1: %\documentstyle[psfig,apjfonts,emulateapj5,multicol]{aastex}
2: %\documentstyle[psfig,aaspp4,12pt,multicol]{article}
3: \documentstyle[emulateapj,apjfonts,psfig]{article}
4: %\input epsf
5:
6:
7: \lefthead{Salvesen et al.}
8: \righthead{3C~287}
9:
10: \received{Date}
11: \revised{Date}
12: \accepted{Date}
13:
14: \journalid{vol}{date}
15: \articleid{1}{4}
16: \paperid{id}
17:
18: \cpright{AAS}{1999}
19: \ccc{x}
20:
21: \renewcommand{\markcite}[1]{#1}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{A Deep XMM-Newton Observation of the Quasar 3C~287}
26:
27: \author{G.~Salvesen\altaffilmark{1}, J.~M.~Miller\altaffilmark{1},
28: E.~Cackett\altaffilmark{1,2}, \& A.~Siemiginowska\altaffilmark{3}}
29:
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, The University of Michigan,
31: 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor MI, 48109-1042; salvesen@umich.edu,
32: jonmm@umich.edu}
33: \altaffiltext{2}{Chandra Fellow}
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60
35: Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, aneta@head.cfa.harvard.edu}
36:
37:
38: \keywords{Black hole physics -- relativity
39: -- physical data and processes: accretion disks}
40:
41: \authoremail{salvesen@umich.edu}
42:
43: \label{firstpage}
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46:
47: We report on an {\it XMM-Newton} observation of the $z=1.055$ quasar
48: and Giga-hertz Peaked Spectrum (GPS) source 3C 287. Our 62.3~ksec
49: observation provides an exceptional X-ray view of a prominent member
50: of this important subclass of active galactic nuclei (AGN). The X-ray
51: spectra of 3C 287 are consistent with a simple absorbed power-law with
52: a spectral index of $\Gamma=1.72\pm 0.02$. Our fits imply a bolometric
53: luminosity of $L = 5.8\pm 0.2 \times 10^{45}~{\rm erg}~ {\rm
54: s}^{-1}$ over the 0.3--10.0 keV band; this gives a mass lower limit of
55: $M_{BH min} \geq 4.6 \times 10^{7}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$ assuming X-rays contribute
56: 10\% of the bolometric luminosity and radiation at the Eddington limit. Iron
57: emission lines are common in the X-ray spectra of many AGN, but the
58: observed spectra appear to rule-out strong emission lines in 3C~287.
59: The simple power-law spectrum and absence of strong emission
60: lines may support a picture where our line of sight intersects a
61: relativistic jet. Milliarcsecond radio imaging of 3C 287
62: appears to support this interpretation. We discuss our results in the
63: context of different AGN sub-classes and the possibility that GPS
64: sources harbor newly-formed black hole jets.
65: \smallskip
66:
67:
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72:
73: Connections between accretion disks and relativistic jets in black
74: hole systems are anticipated theoretically, but observational
75: constraints on this coupling remain elusive. Some progress has been
76: made by tracking X-ray and radio flux variations in stellar-mass black
77: holes, for instance, where transient outbursts evolve over weeks and months
78: (e.g. Gallo, Fender, \& Pooley 2003). However, observations of
79: stellar-mass black holes average over vastly more dynamical timescales and
80: much larger regions than observations of the supermassive black holes
81: powering AGN. In a sense, every observation is an average, and every
82: image is coarse.
83:
84: Giga-hertz Peaked Spectrum (GPS) sources and Compact Steep-Spectrum (CSS)
85: sources are well-known AGN subclasses. Beyond the flux-based criteria used
86: to separate these classes, surveys reveal an important size difference:
87: GPS sources are generally less than 1 kpc in projected linear size, while
88: CSS sources can be 20 times larger (see, e.g., Edwards \& Tingay 2004).
89: These small size scales imply relatively
90: young jets from new activity. Compact Symmetric Objects (CSOs) -- a
91: subclass of GPS and CSS sources -- represent an even more interesting
92: regime in which to explore disk--jet connections. Proper motion
93: studies of some CSO sources imply jets that have only become active
94: within the last $10^{3}$ years (Conway 2002).
95:
96: 3C 287 is a well-known radio--loud quasar at $z=1.055$ that falls into the GPS
97: category, and perhaps also into the CSO category (Kellerman et al.\
98: 1998). Our preliminary analysis of a prior {\it Chandra} observation
99: suggested the presence of a broad, relativistic iron disk line. Such
100: lines are excellent probes of the inner disk (e.g. Miller 2007),
101: making 3C 287 an even more exciting target in which to explore
102: accretion flows and to study disk--jet connections. GPS quasars do not
103: necessarily have the same X-ray properties as GPS galaxies. GPS galaxies
104: show large X-ray absoption columns while GPS quasars show significantly less
105: absorption (Siemiginowska et al. 2008). X-ray absorption in GPS galaxies
106: may result from an orientation coincident with an obscuring "torus",
107: possibly blocking the central engine from direct observation (Guainazzi
108: et al. 2006). Although a modest survey of GPS sources has been performed
109: with Chandra (Siemiginowska 2003, 2008), deep X-ray observations of these
110: sources are rare.
111:
112: In the following sections, we report the results of fits to the
113: spectra of 3C 287 as measured using the {\it XMM-Newton} EPIC/pn,
114: MOS-1, MOS-2, and OM cameras. Fits to these spectra suggest power-law
115: behavior typical of CSS sources and the absence of strong Fe K emission
116: lines. We discuss these results as well as their implications on
117: emission mechanisms and our line of sight to 3C 287.
118:
119:
120: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
121:
122: {\it XMM-Newton} observed 3C 287 for a total of 62.3 ksec, starting on
123: 2006 July 19 at 01:57:09 (UT). The EPIC/pn and MOS cameras were run
124: in "PrimeFullWindow" mode with the "medium" optical blocking filter.
125: The RGS was run in the standard "spectroscopy" mode. The OM obtained
126: a sequence of images in V (corresponding to UV in the source frame) in
127: order to sample any light from an accretion disk. The results
128: reported in this analysis are restricted to the EPIC cameras and to
129: the OM; the RGS spectra are count-limited and do not add much
130: information.
131:
132: SAS version 7.1 was used to reduce and filter the data and create
133: products from the raw ODF files. The tasks "epproc", "emproc", and
134: "omichain" were used to create calibrated event lists from the pn, MOS, and OM
135: cameras. Subsequent reduction was performed using "xmmselect". The
136: pn event list was filtered to accept only good events (via
137: "PATTERN$\leq 4$" and "FLAG$=$0"). The MOS event lists were also
138: filtered to accept only good events (via "PATTERN$\leq 12$" and
139: "FLAG$=$0").
140:
141: \centerline{~\psfig{file=f1.ps,width=3.3in}~}
142: \figcaption[h]{\footnotesize The EPIC/MOS-2 X-ray image (0.3--10.0~keV)
143: of 3C 287 is shown above. The source is circled.}
144: \medskip
145:
146: Inspection of the EPIC lightcurves revealed strong flaring at the end
147: of the observation; therefore, only the first 48.1~ksec of the pn
148: exposure was used to create images and spectra, and only the first
149: 53.8~ksec of the MOS exposures were used. Circles with radii of 30
150: arcseconds centered on 3C~287 were used as source extraction regions.
151: Background regions of equivalent size were taken nearby to the source,
152: on the same CCD. The pn source and background spectra were generated
153: by grouping channels 0--20,479 by a factor of 5; the MOS spectra were
154: generated by grouping channels 0--11,999 by a factor of 15. Custom
155: response files for the EPIC spectra were generated using the tools
156: "rmfgen" and "arfgen".
157:
158: To ensure valid constraints from the use of the $\chi^{2}$ fitting
159: statistic, the EPIC spectra were binned to require at least 20 counts
160: per bin using the FTOOL "grppha". Spectra were then fit using XSPEC
161: version 11.3.2 (Arnaud 1996). All EPIC spectra were fit in the
162: 0.3--10.0~keV band as the cameras are best calibrated in this range.
163: All errors in this work are 90\% confidence errors as derived using
164: the XSPEC ``error'' command, unless otherwise noted.
165:
166:
167: \section{Analysis and Results}
168:
169: \subsection{EPIC Analysis}
170:
171: Model spectra were fitted to the data. The pn and MOS spectral
172: data were fit jointly, allowing an overall normalization constant to float
173: between the spectra. This normalization constant was within
174: 3\% of unity. All models were multiplied by the XSPEC model
175: "phabs" to account for photoelectric absorption by neutral hydrogen
176: along the line of sight, assuming default abundances. The X-ray spectra
177: were jointly fitted using simple power-law models, where $\chi^{2}$ statistics
178: determined the goodness of each fit. The three models we report are
179: spectral fits to a power-law, broken power-law, and line functions
180: incorporated into the power-law. We added line functions to the power-law
181: model over a restricted energy range of 3.1--3.4~keV which is where
182: we expect to locate an Fe K emission line based on a redshift of $z =
183: 1.055$ for 3C 287. Spectral parameter values and fluxes, along with
184: the corresponding upper limits, are recorded for fits to
185: each of the models. Investigation of our orientation relative to the
186: jet or disk comes from equivalent width methods, determined by the
187: upper limit of the normalization for the line
188:
189: \centerline{~\psfig{file=f2.ps,width=3.3in}~}
190: \figcaption[h]{\footnotesize The OM V-band image of 3C 287, generated from a
191: single exposure, is shown above. The source was found to have a V magnitude
192: of 18.2. The apparent diffuse emission feature in the upper--left corner
193: is likely instrumental and has negligible impact on our OM measurements.}
194: \medskip
195:
196: \noindent functions.
197: Both narrow and broad line fits were made to ensure robust limits
198: on the equivalent width.
199:
200: We present images as observed by {\it XMM-Newton} and spectral fits along with
201: parameters obtained using XSPEC. Figures 1 and 2 show an X-ray and V-band
202: image of 3C 287 respectively, as observed by {\it XMM-Newton}. The results
203: from the joint fits of MOS-1 and MOS-2 spectra to the pn spectra of 3C 287
204: over the 0.3--10.0~keV energy band are listed in Table 1.
205:
206: Both a simple power-law model and power-law with a break in the 0.3--10.0~keV
207: range yield acceptable fits based on $\chi^{2}$ statistics. The best-fit
208: power-law model gives $\chi^{2}/\nu = 650.3/598 = 1.09$, where $\nu$
209: is the number of degrees of freedom. The best-fit broken power-law
210: model result is $\chi^2/\nu = 643.4/596 = 1.08$; this is not a
211: statistically significant improvement over the simple power-law model.
212: Spectral fits using a power-law model are shown in Figure 3. The simple
213: power-law model gives a flux of $F = 7.1\pm 0.2 \times 10^{-13}$~ergs~
214: ${\rm cm}^{-2} {\rm s}^{-1}$ over the 0.3--10.0~keV band. We calculate a
215: corresponding bolometric luminosity of $L = 5.8\pm 0.2 \times
216: 10^{45}~{\rm ergs}~ {\rm s}^{-1}$ based on the stated redshift $z =
217: 1.055$, allowing us to place a minimum mass estimate on the central
218: engine. The lower mass limit of 3C 287 is $M_{BH min} \geq 4.6 \times
219: 10^{7}~ {\rm M_{\odot}}$, assuming that the X-ray luminosity accounts
220: for 10$\%$ of the bolometric luminosity and radiation at the Eddington
221: luminosity limit. We calculate a recession velocity of $v_{rec} =
222: (0.62)c$ from the redshift, corresponding to a distance of $d = 2.6~
223: {\rm Gpc}$ assuming $H_0 = 71 ~{\rm km}~ {\rm s}^{-1}~ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$.
224: This is the distance we assume when calculating the luminosity.
225:
226: An interesting feature in the power-law model joint fits is the
227: absence of a strong Fe K emission line centered at a rest frame energy of
228: 6.4~keV. Figure 3 plots spectra in the observed frame. Due to
229: redshift, we expect to search for the presence of this line at
230: 3.1~keV. Jointly fitting the spectra
231: of three simultaneous observations of 3C 287 with {\it XMM-Newton}'s
232: EPIC/pn, MOS-1, and MOS-2 appears to exclude a very strong Fe K emission
233: line. We investigate the possibility of a
234: narrow to broad emission line within the rest frame energy range of
235: 6.4--6.97~keV. Freezing the width of a Gaussian profile to zero in the
236: fit placed
237:
238: \centerline{~\psfig{file=f3.ps,width=3.3in,angle=-90}~}
239: \figcaption[h]{\footnotesize The {\it XMM-Newton} X-ray spectra of 3C
240: 287 are shown above (black: pn, red: MOS1, blue: MOS2). Energy units
241: are shown in the observed frame. The spectra were fitted with a
242: simple absorbed power-law model. The spectra themselves and the
243: data/model ratio indicate that no strong emission or absorption lines
244: are present.}
245: \medskip
246:
247: \noindent a narrow line upper limit of 69 eV on the
248: equivalent width. We find a broad line upper limit of 312 eV using the
249: XSPEC model "diskline" instead of fitting a broad Gaussian line profile to
250: account for the possibility of a relativistically broadened disk line.
251: However, the limits on the narrow line, which is expected to come
252: from a large region, could indicate that the innermost accretion flow may not be observed
253: directly. This is consistent with the compact size of the radio emitting
254: region and supports the conclusion that a relativistically broadened iron
255: line is not present. The limits on narrow line emission are typical for
256: Seyfert-1 AGN (Nandra et al. 1997). The limits are less constraining when viewed in the context of high luminosity objects (see Bianchi et al.\ 2007), though there is considerable scatter in the strength of iron emission lines in such sources.
257:
258: \subsection{OM Analysis}
259:
260: To obtain a preliminary characterization of the broad-band spectral
261: energy distribution, we focused on a single characteristic OM
262: exposure, frame 433. The OM V filter has a central wavelength of
263: 5430\AA~ and spans roughly 1000\AA. The task "omichain" generates a
264: list of source detections; 3C 287 was detected at the 12$\sigma$ level
265: of confidence, as imaged in Figure 2. A count rate of
266: $0.7\pm 0.1$ counts/second was recorded. The measured instrumental
267: magnitude is $V = 18.2\pm 0.2$. Using the recipe on the SAS website
268: appropriate for blue continuum sources, the count rate given above can
269: be converted to a flux of $1.0 \pm 0.1 \times 10^{-12}~{\rm erg}~
270: {\rm cm}^{-2}~ {\rm s}^{-1}$.
271:
272: \subsection{Broad-band Analysis}
273:
274: To place the X-ray flux trends from 3C 287 in context, we constructed
275: a broad-band spectral energy distribution using XSPEC. Using the
276: ftool ``flx2xsp'' we generated single-bin spectral files. To make use
277: of this tool, the flux in the bin is required, as well as the bin
278: boundaries. The OM V filter spans approximately 1000\AA. The 2MASS
279: survey recorded J and H magnitudes of 16.44 and 16.06, respectively.
280: These magnitudes were converted into fluxes using the Spitzer Science
281: Center conversion tool, and then into spectral files using the filter
282: boundaries appropriate to the 2MASS J and H filters (Cutri et al.\
283: 2003). VLA observations of 3C 287 recorded a flux density of 3.22 Jy
284: at 5 GHz (Kellermann et al.\ 1998). We also converted this flux into
285: a spectral file. For visual clarity, fiducial flux errors of 10\%
286: were assumed for the J, H, and radio fluxes, though true statistical
287: errors are far lower.
288:
289: The resulting broad-band spectral energy distribution of 3C 287 is
290: shown in Figure 4. The emission of 3C 287 peaks in the H, J, and UV
291: bands in the observed frame, or the optical and UV bands in the source
292: frame. Thus, we do observe the ''Big Blue Bump'' emission that is
293: usually seen in radio-quiet quasars and interpreted as thermal emission
294: from an accretion disk (Shields 1978). The OM measured luminosity is
295: about 6$\times 10^{45}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ and it indicates high accretion
296: rates in this system.
297:
298: The radio to X-ray luminosity ratio is smaller than typically observed
299: in samples of radio loud sources (blazars, Fossati et al. 1998; FRI galaxies, Donato et al.\ 2004; FRII
300: type radio loud quasars and galaxies, Evans et al.\ 2006, Belsole et al.\ 2006, Balmaverde et al.\ 2006) in terms of the source being more powerful in radio than a
301: typical radio loud quasar (Elvis et al. 1994, Richards et al. 2006).
302: However, the ratio agrees with the ratios observed in compact radio
303: sources (GPS galaxies Guainazzi et al. 2006, Vink et al. 2006, GPS/CSS
304: quasars Siemiginowska et al. 2008). In the case of GPS quasars the
305: X-ray emission could originate in a jet via Inverse Compton scattering
306: of the IR photons on the relativistic electrons in a parsec scale jet
307: (Blazejowski et al. 2004). This emission could
308: contribute to the observed X-ray emission.
309:
310: We also calculate the $\alpha_{ox}$ parameter (Avni \& Tannanbaum
311: 1982) usually used to characterize a relative stregth of the
312: optical-UV thermal disk emission and the Comptonized X-ray component
313: (for example Sobolewska et al 2004). This parameter is defined as:
314: $\alpha_{ox} = {\rm log [Flux(2500\AA)/Flux(2keV)]}/2.605$ in the
315: source rest frame. We take the V-band magnitude and assume a spectral
316: slope of $f_{\nu} = {\nu}^{-0.5}$ to calculate the flux at the rest
317: frame $\lambda$=2500\AA~and the measured XMM flux at 2~keV. Our
318: $\alpha_{ox}$ is equal to 1.7. It is in a high end of a typical
319: distribution of the $\alpha_{ox}$ parameter for radio quiet quasars
320: ($\alpha_{ox} = 1.5 \pm 0.2$, Kelly et al. 2008) and also radio loud quasars (Bechtold et al. 1994).
321:
322:
323: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
324:
325: In the sections above, we have detailed our analysis of a deep
326: exposure of 3C 287 made with {\it XMM-Newton}. In the 0.3--10.0~keV
327: observed frame (approximately 0.6--20~keV in the source frame), the
328: spectrum is well represented by a simple absorbed power-law model. In
329: AGN that are viewed at a modest inclination, it is common to observe
330: either an X-ray warm absorber (likely a disk wind; see, e.g., Reynolds
331: 1997) or a soft excess (perhaps also tied to the disk; e.g. Crummy et
332: al.\ 2006), and an Fe K emission line due to hard X-ray illumination of
333: the disk, the torus, or both. Fits made with a broken power-law were
334: made in order to test for evidence of either a soft excess or warm
335: absorption at low energy. However, these fits do not provide a
336: significantly improved description of the data. Similarly, fits with
337: Gaussian and disk line functions place limits on the strength of both
338: narrow and broad emission lines.
339:
340: It is also worth noting that our results place a limit of
341: approximately $5 \times 10^{19}$~atoms~${\rm cm}^{-2}$ on any neutral
342: absorbing gas along our line of sight to 3C 287. This limit is about
343: a factor of two lower than the measurement reported by Siemiginowska
344: et al.\ (2003). Although models where the source is confined by dense gas (Snellen et al.\ 2000, Alexander 2000) have not been completely ruled out, new work argues against confinement (Guainazzi et al.\ 2004, Morganti 2007).
345:
346: Our X-ray results are consistent with emission related to a jet that
347: dominates over the typical X-ray emission associated
348:
349: \centerline{~\psfig{file=f4.eps,width=3.3in}~}
350: \figcaption[h]{\footnotesize A broad-band spectral energy distribution
351: of 3C 287 is shown above. X-ray and optical points are from our {\it
352: XMM-Newton} observations. Infrared points are from 2MASS observations
353: in J and H. The single radio point is from a VLA observation at
354: 5~GHz.}
355: \medskip
356:
357: \noindent with the
358: accretion process. The emission we observe could be accounted for
359: through a combination of synchrotron and synchrotron
360: self-Comptonization in the jet, hot spots, and compact lobes.
361:
362: A line of sight coincident with the jet is suggested by deep
363: milliarcsecond radio imaging of 3C 287. VLBA imaging at 15~GHz
364: reveals an extremely compact core in 3C 287, with a minimal extension
365: of less than 4 milliarcseconds, or less than about 20~pc in the source
366: frame (Kellermann et al.\ 1998). This core is among the smallest and
367: least extended in the survey of AGN conducted by Kellerman et al.\
368: (1998), and is strongly suggestive of a jet that lies primarily along
369: our line of sight. In many AGN, the presence of a strong,
370: narrow iron fluorescence line is tied to X-ray irradiation of a
371: parsec-scale torus (e.g. Antonucci 1993, Urry \& Padovani 1995, Yaqoob
372: \& Padmanabhan 2004, Nandra 2006). Thus, although the radio core is
373: remarkably small by the standards of jet sources, it is still large
374: enough to block our line of sight to the innermost region (or even the torus) in 3C 287.
375: A possible difficulty with this inpretation is that emission consistent with the big blue bump is observed. This may indicate that the jet does not block all of the disk emission along our line of sight.
376:
377: The question arises, then, why extreme blazar-like variability is not
378: observed in 3C 287 (and similar sources). A partial
379: answer may lie in the likely nature of CSS and GPS sources.
380: Proper motion studies of some sources in this class suggest that these
381: AGN have only been powering jets for approximatly $10^{3}$ years
382: (Conway 2002), however, a young radio source may have higher
383: efficiency of converting the jet power into radiation. In such young
384: sources the X-ray emission may originate in compact lobes and hot
385: spots (Stawarz et al 2007) if the line of sight is not aligned
386: directly with a jet. In this model there is no expectation of the
387: X-ray variability typically observed in blazars. Note that there is no
388: change in X-ray luminosity between the {\it Chandra} and {\it
389: XMM-Newton} observations (Siemiginowska et al 2008).
390:
391: The broad-band spectral energy distribution shown in Figure 4 may further
392: support this interpretation. The source is more radio-loud than typical
393: radio-loud quasars (Elvis et al 1994, Richards, 2006, Siemiginowska et
394: al 2008), while its X-ray emission is relatively weak with
395: $\alpha_{ox}=1.7$. This suggests a weak contribution from the standard
396: emission component (for example a parsec scale jet, Blazejowski et al.
397: 2004) observed in radio-loud quasars.
398:
399: We conclude that 3C 287 may be a ``proto-blazar'' candidate.
400: Dedicated multi-wavelength monitoring of sources like 3C 287 over a
401: period of years can help to better reveal the nature of this source.
402:
403: \vspace{0.25in}
404:
405: We thank the anonymous referee for insightful comments that improved the paper. JMM gratefully acknowledges funding from NASA, through the {\it
406: XMM-Newton} guest observerations program. Partial support for
407: this work was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space
408: Administration through Chandra Award Number GO2-3148A and GO5-6113X
409: and under the contract NAS8-39073.
410:
411:
412:
413: \begin{references}
414:
415: \reference{} Alexander, P., 2000, MNRAS, 319, 8
416:
417: \reference{} Antonucci, R., 1993, ARA\&A, 31, 473
418:
419: \reference{} Arnaud, K. A., 1996, ADASS V, eds. G. Jacoby and
420: J. Barnes, ASP Conf.\ Series 101, 17
421:
422: \reference{} Avni, Y., \& Tananbaum, H.\ 1982, ApJ.Lett, 262, L17
423:
424: \reference{} Balmaverde, B., Capetti, A., \& Grandi, P., 2006, A\&A, 451, 35
425:
426: \reference{} Bechtold, J., et al.\ 1994, AJ, 108, 374
427:
428: \reference{} Belsole, E., Worrall, D. M., \& Hardcastle, M. J., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 339
429:
430: \reference{} Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., Matt, G., \& Fonseca Bonilla, N., 2007, A\&A, 467, L19
431:
432: \reference{} B{\l}a{\.z}ejowski, M., Siemiginowska, A., Sikora, M., Moderski, R.,
433: \& Bechtold, J.\ 2004, ApJLett, 600, L27
434:
435: \reference{} Conway, J. E., 2002, NewAR, 46, 263
436:
437: \reference{} Crummy, J., Fabian, A. C., Gallo, L., \& Ross, R. R.,
438: 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1067
439:
440: \reference{} Cutri, R. M., et al., 2003, ``The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky
441: Survey Point Source Catalog'', NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive
442:
443: \reference{} Donato, D., Sambruna, R. M., \& Gliozzi, M., 2004, ApJ, 617, 915
444:
445: \reference{} Elvis, M., et al.\ 1994, ApJSupp, 95, 1
446:
447: \reference{} Evans, D. A., et al., 2006, ApJ, 653, 1121
448:
449: \reference{} Fender, R. P., 2004, ``Jets from X-ray Binaries'', to
450: appear in ``Compact Stellar X-ray Sources'' eds. W. H. G. Lewin \&
451: M. van der Klis, Cambridge, 2004, see astro-ph/0303339
452:
453: Gallo, E., Fender, R., \& Pooley, G. G., 2003, MNRAS, 344, 60
454:
455: \reference{} Fossati et al.(1998){1998MNRAS.299..433F} Fossati, G., Maraschi,
456: L., Celotti, A., Comastri, A., \& Ghisellini, G.\ 1998, \mnras, 299, 433
457:
458: \reference{} George, I. M., \& Fabian, A. C., 1991, MNRAS, 249, 352
459:
460: \reference{} Guainazzi, M., Siemiginowska, A., Rodriguez-Pascual, P., \& Sgnhellini, C., 2004, A\&A, 421, 461
461:
462: \reference{} Guainazzi et al.(2006){2006A\&A...446...87G} Guainazzi, M.,
463: Siemiginowska, A., Stanghellini, C., Grandi, P., Piconcelli, E.,
464: \& Azubike Ugwoke, C.\ 2006, \aap, 446, 87
465:
466: \reference{} Kellermann, K. I., et al., 1998, ApJ, 115, 1295
467:
468: \reference{} Kelly, B.~C., Bechtold, J., Trump, J.~R., Vestergaard, M.,
469: \& Siemiginowska, A.\ 2008, ApJ in press, see ArXiv e-prints, 801, arXiv:0801.2383
470:
471: \reference{} Laor, A., 1991, ApJ, 376, 90
472:
473: \reference{} Miller, J. M., 2007, ARA\&A, 45, in press, arxiv:0705.0540
474:
475: \reference{} Morganti, R., 2007, arxiv:0710:1197
476:
477: \reference{} Nandra, K., George, I. M., Mushotzky, R. F., Turner, T. J., \&
478: Yaqoob, T., 1997, ApJ, 477, 602
479:
480: \reference{} Nandra, K., 2006, MNRAS, 368, L62
481:
482: \reference{} Reynolds, C. S., 1997, MNRAS, 286, 513
483:
484: \reference{} Richards, G.~T., et al.\ 2006, ApJSupp, 166, 470
485:
486: \reference{} Shields, G.~A.\ 1978, Nature, 272, 706
487:
488: \reference{} Siemiginowska, A. et al 2008, ApJ. submitted
489:
490: \reference{} Siemiginowska et al.(2008){2008arXiv0804.1564S} Siemiginowska,
491: A., LaMassa, S., Aldcroft, T.~L., Bechtold, J., \& Elvis, M.\ 2008,
492: ArXiv e-prints, 804, arXiv:0804.1564
493:
494: \reference{} Siemiginowska, A., et al., 2003, PASA, 20, 113
495:
496: \reference{} Snellen, I. A. G.,Schilizzi, R. T., Miley, G. K., de Bruyn, A. G., Bremer, M. N., \& Rottgering, H. J. A., 2000, MNRAS, 319, 445
497:
498: \reference{} Sobolewska, M.~A., Siemiginowska, A., {\. Z}ycki, P.~T.\ 2004, ApJ,
499: 608, 80
500:
501: \reference{} Stawarz, L., Ostorero, L., Begelman, M.~C., Moderski, R., Kataoka, J.,
502: \& Wagner, S.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 712, arXiv:0712.1220
503:
504: \reference{} Urry, C. M., \& Padovani, P., 1995, PASP, 107, 803
505:
506: \reference{} Vink et al.(2006){2006MNRAS.367..928V} Vink, J., Snellen, I.,
507: Mack, K.-H., \& Schilizzi, R.\ 2006, \mnras, 367, 928
508:
509: \reference{} Yaqoob., T., \& Padmanabhan, U., 2004, ApJ, 604, 63
510:
511: \end{references}
512:
513: \begin{table}[ht]
514: \caption~\center{Spectral Fit Parameters}
515: \begin{center} % centers table
516: \begin{footnotesize}
517: \begin{tabular}{l c} % centered columns (3 columns)
518: \hline
519: \hline \\ % inserts double horizontal lines
520: Model Parameter & EPIC/pn \\ [0.5 ex] % inserts table heading
521: \hline \\ % inserts single horizontal line
522:
523: Power-Law Model \\
524: \hline
525: N$_{H}$ ($10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$) & $<$ 3.1 \\
526: $\Gamma$ & 1.72 $\pm$ 0.02 \\
527: Norm. ($10^{-4}$~ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$) & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.02 \\
528: $\chi^{2}/\nu$ & $650.3/598 = 1.09$ \\ [1 ex]
529:
530: Flux ($10^{-13}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) & 7.1 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
531: Lumin ($10^{45}$ ergs s$^{-1}$) & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.2 \\ [1 ex]
532:
533: \hline \\
534:
535: Broken Power-Law Model \\
536: \hline
537: N$_{H}$ ($10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$) & $<$ 18 \\
538: $\Gamma_{1}$ & 1.74 $\pm$ 0.09 \\
539: $\Gamma_{2}$ & 1.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
540: E$_{break}$ (keV) & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
541: Norm. ($10^{-4}$~ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$) & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.06 \\
542: $\chi^{2}/\nu$ & $643.4/596 = 1.08$ \\ [1 ex]
543:
544: Flux ($10^{-13}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) & 7.3 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
545: Lumin ($10^{45}$ ergs s$^{-1}$) & 5.9 $\pm$ 0.5 \\ [1 ex]
546:
547: \hline \\
548:
549: Line Profile Fits to Power-Law Model \\
550: (Narrow Line) : (Broad Line) \\
551: \hline
552: N$_{H}$ ($10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$) & $<$ 3.5 : $<$ 3.7 \\
553: $\Gamma$ & 1.73 $\pm$ 0.02 : 1.72 $\pm$ 0.03 \\
554: Norm.$_{Power-Law}$ ($10^{-4}$~ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$)
555: & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.02 : 1.04 $\pm$ 0.02 \\
556: E$_{line}$ (keV) & 3.2 : 3.1 \\
557: %$\sigma$ (keV) & 0.0 : 0.5 \\
558: Norm.$_{Line}$ ($10^{-6}$~ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$) & $<$ 1.0 : $<$ 4.3 \\
559: $\chi^{2}/\nu$ & $644.9/594 = 1.09$ : $645.5/592 = 1.09$ \\ [1 ex]
560:
561: Flux ($10^{-13}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) & 7.1 $\pm$ 0.2 : 7.1 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
562: Lumin ($10^{45}$ ergs s$^{-1}$) & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.1 : 5.7 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
563: EW (eV) & 69 : 312 \\ [1 ex]
564:
565:
566: \hline
567: \end{tabular}
568:
569: \tablecomments{The results of joint spectral fits to the EPIC pn,
570: MOS1, and MOS2 spectra of 3C 287 are detailed above. Though a broken
571: power-law provides a slightly better fit, the spectrum is consistent
572: with a simple power-law form. The narrow line is fit with a Gaussian model
573: while the broad line is fit with a diskline model. Upper limits are given
574: for the column density of neutral gas along the line of sight and for line
575: profile normalizations. The bolometric luminosity is quoted in the table
576: assuming that X-rays contribute 10$\%$ of the bolometric luminosity. We
577: report the best-fit X-ray flux values over the 0.3--10.0 keV band.
578: Reported flux and luminosity of 3C 287 in the text are taken from the
579: power-law fits.}
580: \vspace{-1.0\baselineskip}
581: \end{footnotesize}
582: \end{center}
583: \end{table}
584:
585:
586:
587:
588:
589:
590:
591:
592:
593: \end{document}
594:
595: