1: \documentclass[aps,prd,groupedaddress,showpacs,showkeys]{revtex4}

2: \usepackage{amssymb}

3: \usepackage{amsmath}

4: \usepackage{amsfonts}

5: \usepackage{epsfig}

6: 

7: \newcommand{\seq}{\begin{subequations}}

8: \newcommand{\sen}{\end{subequations}}

9: \newcommand{\eq}{\begin{eqnarray}}

10: \newcommand{\en}{\end{eqnarray}}

11: \newcommand{\mpps}{M_{\pi^+}^2}

12: \newcommand{\mpzs}{M_{\pi^0}^2}

13: \newcommand{\mpp}{M_{\pi^+}}

14: \newcommand{\mpz}{M_{\pi^0}}

15: \newcommand{\scs}{\, , \,}

16: \newcommand{\per} {\, .}

17: \newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}

18: \newcommand{\la}{\langle}

19: \newcommand{\mnz}{\stackrel{\!\!\!\!\!\circ}{m_N}}

20: \newcommand{\gaz}{\stackrel{\!\!\!\!\!\circ}{g_A}}

21: \newcommand{\Dt}{D_\tau}

22: 

23: \begin{document}

24: 

25: \title{Semileptonic decays of the light $J^{P}=1/2^{+}$ ground state

26: baryon octet}

27: \noindent

28: \author{Amand Faessler$^{1}$,

29:         Thomas Gutsche$^{1}$,

30:         Barry R. Holstein$^{2}$, \\

31:         Mikhail A. Ivanov$^{3}$,

32:         J\"urgen G. K\"{o}rner$^{4}$,

33:         Valery E. Lyubovitskij$^1$\footnote{On leave of absence

34:           from Department of Physics, Tomsk State University,

35:         634050 Tomsk, Russia}

36: \vspace*{1.2\baselineskip}}

37: 

38: \affiliation{$^1$ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,

39: Universit\"at T\"ubingen,\\

40: Auf der Morgenstelle 14, D--72076 T\"ubingen, Germany

41: \vspace*{1.2\baselineskip} \\

42: $^2$ Department of Physics--LGRT, University of

43: Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA

44: \vspace*{1.2\baselineskip} \\

45: $^3$ Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics,

46: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,~141980~Dubna,~Russia

47: \vspace*{1.2\baselineskip} \\

48: $^4$ Institut f\"{u}r Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit\"{a}t,

49: D--55099 Mainz, Germany\\}

50: 

51: \date{\today}

52: 

53: \begin{abstract}

54: 

55: We calculate the semileptonic baryon octet--octet transition form factors

56: using a manifestly Lorentz covariant quark model approach based on the

57: factorization of the contribution of valence quarks and chiral effects.

58: We perform a detailed analysis of SU(3) breaking corrections

59: to the hyperon semileptonic decay form factors. We present complete

60: results on decay rates and asymmetry parameters including lepton mass

61: effects for the rates.

62: 

63: \end{abstract}

64: 

65: \pacs{12.39.Fe, 12.39.Ki, 13.30.Ce, 14.20.Dh, 14.20.Jn}

66: 

67: \keywords{chiral symmetry, effective Lagrangian, relativistic quark model,

68: nucleon and hyperon vector and axial form factors}

69: 

70: \maketitle

71: 

72: \newpage

73: 

74: \section{Introduction}

75: 

76: The analysis of the semileptonic decays of the baryon octet $B_i \to

77: B_j e \bar\nu_e$ presents an opportunity to shed light on the

78: Cabibbo--Kobayashi--Maskawa (CKM) matrix element $V_{us}$.  At zero

79: momentum transfer, the weak baryon matrix elements for the $B_i \to

80: B_j e \bar\nu_e$ transitions are determined by just two constants

81: --- the vector coupling $F_1^{B_iB_j}$ and its axial counterpart

82: $G_1^{B_iB_j}$. In the limit of exact SU(3) symmetry $F_1^{B_iB_j}$

83: and $G_1^{B_iB_j}$ are expressed in terms of basic parameters ---

84: the vector couplings are given in terms of well--known

85: Clebsch--Gordan coefficients which are fixed due to the conservation of

86: the vector current (CVC), while the axial couplings are given in

87: terms of the familiar SU(3) octet axial--vector couplings $F$ and

88: $D$. The Ademollo--Gatto theorem (AGT)~\cite{Ademollo:1964sr}

89: protects the vector form factors from leading SU(3)--breaking

90: corrections generated by the mass difference of strange and

91: nonstrange quarks---the first nonvanishing breaking effects begin at

92: second order in symmetry--breaking.  As emphasized in

93: Ref.~\cite{Cabibbo:2003ea}, the vanishing of the first--order

94: correction to the vector hyperon form factors $F_1^{B_iB_j}$

95: presents an opportunity to determine $V_{us}$ from the direct

96: measurement of $V_{us} F_1^{B_iB_j}$.  The axial form factor, on

97: the other hand, contains symmetry--breaking corrections already at

98: first order.  We note that the experimental data on baryon

99: semileptonic decays~\cite{Yao:2006px} are well described by the Cabibbo

100: theory~\cite{Cabibbo:1963yz}, which assumes SU(3) invariance of the

101: strong interactions.  However, for a precise determination of

102: $V_{us}$ one needs to include the leading and very likely also the  

103: subleading SU(3) breaking corrections. 

104: 

105: The theoretical analysis of SU(3) breaking corrections to hyperon

106: semileptonic decay form factors has been performed in various

107: approaches, including quark and soliton models, the $1/N_c$ expansion of

108: QCD, chiral perturbation theory (ChPT), lattice QCD, {\it etc.} (for

109: an overview and references see~\cite{Faessler:2007pp}). In

110: Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp} we have suggested the use of a quark-based

111: approach, which offers the possibility to consistently include

112: chiral corrections (both SU(3)--symmetric and SU(3)--breaking) to

113: the baryon semileptonic form factors.  By matching the baryon matrix

114: elements to the corresponding quantities derived in baryon ChPT we

115: reproduced the chiral expansion of physical quantities (e.g. mass,

116: magnetic moments, slopes and the axial charge of the nucleon) at the

117: order of accuracy at which we worked.  In the valence quark

118: calculation of the baryon matrix elements we employed a simple

119: generic ansatz for the spatial form of the quark wave

120: function~\cite{Donoghue:1992dd,PCQM}.

121: 

122: In the present paper we evaluate the baryon matrix

123: elements within a Lorentz and gauge invariant constituent quark

124: model~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft}. Note that in

125: Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2006ky} we have studied

126: the electromagnetic properties of the baryon octet and the

127: $\Delta(1230)$--resonance in an analogous approach.  In particular, we

128: developed an approach based on a nonlinear chirally symmetric

129: Lagrangian which involves constituent quarks {\it and} chiral

130: fields.  In a first step, this Lagrangian was used to dress the

131: constituent quarks with a cloud of light pseudoscalar mesons and

132: other (virtual) heavy states using the calculational technique of

133: infrared dimensional regularization (IDR)~\cite{Becher:1999he}. Then,

134: within a formal chiral expansion, we evaluated the dressed

135: transition operators relevant for the interaction of quarks with

136: external fields in the presence of a virtual meson cloud.  In a

137: next step, these dressed operators were used to calculate

138: baryon matrix elements.  (A simpler and more

139: phenomenological quark model based on similar ideas regarding the

140: dressing of constituent quarks by the meson cloud has been developed

141: in Refs.~\cite{PCQM}.)  In the present paper we improve the

142: quantitative determination of valence quark effects by resorting to

143: a specific relativistic quark

144: model~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ky} describing the internal

145: quark dynamics.  This procedure will allow us to generate

146: predictions for all six form factors showing up in the matrix

147: elements of the semileptonic decays of the baryon octet.  With the

148: explicit form factors together with radiative

149: corrections, we present predictions for the corresponding

150: decay widths and asymmetries.

151: 

152: The paper is structured as follows.  First, in Section~II, we

153: discuss the basic notions of our approach which is directly

154: connected to our previous work in

155: Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2006ky,Faessler:2007pp}. That

156: is, we derive a chiral Lagrangian motivated by baryon

157: ChPT~\cite{Becher:1999he,Gasser:1987rb}, and write it in terms

158: of quark and mesonic degrees of freedom.  Using constituent quarks

159: dressed with a cloud of light pseudoscalar mesons and other mesons heavier

160: than the pseudoscalar mesons, we derive dressed

161: transition operators within the chiral

162: expansion, which are in turn used in a Lorentz and gauge invariant

163: quark model~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz} explicitly including internal

164: quark dynamics to calculate baryon matrix elements. In Section~III we

165: derive specific expressions for the vector and axial baryon

166: semileptonic decay constants, while in Section~IV we present the

167: numerical analysis of the axial nucleon charge and the vector and

168: axial vector hyperon semileptonic form factors.  Finally, in Section~V we

169: summarize our results.

170: 

171: \section{Approach}

172: \label{Sec_approach}

173: 

174: \subsection{Matrix elements of semileptonic decays of the baryon octet}

175: 

176: In Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2006ky,Faessler:2007pp} we

177: have developed a Lorentz covariant quark approach which allowed us to

178: study light baryon properties based on the inclusion of chiral effects

179: in a consistent fashion by matching the quark model approach to the

180: predictions of ChPT. In

181: particular, our results for various baryon properties (static

182: properties and form factors in the Euclidean region)

183: derived in~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2006ky,Faessler:2007pp} using

184: this approach satisfy the low--energy theorems and identities

185: dictated by the infrared singularities of QCD (see, {\it e.g.}, the

186: detailed discussion in Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2007pp}

187: and a brief overview in Section~\ref{sec_ChPT}).

188: 

189: The main idea is to include chiral effects in the transition quark

190: operators, which are then sandwiched between the respective baryon

191: states. We have developed a technique which allows us to explicitly

192: generate chiral corrections associated with the small scale $\lambda

193: \sim m_q$, where $m_q$ is the constituent quark mass, together with

194: effects of the internal dynamics of the valence quarks.  In particular,

195: as a first step, we dress the bare valence quark operators by a

196: cloud of pseudoscalar mesons and states heavier than the pseudoscalar

197: mesons in a straightforward

198: manner by the use of an effective chirally--invariant Lagrangian

199: (see the explicit forms in

200: Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2006ky,Faessler:2007pp} and

201: the relevant expressions for the calculation of semileptonic form factors

202: below). In particular, the Lagrangian which dynamically generates the

203: dressing

204: of the constituent quarks by the mesonic degrees of freedom, consists of

205: two basic pieces ${\cal L}_{q}$ and

206: ${\cal L}_{U}$:

207: \eq\label{L_qU}

208: {\cal L}_{qU} \,

209: = \, {\cal L}_{q} + {\cal L}_{U}\,, \hspace*{.5cm}

210: {\cal L}_q \, =

211: \, {\cal L}^{(1)}_q + {\cal L}^{(2)}_q + {\cal L}^{(3)}_q

212: + {\cal L}^{(4)}_q + \cdots\,, \hspace*{.5cm}

213: {\cal L}_{U} \, = \, {\cal L}_{U}^{(2)} +

214: \cdots\,.

215: \en

216: The superscript $(i)$ attached to ${\cal L}^{(i)}_{U}$

217: and ${\cal L}^{(i)}_{q}$

218: denotes the low energy dimension of the Lagrangian:

219: \seq\label{L_exp}

220: \eq

221: {\cal L}_{U}^{(2)} &=&\frac{F^2}{4} \la{u_\mu u^\mu

222: + \chi_+}\ra\,, \hspace*{.5cm} {\cal L}^{(1)}_q \, = \,  \bar q

223: \left[ i \, \slash\!\!\!\! D - m + \frac{1}{2} \, g \, \slash\!\!\!

224: u \, \gamma^5 \right] q\,,

225: \label{L_exp1} \\[2mm]

226: {\cal L}^{(2)}_q & = & \frac{C_3^q}{2} \, \la{u_\mu u^\mu}\ra \,

227: \bar q \, q \, + \, \frac{C_4^q}{4}\, \bar q\, i\, \sigma^{\mu\nu}\,

228: [u_\mu, u_\nu]\, q + \frac{C_6^q}{8m}\, \bar q\, \sigma^{\mu\nu}

229: F_{\mu\nu}^+ \, q  \, + \, \cdots \,, \label{L_exp2}\\[2mm]

230: {\cal L}^{(3)}_q &=& \frac{D_{16}^q}{2} \,\bar q \, \slash\!\!\! u

231: \, \gamma^5 \, q \,\la \, \chi_+ \ra + \frac{D_{17}^q}{8} \,\bar q \, \{

232: \slash\!\!\! u \, \gamma^5 \,, \hat\chi_+ \} \, q

233: + \frac{iD_{18}^q}{2} \, \bar q \gamma^\mu\gamma^5 \, [ D_\mu, \chi_-] \, q

234: + \frac{D_{22}^q}{2} \, \bar q \gamma^\mu\gamma^5 \,

235: [ D^\nu, F_{\mu\nu}^-] \, q \, + \, \cdots \,,

236: \label{L_exp3}\\[2mm]

237: {\cal L}^{(4)}_q &=& \frac{E_6^q}{2} \la \chi_+ \ra \,

238: \bar q\, \sigma^{\mu\nu} F_{\mu\nu}^+ \, q

239: + \frac{E_7^q}{4}

240: \bar q\, \sigma^{\mu\nu} \{ F_{\mu\nu}^+ \hat\chi_+ \} \, q

241: + \frac{E_8^q}{2}

242: \bar q\, \sigma^{\mu\nu} \la F_{\mu\nu}^+ \hat\chi_+ \ra \, q

243: + \, \cdots \,,\label{L_exp4}

244: \en

245: \sen

246: where the symbols $\la \,\, \ra$, $[ \,\, ]$ and  $\{ \,\, \}$

247: occurring in Eq.~(\ref{L_exp}) denote the trace over

248: flavor matrices, commutator, and anticommutator, respectively.

249: In Eq.~(\ref{L_exp}) we display only the terms involved in the

250: calculation of semileptonic vector and axial vector quark coupling constants.

251: 

252: We use the following notation. $q$, $U = u^2 = \exp(i\phi/F)$ are

253: the quark and chiral fields, respectively, where $\phi$ is the octet

254: of pseudoscalar fields and $F$ is the octet decay constant, 

255: $\sigma_{\mu\nu} = i/2 [\gamma_\mu, \gamma_\nu]$,

256: $u_\mu = i \{ u^\dagger, \nabla_\mu u \}$. 

257: $D_\mu$ and $\nabla_\mu$ are the covariant derivatives acting on the quark 

258: and chiral fields, respectively, including external vector $(v_\mu)$ and 

259: axial $(a_\mu)$ fields, 

260: $F_{\mu\nu}^\pm = u^\dagger F_{\mu\nu}^R u \pm u F_{\mu\nu}^L u^\dagger$

261: is the stress tensor involving $v_\mu$ and $a_\mu$, 

262: $\chi_\pm = u^\dagger \chi u^\dagger \pm u \chi^\dagger u$ and 

263: $\hat \chi_+ = \chi_+ - \la \chi_+ \ra/3$ with

264: $\chi = 2 B {\cal M} + \ldots$, where $B$ is the quark vacuum condensate

265: parameter and ${\cal M} = {\rm diag}\{ \hat m, \hat m, \hat m_s \}$

266: is the mass matrix of current quarks (We work in

267: the isospin symmetry limit with $\hat m_{u}= \hat m_{d}=\hat{m}=7$~MeV.

268: The mass of the strange quark $\hat m_s$ is related to the

269: nonstrange one via $\hat m_s \simeq 25 \, \hat m$).

270: 

271: The parameters $m = 420$ MeV and $g = 0.9$ denote the constituent quark

272: mass and

273: axial charge in the chiral limit ({\it i.e.}, they are counted as

274: quantities of order ${\cal O}(1)$ in the chiral expansion).

275: $C_i^q$, $D_i^q$ and $E_i^q$ are the SU(3) quark second--, third-- and 

276: fourth--order low--energy constants (LEC's). We denote the SU(3) quark  

277: LEC's by capital letters in order to distinguish them from the SU(2) 

278: LEC's $c_i^q$, $d_i^q$ and $e_i^q$. Also, for the quark LEC's we use  

279: the additional superscript ``$q$'' to differentiate them from the 

280: analogous ChPT LEC's: $C_i$, $D_i$, $E_i$ in SU(3) and 

281: $c_i$, $d_i$, $e_i$ in SU(2). For the numerical analysis we will use: 

282: $M_{\pi} = 139.57$ MeV, $M_K = 493.677$ MeV (the charged pion and

283: kaon masses), $M_\eta = 547.51$ MeV and $F = (F_\pi + F_K)/2$ in SU(3)

284: with $F_\pi = 92.4$ MeV and $F_K/F_\pi = 1.22$. 

285: Using the Lagrangian~(\ref{L_exp}) we can calculate the semileptonic  

286: vector and axial vector quark couplings including 

287: chiral corrections following the procedure discussed in detail in

288: Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp,Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2006ky}.

289: In Appendix~\ref{App_VA_couplings} we list the results for the

290: semileptonic quark couplings $f_{1,2,3}^{du}$, $f_{1,2,3}^{su}$,

291: $g_{1,2,3}^{du}$ and $g_{1,2,3}^{su}$ up to order ${\cal O}(p^4)$

292: in the three--flavor picture.

293: 

294: In Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2006ky} we illustrated the

295: dressing technique in the case of the electromagnetic quark operator.

296: We performed a detailed analysis of the electromagnetic properties

297: of the baryon octet and of the $\Delta \to N \gamma$ transition. In

298: Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp} we extended this technique to the case

299: of vector and axial vector quark operators, deriving master formulae for

300: the calculation of the semileptonic form factors of baryons

301: including the effects of valence quarks together with chiral

302: corrections. Below we briefly review the derivation of these master

303: formulae, which will be the starting point for the present paper.

304: 

305: First, we define the bare vector and axial vector quark transition

306: operators constructed from quark fields of flavor $i$ and $j$ as:

307: \seq\label{bare_V}

308: \eq

309: & &J_{\mu, \, V}(q) = \int d^4x \, e^{-iqx} \,

310: j_{\mu, \, V}(x) \,, \quad \hspace*{.3cm} j_{\mu, V}(x)

311: = \bar q_j(x) \, \gamma_\mu \, q_i(x)\,, \\

312: & &J_{\mu, \, A}(q) = \int d^4x \, e^{-iqx} \, j_{\mu, \, A}(x) \,,

313: \quad \hspace*{.3cm} j_{\mu, A}(x) = \bar q_j(x) \, \gamma_\mu \,

314: \gamma_5 \, q_i(x)\,.

315: \en

316: \sen

317: Next, using the chiral Lagrangian derived

318: in Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp}, we construct the vector/axial vector

319: currents with quantum numbers of the bare quark currents which

320: include mesonic degrees of freedom.  These currents are then

321: projected on the corresponding (initial and final) quark states in

322: order to evaluate dressed vector $f_k^{ij}(q^2)$ and axial vector

323: $g_k^{ij}(q^2)$ ($k=1,2,3$) quark form factors which encode the

324: chiral corrections.  Finally, using the dressed quark form factors

325: in momentum space we can determine their Fourier--transform in

326: coordinate space.

327: 

328: In the one-body approximation the dressed quark operators $j_{\mu,

329: \, V(A)}^{\rm dress}(x)$ and their Fourier transforms $J_{\mu, \,

330: V(A)}^{\rm dress}(q)$ have the forms (for an extension which also

331: includes the two--body quark--quark interactions see

332: Ref.~~\cite{Faessler:2007pp})

333: \seq\label{JVmu_dress}

334: \eq

335: j_{\mu, \, V}^{\rm dress}(x) &=& f_1^{ij}(-\partial^2) \, [ \bar q_j(x)

336: \gamma_\mu q_i(x) ] \, + \, \frac{f_2^{ij}(-\partial^2)}{m_i}

337: \, \partial^\nu \, [ \bar q_j(x) \sigma_{\mu\nu} q_i(x) ] \, - \,

338: \frac{f_3^{ij}(-\partial^2)}{m_i} \, i \,  \partial_\mu \,

339: [ \bar q_j(x) q_i(x) ] \,, \\

340: J_{\mu, \, V}^{\rm dress}(q) &=& \int d^4x \, e^{-iqx} \,

341: \bar q_j(x) \, \biggl[ \, \gamma_\mu \, f_1^{ij}(q^2)

342: \, + \, \frac{i \sigma_{\mu\nu} \, q^\nu}{m_i} \, f_2^{ij}(q^2) \,

343: \, + \, \frac{q_\mu}{m_i} \, f_3^{ij}(q^2) \, \biggr] \, q_i(x)\,,

344: \en

345: \sen

346: and

347: \seq\label{JAmu_dress}

348: \eq

349: j_{\mu, \, A}^{\rm dress}(x) &=&

350: g_1^{ij}(-\partial^2) \, [ \bar q_i(x) \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 q_j(x) ]

351: \, + \, \frac{g_2^{ij}(-\partial^2)}{m_i} \, \partial^\nu \,

352: [ \bar q_j(x) \sigma_{\mu\nu} \gamma_5 q_i(x) ]

353: \, - \, \frac{g_3^{ij}(-\partial^2)}{m_i} \, i \,  \partial_\mu \,

354: [ \bar q_j(x) \gamma_5 q_i(x) ] \,, \\

355: J_{\mu, \, A}^{\rm dress}(q) &=& \int d^4x \, e^{-iqx} \, \bar

356: q_j(x) \, \biggl[ \, \gamma_\mu \, \gamma_5 \, g_1^{ij}(q^2) \, + \,

357: \frac{i \sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu}{m_i} \, \gamma_5 \,

358: g_2^{ij}(q^2) \, \, + \, \frac{q_\mu}{m_i} \, \gamma_5 \,

359: g_3^{ij}(q^2) \, \biggr] \, q_i(x)\,,

360: \en

361: \sen

362: where $m_{i(j)}$

363: denotes the dressed constituent quark mass of the $i(j)$--th flavor

364: generated by the corresponding chiral Lagrangian (for details see

365: Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2005gd}); $f_{1,2,3}^{ij}(q^2)$ and

366: $g_{1,2,3}^{ij}(q^2)$ denote the quark-level vector and axial vector

367: $i \to j$ flavor changing form factors. Up to and including the third

368: order in the chiral expansion, the tree and loop diagrams which

369: contribute to the dressed vector $J_{\mu, \, V}^{\rm dress}(q)$ and

370: axial vector $J_{\mu, \, A}^{\rm dress}(q)$ operators, respectively, are

371: displayed in Figs.1 and 2 of Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp}. In

372: Appendix~\ref{App_VA_couplings} we present our results for the

373: semileptonic vector $f_k^{ij} = f_k^{ij}(0)$ and axial $g_k^{ij} =

374: g_k^{ij}(0)$ couplings at the order of accuracy at which we work --

375: up to order ${\cal O}(p^4)$ in the three--flavor picture including

376: chiral corrections (both SU(3)--symmetric and SU(3)--breaking).

377: For simplicity we restrict our approach to the isospin symmetry limit in our

378: consideration.

379: 

380: In order to calculate the vector and axial vector current transitions

381: between baryons we sandwich the dressed quark operators between the

382: relevant baryon states. The master formulae are:

383: \eq\label{master}

384: \la B_j(p^\prime) | \, J_{\mu, \, V(A)}^{\rm dress}(q) \, | B_i(p) \ra

385: = (2\pi)^4 \, \delta^4(p^\prime - p - q)

386: \, M_{\mu, \, V(A)}^{B_iB_j}(p,p^\prime) \,, \en \seq \eq M_{\mu, \,

387: V}^{B_iB_j}(p,p^\prime) &=& \sum\limits_{k = 1}^3 f_k^{ij}(q^2) \,

388: \la B_j(p^\prime)|\,V_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \, |B_i(p) \ra

389: \nonumber\\

390: &=&\bar u_{B_j}(p^\prime) \biggl\{ \gamma_\mu \, F_1^{B_iB_j}(q^2)

391: \, + \, \frac{i \sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu}{m_{B_i}}

392: \, F_2^{B_iB_j}(q^2) + \frac{q_\mu}{m_{B_i}}

393: \, F_3^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \biggr\} u_{B_i}(p) \,

394: \label{M_V} \,,\\

395: M_{\mu, \, A}^{B_iB_j}(p,p^\prime) &=&

396: \sum\limits_{k = 1}^3 g_k^{ij}(q^2)

397: \, \la B_j(p^\prime)|\,A_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \, |B_i(p) \ra

398: \nonumber\\

399: &=& \bar u_{B_j}(p^\prime) \biggl\{ \gamma_\mu \, \gamma_5 \,

400: G_1^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \, + \, \frac{i \, \sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu}{m_{B_i}}

401: \, \gamma_5 \, G_2^{B_iB_j}(q^2) + \frac{q_\mu}{m_{B_i}} \, \gamma_5

402: \, G_3^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \biggr\} u_{B_i}(p) \label{M_A} \,, \en \sen

403: where $B_i(p)$ denotes the baryon state and $u_{B_i}(p)$ is the

404: baryon spinor normalized according to

405: \eq

406: \la B_i(p^\prime) | B_i(p) \ra = 2 E_{B_i} \, (2\pi)^3 \,

407: \delta^3(\vec{p}-\vec{p}^{\,\prime})\,, \hspace*{.5cm} \bar

408: u_{B_i}(p) u_{B_i}(p) = 2 m_{B_i}\,. \en The baryon energy and its mass

409: are denoted by $E_{B_i} =\sqrt{m_{B_i}^2+\vec{p}^{\,2}}$ and

410: $m_{B_i}$. The index $i(j)$ attached to the baryon

411: state indicates the flavor of the quark involved in the

412: semileptonic transition, and $F_k^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$ and

413: $G_k^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$ with $k=1,2,3$ are the vector and axial vector

414: semileptonic form factors of the baryons.

415: 

416: The main idea of the above relations is to express the matrix

417: elements of the dressed quark operators in terms of the matrix

418: elements of the bare vector and axial vector quark operators

419: $V_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0)$ and $A_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0)$, respectively, where

420: \eq\label{Operators_VA1}

421: V_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) = \bar q_j(0)

422: \Gamma^{V}_{\mu, k} q_i(0)\,, \hspace*{1cm}

423: A_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) = \bar q_j(0) \Gamma^{A}_{\mu, k} q_i(0)\,,

424: \en

425: with

426: \eq\label{Operators_VA2}

427: & &\Gamma^V_{\mu, 1} = \gamma_\mu\,,

428: \hspace*{.65cm} \Gamma^V_{\mu, 2} = \frac{i \sigma_{\mu\nu}

429: q^\nu}{m_i} \,, \hspace*{.65cm}

430: \Gamma^V_{\mu, 3} = \frac{q_\mu}{m_i} \,, \nonumber\\

431: & &\Gamma^A_{\mu, 1} = \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \,, \hspace*{.3cm}

432: \Gamma^A_{\mu, 2} = \frac{i \sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu}{m_i}

433: \gamma_5\,, \hspace*{.3cm} \Gamma^A_{\mu, 3} = \frac{q_\mu}{m_i} \gamma_5\,.

434: \en

435: Next we specify the expansion of the bare matrix elements

436: $\la B_j(p^\prime)|\,V_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \, |B_i(p) \ra$ and

437: $\la B_j(p^\prime)|\,A_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \, |B_i(p) \ra$

438: in terms of the form factors $V_{lk}^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$ and

439: $A_{lk}^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$ with $(l=1,2,3)$ encoding the effects of

440: the internal dynamics of valence quarks:

441: \seq\label{VA_val}

442: \eq

443: \la B_j(p^\prime)| \,

444: V_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \, |B_i(p) \ra &=& \bar u_{B_j}(p^\prime) \,

445: \biggl( \gamma_\mu \, V_{1k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \, + \, \frac{i

446: \sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu}{m_{B_i}} \, V_{2k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) +

447: \frac{q_\mu}{m_{B_i}}

448: \, V_{3k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \biggr) \, u_{B_i}(p) \,, \\

449: \la B_j(p^\prime)| \, A_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \, |B_i(p) \ra

450: &=& \bar u_{B_j}(p) \,

451: \biggl( \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \, A_{1k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2)

452: \, + \, \frac{i \sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu}{m_{B_i}} \gamma_5

453: \, A_{2k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) + \frac{q_\mu}{m_{B_i}} \gamma_5

454: \, A_{3k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \biggr) \, u_{B_i}(p) \,.

455: \en

456: \sen

457: Combining chiral effects (encoded in the chiral form factors $f_k^{ij}(q^2)$

458: and $g_k^{ij}(q^2)$) and valence quarks effects (encoded in the

459: form factors $V_{lk}^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$ and $A_{lk}^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$)

460: the expressions for the vector and axial vector form factors

461: $F_k^{B_iB_j}$ and $G_1^{B_iB_j}$, which govern the semileptonic

462: transitions between octet baryons, are defined as:

463: \seq\label{FiGi}

464: \eq

465: & &F_1^{B_iB_j}(q^2) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^2

466:    f_k^{ij}(q^2) \, V_{1k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \,, \hspace*{.5cm}

467:    G_1^{B_iB_j}(q^2) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^2

468:    g_k^{ij}(q^2) \, A_{1k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \,, \\

469: & &F_2^{B_iB_j}(q^2) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^2

470:    f_k^{ij}(q^2) \, V_{2k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \,, \hspace*{.5cm}

471:    G_2^{B_iB_j}(q^2) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^2

472:    g_k^{ij}(q^2) \, A_{2k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \,, \\

473: & &F_3^{B_iB_j}(q^2) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^3

474:    f_k^{ij}(q^2) \, V_{3k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \,, \hspace*{.5cm}

475:    G_3^{B_iB_j}(q^2) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^3

476:    g_k^{ij}(q^2) \, A_{3k}^{B_iB_j}(q^2) \,,

477: \en

478: \sen

479: Note that the operators $V(A)_{\mu, 3}^{ij}(0)$

480: are proportional to $q_\mu$, and therefore do not generate

481: contributions to the baryon form factors

482: $F_{1,2}^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$ and $G_{1,2}^{B_iB_j}(q^2)$.

483: Further simplifications occur when we consider the semileptonic

484: coupling constants of baryons at maximal recoil $q^2 = 0$.

485: For the couplings encoding valence quark effects

486: we get the following constraints due to Lorentz covariance and

487: gauge invariance:

488: \eq

489: V_{12}^{B_iB_j}(0) = A_{12}^{B_iB_j}(0) = 0\,, \hspace*{.25cm}

490: V_{31}^{B_iB_j}(0) = {\cal O}(m_{B_i} - m_{B_j}) \,, \hspace*{.25cm}

491: V_{32}^{B_iB_j}(0) = {\cal O}(m_{B_i} - m_{B_j}) \,.

492: \en

493: It is seen that the $V_{31}^{B_iB_j}(0)$ and $V_{32}^{B_iB_j}(0)$

494: couplings start at the first order in SU(3) breaking. In the case of 

495: the couplings $f_k^{ij}=f_k^{ij}(0)$ and $g_k^{ij}=g_k^{ij}(0)$

496: encoding the chiral effects we have the following results 

497: (see details in Appendix~\ref{App_VA_couplings}):

498: 

499: 1) The vector coupling $f_1^{du}$ governing the $d \to u$ transition

500: is trivial and equal to unity --- $f_1^{du} = 1$, because we work in the

501: isospin symmetry limit.

502: In the case of the $s \to u$ transition, the corresponding vector

503: coupling $f_1^{su}$ contains symmetry breaking corrections of second order

504: in SU(3) --- ${\cal O}((M_K^2-M_\pi^2)^2)$ and ${\cal O}((M_K^2-M_\eta^2)^2)$.

505: Note that this is nothing but the statement of the Ademollo--Gatto theorem

506: (AGT) which asserts that the coupling

507: $f_1^{su}$ is protected from {\it first--order} symmetry breaking corrections.

508: 

509: 2) The coupling $f_3^{du}$ vanishes due to isospin invariance,

510: while the coupling $f_3^{su}$ starts at first order in

511: SU(3) breaking~--- $f_3^{su} = {\cal O}( M_K^2 - M_\pi^2 )$.

512: 

513: 3) The axial vector  couplings $g_2^{ij}$ are either equal to zero

514: (e.g. the coupling $g_2^{du}$ governing the $d \to u$ transition) or

515: vanish at the order of accuracy that we are working at (e.g. the coupling

516: $g_2^{su}$ governing the $s \to u$ transition).

517: 

518: The set of Eqs.~(\ref{master})--(\ref{FiGi}) contains our main result:

519: we separate the effects of the internal dynamics of the valence

520: quarks contained in the matrix elements of the bare quark operators

521: $V(A)_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0)$ and the effects

522: dictated by chiral dynamics which are encoded in the relativistic

523: form factors $f_k^{ij}(q^2)$ and $g_k^{ij}(q^2)$. Due to the

524: factorization of chiral effects and the effects of the internal

525: dynamics of the valence quarks the calculation of the form factors

526: $f(g)_k^{ij}(q^2)$ which encode the chiral dynamics, on one side,

527: and the matrix elements of $V(A)_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0)$ which encodes the

528: effects of the valence quarks, on the other side, can be done

529: independently. The evaluation of the matrix elements $V(A)_{\mu,

530: k}^{ij}(0)$ is not restricted to small momenta squared and,

531: therefore, can shed light on baryon form factors at higher

532: (Euclidean) momentum squared in comparison with ChPT. In particular,

533: as a first step, we employ a formalism motivated by the ChPT

534: Lagrangian for the calculation of $f(g)_k^{ij}(q^2)$ which is

535: formulated in terms of constituent quark degrees of freedom. The

536: evaluation of the matrix elements of the bare quark operators can

537: then be relegated to quark models based on specific assumptions on

538: the internal quark dynamics, hadronization, and confinement. Note that

539: Eqs.~(\ref{master})--(\ref{FiGi}) are valid for the

540: calculations of dressed vector and axial vector quark operators of {\it

541: any} flavor content. In Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp} we

542: calculated the vector and axial vector coupling constants

543: $F_1^{B_iB_j}(0)$ and $G_1^{B_iB_j}(0)$.

544: Here we extend our analysis to all six coupling

545: constants $F_i^{B_iB_j}(0)$ and $G_i^{B_iB_j}(0)$ $(i=1,2,3)$.

546: 

547: \subsection{Evaluation of the matrix elements of

548: the valence quark operators}

549: 

550: In this section we discuss the calculation of the baryonic matrix

551: elements

552: \eq\label{matrix_VT}

553: \la B(p^\prime)|\,V_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra\, \hspace*{.5cm}

554: {\rm and} \hspace*{.5cm}

555: \la B(p^\prime)|\,A_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra

556: \en

557: induced by the bare quark operators~(\ref{Operators_VA1}).

558: We will consistently employ the relativistic three-quark model

559: (RQM)~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft} to compute the matrix 

560: elements~(\ref{matrix_VT}). The RQM was previously successfully applied 

561: to the study of the properties of

562: baryons containing light and heavy quarks~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft}.

563: The main advantages of this approach are: Lorentz and gauge

564: invariance, a small number of parameters, and the modelling of effects of

565: strong interactions at large ($\sim 1$ fm) distances.

566: Various properties of light and heavy baryons in electromagnetic,

567: strong and weak decays have been successfully analyzed within this

568: RQM~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft} where the effects of

569: valence quarks have been consistently taken into account.

570: Here we extend this approach to evaluate the effects of valence

571: quarks in the semileptonic decays of the baryon octet.

572: 

573: Let us begin by briefly reviewing the basic notions of the RQM

574: approach~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft}. The RQM is

575: based on an interaction Lagrangian describing the

576: coupling between baryons and their constituent quarks. The

577: coupling of a baryon $B(q_1q_2q_3)$ to its constituent quarks

578: $q_1$, $q_2 $ and $q_3$ is described by the Lagrangian

579: \eq\label{Lagr_str}

580: {\cal L}_{\rm int}^{\rm str}(x) = g_B \bar

581: B(x) \, \int\!\! dx_1 \!\! \int\!\! dx_2 \!\! \int\!\! dx_3 \,

582: F(x,x_1,x_2,x_3) \, J_B(x_1,x_2,x_3) \, + \, {\rm h.c.}

583: \en

584: where $J_{B}(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ is a three-quark current with the

585: quantum numbers of the relevant baryon

586: $B$~\cite{Ioffe:1982ce,Efimov:1987na}. One has

587: \eq

588: J_{B}(x_1,x_2,x_3) \, = \, \epsilon^{a_1a_2a_3} \, \Gamma_1 \,

589: q^{a_1}_1(x_1) \, q^{a_2}_2(x_2) C \, \Gamma_2 \, q^{a_3}_3(x_3)

590: \, ,

591: \en

592: where $\Gamma_{1,2}$ are Dirac structures,

593: $C=\gamma^{0}\gamma^{2}$ is the charge conjugation matrix and

594: $a_i (i=1,2,3)$ are color indices. In Appendix~\ref{App_currents}

595: we list the relevant three-quark currents for the baryon octet.

596: The choice of light baryon three-quark currents has been

597: discussed in detail in Refs.~\cite{Ioffe:1982ce,Efimov:1987na}.

598: 

599: The function $F$ is related to the scalar part of the Bethe-Salpeter

600: amplitude and characterizes the finite size of the baryon. In the

601: following we use a specific form for the vertex

602: function~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft} 

603: \eq\label{vertex_F}

604: F(x,x_1,x_2,x_3)

605: \, = \, N \ \delta^4(x - \sum\limits_{i=1}^3 w_i x_i) \;

606: \Phi\biggl(\sum_{i<j}( x_i - x_j )^2 \biggr)

607: \en

608: where $\Phi$ is the

609: correlation function of the three constituent quarks with masses

610: $m_1$, $m_2$, $m_3$ and $N=9$ is a normalization factor.

611: With the variable $w_i$ defined by

612: $w_i=m_i/(m_1+m_2+m_3)$ the function $\Phi$ depends only on the

613: relative Jacobi coordinates $(\xi_{1}, \xi_{2})$ via

614: $\Phi(\xi^2_1+\xi^2_2)$, where 

615: \eq\label{coordinates_F} 

616: x_1&=&x \, -

617: \, \frac{\xi_1}{\sqrt{2}} \, (w_2+w_3)

618:         \, + \, \frac{\xi_2}{\sqrt{6}} \, (w_2 - w_3)\,,\nonumber\\

619: x_2&=&x \, + \, \frac{\xi_1}{\sqrt{2}} \,  w_1

620:         \, - \, \frac{\xi_2}{\sqrt{6}} \, (w_1 + 2w_3)\,, \\

621: x_3&=&x \, + \, \frac{\xi_1}{\sqrt{2}} \,  w_1

622:         \, + \, \frac{\xi_2}{\sqrt{6}} \, (w_1 + 2w_2)\,,\nonumber

623: \en 

624: and $x \,= \, \sum\limits_{i=1}^3 w_i x_i$ is the center of mass

625: (CM) coordinate. Expressed in terms of the relative Jacobi

626: coordinates and the center of mass coordinate, the Fourier transform

627: of the vertex function reads~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft}: 

628: \eq

629: \Phi(\xi^2_1+\xi^2_2)=

630: \int\!\frac{d^4p_1}{(2\pi)^4}\!\int\!\frac{d^4p_2}{(2\pi)^4}

631: e^{-ip_1\xi_1-ip_2\xi_2}{\widetilde{\Phi}}(-p^2_1-p^2_2) \,.

632: \en

633: The baryon-quark coupling constants $g_B$ are determined by the

634: compositeness condition~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft} (see

635: also~\cite{Weinberg:1962hj,Efimov:1993ei}), which implies that the

636: renormalization constant of the hadron wave function is set equal to

637: zero: 

638: \eq \label{zero} 

639: Z_B = 1 - \Sigma^\prime_B(m_B) = 0 \, 

640: \en

641: where $\Sigma^\prime_B (m_B) = g_B^2 \Pi^\prime_B(m_B)$ is the first

642: derivative of the baryon mass operator described by the diagram in

643: Fig.1, and $m_B$ is the baryon mass. To clarify the physical meaning

644: of Eq.(\ref{zero}) we first want to remind the reader that the

645: renormalization constant $Z_B^{1/2}$ can also be interpreted as the

646: matrix element between the physical and the corresponding bare

647: state. For $Z_B=0$ it then follows that the physical state does not

648: contain the bare one and is described as a bound state. The

649: interaction Lagrangian Eq.~(\ref{Lagr_str}) and the corresponding

650: free components describe both the constituents (quarks) and the

651: physical particles (hadrons), which are taken to be the bound states

652: of the constituents. As a result of the interaction, the physical

653: particle is dressed, {\it i.e.} its mass and its wave function have

654: to be renormalized. The condition $Z_B=0$ also effectively excludes

655: the constituent degrees of freedom from the physical space and

656: thereby guarantees that there is no double counting for the physical

657: observable under consideration. In this picture the constituent

658: quarks exist in virtual states only. One of the corollaries of the

659: compositeness condition is the absence of a direct interaction of

660: the dressed charged particle with the electromagnetic and the weak

661: gauge boson field. Taking

662: into account both the tree-level diagram and the diagrams with the

663: self-energy and counter-term insertions into the external legs

664: (that is the tree-level diagram times $(Z_B -1$)) one obtains a

665: common factor $Z_B$  which is equal to zero~\cite{Efimov:1993ei}.

666: 

667: The quantities of interest---the matrix

668: elements~(\ref{matrix_VT})---are described by the triangle diagram

669: in Fig.2(a). In case of the matrix elements

670: $\la B(p^\prime)|\,V_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$ and

671: $\la B(p^\prime)|\,A_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$ we need to include

672: two additional so-called ``bubble''

673: diagrams in Figs.2(b) and 2(c) which guarantee gauge invariance of the  

674: matrix elements (see details in Refs.~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft}  

675: and~\cite{Mandelstam:1962mi,Terning:1991yt}). In particular, the ``bubble''

676: diagrams are generated by the non-local coupling of the baryon to

677: the constituent quarks and the external gauge field which arises

678: after gauging of the non-local strong interaction

679: Lagrangian~(\ref{Lagr_str}) containing the vertex

680: function~(\ref{vertex_F}). In Appendix~\ref{App_gauge} we present

681: more details of how to restore gauge invariance in the non-local

682: strong interaction Lagrangian~(\ref{Lagr_str}) through the

683: ``bubble'' diagrams in Figs.2(b) and 2(c).

684: Note that the contributions of the bubble diagrams Figs.2(b) and 2(c)

685: to the matrix elements $\la B(p^\prime)|\,V_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$

686: and $\la B(p^\prime)|\,A_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$ are suppressed.

687: In the present application the bubble diagrams contribute less than 5 \%

688: in magnitude compared to the contribution of the triangle

689: diagram in Fig.2(a).

690: 

691: In the evaluation of the quark-loop diagrams we use

692: the free fermion propagator for the constituent

693: quark~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft}: 

694: \eq\label{quark_propagator}

695: i \, S_q(x-y) = \langle 0 | T \, q(x) \, \bar q(y)  | 0 \rangle

696: \ = \ \int\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4i} \, e^{-ik(x-y)} \ \tilde S_q(k)

697: \en

698: where $\tilde S_q(k) = (m_q-\not\! k -i\epsilon)^{-1}$

699: is the usual free fermion propagator in momentum space.

700: The appearance of unphysical imaginary parts

701: in Feynman diagrams can be avoided by postulating the condition that

702: the baryon mass must be less than the sum of the constituent

703: quark masses $M_{B} < \sum_{i}m_{q_{i}}$.

704: 

705: In the next step we have to specify the vertex function

706: $\tilde\Phi$, which characterizes the finite size of the baryons and

707: the internal quark dynamics. In principle, its functional form can

708: be calculated from the solutions of the Bethe-Salpeter equation for

709: baryon bound states~\cite{Ivanov:1998ya}. In

710: Refs.~\cite{Anikin:1995cf} it was found that, using various forms

711: for the vertex function, the basic hadron observables are relatively

712: insensitive to the specific details of the functional form of the

713: hadron-quark vertex form factor.  Using this observation as a

714: guiding principle, we select a simple Gaussian form for the vertex

715: function $\tilde\Phi$ (any choice for $\tilde\Phi$ is

716: appropriate as long as it falls off sufficiently fast in the

717: ultraviolet region of Euclidean space to render the Feynman diagrams

718: ultraviolet finite).  We shall employ the Gaussian form

719: \eq\label{Gauss_CF}

720: \tilde\Phi(k_{1E}^2,k_{2E}^2  ) \doteq

721: \exp( - 18 \ [k_{1E}^2 + k_{2E}^2]/\Lambda^2_B )\,,

722: \en

723: where $k_{1E}$ and $k_{2E}$ are Euclidean momenta and $\Lambda_{B}$

724: is a size parameter which parametrizes the distribution of quarks inside

725: a given baryon. In previous papers~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ft} 

726: we have determined a set of parameters for the light baryons

727: \eq

728: m_u = m_d = 420 \ \ {\rm MeV}\,,

729: \ \ m_s = 570  \ \ {\rm MeV}\,, \ \ \Lambda_B = 0.75 - 1.25 \ \ {\rm GeV}\,

730: \en

731: which gives very satisfactory agreement with a wide class of

732: experimental data. Note that most of the results are not

733: sensitive to the actual values of $\Lambda_{B}$ in the above range. We

734: present some

735: sample results of this approach in Table 1. These are the magnetic

736: moments of the baryon octet and the nucleon electromagnetic radii

737: generated with $m_u = m_d = 420$ MeV, $m_s$ = 570 MeV and $\Lambda_B

738: = 1.25$ GeV.  We show the contributions both of the valence quarks~(3q)  

739: and of the meson cloud. In the present paper we present  

740: a corresponding analysis for the semileptonic coupling constants of

741: the baryon octet using this same set of model parameters.

742: 

743: \subsection{Connection with chiral perturbation theory}

744: \label{sec_ChPT}

745: 

746: As stressed earlier, results for the baryon properties obtained

747: using this approach~\cite{Faessler:2005gd,Faessler:2007pp} satisfy

748: the low-energy theorems and identities dictated by the infrared

749: singularities of QCD~\cite{Becher:1999he},\cite{Gasser:1987rb},% 

750: \cite{Kambor:1998pi}-\cite{Schindler:2006it}.

751: As a result we can relate the parameters of our approach to those of

752: ChPT.  In particular, we have analyzed the chiral expansion of the

753: following properties of the nucleon: mass, magnetic moments, charge

754: radii, the $\pi N$ $\sigma$--term, axial charge and $\pi NN$ coupling

755: constant in SU(2). We have also extended our results to SU(3) including

756: kaon and $\eta$-meson degrees of freedom.

757: 

758: The results are:

759: 

760: 1. Nucleon mass and $\pi N$ $\sigma$--term.

761: \seq\label{mN_chir}

762: \eq

763: m_N &=& \mnz - 4 c_1 M^2 - \frac{3 \gaz^{\!\!\! 2} M^3}{32 \pi F^2} \,

764:  + k_1 M^4 {\rm\ln}\frac{M}{\mnz} + k_2 M^4 + {\cal O}(M^5)\,,\\

765: \sigma_{\pi N} &=& - 4 c_1 M^2 - \frac{9 \gaz^{\!\!\! 2} M^3}{64 \pi F^2} \,

766: + \sigma_1 M^4 {\rm\ln}\frac{M}{\mnz} + \sigma_2 M^4 + {\cal O}(M^5)\,,

767: \en

768: \sen

769: where

770: \eq

771: k_1 &=& \frac{1}{2} \sigma_1 = - \frac{3}{32 \pi^2 F^2 \mnz} \,

772: \biggl( \gaz^{\!\!\! 2}

773: - 8 c_1 \mnz + c_2 \mnz + 4 c_3 \mnz \biggr)\,,

774: \nonumber\\

775: k_2 &=& \bar e_1 - \frac{3}{128 \pi^2 F^2 \mnz} \,

776: \biggl( 2  \gaz^{\!\!\! 2} -  c_2 \mnz \biggr)\,,

777: \nonumber\\

778: \sigma_2 &=& 2 \bar e_1 - \frac{3}{64 \pi^2 F^2 \mnz}

779: \biggl( \gaz^{\!\!\! 2} - 8 c_1 \mnz + 4 c_3 \mnz \biggr)\,, \\

780: \bar e_1 &=& e_1 - \frac{3 \bar\lambda}{2 F^2 \mnz} \biggl(

781: \gaz^{\!\!\! 2} - 8 c_1 \mnz+ c_2 \mnz+ 4 c_3 \mnz \biggr) \,,

782: \nonumber

783: \en

784: and

785: \eq

786: \lambda(\mu) = \frac{\mu^{d-4}}{(4\pi)^2} \,

787: \biggl(\frac{1}{d-4} \, - \, \frac{1}{2} ({\rm ln}4\pi \, + \,

788: \Gamma^\prime(1) \, + \, 1 ) \biggr) \,, \hspace*{.5cm}

789: \bar\lambda = \lambda(\mnz)\,.

790: \en

791: 

792: 2. Magnetic moments and charge radii.

793: \eq\label{mag_mon_chir}

794: \mu_p &=& - \frac{\gaz^{\!\!\! 2}}{8 \pi} \, \frac{M}{F^2} \,

795: \mnz \, + \, \ldots \,, \nonumber\\

796: \la r^2 \ra^E_p &=& - \frac{1 + 5 \gaz^{\!\!\! 2}}{16 \, \pi^2 \, F^2} \,

797: {\rm ln}\frac{M}{\mnz} \, + \, \ldots \,, \\

798: \la r^2 \ra^M_p &=& \frac{\gaz^{\!\!\! 2}}{16 \, \pi \, F^2 \, \mu_p} \,

799: \frac{\mnz}{M} \, + \, \ldots \,,  \nonumber

800: \en

801: 

802: 3. Axial charge $g_A = G_1^{np}(0)$, $\pi NN$ coupling constant

803: and induced pseudoscalar

804: form factor $g_P(q^2) = 2 G_3^{np}(q^2)$.

805: \seq\label{ga_chir}

806: \eq

807: g_A &=& \gaz \biggl( 1 + \frac{4 \bar d_{16} M^2}{\gaz}

808: - \frac{\gaz^{\!\!\! 2} M^2}{16 \pi^2 F^2}

809: + \frac{M^3}{24 \pi \!\mnz \!\! F^2}

810: \biggl( 3 + 3 \gaz^{\!\!\! 2} - 4 c_3 \mnz + 8 c_4 \mnz \biggr)

811: + {\cal O}(M^4) \biggr)  \, \\

812: g_{\pi N} &=& \frac{\gaz \mnz}{F} \biggl( 1 - \frac{\bar l_4 M^2}{F^2}

813: - \frac{4 c_1 M^2}{\mnz} + (4 \bar d_{16} - 2d_{18}) \frac{M^2}{\gaz}

814: - \frac{\gaz^{\!\!\! 2} M^2}{16 \pi^2 F^2} \nonumber\\

815: &+& \frac{M^3}{96 \pi \mnz F^2} ( 12 + 3 \gaz^{\!\!\! 2}

816: - 16 c_3 \mnz + 32 c_4 \mnz) + {\cal O}(M^4) \biggr)

817: = \frac{g_A m_N}{F_\pi} ( 1 + \Delta_{\rm GT} )\,, \\

818: g_P(q^2) &=& 4 m_N F_\pi \frac{g_{\pi N}}{M_\pi^2 - q^2}

819: - \frac{2}{3} m_N^2 g_A \la r_A^2 \ra + {\cal O}(p^2)

820: \en

821: \sen

822: where $\la r_A^2 \ra$ is the axial mean--square radius,

823: $\Delta_{\rm GT} = - 2 d_{18} M^2/\gaz + {\cal O}(M^4)$

824: is the correction~\cite{Becher:2001hv} to the

825: Goldberger-Treiman (GT) relation~\cite{Goldberger:1958tr} which

826: vanishes in the chiral limit (in full equivalence with the

827: prediction of ChPT). Note that the correction $\Delta_{\rm GT}$ is

828: related to the so-called Goldberger-Treiman discrepancy~\cite{Pagels:1969ne}

829: $\Delta_{\rm D} = 1 - (m_N g_A/F_\pi g_{\pi N})$ via~\cite{Schindler:2006it}:

830: $\Delta_{\rm GT} = \Delta_{\rm D}/(1 - \Delta_{\rm D})$.

831: In Eqs.~(\ref{mN_chir})-(\ref{ga_chir}) we use the standard notation

832: for the parameters of the ChPT Lagrangian: $M$ represents the pion

833: mass to leading--order in the chiral expansion, $F_\pi$ is the

834: leptonic decay constant (F is its value in the chiral limit), $\gaz$

835: and $\mnz$ are the axial charge and mass of the nucleon in the

836: chiral limit; $l_i$, $c_i$, $d_i$ and $e_i$ are the low-energy

837: constants (LEC's) with an overline indicating that the corresponding

838: LEC's are renormalized.

839: 

840: In order to reproduce the above model--independent results we need to

841: fulfill the following matching conditions between the parameters and

842: LECs of the ChPT Lagrangian and our chiral quark--level Lagrangian

843: (for the quark level LEC's we use the additional superscript ``$q$'' to

844: differentiate them from the analogous ChPT LEC's) :

845: \seq\label{matching_LECs}

846: \eq

847: & &\frac{\mnz}{m} = \biggl(\frac{\gaz}{g}\biggr)^2 = R^2\,, \\

848: & &- 4 c_1 M^2 = ( \hat m - 4 c_1^q M^2) R^2 \,,\\

849: & &8 c_1  - c_2  - 4 c_3

850: - \frac{\gaz^{\!\!\! 2}}{\mnz} = \biggl( 8 c_1^q - c_2^q - 4 c_3^q

851: - \frac{\gaz^{\!\!\! 2}}{\mnz} \biggr) \ R^2 \,,\\

852: & &\bar e_1 - \frac{3}{64 \, \pi^2 \, F^2}

853: \biggl( \frac{2 \gaz^{\!\!\! 2}}{\mnz}  -  c_2 \biggr)

854: = \biggl( \bar e_1^q - \frac{3}{64 \, \pi^2 \, F^2} \, \biggl(

855: \frac{2 \gaz^{\!\!\! 2}}{\mnz} -  c_2^q \biggr) \, \biggr) \ R^2 \,,  \\

856: & &c_3 - 2 c_4 = c_3^q - 2 c_4^q + \frac{3}{4 \mnz} ( 1 - R^2 ) \,,\\

857: & &\bar d_{16} - \frac{\gaz^{\!\!\! 3}}{64 \pi^2 F^2}

858: = \biggl( \bar d_{16}^q - \frac{g^3}{64 \pi^2 F^2} \biggr) \ R \,,\\[3mm]

859: & &d_{18} = d_{18}^q \ R \,,\\[3mm]

860: & &d_{22} = d_{22}^q \ R \ + \ \gaz \frac{Q}{R}\,,

861: \en

862: \sen

863: where $R = A_{11}^{np}(0)$ and 

864: $Q = (A_{11}^{np}(0))^\prime = dA_{11}^{np}(q^2)/dq^2|_{q^2=0}$.

865: In addition we deduce the following constraints on the form factors

866: encoding valence quark effects:

867: $A_{33}^{np}(0) = R^3$ and $A_{13}^{np}(0) = - 2 m_N^2 Q$.

868: 

869: \section{Rates and asymmetry parameters in semileptonic decays of baryons}

870: 

871: In this section we present detailed theoretical

872: expressions~\cite{Pietschmann:1974ap}-\cite{Kadeer:2005aq} for the

873: decay rates and asymmetry parameters in semileptonic

874: baryon decays.

875: 

876: The decay width is given by the expression~\cite{Pietschmann:1974ap}

877: \eq\label{Gamma_BiBf} \Gamma(B_i \to B_j l \nu_l) = \frac{G_F^2}{384

878: \pi^3 m_{B_i}^3} \ |V_{\rm CKM}|^2 \, (1 + \delta_{\rm rad}) \,

879: \int\limits_{m_l^2}^{\Delta^2} ds  \ (1 - m_l^2/s)^2 \

880: \sqrt{(\Sigma^2 - s) (\Delta^2 - s)} \ N(s) \en

881: where

882: \eq N(s) &=&

883: F_1^2(s) (\Delta^2 (4s - m_l^2) + 2 \Sigma^2 \Delta^2

884: (1 + 2 m_l^2/s) - (\Sigma^2 + 2s) (2s + m_l^2) )\nonumber\\[3mm]

885: &+& F_2^2(s) (\Delta^2 - s)(2 \Sigma^2 + s) (2s + m_l^2)/m_{B_i}^2

886: + 3 F_3^2(s) m_l^2 (\Sigma^2 - s) s/m_{B_i}^2  \nonumber\\[3mm]

887: &+& 6 F_1(s) F_2(s) (\Delta^2 - s) (2 s + m_l^2) \Sigma/m_{B_i}

888: - 6 F_1(s) F_3(s)  m_l^2 (\Sigma^2 - s) \Delta/m_{B_i} \nonumber\\[3mm]

889: &+& G_1^2(s) (\Sigma^2 (4s - m_l^2) + 2 \Sigma^2 \Delta^2

890: (1 + 2 m_l^2/s) - (\Delta^2 + 2s) (2s + m_l^2) )\nonumber\\[3mm]

891: &+& G_2^2(s) (\Sigma^2 - s)(2 \Delta^2 + s) (2s + m_l^2)/m_{B_i}^2

892: + 3 G_3^2(s) m_l^2 (\Delta^2 - s) s/m_{B_i}^2  \nonumber\\[3mm]

893: &-& 6 G_1(s) G_2(s) (\Sigma^2 - s) (2 s + m_l^2) \Delta/m_{B_i}

894:  +  6 G_1(s) G_3(s)  m_l^2 (\Delta^2 - s) \Sigma/m_{B_i}  \,.

895: \en We have introduced the notation: $s = q^2$, $\Sigma  =

896: m_{B_i} + m_{B_j}$, $\Delta  = m_{B_i} - m_{B_j}$, $\beta = (m_{B_i}

897: - m_{B_j})/m_{B_i}$.  The factor $\delta_{\rm rad}$ represents the

898: effect of radiative corrections~\cite{Garcia:1985xz} (see Table 2),

899: $G_F = 1.16637 \times 10^{-5}$ GeV$^{-2}$ is the Fermi coupling

900: constant, and $m_l$ is the leptonic (electron or muon) mass. For the

901: corresponding CKM matrix elements $V_{\rm CKM} = V_{ud}$ or $V_{us}$

902: we use the central values from~\cite{Yao:2006px}: $V_{ud} = 0.97377$

903: and $V_{us} = 0.225$. Also we assume that the form factors are real.

904: 

905: Next we simplify the master formula~(\ref{Gamma_BiBf}), integrating

906: over $s$ and including terms up to ${\cal O}(\beta^7)$ where $\beta

907: = \Delta/m_{B_i}$ is the SU(3) breaking parameter. (In this case the

908: term proportional to $G_3^2$ can be omitted because it already starts

909: at order ${\cal O}(\beta^8)$.)  Also, we include the momentum

910: dependence of the leading form factors $F_1(s)$ and $G_1(s)$ and

911: neglect the momentum dependence of the others. We expand the form

912: factors $F_1(s),G_1(s)$ to first order in $s$:

913: \eq

914: F_1(s) = F_1 (0) (1 + \frac{s}{6} \la r_{F_1}^2 \ra + {\cal O}(s^2))\,,

915: \hspace*{1.5cm} G_1(s) = G_1 (0) (1 + \frac{s}{6} \la r_{G_1}^2 \ra

916: + {\cal O}(s^2) )\,,

917: \en

918: where $\la r_{F_1}^2 \ra$ and $\la

919: r_{G_1}^2 \ra$ are the "charge" radii of the $F_1$ and $G_1$ form

920: factors calculated within our approach ({\it cf.} the numerical

921: results in Sec.~\ref{Sec_numerics}). In addition we retain

922: finite lepton masses. These approximations are sufficient for both

923: the $n \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$ decay and for the muonic decay modes of

924: hyperons. We also retain terms containing the form factors $F_3$ and $G_3$.

925: Although their effects are proportional to $m_l^2$ they may give a

926: measurable contribution for muonic modes (see also the discussion in

927: Ref.~\cite{Kadeer:2005aq,FloresMendieta:2004sk}).

928: 

929: At the order of accuracy to which we work the result for the

930: decay width reads (exact formulas can be found in \cite{Garcia:1985xz,

931: Kadeer:2005aq}):

932: \eq\label{Gamma_BiBf2}

933: \Gamma(B_i \to B_j l \nu_l) &=& \frac{G_F^2}{60 \pi^3} \,

934: |V_{\rm CKM}|^2 \, \Delta^5 \,

935: (1 + \delta_{\rm rad}) \, \Biggl\{ (F_1^2 + 3 G_1^2) (1 -

936: \frac{3}{2} \beta) \, R_0(x) +\beta^2 \biggl( \frac{6}{7} F_1^2 \,

937: R_{F_1}(x)

938:  + \frac{12}{7} G_1^2 \, R_{G_1}(x) \nonumber\\

939: &+& \frac{4}{7}  F_2^2 \, R_{F_2}(x)

940:  + \frac{12}{7} G_2^2 \, R_{G_2}(x)

941:  +  F_3^2 \, R_{F_3}(x) + \frac{6}{7} F_1 F_2 \, R_{F_{12}}(x)

942:  + G_1 G_3 \, R_{G_{13}}(x) \biggr) \nonumber\\

943:  &-& 4 \beta (1 - \frac{3}{2} \beta) (F_1 F_3 \, R_{F_{13}}(x) +

944:      G_1 G_2 \, R_{G_{12}}(x)) \Biggr\} + {\cal O}(\beta^8) \,,

945: \en

946: where $F_i = F_i(0)$, $G_i = G_i(0)$ and $x=m_l/\Delta$.  

947: Here the functions $R_i(x)$ take into account the charged lepton mass  

948: $m_l$ (see their expressions in Appendix~\ref{App_lepton_functions}).

949: In the calculation of the asymmetry parameters we restrict ourselves 

950: to the electron modes. The expressions for the electron--neutrino

951: $\alpha_{e \nu_e}$, electron $\alpha_{e}$, neutrino $\alpha_{\nu_e}$ 

952: and emitted baryon $\alpha_{B}$ asymmetries to the order of accuracy 

953: at which we are working are given in~\cite{Garcia:1985xz}. 

954: 

955: \section{Numerical results}

956: \label{Sec_numerics}

957: 

958: In this section we present our numerical results for the

959: semileptonic decays of the baryon octet---coupling constants, decay

960: widths and asymmetry parameters. First, we calculate the vector

961: $V_{i1}^{B_iB_j}$ and axial vector $A_{i1}^{B_iB_j}$ couplings

962: representing the contribution of the pure valence quarks to the

963: semileptonic form factors of the baryons $F_i^{B_iB_j}$ and

964: $G_i^{B_iB_j}$, {\it i.e.}, when $f_1^{ij} \equiv 1$, $g_1^{ij}

965: \equiv 1$ and $f_{2,3}^{ij} = g_{2,3}^{ij} = 0$. This limiting case

966: corresponds to the projection of

967: the nonrenormalized weak quark current $j_{\mu, V-A} = \bar q_j

968: \gamma_\mu (1 - \gamma_5) q_i$ between the respective baryon states. Our

969: results for $V_{i1}^{B_iB_j}$ and $A_{i1}^{B_iB_j}$ are displayed in

970: Tables 3 and 4. In Table 3, for comparison, we also present the

971: predictions of the naive SU(6) model for the couplings $V_{11}^{B_iB_j}$

972: and $A_{11}^{B_iB_j}$.

973: 

974: Combining the contributions of the valence quarks and chiral effects

975: we then derive the full expressions for the semileptonic couplings

976: constants $F_i^{B_iB_j}$ and $G_i^{B_iB_j}$. The resulting forms are

977: listed in Tables 5, 6 and 7.  For convenience, we present the results

978: for the leading (Fermi) $F_1^{B_iB_j}= f_1^{ij} V_{11}^{B_iB_j}$ and

979: (Gamow-Teller) $G_1^{B_iB_j}= g_1^{ij} A_{11}^{B_iB_j}$ couplings in

980: the form of a product of their SU(3) symmetric value together with a

981: multiplicative factor $1 + \delta_{V,A}^{B_iB_j}$ which includes the

982: SU(3) breaking correction $\delta_{V,A}^{B_iB_j}$.  (We remind the

983: reader that the quark couplings $f_{2,3}^{ij}$ and $g_{2,3}^{ij}$ do

984: not contribute to the leading baryon couplings $F_1^{B_iB_j}$ and

985: $G_1^{B_iB_j}$.)  Note that the axial vector couplings $g_1^{du}$

986: and $g_1^{su}$ defining the $d \to u$ and $s \to u$ flavor

987: transitions, respectively, are expressed in terms of the unknown 

988: LEC's $C_i^q$ and $D_i^q$.  We fix the value of

989: these couplings to be $g_1^{du} = 0.874$ and $g_1^{su} = 0.855$ in

990: order to reproduce the experimental data on the semileptonic decay

991: widths as well as the ratio $G_1/F_1 = 1.2695$ in $n \to p + e^- +

992: \bar\nu_e$ decay.

993: 

994: The nucleon axial charge in the SU(3) limit ({\it cf.}

995: Appendix~\ref{App_VA_couplings})---$g_A^{\rm SU_3}$---is given by 

996: \eq 

997: g_A^{\rm SU_3}=1.258 

998: \en 

999: while the SU(3) breaking parameters, 

1000: $\delta_V^{B_iB_j}$ and $\delta_A^{B_iB_j}$ are found to have the form: 

1001: \eq\label{deltaV} 

1002: & &\delta_V^{\Lambda p}  = - 0.069 \ ({\rm val})  \ + \ 0.070 \  ({\rm ch})

1003: \ = 0.001\,, \nonumber\\

1004: & &\delta_V^{\Sigma n}   = - 0.061 \  ({\rm val}) \ + \ 0.070 \  ({\rm ch})

1005: \ = 0.009\,, \\

1006: & &\delta_V^{\Xi\Lambda} = - 0.048 \  ({\rm val}) \ + \ 0.070 \  ({\rm ch})

1007: \ = 0.022\,, \nonumber\\

1008: & &\delta_V^{\Xi\Sigma}  = - 0.028 \  ({\rm val}) \ + \ 0.070 \  ({\rm ch})

1009: \ = 0.042\,, \nonumber

1010: \en

1011: and

1012: \eq\label{deltaA}

1013: & &\delta_A^{n p}  = 0 \  ({\rm val}) \ + \ 0.009 \  ({\rm ch})

1014: \ = 0.009 \,, \nonumber\\

1015: & &\delta_A^{\Sigma \Lambda}  = 0.024 \  ({\rm val})

1016: \ + \ 0.009 \  ({\rm ch}) \ = 0.033 \,, \nonumber\\

1017: & &\delta_A^{\Lambda p}  = - 0.030 \  ({\rm val})

1018: \ - \ 0.013 \  ({\rm ch}) \ = - 0.043 \,, \nonumber\\

1019: & &\delta_A^{\Sigma n}  = 0.091  \ ({\rm val})

1020: \ - \ 0.013 \  ({\rm ch}) \ = 0.078\,, \\

1021: & &\delta_A^{\Xi \Lambda}  = 0.066 \ ({\rm val})

1022: \ - \ 0.013 \  ({\rm ch}) \ = 0.053\,, \nonumber\\

1023: & &\delta_A^{\Xi \Sigma}  = 0.0085 \ ({\rm val}) \ - \ 0.013 \ ({\rm

1024: ch}) \ = - 0.0045\, \nonumber \en where have denoted the

1025: contributions of valence quarks and chiral effects by

1026: the round brackets (val) and (ch), respectively.

1027: 

1028: Note that the SU(3) breaking corrections to the vector couplings

1029: $g_V^{B_iB_j}$ begin at second order, in accord with the

1030: Ademollo-Gatto theorem (AGT)~\cite{Ademollo:1964sr} (see discussion

1031: in Appendix~\ref{App_AGT}), while corrections to the axial couplings

1032: $g_A^{B_iB_j}$ begin at first order.  In this regard, if one works

1033: to first order in symmetry breaking, our results must be expressible

1034: in terms of a model-independent representation for the axial

1035: couplings derived in terms of the SU(3) symmetric couplings $D$ and

1036: $F$ plus four SU(3)-breaking parameters

1037: $H_i$~\cite{Ademollo:1964sr,Garcia:1974cs} ({\it cf.} the discussion

1038: in Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp})---

1039: \eq\label{gA_theory}

1040: & &g_A^{np} = D + F + \frac{2}{3} (H_2 - H_3) \,, \nonumber\\

1041: & &g_A^{\Lambda p} = - \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}

1042: \biggl( F + \frac{D}{3} + \frac{1}{9} (H_1 - 2 H_2 - 3 H_3 - 6 H_4)

1043: \biggr) \,, \nonumber\\

1044: & &g_A^{\Sigma^- n} = D - F - \frac{1}{3} (H_1 + H_3)

1045: \,, \nonumber\\

1046: & &g_A^{\Sigma^- \Lambda} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}

1047: \biggl( D + \frac{1}{3} (H_1 + H_2 + 3 H_4)

1048: \biggr) \,, \\

1049: & &g_A^{\Xi^- \Lambda} = \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}

1050: \biggl( F - \frac{D}{3} + \frac{1}{9} (2 H_1 - H_2 - 3 H_3 + 6 H_4)

1051: \biggr) \,, \nonumber\\

1052: & &g_A^{\Xi^- \Sigma^0} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}

1053: \biggl( D + F - \frac{1}{3} (H_2 - H_3)

1054: \biggr) \,, \nonumber\\

1055: & &g_A^{\Xi^0 \Sigma^+} = D + F - \frac{1}{3} (H_2 - H_3) \,.

1056: \nonumber \en Such a representation is indeed found to hold in our

1057: model with the values 

1058: \eq\label{matching_DFHi} 

1059: D = 0.7505\,,\hspace*{.25cm} 

1060: F = 0.5075\, 

1061: \en 

1062: for the SU(3) symmetric couplings,

1063: and 

1064: \eq H_1 = - 0.050 \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1065:     H_2 =   0.011 \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1066:     H_3 = - 0.006 \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1067:     H_4 =   0.037 \,

1068: \en 

1069: for the SU(3) breaking terms. The components of

1070: $\delta_A^{B_iB_j}$ which are {\it first} order in symmetry

1071: breaking---$\delta_A^{B_iB_j (1)}$---are proportional to the

1072: couplings $H_i$ via: 

1073: \eq\label{H_i} 

1074: \delta_A^{np (1)} &=& - 2 \delta_A^{\Xi\Sigma (1)} 

1075: \ = \ \frac{2(H_2 - H_3)}{3(D + F)} \,, \nonumber\\

1076: \delta_A^{\Lambda p (1)} &=& \frac{H_1 - 2 H_2 - 3 H_3 - 6 H_4}{3 (D + 3 F)}

1077: \,, \nonumber\\

1078: \delta_A^{\Sigma n (1)} &=& - \frac{H_1 + H_3}{3(D - F)}\,, \nonumber\\

1079: \delta_A^{\Sigma \Lambda (1)} &=& \frac{H_1 + H_2 + 3 H_4}{3 D}\,, 

1080: \nonumber\\

1081: \delta_A^{\Xi \Lambda (1)} &=& \frac{2 H_1 - H_2 - 3 H_3 + 6 H_4}

1082: {3 (3 F - D)} \,. 

1083: \en 

1084: From Eq.~(\ref{H_i}) one obtains a sum rule which relates the corrections 

1085: $\delta_A^{np (1)} = - 2 \delta_A^{\Xi\Sigma (1)}$ to a linear combination 

1086: of the four remaining $SU(3)$ breaking $\delta_A^{(1)}$--parameters 

1087: together with the SU(3)-symmetric couplings $F$ and $D$: 

1088: \eq\label{sum_rule}

1089: \delta_A^{np (1)} = - 2 \delta_A^{\Xi\Sigma (1)} =

1090: \frac{2}{3} \Big( \frac{D - 3F}{D + F} \delta_A^{\Xi\Lambda (1)} 

1091: + \frac{D + 3F}{D + F} \delta_A^{\Lambda p (1)} 

1092: + \frac{3 (D - F)}{D + F} \delta_A^{\Sigma n (1)} 

1093: + \frac{4 D}{D + F} \delta_A^{\Sigma \Lambda (1)} \Big) \,. 

1094: \en

1095: The SU(3) LEC's from the chiral Lagrangian (\ref{L_exp}) can now be

1096: determined.  Three of the four couplings $C_3^q$, $C_4^q$, $\bar

1097: D_{16}^q$ and $\bar D_{16}^q$ can be fixed by use of three

1098: constraints: the value of the nucleon axial charge in the SU(3)

1099: limit $g_A^{\rm SU_3} = D + F = 1.258$ together with the values of

1100: the axial quark couplings $g_1^{du} = 0.874$ and $g_1^{su} = 0.855$.

1101: Keeping, {\it e.g.}, $\bar D_{17}^q$ undetermined we can relate the

1102: remaining three LEC's via: 

1103: \eq 

1104: C_3^q = - 0.319 \ {\rm GeV}^{-1} \

1105: \bar D_{17}^q\,, \hspace*{.25cm} C_4^q = - 0.451 \ {\rm GeV}^{-1} \

1106: \bar D_{17}^q\,, \hspace*{.25cm} \bar D_{16}^q = 0.397 \ \bar

1107: D_{17}^q \,. 

1108: \en  

1109: In turn, the couplings $C_6^q = -1.476$, 

1110: $\bar E_7^q = 0.086$ GeV$^{-3}$, $\bar E_8^q = 0.532$ GeV$^{-3}$ 

1111: are fixed from the description of magnetic moments of the baryon octet, 

1112: while $\bar E_6^q = 1.868$ GeV$^{-3}$ is found from the induced

1113: pseudoscalar form factor of the nucleon.  The coupling $D_{22}^q =

1114: 0.006$ GeV$^{-2}$ is determined by fitting the slope of the form

1115: factor $G_1^{np}$: $\la r_{G_1}^2 \ra = 0.45$~fm$^{2}$. Finally, the

1116: coupling $D_{18}^q = - 0.548$ GeV$^{-2}$ is fixed by the fitting the

1117: central value of the induced pseudoscalar coupling of the nucleon

1118: $g_p = (M_\mu/m_N) G_1^{np}(q^2 = - 0.88 M_\mu^2) \simeq 8.25$

1119: predicted by ChPT~\cite{Bernard:2001rs,Schindler:2006it} together

1120: with the value of the pion--nucleon coupling constant $g_{\pi N} =

1121: 13.10$. It should be noted that the LEC's $C_6^q$, $\bar E_7^q$,

1122: $\bar E_8^q$, $D_{18}^q$ and $D_{22}^q$ are unimportant for

1123: reproducing the semileptonic decay widths because they make no

1124: contribution to the leading baryon coupling constants $F_1^{B_iB_j}$

1125: and~$G_1^{B_iB_j}$.

1126: 

1127: Of particular interest is the decay $\Sigma^- \to n e^- \bar\nu_e$

1128: for which we predict $G_1/F_1 = -0.260$ and $(G_1 - 0.237 G_2)/F_1 =

1129: - 0.278$ (see Table 6). The latter result underestimates the

1130: experimental value $- 0.327 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.019$. However, this

1131: ratio was extracted by neglecting the $q^2$ dependence of the form

1132: factors $F_1$ and $G_1$ in the decay $\Sigma^- \to n e^- \bar\nu_e$

1133: decay. We find (see the discussion below) that inclusion of the

1134: $q^2$ dependence brings about agreement with the data for both

1135: electron and muon decay widths of the decay $\Sigma^- \to

1136: n\,l^{-}\bar{\nu}_{l}$.

1137: 

1138: In Table 7 we present our results for the nonleading  baryon

1139: semileptonic couplings $F_{2,3}$ and $G_{2,3}$. One can see that the

1140: pseudoscalar couplings $G_3^{B_iB_j}$ are dominated by the

1141: corresponding pion or kaon pole contribution. (Here the leading

1142: contribution of the pole term is shown in brackets.)  We also

1143: display the induced pseudoscalar coupling constant of the nucleon

1144: $g_p$, which is fixed by the LEC $D_{18}^q$.  In Table 8 we compare

1145: our results for the ratios $F_2^{B_iB_j}/F_1^{B_iB_j}$: i) with

1146: the predictions of the simple Cabibbo model in terms of the nucleon

1147: magnetic moments and baryon octet masses, ii) with the calculations

1148: performed in the $1/N_c$ expansion of

1149: QCD~\cite{FloresMendieta:1998ii}, and iii) with the results found in the

1150: SU(3) chiral quark-soliton model ($\chi$QSM)~\cite{Ledwig:2008ku}.

1151: Because of SU(2) invariance, we exactly reproduce the result of

1152: the Cabibbo model for the ratio $F_2^{np}/F_1^{np}$ in neutron

1153: $\beta$--decay, while for the other modes we find SU(3) breaking

1154: deviations. Our result for the ratio

1155: $F_2^{\Sigma n}/F_1^{\Sigma n} = - 0.962$ compares well:

1156: i) with the experimental data $(0.97 \pm 0.14)$,

1157: ii) with the results of the $1/N_c$ expansion of

1158: QCD~\cite{FloresMendieta:1998ii} $(- 1.02)$, iii) with the results found

1159: in the $\chi$QSM model~\cite{Ledwig:2008ku} $(-0.96)$, and iv) with

1160: calculations done in quenched lattice QCD~\cite{Guadagnoli:2006gj}

1161: $(- 0.85 \pm 0.45)$.  Also, we have quite reasonable agreement for

1162: $F_2^{B_iB_j}/F_1^{B_iB_j}$ with the results of the $1/N_c$

1163: expansion~\cite{FloresMendieta:1998ii} and with those of the

1164: $\chi$QSM approach for the remaining semileptonic modes.

1165: 

1166: Finally, we would like to stress that our results for the various

1167: semileptonic couplings of the decay mode $\Sigma^- \to n e^-

1168: \bar\nu_e$ are in good agreement with the predictions of the lattice

1169: approach~\cite{Guadagnoli:2006gj}. In Table 9 we give a detailed

1170: comparison with the results of Ref.~\cite{Guadagnoli:2006gj} using

1171: our conventions for the semileptonic matrix elements.

1172: 

1173: It is useful to parametrize our predictions for the weak magnetic

1174: couplings $F_2$ in terms of SU(3) symmetric couplings together with

1175: first order SU(3) symmetry-breaking parameters. As stressed in

1176: Ref.~\cite{Cabibbo:2003ea} there is an ambiguity in expressing the

1177: SU(3) limit that clearly indicates the relevance of the first-order

1178: correction. It means that if in analogy to Eq.~(\ref{gA_theory}) we

1179: introduce a set of parameters $\{F^{F_2}, D^{F_2},

1180: H^{F_2}_i\}$~\cite{Ademollo:1964sr} then we should apply it to

1181: $F_2^{B_iB_j}(0)$ or to $\frac{m_N}{m_{B_i}}F_2^{B_iB_j}(0)$. The

1182: second choice, $\frac{m_N}{m_{B_i}}F_2^{B_iB_j}(0)$, is

1183: traditionally preferred (See discussion in~\cite{Cabibbo:2003ea}. 

1184: The difference is that we in addition multiply $F_2^{B_iB_j}(0)$ by

1185: the nucleon mass $m_N$ to deal with dimensionless coupling).

1186: Otherwise the SU(3) breaking corrections will be overestimated.

1187: Within our model, we determine values for these parameters: 

1188: \eq

1189: D^{F_2}   =  1.237\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1190: F^{F_2}   =  0.563\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1191: H^{F_2}_1 = -0.246\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1192: H^{F_2}_2 =  0.096\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1193: H^{F_2}_3 =  0.021\,, \hspace*{.25cm}

1194: H^{F_2}_4 =  0.030\,. 

1195: \en

1196: 

1197: Also, we can check the consistency of our results with the

1198: model-independent predictions for the second-class coupling

1199: constants ${\cal F}^{B_iB_j} = \frac{m_N}{m_{B_i}}F_3^{B_iB_j},

1200: \frac{m_N}{m_{B_i}}G_2^{B_iB_j}$ to first order in SU(3) breaking,

1201: which can be parametrized in terms of three SU(3) symmetry--breaking

1202: parameters $H_i^{\cal F}$ (see details in~\cite{Ademollo:1964sr}):

1203: \eq\label{H_F2G2}

1204: & &{\cal F}^{n p} = 0 \,, \nonumber\\

1205: & &{\cal F}^{\Lambda p} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} \Big( - H_1^{\cal F} +

1206: 2 H_2^{\cal F} + 2 H_3^{\cal F} \Big)\,,

1207: \nonumber\\

1208: & &{\cal F}^{\Sigma^- n} = - H_1^{\cal F}\,,\nonumber\\

1209: & &{\cal F}^{\Sigma^- \Lambda} = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} H_3^{\cal F}\,,\\

1210: & &{\cal F}^{\Xi^- \Lambda} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}

1211: \Big( 2 H_1^{\cal F} - H_2^{\cal F} - 2 H_3^{\cal F} \Big)\,, \nonumber\\

1212: & &{\cal F}^{\Xi^- \Sigma^0} = - \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}} H_2^{\cal F}\,,\nonumber\\

1213: & &{\cal F}^{\Xi^0 \Sigma^+} = - H_2^{\cal F}\,,\nonumber \en Using

1214: Eq.~(\ref{H_F2G2}) one can derive the following sum rules for the

1215: amplitudes ${\cal F}^{B_iB_j}$: \seq\label{F_sum_rules} \eq {\cal

1216: F}^{\Lambda p} &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} ( {\cal F}^{\Sigma^- n} - 2

1217: {\cal F}^{\Xi^0 \Sigma^+} )

1218: - {\cal F}^{\Sigma^- \Lambda} \,, \label{F_sr_1}\\

1219: {\cal F}^{\Xi^- \Lambda} &=& - \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} ( 2 {\cal

1220: F}^{\Sigma^- n} - {\cal F}^{\Xi^0 \Sigma^+} )

1221: + {\cal F}^{\Sigma^- \Lambda} \,, \label{F_sr_2}\\

1222: - \sqrt{6} ( {\cal F}^{\Lambda p} + {\cal F}^{\Xi^- \Lambda} ) &=&

1223: {\cal F}^{\Xi^0 \Sigma^+} + {\cal F}^{\Sigma^- n} \label{F_sr_3} \,.

1224: \en \sen (Note that the sum rule~(\ref{F_sr_3}) was originally

1225: derived in~\cite{Ademollo:1964sr}.)  When we restrict our

1226: calculation to first-order SU(3) breaking terms, we indeed fulfill

1227: the sum rules (\ref{F_sum_rules}) and for the SU(3)-breaking

1228: parameters we obtain $H_i^{\cal F}$: 

1229: \eq H^{F_3}_1 =   0.032 \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1230:     H^{F_3}_2 = - 0.028 \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1231:     H^{F_3}_3 = - 0.011 \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1232:     H^{G_2}_1 =   0.047 \,, \hspace*{.25cm}

1233:     H^{G_2}_2 = - 0.035 \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1234:     H^{G_2}_3 = - 0.009 \,. 

1235: \en

1236: 

1237: Next we turn to the discussion of the semileptonic decay widths.  We

1238: present our results in Table 10: i) total width $\Gamma$ including

1239: all six couplings $F_{1,2,3}$ and $G_{1,2,3}$, leading $q^2$

1240: dependence of $F_1$ and $G_1$ form factors and radiative

1241: corrections; ii) predictions $\Gamma(F_1,G_1)$ are the results {\it

1242: without} inclusion of the subleading semileptonic form factors

1243: $F_{2,3}$ and $G_{2,3}$; iii) predictions $\Gamma(F_1(0),G_1(0))$

1244: are the total widths without inclusion of the subleading

1245: semileptonic form factors $F_{2,3}$ and $G_{2,3}$ {\it and} of the

1246: $q^2$ dependence in the form factors $F_1$ and $G_1$; iv)

1247: predictions $\Gamma^0$ are total results without radiative

1248: corrections. For comparison we present the results of a pure SU(3)

1249: fit where we include only the $F_1$ and $G_1$ coupling constants

1250: omitting the $q^2$ dependence of $F_1$ an $G_1$ form factors and

1251: subleading form factors $F_{2,3}$ and $G_{2,3}$. The values of $F_1$

1252: and $G_1$ are given by the Cabibbo model~\cite{Cabibbo:2003ea} where

1253: $G_1$ is expressed in terms of the SU(3) couplings $F$ and $D$. We

1254: fix $F$ and $D$ via $F=0.470$ and $D=0.800$. One can observe that

1255: the contribution of the subleading coupling constants $F_{2,3}$ and

1256: $G_{2,3}$ to the semileptonic decay width of the baryon octet is

1257: negligible. On the other hand, inclusion of $q^2$ dependence of the

1258: leading form factors $F_1$ and $G_1$ makes a significant difference

1259: for the $\Lambda \to p$, $\Sigma \to n$ and $\Xi \to \Lambda$ decay

1260: modes.  As stressed above, this $q^2$ dependence inclusion

1261: substantially improves agreement with the data for both decays

1262: $\Sigma^- \to n\,l^{-}\bar{\nu}_{l}\,\,\,(l=e,\mu)$.

1263: Specifically, the $q^{2}$ dependence yields a contribution of $0.78

1264: \times 10^6$ s$^{-1}$ (12\%) to the decay width of $\Sigma^ - \to n

1265: e^- \bar\nu_e$ transition and $0.61 \times 10^6$ s$^{-1}$ (19\%) to

1266: the decay width of $\Sigma^ - \to n \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ transition. 

1267: 

1268: Another interesting point of discussion -- the rate ratio

1269: $R_{e\mu}^0= \Gamma(\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ e^- \bar\nu_e)/ 

1270: \Gamma(\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu)$ 

1271: which has recently been measured by the KTeV

1272: Collaboration ($R_{e\mu}^0 = 55.6^{+22.2}_{-16.7}$~\cite{AlaviHarati:2005ev}). 

1273: Using a much larger data sample the NA48 Collaboration has published a

1274: preliminary value of ($R_{e\mu}^0 = 114.1 \pm 19.4$~\cite{Lazzeroni:2005zd}). 

1275: Our result $R_{e\mu}^0 = 114.81$ nearly coincides with the central value 

1276: of the NA48 Collaboration and is close to the theoretical prediction of 

1277: Ref.~\cite{Kadeer:2005aq}---$R_{e\mu}^0 = 118.71$. Note, that for

1278: the corresponding ratio of the $\Xi^-$ hyperon we find $R_{e\mu}^- =

1279: \Gamma(\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0 e^- \bar\nu_e)/ \Gamma(\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0

1280: \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu) = 77.61$. 

1281: 

1282: For comparison, we present the

1283: $\chi^2$/dof for our total results (the first column of Table 10)

1284: and the SU(3) fit: $\chi^2/8 \ {\rm dof} = 1.4$ [this paper] and 

1285: $\chi^2/8 \ {\rm dof} = 2.4$ [SU(3) fit]. 

1286: (We exclude from the $\chi^2$ analysis the

1287: results for the neutron $\beta$ decay and the poorly known data for

1288: the muonic modes of the cascade hyperons $\Xi$.)

1289: 

1290: As mentioned earlier, we include the momentum dependence of the

1291: $F_1(q^2)$ and $G_1(q^2)$ form factors up to first order in $q^2$.

1292: The slopes for $F_1$ and $G_1$ form factors calculated in our

1293: approach are found to be: \eq \la r_{F_1}^2 \ra  = \left\{

1294: \begin{array}{ll}

1295: 0.66 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & n \to p \\

1296: 0.51 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Lambda \to p \\

1297: 0.59 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Sigma \to n \\

1298: 0.50 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Xi \to \Lambda \\

1299: 0.43 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Xi \to \Sigma \\

1300: \end{array}

1301: \right . \,  \hspace*{1cm} {\rm and} \hspace*{1cm}

1302: \la r_{G_1}^2 \ra  = \left\{

1303: \begin{array}{ll}

1304: 0.45 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & n \to p \\

1305: 0.32 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Lambda \to p \\

1306: 0.40 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Sigma \to n \\

1307: 0.41 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Sigma \to \Lambda \\

1308: 0.30 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Xi \to \Lambda \\

1309: 0.28 \ {\rm fm^2}\,, & \Xi \to \Sigma \\

1310: \end{array}

1311: \right . \,. \en

1312: These predictions for the radii of the $F_1$ and $G_1$ form

1313: factors are consistent both with data and with the results of

1314: alternative theoretical approaches. In particular, the

1315: electroproduction and the neutrino experiments which involve $d \to

1316: u$ transitions are well fitted using dipole formulas which give

1317: $\la r_{F_1}^2 \ra = 0.66$ fm$^2$ and $\la r_{G_1}^2 \ra = 0.40$ fm$^2$

1318: for the slopes of the $F_1$ and $G_1$ form

1319: factors~\cite{Bourquin:1981ba}. For the $s \to u$ modes one expects

1320: smaller radii $\la r_{F_1}^2 \ra = 0.50$~fm$^2$ and $\la r_{G_1}^2 \ra

1321: = 0.30$~fm$^2$, respectively (see discussion

1322: in~\cite{Bourquin:1981ba,Garcia:1985xz}). For example, the authors 

1323: of~\cite{Kadeer:2005aq} find slopes of $\la r_{F_1}^2 \ra = 0.42$~fm$^2$

1324: and $\la r_{G_1}^2 \ra = 0.23$~fm$^2$ for the $\Xi \to \Sigma$ transition

1325: using a generalized vector dominance ansatz for the form factors. In

1326: Refs.~\cite{Lacour:2007wm,Ledwig:2008ku} the $F_1$ form factor radii

1327: have been calculated in the framework of ChPT and of the $\chi$QSM model.

1328: Our results are in qualitative agreement with the full covariant result

1329: of ChPT~\cite{Lacour:2007wm}, while the $\chi$QSM

1330: approach~\cite{Ledwig:2008ku} gives somewhat higher values for the

1331: corresponding slopes: \eq \la r_{F_1}^2 \ra  = \left\{

1332: \begin{array}{ll}

1333: 0.44 \pm 0.06 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (ChPT)};

1334: \ 0.72 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (\chi QSM)}\,,

1335: & \Lambda \to p \\

1336: 0.51 \pm 0.05 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (ChPT)};

1337: \ 0.60 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (\chi QSM)}\,,

1338: & \Sigma \to n \\

1339: 0.45 \pm 0.03 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (ChPT)};

1340: \ 0.66 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (\chi QSM)}\,,

1341: & \Xi \to \Lambda \\

1342: 0.46 \pm 0.07 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (ChPT)};

1343: \ 0.80 \ {\rm fm^2 \ (\chi QSM)}\,,

1344: & \Xi \to \Sigma

1345: \end{array}

1346: \right . \,.

1347: \en

1348: We do not include the $q^2$ dependence of the $F_1$ form

1349: factor in the $\Sigma \to \Lambda$ transition, since it vanishes on

1350: account of the assumed degeneracy of the $u$ and $d$ quark masses.

1351: 

1352: Our approach generates a very reasonable

1353: description of the baryon semileptonic data with only two

1354: parameters---the axial couplings $g_1^{du}$ and $g_1^{su}$

1355: responsible for the $d \to u$ and $s \to u$ transitions, which are

1356: in turn expressed in terms of the parameters of the chiral Lagrangian

1357: (see Appendix~\ref{App_VA_couplings}). We remind the reader that the

1358: parameters controlling the valence quark contributions to the

1359: semileptonic properties of baryons---the constituent quark masses

1360: $m_u=m_d = 420$ MeV, $m_s = 570$ MeV and the size parameter

1361: $\Lambda_B = 1.25$ GeV---have been previously fixed via the analysis

1362: of electromagnetic properties of the baryon

1363: octet~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz,Faessler:2006ky}. Also, the same set of

1364: parameters $(m_u=m_d, m_s, \Lambda_B)$ has been successfully used in

1365: the analysis of strong, electromagnetic and weak decays of charm and

1366: bottom baryons with light baryons in the final

1367: state~\cite{Ivanov:1996pz}. In Table 11 we present the decay rates

1368: of hyperons divided by the squared CKM matrix elements in order to

1369: remove the uncertainty related to the values of $V_{ud}$ and $V_{us}$.

1370: Finally, in Table 12 we display the predictions for the asymmetry

1371: parameters in the electron modes.

1372: 

1373: \section{Summary}

1374: 

1375: In this paper we have analyzed the semileptonic decay properties

1376: (coupling constants, decay widths and asymmetry parameters) of the

1377: baryon octet using a manifestly Lorentz covariant quark approach

1378: including chiral and SU(3) symmetry breaking effects.

1379: 

1380: Our main results are summarized as follows:

1381: 

1382: -- We have derived results for the six couplings governing

1383: the semileptonic decays of the baryon octet, revealing both chiral

1384: and SU(3) symmetry--breaking corrections;

1385: 

1386: -- We presented a numerical analysis of the decay rates and asymmetry

1387: parameters in the semileptonic decays of the baryon octet.

1388: 

1389: Our results provide a generally improved representation of

1390: hyperon semileptonic decay over the conventional SU(3)-symmetric

1391: (Cabibbo) analysis. We hope that the results of this paper can be used

1392: to reliably extract a value of

1393: the CKM matrix element $V_{us}$ from semileptonic hyperon decay data

1394: along the lines of \cite{Cabibbo:2003ea}.

1395: 

1396: \begin{acknowledgments}

1397: 

1398: This work was supported by the DFG under Contract No. FA67/31-1, 

1399: No. FA67/31-2, and No. GRK683.  

1400: B.R.H. is supported by the US National Science Foundation under

1401: Grant No. PHY 05-53304. M.A.I. appreciates the partial support

1402: of the Heisenberg-Landau program and DFG grant KO 1069/12-1.

1403: This research is also part of the EU

1404: Integrated Infrastructure Initiative Hadronphysics project under

1405: contract number RII3-CT-2004-506078 and President grant of Russia

1406: "Scientific Schools"  No. 871.2008.2.

1407: 

1408: \end{acknowledgments}

1409: 

1410: \appendix\section{Chiral expansion of the vector and axial vector

1411: quark couplings}\label{App_VA_couplings}

1412: 

1413: In this Appendix we list the results for the semileptonic vector

1414: and axial quark couplings including chiral corrections

1415: (both SU(3)--symmetric and SU(3)--breaking).

1416: The corresponding SU(3) chiral quark Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{qU}$ is

1417: specified in Sec.II. Below we list the results for the semileptonic

1418: quark couplings $f_{1,2,3}^{du}$, $f_{1,2,3}^{su}$, $g_{1,2,3}^{du}$

1419: and $g_{1,2,3}^{su}$ up to order ${\cal O}(p^4)$ in the

1420: three--flavor picture.

1421: 

1422: 1. Vector quark couplings.

1423: 

1424: a) Couplings $f_1^{du}$ and $f_1^{su}$:

1425: 

1426: The vector coupling governing the $d \to u$ transition is trivial

1427: and equal to unity --- $f_1^{du} = 1$, because we work in the

1428: isospin limit.

1429: In the case of the $s \to u$ transition, the corresponding vector

1430: coupling $f_1^{su}$ contains symmetry breaking corrections of second order

1431: in SU(3) --- ${\cal O}((M_K-M_\pi)^2)$ and ${\cal O}((M_K-M_\eta)^2)$.

1432: Note, that the Ademollo--Gatto theorem (AGT) protects the coupling

1433: $f_1^{su}$ from {\it first--order} symmetry breaking corrections.

1434: The result for the $f_1^{su}$ is

1435: \eq\label{f1_delta}

1436: f_1^{su} = 1 - \frac{3}{16}

1437: \biggl( (1 + 3 g^2) ( H_{\pi K} + H_{\eta K} ) + 3 g^2 ( G_{\pi K} +

1438: G_{\eta K} ) \biggr) = 1 + \delta f_1^{su} \,.

1439: \en

1440: Here $\delta f_1^{su} = 0.07$ is the $SU(3)$ breaking correction.

1441: The ${\cal O}(p^2)$ functions $H_{ab}$ and $G_{ab}$,

1442: which show up in the context of ChPT [see, {\it e.g.},

1443: Refs.~\cite{Leutwyler:1984je,Lacour:2007wm}],

1444: are defined as

1445: \seq\label{fun_HG}

1446: \eq

1447: H_{ab} &=& \frac{1}{(4 \pi F)^2}

1448: \biggl( M_a^2 + M_b^2 - \frac{2 M_a^2 M_b^2}{M_a^2 - M_b^2}

1449: {\rm ln}\frac{M_a^2}{M_b^2} \biggr)

1450: = {\cal O}( (M_a^2 - M_b^2)^2 )\,, \\

1451: G_{ab} &=& - \frac{1}{(4 \pi F)^2} \frac{2\pi}{3m}

1452: \frac{(M_a - M_b)^2}{M_a + M_b} (M_a^2 + 3 M_a M_b + M_b^2) =

1453: {\cal O}( (M_a^2 - M_b^2)^2 ) \,.

1454: \en

1455: \sen

1456: 

1457: b) Couplings $f_2^{du}$ and $f_2^{su}$:

1458: 

1459: The coupling $f_2^{du}$ is expressed through the linear combination

1460: of diagonal couplings $f_2^u$ and $f_2^d$ relevant for

1461: $u \to u$ and $d \to d$ transitions:

1462: \seq

1463: \eq

1464: f_2^{du} &=& \frac{1}{2} (f_2^u - f_2^d)

1465: = f_2^{\rm SU_3} + \delta f_2^{du}\,,  \\

1466: f_2^u &=& \frac{4}{3} f_2^{\rm SU_3} + \delta f_2^{u}\,,  \\

1467: f_3^d &=& - \frac{2}{3} f_2^{\rm SU_3} + \delta f_2^{d}\,,

1468: \en

1469: \sen

1470: where

1471: \eq

1472: f_2^{\rm SU_3} =  C_6^q \biggl( \frac{1}{2}

1473: - \frac{3 g^2 \bar M^2}{32 \pi^2 F^2} \biggl)

1474: + 12 m \bar E_6^q \bar M^2 - \frac{3 g^2 \bar M m}{16 \pi^2 F^2}

1475: \biggl( \pi + \frac{\bar M}{m} \biggr) + {\cal O}(\bar M^3)

1476: \en

1477: is the SU(3) symmetric term, and $\delta f_2^{du}$, $\delta f_2^{u}$

1478: and $\delta f_2^{d}$ are the SU(3) breaking terms.

1479: The first--order terms read:

1480: \seq

1481: \eq

1482: \delta f_2^u    &=& h_2^u (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)

1483: + {\cal O}( (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)^2 ) \,, \\

1484: \delta f_2^d    &=& - 2 \delta f_2^u - \frac{16}{3} m

1485: ( \bar E_7^q - \bar E_8^q ) (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2) \,, \\

1486: \delta f_2^{du} &=& \frac{1}{2} (\delta f_2^u  - \delta f_2^d)\,, \\

1487: h_2^u &=& C_6^q \frac{g^2}{48 \pi^2 F^2}

1488: - \frac{16}{9} m ( 2 \bar E_7^q + 3 \bar E_8^q )

1489: + \frac{g^2 m}{48 \pi^2 F^2 \bar M} \biggl( \pi + \frac{2 \bar M}{m} \biggr)

1490: + {\cal O}(\bar M)\,.

1491: \en

1492: \sen

1493: The coupling $f_2^{su}$ is given by

1494: \eq

1495: f_2^{su} = f_2^{\rm SU_3} + \delta f_2^{su}

1496: \en

1497: where

1498: \seq

1499: \eq

1500: \delta f_2^{su} &=& (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)  h_2^{su}

1501: + {\cal O}( (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)^2 ) \,, \\

1502: h_2^{su} &=& - C_6^q \frac{g^2}{64 \pi^2 F^2}

1503: + \frac{8}{3} m \bar E_7^q

1504: - \frac{g^2 m}{64 \pi^2 F^2 \bar M}

1505: \biggl( \pi + \frac{2 \bar M}{m} \biggr)

1506: + {\cal O}(\bar M)\,.

1507: \en

1508: \sen

1509: Here, for convenience, we define the so--called SU(3) symmetric octet

1510: mass $\bar M$ of pseudoscalar mesons as $\bar M^2 = 2 \bar m B$ with

1511: $\bar m = (m_u + m_d + m_s)/3 = (2 \hat m + m_s)/3$. Also $c_i^q, d_i^q$

1512: and $C_i^q, \bar D_i^q$ are the SU(2) and SU(3) quark low-energy

1513: constants (LEC's). The overline on top of the LEC's denotes

1514: renormalized quantities (see definitions in Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007pp}).

1515: 

1516: c) Couplings $f_3^{du}$ and $f_3^{su}$:

1517: 

1518: The coupling $f_3^{du}$ vanishes due to isospin invariance,

1519: while the coupling $f_3^{su}$ starts at the first order in

1520: SU(3) breaking:

1521: \eq

1522: f_3^{su} = \frac{g^2 m^2}{96 \pi^2 F^2} \,

1523: \frac{M_K^2 - M_\pi^2}{\bar M^2} \, \biggl(

1524: 1 - \frac{3 \pi}{2} \frac{\bar M}{m} - 4 \frac{\bar M^2}{m^2}

1525: + {\cal O}(\bar M^2) \biggr)

1526: + {\cal O}( (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)^2) \,.

1527: \en

1528: 

1529: 2. Axial vector quark couplings.

1530: 

1531: a) Couplings $g_1^{du}$ and $g_1^{su}$:

1532: 

1533: The expressions for the axial vector couplings $g_1^{du}$ and $g_1^{su}$

1534: responsible for the $d \to u$ and $s \to u$ transitions are as

1535: follows:

1536: \seq

1537: \eq

1538: g_1^{du} &=& g_1^{\rm SU_3} + \delta g_1^{du}\,,  \\

1539: g_1^{su} &=& g_1^{\rm SU_3} + \delta g_1^{su}\,,

1540: \en

1541: \sen

1542: where

1543: \eq

1544: g_1^{\rm SU_3} = g \biggl( 1 - \frac{7 g^2 \bar M^2}{48 \pi^2 F^2}

1545: + \frac{\bar M^3}{48 \pi m F^2}

1546: \biggl( 9 + \frac{23}{2} g^2 - 8 C_3^q m + 24 C_4^q m \biggr) \biggr)

1547: + 6 \bar M^2 \bar D_{16}^q + {\cal O}(\bar M^4)

1548: \en

1549: is the SU(3) symmetric term, $\delta g_1^{du}$ and $\delta g_1^{su}$

1550: are the SU(3) breaking terms. Let us display the first--order terms:

1551: \seq\label{delta_g1du}

1552: \eq

1553: \delta g_1^{du} &=& h^{du}_1 (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)

1554: + {\cal O}( (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)^2 ) \,, \\

1555: \delta g_1^{su} &=& h^{su}_1 (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)

1556: + {\cal O}( (M_K^2 - M_\pi^2)^2 ) \,, \\

1557: h^{du}_1 &=& - 2 h^{su}_1 + \frac{g}{48 \pi^2 F^2} (9 + 23 g^2) \nonumber\\

1558: &=& \frac{g}{96 \pi^2 F^2} \biggl( 9 + \frac{59}{3} g^2 \biggr)

1559: - \frac{g \bar M}{96 \pi m F^2}

1560: \biggl( 9 + \frac{11}{2} g^2 - 16 C_3^q m + 24 C_4^q m \biggr)

1561: - \frac{2}{3} \bar D_{17}^q  + {\cal O}(\bar M^2) \,.

1562: \en

1563: \sen

1564: 

1565: b) Couplings $g_2^{du}$ and $g_2^{su}$:

1566: 

1567: The coupling $g_2^{du}$ vanishes in the isospin limit, while the

1568: coupling $g_2^{su}$ is zero at order of accuracy we are working~at.

1569: 

1570: c) Couplings $g_3^{du}$ and $g_3^{su}$:

1571: 

1572: The couplings $g_3^{du}$ and $g_3^{su}$ are related to the couplings

1573: $g_1^{du}$ and $g_1^{su}$ via:

1574: \seq

1575: \eq

1576: g_3^{du} &=& 2 m^2 \biggl( \frac{g_1^{du}}{M_\pi^2} - D_{22}^q - 2 D_{18}^q

1577: \biggr) \,, \\

1578: g_3^{su} &=& 2 m^2 \biggl( \frac{g_1^{su}}{M_K^2} - D_{22}^q - 2 D_{18}^q

1579: \biggr) \,.

1580: \en

1581: \sen

1582: The SU(3) LEC's are fixed by: $C_6^q = -1.476$,

1583: $\bar E_7^q = 0.086$ GeV$^{-3}$, $\bar E_8^q = 0.532$ GeV$^{-3}$ from

1584: the description of the baryon octet magnetic moments, $\bar E_6^q = 1.868$

1585: from the description of the induced pseudoscalar form factor of the nucleon.

1586: The coupling $D_{22}^q = 0.006$ GeV$^{-2}$ is fixed by fitting the slope of

1587: the form factor $G_1^{np}$: $\la r_{G_1}^2 \ra = 0.45$ fm$^{2}$.

1588: The coupling $D_{18}^q = - 0.548$ GeV$^{-2}$ is fixed by fitting the

1589: central value of the induced pseudoscalar coupling of the nucleon

1590: $g_p = (M_\mu/m_N) G_1^{np}(q^2 = - 0.88 M_\mu^2)

1591: \simeq 8.25$ predicted by ChPT~\cite{Bernard:2001rs,Schindler:2006it}

1592: and the value of the pion--nucleon coupling constant

1593: $g_{\pi N} = 13.10$.

1594: 

1595: \section{Three-quark baryon currents and Fierz identities}

1596: \label{App_currents}

1597: 

1598: In this Appendix we specify the baryonic currents used in the main text

1599: following the approach of~\cite{Ioffe:1982ce,Efimov:1987na}.

1600: The three-quark currents of the baryon octet are (we restrict ourselves

1601: to the so-called {\it vector} currents obtained in the SU(3) limit and

1602: without inclusion of terms with derivatives):

1603: \eq

1604: J_p &=& \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3} \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 d^{a_1} u^{a_2}

1605: C \gamma_\mu u^{a_3}  \,, \nonumber\\[2mm]

1606: J_n &=& - \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3} \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 u^{a_1} d^{a_2}

1607: C \gamma_\mu d^{a_3}  \,, \nonumber\\[2mm]

1608: J_{\Sigma^+} &=& \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1609: \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 s^{a_1} u^{a_2}

1610: C \gamma_\mu u^{a_3}  \,, \nonumber\\[2mm]

1611: J_{\Sigma^0} &=& \sqrt{2} \ \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1612: \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 s^{a_1} u^{a_2}

1613: C \gamma_\mu d^{a_3} \,, \\[2mm]

1614: J_{\Sigma^-} &=& \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1615: \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 s^{a_1} d^{a_2}

1616: C \gamma_\mu d^{a_3}  \,, \nonumber\\[2mm]

1617: J_{\Xi^-} &=& - \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1618: \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 d^{a_1} s^{a_2}

1619: C \gamma_\mu s^{a_3}  \,, \nonumber\\[2mm]

1620: J_{\Xi^0} &=& - \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1621: \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 u^{a_1} s^{a_2} C \gamma_\mu s^{a_3}  \,,

1622: \nonumber\\[2mm]

1623: J_{\Lambda^0} &=& \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} \ \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1624: \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 (u^{a_1} d^{a_2} C \gamma_\mu s^{a_3} -

1625: d^{a_1} u^{a_2} C \gamma_\mu s^{a_3} )  \,. \nonumber

1626: \en

1627: where $C = \gamma_0 \gamma_2$ is the charge conjugation

1628: matrix.

1629: 

1630: When generating matrix elements it is convenient to use Fierz

1631: transformations and corresponding identities in order to interchange

1632: the quark fields. First we specify five possible spin structures

1633: $J^{\alpha\beta,\rho\sigma} = \Gamma_1^{\alpha\beta} \otimes (C

1634: \Gamma_2)^{\rho\sigma}$ defining the Fierz transformation of the

1635: baryon currents: \eq\label{Fierz_trans}

1636: P &=& I \otimes C \gamma_5 \,, \nonumber\\

1637: S &=& \gamma_5 \otimes C  \,, \nonumber\\

1638: A &=& \gamma^\mu \otimes C \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \,,  \\

1639: V &=& \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \otimes C \gamma_\mu \,, \nonumber\\

1640: T &=& \sigma^{\mu\nu} \gamma^5 \otimes C \sigma_{\mu\nu} \,. \nonumber

1641: \en

1642: The Fierz transformation of the structures

1643: $J = \{P,S,A,V,T\}$ read

1644: \eq\label{Fierz_trans2}

1645: P &=& \frac{1}{4} \biggl( \tilde P + \tilde S - \tilde A

1646: + \tilde V + \frac{1}{2} \tilde T  \biggr) \,, \nonumber\\

1647: S &=& \frac{1}{4} \biggl( \tilde P + \tilde S + \tilde A

1648: - \tilde V + \frac{1}{2} \tilde T  \biggr) \,, \nonumber\\

1649: A &=& - \tilde P + \tilde S - \frac{1}{2} \biggl(

1650: \tilde A + \tilde V \biggr) \,, \\

1651: V &=& \tilde P - \tilde S - \frac{1}{2} \biggl(

1652: \tilde A + \tilde V \biggr) \,, \nonumber\\

1653: T &=& 3 ( \tilde P + \tilde S)  - \frac{1}{2} \tilde T \,. \nonumber

1654: \en

1655: Viewing the Fierz transformation in terms of a Fierz matrix $\cal{F}$ one

1656: can check that

1657: ${\cal F}^{2}=1$.

1658: Using Eqs.~(\ref{Fierz_trans2}) one can derive useful identities

1659: \eq\label{Fierz_id}

1660: 2 ( P - S ) - A + V &=& 2 ( \tilde P - \tilde S ) - \tilde A + \tilde V \,,

1661: \nonumber\\

1662: 6 ( P + S ) + T &=& 6 ( \tilde P + \tilde S ) + \tilde T \,,

1663: \nonumber\\

1664: V &=& 2 ( P - S) - A - 2 \tilde V \,, \\

1665: T &=& 6 ( P + S) - 2 \tilde T \,. \nonumber

1666: \en

1667: The symbol $\ \tilde{}\ $ is used to denote Fierz-transformed matrices

1668: according to $\tilde J^{\alpha\sigma,\rho\beta} = \Gamma_1^{\alpha\sigma}

1669: \otimes (C \Gamma_2)^{\rho\beta}$ where $\alpha,\beta,\rho$ and $\sigma$ are

1670: Dirac indices.

1671: 

1672: \section{Gauging and matrix elements of the $n \to p W^-_{off-shell}$

1673: transition}

1674: \label{App_gauge}

1675: 

1676: In this section we discuss the issue of gauge invariance in the

1677: context of the calculation of the baryonic matrix

1678: elements

1679: $\la B(p^\prime)|\,V_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$ and

1680: $\la B(p^\prime)|\,A_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$.

1681: The nonlocal structure of the strong interaction Lagrangian leads to

1682: the breaking of local symmetries, which can be restored using

1683: minimal substitution. In our approach we use an equivalent method

1684: suggested by Mandelstam~\cite{Mandelstam:1962mi} based on

1685: multiplying the quark fields with path-ordered exponentials---{\it

1686: gauge exponentials}. As a result of gauging the strong interaction

1687: Lagrangian~(\ref{Lagr_str}) the conventional

1688: triangle diagram in Fig.2a has to be supplemented by the two

1689: additional diagrams in Figs.2b and 2c.

1690: In our previous papers we have concentrated on

1691: electromagnetic processes. For the present application we extend this

1692: procedure to the

1693: electroweak interactions. Following Terning~\cite{Terning:1991yt} we

1694: can show that the Mandelstam method is equivalent to minimal

1695: substitution.  Introducing the doublet of left fermions, $L$,

1696: (without specifying the number of generations), the free Lagrangian

1697: (kinetic term) for $L$ is:

1698: \eq {\cal L}_0^L(x) &=& \bar L(x)

1699: i\!\!\not\!\partial_x L(x)

1700: \to \int dy  \bar L(x) \delta^4(x-y) i\!\!\not\!\partial_y

1701: \biggl[ {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu \Gamma^L_\mu(z)\biggr) L(y)

1702: \biggr]  \nonumber\\

1703: &=& \int dy  \bar L(x) \delta^4(x-y)

1704: {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu \Gamma^L_\mu(z) \biggr)

1705: i\!\not\!\! D_y^L L(y) = \bar L(x) i\!\not\!\! D_x^L L(x)

1706: \en

1707: where $D^L_\mu = \partial_\mu + \Gamma^L_\mu\,,

1708: \hspace*{.25cm} \Gamma^L_\mu = - \frac{ig_{_{W}}}{2}  \vec{W}_\mu \,

1709: \vec{\tau} - \frac{ig_{_{W}}^\prime}{2}  Y_L B_\mu$.

1710: 

1711: By analogy, the Mandelstam method works for the right singlet fields

1712: $R$

1713: \eq

1714: {\cal L}_0^R(x) &=& \bar R(x) i\!\!\not\!\partial_x R(x)

1715: \to \int dy  \bar R(x) \delta^4(x-y) i\!\!\not\!\partial_y

1716: \biggl[ {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu \Gamma^R_\mu(z)\biggr) R(y)

1717: \biggr]  \nonumber\\

1718: &=& \int dy  \bar R(x) \delta^4(x-y)

1719: {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu \Gamma^R_\mu(z) \biggr)

1720: i\!\not\!\! D_y^R R(y) = \bar R(x) i\!\not\!\! D_x^R R(x)

1721: \en

1722: where

1723: $D^R_\mu = \partial_\mu + \Gamma^R_\mu\,,

1724: \hspace*{.25cm} \Gamma^R_\mu = - \frac{ig_{_{W}}^\prime}{2} Y_R

1725: B_\mu$. We employ the standard notation: $W_\mu^i$ (i=1,2,3) and

1726: $B_\mu$ are the gauge bosons, $g_{_{W}}$ and $g_{_{W}}^\prime$ are

1727: the corresponding coupling constants (to distinguish them from the

1728: axial charge of the quark we attach the subscript $W$), $Y_L$ and $Y_R$

1729: are the hypercharges of the left and right quarks, respectively. The set

1730: of the physical states of the gauge bosons ($W^\pm$, $Z^0$, $A$) is

1731: connected to the set ($W^i$, $B$) via

1732: \eq\label{WZA}

1733: W^\pm_\mu = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (W^1_\mu \mp i W^2_\mu) \,,

1734: Z^0_\mu   = \cos\theta_{_{W}} W^3_\mu - \sin\theta_{_{W}} B_\mu \,,

1735: \hspace*{.25cm} \

1736: A_\mu     = \sin\theta_{_{W}} W^3_\mu + \cos\theta_{_{W}} B_\mu

1737: \,,

1738: \en

1739: where $\theta_{_{W}}$ is the Weinberg angle which relates the

1740: electromagnetic coupling constant $e$ and the

1741: couplings $g_{_{W}}$ and $g_{_{W}}^\prime$ via

1742: $e = g_{_{W}} \sin\theta_{_{W}} =  g_{_{W}}^\prime \sin\theta_{_{W}}$.

1743: The quantities $\Gamma^L_\mu$ and $\Gamma^R_\mu$ in terms of ($W^\pm$,

1744: $Z^0$, $A$) fields are given by

1745: \seq\label{GLGR}

1746: \eq

1747: \Gamma^L_\mu &=& -

1748: \frac{ig_{_{W}}}{\sqrt{2}}  (W^+_\mu \tau^+ + W^-_\mu \tau^-) - i e

1749: \tan\theta_{_{W}} Z^0_\mu \biggl(

1750: \frac{\tau_3}{2\sin^2\theta_{_{W}}} - Q \biggr)

1751: - i e Q A_\mu \,, \label{GL}\\

1752: \Gamma^R_\mu &=&  \frac{ie}{2} \tan\theta_{_{W}}  Z^0_\mu  - i e Q

1753: A_\mu \,. \label{GR}

1754: \en

1755: \sen

1756: In the case of the strong

1757: baryon--three--quark interaction Lagrangian it is not necessary to

1758: rewrite the Lagrangian in terms of left quark doublets and right singlets.

1759: Instead we merely substitute each quark field $q$ by its left-handed

1760: $q_L = (1 - \gamma_5) q /2$ and right--handed $q_R = (1 + \gamma_5)

1761: q /2$ components. Then we proceed with the gauging of the theory. We

1762: only need to know the gauging for the quarks of specific flavor and

1763: handedness---{\it e.g.}, for the left--handed $u_L$, $d_L$ and $s_L$

1764: and the right-handed $q_R = u_R$, $d_R$ and $s_R$ quarks the gauging

1765: is \seq\label{gauging} \eq u_L(y) &\to& {\cal P}\exp\biggl(

1766: \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu \Gamma^L_\mu(z) \biggr)_{11} u_L(y) + {\cal

1767: P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu

1768: \Gamma^L_\mu(z) \biggr)_{12} d_L^\prime(y) \,, \label{gauging_uL}\\

1769: d_L(y) &\to& {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu

1770: \Gamma^L_\mu(z) \biggr)_{21} u_L^\prime(y)

1771: + {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu

1772: \Gamma^L_\mu(z) \biggr)_{22} d_L^\prime(y) \,, \label{gauging_dL}\\

1773: s_L(y) &\to& {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu

1774: \Gamma^L_\mu(z) \biggr)_{21} c_L^\prime(y)

1775: + {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu

1776: \Gamma^L_\mu(z) \biggr)_{22} s_L^\prime(y)\,, \label{gauging_sL}\\

1777: q_R(y) &\to& {\cal P}\exp\biggl( \int\limits_x^y dz^\mu

1778: \Gamma^R_\mu(z) \biggr) q_R(y)  \label{gauging_qR}

1779: \en

1780: \sen

1781: where $(ij)$ are pairs of flavor indices.

1782: The mixed left-handed quark fields are defined as:

1783: \eq

1784: u_L^\prime &=& V_{ud}^\dagger u_L + V_{cd}^\dagger c_L

1785: + V_{td}^\dagger t_L \,, \nonumber\\[1mm]

1786: d_L^\prime &=& V_{ud} d_L + V_{us} s_L + V_{ub} b_L \,, \nonumber\\[1mm]

1787: c_L^\prime &=& V_{us}^\dagger u_L + V_{cs}^\dagger c_L

1788: + V_{ts}^\dagger t_L \,,  \\[1mm]

1789: s_L^\prime &=& V_{cd} d_L + V_{cs} s_L + V_{cb} b_L \,. \nonumber

1790: \en

1791: In the derivation of Eqs.~(\ref{gauging_dL}) and (\ref{gauging_sL})

1792: we have used the unitarity condition

1793: $\sum\limits_{k} V_{ik} V_{jk}^\dagger \, = \, \delta_{ij}$

1794: for the CKM matrix elements, which leads to the useful identities:

1795: \eq

1796: d_L &=& d_L^\prime V_{ud}^\dagger

1797:       + s_L^\prime V_{cd}^\dagger

1798:       + b_L^\prime V_{td}^\dagger \,, \nonumber\\

1799: s_L &=& d_L^\prime V_{us}^\dagger

1800:       + s_L^\prime V_{cs}^\dagger

1801:       + b_L^\prime V_{ts}^\dagger \,, \\

1802: b_L &=& d_L^\prime V_{ub}^\dagger

1803:       + s_L^\prime V_{cb}^\dagger

1804:       + b_L^\prime V_{tb}^\dagger \,. \nonumber

1805: \en

1806: In the present manuscript we restrict our considerations to

1807: semileptonic processes ({\it i.e.}, processes with a single

1808: intermediate off--shell charged weak gauge boson $W^\pm$). Therefore,

1809: we expand

1810: the gauge exponentials and keep only the term linear in $W^\pm$

1811: which gives a correction to the weak current (in addition to the

1812: standard term which comes from the gauging of the free quark

1813: Lagrangian). This is a rather important point. The use of nonlocal

1814: Lagrangians automatically requires an extension of the conventional

1815: currents dictated by the local symmetries. In addition we have an

1816: extra piece from ``gauging'' the strong Lagrangian which

1817: contains derivatives acting on quark fields.

1818: 

1819: For illustration we derive the weak current which governs the

1820: $n \to p W^-$ transition. The first contribution comes from

1821: ``gauging'' the free Lagrangian:

1822: \eq

1823: J^\mu_{1}(x) \ = \ \frac{g_{_{W}}}{\sqrt{2}}

1824: V_{ud} \ \bar u_L(x) \ \gamma^\mu \ d_L(x) \ = \

1825: \frac{g_{_{W}}}{2\sqrt{2}} V_{ud} \ \bar u(x) \ O^\mu \ d(x)

1826: \en

1827: where $O^\mu = \gamma^\mu (1 - \gamma^5)$.

1828: 

1829: To derive the contribution due to ``gauging'' the strong interaction

1830: Lagrangian we take the three--quark currents of the proton and neutron and

1831: proceed as follows:

1832: 

1833: \begin{itemize}

1834: 

1835: \item We express the quark fields in terms of left-- and right--handed fields.

1836: One obtains:

1837: \eq

1838: J_p &=& \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3} \, \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \,

1839: (d^{a_1}_L + d^{a_1}_R) \, ( u^{a_2}_L  C \gamma_\mu u^{a_3}_R

1840: \ + \ u^{a_2}_R  C \gamma_\mu u^{a_3}_L )

1841: \,, \nonumber \\

1842: J_n &=& - \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3} \, \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \,

1843: (u^{a_1}_L + u^{a_1}_R) \,  ( d^{a_2}_L  C \gamma_\mu d^{a_3}_R

1844: \ + \ d^{a_2}_R  C \gamma_\mu d^{a_3}_L )

1845: \,. \nonumber

1846: \en

1847: \item We perform the gauging using the master formulas (\ref{gauging})

1848: and after some simple algebra we derive the ``nonlocal'' contributions

1849: to the weak current associated with the $d \to u$ flavor exchange:

1850: \eq

1851: J^\mu_{2}(x) \ = \ \int dy

1852: \frac{\delta{\cal L}^{weak}_{BB^\prime}(y)}{\delta W_\mu^+(x)}

1853: \en

1854: where

1855: \eq

1856: \hspace*{-.7cm}{\cal L}_{np}^{weak}(x) &=&

1857: \frac{g_{_{W}} g_{_{N}}}{\sqrt{2}}

1858: \, V_{ud} \, \bar p(x) \, \int dx_{123} \,

1859: F(x,x_1,x_2,x_3) \, \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3} \,

1860: \gamma^\mu\gamma^5 \, d^{a_1}(x_1)  d^{a_2}(x_2)

1861: C \gamma_\mu (1 + \gamma_5) u^{a_3}(x_3) \, I(x_2,x,W^+)

1862: \nonumber\\

1863: &-& \frac{g_{_{W}} g_{_{N}}}{\sqrt{2}}  \, V_{ud}^\dagger \,

1864: \bar n(x) \, \int dx_{123} \,

1865: F(x,x_1,x_2,x_3) \, \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1866: \, \gamma^\mu\gamma^5 \, u^{a_1}(x_1)

1867: u^{a_2}(x_2) C \gamma_\mu (1 + \gamma_5) d^{a_3}(x_3) \, I(x_2,x,W^-)

1868: \nonumber\\

1869: &+& {\rm H.c.} \en Using the Fierz transformation (see

1870: Appendix~\ref{App_currents}) the Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{np}^{weak}$ can

1871: be written in a more convenient form \eq \hspace*{-.7cm}{\cal

1872: L}_{np}^{weak}(x) &=& - \frac{g_{_{W}} g_{_{N}}}{2 \sqrt{2}} \,

1873: V_{ud} \, \bar p(x) \, \int dx_{123} \, F(x,x_1,x_2,x_3) \,

1874: \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3} \, \, \gamma^\mu (1 + \gamma^5) \,

1875: u^{a_1}(x_1)  d^{a_2}(x_2) C \gamma_\mu  d^{a_3}(x_3) \,

1876: I(x_2,x,W^+)

1877: \nonumber\\

1878: &+& \frac{g_{_{W}} g_{_{N}}}{2 \sqrt{2}}

1879: \, V_{ud}^\dagger \, \bar n(x) \, \int dx_{123} \,

1880: F(x,x_1,x_2,x_3) \, \varepsilon^{a_1a_2a_3}

1881: \, \gamma^\mu (1 + \gamma^5) \, d^{a_1}(x_1)

1882: u^{a_2}(x_2) C \gamma_\mu u^{a_3}(x_3) \, I(x_2,x,W^-)

1883: \nonumber\\

1884: &+& {\rm H.c.}

1885: \en

1886: where $\int dx_{123} = \int dx_1 \int dx_2 \int dx_3$

1887: and $I(x_2,x,W^\pm) = \int\limits_x^{x_2} dz^\mu W^\pm_\mu(z)$.

1888: 

1889: \item We remind the reader that the function $F(x,x_1,x_2,x_3)$ is related to

1890: the scalar part of the Bethe-Salpeter amplitude and characterizes the

1891: finite size of the baryon. We use a particular form

1892: for the vertex function defined in Eq.~(\ref{vertex_F}).

1893: 

1894: \item The current $J^\mu_{1}(x)$ generates the triangle diagram (the left

1895: diagram in Fig.1) contributing to the $n \to p W^-$ transition,

1896: while the current $J^\mu_{2}(x)$ generates the bubble diagrams (the

1897: central and right diagram in Fig.1). By analogy one can derive the

1898: currents which govern the other six modes.

1899: 

1900: \item A crucial check of our gauging procedure is to check the

1901: vector and axial-vector Ward-Takahashi identities (WTI)

1902: involving matrix elements of the $n \to p W^-$ transition. In general,

1903: for an off-shell neutron and proton with momentum $p$ and $p^\prime$,

1904: respectively, and the momentum transfer $q = p^\prime - p$,

1905: it is convenient to write down the corresponding weak matrix elements

1906: associated with the vector and axial vector current in the form

1907: (here and in the following we omit the weak coupling $g$ and

1908: the CKM matrices in the matrix elements):

1909: \eq

1910: \Lambda_\mu^V(p,p^\prime) = \Lambda_\mu^{V; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime) +

1911: \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} \, \biggl[ \Sigma_N(p^\prime) - \Sigma_N(p) \biggr]

1912: \en

1913: and

1914: \eq

1915: \Lambda_\mu^A(p,p^\prime) = \Lambda_\mu^{A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime)

1916: - \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} \,

1917: \biggl[ \gamma^5 \, \Sigma_N(p) + \Sigma_N(p^\prime) \, \gamma^5 \biggr]

1918: + \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} \biggl[ 2 m_q \, \Lambda_P(p,p^\prime) \biggr] \,.

1919: \en

1920: Here, $\Lambda_\mu^{V; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime)$ and

1921: $\Lambda_\mu^{A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime)$ are the contributions to the

1922: vector and axial vector matrix elements orthogonal to the $W$-boson

1923: (or leptonic pair) momenta; $\Sigma_N(p)$ is the nucleon mass operator

1924: and $\Lambda_P(p,p^\prime)$ is the pseudoscalar nucleon vertex function.

1925: 

1926: Then, the vector and axial vector WTI are satisfied according to

1927: \seq

1928: \eq

1929: q^\mu \ \Lambda_\mu^V(p,p^\prime) &=&

1930: \Sigma_N(p^\prime) - \Sigma_N(p)  \,\\

1931: q^\mu \ \Lambda_\mu^A(p,p^\prime) &=&

1932: - \gamma^5 \, \Sigma_N(p) - \Sigma_N(p^\prime) \, \gamma^5

1933: + 2 \, m_q \, \Lambda_P(p,p^\prime) \,.

1934: \en

1935: \sen

1936: In our derivation we have made use of the quark-level identities

1937: \seq

1938: \eq

1939: S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) \gamma_\mu S_{q_1}(k+p) &=&

1940: S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) \gamma_\mu^\perp S_{q_1}(k+p)

1941: + \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} [S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) - S_{q_1}(k+p)] \nonumber\\

1942: &+& \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} (m_{q_2} - m_{q_1})

1943: S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) S_{q_1}(k+p) \,,\\

1944: S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) \gamma_\mu\gamma_5 S_{q_1}(k+p) &=&

1945: S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) (\gamma_\mu\gamma_5)^\perp S_{q_1}(k+p) -

1946:  \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} [\gamma_5 S_{q_1}(k+p) + S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime)\gamma_5]

1947: \nonumber\\

1948: &+& \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} (m_{q_1} + m_{q_2})

1949: S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) \gamma_5 S_{q_1}(k+p) \,

1950: \en

1951: \sen

1952: which lead to the vector and axial vector WTI on the quark level:

1953: \seq

1954: \eq

1955: \hspace*{-1.2cm}

1956: q^\mu \ S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) \gamma_\mu S_{q_1}(k+p) &=&

1957: S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) - S_{q_1}(k+p)

1958: \ + \ (m_{q_2} - m_{q_1}) S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) S_{q_1}(k+p) \,,\\

1959: \hspace*{-1.2cm}

1960: q^\mu \ S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) \gamma_\mu\gamma_5 S_{q_1}(k+p)

1961: &=& - S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime)\gamma_5 - \gamma_5 S_{q_1}(k+p)

1962: \ + \ (m_{q_1} + m_{q_2}) S_{q_2}(k+p^\prime) \gamma_5 S_{q_1}(k+p)\,.

1963: \en

1964: \sen

1965: We have introduced the notation

1966: $\Gamma_\mu^\perp = \Gamma^\nu ( g_{\mu\nu} - q_\mu q_ \nu/q^2 )$

1967: for the so-called Dirac matrices orthogonal to the transverse momentum $q$.

1968: All three diagrams contribute to

1969: $\Lambda_\mu^{V; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime)$ and

1970: $\Lambda_\mu^{A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime)$

1971: \eq

1972: \Lambda_\mu^{V-A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime) \ = \

1973: \Lambda_{\mu, \, \Delta}^{V-A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime) \ + \

1974: \Lambda_{\mu, \, \circ_L}^{V-A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime) \ + \

1975: \Lambda_{\mu, \, \circ_R}^{V-A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime)

1976: \en

1977: where

1978: \seq

1979: \eq

1980: \Lambda_{\mu, \, \Delta}^{V-A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime) &=&

1981: - \alpha_N \, \int dk_{123} \tilde\Phi(z_0) \,

1982: \tilde\Phi[z_0 + z_2(q)] \nonumber\\

1983: &\times& \Gamma_{1f} S_q(k_1^+) \gamma^\beta\gamma^5

1984: \, {\rm tr} [\Gamma_{2f} S_q(k_2^++q) O_\mu^\perp S_q(k_2^+)

1985: \gamma_\beta S_q(-k_3^+)] \\

1986: \Lambda_{\mu, \, \circ_L}^{V-A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime) &=&

1987: \alpha_N \, \int dk_{123} \,\, \, L_{2 \mu}^\perp \,

1988: \tilde\Phi(z_0) \, \int\limits_0^1 \, dt \,

1989: \tilde\Phi^\prime[z_0 + t z_2(-q)] \nonumber\\

1990: &\times&\gamma^\alpha \gamma^5 S_q(k_1^{\prime +})

1991: \gamma^\beta (1 + \gamma^5)

1992: \, {\rm tr}[\gamma_\alpha S_q(k^{\prime +}_2)

1993: \gamma_\beta S_q(-k^{\prime +}_3)]

1994: \,, \\

1995: \Lambda_{\mu, \, \circ_R}^{V-A; \, \perp}(p,p^\prime) &=&

1996: \alpha_N \,  \int dk_{123} \,\, \, L_{2 \mu}^\perp \,

1997: \tilde\Phi(z_0) \, \int\limits_0^1 \, dt \,

1998: \tilde\Phi^\prime[z_0 + t z_2(q)] \nonumber\\

1999: &\times&\gamma^\alpha (1 + \gamma^5) S_q(k_1^+) \gamma^\beta

2000: \gamma^5 \, {\rm tr}[\gamma_\alpha S_q(k^+_2) \gamma_\beta

2001: S_q(-k^+_3)] \,.

2002: \en

2003: \sen

2004: Here

2005: $\Gamma_{1f} \otimes \Gamma_{2f} \ = \

2006: \gamma^\alpha \gamma^5 \otimes \gamma_\alpha - \gamma^\alpha \otimes

2007: \gamma_\alpha \gamma_5 + 2 I \otimes \gamma_5 - 2 \gamma_5 \otimes I$.

2008: 

2009: The expressions for $\Sigma_N(p)$ and $\Lambda_P(p,p^\prime)$ are given

2010: by

2011: \eq

2012: \Sigma_N(p) = - \alpha_N \int dk_{123} \tilde\Phi^2(z_0)

2013: \gamma^\alpha \gamma^5 S_q(k_1^+) \gamma^\beta \gamma^5

2014: \, {\rm tr}[\gamma_\alpha S_q(k_2^+) \gamma_\beta S_q(-k_3^+)]

2015: \en

2016: and

2017: \eq

2018: \Lambda_P(p,p^\prime) = - \alpha_N \int dk_{123}

2019: \tilde\Phi(z_0) \, \tilde\Phi[z_0 + z_2(q)]

2020: \Gamma_{1f} S_q(k_1^+) \gamma^\beta\gamma^5

2021: \, {\rm tr} [\Gamma_{2f} S_q(k_2^++q) \gamma_5 S_q(k_2^+) \gamma_\beta

2022: S_q(-k_3^+)] \,.

2023: \en

2024: We have used the notations from our paper on magnetic moments of

2025: heavy baryons~\cite{Faessler:2006ft}:

2026: \eq

2027: \alpha_B &=& 6 \, g_{B}^{2}\,, \quad k_i^+ \, = \, k_i + p \omega_i\,,

2028: \quad k_i^{\prime \, +} \, = \, k_i + p^\prime \omega_i\,,

2029: \quad z_0 \, = \,  - 6(k_{1}^{2}+k_{2}^{2}+k_{3}^{2})\,

2030: \nonumber\\

2031: dk_{123} &=& \frac{d^{4}k_{1}d^{4}k_{2}d^{4}k_{3}}{(2\pi)^8 i^2}

2032: \, \delta^{4}(k_{1}+k_{2}+k_{3})  \,, \quad

2033: L_i \, = \, 12 (k_i - \sum\limits_{j=1}^3 k_j \omega_j) \,, \\

2034: z_1(q) &=& - 12q^{2}(\omega_{2}^{2}+\omega_{2}\omega_{3}

2035: +\omega_{3}^{2}) - L_1 q \,, \nonumber\\

2036: z_2(q) &=& - 12q^{2}(\omega_{1}^{2}+\omega_{1}\omega_{3}

2037: +\omega_{3}^{2}) - L_2 q \,, \nonumber\\

2038: z_3(q) &=& - 12q^{2}(\omega_{1}^{2}+\omega_{1}\omega_{2}

2039: +\omega_{2}^{2}) - L_3 q \,. \nonumber

2040: \en

2041: \end{itemize}

2042: By analogy one can derive the matrix elements

2043: $\la B(p^\prime)|\,V_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$ and

2044: $\la B(p^\prime)|\,A_{\mu, 1}^{ij}(0) \,|B(p) \ra$

2045: for the other six modes.

2046: 

2047: \section{Functions $R_i(x)$}

2048: \label{App_lepton_functions}

2049: 

2050: In this Appendix we write down the functions $R_i(x=m_l/\Delta)$:

2051: \eq

2052: R_0(x) &=& \sqrt{1 - x^2} \biggl(1 - \frac{9}{2} x^2 - 4 x^4 \biggr)

2053: + \frac{15}{4} x^4 \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}}\,,

2054: \nonumber\\[2mm]

2055: R_{F_1}(x) &=& R_{F_1}^{0}(x) + \frac{m_{B_i}^2}{9} \la r^2_{F_1} \ra

2056: R_{F_1}^{q^2}(x)\,,\nonumber\\[2mm]

2057: R_{F_1}^{0}(x) &=& \sqrt{1 - x^2} \biggl(1 - \frac{45}{8} x^2

2058: - \frac{37}{4} x^4 + \frac{3}{4} x^6 \biggr) + \frac{105}{16} x^4

2059: \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}}\,,\nonumber\\[2mm]

2060: R_{F_1}^{q^2}(x) &=& \sqrt{1 - x^2} \biggl(1 + 4 x^2

2061: + \frac{271}{4} x^4 + 6 x^6 \biggr) - \frac{105}{4} x^4

2062: ( 1 + \frac{x^2}{2} ) \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}}\,,

2063: \nonumber\\[2mm]

2064: R_{G_1}(x) &=& R_{G_1}^{0}(x) +

2065: \frac{5 m_{B_i}^2}{18} \la r^2_{G_1} \ra R_{G_1}^{q^2}(x) \,,\nonumber\\[2mm]

2066: R_{G_1}^{0}(x) &=& \sqrt{1 - x^2} \biggl(1 - \frac{83}{16} x^2

2067: - \frac{173}{24} x^4 + \frac{11}{24} x^6 \biggr) + \frac{175}{32} x^4

2068: \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}} \,,\\[2mm]

2069: R_{G_1}^{q^2}(x) &=& \sqrt{1 - x^2} \biggl(1 - \frac{8}{5} x^2

2070: + \frac{319}{20} x^4 + \frac{2}{5} x^6 \biggr) - \frac{21}{4} x^4

2071: ( 1 + \frac{x^2}{2} ) \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}}\,,

2072: \nonumber\\[2mm]

2073: R_{F_2}(x) &=& R_{F_{12}}(x^2) = \sqrt{1 - x^2}

2074: \biggl(1 - \frac{19}{4} x^2 + \frac{87}{8} x^4 + 6 x^6 \biggr)

2075: - \frac{105}{16} x^6 \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}}

2076: \,,\nonumber\\[1mm]

2077: R_{F_3}(x) &=& x^2 R_0(x)\,, \hspace*{1cm}

2078: R_{G_2}(x) \ = \  (1 - x^2)^{7/2}\,,\nonumber\\[2mm]

2079: R_{F_{13}}(x) &=& \frac{5}{4} x^2 \sqrt{1 - x^2} \biggl(1 + \frac{13}{2}

2080: x^2 \biggr) -  \frac{15}{4} x^4 ( 1 + \frac{x^2}{4} )

2081: \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}} \,, \nonumber\\[2mm]

2082: R_{G_{12}}(x) &=& \sqrt{1 - x^2} \biggl(1 - \frac{13}{4} x^2

2083: + \frac{33}{8} x^4 \biggr) - \frac{15}{16} x^6

2084: \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}} \,,\nonumber\\[2mm]

2085: R_{G_{13}}(x) &=& \frac{3}{2} x^2 \sqrt{1 - x^2}

2086: \biggl(1 + \frac{83}{6} x^2 + \frac{8}{3} x^4 \biggr)

2087: - \frac{15}{2} x^4 ( 1 + \frac{3}{4} x^2 )

2088: \ln\frac{1 +  \sqrt{1 - x^2}}{1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2}} \,. \nonumber

2089: \en

2090: 

2091: \section{Check of the Ademollo--Gatto theorem (AGT)}

2092: \label{App_AGT}

2093: 

2094: As stressed above, the Ademollo--Gatto theorem

2095: (AGT)~\cite{Ademollo:1964sr} protects the vector form factors from

2096: leading SU(3)--breaking corrections generated by the mass difference

2097: of strange and nonstrange quarks. The first nonvanishing breaking

2098: effects start at second order in symmetry--breaking.

2099: To demonstrate that this theorem is fulfilled in our

2100: approach we consider a strangeness-changing flavor transition $B_i

2101: \to B_j e \bar\nu_e$. The corresponding matrix element at $q =

2102: p^\prime - p = 0$ is written as

2103: \eq

2104: M_{\mu, \, V}^{B_iB_j}(p,p) =

2105: \bar u_{B_j}(p) \gamma_\mu \, F_1^{B_iB_j}(0) u_{B_i}(p) \,

2106: \label{M_V0} \,,

2107: \en

2108: where the vector coupling constant

2109: $F_1^{B_iB_j}(0)$ is defined as 

2110: \eq\label{F1BiBj0} 

2111: F_1^{B_iB_j}(0) = f_1^{su} \, V_1^{B_iB_j} \,. 

2112: \en 

2113: Note that we have already proved

2114: (see~\cite{Faessler:2007pp}) that the vector form factor $f_1^{su}$

2115: obeys the AGT. Therefore, we merely need to demonstrate that the same

2116: is true for the form factor $V_1^{B_iB_j}$ encoding valence quark

2117: effects---the valence quark vector form factor. In other words, due

2118: to the factorization of chiral effects and the effects of valence quarks,

2119: {\it both} form factors -- $f_1^{su}$ and $V_1^{B_iB_j}$ should obey

2120: the AGT.

2121: The quantity $V_1^{B_iB_j}$ is expressed in terms of the

2122: baryon-three-quark coupling constants $g_{B_i} =

2123: g_B(m_{B_i},m_{1i})$ and $g_{B_j} = g_B(m_{B_j},m_{1j})$,

2124: the Clebsch--Gordan coefficients $C_V^{B_iB_j}$ and the structure

2125: integral $I_{B_iB_j} = I(m_{B_i},m_{B_j},m_{1i},m_{1j})$, according to the

2126: contributions from the diagrams in Fig.2: \eq V_1^{B_iB_j} = g_{B_i}

2127: g_{B_j} C_V^{B_iB_j} I_{B_iB_j} \en where $m_i = m_s$ and $m_j = m$

2128: are the masses of strange and nonstrange quarks. In the above

2129: formulae we do not display the dependence on the spectator quark

2130: masses $m_2$ and $m_3$. Note that the coupling constant $g_{B_i}$ is

2131: related to the structure integral $I_{B_iB_j}$ as $g_{B_i}^2 =

2132: 1/I_{B_iB_i}$.

2133: 

2134: Next, using the transformation of the matrix element

2135: $M_{\mu, \, V}^{B_iB_j}(p,p)$ under hermitian conjugation \eq

2136: \biggl( M_{\mu, \, V}^{B_iB_j}(p,p) \biggr)^\dagger = \bar

2137: u_{B_i}(p) \gamma_\mu \, F_1^{B_iB_j}(0) u_{B_j}(p) = M_{\mu, \,

2138: V}^{B_jB_i}(p,p) = \bar u_{B_j}(p) \gamma_\mu \, F_1^{B_jB_i}(0)

2139: u_{B_i}(p) \label{M_V0_dagger} \,, \en we deduce the condition

2140: $I_{B_iB_j} = I_{B_jB_i}$ which means that the structure integral

2141: $I(m_{B_i},m_{B_j},m_{1i},m_{1j})$ is symmetric under the

2142: transformations $m_{B_i} \leftrightarrow m_{B_j}$, $m_{1i}

2143: \leftrightarrow m_{1j}$:

2144: \eq I(m_{B_i},m_{B_j},m_{1i},m_{1j}) =

2145: I(m_{B_j},m_{B_i},m_{1j},m_{1i}) \,.

2146: \en

2147: Using the latter

2148: constraint, we express the structure integral $I_{B_iB_j}$ through

2149: the coupling constants $g_{B_i}$ and $g_{B_j}$, i.e. one has

2150: \eq\label{IBiBj}

2151: I_{B_iB_j} &=& \frac{1}{2} \biggl( I_{B_iB_j} + I_{B_jB_i} \biggr) =

2152: \frac{1}{2} \biggl( I_{B_iB_i} + I_{B_jB_j} + {\cal

2153: O}(\delta_{B_iB_j}^2,\delta_{ij}^2,\delta_{B_iB_j}\delta_{ij})\biggr)

2154: \nonumber\\

2155: &=& \frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{1}{g_{B_i}^2} + \frac{1}{g_{B_j}^2} +

2156: {\cal O}(\delta^2) \biggr)

2157: \en

2158: where the parameters $\delta_{B_iB_j}

2159: =  m_{B_i}-m_{B_j} = {\cal O}(\delta)$ and $\delta_{ij} =  m_{1i} -

2160: m_{1j} = {\cal O}(\delta)$ are of first order in SU(3) breaking.

2161: Using the expansion (\ref{IBiBj}) we then obtain

2162: \eq V_1^{B_iB_j} =

2163: \frac{C_V^{B_iB_j}}{2} \biggl( \frac{g_{B_i}}{g_{B_j}} +

2164: \frac{g_{B_j}}{g_{B_i}} + {\cal O}(\delta^2) \biggr) \,.

2165: \en

2166: Finally, expanding $g_{B_i}/g_{B_j} + g_{B_j}/g_{B_i}$ in terms of

2167: the difference $g_{B_i} - g_{B_j} \sim O(\delta)$

2168: \eq

2169: \frac{g_{B_i}}{g_{B_j}} + \frac{g_{B_j}}{g_{B_i}} = 2 +

2170: \frac{(g_{B_i}-g_{B_j})^2}{g_{B_i}^2} + {\cal

2171: O}((g_{B_i}-g_{B_j})^3) = 2 + {\cal O}(\delta^2) \en we prove the

2172: Ademollo-Gatto theorem

2173: \eq V_1^{B_iB_j} = C_V^{B_iB_j} ( 1 + {\cal O}(\delta^2) ) \,.

2174: \en

2175: 

2176: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

2177: %\cite{Ademollo:1964sr}

2178: \bibitem{Ademollo:1964sr}

2179:   M.~Ademollo and R.~Gatto,

2180:   %``Nonrenormalization Theorem for the Strangeness Violating

2181:   %Vector Currents,''

2182:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 13}, 264 (1964).

2183:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,13,264;%%

2184: %\cite{Cabibbo:2003ea}

2185: \bibitem{Cabibbo:2003ea}

2186:   N.~Cabibbo, E.~C.~Swallow and R.~Winston,

2187:   %``Semileptonic hyperon decays and CKM unitarity,''

2188:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 92}, 251803 (2004)

2189:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0307214];

2190:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,92,251803;%%

2191: %\cite{Cabibbo:2003cu}

2192: %\bibitem{Cabibbo:2003cu}

2193: %  N.~Cabibbo, E.~C.~Swallow and R.~Winston,

2194:   %``Semileptonic hyperon decays,''

2195:   Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\  {\bf 53}, 39 (2003)

2196:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0307298].

2197:   %%CITATION = ARNUA,53,39;%%

2198: %\cite{Yao:2006px}

2199: \bibitem{Yao:2006px}

2200:   W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.}  [Particle Data Group],

2201:   %``Review of particle physics,''

2202:   J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33}, 1 (2006).

2203:   %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%

2204: %\cite{Cabibbo:1963yz}

2205: \bibitem{Cabibbo:1963yz}

2206:   N.~Cabibbo,

2207:   %``Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays,''

2208:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 10}, 531 (1963).

2209:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,10,531;%%

2210: %\cite{Faessler:2007pp}

2211: \bibitem{Faessler:2007pp}

2212:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, B.~R.~Holstein and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2213:   %``Chiral corrections to the vector and axial couplings of quarks and

2214:   %baryons,''

2215:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 77}, 114007 (2008) 

2216:   [arXiv:0712.3437 [hep-ph]].

2217:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,114007;%%

2218: %\cite{Donoghue:1992dd}

2219: \bibitem{Donoghue:1992dd}

2220:   J.~F.~Donoghue, E.~Golowich and B.~R.~Holstein,

2221:   %``Dynamics Of The Standard Model,''

2222:   Camb.\ Monogr.\ Part.\ Phys.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ Cosmol.\  {\bf 2}, 1 (1992). 

2223:   %%CITATION = CMPCE,2,1;%%

2224: %\cite{PCQM}

2225: \bibitem{PCQM}

2226: V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, T.~Gutsche and A. Faessler,

2227: %``Electromagnetic structure of the nucleon in the perturbative

2228: %chiral  quark model,''

2229: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 64}, 065203 (2001)

2230: [arXiv: hep-ph/0105043];

2231: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105043;%%

2232: %\cite{Lyubovitskij:2000sf}

2233: %\bibitem{Lyubovitskij:2000sf}

2234: V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, T.~Gutsche, A.~Faessler and E.~G.~Drukarev,

2235: %``Sigma-term physics in the perturbative chiral quark model,''

2236: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 054026 (2001)

2237: [arXiv:hep-ph/0009341];

2238: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009341;%%

2239: %\bibitem{PCQM3}

2240: %%\cite{Lyubovitskij:2001fv}

2241: %\bibitem{Lyubovitskij:2001fv}

2242: V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, T.~Gutsche, A.~Faessler and R.~Vinh Mau,

2243: %``pi N scattering and electromagnetic corrections

2244: %in the perturbative  chiral quark model,''

2245: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 520}, 204 (2001)

2246: [arXiv:hep-ph/0108134];

2247: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108134;%%

2248: %%\cite{Lyubovitskij:2002ng}

2249: %\bibitem{Lyubovitskij:2002ng}

2250: V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, P.~Wang, T.~Gutsche and A.~Faessler,

2251: %``Strange nucleon form factors in the perturbative chiral

2252: %quark model,''

2253: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 66}, 055204 (2002)

2254: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207225];

2255: %%\cite{Inoue:2003bk}

2256: %\bibitem{Inoue:2003bk}

2257: T.~Inoue, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, T.~Gutsche and A.~Faessler,

2258: %``Updated analysis of meson nucleon sigma terms

2259: %in the perturbative chiral quark model,''

2260: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 69}, 035207 (2004)

2261: [arXiv:hep-ph/0311275].

2262: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311275;%%

2263: %\cite{Ivanov:1996pz}

2264: \bibitem{Ivanov:1996pz}

2265: M.~A.~Ivanov, M.~P.~Locher and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2266: %``Electromagnetic form factors of nucleons in a relativistic

2267: %three-quark model,''

2268: Few Body Syst.\  {\bf 21}, 131 (1996);

2269: %\cite{Ivanov:1996fj}

2270: %\bibitem{Ivanov:1996fj}

2271: M.~A.~Ivanov, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, J.~G.~K\"orner and P.~Kroll,

2272: %``Heavy baryon transitions in

2273: %a relativistic three-quark model,''

2274: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 348 (1997)

2275: [arXiv:hep-ph/9612463];

2276: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612463;%%

2277: %\cite{Ivanov:1999bk}

2278: %\bibitem{Ivanov:1999bk}

2279:   M.~A.~Ivanov, J.~G.~K\"orner, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and A.~G.~Rusetsky,

2280:   %``Strong and radiative decays of heavy flavored baryons,''

2281:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 094002 (1999)

2282:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9904421];

2283:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904421;%%

2284: %\cite{Faessler:2001mr}

2285: %\bibitem{Faessler:2001mr}

2286:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, M.~A.~Ivanov, J.~G.~K\"orner

2287:   and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2288:   %``Semileptonic decays of double heavy baryons,''

2289:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 518}, 55 (2001)

2290:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0107205].

2291:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107205;%%

2292: %\cite{Faessler:2006ft}

2293: \bibitem{Faessler:2006ft}

2294: A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, M.~A.~Ivanov, J.~G.~K\"orner,

2295: V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, D.~Nicmorus and K.~Pumsa-ard,

2296: %``Magnetic moments of heavy baryons in the relativistic

2297: %three-quark model,''

2298: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 094013 (2006)

2299: [arXiv:hep-ph/0602193].

2300: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602193;%%

2301: %\cite{Faessler:2005gd}

2302: \bibitem{Faessler:2005gd}

2303:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and K.~Pumsa-ard,

2304:   %``Chiral dynamics of baryons in a Lorentz covariant quark model,''

2305:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 73}, 114021 (2006)

2306:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0511319];

2307:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D73,114021;

2308: %\cite{Faessler:2005ah}

2309: %\bibitem{Faessler:2005ah}

2310: %  A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and K.~Pumsa-Ard,

2311:   %``Chiral dynamics of baryons in a covariant quark model,''

2312:   Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 55}, 12 (2005);

2313:   %%CITATION = PPNPD,55,12;%%

2314: %\cite{Faessler:2007mv}

2315: %\bibitem{Faessler:2007mv}

2316: %  A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and K.~Pumsa-Ard,

2317:   %``Chiral Dynamics Of Baryons In The Quark Model,''

2318:   AIP Conf.\ Proc.\  {\bf 884}, 43 (2007).

2319:   %%CITATION = APCPC,884,43;%%

2320: %\cite{Faessler:2006ky}

2321: \bibitem{Faessler:2006ky}

2322:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, B.~R.~Holstein, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2323:   D.~Nicmorus and K.~Pumsa-ard,

2324:   %``Light baryon magnetic moments and N --> Delta gamma transition in a

2325:   %Lorentz covariant chiral quark approach,''

2326:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 74}, 074010 (2006)

2327:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0608015];

2328:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,074010;%%

2329: %\cite{Faessler:2006wp}

2330: %\bibitem{Faessler:2006wp}

2331: %  A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, B.~R.~Holstein, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2332: %  D.~Nicmorus and K.~Pumsa-ard,

2333:   %``Electromagnetic properties of nucleons and hyperons in a Lorentz covariant

2334:   %quark model,''

2335:   arXiv:hep-ph/0612246.

2336:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0612246;%%

2337: %\cite{Becher:1999he}

2338: \bibitem{Becher:1999he}

2339: T.~Becher and H.~Leutwyler,

2340: %``Baryon chiral perturbation theory in

2341: %manifestly Lorentz invariant form,''

2342: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9}, 643 (1999)

2343: [arXiv:hep-ph/9901384].

2344: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9901384;%%

2345: %\cite{Gasser:1987rb}

2346: \bibitem{Gasser:1987rb}

2347: J.~Gasser, M.~E.~Sainio and A.~\v{S}varc,

2348: %``Nucleons With Chiral Loops,''

2349: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 307}, 779 (1988);

2350: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B307,779;%%

2351: %\cite{Jenkins:1990jv}

2352: %\bibitem{Jenkins:1990jv}

2353: E.~Jenkins and A.~V.~Manohar,

2354: %``Baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory Using

2355: %A Heavy Fermion Lagrangian,''

2356: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 255}, 558 (1991);

2357: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B255,558;%%

2358: %\cite{Bernard:1992qa}

2359: %\bibitem{Bernard:1992qa}

2360: V.~Bernard, N.~Kaiser, J.~Kambor and U.~G.~Meissner,

2361: %``Chiral structure of the nucleon,''

2362: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 388}, 315 (1992);

2363: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B388,315;%%

2364: %\cite{Ellis:1997kc}

2365: %\bibitem{Ellis:1997kc}

2366: P.~J.~Ellis and H.~B.~Tang,

2367: %``Pion nucleon scattering in a new approach

2368: %to chiral perturbation  theory,''

2369: Phys.\ Rev.\  C {\bf 57}, 3356 (1998)

2370: [arXiv:hep-ph/9709354];

2371: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C57,3356;%%

2372: %\cite{Fettes:1998ud}

2373: %\bibitem{Fettes:1998ud}

2374: N.~Fettes, U.~G.~Meissner and S.~Steininger,

2375: %``Pion nucleon scattering in chiral perturbation theory.

2376: %I: Isospin-symmetric case,''

2377: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 640}, 199 (1998)

2378: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803266];

2379: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803266;%%

2380: %\cite{Kubis:2000zd}

2381: %\bibitem{Kubis:2000zd}

2382: B.~Kubis and U.~G.~Meissner,

2383: %``Low energy analysis of the nucleon

2384: %electromagnetic form factors,''

2385: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 679}, 698 (2001)

2386: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007056];

2387: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007056;%%

2388: %\cite{Schindler:2003xv}

2389: %\bibitem{Schindler:2003xv}

2390: M.~R.~Schindler, J.~Gegelia and S.~Scherer,

2391: %``Infrared regularization of baryon chiral perturbation theory

2392: %reformulated,''

2393: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 586}, 258 (2004)

2394: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309005];

2395: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309005;%%

2396: %\cite{Fuchs:2003kq}

2397: %\bibitem{Fuchs:2003kq}

2398: T.~Fuchs, J.~Gegelia and S.~Scherer,

2399: %``Structure of the nucleon in chiral perturbation theory,''

2400: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A {\bf 19}, 35 (2004)

2401: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309234].

2402: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309234;%%

2403: %\cite{Ioffe:1982ce}

2404: \bibitem{Ioffe:1982ce}

2405:   B.~L.~Ioffe,

2406:   %``On The Choice Of Quark Currents In The QCD Sum Rules For Baryon Masses,''

2407:   Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 18}, 67 (1983);

2408:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C18,67;%%

2409: %\cite{Ioffe:1983ty}

2410: %\bibitem{Ioffe:1983ty}

2411:   B.~L.~Ioffe and A.~V.~Smilga,

2412:   %``Hyperon Magnetic Moments In QCD,''

2413:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 133}, 436 (1983);

2414:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B133,436;%%

2415: %\cite{Chung:1981wm}

2416: %\bibitem{Chung:1981wm}

2417:   Y.~Chung, H.~G.~Dosch, M.~Kremer and D.~Schall,

2418:   %``QCD Sum Rules For 'Baryonic Currents',''

2419:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 102}, 175 (1981);

2420:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B102,175;%%

2421: %\cite{Reinders:1984sr}

2422: %\bibitem{Reinders:1984sr}

2423:   L.~J.~Reinders, H.~Rubinstein and S.~Yazaki,

2424:   %``Hadron Properties From QCD Sum Rules,''

2425:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 127}, 1 (1985). 

2426:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,127,1;%%

2427: %\cite{Efimov:1987na}

2428: \bibitem{Efimov:1987na}

2429:   G.~V.~Efimov, M.~A.~Ivanov and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2430:   %``Nucleon Quark Structure And Strong Meson - Nucleon

2431:   %Form-Factors,''

2432:   Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 48}, 126 (1988)

2433:   [Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 48}, 198 (1988)];

2434:   %%CITATION = SJNCA,48,126;%%

2435: %\cite{Efimov:1987sa}

2436: %\bibitem{Efimov:1987sa}

2437: %  G.~V.~Efimov, M.~A.~Ivanov and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2438:   %``Strong Nucleon And Delta Isobar Form-Factors

2439:   %In Quark Confinement Model,''

2440:   Few Body Syst.\  {\bf 6}, 17 (1989)

2441:   [Acta Phys.\ Austriaca {\bf 6}, 17 (1989)].

2442:   %%CITATION = FBSYE,6,17;%%

2443: %\cite{Weinberg:1962hj}

2444: \bibitem{Weinberg:1962hj}

2445:   S.~Weinberg,

2446:   %``Elementary Particle Theory Of Composite Particles,''

2447:   Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 130}, 776 (1963);

2448:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,130,776;%%

2449: %\cite{Salam:1962ap}

2450: %\bibitem{Salam:1962ap}

2451:   A.~Salam,

2452:   %``Lagrangian Theory Of Composite Particles,''

2453:   Nuovo Cim.\  {\bf 25}, 224 (1962);

2454:   %%CITATION = NUCIA,25,224;%%

2455: %\cite{Hayashi:1967hk}

2456: %\bibitem{Hayashi:1967hk}

2457: K.~Hayashi, M.~Hirayama, T.~Muta, N.~Seto and T.~Shirafuji,

2458: Fortsch.\ Phys.\ {\bf 15}, 625 (1967).

2459:   %%CITATION = FPYKA,15,625;%%

2460: %\cite{Efimov:1993ei}

2461: \bibitem{Efimov:1993ei}

2462: G.~V.~Efimov and M.~A.~Ivanov,

2463: {\it The Quark Confinement Model of Hadrons},

2464: (IOP Publishing, Bristol $\&$ Philadelphia, 1993).

2465: %\cite{Mandelstam:1962mi}

2466: \bibitem{Mandelstam:1962mi}

2467: S.~Mandelstam,

2468: %``Quantum Electrodynamics Without Potentials,''

2469: Annals Phys.\  {\bf 19}, 1 (1962).

2470: %%CITATION = APNYA,19,1;%%

2471: %\cite{Terning:1991yt}

2472: \bibitem{Terning:1991yt}

2473: J.~Terning,

2474: %``Gauging nonlocal Lagrangians,''

2475: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 887 (1991).

2476: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,887;%%

2477: %\cite{Ivanov:1998ya}

2478: \bibitem{Ivanov:1998ya}

2479:   M.~A.~Ivanov, J.~G.~K\"orner, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and A.~G.~Rusetsky,

2480:   %``Charm and bottom baryon decays in the Bethe-Salpeter approach:

2481:   %Heavy to heavy semileptonic transitions,''

2482:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 074016 (1999)

2483:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9809254];

2484:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809254;%%

2485: %\cite{Alkofer:2004yf}

2486: %\bibitem{Alkofer:2004yf}

2487:   R.~Alkofer, A.~Holl, M.~Kloker, A.~Krassnigg and C.~D.~Roberts,

2488:   %``On nucleon electromagnetic form factors,''

2489:   Few Body Syst.\  {\bf 37}, 1 (2005)

2490:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0412046].

2491:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0412046;%%.

2492: %\cite{Anikin:1995cf}

2493: \bibitem{Anikin:1995cf}

2494:   I.~V.~Anikin, M.~A.~Ivanov, N.~B.~Kulimanova and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

2495:   %``The Extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with separable interaction:

2496:   %Low-energy pion physics and pion nucleon form-factor,''

2497:   Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 65}, 681 (1995).

2498:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C65,681;%%

2499: %\cite{Kambor:1998pi}

2500: \bibitem{Kambor:1998pi}

2501:   J.~Kambor and M.~Mojzis,

2502:   %``Field redefinitions and wave function

2503:   %renormalization to O(p**4) in  heavy

2504:   %baryon chiral perturbation theory,''

2505:   JHEP {\bf 9904}, 031 (1999)

2506:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9901235];

2507:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,9904,031;%%

2508: %\cite{Schweizer:2000zz}

2509: %\bibitem{Schweizer:2000zz}

2510:   J.~Schweizer,

2511:   %``Low energy representation for the axial form factor of the nucleon,''

2512: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=7663641}{SPIRES entry}

2513: Diploma thesis, University of Bern (2000).

2514: %\cite{Becher:2001hv}

2515: \bibitem{Becher:2001hv}

2516:   T.~Becher and H.~Leutwyler,

2517:   %``Low energy analysis of pi N --> pi N,''

2518:   JHEP {\bf 0106}, 017 (2001)

2519:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0103263].

2520:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0106,017;%%

2521: %\cite{Bernard:2001rs}

2522: \bibitem{Bernard:2001rs}

2523:   V.~Bernard, L.~Elouadrhiri and U.~G.~Meissner,

2524:   %``Axial structure of the nucleon,''

2525:   J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 28}, R1 (2002)

2526:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0107088].

2527:   %%CITATION = JPHGB,G28,R1;%%

2528: %\cite{Schindler:2006it}

2529: \bibitem{Schindler:2006it}

2530:   M.~R.~Schindler, T.~Fuchs, J.~Gegelia and S.~Scherer,

2531:   %``Axial, induced pseudoscalar, and pion nucleon form factors in manifestly

2532:   %Lorentz-invariant chiral perturbation theory,''

2533:   Phys.\ Rev.\  C {\bf 75}, 025202 (2007)

2534:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0611083].

2535:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,C75,025202;%%

2536: %\cite{Goldberger:1958tr}

2537: \bibitem{Goldberger:1958tr}

2538:   M.~L.~Goldberger and S.~B.~Treiman,

2539:   %``Decay of the pi meson,''

2540:   Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 110}, 1178 (1958);

2541:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,110,1178;%%

2542: %\cite{Nambu:1960xd}

2543: %\bibitem{Nambu:1960xd}

2544:   Y.~Nambu,

2545:   %``Axial vector current conservation in weak interactions,''

2546:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 4}, 380 (1960).

2547:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,4,380;%%

2548: %\cite{Pagels:1969ne}

2549: \bibitem{Pagels:1969ne}

2550:   H.~Pagels,

2551:   %``Hadronic corrections to the goldberger-treiman relation,''

2552:   Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 179}, 1337 (1969).

2553:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,179,1337;%%

2554: %\cite{Pietschmann:1974ap}

2555: \bibitem{Pietschmann:1974ap}

2556:   H.~Pietschmann,

2557:   %``Formulae and results in weak interactions,''

2558:   Acta Phys.\ Austriaca Suppl.\  {\bf 12}, 1 (1974).

2559: %\cite{Garcia:1985xz}

2560: \bibitem{Garcia:1985xz}

2561:   A.~Garcia, P.~Kielanowski,

2562:   %``The Beta Decay Of Hyperons,''

2563:   Lect.\ Notes Phys.\  {\bf 222}, 1 (1985).

2564:   %%CITATION = LNPHA,222,1;%%

2565: %\cite{Kadeer:2005aq}

2566: \bibitem{Kadeer:2005aq}

2567:   A.~Kadeer, J.~G.~Korner and U.~Moosbrugger,

2568:   %``Helicity analysis of semileptonic hyperon decays

2569:   %including lepton mass effects,''

2570:   arXiv:hep-ph/0511019.

2571:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0511019;%%

2572: %\cite{FloresMendieta:2004sk}

2573: \bibitem{FloresMendieta:2004sk}

2574:   R.~Flores-Mendieta,

2575:   %``V(us) from hyperon semileptonic decays,''

2576:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 70}, 114036 (2004)

2577:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0410171].

2578:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,114036;%%

2579: %\cite{Garcia:1974cs}

2580: \bibitem{Garcia:1974cs}

2581:   A.~Garcia,

2582:   %``Cabibbo's model with first-order su(3)-breaking corrections and hyperon

2583:   %beta decay,''

2584:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 10}, 884 (1974);

2585:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D10,884;%%

2586: %\cite{Song:1996mi}

2587: %\bibitem{Song:1996mi}

2588:   X.~Song, P.~K.~Kabir and J.~S.~McCarthy,

2589:   %``F/D Ratios in Hyperon Beta Decays and Spin Distribution

2590:   %in the Nucleon,''

2591:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 54}, 2108 (1996)

2592:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9602422].

2593:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D54,2108;%%

2594: %\cite{FloresMendieta:1998ii}

2595: \bibitem{FloresMendieta:1998ii}

2596:   R.~Flores-Mendieta, E.~E.~Jenkins and A.~V.~Manohar,

2597:   %``SU(3) symmetry breaking in hyperon semileptonic decays,''

2598:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 58}, 094028 (1998)

2599:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9805416].

2600:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D58,094028;%%

2601: %\cite{Ledwig:2008ku}

2602: \bibitem{Ledwig:2008ku}

2603:   T.~Ledwig, A.~Silva, H.~C.~Kim and K.~Goeke,

2604:   %``Semileptonic hyperon decays in the self-consistent SU(3) chiral

2605:   %quark-soliton model,''

2606:   arXiv:0806.4072 [hep-ph].

2607:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4072;%%

2608: %\cite{Guadagnoli:2006gj}

2609: \bibitem{Guadagnoli:2006gj}

2610:   D.~Guadagnoli, V.~Lubicz, M.~Papinutto and S.~Simula,

2611:   %``First lattice QCD study of the Sigma- --> n axial and vector form  factors

2612:   %with SU(3) breaking corrections,''

2613:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 761}, 63 (2007)

2614:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0606181].

2615:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B761,63;%%

2616: %\cite{AlaviHarati:2005ev}

2617: \bibitem{AlaviHarati:2005ev}

2618:   E.~Abouzaid {\it et al.}  [KTeV Collaboration],

2619:   %``Observation of the decay Xi0 --> Sigma+ mu- anti-nu/mu,''

2620:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 95}, 081801 (2005)

2621:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0504055].

2622:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,95,081801;%%

2623: %\cite{Lazzeroni:2005zd}

2624: \bibitem{Lazzeroni:2005zd}

2625:   C.~Lazzeroni  [NA48 Collaboration],

2626:   %``Recent Hadronic Physics Results From Na48,''

2627:   PoS {\bf HEP2005}, 096 (2006).

2628:   %%CITATION = POSCI,HEP2005,096;%%

2629: %\cite{Bourquin:1981ba}

2630: \bibitem{Bourquin:1981ba}

2631:   M.~Bourquin {\it et al.}

2632:   [Bristol-Geneva-Heidelberg-Orsay-Rutherford-Strasbourg Collaboration],

2633:   %``Measurements Of Hyperon Semileptonic Decays At The Cern Super Proton

2634:   %Synchrotron. 1. The Sigma- $\to$ Lambda E- Anti-Neutrino Decay Mode,''

2635:   Z.\ Phys.\  C {\bf 12}, 307 (1982).

2636:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C12,307;%%

2637: %\cite{Lacour:2007wm}

2638: \bibitem{Lacour:2007wm}

2639:   A.~Lacour, B.~Kubis and U.~G.~Meissner,

2640:   %``Hyperon decay form factors in chiral perturbation theory,''

2641:   JHEP {\bf 0710}, 083 (2007)

2642:   [arXiv:0708.3957 [hep-ph]].

2643:   %%CITATION = JHEPA,0710,083;%%

2644: %\cite{Leutwyler:1984je}

2645: \bibitem{Leutwyler:1984je}

2646:   H.~Leutwyler and M.~Roos,

2647:   %``Determination Of The Elements V(Us) And V(Ud)

2648:   %Of The Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix,''

2649:   Z.\ Phys.\  C {\bf 25}, 91 (1984);

2650:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C25,91;%%

2651: %\cite{Gasser:1984ux}

2652: %\bibitem{Gasser:1984ux}

2653: J.~Gasser and H.~Leutwyler,

2654: %``Low-Energy Expansion Of Meson Form-Factors,''

2655: Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 250}, 517 (1985);

2656: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B250,517;%%

2657: %\cite{Krause:1990xc}

2658: %\bibitem{Krause:1990xc}

2659:   A.~Krause,

2660:   %``BARYON MATRIX ELEMENTS OF THE VECTOR CURRENT

2661:   %IN CHIRAL PERTURBATION THEORY,''

2662:   Helv.\ Phys.\ Acta {\bf 63}, 3 (1990);

2663:   %%CITATION = HPACA,63,3;%%

2664: %\cite{Anderson:1993as}

2665: %\bibitem{Anderson:1993as}

2666:   J.~Anderson and M.~A.~Luty,

2667:   %``Chiral corrections to hyperon vector form-factors,''

2668:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 47}, 4975 (1993)

2669:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9301219];

2670:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D47,4975;%%

2671: %\cite{Kaiser:2001yc}

2672: %\bibitem{Kaiser:2001yc}

2673:   N.~Kaiser,

2674:   %``Isospin breaking in neutron beta-decay and SU(3) violation in

2675:   %semi-leptonic hyperon decays,''

2676:   Phys.\ Rev.\  C {\bf 64}, 028201 (2001)

2677:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0105043];

2678:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,C64,028201;%%

2679: %\cite{Villadoro:2006nj}

2680: %\bibitem{Villadoro:2006nj}

2681:   G.~Villadoro,

2682:   %``Chiral corrections to the hyperon vector form factors,''

2683:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 74}, 014018 (2006)

2684:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0603226].

2685:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,014018;%%

2686: \end{thebibliography}

2687: 

2688: \newpage

2689: 

2690: \begin{center}

2691: \epsfig{figure=fig1.eps,scale=.9}

2692: \end{center}

2693: 

2694: \vspace*{0.5cm}

2695: 

2696: \noindent {\bf Fig. 1.} {\em Baryon mass operator. Bold and thin

2697: lines refer to the baryons and quarks, respectively. Quarks are labeled

2698: by the indices $k=1,2,3$.

2699: \label{fig1}}

2700: 

2701: \vspace*{1cm}

2702: 

2703: \begin{center}

2704: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,scale=.9}

2705: \end{center}

2706: 

2707: \vspace*{0.5cm}

2708: 

2709: \noindent {\bf Fig. 2.} {\em Diagrams contributing to the matrix elements

2710: of the bare quark operators $V_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0)$ and

2711: $A_{\mu, k}^{ij}(0)$, $k=1,2,3:$ triangle (a), bubble (b) and (c).

2712: Bold, thin and wiggly lines refer to the baryons, quarks and

2713: external weak field, respectively. Quarks participating in the quark flavor

2714: transition $q_i \to q_j$

2715: are labeled by the indices $1i$ and $1j$, while the spectator quarks --

2716: by the indices $2$ and $3$. Initial and final baryons are labeled by

2717: the indices $i$ and $j$.

2718: 

2719: \label{fig2}}

2720: 

2721: \newpage

2722: 

2723: \begin{center}

2724: {\bf Table 1.} Magnetic moments of the baryon octet

2725: (in units of the nuclear magneton $\mu_N$) \\

2726: and nucleon electromagnetic radii (in units of fm$^2$).

2727: 

2728: \vspace*{.3cm}

2729: \def\arraystretch{1.5}

2730: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}

2731: \hline

2732: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{Our results \cite{Faessler:2006ky}} &\\

2733: \cline{2-4}

2734: Quantity & Valence     & Meson & Total & Experiment~\cite{Yao:2006px}\\

2735:          & quarks      & cloud &       & \\

2736: \hline

2737: $\mu_p$ &\, 2.530 \,&\, 0.263 \,&\, 2.793 \,&\, 2.793 \\

2738: \hline

2739: $\mu_n$ & $-1.530$ & $-0.383$ & $-1.913$ & $-1.913$ \\

2740: \hline

2741: $\mu_{\Lambda}$ & $-0.575$ & $-0.038$ & $-0.613$ & $-0.613 \pm 0.004$ \\

2742: \hline

2743: $\mu_{\Sigma^+}$ & 2.336 & 0.196 & 2.532 & 2.458 $\pm$ 0.010\\

2744: \hline

2745: $\mu_{\Sigma^-}$ & $-0.942$ & $-0.327$ & $-1.269$ & $-1.160 \pm 0.025$ \\

2746: \hline

2747: $\mu_{\Xi^0}$ & $-1.240$ & $-0.096$ & $-1.336$ & $-1.250 \pm 0.014$ \\

2748: \hline

2749: $\mu_{\Xi^-}$ & $-0.599$ & 0.033 & $-0.566$ & $-0.6507 \pm 0.0025$ \\

2750: \hline

2751: $|\mu_{\Sigma^0 \Lambda}|$ & 1.273 & 0.293 & 1.566 & 1.61 $\pm$ 0.08 \\

2752: \hline

2753: $\la r^2 \ra_E^p $ &\, 0.700 \,&\, 0.078 \,&\, 0.778 \,&\, 0.767 $\pm$ 0.012\\

2754: \hline

2755: $\la r^2 \ra_E^n $ &\, $- 0.0628$ \,&\, $-0.0542$ \,&\, $-0.117$ \,&\,

2756: $-0.1161 \pm 0.0022$ \\

2757: \hline

2758: $\la r^2 \ra_M^p $ &\, 0.637 \,&\, 0.118 \,&\, 0.755 \,&\, 0.731 $\pm$ 0.060\\

2759: \hline

2760: $\la r^2 \ra_M^n $ &\, 0.618 \,&\, 0.099 \,&\, 0.717 \,&\, 0.762 $\pm$ 0.019\\

2761: \hline

2762: \end{tabular}

2763: \end{center}

2764: 

2765: \vspace*{1cm}

2766: 

2767: \noindent

2768: \begin{center}

2769: {\bf Table 2.} Numerical values for the radiative

2770: corrections in \% (taken from Ref.~\cite{Garcia:1985xz}).

2771: 

2772: \end{center}

2773: 

2774: \begin{center}

2775: \def\arraystretch{1.5}

2776: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

2777: \hline

2778: Decay mode & $\delta_{\rm rad}$

2779: & $\delta_{\rm rad}^{e \nu_e}$

2780: & $\delta_{\rm rad}^e$

2781: & $\delta_{\rm rad}^{\nu_e}$

2782: & $\delta_{\rm rad}^B$ \\

2783: \hline

2784: $n \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$              & 6.96 & 1.98 & 1.98 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2785: \hline

2786: $\Lambda \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$        & 4.17 & 1.99 & 1.99 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2787: \hline

2788: $\Sigma^- \to n e^- \bar\nu_e$       & 1.85 & 1.98 & 1.98 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2789: \hline

2790: $\Sigma^+ \to \Lambda e^+ \nu_e$     & 2.25 & 1.99 & 1.99 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2791: \hline

2792: $\Sigma^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$ & 2.22 & 1.99 & 1.99 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2793: \hline

2794: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$    & 1.95 & 1.98 & 1.98 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2795: \hline

2796: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0 e^- \bar\nu_e$   & 2.10 & 1.99 & 1.99 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2797: \hline

2798: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ e^- \bar\nu_e$   & 4.36 & 1.99 & 1.99 & 2.10 & 2.10 \\[2mm]

2799: \hline

2800: $\Lambda \to p \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$    & 6.78 &      &      &      &      \\[2mm]

2801: \hline

2802: $\Sigma^- \to n \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$   & 1.88 &      &      &      &      \\[2mm]

2803: \hline

2804: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0\mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$& 2.12 &      &      &      &      \\[2mm]

2805: \hline

2806: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+\mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$& 6.78 &      &      &      &      \\[2mm]

2807: \hline

2808: \end{tabular}

2809: \end{center}

2810: 

2811: \newpage

2812: 

2813: \begin{center}

2814: {\bf Table 3.} Couplings $V_{11}^{B_iB_j}$ and $A_{11}^{B_iB_j}$.

2815: 

2816: \vspace*{.3cm}

2817: \def\arraystretch{2}

2818: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}

2819: \hline

2820: Mode  & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Our results}

2821:       & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{SU(6) quark model} \\

2822: \cline{2-5}

2823: & \hspace*{.2cm} $V_{11}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}

2824: & \hspace*{.2cm} $A_{11}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}

2825: & \hspace*{.2cm} $V_{11}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}

2826: & \hspace*{.2cm} $A_{11}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}  \\

2827: \cline{2-5}

2828: \hline

2829: $n         \to p$          &  1      &  1.452 & 1 &

2830: $\displaystyle\frac{5}{3}$\\[1mm]

2831: \hline

2832: $\Lambda   \to p$          & $-1.146$  & $-1.039$ &

2833: $- \displaystyle{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}} = -1.225$ &

2834: $- \displaystyle{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}} = -1.225$ \\[1mm]

2835: \hline

2836: $\Sigma^-  \to n$          & $-0.943$  & 0.307  & $-1$ &

2837: $\displaystyle\frac{1}{3} = 0.333$ \\[1mm]

2838: \hline

2839: $\Sigma^-  \to \Lambda$    & $-0.002$  & 0.724  & 0 &

2840: $\displaystyle{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}} = 0.816$\\[1mm]

2841: \hline

2842: $\Xi^-     \to \Lambda$    &  1.170  & 0.388  &

2843: $\displaystyle{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}} = 1.225$  &

2844: $\displaystyle\frac{1}{ \sqrt{6}} = 0.408$ \\[1mm]

2845: \hline

2846: $\Xi^-     \to \Sigma^0$   &  0.689  & 1.035  &

2847: $\displaystyle\frac{1}{ \sqrt{2}} = 0.707$ &

2848: $\displaystyle\frac{5}{3\sqrt{2}} = 1.179$ \\[1mm]

2849: \hline

2850: $\Xi^0     \to \Sigma^+$   &  0.975  & 1.464  & 1 &

2851: $\displaystyle\frac{5}{3} = 1.667$\\[1mm]

2852: \hline

2853: \end{tabular}

2854: \end{center}

2855: 

2856: 

2857: \vspace*{1cm}

2858: 

2859: \begin{center}

2860: {\bf Table 4.} Couplings $V_{21,31}^{B_iB_j}$ and $A_{21,31}^{B_iB_j}$.

2861: 

2862: \vspace*{.3cm}

2863: \def\arraystretch{2}

2864: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}

2865: \hline

2866: Mode

2867: & \hspace*{.2cm} $V_{21}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}

2868: & \hspace*{.2cm} $V_{31}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}

2869: & \hspace*{.2cm} $A_{21}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}

2870: & \hspace*{.2cm} $A_{31}^{B_iB_j}$ \hspace*{.2cm}  \\

2871: \hline

2872: $n         \to p$          &  1.530 & 0      & 0      &  2.850 \\

2873: \hline

2874: $\Lambda   \to p$          & $-0.840$ & $-0.093$ & $-0.042$ & $-1.431$ \\

2875: \hline

2876: $\Sigma^-  \to n$          & 0.802  & $-0.288$ & $-0.047$ &  1.467 \\

2877: \hline

2878: $\Sigma^-  \to \Lambda$    & 1.180  & $-0.034$ & 0.034  &  2.517 \\

2879: \hline

2880: $\Xi^-     \to \Lambda$    & 0.009  &  0.231 & 0.061  & $-0.048$ \\

2881: \hline

2882: $\Xi^-     \to \Sigma^0$   & 1.235  &  0.014 & 0.006  &  2.374 \\

2883: \hline

2884: $\Xi^0     \to \Sigma^+$   & 1.747  &  0.019 & 0.009  &  3.357 \\

2885: \hline

2886: \end{tabular}

2887: \end{center}

2888: 

2889: 

2890: \newpage

2891: 

2892: \noindent

2893: \begin{center}

2894: {\bf Table 5.} Semileptonic decay constants of baryons

2895: $F_1^{B_iB_j}$ and $G_1^{B_iB_j}$. 

2896: \end{center}

2897: 

2898: \begin{center}

2899: \def\arraystretch{2}

2900: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}

2901: \hline

2902: Decay mode & $F_1^{B_iB_j}$ & $G_1^{B_iB_j}$ \\

2903: \hline

2904: $n \to p$          & 1

2905: & $g_A = 1.258 \, (1 + \delta_A^{np}) = 1.2695$

2906: \\[2mm]

2907: \hline

2908: $\Lambda \to p$

2909: & $- \displaystyle\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} (1 + \delta_V^{\Lambda p}) =

2910: - 1.226 $

2911: & $- 0.928 \, (1 + \delta_A^{\Lambda p}) = - 0.888$

2912: \\[2mm]

2913: \hline

2914: $\Sigma^- \to n$   &

2915: $- (1 + \delta_V^{\Sigma n}) = - 1.009$

2916: & $0.243 \, (1 + \delta_A^{\Sigma n}) = 0.262 $\\[2mm]

2917: \hline

2918: $\Sigma^- \to \Lambda$  & $- 0.002$

2919:                         &

2920: $0.613 \, (1 + \delta_A^{\Sigma\Lambda}) = 0.633 $\\[2mm]

2921: \hline

2922: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda$

2923: & $\displaystyle\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}

2924: (1 + \delta_V^{\Xi\Lambda}) = 1.252$

2925: & $0.315 \, (1 + \delta_A^{\Xi\Lambda}) = 0.332 $\\[2mm]

2926: \hline

2927: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0$ &

2928: $\displaystyle\frac{1}{ \sqrt{2}}

2929: (1 + \delta_V^{\Xi\Sigma}) = 0.737$

2930: & $ 0.890 \, (1 + \delta_A^{\Xi\Sigma}) = 0.885 $\\[2mm]

2931: \hline

2932: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+$   &

2933: $1 + \delta_V^{\Xi\Sigma} = 1.042$

2934: & $1.258 \, (1 + \delta_A^{\Xi\Sigma}) = 1.252 $\\[2mm]

2935: \hline

2936: \end{tabular}

2937: \end{center}

2938: 

2939: \vspace*{1cm}

2940: 

2941: \noindent

2942: \begin{center}

2943: {\bf Table 6.} Ratios $G_1^{B_iB_j}/F_1^{B_iB_j}$. 

2944: \end{center}

2945: 

2946: \begin{center}

2947: \def\arraystretch{2}

2948: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|}

2949: \hline

2950: Decay mode & Our results & Data~\cite{Yao:2006px}\\

2951: \hline

2952: $n \to p$          & 1.2695 & 1.2695 $\pm$ 0.0029 \\[2mm]

2953: \hline

2954: $\Lambda \to p$    & 0.724  & 0.718  $\pm$ 0.015  \\[2mm]

2955: \hline

2956: $\Sigma^- \to n$, $\ G_1/F_1$   & $- 0.260$  &  $- 0.34 \pm 0.017$ \\[2mm]

2957: $\Sigma^- \to n$, $\ (G_1 - 0.237 G_2)/F_1$

2958: & $- 0.278$  & $- 0.327 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.019$ \\[2mm]

2959: \hline

2960: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda$& 0.265  & 0.25 $\pm$ 0.05 \\[2mm]

2961: \hline

2962: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0$ & 1.20 & \\[2mm]

2963: \hline

2964: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+$ & 1.20 & 1.20 $\pm$ 0.04 $\pm$ 0.03 \\[2mm]

2965: \hline

2966: \end{tabular}

2967: \end{center}

2968: 

2969: \newpage

2970: 

2971: \noindent

2972: \begin{center}

2973: {\bf Table 7.} Semileptonic decay constants of baryons

2974: $F_{2,3}^{B_iB_j}$ and $G_{2,3}^{B_iB_j}$. \\

2975: Here $\mu_\pi = 0.13957$ and $\mu_K = 0.493677$ are

2976: the dimensionless masses of $\pi$ and $K$ mesons.

2977: \end{center}

2978: 

2979: \begin{center}

2980: \def\arraystretch{2.5}

2981: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}

2982: \hline

2983: Decay mode & $F_2^{B_iB_j}$ & $G_2^{B_iB_j}$

2984:            & $F_3^{B_iB_j}$ & $G_3^{B_iB_j}$ \\

2985: \hline

2986: $n \to p$

2987: & 1.853

2988: & 0

2989: & 0

2990: & $\displaystyle{\frac{2.187}{\mu_\pi^2}}$

2991:   \Big($\displaystyle{\frac{2.271}{\mu_\pi^2}}$\Big)

2992: \\

2993: & & & & $\ g_p = 8.25$ \\[2mm]

2994: \hline

2995: $\Lambda \to p$

2996: & $- 1.226$

2997: & $- 0.072$

2998: & $- 0.067$

2999: & $\displaystyle{- \frac{1.647}{\mu_K^2}}$

3000:  \Big($\displaystyle{- \frac{2.035}{\mu_K^2}}$\Big) \\[2mm]

3001: \hline

3002: $\Sigma^- \to n$

3003: & 0.971

3004: & $- 0.078$

3005: & $- 0.055$

3006: & $\displaystyle{\frac{0.536}{\mu_K^2}}$

3007:  \Big($\displaystyle{\frac{0.663}{\mu_K^2}}$\Big) \\[2mm]

3008: \hline

3009: $\Sigma^- \to \Lambda$

3010: & 1.206

3011: & 0.013

3012: & 0.016

3013: & $\displaystyle{\frac{1.645}{\mu_\pi^2}}$

3014:  \Big($\displaystyle{\frac{1.735}{\mu_\pi^2}}$\Big) \\[2mm]

3015: \hline

3016: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda$

3017: & 0.162

3018: & 0.076

3019: & 0.052

3020: & $\displaystyle{\frac{1.002}{\mu_K^2}}$

3021:  \Big($\displaystyle{\frac{1.403}{\mu_K^2}}$\Big) \\[2mm]

3022: \hline

3023: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0$

3024: & 1.770

3025: & 0.037

3026: & 0.035

3027: & $\displaystyle{\frac{2.783}{\mu_K^2}}$

3028:  \Big($\displaystyle{\frac{3.631}{\mu_K^2}}$\Big) \\[2mm]

3029: \hline

3030: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+$

3031: & 2.503

3032: & 0.052

3033: & 0.050

3034: & $\displaystyle{\frac{3.936}{\mu_K^2}}$

3035:  \Big($\displaystyle{\frac{5.137}{\mu_K^2}}$\Big) \\[2mm]

3036: \hline

3037: \end{tabular}

3038: \end{center}

3039: 

3040: \vspace*{1cm}

3041: 

3042: \noindent

3043: \begin{center}

3044: {\bf Table 8.} Ratios $F_2^{B_iB_j}/F_1^{B_iB_j}$. 

3045: \end{center}

3046: 

3047: \begin{center}

3048: \def\arraystretch{2}

3049: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|}

3050: \hline

3051: Decay mode & Cabibbo model~\cite{Cabibbo:2003ea}

3052: & $1/N_c$ expansion~\cite{FloresMendieta:1998ii}

3053: & $\chi$QSM~\cite{Ledwig:2008ku}

3054: & Our results \\

3055: \hline

3056: $n \to p$          &

3057: $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}(\mu_p - \mu_n - 1)} = 1.853$

3058: & 1.85

3059: & 1.57

3060: & 1.853 \\[2mm]

3061: \hline

3062: $\Lambda \to p$    &

3063: $\displaystyle{\frac{m_\Lambda}{2 m_N}(\mu_p - 1)} = 1.066$

3064: & 0.90

3065: & 0.71

3066: & 1 \\[2mm]

3067: \hline

3068: $\Sigma^- \to n$   &

3069: $\displaystyle{\frac{m_{\Sigma^-}}{m_N}(\mu_p + 2 \mu_n - 1)} = - 1.297$

3070: & $- 1.02$

3071: & $- 0.96$

3072: & $- 0.962$ \\[2mm]

3073: \hline

3074: $\Sigma^- \to \Lambda$ \ $(F_2)$&

3075: $- \displaystyle{\frac{m_{\Sigma^-}}{2 m_N}

3076: \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \, \mu_n = 1.490} $

3077: & 1.17

3078: & 1.24

3079: & 1.206 \\[2mm]

3080: \hline

3081: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda$&

3082: $- \displaystyle{\frac{m_{\Xi^-}}{2 m_N}(\mu_p + \mu_n - 1)} = 0.085$

3083: & 0.06

3084: & 0.02

3085: & 0.129 \\[2mm]

3086: \hline

3087: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0$ &

3088: $\displaystyle{\frac{m_{\Xi^-}}{2 m_N}(\mu_p - \mu_n - 1)} = 2.609$

3089: & 1.85

3090: & 2.02

3091: & 2.402 \\[2mm]

3092: \hline

3093: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+$ &

3094: $\displaystyle{\frac{m_{\Xi^0}}{2 m_N}(\mu_p - \mu_n - 1)} = 2.597$

3095: & 1.85

3096: &

3097: & 2.402 \\[2mm]

3098: \hline

3099: \end{tabular}

3100: \end{center}

3101: 

3102: \newpage

3103: 

3104: \noindent

3105: \begin{center}

3106: {\bf Table 9.} Results for the $\Sigma^- \to n e^- \bar\nu_e$ decay. 

3107: \end{center}

3108: 

3109: \begin{center}

3110: \def\arraystretch{1.5}

3111: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|}

3112: \hline

3113: Quantity & Lattice approach~\cite{Guadagnoli:2006gj} & Our results \\

3114: \hline

3115: $F_1$  & $-0.988 \pm 0.029_{\rm lattice} \pm 0.040_{\rm HBChPT}$

3116: & $- 1.009$ \\[2mm]

3117: \hline

3118: $G_1/F_1$  & $- 0.287 \pm 0.052$ & $- 0.260$ \\[2mm]

3119: \hline

3120: $(G_1 - 0.237 G_2)/F_1$ & $- 0.37 \pm 0.08$ & $- 0.278$ \\[2mm]

3121: \hline

3122: $F_2/F_1$  & $- 0.85 \pm 0.45$ & $- 0.962$ \\[2mm]

3123: \hline

3124: $F_3/F_1$  & $ 0.24 \pm 0.12$ & 0.055 \\[2mm]

3125: \hline

3126: $G_2/F_1$  & $ 0.35 \pm 0.15$ & 0.077 \\[2mm]

3127: \hline

3128: $G_3/F_1$  & $- 3.42 \pm 1.85$ & $- 2.180$ \\[2mm]

3129: \hline

3130: \end{tabular}

3131: \end{center}

3132: 

3133: 

3134: \vspace*{1cm}

3135: 

3136: \noindent

3137: \begin{center}

3138: {\bf Table 10.} Decay widths $\Gamma$ (in units of 10$^6$ s$^{-1}$, \\

3139:                 for neutron decay in units of 10$^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$).

3140: \end{center}

3141: 

3142: \begin{center}

3143: \def\arraystretch{2}

3144: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

3145: \hline

3146: & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Our results}& & \\

3147: \cline{2-5}

3148: Decay mode & $\Gamma$ & $\Gamma(F_1,G_1)$ & $\Gamma(F_1(0),G_1(0))$

3149: & $\Gamma^0$

3150: & SU(3) fit & Data~\cite{Yao:2006px}\\

3151: \hline

3152: $n \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$  &  1.12 & 1.12 & 1.12 & 1.05 & 1.12 &

3153: 1.129 $\pm$ 0.001 \\

3154: \hline

3155: $\Lambda \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$

3156: & 3.28 & 3.26 & 3.10 & 3.15 & 3.16 & 3.16$\pm$0.06 \\

3157: \hline

3158: $\Lambda \to p \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$  & 0.57 & 0.56 & 0.51

3159: & 0.53 & 0.52 & 0.60$\pm$0.13 \\

3160: \hline

3161: $\Sigma^- \to n e^- \bar\nu_e$     & 6.50 & 6.50 & 5.72

3162: & 6.39 & 6.19 & 6.88$\pm$0.24 \\

3163: \hline

3164: $\Sigma^- \to n \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 3.15 & 3.15 & 2.54

3165: & 3.09 & 2.74 & 3.0$\pm$0.2   \\

3166: \hline

3167: $\Sigma^+ \to \Lambda e^+ \nu_e$  & 0.26 & 0.26 & 0.26

3168: & 0.25 & 0.27 & 0.25$\pm$0.06 \\

3169: \hline

3170: $\Sigma^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$  & 0.43 & 0.43 & 0.43

3171: & 0.42 & 0.45 &0.39$\pm$0.02 \\

3172: \hline

3173: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$     & 3.35 & 3.35 & 3.15

3174: & 3.28 & 2.80 & 3.35$\pm$0.37 \\

3175: \hline

3176: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 0.96 & 0.96 & 0.85

3177: & 0.94 & 0.76 & 2.1$^{+2.1}_{-1.3}$ \\

3178: \hline

3179: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0 e^- \bar\nu_e$    & 0.52 & 0.51 & 0.50

3180: & 0.51 & 0.51 & 0.53$\pm$0.10 \\

3181: \hline

3182: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0 \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 0.0067 & 0.0067

3183: & 0.0064 & 0.0065 & 0.0064 & $<$ 0.05  \\[2mm]

3184: \hline

3185: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ e^- \bar\nu_e$    & 0.93 & 0.93 & 0.91

3186: & 0.89 & 0.91 & 0.93$\pm$0.14\\

3187: \hline

3188: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 0.0081 & 0.0081

3189: & 0.0078 & 0.0076 & 0.0078 & 0.02$\pm$0.01\\

3190: \hline

3191: \end{tabular}

3192: \end{center}

3193: 

3194: \newpage

3195: 

3196: \noindent

3197: \begin{center}

3198: {\bf Table 11.} Predictions for $\Gamma/|V_{\rm CKM}|^2$

3199: (in units of 10$^7$ s$^{-1}$).

3200: \end{center}

3201: 

3202: \begin{center}

3203: \def\arraystretch{2}

3204: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}

3205: \hline

3206:   Decay mode & $\Gamma/|V_{\rm CKM}|^2$

3207: & Decay mode & $\Gamma/|V_{\rm CKM}|^2$ \\

3208: \hline

3209: $\Lambda \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$ & 6.48 &

3210: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$ & 6.62 \\

3211: \hline

3212: $\Lambda \to p \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 1.13 &

3213: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 1.90 \\

3214: \hline

3215: $\Sigma^- \to n e^- \bar\nu_e$ & 12.84 &

3216: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0 e^- \bar\nu_e$ & 1.03 \\

3217: \hline

3218: $\Sigma^- \to n \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 6.22 &

3219: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0 \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 0.013 \\

3220: \hline

3221: $\Sigma^+ \to \Lambda e^+ \nu_e$  & 0.027 &

3222: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ e^- \bar\nu_e$ & 1.84 \\

3223: \hline

3224: $\Sigma^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$ & 0.045 &

3225: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ \mu^- \bar\nu_\mu$ & 0.016\\

3226: \hline

3227: \end{tabular}

3228: \end{center}

3229: 

3230: \vspace*{1cm}

3231: 

3232: \noindent

3233: \begin{center}

3234: {\bf Table 12.} Asymmetry parameters.

3235: 

3236: \end{center}

3237: 

3238: \begin{center}

3239: \def\arraystretch{2}

3240: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}

3241: \hline

3242: Decay mode & $\alpha_{e\nu_e}$ & $\alpha_{e}$

3243: & $\alpha_{\nu_e}$ & $\alpha_{B}$\\

3244: \hline

3245:   $n \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$

3246: & $- 0.08$  & $- 0.10$ & 0.99 & $- 0.48$ \\

3247: \hline

3248: $\Lambda \to p e^- \bar\nu_e$

3249: & $- 0.01$ & 0.02 & 0.92 & $- 0.60$ \\

3250: \hline

3251: $\Sigma^- \to n e^- \bar\nu_e$

3252: & 0.42 & $- 0.50$ & $- 0.32$ & 0.65 \\

3253: \hline

3254: $\Sigma^+ \to \Lambda e^+ \nu_e$

3255: & $- 0.39$ & $- 0.68$ & 0.63 & 0.06\\

3256: \hline

3257: $\Sigma^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$

3258: & $- 0.40$ & $- 0.69$ & 0.63 & 0.07\\

3259: \hline

3260: $\Xi^- \to \Lambda e^- \bar\nu_e$

3261: & 0.54 & 0.23 & 0.57 & $- 0.54$ \\

3262: \hline

3263: $\Xi^- \to \Sigma^0 e^- \bar\nu_e$

3264: & $- 0.19$ & $- 0.18$ & 0.96 & $- 0.46$ \\

3265: \hline

3266: $\Xi^0 \to \Sigma^+ e^- \bar\nu_e$

3267: & $- 0.18$ & $- 0.17$ & 0.92 & $- 0.45$ \\

3268: \hline

3269: \end{tabular}

3270: \end{center}

3271: 

3272: \end{document}

3273: