1: %\documentclass{aastex}
2:
3: % Remove before submission
4: %You can submit your .tex and .bbl (not.bib!) files directly to the journal,
5: %or paste the .bbl file in and comment out the \bibliography* commands
6: %to produce a stand-alone .tex file.
7: %% use sgcgript makefigs.pl to handle Journal requirements for figure
8: %% positioning
9:
10: %%preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
11:
12: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
13:
14: \documentclass{emulateapj}
15:
16: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
17:
18: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
19:
20: \usepackage{epsfig}
21: \usepackage[]{natbib}
22:
23: \newcommand{\eg}{{\rm e.g., }}
24: \newcommand{\ie}{{\rm i.e., }}
25: \newcommand{\cf}{{\rm c.f., }}
26: \newcommand{\Mo}{\ensuremath{M_\odot}}
27: \newcommand{\Morat}{\ensuremath{M/M_\odot}}
28: \newcommand{\Lo}{\ensuremath{L_\odot}}
29: \newcommand{\Lorat}{\ensuremath{L/L_\odot}}
30: \newcommand{\Bo}{\ensuremath{B_\odot}}
31: \newcommand{\Ro}{\ensuremath{R_\odot}}
32: \newcommand{\Mstar}{\ensuremath{M_{\star}}}
33: \newcommand{\Mstarrat}{\ensuremath{M/M_{\star}}}
34: \newcommand{\Lstar}{\ensuremath{L_{\star}}}
35: \newcommand{\Lstarrat}{\ensuremath{L/L_{\star}}}
36: \newcommand{\rtLstarrat}{\ensuremath{(L/L_{\star})^{1/2}}}
37: \newcommand{\Leff}{\ensuremath{L_{\rm eff}}}
38: \newcommand{\Leffrat}{\ensuremath{L_{\rm eff}/L_{\star}}}
39: \newcommand{\rtLeffrat}{\ensuremath{(L_{\rm eff}/L_{\star})^{1/2}}}
40: \newcommand{\LstarB}{\ensuremath{\Lstar^{B}}}
41: \newcommand{\Bstar}{\ensuremath{B_{\star}}}
42: \newcommand{\sstar}{\ensuremath{\sigma_{\star}}}
43: \newcommand{\sstarrat}{\ensuremath{\sigma/\sigma_{\star}}}
44: \newcommand{\sstarratsq}{\ensuremath{(\sigma/\sigma_{\star})^{2}}}
45: \newcommand{\sstarsratsq}{\ensuremath{(\sigma^{stars}/\sigma_{\star}^{stars})^{2}}}
46: \newcommand{\vstar}{\ensuremath{v_{\star}}}
47: \newcommand{\vstarsq}{\ensuremath{v_{\star}^{2}}}
48: \newcommand{\vstarrat}{\ensuremath{v/\vstar}}
49: \newcommand{\vstarratsq}{\ensuremath{(v/\vstar)^{2}}}
50: \newcommand{\vcirc}{\ensuremath{v_{\rm circ}}}
51: \newcommand{\sv}{\ensuremath{\sigma_{v}}}
52: \newcommand{\phistar}{\ensuremath{\phi_{\star}}}
53: \newcommand{\adeg}{\ensuremath{\arcdeg}}
54: \newcommand{\amin}{\ensuremath{\arcmin}}
55: \newcommand{\asec}{\ensuremath{\arcsec}}
56: \newcommand{\ml}{\ensuremath{M/L}}
57: \newcommand{\mlb}{\ensuremath{M/L_{B}}}
58: \newcommand{\mlv}{\ensuremath{M/L_{V}}}
59: \newcommand{\mlk}{\ensuremath{M/L_{K}}}
60: \newcommand{\mlo}{\ensuremath{\Mo/\Lo}}
61: \newcommand{\hmlo}{~\ensuremath{{h}\ {\mlo}}}
62: \newcommand{\kmsMpc}{~\ensuremath{{\rm km\ s}^{-1}\ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}}}
63: \newcommand{\kms}{~\ensuremath{{\rm km\ s}^{-1}}}
64: \newcommand{\hkpc}{~\ensuremath{{h}^{-1}\ {\rm kpc}}}
65: \newcommand{\hMpc}{~\ensuremath{{h}^{-1}\ {\rm Mpc}}}
66: %newcommand{\hMpc}{~\ensuremath{{\rm h}^{-1}\ {\rm Mpc}}}
67: %\newcommand{\hkpc}{~\ensuremath{{\rm h}^{-1}\ {\rm kpc}}}
68: \newcommand\percmsq{~\ensuremath{{\rm cm}^{-2}}}
69: \newcommand{\ergsHzMpccube}{~\ensuremath{{\rm ergs\ s}^{-1}\ {\rm Hz}^{-1}\ {\rm Mpc}^{-3}}}
70: \newcommand{\hergsHzMpccube}{~\ensuremath{h^{1}\ {\rm ergs\ s}^{-1}\ {\rm Hz}^{-1}\ {\rm Mpc}^{-3}}}
71: \newcommand{\snumrat}{\ensuremath{(\sigma/250 \kms)}}
72: \newcommand{\snumratsq}{\ensuremath{(\sigma/250 \kms)^{2}}}
73: \newcommand{\snumstarratsq}{\ensuremath{(\sigma_{\star}/250 \kms)^{2}}}
74: \newcommand{\vnumrat}{\ensuremath{(v/360 \kms)}}
75: \newcommand{\vnumratsq}{\ensuremath{(v/360 \kms)^{2}}}
76: \newcommand{\vnumstarratsq}{\ensuremath{(v_{\star}/360 \kms)^{2}}}
77: \newcommand{\uprime}{\ensuremath{U^{\prime}}}
78: \newcommand{\hkprime}{\ensuremath{HK^{\prime}}}
79: \newcommand{\vprime}{\ensuremath{V^{\prime}}}
80: %\newcommand{\iprime}{\ensuremath{I^{\prime}}}
81: \newcommand{\ang}{\AA}
82: \newcommand{\angstrom}{\AA{\rm ngstrom}}
83: \newcommand{\qnought}{\ensuremath{q_0}}
84: \newcommand{\Hnought}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}_0}}
85: \newcommand{\znought}{\ensuremath{z_0}}
86: \newcommand{\omeganought}{\ensuremath{\Omega_{0}}}
87: \newcommand{\lambdanought}{\ensuremath{\lambda_{0}}}
88: \newcommand{\omegamnought}{\ensuremath{\Omega_{m0}}}
89: \newcommand{\omegalnought}{\ensuremath{\Omega_{\lambda0}}}
90: \newcommand{\omegaknought}{\ensuremath{\Omega_{k0}}}
91: \newcommand{\omegam}{\ensuremath{\Omega_{\rm m}}}
92: \newcommand{\omegal}{\ensuremath{\Omega_{\lambda}}}
93: \newcommand{\omegak}{\ensuremath{\Omega_{k}}}
94: \newcommand{\scrit}{\ensuremath{\Sigma_{\rm crit}}}
95: \newcommand{\scritrat}{\ensuremath{\Sigma/\Sigma_{\rm crit}}}
96: \newcommand{\scritinv}{\ensuremath{1/\Sigma_{\rm crit}}}
97: \newcommand{\wt}{\ensuremath{\omega(\theta)}}
98: \newcommand{\Aw}{\ensuremath{A_{\omega}}}
99: \newcommand{\xr}{\ensuremath{\xi(r)}}
100: \newcommand{\xrz}{\ensuremath{\xi(r,z)}}
101: \newcommand{\rnought}{\ensuremath{r_0}}
102: \newcommand{\xnought}{\ensuremath{x_0}}
103: \newcommand{\zprime}{\ensuremath{z^{\prime}}}
104: \newcommand{\iprime}{\ensuremath{i^{\prime}}}
105:
106: \def \figwidth {\linewidth}
107:
108:
109: %\received{4 August 1988}
110: %\accepted{23 September 1988}
111: %\journalid{337}{15 January 1989}
112: %\articleid{11}{14}
113:
114: %\slugcomment{To appear in Ap.J.}
115:
116: \shorttitle{SpARCS : Southern Fields}
117: \shortauthors{Wilson et al.}
118:
119: %\received{}
120:
121: \begin{document}
122:
123:
124: \title{SPECTROSCOPIC CONFIRMATION OF A MASSIVE RED-SEQUENCE SELECTED GALAXY CLUSTER AT $z=1.34$ IN THE SPARCS-SOUTH CLUSTER SURVEY}
125:
126: \author{Gillian Wilson\altaffilmark{1}, Adam Muzzin\altaffilmark{2}, H. K. C. Yee\altaffilmark{3}, Mark Lacy\altaffilmark{4}, Jason Surace\altaffilmark{4}, David Gilbank\altaffilmark{5}, Kris Blindert\altaffilmark{6}, Henk Hoekstra\altaffilmark{7,8,9}, Subhabrata Majumdar\altaffilmark{10}, Ricardo Demarco\altaffilmark{1}, Jonathan P. Gardner\altaffilmark{11}, Michael D. Gladders\altaffilmark{12}, and Carol Lonsdale\altaffilmark{13,14}
127: }
128:
129: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521; gillianw@ucr.edu}
130:
131: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520-8101}
132:
133: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3H4}
134:
135: \altaffiltext{4}{Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
136:
137: \altaffiltext{5}{Astrophysics and Gravitation Group, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University Of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1}
138:
139: \altaffiltext{6}{Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Koenigstuhl 17, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany}
140:
141: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada}
142:
143: \altaffiltext{8}{Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands}
144:
145: \altaffiltext{9}{Alfred P. Sloan Fellow}
146:
147: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai, India}
148:
149: \altaffiltext{11}{Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 665, Laboratory for Observational Cosmology, Greenbelt MD 20771}
150:
151: \altaffiltext{12}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637}
152:
153: \altaffiltext{13}{Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
154:
155: \altaffiltext{14}{North American ALMA Science Center, NRAO Headquarters, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903}
156:
157: \begin{abstract}
158:
159: %In this paper, and its companion \citep{muzzin-08b}, we introduce The Spitzer Adaptation of the Red-sequence Cluster Survey (SpARCS), a
160: %54 deg$^2$
161: %\zprime-passband imaging survey, consisting of deep ($\zprime \simeq24$ AB)
162: %%($z_{\rm Vega}\simeq24$)
163: The Spitzer Adaptation of the Red-sequence Cluster Survey (SpARCS) is a \zprime-passband imaging survey, consisting of deep ($\zprime \simeq 24$ AB)
164: observations made from both hemispheres using
165: the CFHT 3.6m and CTIO 4m telescopes. The survey was designed with the primary aim of detecting
166: galaxy clusters at $z~>~1$. In tandem with pre-existing
167: $3.6 \micron$ observations from the
168: %50 deg$^2$
169: \emph{Spitzer} Space Telescope SWIRE Legacy Survey,
170: %this 42
171: SpARCS detects clusters using an infrared adaptation of the two-filter red-sequence cluster technique. The total effective area of
172: the SpARCS cluster survey is 41.9 deg$^2$.
173: In this paper, we provide an overview of the 13.6 deg$^2$ Southern CTIO/MOSAICII observations.
174: The 28.3 deg$^2$ Northern CFHT/MegaCam observations
175: are summarized in a companion paper by \citet{muzzin-08b}. In this paper, we also report spectroscopic confirmation of SpARCS J003550-431224, a very rich galaxy cluster at
176: $z=1.335$, discovered in the ELAIS-S1 field. To date, this is the highest spectroscopically confirmed redshift for a galaxy
177: cluster discovered using the red-sequence technique. Based on nine confirmed members, SpARCS J003550-431224 has
178: a preliminary velocity dispersion of $1050 \pm 230$ km s$^{-1}$.
179: %, and a mass $(M_{200})$ of $9.4\pm6.2\times 10^{14} \Mo$.
180: %With its proven capability for efficient cluster detection, SpARCS
181: %is a demonstration that we have entered
182: %an era of large surveys of homogeneously-selected $z>1$ clusters.
183: With its proven capability for efficient cluster detection, SpARCS
184: is a demonstration that we have entered
185: an era of large, homogeneously-selected $z>1$ cluster surveys.
186: %an era of large, homogeneous $z>1$ cluster surveys.
187: %an era of large surveys of clusters utilizing samples.
188:
189: \end{abstract}
190:
191: \keywords{surveys --- cosmology: observations --- galaxies: clusters: general --- galaxies: high-redshift --- infrared: galaxies}
192:
193: \section{INTRODUCTION}
194: \label{sec:intro}
195:
196:
197: Dating back to the pioneering photographic work of the mid-twentieth century \citep{abell-58, zwicky-68},
198: galaxy cluster surveys have held a special place in the history of Astronomy. Due to the limitations
199: of photographic plates, however, early optical surveys struggled to discover clusters at redshifts
200: higher than $z\simeq0.2$.
201: %(ref Dressler 80, Schectman 85, Gunn 86, Couch and Sharples?)
202:
203: Galaxy cluster surveys were revolutionized by the launch of
204: a series of powerful X-ray observatories in the 1980's and 1990's.
205: Firstly \emph{Einstein}, then \emph{ROSAT}, and later the XMM and \emph{Chandra} telescopes proved their capability to detect
206: clusters out to
207: %$z=0.8$
208: $z=1$.
209: %Over the years since, many systematic studies of clusters have been based on X-ray catalogs.
210: For example, the wide but relatively shallow 734 deg$^{2}$ \emph{Einstein} Medium-Sensitivity Survey \citep[EMSS]{gioia-90} both provided the base
211: catalog for the Canadian Network for Observation Cosmology (CNOC1) survey of clusters at $z\sim0.4$ \citep{yec-96}, and discovered
212: MS 1054-03 at $z=0.83$ \citep{gl-94}, a massive cluster which provided
213: the first evidence that $\Omega_m$ was significantly $<1$ \citep{donahue-98}.
214: %The \emph{ROSAT} Deep Cluster Survey
215: The deeper but smaller 48 deg$^{2}$ \emph{ROSAT} Deep Cluster Survey \citep[RDCS]{rosati-98} detected
216: RX J0848.9+4452 at $z = 1.26$, which was, at the time, one of the most distant clusters to be discovered \citep{rosati-99}.
217:
218: The advent of large-format charge coupled devices (CCDs) brought renewed interest in carrying out optical cluster surveys \eg the 6 deg$^{2}$ Palomar Distant Cluster Survey \citep[PDCS]{postman-96}, the 16 deg$^{2}$ KPNO survey of \citet{postman-98},
219: %the 17 deg$^{2}$ survey of \citep{daCosta-99}
220: and the 135 deg$^{2}$ Las Campanas Distant Cluster Survey \citep[LCDCS]{gonzalez-01} from which the ESO Distant Cluster
221: Survey \citep[EDisCS]{white-05} was selected. All three of these surveys used variants of the matched-filter method to detect clusters.
222:
223: In an effort to combat ``false positive'' detections caused by line-of-sight projections of unrelated systems
224: in single-passband optical cluster searches, \citet{gy-00} proposed a two-filter technique.
225: Their Cluster Red-Sequence (CRS) technique was motivated by the observational fact that galaxy clusters contain a population of
226: early-type galaxies which follow a tight color-magnitude relation.
227: This relation has been shown to have an extremely small scatter (\eg \citealt{bower-92}), even to redshifts as high as $z\sim1.4$ \citep{blakeslee-03, holden-04, lidman-08}. If two filters which bracket the $4000\AA$ break are used to construct color-magnitude diagrams, early types are always the brightest, reddest galaxies at any redshift, and provide significant contrast from the field.
228: The CRS method has been used for the $\sim100$ deg$^{2}$ Red-sequence Cluster Survey (RCS-1, Gladders \& Yee 2005) and is also being used for the next generation $\sim 1000$ deg$^{2}$ RCS-2 survey \citep{yee-07}. Both of these surveys use an $R-\zprime$ filter combination. A variant of the red sequence method (the BCGmax algorithm)
229: has also been used to detect clusters in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey \citep{koester-07a, koester-07b}. In addition to detecting clusters with a very low false-positive rate, a second important advantage of the CRS
230: technique is that it also provides a good photometric estimate of the cluster redshift, accurate to $\Delta z \sim 0.05$ at $z<1$ \citep{gilbank-07}.
231:
232: Applying the CRS technique to searching for clusters at higher redshift was an obvious next step which
233: was not feasible until very recently, because of technical limitations.
234: At $z\sim1.2$, the \zprime\ filter is no longer redward of the rest-frame $4000\AA$ break, requiring
235: the use of large-format near-infrared cameras which have only recently begun to appear on 4m telescopes \citep{dalton-06,warren-07}.
236: Another issue is that the sky itself is bright in the infrared, requiring longer integration times than for optical imaging.
237:
238: The first real opportunity to systematically detect galaxy clusters at $z>1$ in large numbers was presented in 2003
239: with the launch of the InfraRed Array Camera (IRAC; \citealt{fazio-04}) onboard the \emph{Spitzer} Space Telescope \citep{werner-04}.
240: %. \emph{Sth abpout RS needing to exist}
241: Both our own pilot study carried out using the
242: 3.8 deg$^{2}$ 60s-depth First Look Survey
243: %(FLS; see \S~\ref{sec:obs}) \citep{lacy-05, wilson-05, muzzin-05, muzzin-08a},
244: (FLS \citealt{lacy-05, wilson-05, muzzin-08a}),
245: and that carried out using the
246: 8.5 deg$^{2}$ 90s-depth IRAC Shallow Survey
247: %, the IRAC Shallow Survey Cluster Search (ISCS; \citealt{eisenhardt-04, stanford-05, brodwin-06, eisenhardt-08}),
248: \citep{eisenhardt-04, stanford-05, brodwin-06, eisenhardt-08}, quickly demonstrated the power of IRAC
249: %\citep[the IRAC Shallow Survey Cluster Search (ISCS)]{eisenhardt-04, stanford-05, brodwin-06, eisenhardt-08} soon demonstrated the power of IRAC
250: for $z>1$ cluster detection.
251:
252: Clusters of galaxies are extremely rare and one requires a widefield survey to find the most massive examples.
253: The largest area \emph{Spitzer} Space Telescope
254: Survey is the 50 deg$^{2}$ 120s-depth SWIRE Legacy Survey \citep{lonsdale-03}.
255: %In this paper, and its companion \citep{muzzin-08b},
256: %we describe the SpARCS
257: %a CFHT 3.6m and CTIO 4m
258: %\zprime-imaging survey of the six SWIRE fields.
259: %, designed with the explicit goal of detecting $z > 1$ clusters of galaxies.
260: In \S~\ref{sec:obs}, we provide an overview of SpARCS\footnote{http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/$\sim$gillianw/SpARCS}, our \zprime-imaging survey of the six SWIRE fields.
261: We also summarize the Southern observations.
262: In \S~\ref{sec:clusdet}, we briefly review our red-sequence detection algorithm and
263: introduce a rich cluster candidate
264: selected in the CTIO ELAIS-S1 field.
265: %In \S~\ref{sec:clusdet}, we present spectroscopic confirmation of SpARCS J003550-431224 at redshift $z=1.34$,
266: %making the
267: We present Gemini/GMOS-S spectroscopic follow-up of SpARCS J003550-431224
268: in \S~\ref{sec:spectra}, confirming it to be, at $z=1.34$, the highest redshift cluster yet discovered using the red-sequence technique.
269: We discuss our main results in \S~\ref{sec:disc} and conclude in \S~\ref{sec:conc}.
270: We assume an $\Omega_{{\rm m}0} = 0.3, \Omega_{\lambda 0} = 0.7$
271: cosmology with $\Hnought = 70$ $\kmsMpc$ throughout.
272:
273:
274:
275: \section{SpARCS SURVEY IMAGING}
276: \label{sec:obs}
277:
278: \subsection{Choice of Passbands}
279:
280:
281: The Spitzer SWIRE Legacy Survey is a seven passband imaging survey consisting of
282: %InfraRed Array Camera (IRAC) 3.6, 4.5, 5.8$ and $8.0 $\micron$ \citep{fazio-04}
283: IRAC 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0 $\micron$
284: and Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS; \citealt{rieke-04}) 24, 70, 160 $\micron$ observations.
285: Full details of the survey design, data processing, ancillary datasets and source catalogs
286: may be found in \cite{surace-05}.
287: For cluster detection SpARCS utilizes
288: $3.6\micron$, the most sensitive \emph{Spitzer} channel, as its ``red'' filter.
289: %, which reaches a limiting magnitude of $3.7uJy$ (22.5AB: 5$\sigma$).
290:
291:
292: SpARCS utilizes \zprime\ as its ``blue'' filter. Simulations (\eg\ see \citealt{wilson-06}) showed a limiting magnitude of $z\sim24$ AB
293: %(AB; 5$\sigma$)
294: was required to match the 3.6$\micron$ depth.
295: It was necessary to obtain our own widefield \zprime-imaging for only five of the six SWIRE fields (Table~\ref{tab:fields}), because observations of the
296: XMM-LSS field were available from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope
297: (CFHT) Legacy Survey\footnote{http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/Science/CFHTLS/}. Those observations were made either using the MOSAICII instrument on the 4m Blanco telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-Amercian Observatory (CTIO) in the case of the Southern fields (ELAIS-S1 and Chandra-S) or
298: using MegaCam
299: %\citep{boulade-03}
300: at the 3.6m CFHT in the case of the Northern fields (ELAIS-N1, ELAIS-N2 and Lockman).
301: A summary of the latter observations, and spectroscopic confirmation of two clusters at $z=1.18$ and $z=1.20$ in the ELAIS-N2 field may be found in the companion paper by \cite{muzzin-08b}.
302: %In the remainder of this paper is devoted to SpARCS CTIO observations and \emph{preliminary cluster spectroscopy}
303:
304: \subsection{The CTIO Dataset}
305:
306: The SWIRE IRAC $3.6\micron$ Southern fields are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:overlay}.
307: The $3.6\micron$ mosaic of the ELAIS-S1 field totals 7.1 deg$^{2}$ and the
308: Chandra-S field totals 8.1 deg$^{2}$ (see Table~\ref{tab:fields})
309:
310: The $8192\times8192$ pixel MOSAIC II camera on the 4m Blanco telescope has a
311: pixel scale of $0. \arcsec 267$ pixel$^{-1}$, leading to a $36\arcmin \times36 \arcmin$ footprint per pointing. The white squares overlaid on Figure~\ref{fig:overlay} show the
312: 46 CTIO MOSAICII pointings required to image the ELAIS-S1 and Chandra-S fields.
313: These pointings were designed to maximize the overlap with the $3.6\micron$ data, but to minimize the overall
314: number of pointings by omitting regions with little overlap with the IRAC data. The total area of the \zprime\ observations per field is shown in Table~\ref{tab:fields}.
315:
316: CTIO observations were made of the ELAIS-S1 and Chandra-S fields using the \zprime\ filter on a total of 17 nights.
317: %To reach the target magnitude limit of $\zprime =24$ (Vega; 5-$\sigma$),
318: %each pointing was observed to depth of 100 mins (comprised of ten 600s dithers). A 10-point dither pattern with $ \sim50-200\asec$ offsets in a square pattern %was utilized. The median seeing was $1.1 \asec$.
319: The depth of the \zprime\ data varies from pointing to pointing depending on the seeing and the sky background; however, the mean depth is 24.0 AB (23.5 Vega; $5 \sigma$).
320: Table~\ref{tab:fields} shows
321: %the total area per field of usable between the \zprime and $3.6 \micron$ datasets. This is
322: the total effective area per field, \ie the total usable area of overlap between the \zprime\ and $3.6 \micron$ datasets once areas of bright star contamination and chips gaps have been excluded. The total effective area of the CTIO fields is 13.6 deg$^{2}$ (6.5 deg$^{2}$ in the ELAIS-S1 and 7.1 deg$^{2}$ in the Chandra-S fields), and the total effective area of the six fields is 41.9 deg$^{2}$.
323:
324: %The Sextractor photometry package \citep{bertarn-96} was used on both the IRAC and \zprime mosaics.
325:
326:
327: \section{CLUSTER DETECTION}
328: \label{sec:clusdet}
329:
330: We defer a full description of the SpARCS data reduction, cluster candidate detection algorithm and catalogs
331: %(flatfielded, fringe-corrected, sky-subtracted, stacked, cataloged and analyzed)
332: to Muzzin et al.\ 2009, in prep.
333: % (see also \citealt{muzzin-08b}).
334: However, we note that the algorithm used here is almost identical to that
335: described in \citet{muzzin-08a}, as applied to the Spitzer First Look
336: Survey (FLS; \citealt{lacy-05, wilson-05}). The one important difference is that
337: \citet{muzzin-08a} used an $R-[3.6]$ color to detect clusters at $0 < z < 1.3$ in the FLS.
338: %The IRAC SWIRE observations are deeper, totalling 120s
339: %compared with the IRAC FLS observations which total only
340: %60s per pointing.
341: The slightly deeper SWIRE exposure time, combined with the $\zprime-[3.6]$ color choice, allows
342: SpARCS to detect clusters to higher redshift than possible with the FLS dataset.
343:
344:
345: \subsection{SpARCS J003550-431224}
346: \label{ssec:cluster}
347:
348: From analysis of the ELAIS-S1 field, SpARCS J003550-431224,
349: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:images}, was identified
350: as a high probability rich cluster candidate.
351: SpARCS J003550-431224 (R.A.: 00:35:49.7, Dec.:-43:12:24.16) has a B$_{\rm gc,R}$\footnote{We use the $\zprime - [3.6]$ vs. $3.6\micron$ red-sequence to determine B$_{\rm gc,R}$} richness of $1055 \pm 276$ Mpc$^{1.8}$ (for a discussion of B$_{\rm gc}$ and B$_{\rm gc,R}$ see \citealt{yeelc-99} and \citealt{gy-05}). Based on the empirical calibration of B$_{\rm gc}$ vs. M$_{200}$ determined by \citet{muzzin-07b} in the K-band for the CNOC1 clusters at $z \sim 0.3$, this implies M$_{200}= 5.7 \times 10^{14} \Mo$.
352:
353: %\subsection{Spectroscopic Data}
354: \section{SPECTROSCOPY}
355: \label{sec:spectra}
356:
357: Spectroscopic follow-up of SpARCS J003550-431224 was obtained
358: %on October ? 2007
359: with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph on the Gemini South telescope (GMOS-S)
360: in queue mode (program ID GN-2007B-Q16). We used $1.0 \asec$ wide slits.
361: We used GMOS with the R150 grism, blazed at 7170$\AA$. This provided a spectral resolving power of R = 631 which corresponds to a resolution of $11\AA$, or 280 km s$^{-1}$ at the redshift of the cluster.
362:
363: We observed a single mask for 10 hrs. The mask was observed using the OG515 filter
364: which blocks light blueward of $5150\AA$. The central wavelength of the grating was moved between $7380\AA$, $7500\AA$, and $7620\AA$ to ``dither'' in the dispersion direction and fill in GMOS chip gaps.
365: We used nod-$\&$-shuffle in band-shuffle mode. This is slightly less efficient than micro-shuffle mode but allows one to maximize the number of slits
366: in a small area, such as is the case for a distant cluster with a high surface density of red-sequence galaxies concentrated in the cluster core
367: (see Figure~\ref{fig:images}). There
368: were 26 slits on the mask, including three alignment stars.
369: Slits were placed on galaxies with priorities from 1 to 5. Priority 1 (single digit ID $\#$'s in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}) was galaxies with colors within 0.6 magnitude of the red sequence, and with $[3.6] < 17.0$ (Vega). Priority 2 (ID $\#$'s in the 1000's) was galaxies with colors within 0.6 magnitude of the red sequence, and
370: with $17.0 < [3.6] < 18.0$. Priority 3 (ID $\#$'s in the 2000's) was galaxies with colors bluer than the red sequence by $0.6-1.0$ magnitude, and with $[3.6] < 17.5$. Priority 4 (ID $\#$'s in the 3000's) was galaxies with colors bluer than the red-sequence by $1.0-1.5$ magnitude, and with $[3.6] < 17.5$. Priority 5 (ID $\#$'s in the 4000's) was the lowest priority and included all galaxies with magnitude $16.9 < [3.6] < 18.0$. Priorities 1 to 4 roughly correspond to bright red-sequence, faint red-sequence, blue cloud, and extreme blue cloud galaxies respectively. Each exposure was 30 minutes in duration.
371: The 20 exposures used nod cycles of 60s integration time per cycle and were offset by a few arcseconds using the on-chip dithering option.
372:
373: \subsection{Data Reduction}
374: %\label{ssec:spectra}
375:
376: The data were reduced using standard GeminiIRAF routines to bias-subtract the data.
377: The iGDDS package \citep{abraham-04} was used to interactively trace the 2D spectra and extract 1D spectra.
378: Wavelength-calibration for each extracted spectrum was performed-using bright sky lines from the unsubtracted image, also
379: with the iGDDS software. Wavelength solutions typically have an r.m.s.\ $ < 0.5\AA$. We determined a relative flux calibration curve using a long slit
380: observation of the standard star EG21.
381: We determined redshifts by identifying prominent spectra features such as Calcium H+K lines at 3934$\AA$ and 3968 $\AA$ and the [OII] $\lambda \lambda 3727$ doublet using the iGDDS code. A few of the spectra also show some Balmer series lines.
382:
383:
384: Spectra were obtained for 15 of the 23 photometrically selected galaxies with quality sufficient
385: for determining redshifts: the other eight were deemed too faint for reliable identification of spectral
386: features. Table~\ref{tab:spectra} shows ten galaxies, which were deemed likely to
387: be cluster members based upon the value of their spectroscopic redshifts (although see \S~\ref{sec:disc}).
388: These galaxies are indicated by white boxes in the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:images}.
389: Some examples of the spectra of confirmed members are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:spectra}.
390: These spectra have been smoothed by a 7-pixel boxcar (which produces a resolution equal to that of the spectrograph).
391:
392:
393: %Five? of the cluster members showed no evidence of ongoing star formation
394: %Five? of the cluster members show prominent [OII] emission lines \emph{more discussion of types}
395:
396: A total of five galaxies were determined
397: to be foreground or background sources. These galaxies are also listed in Table~\ref{tab:spectra} and indicated by green boxes in the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:images}.
398: The histogram in the left panel of Figure~\ref{fig:hist} shows the spectroscopic redshifts of all 15 galaxies.
399: The histogram in the right panel
400: %of Fig~\ref{fig:hist}
401: shows only the redshifts of the 10 likely cluster members.
402:
403: \section{DISCUSSION}
404: \label{sec:disc}
405:
406: Before calculating a redshift and velocity dispersion for SpARCS J003550-431224,
407: we first checked for near-field interlopers using the code of \citet{blindert-06}.
408: This employs a modified version of the \citet{fadda-96} shifting-gap technique, and uses
409: both galaxy position and velocity information.
410: Figure~\ref{fig:vd} shows galaxy velocities relative to the mean velocity, as a function of radius. The galaxy marked with an ``x'' (ID 5 at $z=1.315$ in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}) was
411: identified as being more likely to be a near-field object than a member of the cluster and was not used in the computation of the velocity dispersion or the mean redshift of the cluster.
412: (This is also the lowest redshift galaxy in the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:hist}).
413: A mean redshift of $z=1.335$ and a velocity dispersion of $1050 \pm 230$ km s$^{-1}$ was
414: calculated for SpARCS J003550-431224. The uncertainty on the latter was determined using Jackknife
415: resampling of the data.
416:
417:
418: It is, as yet, unclear as to whether SpARCS J003550-431224 is a relaxed cluster or a system in the process of collapsing.
419: The distribution in Figure~\ref{fig:hist} (right panel) appears non-Gaussian and there is some evidence of bimodality.
420: For comparison, a Gaussian with an r.m.s. of 1050 km s$^{-1}$ has been overlaid on the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig:hist}.
421: %We also note that the central galaxy appears to be offset in Figure~\ref{fig:images}, a likely
422: %sign that this cluster is unrelaxed.
423: The velocity dispersion of $1050 \pm 230$ km s$^{-1}$ should certainly be considered ``preliminary'', based, as it is, upon
424: only nine members.
425: However, if one does adopt this value of velocity dispersion, one can use it to calculate a dynamical estimate
426: of r$_{200}$ (the radius at which the
427: mean interior density is 200 times the critical density, $\rho_{c}$) using the equation
428: of \citet{carlberg-97}:
429:
430: \begin{equation}
431: r_{200} = \frac{\sqrt{3}\sigma}{10H(z)},
432: \end{equation}
433: where H($z$) is the Hubble parameter at the redshift of the cluster.
434: This gives a value of r$_{200}$ = 1.2 $\pm$ 0.3 Mpc. From this,
435: the dynamical mass M$_{200}$, the mass contained within r$_{200}$, can also be inferred
436: using:
437:
438: \begin{equation}
439: M_{200} = \frac{4}{3}\pi r_{200}^3 \cdot 200\rho_{c},
440: \end{equation}
441:
442: We estimate a dynamical mass of M$_{200}= (9.4 \pm 6.2) \times 10^{14} \Mo$ for J003550-431224, which is
443: in good agreement with, albeit slightly larger than, the value of M$_{200}= 5.7 \times 10^{14} \Mo$, which was
444: calculated based upon its richness. Further spectroscopy is certainly warranted, but the preliminary evidence
445: suggests that SpARCS J003550-431224 is a massive cluster, perhaps the most massive cluster at $z>1$ in
446: our 42 deg$^{2}$ survey.
447:
448: The color-magnitude diagram for all galaxies in a 550 kpc ($65\asec$) radius of the cluster center
449: is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:colmag}.
450: The red diamonds show the 10 cluster members from Table~\ref{tab:spectra}. The blue
451: diamonds show the two (of five) confirmed foreground/background galaxies that fall within the 550 kpc radius.
452: %(ID's 1007? and 3003? in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}).
453: %The dashed line indicates the $3.6$ magnitude limit of 19.2 Vega \emph{$22.0 =22.5 AB?$}.
454:
455:
456: Based on its red-sequence color of $\zprime-[3.6]=5.4$ (shown as dotted line in Figure~\ref{fig:colmag}),
457: SpARCS J003550-431224 was originally assigned a photometric redshift of $z=1.57$.
458: This was based on \citet[BC03]{bc-03} models assuming a formation redshift $z_{f}=4$.
459: If one assumes a formation redshift of $z_{f}=10$, then the $\zprime-[3.6]=5.4$ color would cause one to infer a photometric redshift
460: of $z=1.39$ for SpARCS J003550-431224, which is reasonably consistent with the spectroscopic value.
461: One possibility for the overestimate of the photometric redshift is that the BC03 models are too blue at young ages, as suggested by \citet{maraston-05}.
462: %Another possibility is that dust may be present in early-type galaxies
463: %Adding a small amount of dust ($\sim0.4$ mag) to the models can reconcile the colors.
464: %This is consistent with the level of extinction recently reported in massive \emph{field} early-type galaxies at $z=2$ \citep{kriek-08}.
465: Spectroscopy of additional $z\sim1.35$ SpARCS clusters
466: will determine whether SpARCS J003550-431224's red-sequence color is representative for this redshift, or if there
467: is something atypical about this particular cluster.
468: %A second possibility is that we are encountering ``progenitor bias'' \citep{vD-00}, in the sense that a cluster which is detected at $z\sim1.35$
469: %based upon its galaxies having similar red-sequence colors, will be a cluster whose galaxies formed at $z=10$; those $z\sim1.35$ clusters
470: %whose galaxies formed at $z=4$, would not display well-developed red sequences and would be less likely to be detected by our method.
471: %One the other hand, SpARCS J003550-431224 is an extremely rich cluster.
472: %Spectroscopic confirmation of less rich (and presumably younger) clusters at $z\sim1.35$ from the SpARCS survey will help determine if the red-sequence color
473: %of SpARCS J003550-431224 is typical of clusters at this redshift, or if red-sequence color is a function of system richness.
474:
475: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
476: \label{sec:conc}
477:
478: In this paper, we reported the discovery of SpARCS J003550-431224 in the ELAIS-S1 field, a very rich galaxy cluster at $z=1.335$, with a preliminary velocity dispersion of $1050 \pm 230$ km s$^{-1}$. Several other rich $z>1$ clusters in the SpARCS survey have also been spectroscopically confirmed
479: (\citealt{muzzin-08b}, Demarco et al.\ 2008, in prep), with no false positives.
480:
481:
482:
483: %Our photometric redshifts are calculated using \citep[BC]{bc-03} models, and
484: %the color tracks of galaxies at $z>1$ are strongly dependent on the formation redshift of the galaxies.
485: %At any given redshift, the $\zprime-[3.6]$ color of an early-type (elliptical and S0) galaxy is redder with higher
486: %formation redshifts, as one would expect because the young UV-bright stars have had time
487: %to exhaust their fuel supply.
488: %Neither BC or Maraston models (which are known to predict redder near-IR colors because of ....)
489: %can reproduce the measured red-sequence colors of the galaxies in SpARCS J003550-431224, even assuming an infinite redshift of formation.
490: %The cause
491: %of the discrepancy is as yet unclear. One possibility for the overestimate of the photomeric redshiftis that the models are in error. A second is that
492: %%the photometry is in error. The IRAC $3.6\micron$ Point Spread Function (PSF) is $1.8 \asec$, and deblending
493: %%does become a concern in crowded regions such as rich cluster of galaxies.
494: %A third possibility is the presence of dust in the bright early types.
495: %Adding a small amount of dust ($\sim0.4$ mag) to the models can reconcile the colors.
496: %This is consistent with the level of extinction recently reported in massive \emph{field} early-type galaxies at $z=2$ (Kriek et al.\ 2008).
497: %The cause of the discrepancy must remain unknown for now, but presents an intriguing challenge that obviously warrants further investigation.
498:
499:
500: The FLS, IRAC Shallow Cluster Survey (ISCS) and SpARCS have demonstrated the power and potential of widefield infrared observations from space for $z>1$ cluster surveys. Both the FLS and SpARCS surveys are very similar to the RCS-1 and RSC-2 surveys, except that they utilize an optical-infrared adaptation of the CRS technique (the ISCS uses a multipassband photometric technique).
501: %The FLS and SpARCS cluster surveys both utilize two-filter detection \citep{muzzin-08a}; the IRAC Shallow Survey utilizes a multiband photometric technique \citep{brodwin-06}
502: SpARCS, in particular, is a demonstration that $z>1$ cluster detection is now routine. With its two filter red-sequence detection algorithm,
503: it is both highly efficient and robust against line-of-sight projections.
504: % \eg groups at different redshifts.
505: At 42 deg$^2$, the SpARCS cluster survey is also currently
506: the only $z>1$ survey sufficiently large to select clusters \emph{both} as a function of redshift and richness.
507:
508: It is noteworthy that all the $z>1$ SpARCS clusters were discovered in only 120s per pointing of IRAC observations.
509: Since clusters are rare, widefield cluster searches are required to discover the most massive examples.
510: To discover a representative sample of massive structures at $z>1.5$ would require an even wider survey, of several hundred square
511: degrees, a proposition which would be feasible during the lifetime of the \emph{Spitzer} Space Telescope Warm Mission \citep{gardner-07, stauffer-07}.
512:
513:
514: \acknowledgements
515:
516: The authors wish to thank the staff of The Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory for their invaluable assistance,
517: without which this work would not have been possible. CTIO is operated by the Association of Universities for
518: Research in Astronomy, under contract with the National Science Foundation.
519:
520: Based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the
521: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement
522: with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United
523: States), the Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom), the
524: National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council
525: (Australia), Ministrio da Cincia e Tecnologia (Brazil) and SECYT (Argentina)
526:
527: This work is based in part on archival data obtained with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by an award issued by JPL/Caltech.
528: GW acknowledges support from the College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences at UCR.
529:
530:
531:
532: \newpage
533:
534: %\bibliography{clusters}
535: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
536:
537: \begin{thebibliography}{}
538:
539: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Abell}}{{Abell}}{1958}]{abell-58}
540: {Abell}, G.~O. 1958, \apjs, 3, 211
541:
542: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Abraham} et~al.}{{Abraham}
543: et~al.}{2004}]{abraham-04}
544: {Abraham}, R.~G., et~al. 2004, \aj, 127, 2455
545:
546: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blakeslee} et~al.}{{Blakeslee}
547: et~al.}{2003}]{blakeslee-03}
548: {Blakeslee}, J.~P., et~al. 2003, \apjl, 596, L143
549:
550: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blindert}}{{Blindert}}{2006}]{blindert-06}
551: {Blindert}, K. 2006, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto (Canada)
552:
553: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bower}, {Lucey}, \& {Ellis}}{{Bower}
554: et~al.}{1992}]{bower-92}
555: {Bower}, R.~G., {Lucey}, J.~R., \& {Ellis}, R.~S. 1992, \mnras, 254, 601
556:
557: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Brodwin} et~al.}{{Brodwin}
558: et~al.}{2006}]{brodwin-06}
559: {Brodwin}, M., et~al. 2006, \apj, 651, 791
560:
561: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bruzual} \& {Charlot}}{{Bruzual} \&
562: {Charlot}}{2003}]{bc-03}
563: {Bruzual}, G., \& {Charlot}, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000
564:
565: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Carlberg} et~al.}{{Carlberg}
566: et~al.}{1997}]{carlberg-97}
567: {Carlberg}, R.~G., et~al. 1997, \apjl, 485, L13
568:
569: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Dalton} et~al.}{{Dalton}
570: et~al.}{2006}]{dalton-06}
571: {Dalton}, G.~B., et~al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation
572: Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6269, Society of Photo-Optical
573: Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series
574:
575: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Donahue} et~al.}{{Donahue}
576: et~al.}{1998}]{donahue-98}
577: {Donahue}, M., {Voit}, G.~M., {Gioia}, I., {Lupino}, G., {Hughes}, J.~P., \&
578: {Stocke}, J.~T. 1998, \apj, 502, 550
579:
580: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Eisenhardt} et~al.}{{Eisenhardt}
581: et~al.}{2004}]{eisenhardt-04}
582: {Eisenhardt}, P.~R., et~al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 48
583:
584: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Eisenhardt} et~al.}{{Eisenhardt}
585: et~al.}{2008}]{eisenhardt-08}
586: {Eisenhardt}, P.~R.~M., et~al. 2008, \apj, 684, 905
587:
588: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fadda} et~al.}{{Fadda}
589: et~al.}{1996}]{fadda-96}
590: {Fadda}, D., {Girardi}, M., {Giuricin}, G., {Mardirossian}, F., \& {Mezzetti},
591: M. 1996, \apj, 473, 670
592:
593: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fazio} et~al.}{{Fazio}
594: et~al.}{2004}]{fazio-04}
595: {Fazio}, G.~G., et~al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
596:
597: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gardner} et~al.}{{Gardner}
598: et~al.}{2007}]{gardner-07}
599: {Gardner}, J.~P., {Fan}, X., {Wilson}, G., \& {Stiavelli}, M. 2007, in
600: American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 943, The Science
601: Opportunities of the Warm Spitzer Mission Workshop, ed. L.~J.
602: {Storrie-Lombardi} \& N.~A. {Silbermann}, 229
603:
604: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gilbank} et~al.}{{Gilbank}
605: et~al.}{2007}]{gilbank-07}
606: {Gilbank}, D.~G., {Yee}, H.~K.~C., {Ellingson}, E., {Gladders}, M.~D.,
607: {Barrientos}, L.~F., \& {Blindert}, K. 2007, \aj, 134, 282
608:
609: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gioia} et~al.}{{Gioia}
610: et~al.}{1990}]{gioia-90}
611: {Gioia}, I.~M., {Henry}, J.~P., {Maccacaro}, T., {Morris}, S.~L., {Stocke},
612: J.~T., \& {Wolter}, A. 1990, \apjl, 356, L35
613:
614: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gioia} \& {Luppino}}{{Gioia} \&
615: {Luppino}}{1994}]{gl-94}
616: {Gioia}, I.~M., \& {Luppino}, G.~A. 1994, \apjs, 94, 583
617:
618: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gladders} \& {Yee}}{{Gladders} \&
619: {Yee}}{2000}]{gy-00}
620: {Gladders}, M.~D., \& {Yee}, H.~K.~C. 2000, \aj, 120, 2148
621:
622: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gladders} \& {Yee}}{{Gladders} \&
623: {Yee}}{2005}]{gy-05}
624: {Gladders}, M.~D., \& {Yee}, H.~K.~C. 2005, \apjs, 157, 1
625:
626: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gonzalez} et~al.}{{Gonzalez}
627: et~al.}{2001}]{gonzalez-01}
628: {Gonzalez}, A.~H., {Zaritsky}, D., {Dalcanton}, J.~J., \& {Nelson}, A. 2001,
629: \apjs, 137, 117
630:
631: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Holden} et~al.}{{Holden}
632: et~al.}{2004}]{holden-04}
633: {Holden}, B.~P., {Stanford}, S.~A., {Eisenhardt}, P., \& {Dickinson}, M. 2004,
634: \aj, 127, 2484
635:
636: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Koester} et~al.}{{Koester}
637: et~al.}{2007a}]{koester-07a}
638: {Koester}, B.~P., et~al. 2007a, \apj, 660, 239
639:
640: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Koester} et~al.}{{Koester}
641: et~al.}{2007b}]{koester-07b}
642: {Koester}, B.~P., et~al. 2007b, \apj, 660, 221
643:
644: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lacy} et~al.}{{Lacy} et~al.}{2005}]{lacy-05}
645: {Lacy}, M., et~al. 2005, \apjs, 161, 41
646:
647: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lidman} et~al.}{{Lidman}
648: et~al.}{2008}]{lidman-08}
649: {Lidman}, C., et~al. 2008, ArXiv e-prints
650:
651: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lonsdale} et~al.}{{Lonsdale}
652: et~al.}{2003}]{lonsdale-03}
653: {Lonsdale}, C.~J., et~al. 2003, \pasp, 115, 897
654:
655: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Maraston}}{{Maraston}}{2005}]{maraston-05}
656: {Maraston}, C. 2005, \mnras, 362, 799
657:
658: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Muzzin} et~al.}{{Muzzin}
659: et~al.}{2008a}]{muzzin-08b}
660: {Muzzin}, A., et~al. 2008a, (astro-ph/0810.0005)
661:
662: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Muzzin} et~al.}{{Muzzin}
663: et~al.}{2008b}]{muzzin-08a}
664: {Muzzin}, A., {Wilson}, G., , {Lacy}, M., {Yee}, H. K.~C., \& A, S.~S. 2008b,
665: in press, (astro-ph/0807.0227)
666:
667: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Muzzin} et~al.}{{Muzzin}
668: et~al.}{2007}]{muzzin-07b}
669: {Muzzin}, A., {Yee}, H.~K.~C., {Hall}, P.~B., \& {Lin}, H. 2007, \apj, 663,
670: 150
671:
672: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Postman} et~al.}{{Postman}
673: et~al.}{1998}]{postman-98}
674: {Postman}, M., {Lauer}, T.~R., {Szapudi}, I., \& {Oegerle}, W. 1998, \apj,
675: 506, 33
676:
677: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Postman} et~al.}{{Postman}
678: et~al.}{1996}]{postman-96}
679: {Postman}, M., {Lubin}, L.~M., {Gunn}, J.~E., {Oke}, J.~B., {Hoessel}, J.~G.,
680: {Schneider}, D.~P., \& {Christensen}, J.~A. 1996, \aj, 111, 615
681:
682: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Rieke} et~al.}{{Rieke}
683: et~al.}{2004}]{rieke-04}
684: {Rieke}, G.~H., et~al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
685:
686: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Rosati} et~al.}{{Rosati}
687: et~al.}{1998}]{rosati-98}
688: {Rosati}, P., {della Ceca}, R., {Norman}, C., \& {Giacconi}, R. 1998, \apjl,
689: 492, L21
690:
691: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Rosati} et~al.}{{Rosati}
692: et~al.}{1999}]{rosati-99}
693: {Rosati}, P., {Stanford}, S.~A., {Eisenhardt}, P.~R., {Elston}, R., {Spinrad},
694: H., {Stern}, D., \& {Dey}, A. 1999, \aj, 118, 76
695:
696: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Stanford} et~al.}{{Stanford}
697: et~al.}{2005}]{stanford-05}
698: {Stanford}, S.~A., et~al. 2005, \apjl, 634, L129
699:
700: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Stauffer} et~al.}{{Stauffer}
701: et~al.}{2007}]{stauffer-07}
702: {Stauffer}, J.~R., et~al. 2007, in American Institute of Physics Conference
703: Series, Vol. 943, The Science Opportunities of the Warm Spitzer Mission
704: Workshop, ed. L.~J. {Storrie-Lombardi} \& N.~A. {Silbermann}, 43
705:
706: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Surace} et~al.}{{Surace}
707: et~al.}{2005}]{surace-05}
708: {Surace}, J., {Shupe}, D.~L., {Fang}, F., {Lonsdale}, C.~J., \&
709: {Gonzalez-Solares}, E. 2005, SSC website release
710:
711: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Warren} et~al.}{{Warren}
712: et~al.}{2007}]{warren-07}
713: {Warren}, S.~J., et~al. 2007, \mnras, 375, 213
714:
715: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Werner} et~al.}{{Werner}
716: et~al.}{2004}]{werner-04}
717: {Werner}, M.~W., et~al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
718:
719: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{White} et~al.}{{White}
720: et~al.}{2005}]{white-05}
721: {White}, S.~D.~M., et~al. 2005, \aap, 444, 365
722:
723: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Wilson} et~al.}{{Wilson}
724: et~al.}{2005}]{wilson-05}
725: {Wilson}, G., {Muzzin}, A., {Lacy}, M., \& {the FLS Team}. 2005, ArXiv
726: Astrophysics e-prints (astro-ph/0503638)
727:
728: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Wilson} et~al.}{{Wilson}
729: et~al.}{2006}]{wilson-06}
730: {Wilson}, G., et~al. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints (astro-ph/0604289)
731:
732: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Yee}, {Ellingson}, \& {Carlberg}}{{Yee}
733: et~al.}{1996}]{yec-96}
734: {Yee}, H.~K.~C., {Ellingson}, E., \& {Carlberg}, R.~G. 1996, \apjs, 102, 269
735:
736: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Yee} et~al.}{{Yee} et~al.}{2007}]{yee-07}
737: {Yee}, H.~K.~C., {Gladders}, M.~D., {Gilbank}, D.~G., {Majumdar}, S.,
738: {Hoekstra}, H., \& {Ellingson}, E. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the
739: Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 379, Cosmic Frontiers, ed. N.~{Metcalfe} \&
740: T.~{Shanks}, 103
741:
742: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Yee} \& {L{\'o}pez-Cruz}}{{Yee} \&
743: {L{\'o}pez-Cruz}}{1999}]{yeelc-99}
744: {Yee}, H.~K.~C., \& {L{\'o}pez-Cruz}, O. 1999, \aj, 117, 1985
745:
746: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Zwicky}, {Herzog}, \& {Wild}}{{Zwicky}
747: et~al.}{1968}]{zwicky-68}
748: {Zwicky}, F., {Herzog}, E., \& {Wild}, P. 1968, {Catalogue of galaxies and of
749: clusters of galaxies} (Pasadena: California Institute of Technology (CIT),
750: 1961-1968)
751:
752: \end{thebibliography}
753:
754:
755: \clearpage
756:
757:
758: \begin{figure}
759: \plotone{f1.eps}
760: \caption{
761: The SWIRE $3.6\micron$ IRAC mosaics are shown in grayscale. The roll angle of the Spitzer Space Telescope on the date of observation
762: determines the orientation of the IRAC observations. The white squares overlaid show the
763: 46 CTIO MOSAICII pointings. There are 23 MOSAICII pointings each in the SWIRE 7.1 deg$^{2}$ ELAIS-S1 and
764: 8.1 deg$^{2}$ Chandra-S fields.
765: \label{fig:overlay}
766: }
767: \end{figure}
768:
769: \clearpage
770:
771: \begin{figure}
772: \plotone{f2.eps}
773: \caption{
774: $r^{\prime}\zprime[3.6]$ color composites of J003550-431224 are shown in both panels. The FOV is 1.5 Mpc at the cluster redshift.
775: The white (green) boxes overlaid on the right panel
776: show the 10 cluster members (5 foreground/background galaxies) with spectroscopically-confirmed redshifts from Gemini/GMOS-S (see Table~\ref{tab:spectra}).
777: \label{fig:images}
778: }
779: \end{figure}
780:
781: \clearpage
782:
783: \begin{figure}
784: \plotone{f3.eps}
785: \caption{
786: Spectra for a subsample of seven galaxies in cluster SpARCS J003550-431224 (see Table~\ref{tab:spectra}). The spectra have been smoothed with a 7-pixel ($11 \AA$) boxcar. The identified spectral features
787: are marked. The lowermost panel shows the typical sky spectrum.
788: \label{fig:spectra}
789: }
790: \end{figure}
791:
792: \clearpage
793:
794: \begin{figure}
795: \plotone{f4.eps}
796: \caption{
797: Histogram showing 15 galaxies with confirmed redshifts (left). Ten galaxies are confirmed as cluster members (right) and five are confirmed as foreground or background sources. See Table~\ref{tab:spectra} for further details. A Gaussian with an r.m.s. of 1050 km s$^{-1}$ (see \S~\ref{sec:disc}) has been overlaid
798: \label{fig:hist}
799: }
800: \end{figure}
801:
802: \clearpage
803:
804:
805: \begin{figure}
806: \plotone{f5.eps}
807: \caption{
808: Galaxy velocities relative to the mean velocity, as a function of radius. The galaxy marked with an ``x'' (ID \# 5 at $z=1.315$ in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}) is more likely to a near-field object than a member of the cluster and was not used in the computation of the mean redshift or velocity dispersion.
809: \label{fig:vd}
810: }
811: \end{figure}
812:
813: \clearpage
814:
815: \begin{figure}
816: \epsscale{1.0}
817: \plotone{f6.eps}
818: \caption{
819: \zprime-[3.6] versus [3.6] color-magnitude diagram for SpARCS J003550-431224.
820: The black circles are all the galaxies contained within a circle of radius 550 kpc ($65\asec$)
821: at the cluster redshift.
822: The red diamonds show the ten spectroscopically confirmed cluster members. The blue
823: diamonds show the two (of the five) confirmed foreground/background galaxies which fall within the 550 kpc radius.
824: %(ID's ? and ? in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}).
825: The dotted line indicates the nominal red-sequence color for this cluster ($\zprime-[3.6]=5.4$).
826: %, which is surprisingly ``red'' for a cluster
827: %at $z=1.34$.
828: See \S~\ref{sec:disc} for a discussion.
829: \label{fig:colmag}
830: }
831: \end{figure}
832:
833: \clearpage
834:
835:
836:
837: \begin{deluxetable}{rccrrr}
838: \tablewidth{0pt}
839: \tablecaption{The SpARCS Fields. \label{tab:fields}}
840: \tablewidth{0pt}
841: %\tablehead{\colhead{Field} & \colhead{RA(J2000)} & \colhead{DEC(J2000)} & \colhead{IRAC Area(deg$^{2}$)} & \colhead{SpARCS Area(deg$^{2}$)} & \colhead{Effective Area(deg$^{2}$)} \
842: \tablehead{\colhead{Field} & \colhead{R.A.} & \colhead{Decl.} & \colhead{SWIRE $3.6\micron$} & \colhead{SpARCS $\zprime$} & \colhead{Usable} \
843: \\
844: \colhead{} & \colhead{J2000 (Deg.)} & \colhead{J2000 (Deg.)} & \colhead{Area(deg$^{2}$)} & \colhead{Area(deg$^{2}$)} & \colhead{Area(deg$^{2}$)} \
845: }
846: \startdata
847: \\
848: ELAIS-S1 & 00:38:30 & -44:00:00 & 7.1 & 8.3 & 6.5 \
849: \\
850: XMM-LSS & 02:21:20 & -04:30:00 & 9.4 & 11.7 & 7.3 \
851: \\
852: Chandra-S & 03:32:00 & -28:16:00 & 8.1 & 7.9 & 7.1 \
853: \\
854: Lockman & 10:45:00 & +58:00:00 & 11.6 & 12.9 & 9.7 \
855: \\
856: ELAIS-N1 & 16:11:00 & +55:00:00 & 9.8 & 10.3 & 7.9 \
857: \\
858: ELAIS-N2 & 16:36:48 & +41:01:45 & 4.4 & 4.3 & 3.4 \
859: \\
860: \hline
861: \\
862: Total & & & 50.4 & 55.4 & 41.9 \
863: \\
864: \enddata
865: \end{deluxetable}
866:
867: \clearpage
868:
869: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
870: %\LongTables
871: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
872: \scriptsize
873: \tablecolumns{5}
874: \tablecaption{Spectroscopic Redshifts in the Field of SpARCSJ0035.7-4312 \label{tab:spectra}}
875: \tablewidth{2.0in}
876: \tablehead{\colhead{ID} & \colhead{R.A.} & \colhead{Decl.} & \colhead{z$^{\prime}$} & \colhead{$z$} \
877: \\
878: \colhead{} & \colhead{J2000 (Deg.)} & \colhead{J2000 (Deg.)} &\colhead{Mag Vega} & \colhead{} \
879: }
880: \startdata
881: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Members}\
882: \\
883: \hline
884: 3 & 0.597095 & -43.20612 & 21.59 & 1.329 \
885: \\
886: 4 & 0.596806 & -43.20263 & 22.62 & 1.337 \
887: \\
888: 5 & 0.598068 & -43.19822 & 22.19 & 1.315 \
889: \\
890: 6 & 0.596565 & -43.19285 & 22.70 & 1.339 \
891: \\
892: 1001 & 0.596076 & -43.21811 & 22.22 & 1.327 \
893: \\
894: 1002 & 0.596473 & -43.21479 & 23.69 & 1.329 \
895: \\
896: 1009 & 0.597075 & -43.20102 & 22.78 & 1.324 \
897: \\
898: 1010 & 0.597606 & -43.20000 & 22.28 & 1.347 \
899: \\
900: 1012 & 0.596664 & -43.19551 & 22.98 & 1.344 \
901: \\
902: 3002 & 0.597252 & -43.21589 & 21.81 & 1.340 \
903: \\
904: \hline
905: %\\
906: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Foreground/Background} \
907: \\
908: \hline
909: 1 & 0.599490 & -43.20939 & 22.33 & 1.100 \
910: \\
911: 1007 & 0.598371 & -43.20495 & 22.84 & 1.394 \
912: \\
913: 2010 & 0.599674 & -43.21098 & 22.98 & 1.104 \
914: \\
915: 3003 & 0.598673 & -43.21307 & 21.62 & 1.550 \
916: \\
917: 4001 & 0.596434 & -43.19699 & 22.68 & 1.581 \
918: \\
919: \enddata
920: %\tablecomments{(3) Photometric redshift estimated from red sequence
921: \end{deluxetable}
922:
923: \end{document}
924:
925:
926:
927:
928:
929:
930:
931: