1: %
2: %-MODIFICATION HISTORY:
3: %
4: %
5: % Ver2 from 'resumen.tex' and jos notes
6: %
7: % ver3 It includes de notes and corrections
8: % by all CoAu. This is the version
9: % first submitted to ApJ
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} % referee's version
16: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
17:
18:
19: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
20: \usepackage{natbib}
21: \usepackage{graphicx}
22: %\usepackage{amssymb}
23: %\usepackage{amsmath}
24: %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
26:
27:
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: % My defs
30:
31: %\newcommand\comment[1]{{\bf {\sc comment} #1}}
32: \newcommand\modified[1]{{\bf #1}}
33:
34:
35:
36: % \epsscale{0.5}
37: % \epsscale{1.}
38:
39:
40: \begin{document}
41:
42: \title{%Whirlpools in the Sun\\
43: Convectively driven vortex flows in the Sun}
44:
45:
46: %
47: \author{%Our gang
48: J.~A.~Bonet\altaffilmark{1},
49: I.~M\'arquez\altaffilmark{1,2},
50: J.~S\'anchez~Almeida\altaffilmark{1},
51: I.~Cabello\altaffilmark{3},
52: and
53: V.~Domingo\altaffilmark{3}
54: }
55: \altaffiltext{1}{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias,
56: E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
57: \altaffiltext{2}{Departamento de An\'alisis
58: Matem\'atico, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna,
59: Tenerife, Spain}
60: \altaffiltext{3}{Grupo de Astronom\'\i a y Ciencias del Espacio,
61: Universidad de Valencia, E-46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain}
62: \email{jab@iac.es, imr@iac.es, jos@iac.es, iballa.cabello@uv.es,
63: vdomingo@uv.es}
64:
65:
66:
67: %
68: \begin{abstract}
69: We have discovered small whirlpools in the Sun, with a size
70: similar to the terrestrial hurricanes ($\la$~0.5~Mm).
71: The theory of solar convection predicts them,
72: but they had remained elusive so far. The vortex flows are
73: created at the downdrafts where the plasma returns to
74: the solar interior after cooling down, and we detect them
75: because some magnetic bright points (BPs) follow a logarithmic
76: spiral in their way to be engulfed by a downdraft.
77: %
78: Our disk center observations show 0.9$\times 10^{-2}$~vortexes per Mm$^{2}$,
79: with a lifetime of the order of 5~min, and with
80: no preferred sense of rotation. They are not
81: evenly spread out over the surface, but they seem to
82: trace the supergranulation and the mesogranulation.
83: These observed properties are strongly biased
84: by our type of
85: measurement, unable to detect vortexes
86: except when they are engulfing magnetic BPs.
87: %
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90:
91: \keywords{
92: convection -- Sun: photosphere -- Sun: granulation
93: }
94:
95: % \slugcomment{ver3.1}
96:
97:
98:
99: \shorttitle{Convectively driven vortex flows in the Sun}
100: \shortauthors{Bonet et al.}
101:
102:
103: \section{Introduction}\label{introduction}
104:
105: A proper
106: understanding of the solar surface convection has
107: impact on many different
108: %seemingly unrelated
109: areas of astrophysics. For example, (a) the solar metallicity
110: is used as a universal reference, and it has been
111: recently modified by fifty percent after considering
112: realistic convective motions in the analysis \citep{asp05b},
113: and (b)
114: % magnetic fields of astrophysical relevance
115: % are created by turbulent dynamo action driven by
116: % convection
117: % \citep{cat99a,ber05,vog07}.
118: turbulent dynamo action can produce magnetic
119: fields in many astrophysical environments
120: \citep[e.g.,][]{mar04,ber05},
121: but its observational study is so far confined to the
122: turbulent dynamo driven by the solar convective motions
123: \citep[e.g.,][]{cat99a,vog07}.
124:
125:
126:
127: We have discovered small whirlpools in
128: the Sun, with a size similar to the terrestrial
129: hurricanes. This discovery confirms a specific
130: prediction of the current theory of solar convection
131: that had remained elusive so far.
132: %
133: The energy produced in the solar interior is
134: transported to the surface firstly by radiation exchange
135: and, during the last thirty percent of the way, by
136: convective motions \citep[e.g.,][]{sti91}.
137: The hot buoyant plasma rises, releases energy,
138: and then falls down. According to the
139: current theory, these convective motions are driven
140: by strong highly localized downdrafts at the solar
141: surface \citep{spr90,stei98,ras98}.
142: The downdrafts are sinks where
143: the cold plasma returns to the solar interior.
144: Since the matter has angular momentum with respect to
145: the draining point, it must spin up when approaching the
146: sink, giving rise to a whirl flow ({\em bathtub effect}).
147: Although the vortex motions predicted by the theory
148: have been repeatedly sought, they had not been found
149: so far \citep{nov89,spr90,rou97,hoe98,nis03}. (The exception in
150: \citealt{bra88} represents
151: the same phenomenon at much larger scale.) We have
152: detected these vortexes as proper motions of magnetic
153: bright points (BPs), which follow spiral paths in the way
154: to be engulfed by a downdraft. The BPs are
155: easily blurred by seeing \citep{tit96}, thus the unique 90~km spatial
156: resolution provided by the Swedish Solar Telescope at
157: La Palma turned out to be necessary \citep{sch02}.
158: %
159: Magnetic BPs are present almost
160: everywhere on the Sun, also
161: in the quiet internetwork regions \citep{san04a,dew05,dew08}.
162: Precisely looking for properties of these quiet Sun
163: BPs, we found out that some of them spiral when heading
164: towards the supposed location of a
165: sink, which is the result reported in this Letter.
166: %
167: We note that the vortical motion of photospheric
168: magnetic concentrations may have significant
169: impact on its own, e.g., on the heating of the solar corona
170: \citep[][]{bal98,gud05,ama08}.
171: Previous searches for photospheric vortexes
172: were often motivated by this interest
173: \citep{bal98,nis03}.
174:
175:
176:
177: \section{Observations}\label{reduction}
178: A quiet Sun internetwork target was observed near solar
179: disk center with the Swedish Solar Telescope
180: \citep[SST; ][]{sch02}. During observation seeing
181: was fluctuating with minutes of excellence
182: (September 29, 2007; from 9:13:57 to 9:45:55 UT).
183: We used 12 bit Kodak Mega Plus II
184: 2048~$\times$~2048 cameras, which render
185: an image scale of 0.034~\arcsec~pix$^{-1}$.
186: The field-of-view (FOV)
187: includes various supergranules.
188: We observe simultaneously in
189: the G-band (a 10.8~\AA\ wide filter centered at 4305.6~\AA),
190: in
191: Ca~H line-core, % (1.1~\AA\ wide filter centered at 3968.5~\AA),
192: % and in Ca~H continuum.% (10~\AA\ wide filter centered at 3953.7~\AA).
193: and in the continuum close to Ca~H.
194: The images were reconstructed with
195: multi-frame blind deconvolution
196: \citep[][]{noo05}
197: to produce movies whose snapshots
198: have an angular resolution close to the diffraction
199: limit of the SST
200: at the working wavelength ($\sim$0\farcs 1).
201: Each snapshot results from combining 125 images,
202: rendering a mean cadence of one snapshot every 15~s.
203: A destretching algorithm allows us to
204: remove residual image distortion left by the
205: restoration
206: process,
207: and a subsonic filter suppresses
208: p-modes and residual jitter stemming from destreching
209: \citep[][]{tit89}.
210: Our analysis is focused on the G-band images,
211: where BPs are easily observed even in the
212: quietest Sun.
213:
214:
215: \section{Whirlpools}\label{whirlpool}
216: %
217: The G-band movie often shows
218: BPs swirling around intergranular points where several
219: dark lanes converge. These motions are reminiscent
220: of the bathtub vortex flows predicted by
221: numerical simulations of convection, and which are
222: driven by the granulation downdrafts (\S~\ref{introduction}).
223: Since we have no other information but the proper motions
224: of the BPs, we cannot proceed without assuming that
225: these proper motions trace true plasma motions.
226: We cannot think of any other physical mechanism able
227: to generate these {\em very special} trajectories, but it must be
228: clear that treating the proper motions as plasma motions is a
229: working hypothesis\footnote{One may argue that BPs are not
230: good passive tracers because they posses strong kG
231: magnetic fields and, therefore, the magnetic forces
232: back-react on the plasma flows counteracting the drag forces.
233: This theoretical prejudice has been proved to be erroneous,
234: since the BPs move exactly as dictated by the
235: granular flow field \citep[see ][]{bal98}. The
236: reason seems to be the small cross section of the
237: magnetic concentrations. Drag forces
238: overcome magnetic forces when the magnetic
239: concentrations are slender enough
240: \citep[e.g.,][]{sch86,san01b}.}.
241:
242: We will discuss statistical properties of the
243: whirlpools in \S~\ref{statistics}. This section
244: is focused on a particularly well defined
245: event whose snapshots are shown in Fig.\ref{snapshots}.
246: \begin{figure}
247: % \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{sequence.ps}
248: %\includegraphics[width=1.\textwidth]{sequence.ps}
249: % \includegraphics[width=1.\textwidth]{f1.ps}
250: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f1.ps}
251: \caption{Sequence of snapshots corresponding to
252: the event analyzed in detail in the Letter.
253: The snapshots are separated by 15~s, and the
254: bar on the lower left image corresponds
255: to 1~Mm on the Sun.
256: %
257: We have
258: marked with symbols two sets of two
259: nearby BPs, so that it is easy to appreciate how the two
260: BPs rotate with respect to each other.
261: (Although the sequence is continuous, the two upper
262: rows show only one pair, whereas the two lower rows
263: show the other pair.)
264: %
265: Note how the bright
266: structures in each snapshot depict a
267: spiral pattern resembling
268: the vortex derived from BP proper motions.
269: %
270: The
271: animation
272: given as on-line material allows
273: to appreciate the vortex motions in
274: more detail.
275: }%full.}
276: \label{snapshots}
277: \end{figure}
278: (See also the animation provided
279: as on-line material.) Up to eight different BPs move under
280: the influence of this whirlpool during the 5~min
281: duration of the event. Their trajectories are shown
282: in Fig.~\ref{todo}, where we use a different symbol
283: for each trajectory, i.e., the set of positions
284: of a single BP as time goes on.
285: The positions have been determined as the
286: centroid of the BP in successive snapshots.
287: The identification of each particular BP has been
288: carried out by eye, playing back and forth the movie
289: with the FOV of the event. It is clear from
290: Fig.~\ref{todo}a that the BPs swirl around a
291: quite stable central point. Only two BPs follow
292: straight trajectories (see Fig.~\ref{todo}b),
293: but this path coincides with the position
294: of one of the intergranular lanes that feeds
295: the whirlpool, and which channels the BP motion
296: (see also the top row of Fig.~\ref{snapshots}).
297:
298: If the analogy with a bathtub vortex holds for the
299: observed whirlpools, then a passive tracer should
300: approximately follow a logarithmic spiral when heading
301: to the sinkhole, i.e.,
302: \begin{equation}
303: \theta-\theta_0=A\,\ln(r/r_0),
304: \label{bathtub}
305: \end{equation}
306: where $r$ and $\theta$ stand for
307: the radius and azimuth
308: in polar coordinates
309: %refereed to the draining point.
310: with the draining point as origin.
311: The symbol $\theta_0$ corresponds to the azimuth at the
312: arbitrary radius $r_0$, and
313: \begin{equation}
314: A=U_\theta/U_r,
315: \label{bathtub2}
316: \end{equation}
317: is a constant of motion given by the ratio between
318: the azimuthal velocity $U_\theta$ and
319: the radial velocity $U_r$. The parameter
320: $A$ controls the shape
321: of the spiral, which
322: becomes a straight line for $A$ equals zero,
323: and a circle for $A\rightarrow\infty$.
324: Equation~(\ref{bathtub}) follows from
325: the conservation of mass and angular momentum
326: in a non-viscous incompressible fluid moving in a bathtub
327: vortex \citep[e.g.,][]{fey64,mas83}.
328: These conditions are only loosely met by the solar plasma,
329: however, the observed motions match quite well
330: this approximate behavior.
331: %
332: Using a non-linear least squares procedure, we have fitted
333: the trajectories of the BPs in Fig.~\ref{todo}a. We assume
334: the whirlpool to be the same for all of them, i.e.,
335: all trajectories share a common origin and the same $A$.
336: Each BP trajectory has its own starting point
337: parameterized by $\theta$ at $r_0$, i.e., by
338: $\theta_0$. The fitting is
339: fairly robust and independent of the
340: initial conditions, providing,
341: \begin{equation}
342: A=6.4 \pm 1.6,
343: \label{actuala}
344: \end{equation}
345: where the mean value corresponds to the fit in
346: Fig.~\ref{todo}a (the solid lines),
347: and the error bar indicates the standard
348: deviation among the inferred values when
349: each one of the
350: BP trajectories is excluded from the fit.
351: The area of the swirling region turns out to be
352: of the order of
353: 0.5$\times$0.5~Mm$^2$. The size of the sinkhole
354: (i.e., of the hypothetical downdraft) has to be smaller than
355: the radius of curvature of the smallest trajectory,
356: which corresponds to the one marked by triangles
357: in Fig.~\ref{todo}.
358: Its radius of curvature is of the order of 100 km, i.e.,
359: the downdraft seems to be spatially unresolved to
360: SST observations.
361: %
362: BP proper motion velocities span from one to four km~s$^{-1}$
363: and, with some noise, they tend to increase towards
364: the sinkhole.
365:
366: \begin{figure}
367: % \includegraphics[width=1.\textwidth]{whirlpool2b.ps}
368: % \includegraphics[width=1.3\textwidth]{whirlpool2b.ps}
369: \includegraphics[width=1.\textwidth]{f2.ps}
370: % \includegraphics[width=1.3\textwidth]{f2.ps}
371: \caption{
372: (a) Logarithmic spiral (the solid lines) that
373: fits the trajectories of six observed BPs (the symbols).
374: (b) Same as (a) but with a FOV twice larger and
375: including two additional BPs (the solid circles)
376: whose paths are not set by the whirlpool,
377: but they follow a nearby intergranular lane.
378: The square in (b) represents the FOV in (a).
379: (The assignment of symbols to BPs
380: differs from that used in Fig.~\ref{snapshots}.)
381: }
382: \label{todo}
383: \end{figure}
384:
385:
386: \section{Statistical properties}\label{statistics}
387: %
388: Detailled visual inspection of the G-band
389: movie shows
390: the whirlpool motion described above to be quite common.
391: In order to have a statistically significant
392: description of the phenomenon, we carried out
393: a careful visual analysis of the full time series looking
394: for swirl motions. Roughly speaking, one finds two
395: types of motions that we have identified as vortexes:
396: (1) two or more BPs move (in the same
397: or in opposite directions) towards a
398: point, where they rotate
399: with respect to one another,
400: %ones with respect to the others,
401: and (2)
402: the rotation also includes
403: the diffuse bright borders of the
404: sometimes fragmented
405: granules
406: surrounding the turning point.
407: Taking this vague definition in
408: mind, we find 138 swirls (Fig.~\ref{meso-super}),
409: 83\% of which belong to type~1, and the rest to type~2.
410: (The motion shown in Fig.~\ref{snapshots}
411: belongs to the second type.) Our FOV covers
412: 49.7\,Mm$\times$49.7\,Mm.
413: The time series lasts 31.5~min.
414: This corresponds to an space-and-time density
415: equals to $d\simeq 1.8\times 10^{-3}$ vortex Mm$^{-2}$\,min$^{-1}$.
416:
417:
418: The lifetimes of the vortexes
419: were also estimated. The starting time was defined
420: as the time where the BPs begin their swirling motions.
421: These motions often end up producing a central
422: still BP.
423: Then we take the end time as the moment when this
424: BP starts fading away or fragmenting. If the central
425: BP is not formed,
426: our final time is the time when circular motions
427: are no longer distinguished. The mean lifetime
428: of the 138 whirlpools turns out
429: to be $\tau\simeq (5.1\pm 2.1)~$min,
430: with the error bar representing the standard
431: deviation among all single measurements.
432: Assuming that the number of swirls
433: is stationary, at any given time one finds
434: $\tau d$ whirlpools on the solar surface,
435: which corresponds to
436: 0.90$\times 10^{-2}$ vortex Mm$^{-2}$.
437: The lifetime estimates are only lower limits to the
438: true lifetimes, since the vortexes should exist and
439: last even if there are no magnetic
440: BPs that allow us to detect them.
441: For the same reason the number of detected
442: vortexes also represents a lower limit.
443:
444: %
445: There is the same probability of clockwise and
446: counterclockwise motions. We find 50.4\% of the whirls
447: with counterclockwise rotation, and 49.3\% with clockwise
448: rotation (Fig.~\ref{meso-super}).
449:
450: %
451: The observed swirls are not uniformly distributed
452: throughout the FOV. They follow a pattern that
453: closely resembles supergranulation and mesogranulation
454: cells (Fig.~\ref{meso-super}).
455: %
456: \begin{figure}
457: % \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{ima_puntosremo.ps}
458: % \includegraphics[width=1.\textwidth]{ima_puntosremo.ps}
459: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f3.ps}
460: % \includegraphics[width=1.\textwidth]{f3.ps}
461: \caption{
462: Positions of the observed
463: vortexes on the average G-band image.
464: They trace a pattern resembling the supergranulation
465: and the mesogranulation. Plus signs
466: correspond to counterclockwise motions whereas
467: circles correspond to clockwise motions. We do not
468: think that such a distribution reveals an intrinsic
469: property of the vortexes, but it is a bias
470: set by using magnetic BPs to trace small
471: scale proper motions.
472: }
473: \label{meso-super}
474: \end{figure}
475: %
476: It is not clear whether this distribution reveals
477: an intrinsic property of the vortexes. Rather, it
478: seems to be a selection effect we impose when using
479: G-band BPs as passive tracers of plasma motions.
480: It is well known that BPs trace
481: supergranulation \citep{dun73,meh74}
482: and mesogranulation \citep{san04a}.
483: Vortexes outside these areas
484: lack of enough BPs and they will not be detected.
485:
486: \section{Discussion}
487:
488: Observing these convectively driven vortex flows
489: has been elusive because of the size of the whirlpools.
490: Motions take place at sub-arcsec scales and,
491: therefore, close to the best angular resolution
492: achieved at present. In addition, the
493: case analyzed in \S~\ref{whirlpool} seems to
494: be extreme in the sense that the
495: ratio between the azimuthal
496: velocity and the radial velocity is
497: particularly large ($A\simeq 6.4$), which renders
498: closed spiral paths and clear swirling motions.
499: Assuming that the velocity of the
500: plasma that feeds the whirlpools has an important
501: stochastic component set by the complex
502: granular dynamics, then one should expect
503: the azimuthal and the radial velocities to be similar,
504: rendering $A\sim 1$.
505: In this case the swirling motions are moderate
506: and so easy to overlook.
507: %The typical case would correspond to a initial
508: %velocity whose orientation is independent of the position
509: %of the sinking point and therefore, in average,
510: %it has similar azimuthal and radial velocities
511: %(i.e., $A\ll 6.4$).
512: The BP trajectories corresponding to these
513: more typical
514: cases are hard to distinguish from straight lines within the angular
515: resolution of the observations (see Fig.~\ref{twocases}).
516: \begin{figure}
517: % \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{whirlpool3.ps}
518: %\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{whirlpool3.ps}
519: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f4.ps}
520: % \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{f4.ps}
521: \caption{
522: BP trajectories like the one analyzed in \S~\ref{whirlpool}
523: (the solid line, corresponding to $A=6.4$),
524: and what we expect to be the most probable case, with $A\sim 1$
525: (the dashed line). The swirling motions of the latter are
526: difficult to detect since the deviations from straight lines
527: are of the order of the angular resolution of the
528: observation (represented by the hashed disk
529: at the core of the whirlpool).
530: }
531: \label{twocases}
532: \end{figure}
533:
534: Our work should be complemented with a
535: spectroscopic confirmation of the
536: vortex motions. It requires observing the whirlpools
537: out of the disk center so that
538: the horizontal circular motions
539: have a component along the
540: line-of-sight (LOS).
541: Such spectroscopic observation is challenging.
542: Achieving the required spatial resolution
543: is even more difficult in spectroscopy.
544: Moreover, one would like to maximize
545: the velocity component along the LOS
546: by observing well outside
547: the solar disk center. However, the solar surface
548: is corrugated and, outside the disk center,
549: the granules protrude hiding the
550: intergranular lanes that harbor the vortexes
551: \citep[e.g.,][]{car04,kel04}.
552:
553: %This confirmation is in progress.
554:
555:
556: \acknowledgements
557: %
558: We thank an anonymous referee for help with the
559: presentation of the results.
560: %
561: The work has partly been funded by the Spanish Ministry
562: of Education, and Science and Innovation , projects
563: AYA2007-66502, AYA2007-63881 and ESP2006-13030-C06-04.
564: Financial support by the European Commission through the SOLAIRE
565: Network (MTRN-CT-2006-035484) is gratefully acknowledged,
566: as are the computer resources and assistance
567: provided by the LaPalma (IAC/RES, Spain)
568: supercomputer installation used for image restoration.
569: %
570: %
571: %
572: %
573:
574: %
575: {\it Facility:} \facility{SST}
576:
577: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
578: %
579: %--------
580: %\newcommand\aj{AJ}
581: %\newcommand\apj{ApJ}
582: %\newcommand\apjs{ApJS}
583: %\newcommand\mnras{MNRAS}
584: %\newcommand\aapr{A\&ARev}
585: %\newcommand\aap{A\&A}
586: % \bibliography{/home/jos/texto/papers/references/trloops.bib,/home/jos/texto/papers/references/sun.bib}
587: % \bibliographystyle{aa}%{apj}
588:
589: %
590: %
591: \begin{thebibliography}{32}
592: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
593:
594: \bibitem[{{Amari} {et~al.}(2008){Amari}, {Luciani}, \& {Aly}}]{ama08}
595: {Amari}, T., {Luciani}, J.~F., \& {Aly}, J.~J. 2008, \apjl, 681, L45
596:
597: \bibitem[{{Asplund}(2005)}]{asp05b}
598: {Asplund}, M. 2005, \araa, 43, 481
599:
600: \bibitem[{{Bercik} {et~al.}(2005){Bercik}, {Fisher}, {Johns-Krull}, \&
601: {Abbett}}]{ber05}
602: {Bercik}, D.~J., {Fisher}, G.~H., {Johns-Krull}, C.~M., \& {Abbett}, W.~P.
603: 2005, \apj, 631, 529
604:
605: \bibitem[{{Brandt} {et~al.}(1988){Brandt}, {Scharmer}, {Ferguson}, {Shine},
606: {Tarbell}, \& Title}]{bra88}
607: {Brandt}, P.~N., {Scharmer}, G.~B., {Ferguson}, S., {et~al.} 1988, \nat, 335,
608: 238
609:
610: \bibitem[{{Carlsson} {et~al.}(2004){Carlsson}, {Stein}, {Nordlund}, \&
611: {Scharmer}}]{car04}
612: {Carlsson}, M., {Stein}, R.~F., {Nordlund}, {\AA}., \& {Scharmer}, G.~B. 2004,
613: \apjl, 610, L137
614:
615: \bibitem[{{Cattaneo}(1999)}]{cat99a}
616: {Cattaneo}, F. 1999, \apjl, 515, L39
617:
618: \bibitem[{{de Wijn} {et~al.}(2008){de Wijn}, {Lites}, {Berger}, {Frank},
619: {Tarbell}, \& {Ishikawa}}]{dew08}
620: {de Wijn}, A.~G., {Lites}, B.~W., {Berger}, T.~E., {et~al.} 2008, \apj, 684,
621: 1469
622:
623: \bibitem[{{de Wijn} {et~al.}(2005){de Wijn}, {Rutten}, {Haverkamp}, \&
624: {S{\"u}tterlin}}]{dew05}
625: {de Wijn}, A.~G., {Rutten}, R.~J., {Haverkamp}, E.~M.~W.~P., \&
626: {S{\"u}tterlin}, P. 2005, \aap, 441, 1183
627:
628: \bibitem[{{Dunn} \& {Zirker}(1973)}]{dun73}
629: {Dunn}, R.~B. \& {Zirker}, J.~B. 1973, \solphys, 33, 281
630:
631: \bibitem[{{Feynman} {et~al.}(1964){Feynman}, {Leighton}, \& M.~Sands}]{fey64}
632: {Feynman}, R.~P., {Leighton}, R.~B., \& M.~Sands, M. 1964, The Feynman Lectures
633: on Physics (Addison-Wesley)
634:
635: \bibitem[{{Gudiksen} \& {Nordlund}(2005)}]{gud05}
636: {Gudiksen}, B.~V. \& {Nordlund}, {\AA}. 2005, \apj, 618, 1020
637:
638: \bibitem[{{Hoekzema} {et~al.}(1998){Hoekzema}, {Brandt}, \& {Rutten}}]{hoe98}
639: {Hoekzema}, N.~M., {Brandt}, P.~N., \& {Rutten}, R.~J. 1998, \aap, 333, 322
640:
641: \bibitem[{{Keller} {et~al.}(2004){Keller}, {Sch{\"u}ssler}, {V{\"o}gler}, \&
642: {Zakharov}}]{kel04}
643: {Keller}, C.~U., {Sch{\"u}ssler}, M., {V{\"o}gler}, A., \& {Zakharov}, V. 2004,
644: \apjl, 607, L59
645:
646: \bibitem[{{Maron} {et~al.}(2004){Maron}, {Cowley}, \& {McWilliams}}]{mar04}
647: {Maron}, J., {Cowley}, S., \& {McWilliams}, J. 2004, \apj, 603, 569
648:
649: \bibitem[{Massey(1983)}]{mas83}
650: Massey, B.~S. 1983, Mechanics of Fluids, 5th edn. (Berkshire: Van Nostrand
651: Reinhold)
652:
653: \bibitem[{{Mehltretter}(1974)}]{meh74}
654: {Mehltretter}, J.~P. 1974, \solphys, 38, 43
655:
656: \bibitem[{{Nisenson} {et~al.}(2003){Nisenson}, {van Ballegooijen}, {de Wijn},
657: \& {S{\"u}tterlin}}]{nis03}
658: {Nisenson}, P., {van Ballegooijen}, A.~A., {de Wijn}, A.~G., \&
659: {S{\"u}tterlin}, P. 2003, \apj, 587, 458
660:
661: \bibitem[{{November}(1989)}]{nov89}
662: {November}, L.~J. 1989, \apj, 344, 494
663:
664: \bibitem[{{Rast}(1998)}]{ras98}
665: {Rast}, M.~P. 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 369, 125
666:
667: \bibitem[{{Roudier} {et~al.}(1997){Roudier}, {Malherbe}, {November}, {Vigneau},
668: {Coupinot}, {Lafon}, \& {Muller}}]{rou97}
669: {Roudier}, T., {Malherbe}, J.~M., {November}, L., {et~al.} 1997, \aap, 320, 605
670:
671: \bibitem[{{S\' anchez Almeida}(2001)}]{san01b}
672: {S\' anchez Almeida}, J. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 248, Magnetic Fields
673: Across the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram, ed. G.~{Mathys}, S.~K. {Solanki}, \&
674: D.~T. {Wickramasinghe} (San Francisco: ASP), 55
675:
676: \bibitem[{{S{\' a}nchez Almeida} {et~al.}(2004){S{\' a}nchez Almeida}, {M{\'
677: a}rquez}, {Bonet}, {Dom{\'{\i}}nguez Cerde{\~ n}a}, \& {Muller}}]{san04a}
678: {S{\' a}nchez Almeida}, J., {M{\' a}rquez}, I., {Bonet}, J.~A.,
679: {Dom{\'{\i}}nguez Cerde{\~ n}a}, I., \& {Muller}, R. 2004, \apjl, 609, L91
680:
681: \bibitem[{{Scharmer} {et~al.}(2002){Scharmer}, {Gudiksen}, {Kiselman}, {L{\"
682: o}fdahl}, \& {Rouppe van der Voort}}]{sch02}
683: {Scharmer}, G.~B., {Gudiksen}, B.~V., {Kiselman}, D., {L{\" o}fdahl}, M.~G., \&
684: {Rouppe van der Voort}, L.~H.~M. 2002, \nat, 420, 151
685:
686: \bibitem[{{Sch\"ussler}(1986)}]{sch86}
687: {Sch\"ussler}, M. 1986, in Small Scale Magnetic Flux Concentrations in the
688: Solar Photosphere, ed. W.~{Deinzer}, M.~{Kn\"olker}, \& H.~H. Voigt
689: (G\"ottingen: Vandenhoeck \& Ruprecht), 103
690:
691: \bibitem[{{Spruit} {et~al.}(1990){Spruit}, {Nordlund}, \& {Title}}]{spr90}
692: {Spruit}, H.~C., {Nordlund}, {\AA}., \& {Title}, A.~M. 1990, \araa, 28, 263
693:
694: \bibitem[{{Stein} \& {Nordlund}(1998)}]{stei98}
695: {Stein}, R.~F. \& {Nordlund}, {\AA}. 1998, \apj, 499, 914
696:
697: \bibitem[{{Stix}(1991)}]{sti91}
698: {Stix}, M. 1991, The Sun (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
699:
700: \bibitem[{{Title} \& {Berger}(1996)}]{tit96}
701: {Title}, A.~M. \& {Berger}, T.~E. 1996, \apj, 463, 797
702:
703: \bibitem[{{Title} {et~al.}(1989){Title}, {Tarbell}, {Topka}, {Ferguson},
704: {Shine}, \& {SOUP Team}}]{tit89}
705: {Title}, A.~M., {Tarbell}, T.~D., {Topka}, K.~P., {et~al.} 1989, \apj, 336, 475
706:
707: \bibitem[{{van Ballegooijen} {et~al.}(1998){van Ballegooijen}, {Nisenson},
708: {Noyes}, {L\"ofdahl}, {Stein}, {Nordlund}, \& {Krishnakumar}}]{bal98}
709: {van Ballegooijen}, A.~A., {Nisenson}, P., {Noyes}, R.~W., {et~al.} 1998, \apj,
710: 509, 435
711:
712: \bibitem[{{van Noort} {et~al.}(2005){van Noort}, {Rouppe van der Voort}, \&
713: {L\"ofdahl}}]{noo05}
714: {van Noort}, M., {Rouppe van der Voort}, L., \& {L\"ofdahl}, M.~G. 2005,
715: \solphys, 228, 191
716:
717: \bibitem[{{V{\"o}gler} \& {Sch{\"u}ssler}(2007)}]{vog07}
718: {V{\"o}gler}, A. \& {Sch{\"u}ssler}, M. 2007, \aap, 465, L43
719:
720: \end{thebibliography}
721:
722:
723:
724: \end{document}
725:
726:
727:
728:
729:
730:
731:
732:
733:
734:
735:
736:
737:
738: