1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\sbr}{ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$}
4: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}
5: \newcommand{\cms}{cm$^{-3}$}
6: \newcommand{\feii}{[\ion{Fe}{2}]}
7: \newcommand{\hh}{H$_2$}
8:
9: \slugcomment{Submitted: \today}
10:
11: \shorttitle{Near-Infrared Observations of 3C~396}
12: \shortauthors{Lee et al.}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Near-Infrared \feii\ and \hh\ Line Observations of
17: the Supernova Remnant 3C~396:
18: Probing the Pre-supernova Circumstellar Materials}
19:
20: \author{Ho-Gyu Lee\altaffilmark{1,2}, Dae-Sik Moon\altaffilmark{3},
21: Bon-Chul Koo\altaffilmark{1}, Jae-Joon Lee\altaffilmark{4},
22: and Keith Matthews\altaffilmark{5}}
23:
24: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
25: Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Korea;
26: hglee@astro.snu.ac.kr, koo@astrohi.snu.ac.kr}
27: \altaffiltext{2}{Astrophysical Research Center
28: for the Structure and Evolution of the Cosmos,
29: Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Korea}
30: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
31: University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada;
32: moon@astro.utoronto.ca}
33: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
34: Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
35: lee@astro.psu.edu}
36: \altaffiltext{5}{Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy,
37: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125;
38: kym@caltech.edu}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41: We present the results of near-infrared \feii\ and \hh\ line imaging
42: and spectroscopic observations of the supernova remnant 3C~396
43: using the Palomar 5~m Hale telescope.
44: We detect long, filamentary \feii\ emission delineating the inner edge
45: of the radio emission in the western boundary of the remnant in imaging observations,
46: together with a bright \feii\ emission clump close to the remnant center.
47: There appears to be faint, diffuse \feii\ emission between the central
48: clump and the western filamentary emission.
49: The spectroscopic observations determine the expansion velocity of the central clump
50: to be $\sim 56$ \kms. This is far smaller than the expansion velocity of 3C~396
51: obtained from X-ray observations, implying the inhomogeneity of the ambient medium.
52: The electron number density of the \feii\ emission gas is $\le$ 2,000 \cms.
53: The \hh\ line emission, on the other hand,
54: lies slightly outside the filamentary \feii\ emission in the
55: western boundary, and forms a rather straight filament.
56: We suggest that the \feii\ emission represents dense clumps in the wind material
57: from the red supergiant phase of a Type IIL/b progenitor of 3C~396 which
58: have been swept up by the supernova remnant shocks.
59: The \hh\ emission may represent either the boundary of a wind bubble produced during
60: the main-sequence phase of the progenitor or molecular clumps left over inside the bubble.
61: We propose that the near-infrared \feii\ and \hh\ emission observed in several
62: supernova remnants of Type IIL/b SNe likely has the same origin.
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \keywords{circumstellar matter --- infrared: ISM ---
66: ISM: individual(\objectname{3C~396}) ---
67: shock waves --- supernova remnant}
68:
69:
70: \section{Introduction}
71:
72: The near-infrared (IR) \feii\ lines are useful tools for studying
73: the radiative shocks of supernova remnants (SNRs).
74: The increased abundance of the gas phase iron by
75: shock-induced sputtering of the dust grains and/or
76: the creation of an extensive partially ionized zone by shock heating
77: can substantially enhance the \feii\ emission \citep[e.g.,][]{gre91, mou00}.
78: This, together with less severe extinction effects than the optical
79: and the recent advents of near-IR imaging cameras covering sufficiently wide fields
80: (e.g., $\ge$ 5\arcmin),
81: can potentially make the observations of the near-IR \feii\ lines
82: a very competitive and efficient way to study the radiative shocks of SNRs,
83: especially in the Galactic plane where the extinction is usually large.
84:
85: A good example is the young core-collapse SNR G11.2$-$0.3 where
86: we recently found the brightest near-IR \feii\ emission of all
87: known SNRs using Wide-field Infrared Camera aboard the
88: Palomar 5-m telescope \citep{koo07}.
89: Besides G11.2$-$0.3, a few other SNRs --
90: such as RCW~103 \citep{oli99}, 3C~391 \citep{rea02}, W44 \citep{rea05},
91: and W49B \citep{keo07} --
92: have been detected in the near-IR \feii\ line
93: emission.\footnote{Here we only consider \feii\ emission from the radiative SNR shocks,
94: excluding \feii\ emission from the supernova ejecta \citep[e.g.,][]{moo08}}
95: Note that all these SNRs have a core-collapse nature
96: and, except for W44, all of them are relatively young SNRs.
97: Interestingly, in addition to the \feii\ lines,
98: near-IR \hh\ emission of shocked molecular gas
99: has been detected from all these SNRs.
100: The \hh\ emission is distributed close to, but slightly outside, the \feii\ emission
101: from the center of the SNRs \citep[e.g.,][]{oli90, keo07, koo07},
102: which is opposite to the standard picture of the molecular shocks
103: where molecules form in the downstream behind a recombination region.
104: This apparent pattern of the positional `reversal' between
105: the \feii\ and \hh\ emission
106: may have important clues to understanding the pre-supernova environment of SNRs,
107: calling more systematic investigation of the \feii\ and \hh\ emission together
108: in (young) core-collapse SNRs.
109:
110: In this paper we present the near-IR imaging and spectroscopic
111: observations of \feii\ and \hh\ lines from another core-collapse
112: SNR 3C~396 (also known as G39.2--0.3).
113: In radio 3C~396 is a shell-type SNR of $\sim$ $8'\times6'$ size \citep{and93}
114: composed of multiple elliptical arcs and filaments (Figure~\ref{fig_rx}),
115: with a thick, half ring-like feature in the west.
116: The {\em ASCA} X-ray observation revealed
117: the existence of a pulsar wind nebula within
118: a thermal X-ray shell \citep{har99},
119: and the former was later resolved by {\em Chandra},
120: although no X-ray pulsation was detected \citep{olb03}.
121: Recently {\em Spitzer} detected bright mid-IR emission
122: from this SNR along its western boundary in the radio \citep{lee05, rea06}.
123: The mid-IR emission is filamentary,
124: and is prominent in the 4.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m bands.
125: If the origin of the mid-IR emission is ionic and molecular lines
126: as suggested \citep{lee05, rea06},
127: we expect the existence of the corresponding near-IR
128: emission of the \feii\ line at 1.64 $\mu$m and \hh\ line at 2.12 $\mu$m
129: from this SNR, which motivated our observations presented in this paper.
130: The distance to 3C~396 is rather uncertain; however,
131: most of the previous observations of H and OH indicate that it is
132: beyond the tangential point at 6.6~kpc,
133: and possibly at 9.6~kpc \citep{cas75, bec87, gre89}.
134: In this paper, we adopt the distance of 8.5 kpc determined based on
135: the velocity of a nearby molecular cloud in 3C~396 (see \S~4).
136: We organize this paper as follows.
137: We first give a description of our near-IR imaging and spectroscopic
138: observations of 3C~396 in \S~2,
139: together with the basic data reduction processes.
140: In \S~3 and \S~4,
141: we present the results of the \feii\ and \hh\ line observations,
142: respectively.
143: We discuss the origin of the \feii\ and \hh\ emission in \S~5
144: and summarize the paper in \S~6.
145:
146:
147: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
148:
149: Near-IR narrow-band imaging observations of the SNR 3C~396
150: were carried out to search for \feii\ and \hh\ emission
151: using Wide-field Infrared Camera (WIRC)
152: aboard the Palomar 5-m Hale telescope on 2005 July 15 and August 28 and 29.
153: WIRC is equipped with a
154: Rockwell Scientific now Teledyne Hawaii II HgCdTe 2K
155: IR focal plane array, covering a $\sim$ 8\farcm5 $\times$ 8\farcm5
156: field of view with a 0\farcs25 pixel scale.
157: Our WIRC field covers the entire area of 3C~396 seen in radio
158: except for a tiny portion of the faint tail in the east
159: (see Figure~\ref{fig_rx}).
160: The narrow-band filters for the 1.64~$\mu$m \feii\ line and 2.12~$\mu$m \hh\
161: line were used, together with $H$-cont and $K$-cont filters to subtract
162: out continuum emission.
163: The detailed observing parameters are given in Table~\ref{tab_obsimg}.
164: For the basic data reduction, the dark and sky background were subtracted
165: out from each dithered frame using the median filtering of
166: stacked dithered frames, and then
167: the dithered frames were combined to a final image after flat fielding.
168: The photometric solutions of the \feii\ and \hh\ images were
169: obtained using the aperture photometry of
170: 14 isolated stars from the 2MASS point source catalog \citep{skr06}.
171: The obtained instrumental magnitudes of the \feii\ and \hh\
172: images were found to have a very good correlation ($r \simeq 1$) with the
173: 2MASS $H$ and $K_{\rm s}$ magnitudes.
174: Astrometric solutions were also obtained using the 2MASS stars.
175: The 1-$\sigma$ uncertainties of both R.A. and decl. directions
176: in the \feii\ and \hh\ images were smaller than 0\farcs05
177: which is within the systematic accuracy of the 2MASS astrometry.
178:
179: The left panels in Figures~\ref{fig_fe} and \ref{fig_h2} present
180: the WIRC images obtained with
181: the \feii\ 1.64 $\mu$m and \hh\ 2.12 $\mu$m narrow-band filters respectively,
182: where we see filamentary non-stellar emission in both the \feii\ and \hh\ images
183: which are highly contaminated by the emission from numerous stars in the field.
184: In order to see the non-stellar emission more clearly
185: we subtracted out the stellar emission using the continuum
186: emission images obtained with the $H$-cont and $K$-cont filters.
187: For this we first performed PSF photometry of the $H$-cont image
188: to obtain a list of stars for continuum subtraction,
189: and then subtracted out the corresponding stars in the \feii\ image.
190: To enhance the image quality we applied a median filtering with
191: a square box of 1\farcs75 $\times$ 1\farcs75 and then smoothed the resulting
192: image using a Gaussian with an 1$''$ FWHM.
193: It was difficult to remove several very bright stars with the above method,
194: so we simply masked them out.
195: We followed the same procedure with the \hh\ and $K$-cont images.
196: The right panels in Figures~\ref{fig_fe} and \ref{fig_h2} present
197: the star-subtracted images obtained with the \feii\ and \hh\ filters,
198: and we can clearly identify the non-stellar extended emission in 3C~396.
199: We give detailed analysis of the \feii\ and \hh\ emission in \S~3 and 4.
200:
201: After the aforementioned imaging observations,
202: follow-up spectroscopic observations were carried out using the
203: Long-slit Near-IR Spectrograph aboard the same Hale Telescope \citep{lar96}.
204: The spectrograph is equipped with a 256 $\times$ 256 HgCdTe NICMOS detector
205: from Rockwell International now Teledyne,
206: providing a 38\arcsec\ slit length
207: and 1\arcsec\ (= 6 detector pixels) slit width.
208: Both low-resolution ($R$ $\simeq$ 700) and high-resolution ($R$ $\simeq$ 5,000)
209: modes of the spectrograph were used for the observations.
210: The spectral coverages of the low-resolution mode were
211: $\sim$ 0.06 and 0.12 $\mu$m
212: for the \feii\ (1.64 $\mu$m) and \hh\ (2.12 $\mu$m) lines respectively,
213: while that of the high-resolution mode was
214: $\sim$ 0.02 $\mu$m for the \feii\ line.
215: (Note that only the \feii\ line was observed with the high-resolution mode.)
216: The \feii\ line spectra were obtained toward two bright peaks
217: of the 1.64 $\mu$m \feii\ line emission found in the WIRC image (see \S~3).
218: The coordinates (J2000) of these two peaks,
219: which are referred to \feii-pk1\ and \feii-pk2\ in this paper,
220: are (R.A., decl.) =
221: ($\rm 19^h04^m05.54^s$, $\rm +05^\circ25'26.8''$)
222: and ($\rm 19^h03^m56.29^s$, $\rm +05^\circ25'56.0''$) respectively.
223: As in Figure~\ref{fig_fe} the \feii-pk1\ is located inside 3C~396 while
224: \feii-pk2\ is at its western boundary.
225: The \hh\ line spectrum was obtained toward the peak position at
226: ($\rm 19^h03^m56.08^s$, $\rm +05^\circ25'38.3''$),
227: which is referred to \hh-pk1.
228: The parameters of the spectroscopic observations are listed
229: in Table~\ref{tab_obssp}.
230: Both flat fielding and atmospheric opacity correction were
231: performed by dividing the spectrum of a standard G-type star
232: obtained at a similar airmass just after the target observations.
233: Then the target spectrum was multiplied by a blackbody curve with
234: an effective temperature of the standard G-type star.
235: The OH air glow lines \citep{rou00} were used for wavelength calibration
236: and the Earth motion was corrected.
237:
238:
239: \section{Results of \feii\ Observations}
240:
241: \subsection{Distribution of \feii\ Emission in 3C~396}
242:
243: We can clearly identify extended, non-stellar \feii\ emission
244: spread over the central and the western parts of 3C~396 in Figure~\ref{fig_fe}.
245: The brightest \feii\ emission is from the
246: \feii-pk1 knot which is about $\sim$ 1\arcmin\ (or 2 pc) south from the center.
247: Its surface brightness is $7.6 \pm 0.5 \times 10^{-5}$ \sbr,
248: and the $\sim$~30\arcsec-long (or 1 pc) northwest-southeast elongation
249: matches well the local radio emission.
250: In addition to the emission around the \feii-pk1 knot,
251: there is a long, curved, half ring-like \feii\ filament in the
252: western boundary of 3C~396.
253: This filament, which peaks at \feii-pk2,
254: is clumpy and $\sim$ 3\arcmin\ (or 7 pc) long.
255: Its peak and average surface brightnesses are
256: $4.6 \pm 0.5 \times 10^{-5}$ and $1.5 \pm 0.5 \times 10^{-5}$ \sbr, respectively.
257: Compared to the radio emission,
258: this filamentary \feii\ emission is confined by radio contours
259: delineates the inner edge of a large, bright half-shell feature
260: prominent in radio in the western part of the remnant
261: (Figures~\ref{fig_rx} and \ref{fig_fe}).
262: The radio half-shell feature is relatively thick ($\sim$ 0\farcs5\ or 1 pc),
263: and the brightnesses of the both \feii\ and radio emission drop
264: sharply across the western boundary of this feature.
265: The central \feii\ emission and the emission in the west
266: appear to be connected though low-surface brightness \feii\ emission.
267: There is also more diffuse \feii\ emission in the north around
268: (R.A., decl.) = ($\rm 19^h03^m58^s$, $\rm +05^\circ29'10''$),
269: although it might be an extension of the filamentary emission in the west.
270: The mean surface brightness of the emission in the north is
271: $0.8 \pm 0.5 \times 10^{-5}$ \sbr.
272: Integrating all the mentioned features above,
273: the total flux of the \feii\ 1.64 $\mu$m emission in 3C~396 is
274: $1.8 \pm 0.6 \times 10^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
275:
276:
277: \subsection{\feii\ Spectroscopic Observations}
278:
279: \subsubsection{Low-Resolution Spectroscopy}
280:
281: Figure~\ref{fig_splow} presents low-resolution spectra of
282: \feii-pk1 and \feii-pk2.
283: For \feii-pk1, we placed the slit perpendicular to the elongation
284: direction of the clump, while the slit direction was parallel to
285: the direction of the filamentary emission for \feii-pk2 (see Figure~\ref{fig_fe}).
286: We have averaged extended emission over $\sim$ 5\arcsec\ (for \feii-pk1)
287: and 27\arcsec\ (for \feii-pk2) regions around their peak emission to obtain the spectra.
288: The near-IR \feii\ emission is known to have several other line transitions
289: besides the transition at 1.64 $\mu$m, including the transitions
290: at 1.26, 1.60, and 1.66 $\mu$m \citep[e.g.,][]{koo07}.
291: We clearly detected the 1.64 $\mu$m transition
292: from both \feii-pk1 and \feii-pk2, while we detected the 1.26 $\mu$m transition
293: only from \feii-pk1.
294: (Note that our \feii-pk2 spectrum does not cover the 1.26 $\mu$m transition.)
295: For all other transitions we obtain the upper limits
296: of their intensities relative to that of the 1.64 $\mu$m transition.
297: Table~\ref{tab_splow} summarizes the results.
298:
299: The \feii\ 1.26 and 1.64 $\mu$m transitions originate
300: from the same upper level.
301: Thus their intensity ratio can provide information
302: on the extinction toward the source, given the Einstein $A$ coefficients.
303: The exact values of the $A$ coefficients, however, are somewhat controversial
304: and their ratio could be from 1.04 \citep{qui96} to 1.49 \citep{smi06}.
305: From \feii-pk1, we obtain \feii\ 1.26 to 1.64 $\mu$m line ratio
306: of $0.232 \pm 0.026$,
307: which gives the visual extinction in the range of $A_{\rm V}$ = 17 -- 21 mag
308: based on the extinction cross section per hydrogen nuclei for the
309: carbonaceous-silicate model
310: of interstellar dust with $R_{\rm V}$ = 3.1 \citep{dra03}.
311: The estimated column density of hydrogen nuclei
312: is $N_H$ = 3.4 -- 4.2 $\times$ 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$,
313: which is between the values obtained by X-ray and
314: radio H~I observations \citep{bec87, har99, olb03}.
315: We adopt $N_{\rm H}$ = 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$,
316: which is approximately the middle value of X-ray and H I observations,
317: in this paper.
318: On the other hand,
319: the intensity ratios of the two undetected \feii\ transitions
320: at 1.60 and 1.66 $\mu$m to the 1.64 $\mu$m transition is useful to estimate
321: the upper limit of electron number density \citep[e.g.,][]{koo07}.
322: We solve the rate equation of 16 levels of the ionized iron using the
323: atomic parameters assembled by the CLOUDY program
324: \citep[ver. C05.05;][]{fer98},
325: and derived an upper limit of the electron number density to be
326: $\la$~2,000~cm$^{-3}$ for both \feii-pk1 and \feii-pk2
327: at assumed temperature of 5,000~K.
328:
329:
330: \subsubsection{High-Resolution Spectroscopy}
331:
332: Figure~\ref{fig_sphi} (top) is the high-resolution spectrum of
333: \feii\ 1.64 $\mu$m emission from \feii-pk1
334: averaged over a 10$''$ area around the peak.
335: The central velocity and the FWHM of the line
336: are $v_{LSR}$ = +117 $\pm$ 18 \kms\ and 149 $\pm$ 5 \kms, respectively.
337: (For comparison, the velocity of \feii-pk2 in the western boundary
338: measured from the low-resolution spectrum in Figure~\ref{fig_fe}
339: is +50 $\pm$ 26 \kms, which is close to
340: the systematic velocity +69 \kms\ of 3C~396 caused by the Galactic rotation [see \S~4.1].)
341: The large linewidth of the averaged spectrum is partly due to a velocity shift
342: which is apparent in the position-velocity diagram in Figure~\ref{fig_sphi} (bottom)
343: where we can identify a velocity shift from 93 to 145 \kms\
344: across the peak position from the northeast to the southwest direction.
345: The measured velocity +117 \kms\ of \feii-pk1 corresponds to a radial
346: velocity of +48 \kms\ after subtraction of the contribution from the Galactic rotation.
347:
348: If all the \feii\ emission in 3C~396 is originated from the surface
349: of an expanding sphere of 2\arcmin5 (or 6 pc) radius
350: which is the average distance of the western filament from the center,
351: then the three dimensional expansion velocity of \feii-pk1 is $\sim$ 56 \kms.
352: (Note that the radial velocity of the western filament is comparable to the
353: systematic Galactic rotational velocity of 3C~396,
354: indicating that the filament motion is largely transverse.)
355: The obtained expansion velocity of
356: 56 \kms\ is too low to be ejecta \citep[e.g.,][]{moo08},
357: which suggests that the \feii\ gas in 3C~396
358: is primarily the ambient or circumstellar gas swept up
359: by the SNR shock.
360: Generally the SNR shocks become radiative at expansion
361: velocities of $<$ 200 \kms\ \citep{mck80},
362: so that the above expansion velocity of 56 \kms\ of 3C~396
363: appears to be consistent with the detection of the shocked \feii\ lines
364: in this remnant.
365: In addition, the de-reddened surface brightness
366: (0.1 -- 1.2 $\times 10^{-3}$ \sbr) can be explained by
367: a shock propagating into the gas
368: of $n_{\rm H}$ = 10$^3$ -- 10$^4$~cm$^{-3}$
369: with a velocity of 30 -- 50 \kms\ \citep{har04}.
370:
371:
372: \section{Results of \hh\ Observations}
373:
374: \subsection{Distribution of \hh\ Emission and Molecular Gas Toward 3C~396}
375:
376: There is only one conspicuous feature in
377: the \hh\ 2.12 $\mu$m emission which is a long
378: ($\sim$ 3\arcmin, or 7 pc)
379: filamentary emission along the southwestern boundary of 3C~396
380: (Figure~\ref{fig_h2}).
381: The peak position (\hh-pk1)
382: is slightly south of the position of \feii-pk2,
383: and its surface brightness is $2.4 \pm 0.2 \times 10^{-5}$ \sbr.
384: The total integrated flux of the \hh\ 2.12 $\mu$m emission is
385: $4.1 \pm 1.3 \times 10^{-13}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
386: Figure~\ref{fig_twocolor} compares the relative locations
387: of the \feii\ and \hh\ emission, superimposed on the radio contours.
388: It is apparent that the \hh\ emission is located slightly farther
389: than the \feii\ emission from the SNR center,
390: and the former is linear as opposed to the latter which is curved
391: along the bright radio emission.
392: The \feii\ and \hh\ filaments are adjacent near the position of \feii-pk1,
393: but are apparently separated at the edges.
394:
395: Across the southwest boundary of 3C~396,
396: the radio emission drops sharply (Figure~\ref{fig_rx}).
397: This, together with our detection of the \hh\ emission,
398: strongly suggests that 3C~396 has encountered dense medium in this region,
399: most likely a molecular cloud.
400: In order to investigate this more
401: we examined the distribution of molecular gas around 3C~396
402: using the Galactic Ring $^{13}$CO J=1--0 line Survey \citep{jac06}
403: and found molecular gas at $v_{\rm LSR}$ = 68--70 \kms\
404: surrounding 3C~396 (Figure~\ref{fig_co}).
405: These velocities are consistent with the previously proposed systematic velocity
406: of 3C~396 \citep{cas75},
407: and the location of the \hh\ filament that we found in this study
408: matches the inner boundary of the molecular gas that forms a ring-like structure.
409: Therefore, it is likely that 3C~396 is indeed interacting with
410: some of these molecular clouds.
411: If we adopt the velocity (69 \kms) of the molecular gas
412: as the systemic velocity of 3C~396,
413: its distance is 8.5 kpc which we use in this paper as the distance to 3C~396.
414:
415:
416: \subsection{Spectroscopic Observations and Molecular Shocks}
417:
418: Our \hh\ spectrum of \hh-pk1 averaged over a 24$''$ area around the peak
419: is shown in Figure~\ref{fig_sph2}.
420: The \hh\ 2.12 $\mu$m 1-0 S(1) line stands out clearly,
421: while the detection of \hh\ 2.03 $\mu$m 1-0 S(2) line is marginal.
422: The \hh\ 2.07 $\mu$m 2-1 S(3) line is not detected,
423: which could be partly due to the incomplete OH airglow subtraction.
424: The ratio of the \hh\ 2.03 $\mu$m 1-0 S(2) line to the 2.12 $\mu$m 1-0 S(1)
425: line is $0.25~\pm~0.08$,
426: giving an excitation temperature of $T_{ex}$ = $820~\pm~350$~K
427: based on the transition probabilities of \citet{wol98}
428: and an ortho to para hydrogen ratio of 3.
429: This is lower than the general value of $\sim 2,000$ K derived from
430: the ro-vibrational \hh\ 1-0 S(1) and 2-1 S(1) line ratios in
431: thermalized molecular shock regions \citep{bur89}.
432: It may be that in the case of 3C~396 the density of the molecular gas is
433: smaller than the critical density for thermalization,
434: so that the excitation temperature is lower.
435:
436: The dereddened surface brightness of \hh-pk1 is
437: $1.4~\times~10^{-4}$ \sbr.
438: This surface brightness can be produced by a C-shock
439: penetrating into a molecular cloud of
440: n$_H$ = $10^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $B$ = 50 -- 100 $\mu$G
441: with a shock velocity of 20--30 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{dra83}.
442: Since we are observing tangentially to the shock front in 3C~396,
443: the real density could be lower than the model value
444: which was calculated for a normal surface brightness.
445:
446:
447: \section{Origin of the \feii\ and \hh\ Filaments}
448:
449: We detected the \feii\ 1.64 $\mu$m and \hh\ 2.12 $\mu$m filaments
450: which are close to each other in the western boundary of 3C~396.
451: While the \feii\ filament is curved and distributed
452: along the bright radio emission,
453: the \hh\ filament appears to be straight and is located just
454: {\it outside} the bright radio emission.
455: The \feii\ and \hh\ filaments are adjacent in the middle,
456: but are apparently separated at the edges.
457: The former is brighter than the latter.
458:
459: What would be the origin of these filaments?
460: In principle, one can observe the emission from both Fe$^+$ ions and \hh\ molecules
461: in a single SNR shock if the shock is radiative and has swept up enough column density
462: to have reformation of molecules behind the shock \citep[e.g.,][]{hol89b}.
463: However, in such cases the \hh\ emission originates in the downstream,
464: which is opposite to the `reversal' of the relative positions between the \feii\ and \hh\
465: emission observed in 3C~396 (Figure~\ref{fig_twocolor}).
466: Interestingly 3C~396 is not the first SNR
467: where the `reversal' is detected.
468: It has been detected previously in several SNRs, including
469: RCW~103 \citep{oli89, oli90}, G11.2$-$0.3 \citep{koo07}, and W49B \citep{keo07}.
470: (The `reversal' was also observed in W44 \citep{rea05},
471: but it is excluded in our discussion because it is an old SNR
472: and also \feii\ emission is fainter than \hh\ emission,
473: on the contrary to the other SNRs.)
474: Table~\ref{tab_snrlist} summarizes the properties of these four SNRs (including 3C~396)
475: where we list their distances, radii, and ages, along with
476: their interactions with ambient molecular clouds.
477: For the origin of the `reversal' between the near-IR \feii\ and \hh\ emission,
478: \citet{oli90} considered the excitation of \hh\ by ultraviolet or X-rays from a SNR,
479: although it appears unlikely because of the difficulty in exciting the cold gas.
480: For W49B, \citet{keo07} proposed an explosion inside a wind bubble within a molecular cloud and
481: \hh\ emission being produced by a `jet' propagating beyond the bubble; however,
482: it is inadequate to explain all the four SNRs.
483:
484: All the SNRs in Table~\ref{tab_snrlist}
485: are core-collapse SNRs with a relatively small radius of $\la 10$ pc.
486: According to \cite{che05}, G11.2$-$0.3 and RCW~103 are remnants of Type IIL/b SNe
487: that had intermediate-mass (25--35 $M_\odot$) progenitors with strong red supergiant (RSG) winds,
488: and the SNR shocks are interacting with the wind material extending to 5--7~pc.
489: The radio morphology of 3C~396, together with the detection of the \feii\ and \hh\ filaments,
490: indicates that it may also be a remnant of a Type IIL/b SN.
491: In the radio emission (Figure~\ref{fig_rx}),
492: there exists a thick, half ring-like bright radio shell (BRS) in the western part of the remnant.
493: Beyond this BRS of $\sim$ 2\farcm5 (or 6 pc) radius,
494: there appears faint plateau-like emission especially in the north and south of the remnant.
495: We interpret this BRS as the RSG wind material confined by the ambient pressure
496: and the faint extended plateau-like emission as originating from the SNR shock
497: that has crossed the boundary of the wind material.
498: This interpretation is consistent with the size of the BRS which is comparable to
499: to the typical size of the RSG wind material confined by the ambient pressure \citep{che05}.
500: In this scenario, the \feii\ emission may trace the shocked material of the RSG wind,
501: while the \hh\ emission may represent interactions between the SNR shock and
502: a wind blown bubble produced during the main sequence (MS) phase of the progenitor star
503: by its fast stellar winds \citep[e.g.,][]{mck84b}.
504: This also provides a natural explanation of the positional `reversal' between
505: the \feii\ and \hh\ emission.
506: The \hh\ filament could be either the inner boundary of the MS wind blown bubble
507: or molecular clumps left over inside the bubble.
508: We note that the 4.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m emission of 3C~396 detected with $Spitzer$
509: \citep[][; see \S~1]{lee05, rea06} can also be explained by this scenario.
510: The $Spitzer$ 4.5~$\mu$m waveband contains the wavelengths of
511: pure rotational \hh\ lines, while the 5.8~$\mu$m one does those
512: of many atomic lines, including the \feii\ line at 5.34~$\mu$m.
513: The 4.5~$\mu$m emission is located slightly outside of the 5.8~$\mu$m emission,
514: consistent with what we see in this study with the near-IR \hh\ and \feii\ line emission.
515: In conclusion, the two-stage SNR shock interactions with RSG wind material and also with
516: a MS wind blown bubble appear to explain the near-IR \feii\ and \hh\ emission
517: in the young SNRs of Type IIL/b SNe, including 3C~396.
518:
519: We suggest that the \feii\ emission in 3C~396 represent dense clumps
520: in the RSG wind of the progenitor star as follows.
521: The expansion velocity of \feii-pk1
522: is very small compared to what we expect from a young SNR.
523: If we use the hot gas temperature of 0.62 keV
524: derived from X-ray observations \citep{har99},
525: the implied velocity of the SNR shock in 3C~396 is in fact 600~\kms.
526: This discrepancy indicates that the ambient medium may be inhomogeneous,
527: so that the SNR shocks propagating into dense clumps are slow and radiative
528: while the shocks propagating through the diffuse interclump medium
529: are fast and non-radiative.
530: Generally in a shocked gas the \feii\ lines are emitted in the far downstream
531: where hydrogen atoms are mostly neutral at $T = 10^3$--$10^4$~K
532: \citep{mck84a, hol89a, oli89}.
533: This is because the ionization potential of the Fe atom is low (7.9 eV)
534: and the far-ultraviolet photons from hot shocked gas can penetrate far downstream
535: to maintain the ionization state of Fe$^+$.
536: The upper limit of the electron density that we derived in \S~3.2.1
537: gives an upper limit of the density of hydrogen nuclei
538: $n_H \approx n_e/0.11\lesssim 2\times 10^4$~cm$^{-3}$
539: if the mean ionization fraction is 0.11 \citep{oli89}.
540: Assuming 5,000~K as the temperature of the \feii\ line emitting region,
541: the thermal pressure is $p/k_B\lesssim 1\times 10^8$~cm$^{-3}$ K where
542: $k_B$ is Boltzmann constant, which is comparable to the thermal pressure of
543: the X-ray emitting hot gas \citep{har99}.
544: This indicates that the shock in the \feii\ gas can be driven
545: by the thermal pressure of the hot gas.
546: The preshock density may be estimated from
547: $n_0\approx p/{\mu_H v_s^2}\sim 50$~cm$^{-3}$ where
548: $\mu_{\rm H}$ (= $2.34\times 10^{-24}$ g) is the mean mass
549: per hydrogen nuclei including the cosmic abundance of He and $v_s\simeq 56$~\kms\
550: is the shock speed.
551: The density of the RSG wind at $r=6$ pc is $n_w=\dot M/4\pi r^2 \mu_H v_w\sim 1$~cm$^{-3}$
552: if we use the mass loss rate $\dot M=5\times 10^{-5}$~$M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$
553: and the wind speed $v_w=15$~\kms\ \citep[e.g.,][]{che05}.
554: Therefore, the preshock density of the \feii\ emitting gas
555: is an order of magnitude greater than the mean density of the RSG wind,
556: suggesting that the former represents dense clumps in the RSG wind material.
557:
558:
559: \section{Conclusion}
560:
561: Stars of intermediate-mass (25--35 M$_\odot$) have fast winds
562: in the MS phase and slow dense winds during the RSG phase.
563: Just before a core-collapse SN explosion, therefore,
564: they are surrounded by a dense circumsteller region of 5--7~pc radius
565: created by the RSG winds embedded within a low-density bubble
566: produced by the MS winds \citep{che05}.
567: Once explodes, the SN shock encounters these pre-existing structures
568: to generate in principle a multi-shell structure \citep[e.g.][]{dwa05},
569: although the details can differ from case to case depending
570: on the distribution of the interstellar medium.
571: In this paper, based on the detection of the near-IR \feii\ and \hh\ filaments,
572: we propose that the SNR 3C~396 is a remnant of a Type IIL/b SN that shows
573: such a multi-shell structure produced by the interactions of the SNR
574: shocks with the RSG wind material (i.e., \feii\ filament)
575: and also with the MS wind blown bubble (i.e., \hh\ filament).
576: This scenario can provide a natural explanation of the relative locations
577: between the \feii\ and \hh\ emission, where the latter is placed farther
578: from the center of the remnant than the former, and is also consistent
579: with the $Spitzer$ 4.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m emission of 3C~396.
580: The \feii\ emission likely represents dense clumps driven by the thermal
581: pressure of hot X-ray emitting gas in the remnant.
582: We identify that there exists a molecular cloud that appears to surround 3C~396.
583: The velocities of the molecular gas are very similar to the systematic
584: velocity of 3C~396, indicating that this molecular gas may be indeed interacting
585: with 3C~396 to produce the \hh\ emission.
586: Further sensitive molecular line observations are needed to investigate this
587: possibility more.
588: Finally, we note that there are three other SNRs having \feii\ and \hh\ emission
589: somewhat similar to that of 3C~396.
590: We expect that these SNRs are also remnants of Type IIL/b SNe \citep[e.g.,][]{che05}
591: that have comparable environments produced by the stellar winds of similar progenitors.
592:
593:
594: \acknowledgments
595: We would like to thank Kristy Dyer for providing the VLA image of 3C~396.
596: This work was partly supported by Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
597: through the Joint Research Project under the KOSEF-NSERC Cooperative Program
598: (F01-2007-000-10048-0).
599: D.-S.M. acknowledges the support from the Discovery Grant (327277) of
600: Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
601:
602: {\it Facility:} \facility{Hale (WIRC, HNA)}
603:
604:
605: \clearpage
606: \begin{thebibliography}{}
607: \bibitem[Anderson \& Rudnick(1993)]{and93} Anderson, M. C., \& Rudnick, L.
608: 1993, \apj, 408, 514
609: \bibitem[Becker \& Helfand(1987)]{bec87} Becker, R. H., \& Helfand, D. J.
610: 1987, \aj, 94, 1629
611: \bibitem[Burton et al.(1989)]{bur89} Burton, M. G.,
612: Brand, P. W. J. L., Geballe, T. R., \& Webster, A. S.
613: 1989, \mnras, 236, 409
614: \bibitem[Carter et al.(1997)]{car97} Carter, L. M.,
615: Dickel, J. R., \& Bomans, D. J.
616: 1997, \pasp, 109, 990
617: \bibitem[Caswell et al.(1975)]{cas75} Caswell, J. L.,
618: Murray, J. D., Roger, R. S., Cole, D. J., \& Cooke, D. J.
619: 1975, \aap, 45, 239
620: \bibitem[Chevalier(2005)]{che05} Chevalier, R. A.
621: 2005, \apj, 619, 839
622: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2003)]{coh03} Cohen, M.,
623: Wheaton, W. A., \& Megeath, S. T.
624: 2003, \aj, 126, 1090
625: \bibitem[Draine(2003)]{dra03} Draine, B. T.,
626: 2003, \apj, 598, 1017
627: \bibitem[Draine at al.(1983)]{dra83} Draine, B. T.,
628: Roberge, W. G., \& Dalgarno, A.
629: 1983, \apj, 264, 485
630: \bibitem[Dwarkadas(2005)]{dwa05} Dwarkadas, V. V.,
631: 2005, \apj, 630, 892
632: \bibitem[Dyer \& Reynolds(1999)]{dye99} Dyer, K. K., \& Reynolds, S. P.
633: 1999, \apj, 526, 365
634: \bibitem[Eisl\"offel et al.(2000)]{eis00} Eisl\"offel, J.,
635: Smith, M. D., \& Davis, C. J.
636: 2000, \aap, 359, 1147
637: \bibitem[Ferland(1998)]{fer98} Ferland, G. J.,
638: Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., Ferguson, J. W., Kingdon, J. B.,
639: \& Verner, E. M.
640: 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
641: \bibitem[Graham et al.(1987)]{gra87} Graham, J. R.,
642: Wright, G. S., \& Longmore, A. J.
643: 1987, \apj, 313, 847
644: \bibitem[Green(1989)]{gre89} Green, D. A.
645: 1989, 238, 737
646: \bibitem[Greenhouse(1991)]{gre91} Greenhouse, M. A.,
647: Woodward, C. E., Thronson, H. A., Rudy, R. J.,
648: Rossano, G. S., Erwin, P., \& Puetter, R. C.
649: 1991, \apj, 383, 164
650: \bibitem[Harrus \& Slane(1999)]{har99} Harrus, I. M., \& Slane, P. O.,
651: 1999, \apj, 516, 811
652: \bibitem[Hartigan et al.(2004)]{har04} Hartigan, P.,
653: Raymond, J., \& Pierson, R.
654: 2004, \apjl, 614, L69
655: \bibitem[Hollenbach et al.(1989a)]{hol89a} Hollenbach, D.,
656: Chernoff, D. F., \& McKee, C. F.
657: 1989a, in Proceedings of the 22nd Eslab Symposium,
658: ed. B.H. Kaldeich (ESA SP-290; European Space Agency), 245
659: \bibitem[Hollenbach \& McKee(1989b)]{hol89b} Hollenbach, D., \& McKee, C. F.
660: 1989b, \apj, 342, 306
661: \bibitem[Jackson et al.(2006)]{jac06} Jackson, J.~M.,
662: Rathborne, J. M., Shah, R. Y., Simon, R., Bania, T. M., Clemens, D. P.,
663: Chambers, E. T., Johnson, A. M., Dormody, M., Lavoie, R., \& Heyer, M. H.
664: 2006, \apjs, 163, 145
665: \bibitem[Keohane et al.(2007)]{keo07} Keohane, J. W.,
666: Reach, W. T., Rho, J., \& Jarrett, T. H.
667: 2007, \apj, 654, 938
668: \bibitem[Koo et al.(2007)]{koo07} Koo, B.-C.,
669: Moon, D.-S., Lee, H.-G., Lee, J.-J., \& Matthews, K.
670: 2007, \apj, 657, 308
671: \bibitem[Larkin et al.(1996)]{lar96} Larkin, J. E.,
672: Knop, R. A., Lin, S., Matthews, K., \& Soifer, B. T.
673: 1996, \pasp, 108, 211
674: \bibitem[Lee(2005)]{lee05} Lee, H.-G.
675: 2005, JKAS, 38, 385
676: \bibitem[McKee, \& Hollenbach(1980)]{mck80} McKee, C. F., \& Hollenbach, D. J.
677: 1980, \araa, 18, 219
678: \bibitem[McKee at al.(1984a)]{mck84a} McKee, C. F.,
679: Chernoff, D. F., \& Hollenbach, D. J.
680: 1984a, in Galactic and Extragalactic Infrared Spectroscopy,
681: eds. M. F. Kessler, J. P. Phillips (Reidel; Dordrecht), 103
682: \bibitem[McKee at al.(1984b)]{mck84b} McKee, C. F.,
683: van Buren, D., \& Lazareff, B.
684: 1984b, \apj, 278, L115
685: \bibitem[Moon at al.(2008)]{moo08} Moon, D.-S.,
686: Koo, B.-C., Lee, H.-G., Matthews, K.,
687: Lee, J.-J., Pyo, T.-S., Seok, J.~Y., \& Hayashi, M.
688: 2008, Science, submitted
689: \bibitem[Mouri et al.(2000)]{mou00} Mouri, H.,
690: Kawara, K., \& Taniguchi, Y.
691: 2000, \apj, 528, 186
692: \bibitem[Olbert et al.(2003)]{olb03} Olbert, C. M,
693: Keohane, J. W., Arnaud, K. A., Dyer, K. K., Reynolds, S. P.,
694: \& Safi-Harb, S.
695: 2003, \apjl, 592, L45
696: \bibitem[Oliva et al.(1989)]{oli89} Oliva, E.,
697: Moorwood, A. F. M., \& Danziger, I. J.
698: 1989, \aap, 214, 307
699: \bibitem[Oliva et al.(1990)]{oli90} Oliva, E.,
700: Moorwood, A. F. M., \& Danziger, I. J.
701: 1990, \aap, 240, 453
702: \bibitem[Oliva et al.(1999)]{oli99} Oliva, E.,
703: Moorwood, A. F. M., Drapatz, S., Lutz, D., \& Sturm, E.
704: 1999, \aap, 343, 943
705: \bibitem[Paron et al.(2006)]{par06} Paron, S. A.,
706: Reynoso, E., Purcell, C., Dubner, G. M., \& Green, A.
707: 2006, PASA, 23, 69
708: \bibitem[Patnaik et al.(1990)]{pat90} Patnaik, A. R.,
709: Hunt, G. C., Salter, C. J., Shaver, P. A., \& Velusamy, T.
710: 1990, \aap, 232, 467
711: \bibitem[Quinet et al.(1996)]{qui96} Quinet, P.,
712: Le Dourneuf, M., \& Zeippen, C. J.
713: 1996, \aaps, 120, 361
714: \bibitem[Reach \& Rho (2000)]{rea00} Reach, W. T., \& Rho, J.
715: 2000, \apj, 544, 843
716: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{rea05} Reach, W. T.,
717: Rho, J., \& Jarrett, T. H.
718: 2005, \apj, 618, 297
719: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2002)]{rea02} Reach, W. T.,
720: Rho, J., Jarrett, T. H., \& Lagage, P.-O.
721: 2002, \apj, 564, 302
722: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2006)]{rea06} Reach, W. T., et al.
723: 2006, \aj, 131, 1479
724: \bibitem[Rho et al.(2003)]{rho03} Rho, J.,
725: Reynolds, S. P., Reach, W. T., Jarrett, T. H., Allen, G. E.,
726: \& Wilson, J. C.
727: 2003, \apj, 592, 299
728: \bibitem[Rousselot et al.(2000)]{rou00} Rousselot, P.,
729: Lidman, C., Cuby, J.-G., Moreels, G., \& Monnet, G.
730: 2000, \aap, 354, 1134
731: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06} Skrutskie, M. F.,
732: Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R. et al.
733: 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
734: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1997)]{smi97} Smith, M. D.,
735: Davis, C. J., \& Lioure, A.
736: 1997, \aap, 327, 1206
737: \bibitem[Smith \& Hartigan(2006)]{smi06} Smith, N., \& Hartigan, P.
738: 2006, \apj, 638, 1045
739: \bibitem[Wilgenbus et al.(2000)]{wil00} Wilgenbus, D.,
740: Cabrit, S., Pineau des For\^ets, G., \& Flower, D. R.
741: 2000, \aap, 356, 1010
742: \bibitem[Wolniewicz et al.(1998)]{wol98} Wolniewicz, L.,
743: Simbotin, I., \& Dalgarno, A.
744: 1998, \apjs, 115, 293
745: \bibitem[Woltjer(1972)]{wol72} Woltjer, L.
746: 1972, \aapr, 10, 129
747: \end{thebibliography}
748:
749:
750:
751: \clearpage
752: \begin{figure}
753: \plotone{f1.eps}
754: \caption{
755: $(Left)$ VLA 20~cm radio continuum image of 3C~396 \citep{dye99}.
756: The contour levels are 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 mJy beam$^{-1}$,
757: and the beam size is $6''.8 \times 6''.1$.
758: The large box inside indicates the field covered by our near-IR imaging observations with WIRC.
759: The cross at the center marks the central position of its X-ray pulsar wind nebula.
760: $(Right)$ Chandra X-ray image of 3C~396 \citep{olb03} superimposed on
761: radio contours of 1, 8, 12 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
762: }
763: \label{fig_rx}
764: \end{figure}
765:
766: \clearpage
767: \begin{figure}
768: \plotone{f2.eps}
769: \caption{
770: $(Left)$ WIRC image of 3C~396 obtained with
771: the \feii\ 1.64 $\mu$m narrow-band filter.
772: The filamentary \feii\ emission is detected in the western part of remnant
773: distinguished from the point-like stellar emission.
774: The two slit positions used for the spectroscopic observations
775: are indicated by elongated white bars in the small internal panel.
776: The surface brightness scale range of two panel images is expressed
777: by the color-bar at the top in unit of \sbr.
778: $(Right)$ Enlarged image of the panel in the left after the subtraction of
779: stellar emission, superimposed on radio contours.
780: Median-box filtering and Gaussian smoothing are applied
781: to enhance the image quality (see \S~2).
782: }
783: \label{fig_fe}
784: \end{figure}
785:
786: \clearpage
787: \begin{figure}
788: \plotone{f3.eps}
789: \caption{
790: Same as Figure~\ref{fig_fe} but for the \hh\ emission.
791: }
792: \label{fig_h2}
793: \end{figure}
794:
795:
796: \clearpage
797: \begin{figure}
798: \plotone{f4.eps}
799: \caption{
800: $(Top)$ Low-resolution spectrum of the \feii\ 1.64 $\mu$m line transition from \feii-pk1.
801: The air wavelengths of the \feii\ transitions are indicated.
802: $(Middle)$ Same as the top panel, but for the \feii\ 1.26 $\mu$m line transition.
803: $(Bottom)$ Same as the top panel, but for \feii-pk2.
804: }
805: \label{fig_splow}
806: \end{figure}
807:
808: \clearpage
809: \begin{figure}
810: \plotone{f5.eps}
811: \caption{
812: $(Top)$ High-resolution spectrum of the \feii\ 1.64 $\mu$m line transition from \feii-pk1.
813: Note that the center of the line profile is shifted from the rest wavelength of the transition
814: indicated by the vertical line, clearly showing a Doppler shift.
815: $(Bottom)$ Position-velocity diagram of the high-resolution spectrum in the top panel.
816: The dotted line represents the evolution of the velocity centroids along the offset.
817: The negative offset corresponds to the northeast along the slit.
818: }
819: \label{fig_sphi}
820: \end{figure}
821:
822: \clearpage
823: \begin{figure}
824: \plotone{f6.eps}
825: \caption
826: {Comparison between the star-subtracted images of
827: the \feii\ and \hh\ emission superimposed on the radio contours in the western boundary of 3C~396.
828: Blue is for the \feii\ emission; red is for the \hh\ emission.
829: Note that the \hh\ emission is clearly located outside the \feii\ emission from the center.
830: }
831: \label{fig_twocolor}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \clearpage
835: \begin{figure}
836: \plotone{f7.eps}
837: \caption
838: {Comparison between the WIRC \hh\ 2.12 $\mu$m image of 3C~396 and
839: contours of the $^{13}$CO J=1--0 transition integrated
840: over the velocity range of 68 -- 70 \kms (see text).
841: The radio-continuum boundary of the remnant is marked by dotted line.
842: }
843: \label{fig_co}
844: \end{figure}
845:
846: \clearpage
847: \begin{figure}
848: \plotone{f8.eps}
849: \caption{Low-resolution spectrum of \hh\ 2.12 $\mu$m transition from \hh-pk1.
850: The air wavelengths of the \hh\ transitions are indicated.
851: }
852: \label{fig_sph2}
853: \end{figure}
854:
855:
856: \clearpage
857: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
858: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
859: \tablewidth{0pt}
860: \tablecolumns{5}
861: \tablecaption{Parameters of WIRC Imaging Observations \label{tab_obsimg}}
862: \tablehead {
863: \colhead{Filter} & \colhead{$\lambda _c\tablenotemark{a}$}
864: & \colhead{$\Delta \lambda \tablenotemark{b}$ }
865: & \colhead{Exposure$\tablenotemark{c}$} & \colhead{Date} }
866: \startdata
867: $[$Fe II$]$& 1.644 $\mu$m & 0.0252 $\mu$m & 900 s & 2005. 07. 15. \\
868: H$_2$ & 2.120 $\mu$m & 0.0329 $\mu$m & 600 s & 2005. 08. 28. \\
869: $H$-cont & 1.570 $\mu$m & 0.0236 $\mu$m & 300 s & 2005. 08. 29. \\
870: $K$-cont & 2.270 $\mu$m & 0.0330 $\mu$m & 300 s & 2005. 08. 29. \\
871: \enddata
872: \tablenotetext{a}{The central wavelength of the filter obtained from
873: $\rm http://www.astro.caltech.edu/palomar/200inch/wirc/wirc\_spec.html$}
874: \tablenotetext{b}{Equivalent width of
875: $\Delta \lambda~=~\int S(\lambda) d\lambda$
876: where $S(\lambda)$ is the normalized filter response. }
877: \tablenotetext{c}{The integrated exposure over dithered frames of 30~s exposure.}
878: \end{deluxetable}
879:
880:
881: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
882: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
883: \tablewidth{0pt}
884: \tablecolumns{5}
885: \tablecaption{Parameters of Spectroscopic Observations \label{tab_obssp}}
886: \tablehead {
887: \colhead{Position}
888: & \colhead{Central wavelength}
889: & \colhead{Exposure} & \colhead{Mode$\tablenotemark{a}$} & \colhead{Date} }
890: \startdata
891: $[$Fe II$]$-pk1 & 1.24 $\mu$m & 600 s & Low & 2005. 08. 26. \\
892: & 1.63 $\mu$m & 600 s & Low & 2005. 08. 26. \\
893: & 1.64 $\mu$m & 1200 s & High & 2006. 06. 09. \\
894: $[$Fe II$]$-pk2 & 1.63 $\mu$m & 300 s & Low & 2005. 08. 26. \\
895: H$_2$-pk1 & 2.09 $\mu$m & 300 s & Low & 2006. 06. 10. \\
896: \enddata
897: \tablenotetext{a}{~Low: Low-resolution mode; High: High-resolution mode.}
898: \end{deluxetable}
899:
900:
901: \begin{deluxetable}{lclll}
902: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
903: \tablewidth{0pt}
904: \tablecolumns{5}
905: \tablecaption{Relative Intensities of the \feii\ and \hh\ Lines \label{tab_splow}}
906: \tablehead{
907: \colhead{Position} & \colhead{Wavelength} & \colhead{Transition}
908: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Relative Strength} \\
909: & &
910: &\colhead{Observed}& \colhead{Dereddened} }
911: \startdata
912: \underline{[Fe II]-pk1}
913: & 1.26 $\mu$m & [Fe II] $a^4D_{7/2} \rightarrow a^6D_{9/2}$
914: & 0.232 (0.026) & 1.05 (0.13) \\
915: & 1.60 $\mu$m & [Fe II] $a^4D_{3/2} \rightarrow a^4F_{7/2}$
916: & $<$ 0.034 & $<$ 0.039 \\
917: & 1.64 $\mu$m & [Fe II] $a^4D_{7/2} \rightarrow a^4F_{9/2}$
918: & 1 & 1 \\
919: & 1.66 $\mu$m & [Fe II] $a^4D_{1/2} \rightarrow a^4F_{5/2}$
920: & $<$ 0.028 & $<$ 0.027 \\
921: \underline{[Fe II]-pk2}
922: & 1.60 $\mu$m & [Fe II] $a^4D_{3/2} \rightarrow a^4F_{7/2}$
923: & $<$ 0.019 & $<$ 0.022 \\
924: & 1.64 $\mu$m & [Fe II] $a^4D_{7/2} \rightarrow a^4F_{9/2}$
925: & 0.400 (0.014) & 0.400 (0.014) \\
926: & 1.66 $\mu$m & [Fe II] $a^4D_{1/2} \rightarrow a^4F_{5/2}$
927: & $<$ 0.010 & $<$ 0.009 \\
928: \underline{H$_2$-pk}
929: & 2.03 $\mu$m & H$_2$ 1-0 S(2)
930: & 0.247 (0.081) & 0.284 (0.093) \\
931: & 2.07 $\mu$m & H$_2$ 2-1 S(3)
932: & $<$ 0.023 & $<$ 0.025 \\
933: & 2.12 $\mu$m & H$_2$ 1-0 S(1)
934: & 1 & 1 \\
935: \enddata
936: \end{deluxetable}
937:
938:
939: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccl}
940: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
941: \tablewidth{0pt}
942: \tablecolumns{7}
943: \tablecaption{Properties of SNRs with \feii\ inside \hh\ emission \label{tab_snrlist}}
944: \tablehead{
945: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{Distance} & \colhead{Radius} & \colhead{Age}
946: &\colhead{SN Type} & \colhead{MC\tablenotemark{a}}
947: & References \\
948: & \colhead{(kpc)} & \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{(yrs)}
949: & &
950: }
951: \startdata
952: G11.2-0.3 &5 &3.3 &1600
953: &IIL/b &No & \citet{koo07}
954: \\
955: RCW~103 &3.8 &5.0 &2000
956: &IIL/b &Yes & \citet{oli90, oli99, par06}
957: \\
958:
959: W49B &11.4 &7 &4000
960: &? &No & \citet{keo07}
961: \\
962: 3C~396 &8.5 &10 &6000
963: &IIL/b &Yes & This work
964: \\
965: \enddata
966: \tablenotetext{a}{Detection of an ambient molecular cloud
967: interacting with the SNR}
968: \end{deluxetable}
969:
970:
971:
972: \end{document}
973: