1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}

3: %\voffset 0.25in

4: 

5: \received{2008 August 13}

6: \accepted{2008 September 30}

7: %\journalid{}{}

8: %\articleid{}{}

9: 

10: %\usepackage{epsfig}

11: 

12: \def\ts{{\thinspace}}

13: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}

14: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}

15: \def\sp{\hspace{1.5pt}}

16: \def\jump{\hskip 0.2in}

17: 

18: \def\s{\phantom}

19: \def\ss{\phantom\phantom}

20: \def\sss{\phantom\phantom\phantom}

21: \def\ssss{\phantom\phantom\phantom\phantom}

22: \def\sp{\hspace{1.5pt}}

23: \def\etal{{et~al.}}

24: \def\amin{\ifmmode^{\prime}\else$^{\prime}$\fi}

25: \def\asec{\ifmmode^{\prime\prime}\else$^{\prime\prime}$\fi}

26: \def\ts{{\thinspace}}

27: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}

28: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}

29: \def\jump{\hskip 0.2in}

30: 

31: \newcommand{\loe}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

32: \newcommand{\goe}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

33: \newcommand\asca{{\it ASCA\/}}

34: \newcommand\chandra{{\it Chandra}}

35: \newcommand\glast{{\it GLAST\/}}

36: \newcommand\agile{{\it AGILE\/}}

37: \newcommand\cgro{{\it CGRO\/}}

38: 

39: \def\sp{\hskip 1.5pt}

40: \newcommand\pwna{G75.2+0.1}

41: \newcommand\pwnb{G74.9+1.2 = CTB 87}

42: \newcommand\mgro{MGRO~J2019+37}

43: \newcommand\asrc{CXOU~J20210546+3651048}

44: \newcommand\egra{3EG~J2021+3716}

45: \newcommand\egrb{3EG~J2016+3657}

46: \newcommand\gev{GeV~J2020+3658}

47: \newcommand\blazar{B2013+370}

48: \newcommand\cxo{CXOU~J183803.1$-$3651}

49: \newcommand\psr{PSR~J2021+3651}

50: \newcommand\agl{AGL~J2020.5+3653}

51: 

52: \newcommand\phndn{\phm{0.0}}

53: 

54: \slugcomment{The Astrophysical Journal Letters}

55: 

56: \shorttitle{Discovery of Gamma-Ray Pulsations from PSR J2021+3651}

57: \shortauthors{Halpern et al.}

58: 

59: \begin{document}

60: 

61: \title{Discovery of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Pulsations from PSR J2021+3651 with AGILE} 

62: 

63: \author{J. P. Halpern\altaffilmark{1}, F.~Camilo\altaffilmark{1},

64: A.~Giuliani\altaffilmark{2},

65: E.~V.~Gotthelf\altaffilmark{1}, M.~A. McLaughlin\altaffilmark{3},

66: R.~Mukherjee\altaffilmark{4},

67: A.~Pellizzoni\altaffilmark{2}, S.~M. Ransom\altaffilmark{5},

68: M.~S.~E. Roberts\altaffilmark{6},

69: and M.~Tavani\altaffilmark{7,8}}

70: 

71: \altaffiltext{1}{Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University,

72: New York, NY 10027.}

73: 

74: \altaffiltext{2}{INAF/IASF-Milano, I-20133 Milano, Italy.}

75: 

76: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, West Virginia University,

77: Morgantown, WV 26501.}

78: 

79: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Barnard College,

80: Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.}

81: 

82: \altaffiltext{5}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory,

83: Charlottesville, VA 22903.}

84: 

85: \altaffiltext{6}{Eureka Scientific, Inc., Oakland, CA 94602.}

86: 

87: \altaffiltext{7}{INAF/IASF-Roma, I-00133 Roma, Italy.}

88: 

89: \altaffiltext{8}{Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a ``Tor Vergata'', 

90: I-00133 Roma, Italy.}

91: 

92: \begin{abstract}

93: 

94: Discovered after the end of the {\it Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory}

95: mission, the radio pulsar \psr\ was long considered a likely

96: counterpart of the high-energy $\gamma$-ray source 2CG~075+00 = \egra\ = \gev,

97: but it could not be confirmed due to the lack of a contemporaneous

98: radio pulsar ephemeris to fold the sparse, archival $\gamma$-ray photons.

99: Here, we report the discovery of $\gamma$-ray pulsations from \psr\

100: in the 100--1500 MeV range

101: using data from the \agile\ satellite gathered over 8 months, folded

102: on a densely sampled, contemporaneous radio ephemeris obtained for this

103: purpose at the Green Bank Telescope.  The $\gamma$-ray pulse consists

104: of two sharp peaks separated by $0.47\pm 0.01$ cycles.  The single radio

105: pulse leads the first $\gamma$-ray peak by $0.165\pm 0.010$ cycles.

106: These properties are similar to those of other $\gamma$-ray pulsars,

107: and the phase relationship of the peaks can be interpreted in the

108: context of the outer-gap accelerator model for $\gamma$-ray emission.

109: Pulse-phase resolved images show that there is only one dominant source,

110: \agl\ = \psr, in the region previously containing confused sources

111: \egra\ and \egrb.

112: 

113: 

114: \end{abstract}

115: \keywords{gamma-rays: observations --- pulsars: individual (\psr)}

116: 

117: \section{Introduction}

118: 

119: Rotation-powered pulsars are the dominant class of high-energy

120: ($> 100$ MeV) $\gamma$-ray sources in the Galaxy.  The

121: Energetic Gamma-Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) on the

122: {\it Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory} (\cgro), 

123: which operated between 1991 and 2000, detected six pulsars,

124: and three others with less confidence.

125: (See \citealt{tho04} for a review of these EGRET results.)

126: %For young and middle-aged pulsars the maximum efficiency of

127: %converting rotational energy into radiation occurs in the

128: %100~MeV -- 1~GeV range, which makes this energy band of prime

129: %importance for pulsar physics.

130: It is widely assumed that a large

131: number of unidentified $\gamma$-ray sources in the Galactic

132: plane are also pulsars.  Some of these are positionally coincident

133: with radio pulsars, but do not have enough photons to recover the

134: pulse period, while others may be radio quiet.  An ephemeris

135: from radio or X-ray observations is generally

136: needed to fold the sparse $\gamma$-ray source photons over a

137: span of months to years in order to build up a statistically

138: significant pulsed

139: light curve.  In several cases, a radio pulsar candidate

140: was only discovered after the end of the \cgro\ mission, so that

141: the needed contemporaneous ephemeris does not exist.  The typical

142: ``timing noise'' of young pulsars causes a phase ephemeris to

143: fail when extrapolated over months to years.

144: 

145: Some of the still-unidentified Galactic $\gamma$-ray sources 

146: date from the 1975 {\it COS B} mission \citep{swa81}.

147: The target of this work is the {\it COS B} source 2CG 075+00

148: located in Cygnus.

149: EGRET possibly resolved 2CG 075+00

150: into two sources, \egra\ and the weaker \egrb\ \citep{har99}.

151: Multiwavelength study of these regions by \citet{muk00}

152: and \citet{hal01} uncovered possible counterparts for \egrb,

153: but no obvious candidate for \egra.  A smaller error region

154: was derived by \citet{lam97} by restricting analysis

155: to energies above 1~GeV, yielding a source \gev\

156: that overlapped with \egra.  An \asca\ observation

157: of \gev\ found two compact X-ray sources \citep{rob01},

158: one of which was discovered to contain a new, energetic

159: radio pulsar, \psr\ \citep{rob02}.  Its spin period $P = 0.103$~s,

160: characteristic age $\tau_c \equiv P/2\dot P$ = 17~kyr, and spin-down

161: luminosity $\dot E = 3.4 \times 10^{36}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ are in the

162: range of other young pulsars that were detected by EGRET, but its

163: initial distance estimate of $\sim 12$~kpc implied an unusually

164: large $\gamma$-ray efficiency (see \S 3.3) if \psr\ is

165: responsible for \egra.  It was not possible to extrapolate

166: the radio ephemeris backward to search

167: for the pulsar in EGRET $\gamma$-ray photons.

168: By searching in a range around the expected $P$ and $\dot P$,

169: \citet{mc04} possibly detected pulsations, but only in

170: two out of eight EGRET viewing periods.

171: Thus, the proposed identification of \psr\ with \egra\ and

172: \gev\ could not be confirmed, until now.

173: 

174: The \agile\ ({\it Astro-rivelatore Gamma a Immagini LEggero})

175: mission of the Italian Space Agency (ASI) was launched on 2007 April 23

176: into a low-Earth orbit \citep{tav08}.  \agile\ will allow a number of

177: new $\gamma$-ray pulsars to be found by folding on contemporaneous

178: pulsar ephemerides that are being constructed by our group

179: and others using several radio telescopes.  For the

180: analysis of \psr, we have been using the NRAO Green Bank Telescope

181: (GBT).  In this Letter, we apply the ephemeris of \psr\

182: to data obtained by \agile\ during the first year

183: of the mission.

184: 

185: \section{Observations and Analysis}

186: 

187: The \agile\ GRID (Gamma-Ray Imaging Detector) comprises 

188: a Silicon-Tungsten tracker \citep{bar01,pre03}

189: and a CsI(Tl) mini-calorimeter \citep{lab06}.  These provide effective

190: area of $\sim 500$~cm$^2$ in the 30 MeV--50 GeV range over

191: a $\sim 2.5$ sr field of view.  We used

192: GRID observations of the Cygnus region during five

193: periods between 2007 November 2 and 2008 June 30

194: that sum to 103 days of observation when

195: \psr\ was within $40^{\circ}$ of the pointing direction.

196: GRID photons are time-tagged with a precision of $\sim 1\ \mu$s,

197: and the arrival times were transformed to the solar system barycenter

198: in Barycentric Dynamical Time using GPS positioning of the

199: spacecraft and the \chandra\ measured position of the pulsar,

200: (J2000.0) R.A. = $20^{\rm h}21^{\rm m}05.46^{\rm s}$,

201: decl. = $+36^{\circ}51^{\prime}04.8^{\prime\prime}$, uncertainty

202: $\sim 0.5^{\prime\prime}$ \citep{hes04}.

203: The accuracy of this procedure is $\sim 10\ \mu$s, and the absolute

204: times were verified to a precision of $\sim 400\ \mu$s using observations

205: of the Crab pulsar and others \citep{pel08}.

206: %The latter paper describes

207: %additional details of \agile\ pulsar analysis on the Crab, Vela,

208: %Geminga, and PSR B1706$-$44.

209: 

210: A phase-connected rotational ephemeris for \psr\ contemporaneous with all

211: of the \agile\ observing periods was derived from 36 observations obtained

212: at the GBT between 2007 September 28 and 2008 June 30.  The pulsar was

213: observed with the GBT Pulsar Spigot \citep{kap05},

214: yielding total power samples every

215: $81.92\ \mu$s in each of 768 frequency channels spanning a bandwidth of

216: 600\,MHz centered on 1950\ MHz.  Each observation usually lasted for 5

217: minutes, from which we derived a time of arrival with typical uncertainty

218: of 0.2\,ms.  We used the

219: TEMPO\footnote{See http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/tempo.}

220: timing software to obtain the

221: ephemeris using standard methods.  Like many young pulsars, \psr\ exhibits

222: significant rotational instability.  We parameterized this by fitting for

223: the rotational frequency and its first six derivatives.  This timing

224: solution had small unmodeled residual features ($\chi^2_\nu = 2.5$),

225: with a post-fit rms of 0.33\ ms and maximum of 0.9\ ms.  This precision

226: is comparable to the absolute accuracy of the \agile\ timing, and ensures

227: that the effective time resolution of the folded $\gamma$-ray light curve

228: is $\simlt 0.01\,P$.  The observed radio dispersion measure ($\mbox{DM}

229: = 369.3\pm0.3$\ pc\ cm$^{-3}$, determined with the addition of a few

230: observations centered at 1550\ MHz) was used to correct the times

231: of arrival of the radio pulse to infinite frequency (with resulting

232: $1\sigma$ uncertainty of 0.6\ ms) for absolute phase comparison with

233: the $\gamma$-ray pulse.

234: 

235: In choosing the sky region around the pulsar position for extraction

236: of $\gamma$-ray photons, consideration of the point-spread

237: function (PSF) of the instrument, which increases with decreasing

238: energy, must be weighed against the high diffuse $\gamma$-ray

239: background in this region, which also increases with decreasing

240: energy, as well as possible contamination from nearby

241: point sources.

242: We find that the

243: pulsed power is maximized if we use an extraction region that is

244: comparable to the $68\%$ containment radius, which is

245: $3.5^{\circ}$ at 100~MeV and $1.2^{\circ}$ at 400~MeV \citep{tav08}.

246: We used $r = 1.2^{\circ}$ for $E \ge 400$ MeV,

247: and $r = 1.2^{\circ}(400/E)^{1/2}$ for $E < 400$ MeV.

248: %The latter scaling is somewhat arbitrary, as the energy resolution

249: %is only $\Delta E/E \sim 1$ at these energies.  In addition, for

250: %the light curve we

251: In addition. 

252: we use only the ``G'' class events, which are identified with good

253: confidence as photons, and exclude the ``L'' class which suffer

254: much higher particle background contamination.  This selection

255: limits the effective area to $\sim 250$~cm$^2$ at 100~MeV.

256: 

257: \begin{figure}[t]

258: \centerline{

259: \includegraphics[height=1.15\linewidth,clip=true]{f1.eps}

260: }

261: \caption{Folded $\gamma$-ray light curves ({\it histograms})

262: of \psr\ in two energy bands, and their sum.

263: Two cycles are plotted, with 40 bins per cycle.

264: The solid line in the bottom panel is the mean radio pulse at

265: 1950 MHz from the GBT. Phase lags are P2--P1=$0.47\pm 0.01$

266: cycles and P1--R=$0.165\pm 0.010$ cycles.}

267: \label{fig:pulse}

268: \end{figure}

269: 

270: \section{Results and Interpretation}

271: 

272: \subsection{Pulsed Light Curve}

273: 

274: Figure~\ref{fig:pulse} shows the resulting folded light curve

275: of \psr\ in

276: two energy bands, $100-300$~MeV and $300-1500$~MeV.

277: The pulse shape consists of two sharp peaks,

278: labeled P1 and P2, with 

279: separation of $0.47 \pm 0.01$ cycles \cite[consistent with the separation

280: in the tentative detections reported in EGRET data by][]{mc04}.

281: This structure

282: is similar to that seen with much better signal-to-noise ratio in

283: other pulsars.  For comparison, peak separations are 0.38,

284: 0.43, and 0.49 for the Crab, Vela, and Geminga, respectively.

285: As in the other $\gamma$-ray pulsars, the

286: radio pulse of \psr\ leads the $\gamma$-ray P1 by a 

287: significant phase, in this case $0.165 \pm 0.010$ cycles.

288: In Vela, the radio leads by 0.13 cycles.

289: The Crab pulsar has multiple broad radio peaks that

290: continue to high frequency, and coincide with

291: higher-energy emission from infrared through X-ray.  However,

292: if we identify the narrow low-frequency component

293: \citep[LFC:][]{mof96,mof99} as the usual polar-cap core emission analogous

294: to other pulsars, the $\gamma$-ray--radio lag is 0.11 cycles.  Alternatively,

295: the Crab's even lower frequency ``precursor'' pulse, which leads

296: the $\gamma$-ray P1 by 0.056 cycles, may be the core component.

297: Even in the case of PSR~B1706$-$44, where \agile\ resolved

298: two peaks separated by 0.24 cycles from the dominant ``bridge''

299: emission, the radio pulse leads P1 by 0.21 cycles \citep{pel08}.

300: 

301: The outer-gap model of $\gamma$-ray pulse shapes of

302: \citet{rom95} predicts an inverse dependence of the

303: $\gamma$-ray peak separation on the $\gamma$-ray--radio

304: lag, with the principal controlling parameter being viewing

305: angle $\zeta$ from the rotation axis.

306: Large $\zeta$ results in large peak separation,

307: and small $\gamma$-ray--radio lag.

308: \psr\ is roughly in accord with this prediction

309: (Fig.~\ref{fig:delta}).  In this picture,

310: pulsars that have peak separations close to 0.5, such as

311: Vela, Geminga, and \psr, have $\zeta$ close to $90^{\circ}$.

312: Such an angle for \psr\ is also supported by the

313: modeling of its X-ray pulsar wind nebula (PWN) \pwna\

314: \citep{hes04,van08}, which can be understood as a nearly

315: edge-on torus,

316: indicating a pulsar rotation axis nearly perpendicular

317: ($86^{\circ}$) to the line of sight.  In contrast, PSR B1706$-$44

318: has narrow $\gamma$-ray peak separation of 0.24 cycles,

319: and $\zeta = 53^{\circ}$

320: from its X-ray torus model.  \citet{ng08} summarize

321: the X-ray measurements and their implications for $\gamma$-ray

322: pulse profiles.

323: 

324: \begin{figure}[t]

325: \centerline{

326: \includegraphics[height=0.85\linewidth,clip=true]{f2.eps}

327: }

328: \caption{Reproduction of Figure~3 of \citet{rom95} comparing

329: $\gamma$-ray peak

330: separation $\Delta$ with $\gamma$-ray--radio lag $\delta$

331: for \cgro\  pulsars ({\it filled circles}).  The $\delta$

332: of the Crab pulsar (0531) is uncertain due to the

333: ambiguous identification of its core radio pulse.

334: The location of \psr\ is marked with an asterisk,

335: as is the closely situated PSR~B1951+32 \citep{ram05}.

336: Model predictions ({\it solid lines}) for different magnetic axis

337: inclination angles $\alpha$ are similar, while viewing angle $\zeta$

338: increases along the curves from lower right to upper left.

339: }

340: \label{fig:delta}

341: \end{figure}

342: 

343: \begin{figure}[t]

344: \centerline{

345: \includegraphics[height=0.9\linewidth,clip=true]{f3.eps}

346: }

347: \caption{Images of the \agile\ field centered on \psr\ ({\it cross})

348: in the 100--1500~MeV range.  Pulse-phase resolved images

349: were created as described in \S 3.2, and \psr\ was

350: isolated via difference imaging.  North is up and east is

351: to the left. The diameter of the field displayed is

352: $20^{\circ}$, and the pixel size is $0.125^{\circ}$.

353: Gaussian smoothing of $\sigma = 1.5$ pixels has been applied.

354: Each image is linearly scaled to its highest point (white), while

355: the inset stretches the scale to show the level of fluctuations

356: in the off-pulse image in the vicinity of the pulsar.

357: }

358: \label{fig:image}

359: \end{figure}

360: 

361: \begin{figure}[b]

362: \centerline{

363: \includegraphics[height=0.82\linewidth,angle=270.,clip=true]{f4.eps}

364: }

365: \caption{Photon spectrum of \agl\ with power-law fit

366: of $\Gamma=1.86$ to the first three points.

367: }

368: \label{fig:spec}

369: \end{figure}

370: 

371: \subsection{Position, Flux, and Spectrum}

372: 

373: In order to separate the contribution of \psr\ from other possible

374: $\gamma$-ray sources within its PSF, we made

375: images corresponding to on-pulse and off-pulse

376: intervals of its light curve (Fig.~\ref{fig:image}).

377: The on-pulse image includes six phase bins on each of P1 and

378: P2, while the off-pulse

379: image comprises the remaining 28 bins.

380: A difference image was created by

381: subtracting the off-pulse image from the on-pulse

382: image, scaled by the number of phase bins.

383: As expected, differencing

384: removes all diffuse background and sources except for

385: \psr.  We measure the

386: position of the resulting source \agl\ as 

387: (J2000.0) R.A. = $20^{\rm h}20^{\rm m}30^{\rm s}$,

388: decl. = $+36^{\circ}53.7^{\prime}$,

389: which is only $0.12^{\circ}$ from the X-ray position,

390: well within the current \agile\ systematic uncertainty

391: of $0.25^{\circ}$ \citep{tav08}.

392: We performed a standard spectral analysis on the total source

393: photons including exposure correction and modelling of

394: the diffuse Galactic background.  The energy range

395: 100$-$1000~MeV is fitted with a power law of photon index

396: $\Gamma = 1.86\pm 0.18$ and a flux of $(46\pm6)\times 10^{-8}$

397: photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, while a turndown is seen above 1.5~GeV

398: (Fig.~\ref{fig:spec}).

399: 

400: Using the counting statistics of the off-pulse image,

401: we estimate the level of fluctuation that would correspond

402: to a 3$\sigma$ point source at the location of \psr,

403: noting that there is no source present at this level.

404: Scaling from the pulsar flux, this corresponds to

405: upper limits of $1.0 \times 10^{-7}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$

406: for the off-pulse flux from \psr, and

407: $1.7 \times 10^{-7}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for a steady

408: point source within $1.2^{\circ}$ of \psr, 

409: such as the PWN \pwnb\ (of unknown spin parameters) or the blazar \blazar,

410: both located in the error circle of \egrb\ \citep{muk00,hal01}.

411: Since blazars are episodic $\gamma$-ray emitters, it cannot be ruled

412: out that \blazar\ was more active during the EGRET era.

413: However, we are not confident that \egrb\ was a source distinct from 

414: \egra.  The former is not included in the revised EGRET catalog

415: of \citet{cas08}, which instead lists only one source,

416: EGR J2019+3722.  The positions of \egra\ and EGR J2019+3722

417: are both inconsistent with \psr\ at their 99\% confidence

418: contours, while \agile\ sees one dominant source that is clearly

419: attributed to \psr\ by phase-resolved imaging.

420: 

421: \subsection{Gamma-Ray Efficiency}

422: 

423: Previous authors have noted that the $\gamma$-ray luminosity

424: of \egra\ is a large fraction $\eta_{\gamma}$ of the spin-down

425: luminosity of \psr\ if placed at the nominal DM

426: distance of 12~kpc using the \citet{cor02} electron-density

427: model of the Galaxy.

428: \cite{rob02} and \cite{hes04} calculated, assuming $1/4\pi$ beaming,

429: that $\eta_{\gamma} \equiv Fd^2/\dot E \approx 0.18\,d_{12}^2$,

430: where $F$ is the flux in the 100~MeV--10~GeV range.  Such

431: high efficiency deviates from the trend of other $\gamma$-ray

432: pulsars, which follow an approximate

433: $\eta_{\gamma} \propto \dot E^{-1/2}$ relation \citep{tho04}.

434: Pulsars of similar $\dot E$ to \psr\ have

435: $\eta_{\gamma} \sim 10^{-3}-10^{-2}$.

436: This contrast casts some suspicion on the accuracy of the

437: DM distance, but in addition, consideration of the X-ray

438: properties of \psr, including the thermal spectrum of

439: the neutron star and the size of its PWN torus,

440: led \citet{van08} to favor a distance as small as $3-4$ kpc.

441: 

442: Our results do not bear directly on the distance question,

443: while the inferred $\gamma$-ray efficiency of \psr\ remains

444: exceptional.

445: The \agile\ flux above 100~MeV is

446: $\approx 2.4 \times 10^{-10}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$

447: yielding $\eta_{\gamma} \approx 0.10\,d_{12}^2$,

448: somewhat smaller than previous estimates 

449: because of the cutoff above 1.5~GeV.

450: In the models of \citet{rom95},

451: the beaming of \psr\ may be more severe than

452: in other $\gamma$-ray pulsars if its nearly

453: edge-on X-ray torus implies a large

454: magnetic inclination angle $\alpha$.

455: 

456: The TeV source \mgro\ \citep{abd07a,abd07b} 

457: of diameter $1.1^{\circ}\pm 0.5^{\circ}$

458: centered at $(\ell,b)=(75.0^{\circ},0.2^{\circ})$

459: may be an extension of \pwna, similar to many other

460: TeV PWNe that are spatially offset from their

461: smaller X-ray counterparts.  The flux of \mgro,

462: $\approx 5.6 \times 10^{-12}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$,

463: represents $\approx 0.03\,d_{12}^2\,\dot E$ of \psr,

464: similar to other TeV PWNe \citep{gal08}.

465: 

466: \section{Conclusions}

467: 

468: After the demise of \cgro, several candidate

469: pulsar identifications for EGRET sources could not be confirmed

470: until it became possible again to obtain contemporaneous $\gamma$-ray

471: and radio timing.  Using the extensive exposure of \agile\

472: on the Cygnus region,

473: we detect $\gamma$-rays in the 100--1500~MeV

474: range from the first post-EGRET pulsar, \psr=\agl.

475: Its pulse shape is similar to other

476: $\gamma$-ray pulsars, with two sharp peaks separated by

477: slightly less than 0.5 cycles. This

478: morphology, as well as the lag between the

479: radio and first $\gamma$-ray peak, are in accord with simulations of

480: outer-gap accelerators viewed at large angles from the pulsar rotation axis,

481: which may help to explain its high $\gamma$-ray efficiency.  \psr\ is

482: the only $\gamma$-ray point source detected in the region of 2CG~075+00.

483: Timing noise of young pulsars such as \psr\ and other candidate

484: $\gamma$-ray pulsars demands frequent radio observations to

485: be able to discover and resolve the finest structure

486: in $\gamma$-ray light curves that will be accumulated

487: over months to years.  Independent discovery of pulsed

488: $\gamma$-rays from \psr\ by the {\it Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope}

489: will also be reported shortly.

490: 

491: \acknowledgements

492: 

493: We thank ASI for making these data available under the

494: Guest Observer Program of the \agile\ mission.

495: The GBT is operated by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory,

496: a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under

497: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.

498: The referee David Thompson suggested

499: several improvements to this Letter.

500: 

501: \begin{thebibliography}{}

502: 

503: \bibitem[Abdo et al.(2007a)]{abd07a}

504: Abdo, A. A., et al. 2007a, \apj, 658, L33

505: 

506: \bibitem[Abdo et al.(2007b)]{abd07b}

507: ---------. 2007b, \apj, 664, L91

508: 

509: \bibitem[Barbiellini et al.(2001)]{bar01}

510: Barbiellini, G., et al. 2001, in AIP Conf. Ser. 587, Gamma 2001:

511: Gamma-Ray Astrophysics 2001, ed. S. Ritz, N. Gehrels,

512: \& C. R. Shrader (Melville, NY: AIP), 754

513: 

514: \bibitem[Casandjian \& Grenier(2008)]{cas08}

515: Casandjian, J.-M., \& Grenier, I. A. 2008, \aap, in press (arXiv:0806.0113)

516: 

517: \bibitem[Cordes \& Lazio(2002)]{cor02}

518: Cordes, J. M. \& Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, preprint (astro-ph/0207156)

519: 

520: \bibitem[Gallant \etal(2008)]{gal08}

521: Gallant, Y. A., et al. 2008, AIP Conference Ser. 983,

522: 40 Years of Pulsars: Millisecond Pulsars, Magnetars, and More,

523: ed. C. Bassa, Z. Wang, A. Cumming, \& V. M. Kaspi

524: (Melville, NY: AIP), 195

525: 

526: \bibitem[Halpern et al.(2001)]{hal01}

527: Halpern, J. P., Eracleous, M., Mukherjee, R., \& Gotthelf, E. V. 2001,

528: \apj, 551, 1016 (Erratum: 2002, \apj, 572, 693)

529: 

530: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(1999)]{har99}

531: Hartman, R. C., et al. 1999, \apjs, 123, 79

532: 

533: \bibitem[Hessels et al.(2004)]{hes04}

534: Hessels, J. W. T., Roberts, M. S. E., Ransom, S. M., Kaspi, V. M.,

535: Romani, R. W., Ng, C.-Y., Freire, P. C., \& Gaensler, B. M. 2004,

536: \apj, 612, 389

537: 

538: \bibitem[Kaplan et al.(2005)]{kap05}

539: Kaplan, D., Escoffier, R. P., Lacasse, R. J., O'Neill, K.,

540: Ford, J. M., Ransom, S. M., Anderson, S. B., Cordes, J. M.,

541: Lazio, T. J. W., \& Kulkarni, S. R. 2005, \pasp, 117, 643

542: 

543: \bibitem[Labanti et al.(2006)]{lab06}

544: Labanti, C. M., et al. 2006, in SPIE Conf. Ser. 6266, Space Telescopes

545: and Instrumentation II: Ultraviolet to Gamma-Ray, ed. M. J. L. Turner

546: \& G. Hasinger, 62663Q

547: 

548: \bibitem[Lamb \& Macomb(1997)]{lam97}

549: Lamb, R. C., \& Macomb, D. J. 1997, \apj, 488, 872

550: 

551: \bibitem[McLaughlin \& Cordes(2004)]{mc04}

552: McLaughlin, M. A., \& Cordes, J. M. 2004, in 

553: X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Astrophysics of Galactic Sources, ed. M. Tavani,

554: A. Pellizzoni, \& S. Vercellone (Rome: IASF), 67

555: 

556: \bibitem[Moffett \& Hankins(1996)]{mof96}

557: Moffett, D. A., \& Hankins, T. H. 1996, \apj, 468, 779

558: 

559: \bibitem[Moffett \& Hankins(1999)]{mof99}

560: ---------. 1999, \apj, 522, 1046

561: 

562: \bibitem[Mukherjee et al.(2000)]{muk00}

563: Mukherjee, R., Gotthelf, E. V., Halpern, J. P., \& Tavani, M.

564: 2000, \apj, 542, 740

565: 

566: \bibitem[Ng \& Romani(2008)]{ng08}

567: Ng, C.-Y., \& Romani, R. W. 2008, \apj, 673, 411

568: 

569: \bibitem[Pellizzoni et al.(2008)]{pel08}

570: Pellizzoni, A., et al. 2008, \apj, in press

571: 

572: \bibitem[Prest et al.(2003)]{pre03}

573: Prest, M., Barbiellini, G., Bordignon, G., Fedel, G., Liello, F.,

574: Longo, F., Pontoni, C., \& Vallazza, E. 2003, Nucl. Inst. and Meth.

575: A, 501, 280

576: 

577: \bibitem[Ramanamurthy et al.(1995)]{ram05}

578: Ramanamurthy, P. V., et al. 1995, \apj, 447, L109

579: 

580: \bibitem[Roberts et al.(2002)]{rob02}

581: Roberts, M. S. E., Hessels, J. W. T., Ransom, S. M., Kaspi, V. M.,

582: Freire, P. C., Crawford, F., \& Lorimer, D. R. 2002, \apj, 577, L19

583: 

584: \bibitem[Roberts et al.(2001)]{rob01}

585: Roberts, M. S. E., Romani, R. W., \& Kawai, N. 2001,

586: \apjs, 133, 451

587: 

588: \bibitem[Romani \& Yadigaroglu(1995)]{rom95}

589: Romani, R. W., \& Yadigaroglu, I.-A. 1995, \apj, 438, 314

590: 

591: \bibitem[Swanenburg et al.(1981)]{swa81}

592: Swanenburg, B. N., et al. 1981, \apj, 243, L69

593: 

594: \bibitem[Tavani et al.(2008)]{tav08}

595: Tavani, M., et al. 2008, \aap, submitted (arXiv:0807.4254)

596: 

597: \bibitem[Thompson(2004)]{tho04}

598: Thompson, D. J. 2004, in Cosmic Gamma Ray Sources, ed. K. S. Cheng

599: \& G. E. Romero (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 149

600: 

601: \bibitem[van Etten et al.(2008)]{van08}

602: van Etten, A., Romani, R. W., \& Ng, C.-Y. 2008, \apj, 680, 1417

603: 

604: \end{thebibliography}

605: 

606: \end{document}