

1598:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B150,352;%%

1599: 

1600: %\cite{Corrado:2001nv}

1601: \bibitem{CPW}

1602:   R.~Corrado, K.~Pilch and N.~P.~Warner,

1603:   %``An N = 2 supersymmetric membrane flow,''

1604:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 629}, 74 (2002).

1605:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B629,74;%%

1606: 

1607: %\cite{Ahn:2002eh}

1608: \bibitem{AI02-1}

1609:   C.~Ahn and T.~Itoh,

1610: %  ``The 11-dimensional metric for AdS/CFT RG flows with common SU(3)

1611: %  invariance,''

1612:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 646}, 257 (2002).

1613:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B646,257;%%

1614: 

1615: \bibitem{Ziller}

1616: W. Ziller, 

1617: % ``Homogeneous Einstein Metrics on Spheres and Projective Spaces,'' 

1618: Math. Ann. {\bf 259}, 351 (1982).

1619: 

1620: %\cite{Aldazabal:2007sn}

1621: \bibitem{AF}

1622:   G.~Aldazabal and A.~Font,

1623: %  ``A second look at N=1 supersymmetric $AdS_4$ vacua of type IIA supergravity,''

1624:   JHEP {\bf 0802}, 086 (2008).

1625:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0802,086;%%

1626: 

1627: %\cite{Ooguri:2008dk}

1628: \bibitem{OP}

1629:   H.~Ooguri and C.~S.~Park,

1630: %  ``Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories and the Squashed Seven Sphere,''

1631:   arXiv:0808.0500 [hep-th].

1632:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0500;%%

1633: 

1634: %\cite{Freund:1980xh}

1635: \bibitem{FR}

1636:   P.~G.~O.~Freund and M.~A.~Rubin,

1637: %  ``Dynamics Of Dimensional Reduction,''

1638:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 97}, 233 (1980).

1639:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B97,233;%%

1640: 

1641: %\cite{Cvetic:2000yp}

1642: \bibitem{CLP}

1643:   M.~Cvetic, H.~Lu and C.~N.~Pope,

1644: %  ``Consistent warped-space Kaluza-Klein reductions, half-maximal gauged

1645: %  supergravities and CP(n) constructions,''

1646:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 597}, 172 (2001).

1647:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B597,172;%%

1648: 

1649: %\cite{Duff:1986hr}

1650: \bibitem{DNP86}

1651:   M.~J.~Duff, B.~E.~W.~Nilsson and C.~N.~Pope,

1652: %  ``Kaluza-Klein Supergravity,''

1653:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 130}, 1 (1986).

1654:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,130,1;%%

1655: 

1656: %\cite{Campos:2000yu}

1657: \bibitem{CFLMN}

1658:   V.~L.~Campos, G.~Ferretti, H.~Larsson, D.~Martelli and B.~E.~W.~Nilsson,

1659: %  ``A study of holographic renormalization group flows in d = 6 and d = 3,''

1660:   JHEP {\bf 0006}, 023 (2000).

1661:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0006,023;%%

1662: 

1663: %\cite{Tomasiello:2007eq}

1664: \bibitem{Tomasiello}

1665:   A.~Tomasiello,

1666: %  ``New string vacua from twistor spaces,''

1667:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 78}, 046007 (2008).

1668:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D78,046007;%%

1669: 

1670: %\cite{Koerber:2008rx}

1671: \bibitem{KLT}

1672:   P.~Koerber, D.~Lust and D.~Tsimpis,

1673:   %``Type IIA AdS4 compactifications on cosets, interpolations and domain

1674:   %walls,''

1675:   JHEP {\bf 0807}, 017 (2008).

1676:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0807,017;%%

1677: 

1678: %\cite{Gibbons:1989er}

1679: \bibitem{GNP}

1680:   G.~W.~Gibbons, D.~N.~Page and C.~N.~Pope,

1681: %  ``Einstein Metrics on S**3 R**3 and R**4 Bundles,''

1682:   Commun.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 127}, 529 (1990).

1683:   %%CITATION = CMPHA,127,529;%%

1684: 

1685: %\cite{Liu:2000gk}

1686: \bibitem{LS}

1687:   J.~T.~Liu and H.~Sati,

1688: %  ``Breathing mode compactifications and supersymmetry of the brane-world,''

1689:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 605}, 116 (2001).

1690:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B605,116;%%

1691: 

1692: %\cite{Duff:1997qz}

1693: \bibitem{DLP}

1694:   M.~J.~Duff, H.~Lu and C.~N.~Pope,

1695: %  ``Supersymmetry without supersymmetry,''

1696:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 409}, 136 (1997).

1697:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B409,136;%%

1698: 

1699: %\cite{Halyo:1998pn}

1700: %\bibitem{Halyo}

1701: %  E.~Halyo,

1702: %  ``Supergravity on AdS(5/4) x Hopf fibrations and conformal field  theories,''

1703: %  Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\  A {\bf 15}, 397 (2000).

1704: %  %%CITATION = MPLAE,A15,397;%%

1705: 

1706: %\cite{Slansky:1981yr}

1707: \bibitem{Slansky}

1708:   R.~Slansky,

1709:   %``Group Theory For Unified Model Building,''

1710:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 79}, 1 (1981).

1711:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,79,1;%%

1712: 

1713: \bibitem{Petera} 

1714: J. Patera and D. Sankoff, {\sl Tables of Branching

1715: Rules for 

1716: Representations of Simple Lie Algebras}(L'Universit\'{e} de Montr\'{e}al, 

1717: Montr\'{e}al, 1973); 

1718: W. MacKay and J. Petera, {\sl Tables of Dimensions, Indices and 

1719: Branching Rules for representations of Simple Algebras}(Dekker, New

1720: York, 1981).

1721: 

1722: %\cite{Biran:1983iy}

1723: \bibitem{BCERS}

1724:   B.~Biran, A.~Casher, F.~Englert, M.~Rooman and P.~Spindel,

1725: %  ``The Fluctuating Seven Sphere In Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity,''

1726:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 134}, 179 (1984).

1727:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B134,179;%%

1728: 

1729: %\cite{Girardello:1998pd}

1730: \bibitem{GPPZ}

1731:   L.~Girardello, M.~Petrini, M.~Porrati and A.~Zaffaroni,

1732:   %``Novel local CFT and exact results on perturbations of N = 4 super

1733:   %Yang-Mills from AdS dynamics,''

1734:   JHEP {\bf 9812}, 022 (1998).

1735:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,9812,022;%%

1736: 

1737: %\cite{Distler:1998gb}

1738: \bibitem{DZ}

1739:   J.~Distler and F.~Zamora,

1740:   %``Non-supersymmetric conformal field theories from stable anti-de Sitter

1741:   %spaces,''

1742:   Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 2}, 1405 (1999).

1743:   %%CITATION = 00203,2,1405;%%

1744: 

1745: %\cite{Bandres:2008ry}

1746: \bibitem{BLS1}

1747:   M.~A.~Bandres, A.~E.~Lipstein and J.~H.~Schwarz,

1748:   %``Studies of the ABJM Theory in a Formulation with Manifest SU(4)

1749:   %R-Symmetry,''

1750:   JHEP {\bf 0809}, 027 (2008).

1751:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0809,027;%%

1752: 

1753: %\cite{Porrati:1999ew}

1754: \bibitem{PS}

1755:   M.~Porrati and A.~Starinets,

1756:   %``RG fixed points in supergravity duals of 4-d field theory and

1757:   %asymptotically AdS spaces,''

1758:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 454}, 77 (1999).

1759: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9903085].

1760:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B454,77;%%

1761: 

1762: %\cite{Freedman:1999gp}

1763: \bibitem{FGPW}

1764:   D.~Z.~Freedman, S.~S.~Gubser, K.~Pilch and N.~P.~Warner,

1765:   %``Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a

1766:   %c-theorem,''

1767:   Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 3}, 363 (1999).

1768: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9904017].

1769:   %%CITATION = 00203,3,363;%%

1770: 

1771: %\cite{Gomis:2008vc}

1772: \bibitem{GRVV}

1773:   J.~Gomis, D.~Rodriguez-Gomez, M.~Van Raamsdonk and H.~Verlinde,

1774:   %``A Massive Study of M2-brane Proposals,''

1775:   arXiv:0807.1074 [hep-th].

1776:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1074;%%

1777: 

1778: %\cite{Ahn:1999zy}

1779: \bibitem{AR1}

1780:   C.~Ahn and S.~J.~Rey,

1781:   %``More CFTs and RG flows from deforming M2/M5-brane horizon,''

1782:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 572}, 188 (2000).

1783:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B572,188;%%

1784: 

1785: %\cite{Ahn:2008gda}

1786: \bibitem{Ahn08-1}

1787:   C.~Ahn,

1788:   %``Towards Holographic Gravity Dual of N=1Superconformal Chern-Simons Gauge

1789:   %Theory,''

1790:   JHEP {\bf 0807}, 101 (2008).

1791:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0807,101;%%

1792: 

1793: %\cite{Ahn:2008ya}

1794: \bibitem{Ahn08}

1795:   C.~Ahn,

1796:   %``Holographic Supergravity Dual to Three Dimensional N=2 Gauge Theory,''

1797:   JHEP {\bf 0808}, 083 (2008).

1798:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0808,083;%%

1799: 

1800: %\cite{Acharya:1998db}

1801: \bibitem{AFHS}

1802:   B.~S.~Acharya, J.~M.~Figueroa-O'Farrill, C.~M.~Hull and B.~J.~Spence,

1803:   %``Branes at conical singularities and holography,''

1804:   Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 2}, 1249 (1999).

1805:   %%CITATION = 00203,2,1249;%%

1806: 

1807: %\cite{Morrison:1998cs}

1808: %\bibitem{MP}

1809: %  D.~R.~Morrison and M.~R.~Plesser,

1810:   %``Non-spherical horizons. I,''

1811: %  Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 3}, 1 (1999).

1812:   %%CITATION = 00203,3,1;%%

1813: 

1814: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1815: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1816: 

1817: %\cite{Franco:2008um}

1818: \bibitem{FHPR}

1819:   S.~Franco, A.~Hanany, J.~Park and D.~Rodriguez-Gomez,

1820:   %``Towards M2-brane Theories for Generic Toric Singularities,''

1821:   arXiv:0809.3237 [hep-th].

1822:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.3237;%%

1823: 

1824: %\cite{Kluson:2008wn}

1825: \bibitem{KP}

1826:   J.~Kluson and K.~L.~Panigrahi,

1827:   %``Defects and Wilson Loops in 3d QFT from D-branes in AdS(4) x CP**3,''

1828:   arXiv:0809.3355 [hep-th].

1829:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.3355;%%

1830: 

1831: %\cite{Chen:2008vc}

1832: \bibitem{Chen:2008vc}

1833:   C.~M.~Chen, J.~H.~Tsai and W.~Y.~Wen,

1834:   %``Giant Magnons and Spiky Strings on S^3 with B-field,''

1835:   arXiv:0809.3269 [hep-th].

1836:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.3269;%%

1837: 

1838: %\cite{Lee:2008cr}

1839: \bibitem{LLP}

1840:   K.~Lee, S.~Lee and J.~H.~Park,

1841:   %``Topological Twisting of Multiple M2-brane Theory,''

1842:   arXiv:0809.2924 [hep-th].

1843:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.2924;%%

1844: 

1845: %\cite{Chen:2008bp}

1846: \bibitem{Chen:2008bp}

1847:   B.~Chen and J.~B.~Wu,

1848:   %``Supersymmetric Wilson Loops in N=6 Super Chern-Simons-matter theory,''

1849:   arXiv:0809.2863 [hep-th].

1850:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.2863;%%

1851: 

1852: %\cite{Drukker:2008zx}

1853: \bibitem{Drukker:2008zx}

1854:   N.~Drukker, J.~Plefka and D.~Young,

1855:   %``Wilson loops in 3-dimensional N=6 supersymmetric Chern-Simons Theory and

1856:   %their string theory duals,''

1857:   arXiv:0809.2787 [hep-th].

1858:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.2787;%%

1859: 

1860: %\cite{Hashimoto:2008ij}

1861: \bibitem{HTT}

1862:   K.~Hashimoto, T.~S.~Tai and S.~Terashima,

1863:   %``Toward a Proof of Montonen-Olive Duality via Multiple M2-branes,''

1864:   arXiv:0809.2137 [hep-th].

1865:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.2137;%%

1866: 

1867: %\cite{Hosomichi:2008ip}

1868: \bibitem{Hosomichi:2008ip}

1869:   K.~Hosomichi, K.~M.~Lee, S.~Lee, S.~Lee, J.~Park and P.~Yi,

1870:   %``A Nonperturbative Test of M2-Brane Theory,''

1871:   arXiv:0809.1771 [hep-th].

1872:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.1771;%%

1873: 

1874: %\cite{Yamazaki:2008gg}

1875: \bibitem{Yamazaki:2008gg}

1876:   M.~Yamazaki,

1877:   %``Octonions, G_2 and generalized Lie 3-algebras,''

1878:   arXiv:0809.1650 [hep-th].

1879:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.1650;%%

1880: 

1881: %\cite{Hanany:2008fj}

1882: \bibitem{Hanany:2008fj}

1883:   A.~Hanany, D.~Vegh and A.~Zaffaroni,

1884:   %``Brane Tilings and M2 Branes,''

1885:   arXiv:0809.1440 [hep-th].

1886:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.1440;%%

1887: 

1888: %\cite{deMedeiros:2008zh}

1889: \bibitem{deMedeiros:2008zh}

1890:   P.~de Medeiros, J.~Figueroa-O'Farrill, E.~Mendez-Escobar and P.~Ritter,

1891:   %``On the Lie-algebraic origin of metric 3-algebras,''

1892:   arXiv:0809.1086 [hep-th].

1893:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.1086;%%

1894: 

1895: %\cite{Garousi:2008xn}

1896: \bibitem{Garousi:2008xn}

1897:   M.~R.~Garousi,

1898:   %``On non-linear action of multiple M2-branes,''

1899:   arXiv:0809.0985 [hep-th].

1900:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.0985;%%

1901: 

1902: %\cite{Jeon:2008zj}

1903: \bibitem{Jeon:2008zj}

1904:   I.~Jeon, J.~Kim, N.~Kim, B.~H.~Lee and J.~H.~Park,

1905:   %``M-brane bound states and the supersymmetry of BPS solutions in the

1906:   %Bagger-Lambert theory,''

1907:   arXiv:0809.0856 [hep-th].

1908:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.0856;%%

1909: 

1910: %\cite{Garousi:2008yv}

1911: \bibitem{Garousi:2008yv}

1912:   M.~R.~Garousi,

1913:   %``A proposal for M2-brane-anti-M2-brane action,''

1914:   arXiv:0809.0381 [hep-th].

1915:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.0381;%%

1916: 

1917: %\cite{Imamura:2008qs}

1918: \bibitem{Imamura:2008qs}

1919:   Y.~Imamura and K.~Kimura,

1920:   %``Quiver Chern-Simons theories and crystals,''

1921:   arXiv:0808.4155 [hep-th].

1922:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.4155;%%

1923: 

1924: %\cite{Ueda:2008hx}

1925: \bibitem{Ueda:2008hx}

1926:   K.~Ueda and M.~Yamazaki,

1927:   %``Toric Calabi-Yau four-folds dual to Chern-Simons-matter theories,''

1928:   arXiv:0808.3768 [hep-th].

1929:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.3768;%%

1930: 

1931: %\cite{Bandos:2008df}

1932: \bibitem{Bandos:2008df}

1933:   I.~A.~Bandos,

1934:   %``NB BLG model in N=8 superfields,''

1935:   arXiv:0808.3568 [hep-th].

1936:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.3568;%%

1937: 

1938: %\cite{Rashkov:2008rm}

1939: \bibitem{Rashkov:2008rm}

1940:   R.~C.~Rashkov,

1941:   %``A note on the reduction of the AdS4 x CP3 string sigma model,''

1942:   arXiv:0808.3057 [hep-th].

1943:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.3057;%%

1944: 

1945: %\cite{Niarchos:2008jb}

1946: \bibitem{Niarchos:2008jb}

1947:   V.~Niarchos,

1948:   %``Seiberg Duality in Chern-Simons Theories with Fundamental and Adjoint

1949:   %Matter,''

1950:   arXiv:0808.2771 [hep-th].

1951:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.2771;%%

1952: 

1953: %\cite{Nishioka:2008ib}

1954: \bibitem{Nishioka:2008ib}

1955:   T.~Nishioka and T.~Takayanagi,

1956:   %``Fuzzy Ring from M2-brane Giant Torus,''

1957:   arXiv:0808.2691 [hep-th].

1958:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.2691;%%

1959: 

1960: %\cite{Berenstein:2008dc}

1961: \bibitem{Berenstein:2008dc}

1962:   D.~Berenstein and D.~Trancanelli,

1963:   %``Three-dimensional N=6 SCFT's and their membrane dynamics,''

1964:   arXiv:0808.2503 [hep-th].

1965:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.2503;%%

1966: 

1967: %\cite{Iengo:2008cq}

1968: \bibitem{Iengo:2008cq}

1969:   R.~Iengo and J.~G.~Russo,

1970:   %``Non-linear theory for multiple M2 branes,''

1971:   arXiv:0808.2473 [hep-th].

1972:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.2473;%%

1973: 

1974: %\cite{D'Auria:2008cw}

1975: \bibitem{D'Auria:2008cw}

1976:   R.~D'Auria, P.~Fre, P.~A.~Grassi and M.~Trigiante,

1977:   %``Superstrings on AdS_4 x CP^3 from Supergravity,''

1978:   arXiv:0808.1282 [hep-th].

1979:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.1282;%%

1980: 

1981: %\cite{Imeroni:2008cr}

1982: \bibitem{Imeroni:2008cr}

1983:   E.~Imeroni,

1984:   %``On deformed gauge theories and their string/M-theory duals,''

1985:   arXiv:0808.1271 [hep-th].

1986:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.1271;%%

1987: 

1988: %\cite{Hanany:2008cd}

1989: \bibitem{Hanany:2008cd}

1990:   A.~Hanany and A.~Zaffaroni,

1991:   %``Tilings, Chern-Simons Theories and M2 Branes,''

1992:   arXiv:0808.1244 [hep-th].

1993:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.1244;%%

1994: 

1995: %\cite{Bonelli:2008us}

1996: \bibitem{Bonelli:2008us}

1997:   G.~Bonelli, P.~A.~Grassi and H.~Safaai,

1998:   %``Exploring Pure Spinor String Theory on $AdS_4\times \mathbb{CP}^3$,''

1999:   arXiv:0808.1051 [hep-th].

2000:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.1051;%%

2001: 

2002: %\cite{Martelli:2008si}

2003: \bibitem{Martelli:2008si}

2004:   D.~Martelli and J.~Sparks,

2005:   %``Moduli spaces of Chern-Simons quiver gauge theories,''

2006:   arXiv:0808.0912 [hep-th].

2007:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0912;%%

2008: 

2009: %\cite{Martelli:2008rt}

2010: \bibitem{Martelli:2008rt}

2011:   D.~Martelli and J.~Sparks,

2012:   %``Notes on toric Sasaki-Einstein seven-manifolds and AdS_4/CFT_3,''

2013:   arXiv:0808.0904 [hep-th].

2014:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0904;%%

2015: 

2016: %\cite{Jafferis:2008qz}

2017: \bibitem{Jafferis:2008qz}

2018:   D.~L.~Jafferis and A.~Tomasiello,

2019:   %``A simple class of N=3 gauge/gravity duals,''

2020:   arXiv:0808.0864 [hep-th].

2021:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0864;%%

2022: 

2023: %\cite{Garousi:2008ai}

2024: \bibitem{Garousi:2008ai}

2025:   M.~R.~Garousi and A.~Ghodsi,

2026:   %``Hydrodynamics of N=6 Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories at Strong

2027:   %Coupling,''

2028:   arXiv:0808.0411 [hep-th].

2029:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0411;%%

2030: 

2031: %\cite{Giveon:2008zn}

2032: \bibitem{Giveon:2008zn}

2033:   A.~Giveon and D.~Kutasov,

2034:   %``Seiberg Duality in Chern-Simons Theory,''

2035:   arXiv:0808.0360 [hep-th].

2036:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0360;%%

2037: 

2038: %\cite{Bak:2008vd}

2039: \bibitem{Bak:2008vd}

2040:   D.~Bak, D.~Gang and S.~J.~Rey,

2041:   %``Integrable Spin Chain of Superconformal U(M)xU(N) Chern-Simons Theory,''

2042:   arXiv:0808.0170 [hep-th].

2043:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0808.0170;%%

2044: 

2045: %\cite{Nilsson:2008kq}

2046: \bibitem{Nilsson:2008kq}

2047:   B.~E.~W.~Nilsson and J.~Palmkvist,

2048:   %``Superconformal M2-branes and generalized Jordan triple systems,''

2049:   arXiv:0807.5134 [hep-th].

2050:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.5134;%%

2051: 

2052: %\cite{Bonelli:2008kh}

2053: \bibitem{Bonelli:2008kh}

2054:   G.~Bonelli, A.~Tanzini and M.~Zabzine,

2055:   %``Topological branes, p-algebras and generalized Nahm equations,''

2056:   arXiv:0807.5113 [hep-th].

2057:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.5113;%%

2058: 

2059: %\cite{Singh:2008ix}

2060: \bibitem{Singh:2008ix}

2061:   H.~Singh,

2062:   %``M2-branes on a resolved $C_4/Z_4$,''

2063:   arXiv:0807.5016 [hep-th].

2064:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.5016;%%

2065: 

2066: %\cite{Aharony:2008gk}

2067: \bibitem{Aharony:2008gk}

2068:   O.~Aharony, O.~Bergman and D.~L.~Jafferis,

2069:   %``Fractional M2-branes,''

2070:   arXiv:0807.4924 [hep-th].

2071:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.4924;%%

2072: 

2073: %\cite{Gromov:2008fy}

2074: \bibitem{Gromov:2008fy}

2075:   N.~Gromov and V.~Mikhaylov,

2076:   %``Comment on the Scaling Function in AdS4 x CP3,''

2077:   arXiv:0807.4897 [hep-th].

2078:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.4897;%%

2079: 

2080: %\cite{Krishnan:2008zs}

2081: \bibitem{Krishnan:2008zs}

2082:   C.~Krishnan,

2083:   %``AdS4/CFT3 at One Loop,''

2084:   arXiv:0807.4561 [hep-th].

2085:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.4561;%%

2086: 

2087: %\cite{Alday:2008ut}

2088: \bibitem{Alday:2008ut}

2089:   L.~F.~Alday, G.~Arutyunov and D.~Bykov,

2090:   %``Semiclassical Quantization of Spinning Strings in AdS_4 x CP^3,''

2091:   arXiv:0807.4400 [hep-th].

2092:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.4400;%%

2093: 

2094: %\cite{Kluson:2008nw}

2095: \bibitem{Kluson:2008nw}

2096:   J.~Kluson,

2097:   %``D2 to M2 Procedure for D2-Brane DBI Effective Action,''

2098:   arXiv:0807.4054 [hep-th].

2099:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.4054;%%

2100: 

2101: %\cite{McLoughlin:2008ms}

2102: \bibitem{McLoughlin:2008ms}

2103:   T.~McLoughlin and R.~Roiban,

2104:   %``Spinning strings at one-loop in AdS_4 x P^3,''

2105:   arXiv:0807.3965 [hep-th].

2106:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.3965;%%

2107: 

2108: %\cite{Honma:2008ef}

2109: \bibitem{Honma:2008ef}

2110:   Y.~Honma, S.~Iso, Y.~Sumitomo, H.~Umetsu and S.~Zhang,

2111:   %``Generalized Conformal Symmetry and Recovery of SO(8) in Multiple M2 and D2

2112:   %Branes,''

2113:   arXiv:0807.3825 [hep-th].

2114:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.3825;%%

2115: 

2116: %\cite{Ahn:2008hj}

2117: \bibitem{Ahn:2008hj}

2118:   Changrim Ahn, P.~Bozhilov and R.~C.~Rashkov,

2119:   %``Neumann-Rosochatius integrable system for strings on AdS_4 x CP^3,''

2120:   JHEP {\bf 0809}, 017 (2008).

2121:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0809,017;%%

2122: 

2123: %\cite{Shenderovich:2008bs}

2124: \bibitem{Shenderovich:2008bs}

2125:   I.~Shenderovich,

2126:   %``Giant magnons in $AdS_4/CFT_3$: dispersion, quantization and finite--size

2127:   %corrections,''

2128:   arXiv:0807.2861 [hep-th].

2129:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2861;%%

2130: 

2131: %\cite{Bergshoeff:2008bh}

2132: \bibitem{Bergshoeff:2008bh}

2133:   E.~A.~Bergshoeff, O.~Hohm, D.~Roest, H.~Samtleben and E.~Sezgin,

2134:   %``The Superconformal Gaugings in Three Dimensions,''

2135:   arXiv:0807.2841 [hep-th].

2136:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2841;%%

2137: 

2138: %\cite{Lee:2008ui}

2139: \bibitem{Lee:2008ui}

2140:   B.~H.~Lee, K.~L.~Panigrahi and C.~Park,

2141:   %``Spiky Strings on AdS$_4 \times {\bf CP}^3$,''

2142:   arXiv:0807.2559 [hep-th].

2143:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2559;%%

2144: 

2145: %\cite{Imamura:2008dt}

2146: \bibitem{Imamura:2008dt}

2147:   Y.~Imamura and K.~Kimura,

2148:   %``N=4 Chern-Simons theories with auxiliary vector multiplets,''

2149:   arXiv:0807.2144 [hep-th].

2150:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2144;%%

2151: 

2152: %\cite{Verlinde:2008di}

2153: \bibitem{Verlinde:2008di}

2154:   H.~Verlinde,

2155:   %``D2 or M2? A Note on Membrane Scattering,''

2156:   arXiv:0807.2121 [hep-th].

2157:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2121;%%

2158: 

2159: %\cite{Hanaki:2008cu}

2160: \bibitem{Hanaki:2008cu}

2161:   K.~Hanaki and H.~Lin,

2162:   %``M2-M5 Systems in N=6 Chern-Simons Theory,''

2163:   arXiv:0807.2074 [hep-th].

2164:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2074;%%

2165: 

2166: %\cite{Bak:2008cp}

2167: \bibitem{Bak:2008cp}

2168:   D.~Bak and S.~J.~Rey,

2169:   %``Integrable Spin Chain in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theory,''

2170:   arXiv:0807.2063 [hep-th].

2171:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.2063;%%

2172: 

2173: %\cite{Ahn:2008aa}

2174: \bibitem{Ahn:2008aa}

2175:   Changrim Ahn and R.~I.~Nepomechie,

2176:   %``N=6 super Chern-Simons theory S-matrix and all-loop Bethe ansatz

2177:   %equations,''

2178:   arXiv:0807.1924 [hep-th].

2179:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1924;%%

2180: 

2181: %\cite{Astolfi:2008ji}

2182: \bibitem{Astolfi:2008ji}

2183:   D.~Astolfi, V.~G.~M.~Puletti, G.~Grignani, T.~Harmark and M.~Orselli,

2184:   %``Finite-size corrections in the SU(2) x SU(2) sector of type IIA string

2185:   %theory on AdS_4 x CP^3,''

2186:   arXiv:0807.1527 [hep-th].

2187:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1527;%%

2188: 

2189: %\cite{Hashimoto:2008iv}

2190: \bibitem{Hashimoto:2008iv}

2191:   A.~Hashimoto and P.~Ouyang,

2192:   %``Supergravity dual of Chern-Simons Yang-Mills theory with N=6,8

2193:   %superconformal IR fixed point,''

2194:   arXiv:0807.1500 [hep-th].

2195:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1500;%%

2196: 

2197: %\cite{Garousi:2008ik}

2198: \bibitem{Garousi:2008ik}

2199:   M.~R.~Garousi, A.~Ghodsi and M.~Khosravi,

2200:   %``On thermodynamics of N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories at strong

2201:   %coupling,''

2202:   JHEP {\bf 0808}, 067 (2008).

2203:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0808,067;%%

2204: 

2205: %\cite{Pang:2008hw}

2206: \bibitem{Pang:2008hw}

2207:   Y.~Pang and T.~Wang,

2208:   %``From N M2's to N D2's,''

2209:   arXiv:0807.1444 [hep-th].

2210:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1444;%%

2211: 

2212: %\cite{Kim:2008gn}

2213: \bibitem{Kim:2008gn}

2214:   N.~Kim,

2215:   %``How to put the Bagger-Lambert theory on an orbifold : A derivation of the

2216:   %ABJM model,''

2217:   arXiv:0807.1349 [hep-th].

2218:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1349;%%

2219: 

2220: %\cite{Li:2008ya}

2221: \bibitem{Li:2008ya}

2222:   T.~Li, Y.~Liu and D.~Xie,

2223:   %``Multiple D2-Brane Action from M2-Branes,''

2224:   arXiv:0807.1183 [hep-th].

2225:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1183;%%

2226: 

2227: %\cite{Schnabl:2008wj}

2228: \bibitem{Schnabl:2008wj}

2229:   M.~Schnabl and Y.~Tachikawa,

2230:   %``Classification of N=6 superconformal theories of ABJM type,''

2231:   arXiv:0807.1102 [hep-th].

2232:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.1102;%%

2233: 

2234: %\cite{Zhou:2008sa}

2235: \bibitem{Zhou:2008sa}

2236:   Y.~Zhou,

2237:   %``Interpreting N M2 branes,''

2238:   arXiv:0807.0890 [hep-th].

2239:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0890;%%

2240: 

2241: %\cite{Chu:2008qv}

2242: \bibitem{Chu:2008qv}

2243:   C.~S.~Chu, P.~M.~Ho, Y.~Matsuo and S.~Shiba,

2244:   %``Truncated Nambu-Poisson Bracket and Entropy Formula for Multiple

2245:   %Membranes,''

2246:   JHEP {\bf 0808}, 076 (2008).

2247:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0808,076;%%

2248: 

2249: %\cite{Cherkis:2008qr}

2250: \bibitem{Cherkis:2008qr}

2251:   S.~Cherkis and C.~Saemann,

2252:   %``Multiple M2-branes and Generalized 3-Lie algebras,''

2253:   arXiv:0807.0808 [hep-th].

2254:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0808;%%

2255: 

2256: %\cite{Chen:2008qq}

2257: \bibitem{Chen:2008qq}

2258:   B.~Chen and J.~B.~Wu,

2259:   %``Semi-classical strings in AdS_4*CP^3,''

2260:   arXiv:0807.0802 [hep-th].

2261:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0802;%%

2262: 

2263: %\cite{Gromov:2008qe}

2264: \bibitem{Gromov:2008qe}

2265:   N.~Gromov and P.~Vieira,

2266:   %``The all loop AdS4/CFT3 Bethe ansatz,''

2267:   arXiv:0807.0777 [hep-th].

2268:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0777;%%

2269: 

2270: %\cite{Ahn:2008gd}

2271: \bibitem{Ahn:2008gd}

2272:   Changrim Ahn and P.~Bozhilov,

2273:   %``Finite-size effects of Membranes on $AdS_4\times S_7$,''

2274:   JHEP {\bf 0808}, 054 (2008).

2275:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0808,054;%%

2276: 

2277: %\cite{Gromov:2008bz}

2278: \bibitem{Gromov:2008bz}

2279:   N.~Gromov and P.~Vieira,

2280:   %``The AdS4/CFT3 algebraic curve,''

2281:   arXiv:0807.0437 [hep-th].

2282:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0437;%%

2283: 

2284: %\cite{Terashima:2008ba}

2285: \bibitem{Terashima:2008ba}

2286:   S.~Terashima and F.~Yagi,

2287:   %``Orbifolding the Membrane Action,''

2288:   arXiv:0807.0368 [hep-th].

2289:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0368;%%

2290: 

2291: %\cite{Grignani:2008te}

2292: \bibitem{Grignani:2008te}

2293:   G.~Grignani, T.~Harmark, M.~Orselli and G.~W.~Semenoff,

2294:   %``Finite size Giant Magnons in the string dual of N=6 superconformal

2295:   %Chern-Simons theory,''

2296:   arXiv:0807.0205 [hep-th].

2297:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0205;%%

2298: 

2299: %\cite{Terashima:2008sy}

2300: \bibitem{Terashima:2008sy}

2301:   S.~Terashima,

2302:   %``On M5-branes in N=6 Membrane Action,''

2303:   JHEP {\bf 0808}, 080 (2008).

2304:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0808,080;%%

2305: 

2306: %\cite{Bagger:2008se}

2307: \bibitem{Bagger:2008se}

2308:   J.~Bagger and N.~Lambert,

2309:   %``Three-Algebras and N=6 Chern-Simons Gauge Theories,''

2310:   arXiv:0807.0163 [hep-th].

2311:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0163;%%

2312: 

2313: %\cite{Beisert:2008qy}

2314: \bibitem{Beisert:2008qy}

2315:   N.~Beisert,

2316:   %``The su(2|3) Undynamic Spin Chain,''

2317:   arXiv:0807.0099 [hep-th].

2318:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0099;%%

2319: 

2320: %\cite{Okuyama:2008qd}

2321: \bibitem{Okuyama:2008qd}

2322:   K.~Okuyama,

2323:   %``Linear Sigma Models for the R^8/Z_k Orbifold,''

2324:   arXiv:0807.0047 [hep-th].

2325:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0047;%%

2326: 

2327: %\cite{Fre:2008qc}

2328: \bibitem{Fre:2008qc}

2329:   P.~Fre and P.~A.~Grassi,

2330:   %``Pure Spinor Formalism for {Osp}(N|4) backgrounds,''

2331:   arXiv:0807.0044 [hep-th].

2332:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0807.0044;%%

2333: 

2334: %\cite{Hosomichi:2008jb}

2335: \bibitem{Hosomichi:2008jb}

2336:   K.~Hosomichi, K.~M.~Lee, S.~Lee, S.~Lee and J.~Park,

2337:   %``N=5,6 Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories and M2-branes on Orbifolds,''

2338:   arXiv:0806.4977 [hep-th].

2339:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4977;%%

2340: 

2341: %\cite{Grignani:2008is}

2342: \bibitem{Grignani:2008is}

2343:   G.~Grignani, T.~Harmark and M.~Orselli,

2344:   %``The SU(2) x SU(2) sector in the string dual of N=6 superconformal

2345:   %Chern-Simons theory,''

2346:   arXiv:0806.4959 [hep-th].

2347:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4959;%%

2348: 

2349: %\cite{Stefanski:2008ik}

2350: \bibitem{Stefanski:2008ik}

2351:   B.~j.~Stefanski,

2352:   %``Green-Schwarz action for Type IIA strings on $AdS_4\times CP^3$,''

2353:   arXiv:0806.4948 [hep-th].

2354:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4948;%%

2355: 

2356: %\cite{Arutyunov:2008if}

2357: \bibitem{Arutyunov:2008if}

2358:   G.~Arutyunov and S.~Frolov,

2359:   %``Superstrings on AdS_4 x CP^3 as a Coset Sigma-model,''

2360:   arXiv:0806.4940 [hep-th].

2361:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4940;%%

2362: 

2363: %\cite{Bedford:2008hn}

2364: \bibitem{Bedford:2008hn}

2365:   J.~Bedford and D.~Berman,

2366:   %``A note on Quantum Aspects of Multiple Membranes,''

2367:   arXiv:0806.4900 [hep-th].

2368:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4900;%%

2369: 

2370: %\cite{Gaiotto:2008cg}

2371: \bibitem{Gaiotto:2008cg}

2372:   D.~Gaiotto, S.~Giombi and X.~Yin,

2373:   %``Spin Chains in N=6 Superconformal Chern-Simons-Matter Theory,''

2374:   arXiv:0806.4589 [hep-th].

2375:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4589;%%

2376: 

2377: %\cite{Agarwal:2008rr}

2378: \bibitem{Agarwal:2008rr}

2379:   A.~Agarwal,

2380:   %``Mass Deformations of Super Yang-Mills Theories in D= 2+1, and

2381:   %Super-Membranes: A Note,''

2382:   arXiv:0806.4292 [hep-th].

2383:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4292;%%

2384: 

2385: %\cite{Hanany:2008qc}

2386: \bibitem{Hanany:2008qc}

2387:   A.~Hanany, N.~Mekareeya and A.~Zaffaroni,

2388:   %``Partition Functions for Membrane Theories,''

2389:   arXiv:0806.4212 [hep-th].

2390:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4212;%%

2391: 

2392: %\cite{Armoni:2008kr}

2393: \bibitem{Armoni:2008kr}

2394:   A.~Armoni and A.~Naqvi,

2395:   %``A Non-Supersymmetric Large-N 3D CFT And Its Gravity Dual,''

2396:   arXiv:0806.4068 [hep-th].

2397:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4068;%%

2398: 

2399: %\cite{Minahan:2008hf}

2400: \bibitem{Minahan:2008hf}

2401:   J.~A.~Minahan and K.~Zarembo,

2402:   %``The Bethe ansatz for superconformal Chern-Simons,''

2403:   arXiv:0806.3951 [hep-th].

2404:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.3951;%%

2405: 

2406: %\cite{Imamura:2008nn}

2407: \bibitem{Imamura:2008nn}

2408:   Y.~Imamura and K.~Kimura,

2409:   %``Coulomb branch of generalized ABJM models,''

2410:   arXiv:0806.3727 [hep-th].

2411:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.3727;%%

2412: 

2413: %\cite{Honma:2008jd}

2414: \bibitem{Honma:2008jd}

2415:   Y.~Honma, S.~Iso, Y.~Sumitomo and S.~Zhang,

2416:   %``Scaling limit of N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories and Lorentzian

2417:   %Bagger-Lambert theories,''

2418:   arXiv:0806.3498 [hep-th].

2419:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.3498;%%

2420: 

2421: %\cite{Nishioka:2008gz}

2422: \bibitem{Nishioka:2008gz}

2423:   T.~Nishioka and T.~Takayanagi,

2424:   %``On Type IIA Penrose Limit and N=6 Chern-Simons Theories,''

2425:   JHEP {\bf 0808}, 001 (2008).

2426:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0808,001;%%

2427: 

2428: %\cite{Blau:2008bm}

2429: \bibitem{Blau:2008bm}

2430:   M.~Blau and M.~O'Loughlin,

2431:   %``Multiple M2-Branes and Plane Waves,''

2432:   arXiv:0806.3253 [hep-th].

2433:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.3253;%%

2434: 

2435: %\cite{Bhattacharya:2008bja}

2436: \bibitem{Bhattacharya:2008bja}

2437:   J.~Bhattacharya and S.~Minwalla,

2438:   %``Superconformal Indices for ${\cal N}=6$ Chern Simons Theories,''

2439:   arXiv:0806.3251 [hep-th].

2440:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.3251;%%

2441: 

2442: %\cite{deMedeiros:2008bf}

2443: \bibitem{deMedeiros:2008bf}

2444:   P.~de Medeiros, J.~M.~Figueroa-O'Farrill and E.~Mendez-Escobar,

2445:   %``Metric Lie 3-algebras in Bagger-Lambert theory,''

2446:   JHEP {\bf 0808}, 045 (2008).

2447:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0808,045;%%

2448: 

2449: %\cite{Bergshoeff:2008ix}

2450: \bibitem{Bergshoeff:2008ix}

2451:   E.~A.~Bergshoeff, M.~de Roo, O.~Hohm and D.~Roest,

2452:   %``Multiple Membranes from Gauged Supergravity,''

2453:   arXiv:0806.2584 [hep-th].

2454:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.2584;%%

2455: 

2456: %\cite{Mauri:2008ai}

2457: \bibitem{Mauri:2008ai}

2458:   A.~Mauri and A.~C.~Petkou,

2459:   %``An N=1 Superfield Action for M2 branes,''

2460:   arXiv:0806.2270 [hep-th].

2461:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.2270;%%

2462: 

2463: %\cite{Cecotti:2008qs}

2464: \bibitem{Cecotti:2008qs}

2465:   S.~Cecotti and A.~Sen,

2466:   %``Coulomb Branch of the Lorentzian Three Algebra Theory,''

2467:   arXiv:0806.1990 [hep-th].

2468:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.1990;%%

2469: 

2470: %\cite{Ezhuthachan:2008ch}

2471: \bibitem{Ezhuthachan:2008ch}

2472:   B.~Ezhuthachan, S.~Mukhi and C.~Papageorgakis,

2473:   %``D2 to D2,''

2474:   JHEP {\bf 0807}, 041 (2008).

2475:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0807,041;%%

2476: 

2477: %\cite{Benna:2008zy}

2478: \bibitem{Benna:2008zy}

2479:   M.~Benna, I.~Klebanov, T.~Klose and M.~Smedback,

2480:   %``Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories and AdS_4/CFT_3 Correspondence,''

2481:   arXiv:0806.1519 [hep-th].

2482:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.1519;%%

2483: 

2484: %\cite{Bandres:2008kj}

2485: \bibitem{BLS}

2486:   M.~A.~Bandres, A.~E.~Lipstein and J.~H.~Schwarz,

2487:   %``Ghost-Free Superconformal Action for Multiple M2-Branes,''

2488:   JHEP {\bf 0807}, 117 (2008).

2489:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0807,117;%%

2490: 

2491: %\cite{Girardello:1998pd}

2492: %\bibitem{GPPZ}

2493: %  L.~Girardello, M.~Petrini, M.~Porrati and A.~Zaffaroni,

2494:   %``Novel local CFT and exact results on perturbations of N = 4 super

2495:   %Yang-Mills from AdS dynamics,''

2496: %  JHEP {\bf 9812}, 022 (1998).

2497: %  [arXiv:hep-th/9810126].

2498:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,9812,022;%%

2499: 

2500: \end{thebibliography}

2501: 

2502: \end{document}

2503: 

2504: 

2505: 

2506: 

2507: 

2508: 

2509: 

2510: 

2511: 

2512: 

2513: 

2514: 

2515: 

2516: 

2517: