1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \textwidth 165 truemm
5: %\textheight 240 truemm
6: \textheight 235 truemm
7: \tolerance 500
8: \voffset = -1.0truecm %% сдвинут вниз
9: \hoffset = -1.0truecm %% результат сдвинут в право
10:
11: \def\leaderfill{\leaders\hbox to 1em{\hss.\hss}\hfill} %% точка-проводник
12: \def\bull{\vrule height .9ex width .8ex depth -.1ex} %% квадрат
13: \def\bul{\vrule height .4ex width .4ex depth -.1ex} %% квадрат
14:
15: \sloppy
16:
17: \begin{document}
18:
19: \noindent {\footnotesize\it ISSN 1063-7737,
20: Astronomy Letters, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 515--528.
21: \copyright Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2008.
22: \noindent Original Russian Text
23: \copyright V.V. Bobylev, A.T. Bajkova, A.S. Stepanishchev, 2008,
24: published in Pis'ma v Astronomicheski$\check{\imath}$ Zhurnal,
25: 2008, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 570--584.}
26:
27: \noindent
28: \begin{tabular}{llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll}
29: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
30: \hline \hline
31: \end{tabular}
32:
33: \vskip 1.5cm
34:
35:
36: \centerline {\large\bf Galactic Rotation Curve and the Effect of Density Waves}
37: \centerline {\large\bf from Data on Young Objects}
38: \bigskip
39: \centerline {V.V. Bobylev, A.T. Bajkova, and A.S. Stepanishchev,}
40: \bigskip
41: \centerline {\small\it
42: Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of RAS, St-Petersburg}
43: \bigskip
44:
45: {\bf Abstract--}Based on currently available data on the
46: three-dimensional field of space velocities of young ($\leq$50
47: Myr) open star clusters and the radial velocities of HI clouds and
48: star-forming (HII) regions, we have found the Galactic rotation
49: curve in the range of Galactocentric distances 3 kpc $<R<12$ kpc
50: using the first six terms of the Taylor expansion of the angular
51: velocity of Galactic rotation in Bottlinger's equations. The
52: Taylor terms found at the Galactocentric distance of the Sun
53: $R_0=7.5$~kpc are:
54: $\omega_0= -27.7\pm0.6$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
55: $\omega_0^1= 4.13\pm0.07$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$,
56: $\omega_0^2= -0.912\pm0.065$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$,
57: $\omega_0^3= 0.277\pm0.036$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-4}$,
58: $\omega_0^4= -0.265\pm0.034$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-5}$,
59: $\omega_0^5= 0.104\pm0.020$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-6}$.
60: In this case, the Oort
61: constants are
62: $A= 15.5\pm0.3$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ and
63: $B=-12.2\pm0.7$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$.
64: We have established that the centroid of the sample moves relative
65: to the local standard of rest along the Galactic $Y$ axis with a
66: velocity of $-6.2\pm0.8$ km s$^{-1}$. A Fourier spectral analysis
67: of the velocity residuals from the derived rotation curve
68: attributable to density waves reveals three dominant peaks with
69: wavelengths of 2.5, 1.4, and 0.9 kpc and amplitudes of 4.7, 2.6,
70: and 3.6 km s$^{-1}$, respectively. These have allowed us to
71: estimate the distances between the density wave peaks, 1.9, 2.4,
72: and 3.2 kpc as R increases, in agreement with the description of
73: the density weave as a logarithmic spiral. The amplitude of the
74: density wave perturbations is largest in the inner part of the
75: Galaxy, $\approx9$ km s$^{-1}$, and decreases to $\approx1$ km
76: s$^{-1}$ in its outer part. A spectral analysis of the radial
77: velocities of young open star clusters has confirmed the presence
78: of periodic perturbations with an amplitude of $5.9\pm1.1$ km
79: s$^{-1}$ and a wavelength $\lambda=1.7\pm0.5$ kpc. It shows that
80: the phase of the Sun in the density wave is close to $-\pi/2$ and
81: the Sun is located in the interarm space near the outer edge of
82: the Carina-Sagittarius arm.
83:
84:
85: \section*{INTRODUCTION}
86:
87: Constructing the Galactic rotation curve is of great importance in
88: solving a number of problems, such as estimating the mass of the
89: Galaxy, determining the distribution of matter, estimating the
90: hidden mass, studying the dynamics of the Galaxy and its
91: subsystems, etc. The shape of the rotation curve in the outer
92: Galaxy is of particular interest. Xue et al. (2008) showed that
93: the circular rotation velocity is close to 200 km s$^{-1}$ far
94: from the Galactic center, being 175 km s$^{-1}$ at a distance of
95: 60 kpc.
96:
97: The following data on various objects in the Galactic disk are
98: used to determine the Galactic rotation parameters: HI and HII
99: radial velocities (Burton 1971; Clemens 1985; Fich et al. 1989;
100: Brand and Blitz 1993; Nikiforov 1999; Russeil 2003; Avedisova
101: 2005), data on open star clusters (OSCs) and associations,
102: Cepheids and other young stars (Mishurov and Zenina 1999;
103: Rastorguev et al. 1999; Dambis et al. 2001; Zabolotskikh et al.
104: 2002; Dias and L\'epine 2005).
105:
106: The most comprehensive information about the pattern of Galactic
107: rotation in the inner region can be obtained using the radial
108: velocities of hydrogen clouds extracted from 21-cm or CO radio
109: observations.
110:
111: Once the theory of spiral density waves has been developed (Lin
112: and Shu 1964; Lin et al. 1969), it turned out that the small
113: deviations of the circular velocities of hydrogen clouds from the
114: smooth rotation curve constructed from radial velocities could be
115: successfully interpreted in terms of the density wave theory
116: (Burton 1971; Burton and Gordon 1978; Clemens 1985). However, the
117: hydrogen radial velocity data are insufficient to trace the
118: kinematic effect of the spiral pattern in the outer Galaxy.
119: (Indeed, since the tangential point method is inapplicable, the
120: hydrogen data have large errors.) Therefore, other data, for
121: example, those on OSCs, should be invoked additionally.
122:
123: When only the radial velocities are analyzed, the following two
124: quantities serve as model ones for constructing the Galactic
125: rotation curve: the Galactocentric distance of the Sun $R_0$ and
126: the linear circular velocity of the Sun $V_0$ (Brand and Blitz
127: 1993; Russeil 2003; Avedisova 2005). Including OSCs for which
128: reliable estimates of their proper motions are available allows us
129: either to reduce the number of model quantities to one ($R_0$),
130: because in this case the angular velocity of solar rotation
131: $\omega_0$ can be determined from observations (Rastorguev et al.
132: 1999; Zabolotskikh et al. 2002), or to determine both $R_0$ and
133: $V_0$ directly from observational data (Bobylev et al. 2007).
134:
135: The goal of this paper is to solve two problems: (1) constructing
136: a smooth rotation curve from young objects in the Galactic disk
137: and (2) analyzing the high-frequency periodic circular velocity
138: residuals of the objects used from the derived rotation curve
139: attributable to the effect of spiral density waves.
140:
141: To solve the first problem, the $R$ range is usually broken down
142: into several segments: the central ($R<0.8-1.5R_0$), inner
143: ($\approx1.5R_0<R<R_0$), and outer ($R>R_0$) regions of the
144: Galaxy, as was done by Burton (1971) and Clemens (1985). This
145: approach is used mainly because there is a segment of solid-body
146: rotation in the inner Galaxy that passes into a fairly flat curve
147: further out. Therefore, the entire $R$ range is difficult to
148: describe by a smooth curve. In addition, there are significant
149: radial motions of gas at $R<3$ kpc (Bania 1977; Liszt and Burton
150: 1980). Several authors suggested their smoothed rotation curves
151: for each of these regions (Burton and Gordon 1978; Clemens 1985).
152: However, it is not always convenient to use a rotation curve
153: defined by different expressions in different $R$ segments. It is
154: much more convenient to have one analytical expression for the
155: rotation curve in the entire range.
156:
157: Here, we restrict our analysis to the range of distances
158: $R>2.5$~kpc. Zabolotskikh et al. (2002) found a smoothed Galactic
159: rotation curve in a wide range of distances $R$ without dividing
160: it into segments, but this rotation curve was given in tabular
161: form, which complicates its use. Our objective is to determine the
162: Galactic rotation curve in a wide range of distances, $R>2.5$~kpc,
163: in analytical form.
164:
165: We use a Fourier spectral analysis to analyze the velocity
166: residuals of the objects from the derived rotation curve produced
167: by a spiral density wave.
168:
169: Apart from the radial velocities of hydrogen clouds, we invoke
170: data on star-forming regions (Russeil 2003) and new data on young
171: OSCs (Kharchenko et al. 2007). To determine the projections of the
172: OSC circular velocities, we use their total space velocities.
173:
174: \section*{DATA}
175: \subsection*{The Working Data Set}
176:
177: We took the radial velocities of HI clouds obtained by the
178: tangential point method from Fich et al. (1989), where the 21-cm
179: hydrogen radio observations described in Burton and Gordon (1978)
180: are presented in tabular form. We also used the CO radio
181: observations by the tangential point method from Clemens (1985).
182:
183: We took the data on star-forming (H II) regions mainly from the
184: catalog by Russeil (2003), which contains the radial velocities
185: and photometric distances for 204 regions. In this paper, we use
186: only 89 HII regions selected according to the following criteria:
187:
188: (i) the relative random errors in the distances to the objects do
189: not exceed $20\%$;
190:
191: (ii) the regions are located outside the zone with the Galactic
192: center--anticenter direction $|l|<12^\circ$, where the chance of
193: estimating the radial velocities is reduced sharply (Russeil
194: 2003);
195:
196: (iii) the regions have Galactocentric distances of more than 5 kpc
197: (closer regions are rejected because of the large velocity
198: dispersion).
199:
200: For the HII region Sharpless 294, we use a new estimate of its
201: photometric distance, $r=4.8\pm0.2$ kpc, from Samal et al. (2007).
202: For the star-forming region W3OH, we use a new estimate of its
203: distance, $r=1.95\pm0.04$ kpc, from Xu et al. (2006) obtained from
204: the trigonometric parallax ($0.512\pm0.010$ mas) measured using
205: the VLBA. For the HII region Sharpless 269, we use the results of
206: high-precision radio interferometry (Honma et al. 2007): the
207: trigonometric parallax $0.189\pm0.008$ mas ($r=5.28\pm0.23$ kpc),
208: the radial velocity $V_{LSR}=19.6$ km s$^{-1}$, and the proper
209: motion components
210: $(\mu_\alpha \cos\delta, \mu_\delta)_{J2000} =(-0.422\pm0.010,-0.121\pm0.042)$ mas
211: determined relative to an extragalactic source. Thus, these data
212: allow the space velocities of the region Sharpless 269 to be
213: determined.
214:
215: For OSCs, we use the coordinates, proper motions, radial
216: velocities, and age estimates from the compilation by Bobylev et
217: al. (2007), which is based on the catalog by Piskunov et al.
218: (2006). We took new radial velocities for a number of OSCs from
219: the CRVOCA catalog (Kharchenko et al. 2007). In this paper, we
220: consider only the OSCs whose ages do not exceed 50 Myr and for
221: which the space velocities can be determined. We took the data for
222: two young clusters, Cr 272 and Tr 28, which are missing from the
223: CRVOCA catalog, from the catalog by Dias et al. (2002).
224:
225:
226: \subsection*{Heliocentric Radial Velocities}
227:
228: We will work with the radial velocity estimates for the objects
229: given in the heliocentric frame of reference. Different authors
230: give their radial velocity estimates relative to the local
231: standard of rest using differing parameters --- $(U, V, W)_{LSR}$.
232:
233: We reduce ~~the hydrogen~~ radial velocities from Burton and
234: Gordon (1978) and Clemens (1985) to the heliocentric frame of
235: reference using the velocities $(U, V, W)_{LSR} = (10.3, 15.3,
236: 7.7) $ km s$^{-1}$. We calculated these values based on the
237: following parameters of the standard solar motion:
238: $(\alpha, \delta)_{1900}=(270^\circ, +30^\circ)$ and
239: $V= 20$ km s$^{-1}$ (Burton and Gordon 1978).
240:
241: We reduce the radial velocities of the star-forming regions to the
242: heliocentric frame of references using the velocities
243: $(U,V,W)_{LSR} = (10.4,14.8,7.3)$ km s$^{-1}$ from Russeil (2003).
244:
245: We reduce the radial velocities of the HII region Sharpless 269 to
246: the heliocentric frame of reference using the velocities
247: $(U,V,W)_{LSR} = (10.0,15.4,7.8)$ km s$^{-1}$ from Honma et al.
248: (2007).
249:
250: All proper motions of the objects are given for the epoch J2000.0,
251: i.e., they are homogeneous. Therefore, no problem with their
252: reduction to a single frame of reference arises.
253:
254:
255: \section*{METHODS}
256:
257: In this paper, we use a rectangular Galactic coordinate system
258: with the axes directed away from the observer toward the Galactic
259: center $(l=0^\circ, b=0^\circ$, the $X$ axis), along the Galactic
260: rotation ($l=90^\circ, b=0^\circ$, the $Y$ axis), and toward the
261: North Galactic Pole ($b=90^\circ$, the $Z$ axis).
262:
263:
264: \subsection*{Determining the Rotation-Curve Parameters}
265:
266: The method used here is based on Bottlinger's well-known formulas
267: (Ogorodnikov 1958) with the angular velocity of Galactic rotation
268: expanded in a series to terms of the sixth order of smallness in
269: $r/R_0$:
270: $$
271: \displaylines{\hfill
272: V_r=-u_\odot\cos b\cos l -
273: \hfill\llap(1)\cr\hfill
274: -v_\odot\cos b\sin l
275: -w_\odot\sin b-
276: \hfill\cr\hfill
277: -R_0\sin l \cos b[ (R-R_0) \omega^1_0/1!+
278: \hfill\cr\hfill
279: +...+(R-R_0)^5 \omega^5_0/5!],
280: \hfill\cr\hfill
281: %%
282: V_l= u_\odot\sin l - v_\odot\cos l -
283: \hfill\llap(2)\cr\hfill
284: -(R_0\cos l - r\cos b) [(R-R_0)\omega^1_0/1!+
285: \hfill\cr\hfill
286: +...+(R-R_0)^5 \omega^5_0/5!]+
287: \hfill\cr\hfill
288: + r \omega_0 \cos b,\hfill\cr\hfill
289: %%
290: V_b=u_\odot\cos l \sin b +
291: \hfill\llap(3)\cr\hfill
292: +v_\odot\sin l \sin b
293: -w_\odot\cos b +
294: \hfill\cr\hfill
295: +R_0\sin l \sin b[(R-R_0)\omega^1_0/1!+
296: \hfill\cr\hfill
297: +...+(R-R_0)^5\omega^5_0/5!],
298: \hfill
299: }
300: $$
301: where $V_r$ is the radial velocity; $V_l = 4.74r\mu_l \cos b$ and
302: $V_b = 4.74r\mu_b$ are the proper motion velocity components in
303: the $l$ and $b$ directions, respectively (the coefficient 4.74 is
304: the quotient of the number of kilometers in the astronomical unit
305: by the number of seconds in the tropical year); $r$ is the
306: heliocentric distance of the object; the proper motion components
307: $\mu_l \cos b$ and $\mu_b$ are in mas yr$^{-1}$, the radial
308: velocity $V_r$ is in km s$^{-1}$; $u_\odot,v_\odot,w_\odot$ are
309: the solar velocity components relative to the centroid under
310: consideration; $R_0$ is the Galactocentric distance of the Sun,
311: which we take to be $R_0=7.5$ kpc (Bobylev et al. 2007); $R$ is
312: the Galactocentric distance of the object; $R$, $R_0$, and $r$ are
313: in kpc. The quantity $\omega_0$ is the angular velocity of
314: rotation at the distance $R_0$, the parameters
315: $\omega^1_0, ..., \omega^5_0$ are the derivatives of the angular velocity from the
316: first to the fifth order, respectively. The distance $R$ can be
317: calculated using the expression
318: $$
319: \displaylines{\hfill
320: R^2=r^2\cos^2 b-2R_0 r\cos b\cos l+R^2_0.\hfill\llap(4)
321: }
322: $$
323: Note also that Eqs. (1)--(3) are written in such a way that the
324: direction of rotation from the $X$ axis to the $Y$ axis is
325: positive. The system of conditional equations (1)--(3) contains
326: nine unknowns: $u_\odot$,$v_\odot$,$w_\odot$,
327: $\omega_0,\omega^1_0,\omega^2_0$,
328: $\omega^3_0,\omega^4_0,\omega^5_0$,
329: which can be determined by the least-squares method. Equations
330: (1)--(3) can be easily generalized to determine any necessary
331: number of terms of the series in the expansion of the angular
332: velocity of rotation $\omega^n_0$. The system of equations
333: (1)--(3) is solved with weights of the form
334: $$
335: \displaylines{\hfill
336: P_{(r, l, b)}=S_0/\sqrt{S_0^2+\sigma^2_{V_{r, l, b} }},\hfill
337: }
338: $$
339: where $P_r$ is the weight of the equation for the radial velocity,
340: $P_l$ and $P_b$ are the corresponding weights for the components
341: $V_l$ and $V_b$, and $S_0$ denotes the dispersion averaged over
342: all observations, which has the meaning of the ``cosmic''
343: dispersion that we take to be 8 km s$^{-1}$. The errors
344: $\sigma_{V_l}$ and $\sigma_{V_b}$ in the velocities $V_l$ and
345: $V_b$ can be calculated using the formulas
346: $$
347: \displaylines{\hfill
348: \sigma_{(V_l, V_b)} = 4.74 r
349: \sqrt{\mu^2_{l, b}\Biggl({\sigma_r\over r}\Biggr)^2+\sigma^2_{\mu_{l, b}}},\hfill %%\llap(10)
350: }
351: $$
352: where $\sigma_\pi/\pi$ is taken to be 0.2, a typical error in the
353: photometric distance for OSCs.
354:
355:
356: \subsection*{Determining the Projections $V_{rot}$ and $V_{rad}$}
357:
358: When only the radial velocity is available for an object, we
359: calculate the projection of the circular rotation velocity
360: $V_{rot}$ from the well-known formula (Burton 1971)
361: $$
362: \displaylines{\hfill
363: V_{rot}=|R\omega_0|+RV_r/(R_0\sin l\cos b).\hfill\llap(5)
364: }
365: $$
366: For OSCs, we have the rectangular coordinates $X,Y,Z$ and
367: calculate the components of the observed space velocities $U$ and
368: $V$ from the projections $V_r,Vl,$ and $V_b$ (Kulikovskii 1985).
369: Using these components, we find two projections, $V_{rad}$
370: directed radially away from the Galactic center and $V_{rot}$
371: orthogonal to it, from the relations
372: $$
373: \displaylines{\hfill
374: V_{rot}= U\sin \theta+(V_0+V)\cos \theta, \hfill\llap(6)\cr\hfill
375: V_{rad}=-U\cos \theta+(V_0+V)\sin \theta, \hfill\llap(7)
376: }
377: $$
378: where $V_0=|R_0\omega_0|$ and the position angle $\theta$ is
379: defined as $\tan\theta=Y/(R_0-X)$. We assume that the velocities
380: $U$ and $V$ are free from the solar velocity relative to the
381: centroid $V_\odot(u_\odot,v_\odot,w_\odot)$ derived above from
382: Eqs. (1)--(3). The errors in the projections $V_{rad}$ and
383: $V_{rot}$ can be estimated from the relations
384: $$
385: \displaylines{\hfill
386: \sigma^2(V_{rot})= \sigma^2_U\sin^2 \theta+\sigma^2_V\cos^2 \theta, \hfill\cr\hfill
387: \sigma^2(V_{rad})= \sigma^2_U\cos^2 \theta+\sigma^2_V\sin^2 \theta, \hfill
388: }
389: $$
390: where the errors in the space velocities $U$ and $V$ are denoted
391: by $\sigma_U$ and $\sigma_V$.
392:
393:
394: \subsection*{Analysis of the Residual Velocities}
395:
396: At the next step, we consider the rotation velocities $\Delta V$
397: that are the residual ones with respect to the Galactic rotation
398: curve found at the first step.
399:
400: A spectral analysis consists in applying the direct Fourier
401: transform to the sequence of residual velocities in the following
402: way:
403: $$
404: \displaylines{\hfill
405: \overline{\Delta V}(\lambda_k)=
406: \frac{1}{M}\sum_i^M \Delta
407: V^i\exp\biggl(-j\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_k} R_i \biggr),\hfill\llap(8)
408: }
409: $$
410: where $\overline{\Delta V}(\lambda_k)$ is the value of harmonic
411: $k$ of the Fourier transform, $M$ is the number of measurements of
412: the residual velocities $\Delta V^i$ with coordinates $R_i$,
413: $i=1,2,...,M$, and $\lambda_k$ is the wavelength in kpc; the latter is equal
414: to $D/k$, where $D$ is the period of the original sequence in kpc.
415:
416: \subsection*{Constraints}
417:
418: The constraints listed below reduce significantly the error of a
419: unit weight when the system of equations (1)--(3) is solved by the
420: least-squares method.
421:
422: For HII regions: (i) the error in the distance is no more than
423: 20\%; (ii) $R>5$ kpc; (iii) location outside the zone with the
424: Galactic center.anticenter direction $|l|<12^\circ$.
425:
426: For OSCs:
427: (i) the age is younger than 50 Myr;
428: (ii) the error in the modulus of the space velocity is
429: $\sqrt{\sigma^2_{R_V}+\sigma^2_{V_l}+\sigma^2_{V_b}}<15$ km s$^{-1}$;
430: (iii) $V_{pec}=\sqrt{U^2+V^2+W^2}<100$ km s$^{-1}$. In
431: particular, we also use condition (i), because the negative
432: K-effect, i.e., the effect of radial motions (Bobylev et al.
433: 2007), for young OSCs is less pronounced than that for older ones.
434:
435: For neutral hydrogen (HI): (i) $R>2.4$ kpc; (ii) several radial
436: velocities from Burton and Gordon (1978) are not used; these data
437: are marked by the circles in Figs. 3a and 4. At the same time,
438: when analyzing the residual velocities, we rejected only two
439: points close to the Sun. Condition (i) is used, because a
440: transition to the zone of solid-body rotation is observed on the
441: rotation curve at $R\approx2.4$ kpc (Burton 1971; Clemens 1985).
442:
443: The system of conditional equations (1)--(3) is solved twice with
444: an analysis of the residuals using the $3\sigma$ criterion (we
445: clearly see from Fig. 4 that the points rejected by this criterion
446: have large residuals).
447:
448:
449:
450: \section*{RESULTS}
451:
452: At a fixed Galactocentric distance of the Sun ($R_0=7.5$ kpc), by
453: solving the system of 777 equations, we found the parameters of
454: the solar velocity relative to the centroid,
455: $(u_\odot,v_\odot,w_\odot) = (8.41,11.41,8.01)\pm(0.49,0.50,0.64)$
456: km s$^{-1}$, and the parameters of the angular velocity of
457: Galactic rotation,
458: $$
459: \displaylines{\hfill
460: ~\omega_0= -27.67\pm 0.61~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$},\hfill\llap(9)\cr\hfill
461: \omega^1_0= +4.132\pm0.072~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$},~\hfill\cr\hfill
462: \omega^2_0= -0.912\pm0.065~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$},~\hfill\cr\hfill
463: \omega^3_0= +0.277\pm0.036~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-4}$},~\hfill\cr\hfill
464: \omega^4_0= -0.265\pm0.034~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-5}$},~\hfill\cr\hfill
465: \omega^5_0= +0.104\pm0.020~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-6}$}.~\hfill
466: }
467: $$
468: As a result, taking into account all constraints, we used the data
469: for 140 young OSCs (including S269) with a mean age of 18 Myr, 89
470: radial velocities of the HII regions (Russeil 2003), 135 radial
471: velocities for the tangential points (CO) from Clemens (1985), and
472: 133 radial velocities for the tangential points (H I) from Burton
473: and Gordon (1978). The error of a unit weight is $\sigma_0=8.0$ km
474: s$^{-1}$.
475:
476: As a result, the Oort constants
477: $A=0.5R_0\omega^1_0$,
478: $B=\omega_0+0.5R_0\omega^1_0$,
479: are
480: $A= 15.50\pm0.27$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ and
481: $B=-12.17\pm0.67$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$.
482:
483: Based on parameters (9), we estimated the circular rotation
484: velocity of the solar neighborhood to be
485: $V_0=|R_0\omega_0|=208\pm5$ km s$^{-1}$ and the period of its
486: revolution around the Galactic center to be
487: $T=2\pi/(\gamma~\omega_0)=221$~Myr, where the coefficient
488: $\gamma=1.023\times10^{-9}$ [km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$]/[rad yr$^{-1}$] (Murray 1986).
489:
490: Figure 1 shows the coordinates of the objects being analyzed in
491: projection onto the Galactic $XY$ plane.
492:
493: Figure 2 shows the Galactic rotation curve constructed from
494: parameters (9); the OSC circular velocity projections were
495: calculated only from radial velocities using Eq. (5). As can be
496: seen from Eq. (5), the division by $\sin l$ is made in the second
497: term. Hence, the projections of the objects with $l$ close to zero
498: have large deviations and large errors. In Fig. 2, the open
499: squares mark 17 OSCs with $|l|<12^\circ$. Therefore, Eq. (5) is
500: not used to analyze the OSC velocities.
501:
502: Figures 3a and 3b show the OSC circular velocity projections
503: calculated using Eq. (6). The thick solid line in these figures
504: indicates the derived rotation curve. Figures 3a and 3b differ by
505: the age of the OSCs used, whose velocities are denoted by the
506: circles. Figure 3a pertains to young OSCs (younger than 50 Myr),
507: while Fig. 3b pertains to old OSCs (older than 50 Myr). We see
508: from the figure that the velocities of both young and old OSCs
509: fall nicely on the derived Galactic rotation curve; in contrast to
510: the old OSCs, the young OSCs exhibit a distinct high-frequency
511: component related to the effect of density waves. The dotted line
512: in Fig. 3a indicates the Galactic rotation curve from Zabolotskikh
513: et al. (2002), which was found using seven terms in the expansion
514: of the angular velocity. From the figure, we see good agreement
515: between the two rotation curves for $R>3.5$~kpc.
516:
517:
518: We solved Eqs. (1)--(3) using various numbers of terms in the
519: expansion of $\omega_0$. A direct construction of the rotation
520: curves shows that adding each succeeding term extends
521: significantly the boundaries of the confidence interval. However,
522: it can be said with confidence that three expansion terms are
523: clearly not enough to construct the Galactic rotation curve in the
524: range of distances 3 kpc$<R<12$ kpc (Bobylev et al. 2007), while
525: seven terms are too many. For example, when the seventh term is
526: added to Eqs. (1)--(3), terms that do not differ significantly
527: from zero appear:
528: $\omega^3_0= +0.107\pm0.086$~km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-4}$ and
529: $\omega^6_0= -0.076\pm0.035$~km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-7}$, with the shape of the curve
530: remaining virtually unchanged. In this sense, we found an optimal
531: solution.
532:
533: We can see from our comparison of the OSC circular velocities in
534: Figs. 2 and 3a that the projections calculated using Eq. (6) have
535: a smaller residual velocity dispersion with respect to the derived
536: rotation curve.
537:
538: The dotted line in Fig. 3b denotes the rotation curve as derived
539: by Dias and L\'epine (2005) for $R_0=7.5$~kpc; we added a constant
540: term of 18 km s$^{-1}$ to $V_0=190$ km s$^{-1}$ to reconcile it
541: with our data at $R=R_0(V_0=208$ km s$^{-1}$).
542:
543: Figure 4 shows the angular velocity of Galactic rotation
544: determined using parameters (9). The circles mark the HI data
545: points rejected by the $3\sigma$ criterion when seeking for the
546: rotation curve. Note, however, that these points were not rejected
547: at the second step during our spectral analysis of the
548: high-frequency deviations. Based on Fig. 4, we choose the range of
549: distances 3 kpc $<R<12$ kpc as the most significant one.
550:
551:
552:
553: The $R$ distribution of the residual velocities obtained by
554: subtracting the derived Galactic rotation curve from the original
555: distribution of circular velocities is shown in Fig. 5. This
556: distribution corresponds to the case where no OSCs are used, i.e.,
557: here we essentially repeated the analysis by Clemens (1985). The
558: result obtained is discussed in the next section. Figure 5b
559: corresponds to the entire set of objects under consideration. The
560: residual velocity dispersion is 8.8 km s$^{-1}$. The maximum
561: residual velocity is 45 km s$^{-1}$. As we see from the figure, a
562: periodic structure of the velocity distribution attributable to
563: the effect of Galactic spiral density waves is traceable.
564: Therefore, it is quite natural to use a spectral analysis to
565: investigate the residual velocities in an effort to obtain
566: quantitative characteristics.
567:
568: We can see from our comparison of Figs. 5a and 5b that the fitting
569: residual velocity curve in Fig. 5b has more distinct peaks; the
570: similarity of the two periods in the inner Galaxy is better seen
571: in this curve than in the curve of Fig. 5a.
572:
573: Figure 6 shows the power spectra of the residual velocities as a
574: function of the natural logarithm of the wavelength-to-$R_0$ ratio
575: ($\ln \lambda/R_0$). Figure 6a pertains to the residual velocities
576: $\Delta V_{I}$ obtained by subtracting $V_{rot}-V_0$ (where we
577: found the velocity $V_0=208$ km s$^{-1}$ above), representing the
578: deviation from a flat rotation curve, while Fig. 6b pertains to
579: the residual velocities $\Delta V_{II}$ obtained by subtracting
580: the derived Galactic rotation curve from the original distribution
581: of $V_{rot}$ (Fig. 5b).
582:
583: The power spectra are fairly wide, but we give them only up to
584: $\ln \lambda/R_0=-3.5$. The amplitude of the spectrum decreases
585: rapidly with increasing frequency (decreasing wavelength).
586:
587:
588: We can see from our comparison of Figs. 6a and 6b that taking into
589: account the derived Galactic rotation curve with parameters (9)
590: allows us to get rid of the low-frequency spectral component
591: almost completely.
592:
593: Three~~ dominant~~ peaks with wavelengths of 2.5, 1.4, and 0.9 kpc
594: ($\ln \lambda/R_0\approx-1.2, -1.8, -2.2$) and amplitudes of 4.7,
595: 2.6, and 3.6 km s$^{-1}$, respectively, can be distinguished in
596: the power spectrum of the residual velocities shown in Fig. 6b.
597: The thick line in Fig. 5b indicates the fitting curve of the
598: residuals constructed using the frequencies of the spectrum in
599: Fig. 6b for $\ln \lambda/R_0>-2.5$. In contrast to the approach by
600: Clemens (1985), who estimated the perturbation wavelength and
601: amplitude only from one dominant peak in the residual power
602: spectrum, we construct the fitting curve in a wider frequency
603: range. As a result, we obtain a complex periodic curve that
604: represents satisfactorily the residuals.
605:
606: Four main peaks with the following characteristics can be
607: distinguished in Fig. 5b:
608:
609: (1) $R_1=3.9$ kpc, $\Delta V_1= 8.2$ km s$^{-1}$;
610:
611: (2) $R_2=5.8$ kpc, $\Delta V_2= 9.2$ km s$^{-1}$;
612:
613: (3) $R_3=8.2$ kpc, $\Delta V_3= 1.0$ km s$^{-1}$;
614:
615: (4) $R_4=11.4$ kpc, $\Delta V_4=1.8$ km s$^{-1}$.
616:
617: The distance differences between the peaks are
618: $\Delta R_{21}=1.9$ kpc,
619: $\Delta R_{32}=2.4$ kpc and
620: $\Delta R_{43}=3.2$ kpc. As can be seen from Fig. 5b, the fourth
621: peak is revealed with the lowest confidence. In general, Fig. 5b
622: gives only a qualitative picture of the effect of spiral density
623: waves. This is because the line of sight passes through different
624: sections of the spiral arms and, hence, the resulting velocity
625: distribution is ``smeared''. Nevertheless, we can suggest the
626: following identification with known spiral arms:
627: peak 1 --- the Scutum-Crux arm;
628: peak 2 --- the Carina-Sagittarius arm;
629: peak 3 --- the Perseus arm;
630: peak 4 --- the Norma-Cygnus arm. In general, the
631: locations of the first three peaks agree well with the two-arm
632: model by Yuan (1969). Comparison with Figs. 4 and 5 from Russeil
633: (2003) shows that this identification agrees satisfactorily with
634: both three-arm and four-arm models of the spiral pattern (see also
635: Fig. 2 from Vall\'ee (2002)). However, for the best agreement with
636: models, for example, the model by Russeil (2003), we must assume
637: that the peak with $R=2.9$~kpc and $\Delta V = 1.9$ km s$^{-1}$ is
638: significant in our Fig. 5b. In this case, it will be either the
639: beginning of the Perseus arm for the three-arm model or the
640: beginning of the Norma-Cygnus arm for the four-arm model.
641:
642: Figure 7 shows the residual radial velocities of young OSCs as a
643: function of the Galactocentric distance calculated using Eq. (7).
644: The power spectrum of the residual radial velocities for young
645: OSCs obtained using Eq. (8), where the radial velocities are
646: considered as $\Delta V$, is shown in Fig. 8. The curve of
647: residuals shown in Fig. 7 has a wavelength $\lambda=1.7$~kpc and
648: an amplitude of 5.9 km s$^{-1}$; the linear displacement along the
649: vertical axis is $-1.6$ km s$^{-1}$. We clearly see from our
650: comparison of Figs. 6b and 8 that, in contrast to the circular
651: residual velocities, the power spectrum of the residual radial
652: velocities of young OSCs for wavelengths $\ln \lambda/R_0>-2.5$ is
653: simpler: in fact, there is only one distinct and symmetric peak
654: near $\ln\lambda/R_0\approx-1.7$. Therefore, the derived curve of
655: residuals is nearly sinusoidal in the range $R=6.9$~kpc.
656:
657: When the circular velocities are analyzed, the error in $\lambda$
658: is $\pm0.3$ kpc and the error in the perturbation velocity
659: amplitude is $\pm0.5$ km s$^{-1}$ (504 points). We estimated these
660: values by the Monte Carlo method. When the radial velocities of
661: 140 young OSCs are analyzed, these errors have the following
662: values: the error in $\lambda$ is $\pm0.5$~kpc and the error in
663: the perturbation velocity amplitude is $\pm1.1$ km s$^{-1}$.
664:
665:
666: \section*{DISCUSSION}
667: \subsection*{The Galactic Rotation Curve}
668:
669: Having analyzed the data on hydrogen clouds in a wide $R$ range,
670: up to $2R_0$, Brand and Blitz (1993) found a nearly flat Galactic
671: rotation curve ($A=-B$). However, the Oort constants
672: $A= 15.50\pm0.27$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ and
673: $B=-12.17\pm0.67$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ we found,
674: which are in good agreement with the result of various recent
675: studies (for an overview of the determinations of the Oort
676: constants, see Bobylev 2004), show that the rotation curve in the
677: solar neighborhood is nevertheless not flat. The low-frequency
678: peak in Fig. 6a shows that the amplitude of the deviations of the
679: Galactic rotation curve from a flat one is about 8 km s$^{-1}$ in
680: the range 3 kpc $<R<12$~kpc.
681:
682: Note that, in general, our Galactic rotation curve in the R range
683: under consideration agrees satisfactorily with the ``composite''
684: rotation curve by Clemens (1985).
685:
686: The shape of the rotation curve in the outer Galaxy depends
687: significantly on the adopted value of $R_0$ (Clemens 1985; Olling
688: and Merrifield 2000; Zabolotskikh et al. 2002). Our Galactic
689: rotation curve is intermediate between the two rotation curves
690: from Olling and Merrifield (2000) constructed using currently
691: available data for $R_0=7.1$ and 8.5 kpc.
692:
693: As we see from Fig. 3a, our Galactic rotation curve agrees well,
694: within the $1\sigma$ confidence interval, with one of the best
695: (since it was constructed by carefully reconciling the distance
696: scales of various samples) curves to date constructed by
697: Zabolotskikh et al. (2002) for $R_0=7.5$~kpc.
698:
699: As we see from Fig. 3b, our Galactic rotation curve differs
700: significantly from the rotation curve that was found by Dias and
701: L\'epine (2005) using data from Clemens (1985) only in the distant
702: outer part of the Galaxy ($R>11$~kpc). This difference stems from
703: the fact that the observational data in the outer Galaxy are
704: scarce, while the available data are unreliable. In this respect,
705: the unique observational data for S269 (Fig. 3a) are of great
706: importance.
707:
708: In general, it can be concluded that our Galactic rotation curve
709: in the range 3 kpc $<R<12$ kpc under consideration describes well
710: the observational data used and is in good agreement with the
711: results of other authors.
712:
713:
714: \subsection*{The Phase of the Sun in the Spiral Wave}
715:
716: Having analyzed the velocities of HI clouds in the inner Galaxy,
717: Clemens (1985) found the deviation of the motion of the local
718: standard of rest from the circular one with a velocity
719: $\Delta V_{rot}=+7.0\pm1.5$ km s$^{-1}$ in the direction of Galactic rotation.
720:
721: In our view, this motion can also be associated with the effect of
722: a density wave. Let us consider an example from Rohlfs (1977),
723: $$
724: \displaylines{\hfill
725: \sigma_1 = |\widehat \sigma| \cos \chi,\hfill\llap(10)\cr\hfill
726: V_{rad} =-|f_R| \cos \chi,\hfill\cr\hfill
727: \Delta V_{rot}= |f_\theta| \sin\chi~\hfill
728: }
729: $$
730: for the region within the corotation radius in the case of a
731: tightly wound spiral. Here, $\chi=f(R,\chi_\odot)$ is the phase of
732: the spiral wave,
733: $\chi_\odot$ is the phase of the Sun in the spiral wave,
734: $\sigma_1$ is the matter density,
735: $\widehat \sigma$ is the density perturbation amplitude,
736: $f_R$ and $f_\theta$ are the amplitudes of the radial and tangential velocity perturbation
737: components, the center of the spiral arm corresponds to the phase $\chi=0$
738: (for details, see the description to Fig. 21 in the
739: monograph by Rohlfs (1977)).
740: For the case of $\Delta V_{rot}=+7.0$ km s$^{-1}$
741: under consideration, the phase of the solar neighborhood in the
742: wave will be close to $-\pi/2$. It thus follows that the Sun is
743: located at the outer edge of the arm.
744:
745: The solar velocity components $V_\odot(u_\odot,v_\odot,w_\odot)$
746: we found lead us to conclude that there is a motion of the
747: centroid of our sample along the Galactic $Y$ axis with a velocity
748: $\Delta V_{rot}=V_{LSR}-v_\odot=-6.2\pm0.8$ km s$^{-1}$ relative
749: to the local standard of rest with parameters $(U,V,W)_{LSR} =
750: (10.00,5.25,7.17)\pm(0.36,0.62,0.38)$ km s$^{-1}$ (Dehnen and
751: Binney 1998) that differs significantly from zero. Note that
752: Dehnen and Binney (1998) determined the velocity of the Sun
753: relative to the local standard of rest based on the proper motions
754: of $\approx12000$ main-sequence stars from the Hipparcos Catalogue
755: (1997). Our previous analysis (Bobylev and Bajkova 2007) of the
756: space velocities for $\approx5000$ F and G dwarfs using radial
757: velocities showed that
758: $(U,V,W)_{LSR} = (8.7,6.2,7.2)\pm(0.5,2.2,0.8)$ km s$^{-1}$.
759: Thus, the reliability of the parameters $(U,V,W)_{LSR}$ is beyond doubt.
760:
761: As we see, the velocity $\Delta V_{rot}$ of the centroid of our
762: sample along the $Y$ axis is negative. Hence, in this case, the
763: Sun should be located at the inner edge of the spiral arm, having
764: a phase close to $\pi/2$. This contradiction between the two
765: estimates of the phase of the Sun was also pointed out by
766: Zabolotskikh et al. (2002).
767:
768: It is clearly seen from Fig. 5a, where we essentially repeated the
769: analysis of data from Clemens (1985), that the perturbation
770: velocity in the solar neighborhood is positive, $\Delta V_{rot}=
771: +2$ km s$^{-1}$. As can be seen from Fig. 5b, including the data
772: on OSCs in the analysis changes significantly the picture in the
773: immediate neighborhood of the Sun. The perturbation velocity at
774: $R=R_0$ is $\Delta V_{rot}=-5.5\pm0.5$ km s$^{-1}$; the phase of
775: the Sun in the wave should then be close to $\pi/2$.
776:
777: However, we again run into a significant contradiction. If the
778: phase of the Sun is assumed to be close to $\pi/2$, then the
779: radial velocities should decrease with increasing distance from
780: the Sun in the direction of increasing $R$, but the reverse is
781: true in Fig. 7.
782:
783: Note that our OSC residual velocity distributions (Figs. 5b and 7)
784: are in good agreement with the results of the analyses of the
785: velocity ($V_R$ and $V_\theta$) fields for OB associations
786: performed by several authors: see Fig. 3 in Mel'nik et al. (2001)
787: and Fig. 1 in Mel'nik (2003).
788:
789: We associate the above contradictions with the influence of the
790: Orion arm, since a significant fraction of the nearby OSCs (Fig.
791: 1) belong to this structure. In the opinion of several authors
792: (Yuan 1969; Weaver 1970; Elmegreen 1980; Efremov 1997), the Orion
793: arm is a branch at the outer edge of the Cygnus spiral arm (Melnik
794: 2003) or a spur. Previously, Bobylev et al. (2007) found that the
795: centroid of the OSCs belonging to the Orion arm lags behind the
796: local standard of rest with a velocity of $\approx-10$ km
797: s$^{-1}$, while the typical lag velocity for the centroids of the
798: OSC belonging to other arms is $\approx-5$ km s$^{-1}$.
799:
800: All of the data obtained are difficult to reconcile within the
801: framework of a simple model. As was shown by Sitnik and Mel'nik
802: (1999) and Mel'nik (2003, 2006), the real picture of the solar
803: neighborhood may be much more complex.
804:
805: Nevertheless, the phase of the Sun in the spiral wave can be
806: determined from radial velocities. The amplitude of the OSC radial
807: velocity perturbations is higher than that of the circular
808: velocity perturbations. The radial velocities are almost free from
809: the discrepancy in the velocities of the centroid and the local
810: standard of rest (see the vertical displacement in Fig. 7). The
811: amplitude of the radial velocity perturbations is essentially
812: determined by the spiral density wave. Thus, for example, as was
813: pointed out by Lin et al. (1969), the stars in the solar
814: neighborhood can go away from their birthplace to distances of
815: $\sim1.2$ kpc over a period of $\sim10$ Myr, which is
816: attributable mainly to the rotation velocities, while the stars go
817: away in the radial direction to distances that are a factor of 10
818: smaller due to the small pitch angle of the spiral arms. Based on
819: the data in Fig. 7, we conclude that the phase of the Sun in the
820: density wave is slightly larger than $-\pi/2$ (a more accurate
821: value is $\chi_\odot=-0.66\pi$). Consequently, the Sun is located
822: in the interarm space near the outer edge of the
823: Carina-Sagittarius arm. This location of the Sun agrees well with
824: the distribution of stars and gas (Vall\'ee 2002; Russeil 2003)
825: and with predictions of the density-wave theory. Indeed, as we see
826: from relations (10), the variations in velocity $V_{rad}$ are in
827: phase with the variations in density $\sigma_1$.
828:
829:
830: \subsection*{The Scale Factor $\lambda$}
831:
832: The distance between the neighboring spiral arms along the
833: Galactic radius vector is usually denoted by $\lambda$;
834: occasionally, it is called a scale factor or scale length (Mel'nik
835: et al. 2001).
836:
837: Clemens (1985) obtained an estimate of $\lambda = 0.22R_0$. For
838: the value of $R_0 = 8.5$ kpc used by him, this gives $\lambda =
839: 1.9$ kpc, which is in good agreement with our results.
840:
841: Having analyzed the space velocities of OB associations within 3
842: kpc of the Sun, Mel'nik et al. (2001) estimated the scale length
843: of the periodic variations in radial residual velocity components
844: along the Galactic radius vector to be $\lambda = 2.0\pm0.2$~kpc.
845:
846: At the same time, we found that the distance between the spiral
847: arms does not remain constant in the R range under consideration
848: and is $\Delta R_{i}=1.9,2.4,3.2$~kpc. This is in agreement with
849: the description of the density wave as a logarithmic spiral, as
850: distinct from an Archimedean spiral characterized by a constant
851: distance between the neighboring turns of the spiral. Details of
852: the discussion on the specific shape of the spiral in the Galaxy
853: can be found in the monograph by Efremov (1989). The model using
854: an Archimedean spiral was suggested by Cowie and Rybicki (1982).
855:
856: Having analyzed the radial velocities of young OSCs, we obtained
857: an independent estimate of $\lambda=1.7\pm0.5$~kpc from data in
858: the range of distances 6 kpc$<R<9$ kpc.
859:
860:
861: \subsection*{The Perturbation Amplitudes}
862:
863: The perturbation amplitudes of the circular,
864: $f_\theta=4.6\pm0.5$ km s$^{-1}$ (the main peak in Fig. 6b), and radial,
865: $f_R= 5.9\pm1.1$ km s$^{-1}$ (the main peak in Fig. 8), velocities that we found are in
866: good agreement with the minimum perturbation amplitude of 5 km
867: s$^{-1}$ (at the minimum wavelength $\lambda=0.22R_0$) estimated
868: by Clemens (1985).
869:
870: Based on formulas from Lin et al. (1069), Burton (1971) estimated
871: the change in the amplitudes of the perturbation velocities from a
872: density wave ($f_R$ and $f_\theta$) as a function of $R$ in the
873: range $0.2R_0 < R < 1.3R_0$. It turned out that for both
874: velocities, there is a wide peak in the region $0.5R_0<R<0.9R_0$,
875: where the velocities reach $\approx8$ km s$^{-1}$ ($f_R$ is larger
876: than $f_\theta$ by $\approx1$ km s$^{-1}$ everywhere), the
877: velocities are about 4 km s$^{-1}$ near $0.2R_0$ and decrease to
878: 2.5 km s$^{-1}$ near $1.3R_0$. Our results (Fig. 5b) agree well
879: with the estimates by Burton (1971).
880:
881: However, it is hard to say that our results are in good agreement
882: with those of other authors obtained for the solar neighborhood.
883: Thus, for example, having analyzed OB associations, Mel'nik et al.
884: (2001) found the velocities of the perturbations from a spiral
885: density wave to be $f_R = 7\pm1$ km s$^{-1}$ and $f_\theta =
886: 2\pm1$ km s$^{-1}$. Popova and Loktin (2005) obtained completely
887: different velocities of the perturbations from a spiral density
888: wave, $f_R = -4\pm5$ km s$^{-1}$ and $f_\theta = 13\pm3$ km
889: s$^{-1}$, using data on OSCs and OB stars. Based on Cepheids,
890: Mishurov and Zenina (1999) found $f_R = 3.3\pm1.6$ km s$^{-1}$ and
891: $f_\theta = -7.9\pm2.0$ km s$^{-1}$. The analysis of data on
892: Cepheids performed by Popova (2006) showed that the amplitude of
893: the perturbation velocities, $f_R = -1.8\pm2.5$ km s$^{-1}$ and
894: $f_\theta = 4.0\pm3.4$ km s$^{-1}$ are small and do not differ
895: significantly from zero. Zabolotskikh et al. (2002) found
896: $f_R\approx-7\pm2$ km s$^{-1}$ and $f_\theta\approx-1\pm2$ km
897: s$^{-1}$ from data on Cepheids and OSCs.
898:
899: In general, our results lead us to conclude that the curve in Fig.
900: 5b describes well the large-scale (grand design) spiral structure;
901: there are peculiarities at $R=R_0$ attributable to the kinematic
902: properties of the Orion arm.
903:
904:
905: \section*{CONCLUSIONS}
906:
907: Based on currently available data on the three-dimensional field
908: of space velocities of young ($\leq50$~Myr) open star clusters and
909: the radial velocities of HI clouds and star-forming (H II)
910: regions, we constructed the Galactic rotation curve in the range
911: of Galactocentric distances 3 kpc $<R<12$ kpc.
912:
913: At the first step, we determined a smoothed curve that fitted
914: fairly accurately the Galactic rotation curve in this range of
915: distances. The curve parameters (9) were found by using the first
916: six terms of the Taylor expansion of the angular velocity of
917: Galactic rotation at a given Galactocentric distance of the Sun,
918: $R_0 = 7.5$ kpc. We found that the centroid of the sample moves
919: relative to the local standard of rest along the Galactic $Y$ axis
920: with a velocity of $-6.2\pm0.8$ km s$^{-1}$.
921:
922: At the second step, we performed a spectral analysis of the
923: circular velocity residuals of the objects under consideration
924: from the derived rotation curve, which attributes the observed
925: periodic residuals to the effect of density waves. Our spectral
926: analysis showed that the peak with an amplitude of $4.6\pm0.5$ km
927: s$^{-1}$ corresponding to a wavelength $\lambda = 2.5\pm0.3$ kpc
928: is dominant. A similar analysis of the radial velocities for young
929: OSCs confirmed the presence of periodic perturbations from a
930: density wave with an amplitude of $5.9\pm1.1$ km s$^{-1}$ and a
931: wavelength $\lambdaл = 1.7\pm0.5$~kpc.
932:
933: Based on the described approach, Clemens (1985) obtained similar
934: results, but only for the inner Galaxy ($R<R_0$), where highly
935: accurate data on hydrogen are available for tangential points. In
936: contrast, for the outer Galaxy ($R>R_0$), the radial velocities of
937: hydrogen (HI and HII) clouds usually have large errors, which
938: makes it much more difficult to interpret the residuals.
939:
940: We were able to advance slightly farther than $R_0$, because we
941: used the total space velocities of OSCs to determine the
942: projections of their circular velocities. In our view, this
943: approach improves the homogeneity of the sample.the tangential
944: point method allows the total space velocity of hydrogen clouds to
945: be analyzed, since the velocity vector lies entirely on the line
946: of sight under the assumption of purely circular rotation of
947: hydrogen at the tangential point. Therefore, supplementing the
948: sample of objects with OSCs seems natural.
949:
950: We found that the distance between the spiral arms increases with
951: Galactocentric distance, being 1.9, 2.4, and 3.2 kpc; this is in
952: agreement with the description of the density wave as a
953: logarithmic spiral. The perturbation amplitude also changes --- it
954: is largest in the inner part of the Galaxy, $\approx9$ km
955: s$^{-1}$, and decreases to $\approx1$ km s$^{-1}$ in its outer
956: part.
957:
958: Analysis of the radial velocities of a sample of young OSCs
959: suggests that the phase of the Sun in the density wave is close to
960: $-\pi/2$ and that the Sun is located in the interarm space near
961: the outer edge of the Carina.Sagittarius arm.
962:
963:
964: \subsection*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
965:
966: We wish to thank R.-D. Scholz, who provided the version of the
967: CRVOCA catalog even before its appearance in the Strasbourg
968: database, S.V. Lebedeva for help in working with our database, and
969: the referees for useful remarks that contributed to an improvement
970: of the paper. This work was supported by the Russian Foundation
971: for Basic Research (project no. 08-02-00400).
972:
973: \section*{REFERENCES}
974: {\small
975:
976: ~~~~ 1. V. S. Avedisova, Astron. Zh. 82, 488 (2005) [Astron. Rep.
977: 49, 435 (2005)].
978:
979: 2. T. M. Bania, Astroph. J. 216, 381 (1977).
980:
981: 3. V. V. Bobylev, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 30, 185 (2004) [Astron. Lett.
982: 30, 159 (2004)].
983:
984: 4. V. V. Bobylev, A. T. Bajkova, and S. V. Lebedeva, Pis'ma
985: Astron. Zh. 33, 809 (2007) [Astron. Lett. 33, 720 (2007)].
986:
987: 5. V. V. Bobylev and A. T. Bajkova, Astron. Zh. 84, 418 (2007)
988: [Astron. Rep. 51, 372 (2007)].
989:
990: 6. J. Brand and L. Blitz, Astron. Astrophys. 275, 67 (1993).
991:
992: 7. W. B. Burton, Astron. Astrophys. 10, 76 (1971).
993:
994: 8. W. B. Burton and M. A. Gordon, Astron. Astrophys. 63, 7 (1978).
995:
996: 9. L. L. Cowie and G. B. Rybicki, Astroph. J. 260, 504 (1982).
997:
998: 10. D. P. Clemens, Astroph. J. 295, 422 (1985).
999:
1000: 11. A. K. Dambis, A. M. Mel'nik, and A. S. Rastorguev, Pis'ma
1001: Astron. Zh. 27, 68 (2001) [Astron. Lett. 27, 58 (2001)].
1002:
1003: 12. W. Dehnen and J. J. Binney, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 298, 387
1004: (1998).
1005:
1006: 13. W. S. Dias, B. S. Alessi, A. Moitinho, et al., Astron.
1007: Astrophys. 389, 971 (2002).
1008:
1009: 14. W. S. Dias and J. R. D. L\'epine, Astroph. J. 629, 825 (2005).
1010:
1011: 15. Yu.N. Efremov, Sites of Star Formation in Galaxies (Nauka,
1012: Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].
1013:
1014: 16. Yu. N. Efremov, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 23, 659 (1997) [Astron.
1015: Lett. 23, 579 (1997)].
1016:
1017: 17. D.M. Elmegreen, Astroph. J. 242, 528 (1980).
1018:
1019: 18. M. Fich, L. Blitz, and A. A. Stark, Astroph. J. 342, 272
1020: (1989).
1021:
1022: 19. The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, ESA SP-1200 (1997).
1023:
1024: 20. M. Honma, T. Bushimata, Y. K. Choi, et al., astroph/
1025: 0709.0820v1 (2007).
1026:
1027: 21. N. V. Kharchenko, R.-D. Scholz, A. E. Piskunov, et al.,
1028: Astron. Nachr. 328 (2007).
1029:
1030: 22. P. G. Kulikovskii, Stellar Astronomy (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in
1031: Russian].
1032:
1033: 23. H. S. Liszt and W. B. Burton, Astroph. J. 236, 779 (1980).
1034:
1035: 24. C. C. Lin and F. H. Shu, Astroph. J. 140, 646 (1964).
1036:
1037: 25. C. C. Lin, C. Yuan, and F. H. Shu, Astroph. J. 155, 721
1038: (1969).
1039:
1040: 26. A. M. Mel'nik, A. K. Dambis, and A. S. Rastorguev, Pis'ma
1041: Astron. Zh. 27, 521 (2001) [Astron. Lett. 27, 521 (2001)].
1042:
1043: 27. A. M. Mel'nik, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 29, 349 (2003) [Astron.
1044: Lett. 29, 304 (2003)].
1045:
1046: 28. A. M. Mel'nik, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 32, 9 (2006) [Astron. Lett.
1047: 32, 7 (2006)].
1048:
1049: 29. Yu. N.Mishurov and I. A. Zenina, Astron. Astrophys. 341, 81
1050: (1999).
1051:
1052: 30. C. A. Murray, Vectorial Astrometry (Adam Hilger, Bristol,
1053: 1983).
1054:
1055: 31. I. I. Nikiforov, Astron. Zh. 76, 403 (1999) [Astron. Rep. 43,
1056: 345 (1999)].
1057:
1058: 32. K. F. Ogorodnikov, Dynamics of Stellar Systems (Fizmatgiz,
1059: Moscow, 1958; Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).
1060:
1061: 33. R. P. Olling and M. R. Merrifield, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
1062: 311, 361 (2000).
1063:
1064: 34. M. E. Popova and A. V. Loktin, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 31, 743
1065: (2005) [Astron. Lett. 31, 663 (2005)].
1066:
1067: 35. M. E. Popova, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 32, 274 (2006) [Astron. Lett.
1068: 32, 244 (2006)].
1069:
1070: 36. A. E. Piskunov, N. V. Kharchenko, S. R\"{o}ser, et al.,
1071: Astron. Astrophys. 445, 545 (2006).
1072:
1073: 37. A. S. Rastorguev, E. V. Glushkova, A. K. Dambis, and M. V.
1074: Zabolotskikh, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 25, 689 (1999) [Astron. Lett. 25,
1075: 595 (1999)].
1076:
1077: 38. K. Rohlfs, Lectures on Density Wave Theory (Springer-Verlag,
1078: Berlin, 1977; Mir,Moscow, 1980).
1079:
1080: 39. D. Russeil, Astron. Astrophys. 397, 133 (2003).
1081:
1082: 40. M. R. Samal, A. K. Pandey, D. K. Ojha, et al., astroph/
1083: 0708.4137v1 (2007).
1084:
1085: 41. T. G. Sitnik and A. M. Mel'nik, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 25, 194
1086: (1999) [Astron. Lett. 25, 156 (1999)].
1087:
1088: 42. Y. Xu,M. J. Reid, X.W. Zheng, et al., Science 311, 54 (2006).
1089:
1090: 43. X.-X. Xue, H. W. Rix, G. Zhao, et al., astroph/ 0801.1232v1
1091: (2008). 44. J. P. Vall\'ee, Astroph. J. 566, 261 (2002).
1092:
1093: 45. H. Weaver, in Proceedings of the IAU Symposium: Interstellar
1094: Gas Dynamics, Ed. by H. Habing (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1970), Vol. 39,
1095: p. 22.
1096:
1097: 46. C. Yuan, Astroph. J. 158, 871 (1969).
1098:
1099: 47. M. V. Zabolotskikh, A. S. Rastorguev, and A. K. Dambis, Pis'ma
1100: Astron. Zh. 28, 516 (2002) [Astron. Lett. 28, 454 (2002)].
1101:
1102: }
1103:
1104: \newpage
1105:
1106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.1:
1107: \begin{figure}[t]
1108: {
1109: \begin{center}
1110: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{F1.EPS}
1111: \end{center}
1112: } Fig.~1. Coordinates of the objects being analyzed in projection
1113: onto the Galactic XY plane. The Sun lies at the coordinate origin.
1114: The pluses, dots, and filled circles denote the HII regions,
1115: tangential points, and OSCs, respectively.
1116: \end{figure}
1117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1118:
1119: %\newpage
1120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.2:
1121: \begin{figure}[t]
1122: {
1123: \begin{center}
1124: \includegraphics[width=100mm]{F2.EPS}
1125: \end{center}
1126: } Fig.~2. Galactic rotation curve. The vertical line indicates
1127: $R_0=7.5$ kpc. For OSCs, the velocities were calculated only from
1128: the radial velocities using Eq. (5).
1129: \end{figure}
1130: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1131:
1132: \newpage
1133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.3:
1134: \begin{figure}[t]
1135: {
1136: \begin{center}
1137: \includegraphics[width=140mm]{F3.EPS}
1138: \end{center}
1139: } Fig.~3. Galactic rotation curve (thick line), the thin lines
1140: mark the boundaries of the $1\sigma$ confidence intervals, the
1141: vertical line indicates $R_0=7.5$~kpc, the symbols $\odot$ in
1142: panel (a) mark the tangential points that were not used to
1143: determine the rotation curve parameters and the remaining symbols
1144: are the same as those in Fig.~1. The dotted line in panels (a) and
1145: (b) denote the rotation curve as derived by Zabolotskikh et al.
1146: (2002) and Dias and L\'epine (2005), respectively.
1147: \end{figure}
1148: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1149:
1150: \newpage
1151: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.4:
1152: \begin{figure}[t]
1153: {
1154: \begin{center}
1155: \includegraphics[width=120mm]{F4.EPS}
1156: \end{center}
1157: } Fig.~4. Angular velocity of Galactic rotation versus
1158: Galactocentric distance. The symbols are the same as those in
1159: Figs. 1 and 3, the thin lines mark the boundaries of the $1\sigma$
1160: confidence intervals, and the vertical line indicates
1161: $R_0=7.5$~kpc.
1162: \end{figure}
1163: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1164:
1165: \newpage
1166: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.5:
1167: \begin{figure}[t]
1168: {
1169: \begin{center}
1170: \includegraphics[width=140mm]{F5.EPS}
1171: \end{center}
1172: } Fig.~5. Residual circular velocities versus Galactocentric
1173: distance: (a) no OSCs are used; (b) the entire set of objects
1174: being analyzed is used.
1175: \end{figure}
1176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1177:
1178: \newpage
1179: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.6:
1180: \begin{figure}[t]
1181: {
1182: \begin{center}
1183: \includegraphics[width=140mm]{F6.EPS}
1184: \end{center}
1185: } Fig.~6. Power spectrum of the residual rotation velocities as a
1186: function of $\ln(\lambda/R_0)$: (a) residual velocities relative
1187: to the flat curve; (b) residual velocities relative to curve (9).
1188: \end{figure}
1189: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1190:
1191: \newpage
1192: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.7:
1193: \begin{figure}[t]
1194: {
1195: \begin{center}
1196: \includegraphics[width=100mm]{F7.EPS}
1197: \end{center}
1198: } Fig.~7. Residual radial velocities of young OSCs versus
1199: Galactocentric distance.
1200: \end{figure}
1201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1202:
1203: \newpage
1204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.8:
1205: \begin{figure}[t]
1206: {
1207: \begin{center}
1208: \includegraphics[width=100mm]{F8.EPS}
1209: \end{center}
1210: } Fig.~8. Power spectrum of the residual radial velocities for
1211: young OSCs as a function of $\ln(\lambda/R_0)$.
1212: \end{figure}
1213: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1214:
1215: \end{document}
1216: