1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
3: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,apjfonts,epsf,versioncopy]{article}
4: %\def\versionnumber{9} % <-- here the version number
5: %
6: \newcommand{\gras}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
7: \def\etal{{et al.~}}
8: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
9: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
10: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
11: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
12: \def\lapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}
13: \def\gapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{>}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}
14:
15: \def\msol{\,\mathrm{M}_\odot}
16: \def\media#1{\langle #1\rangle}
17:
18:
19: \newdimen\minuswidth %define @ width of minus sign for tables
20: \setbox0=\hbox{$-$}
21: \minuswidth=\wd0
22: \catcode`@=\active
23: \def@{\kern\minuswidth}
24: %\newdimen\digitwidth %define ! a one digit width for tables
25: \setbox0=\hbox{\rm0}
26: %\digitwidth=\wd0
27: %\catcode`!=\active
28: %\def!{\kern\digitwidth}
29:
30: \shorttitle{The age of Bulge clusters}
31: \shortauthors{Origlia et al.}
32:
33: \begin{document}
34: \title{
35: Probing the Galactic Bulge with deep Adaptive Optics imaging: the age of NGC 6440\altaffilmark{1} }
36:
37: \author{
38: L. Origlia\altaffilmark{2},
39: %
40: S. Lena\altaffilmark{3},
41: %
42: E. Diolaiti\altaffilmark{2},
43: %
44: F.R. Ferraro\altaffilmark{3},
45: %
46: E. Valenti\altaffilmark{4},
47: %
48: S. Fabbri\altaffilmark{3},
49: %
50: G. Beccari\altaffilmark{3}
51: }
52:
53: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations collected
54: at the European Southern Observatory (programs 075.D-0359(A) and 077.D-0316(A)),
55: at the VLT, Paranal and program 081.D-0371(A) at NTT, La Silla, Chile.}
56: %
57: \altaffiltext{2} {INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico
58: di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I--40127 Bologna, Italy, livia.origlia@oabo.inaf.it, emiliano.diolaiti@oabo.inaf.it,
59: giacomo.beccari@oabo.inaf.it}
60: %
61: \altaffiltext{3} {Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a degli Studi
62: di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I--40127 Bologna, Italy, sebastiano.lena@studio.unibo.it, francesco.ferraro3@unibo.it,
63: sara.fabbri5@studio.unibo.it}
64: %
65: \altaffiltext{4} {European Southern Observatory,
66: Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile, evalenti@eso.org}
67:
68: %
69: %\date{20 May, 08}
70:
71: \begin{abstract}
72: We present first results of a pilot project aimed at exploiting the potentiality of
73: ground based adaptive optics imaging
74: in the near infrared to determine the age of stellar clusters
75: in the Galactic Bulge.
76: We have used a combination of high resolution adaptive optics (ESO-VLT NAOS-CONICA)
77: and wide-field (ESO-NTT-SOFI) photometry of the
78: metal rich globular cluster NGC 6440 located towards the inner Bulge,
79: to compute a deep color magnitude diagram from the tip of the Red Giant Branch down to
80: $J\sim 22$, two magnitudes below the Main Sequence Turn Off (TO).
81: The magnitude difference between the TO level and the red Horizontal Branch has been
82: used as an age indicator.
83: It is the first time that such a measurement for a bulge globular cluster
84: has been obtained with a ground based telescope.
85: From a
86: direct comparison with 47 Tuc and with a set of theoretical isochrones,
87: we concluded that NGC 6440 is old and likely coeval to 47 Tuc.
88: This result adds a new evidence that the Galactic
89: Bulge is $\approx$2 Gyr younger at most than the pristine,
90: metal poor population of the Galactic Halo.
91:
92: \end{abstract}
93:
94: \keywords{Globular clusters: individual (NGC 6440); stars: evolution --
95: }
96:
97: \section{Introduction}
98: Galactic globular clusters (GCs) are known since a long time to be the oldest
99: stellar population of our Galaxy, hence their accurate age determination
100: is crucial to settle the epoch of the Galaxy formation and a
101: lower limit to the age of the Universe.
102: A major effort has been devoted to obtain
103: reliable ages for the Halo GC system \citep{ros99,ros00,sw02,dea05}.
104:
105: With the growing awareness that the Bulge GCs are a
106: distinct sub-system, has come a new urgency to properly characterize their
107: evolutionary sequences and to determine their ages and chemical composition.
108: Moreover, Bulge GCs are {\it key templates} of simple stellar populations
109: to study the
110: stellar and chemical evolution in the high metallicity domain \citep{mcw97,mat99,wys00,bal07}
111: and for population synthesis of giant elliptical galaxies.
112: Hence, a proper characterization of
113: the main chemical and evolutionary properties of the Galactic Bulge and its
114: comparison with the other components of the Galaxy is a
115: fundamental step to unveiling the process of Galaxy formation and evolution \citep{dut02,wys00}.
116:
117: Despite its importance, the Galactic Bulge GC system
118: remained mostly unexplored, because of the huge foreground extinction,
119: which severely prevents the usage of optical observations.
120: Also, the limited photometric
121: and spectroscopic performances of the previous generations of infrared (IR) arrays,
122: prevented any deep, high resolution imaging and spectroscopy to
123: properly survey the Bulge field and GC population.
124:
125: Over the last decade a few optical and near IR ground-based
126: photometric studies of bulge GCs have been performed \citep{ort96,gua98,fro95,dav00}.
127: Recently, \citet{val07} presented homogeneous and accurate IR color-magnitude diagrams
128: (CMDs) of the evolved
129: sequences of a sample of 24 GCs in the Bulge direction.
130:
131: However, only a few attempts exist so far to estimate the age of Bulge
132: GCs from the direct measurement of the Main Sequence (MS) TO,
133: by using the
134: WFPC2 and NICMOS onboard HST
135: \citep{ort95,hea00,ort01,zoc01,coh02,fel02}.
136:
137: The recent advent of adaptive optics (AO) capabilities on 8m-class telescopes allows unprecedent
138: deep ground-based IR photometry down to the TO level in clusters as distant as
139: $\approx$10 kpc with potential better spatial sampling and coverage than NICMOS
140: onboard HST. We performed a pilot project aimed at measuring the age of the
141: Bulge GCs, by taking advantage of the ESO-VLT NAOS-CONICA (NACO) imaging facility
142: with AO and wavefront sensing in the IR, which is crucial to find natural guide stars
143: bright enough in such a reddened environment. In this Letter, we present the first
144: results of such a project, namely the age determination of the GC NGC 6440. This
145: cluster has an iron abundance [Fe/H]=-0.56 \citep{ori08} and a global metallicity
146: [M/H]=-0.4 \citep{val07} and it is located in the inner Bulge at (l,b)=(7.7,3.8)
147: and 8.2 kpc from the Sun. The high reddening \citep[E(B-V)=1.15, ][]{val07}
148: along the line of sight yields an extinction of $\approx$3.5 mag
149: in the visible, and makes this cluster an ideal target to
150: be investigated in the near IR.
151:
152:
153: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
154:
155: The observations have been performed in service mode between August 2005 and
156: September 2006 as part of the programmes 075.D-0359(A) and
157: 077.D-0316(A) (PI: Origlia), by using
158: NACO mounted at the ESO-VLT.
159: We used the S54 camera which offers a relatively large
160: $55\arcsec\times 55\arcsec$ FoV with sufficient
161: ($0\farcs054\,{\rm pix}^{-1}$) spatial resolution to resolve the stars.
162: We selected an appropriate
163: field located at $\approx$110'' South-West from the cluster center, where
164: crowding is not too severe but the
165: star density is still large enough to sample
166: a reasonable number of stars along the evolved sequences of the CMD
167: (like the Sub Giant Branch).
168: A series of 24 exposures each one 90
169: sec-long (DIT=18 sec and NDIT=5 and DIT=10 sec and NDIT=9, in the J and H
170: bands, respectively) have been secured.
171: Fig.~\ref{ima} shows the NACO J and H mosaiced images, with marked
172: the natural guide star used to perform the AO correction.
173:
174: We used the final mosaiced images obtained from the reduction pipeline and
175: computed PSF-fitting photometry by using STARFINDER \citep{dio00} specifically
176: developed and optimized to obtain accurate photometry in AO-corrected crowded
177: fields. Indeed, STARFINDER allows the modeling of the PSF as a function of the
178: distance from the reference star with a combination of Gaussian/Moffat functions
179: to simultaneously account for the stellar peak and the diffuse seeing halo.
180: More specifically,
181: the complex NACO-PSF in the NGC 6440 images has been modeled with a combination of
182: three Gaussians. Two Gaussians have been used to properly model the
183: central peak of the PSF (their parameters strongly depending on the efficiency of
184: the AO correction), while the third Gaussian parametrizes the PSF halo, and
185: depends on the seeing. Since the AO corrections
186: degrade with the distance from the reference star, STARFINDER has been optimized
187: to allow the parameters of the two Gaussians modeling the central peak to vary as a function of the
188: distance from the reference star. All the parameters of the Gaussians have been
189: fine-tuned by properly modeling a number of high signal-to-noise ratio, unsaturated stars
190: over the entire science image. Once the PSF has been determined, an
191: automatic search of the stars has been performed and the PSF fitting
192: procedure executed for all the detected objects. At the end of this
193: procedure, a final list of instrumental magnitudes and coordinates for more than
194: 2000 stars has been obtained.
195:
196: Complementary to the NACO observations of the TO region,
197: we have also acquired shallower ($\approx$1min exposures) J,H,Ks images over a wider (5'$\times$5') field of view
198: at the ESO-NTT using SOFI (programme 081.D-0371(A), PI Valenti) to
199: sample the brightest portion of the CMD, namely the Red Giant Branch (RGB) and the Helium clump.
200: The SOFI J and H images have been reduced by using ROMAFOT \citep{buo83}
201: and the instrumental magnitudes have been calibrated and placed on the absolute astrometric system
202: of 2MASS. The brightest, unsaturated stars in the NACO field which are in common
203: with the SOFI dataset have thus been used to
204: transform the NACO J and H instrumental magnitudes to the
205: SOFI/2MASS photometric system.
206: The average photometric uncertainty turns out to be a few hundreths mag along the RGB and
207: $\approx$0.1 mag in the TO region.
208: From a direct comparison of our SOFI photometry of the cluster with
209: a control field from 2MASS we find that field contamination
210: along the RGB is below 20\% in the NACO field of view.
211: By performing a number of simulations with the \citet{rob03}
212: model of stellar population synthesis of the Galaxy,
213: we also estimate a similar degree of field contamination in the TO region.
214: Hence we conclude that such a degree of field contamination should not appreciably affect
215: our estimates of the Horizontal Branch (HB) and TO levels.
216:
217: As a template of an old, metal rich GC we took 47 Tuc ([Fe/H]=-0.67)
218: \citep{car00}, for which an accurate absolute age estimate ($11.2\pm1.1$ Gyr) has
219: been recently obtained by \citet{gra03}. As was done in the case of NGC 6440, we use
220: SOFI shallow photometry of the cluster center to sample the RGB \citep{ori07} and
221: deep photometry of the TO region as obtained from archival SOFI J,H images of a
222: field located at $\approx$2' from the cluster center \citep[see also][]{sal07}.
223: The photometric analysis of this dataset was performed by using ROMAFOT
224: \citep{buo83}. The sample has been astrometrized and photometrically calibrated by
225: using the stars in common with the 2MASS catalog.
226:
227:
228: \section{Results}
229:
230: Fig.~\ref{cmd} shows the NACO-SOFI $J,J-H$ and $H,J-H$ combined CMDs for NGC 6440.
231: Only stars with $J<16.5$ in
232: the SOFI sample and within $30"$ from the reference star in the NACO sample
233: are plotted. All the
234: evolutionary sequences from the RGB tip down to the MS are sampled. In particular,
235: the CMDs reach two magnitudes below the
236: cluster TO and offer one of the cleanest insights of the MS TO region ever
237: published for a cluster in the inner Galactic Bulge.
238: These observations show that an AO capability at an 8m class telescope is
239: crucial to obtain samples of stars
240: {\it i}) $\approx$1 mag fainter and {\it ii}) poorly affected by incompleteness due to crowding
241: with respect to those obtained from average seeing limited observations.
242: These samples allow us to properly
243: measure the TO region even in severely obscured star clusters in the Galactic Bulge.
244:
245: The mean ridge line of the RGB/SGB/MS
246: sequence has been determined by
247: applying an iterative 3$\sigma$-clipping procedure to the observed points
248: and it is overplotted on the CMDs.
249:
250: The obtained CMDs can be used to measure the age of NGC 6440.
251: As has been well known for many years \citep{ibe74,san86} the difference in magnitude
252: between the HB and the TO is a sensitive function of the cluster age for any
253: stellar population older than 2 Gyr. In fact in this age range the luminosity of
254: the HB remains nearly constant while the MS-TO becomes fainter and
255: fainter with increasing age. The $\Delta_{HB-MSTO}$ parameter, defined in different
256: photometric bands, has been successfully used
257: in the past to derive relative ages
258: of Halo \citep{buo89,ros99,cha96} and Bulge \citep{ort01} GCs.
259:
260: In the following we compute this parameter for NGC 6440 and the reference cluster
261: 47 Tuc, in order
262: to derive the relative ages of these two stellar systems.
263:
264: The HB levels in NGC 6440 turn out to be
265: J(HB)=14.70 and H(HB)=13.85, respectively; for comparison,
266: 47 Tuc shows J(HB)=12.5 and H(HB)=12.05.
267: They have been computed by determining the peak of the HB Luminosity Function
268: for stars with $J<15$ and $(J-H)<0.95$.
269: Such a selection allows a safe determination within $\pm 0.05$ mag
270: of the mean level of the HB red clump by reducing any possible
271: contamination of RGB stars.
272: The MS TO points, defined as the bluest point along the mean ridge line
273: of the RGB,SGB,MS are located at J(TO)=18.8 and H(TO)=18.1;
274: for comparison, 47 Tuc shows J(TO)=16.55 and H(TO)=16.20.
275: In order to estimate the errors in the TO level determination
276: we follow \citet{mw06}.
277: We fitted the ridge line with a fifth-order (J-H)=f(J) polynomial
278: and compute the $\rm \sigma(J_{TO})=\sigma(f(J))/\sqrt(N)$,
279: where $\rm \sigma(f(J))$ is the standard deviation of f(J)
280: within a $\rm 3\sigma(J-H)_{TO}$ color interval around the TO.
281: The inferred $\rm \sigma(J_{TO})$ are 0.07 for NGC 6440 and 0.06 for 47 Tuc.
282: As an independent estimate we also compute the distribution of
283: the $\rm J_{TO}$ values obtained by directly fitting the
284: observed CMD TO region with a fifth-order polynomial,
285: by varying the magnitude interval around the TO and the $\sigma$ rejection
286: threshold between 2 and 4.
287: The obtained distributions of the TO level determinations are plotted in Fig.~\ref{dis}.
288: The best fit Gaussian $\sigma$ turns out to be 0.08 in NGC 6440 and 0.05 in 47 Tuc.
289: We thus conservatively assume a $\pm 0.1$ mag error in NGC 6440 and $\pm 0.05$ mag in 47 Tuc.
290: On the basis of these measurements, the magnitude difference between
291: the HB and the TO in the J band of NGC 6440 is $\rm \Delta J(HB-TO)=4.10\pm0.11$
292: and the corresponding value in 47 Tuc is $\rm \Delta J(HB-TO)=4.05\pm0.07$.
293: These values suggest a similar age for the two clusters.
294: The nice similarity between the CMDs of the two clusters is clearly
295: visible in Fig.~\ref{cmdconf}, where the CMD of 47 Tuc (right panel)
296: has been shifted in color and magnitude according to the reddening
297: and distance of NGC 6440, and to match the HB level of the latter (left panel).
298: Note that the
299: metallicity of NGC 6440 is slightly higher ($\approx$0.1 dex) than that of 47 Tuc.
300: However, inspection of the theoretical isochrones suggests that
301: a $\rm \delta[Fe/H]\approx0.1$ translates into a $\rm \delta J(HB-TO)\approx 0.03$, only,
302: which is well within the errors.
303: Hence, from this analysis we conclude that NGC 6440 is consistent with being coeval to 47 Tuc,
304: that is $\approx$11 Gyr old.
305:
306: In order to evaluate the overall uncertainty of the $\Delta J(HB-TO)$ method
307: in deriving absolute ages, we use theoretical isochrones of different ages.
308: Two sets of $\alpha$-enhanced models at [M/H]=-0.65 and [M/H]=-0.35,
309: respectively, to encompass the metallicity of 47 Tuc and NGC 6440,
310: and ages ranging from 2 to 13 Gyr, have been retrieved from
311: the BASTI database \citep{pie04} and transformed into the observational
312: 2MASS (J,J-H) plane following the prescriptions by \citet{ori00}.
313: The difference between the mean value of the HB and the TO level
314: was computed for each isochrone\footnote{
315: As an independent test of the isochrones, we can also
316: use our measurement, we can also use our measurement of the
317: $\rm \Delta J(HB-TO)$ in 47 Tuc and its robust age estimate by \citet{gra03}
318: to evaluate the reliability of the theoretical $\rm \Delta J(HB-TO)$
319: in deriving absolute ages of a stellar system.
320: By using the [M/H]=-0.65 isochrone, we find that 47 Tuc turns out to be
321: $\approx$10 Gyr old,
322: which is $\approx$1 Gyr younger than in \citet{gra03}.
323: In this context, the $\rm \Delta J(HB-TO)$ value measured in NGC 6440 would
324: give ages $\approx$11 and $\approx$10 Gyr, by using
325: the [M/H]=-0.65 and the [M/H]=-0.35 isochrones, respectively.}.
326: We find that in the metallicity range under consideration,
327: a $\approx$0.1mag error in the $\rm \Delta J(HB-TO)$ value translates into
328: a 2 Gyr uncertainty in the 8-11 Gyr age range and $\ge$3 Gyr between 10 and 13 Gyr,
329: since $\rm \Delta J(HB-TO)$ becomes progressively less and less sensitive
330: to age above 11 Gyr.
331: Hence we can conclude that NGC-6440 is 11$^{+3}_{-2}$ Gyr,
332: similar to 47 Tuc and other metal rich GCs of the Galaxy.
333:
334:
335: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
336:
337: In this letter we have presented the age determination for NGC 6440: it is the first time that
338: ground based AO imaging in the near infrared has been used to successfully measure the TO
339: region and derive the age of a Bulge GC. The few previous studies have been all based on
340: space observations. In fact, since the pioneering work by \citet{ort95} who first measured
341: the TO region of NGC~6553 and NGC~6528 by using HST-WFC2 and suggested a near-coeval age
342: for the Galactic bulge and Halo, a number of subsequent works using HST and the WFPC2 and
343: NICMOS imagers \citep{ort01,fel02} refined techniques and procedures to measure the age of
344: these two globular clusters, by also applying proper motion decontamination to the CMDs
345: \citep{zoc01,fel02}. Only one other cluster in the inner Bulge, namely Terzan 5
346: \citep{ort01,coh02} has been studied with HST-NICMOS, while \citet{hea00} analyzed
347: two other GCs observed with HST-WFPC2 in the outer Bulge, namely NGC~6624 an NGC~6637.
348: All these studies suggest that these clusters are old ($>$10 Gyr) and likely
349: coeval with 47 Tuc.
350:
351: While our and previous studies agree on the fact that Bulge GCs are likely coeval to 47 Tuc,
352: absolute age estimates range between 11 and 14 Gyr, depending on the adopted
353: theoretical isochrones and/or the absolute age for 47 Tuc itself. In this respect, a
354: significant step forward in setting the absolute age of reference clusters
355: has been performed by \citet{gra03} who provided accurate distances and absolute ages for
356: three pillar GCs, namely NGC~6397, NGC~6752 and 47 Tuc, by using the MS Fitting Method and
357: the Hipparcos distance scale. Their age estimate for 47 Tuc turns out to be 11.2$\pm$1 Gyr,
358: $\approx 2.6$ Gyr younger than the other more metal poor Halo clusters. A somewhat
359: younger age (by 1-2 Gyr) was previously suggested by \citet{ros99}, who also found
360: slightly younger ages for other two metal rich clusters in their sample, namely NGC~6352 and
361: NGC~6838, which possibly belong to the thick disk population, like 47 Tuc \citep[see also
362: Figure 2 in][]{fer04}.
363:
364: These first set of age determinations seem to suggest a common epoch of formation of the
365: tick disk and Bulge and an overall GC formation process in our Galaxy starting $\approx
366: 13.5$ Gyr ago \citep{gra03} with the formation of the oldest Halo GCs and ending $\approx 11$ Gyr ago
367: with the formation of the metal rich objects in the thick disk and Bulge. In this scenario,
368: the few younger GCs found in the Halo (like for example Pal~12, Arp~2, Terzan~8 etc.) could not have
369: formed in situ. In fact, a number of recursive accretions of satellites and their GC
370: systems \citep[as e.g. the Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal, ][]{iba94} could have
371: significantly contributed to form the present Halo stellar populations \citep{bel03,fer04}.
372:
373: However, a larger sample of both Bulge and thick disk GCs urgently need
374: to be observed with the purpose of determining their relative and absolute ages, before drawing firm conclusions.
375: This is something that is well within the capabilities of the current generation of instruments,
376: such as the refurbished HST and the improving performances of ground based AO imagers.
377:
378:
379: \acknowledgements This research was supported by the {\it Ministero dell'Istruzione,
380: dell'Universit\'a e della Ricerca} and by the {\it Progetti Strategici 2006}
381: granted by the University of Bologna.
382: We thank the anonymous Referee for his/her helpful comments.
383:
384: \begin{thebibliography}{}
385:
386: \bibitem[Ballero et al.(2007)]{bal07}
387: Ballero, S.~K., Matteucci, F., Origlia, L., \& Rich, R.~M.\ 2007, \aap, 467, 123
388:
389: \bibitem[Bellazzini, Ferraro \& Ibata(2003)]{bel03}
390: Bellazzini, M., Ferraro, F. R., \& Ibata, R. 2003, \aj, 125, 188
391:
392: \bibitem[Buonanno et al.(1983)]{buo83}
393: Buonanno, R., Buscema, G., Corsi, C.~E., Ferraro, I., \& Iannicola, G.\ 1983,
394: \aap, 126, 278
395:
396: \bibitem[Buonanno et al.(1989)]{buo89}
397: Buonanno, R., Corsi, C.~E., \& Fusi Pecci, F.\ 1989, \aap, 216, 80
398:
399: \bibitem[Carretta et al.(2000)]{car00}
400: Carretta, E. Gratton, R. G., Clementini, G., \& Fusi Pecci, F.
401: 2000, ApJ, 533, 215
402:
403: \bibitem[Chaboyer et al.(1996)]{cha96}
404: Chaboyer, B., Demarque, P., Kernan, P.~J., Krauss, L.~M., \& Sarajedini, A.\ 1996, \mnras, 283, 683
405:
406: \bibitem[Cohn et al.(2002)]{coh02}
407: Cohn, H.~N., Lugger, P.~M., Grindlay, J.~E., \& Edmonds, P.~D.\ 2002, \apj, 571, 818
408:
409: \bibitem[Davidge(2000)]{dav00}
410: Davidge, T.~J.\ 2000, \apjs, 126, 105
411:
412: \bibitem[De Angeli et al.(2005)]{dea05}
413: De Angeli, F., Piotto, G., Cassisi, S., Busso, G., Recio-Blanco, A., Salaris, M., Aparicio, A., \& Rosenberg, A.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 116
414:
415: \bibitem[Diolaiti et al.(2000)]{dio00}
416: Diolaiti, E., Bendinelli, O., Bonaccini, D., Close, L., Currie, D., \& Parmeggiani, G.
417: 2000, \aaps, 147, 335
418:
419: \bibitem[Dutra et al.(2002)]{dut02}
420: Dutra, C.~M., Santiago, B.~X., \& Bica, E.\ 2002, \aap, 381, 219
421:
422: \bibitem[Feltzing \& Johnson(2002)]{fel02}
423: Feltzing, s., \& Johnson, R. A. 2002, \aap, 385, 67
424:
425: \bibitem[Ferraro(2004)]{fer04}
426: Ferraro, F.~R. 2004, in{\it How does the Galaxy Work?},
427: E.J. Alfaro, E. Perez and J. Franco eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 241
428:
429: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2006)]{fer06}
430: Ferraro, F.~R., Valenti, E., \& Origlia, L.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 243
431:
432: \bibitem[Frogel et al.(1995)]{fro95}
433: Frogel, J.~A., Kuchinski, L.~E., \& Tiede, G.~P.\ 1995, \aj, 109, 1154
434:
435: \bibitem[Gratton et al.(2003)]{gra03}
436: Gratton, R.~G., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., Clementini, G., Desidera, S., Grundahl, F., \& Lucatello, S.\ 2003, \aap, 408, 529
437:
438: \bibitem[Guarnieri et al.(1998)]{gua98}
439: Guarnieri, M.~D., Ortolani, S., Montegriffo, P., Renzini, A., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., \& Moneti, A.\ 1998, \aap, 331, 70
440:
441: \bibitem[Ibata,Gilmore \& Irwin(1994)]{iba94}
442: Ibata, R. A., Gilmore, G., \& Irwin, M. J. 1994, Nature, 370, 194
443:
444: \bibitem[Heasley et al.(2000)]{hea00}
445: Heasley, J.~N., Janes, K.~A., Zinn, R., Demarque, P., Da Costa, G.~S., \& Christian, C.~A.\ 2000, \aj, 120, 879
446:
447: \bibitem[Iben(1974)]{ibe74}
448: Iben, I.\ 1974, Late Stages of Stellar Evolution, 66, 237
449:
450: \bibitem[Matteucci et al.(1999)]{mat99}
451: Matteucci, F., Romano, D., \& Molaro, P.\ 1999, \aap, 341, 458
452:
453: \bibitem[McWilliam(1997)]{mcw97}
454: McWilliam, A.\ 1997, \araa, 35, 503
455:
456: \bibitem[Meissner \& Weiss(2006)]{mw06}
457: Meissner, F., \& Weiss, A. 2006, \aap, 456, 1085
458:
459: \bibitem[Origlia \& Leitherer(2000)]{ori00}
460: Origlia, L., \& Leitherer, C.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 2018
461:
462: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(2007)]{ori07}
463: Origlia, L., Rood, R. T., Fabbri, S., Ferraro, F. R., Fusi Pecci, F., \& Rich, R. M.
464: 2007, \apj, 667, 85
465:
466: \bibitem[Origlia, Valenti \& Rich (2008)]{ori08}
467: Origlia, L., Valenti, E., \& Rich, R. M.
468: 2008, \mnras, in press (astro-ph/0805-3442)
469:
470: \bibitem[Ortolani et al.(1995)]{ort95}
471: Ortolani, S., Renzini, A., Gilmozzi, R., Marconi, G., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., \& Rich, R.~M.\ 1995, \nat, 377, 701
472:
473: \bibitem[Ortolani et al.(1996)]{ort96}
474: Ortolani, S., Barbuy, B., \& Bica, E.\ 1996, \aap, 308, 733
475:
476: \bibitem[Ortolani et al.(2001)]{ort01}
477: Ortolani, S., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., Renzini, A., Zoccali, M., Rich, R.~M., \& Cassisi, S.\ 2001, \aap, 376, 878
478:
479: \bibitem[Pietrinferni et al.(2004)]{pie04}
480: Pietrinferni, A, Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., \& Castelli F. 2004, \aj, 612, 168
481:
482: \bibitem[Robin et al.(2003)]{rob03}
483: Robin, A. C., Reyle, C., Derriere, S., \& Picaud, S. 2003, \aap, 409, 523
484:
485: \bibitem[Rosenberg et al.(1999)]{ros99}
486: Rosenberg, A., Saviane, I., Piotto, G., \& Aparicio, A.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 2306
487:
488: \bibitem[Rosenberg(2000)]{ros00}
489: Rosenberg, A.\ 2000, \pasp, 112, 575
490:
491: \bibitem[Salaris \& Weiss(2002)]{sw02}
492: Salaris, \& Weiss, A.\ 2002, \aap, 388, 492
493:
494: \bibitem[Salaris et al.(2007)]{sal07}
495: Salaris, M., Held, E.~V., Ortolani, S., Gullieuszik, M., \& Momany, Y.\ 2007, \aap, 476, 243
496:
497: \bibitem[Sandage(1986)]{san86}
498: Sandage, A.\ 1986, \araa, 24, 421
499:
500: \bibitem[Valenti et al.(2007)]{val07}
501: Valenti, E., Ferraro, F.~R., \& Origlia, L.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 1287
502:
503: \bibitem[Wyse(1999)]{wys99}
504: Wyse, R.~F.~G.\ 1999, \apss, 267, 145
505:
506: \bibitem[Wyse et al.(2000)]{wys00}
507: Wyse, R.~F.~G., Gilmore, G., Norris, J.~E., \& Freeman, K.~C.\ 2000, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 197, 424
508:
509: \bibitem[Zoccali et al.(2001)]{zoc01}
510: Zoccali, M., Renzini, A., Ortolani, S., Bica, E., \& Barbuy, B.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 2638
511:
512: \end{thebibliography}
513:
514: \clearpage
515:
516: \begin{figure}[!hp]
517: \begin{center}
518: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f1.ps}
519: \caption{NACO J and H band images of the observed field ($\approx$50''$\times$50'')
520: located $\approx$110'' South-West from the NGC 6440 center.
521: North is up, East is left. The circled star is the natural guide star used for AO correction.}
522: \label{ima}
523: \end{center}
524: \end{figure}
525:
526: \begin{figure}[!hp]
527: \begin{center}
528: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f2.ps}
529: \caption{Combined NACO-SOFI (J,J--H) and (H,J--H) CMDs
530: for NGC 6440. Only stars with $J<16.5$ from the SOFI sample and
531: with $r<30"$ from the reference star in the NACO sample are plotted.
532: The RGB-SGB-MS mean
533: ridge lines are overplotted to the data.
534: The HB and TO levels are also marked for reference.}
535: \label{cmd}
536: \end{center}
537: \end{figure}
538:
539: \begin{center}
540: \begin{figure}[!p]
541: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f3.ps}
542: \caption{Distribution of the TO level determinations as obtained from $\approx$ 400 fitting models
543: of the TO region for NGC 6440 (left panel) and 47 Tuc (right panel).
544: The Gaussian best fit and the corresponding $\sigma$ value for each distribution
545: is also reported.
546: }
547: \label{dis}
548: \end{figure}
549: \end{center}
550:
551: \begin{figure}[!hp]
552: \begin{center}
553: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f4.ps}
554: \caption{The $(J,J-H)$ CMDs
555: for NGC 6440 (left panel) and
556: 47 Tuc (right panel), as shifted in color and magnitude, accordingly to the reddening and
557: distance modulus of NGC 6440.
558: The horizontal dashed lines mark the
559: HB and TO level of NGC 6440.}
560: \label{cmdconf}
561: \end{center}
562: \end{figure}
563:
564:
565:
566: \end{document}
567:
568:
569:
570:
571:
572: