1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \newcommand{\mnras}{MNRAS}
46: \newcommand{\aj}{AJ}
47: \newcommand{\apj}{ApJ}
48: \newcommand{\apjs}{ApJS}
49: \newcommand{\apjl}{ApJL}
50: \newcommand{\aap}{A\&A}
51:
52: \layoutstyle{6x9}
53:
54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
55: %% FRONTMATTER
56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57:
58: \begin{document}
59:
60: \title{X-ray observations of IC\,348 \newline in light of an updated cluster census}
61:
62: \classification{95.85.Nv, 97.10.Bt, 97.21.+a, 97.10.Ex, 97.10.Jb}
63: \keywords {X-rays: stars, Stars: formation, pre-main sequence, activity, coronae}
64:
65: \author{B. Stelzer}{
66: address={INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, I-90134 Palermo, Italy}
67: }
68: \author{G. Micela}{
69: address={INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, I-90134 Palermo, Italy}
70: }
71: \author{E. Flaccomio}{
72: address={INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, I-90134 Palermo, Italy}
73: }
74: \author{S. Sciortino}{
75: address={INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, I-90134 Palermo, Italy}
76: }
77:
78:
79:
80: \begin{abstract}
81: IC\,348 is
82: %a prototype of low-mass clustered star formation and
83: an excellent laboratory for studies of low-mass star formation being
84: nearby, compact and rich. A {\em Chandra} observation was carried out early in the satellite's lifetime.
85: The extensive new data in optical and infrared wavelengths accumulated in subsequent years have changed the
86: cluster census calling for a re-analysis of the X-ray data.
87: \end{abstract}
88:
89: \maketitle
90:
91: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
92: %% MAINMATTER
93: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
94:
95:
96: \section{The current IC\,348 cluster census}
97:
98: IC\,348 is the nearest ($\sim 310$\,pc), rich and compact ($d \sim 20^{\prime}$)
99: cluster of low-mass star formation.
100: To date, more than $300$
101: members in a wide mass range ($\sim 0.02-5\,M_\odot$)
102: have been spectroscopically confirmed, most of them within the central cluster area of $16^\prime \times 14^\prime$.
103: The extinction is relatively low ($A_{\rm V} < 4$\,mag for most known members) and the mean cluster age
104: is $2$\,Myr.
105:
106: With these characteristics IC\,348 is a prime laboratory for studies of low-mass star formation.
107: A $53$\,ksec of IC\,348 was
108: presented by \cite{Preibisch01.1, Preibisch02.1}. Subsequently, extensive work was done on the cluster
109: at optical and infrared wavelengths:
110: \begin{itemize}
111: \item $\sim 130$ new cluster members were discovered by signatures of youth in optical low-resolution spectra and their
112: position in the HR diagram above the $10$\,Myr isochrone \cite{Luhman03.2};
113: \item the stellar parameters have been revised shifting some objects to
114: earlier spectral type, i.e. higher mass \cite{Luhman03.2};
115: \item Young Stellar Objects (YSOs) have been classified using {\em Spitzer} photometry \cite{Lada06.1};
116: \item rotation periods were measured for $> 100$ cluster members \cite[e.g.][]{Cieza06.1}.
117: \end{itemize}
118:
119: All these stellar properties impact on the interpretation of the X-ray data, such as the relation between
120: X-ray luminosity and stellar parameters ($L_{\rm bol}$, $T_{\rm eff}$, $M$), X-ray luminosity functions,
121: the rotation-activity relation, etc. Therefore, we present a re-analysis of the {\em Chandra}
122: observation of IC\,348 incorporating the updated optical and infrared database.
123: Two representations of the {\em Chandra} image are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:1}.
124:
125: \begin{figure}
126: \parbox{0.5\textwidth}{
127: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{./acis_colorimage2.ps}
128: }
129: \parbox{0.5\textwidth}{
130: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{./acis_with_stars.ps}
131: }
132: \caption{{\em Chandra}/ACIS-I image of IC\,348:
133: (LEFT) - false-color image; (RIGHT) -
134: image with X-ray sources from \protect\cite{Preibisch01.1, Preibisch02.1} (red circles)
135: and cluster members from the literature: blue \protect\cite{Luhman03.2}, green \protect\cite{Luhman05.7},
136: pink and black \protect\cite{Muench07.1}; blue, green and pink sources are spectroscopically confirmed IC\,348 members.}
137: \label{fig:1}
138: \end{figure}
139:
140:
141: \section{Data analysis}
142:
143: In this paper we use the results from our new analysis of the X-ray data
144: only for known IC\,348 members absent from the list
145: of detections in \cite{Preibisch01.1, Preibisch02.1}.
146: For all detections in common with our new analysis the X-ray data from \cite{Preibisch01.1, Preibisch02.1} is used.
147: The X-ray source list was cross-correlated with the IC\,348 master catalog compiled from the references
148: given in Sect.~1.
149: The re-analysis is also used to extract upper limits for undetected IC\,348 members.
150: This is mandatory for a complete X-ray census, because upper limits are not available
151: from \cite{Preibisch01.1, Preibisch02.1} for the IC\,348 members discovered after 2001.
152:
153:
154: \section{Results}
155:
156: \subsection{X-rays and evolutionary stage}
157:
158: IC\,348 is rich in Young Stellar Objects (YSOs) of all evolutionary stages.
159: Class\,I protostars, disk-bearing
160: Class\,II T Tauri stars and disk-less Class\,III T Tauri stars can be distinguished
161: by the slope of their spectral energy distribution (SED) in the mid-IR.
162: The spectral index $\alpha_{\rm SED}$ derived from
163: {\em Spitzer} mid-IR photometry for IC\,348 members was presented by \cite{Lada06.1}.
164: We assign the YSO class to each X-ray source using the boundaries for
165: $\alpha_{\rm SED}$ defined by \cite{Lada06.1} and \cite{Muench07.1}.
166:
167: The X-ray detection statistics for the different YSO classes in IC\,348
168: can be summarized as follows: $N_{\rm det}/N_{\rm ul} = 5/7$ (Class\,I),
169: $45/55$ (Class\,II), $36/31$ (Class\,II/III), and $93/22$ (Class\,III) where $N_{\rm det}$ is the number
170: of detections and $N_{\rm ul}$ the number of undetected stars.
171:
172:
173:
174: \subsection{X-ray luminosity functions}
175:
176: We computed X-ray luminosity functions (XLF) for different YSO classes (to examine the influence of disks) and for
177: different levels of H$\alpha$ emission (to examine the influence of accretion). To avoid biases related
178: to the known dependence of $L_{\rm x}$ on stellar mass, the analysis was carried out in three mass bins.
179: %The significance of the results is verified with $2$-sample tests that yield the probability for the
180: %observed luminosity distributions to be drawn from different parent distributions.
181: %Both XLF and $2$-sample tests are computed within the ASURV\footnote{ASURV...} environment.
182: The XLF take into account the upper limits for undetected stars.
183:
184: In Fig.~\ref{fig:2} we compare the XLF of Class\,II, II/III, and III sources. Class\,I objects are not considered because
185: of poor statistics. There is a pronounced difference in the X-ray luminosities of the three YSO classes for
186: the lowest mass bin ($0.1-0.3\,M_\odot$), while for higher mass stars the XLF of the three types of YSOs can not
187: be distinguished.
188: %The smaller X-ray luminosities of Class\,II with respect
189: %to more evolved Class\,II/III and Class\,III sources is statistically significant.
190: %
191: \begin{figure}
192: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{./km_0.1-0.3_color.eps}
193:
194: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{./km_0.3-0.6_color.eps}
195:
196: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{./km_0.6-1.4_color.eps}
197: \caption{X-ray luminosity functions for the {\em Spitzer} YSO classes in different mass bins. {\em red} - Class\,II,
198: {\em blue} - Class\,II/III, {\em green} - Class\,III.}
199: \label{fig:2}
200: \end{figure}
201:
202:
203: \subsection{X-rays and stellar parameters}
204:
205: Fig.~\ref{fig:3} shows the HR diagram and the $L_{\rm x}$ vs. $L_{\rm bol}$ diagram for IC\,348.
206: Evidently most undetected cluster members are very-low mass stars and brown dwarfs.
207: The sample of known IC\,348 members extends to lower
208: bolometric luminosities and masses than that of Orion, possibly due to both environmental and observational effects
209: (e.g. higher extinction in Orion).
210: Therefore, IC\,348 is excellent for
211: studying the relation between X-ray activity an stellar parameters in very-low mass stars and brown dwarfs.
212: Contrary to what was observed for Orion and Taurus \cite[see ][]{Preibisch05.1, Grosso07.1},
213: we find that the relation between $L_{\rm x}$ and $L_{\rm bol}$ in IC\,348 seems to
214: be steeper than expected for constant $L_{\rm x}/L_{\rm bol}$ ratio (see Fig.~\ref{fig:3}~{\em right}).
215: This is due to a large number of X-ray faint (undetected) low-mass stars. Note, that the fitted curve for
216: IC\,348 includes only stars with $> 0.1\,M_\odot$ where upper limits are well constrained.
217: %It is not clear if this is
218: %an effect of a dependence of $L_{\rm x}/L_{\rm bol}$ on mass, on effective temperature,
219: %or bolometric luminosity itself.
220: %
221: \begin{figure*}[t]
222: \parbox{16cm}{
223: \parbox{8cm}{
224: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{./hrd_b98_cb00_IC348_luhman03_color.eps}
225: }
226: \parbox{8cm}{
227: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{./lx_lbol_all.eps}
228: }
229: }
230: \caption{
231: \newline
232: (LEFT) -- Low-mass region of the HR diagram for IC\,348 compared to evolutionary tracks of
233: \cite{Baraffe98.1} and \cite{Chabrier00.2}.
234: {\em filled circles} - X-ray detections, {\em crosses} - non-detections;
235: %the objects are color-coded according to their YSO class (see text).
236: \newline
237: (RIGHT) -- X-ray versus bolometric luminosity; dotted lines represent constant $L_{\rm x}/L_{\rm bol}$
238: ratios $10^{-3}$, $10^{-4}$ and $10^{-5}$; the dashed line is the linear regression fit derived
239: by \cite{Preibisch05.1} for the Orion Nebula Cluster
240: corresponding to $\log{(L_{\rm x}/L_{\rm bol})} = -3.7$; the solid line is a linear regression fit
241: to the IC\,348 members with $M \leq 1.2 M_\odot$ excluding some flaring objects.
242: }
243: \label{fig:3}
244: \end{figure*}
245:
246: Clearly, at the low-luminosity end the X-ray data are dominated by insufficiently constrained upper limits.
247: Some hypotheses for a possible decrease of $L_{\rm x}/L_{\rm bol}$ level towards lower masses are:
248: %This mass range ($0.3...0.1\,M_\odot$) is probably critical for the
249: (i) transition from a solar-like to a convective dynamo, combined with a lower efficieny of the latter one
250: resulting in decreased X-ray production;
251: (ii) smaller co-rotation radius for lower-mass stars and the ensuing
252: centrifugal disruption of the corona \citep{Jardine06.1};
253: (iii) a mass dependent fraction of stars with X-ray emission suppressed by accretion
254: \citep{Flaccomio03.2}.
255: A deeper X-ray observation is necessary to unveil the behavior of the $L_{\rm x}/L_{\rm bol}$ level
256: for the faint and cool objects with the lowest stellar masses ($0.1...0.3\,M_\odot$).
257:
258:
259:
260:
261: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
262: %% BACKMATTER
263: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
264:
265: %\begin{theacknowledgments}
266: %\end{theacknowledgments}
267:
268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
269: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
270: %% manually.
271: %%
272: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
273: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
274: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
275: %%
276: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
277: %% after the \end{document}
278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
279:
280: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
281: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
282: %% setup or preferences.
283: %%
284: %%
285: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
286: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
287:
288: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
289: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
290:
291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
292: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
293: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
294: \bibliography{ms}
295:
296: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
297: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
298: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
299: %% if you don't like the warning.
300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
301: \IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
302: {\typeout{}
303: \typeout{******************************************}
304: \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to optain}
305: \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
306: \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
307: \typeout{******************************************}
308: \typeout{}
309: }
310:
311: \end{document}
312:
313: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
314: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
315: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
316: %% of the above.
317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
318:
319: %\begin{thebibliography}{9}
320: %
321: %\bibitem{Brown2000}
322: %M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{The New Physique}, Publisher Name,
323: % Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
324: %
325: %\bibitem{BrownAustin:2000}
326: %M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{Appl. Phys. Letters} \textbf{85},
327: % 2503--2504 (2000).
328: %
329: %\bibitem{Wang}
330: %R.~Wang, ``Title of Chapter,'' in \emph{Classic Physiques}, edited by
331: % R.~B. Hamil, Publisher Name, Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
332: %
333: %\bibitem{SJ:1999}
334: %C.~D.~Smith and E.~F.~Jones, ``Load-Cycling in Cubic Press,'' in
335: % \emph{Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-1999}, edited by M.~D.~F. et~al.,
336: % AIP Conference Proceedings 505, American Institute of Physics, New York,
337: % 1999, pp. 651--654.
338: %
339: %\end{thebibliography}
340:
341: \endinput
342: %%
343: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
344: