1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \textwidth 165 truemm
5: %\textheight 240 truemm
6: \textheight 235 truemm
7: \tolerance 500
8: \voffset = -1.0truecm %% сдвинут вниз
9: \hoffset = -1.0truecm %% результат сдвинут в право
10:
11: \def\leaderfill{\leaders\hbox to 1em{\hss.\hss}\hfill} %% точка-проводник
12: \def\bull{\vrule height .9ex width .8ex depth -.1ex} %% квадрат
13: \def\bul{\vrule height .4ex width .4ex depth -.1ex} %% квадрат
14:
15: \sloppy
16:
17: \begin{document}
18:
19: \noindent {\footnotesize\it ISSN 1063-7737,
20: Astronomy Letters, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 686--698.
21: \copyright Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2008.
22: \noindent Original Russian Text
23: \copyright V.V. Bobylev, 2008, published in Pis'ma v
24: Astronomicheski$\check{\imath}$ Zhurnal, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 10,
25: pp. 757--770.}
26:
27: \noindent
28: \begin{tabular}{llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll}
29: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
30: \hline \hline
31: \end{tabular}
32:
33: \vskip 1.5cm
34:
35: \centerline {\large\bf Open Clusters IC 4665 and Cr 359 and a Probable Birthplace}
36: \centerline {\large\bf of the Pulsar PSR B1929+10}
37: \bigskip
38: \centerline {V.V. Bobylev}
39: \bigskip
40: \centerline {\small\it
41: Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of RAS, St-Petersburg}
42: \bigskip
43:
44: {\bf Abstract--}Based on the epicyclic approximation, we have
45: simulated the motion of the young open star clusters IC 4665 and
46: Collinder 359. The separation between the cluster centers is shown
47: to have been minimal 7 Myr ago, 36 pc. We have established a close
48: evolutionary connection between IC 4665 and the Scorpius-Centaurus
49: association --- the separation between the centers of these
50: structures was $\approx200$~pc 15 Myr ago. In addition, the center
51: of IC 4665 at this time was near two well-known regions of coronal
52: gas: the Local Bubble and the North Polar Spur. The star HIP 86768
53: is shown to be one of the candidates for a binary (in the past)
54: with the pulsar PSR B1929+10. At the model radial velocity of the
55: pulsar $V_r= 2\pm50$~km s$^{-1}$, a close encounter of this pair
56: occurs in the vicinity of IC 4665 at a time of $-1.1$~Myr. At the
57: same time, using currently available data for the pulsar B1929+10
58: at its model radial velocity $V_r=200\pm50$~km~s$^{-1}$, we show
59: that the hypothesis of Hoogerwerf et al. (2001) about the breakup
60: of the $\zeta$Oph---B1929+10 binary in the vicinity of Upper
61: Scorpius (US) about 0.9 Myr ago is more plausible.
62:
63:
64: \section*{INTRODUCTION}
65:
66: At present, fairly reliable estimates of such parameters as the
67: distance and proper motion components are available for a number
68: of nearby neutron stars, but as yet there is no information about
69: their radial velocities. In the problem of determining the
70: possible birthplace of a neutron star, the radial velocity is a
71: free parameter.
72:
73: Based on the Hipparcos Catalogue and radioastrometric data,
74: Hoogerwerf et al. (2001) analyzed 56 nearby high-velocity stars
75: ($r<700$~pc), the so-called runaway stars, to determine their
76: possible birthplace inside nearby young stellar groups --- open
77: star clusters or associations. One of their conclusions was that
78: the star $\zeta$ Oph and the pulsar PSR B1929+10 (which, according
79: to the J2000 coordinate system, was designated as PSR J1932+1059)
80: originated jointly in a supernova explosion in a binary about 1
81: Myr ago in the part of the Scorpius-Centaurus association
82: designated as US (Upper Scorpius).
83:
84: However, subsequent VLBI measurements of the parallax for PSR
85: B1929+10 (Brisken et al. 2002; Chatterjee et al. 2004) showed that
86: the probable distance to the pulsar differs significantly from
87: that used by Hoogerwerf et al. (2001). In the opinion of
88: Chatterjee et al. (2004), the new data basically reject the
89: hypothesis of Hoogerwerf et al. (2001) about the birthplace of PSR
90: B1929+10 at the boundary of the Scorpius-Centaurus association and
91: its connection with the star $\zeta$ Oph. In this paper, we test
92: Hoogerwerf's hypothesis using new observational data. In addition,
93: estimating the probability of other hypotheses is also of
94: considerable interest.
95:
96: One of such hypotheses was proposed by Walter (2001), who
97: suggested considering a different neutron star as a binary (in the
98: past) with $\zeta$ Oph, namely, RX J185635-3754.
99:
100: For our part, we also suggest considering the hypothesis that the
101: birthplace of PSR B1929+10 could be the open cluster IC 4665 or Cr
102: 359. The idea of this hypothesis is based on the simulations of
103: the PSR B1929+10 trajectory over the celestial sphere (Fig. 2 from
104: Hoogerwerf et al. (2001)) at various radial velocities (+200 or
105: $-$200 km s$^{-1}$), which showed that it passed in the immediate
106: vicinity of the open clusters IC 4665 and Cr 359. In this paper,
107: we determine the radial velocity of the pulsar at which its
108: encounter with these clusters is closest.
109:
110: In the immediate solar neighborhood with a radius of 200--300 pc,
111: we know such regions of interstellar tenuous hot gas with a
112: temperature $T\approx10^6$~K as the Local Bubble and the North
113: Polar Spur. Since the Local Bubble is a compact region that is
114: almost free from absorbing matter, it was first discovered by
115: Fitzgerald (1968) through an analysis of the interstellar
116: reddening of stars. The absorption maps of the distribution of
117: neutral gas in NaI lines constructed by Sfeir et al. (1999) show
118: an inclination to the Galactic plane as for the Gould Belt. An
119: overview of the formation scenarios for the North Polar Spur can
120: be found in Miller et al. (2007). Data on all of the known bubbles
121: in the solar neighborhood were collected in Heiles (1998).
122:
123: The physical processes that produce bubbles, in outline, are as
124: follows. Multiple supernova explosions occur in young open
125: clusters. This gives rise to stellar winds and shock waves that
126: sweep out the gas to the periphery of the local region in
127: question, where it produces blobs in the form of shells or
128: extended walls. At the shell boundaries, the gas density increases
129: significantly, the gas cools down, and molecular clouds are
130: formed. During supernova explosions, the gas inside the shell can
131: heat up and radiate in the X-ray range. In the opinion of
132: Bergh\"ofer and Breitschwerdt (2002), the most realistic theory
133: for the origin of the Local Bubble is the hypothesis about
134: multiple, but not simultaneous explosions of about 20 supernovae
135: during the past 10--20 Myr. Frish (1995), Maiz-Apell\'aniz (2001),
136: and Breitschwerdt and de Avillez (2006) substantiate the viewpoint
137: that supernova explosions in the Scorpius-Centaurus association,
138: which is part of the Gould Belt, are the most suitable objects
139: responsible for the formation of both the Local Bubble and the
140: North Polar Spur.
141:
142: The open clusters IC 4665 and Cr 359 have a high probability of
143: belonging to the Gould Belt both in their age and spatial position
144: (Piskunov et al. 2006) and in kinematics (Bobylev 2006). Since
145: there are very few young open star clusters in the first Galactic
146: quadrant that are members of the Gould Belt and that have reliable
147: kinematic data (particularly the radial velocities), studying the
148: trajectories of the open clusters IC 4665 and Cr 359 and members
149: of the Scorpius-Centaurus association is of great importance for
150: understanding the evolution of the Gould Belt.
151:
152: The goal of this paper is to establish the evolutionary
153: connections of the young open clusters IC 4665 and Cr 359 with the
154: structure of the Gould Belt, to establish the possible influence
155: of the clusters on the bubble development, and to determine the
156: most probable birthplace of the pulsar PSR B1929+10 by varying its
157: radial velocity.
158:
159: The problems posed here are solved by constructing the
160: trajectories of the objects using the epicyclic approximation.
161:
162:
163:
164:
165:
166: \section*{THE METHOD}
167:
168: In this paper, we use a rectangular Galactic coordinate system
169: with the axes directed away from the observer toward the Galactic
170: center $(l=0^\circ, b=0^\circ$, the $X$ axis), along the Galactic
171: rotation $(l=90^\circ, b=0^\circ$, the $Y$ axis), and toward the
172: North Galactic Pole $(b=90^\circ$, the $Z$ axis). The
173: corresponding space velocity components of the objects $U,V,W$ are
174: also directed along the $X,Y,Z$ axes (Kulikovskii 1985).
175:
176: The method of the epicyclic approximation (Lindblad 1927, 1959)
177: allows the orbits of stars to be constructed in a coordinate
178: system rotating around the Galactic center in a circular orbit.We
179: assume that the origin of the coordinate system coincides with the
180: local standard of rest and that the stars move along epicycles in
181: the direction opposite to the Galactic rotation. We use the method
182: in a form associated with a rectangular coordinate system (Fuchs
183: et al. 2006):
184: $$
185: \displaylines{\hfill
186: X(t)= X(0)+{U(0)\over \kappa} \sin(\kappa t)+{V(0)\over 2B} (1-\cos(\kappa t)), \hfill\llap(1)\cr\hfill
187: Y(t)= Y(0)+2A \biggl( X(0)+{V(0)\over 2B} \biggr) t
188: - {\Omega_0\over B\kappa} V(0) \sin(\kappa t)
189: +{2\Omega_0\over \kappa^2} U(0) (1-\cos(\kappa t)),\hfill\cr\hfill
190: Z(t)= {W(0)\over \nu} \sin(\nu t) + Z(0) \cos(\nu t), \hfill
191: }
192: $$
193: where $t$ is the time in Myr (pc/Myr=0.978 km s$^{-1}$), which is
194: measured into the past; $\kappa=\sqrt{-4\Omega_0 B}$ is the
195: epicyclic frequency; A and B are the Oort constants; $\Omega_0$ is
196: the angular velocity of Galactic rotation of the local standard of
197: rest, $\Omega_0=A-B$; and $\nu=\sqrt{4\pi G \rho_0}$ is the
198: frequency of the vertical oscillations, where $G$ is the
199: gravitational constant and $\rho_0$ is the star density in the
200: solar neighborhood. The space velocities of the objects are
201: calculated for any necessary time using the formulas
202: $$ \displaylines{\hfill
203: U(t)= U(0) \cos(\kappa t)-{\kappa\over -2B} V(0) \sin(\kappa t), \hfill\llap(2)\cr \hfill
204: V(t)= {-2B\over \kappa} U(0) \sin(\kappa t) + V(0) \cos(\kappa t),\hfill\cr \hfill
205: W(t)= W(0) \cos(\nu t) - Z(0)\nu \sin(\nu t). \hfill
206: }
207: $$
208: The parameters $X(0),Y(0),Z(0)$ and $U(0),V(0),W(0)$ in Eqs. (1)
209: and (2) denote the current positions and velocities of the
210: objects. The velocities $U,V,W$ are given relative to the local
211: standard of rest with $(U,V,W)_{LSR}=(10.00,5.25,7.17)\pm(0.36,
212: 0.62,0.38)$ km s$^{-1}$ (Dehnen and Binney 1998).
213:
214: Following Fuchs et al. (2006), we adopted
215: $\rho_0=0.1~M_\odot $pc$^{-3}$,
216: which gives
217: $\nu=0.074$ km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$. We also took the Oort constants
218: $A= 13.7\pm0.6$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ and
219: $B=-12.9\pm0.4$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ that we
220: found previously (Bobylev 2004) by analyzing the independent
221: determinations of these parameters by various authors; in that
222: case, $\kappa=0.037$ km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$.
223:
224:
225: \section*{THE DATA}
226:
227: The necessary input data on the objects under consideration, such
228: as their equatorial coordinates, proper motion components, radial
229: velocities, and parallaxes, are given in Table 1. Table 2 gives
230: the spatial coordinates
231: $X(0),Y(0),Z(0)$ and space velocities
232: $U(0),V(0),W(0)$ of the stars and clusters under consideration.
233:
234: {\bf IC 4665 and Cr 359}.
235: For the open cluster IC 4665, we use the
236: coordinates of the center, proper motion components, and an
237: estimate of the photometric distance $r=352\pm70$ pc from the
238: CRVOCA Catalog (Kharchenko et al. 2007) and the radial velocity
239: from Manzi et al. (2007), where it was determined using 39 most
240: probable cluster members. According to Manzi et al. (2007), the
241: age of IC 4665 is $27.7^{+4.2}_{-3.5}$ Myr. This estimate is
242: interesting in that it depends little on the quality of
243: isochrones, because it was obtained by comparing the lithium
244: abundances in cluster stars with such well-known young clusters as
245: NGC 2547 and IC 2391. Other authors give the following
246: ``isochronic'' cluster age estimates: 36 Myr (Mermilliod 1981),
247: 30--100 Myr (Prosser 1993), and 43 Myr (Piskunov et al. 2006).
248:
249: For the open cluster Cr 359, we use the coordinates of the center,
250: proper motion components, and radial velocity from the CRVOCA
251: Catalog (Kharchenko et al. 2007) and the distance $r=450\pm200$~pc
252: from Lodieu et al. (2006), who conducted a critical review of the
253: estimates obtained by various authors. According to Lodieu et al.
254: (2006), the age of Cr 359 is $60\pm20$ Myr. Other authors estimate
255: this cluster as a younger one, 32 Myr (Piskunov et al. 2006) and
256: $\approx30$~Myr (Wielen 1971; Abt and Cardona 1983).
257:
258: According to Kharchenko et al. (2007), the apparent radii of IC
259: 4665 and Cr 359 are $1.^\circ0$ and $1.^\circ1$, respectively.
260:
261: de Wit et al. (2006) estimated the mass of IC 4665 to be 300--350
262: $M_\odot$. Cr 359 probably has a similar mass.
263:
264: {\bf PSR B1929+10}. The radio pulsar PSR B1929+10 is an isolated
265: neutron star with an age of 3 Myr (estimated from the ratio P/2\.P
266: and belongs to the population of nearby neutron stars that are
267: closely related to the Gould Belt (Popov et al. 2003; Motch et al.
268: 2006).
269:
270: For PSR B1929+10, we use the data from Chatterjee et al. (2004)
271: that were obtained from VLBI measurements. The most important
272: refined parameter is the new parallax of the pulsar, $\pi=2.77
273: \pm0.07$~mas.
274:
275: Note that Hoogerwerf et al. (2001) adopted a model value of
276: $\pi=4\pm2$~mas. The preliminary distance estimates for the pulsar
277: that made it closer to the Sun served as a basis for this choice.
278:
279: {\bf US, UCL, and LCC}. The initial positions of the centers
280: $(X(0),Y (0),Z(0))=(134,-20,52)$ pc and heliocentric
281: velocities
282: $(U(0),V (0),W(0))=(-6.7,-16.0,-8.0)\pm(5.9, 3.5,2.7)$ km s$^{-1}$ for US,
283: $(119,-67,31)$~pc and
284: $(-6.8,-19.3,-5.7)\pm(4.6,4.7,2.5)$ km s$^{-1}$ for UCL,
285: $(62,-100,10)$~pc and
286: $(-8.2,-18.6,-6.4)\pm(5.1,7.3,2.6)$~km s$^{-1}$ for LCC
287: were taken
288: from Fern\'andez et al. (2006). These authors obtained the
289: positions of the centers (with errors of 1.2 pc) using data from
290: de Zeeuw et al. (1999); the velocities were determined by Sartori
291: et al. (2003) based on the space velocities of a large number of
292: stars (more than 120 for each of the groups). Fern\'andez et al.
293: (2006) used these data to analyze the kinematics of the members of
294: the Scorpius. Centaurus association. However, the orbits of the
295: objects were calculated using a model that, apart from the
296: axisymmetric Galactic potential, also included the potential from
297: a spiral density wave and the potential of the bar at the Galactic
298: center (Fern\'andez et al. 2008). Comparing the results obtained
299: by various methods is of considerable interest.
300:
301:
302: \section*{RESULTS}
303: \subsection*{The Neighborhoods of IC 4665, Cr 359, and PSR B1929+10}
304:
305: {\bf The encounters of the centers}.
306: Based on Eqs. (1) and (2), we
307: obtained several solutions at various radial velocities of the
308: pulsar PSR B1929+10, $V_r$ (PSR). The results are the following:
309:
310: (1) at $V_r$ (PSR) = $+45$ km s$^{-1}$, the pulsar encounters with
311: the cluster IC 4665 at the distance
312: $\Delta_r=\sqrt{\Delta X^2+\Delta Y^2+\Delta Z^2}=52$~pc at
313: $t=-0.85$~Myr;
314:
315: (2) at $V_r$ (PSR) = $-60$ km s$^{-1}$, the minimum distance from
316: the pulsar to the center of Cr 359 is $\Delta_r=38$~pc at
317: $t=-1.0$~Myr;
318:
319: (3) at $V_r$ (PSR) = 0 km s$^{-1}$, we obtain a joint encounter
320: with the two clusters. In this case, the minimum distances from
321: the pulsar to the centers of Cr 359 and IC 4665 are
322: $\Delta_r=69$~pc and $\Delta_r=60$~pc, respectively, at
323: $t=-1.0$~Myr.
324:
325: As we see, the pulsar trajectory can pass through the coronas of
326: the two clusters under consideration. As was noted by de Wit et
327: al. (2006), the tidal radius of IC 4665 is $\approx1^\circ$. At an
328: assumed distance to the cluster of $0r=352$~pc, it is
329: $\approx6$~pc. However, the stars with a common proper motion
330: occupy an area of $\approx100$ square degrees on the celestial
331: sphere (Lodieu et al. 2006) and, hence, the coronal radius of IC
332: 4665 is $\approx30$~pc. As can be seen from Table 2, the error in
333: the spatial position of the center of IC 4665 is about $\pm50$~pc;
334: its spatial displacement in 2 Myr is insignificant.
335:
336: In this respect, Cr 359 is of lesser interest, since the error in
337: its distance is 44\%. Therefore, the radius of its corona lies
338: within the range 20--60 pc, but the spatial localization accuracy
339: of the cluster is low, about $\approx150$ pc (Table 2).
340:
341: Next, we take the next natural step or, more specifically, we
342: search for a suitable rapidly flying star, a possible member of a
343: binary. For this purpose, we use the list of such stars from
344: Hoogerwerf et al. (2001). We can see from Fig. 2 in Hoogerwerf et
345: al. (2001) that the trajectories of three stars passed in the
346: immediate vicinity of IC 4665 and Cr 359 on the celestial sphere
347: with a radius of $\approx15^\circ$ 2 Myr ago: HIP 66524, HIP
348: 86768, and HIP 91599. To calculate the space velocities, we invoke
349: the current radial velocities of these stars from the Pulkovo
350: Catalog of Radial Velocities (Gontcharov 2006).
351:
352: The construction of the trajectories for the three rapidly flying
353: stars shows that HIP 86768 is most interesting among them.
354:
355: Indeed, HIP 66524 moves away fairly rapidly toward the Galactic
356: center in $X$ coordinate, without having a close encounter with
357: the objects of interest to us.
358:
359: For HIP 91599 (star No. 20 from the list of Hoogerwerf et al.
360: 2001), the situation is slightly different. At the radial velocity
361: of the pulsar PSR B1929+10 $V_r$ (PSR)=$+250$ km s$^{-1}$, it
362: encounters with HIP 91599 at the distance $\Delta_r=47$~pc at
363: $t=-0.5$ Myr. The modulus of the velocity difference between the
364: pulsar and HIP 91599 at the time of their encounter is
365: $\Delta_V=\sqrt{\Delta U^2+\Delta V^2+\Delta W^2}=316$~km
366: s$^{-1}$.
367:
368: At the radial velocity of the pulsar $V_r$ (PSR)=$+2$ km s$^{-1}$,
369: it encounters with HIP 86768 at the distance $\Delta_r=19$~pc at
370: $t=-1.1$ Myr. In this case, the modulus of the velocity difference
371: between the pulsar and HIP 86768 at the time of their encounter
372: $\Delta_V=206$ km s$^{-1}$. Taking into account the fairly large
373: errors in the distances and velocities of HIP 86768, we can assume
374: that a closer encounter is also possible. Therefore, simulating
375: the encounters by taking into account the errors in the data is of
376: great interest.
377:
378: {\bf Monte Carlo Simulations of Encounters}.
379: (1) Initially, we
380: directly repeated the numerical experiment of Hoogerwerf et al.
381: (2001) on the encounter between the star $\zeta$ Oph and PSR
382: B1929+10. We computed 3 million orbits by taking into account the
383: random errors in the input data, which were normally distributed
384: with the $3\sigma$ region. For the pulsar, we used old data:
385: $V_r (PSR) =200\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$,
386: $\pi=4\pm2$ mas,
387: $\mu_\alpha\cos\delta= 99\pm12~(6\times2)$ mas yr$^{-1}$, and
388: $\mu_\delta= 39\pm8~(4\times2)$~mas yr$^{-1}$ (following Hoogerwerf et al. (2001),
389: we doubled the initial errors
390: in the proper motions, as shown in parentheses). The results are:
391: out of the 3 million orbits, 32505 encounters occur at distances
392: $\Delta_r\leq10$~pc (1.1\%); in 4410 of the 32505 cases, the star
393: and the pulsar were no farther than 10 pc from the US center about
394: 1 Myr ago. The derived parameters are in excellent agreement with
395: the results of Hoogerwerf et al. (2001).
396:
397: (2) The same experiment on the encounter between $\zeta$ Oph and
398: PSR B1929+10 with the currently available data for the pulsar:
399: $V_r$ (PSR) = $200\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$,
400: $\pi=2.77\pm0.7(0.07\times10)$~mas,
401: $\mu_\alpha\cos\delta= 94.09\pm3.3 (0.11\times30)$~mas yr$^{-1}$, and
402: $\mu_\delta= 42.99\pm4.8 (0.16\times30)$~mas yr$^{-1}$.
403: The initial
404: values of the random errors (as shown in parentheses) were
405: increased in order to have conditions comparable to those in
406: experiment (1). The results are: out of the 3 million orbits,
407: 74115 encounters occur at distances $\Delta_r\leq10$~pc (2.5\%);
408: in 5611 of the 74115 cases, the star and the pulsar were no father
409: than 10 pc from the US center about 1 Myr ago. The domains of
410: admissible values of $V_r$, $\pi$,
411: $\mu_\alpha\cos\delta~(\mu^*_\alpha)$, and
412: $\mu_\delta$ at which 5611 encounters occur
413: are presented in Fig. 1 for the star $\zeta$ Oph and in Fig. 2 for
414: PSR B1929+10. Figure 3 shows the expected distribution F3D of
415: minimum distance $\Delta_r$ calculated from the formula of
416: Hoogerwerf et al. (2001),
417: $$ \displaylines{\hfill
418: F_{3D}(\Delta_r)=
419: {\Delta^2_r\over {2\sigma^3\sqrt\pi}}\exp\biggl[-{\Delta^2_r\over{4\sigma^2}}\biggr] \hfill\llap(3)
420: }
421: $$
422: for the adopted $\sigma=2.5$~pc.
423:
424: (3) The experiment on the encounter between HIP 86768 and PSR
425: B1929+10 for $V_r$ (PSR) = $2\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$ and the same
426: values of
427: $\pi= 2.77\pm0.7 (0.07\times10)$ mas,
428: $\mu_\alpha\cos\delta= 94.09\pm3.3 (0.11\times30)$ mas yr$^{-1}$, and
429: $\mu_\delta= 42.99\pm4.8 (0.16\times30)$ mas yr$^{-1}$
430: as those in experiment~(2).
431: The results are: out of the 3 million orbits, 22708 encounters occur at distances $\Delta_r\leq10$~pc
432: (0.8\%); in 6932 of the 22708 cases, the star and the pulsar were
433: no father than 80 pc from the center of IC 4665 about 1 Myr ago.
434: The domains of admissible values of $V_r$, $\pi$,
435: $\mu_\alpha\cos\delta~(\mu^*_\alpha)$, and
436: $\mu_\delta$ at which 6932 encounters occur are presented in Fig. 4
437: for HIP 86768 and in Fig. 5 for PSR B1929+10. Figure 6 shows the
438: expected distribution of minimum distance $\Delta_r$ calculated
439: from Eq.~(3) for the adopted $\sigma=6$~pc.
440:
441: (4) The experiment of the simulation of encounters between HIP
442: 91599 and PSR B1929+10 at $V_r$ (PSR) = $250\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$
443: shows that out of the 3 million orbits, 32961 encounters occur in
444: the range 15 pc$<\Delta_r\leq30$~pc (0 encounters at
445: $\Delta_r\leq15$~pc) about 0.5 Myr ago. The stars HIP 86768 and
446: HIP 91599 do not encounter at distances $\Delta_r\leq10$~pc,
447: suggesting that the triple system HIP 86768---HIP 91599---B1929+10
448: is unlikely.
449:
450: (5) Testing the hypothesis of Walter (2001) --- the experiment on
451: the encounter between $\zeta$ Oph and the isolated neutron star
452: (NS) RX J185635-3754 at $V_r$ (NS)= $-50\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$. The
453: results are: out of the 3 million orbits, 2144 encounters occur at
454: distances $\Delta_r\leq10$~pc (0.07\%); there are no encounters
455: with the US center at $\Delta_r\leq10$~pc. The derived
456: characteristics are in good agreement with the results of
457: Hoogerwerf et al. (2001).
458:
459:
460:
461: \subsection*{IC 4665 and the Scorpius-Centaurus Association}
462:
463: We traced the trajectories of IC 4665 and Cr 359 in a time
464: interval comparable to their lifetime, up to $t=-30$ Myr. For the
465: mean values of the input parameters described in Section 2.1, we
466: found the minimum separation between the cluster centers to be
467: $\Delta_r=36$ pc at $t=-7$ Myr. Allowance for the errors in the
468: cluster distances and velocities showed that the encounter time
469: lies within the interval 0--12 Myr.
470:
471: Figure 7 shows the positions of IC 4665, Cr 359, and members of
472: the Scorpius-Centaurus association and their trajectories in the
473: past 30 Myr; since the age of US does not exceed 5 Myr, the
474: corresponding part of the trajectory is marked by the dotted line.
475:
476: Figure 8 shows the calculated positions of IC 4665, the members of
477: the Scorpius-Centaurus association UCL and LCC, and two bubbles,
478: the Local Bubble (LB) and the North Polar Spur (L1) (Breitschwerdt
479: and de Avillez 2006) at $t=-15$ Myr. The difference in the
480: positions of the UCL and LCC centers at this time found from
481: comparison with the data of Ortega et al. (2002) or Fern\'andez et
482: al. (2006) is $\approx\pm50$ pc along the $X$ and $Y$ axes and
483: very small, $\approx\pm3$ pc, along the $Z$ axis. We think these
484: discrepancies attributable to differences in the models to be
485: insignificant for the purposes of this paper. Note the approach of
486: Fuchs et al. (2006), who simulated not the trajectories of the
487: group centers, but the individual trajectories of very massive
488: stars, potential supernovae, using Eq. (1). Some of them turned
489: out to be near bubble L1 at $t=-15$~Myr (see Fig. 8). For IC 4665,
490: apart from the coordinates of the center, Fig. 8 shows a cloud of
491: 300 points (distributed with the $3\sigma$ region) calculated by
492: taking into account the errors in the input data for the cluster.
493: As can be seen from the figure, the contribution from the errors
494: in the distance is dominant.
495:
496:
497: \section*{DISCUSSION}
498: \subsection*{The Connection of IC 4665 and Cr 359 with the
499: Scorpius-Centaurus Complex}
500:
501: As we see from Fig. 7, the edge of the Gould Belt located in the
502: first Galactic quadrant continuously approached the Galactic plane
503: in a time interval of $\approx30$ Myr in the past. This is in good
504: agreement with the model for the evolution of the Gould Belt
505: suggested by Olano (2001) and is consistent with the model
506: calculations of the kinematic evolution of the Gould Belt
507: performed by Perrot and Grenier (2003) using data on molecular
508: clouds for the scenario with a ``Galactic-plane crossing'' (Fig. 7
509: from Perrot and Grenier (2003)), whereby the age of the Gould Belt
510: is $51.8\pm1.0$ Myr. According to these two models, the edge of
511: the Gould Belt located in the first Galactic quadrant reaches the
512: Galactic plane at $\approx-10$ Myr. Our results show a similar
513: motion. Thus, for example, the $Z$ coordinates of the centers of
514: UCL and LCC (which lie in the plane of the Gould Belt) at
515: $t=-15$~Myr fixed in Fig. 7 are close to 0 pc, while the $Z$
516: coordinates of the centers of IC 4665 and Cr 359 (rising above the
517: plane of the Gould Belt) are close to 70 pc.
518:
519: Most of the authors believe that the Scorpius-Centaurus
520: association is part of the Gould Belt (de Zeeuw et al. 1999;
521: Bobylev 2006). However, Fern\'andez et al. (2008) advocate the
522: point of view that the association could evolve independently of
523: the Gould Belt (outside the scope of the supernova explosion
524: hypothesis) and could be formed from the parent cloud that was
525: compressed by collisions with a spiral density wave.
526:
527: On the other hand, whatever the origin of the association, the
528: history of star formation in it agrees satisfactorily with the
529: model of successive star formation suggested by Blaauw (1964;
530: 1991) and developed by Preibish and Zinnecker (1999), as applied
531: to US. The age estimates for the members of the Scorpius-Centaurus
532: association (de Geus et al. 1989) lie within the ranges 5--6 Myr
533: for US, 14--15 Myr for UCL, and 11--2 Myr for LCC. Both the
534: present-day ``isochronic'' estimates (Mamajek et al. 2002; Sartori
535: et al. 2003), 8--10 Myr for US and 16--20 Myr for UCL and LCC, and
536: our kinematic age estimate for the entire association, 21 Myr
537: (Bobylev and Bajkova 2007), agree well with these estimates.
538:
539:
540: Our results show that the separation between IC 4665 and the
541: Scorpius-Centaurus association was much smaller in the past. Thus,
542: for example, whereas the current separation between their centers
543: is 302 pc (UCL--IC 4665), it was 215 pc 15 Myr ago and 120 pc 30
544: Myr ago. The minimum separation was $\approx80$ pc at $-66$ Myr,
545: but our model approximation on such a long time scale is already
546: unreliable. All of these facts suggest that they were formed from
547: the same parent hydrogen cloud; the cluster IC 4665 has always
548: been located on its periphery.
549:
550: According to the model of successive star formation, the shocks
551: from supernova explosions compress the nearby (within $\approx100$
552: pc) molecular clouds, triggering star formation in them. In our
553: view, the role of IC 4665 in the evolution of the
554: Scorpius-Centaurus association could lie in the fact that
555: supernova explosions in this cluster could trigger star formation
556: processes in the association itself.
557:
558: At $t=-15$ Myr, IC 4665 was near two well-known regions of coronal
559: gas: the Local Bubble and the North Polar Spur.
560:
561: Based on an analysis of HI data, Heiles (1998) obtained the
562: following parameters for the North Polar Spur (which is known as
563: the brightest component of radio loop I): the heliocentric
564: distance to the center is 120 pc, the coordinates of the center
565: are $l=320^\circ$ and $b=+5^\circ$, and the radius is 118 pc.
566: According to the model of Willingale et al. (2003), it can be
567: represented as an expanding spherical superbubble with the
568: following parameters: the distance is 210 pc, the direction of the
569: center is $l=352^\circ$, $b=+15^\circ$, and the bubble radius is
570: 140 pc. X-ray observations of the North Polar Spur showed that the
571: peak of emission with an energy of 3/4 keV is observed in the
572: direction with $l=26.^\circ8$ and $b=+22.^\circ0$ (Snowden et al.
573: 1997; Willingale et al. 2003; Miller et al. 2007), i.e., at the
574: bubble boundary. The current coordinates of IC 4665 are
575: $l=30.^\circ6$ and $b=+17.^\circ1$. Taking into account the results shown in Figs. 7
576: and 8, we conclude that IC~4665 has always been located at a
577: distance of 150--200 pc from the bubble boundary both in the past
578: and at present. This means that supernova explosions in IC 4665
579: over the past several Myr could influence the formation of the
580: North Polar Spur. This influence lies in the fact that supernova
581: explosions in IC 4665 could produce a stellar counter-wind (the
582: main explosions in the Scorpius-Centaurus association), which
583: additionally compresses the bubble walls.
584:
585:
586: \subsection*{The Probable Birthplace of the Pulsar PSR B1929+10}
587:
588: We considered the hypothesis of Hoogerwerf et al. (2001) that the
589: star $\zeta$ Oph and the pulsar B1929+10 could be components of a
590: binary in the neighborhood (within less than 10 pc) of US about 1
591: Myr ago using currently available data for the pulsar. Our
592: simulations of encounters showed that, contrary to the view of
593: Chatterjee et al. (2004), improved data for the pulsar only
594: strengthen this hypothesis. Therefore, it seems most plausible.
595: This requires that the pulsar radial velocity fall within the
596: range $V_r=200\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$.
597:
598: Our hypothesis of the HIP 86768---B1929+10 binary, which could
599: exist about 1 Myr ago in a wide neighborhood (within less than 80
600: pc) of IC4665, also seems plausible. The probability of the
601: existence of such a binary is lower than that in the hypothesis of
602: Hoogerwerf et al. (2001). A distinctly different pulsar radial
603: velocity, $V_r=2\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$, is required for our hypothesis
604: to hold.
605:
606: An examination of the hypothesis by Walter (2001) about the
607: $\zeta$ Oph---RXJ185635-3754 binary showed its probability to be
608: an order of magnitude lower than that of our hypothesis.
609:
610:
611: \section*{CONCLUSIONS}
612:
613: Based on the epicyclic approximation, we simulated the motion of
614: the young open star clusters IC 4665 and Collinder 359. The
615: separation between the cluster centers was found to have been
616: minimal 7 Myr ago, 36 pc. This suggests that IC 4665 and Collinder
617: 359 were formed from the same parent hydrogen cloud.
618:
619: We showed a close evolutionary connection between IC 4665 and the
620: Scorpius-Centaurus association. Thus, for example, the separation
621: between the centers of these structures was $\approx200$ pc about
622: 15 Myr ago. At that time, IC 4665 was near two well-known regions
623: of coronal gas: the Local Bubble and the North Polar Spur. This
624: means that supernova explosions in IC 4665 over the past 15 Myr
625: could affect the development of bubbles and, in particular, the
626: North Polar Spur.
627:
628: Analysis of the parameters for the encounter of the pulsar PSR
629: B1929+10 with various stars in the vicinity of IC 4665 and Cr 359
630: suggests that the star HIP 86768 is a suitable candidate for a
631: binary (in the past) with the pulsar. Monte Carlo simulations of
632: the encounters of this pair with the pulsar radial velocity
633: $V_r=2\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$ showed that out of the 3 million orbits, 22708
634: encounters occur at distances $\Delta_r<10$ pc (0.8\%); in 6932 of
635: the 22708 cases, the star and the pulsar were no farther than 80
636: pc from the center of IC 4665 about 1 Myr ago. We showed that
637: using currently available data for the pulsar increases the
638: probability of the hypothesis by Hoogerwerf et al. (2001) about
639: the breakup of the $\zeta$ Oph---B1929+10 binary in the immediate
640: vicinity of US about 1 Myr ago. Monte Carlo simulations of the
641: encounters of this pair with the pulsar radial velocity
642: $V_r=200\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$ showed that out of the 3 million
643: orbits, 74115 encounters occur at distances $\Delta_r<10$~pc
644: (2.5\%); in 5611 of the 74115 cases, the star and the pulsar were
645: no farther than 10~pc from the US center about 1 Myr ago.
646:
647:
648: \section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
649:
650: I am grateful to A.T. Bajkova for help in the work and to the
651: referees for several useful remarks that contributed to an
652: improvement of the paper. This work was supported by the Russian
653: Foundation for Basic Research
654: (project nos. 05-02-17047 and 08-02-00400).
655:
656:
657:
658: \newpage
659: \section*{REFERENCES}
660:
661: {\small
662:
663: ~~~~~1. H. A. Abt and O. Cardona, Astrophys. J. 272, 182 (1983).
664:
665: 2. T.W. Bergh\"ofer and D. Breitschwerdt, Astron. Astrophys. 390,
666: 299 (2002).
667:
668: 3. A. Blaauw, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2, 213 (1964).
669:
670: 4. A. Blaauw, The Physics of star Formation and Early Stellar
671: Evolution, Ed. by C. J. Lada and N. D. Kylafis (Kluwer, Dordrecht,
672: 1991).
673:
674: 5. V. V. Bobylev, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 30, 185 (2004) [Astron. Lett.
675: 30, 159 (2004)].
676:
677: 6. V. V. Bobylev, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 32, 906 (2006) [Astron. Lett.
678: 32, 816 (2006)].
679:
680: 7. V. V. Bobylev and A. T. Bajkova, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 33, 643
681: (2007) [Astron. Lett. 33, 571 (2007)].
682:
683: 8. D. Breitschwerdt and M. A. de Avillez, Astron. Astrophys. 452,
684: L1 (2006).
685:
686: 9. W. F. Brisken, J. M. Benson, W. M. Goss, et al., Astrophys. J.
687: 571, 906 (2002).
688:
689: 10. S. Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, W. H. T. Vlemmings, et al.,
690: Astrophys. J. 604, 339 (2004).
691:
692: 11. W. Dehnen and J. J. Binney, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 298, 387
693: (1998).
694:
695: 12. D. Fern\'andez, F. Figueras, and J. Torra, Highlights of
696: Spanish Astrophysics IV Ed. by F. Figueras et al.
697: (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2006); astro-ph: 0611766v1 (2006).
698:
699: 13. D. Fern\'andez, F. Figueras, and J. Torra, astro-ph:
700: 0801.0605v1 (2008).
701:
702: 14 . M. P. Fitzgerald, Astron. J. 73, 983 (1968).
703:
704: 15. P. C. Frish, Space Sci. Rev. 72, 499 (1995).
705:
706: 16. B. Fuchs, D. Breitschwerdt,M. A. Avilez, et al., Mon. Not. R.
707: Astron. Soc. 373, 993 (2006).
708:
709: 17. E. J. de Geus, P. T. de Zeeuw, and J. Lub, Astron. Astrophys.
710: 216, 44 (1989).
711:
712: 18. G. A. Gontcharov, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 32, 844 (2006) [Astron.
713: Lett. 32, 759 (2006)].
714:
715: 19. C. Heiles, Astrophys. J. 498, 689 (1998).
716:
717: 20. R. Hoogerwerf, J. H. J. de Bruijne, and P. T. de Zeeuw,
718: Astron. Astrophys. 365, 49 (2001).
719:
720: 21. N. V. Kharchenko, R.-D. Scholz, A. E. Piskunov, et al.,
721: Astron. Nachr. 328 (2007).
722:
723: 22. P. G. Kulikovskii, Zvezdnaya astronomiya (Stellar Astronomy)
724: (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].
725:
726: 23. B. Lindblad, Ark. Mat., Astron. Fys. 20 A, No. 17 (1927).
727:
728: 24. B. Lindblad, Handbuch der Physik 53, 21 (1959).
729:
730: 25. N. Lodieu, J. Bouvier, D. J. James, et al., Astron. Astrophys.
731: 450, 147 (2006).
732:
733: 26. J. Maiz-Apell\'aniz, Astrophys. J. 560, L83 (2001).
734:
735: 27. E. E. Mamajek, M. Meyer, and J. Liebert, Astron. J. 124, 1670
736: (2002).
737:
738: 28. S. Manzi, S. Randich, W. J. de Wit, et al., astro-ph/
739: 0712.0226v1 (2007).
740:
741: 29. J. C. Mermilliod, Astron. Astrophys. 97, 235 (1981).
742:
743: 30. E. D. Miller, H. Tsunemi, M. W. Bautz, et al., astro-ph/
744: 0708.4227v1 (2007).
745:
746: 31. C. Motch, A. M. Pires, F. Haberl, et al., Astrophys. Space
747: Sci. 308, 217 (2006).
748:
749: 32. C. A. Olano, Astron. Astrophys. 121, 295 (2001).
750:
751: 33. V. G. Ortega, R. de la Reza, E. Jilinski, et al., Astrophys.
752: J. 575, L75 (2002).
753:
754: 34 .C. A. Perrot and I. A. Grenier, Astron. Astrophys. 404, 519
755: (2003).
756:
757: 35. A. E. Piskunov, N. V. Kharchenko, S. R\"{o}ser, et al.,
758: Astron. Astrophys. 445, 545 (2006).
759:
760: 36. S. B. Popov,M. Colpi,M. E. Prokhorov, et al., Astron.
761: Astrophys. 406, 111 (2003).
762:
763: 37. T. Preibish and H. Zinnecker, Astron. J. 117, 2381 (1999).
764:
765: 38. C. F. Prosser, Astron. J. 105, 1441 (1993).
766:
767: 39. M. J. Sartori, J. R. D. L\'epine, and W. S. Dias, Astron.
768: Astrophys. 404, 913 (2003).
769:
770: 40. D. M. Sfeir, R. Lallement, F. Grifo, et al., Astron.
771: Astrophys. 346, 785 (1999).
772:
773: 41. S. L. Snowden, R. Egger, M. J. Freyberg, et al., Astrophys. J.
774: 485, 125 (1997).
775:
776: 42. The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, ESA SP-1200, (1997).
777:
778: 43. F.M.Walter, Astrophys. J. 549, 433 (2001).
779:
780: 44. R.Wielen, Astron. Astrophys. 13, 309 (1971).
781:
782: 45. R. Willingale, A. D. P. Hands, R. S. Warwick, et al., Mon.
783: Not. R. Astron. Soc. 343, 995 (2003).
784:
785: 46. W. J. de Wit, J. Bouvier, F. Palla, et al., Astron. Astrophys.
786: 448, 189 (2006).
787:
788: 47. P. T. de Zeeuw, R. Hoogerwerf, J. H. J. de Bruijne, et al.,
789: Astron. J. 117, 354 (1999).
790:
791: }
792:
793:
794:
795:
796: \newpage
797: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
798: {
799: \begin{table}[t]
800: \caption[]{\small\baselineskip=1.0ex\protect
801: Data on the objects
802:
803: }
804: \begin{center}
805: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
806: &&&&&\\
807: Object & $\alpha_{(J2000.0)},$ & $\mu_\alpha\cos \delta,$ & $\mu_\delta,$ & $\pi,$ & $V_r,$ \\
808: & $\delta_{(J2000.0)}$ & mas yr$^{-1}$ & mas yr$^{-1}$ & mas & km s$^{-1}$ \\\hline
809: B1929+10 & $19^h 32^m 13^s.9497$ & $94.09\pm0.11$ & $ 42.99\pm0.16$ & $2.77\pm0.07$ & --- \\
810: & $10^\circ 59' 32''.4203$ &&&& \\\hline
811: IC~4665 & $17^h 46^m$ & $-0.57\pm0.30$ & $ -7.40\pm0.36$ & $2.84\pm0.56$ & $-16.0\pm1.1$ \\
812: & $ 5^\circ 43'$ &&&& \\\hline
813: Cr~359 & $18^h 01^m$ & $ 0.22\pm0.28$ & $ -8.90\pm0.26$ & $2.22\pm0.99$ & $ -4.6\pm0.2$ \\
814: & $ 2^\circ 54'$ &&&& \\\hline
815: HIP~66524 & $13^h 38^m 09^s.0095$ & $-60.75\pm0.49$ & $-13.34\pm0.67$ & $2.28\pm0.75$ & $ 23\pm1$ \\
816: & $-50^\circ 20' 59''.702$ &&&& \\\hline
817: HIP~81377 & $16^h 37^m 09^s.5378$ & $13.07\pm0.85$ & $25.44\pm0.72$ & $7.12\pm0.71$ & $ -9.9\pm5.5$ \\
818: ($\zeta$ Oph) & $-10^\circ 34' 01''.524$ &&&&\\\hline
819: HIP~86768 & $17^h 43^m 47^s.0205$ & $-7.12\pm0.70$ & $-10.39\pm0.51$ & $2.34\pm0.80$ & $ 19.0\pm4.3$ \\
820: & $-7^\circ 04' 46''.588$ &&&& \\\hline
821: HIP~91599 & $18^h 40^m 48^s.0517$ & $-9.64\pm1.13$ & $-22.64\pm0.79$ & $3.61\pm1.16$ & $ 29 \pm5$ \\
822: & $-8^\circ 43' 07''.688$ &&&& \\\hline
823: {\tiny RXJ185635-3754}
824: & $18^h 56^m 35^s.56$ & $326.7\pm0.8$ & $-59.1\pm0.7$ & $16.5\pm2.3$ & --- \\
825: & $-37^\circ 54' 37''.0$ &&&& \\\hline
826: \end{tabular}
827: \end{center}
828: \end{table}
829: }
830:
831:
832:
833:
834: \newpage
835: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
836: {\begin{table}[t] %% t-2
837: \caption[]{\small\baselineskip=1.0ex\protect
838: Positions and heliocentric velocities of the objects
839:
840: }
841: \begin{center}
842: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
843: &&&&&&\\
844: Объект & $X(0),$ & $Y(0),$ & $Z(0),$ & $U(0),$ & $V(0),$ & $W(0),$ \\
845: & pc & pc & pc & km s$^{-1}$ & km s$^{-1}$ & km s$^{-1}$ \\\hline
846: B1929+10 & $244\pm6$ & $265\pm7 $ & $-25\pm1 $ & $-109\pm34$ & $ 91\pm37$ & $-107\pm6$ \\
847: IC~4665 & $290\pm57$ & $171\pm34$ & $104\pm21$ & $ -6\pm2$ & $-17\pm3$ & $ -9\pm2$ \\
848: Cr~359 & $381\pm169$ & $217\pm96$ & $ 99\pm44$ & $ 6\pm8$ & $-16\pm14$ & $ -10\pm8$ \\
849: HIP~66524 & $279\pm92$ & $-326\pm107$ & $ 90\pm30$ & $-83\pm67$ & $-102\pm57$ & $ 1\pm3$ \\
850: HIP~81377 & $128\pm13$ & $ 14\pm1$ & $ 56\pm6$ & $-11\pm5$ & $ 18\pm2$ & $ -1\pm2$ \\
851: HIP~86768 & $397\pm136$ & $134\pm46$ & $ 86\pm29$ & $ 25\pm7$ & $-18\pm17$ & $ 6\pm2$ \\
852: HIP~91599 & $253\pm81$ & $113\pm36$ & $ -8\pm3$ & $ 39\pm7$ & $-18\pm13$ & $ -3\pm1$ \\
853: {\tiny RXJ185635-3754} & $ 58\pm8$ & $-1.4\pm0.2$ & $-18\pm3$ & $-75\pm48$ & $ 20\pm1$ & $-75\pm15$ \\\hline
854: \end{tabular}
855: \end{center}
856: {\small
857: Note. The velocities of the pulsar B1929+10 were calculated for
858: its radial velocity $V_r=2\pm50$ km s$^{-1}$; the velocities of
859: the pulsar RX J185635.3754were calculated for $V_r=-50\pm50$ km
860: s$^{-1}$.
861: }
862: \end{table}
863: }
864:
865:
866:
867:
868: \newpage
869: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.1:
870: \begin{figure}[t]
871: {
872: \begin{center}
873: \includegraphics[width=145mm]{F1.EPS}
874: \end{center}
875: } Fig.~1. Domains of admissible values at which 5611 encounters
876: occur at distances $\Delta_r<10$~pc between the star $\zeta$ Oph
877: and the pulsar PSR B1929+10, during which they fall into the
878: neighborhood of US, $\Delta_r<10$~pc for $\zeta$ Oph.
879: \end{figure}
880: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
881:
882: \newpage
883: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.2:
884: \begin{figure}[t]
885: {
886: \begin{center}
887: \includegraphics[width=140mm]{F2.EPS}
888: \end{center}
889: } Fig.~2. Domains of admissible values at which 5611 encounters
890: occur at distances $\Delta_r<10$~pc between the star $\zeta$ Oph
891: and the pulsar PSR B1929+10, during which they fall into the
892: neighborhood of US, $\Delta_r<10$~pc for PSR B1929+10.
893: \end{figure}
894: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
895:
896: \newpage
897: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.3:
898: \begin{figure}[t]
899: {
900: \begin{center}
901: \includegraphics[width=120mm]{F3.EPS}
902: \end{center}
903: } Fig.~3. (a) Expected distribution of minimum distance
904: $\Delta_r<10$~pc for 5611 encounters of $\zeta$~Oph with PSR
905: B1929+10 and (b) histogram of encounter times.
906: \end{figure}
907: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
908:
909: \newpage
910: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.4:
911: \begin{figure}[t]
912: {
913: \begin{center}
914: \includegraphics[width=145mm]{F4.EPS}
915: \end{center}
916: } Fig.~4. Domain of admissible values at which 6932 encounters
917: occur at distances $\Delta_r<10$~pc between HIP 86768 and PSR
918: B1929+10, during which they fall into the neighborhood of IC 4665,
919: $\Delta_r<80$~pc for HIP 86768.
920: \end{figure}
921: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
922:
923: \newpage
924: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.5:
925: \begin{figure}[t]
926: {
927: \begin{center}
928: \includegraphics[width=145mm]{F5.EPS}
929: \end{center}
930: } Fig.~5. Domains of admissible values at which 6932 encounters
931: occur at distances $\Delta_r<10$~pc between HIP 86768 and PSR
932: B1929+10, during which they fall into the neighborhood of IC 4665,
933: $\Delta_r<80$~pc for PSR B1929+10.
934: \end{figure}
935: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
936:
937: \newpage
938: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.6:
939: \begin{figure}[t]
940: {
941: \begin{center}
942: \includegraphics[width=120mm]{F6.EPS}
943: \end{center}
944: } Fig.~6. (a) Expected distribution of minimum distance
945: $\Delta_r<10$~pc for 6932 encounters of HIP 86768 with PSR
946: B1929+10 and (b) histogram of encounter times.
947: \vskip 140mm
948: \end{figure}
949: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
950:
951: \newpage
952: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.7:
953: \begin{figure}[t]
954: {
955: \begin{center}
956: \includegraphics[width=90mm]{F7.EPS}
957: \end{center}
958: } Fig.~7. Spatial coordinates of IC 4665, Cr 359, members of the
959: Scorpius-Centaurus association, and their trajectories in the past
960: 30 Myr.
961: \end{figure}
962: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
963:
964: \newpage
965: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.8:
966: \begin{figure}[t]
967: {
968: \begin{center}
969: \includegraphics[width=90mm]{F8.EPS}
970: \end{center}
971: } Fig.~8. Positions of IC 4665, UCL, LCC, the Local Bubble (LB),
972: and the North Polar Spur (L1) (Breitschwerdt and de Avillez 2006)
973: 15 Myr ago..
974: \end{figure}
975: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
976:
977:
978: \end{document}
979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
980: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
981: