1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4: \title{Beryllium Abundances in Stars of One-Solar-Mass}
5:
6: \author{Ann Merchant Boesgaard\altaffilmark{1}}
7: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i at M\-anoa, \\
8: 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI{\ \ } 96822 \\ }
9: \email{boes@ifa.hawaii.edu}
10:
11: \author{Julie A. Krugler\altaffilmark{1}}
12: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, \\
13: Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1116}
14: \email{kruglerj@msu.edu}
15:
16: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, W.~M.~Keck Observatory jointly operated
17: by the California Institute of Technology and the University of California.}
18:
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: We have determined Be abundances in 50 F and G dwarfs in the mass range of 0.9
22: $\leq$ M$_\odot$ $\leq$ 1.1 as determined by Lambert \& Reddy. The effective
23: temperatures are 5600 to 6400 K and metallicities from $-$0.65 to +0.11. The
24: spectra were taken primarily with Keck I + HIRES. The Be abundances were
25: found via spectral synthesis of Be II lines near 3130 \AA. The Be abundances
26: were investigated as a function of age, temperature, metallicity and Li
27: abundance in this narrow mass range. Even though our stars are similar in
28: mass, they show a range in Be abundances of a factor of $>$40. We find that
29: [Be/Fe] has no dependence on temperature, but does show a spread of a factor
30: of 6 at a given temperature. The reality of the spread is shown by two
31: identical stars which differ from each other by a factor of two only in their
32: abundances of Li and Be. Our thin-disk-star sample fits the trend between Be
33: abundance and [Fe/H] found for halo and thick disk stars, extending it to
34: about 4 orders of magnitude in the two logarithmic quantities. Both Fe and Be
35: appear to increase similarly over time in the Galaxy. One-third of our sample
36: may be classified as subgiants; these more-evolved stars have lower Be
37: abundances than the dwarfs. They have undergone Be depletion by slow mixing
38: on the main sequence and Be dilution during their trip toward the red giant
39: base. There are both Li and Be detections in 60 field stars in the
40: ``Li-plateau'' of 5900 - 6300 K now and the abundances of the two light
41: elements are correlated with a slope of 0.34 $\pm$0.05, with greater Li
42: depletion than Be depletion.
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45: \keywords{stars: Abundances; stars: solar-type; stars: evolution; stars:
46: late-type; stars: Population I}
47:
48: \section{INTRODUCTION}
49: The study of the light elements reveals the physics of a star beneath its
50: surface. Lithium, Be, and B can all be used as probes to understand surface
51: mixing down to temperatures of about 2.5 $\times 10^{6}$, 3.5 $\times 10^{6}$,
52: and 5 $\times 10^{6}$ K respectively, where they are destroyed by fusion
53: primarily with protons. Boron provides the deepest look into
54: the interior of a star, but the B I, B II, and B III resonance lines appear
55: only in the ``satellite'' UV so it is impossible to find B abundances without
56: going above the atmosphere. Lithium is markedly easier to observe given that
57: its resonance doublet occurs in the red portion of the spectrum at 6708 \AA{},
58: but inasmuch as there are multiple sites for the creation and destruction of
59: Li, the interpretation of the Li abundance can be complicated. Beryllium
60: provides a clearer picture as it has one mechanism of production: spallation
61: reactions in the vicinity of supernovae or in the ambient interstellar gas.
62: The resonance lines of Be II are found at 3130.421 and 3131.065 \AA{}, which
63: are still observable with ground-based telescopes. However, the Be II
64: features are near the atmospheric cutoff ($\sim$3000 \AA{}), so stars must be
65: observed at low air mass.
66:
67:
68: There have been several recent studies of the light elements Li and Be.
69: Boesgaard et al.~(2004a) (hereinafter B04a) investigated the correlation of Li
70: and Be in F and G dwarf stars in cluster and field stars in the metallicity
71: range of $-$0.45 $\leq$ [Fe/H] $\leq$ +0.11. Included in the paper was a plot
72: of the Be abundance against T$_{\rm eff}$ from a variety of cluster and field
73: sources. The plot showed a large spread in A(Be) = log N(Be)/N(H) + 12.00 and
74: the focus of their study was narrowed by defining two temperature regimes: the
75: cool side of the Li-Be dip (Boesgaard \& Tripicco 1986; Boesgaard \& King
76: 2002) from 6300-6650 K (where Li increases with decreasing temperature) and
77: near the Li plateau from 5900-6300 K (where Li begins to decline with
78: decreasing temperature). B04a found that Li was depleted more than Be in both
79: temperature regimes. The amount of Li and Be depletion in the Li-Be dip
80: (T$_{\rm eff}$ = 6300 - 6650 K) is attributed to slow mixing and is dependent
81: upon age and temperature. Older stars showed more Li and Be depletion and the
82: hotter stars, near the bottom of the dip, show the greatest depletions. There
83: was no difference in the depletion patterns between the cluster and field
84: stars.
85:
86: Santos et al.~(2004a) (hereafter S04a) determined Be abundances by spectrum
87: synthesis in field stars ranging from 4800-6300 K. They found the Be
88: abundance to peak at $\sim$6100 K, with decreasing Be abundances both towards
89: the cooler stars and towards the Li-Be gap that encompasses hotter stars.
90: They suggest that the peak may be explained by a the bias in their sample of
91: metal-rich stars which would also have enhanced Be due to Galactic enrichment.
92: They discuss the decline in the Be abundance and the possibility of a Be
93: plateau around T$_{\rm eff}$ $\sim$5600 K. This decline and plateau are
94: compared to the Be depletion models that introduce rotational mixing by
95: Pinsonneault et al.~(1990) for 1.7 Gyr ages. The match is acceptable above
96: 5600 K, but there is a better fit for cooler temperatures with the wave-driven
97: mixing models of 4.5 Gyr of Montalban \& Schatzman (2000). This same data set
98: was also analyzed in Santos et al.~(2004b) to find a possible correlation
99: between Be abundance and planet hosts. It was found that planet hosts have a
100: ``normal'' Be abundance.
101:
102: Lambert \& Reddy (2004; hereafter LR04) have compiled a database of Li
103: abundances for 451 F and G thin disc stars. The stars were taken from three
104: different surveys of Li in field stars: Reddy et al.~(2003), Chen et
105: al.~(2001), and Balachandran (1990). The stars are located in the solar
106: neighborhood and have measured Hipparcos parallaxes. HR diagrams were created
107: for these field stars using the parallaxes to calculate M$_{\rm V}$. The
108: majority of these stars were slightly evolved away from the zero age main
109: sequence, so it was possible to calculate evolutionary ages from the Girardi
110: et al.~(2000) (hereafter G00) isochrones. The corresponding evolutionary
111: tracks were used to determine masses for each metallicity subset.
112:
113: It has been shown to be useful to study more than one of the light elements at
114: once to develop a fuller picture of the stellar mixing and depletion
115: processes. For example, B04a investigate the correlation of Li and Be, and
116: Boesgaard et al.~(2005) discovered the correlation of Be and B.
117:
118: The location of the Li resonance lines in the red spectral region makes Li
119: easier to observe and measure than Be, due to the location of the Be II lines
120: near the atmospheric cut off and due to the substantial blending found in the
121: UV in solar-type stars. Given that the LR04 data have a complete set of
122: stellar parameters, along with Li abundances, they provide a good base from
123: which to study the Be abundances. In order to disentangle information
124: regarding the Be and Li abundances from the large spread in the B04a plots of
125: A(Be) vs.~T$_{\rm eff}$ and A(Be) vs.~[Fe/H], we placed a one solar mass
126: constraint on the LR04 data in our star selection. In this way we can
127: understand better the nature of the processes which affect both Li and Be at 1
128: M$_\odot$.
129:
130: \section{OBSERVATIONS}
131: A total of 52 high resolution spectra of the Be II resonance lines at 3130.421
132: and 3131.065 \AA{} were taken over several nights with the HIRES instrument on
133: the Keck I 10m telescope and the coud\`e spectrograph on the
134: Canada-France-Hawaii 3.6m telescope (CFHT). These telescopes are on Mauna Kea
135: at 14,000 feet elevation which is above $\sim$40\% of the Earth's atmosphere.
136: This allows additional throughput in the ultraviolet region compared to other
137: observatory sites. Additionally, these spectra were taken when the stars were
138: near the meridian, reducing the air mass and reducing the effects of
139: atmospheric dispersion.
140:
141: \subsection{Star Selection}
142:
143: The stars in this study were chosen from the LR04 paper in which 451 F and G
144: dwarfs were analyzed for the purpose of understanding the metallicity, mass,
145: and age effects on the Li abundance. Their study determined ages and masses
146: using the G00 tracks, and Hipparcos parallaxes for M$_{\rm V}$. Our study
147: focused on the stars that LR04 found to be within 0.9 $\leq$ M$_\odot$ $\leq$
148: 1.1. Of the 451 stars in the LR04 study there were 156, or 35\% in that mass
149: range; we have Be observations of one third of these stars.
150:
151: Figure 1 is an HR Diagram showing the positions of our stars. They are
152: separated into dwarfs and subgiants by the criterion of S04 at log g = 4.1.
153: The circled dot indicates the Sun. They range from 5600 $<$ T$_{\rm eff}$ $<$
154: 6600 and most are somewhat evolved away from the zero age main sequence. Due
155: to the fact that most of the stars in LR04 are evolved beyond the zero age
156: main sequence, it was possible for them to determine stellar ages.
157:
158: \subsection{New Keck/HIRES Observations}
159:
160: In 2004, the HIRES spectrometer was upgraded with a 6144 x 4096 mosaic CCD,
161: which is split into three chips with one optimized for the ultraviolet/blue
162: end of the spectrum. The quantum efficiency is 94\% for this chip in the
163: beryllium region, about 12 times better than the old chip. Between 31 January
164: 2005 and 9 June 2007, 40 Keck spectra were taken with the new HIRES detector
165: on nine separate nights. Given the relative brightness of these stars, they
166: were taken in evening and morning twilights and on partly cloudy nights. The
167: decker used was B5 which has slit dimensions of 3.5 x 0.861 arcsec. These
168: data have a spectral dispersion of 0.0132 \AA{} pixel$^{-1}$ and a measured
169: spectral resolution of $\sim$49,000 near 3130 \AA. Exposure times ranged from
170: 3-30 minutes to attain a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) range from 33 to 277 and
171: a median S/N of 146 and a mean of 168.
172:
173: On each of the nine nights on which observations were made for this program,
174: calibration frames were also taken. Typically 7-9 bias frames were recorded
175: and Th-Ar spectra were obtained at the beginning and end of each night. The
176: internal flat fields were taken with different exposure times for each of the
177: three CCDs. In order to achieve sufficient flux for the Be II line region
178: exposures of 50 s were needed for the UV chip. The optimum exposure for the
179: green chip was typically 3 s and that exposure would be useful for the longer
180: orders of the UV chip. In order not to saturate the flat fields on the red
181: chip exposures of 1 s were obtained. Seven to nine flat exposures were taken
182: at each of the three exposure times to achieve the proper flux for the various
183: orders on all three CCDs.
184:
185: Table 1 gives the star name, V magnitude, date of observation, exposure time,
186: and total S/N of the stars for which observations were taken using Keck I with
187: the upgraded HIRES.
188:
189: \subsection{Other Observations}
190: The Keck spectra from the upgraded HIRES were supplemented by spectra in the
191: LR04 one-solar-mass range from the original HIRES and the CFHT. With the
192: original HIRES on Keck I with a Tektronix 2048 x 2048 CCD (Vogt et al. 1992),
193: five stars were observed between 13 November 1999 and 5 January 2002. These
194: data have a spectral resolution of 0.022 \AA{} pixel$^{-1}$ which gives a
195: resolution of $\sim$48,000 per pixel. Exposure times for those stars ranged
196: from 5-12 minutes with a median S/N of 140 and a mean of 122.
197:
198: Five stars were observed on 15 and 16 October 1995 on the 3.6m CFHT with the
199: Gecko f/4 spectrograph with a resolution of $\sim$120,000 and a dispersion of
200: 0.010 \AA{} pixel$^{-1}$. The detector was a 2048 x 2048 array with 15 $\mu$m
201: pixels that is UV sensitive with a quantum efficiency 80\% in the beryllium
202: region. Exposure times for these five stars range from 15-45 minutes, with a
203: median and mean S/N of 72. Information on these observations and data
204: reduction can be found in Boesgaard et al.~(2001). One additional star (HD
205: 142860) was obtained with the f/8 coud\'e spectrograph at CFHT at a resolution
206: of 24,000. Details of that observation can be found in Boesgaard et
207: al.~(2004b).
208:
209: Table 2 includes the CFHT stars and Keck I stars that were previously included
210: in Boesgaard et al.~(2001, 2004a, 2004b). It lists the name, V magnitude,
211: date of observation, exposure time, total S/N, telescope, and the reference to
212: the paper from which the star was taken and where the earlier analyses were
213: presented. The Be abundances for these stars have been redetermined here
214: using the parameters determined by LR04.
215:
216: \subsection{Data Reduction}
217:
218: The Keck I data from the upgraded HIRES were reduced using IRAF and using two
219: different reduction pipelines: the new MAKEE Data Reduction Software and the
220: IDL-based HIRES Redux software. Both software routines were designed for the
221: new chip. We used our own master flat fields (one for each chip), biases, and
222: arcs rather than adopt archival ones. It is critical to have long flat field
223: exposures, typically 50 s,in order to have sufficient flux at the UV
224: wavelengths of the Be II lines, while 3 s is enough for the green chip and 1 s
225: for the red chip. Our wavelength calibrations were found from our Th-Ar
226: exposures at the beginning and end of the each night. The wavelength solution
227: was applied for the each night. Cosmic ray removal was also performed on the
228: stars in the Be region using the IDL version of
229: L.A. Cosmic\footnote{http://www.astro.yale.edu/dokkum/lacosmic}. The data
230: were then doppler corrected and continuum fit in IRAF using the onedspec
231: package and the echelle package.
232:
233: The data reduction for the stars discussed in $\S$2.3 has been described in
234: the original papers; see Boesgaard et al.~2001, B04a, and B04b for the details
235: of the procedures used regarding the CFHT stars and the earlier Keck I HIRES
236: stars.
237:
238: \section{ABUNDANCES}
239:
240: \subsection{Stellar Parameters}
241: In order to measure the Be abundance in these stars, we interpolated
242: atmospheric models from the Kurucz grid point models (Kurucz 1993). These
243: require metallicity ([Fe/H]), effective temperature (T$_{\rm eff}$), surface
244: gravity (log g), and microturbulence ($\xi$). The [Fe/H], T$_{\rm eff}$, and
245: log g were adopted from LR04; however, the microturbulence parameter was not
246: included. Microturbulences were determined using the following relation
247: derived by Edvardsson et al. (1993):
248:
249: $\xi$ = 1.25 + 8 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$(T$_{\rm eff}$ $-$ 6000) $-$ 1.3(log g $-$ 4.5)
250:
251:
252: A complete list of the stellar parameters (T$_{\rm eff}$, log g, [Fe/H], and
253: $\xi$) for all our stars is found in Table 3.
254:
255: \subsection{Beryllium Synthesis}
256: We determined the abundance of Be by fitting the Be II resonance lines at
257: 3130.421 and 3131.065 \AA{} using the spectral synthesis software
258: MOOG\footnote{http://verdi.as.utexas.edu/moog.html} (Sneden 1973) as updated
259: in 2002 (in ``synth'' mode). Due to the considerable blending around the
260: 3130.421 \AA{} line the stronger of the doublet, the fit of the 3131.065 \AA{}
261: line gave a more reliably-determined Be abundance.
262:
263: Our line list includes 307 atomic and molecular lines between 3129.5 and
264: 3132.5 \AA. It was adopted largely from Kurucz to best fit the Be region with
265: some modifications to the list from former studies of Be abundances in stars
266: covering a wide range of temperatures and gravities., e.g. the log $gf$ value
267: of the 3129.763 \AA{} Zr II line. During the synthesis-fitting a Gaussian
268: profile was used for the instrumental and other broadening. The instrumental
269: broadening has a full-width half-maximum of 0.08 \AA{} and most of the stars
270: were fit with FWHM 0.08 to 0.10 \AA\. The largest broadening was 0.18 \AA{}
271: for HD 218470, an F5 V star in the Li-Be dip region with T$_{\rm eff}$ = 6495
272: K.
273:
274: Figures 2-5 show examples of the synthetic spectra that were created for each
275: star. For each spectrum, the dots represent the data points, while the solid
276: line is the synthesis with the best fit. The dash-dotted lines represent a
277: factor of two in the Be abundance above and below the best-fit Be abundance
278: and the dotted line represents a synthetic spectrum without any Be. The Be
279: abundance is represented in terms of A(Be); the meteoritic value is A(Be)=1.42
280: (Grevesse \& Sauval 1998).
281:
282: In Figure 2 HD 693 and HD 103799 are compared. They have essentially the same
283: T$_{\rm eff}$, [Fe/H], age (6.1 Gyr), and A(Be). The main discernible
284: difference is in the rotation as is seen in the line broadening in HD 103799
285: where its full-width half-maximum (FWHM) gaussian is 0.13 compared to that of
286: HD 693 at 0.09 . Shown in Figure 3 are HD 186379 and HD 94012 which have
287: nearly identical [Fe/H] and the same A(Be) and vary only slightly in age (10
288: Gyr vs.~8 Gyr) even though they differ in T$_{\rm eff}$ by 250 K. In Figure 4
289: are HD 199960 and HD 15335. They have the same age (6.5 Gyr), and T$_{\rm
290: eff}$; however, they differ in both [Fe/H] and A(Be) by a factor of two. This
291: supports the trend of an increasing Be abundance with increasing [Fe/H] for
292: halo and disk stars (e.g. see Boesgaard \& Novicki 2006 Figure 7). Finally,
293: in Figure 5 are HD 209320 and HD 30743. These stars have the same age but
294: differ in [Fe/H] by 0.4 dex. T$_{\rm eff}$ by 225 K, and in A(Be) by 0.2 dex.
295:
296: Table 4 includes the parameters such as mass, age and absolute visual
297: magnitude as determined by LR04, including their value for A(Li). The final
298: column has the Be abundance determined in this work.
299:
300: In the temperature regime of our stars, an error of 100 K results in a
301: negligible error in A(Be), $\leq$ 0.01 dex. However, an uncertainty in log g
302: of $\pm$ 0.5 produces an error between 0.044 to 0.052 dex depending upon
303: T$_{\rm eff}$. A combination of errors due to uncertainties in T$_{\rm eff}$,
304: log g, [Fe/H], $\xi$, S/N of the observed spectrum, and the goodness-of-fit of
305: the synthetic spectrum combine to give errors in A(Be) of 0.1 to 0.2 dex.
306: There are nine stars analyzed here with Be detections that can be compared
307: with the results in B01, B04a, and B04b. The average differences in the
308: parameters used are $\Delta$T = 5 K, $\Delta$log g = $-$0.05, $\Delta$[Fe/H] =
309: $-$0.03 (in the sense of LR04 minus previous publications); these are
310: insignificant differences. The differences in the values of A(Be) for the
311: nine stars are $-$0.12 $\pm$0.12.
312:
313:
314:
315: \section{ANALYSIS AND RESULTS}
316:
317: \subsection{General Results}
318:
319: We have found Be abundances in 46 of our 50 stars ranging from A(Be) = 0.57 up
320: to the meteoritic abundance of 1.42. This represents a spread in A(Be) of
321: almost an order of magnitude in one solar-mass stars. The four upper limits
322: to A(Be) extend this range down to $<$$-$0.2 or a factor of more than 40. In
323: our sample there are six stars with only upper limits on the Li abundance and
324: four of them also have only upper limits on Be, while the two others have
325: measured Be. Two of the Li- and Be-deficient stars, HD 182101 and HD 218470,
326: are in the Li-Be dip region of T$_{\rm eff}$.
327:
328: Histograms of the Li and Be abundance distributions are shown in Figure 6.
329: For this sample of 44 Li detections of one solar-mass stars the median value
330: of A(Li) = 2.39 and for the 46 Be detections the median A(Be) is 0.92. Both
331: of these values are lower than their meteoritic counterparts of 3.31 and 1.42
332: respectively; this indicates considerable stellar depletion relative to the
333: meteoritic values. All the stars are Li depleted and all but one are Be
334: depleted.
335:
336: When we narrow the mass range to those stars that are within $\pm$0.03 solar
337: masses (0.97 - 1.03 $M_{\odot}$) and select those within $\pm$100 K of the
338: Sun, there are six in our sample. For these six the mean A(Li) = 2.24
339: $\pm$0.23 and the mean A(Be) = 1.03 $\pm$0.14. These values compare well,
340: within the errors, with the medians from the whole sample. The six stars (HD
341: 22521, 26421, 94835, 100180, 186379, and 217877) are all older than the sun by
342: 3-4 Gyr (except HD 94835 which is only 2.3 Gyr older) according to the G00
343: tracks and isochrones. Their old age and relatively high mean Li abundance,
344: A(Li) = 2.24, only deepens the mystery of the large solar Li depletion,
345: A(Li)$_{\odot}$ $\sim$1.0.
346:
347:
348: \subsection{HR Diagram}
349:
350: In the LR04 study, masses and ages were determined via the G00 isochrones and
351: evolutionary tracks. We have put our Be results in the familiar context of the
352: HR diagram by showing the relative Be abundances along with the G00
353: evolutionary tracks and isochrones in Figures 7 and 8. We have used tracks
354: for [Fe/H] of 0.0 and $-$0.4 and include stars with [Fe/H] $>$ $-$0.2 in
355: Figure 7 and $<$ $-$0.2 in Figure 8. The evolutionary tracks that cover our
356: range of mass of 0.9 - 1.1 M$_\odot$ are shown for the respective values of
357: [Fe/H]. Isochrones for 100, 700, 2500 and 4500 myr are also shown in each
358: figure. The four sizes of symbols indicates the size of A(Be).
359:
360: In Figure 8, two stars appear to be $>$1.1 M$_{\odot}$ for this survey, but
361: this is due to the metallicity dependence of the evolutionary tracks; in LR04
362: smaller intervals were chosen for the tracks and therefore better constraints
363: on the mass in LR04 were made. Although stars which fall near the cutoff
364: between the two tracks in this study do not appear to be in the right mass
365: range, the masses for these stars are indeed in the correct range and have
366: been adopted from the LR04 paper.
367:
368: As can be seen in Figure 1, many of the stars in our sample have evolved away
369: from the zero age main sequence (which is the reason why evolutionary ages can
370: be assigned). In S04 the cut-off between dwarfs and subgiants is given as log
371: g = 4.1. There are 17 stars in this sample that accordingly would be
372: classified as subgiants. These stars generally have lower Be abundances with
373: a mean A(Be) of 0.82 (excluding the two with upper limits). The stars with
374: log g $\leq$ 4.1 separate out in the distribution shown in the Be histogram in
375: the lower portion of Figure 6; the lower three bins have 3, 8, and 4 stars
376: that are subgiants.
377:
378: The evolutionarily older subgiants show typically lower Be abundances at a
379: given T$_{\rm eff}$ than the dwarf stars. The older age of the subgiants
380: allow them to have had more time for slow mixing of the light elements,
381: leading to depletion on the main sequence while the more advanced evolutionary
382: stage allows them to have enlarged the surface convection zones leading to
383: light element dilution.
384:
385: It may also just be a reflection of small number statistics; S04 do not see a
386: similar depletion in their subgiants as seen in their Figure 4. Indeed there
387: would not be as much Be dilution in evolved stars compared to Li dilution.
388: Figures 7 and 8 show little sign of a correlation between Be abundance and
389: evolutionary age along the mass tracks.
390:
391: \subsection{Trends with Temperature}
392:
393: This solar-mass sample was selected from a survey of F and G stars in the
394: local thin disk. This resulted in a temperature range for our stars from 5600
395: to 6400 K. When plotted against temperature, an upper envelope for the Be
396: abundance becomes apparent as seen in Figure 9. The highest Be abundances are
397: present near 5800-600 K, with reduced amounts of Be in the hotter stars of our
398: sample, 6300-6500 K, in the Li-Be dip region. For the Hyades this dip region
399: is about T$_{\rm eff}$ $\sim$ 6300 - 6800 K (e.g. Boesgaard \& Tripicco 1986)
400: but for older stars the dip region may enlarge toward cooler temperatures
401: (e.e. Michaud 1986) and show a larger spread in A(Li) (e.g.~Jones et
402: al.~1999).
403:
404: The lowest Be {\it detections} for this sample are A(Be) $\sim$0.5 dex and the
405: Be abundances range up to 1.42. This order of magnitude spread can be seen
406: particularly in the cooler stars (i.e. T$_{\rm eff} \leq$ 5900 K). The stars
407: in the S04a paper have T$_{\rm eff}$ in the range of 4800 to 6300 K. They
408: find a abundance peak in A(Be) near 6100 K, with a gentle decline toward lower
409: temperatures approaching 5000 K. Their sample includes planet-host stars,
410: many of which are metal-rich, whereas our sample has only two stars with
411: [Fe/H] $>$ 0.00. Those metal-rich stars show enhanced Be. Although our
412: sample shows no such Be abundance peak and decline we note that our sample
413: covers a specific mass range and thus a smaller range in temperature than that
414: of S04a; we would not expect to see the decline in Be with decreasing
415: temperature that they found.
416:
417: Both slow mixing and convection zone depth vary with the stellar metallicity
418: at a given mass or T$_{\rm eff}$. There is evidence of a correlation between
419: [Fe/H] and A(Be) (e.g.~Boesgaard et al. 2008, Boesgaard \& Novicki 2006, and
420: $\S$4.4 below). That correlation needs to be considered when evaluating the
421: temperature relation. The range for metallicity for our stars is $-$0.65
422: $\leq$ [Fe/H] $\leq$ +0.11. In Figure 10 we show the Be abundances normalized
423: to Fe as [Be/Fe] versus T$_{\rm eff}$. (We used the meteoritic A(Be) for the
424: solar system normalization.) The normalized ratio, [Be/Fe], shows
425: some spread at a given temperature, but no dramatic trend with temperature.
426: And unlike Figure 9, the dwarfs and subgiants show similar relations with
427: temperature. This plot of [Be/Fe] against T$_{\rm eff}$ does not yield the
428: same trend as seen in S04a.
429:
430: \subsection{Trends with [Fe/H]}
431:
432: The stars of this sample are members of the thin disk and generally have
433: considerably higher metallicities than those of the thick disk and halo
434: populations. These stars are of metallicity [Fe/H] $>$ $-$0.65, with two
435: positive metallicity stars. However, when the Be abundance is plotted against
436: [Fe/H] in Figure 11, the metal-rich stars of this survey match the trend with
437: the halo stars sampled in Boesgaard et al.~(2008) remarkably well. The slope
438: of the relation between A(Be) and [Fe/H] is 0.86 $\pm$0.02. The most
439: metal-rich star (at [Fe/H] = 0.11) in our sample is HD 199960 whose Be
440: abundance is equivalent to that of the meteoritic value of 1.42 dex (Grevesse
441: \& Sauval 1998). This value is also the highest Be abundance in this sample,
442: supporting the idea that A(Be) increases with [Fe/H].
443:
444: This is a remarable
445: trend, extending over nearly four orders of magnitude in [Fe/H] and over three
446: orders of magnitude in A(Be).
447:
448: Another illustration of this relation is to sort the sample into metallicity
449: bins. We created four metallicity bins and took the mean A(Be) from the three
450: most Be-rich stars per bin. Table 5 shows again that A(Be) increases as
451: [Fe/H] increases. LR04 created similar [Fe/H] bins for their data with the Li
452: abundance and found that as the [Fe/H] increased the Li abundance increased
453: (which was expected), and so did the mass. Given that our data were selected
454: based on mass, it was not possible to see the mass trend; however, we did
455: apply the same [Fe/H] bins to the 157 LR04 solar mass stars that had Li
456: abundances. A(Li) is shown to increase with increasing [Fe/H] as well, but it
457: is less obvious in our smaller data set.
458:
459:
460: \subsection{Trends with Age}
461:
462: One of the aims of this study was to understand the relationship between
463: A(Be)and age. The mass constraint was placed at 1 $\pm$ 0.1 M$_{\odot}$ in
464: order to parameterize the A(Be)-age relation. Of our stars, all but one are
465: older than the 4.5 Gyr Sun, eight (or 15\%) have ages $<$ 6 Gyr and two (4\%)
466: have ages $<$ 5 Gyr. This fits well with the larger sample of LR04 stars with
467: masses between 0.9 and 1.1 M$_{\odot}$. The full LR04 sample includes 451
468: stars, with 157 (or 35\% of the sample) within our mass constraints; of those
469: 157 stars, only 34 (22\%) have ages $<$ 6 Gyr and only 6 (4\%) have ages $<$5
470: Gyr.
471:
472: Figure 12 plots A(Be) against age and [Be/Fe] against age. The spread in
473: A(Be) (including upper limits) is nearly 1.5 dex for the entire range of ages;
474: including only the Be detections, the spread is still 0.9 dex. It should be
475: noted that only one star (HD 199960) has larger A(Be) than the Sun with the
476: rest being below the solar A(Be) value of $\sim$ 1.3 dex (e.g. Boesgaard et
477: al.~2003). These stars, which have evolved away from the zero age main
478: sequence, have continued to lose Be. In the lower panel one can see that the
479: scatter is reduced by using [Be/Fe], correcting for each star's metallicity.
480: A small trend is found such that the older stars have more Be relative to Fe
481: in our one-solar mass sample. The ratio of Be/Fe is two times larger in the
482: stars of 10 Gyr compared to those of 5 Gyr.
483:
484: \subsection{Trends with Lithium Abundance}
485:
486: Understanding the correlation between Be and Li is key to understanding the
487: nature of light element depletion and slow mixing in these stars. Figure 13
488: shows the plot of A(Be) versus A(Li).
489:
490: B05 found a linear relationship between A(Li) and A(Be) for field and cluster
491: stars in the T$_{\rm eff}$ ranges of 5900-6300 K (the Li ``plateau'') and
492: 6300-6650 K (the cool side of the Li-dip) with slopes of 0.365$\pm$0.036 and
493: 0.404$\pm$0.034 respectively. We can combine our data with the field stars of
494: B04 in the temperature range of 5900 $<$ T$_{\rm eff}$ $<$ 6300 K. Figure 13
495: shows those results for the total of 60 stars. The triangles are stars from
496: this study. For the combined data we find a slope of 0.34 $\pm$0.05 which
497: compares well with the slope for 31 field stars in this same temperature range
498: in B04: 0.36 $\pm$0.05. Note that the three most Li- and Be-depleted stars in
499: Figure 13 all have solar metallicity: [Fe/H] = -0.03, +0.09, +0.12. It
500: appears that metallicity is not an important factor in the Li-Be correlation.
501:
502:
503: \subsection{The Spread in Be Abundance}
504:
505: There is clear evidence that astration of Be is taking place in these
506: one-solar-mass stars. The spread in A(Be) and [Be/Fe] at a given temperature
507: shows that. The spread in A(Be) covers more than 1.5 dex, while the typical
508: errors are $\pm$0.15. There are two stars in our sample that have nearly
509: identical stellar parameters, yet they differ in both A(Be) and A(Li) by a
510: factor of two. The Be region of the spectra of these two stars, HD 200580 and
511: HD 204712, are shown in Figure 14. Only the two Be II lines show meaningful
512: differences between these two spectra. Their full set of stellar parameters
513: are given in Table 4. They differ in T$_{\rm eff}$ by only 35 K, in log g by
514: 0.07, and in [Fe/H] by only 0.06, all within the precision of their
515: determinations. Their respective masses are 0.95 and 0.96 M$_{\odot}$ and
516: their ages are 9.17 and 9.35 Gyr, with the slightly older one having more Be.
517:
518: This pair may indicate that another parameter plays a role in Be astration; it
519: has been suggested by B04a that rotational velocity is that
520: parameter. Stars are formed with differing initial velocities and spin down
521: to their present-day values. During the spin-down, extra mixing occurs which
522: increases the amount of Be (and Li) that can reach the critical temperature
523: for destruction. As found by B04a the depletion of Li and Be observed in
524: cluster and field stars is well-matched by the rotation-model predictions of
525: Deliyannis \& Pinsonneault (1997). See Figure 12 of B04a.
526:
527: \section{SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS}
528:
529:
530: We have determined Be abundances for 50 solar-mass stars using spectra taken
531: at the Keck I telescope and the CFH Telescope. The stars were selected from
532: LR04 to be within 0.1 M$_{\odot}$ of the sun. Most of our sample of
533: one-solar-mass stars were taken using the new Keck I HIRES mosaic CCD, the
534: resolution was $\sim$78,000 with a median S/N ratio of 146. The data were
535: reduced using the IDL HIRES Redux pipeline and IRAF. We adopted the stellar
536: parameters as determined by LR04 and used them to create model atmospheres for
537: spectral synthesis in MOOG using the Kurucz grid point models. Be abundances
538: were determined by fitting the 4 \AA{} region around the Be II resonance lines
539: located at 3130.421 and 3131.065 \AA{}. We plotted HR diagrams using the G00
540: isochrones and evolutionary tracks in combination with the LR04 stellar
541: parameters. The majority of our stars are evolved away from the zero age main
542: sequence and all but one are older than the Sun.
543:
544: The main results from our analysis are as follows:
545:
546: In spite of the similarity in mass of our stars, there is a wide range in Be
547: abundances from A(Be) $<$ $-$0.2 to +1.42, or more than a factor of 40. The
548: median Be abundance is 0.92 -- for the 46 stars with Be detections -- which
549: represents a deficiency relative to the meteoritic abundance of A(Be) = 1.42.
550: The median Li abundance for the 44 stars with Li detections is A(Li) = 2.39,
551: also deficient compared to the meteoritic value of 3.31. See Figure 6 for
552: the distribution of light elements in our stars. Of our four stars with upper
553: limits on the Be abundances, all have upper limits on Li also. This is
554: expected since Li is destroyed in stellar interiors at lower temperatures than
555: Be by (p,$\alpha$), making Li more susceptible to destruction.
556:
557: We have compared the positions of our stars on the HR diagram with the
558: isochrones and evolutionary tracks of G00 (see Figures 7 and 8). In our
559: sample of 50 stars the subgiants, as defined by log g $<$4.1, make up
560: one-third of the stars. At a given T$_{\rm eff}$ these more-evolved stars
561: generally have lower Be abundances than the main-sequence stars. The reduced
562: amount of Be could result both from more depletion on the main sequence and
563: possibly from more dilution due to the expansion of the surface convection
564: zone in the evolutionarily more advanced subgiants.
565:
566: This one-solar-mass sample of thin disk stars matches the remarkable
567: relationship between A(Be) and [Fe/H] found earlier (e.g. Boesgaard et
568: al.~1999, Boesgaard \& Novicki 2006, Boesgaard et al.~2008). As can be seen
569: in Figure 11, this relationship extends over 4 orders of magnitude in [Fe/H]
570: and more than 3 orders of magnitude in A(Be). The linear relation between
571: these two logarithmic quantities has a slope of 0.86 $\pm$0.02. This
572: indicates an increase in the abundance of both elements over the age of the
573: Galaxy even though Fe is made by nuclear processing in stars and Be is made
574: through spallation reactions outside of stars.
575:
576: In the relation between A(Be) and T$_{\rm eff}$ there are lower Be abundances
577: near the F star Li-Be dip, while the higher Be abundances appear in the cooler
578: stars, as can be seen in Figure 9. In fact, there is a large spread in A(Be)
579: in the cooler stars. Due to the relationship between A(Be) and [Fe/H], we
580: have normalized the Be abundances to the Fe abundances and form [Be/Fe]. When
581: this parameter is plotted against T$_{\rm eff}$ (see Figure 10), there is no
582: temperature dependence. The main sequence stars and the subgiants have
583: similar distributions of [Be/Fe] with T$_{\rm eff}$. Even with this
584: normalization, however, there is a large spread in [Be/Fe] of a factor of 6
585: (not including the upper limits on Be).
586:
587: The spread that we find is larger than the typical error of $\sim$0.12 dex in
588: the Be abundances. We can see this in the pair of nearly identical stars, HD
589: 200580 and HD 204712, which differ in Be abundance by a factor of 2
590: although they have the same [Fe/H], T$_{\rm eff}$, log g, age and mass. See
591: Figure 14.
592:
593: The range in age of our stars in the one-solar-mass sample covers 3.8 to 9.9
594: Gyr. In this age range there is a spread of 1.5 dex in A(Be). However, as
595: can be seen in Figure 12, there is no noticeable trend if Be abundance with
596: age. All except one of our stars are older than the sun and all, except one,
597: have lower Be abundances than that found in meteorites (and in the Sun). The
598: stellar deficiencies in Be are probably indicative of the longer time over
599: which slow mixing and depletion of Be has taken place. For the stars that
600: have evolved toward the base of the red giant branch, the deepening of the
601: surface convection zone could have produced additional dilution of the surface
602: Be content.
603:
604: Of our 50 stars, 30 are in the temperature regime of T$_{\rm eff}$ = 5900 -
605: 6300 K. This range corresponds to the ``Li plateau'' region in the Hyades
606: cluster (see B04a). This doubles the number of field stars with detectable Li
607: and Be and confirms the linear correlation of A(Li) and A(Be). The slope is
608: +0.34 $\pm$0.05 for the 60 stars in this temperature region for main-sequence
609: and subgiant stars. The Li depletion is more severe than the Be depletion, as
610: expected. The observed characteristics are in excellent agreement with the
611: predictions of rotational mixing by Deliyannis \& Pinsonneault (1997).
612:
613: \acknowledgements
614: We are grateful to the Keck Observatory support astronomers,
615: Grant Hill, Jeffrey Mader, Hien Tran, and Greg Wirth for their assistance with
616: HIRES and to Megan Novicki and Jeffrey Rich for help in the data reduction.
617: JAK was supported through NSF-Research Experiences for Undergraduates program
618: to the University of Hawaii grant AST 04-53395. This work was supported by
619: NSF AST 05-05899 to AMB.
620:
621:
622:
623: \begin{references}
624: \reference{}
625: Balachandran, S.\ 1990, \apj, 354, 310
626:
627: \reference{}
628: Boesgaard, A.~M., Armengaud, E. \& King, J.~R. 2003, \apj, 582, 410
629:
630: \reference{}
631: Boesgaard, A.~M., Armengaud, E., King, J.~R., Deliyannis, C.~P., \& Stephens,
632: A.\ 2004a, \apj, 613, 1202 (B04a)
633: \reference{}
634: Boesgaard, A.M., Deliyannis, C.P. \& Steinhauer, A. 2005, \apj, 621, 991
635:
636: \reference{}
637: Boesgaard, A.M., Deliyannis, C.P., King, J.R., Ryan, S.G., Vogt, S.S. \&
638: Beers, T.C. 1999, \aj, 117, 1549
639:
640: \reference{}
641: Boesgaard, A.~M., Deliyannis, C.~P., King, J.~R., \& Stephens, A.\ 2001, \apj,
642: 553, 754
643:
644: \reference{}
645: Boesgaard, A.~M. \& King, J.~R. 2002, \apj, 565, 587
646:
647: \reference{}
648: Boesgaard, A.~M., McGrath, E.~J., Lambert, D.~L., \& Cunha, K.\ 2004b, \apj,
649: 606, 306 (B04b)
650: \reference{}
651: Boesgaard, A.~M., \& Novicki, M.~C.\ 2006, \apj, 641, 1122
652: \reference{}
653: Boesgaard, A.~M., Rich, J., \& Levesque, E. 2008, in {\it The First Stars,
654: III}, eds. B.W. O'Shea, A. Heger, \& T. Abel, (AIP), p. 164
655:
656: \reference{}
657: Boesgaard, A.~M., \& Tripicco, M.~J.\ 1986, \apj, 303, 724
658:
659: \reference{}
660: Chen, Y.~Q., Nissen, P.~E., Benoni, T., \& Zhao, G.\ 2001, \aap, 371, 943
661: \reference{}
662:
663: Deliyannis, C.P. \& Pinsonneault, M.H. 1997, \apj, 488, 836
664: \reference{}
665: Edvardsson, B., Andersen, J., Gustafsson, B., Lambert, D.~L., Nissen, P.~E.,
666: \& Tomkin, J.\ 1993, \aap, 275, 101
667:
668: \reference{}
669: Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., \& Chiosi, C.\ 2000, \aaps, 141, 371
670: \reference{}
671: Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A.~J.\ 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
672:
673: \reference{}
674: Jones, B.F., Fischer, D \& Soderblom, D.R. 1999, \aj, 117, 330
675:
676: \reference{}
677: Kurucz, R.~L.\ 1993, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 6039, 0
678: \reference{}
679: Lambert, D.~L., \& Reddy, B.~E.\ 2004, \mnras, 349, 757 (LR04)
680:
681: \reference{}
682: Michaud, M. 1986, \apj, 302, 650
683:
684: \reference{}
685: Montalb{\'a}n, J., \& Schatzman, E.\ 2000, \aap, 354, 943
686: \reference{}
687: Pinsonneault, M.~H., Kawaler, S.D. \& Demarque, P.\ 1990, \apjs, 74, 501
688: \reference{}
689: Pinsonneault, M.~H., Deliyannis, C.~P., \& Demarque, P.\ 1992, \apjs, 78, 179
690:
691: \reference{}
692: Reddy, B.~E., Tomkin, J., Lambert, D.~L., \& Allende Prieto, C.\ 2003, \mnras,
693: 340, 304
694:
695: \reference{}
696: Santos, N.~C., Israelian, G., Randich, S., Garc{\'{\i}}a L{\'o}pez, R.~J., \&
697: Rebolo, R.\ 2004a, \aap, 425, 1013 (S04a)
698:
699: \reference{}
700: Santos, N.~C., Israelian, G., Garc{\'{\i}}a L{\'o}pez, R.~J., Mayor, M.,
701: Rebolo, R.\, Randich, S., Ecuvillon, A. \& Domínguez Cerdeña, C. 2004b, \aap,
702: 427, 1085
703:
704: \reference{}
705: Sneden, C.\ 1973, \apj, 184, 839
706: \reference{}
707: van Dokkum, P.~G.\ 2001, \pasp, 113, 1420
708: \reference{}
709: Vogt, S.~S. et al.~ 1994, Proc. SPIE, 2198, 362
710: \end{references}
711:
712:
713: \clearpage
714: \input{tab1.tex}
715:
716: \clearpage
717: \input{tab2.tex}
718:
719: \clearpage
720: \input{tab3.tex}
721:
722: \clearpage
723: \input{tab4.tex}
724:
725: \clearpage
726: \input{tab5.tex}
727:
728: \clearpage
729:
730: \begin{figure}
731: \plotone{f1.ps}
732: \caption{HR Diagram of the program stars plotted with the zero-age main
733: sequence (from Girardi et al.~2000). The dwarf stars (log g $>$4.1) are filled
734: hexagons and the subgiants are open hexagons. The dotted circle represents
735: the Sun.}
736: \end{figure}
737:
738: \begin{figure}
739: \plotone{f2.ps}
740: \caption{Figures 2-5 show spectral syntheses of the Be II region for selected
741: stars of our sample. The data (points) and best fit (solid line) are shown,
742: as well as the fits for a factor of two above and below the best fit for A(Be)
743: (dashed-dotted lines) and the fit for a star with zero Be. HD 693 and HD
744: 103799 have the same A(Be), T$_{\rm eff}$, [Fe/H], and age, but differ in
745: rotation with HD 693 having a FWHM gaussian at 0.09 and HD 103799 at 0.13}
746: \end{figure}
747:
748: \begin{figure}
749: \plotone{f3.ps}
750: \caption{These stars are of similar A(Be) and [Fe/H], but differ in age (10
751: Gyr vs 8 Gyr) and T$_{\rm eff}$ by 250 K. The Be abundance is the same in
752: spite of the differences in age and T$_{\rm eff}$.}
753: \end{figure}
754:
755: \begin{figure}
756: \plotone{f4.ps}
757: \caption{These solar temperature stars are the same age. Both A(Be) and
758: [Fe/H] are higher by a factor of $\sim$2 in HD 199960 which is the most Be-rich
759: star in this sample.}
760: \end{figure}
761:
762: \begin{figure}
763: \plotone{f5.ps}
764: \caption{These stars have the same age at $\sim$6.6 Gyr, but differ in T$_{\rm
765: eff}$, [Fe/H], and A(Be). Iron and Be are higher by a factor of 2.7 and 1.6
766: respectively in HD 209320. This corresponds well to the trend shown in Figure
767: 11.}
768: \end{figure}
769:
770: \begin{figure}
771: \plotone{f6.ps}
772: \caption{Histograms of the abundances of Li (top) and Be (bottom). For the 44
773: stars with Li detections the median A(Li) is 2.39 while for the 46 stars with
774: Be detections the median is A(Be) is 0.92. The meteoritic values are 3.31 and
775: 1.42 respectively.}
776: \end{figure}
777:
778: \begin{figure}
779: \plotone{f7.ps}
780: \caption{HR diagram for the 10 stars with [Fe/H] $>$ $-$0.2. Metallicity
781: dependent isochrones (dashed lines) for 100, 700, 2500, and 4500 Myr and
782: evolutionary tracks (solid lines) for [Fe/H] = 0 from Girardi et al. (2000)
783: are plotted. The symbol size denotes the relative amounts of Be in each star,
784: with the largest symbols indicative of stars with A(Be) $>$ 1.25 dex and
785: subsequent smaller sizes corresponding to A(Be) bins of 0.25 dex.}
786: \end{figure}
787:
788: \begin{figure}
789: \plotone{f8.ps}
790: \caption {HR diagram for stars with [Fe/H] $<$ $-$0.2. Metallicity dependent
791: isochrones (dashed lines) for 100, 700, 2500, and 4500 Myr and evolutionary
792: tracks (solid lines) for [Fe/H] = $-$0.4 from Girardi et al.~(2000) are
793: plotted. As in Figure 7, the symbol size indicates the relative amount of
794: Be. In this case the largest symbol corresponds to 1.25 $\leq$ A(Be) $<$1.00
795: and the smallest indicates A(Be)$<$ 0.75.}
796: \end{figure}
797:
798: \begin{figure}
799: \plotone{f9.ps}
800: \caption{Distribution of A(Be) with T$_{\rm eff}$. An upper envelope seems to
801: be present showing an increase in A(Be) with decreasing temperature. The
802: dwarf stars -- log g $>$ 4.1 -- are filled symbols while the subgiants are
803: open symbols. The triangles are upper limits. The subgiants show greater
804: depletion of Be at a given temperature. This could indicate light element
805: dilution caused by the expansion of convection zone.}
806: \end{figure}
807:
808: \begin{figure}
809: \plotone{f10.ps}
810: \caption{Distribution of [Be/Fe] with T$_{\rm eff}$. The dwarfs are filled
811: symbols and the subgiants are open symbols. The upper envelope for detection
812: is not present when the Be abundance is normalized to the Fe abundance. The
813: values of [Be/Fe] for dwarfs and subgiants appear to be similar.}
814: \end{figure}
815:
816: \begin{figure}
817: \plotone{f11.ps}
818: \caption{Be abundances from this study along with Boesgaard et al.~(2008). As
819: [Fe/H] increases, A(Be) increases with a slope of 0.86 $\pm$ 0.02, shown as
820: the dashed line.}
821: \end{figure}
822:
823: \begin{figure}
824: \plotone{f12.ps}
825: \caption{Be plotted as a function of age. The upper panel shows A(Be) while
826: the lower panel has the Be abundance normalized to Fe and to the solar values.
827: The meteoritic Be abundance, A(Be) = 1.42 is used for the solar system value.
828: The filled hexagons are the dwarf stars and the open hexagons are subgiants as
829: defined by log g $<$ 4.1. The triangles are Be upper limits. The vertical
830: dotted line represents the age of the Sun. Only one star is younger than the
831: Sun. In the upper panel the dashed line is placed at the approximate value of
832: the solar Be abundance (Boesgaard 2003) and the dashed-dotted line represents
833: the meteoritic Be abundance. As mentioned in the text, most of the LR04 stars
834: are somewhat evolved off the zero age main-sequence and of the 157 stars in
835: the mass range 0.9 to 1.1 M$_{\odot}$ only 6 (or 4\%) are $<$ 5 Gyr in age.
836: Given that these stars are older than the sun and have lower Be abundances,
837: there is evidence for slow mixing during the main sequence stage of these
838: stars. }
839: \end{figure}
840:
841:
842: \begin{figure}
843: \plotone{f13.ps}
844: \caption{A(Be) plotted against A(Li) with the B01 and B04ab data. The
845: triangles represent the stars from this study in the T$_{\rm eff}$ range
846: 5900-6300 K; the hexagons represent the sample from B01 and B04ab. The one
847: solar-mass stars fit the relationship well. The slope for all these stars is
848: +0.34 $\pm$0.05 which is consistent with the slope of 0.36 $\pm$ 0.05 given in
849: B04a.}
850: \end{figure}
851:
852: \begin{figure}
853: \plotone{f14.ps}
854: \caption{The Be region of the observed spectra of HD 204712 and HD 200580.
855: The only difference in the two spectra is the strength of the two Be II
856: features. The spectrum synthesis showed that these stars differ in their Be
857: abundances by a factor of 2. They also differ in Li abundance by a factor of
858: two, with HD 204712 having both more Be and more Li. The parameters of the
859: two stars are virtually identical with 204712/200580 having T$_{\rm eff}$ =
860: 5888/5753; log g = 4.05/4.12; [Fe/H] = $-$0.48/$-$0.54; mass = 0.96/0.95
861: M$_{\odot}$; age = 9.35/9.17 Gyr.}
862: \end{figure}
863:
864: \end{document}
865: