0809.4588/ms.tex
1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw  (with options: `6s')
8: %% 
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %% 
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %% 
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17: 
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26: 
27: \input{aipcheck}
28: 
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36: 
37: \documentclass[
38:     ,final            % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %%  ,draft            % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %%  ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %%  ,                 % add further options here if necessary
42:   ]
43:   {aipproc}
44: 
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46: 
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: %% FRONTMATTER
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: 
51: \begin{document}
52: 
53: \title{Testing evolutionary tracks of Pre-Main Sequence stars: the case of
54: HD113449}
55: 
56: \classification{97.80.Af, 97.80.Fk, 97.10.Nf}
57: \keywords      { Stars: binaries: general;  fundamental parameters; Techniques: interferometric }
58: 
59: \author{F. Cusano}{
60:   address={Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg,  
61:  Sternwarte 5, D - 07778 Tautenburg}
62:  }
63: 
64: \author{E. W. Guenther}{
65:  address={Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg,  
66:  Sternwarte 5, D - 07778 Tautenburg}
67:  }
68: 
69: 
70: \author{M. Esposito}{ 
71: address={Hamburger Sternwarte,
72:  Gojenbergsweg 112,
73:  21029 Hamburg}
74: }
75: \author{M. Mundt}{
76: address={Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie,
77:  Königstuhl 17, 
78:  D - 69117 Heidelberg,
79:  Germany}
80:  }
81: \author{E. Covino }{
82: address={Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte,
83: Salita Moiariello 16,   
84:  80131 - Napoli    }
85:  }
86: \author{ J. M. Alcal\`{a}}{
87: address={Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte,
88: Salita Moiariello 16,   
89:  80131 - Napoli    }
90:  }
91: 
92: 
93: \begin{abstract}
94:  Evolutionary tracks are of key importance for the understanding of
95:  star formation. Unfortunately, tracks published by various groups
96:  differ so that it is fundamental to have observational tests. In
97:  order to do this, we intend to measure the masses of the two
98:  components of the Pre-Main Sequence (PMS) binary HD113449 by
99:  combining radial velocity (RV) measurements taken with HARPS, with
100:  infrared interferometric data using AMBER on the VLTI. The
101:  spectroscopic orbit that has already been determined, combined with
102:  the first AMBER measurement, allows us to obtain a very first
103:  estimation of the inclination of the binary system and from this the
104:  masses of the two stars. More AMBER measurements of HD 113449 are
105:  needed to improve the precision on the masses: in the ESO period P82
106:  two new measurements are scheduled.
107: \end{abstract}
108: 
109: \maketitle
110: 
111: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
112: %% MAINMATTER
113: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
114: 
115: \section{Introduction}
116: 
117:   The most fundamental parameter of a star is its mass which
118:   determines almost everything about its birth, life and death. For PMS
119:   stars this parameter is practically always derived by comparing the
120:   location of the star in the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram (HRD) with theoretically calculated
121:   evolutionary tracks. Unfortunately, the evolutionary tracks
122:   published by various authors differ considerably due to the
123:   differences in the input
124:   physics \cite[e.g.][]{dantona94,baraffe98,palla99}.  In order to
125:   test and calibrate the tracks it is necessary to determine the
126:   masses for a number of young stars. One possibility is to combine RV
127:    data and interferometric data in order to
128:   measure the masses of young stars in spectroscopic binary (SB)
129:   systems. In 1999, we thus initiated a spectroscopic survey for PMS
130:   binaries and detected 15 systems suitable for AMBER
131:   (see \cite{petrov07} for a description of the instrument)
132:   observations \cite{guenther07}. Unfortunately, all of these stars are
133:   too faint for AMBER at the present stage. In addition to these stars
134:   we found a young SB1 system in the course of an RV-survey with HARPS:
135:   HD113449. HD113449 is at a distance of only 22.1$\pm$0.6 pc
136:   (\cite{perryman97}). The primary has a spectral type of
137:   G5V, and an equivalent width of the LiI6708$\lambda$ line of
138:   160m\AA. The secondary is presumably a late K or early M star. The
139:   binary thus consists of two post T Tauri stars, located in a zone of
140:   the HRD where the radiative core is
141:   supposed to form. This region of the HRD is of particular interest
142:   because the only stars where the masses have been determined are the
143:   two components of the binary system HD98800B (\cite{boden05}), and
144:   these only match the evolutionary tracks if either a very low
145:   metallicity is assumed, or if the radiative core forms at an earlier
146:   stage than is presently assumed.
147: 
148: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
149: 
150: Using HARPS, we have observed HD113449 for 2.5 years. The HARPS
151: spectra cover the wavelength region from 378 to 691 nm at
152: R=115000. The HARPS pipeline was used in order to measure the RV of
153: this star.  We henceforth solved the SB1-orbit (Fig. 1), determining
154: the  orbital parameters given in Tab. 1. The inclination of the orbit
155: of the binary with respect to the line of sight and the longitude of
156: the ascending node $\Omega$ can not be derived from the
157: RV-measurements. For this, the binary system has been observed also
158: with AMBER, the near-infrared spectro-interferometric VLTI
159: instrument. Observations have been performed the night between the
160: 20-21st of March 2008.  AMBER was used in Low-Resolution mode
161: combining the light coming from the UT2, UT3 and UT4. In the same
162: night, shortly before HD113449, a standard star, HD111998, of known
163: diameter ($\theta\sim0.30$mas) has been observed to calibrate the
164: visibility.  The data have been reduced at ESO using the AMBER-pipeline. The
165: reduced data have been converted to ascii format running an automatic
166: procedure in the ESO-pipeline and a set of procedures specifically written by us
167: have
168: been used to calibrate the square visibility.  In the first step we
169: considered the calibrator to be unresolved on all the three baselines.
170: This assumption leads to a small error on the calibrated visibility,
171: especially for the largest baseline (UT1-UT3=77.9m). The larger
172: scatter of the data on the right of Fig. 2 is presumably related to
173: this assumption. As a next step we will correct for this. For HD113449 also an 
174: IR high-resolution spectra (R=100000,2236-2293nm) has been taken with CRIRES. Standard
175: procedure have been used to reduce it.
176: 
177: \begin{figure}
178:   \includegraphics[width=120mm,height=70mm]{hd113449_phas_bw.ps}
179:   \caption{The phase-folded RV-measurements of HD113449. The orbital period is 216 days.}
180: \end{figure}
181: 
182: 
183: \begin{table}
184: \footnotesize
185: \begin{tabular}{c c}
186: 
187: \hline
188: element &value \\
189:    \\
190: \hline
191: P & $215.9\pm0.1$ d\\
192: T$_0$[HJD]&$2453411\pm1$ \\
193: $\gamma$& $-1.79\pm0.02$ km s$^{-1}$\\
194: K$_1$  & $13.40\pm0.02$ km s$^{-1}$\\
195: e & $0.300\pm0.005$\\
196: $\omega$ & $114.6\pm0.5^{\rm{o}}$ \\
197: a$_1$sin i & $0.254\pm0.001$ AU\\
198: f(m) & $0.0467\pm0.0006$ M$_\odot$\\
199: \hline
200: \end{tabular}
201: \caption{Orbital elements of HD113449}
202: \label{tab:a}
203: \end{table}
204: 
205: 
206: \section{Analysis and Results}
207: 
208: AMBER in the LR configuration produces spectral dispersed fringes
209: along the J, H and K bands. With a brightness of J=6.0, H=5.7, and
210: K=5.5, HD113449 is close to the limit of AMBER. The S/N in J, and H
211: data is in fact so low that the data can not be used and our analysis thus
212: is based on the K-band.  To derive a first estimation of the
213: inclination of the orbit and of the ascending node, $\Omega$, we
214: compared the observations with a set of theoretical models. For this
215: aim we wrote a software that simulates the visibility of a binary
216: system given all the orbital parameters, the baselines and the epoch
217: of observation. Given the distance to the system and the predicted
218: radius both the stars are point sources.  With this assumption the
219: formula used for the visibility is simply: $V^2 = (1 +
220: r^2+2rcos({\bf{\rho}} {\bf{B}}/\lambda))/(1+r)^2$, where $r$ is the flux
221: ratio between the two components, {$\bf{\rho}$} the angular
222: separation, ${\bf{B}}$ the projected baseline and $\lambda$ the
223: wavelength of observation.  Fixing the parameters that were obtained
224: from the RV-data, we vary just i and $\Omega$, fixing also the flux in
225: the K-band of the two stars assuming their spectral type. Considering
226: that the primary is a G5V and the secondary an early M-star the flux
227: ratio in the K-band is: $r$=$0.21\pm0.02$. 
228: %(f$_2$ is the
229: %flux of the secondary and f$_1$ the one of the primary). 
230:  Using a
231: $\chi^2$ analysis we derive a value for the inclination of
232: i=$63\pm3^{\rm{o}}$ and for the longitude of the ascending node
233: $\Omega$=$102\pm8^{\rm{o}}$. Fig. 2 shows the calibrated visibility
234: squared vs. radius (in unit of Baseline/wavelength) of HD113449 during
235: 45 minutes of observations. Also shown are the modeled visibility that
236: best match the observations, from which we derive the inclination and
237: the $\Omega$. 
238: From a first analysis of the CRIRES spectra (Fig. 3)
239: we derive also a mass-ratio of primary to the secondary of $0.57\pm0.05$.
240: Combining the value found for the inclination, the mass
241: function and the mass ratio we estimate the
242: masses to be M$_1=0.88\pm0.13$M$_\odot$ and
243: M$_2=0.50\pm0.07$M$_\odot$ for the primary and the secondary, respectively.  More observations with
244: AMBER are needed to improve the derived orbital parameters. The AMBER 
245: and CRIRES data are also still being analysed. 
246: 
247: \begin{figure}
248:   \includegraphics[width=120mm,height=70mm]{visibi_radius.ps}
249:   \caption{The red dots are the calibrated squared visibility of HD113449.
250:    Shown as black open triangles are models with i$\sim$ 63$°$ and 
251:    $\Omega\sim102°$ which match the observations best.
252: }
253: \end{figure}
254: 
255: \begin{figure}
256:   \includegraphics[width=120mm,height=75mm]{HD113449_spec.ps}
257:   \caption{From top to bottom: a small part of the CRIRES spectrum of HD113449, FTS
258:    spectrum of the solar photosphere and a sunspot (M3V), and finally
259:    CRIRES spectrum of the M0V star GJ9847. Clearly visible
260:    in the spectrum of HD113449 are the lines of the G5V primary,
261:    and slightly blue-shifted to these the lines of the secondary.
262:    The lines in the spectrum of the sunspot (as well as GJ9847) 
263:    are splitted into the Zeeman components. 
264: }
265: \end{figure}
266: 
267: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
268: %% BACKMATTER
269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
270: 
271: %\begin{theacknowledgments}
272:   
273: %\end{theacknowledgments}
274: 
275: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
276: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
277: %% manually.
278: %%
279: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used.  If the bibliography is
280: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
281: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
282: %%
283: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
284: %% after the \end{document}
285: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
286: 
287: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
288: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
289: %% setup or preferences.
290: %%
291: %%
292: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
293: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
294: 
295: %%%%%%%%\bibliographystyle{aipproc}   % if natbib is available
296: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
297: 
298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
299: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
301: %%%%%%%%\bibliography{sample}
302: 
303: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
304: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
305: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
306: %% if you don't like the warning.
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308: %\IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
309: % {\typeout{}
310: %  \typeout{******************************************}
311: %  \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to obtain}
312: %  \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
313: %  \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
314: %  \typeout{******************************************}
315: %  \typeout{}
316: % }
317: 
318: 
319: 
320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
321: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
322: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
323: %% of the above.
324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
325: 
326: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
327: 
328: 
329: \bibitem{baraffe98}
330: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, A\&A, 337, 403
331: \bibitem{boden05}
332: Boden, Andrew F., Sargent, Anneila I., Akeson, Rachel L. et al.  2005, ApJ, 635, 442
333: \bibitem{dantona94}
334: D'Antona, Francesca, \& Mazzitelli, Italo 1994, ApJS, 90, 467
335: \bibitem{guenther07}
336: Guenther, E. W., Esposito, M., Mundt, R., Covino, E., Alcal\`{a}, J. M., Cusano, F., Stecklum, B.  2007, A\&A, 467, 1147
337: \bibitem{palla99}
338: Palla, Francesco, \& Stahler, Steven W. 1999, ApJ, 525, 772
339: \bibitem{perryman97}
340: Perryman, M.A.C., Lindegren, L., Kovalevsky, J. et al. 1997, A\&A, 323L, 49
341: \bibitem{petrov07}
342: Petrov, R. G., Malbet, F., Weigelt, G. et al. 2007, A\&A, 464, 1
343: \end{thebibliography}
344: \end{document}
345: 
346: \endinput
347: %%
348: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
349: