1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46:
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: %% FRONTMATTER
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53:
54: \title{Star-Planet Interactions}
55:
56: \classification{95.75.Wx,95.85.Kr,95.85.Bh,96.60.Iv,96.60.Na,97.10.-q,97.10.Jb,97.10.Kc,97.10.Ld}
57: \keywords {exoplanets, stellar activity, spectroscopy, spectropolarimetry, MHD, radio emission}
58:
59: \author{Evgenya Shkolnik (DTM/CIW), Suzanne Aigrain (Exeter), Steven Cranmer (CfA), Rim Fares (LATT), Malcolm Fridlund (ESA), Frederic Pont (Exeter), J\"urgen Schmitt (Hamburger Sternwarte), Alexis Smith (St.~Andrews), Takeru Suzuki (U.~of Tokyo)}{
60: address={}
61: }
62:
63: %\author{Suzanne Aigrain \small{(Exeter)}}{
64: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
65: %}
66:
67: %\author{Steven Cranmer \small{(CfA)}}{
68: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
69: %,altaddress={<author1 address>} % additional visiting address
70: %}
71: %\author{Rim Fares \small{(LATT)}}{
72: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
73: %}
74: %\author{Malcolm Fridlund \small{(ESA)}}{
75: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
76: %}
77: %\author{Frederic Pont \small{(Exeter)}}{
78: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
79: %}
80: %\author{J\"urgen Schmitt \small{(Hamburger Sternwarte)}}{
81: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
82: %}
83: %\author{Alexis Smith \small{(St.~Andrews)}}{
84: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
85: %}
86: %\author{Takeru Suzuki \small{(U.~of Tokyo)}}{
87: %address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
88: %}
89:
90:
91: \begin{abstract}
92:
93: Much effort has been invested in recent years, both observationally and theoretically, to understand the interacting processes taking place in planetary systems consisting of a hot Jupiter orbiting its star within 10 stellar radii. Several independent studies have converged on the same scenario: that a short-period planet can induce activity on the photosphere and upper atmosphere of its host star. The growing body of evidence for such \emph{magnetic} star-planet interactions includes a diverse array of photometric, spectroscopic and spectropolarimetric studies. The nature of which is modeled to be strongly affected by both the stellar and planetary magnetic fields, possibly influencing the magnetic activity of both bodies, as well as affecting irradiation and non-thermal and dynamical processes. \emph{Tidal} interactions are responsible for the circularization of the planet orbit, for the synchronization of the planet rotation with the orbital period, and may also synchronize the outer convective envelope of the star with the planet. Studying such star-planet interactions (SPI) aids our understanding of the formation, migration and evolution of hot Jupiters.
94:
95: In this proceeding, we briefly summarise the observations and theories presented during the Cool Stars 15 splinter session\footnote{The complete programme with abstracts for the session can be found at
96: http://ifa.hawaii.edu/$\sim$shkolnik/SPI\_splinter/Program.html.} of this diverse and growing field of star-planet interactions.
97: \end{abstract}
98:
99: \maketitle
100:
101: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
102: %% MAINMATTER
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104:
105: \section{Magnetic SPI}
106:
107: \subsection{SPI as a probe of planetary magnetic fields}
108:
109: Star-planet interactions (SPI) offer an indirect way to detect and measure planetary magnetic fields, providing the unique opportunity to explore the interiors of planets and set constraints on the rapid hydrodynamic escape of hot Jupiter atmospheres. Observations over the past 6 years reveal evidence suggesting an observable magnetic interaction between a star and its hot Jupiter, which appears as a cyclic variation of stellar activity synchronized to the planet's orbit, e.g.~\cite{shko05,shko08,walk08}. A sample of 13 targets exhibits a tentative correlation between this activity and the ratio of the planet's minimum mass to its rotation period, a quantity proportional to the hot Jupiter's magnetic moment. This intriguing correlation between the planet's magnetic moment and the night-to-night chromospheric activity on its star improves SPI's potential as a probe of extrasolar planetary magnetic fields (Figure~\ref{madk}).
110:
111: \begin{figure}[h]
112: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=8cm]{madk_MsiniPorb_v2.eps}
113: \caption{The ratio of the minimum planetary mass (in Jupiter masses) to the orbital period (in days) plotted against the average mean-absolute-deviation ($<$MAD$>$) of the Ca II K-line per observing run for 13 stars with close-in planets. The x-axis quantifies the planet's magnetic moment assuming tidal locking, such that $P_{rot}=P_{orb}$. The filled-in circles are stars which exhibit significant night-to-night variability in the Ca II K line: HD 73526, $\upsilon$ And, HD 179949 and HD 189733. The tidally-locked system of $\tau$ Boo does not follow the correlation traced out by the others. This is consistent with a proposed Alfv\'en wave model where the near zero relative motion due to the tidal locking of both the star and the planet produces minimal SPI because of the weak Alfv\'en waves generated as the planet passes through the stellar magnetosphere, thereby transporting little excess energy to the stellar surface along the magnetic field lines \cite{gu05}. The error bars are one-sided due to the positive contribution of integrated MAD immediately outside the Ca II emission core and reflect the S/N obtained for each target.
114: \citep{shko08}}
115: \label{madk}
116: \end{figure}
117:
118: Direct detections of giant planet magnetic fields, however, require the measurement of radio emission from the planet itself. Much of the work has so far focused on the massive planet orbiting $\tau$ Boo \cite{bast00,farr03,lazi07,geor07} which placed upper limits comparable to the flux densities predicted from the strongest emissions. A.~Smith presented the first eclipse observations, which produced upper limits consistent with previous observations.
119: Based on predictions from a new theoretical model of the cyclotron-maser emission from extrasolar planets \cite{jard08}, observations were carried out of the K-dwarf HD 189733 (with a transiting 1.15-M$_{J}$ planet) \cite{bouc05} with the Green Bank Telescope (GBT) over about 5.5 hours before, during and after secondary eclipse over a bandpass spanning 307--347 MHz. No dip in the radio flux density at the known time of secondary eclipse was observed resulting in a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit to the flux density of 60 mJy. The lack of detection can be explained in three ways:
120: (1) The frequency of the emission is outside the range of the observations and is determined by the magnetic field strength of the planet.
121: (2) Geometric effects; the emission could be beamed out of the line-of-sight.
122: (3) The emission is insufficiently strong to be detected; the strength of the emission is dependent upon the stellar coronal density, which determines how many electrons are available for acceleration.
123: Hope lies now with the radio wavelength facilities currently under construction, such as the
124: Square Kilometer Array (SKA) or the Low-Frequency
125: Array (LOFAR), which will offer more than one order of magnitude improvement.
126:
127:
128: %Based on predictions from a new theoretical model of the cyclotron-maser emission from extra-solar planets (Jardine \& Collier Cameron 2008), we observed the K-dwarf HD 189733 b (Bouchy \textit{et al.} 2005) with the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (GBT) over about 5.5 hours before, during and after secondary eclipse, over a bandpass spanning 307 - 347 MHz. After removing some radio-frequency interference (RFI), we combine the data to produce a radio lightcurve of HD 189733 b (figure \ref{fig:smith1}). We fit for a dip in the radio flux density at the known time of secondary eclipse and calculate the eclipse depth (21.6 mJy) and associated uncertainty ($\pm$27.1 mJy), which are combined to give a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit to the flux density of 60 mJy.
129:
130: %The lack of detection can be explained in three ways:
131: %(i) The emission is insufficiently strong for us to detect. The strength of the emission is dependent upon the stellar coronal density, which determines how many electrons are available for acceleration.
132: %(ii) The frequency of the emission is outside the frequency range of our observations. The frequency of the emission is determined by the magnetic field strength of the planet.
133: %(iii) Geometric effects. The emission could be beamed out of the line-of-sight.
134:
135: %\begin{figure}[h]
136: %\includegraphics[angle=270,width=8cm]{smith_fig1.ps}
137: %\caption{Radio lightcurve of HD 189733 b spanning secondary eclipse. The solid line is our best fit eclipse model.}
138: %\label{fig:smith1}
139: %\end{figure}
140:
141: \subsection{Variable magnetic SPI}
142:
143: Several years of spectroscopic observations have shown that both HD 179949 ($P_{orb}$=3.1 d) and $\upsilon$ And ($P_{orb}$=4.6 d) display synchronicity of the Ca II emission with the planet's orbit during several observational epochs while data collected during other seasons exhibit rotational modulation \cite{shko08}. This on/off nature of magnetic SPI in the two systems is likely a function of the changing stellar magnetic field structure throughout its activity cycle.
144:
145: This is supported by simulations presented by \cite{cran07} of Ca~II K light curves for a close-in extrasolar planet
146: traversing a series of solar-type multi-pole magnetic fields, which exhibit both
147: substantial orbit-to-orbit variability and longer-term solar-cycle dependence. S. Cranmer presented a new statistical analysis of these models at the session. Figure~\ref{cranmer} illustrates a sample light curve
148: for the parameters of HD 179949, which shows variations both due to
149: stellar rotation (green) and SPI field-line enhancements (black).
150: For a set of 50 consecutive orbits and 11 example years out of a
151: solar cycle, the phases of peak light were computed for each of the
152: 550 orbits. About 2/3 of the time, the system was in an ``on'' phase
153: (red) with peak phases centered on orbital phase\footnote{Orbital phase of 0 is defined by the sub-planetary point.} $\phi_{orb}$=0 and a standard deviation of about
154: $\pm 0.1$. When the peak phase was found to be $\pm 0.5$, it was
155: evident that there was no visible SPI enhancement, and thus the system
156: was in an ``off'' phase about 1/3 of the time (blue). The simpler
157: dipole-like field corresponding to solar minimum gave rise to a
158: smaller ``on'' fraction (58\%) than at solar maximum (71\%) because
159: of larger field-line excursions from the point radially below the
160: planet. These fractions are similar to the frequency of on/off
161: phases seen by \cite{shko08}.
162:
163:
164: \begin{figure}[h]
165: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=15cm]{cranmer_histogram.ps}
166: \caption{Example of simulated Ca II K light curve (left) and ``on/off'' histogram (right) for the parameters of HD 179949. See text for more details.}
167: \label{cranmer}
168: \end{figure}
169:
170: This strong dependence on the star may help, at least partially, explain the rather enigmatic case of the solar-type star orbited by CoRoT Exo-1b at only 5 stellar radii from its host ($P_{orb}=1.5 d$; \cite{barg08}). Spectroscopic followup observations with both HARPS and UVES of this star have demonstrated peculiar flaring properties with strong Na~I, relatively faint (but clear) H$\alpha$, and \emph{no} indication of Ca~II H \& K emission. Spectra taken two days apart exhibit strong yet variable emission strengths of both Na I reversals. Observations 6 weeks later, however, show very faint Na I and no H$\alpha$ emission. Several emission sources have been ruled out:
171: (1) an extended background source discounted on the basis of the UVES spectra,
172: (2) an evaporating planet atmosphere (no sign of variation with period 1.5d and amplitude 370 km/s),
173: (3) an unknown stellar companion, as it would have to be closer than 500 AU and there is no drift in the velocity curve, and (4) intrinsic stellar activity/flares as no Ca II emission is observed. The inconclusive results leave open the possibility that reconnection events \emph{between} the star and planet (see Figure~\ref{suzuki}) may produce the Na I emission . Naturally, M. Fridlund et al. plan follow-up observations of this system.
174:
175:
176:
177:
178: %Observations are planned to further study the properties.
179:
180:
181:
182:
183: \subsection{Stellar mapping with spectropolarimetry}
184:
185:
186: It is becoming clearer that stellar fields play an important role in quantitatively studying magnetic SPI. With spectropolarimetry, reconstruction of the large-scale magnetic topologies of hot-Jupiter hosting stars is possible using Zeeman Doppler Imaging (ZDI). ZDI produces tomographic images from a series of circular polarization profiles collected over complete rotational cycles with maximum-entropy image reconstruction to ensure a unique solution (e.g.~Figure~\ref{fares}). It consists of decomposing the field into poloidal and toroidal components, expressed in terms of spherical harmonics expansion. %More details are given in Fares et al.~(this proceedings).
187:
188: In addition to generating a complete magnetic map of a star, the stellar rotation (period and differential rotation) is fully characterized by ZDI. The potential of spectropolarimetric observations in exploring star-planet interactions thus appears extremely promising for comparative observational studies of hot Jupiter systems spanning a range of properties. This will bring constraints of unprecedented quality and completeness to the star-planet interactions models.
189:
190:
191: %To improve the S/N ratio of the data, a multi-line technique of Least Squares Deconvolution (LSD) with
192:
193: The first observational results on $\tau$ Boo, HD 179949 and HD 189733 obtained using ZDI at CFHT/ESPaDOnS and TBL/NARVAL are presented in \cite{cata07,mout07,dona08}, and R.~Fares et al.~(this proceedings).
194: $\tau$ Boo shows indications for tidal interactions (discussed in more detail below), whereas HD 179949 may be showing additional evidence of magnetic interactions by varying magnetic field structure as well as by the spectroscopic activity tracers. Determining whether the HD 189733 system is undergoing SPI with this technique has been challenging and requires further observations and analysis in part due to the high level of intrinsic stellar activity on the late-K dwarf. These three are only the beginning as additional spectropolarimetric observations are underway for a variety of hot-Jupiter systems.
195:
196: %We aim at exploring the star-planet interactions of magnetic and tidal origins, by studying the magnetic properties of Hot Jupiter systems with different parameters. Magnetospheric interactions will be quantitatively studied by extrapolating the magnetospheric field lines up to the planet orbit, and by a deep analysis of the Zeeman signal at both the stellar and planetary cycles.
197:
198:
199: \subsection{Two proposed mechanisms for magnetic SPI}
200:
201:
202: \paragraph{Magnetic Reconnection Events}
203:
204: Gu \& Suzuki (in prep.) investigate the effect of magnetic reconnections in the magnetosphere of
205: hot Jupiters on the chromosphere and wind of central stars using 1-D MHD simulations.
206: A fraction of reconnection jets propagate to a central star along stellar
207: magnetic field lines. The jets, or the beam of charged particles, interact with
208: stellar wind and corona where the density becomes high for sufficient
209: Coulomb coupling.
210:
211: If the magnetic field strength and the input energy is sufficiently high ($>$0.02G at 10 R$_{\odot}$), warm regions with
212: temperatures of 10$^4$ -- 10$^6$ K are formed in the chromosphere. They become sources of chromospheric, transition
213: regional, and coronal radiation fluxes. The radiation fluxes from chromospheric, transition region, and coronal
214: components are enhanced $\sim$100 times, $\sim$1000 times, and $\sim$10 times, respectively. Moreover, the radiation
215: fluxes are highly time-dependent because of thermal instability. The calculated chromospheric luminosity is lower than
216: the observed level (at least for the Ca II emission of HD 179949 \cite{shko05}), possibly because the area at the
217: foot-point connected to planet magnetosphere is too small. In conjunction with new data indicating SPI and a more
218: complete accounting of the energy-budgets, these models may explain at least one of the mechanisms behind the phenomenon.
219:
220:
221: \begin{figure}[h]
222: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=8cm]{suzuki.eps}
223: \caption{Cartoon depicting the magnetic reconnection scenario discussion above.}
224: \label{suzuki}
225: \end{figure}
226:
227: \paragraph{The Jupiter-Io Analogy}
228:
229: Since the 1960s surface phenomena on Jupiter have been connected with
230: its moon Io, culminating with the UV detections of Io's (and the other
231: Galilean moons') footprints on Jupiter. In situ
232: measurements of particles and magnetic fields near Io with the Voyager and
233: Galileo spacecraft have led to a reasonably detailed understanding
234: of the important physical processes. The most relevant elements of these are: (1) The strong magnetic field of Jupiter, leading to co-rotation of Jupiter's magnetosphere far beyond Io. (2) The rapid rotation of Jupiter, leading to super-Keplerian magnetospheric rotation at Io's orbit. (3) The mass loading due to Io's volcanic activity, leading to the creation of the Io plasma torus and ensuing low Alfv\'en speeds.
235: These properties make Io a MHD generator of currents in excess of 1 million amp producing the observed emissions.
236:
237: In the case of extrasolar planets around young stars, conditions (1)-(3) are met and consequently similar processes are expected to occur on far larger scales. Furthermore, MHD forces might provide a torque to halt planet migration.
238:
239: Extending the Jupiter-Io mechanism to a hot-Jupiter planetary system, one can estimate the maximally released power through well-known MHD equations, e.g.~\cite{zark01} $\rightarrow$ Up to 10$^{29}$ ergs/s can be released in an Alfv\'en wing around the planet, especially for a close-in giant planet around a rapidly rotating, therefore young, star. This is further detailed by J.~Schmitt (this proceedings).
240:
241:
242: \section{Tidal SPI}
243:
244: Some hot Jupiters may be close enough to their host star and massive enough to tidally spin up the rotation of the star, potentially forcing the stars outer layers into synchronous rotation with the planet. This may also strongly impact the star's long-term activity cycle (analogous to the 22-year solar cycle). Evidence for these effects is presented by \cite{cata07} and \cite{dona08}, where $\tau$ Boo is not only shown to be tidally locked to its planet ($P_{orb} = P_{rot}$ = 3.3 d at intermediate latitudes), but also a double polarity reversal was detected in the large-scale stellar magnetic field. Figure~\ref{fares} shows the ZDI reconstructed magnetic map of $\tau$ Boo as observed in 2006, 2007 and 2008, where a polarity switch from year to year is evident (R. Fares).
245:
246: \begin{figure}[h]
247: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=15cm]{tauboo_v2.ps}
248: \caption{Maximum-entropy reconstructions of the large-scale magnetic topology of $\tau$ Boo shows two consecutive polarity switches in 2006 (left), 2007 (middle) and 2008 (right, preliminary map), here illustrated on of the radial component of $\tau$ Boo (\cite{cata07,dona08}, Fares et al.~in prep.) The star is shown in flattened polar projection down to latitudes of --30$^{\circ}$, with the equator depicted as a bold circle and parallels as dashed circles. The same flux scale (labeled in Gauss) is used, and orbital phases ($P_{orb}$=3.3 d) of observations are marked with radial ticks around the plots.}
249: \label{fares}
250: \end{figure}
251:
252: %Furthermore, tidal interactions will be studied by comparing stars with and without hot jupiters, synchronized and unsynchronized stars.
253:
254: Through angular momentum exchange, tidal SPI would also lead to a decay of the orbit of the planet, causing it to spiral towards the star. The known sample of transiting exoplanets is finally large enough to begin to probe this effect. Indeed, there are tentative indications in Figure~\ref{pont} that stars with close-in \emph{and} heavy planets rotate faster than the average stellar rotation speed (F.~Pont). If confirmed, this stellar spin-up and planetary tidal decay may explain the observed correlation between mass and period for hot Jupiters, such that the more massive planets have undergone significant orbital decay on their way towards the star.
255:
256:
257: \begin{figure}[h]
258: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=10cm]{pont.ps}
259: \caption{The orbital distance in units of stellar radius, and the planet-to-star mass ratio for transiting exoplanets. The strength of tidal effects increases towards the top-left to bottom-right. Filled symbols show host stars which are measured to rotate faster than typical for their spectral type. Their position on this plot may be an indication of tidal spin-up.}
260: \label{pont}
261: \end{figure}
262:
263:
264: \subsection{Tidal interactions as observed by CoRoT}
265:
266: The CoRoT satellite\footnote{CoRoT was launched in December 2006 and is operated by the French space agency CNES with contributions from Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Germany, Spain and the European Space Agency.} is the first space mission designed to search for planetary transits and will aid in the understanding of both magnetic and tidal SPI. The high precision, high time sampling, long baseline and almost continuous light curves it provides enable us not only to measure precise planet parameters, but also to measure rotation periods for the host stars, and to study active regions on their surface. In addition to the variable (and mysterious) Na I emission of CoRoT Exo-1b discussed above, several examples have already emerged:
267:
268: (1) CoRoT-Exo-2 \cite{alon08} is a very active G-star hosting a $3.3\,M_{\rm Jup}$ planet in a 1.75\,d orbit. A discrete auto-correlation function (ACF, Collier-Cameron et al., submitted) of the out-of transit (OOT) light curve measured a rotation period of 4.55$\pm$0.1\,d and showed evidence for two evolving active regions on opposite hemispheres with no detectable differential rotation (S. Aigrain). This may be an indication of induced stellar activity in the tidal bulges on the star generated by the presence of the planet \cite{cunt00}. \cite{lanz08b} find tentative evidence that the star's spotted areas vary at a multiple of the star-planet synoptic period, a possible indication that star-planet \emph{magnetic} interaction is also at play in this system.
269:
270: (2) With a mass of $21.6\,M_{\rm Jup}$ and an orbital period of 4.26\,d, CoRoT-Exo-3b (Deleuil et al. submitted) lies at the boundary of the planet and brown dwarf regimes, and is a prime candidate for tidal synchronization of its mid-F type host star, a hypothesis supported by the spectroscopically determined rotational velocity of the latter. Unfortunately, the star's activity level is not sufficient to detect a clear photometric rotation period from the light curve.
271:
272: (3) On the other hand, tidal effects should be much weaker in the CoRoT-Exo-4 system, consisting of a late-F star and a Jupiter-mass planet with a period of 9.21\,d \cite{aigr08,mout08}. Nevertheless, ACF analysis of the OOT light curve (Figure~\ref{aigrain}) indicates that stellar rotation is synchronised with the orbit ($P_{\rm rot}=8.8\pm1.1$\,d), a surprising result which remains to be explained.
273:
274:
275: \begin{figure}[h]
276: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=10cm]{aigrain.eps}
277: \caption{Normalised light curve of CoRoT-Exo-4, showing 6 planetary transits and rotational modulation of several emerging and decaying active regions.}
278: \label{aigrain}
279: \end{figure}
280:
281:
282:
283:
284: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
285: %% BACKMATTER
286: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
287:
288: \begin{theacknowledgments}
289:
290: We would like to thank the Cool Stars 15 LOC and SOC for providing an opportunity for this splinter session and for organizing a terrific meeting in St. Andrews.
291:
292: \end{theacknowledgments}
293:
294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
295: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
296: %% manually.
297: %%
298: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
299: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
300: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
301: %%
302: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
303: %% after the \end{document}
304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
305:
306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
307: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
308: %% setup or preferences.
309: %%
310: %%
311: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
313:
314: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
315: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
316:
317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
318: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
320: \bibliography{SPI_refs}
321:
322: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
323: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
324: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
325: %% if you don't like the warning.
326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
327: \IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
328: {\typeout{}
329: \typeout{******************************************}
330: \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to optain}
331: \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
332: \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
333: \typeout{******************************************}
334: \typeout{}
335: }
336:
337: \end{document}
338:
339: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
340: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
341: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
342: %% of the above.
343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
344:
345: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
346:
347: \bibitem{Brown2000}
348: M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{The New Physique}, Publisher Name,
349: Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
350:
351: \bibitem{BrownAustin:2000}
352: M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{Appl. Phys. Letters} \textbf{85},
353: 2503--2504 (2000).
354:
355: \bibitem{Wang}
356: R.~Wang, ``Title of Chapter,'' in \emph{Classic Physiques}, edited by
357: R.~B. Hamil, Publisher Name, Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
358:
359: \bibitem{SJ:1999}
360: C.~D.~Smith and E.~F.~Jones, ``Load-Cycling in Cubic Press,'' in
361: \emph{Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-1999}, edited by M.~D.~F. et~al.,
362: AIP Conference Proceedings 505, American Institute of Physics, New York,
363: 1999, pp. 651--654.
364:
365: \end{thebibliography}
366:
367: \endinput
368: %%
369: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
370: