1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46:
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: %% FRONTMATTER
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: %% \texttt{http://www.aip..org/pacs/index.html}>
51: \begin{document}
52: \url{}
53: \title{Vortices in self-gravitating disks}
54:
55: \classification{97.10.Gz} \keywords {Hydrodynamics,
56: Instabilities, Planetary systems: formation, protoplanetary disks}
57:
58: \author{G. R. Mamatsashvili}{
59: address={SUPA, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh,
60: Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, Scotland; E-mail: grm@roe.ac.uk},
61: altaddress={Georgian
62: National Astrophysical Observatory, Il. Chavchavadze State
63: University, 2a Kazbegi Ave., Tbilisi 0160, Georgia},
64: email={grm@roe.ac.uk},}
65:
66: \iftrue
67:
68: \author{W. K. M. Rice}{
69: address={SUPA, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh,
70: Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, Scotland},
71: email={wkmr@roe.ac.uk},}
72:
73:
74:
75: \copyrightyear{2008}
76:
77: \begin{abstract}
78: Vortices are believed to greatly help the formation of km sized
79: planetesimals by collecting dust particles in their centers.
80: However, vortex dynamics is commonly studied in non-self-gravitating
81: disks. The main goal here is to examine the effects of disk
82: self-gravity on the vortex dynamics via numerical simulations. In
83: the self-gravitating case, when quasi-steady gravitoturbulent state
84: is reached, vortices appear as transient structures undergoing
85: recurring phases of formation, growth to sizes comparable to a local
86: Jeans scale, and eventual shearing and destruction due to
87: gravitational instability. Each phase lasts over 2-3 orbital
88: periods. Vortices and density waves appear to be coupled implying that, in
89: general, one should consider both vortex and density wave modes for
90: a proper understanding of self-gravitating disk dynamics.
91:
92: Our results imply that given such an irregular and rapidly changing,
93: transient character of vortex evolution in self-gravitating disks
94: it may be difficult for such vortices to effectively trap dust
95: particles in their centers that is a necessary process towards
96: planet formation.
97: \end{abstract}
98:
99: \maketitle
100:
101: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
102: %% MAINMATTER
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104:
105: \section{introduction}
106:
107: It is well known that antcyclonic vortices can help the planet
108: formation process by aggregating dust particles in their centers to
109: build planetesimals \cite{BS95, JAB04, KB06}. Numerical simulations
110: \cite{GL99, UR04, JG05} demonstrate that coherent anticyclonic
111: vortices indeed emerge in disks and survive for hundreds of orbits.
112: All these investigations are, however, carried out for
113: non-self-gravitating disks. Here we investigate the effects of disk
114: self-gravity on the vortex formation and evolution, because
115: protoplanetary disks are in general self-gravitating and usually do
116: not cool fast enough to get directly fragmented into giant planets.
117: Instead, they settle into a quasi-steady gravitoturbulent state
118: \cite{Boleyetal06}. Hence, there should be found some mechanism that
119: will build planetesimals in this state. Global simulations of the
120: dynamics of dust particles in self-gravitating gaseous disks show
121: that large scale spiral structure in a self-regulated state does
122: concentrate dust particles in overdense/overpressure spiral arms
123: \cite{Riceetal06}. As mentioned, another possibility of dust
124: particle concentration is their trapping by anticyclonic vortices
125: (worked out originally for non-self-gravitating disks). So, in
126: perspective our present study will allow us to see if the latter
127: mechanism of planetesimal formation can also be at work in
128: self-gravitating disks. Due to resolution constraints, it is
129: difficult to see vortices in global disk simulations. For this
130: purpose we work in the local shearing sheet approximation.
131:
132: \section{physical model and equations}
133:
134: In the shearing sheet model only a local patch of a disk in the
135: vicinity of some radius $r_0$ is considered that rotates around the
136: central star with the angular velocity $\Omega_0\equiv
137: \Omega_K(r_0)$, where $\Omega_K(r)$ is the angular velocity of
138: Keplerian (differential) rotation. Within this patch the
139: differential rotation of a disk manifests itself as a parallel shear
140: flow with a constant velocity shear \cite{GL65}. The unperturbed
141: background surface density $\Sigma_0$ and two-dimensional pressure
142: $P_0$ corresponding to this shear flow are assumed to be spatially
143: constant. Coriolis force is also included to take into account the
144: effects of rotation. As a result, in this local approximation the
145: continuity equation and equations of motion take the form
146: \cite{G01}:
147: \begin{equation}
148: \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial t}+\nabla\cdot(\Sigma{\bf u})
149: -q\Omega_0 x \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial y} = 0,
150: \end{equation}
151: \begin{equation}
152: \frac{\partial {\bf u}}{\partial t}+({\bf u}\cdot\nabla){\bf
153: u}-q\Omega_0 x \frac{\partial {\bf u}}{\partial y} =-\frac{\nabla
154: P}{\Sigma}-2\Omega_0{\bf \hat{z}}\times {\bf u}+q\Omega_0u_x{\bf
155: \hat{y}}-\nabla \psi.
156: \end{equation}
157: This set of equations is supplemented by Poisson's equation for a
158: razor-thin disk
159: \begin{equation}
160: \Delta \psi=4\pi G (\Sigma-\Sigma_0)\delta(z).
161: \end{equation}
162: Here ${\bf u}(u_x, u_y), P, \Sigma$ and $\psi$ are, respectively,
163: the perturbed velocity relative to the background parallel shear
164: flow ${\bf u_0}(0, -q\Omega_0 x)$, the two-dimensional pressure, the
165: surface density and the gravitational potential of the gas sheet.
166: $x$ and $y$ are, respectively, the radial and azimuthal coordinates.
167: ${\bf \hat{y}}$ and ${\bf \hat{z}}$ are the unit vectors in the
168: azimuthal and vertical directions, respectively. Since (1-2) are
169: written for perturbed velocities, only the gravitational potential
170: due to the perturbed surface density $\Sigma-\Sigma_0$ is used. The
171: shear parameter $q=1.5$ for the Keplerian rotation considered here.
172:
173: The equation of state is
174: $$
175: P=(\gamma-1)U,
176: $$
177: where $U$ and $\gamma$ are the two-dimensional internal energy and
178: adiabatic index, respectively. We will adopt $\gamma=2$. The sound
179: speed is $c_s^2=\gamma P/\Sigma=\gamma(\gamma-1)U/\Sigma$.
180:
181: The central quantity of this study is the vertical component of
182: potential vorticity referred to as PV below:
183: $$
184: I\equiv\frac{{\bf \hat{z}}\cdot \nabla\times {\bf
185: u}+(2-q)\Omega}{\Sigma}=\frac{1}{\Sigma}\left(\frac{\partial
186: u_y}{\partial x}- \frac{\partial u_x}{\partial y}+(2-q)\Omega
187: \right).
188: $$
189: The PV will play an important role in the subsequent analysis, as it
190: generally characterizes the formation of coherent structures
191: (vortices) in a disk flow \cite{JG05}.
192:
193: The evolution of the internal energy density is governed by the
194: equation
195: \begin{equation}
196: \frac{\partial U}{\partial t}+ \nabla\cdot(U{\bf u})-q\Omega_0 x
197: \frac{\partial U}{\partial y} = -P\nabla\cdot{\bf
198: u}-\frac{U}{\tau_{c}},
199: \end{equation}
200: where the last term on the rhs takes account of cooling of the disk.
201: The cooling time $\tau_{c}$ is assumed to be constant,
202: $\tau_c=20\Omega^{-1}$, so that the disk does not fragment and
203: enters a saturated gravitoturbulent state. \emph{In the present
204: study we concentrate on examining the peculiarities of potential
205: vorticity evolution in such a gravitoturbulent state}.
206:
207: We introduce the nondimensional variables: $t\rightarrow \Omega_0 t,
208: (x,y)\rightarrow (x\Omega_0/c_{s0}, y\Omega_0/c_{s0}), \Sigma
209: \rightarrow \Sigma/\Sigma_0, P\rightarrow P/c_{s0}^2\Sigma_0,
210: U\rightarrow U/c_{s0}^2\Sigma_0, I\rightarrow I\Sigma_0/\Omega_0$.
211: These nondimensional variables are used throughout what follows. The
212: Toomre's parameter is $Q=c_s\Omega_0/\pi G\Sigma$. We start with
213: $Q=Q_0=c_{s0}\Omega_0/\pi G\Sigma_0=1.5$.
214:
215: Our computational domain in the $(x,y)$ plane is a square $-L/2\leq
216: x,y \leq L/2$, divided into $N\times N$ grid cells. We take $L=20$
217: and $N=1024$. In order to study the evolution of the system we
218: numerically integrate (1-4) within this domain.
219:
220:
221: \begin{figure}
222: \includegraphics[height=0.27\textheight]{fig1_Mamatsashvili.eps}
223: \includegraphics[height=0.27\textheight]{fig2_Mamatsashvili.eps}
224: \caption{Left: Initial PV field at $t=0$ corresponding to Kolmogorov
225: spectrum of velocities. Right four panels: PV, surface density,
226: internal energy/pressure and Toomre's parameter $Q$ in the
227: gravitoturbulent state at $t=33$ and $L=20$ (evolution picture
228: remains unchanged for larger times). Adjusted negative PV regions
229: produce overdense regions, which are gravitationally unstable.
230: Unadjusted negative PV regions correspond to central underdense
231: regions surrounded by overdense regions, though not so strong as for
232: adjusted PV regions.}
233: \end{figure}
234:
235: \section{Nonlinear evolution}
236:
237: Initial conditions consist of random $u_x$ and $u_y$ perturbations
238: superimposed on the mean Keplerian shear flow. Surface density and
239: internal energy are not perturbed initially. Fig. 1 shows these
240: initial conditions in terms of PV. The velocity perturbations are
241: measured by $\sigma = \langle {\bf u}^2(x,y)\rangle^{1/2}$, where
242: the angle brackets mean ensemble averaging. In our calculations
243: $\sigma=0.6$ at $t=0$. We start with Kolmogorov power spectrum
244: $\langle |u(k)|^2\rangle\sim k^{-8/3}$, where $k$ is the wavenumber.
245: These random velocity perturbations are meant to mimic an initial
246: turbulent state in a disk resulting from the collapse of a molecular
247: cloud core.
248:
249:
250: In the presence of both Keplerian shear and self-gravity, the main
251: mechanism responsible for the growth of initial velocity
252: perturbations is swing amplification instead of pure Jeans
253: instability \cite{G01, KO01, MC07}. During swing amplification
254: velocity perturbations induce strong surface density perturbations
255: in the form of trailing shocks with superimposed density structures.
256: After about 4-5 orbital periods balance is reached between shock and
257: compressional heating and cooling. As a result, the disk settles
258: down to a quasi-steady gravitoturbulent state. The snapshot (at
259: $t=33$) of the system evolution in this state is shown in fig.1. $Q$
260: fluctuates around $2.4$, but the $Q(x,y)$ map is very inhomogeneous
261: and contains values as small as $0.6$ associated with some negative
262: PV regions (see below). The positive (cyclonic) PV regions remain
263: sheared into strips showing no signs of vortex formation during the
264: entire course of evolution. Only negative (anticyclonic) PV regions
265: are able to survive in shear flows and wrap up into more or less
266: vortex-like structures. The overall picture of the PV evolution is
267: still irregular and chaotic in the quasi-steady phase (fig. 1). So,
268: we use the term 'vortex' in a broader sense meaning negative PV
269: regions in general even if they do not have well-defined vortical
270: shape. Some of the vortices by this time are not adjusted yet, i.e.,
271: they produce underdense regions corresponding to the centers of
272: vortices surrounded by higher density regions related to density
273: waves/shocks generated during the adjustment process. At the same
274: time, we also see in this figure vortices that have already
275: undergone adjustment phase, have grown to sizes comparable to the
276: local Jeans scale, and correspond to stronger overdense regions. At
277: the location of these overdense regions, $Q$ reaches small values
278: (0.6-0.7) implying that they are gravitationally unstable and are in
279: the process of being sheared and destroyed. (Vortex growth in size
280: is, in general, a consequence of inverse energy cascade in 2D
281: turbulence). During this process the temperature/internal energy
282: rises, the corresponding region becomes stable and the vortex
283: formation process described above starts again.
284:
285: In conclusion, in self-gravitating disks the evolution of vortices
286: has irregular and transient character in contrast to that in
287: non-self-gravitating disks. Vortices form, undergo adjustment phase
288: and finally appear as overdense regions in the surface density
289: field, which afterwards become gravitationally unstable and are
290: destroyed shortly. After that the whole process recurs.
291:
292:
293: %% BACKMATTER
294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
295:
296: \begin{theacknowledgments}
297: G.R.M. would like to acknowledge the financial support from the
298: Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA). The numerical code
299: used here was kindly provided by C. Gammie.
300: \end{theacknowledgments}
301:
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
304: %% manually.
305: %%
306: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
307: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
308: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
309: %%
310: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
311: %% after the \end{document}
312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
313:
314: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
315: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
316: %% setup or preferences.
317: %%
318: %%
319: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
321:
322: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
323: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
324:
325: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
326: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
327: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
328:
329:
330:
331:
332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
333: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
334: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
335: %% of the above.
336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337:
338: \begin{thebibliography}{14}
339:
340:
341: \bibitem{BS95}
342: P.~Barge, and J.~Sommeria, \emph{A\&A}, \textbf{295}L, 1 (1995).
343: \bibitem{JAB04}
344: A.~Johansen, A.~Andersen, and A.~Brandenburg, \emph{A\&A},
345: \textbf{417}, 361 (2004).
346: \bibitem{KB06}
347: H.~Klahr, and P.~Bodenheimer, \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{639}, 432 (2006).
348: \bibitem{GL99}
349: P.~Godon, and M.~Livio, \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{523}, 350 (1999).
350: \bibitem{UR04}
351: O.~Umurhan, and O.~Regev, \emph{A\&A}, \textbf{427}, 855 (2004).
352: \bibitem{JG05}
353: B.~Johnson, and C.~Gammie, \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{635}, 149 (2005).
354: \bibitem{Boleyetal06}
355: A.~Boley, A.~Mejia, R.~Durisen, K.~Cai, M.~Pickett and P.~D'Alessio,
356: \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{651}, 517 (2006).
357: \bibitem{Riceetal06}
358: W.~K.~M. Rice, G.~Lodato, J.~Pringle, P.~Armitage, and I.~Bonnell,
359: \emph{MNRAS}, \textbf{372}L, 9 (2006).
360: \bibitem{GL65}
361: P.~Goldreich, and D.~Lynden-Bell, \emph{MNRAS}, \textbf{130}, 125
362: (1965).
363: \bibitem{G01}
364: C.~Gammie, \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{553}, 174 (2001).
365: \bibitem{KO01}
366: W.-T.~Kim, and E.~Ostriker, \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{559}, 70 (2001).
367: \bibitem{MC07}
368: G.~R.~Mamatsashvili, and G.~D.~Chagelishvili, \emph{MNRAS},
369: \textbf{381}, 809 (2007).
370:
371:
372:
373: \end{thebibliography}
374: \end{document}
375: \endinput
376: %%
377: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
378: