1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: \begin{document}
5: \title{Kinematics of planetary nebulae in
6: the outskirts of the elliptical galaxy NGC 4697\altaffilmark{1}}
7:
8: \author{R. H. M\'endez\altaffilmark{2}, A. M. Teodorescu\altaffilmark{2},
9: R.-P. Kudritzki\altaffilmark{2} and A. Burkert\altaffilmark{3}}
10:
11: \email{mendez@ifa.hawaii.edu}
12:
13: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on data collected at the Subaru Telescope, which is
14: operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.}
15:
16: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii,
17: 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822}
18:
19: \altaffiltext{3}{Universit\"ats-Sternwarte M\"unchen, Scheinerstr. 1,
20: D-81679 M\"unchen, Germany}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We describe the implementation of slitless radial velocity measurements
24: of extragalactic planetary nebulae (PNs) with the 8.2 m Subaru telescope
25: and its Cassegrain imaging spectrograph, FOCAS. As a first application,
26: we have extended a previous search for PNs in NGC 4697 to larger angular
27: distances from its center. A total of 218 PNs were detected, and their
28: radial velocities were measured. We have added 56 new PN detections to
29: the existing sample of 535, observed previously with the ESO VLT + FORS
30: imaging spectrograph; 36 of these new 56 PNs are located at angular
31: distances larger than 230 arcsec from the center of NGC 4697.
32: We compare the new FOCAS velocities with the earlier FORS
33: velocities, for 158 of the 162 reobserved sources, finding
34: good agreement. We now have kinematic information extending out to
35: 5 effective radii from the center. The outer line-of-sight velocity
36: dispersion is a bit lower than estimated earlier. This result is
37: compatible with the existence of a dark matter halo plus some degree
38: of radial anisotropy, but the dark matter halo is rather inconspicuous,
39: and it is still unclear how massive it can be.
40: A more detailed global dynamical study of the whole set of PN velocities
41: will be required to decide if they permit to narrow down the range of
42: possible dark matter distributions in NGC 4697. The new radial velocities
43: reveal no evidence of rotation at 5 effective radii.
44: \end{abstract}
45:
46: \keywords{galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD ---
47: galaxies: individual (NGC 4697) --- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics ---
48: planetary nebulae: general --- techniques: radial velocities}
49:
50: \section{Introduction}
51:
52: Planetary nebulae (PNs) in the outskirts of elliptical galaxies
53: offer valuable kinematic information that can be used to trace the
54: angular momentum distribution and mass distribution in these
55: galaxies. The classic example is the study of PNs in NGC 5128
56: by Hui et al. (1995), later extended by Peng et al. (2004) to
57: 780 PNs. A dark matter halo and significant outer rotation were
58: detected. A recent dynamical study of 340 globular clusters in
59: NGC 5128 has shown additional evidence of a dark matter halo
60: (Woodley et al. 2007). Another case where a dark matter halo was
61: immediately apparent from PN kinematics is NGC 1344 (Teodorescu
62: et al. 2005).
63:
64: In a previous work (M\'endez et al. 2001), hereafter Paper I,
65: we presented photometry and slitless radial velocity
66: information for 535 PNs in the flattened elliptical galaxy
67: NGC 4697. These PNs provided kinematic information up to a distance
68: of 3 effective radii from the center of NGC 4697. The most important
69: result in Paper I was a substantial decline of
70: line-of-sight velocity dispersion (losvd) as a function of angular
71: distance from the center, which can be interpreted as indicating
72: the absence of a dark matter halo around this galaxy,
73: if we assume an isotropic velocity distribution.
74: However, some dark matter can be present if the velocity
75: distribution is radially anisotropic; we explicitly warned about
76: this alternative interpretation in Paper I, and the point
77: has been made in much more detail by Dekel et al. (2005) and
78: De Lorenzi et al. (2008a).
79:
80: It is important to clarify which of the two interpretations,
81: lack of dark matter or pronounced radial anisotropy, is correct. In
82: the current context, with dark matter firmly established as one of
83: the basic components of the universe, the existence of one or several
84: substantial, medium-size elliptical galaxies without a dark matter
85: halo (which is expected to have made possible its very formation)
86: is surprising. On the other hand, if we are able to confirm
87: radial anisotropy, then we have
88: learned about an important constraint concerning the formation of
89: elliptical galaxies. For example, Athanassoula (2005) has made
90: numerical experiments in which a quick succession of disk mergers
91: is more likely to produce significant radial anisotropy.
92:
93: De Lorenzi et al. (2008a) made a detailed dynamical analysis
94: of NGC 4697, using the PNs of Paper I and long-slit absorption line
95: kinematic data. Their best-fitting models were radially anisotropic,
96: and included potentials with a variety of dark matter halos. The models
97: with no dark matter were not consistent with the PN losvds. However,
98: more PN velocities at larger angular distances from the galaxy's
99: center were required to narrow down the range of acceptable dark
100: matter models. In this paper we provide more such PN velocities.
101:
102: Romanowsky et al. (2003) showed similarly declining losvds in
103: NGC 3379, NGC 4494 and NGC 821, claiming that their ``orbit library
104: analysis'' ruled out extreme orbital anisotropies at least in the
105: case of NGC 3379. More recent modeling (De Lorenzi et al. 2008b)
106: indicates again that there
107: are mass-shape-anisotropy degeneracies that need to be resolved to
108: reach a firm conclusion. In addition, a study of two dozens of
109: globular clusters in NGC 3379 (Pierce et al. 2006) suggests
110: that some dark matter may be present there.
111: A recent long-slit spectroscopic study by Forestell \& Gebhardt
112: (2008) seems to indicate the presence of a dark matter halo
113: around NGC 821, again in contradiction to what Romanowsky et al.
114: (2003) concluded from the PNs in that galaxy. In
115: summary, the case for no dark matter appears to be weakening,
116: but it is still quite possible that less massive ellipticals have,
117: on average, lower dark matter fractions, i.e. less easily detected
118: dark matter halos (e.g. Napolitano et al. 2005). We seem to be
119: in a situation that will require more careful studies of several
120: galaxies before we can arrive to more solid conclusions.
121:
122: The need to collect large PN samples means that we need to detect
123: faint PNs. This can be better done using the largest telescopes
124: available; so we had a strong motivation to extend the slitless
125: radial velocity method, used in Paper I with VLT+FORS, to other
126: large telescopes in the northern hemisphere. The FOCAS spectrograph
127: of Subaru proved to be a good choice. As a first application of the
128: slitless technique with FOCAS and Subaru, we have extended our
129: search for PNs around NGC 4697 to larger angular distances. In this
130: paper we present the resulting data and a preliminary analysis.
131: In Section 2 we review the basic idea of slitless radial velocities
132: and describe the Subaru + FOCAS observations in the outskirts of
133: NGC 4697. Section 3 describes the reduction and calibration procedures.
134: Section 4 deals with quality control of the slitless radial velocities
135: using observations of the local PN NGC 7293. In Section 5 we give a
136: catalog of 218 PNs detected with FOCAS, and compare the FOCAS with
137: FORS slitless radial velocities for 158 PNs. Having verified the
138: quality of the data, in Section 6 we discuss the line-of-sight
139: velocity dispersion, and we analyze a plot of the escape
140: velocity as a function of projected distance from the center of the
141: galaxy. We adopt a distance of 10.5 Mpc for NGC 4697, taken from
142: Paper I. Section 7 deals with rotation in the outskirts of NGC 4697.
143: Section 8 gives a summary of results.
144:
145: \section{Radial velocity method, field selection and observations}
146:
147: Since the slitless radial velocity method was described in
148: Paper I, here we give only a brief summary of the basic ideas.
149: Planetary nebulae can be detected in the light of [O III] $\lambda$5007
150: using the traditional on-band, off-band filter technique. Having taken
151: the on-band image, insertion of a grism as dispersing element produces
152: not only dispersion but also a displacement of all images.
153: The dispersed images of PNs remain point sources,
154: which permits an accurate measurement of the displacement. Calibration
155: of the displacement as a function of wavelength and position in the CCD
156: detector offers an efficient way of measuring radial velocities for all
157: PNs in the field, irrespective of their number and distribution.
158: Since no slits are used, there are no light losses, and it is not
159: necessary to go through the complex selection and preparation
160: procedures typical of multi-object slit (or fiber) spectroscopy.
161: Of course the quality of the slitless velocities will depend on the
162: seeing and will decrease for very faint sources because of the larger
163: position uncertainty.
164:
165: The project reported here involves the 8.2 m Subaru telescope on Mauna
166: Kea, Hawaii, and its Cassegrain imaging spectrograph FOCAS. We wanted
167: to extend our search for PNs to larger angular distances from the
168: center of NGC 4697, but allowing for partial overlap with the
169: FORS E and W fields described in Paper I, to be able to compare
170: the radial velocities measured with both instruments. Figure 1
171: shows the FORS fields studied in Paper I, and the two FOCAS
172: fields observed for the present work.
173:
174: The Subaru + FOCAS observations were made on the nights of
175: 2004 May 12/13, 13/14, and 2005 May 11/12, 12/13 and 13/14.
176: The 2004 nights were partly clouded. The first two 2005 nights were
177: photometric, and the last one was affected by thin cirrus. During
178: both observing runs the seeing was stable, oscillating around 0.6
179: arcsec.
180:
181: FOCAS has been described by Kashikawa et al. (2002). The circular
182: field of view of FOCAS has a diameter of 6 arc minutes. This field
183: is covered by two CCDs of 2k$\times$4k (pixel size 15$\mu$m) with
184: an unexposed gap of 5 arcsec between them. The image scale is
185: 0.1 arcsec pix$^{-1}$. Two fields, E and W of NGC 4697, were
186: observed, as shown in Figure 1.
187:
188: On-band direct imaging was done through the
189: interference filter N502, which has the following characteristics:
190: central wavelength 5025 \AA, peak transmission 0.68, and FWHM 60 \AA.
191: Off-band imaging was done through the broad-band standard visual filter.
192: Dispersed images were obtained by exposing through filter N502 and an
193: echelle grism with 175 grooves mm$^{-1}$, operating in the 4th order.
194: In this way the echelle grism gives a dispersion of 0.5 \AA \ pix$^{-1}$,
195: with good efficiency and a rather small displacement. Dispersed PN
196: images of 0.5 arcsec have a size of 5 pixels on the CCD. This implies
197: a radial velocity resolution of 140 km s$^{-1}$, i.e. the PN's
198: internal velocity field is not resolved. In other words, PNs should
199: always appear as single point sources. Assuming position errors of 0.4
200: pixel, the expected uncertainty in radial velocity is 10 km s$^{-1}$.
201:
202: Table 1 lists the most important CCD images obtained for this project.
203: It includes the exposures of the FOCAS E and W NGC 4697 fields, the
204: spectrophotometric standard G138-31 (Oke 1990), and
205: the calibration and quality control exposures to be described in next
206: Section. Since there are two CCD images for each field (Chips 1 and 2),
207: for brevity we have listed only the exposure number corresponding to
208: Chip 1. For Chip 2, add 1 to the listed exposure number. All images
209: were binned 2$\times$1 in the horizontal direction (perpendicular to
210: dispersion). This was done to increase the signal from
211: the very faint sources we wanted to detect, but at the same time
212: without compromising the spectral resolution. As a consequence of
213: this binning, each point source looks like an ellipse. Unbinning
214: is required to bring all stars back to their normal appearance.
215:
216: \section{Reduction and calibration procedures}
217:
218: The basic CCD reductions (bias subtraction, flat-field correction
219: using twilight flats) were made using IRAF\footnote{IRAF is
220: distributed by the National Optical Astronomical Observatories,
221: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
222: Astronomy, Inc., under contract to the National Science
223: Foundation} standard tasks. Then we unbinned the images, recovering
224: the original CCD pixel numbers in the horizontal direction.
225:
226: For image registration and combination we first selected, for each of the
227: E and W fields, a pair (undispersed, dispersed) of on-band individual
228: images, of the best possible quality, taken consecutively at the
229: telescope, and adopted them as reference images. For field E, chip 1,
230: the reference images were 60989 and 60991. For field W, chip 1, the
231: reference images were 52471 and 52473. Obviously, for chip 2 the
232: reference images were 60990, 60992, 52472 and 52474. All the other
233: images, including the off-band ones, were registered upon the
234: corresponding reference image. Registration and combination were
235: made using IRAF standard tasks. In particular the dispersed images
236: were registered using the brightest PN images as reference point
237: sources, avoiding in this way any dependence on ambient temperature
238: variations (see the corresponding discussion in Section 3 of Paper I).
239:
240: We still have to describe the calibration images for radial velocities.
241: They were obtained using an engineering mask with punched holes. The
242: mask produces an array of point sources covering the whole field
243: when illuminated by the internal FOCAS lamps or by any extended
244: astronomical source. There are almost 1000 calibration points,
245: separated by about 100 pixels in $x$ and $y$. Two kinds of calibration
246: images were obtained illuminating the engineering mask with a Th-Ar
247: comparison lamp: (u1) undispersed, taken through filter N502;
248: (d1) dispersed, taken through N502 and the echelle grism.
249: In addition, there were ``quality control'' images, obtained
250: illuminating the engineering mask with the local PN NGC 7293:
251: (u2) undispersed, taken through N502; (d2) dispersed, taken through
252: N502 and the echelle grism. Figure 2 shows examples of images u2,
253: d2 and d1.
254:
255: A comparison between the left and central images in Figure 2 shows
256: the effect of inserting the grism; comparing to the position of a
257: fixed CCD defect, easily recognizable, it is clear that all the point
258: sources have been displaced upwards. The right image in Figure 2 shows
259: what happens if we keep the grism in the light path and illuminate the
260: mask with the Thorium-Argon comparison lamp; now each point source gives
261: a Th-Ar spectrum. The positions of the Th emission lines permit to obtain
262: the wavelength calibration for each grid point. The Th-Ar lamp is ideally
263: suited for our purposes, because its spectrum shows several emission lines
264: within the on-band filter transmission curve. In Paper I we needed to
265: take the calibration images through a broader filter, because the FORS
266: spectrographs do not have Th-Ar lamps.
267:
268: Measurement of the undispersed and dispersed calibration images permits
269: to obtain the displacement produced by the insertion of the grism as a
270: function of wavelength and position on the CCD. The slitless radial
271: velocity calculation proceeds in the following way: (1) identify the
272: four calibration points closest to the undispersed position of the PN;
273: (2) from the displacement between undispersed and dispersed PN images,
274: calculate the redshifted wavelength of the [O III] emission at each
275: of the four calibration points; (3) obtain the final wavelength by
276: bilinear interpolation, weighting the four wavelength values according
277: to the distance from each of the four calibration points to the PN;
278: (4) calculate the radial velocity from the final wavelength and the
279: heliocentric correction.
280:
281: \section{Radial velocity quality control using NGC 7293}
282:
283: The NGC 7293 images we obtained permit to measure radial velocities
284: in two ways: (a) slitless, using images u2 and d2 to obtain the
285: displacement, and using the displacement as a measure of wavelength
286: and therefore velocity, in the way we described at the end of the
287: previous section; (b) ``classical'', using images d1 and d2, and
288: treating each mask hole as a slit. Figure 3 shows a comparison of
289: slitless vs. classical radial velocities of NGC 7293. There is good
290: agreement, which indicates that the calibration of the displacement
291: works very well. In addition, the average heliocentric velocity of
292: NGC 7293 from all the grid points turns out to be approximately $-$30
293: km s$^{-1}$, in good agreement with the known systemic velocity
294: ($-$27 km s$^{-1}$, measured by Meaburn et al. 2005). Furthermore,
295: individual grid points show a range of velocities, from $-$15 to $-$50
296: km s$^{-1}$. Clearly in some cases the mask holes have isolated gas
297: parcels that are moving predominantly towards or away from us, while
298: in most cases we see gas moving in both directions, so that the
299: unresolved emission line profile gives us a velocity closer to the
300: systemic velocity. From the observed range we infer a lower limit of
301: about 20 km s$^{-1}$ for the expansion velocity in [O III], again
302: perfectly consistent with the 25 km s$^{-1}$ measured by Meaburn
303: et al. (2005). No grid point has given a radial velocity departing
304: more from the systemic velocity than we should expect from the expansion
305: velocity. From all these results we estimate that the uncertainty
306: in FOCAS slitless velocities is of the order of 10 kms$^{-1}$. In
307: the next section we will provide more evidence about the quality of
308: the FOCAS slitless velocities.
309:
310: \section{PN detection, photometry, catalog, and comparison with FORS
311: photometry and radial velocities}
312:
313: We searched for PNs using the traditional blinking method.
314: In the same way as in Paper I, a PN candidate was found by blinking
315: on-band vs. off-band, and confirmed by blinking undispersed vs.
316: dispersed on-band. The source was accepted as a PN candidate if it
317: was absent in the off-band image, and if it was a point source.
318: A total of 218 PNs were found, 162 of which had been discovered
319: previously with FORS. Consequently, we have added 56 new
320: detections. Most of the new detections (36 in fact) are at angular
321: distances larger than 230 arcsec from the center of NGC 4697.
322:
323: After measuring the positions of the 218 PNs on
324: the undispersed and dispersed images, the radial velocities were
325: calculated as described in sections 2 and 3.
326: We also measured the Jacoby magnitudes $m$(5007) using the same
327: spectrophotometric standard (G 138-31, Oke 1990) and the same
328: procedures described in Paper I. For a definition of Jacoby
329: magnitudes, see Jacoby (1989) or Paper I. The standard G 138-31
330: has $m$(5007)=19.36 (this number depends on the characteristics
331: of the on-band filter). The faintest objects detected both
332: in Paper I and in the present search have $m(5007)\approx 28.5$.
333: We expect both PN searches to have similar limiting magnitudes,
334: because the telescope sizes, instrumental and CCD efficiencies,
335: and total exposure times, are similar.
336:
337: J2000 equatorial coordinates for all PNs were calculated using a set
338: of astrometric programs written by David Tholen and kindly provided
339: by Fabrizio Bernardi. A first program, when given an input file
340: with field and camera parameters, identifies all the USNO-B1
341: catalog stars available within the desired field and produces a list
342: of reference stars with rough estimates of their position in the chip.
343: The next programs make an improved centroid fitting for reference
344: stars, producing an output file with a list of reference stars
345: with pixel coordinates $x, y$ \/ accurate to a few hundredths
346: of a pixel. The last program performs the final astrometric fit,
347: rejecting outliers and iterating, and provides the PN equatorial
348: coordinates with uncertainties of about 0.5 arcsec.
349:
350: In Table 2 we list the following for all detected PNs: identification
351: number; ($x$, $y$) coordinates, in arcsec, relative to the optical
352: center of NGC 4697; J2000 equatorial coordinates; Jacoby magnitude,
353: $m$(5007); heliocentric radial velocity in km s$^{-1}$;
354: and E and W FORS field identification numbers, if the PN is present
355: in the FORS PN catalog (M\'endez et al. 2008). FOCAS identification
356: numbers that begin with 20, 21, 22 and 23 correspond respectively
357: to FOCAS fields W chip 1, W chip 2, E chip 1, and E chip 2. A few
358: numbers are missing for a variety of reasons: object 2008's radial
359: velocity is 281 km s$^{-1}$, if the emission line is identified as
360: [O III] $\lambda$5007. Since this velocity is incompatible with
361: NGC 4697, we assume that object 2008 is a background emission-line
362: galaxy, at such a redshift that some other emission line falls into
363: the on-band filter transmission curve (e.g. Ly$\alpha$ at $z$=3.1).
364: Object 2023 was a rediscovery of 2014. Object 2049 was not
365: convincingly identified in the grism image, and was rejected as a PN.
366:
367: Since we purposely reobserved many PNs discovered previously with
368: FORS, we can test the accuracy of equatorial coordinates, Jacoby
369: magnitudes, and, most important,
370: radial velocities. Figure 4 shows the differences in declination as a
371: function of the differences in right ascension. We conclude that our
372: coordinates are reliable to within one arcsec, which is adequate for
373: our purposes.
374:
375: Figure 5 shows the differences in magnitudes $m$(5007) plotted as a
376: function of the FORS $m$(5007), which is taken from M\'endez et al.
377: (2008).
378: There is no systematic difference, and the dispersion increases, as
379: expected, towards fainter magnitudes. We find no need to rediscuss
380: the photometric results and PNLF distance of 10.5 Mpc obtained in
381: Paper I.
382:
383: Figure 6 (left panel) shows FORS radial velocities as a function of
384: FOCAS radial velocities for 158 PNs. There is satisfactory agreement.
385: We should explain that four of the 162 PNs could not be measured in
386: Paper I, because these PNs were too far to the right of the W FORS
387: field (see Section 6 in Paper I).
388:
389: We have generated simulations of radial velocity sets affected by random
390: errors that follow a gaussian distribution. In Paper I we estimated
391: errors of about 35 or 40 km s$^{-1}$ for the FORS velocities. The right
392: panel in Figure 6 shows what happens if we assume FOCAS errors of the
393: same magnitude. The dispersion is too large. The central panel in Figure
394: 6 was obtained assuming FOCAS errors of 20 km s$^{-1}$. This is a much
395: better representation of what we observe in the left panel, and we
396: conclude that The FOCAS errors are not larger than 20 km s$^{-1}$;
397: in other words, the FOCAS errors are significantly smaller than the
398: FORS errors. This result is expected.
399: The FOCAS radial velocities are better mainly because the spectral
400: dispersion is larger: 0.5 \AA \ per pixel versus the FORS dispersion
401: of 1.2 \AA \ per pixel. For similar position measurement errors,
402: the larger dispersion gives more accurate velocities.
403: Figure 7 shows the radial velocity difference FOCAS $-$ FORS
404: as a function of the apparent Jacoby magnitude $m$(5007)
405: for 158 PNs. There is a small systematic
406: difference of about 15 km s$^{-1}$, in the sense that FORS velocities
407: are larger, but it is well within the uncertainty attributed to FORS
408: velocities. Note also that large differences occur only for faint PNs.
409: This is expected, because the quality of the slitless radial velocities
410: depends on the quality of the position measurements. For very faint
411: sources, the positions in undispersed and dispersed images are less
412: reliable because the sources are barely detectable and the S/N ratio
413: is low.
414:
415: \section{Line-of-sight velocity dispersions and escape velocities}
416:
417: As mentioned in the introduction, the detailed dynamical analysis
418: by De Lorenzi et al. (2008a) showed that the best-fitting models
419: are radially anisotropic, and require some dark matter; but it is
420: not clear how much. What we need is more PN radial velocities at
421: large angular distances from the center of NGC 4697. Here we
422: present a preliminary discussion of the new FOCAS PN velocities.
423: To illustrate how much we have improved the information about
424: PNs distant from the center, we can mention that
425: we have discovered a total (FORS + FOCAS) of 42 PNs at angular
426: distances larger than 280 arcsec from the center of NGC 4697.
427: We have FORS velocities for 10 of these outlying PNs, and we have
428: FOCAS velocities for 41 of them.
429: Figure 8 shows the positions of all FORS and FOCAS PNs relative
430: to the center of light of NGC 4697 (left panel), and their radial
431: velocities as a function of the $x$ coordinates (right panel).
432: Our coordinate system is defined with the $x$-axis
433: coincident with the major axis of NGC 4697, and with the origin at
434: the center of the galaxy, measuring $x$ and $y$ in arcsec.
435: Since the FORS data were discussed by De Lorenzi et al. (2008a),
436: here we concentrate mostly on the new FOCAS velocities.
437:
438: In a first attempt we defined six data
439: groups: PNs with $x < -300$, $-300 < x < -200$, $-200 < x < -100$,
440: $100 < x < 200$, $200 < x < 300$, and $300 < x$. The numbers of PNs
441: within each group were, respectively, 14, 28, 49, 47, 30 and 8.
442: We calculated the line-of-sight velocity dispersions (losvds), and
443: corrected them for the small effect of measurement errors by subtracting
444: 10 km s$^{-1}$ in quadrature. Figure 9 shows the resulting losvd for
445: each group, as a function of average angular distance from the center
446: of NGC 4697. We also show dispersions derived from absorption-line
447: spectra along the major axis by Binney et al. (1990), and
448: dispersions derived from FORS PNs in Paper I. All these data are in
449: good agreement with each other where they overlap.
450:
451: De Lorenzi et al. (2008a) defined zones with elliptical boundaries for
452: losvd calculations; see their Figure 6. Their outermost datapoint, at
453: a radius of 300 arcsec, has a losvd of 110 km s$^{-1}$.
454: We have calculated the losvd for a group involving all the 48
455: FOCAS PNs that lie outside an ellipse with semi-major and minor
456: axes of 280 and 180 arcsec, respectively. The resulting losvd is
457: 93$\pm$13 km s$^{-1}$, somewhat smaller than the De Lorenzi losvd.
458: We made a similar calculation for the 21 FOCAS PNs lying outside a
459: larger ellipse, with semi-major and minor axes of 350 and 225 arcsec.
460: The corresponding losvd is even smaller: 81$\pm$18 km s$^{-1}$.
461: These values are similar to those shown in Figure 9. We conclude,
462: first, that our FOCAS losvds in the outskirts of NGC 4697 are not very
463: sensitive to the shape of the regions used to define the samples; and
464: second, that the new FOCAS data indicate a slightly smaller losvd
465: beyond 250 arcsec than obtained from the FORS data in De Lorenzi
466: et al. (2008a). Following their discussion, we conclude that the best
467: fitting models are still those including a not very massive dark matter
468: halo, but it is still difficult to narrow down the range of acceptable
469: dark matter models, because the new FOCAS data lie somewhat closer to
470: the models without dark matter than the earlier FORS data.
471:
472: We also built a new sample by adding, to the 21 FOCAS PNs mentioned
473: above, the six other FORS PNs that lie outside of the larger ellipse.
474: We did not make any correction for the larger errors of those few
475: FORS velocities. Still,
476: the losvd for this new 27-object sample was 95$\pm$18 km s$^{-1}$,
477: again lower than the De Lorenzi et al. value.
478:
479: We can also consider an argument
480: used in the pioneering work of Hui et al. (1995) to
481: confirm the existence of a dark matter halo around NGC 5128. When we
482: plot PN radial velocities as a function of angular distance from the
483: center of that galaxy, we find several PNs with velocities exceeding
484: the local escape velocity for a Hernquist (1990) model with constant
485: $M/L$ ratio; see their Figure 20. The argument was repeated and
486: improved in Peng et al. (2004); see their Figure 12. Using a constant
487: $M/L$ Hernquist model, several PNs in NGC 5128 are unbound; we would
488: expect such stars to escape in a very short time. Instead, using a
489: two-component Hernquist model, which includes a dark matter halo,
490: even the most distant PNs become bound, because the escape velocity
491: becomes much larger. This is a test we can easily apply to NGC 4697.
492: Figure 10 shows the result. We calculated the escape velocity for a
493: constant $M/L$ Hernquist (1990) model at a distance $r$ from the
494: center of the mass distribution:
495:
496: $$ V_{\rm esc} = (2 G M_{\rm t} / (r + a))^{0.5}, \eqno(1) $$
497:
498: \noindent where $M_{\rm t}$ is the total mass (for our test we use two
499: masses, 1.5$\times 10^{11} M_\odot$ and 9$\times 10^{10} M_\odot$),
500: and $a$ is a scale length equal to $R_{\rm e}/1.8153$.
501:
502: The choice of galaxy mass needs to be explained. De Lorenzi et al.
503: (2008a) found a $M/L$ ratio of about 5 in the R band, which is
504: equivalent to approximately 7.5 in the B band (see e.g. Maraston 1998).
505: Knowing the extinction-corrected $B_T$=10.0, the distance modulus 30.1
506: from Paper I, and the solar $B$ absolute magnitude 5.48, we obtain
507: for NGC 4697 a blue luminosity of $1.7 \times 10^{10} L_\odot$, which
508: then gives a mass of $1.3 \times 10^{11} M_\odot$.
509:
510: Note that the $(M/L)_B$ ratio of 11 determined in Paper I needs to be
511: changed, because we have reduced the effective radius $R_{\rm e}$ of
512: NGC 4697 after the photometric study by De Lorenzi et al. (2008a).
513: The new value of $R_{\rm e}$ is 66 arcsec, which is equivalent to
514: 3.36 kpc at the galaxy's distance of 10.5 Mpc. This forces a decrease
515: in the total mass required for a fit of the losvd with the Hernquist
516: model. Please refer to formulas (32) and (41) in Hernquist (1990).
517: The dispersion depends on the mass and the scale length $a$. If we
518: change $R_{\rm e}$, which is proportional to $a$, then we need to
519: change $M$. This is perhaps more easily appreciated in Appendix
520: B of Hernquist (1990), where all the formulas for the dispersion
521: express it as a function of $M/a$.
522: Figure 9 shows, for illustrative purposes only, the result of fitting
523: the observed losvd with a Hernquist model. Clearly the NMAGIC modeling
524: by De Lorenzi et al. is to be preferred, but it is useful to show
525: that the Hernquist model is not far off; the total mass of this
526: Hernquist nodel is 1.5$\times 10^{11} M_\odot$, which implies
527: $(M/L)_B = 9$. This differs from the NMAGIC solution by less than
528: 20\% in the mass.
529:
530: Let us go back to Figure 10. We have plotted two escape velocity
531: curves, corresponding to $(M/L)_B = 9$ and 5. For a $(M/L)_B$
532: ratio of 9 we do not find any unbound PNs, but if we decrease
533: $(M/L)_B$ to 5, then a few PNs become unbound. It should be clear
534: that this kind of diagram cannot {\it prove\/} the absence of dark
535: matter. Since we are dealing with projected distances to the center,
536: some PNs can in fact be located at larger distances, where the
537: escape velocity is lower. It is also possible that some PNs
538: have large tangential velocities, so that the total spatial
539: velocity can exceed the escape velocity.
540:
541: In summary, for the larger $M/L$ ratio, no dark matter is
542: necessary; but, for the smaller $M/L$ ratio, the presence of
543: several unbound PNs requires the presence of a dark matter halo.
544: A curve based on the NMAGIC mass of NGC 4697 falls between the two
545: curves we plotted, and therefore the evidence is inconclusive.
546: We can only say that the dark matter halo around NGC 4697
547: is less conspicuous than the one around NGC 5128.
548:
549: What is needed now is to repeat the NMAGIC modeling globally, taking
550: into account both the old FORS and new FOCAS PN velocities. This will
551: require considerable work by other researchers, and is outside the
552: scope of the present paper, which is limited to presenting the
553: new information we have obtained, and exploring its possible
554: significance.
555:
556: %To find even more PNs at large radii is going to be hard, because PN
557: %surface density follows the light. The only way would be to extend
558: %the search to even fainter magnitudes, which will require longer
559: %exposure times and may need spectroscopic confirmation, because at
560: %fainter levels there is increasing contamination by emission-line
561: %galaxies in the background.
562:
563: \section{Rotation}
564:
565: In Paper I we reported that
566: the rotation curve of NGC 4697 appeared to drop beyond about 100
567: arcsec from the center. We can reinvestigate the
568: rotation at large angular distances from the center of NGC 4697
569: using our FOCAS PN velocities, which extend further out and have
570: smaller errors than FORS velocities. Figure 11 shows histograms
571: for PNs progressively more distant from the center. We show separate
572: histograms for PNs with negative and positive $x$ coordinates.
573: In the left panel there is a peak of positive relative radial
574: velocities at negative $x$, but anyway the signal of rotation
575: (most of the galaxy moving toward us at negative $x$, and away from
576: us at positive $x$), is clear. The same sense of rotation is also
577: present in the central panel. The right panel shows that, at $x$
578: coordinates larger than 300 arcsec in absolute value, the rotation
579: is no longer evident. From Paper I and De Lorenzi et al. (2008a) we
580: know already that there is no rotation along the minor axis (that is
581: to say, around the major axis).
582:
583: From long-slit absorption-line studies (Binney et al. 1990, De Lorenzi
584: et al. 2008a) we know how the stars are rotating. Figure 12 shows
585: that the PNs rotate in the same sense. We have selected PNs within
586: 50 arcsec of the major axis, and divided them in eight groups along
587: the major axis, with limits at $-$300, $-$200, $-$100, 0, 100, 200
588: and 300 arcsec. The two extreme groups turned out to have too few PNs,
589: and therefore we removed the $y$ limit in those two cases. In order of
590: increasing average $x$, the numbers of PNs in each group are 14, 16,
591: 19, 20, 11, 20, 13 and 8. We averaged the PN radial velocities and
592: plotted the averages as a function of the average $x$ of each group.
593: The drop in rotation velocity at large radii is clear. It seems that
594: NGC 4697 is hardly rotating at all at $5 R_{\rm e}$. The rotational
595: signal must be somewhat diluted, because we were forced to include
596: PNs with rather large $y$ coordinates; but still the behavior of
597: rotation is obvious. Figures 11 and 12 confirm what we suspected
598: in Paper I. In relation to this lack of outer rotation, it may be
599: interesting to mention a recent study of the S0 galaxy NGC 1023
600: (Noordermeer et al. 2008), which has revealed a similar drop in
601: the outer rotation velocity.
602:
603: Sufficiently massive dark matter halos are usually expected to
604: generate significant rotation in the outskirts, as discussed by
605: De Lorenzi et al. (2008a). Indeed, for example NGC 5128 shows clear
606: evidence of outer rotation (Woodley et al. 2007). That this is not
607: the case in NGC 4697 should not be interpreted as necessarily
608: indicating the lack of a dark matter halo. Instead, it may be a
609: problem of how the specific angular momentum is distributed in the
610: system, independently of its potential well and, by this, its total
611: gravitational mass. In the same way as with the interpretation of
612: the losvd, the interpretation of rotation will require more careful
613: global modeling with NMAGIC or similar codes.
614:
615: For the moment, the conclusion we want to extract is that there
616: appears to exist a variety of cases concerning how much
617: angular momentum resides in the outskirts of elliptical
618: galaxies. PNs are a good tool that will allow to collect angular
619: momentum information for several other galaxies. We hope that the
620: information derived from PN radial velocities will make
621: it possible to explore if this variety in angular momentum
622: distribution can be traced to different galaxy formation
623: mechanisms involving mergers.
624:
625: \section{Summary of conclusions}
626:
627: We have demonstrated how Subaru and FOCAS can be used to obtain accurate
628: slitless radial velocities of extragalactic PNs. Working in two fields
629: in the outskirts of NGC 4697, we discovered and provided radial velocities
630: for 218 PNs, of which 162 had been previously observed with VLT+FORS.
631: Where possible, we compared the FOCAS radial velocities with those
632: previously obtained with FORS, finding good agreement. We now have PN
633: kinematic information extending out to 5 effective radii from the center
634: of NGC 4697 (its effective radius is 66 arcsec). In particular,
635: we have significantly improved the kinematic information at angular
636: distances larger than 230 arcsec from the center of NGC 4697.
637:
638: We have found the following:
639: (1) the losvd at radii between 300 and 400 arcsec from the center
640: of NGC 4697 is below 100 km s$^{-1}$, i.e. a bit lower than obtained
641: from the much smaller FORS outer PN sample by De Lorenzi et al.
642: (2008a). This makes it difficult to narrow down the range of acceptable
643: dark matter models. At least we can say that the dark matter halo
644: around NGC 4697 is not as conspicuous as the one around NGC 5128.
645: (2) the rotational signal, which is obvious close to the center,
646: is no longer visible at about 5 effective radii from the center.
647: By comparison to NGC 5128, it seems that much less angular momentum
648: resides in the outskirts of NGC 4697. We need similar kinematic
649: information about more elliptical galaxies.
650:
651: A more quantitative interpretation of these results
652: concerning NGC 4697 will require careful global modeling
653: of the full, enlarged, FOCAS+FORS PN data set, plus existing
654: absorption-line kinematic data, using NMAGIC or similar codes,
655: following procedures described by De Lorenzi et al. (2008a).
656:
657: \acknowledgements
658: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under
659: Grant No. 0307489. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the help provided
660: by the Subaru staff, in particular the support astronomers Youichi
661: Ohyama, Takashi Hattori and Kentaro Aoki. We would like to thank
662: Fabrizio Bernardi for his help using David Tholen's astrometric
663: programs for the calculation of J2000 equatorial coordinates.
664: We also acknowledge comments by R. Saglia, O. Gerhard and
665: J. Barnes, as well as some very useful remarks by an anonymous
666: referee.
667:
668: \begin{thebibliography}{}
669: \bibitem[]{720}
670: Athanassoula, E. 2005, in AIP Conference Proceedings 804, Planetary
671: Nebulae as Astronomical Tools, eds. R. Szczerba, G. Stasinska
672: \& S.K. Gorny, American Institute of Physics, p. 333
673: \bibitem[]{724}
674: Binney, J. J., Davies, R. L., \& Illingworth, G. D. 1990, ApJ, 361, 78
675: \bibitem[]{}
676: De Lorenzi, F., Gerhard, O., Coccato, L., et al. 2008b,
677: astro-ph arXiv:0804.3350
678: \bibitem[]{}
679: De Lorenzi, F., Gerhard, O., Saglia, R.P., et al. 2008a, MNRAS, 385, 1729
680: \bibitem[]{732}
681: Dekel, A., Stoehr, F., Mamon, G.A., et al. 2005, Nature, 437, 707
682: %\bibitem[]{734}
683: %Emsellem, E., Capellari, M., Peletier, R.F., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 721
684: \bibitem[]{736}
685: Forestell, A.D., \& Gebhardt, K. 2008, astro-ph arXiv:0803.3626
686: \bibitem[]{738}
687: Hernquist, L. 1990, ApJ, 356, 359
688: \bibitem[]{740}
689: Hui, X., Ford, H.C., Freeman, K.C., \& Dopita, M.A. 1995, ApJ, 449, 592
690: \bibitem[]{}
691: Jacoby, G.H. 1989, ApJ, 339, 39
692: \bibitem[]{742}
693: Kashikawa, N., Aoki, K., Asai, R., et al. 2002, PASJ, 54, 819
694: \bibitem[]{}
695: Maraston, C. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 872
696: \bibitem[]{744}
697: Meaburn, J., Boumis, P., L\'opez, J.A., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 963
698: \bibitem[]{746}
699: M\'endez, R.H., Riffeser, A., Kudritzki, R.P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 563, 135
700: (Paper I)
701: \bibitem[]{748}
702: M\'endez, R.H., Teodorescu, A.M., \& Kudritzki, R.P. 2008, ApJS, 175, 522
703: %\bibitem[]{750}
704: %M\'endez, R.H., Thomas, D., Saglia, R.P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 627, 767
705: \bibitem[]{}
706: Napolitano, N.R., Capaccioli, M., Romanowsky, A.J.,
707: et al. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 691
708: \bibitem[]{752}
709: Noordermeer, E., Merrifield, M.R., Coccato, L., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 943
710: \bibitem[]{}
711: Oke, J.B. 1990, AJ, 99, 1621
712: \bibitem[]{754}
713: Peng, E.W., Ford, H.C., \& Freeman, K.C. 2004, ApJ, 602, 685
714: \bibitem[]{}
715: Pierce, M., Beasley, M.A., Forbes, D.A., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1253
716: \bibitem[]{756}
717: Romanowsky, A.J., Douglas, N.G., Arnaboldi, M., et al. 2003, Science,
718: 301, 1696
719: %\bibitem[]{759}
720: %Sambhus, N., Gerhard, O., \& M\'endez, R.H. 2006, AJ, 131, 837
721: %\bibitem[]{761}
722: %Scorza, C., \& Bender, R. 1995, A\&A, 293, 20
723: \bibitem[]{763}
724: Teodorescu, A.M., M\'endez, R.H., Saglia, R.P., et al. 2005, ApJ,
725: 635, 290
726: %\bibitem[]{766}
727: %van der Marel, R.P. 1991, MNRAS, 253, 710
728: \bibitem[]{}
729: Woodley, K.A., Harris, W.E., Beasley, M.A., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 494
730: \end{thebibliography}
731:
732: \clearpage
733:
734: \begin{deluxetable}{lrlrc}
735: \tablecaption{Observations and calibrations \label{tbl-1}}
736: \tablewidth{0pt}
737: \tablehead{
738: \colhead{FOCAS Field} & \colhead{Configuration} &
739: \colhead{FOCAS number} &
740: \colhead{exp (s)} & \colhead{Air mass\tablenotemark{a}}}
741: \startdata
742: NGC 7293 + mask & on-band & 52385 & 200 & 1.88 \\
743: NGC 7293 + mask & on + grism & 52387 & 300 & 1.83 \\
744: Th-Ar + mask & on + grism & 52391 & 10 & 1.77 \\
745: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 52445 & 120 & 1.17 \\
746: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 52447 & 1200 & 1.15 \\
747: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 52449 & 1800 & 1.12 \\
748: Th-Ar + mask & on + grism & 52453 & 10 & 1.11 \\
749: Th-Ar + mask & on-band & 52455 & 4 & 1.11 \\
750: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 52457 & 120 & 1.11 \\
751: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 52459 & 1200 & 1.11 \\
752: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 52461 & 1800 & 1.12 \\
753: Th-Ar + mask & on + grism & 52465 & 10 & 1.14 \\
754: Th-Ar + mask & on-band & 52467 & 4 & 1.14 \\
755: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 52469 & 120 & 1.15 \\
756: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 52471 & 1200 & 1.17 \\
757: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 52473 & 1800 & 1.23 \\
758: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 52481 & 120 & 1.31 \\
759: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 52483 & 1200 & 1.36 \\
760: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 52485 & 1800 & 1.70 \\
761: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 60793 & 120 & 1.24 \\
762: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 60795 & 1200 & 1.21 \\
763: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 60797 & 1800 & 1.16 \\
764: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 60803 & 120 & 1.13 \\
765: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 60805 & 1200 & 1.12 \\
766: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 60807 & 1800 & 1.11 \\
767: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 60813 & 120 & 1.12 \\
768: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 60815 & 1200 & 1.13 \\
769: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 60817 & 1800 & 1.16 \\
770: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 60823 & 120 & 1.22 \\
771: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 60825 & 1200 & 1.26 \\
772: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 60827 & 1800 & 1.35 \\
773: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 60833 & 2000 & 1.59 \\
774: G 138-31 & on-band & 60843 & 60 & 1.02 \\
775: G 138-31 & on-band & 60845 & 120 & 1.02 \\
776: G 138-31 & on-band & 60847 & 60 & 1.02 \\
777: G 138-31 & on-band & 60849 & 60 & 1.02 \\
778: G 138-31 & on-band & 60851 & 120 & 1.02 \\
779: G 138-31 & on-band & 60879 & 60 & 1.34 \\
780: G 138-31 & on-band & 60881 & 120 & 1.36 \\
781: G 138-31 & on-band & 60883 & 60 & 1.38 \\
782: G 138-31 & on-band & 60885 & 120 & 1.40 \\
783: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 60967 & 120 & 1.24 \\
784: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 60969 & 1200 & 1.21 \\
785: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 60971 & 1800 & 1.16 \\
786: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 60977 & 120 & 1.12 \\
787: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 60979 & 1200 & 1.12 \\
788: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 60981 & 1800 & 1.11 \\
789: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 60987 & 120 & 1.12 \\
790: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 60989 & 1200 & 1.13 \\
791: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 60991 & 1800 & 1.16 \\
792: Th-Ar + mask & on + grism & 60993 & 10 & 1.20 \\
793: Th-Ar + mask & on-band & 60995 & 4 & 1.20 \\
794: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 60997 & 120 & 1.21 \\
795: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 60999 & 1200 & 1.24 \\
796: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 61001 & 1800 & 1.35 \\
797: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 61011 & 120 & 1.55 \\
798: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 61013 & 1200 & 1.65 \\
799: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 61015 & 2000 & 1.96 \\
800: G 138-31 & on-band & 61017 & 120 & 1.02 \\
801: G 138-31 & on-band & 61019 & 120 & 1.02 \\
802: G 138-31 & on-band & 61021 & 120 & 1.02 \\
803: G 138-31 & on-band & 61023 & 120 & 1.03 \\
804: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 61081 & 140 & 1.24 \\
805: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 61083 & 1400 & 1.20 \\
806: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 61085 & 2200 & 1.15 \\
807: NGC 4697 E & off-band & 61091 & 140 & 1.12 \\
808: NGC 4697 E & on-band & 61093 & 1400 & 1.11 \\
809: NGC 4697 E & on + grism & 61095 & 2200 & 1.12 \\
810: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 61101 & 140 & 1.13 \\
811: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 61103 & 1400 & 1.15 \\
812: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 61105 & 2200 & 1.22 \\
813: NGC 4697 W & off-band & 61111 & 140 & 1.30 \\
814: NGC 4697 W & on-band & 61113 & 1400 & 1.36 \\
815: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 61115 & 2200 & 1.54 \\
816: NGC 4697 W & on + grism & 61119 & 2200 & 1.93 \\
817: \enddata
818: \tablenotetext{a}{the air masses correspond to the middle of each exposure}
819: \end{deluxetable}
820:
821: \clearpage
822:
823: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrrrrrrr}
824: \tablecaption{Planetary nebulae in NGC 4697 detected with FOCAS \tablenotemark{a} \label{tbl-2}}
825: \tablewidth{0pt}
826: \rotate
827: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
828: \tablehead{
829: \colhead{Id, F} & \colhead{$x$, G} & \colhead{$y$, G} &
830: \colhead{\ } & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{(2000)} &
831: \colhead{\ } & \colhead{$\delta$} & \colhead{(2000)} & \colhead{$m(5007)$} &
832: \colhead{Helioc. RV} & \colhead{Id, E} & \colhead{Id, W}
833: }
834: \startdata
835: % idF xG yG alh alm als decg decm decs mag helRV idE idW
836:
837: 2001 & 376 & -2 & 12 & 48 & 13.13 & -5 & 50 & 43.3 & 27.02 & 1256 & -1 & -1 \\
838: 2002 & 378 & -128 & 12 & 48 & 16.59 & -5 & 52 & 38.1 & 27.01 & 1240 & -1 & -1 \\
839: 2003 & 386 & -129 & 12 & 48 & 16.12 & -5 & 52 & 42.5 & 26.98 & 1282 & -1 & -1 \\
840: 2004 & 287 & -191 & 12 & 48 & 23.89 & -5 & 52 & 56.8 & 26.67 & 1314 & -1 & -1 \\
841: 2005 & 312 & -16 & 12 & 48 & 17.45 & -5 & 50 & 28.9 & 27.84 & 1134 & -1 & -1 \\
842: 2006 & 338 & -142 & 12 & 48 & 19.37 & -5 & 52 & 34.1 & 28.33 & 1362 & -1 & -1 \\
843: 2007 & 286 & -13 & 12 & 48 & 18.91 & -5 & 50 & 15.3 & 25.90 & 1367 & -1 & 1746 \\
844: 2009 & 281 & -69 & 12 & 48 & 20.79 & -5 & 51 & 3.5 & 26.49 & 1178 & -1 & 1742 \\
845: 2010 & 278 & -94 & 12 & 48 & 21.71 & -5 & 51 & 25.4 & 27.51 & 1400 & -1 & -1 \\
846: 2011 & 281 & -136 & 12 & 48 & 22.70 & -5 & 52 & 4.1 & 27.60 & 1251 & -1 & -1 \\
847: 2012 & 260 & -155 & 12 & 48 & 24.48 & -5 & 52 & 12.9 & 27.90 & 1346 & -1 & -1 \\
848: 2013 & 250 & -130 & 12 & 48 & 24.40 & -5 & 51 & 45.7 & 28.06 & 1326 & -1 & -1 \\
849: 2014 & 236 & -80 & 12 & 48 & 23.82 & -5 & 50 & 54.6 & 26.47 & 1218 & -1 & 1734 \\
850: 2015 & 260 & -61 & 12 & 48 & 21.84 & -5 & 50 & 48.0 & 26.95 & 1370 & -1 & 1743 \\
851: 2016 & 269 & -34 & 12 & 48 & 20.52 & -5 & 50 & 27.2 & 26.93 & 1312 & -1 & 1745 \\
852: 2017 & 271 & -44 & 12 & 48 & 20.71 & -5 & 50 & 36.5 & -1. & 1450 & -1 & 1744 \\
853: 2018 & 239 & -8 & 12 & 48 & 21.59 & -5 & 49 & 50.9 & 27.43 & 1208 & -1 & -1 \\
854: 2019 & 236 & -5 & 12 & 48 & 21.71 & -5 & 49 & 46.5 & 27.97 & 1309 & -1 & -1 \\
855: 2020 & 224 & -38 & 12 & 48 & 23.38 & -5 & 50 & 11.6 & 27.09 & 1472 & -1 & 1736 \\
856: 2021 & 216 & -28 & 12 & 48 & 23.62 & -5 & 49 & 59.0 & 25.97 & 1332 & -1 & 1737 \\
857: 2022 & 211 & -45 & 12 & 48 & 24.37 & -5 & 50 & 12.8 & 27.19 & 1280 & -1 & 1735 \\
858: 2024 & 235 & -92 & 12 & 48 & 24.26 & -5 & 51 & 4.5 & 27.16 & 1368 & -1 & 1733 \\
859: 2025 & 220 & -137 & 12 & 48 & 26.43 & -5 & 51 & 40.1 & 26.03 & 1265 & -1 & 1732 \\
860: 2026 & 196 & -150 & 12 & 48 & 28.23 & -5 & 51 & 41.1 & 27.51 & 1312 & -1 & -1 \\
861: 2027 & 191 & -80 & 12 & 48 & 26.55 & -5 & 50 & 35.9 & 27.23 & 1135 & -1 & 1722 \\
862: 2028 & 202 & -45 & 12 & 48 & 24.90 & -5 & 50 & 9.0 & 26.05 & 1315 & -1 & 1723 \\
863: 2029 & 187 & -16 & 12 & 48 & 25.01 & -5 & 49 & 36.3 & 27.57 & 1399 & -1 & -1 \\
864: 2030 & 184 & -51 & 12 & 48 & 26.20 & -5 & 50 & 6.1 & 27.10 & 1322 & -1 & -1 \\
865: 2031 & 165 & -120 & 12 & 48 & 29.26 & -5 & 51 & 0.8 & 26.56 & 1286 & -1 & 1700 \\
866: 2032 & 130 & -27 & 12 & 48 & 28.79 & -5 & 49 & 21.4 & 26.15 & 1430 & -1 & 1668 \\
867: 2033 & 153 & -21 & 12 & 48 & 27.18 & -5 & 49 & 25.8 & 25.96 & 1234 & -1 & 1707 \\
868: 2034 & 141 & -65 & 12 & 48 & 29.19 & -5 & 50 & 1.0 & 26.16 & 1097 & -1 & 1703 \\
869: 2035 & 126 & -78 & 12 & 48 & 30.46 & -5 & 50 & 6.5 & 25.64 & 1243 & -1 & 1661 \\
870: 2036 & 108 & -38 & 12 & 48 & 30.41 & -5 & 49 & 22.8 & 26.51 & 1193 & -1 & 1663 \\
871: 2037 & 198 & -13 & 12 & 48 & 24.25 & -5 & 49 & 38.3 & 27.44 & 1517 & -1 & -1 \\
872: 2038 & 74 & -25 & 12 & 48 & 32.14 & -5 & 48 & 55.9 & 25.72 & 1348 & -1 & 1627 \\
873: 2039 & 108 & -10 & 12 & 48 & 29.62 & -5 & 48 & 57.6 & 26.29 & 1365 & -1 & 1666 \\
874: 2040 & 92 & -27 & 12 & 48 & 31.10 & -5 & 49 & 5.3 & 26.85 & 1400 & -1 & 1664 \\
875: 2041 & 126 & -21 & 12 & 48 & 28.84 & -5 & 49 & 15.1 & 26.63 & 1464 & -1 & 1667 \\
876: 2042 & 85 & -51 & 12 & 48 & 32.21 & -5 & 49 & 24.5 & 26.20 & 953 & -1 & 1623 \\
877: 2043 & 120 & -54 & 12 & 48 & 30.15 & -5 & 49 & 41.7 & 27.67 & 1449 & -1 & -1 \\
878: 2044 & 104 & -54 & 12 & 48 & 31.09 & -5 & 49 & 35.0 & 27.08 & 1425 & -1 & 1662 \\
879: 2045 & 120 & -103 & 12 & 48 & 31.52 & -5 & 50 & 26.9 & 27.30 & 1101 & -1 & 1660 \\
880: 2046 & 147 & -84 & 12 & 48 & 29.34 & -5 & 50 & 21.2 & 26.78 & 1312 & -1 & 1701 \\
881: 2047 & 133 & -78 & 12 & 48 & 30.01 & -5 & 50 & 9.1 & 26.85 & 1222 & -1 & 1702 \\
882: 2048 & 156 & -72 & 12 & 48 & 28.48 & -5 & 50 & 13.5 & 27.67 & 1245 & -1 & -1 \\
883: 2050 & 69 & -13 & 12 & 48 & 32.10 & -5 & 48 & 43.1 & -1. & 1407 & -1 & 1628 \\
884: 2051 & 81 & -14 & 12 & 48 & 31.38 & -5 & 48 & 49.7 & 26.77 & 1388 & -1 & 1630 \\
885: 2101 & 273 & 112 & 12 & 48 & 16.16 & -5 & 48 & 15.8 & 26.93 & 1261 & -1 & -1 \\
886: 2102 & 270 & 102 & 12 & 48 & 16.62 & -5 & 48 & 23.9 & 27.53 & 1207 & -1 & -1 \\
887: 2103 & 279 & 100 & 12 & 48 & 16.16 & -5 & 48 & 29.7 & 27.12 & 1540 & -1 & -1 \\
888: 2104 & 329 & 89 & 12 & 48 & 13.42 & -5 & 49 & 0.2 & 27.61 & 1375 & -1 & -1 \\
889: 2105 & 313 & 60 & 12 & 48 & 15.18 & -5 & 49 & 20.5 & 26.30 & 1270 & -1 & -1 \\
890: 2106 & 356 & 162 & 12 & 48 & 9.72 & -5 & 48 & 6.1 & 27.15 & 1276 & -1 & -1 \\
891: 2107 & 281 & 164 & 12 & 48 & 14.18 & -5 & 47 & 32.2 & 28.16 & 1335 & -1 & -1 \\
892: 2108 & 278 & 30 & 12 & 48 & 18.18 & -5 & 49 & 33.1 & 28.45 & 1329 & -1 & -1 \\
893: 2109 & 241 & 66 & 12 & 48 & 19.41 & -5 & 48 & 44.2 & 26.92 & 1380 & -1 & 1738 \\
894: 2110 & 225 & 69 & 12 & 48 & 20.30 & -5 & 48 & 34.7 & 27.67 & 1339 & -1 & 1739 \\
895: 2111 & 211 & 79 & 12 & 48 & 20.87 & -5 & 48 & 19.9 & -1. & 1185 & -1 & 1740 \\
896: 2112 & 199 & 67 & 12 & 48 & 21.94 & -5 & 48 & 25.4 & 26.23 & 1359 & -1 & 1728 \\
897: 2113 & 207 & 36 & 12 & 48 & 22.31 & -5 & 48 & 57.3 & 26.08 & 1290 & -1 & 1727 \\
898: 2114 & 207 & 26 & 12 & 48 & 22.63 & -5 & 49 & 6.2 & 27.40 & 1205 & -1 & 1725 \\
899: 2115 & 194 & 31 & 12 & 48 & 23.24 & -5 & 48 & 55.9 & 27.65 & 1403 & -1 & 1726 \\
900: 2116 & 203 & 15 & 12 & 48 & 23.14 & -5 & 49 & 14.5 & 27.44 & 1125 & -1 & 1724 \\
901: 2117 & 186 & 45 & 12 & 48 & 23.35 & -5 & 48 & 40.5 & 27.68 & 1316 & -1 & -1 \\
902: 2118 & 157 & 37 & 12 & 48 & 25.32 & -5 & 48 & 35.7 & 27.04 & 1349 & -1 & 1714 \\
903: 2119 & 165 & 41 & 12 & 48 & 24.69 & -5 & 48 & 34.9 & 26.48 & 1204 & -1 & 1715 \\
904: 2120 & 175 & 108 & 12 & 48 & 22.20 & -5 & 47 & 38.6 & 27.30 & 1511 & -1 & 1729 \\
905: 2121 & 168 & 85 & 12 & 48 & 23.29 & -5 & 47 & 56.0 & 27.27 & 1339 & -1 & 1717 \\
906: 2122 & 159 & 66 & 12 & 48 & 24.39 & -5 & 48 & 9.3 & 27.88 & 1437 & -1 & 1716 \\
907: 2123 & 125 & 72 & 12 & 48 & 26.25 & -5 & 47 & 49.7 & 26.81 & 1401 & -1 & 1686 \\
908: 2124 & 173 & 70 & 12 & 48 & 23.38 & -5 & 48 & 11.8 & 27.99 & 1323 & -1 & -1 \\
909: 2125 & 114 & 116 & 12 & 48 & 25.67 & -5 & 47 & 5.6 & 26.39 & 1357 & -1 & 1692 \\
910: 2126 & 110 & 86 & 12 & 48 & 26.80 & -5 & 47 & 30.9 & 27.68 & 1076 & -1 & 1688 \\
911: 2127 & 121 & 85 & 12 & 48 & 26.16 & -5 & 47 & 36.5 & 28.00 & 1554 & -1 & 1689 \\
912: 2128 & 97 & 96 & 12 & 48 & 27.27 & -5 & 47 & 16.3 & 26.80 & 1268 & -1 & 1691 \\
913: 2129 & 99 & 82 & 12 & 48 & 27.58 & -5 & 47 & 29.7 & 26.48 & 1286 & -1 & 1687 \\
914: 2130 & 100 & 75 & 12 & 48 & 27.73 & -5 & 47 & 36.4 & 27.05 & 1290 & -1 & 1685 \\
915: 2131 & 94 & 70 & 12 & 48 & 28.23 & -5 & 47 & 38.2 & 26.63 & 1415 & -1 & 1684 \\
916: 2132 & 149 & 142 & 12 & 48 & 22.85 & -5 & 46 & 56.8 & 27.51 & 1301 & -1 & 1718 \\
917: 2133 & 152 & 138 & 12 & 48 & 22.75 & -5 & 47 & 1.2 & 27.57 & 1471 & -1 & -1 \\
918: 2134 & 194 & 133 & 12 & 48 & 20.33 & -5 & 47 & 24.0 & 27.62 & 1265 & -1 & 1730 \\
919: 2135 & 138 & 42 & 12 & 48 & 26.32 & -5 & 48 & 22.3 & 26.31 & 1064 & -1 & 1713 \\
920: 2136 & 136 & 33 & 12 & 48 & 26.70 & -5 & 48 & 29.5 & 26.28 & 1175 & -1 & 1711 \\
921: 2137 & 133 & 34 & 12 & 48 & 26.86 & -5 & 48 & 27.6 & 26.44 & 1063 & -1 & 1712 \\
922: 2138 & 122 & 31 & 12 & 48 & 27.63 & -5 & 48 & 25.5 & 27.08 & 1323 & -1 & 1677 \\
923: 2139 & 117 & 59 & 12 & 48 & 27.13 & -5 & 47 & 58.8 & 25.63 & 1095 & -1 & 1683 \\
924: 2140 & 109 & 59 & 12 & 48 & 27.60 & -5 & 47 & 55.6 & 26.59 & 1240 & -1 & 1682 \\
925: 2141 & 135 & 14 & 12 & 48 & 27.31 & -5 & 48 & 46.8 & 27.33 & 1321 & -1 & -1 \\
926: 2142 & 135 & 2 & 12 & 48 & 27.67 & -5 & 48 & 58.0 & 27.00 & 1462 & -1 & 1710 \\
927: 2143 & 85 & 61 & 12 & 48 & 28.98 & -5 & 47 & 42.9 & 27.03 & 1410 & -1 & -1 \\
928: 2144 & 95 & 53 & 12 & 48 & 28.62 & -5 & 47 & 54.5 & 26.51 & 1087 & -1 & 1681 \\
929: 2145 & 99 & 42 & 12 & 48 & 28.67 & -5 & 48 & 6.1 & 26.69 & 1315 & -1 & 1679 \\
930: 2146 & 95 & 42 & 12 & 48 & 28.95 & -5 & 48 & 5.0 & 26.71 & 1351 & -1 & 1678 \\
931: 2147 & 98 & 50 & 12 & 48 & 28.55 & -5 & 47 & 58.4 & 27.55 & 1287 & -1 & 1680 \\
932: 2148 & 87 & 35 & 12 & 48 & 29.64 & -5 & 48 & 7.7 & 27.22 & 1222 & -1 & 1644 \\
933: 2149 & 112 & 2 & 12 & 48 & 29.02 & -5 & 48 & 48.2 & 26.08 & 1303 & -1 & 1671 \\
934: 2150 & 109 & 8 & 12 & 48 & 29.04 & -5 & 48 & 41.4 & 26.70 & 1180 & -1 & 1673 \\
935: 2151 & 104 & 16 & 12 & 48 & 29.15 & -5 & 48 & 31.3 & 26.53 & 1377 & -1 & 1676 \\
936: 2152 & 78 & 30 & 12 & 48 & 30.33 & -5 & 48 & 7.8 & 26.61 & 1160 & -1 & 1643 \\
937: 2153 & 85 & 27 & 12 & 48 & 29.97 & -5 & 48 & 13.7 & 27.20 & 1170 & -1 & 1642 \\
938: 2154 & 86 & 19 & 12 & 48 & 30.11 & -5 & 48 & 21.2 & 27.28 & 1060 & -1 & 1641 \\
939: 2155 & 74 & 3 & 12 & 48 & 31.32 & -5 & 48 & 30.8 & 25.87 & 1414 & -1 & 1636 \\
940: 2201 & -265 & -109 & 12 & 48 & 55.10 & -5 & 47 & 48.8 & 27.77 & 1107 & 27 & -1 \\
941: 2202 & -393 & -128 & 12 & 49 & 3.37 & -5 & 47 & 12.2 & 27.07 & 1297 & -1 & -1 \\
942: 2203 & -340 & -157 & 12 & 49 & 0.98 & -5 & 48 & 0.7 & 26.23 & 1257 & -1 & -1 \\
943: 2204 & -349 & -51 & 12 & 48 & 58.55 & -5 & 46 & 21.6 & 25.70 & 1289 & -1 & -1 \\
944: 2205 & -342 & -46 & 12 & 48 & 57.98 & -5 & 46 & 19.6 & 27.24 & 1349 & -1 & -1 \\
945: 2206 & -331 & -57 & 12 & 48 & 57.60 & -5 & 46 & 34.6 & 26.64 & 1244 & -1 & -1 \\
946: 2207 & -318 & -54 & 12 & 48 & 56.76 & -5 & 46 & 37.0 & 26.74 & 1173 & -1 & -1 \\
947: 2208 & -258 & -38 & 12 & 48 & 52.63 & -5 & 46 & 47.8 & 26.55 & 1220 & 65 & -1 \\
948: 2209 & -251 & -53 & 12 & 48 & 52.66 & -5 & 47 & 4.0 & 26.25 & 1153 & 66 & -1 \\
949: 2210 & -244 & -52 & 12 & 48 & 52.16 & -5 & 47 & 6.2 & 26.88 & 1189 & 67 & -1 \\
950: 2211 & -242 & -47 & 12 & 48 & 51.96 & -5 & 47 & 2.8 & 27.78 & 1094 & 68 & -1 \\
951: 2212 & -228 & -26 & 12 & 48 & 50.48 & -5 & 46 & 49.4 & 27.77 & 1314 & -1 & -1 \\
952: 2213 & -338 & -16 & 12 & 48 & 56.88 & -5 & 45 & 54.5 & 26.12 & 1261 & -1 & -1 \\
953: 2214 & -303 & -28 & 12 & 48 & 55.06 & -5 & 46 & 19.5 & 26.72 & 1310 & 114 & -1 \\
954: 2215 & -221 & -113 & 12 & 48 & 52.56 & -5 & 48 & 11.3 & 28.09 & 1245 & -1 & -1 \\
955: 2216 & -261 & -131 & 12 & 48 & 55.45 & -5 & 48 & 10.9 & 27.55 & 1167 & 11 & -1 \\
956: 2217 & -255 & -167 & 12 & 48 & 56.13 & -5 & 48 & 45.6 & 26.73 & 1085 & 2 & -1 \\
957: 2218 & -294 & -179 & 12 & 48 & 58.82 & -5 & 48 & 40.5 & 26.65 & 1363 & 1 & -1 \\
958: 2219 & -215 & -157 & 12 & 48 & 53.42 & -5 & 48 & 53.4 & 27.60 & 1289 & 3 & -1 \\
959: 2220 & -217 & -33 & 12 & 48 & 50.00 & -5 & 47 & 0.7 & 26.78 & 1189 & 69 & -1 \\
960: 2221 & -209 & -34 & 12 & 48 & 49.53 & -5 & 47 & 5.0 & -1. & 1224 & 70 & -1 \\
961: 2222 & -201 & -13 & 12 & 48 & 48.49 & -5 & 46 & 49.1 & 27.06 & 1356 & 118 & -1 \\
962: 2223 & -178 & -30 & 12 & 48 & 47.59 & -5 & 47 & 14.1 & 27.03 & 1388 & 121 & -1 \\
963: 2224 & -172 & -18 & 12 & 48 & 46.88 & -5 & 47 & 6.3 & 27.12 & 1297 & 120 & -1 \\
964: 2225 & -143 & -9 & 12 & 48 & 44.83 & -5 & 47 & 10.4 & 27.43 & 1051 & 128 & -1 \\
965: 2226 & -150 & -38 & 12 & 48 & 46.12 & -5 & 47 & 33.8 & 27.45 & 1124 & 73 & -1 \\
966: 2227 & -124 & -11 & 12 & 48 & 43.76 & -5 & 47 & 20.3 & 27.17 & 1245 & 129 & -1 \\
967: 2228 & -107 & -14 & 12 & 48 & 42.80 & -5 & 47 & 29.4 & 25.93 & 1495 & 130 & -1 \\
968: 2229 & -95 & -29 & 12 & 48 & 42.46 & -5 & 47 & 48.5 & 26.35 & 1409 & 142 & -1 \\
969: 2230 & -83 & -23 & 12 & 48 & 41.59 & -5 & 47 & 47.8 & 26.51 & 1074 & 140 & -1 \\
970: 2231 & -86 & -23 & 12 & 48 & 41.77 & -5 & 47 & 46.9 & -1. & 1190 & 139 & -1 \\
971: 2232 & -85 & -25 & 12 & 48 & 41.77 & -5 & 47 & 49.3 & 27.36 & 1486 & 141 & -1 \\
972: 2233 & -89 & -11 & 12 & 48 & 41.65 & -5 & 47 & 35.0 & 27.50 & 980 & 137 & -1 \\
973: 2234 & -79 & -14 & 12 & 48 & 41.09 & -5 & 47 & 41.8 & 26.73 & 1474 & 138 & -1 \\
974: 2235 & -76 & -47 & 12 & 48 & 41.87 & -5 & 48 & 12.8 & 26.56 & 1015 & 82 & -1 \\
975: 2236 & -79 & -43 & 12 & 48 & 41.94 & -5 & 48 & 7.7 & 27.31 & 1115 & 81 & -1 \\
976: 2237 & -88 & -58 & 12 & 48 & 42.90 & -5 & 48 & 17.3 & 26.89 & 1164 & 83 & -1 \\
977: 2238 & -99 & -67 & 12 & 48 & 43.83 & -5 & 48 & 21.1 & 26.54 & 1249 & 84 & -1 \\
978: 2239 & -118 & -69 & 12 & 48 & 45.03 & -5 & 48 & 15.4 & 26.83 & 1304 & 78 & -1 \\
979: 2240 & -144 & -80 & 12 & 48 & 46.93 & -5 & 48 & 13.8 & 25.82 & 1165 & 36 & -1 \\
980: 2241 & -132 & -107 & 12 & 48 & 46.92 & -5 & 48 & 43.6 & 26.21 & 1016 & 41 & -1 \\
981: 2242 & -126 & -106 & 12 & 48 & 46.59 & -5 & 48 & 45.5 & 26.96 & 1333 & 42 & -1 \\
982: 2243 & -110 & -113 & 12 & 48 & 45.77 & -5 & 48 & 57.9 & 26.50 & 1250 & 15 & -1 \\
983: 2244 & -137 & -87 & 12 & 48 & 46.71 & -5 & 48 & 23.3 & 27.48 & 1170 & 37 & -1 \\
984: 2245 & -113 & -85 & 12 & 48 & 45.19 & -5 & 48 & 32.1 & 27.26 & 1019 & 40 & -1 \\
985: 2246 & -120 & -82 & 12 & 48 & 45.49 & -5 & 48 & 26.4 & 27.63 & 1068 & 39 & -1 \\
986: 2247 & -139 & -71 & 12 & 48 & 46.37 & -5 & 48 & 8.4 & 27.98 & 1150 & -1 & -1 \\
987: 2248 & -155 & -95 & 12 & 48 & 47.99 & -5 & 48 & 23.1 & 26.99 & 1246 & 35 & -1 \\
988: 2249 & -157 & -89 & 12 & 48 & 47.96 & -5 & 48 & 17.0 & 27.51 & 1283 & 34 & -1 \\
989: 2250 & -166 & -106 & 12 & 48 & 49.02 & -5 & 48 & 28.6 & 26.51 & 1159 & 31 & -1 \\
990: 2251 & -169 & -109 & 12 & 48 & 49.25 & -5 & 48 & 29.5 & 27.52 & 1076 & 30 & -1 \\
991: 2252 & -162 & -108 & 12 & 48 & 48.80 & -5 & 48 & 32.2 & 27.52 & 1307 & 32 & -1 \\
992: 2253 & -172 & -133 & 12 & 48 & 50.11 & -5 & 48 & 50.2 & 27.06 & 1343 & 12 & -1 \\
993: 2254 & -133 & -123 & 12 & 48 & 47.48 & -5 & 48 & 57.3 & -1. & 1241 & 13 & -1 \\
994: 2255 & -198 & -81 & 12 & 48 & 50.21 & -5 & 47 & 51.8 & 26.60 & 1351 & 28 & -1 \\
995: 2256 & -175 & -101 & 12 & 48 & 49.38 & -5 & 48 & 20.0 & 27.40 & 1214 & 29 & -1 \\
996: 2257 & -179 & -64 & 12 & 48 & 48.58 & -5 & 47 & 44.9 & 27.98 & 1139 & 71 & -1 \\
997: 2258 & -111 & -43 & 12 & 48 & 43.89 & -5 & 47 & 54.8 & 27.47 & 1176 & 76 & -1 \\
998: 2259 & -103 & -38 & 12 & 48 & 43.24 & -5 & 47 & 53.0 & 27.34 & 1096 & 79 & -1 \\
999: 2260 & -66 & -6 & 12 & 48 & 40.07 & -5 & 47 & 39.9 & -1. & 1140 & 136 & 1024 \\
1000: 2261 & -59 & -15 & 12 & 48 & 39.92 & -5 & 47 & 50.5 & 26.61 & 1207 & 162 & 1043 \\
1001: 2262 & -61 & -14 & 12 & 48 & 40.00 & -5 & 47 & 49.3 & -1. & 1123 & 161 & 1042 \\
1002: 2301 & -88 & 71 & 12 & 48 & 39.25 & -5 & 46 & 20.6 & 26.61 & 1319 & 300 & -1 \\
1003: 2302 & -89 & 50 & 12 & 48 & 39.92 & -5 & 46 & 39.0 & 26.73 & 1218 & 301 & -1 \\
1004: 2303 & -92 & 45 & 12 & 48 & 40.22 & -5 & 46 & 43.3 & 27.45 & 1148 & 220 & -1 \\
1005: 2304 & -105 & 31 & 12 & 48 & 41.39 & -5 & 46 & 49.7 & 26.78 & 1402 & 219 & -1 \\
1006: 2305 & -86 & 29 & 12 & 48 & 40.34 & -5 & 47 & 0.1 & 26.95 & 1332 & 222 & -1 \\
1007: 2306 & -94 & 20 & 12 & 48 & 41.09 & -5 & 47 & 4.7 & 27.05 & 1341 & 221 & -1 \\
1008: 2307 & -74 & 24 & 12 & 48 & 39.72 & -5 & 47 & 9.5 & 26.55 & 973 & 226 & -1 \\
1009: 2308 & -76 & 25 & 12 & 48 & 39.79 & -5 & 47 & 7.6 & 27.24 & 1220 & 225 & -1 \\
1010: 2309 & -70 & 32 & 12 & 48 & 39.22 & -5 & 47 & 4.0 & 27.15 & 1254 & 228 & -1 \\
1011: 2310 & -63 & 34 & 12 & 48 & 38.78 & -5 & 47 & 5.1 & 26.55 & 1069 & 229 & 1050 \\
1012: 2311 & -117 & 129 & 12 & 48 & 39.34 & -5 & 45 & 16.5 & 26.68 & 1157 & 362 & -1 \\
1013: 2312 & -129 & 127 & 12 & 48 & 40.17 & -5 & 45 & 13.1 & 26.27 & 1324 & 343 & -1 \\
1014: 2313 & -137 & 119 & 12 & 48 & 40.85 & -5 & 45 & 16.3 & 27.30 & 1389 & 342 & -1 \\
1015: 2314 & -113 & 96 & 12 & 48 & 40.07 & -5 & 45 & 47.4 & 27.15 & 1011 & 346 & -1 \\
1016: 2315 & -112 & 64 & 12 & 48 & 40.87 & -5 & 46 & 16.8 & 26.78 & 1124 & 298 & -1 \\
1017: 2316 & -125 & 28 & 12 & 48 & 42.74 & -5 & 46 & 44.5 & 26.38 & 1161 & 217 & -1 \\
1018: 2317 & -130 & 26 & 12 & 48 & 43.04 & -5 & 46 & 44.3 & -1. & 1320 & 216 & -1 \\
1019: 2318 & -124 & 6 & 12 & 48 & 43.26 & -5 & 47 & 4.3 & 26.88 & 1035 & 126 & -1 \\
1020: 2319 & -156 & 19 & 12 & 48 & 44.83 & -5 & 46 & 39.8 & 27.38 & 1375 & -1 & -1 \\
1021: 2320 & -172 & 7 & 12 & 48 & 46.13 & -5 & 46 & 43.4 & 26.03 & 1313 & 119 & -1 \\
1022: 2321 & -168 & 63 & 12 & 48 & 44.32 & -5 & 45 & 54.5 & 26.54 & 1464 & 295 & -1 \\
1023: 2322 & -149 & 80 & 12 & 48 & 42.68 & -5 & 45 & 46.5 & 27.47 & 1211 & 296 & -1 \\
1024: 2323 & -146 & 102 & 12 & 48 & 41.90 & -5 & 45 & 28.3 & 28.22 & 1336 & 340 & -1 \\
1025: 2324 & -156 & 99 & 12 & 48 & 42.55 & -5 & 45 & 26.4 & 27.44 & 1279 & 339 & -1 \\
1026: 2325 & -151 & 93 & 12 & 48 & 42.41 & -5 & 45 & 34.0 & 27.87 & 1327 & 341 & -1 \\
1027: 2326 & -166 & 125 & 12 & 48 & 42.47 & -5 & 44 & 58.7 & 27.79 & 1349 & 337 & -1 \\
1028: 2327 & -181 & 19 & 12 & 48 & 46.37 & -5 & 46 & 28.7 & 26.68 & 1030 & -1 & -1 \\
1029: 2328 & -183 & 13 & 12 & 48 & 46.65 & -5 & 46 & 33.3 & 27.71 & 1193 & -1 & -1 \\
1030: 2329 & -188 & 27 & 12 & 48 & 46.55 & -5 & 46 & 18.9 & 26.42 & 1331 & -1 & -1 \\
1031: 2330 & -188 & 26 & 12 & 48 & 46.57 & -5 & 46 & 19.5 & 26.30 & 1223 & -1 & -1 \\
1032: 2331 & -189 & 31 & 12 & 48 & 46.53 & -5 & 46 & 14.7 & 27.69 & 1251 & -1 & -1 \\
1033: 2332 & -201 & 17 & 12 & 48 & 47.64 & -5 & 46 & 21.6 & 26.90 & 1037 & 214 & -1 \\
1034: 2333 & -206 & 19 & 12 & 48 & 47.86 & -5 & 46 & 18.4 & 26.85 & 1275 & 213 & -1 \\
1035: 2334 & -216 & 12 & 12 & 48 & 48.70 & -5 & 46 & 20.2 & 26.84 & 1019 & 212 & -1 \\
1036: 2335 & -223 & 6 & 12 & 48 & 49.27 & -5 & 46 & 22.5 & 26.64 & 1316 & 116 & -1 \\
1037: 2336 & -204 & 77 & 12 & 48 & 46.11 & -5 & 45 & 25.9 & 27.66 & 1148 & 293 & -1 \\
1038: 2337 & -252 & 16 & 12 & 48 & 50.74 & -5 & 46 & 1.8 & 25.87 & 1225 & 211 & -1 \\
1039: 2338 & -247 & 5 & 12 & 48 & 50.78 & -5 & 46 & 12.9 & 27.39 & 1273 & 115 & -1 \\
1040: 2339 & -232 & 20 & 12 & 48 & 49.44 & -5 & 46 & 6.1 & 27.08 & 1285 & -1 & -1 \\
1041: 2340 & -272 & 161 & 12 & 48 & 47.88 & -5 & 43 & 41.5 & 27.30 & 1239 & 357 & -1 \\
1042: 2341 & -272 & 39 & 12 & 48 & 51.31 & -5 & 45 & 32.3 & 27.70 & 1267 & -1 & -1 \\
1043: 2342 & -277 & 35 & 12 & 48 & 51.73 & -5 & 45 & 33.5 & 27.74 & 1158 & -1 & -1 \\
1044: 2343 & -283 & 46 & 12 & 48 & 51.76 & -5 & 45 & 21.5 & -1. & 1267 & 210 & -1 \\
1045: 2344 & -290 & 111 & 12 & 48 & 50.37 & -5 & 44 & 19.5 & 26.97 & 1110 & 336 & -1 \\
1046: 2345 & -294 & 107 & 12 & 48 & 50.75 & -5 & 44 & 21.5 & 26.55 & 1101 & 335 & -1 \\
1047: 2346 & -338 & 143 & 12 & 48 & 52.37 & -5 & 43 & 29.6 & 27.21 & 1120 & -1 & -1 \\
1048: 2347 & -327 & 19 & 12 & 48 & 55.21 & -5 & 45 & 26.9 & 26.05 & 1425 & -1 & -1 \\
1049: 2348 & -361 & 81 & 12 & 48 & 55.54 & -5 & 44 & 16.6 & 26.62 & 1360 & -1 & -1 \\
1050: 2349 & -373 & 96 & 12 & 48 & 55.84 & -5 & 43 & 57.7 & 26.93 & 1238 & -1 & -1 \\
1051: 2350 & -403 & 101 & 12 & 48 & 57.51 & -5 & 43 & 40.8 & 26.49 & 1105 & -1 & -1 \\
1052: 2351 & -409 & 95 & 12 & 48 & 58.08 & -5 & 43 & 43.5 & 26.77 & 1229 & -1 & -1 \\
1053: 2352 & -83 & 17 & 12 & 48 & 40.48 & -5 & 47 & 11.6 & 27.39 & 1286 & 224 & -1 \\
1054: 2353 & -72 & 19 & 12 & 48 & 39.74 & -5 & 47 & 14.3 & 27.61 & 1165 & 227 & -1 \\
1055:
1056: \enddata
1057: \tablenotetext{a}{The $x$, G and $y$, G pixel coordinates are given
1058: in arcsec and have their origin at the center of light of NGC 4697.
1059: The $x$, G coordinate is defined along the major axis of NGC 4697.
1060: The units of Right Ascension are hours, minutes and seconds; the
1061: units of Declination are degrees, arc minutes, and arc seconds.
1062: In col. (6) a value of $-1$ for $m(5007)$ indicates that no measurement
1063: was attempted, because of CCD defects or a complex background.
1064: Heliocentric radial velocities are given in km s$^{-1}$.
1065: In the last two columns, a value of $-1$ indicates that the object either
1066: does not belong or was not measured in the corresponding FORS field.}
1067: \end{deluxetable}
1068:
1069: \clearpage
1070:
1071: \begin{figure}
1072: \epsscale{1.0}
1073: \plotone{f1.ps}
1074: \caption{
1075: FOCAS (circular) and FORS (rectangular) fields
1076: observed in NGC 4697. Paper I was based on observations of the FORS
1077: fields. The line splitting each circular FOCAS field indicates the
1078: position of the narrow gap (5 arcsec) separating chip 1 from chip 2.
1079: }
1080: \end{figure}
1081:
1082: \begin{figure}
1083: \epsscale{0.3}
1084: \plotone{f2a.ps}
1085: \plotone{f2b.ps}
1086: \plotone{f2c.ps}
1087: \caption{
1088: Calibration and quality control images obtained with FOCAS. From left to
1089: right, we show (u2) part of the engineering mask illuminated by NGC 7293,
1090: inserting the on-band filter; (d2) the same, adding the grism; what we
1091: see is [O III] $\lambda$5007 at each position (the only emission line
1092: passed by the on-band filter), plus a very faint nebular continuum; and
1093: (d1) the result of illuminating the mask with the Th-Ar comparison lamp,
1094: inserting filter N502 and grism. The direction of dispersion is vertical.
1095: }
1096: \end{figure}
1097:
1098: \begin{figure}
1099: \epsscale{1.0}
1100: \plottwo{f3a.ps}{f3b.ps}
1101: \caption{
1102: Comparison of slitless vs. classical FOCAS radial velocities of NGC 7293.
1103: The left and right figures correspond to chips 1 and 2, respectively.
1104: The PN's systemic radial velocity is $-$27 km s$^{-1}$, according to
1105: Meaburn et al. (2005).
1106: }
1107: \end{figure}
1108:
1109: \begin{figure}
1110: \epsscale{1.0}
1111: \plotone{f4.ps}
1112: \caption{
1113: Comparison of equatorial coordinates for 162 PNs observed with both
1114: FORS and FOCAS.
1115: }
1116: \end{figure}
1117:
1118: \begin{figure}
1119: \epsscale{1.0}
1120: \plotone{f5.ps}
1121: \caption{
1122: Differences (FOCAS $-$ FORS) of Jacoby magnitudes $m$(5007) plotted
1123: as a function of the FORS $m$(5007).
1124: }
1125: \end{figure}
1126:
1127: \begin{figure}
1128: \epsscale{0.3}
1129: \plotone{f6a.ps}
1130: \plotone{f6b.ps}
1131: \plotone{f6c.ps}
1132: \caption{
1133: Left: comparison of heliocentric radial velocities for 158 PNs observed
1134: with both FORS and FOCAS. Center: random number simulations assuming
1135: errors of 35 km s$^{-1}$ for FORS, and 20 km s$^{-1}$ for FOCAS. Right:
1136: random number simulations assuming 30 km s$^{-1}$ for FOCAS. We confirm
1137: that the FOCAS errors are not larger than 20 km s$^{-1}$.
1138: }
1139: \end{figure}
1140:
1141: \begin{figure}
1142: \epsscale{1.0}
1143: \plotone{f7.ps}
1144: \caption{
1145: Velocity differences (FOCAS $-$ FORS) plotted as a function of $m$(5007).
1146: }
1147: \end{figure}
1148:
1149: \begin{figure}
1150: \epsscale{1.0}
1151: \plottwo{f8a.ps}{f8b.ps}
1152: \caption{
1153: FORS (plus signs) and FOCAS (squares) PN detections.
1154: Left: positions of PNs relative to the center of light of NGC 4697, in
1155: arcsec. Right: radial velocities as a function of the $x$ coordinates.
1156: }
1157: \end{figure}
1158:
1159: \begin{figure}
1160: \epsscale{1.0}
1161: \plotone{f9.ps}
1162: \caption{
1163: Line-of-sight velocity dispersion plotted as a function of average
1164: angular distance from the center of NGC 4697. Plus signs are
1165: measurements by Binney et al. (1990) on long-slit, integrated-light
1166: spectra along the major axis. Diamonds are PN results from Paper I.
1167: Squares are PN results from FOCAS radial velocities.
1168: The solid line is the Hernquist (1990) analytical model with
1169: a constant $M/L$ ratio, adopting $R_{\rm e} =$ 66 arcsec,
1170: and a total mass of 1.5$\times 10^{11} M_\odot$. This is equivalent
1171: to $(M/L)_B = 9$.
1172: }
1173: \end{figure}
1174:
1175: \begin{figure}
1176: \epsscale{1.0}
1177: \plotone{f10.ps}
1178: \caption{
1179: Individual FOCAS (squares) and FORS (plus signs) PN radial velocities
1180: plotted as a function of angular distance from the center of NGC 4697.
1181: We have only used FORS velocities of PNs from regions near the center,
1182: where we do not have FOCAS velocities.
1183: The solid lines are escape velocities for Hernquist models with
1184: $(M/L)_B =$ 9 (outer) and 5 (inner).
1185: }
1186: \end{figure}
1187:
1188: \begin{figure}
1189: \epsscale{0.3}
1190: \plotone{f11a.ps}
1191: \plotone{f11b.ps}
1192: \plotone{f11c.ps}
1193: \caption{
1194: Left panel:
1195: radial velocity (FOCAS) histograms for PNs with $-200 < x < -100$
1196: (dotted line) and $100 < x < 200$ (dashed line). The vertical line
1197: indicates the systemic velocity, 1270 km s$^{-1}$, taken from Paper I.
1198: There is an excess of positive relative velocities for negative $x$, but
1199: still the rotational signal is clear: at positive $x$ the PNs are
1200: preferentially moving away from us (in the same sense as the stars),
1201: while the opposite happens at negative $x$.
1202: Central panel:
1203: radial velocity (FOCAS) histograms for PNs with $-300 < x < -200$
1204: (dotted line) and $200 < x < 300$ (dashed line). The vertical line
1205: has always the same meaning. As we move outward, there is still a clear
1206: rotational signal (compare with the next panel).
1207: Right panel:
1208: radial velocity (FOCAS) histograms for PNs with $x < -300$ (dotted line)
1209: and $300 < x$ (dashed line). No rotation is apparent here.
1210: }
1211: \end{figure}
1212:
1213: \begin{figure}
1214: \epsscale{1.0}
1215: \plotone{f12.ps}
1216: \caption{
1217: Average FOCAS PN radial velocity (squares) plotted as a function
1218: of average $x$ coordinate for eight PN groups, described in the text.
1219: Plus signs are velocities measured on long-slit, integrated-light
1220: spectra along the major-axis by Binney et al. (1990). The origin of
1221: velocities corresponds to the systemic velocity of NGC 4697,
1222: 1270 km s$^{-1}$.
1223: %Note the point at $x = -150$ arcsec. Its position
1224: %is a consequence of the excess of positive velocities detected in
1225: %Figure 11 (left panel).
1226: The effective radius of NGC 4697 is 66 arcsec.
1227: }
1228: \end{figure}
1229:
1230: %status August 29, 2008; 1231 lines
1231: \end{document}
1232:
1233: