1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3: \usepackage[dvips]{color}
4:
5: %=============================%
6: % N E W C O M M A N D %
7: %=============================%
8: % (1) Physical Units
9: \newcommand{\sep}{\hspace{+.2em}}
10: \newcommand{\msun}{\mathrm{M_{\odot}}}
11: \newcommand{\rsun}{\mathrm{R_{\odot}}}
12: \newcommand{\lsun}{\mathrm{L_{\odot}}}
13: \newcommand{\myr}{\mathrm{Myr}}
14: \newcommand{\gyr}{\mathrm{Gyr}}
15: \newcommand{\kms}{\mathrm{km\sep s^{-1}}}
16: \newcommand{\ccm}{\mathrm{cm^{-3}}}
17: \newcommand{\pc}{\mathrm{pc}}
18: \newcommand{\kpc}{\mathrm{kpc}}
19: \newcommand{\sd}{\mathrm{M_{\odot}\sep\pc^{-2}}}
20: \newcommand{\mrate}{\mathrm{M_{\odot}\sep yr^{-1}}}
21: \newcommand{\pspeed}{\mathrm{km\sep s^{-1}\sep\kpc^{-1}}}
22: \newcommand{\OmegaIB}{\Omega _{\mathrm{IB}}}
23: \newcommand{\OmegaOB}{\Omega _{\mathrm{OB}}}
24: \newcommand{\OmegaSP}{\Omega _{\mathrm{SP}}}
25: \newcommand{\omegaib}[1]{\OmegaIB=#1\sep\pspeed}
26:
27: % (2) Chemistry
28: \newcommand{\CO}{\mathrm{CO}}
29:
30: % (3) Other newcommands
31: \newcommand{\ubf}[1]{\underline{\textbf{#1}}}
32: \newcommand{\on}{$\bigcirc$}
33: \newcommand{\bm}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
34: \newcommand{\red}{\color{red}}
35:
36: \newcommand{\Plotone}[1]{%
37: \begin{center}%
38: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{#1}%
39: \end{center}%
40: }
41:
42: \newcommand{\Plottwo}[2]{%
43: \begin{tabular}{cc}%
44: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}%
45: \begin{center}%
46: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{#1}%
47: \end{center}%
48: \end{minipage}%
49: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}%
50: \begin{center}%
51: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{#2}%
52: \end{center}%
53: \end{minipage}%
54: \end{tabular}%
55: }
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: \title{Mass Supply to Galactic Center due to Nested Bars in the Galaxy }
59:
60: \author{Daisuke NAMEKATA\altaffilmark{1},
61: Asao HABE\altaffilmark{2},
62: Hidenori MATSUI\altaffilmark{3} and
63: Takayuki R. SAITOH\altaffilmark{4}}
64: \affil{$^{1,2}$Department of Cosmosciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan; name@astro1.sci.hokudai.ac.jp, habe@astro1.sci.hokudai.ac.jp}
65: \affil{$^{3}$Division of Theoretical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
66: 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588; hidenori.matsui@nao.ac.jp}
67: \affil{$^{4}$Center for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
68: 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588; saitoh.takayuki@nao.jp}
69:
70:
71: \begin{abstract} We investigate rapid mass supply process by nested
72: bars in the Galaxy by numerical simulation. We simulate gas flow in
73: the whole galaxy disk with nested bars, which are the outer bar and
74: the inner bar, especially with highly spatial resolution in the
75: galactic central region. We assume two cases of inner bar size which
76: are a smaller one and a larger one than the radius of the 200 pc gas
77: ring which is corresponds to the Central Molecular Zone. From our
78: numerical results, in the large size bar cases, the inner bars with
79: large elongation induce sufficient mass inflow and destroy the 200 pc
80: gas ring. On the other hand, in the small size bar cases, the inner
81: bars with large elongation induce large mass inflow and do not destroy
82: the 200 pc gas ring. This mass inflow is caused by straight shocks
83: excited by the inner bar. In this case, nuclear gas disks of $\sim
84: 15\sep\pc$ radius are formed. The nuclear gas disks are
85: self-gravitationally unstable and we expect formation of compact star
86: clusters under strong tidal force in the nuclear gas disks. We discuss
87: evolution of the nuclear gas disk.
88: \end{abstract}
89: \keywords{Galaxy: center --- Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics --- methods: numerical}
90:
91: \section{INTRODUCTION} \label{INTRODUCTION}
92:
93: Gas fueling to a galactic center is very important for activity of
94: active galactic nuclei, growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs),
95: nuclear starbursts, formation of super star clusters in a galactic
96: central region, and other interesting phenomena. Our galaxy is very
97: interesting for this study because of the following reasons. First,
98: the center of our galaxy is the most closest galactic center. Its
99: distance is about $8.0\sep\kpc$
100: (\citealt{eisenhauer03:_geomet_deter_of_distan_to_galac_center}).
101: Therefore, there are many observational data with high resolution over
102: wide wavelength. It is easy to compare those with numerical
103: simulations. Secondly, there is evidence of recent mass supply in our
104: galactic center. There are young massive compact star clusters (the
105: Arches, Quintuplet, and Central clusters) in the Galactic center.
106: These clusters are located within 30 pc from the Galactic center and
107: have a number of OB stars (\citealt{figer:02}). Because of the short
108: age of the young stars, such massive star formation occurred within
109: last several million years in the central region of the Galaxy
110: (\citealt{mezger96:_galac_center}). Formation of these clusters
111: requires a large amount of gas. The circumnuclear gas disk (CND),
112: which is dense ($10^{5}\sep\ccm$), clumpy, and turbulent with large
113: line widths ($\geq 40\sep\kms$) (\citealt{CH:99}), has radius of a few
114: pc and a mass of $\approx 10^{6}\sep\msun$ (\citealt{christopher:05}).
115: \citet{CH:99} found a gas stream from the giant molecular cloud (the
116: $20\sep\kms$ cloud) near the Galactic center to the CND. This may be
117: gas inflow to the CND.
118:
119: It is expected that a vast of gas is supplied from the central
120: molecular zone (CMZ), which is a ring-like gas distribution and
121: extends over the range of Galactic longitude $-1.5^{\circ}\le l \le
122: 2^{\circ}$, to the Galactic center
123: (\citealt{serabyn:95,morris96:_galac_center_envir}). The size of the
124: CMZ is $\sim 200\sep\pc$. It is certainly formed by the large-scale bar
125: (\citealt{binney:91,morris96:_galac_center_envir,sawada:04}) and has a
126: large amount of molecular gas $5$-$10\times 10^{7}\sep\msun$
127: (\citealt{serabyn:95}). However, it is unclear how the gas is
128: transported further in. Secondary effects like dissipation can then
129: drive the gas further in but at slower rate (e.g. \citealt{heller01:_doubl_bars_in_disk_galax}),
130: or likewise gravitational instabilities (e.g. \citealt{fukuda00:_effec_of_self_gravit_of}),
131: magnetic viscosity (e.g. \citealt{morris96:_galac_center_envir}).
132:
133:
134: For the gas feeding, many authors show an important role of a bar
135: (e.g. \citealt{athanassoula:92}). Nested bars, which consists of a
136: outer bar and inner bars, may play an important role in the gas
137: feeding to galactic centers. This idea was firstly proposed by
138: \citet{SFB:89} as a mechanism for fueling AGNs. Inspired by the idea
139: of \citet{SFB:89}, many numerical studies have been performed
140: (\citealt{FM:93,friedli:96,maciejewski97:_regul_orbit_and_period_loops,MS:00,heller01:_doubl_bars_in_disk_galax,shlosman02:_nested_bars_in_disk_galax,RSL:02,maciejewski:02,ES:03,ES:04,HSA:06,DS:07,shen07:_obser_proper_of_doubl_barred}).
141: \citet{FM:93} performed three dimensional simulations of gas and stars
142: and showed that an inner bar can drive gas infall to a galactic
143: center.
144:
145: Nested bars are observed in nearby barred galaxies in a large fraction
146: ($\sim 30\%$)
147: (\citealt{wozniak:95,FW:96,jungwiert:97,erwin:02,erwin:04}). The
148: large fraction indicates that nested bars are dynamically stable or
149: recurrent structures. Nested bars are expected to be dynamically
150: decoupling, since the orientations of both bars are random
151: (\citealt{buta93:_metric_charac_of_nuclear_rings}). Dynamical
152: decoupling of these was also reported in many numerical studies
153: (\citealt{FM:93,MS:00,RSL:02,ES:04,DS:07}).
154:
155: An increasing number of observational studies show effect of nested
156: bars in gas flows in central regions of galaxies. \citet{fathi:06}
157: observed the central region of the double-barred galaxy, NGC 1097,
158: with high resolution, using GMOS-IFU and HST-ACS. They show clear
159: evidence of radial streaming motion down to about 10 pc from the
160: nucleus by mapping the gas velocity fields.
161: \citet{schinnerer06:_molec_gas_dynam_in_ngc,schinnerer07:_bar_driven_mass_build_up}
162: observed molecular emissions in the central region of the nearby
163: double-barred spiral galaxy NGC 6946 with very high spacial
164: resolution ($\lesssim 1''$) with the IRAM Plateau de Bure
165: interferometer. They showed that there are nuclear massive gas clumps
166: and straight dust lanes inside the inner bar. They concluded that the
167: inner bar is closely related with the pile-up of molecular gas to the
168: nucleus. \citet{meier08:_nuclear_bar_catal_star_format} observed the
169: central region of barred galaxy, Maffei 2, with BIMA and OVRO. They
170: show a nuclear ring, whose radius is $\sim 80\sep\pc$ and mass is
171: $6.9\times 10^{6}\sep\msun$, well inside the bar and that overall
172: morphology of gas, including the nuclear ring, can be explained by a
173: nuclear bar by comparing the position-velocity diagram of molecular
174: gas with orbits of molecular clouds in their nuclear bar model.
175: These studies support the important role of inner bars in transporting
176: gas to a galactic center.
177:
178: Recently, observational studies show evidence of an inner bar in our
179: galaxy, which is much smaller than the outer bar of semi-major axis
180: $3.5\sep\kpc$. \citet{alard:01} studied surface density of old
181: stellar population in the inner bulge by using the 2MASS data and show
182: evidence of the inner bar. \citet{nishiyama:05,nishiyama:06}
183: investigated the shift of the peak position of red clump stars
184: distribution over $|l|<10.5^{\circ}$ using the IRAF 1.4 m telescope
185: with the near-infrared camera SIRIUS and showed that the gradient of
186: this shift clearly changes in $|l|<4^{\circ}$. They interpreted that
187: this structure may be due to the inner bar.
188:
189: We study the possibility that the inner bar play an important role in
190: the mass supply from the CMZ to the Galactic center. Previous
191: theoretical studies have not reported the case of large contribution
192: of inner bars in gas supply to a galactic center
193: (e.g. \citealt{maciejewski:02,RSL:02}). They studied limited cases.
194: We investigate various inner bar models in this paper. We perform two
195: dimensional hydrodynamical simulations in a gravitational potential
196: model of our galaxy, assuming several inner bar models. In the
197: simulations, we systematically change the mass and the axial ratio of
198: inner bar models, since parameters of the inner bar is not clear from
199: observations.
200:
201: In $\S 2$, we give our gravitational models and numerical method.
202: In $\S 3$, we show the results of our simulations.
203: In $\S 4$, we discuss gravitational instability
204: and evolution of nuclear gas disks, which are obtained in our numerical results.
205: In $\S 5$, we summarize our study.
206:
207:
208: \section{MODEL} \label{MODEL}
209: \subsection{Gravitational Potential of the Galaxy} \label{subsec:gravitational_potential}
210:
211: As the gravitational potential of our galaxy except for an inner bar,
212: we assume the model of \citet{bissantz:03} for the Galactic bulge, the
213: stellar disk, the outer bar, the spiral arms, and the dark halo
214: ($R>500\sep\pc$) and \citet{LZM:02} for the nuclear bulge
215: ($R<500\sep\pc$) and the SMBH. \citet{bissantz:03} simulated gas
216: motion in our galaxy potential model, which consists of the Galactic
217: bulge, the stellar disk, the outer bar, the spiral arms and the dark
218: halo. They gave pattern speed of the outer bar and the spiral arms
219: ($\OmegaOB\approx 60\sep\gyr ^{-1}$ and $\OmegaSP\approx 20\sep\gyr
220: ^{-1}$, respectively) to reproduce observational gas kinematics of
221: molecular clouds. \citet{LZM:02} analyzed IRAS and COBE DIRBE data of
222: the central $500\sep\pc$ of our galaxy. They gave mass distribution
223: of the nuclear bulge, which is distinguished from the Galactic bulge
224: by its flat disk-like feature, assuming a constant mass-to-light
225: ratio. They estimated that the nuclear bulge has a mass of $1.4\pm
226: 0.6\times 10^{9}\msun$. We assume the rotation curve obtained from
227: the mass distribution of the nuclear bulge and the SMBH in $R\leq
228: 500\sep\pc$ for the rotation curve of the total stellar mass. We
229: connect smoothly the rotation curves obtained from the nuclear bulge
230: and the SMBH in $R\leq 500\sep\pc$ and from the stellar component of
231: of \citet{bissantz:03} in $R>500\sep\pc$. Details on the
232: gravitational potential of the outer bar, the spiral arms, and the
233: dark halo are described in \citet{bissantz:03}.
234: Fig. \ref{fig:rotation_curve} shows the rotation curve of one of our
235: models, the model S33. In this figure, we use axially averaged mass
236: distribution of the inner and outer bars. In
237: Fig. \ref{fig:angular_velocity_curve}, we show the angular velocity
238: curve of the model S33. In this figure, there is the local maximum of
239: $\Omega -\kappa /2$ at $150\sep\pc$, where $\Omega$ is the angular
240: velocity and $\kappa$ is the epicyclic frequency. We point out that the
241: curve of $\Omega -\kappa /2$ in $R<\sep 500\sep\pc$ is rather
242: uncertain, since it is difficult to measure accurately the mass
243: profile in this scale.
244:
245:
246: \subsection{Inner bar potential} \label{subsec:inn_bar_pot}
247:
248: We assume Ferrers bar models for inner bars, since a density profile
249: of the inner bar is not observationally confirmed. The Ferrers bar
250: model has a density distribution as
251: \begin{equation}
252: %\rho (x,y,z)=\rho _{0}\left(1-\dfrac{x^{2}}{a^{2}}-\dfrac{y^{2}}{b^{2}}-\dfrac{z^{2}}{c^{2}}\right)^{n},
253: \rho (x,y,z)=\rho _{0}\left(1-\frac{x^{2}}{a^{2}}-\frac{y^{2}}{b^{2}}-\frac{z^{2}}{c^{2}}\right)^{n},
254: \end{equation}
255: where $\rho _{0}$ is density at the origin
256: (\citealt{ferrers:877}). We assume $n=1$ and $b=c$. $\rho_{0}$ is
257: related with mass of the inner bar $M_{\mathrm{IB}}$ through
258: $\rho_{0}=\frac{15M_{\mathrm{IB}}}{8\pi ab^{2}}$ for $n=1$.
259: Parameters we choose are given in
260: Table.\ref{table:small_inner_bar_models} and
261: \ref{table:large_inner_bar_models}.
262:
263: We assume two cases of the length of the semi-major axis of the inner
264: bar models, $a_{\mathrm{IB}}=200\sep\pc$ and $600\sep\pc$ from
265: the following studies. \citet{wozniak:95} performed the BVRI survey of
266: 36 disk galaxies selected as candidates for having an inner bar or a
267: triaxial bulge within the outer bar. They showed that outer to inner
268: bar axis ratios, $a_{\mathrm{OB}}/a_{\mathrm{IB}}$, are in the range of
269: $3.7$ to $18.0$ with the mean value of $7.2$. \citet{FW:96} observed 13
270: disk galaxies, which had been classified into galaxies likely having
271: an inner bar or a triaxial bulge within the outer bar in
272: \citet{wozniak:95}, with JHK band. They show a similar result,
273: $4.0\leq a_{\mathrm{OB}}/a_{\mathrm{IB}}\leq 13.4$ with the mean value
274: of $7.2$. In our galaxy, the ranges above corresponds to
275: $a_{\mathrm{IB}}=200$-$875\sep\pc$ for the semi-major axis of the
276: outer bar, $3.5\sep\kpc$. If our galaxy is a normal nested barred
277: galaxy, our assumed values of $a_{\mathrm{IB}}$ is in this range.
278:
279: In our assumption on sizes of the inner bar models, we also consider the fact
280: that inner bars often coexist with nuclear rings
281: (\citealt{buta93:_metric_charac_of_nuclear_rings,shaw:93,erwin:02}).
282: \citet{erwin:02} found that 60\% of their sample galaxies with nuclear
283: rings have inner bars. In such galaxies, inner bars are often
284: surrounded by nuclear rings and the size of the inner bars is
285: comparable with that of the nuclear rings. In our galaxy, if the CMZ
286: corresponds to such a nuclear ring, the size of the inner bar may be
287: comparable with the size of the CMZ ($R\approx 200\sep\pc$). This is
288: consistent with the projected size of the inner bar of
289: \citet{alard:01} that is $\sim 1.5^{\circ}-2^{\circ}\approx
290: 200-300\sep\pc$. However, the size of the inner bar proposed by
291: \citet{nishiyama:05,nishiyama:06} is $\approx 520\sep\pc$, and it is
292: much larger than the size of the CMZ.
293:
294: Our assumption on sizes of the inner bar models is consistent with
295: recent numerical simulations. \citet{DS:07} and
296: \citet{shen07:_obser_proper_of_doubl_barred} investigated formation of
297: long-lived inner bar from a psuedobulge by performing N-body
298: simulations. They showed that inner bar ends are much smaller than
299: their corotation radius $R_{\mathrm{CR}}$. Similar result is also
300: obtained in \citet{FM:93}. The $R_{\mathrm{CR}}$ of the inner bar is
301: as large as $600\sep\pc$ in our models, if the pattern speed of the
302: inner bar is near the local maximum of $\Omega -\kappa/2$ (our choice
303: is intended to be consistent with the N-body simulations; see
304: below). $a_{\mathrm{IB}}$ may be less than $600\sep\pc$. Since the
305: curve $\Omega -\kappa/2$ in $R<500\sep\pc$ is rather uncertain, we
306: assume two cases of $a_{\mathrm{IB}}$. Hereafter, we call the inner
307: bar models with $a_{\mathrm{IB}}=200\sep\pc$ \textit{small} inner bars
308: and with $a_{\mathrm{IB}}=600\sep\pc$ \textit{large} inner bars.
309:
310: We assume that the mass
311: of the inner bar (see Sec. \ref{subsec:numerical_method})
312: is a part of the mass distribution of the nuclear bulge of
313: \citet{LZM:02}. We give the mass of the inner bar models in
314: Table. \ref{table:small_inner_bar_models} and
315: \ref{table:large_inner_bar_models}. As shown in
316: Fig. \ref{fig:rotation_curve}, the mass of the inner bar models are
317: quite smaller than the total mass within the radius of semi-major axis of
318: the inner bars.
319:
320: We assume that pattern speeds of the inner bar models are near the
321: local maximum of $\Omega -\kappa/2$, which is located at about
322: $150\sep\pc$ (see Fig. \ref{fig:angular_velocity_curve}). This is
323: consistent with N-body simulations of formation of nested barred
324: galaxies (\citealt{FM:93,RSL:02}). We also assume that the inner bars
325: are prograde. In some small inner bar models, we change the pattern
326: speed around the local maximum of $\Omega -\kappa /2$ to investigate
327: the effect of the pattern speed on mass inflow rate to the galactic
328: center. The range of the pattern speed in each model is
329: $175$-$375\sep\pspeed$. We give the pattern speeds in Table
330: \ref{table:pattern_speeds_of_models}.
331:
332: We use $Q_{T}\equiv (F_{\phi}/F_{r})_{\mathrm{max}}$ as a measure of
333: the strength of the inner bar, where $(F_{\phi}/F_{r})_{\mathrm{max}}$
334: is a maximum value of a ratio of the azimuthal component of the
335: gravitational force of the inner bar to the radial component of the
336: total gravitational force within $500\sep\pc$. $Q_{T}$ of each model
337: are given in Table \ref{table:small_inner_bar_models} and
338: \ref{table:large_inner_bar_models}.
339:
340: Hereafter, we specify the inner bar models by the name in the
341: Table \ref{table:small_inner_bar_models} and
342: \ref{table:large_inner_bar_models} and by the value of the pattern speed
343: as S33 ($\omegaib{300}$). In the case of the large inner bar models,
344: we omit the value of the pattern speed, since we assume the same
345: pattern speed for them.
346:
347: \subsection{Numerical method} \label{subsec:numerical_method}
348:
349: We use the advection upstream splitting method (AUSM) for numerical
350: hydrodynamics (\citealt{liou93:_new_flux_split_schem}). The AUSM is
351: one of flux vector splitting schemes. In the AUSM, advection and propagation
352: of acoustic wave are recognized as physically distinct
353: processes. Therefore, the advective terms and the pressure terms in
354: the flux vector are split separately. This makes the formula of the
355: flux vector at the cell face very simple and leads to a reduction of
356: numerical operations without loss of accuracy. The robustness and good
357: performance of the AUSM in the application to galactic gas simulations
358: are well tested by many authors
359: (\citealt{colina00:_nuclear_bar_star_format_and,wada01:_numer_model_of_multip_inter,mori02:_early_metal_enric_by_pregal_outfl}). To
360: obtain higher order spatial resolution, we use the second order MUSCL
361: interpolation with the van Albada limiter function
362: (e.g. \citealt{RK:95}). The AUSM with the MUSCL interpolation is easy
363: to implement due to its simple form and well suitable to capture shock
364: waves in even rarefied medium. In our simulations, we do not use ``gas
365: recycling
366: law''(e.g. \citealt{athanassoula:92,englmaier00:_densit_wave_insid_inner_lindb_reson}),
367: since we do not intend to seek a steady state of the flow and our
368: simulation time is much shorter than a timescale of exhaust a large
369: fraction of gas in the systems by star formation.
370:
371: In order to resolve gas motion in the galactic center region, we use
372: two dimensional polar grids extending from $5\sep\pc$ to $10\sep\kpc$
373: in the Galactic radius. We divided radial grids into 370
374: logarithmically and azimuthal grids into 300 equally keeping the shape
375: of each cell nearly square. The radial spacing $\Delta R$ of the
376: grids decreases inwards. Very high spacial resolution is achieved in
377: the central region, e.g. $\Delta R\approx 0.1\sep\pc$ at $R=5\sep\pc$.
378:
379: We assume isothermal, non-self-gravitating, and non-viscous gas for
380: simplicity. We do not consider a viscous term in the hydrodynamical equations.
381: We use the equation of state of ideal gas with temperature of $10000$
382: K, which corresponds to the sound speed of $c_{s}\approx 10\sep\kms$
383: and random motion of interstellar gas implicitly. We do not consider
384: star formation and feedback process, such as supernovae and stellar
385: mass loss, in this paper.
386:
387: We assume a rotationally supported gas disk for the initial state.
388: This disk is flat and has infinitesimal thickness. Its outer radius
389: and mass are $10\sep\kpc$ and $10^{10}\sep\msun$, respectively. The
390: initial surface density of the disk is uniform in all models.
391:
392: The radial outer and inner boundary conditions are free and the azimuthal
393: boundary condition is periodic. We record mass flux passing through
394: the inner and the outer boundary for checking mass conservation.
395:
396: In order to avoid spurious phenomena, we introduce the
397: non-axisymmetric components, such as the inner bar, the outer bar, and
398: the spiral arms, of the gravitational potential slowly, compared to
399: the rotational speed of each component. We gradually deform the
400: gravitational potential of the inner bar from a spherical shape,
401: \begin{equation}
402: %\rho(x,y,z)=\rho_{0}'\left(1-\dfrac{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}{r_{0}^{2}}\right),
403: \rho(x,y,z)=\rho_{0}'\left(1-\frac{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}{r_{0}^{2}}\right),
404: \end{equation}
405: where $\rho_{0}'=\frac{15M_{\mathrm{IB}}}{8\pi r_{0}^{2}}$ and
406: $r_{0}=\frac{a+b}{2}$, to its assumed one from $t=100\sep\myr$ to
407: $250\sep\myr$ as in \citet{athanassoula:92}. We also similarly
408: introduce the Fourier component of the gravitational potential of the
409: outer bar and the spiral arms given by \citet{bissantz:03} from
410: $t=0\sep\myr$ to $t=100\sep\myr$.
411:
412: We use the super computer SR11000/K1 of the Hokkaido university
413: Information Initiative Center (IIC) for our simulations.
414:
415: \section{NUMERICAL RESULTS} \label{RESULTS}
416:
417: We perform the hydrodynamical simulations for various masses and
418: axial ratios of the inner bar systematically. In the small inner bar
419: models, we also vary their pattern speed.
420:
421: We find a large amount of gas concentration to the galactic center in
422: both sizes of the inner bar models. In small inner bar models, the
423: inner bars induce gas inflow to the galactic center for
424: $0.05<Q_{T}<0.3$ without destroying the 200 pc gas ring, if
425: $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega -\kappa /2)_{\mathrm{max}}\approx
426: 300\sep\pspeed$ for $0.12\gtrsim Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.3$ and if
427: $\OmegaIB\approx 225\sep\pspeed$ for $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.05$. On the
428: other hand, in large inner bar models, gas concentration occurs if
429: $Q_{T}>0.1$ and the inner bar destroys the 200 pc gas ring. In the
430: following subsections, we describe the results in more detail.
431:
432: \subsection{The no-inner bar case} \label{subsec:no-inner}
433:
434: We perform hydrodynamical simulation in the Galaxy model without the
435: inner bar to compare with the models with the inner bars. We show
436: result of the no-inner bar model (model N) in Fig.
437: \ref{fig:no_inner_bar}.
438:
439: Gas ridges are formed in the outer bar region by $t=100\sep\myr$. Gas
440: in the galactic disk flows into the central region ($R<300\sep\pc$)
441: along the gas ridges. This result is almost the same results of
442: \citet{bissantz:03}. In our numerical results, a gas ring is formed at
443: the radius of $150$-$250\sep\pc$. Its mass is almost constant at the
444: value of $\approx 3\times 10^{8}\sep\msun$ after $t=100\sep\myr$.
445: The mass and size of the ring correspond to the CMZ, of which extent
446: is $-1.5^{\circ}\leq l \leq 2^{\circ}$ and mass is $5$-$10\times
447: 10^{7}\sep\msun$. We find similar gas rings in the models with inner
448: bars. Hereafter we call these rings the 200 pc gas rings.
449:
450: The radius of the 200 pc gas ring is well inside the position of the
451: ILR of the outer bar ($\sim 750\sep\pc$). This result agrees with
452: \citet{regan:03}. They showed that size of nuclear ring is related to
453: population of $x_{2}$ orbits, rather than the position of ILRs of an
454: outer bar when gas motion is in the non-linear regime of hydrodynamics
455: in the barred potential.
456:
457: Inside of the 200 pc gas ring, there are weak gas spirals. Their
458: pattern speed agrees with the pattern speed of the outer bar. These
459: spirals are density waves found by
460: \citet{englmaier00:_densit_wave_insid_inner_lindb_reson}.
461: \citet{englmaier00:_densit_wave_insid_inner_lindb_reson} show that
462: gaseous spirals are formed inside the ILR of a bar in their numerical
463: simulations of non-self-gravitating gaseous disks and that such
464: gaseous spirals are supported by pressure force and stationary in the
465: bar frame. The gaseous spirals in our simulation have similar
466: property. Hereafter we call these spirals the nuclear spirals. The
467: nuclear spirals become more tightly wound as approaching to the
468: galactic center. Near 20 pc from the center, nuclear spirals are
469: highly tight winding. An average mass inflow rate from $100\sep\myr$
470: to $500\sep\myr$ is very small, $\approx 3.6\times 10^{-4}\sep\mrate$.
471: This radial gas inflow may be due to the nuclear spirals, since the
472: total gravitational torque on the gas in the nuclear spirals region is
473: consistent with the average mass inflow rate. In order to confirm
474: this, we calculate the total gravitational torque on the gas
475: inside $R=60\sep\pc$ from the outer bar. The time averaged total
476: gravitational torque within $R=60\sep\pc$ between $100$-$500\sep\myr$ is
477: $-7.6\times 10^{49}\sep\mathrm{g\sep cm^{2}\sep s^{-2}}$. The
478: mass inflow rate is as large as $\sim 10^{-3}\sep\mrate$ by this torque.
479: This is consistent with the average mass inflow rate from
480: $100\sep\myr$ to $500\sep\myr$.
481:
482: Such nuclear spirals were not formed in the simulations of
483: \citet{bissantz:03}. This may be due to the lack of the spacial
484: resolution in the nuclear spirals region in the simulations of
485: \citet{bissantz:03}.
486: \citet{englmaier00:_densit_wave_insid_inner_lindb_reson} have shown
487: that in simulations with insufficient spacial resolution to resolve
488: nuclear spiral waves, they are quickly damped out due to numerical
489: viscosity.
490:
491:
492: \subsection{The small inner bar models} \label{subsec:small_inner_bar}
493: We find that a large amount of gas concentrates to the galactic center
494: in the small inner bar models with $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.05$ in some range
495: of $\OmegaIB$. We divide our results into two cases, the high gas
496: mass concentration case and the low gas mass concentration case.
497:
498: If $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.12$ (S42, S43, S33, S34), high gas mass
499: concentration to the galactic center occurs for both $\OmegaIB\approx
500: (\Omega -\kappa /2)_{\mathrm{max}}\approx 300\sep\pspeed$ and
501: $\OmegaIB\sim 225\sep\pspeed$. If $0.05\lesssim Q_{T}\lesssim 0.12$
502: (S41, S32, and S23), high gas mass concentration to the galactic
503: center occurs only for $\OmegaIB\sim 225\sep\pspeed$. One exception
504: is the model S24, in which high gas mass concentration occur for both
505: $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega -\kappa /2)_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $\OmegaIB\sim
506: 225\sep\pspeed$ in spite of $0.05\lesssim Q_{T}\lesssim 0.12$.
507:
508: \subsubsection{The high gas mass concentration cases} \label{subsubsec:high_gas_mass_con_small}
509:
510: Here, we describe the results of the model S33 ($\omegaib{300}$) in
511: detail, since time evolution of gas distribution in the inner bar
512: region are similar to the high gas mass concentration cases.
513:
514: We show the time evolution of the surface density of gas in the
515: central 1 kpc square in the model S33 ($\omegaib{300}$) in
516: Fig. \ref{fig:S33a}. One of characteristic gas distribution is
517: straight shocks inside the inner bar (see Fig.\ref{fig:VF_S33}).
518: These shocks appear after the inner bar potential is introduced and
519: become stronger with calculation time (see Fig. \ref{fig:S33a}d-f).
520: These shocks extend from the galactic central disk to the inner edge
521: of the 200 pc gas ring and are efficient to supply a large amount of
522: gas to the galactic center. A massive nuclear gas disk forms in
523: $R\lesssim 15\sep\pc$. Its mass reaches as large as $10^{7}\sep\msun$
524: at $t=500\sep\myr$. Hereafter we call this disk the nuclear gas disk.
525:
526: An elliptical gas ring is formed around the inner bar and is elongated
527: along the inner bar (see Fig. \ref{fig:S33a}f). Similar elliptical
528: gas ring is shown in \citet{maciejewski:02}. Shape and surface
529: density of this ring changes as the inner bar rotates. In
530: Fig.\ref{fig:VF_S33}, the ellipticity of the ring is larger at $\Delta\theta
531: =90^{\circ}$ than at $\Delta\theta=0^{\circ}$, while
532: surface density of the ring is higher at $\Delta\theta =0^{\circ}$
533: than at $\Delta\theta =90^{\circ}$, where $\Delta\theta$ is the angle
534: between major axes of the inner bar and the outer bar. The velocity
535: fields in the elliptical ring are smoothly connected to that of
536: surrounding gas.
537:
538: In Fig. \ref{fig:Mass_inflows} we show the time evolution of the gas
539: mass within 20 pc, $M_{20}(t)$, in the model S33 ($\omegaib{300}$).
540: As deformation of the inner bar proceeds ($t=100$-$250\sep\myr$),
541: $M_{20}(t)$ rapidly increases with time. Then, $M_{20}(t)$ saturates
542: ($t=250-350\sep\myr$). Similar phenomenon was reported by
543: \citet{maciejewski:02}. \citet{maciejewski:02} showed that an inner
544: bar keeps gas away from the galactic center and gas inflow due to the
545: inner bar is negligible after it reaches its full strength. In the
546: corresponding stage, in our simulations, velocity fields and gas
547: distribution inside the 200 gas pc ring is perturbed by the inner bar.
548: After velocity fields and gas distribution is quasi-steady, increase
549: of gas inflow to the galactic center begins at $t=350\sep\myr$. This
550: second inflow continues to the end of the simulations. $M_{20}(t)$
551: attains $\sim 10^{7}\sep\msun$ at $t=500\sep\myr$. An average second
552: mass inflow rate is $\sim 10^{7}\sep\msun / 100\sep\myr \approx
553: 0.1\sep\mrate$. We discuss the difference between our results and
554: that of \citet{maciejewski:02} in Sect. 4.
555:
556:
557: Occurrence of the second mass inflow depends on pattern speed of the
558: inner bar. We show time evolution of $M_{20}(t)$ for various pattern
559: speeds of the inner bar in the model S33 in the lower panel of
560: Fig.\ref{fig:Mass_inflows}. Figure \ref{fig:Mass_inflows} shows that
561: the second mass inflow occurs when the pattern speed is in
562: $290$-$325\sep\pspeed$ and in $200$-$225\sep\pspeed$ in the model S33.
563: We summarize $M_{20}(t=500\sep\myr)$ for small inner bar models in
564: Table \ref{table:HGMC_SIB}. In this table, we denote models in which
565: the second mass inflow occurs by bold letters. We note the models by
566: daggers, in which $M_{20}(t=500\sep\myr)$ exceeds the stellar mass
567: within $20\sep\pc$ $M_{\star}(<20\sep\pc)\approx 2\times
568: 10^{7}\sep\msun$ (see Fig. 14 in \citealt{LZM:02}). In this case, we
569: should solve self-consistently both the motion of gas and stars in the
570: Galactic central region. Double daggers show the models in which the
571: second mass inflows begin just before the end of the simulation. In
572: these models, more mass will inflow into the galactic center, if we
573: continue the simulations.
574:
575: Mass of the nuclear gas disk increases with time periodically by the
576: second mass inflow. Similar periodicity have been reported in
577: \citet{SH:02}. This case may be closely related with resonance
578: phenomena between the outer bar and the inner bar. In our results,
579: sufficient elongation for a small inner bar and a suitable $\OmegaIB$
580: are needed for the second mass inflow.
581:
582: \subsubsection{The low gas mass concentration cases} \label{subsubsec:low_gas_mass_con_small}
583:
584: In small inner bar models with $Q_{T}<0.05$, gas mass concentration to
585: the galactic center is small (S31, S21, S22, S13, and S14). In these
586: models, loose two gas spirals appear in the inner bar region instead
587: of straight shocks. These nuclear gas spirals become tightly wound
588: near the center and a less massive gas disk appears in $R<20\sep\pc$
589: from the center.
590:
591: The low gas mass concentration is due to the absence of the second
592: mass inflow. We show the time evolution of $M_{20}(t)$ in the model
593: S21 ($\omegaib{300}$) by a dashed line in the upper left panel of
594: Fig. \ref{fig:Mass_inflows}. This figure shows that $M_{20}(t)$
595: saturates after the first mass increase and the second mass inflow
596: does not occur till the end of the simulation. We test the time
597: evolution of $M_{20}(t)$ of the model S21 for various pattern speed,
598: as shown in the upper right panel of Fig. \ref{fig:Mass_inflows}.
599: There is no second mass inflow in a range of $\OmegaIB
600: =175$-$325\sep\pspeed$. Thus, we conclude that the second mass inflow
601: needs $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.05$.
602:
603:
604: We address characteristic gas distribution seen in the low
605: gas mass concentration models, since it is clear evidence of an inner weak
606: bar. In Fig. \ref{fig:weak_small_inner_bars}, we show the snapshots
607: of surface density of the model S21 for two pattern speeds, $\OmegaIB
608: =200$ and $300\sep\pspeed$. In both models, the loose two gas spirals
609: are formed in the inner bar region and are surrounded by the gas
610: rings. Similar structure is observed in the double-barred galaxy, NGC
611: 1097. In this galaxy, the loose gas spirals are observed within the
612: starburst ring (\citealt{PMR:05,fathi:06}). Contrary to
613: \citet{PMR:05}, it is possible that loose gas spirals are formed by an
614: inner bar without any peculiar assumption.
615: % In both models in Fig. \ref{fig:weak_small_inner_bars}, the inner weak bars
616: % excite waves in the 200 pc gas rings. For $\omegaib{300}$, they are
617: % a leading sense when the inner bar is perpendicular to the outer bar.
618: % For $\omegaib{200}$, two-armed leading spiral begins from the inner
619: % bar end. This spiral keeps its shape during the rotation of the inner
620: % bar. It is known by numerical studies that leading gas spirals cannot
621: % live for a long time (e.g. \citealt{wada:94}). In our models, the
622: % leading gas spirals are maintained by the inner bar. Leading gas
623: % spirals in a nuclear gas ring are characteristic feature of an weak
624: % inner bar.
625:
626: \subsection{The large inner bar models} \label{subsec:large_inner_bar}
627: \subsubsection{The high gas mass concentration cases} \label{subsubsec:high_gas_mass_con_large}
628:
629: In large inner bar models with $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.11$ (L42, L43, L33,
630: L34, and L35), a large amount of gas concentrates to the galactic
631: center for $\omegaib{325}$. In Fig. \ref{fig:L42a} we show the time
632: evolution of the surface density of gas of the model L42. In
633: $t=100$-$250\sep\myr$, elongation of the 200 pc gas ring increases.
634: As can be seen in Fig. \ref{fig:L42a}b-d, the 200 pc gas ring is highly
635: elongated in $t=150$-$300\sep\myr$. At $t=350\sep\myr$, the 200 pc
636: gas ring shrinks to less than $R=150\sep\pc$ (see
637: Fig. \ref{fig:L42a}f). Then, large part of the gas of the 200 pc gas
638: ring rapidly concentrates into the galactic center and a very massive
639: gas disk is formed at the center. The mass of the disk highly exceeds
640: $10^{8}\sep\msun$. The final value of $M_{20}(t)$ is unreal because
641: of the same reason described in Sect. \ref{subsubsec:high_gas_mass_con_small}.
642:
643:
644: \subsubsection{The low gas mass concentration cases} \label{subsubsec:low_gas_mass_con_large}
645:
646: In the case of $Q_{T}<0.11$ (L41, L31, L32, L22, L23, L24, L13, L14,
647: and L15), a large amount of gas do not concentrate to the galactic
648: center. The inner bar changes the shape of the 200 pc gas ring into
649: more elliptical. The orientation of the deformed 200 pc gas
650: ring is almost parallel to the inner bar. In these models, there is
651: no enhancement of the mass inflow rate to the center. The average
652: mass inflow rate over the simulation time is as small as the
653: no-inner bar case.
654:
655:
656: \section{DISCUSSION} \label{DISCUSSION}
657: \subsection{Mass supply due to nested bars} \label{subsec:mass_supply}
658:
659: We have shown that mass supply process due to the nested bars is very
660: efficient process by the numerical simulations. There are possible
661: scenarios of the mass supply to the Galactic center.
662: \citet{athanassoula:92} showed that gas ridges can reach a galactic
663: center if a large-scale bar is very strong. However, the axial ratio
664: of the outer bar of our galaxy is $\approx 3$
665: (\citealt{stanek:97,rattenbury07:_model_galac_bar_using_ogle}).
666: Hence, it is unlikely that mass supply to the Galactic center is due
667: to the `past' strong outer bar.
668: \citet{fukuda00:_effec_of_self_gravit_of} simulated self-gravitational
669: instability of a nuclear gas ring and showed that a part of gas in the
670: ring falls into a galactic center, since the gas transfers its
671: angular momentum to a very massive clump, which is formed due to the
672: fragmentation of the gas ring and subsequent mass accretion by
673: surrounding gas. This process can explain mass supply to the galactic
674: center if the CMZ corresponds to such a nuclear gas ring. In this
675: simulation, as the result of the fragmentation, the nuclear ring is
676: disrupted. This is not consistent with the CMZ in our galaxy.
677:
678: We have shown a large amount of gas concentration to the Galactic
679: center, by performing two dimensional hydrodynamical simulations with
680: various inner bar parameters (size of semi-major axis, mass, axial
681: ratio, and pattern speed of the inner bar). We have performed simulations
682: for inner bars with $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega -\kappa
683: /2)_{\mathrm{max}}$, since this pattern speed is consistent with the
684: N-body simulation results (\citealt{FM:93,RSL:02}). We also have
685: performed simulations changing the pattern speed of the inner bar for
686: the small inner bar models to investigate effect of the pattern speed
687: on mass inflow rate. We have assumed the two sizes of the semi-major axis
688: of the inner bar, $200\sep\pc$ and $600\sep\pc$. We have found the
689: high gas mass concentration in both size of the inner bar.
690:
691: In the small inner bar models, The high gas mass concentration occurs
692: for certain ranges of $Q_{T}$ and $\OmegaIB$. In the models with
693: $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.12$, the second mass inflow to the galactic center
694: occurs for $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega -\kappa /2)_{\mathrm{max}}$.
695: However, in models with $Q_{T}\lesssim 0.12$, the second mass inflow
696: does not occur for $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega -\kappa
697: /2)_{\mathrm{max}}$. For $0.05\lesssim Q_{T}\lesssim 0.12$, the
698: second mass inflow occurs for $\OmegaIB\sim 225\sep\pspeed$. Thus, the high
699: gas mass concentration cases for the small inner bar models are
700: divided into two cases:
701: \begin{enumerate}
702: \item $0.05\lesssim Q_{T}\lesssim 0.12$ and $\OmegaIB\sim 225\sep\pspeed$
703: \item $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.12$, and $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega-\kappa /2)_{\mathrm{max}}$
704: or $\OmegaIB\sim 225\sep\pspeed$
705: \end{enumerate}
706: One exception is the model S24, in which high gas mass concentration
707: occurs for both $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega -\kappa /2)_{\mathrm{max}}$
708: and $\OmegaIB\sim 225\sep\pspeed$ in spite of $0.05\lesssim
709: Q_{T}\lesssim 0.12$. These results are summarized in
710: Fig. \ref{fig:Qt-Omega}. In this figure, the results of the model
711: S25($\omegaib{250}$) and the model S41($\omegaib{250}$) occupy the
712: same point at $(Q_{T},\sep\OmegaIB )=(0.115,250)$. High gas mass
713: concentration occurs in the model S25($\omegaib{250}$), while it does
714: not occur in the model S41($\omegaib{250}$).
715:
716: The second mass inflow rates change periodically in the models
717: which are denoted by asterisks in Table \ref{table:HGMC_SIB}
718: (see also the lower panel of Fig. \ref{fig:Mass_inflows}).
719: These periodic changes imply that the second mass inflow is
720: a resonance phenomenon between the outer bar and the inner bar,
721: since the second mass inflow rate increases with the time intervals
722: which are roughly the figure rotation period of the inner bar
723: measured in the rotational frame of the outer bar.
724:
725: The high gas mass concentration cases in the small inner bars models
726: are consistent with observations in our galaxy. In these models, a
727: nuclear gas disk forms. Its size and its mass are $R\lesssim
728: 15\sep\pc$ and $\sim 10^{7}\sep\msun$, respectively. Interestingly,
729: the size of the nuclear gas disk is very close to the location of the
730: Arches cluster and the Quintuplet cluster. Moreover, the nuclear gas
731: disk is massive enough to form these star clusters (we discuss this
732: point in Sect.\ref{subsec:evol_nuclear_gas_disk}). Kinematics of gas
733: induced by the inner bar is consistent with the molecular gas
734: observations (we discuss this point in Sect.\ref{subsec:lv_diagram}).
735: On the other hand, in the small inner bar models with $Q_{T}<0.05$,
736: the inner bar does not highly enhance mass inflow to the galactic
737: center. Hence, the inner bar in our galaxy is $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.05$, if
738: mass supply to the Galactic center is due to the inner bar.
739:
740: There is difference between the size of the small inner bar models and
741: the inner bar reported by \citet{nishiyama:05,nishiyama:06}.
742: \citet{nishiyama:05,nishiyama:06} trace ridge of distribution of red
743: clump stars but do not show profile of gravitational potential of the
744: inner bar. Our numerical results are consistent with their report, if
745: non-axisymmetric component of gravitational potential of the inner bar
746: is small beyond $R=200\sep\pc$.
747:
748: The large inner bars in our models are not consistent with
749: observations in our galaxy, if mass supply to the galactic center is
750: caused by the large inner bar. In the large inner bar models with
751: $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.11$, high gas mass concentration occurs and the 200 pc
752: gas ring is destroyed. This does not correspond to our galaxy. In the
753: models with $Q_{T}<0.11$, the inner bar does not induce a large mass
754: inflow to the galactic center. From these results, large inner bar is
755: difficult to be the case in the Galaxy, if mass supply to the Galactic
756: center is due to an inner bar.
757:
758: It is observed that velocity dispersion of gas clouds in the
759: central region of the Galaxy is higher than that in the Galactic disk
760: (\citealt{rohlfs87:_kinem_and_physic_param_of}).
761: \citealt{englmaier97:_two_modes_of_gas_flow} show that the gas flow
762: can change drastically when the sound speed is changed, since
763: existence and strengths of shocks depend on $c_{s}$. In order to
764: confirm the effect of the sound speed on the mass inflow, we try a
765: test calculation in which the inner bar parameters are the same as the
766: model S33 ($\omegaib{300}$) and the artificial radial profile of
767: $c_{s}$, which rises from $\approx 10\sep\kms$ at the inner edge of
768: the 200 pc gas ring to $20\sep\kms$ at the center, is assumed. The
769: straight shocks in the inner bar become weaker and the mass inflow
770: rate becomes smaller. We will study the effect of the sound speed on
771: the gas flow further in a future work considering realistic cooling
772: and heating process.
773:
774: \subsection{Evolution of the nuclear gas disk } \label{subsec:evol_nuclear_gas_disk}
775:
776: We have shown that small massive gas disks form in the small inner bar
777: models for $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.05$ and their size are $\sim 15\sep\pc$.
778: It is interesting to study the self-gravitational instability of the
779: nuclear gas disk. In an axisymmetric uniform thin gas disk,
780: the dispersion relation of the small radial density perturbation in the
781: axisymmetric mode is
782: \begin{equation}
783: \omega^{2}=c^{2}_{s}k^{2}-2\pi G\Sigma |k|+\kappa^{2},
784: \end{equation}
785: where $\omega$ is the frequency of the perturbation, $c_{s}$ is the
786: sound speed of gas, $k$ is the wave number of the perturbation, $G$ is
787: the gravitational constant, $\Sigma$ is the surface density of the
788: thin disk, and $\kappa$ is the epicyclic frequency (\citealt{BT:87}).
789: From the dispersion relation, the density perturbation can grow if
790: \begin{equation}
791: %Q\equiv\dfrac{c_{s}\kappa}{\pi G\Sigma}\lesssim 1,
792: Q\equiv\frac{c_{s}\kappa}{\pi G\Sigma}\lesssim 1,
793: \end{equation}
794: where $Q$ is the Toomre $Q$-value.
795: We define $\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}$ as the surface density for $Q=1$,
796: \begin{equation}
797: %\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}(R)=\dfrac{c_{s}(R)\kappa (R)}{\pi G},
798: \Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}(R)=\frac{c_{s}(R)\kappa (R)}{\pi G},
799: \end{equation}
800: which may be the minimum surface density for the gravitational instability.
801: Using $\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}$, we define $M_{\mathrm{crit}}$ as
802: \begin{equation}
803: M_{\mathrm{crit}}(R)=\int^{R}_{0}2\pi R^{'}\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}(R^{'})dR^{'}.
804: \end{equation}
805: $M_{\mathrm{crit}}(R)$ may be a measure of gravitational instability of
806: the disk. In the central several tens parsecs of the galaxy, there is
807: evidence for strong magnetic fields
808: (e.g. \citealt{chuss03:_magnet_field_in_cool_cloud}). Magnetic fields
809: have an important role in the gravitational stability of the disk. To
810: consider effect of the magnetic fields in the linear analysis, we
811: assume simple configuration of the magnetic fields, since it is
812: observationally unclear. We assume that the
813: magnetic fields are parallel to the disk and homogeneous,
814: $\bm{B}=B_{0}\bm{e_{\phi}}$, where $B_{0}$ is a strength of the
815: magnetic fields and $\bm{e_{\phi}}$ is the base vector of the
816: azimuth. \citet{FL:97} derived the dispersion relation
817: \begin{equation}
818: \omega^{2}=(c^{2}_{s}+c^{2}_{A})k^{2}-2\pi G\Sigma |k|+k^{2}
819: \end{equation}
820: for this configuration, where $c_{A}$ is a Alfv{\'e}n velocity,
821: \begin{equation}
822: %c_{A}=\sqrt{\dfrac{B^{2}}{4\pi\rho}}.
823: c_{A}=\sqrt{\frac{B^{2}}{4\pi\rho}}.
824: \end{equation}
825: We use this dispersion relation for our analysis. We assume that gas
826: clumps are formed from perturbations with the largest growth rate.
827: The wave length of the density perturbation with the largest growth
828: rate is given by
829: \begin{equation}
830: %\lambda _{\mathrm{max}}=\dfrac{2\pi}{k_{\mathrm{max}}}=\dfrac{2c^{2}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{G\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}}
831: %=\dfrac{2\pi c_{\mathrm{eff}}(R)}{\kappa (R)},
832: \lambda _{\mathrm{max}}=\frac{2\pi}{k_{\mathrm{max}}}=\frac{2c^{2}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{G\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}}
833: =\frac{2\pi c_{\mathrm{eff}}(R)}{\kappa (R)},
834: \end{equation}
835: where $c_{\mathrm{eff}}\equiv\sqrt{c^{2}_{s}+c^{2}_{A}}$.
836: Gas clump mass is estimated as
837: \begin{equation}
838: %M_{\mathrm{clump}}=\pi\left(\dfrac{\lambda _{\mathrm{max}}}{2}\right)^{2}\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}
839: %=\dfrac{\pi^{2}c^{3}_{\mathrm{eff}}(R)}{G\kappa (R)}.
840: M_{\mathrm{clump}}=\pi\left(\frac{\lambda _{\mathrm{max}}}{2}\right)^{2}\Sigma _{\mathrm{crit}}
841: =\frac{\pi^{2}c^{3}_{\mathrm{eff}}(R)}{G\kappa (R)}.
842: \end{equation}
843:
844: Application this results to our numerical results shows that strong
845: magnetic fields, which is comparable with the strongest magnetic
846: fields observed in the Galactic central region, enable massive gas clumps to
847: grow and these are comparable to the mass of the young massive star clusters
848: in the Galactic center. Figure \ref{fig:toomre_instability} show the
849: result of the application for the model S33 ($\omegaib{300}$), which
850: is one of the high gas mass concentration cases in the small inner bar
851: models. In this figure, we assume that the gas in the nuclear gas
852: disk sufficiently cools down to $T=100$ K ($c_{s}\approx 1\sep\kms$).
853: From this figure, the nuclear gas disk becomes gravitationally
854: unstable after $t=300\sep\myr$, if effect of the magnetic fields is
855: very weak. The mass of the disk is $6.7\times 10^{5}\sep\msun$ at
856: that time. The mass of the gas clumps is $100$-$300\sep\msun$ from
857: equation (10). If $B_{0}=1$ mG, the disk becomes unstable after
858: $t=450\sep\myr$. The mass of the disk is $2.9\times 10^{6}\sep\msun$
859: at that time. The mass of the gas clumps is $1.0$-$3.0\times
860: 10^{4}\sep\msun$. This mass is comparable to that of the young
861: massive star clusters in the Galactic center.
862:
863: Massive gas clumps can be formed even in the non-magnetic case. To
864: investigate the non-linear evolution of the nuclear gas disk in the
865: non-magnetic case, we perform very high resolution hydrodynamical
866: simulations in paper II. In paper II, we show that many massive
867: compact gas clumps are formed by gravitational instability of the
868: cooling gas disk in the non-magnetic case. Typical mass and size of
869: the clumps are several $10^{3}\sep\msun$ to $10^{4}\sep\msun$ and less
870: than a few parsecs, respectively. The largest gas clumps have a mass
871: of $\sim 10^{5}\sep\msun$. This is much larger than
872: $100$-$300\sep\msun$. This is because small gas clumps, which are
873: formed rapidly from growth of density perturbation in the cooling
874: disk, collide each other and merge into more massive clumps. The
875: Arches and Quintuplet clusters have a mass of $\sim 10^{4}\sep\msun$
876: and a size of $<1\sep\pc$. If we assume a star formation efficiency
877: of $\sim 0.1$, these clusters can be formed from the gas clump of mass
878: $\sim 10^{5}\sep\msun$, which is comparable to the largest gas clumps
879: in our numerical results of paper II.
880:
881:
882: \subsection{Longitude-velocity diagrams of gas flow in the nested bars} \label{subsec:lv_diagram}
883:
884: We make longitude-velocity ($l$-$v$) diagrams from our numerical
885: results with the following two aims. One is to compare our numerical
886: results with observations in our galaxy. Another is to show that
887: characteristic features of gas motion induced by the inner bar can be
888: evidence of inner bars in external galaxies.
889:
890: Figure \ref{fig:lv} shows the $l$-$v$ diagrams of the model S33
891: ($\omegaib{300}$), which is one of the high gas mass concentration
892: cases in the small inner bar models, for $\Delta\theta' =0^{\circ}$
893: and $90^{\circ}$, where $\Delta\theta'$ is the angle between the
894: direction of the inner bar and the Sun-Galactic center line. In the
895: diagram, we assume that the outer bar is inclined at an angle of
896: $20^{\circ}$ with respect to the Sun-Galactic center line, that the
897: distance of the Sun from the Galactic center is $8\sep\kpc$, and that
898: the circular velocity of the Sun is $220\sep\kms$. These assumption
899: is based on the results of \citet{bissantz:03}. In this figure, we
900: classify the gas components of the results into 7 groups by colors
901: (the detail of the classification is described in the caption of
902: Fig. \ref{fig:lv}) according to property of gas motion. The nuclear
903: gas disk component is shown by the red points in Fig. \ref{fig:lv}.
904: The nuclear gas disk component in Fig. \ref{fig:lv} is weakly
905: dependent on $\Delta\theta'$, since circular motions dominate in the
906: disk. The straight shocks component is shown by the green points in
907: Fig. \ref{fig:lv}. The feature of the straight shocks depends on
908: $\Delta\theta'$. When the inner bar is perpendicular to the outer
909: bar, the straight shocks component is clearly distinguishable from the
910: nuclear gas disk component and the 200 pc gas ring component. The
911: elliptical gas ring component is shown by the purple points in
912: Fig. \ref{fig:lv}. The feature of this ring strongly depends on
913: $\Delta\theta'$, since it is elongated along the inner bar.
914:
915: There are many observational studies on gas distribution and
916: kinematics in the central region of our galaxy.
917: \citet{stark04:_gas_densit_stabil_and_starb} give the $l$-$v$ diagram
918: of highly excited rotational emission lines of CO (J=4-3 and J=7-6) in
919: the central region of our galaxy observed by AST/RO. They cover a
920: range of $-1.2^{\circ}<l<2^{\circ}$. Their $l$-$v$ diagram traces
921: high density components of molecular gas.
922: \citet{rodriguez-fernandez06:_coupl_dynam_and_molec_chemis} show the
923: $l$-$v$ diagram of CO (J=2-1) using the published data. Their $l$-$v$
924: diagram covers the same region as the $l$-$v$ diagram of
925: \citet{stark04:_gas_densit_stabil_and_starb}, but traces diffuse
926: molecular gas. It is known that there are two compact GMCs, the
927: $20\sep\kms$ cloud and the $50\sep\kms$ cloud in the Galactic center
928: region. The $20\sep\kms$ cloud is located at $R\lesssim 10\sep\pc$
929: from the center in the projection. It has a total mass of $\sim
930: 3\times 10^{5}\sep\msun$ and its radial velocities is in a range of
931: $\sim 5$-$25\sep\kms$. The $50\sep\kms$ cloud have a mass of $\sim
932: 10^{5}\sep\msun$ (\citealt{mezger96:_galac_center}). The positions of
933: these GMCs in the $l$-$v$ diagram are shown in
934: \citet{nagayama07:_compl_survey_of_centr_molec}.
935: \citet{oka07:_co_j_survey_of_galac_center} give the $l$-$v$
936: diagram of a highly excited rotational emission line of CO (J=3-2)
937: with high resolution from $l=-0.2^{\circ}$ to $0.1^{\circ}$. They show
938: that there is a pair of high velocity emission (they are named
939: CND$^{+}$ and CND$^{-}$ in their paper) within $0.05^{\circ}\approx
940: 6.5\sep\pc$ from Sgr A*. The line-of-sight velocity of CND$^{+}$ and
941: CND$^{-}$ is $50$-$100\sep\kms$ and $-50$-$-120\sep\kms$,
942: respectively.
943:
944:
945: Our numerical results is consistent with the observations in the
946: central region of our galaxy. The nuclear gas disk component in
947: Fig. \ref{fig:lv} for $\Delta\theta' =90^{\circ}$ is in the longitude
948: range of $-0.2^{\circ}\lesssim l\lesssim 0.2^{\circ}$ and in the
949: velocity range of $-100\sep\kms\lesssim v\lesssim 100\sep\kms$. This
950: is same range of the most inner $x_{2}$ orbit shown in
951: \citet{stark04:_gas_densit_stabil_and_starb}. The velocity range of
952: the nuclear gas disk agrees with that of the CND. The similar
953: agreement between the nuclear gas disk component and the CND is also
954: found in the $l$-$v$ diagram of
955: \citet{rodriguez-fernandez06:_coupl_dynam_and_molec_chemis} and
956: \citet{oka07:_co_j_survey_of_galac_center}. The $20\sep\kms$ and
957: $50\sep\kms$ clouds lie in the same region as the nuclear gas disk in
958: the $l$-$v$ diagram
959: (\citealt{nagayama07:_compl_survey_of_centr_molec}). Thus, the nuclear
960: gas disk component well corresponds to the observations. There are
961: not clear high velocity components corresponding to the elliptical gas
962: ring component for $\Delta\theta' =0^{\circ}$ in the $l$-$v$ diagrams
963: of \citet{stark04:_gas_densit_stabil_and_starb} and
964: \citet{rodriguez-fernandez06:_coupl_dynam_and_molec_chemis}. The
965: other gas components in our $l$-$v$ diagrams occupy the same region in
966: their $l$-$v$ diagrams. Thus, our $l$-$v$ diagrams for $\Delta\theta'
967: =90^{\circ}$ well corresponds to our Galaxy.
968:
969:
970: We compare our numerical results with molecular gas observation in
971: Maffei 2. Our $l$-$v$ diagram at $\Delta\theta'=90^{\circ}$ well
972: corresponds to the $\CO$ position-velocity ($p$-$v$) diagrams of the
973: nuclear region of Maffei 2
974: (\citealt{meier08:_nuclear_bar_catal_star_format}).
975: \citet{meier08:_nuclear_bar_catal_star_format} performed an
976: observation of the nuclear region of Maffei 2 with high spacial
977: resolution with the OVRO and BIMA arrays and found a parallelogram
978: feature and two intense features at both side of the parallelogram
979: feature in their $p$-$v$ diagrams. The parallelogram feature extends
980: over $-5''\lesssim p\lesssim 15''$ and $-125\sep\kms \lesssim v
981: \lesssim 125\sep\kms$ in their diagrams. The two intense features are
982: located at $(p,v)\approx (-15'',50\sep\kms)$ and $(20'', -50\sep\kms)$
983: in their diagram . They explain these features by simple linear
984: orbits in their nuclear bar model. The nuclear gas disk component in
985: our $l$-$v$ diagram corresponds to the parallelogram feature. The
986: straight shocks component and the elliptical gas component in our
987: $l$-$v$ diagram well correspond to the two intense features. Thus,
988: our results strongly support their interpretation that Maffei 2 likely
989: has an nuclear bar. We propose that the nuclear gas disk component,
990: the straight shocks component, and the elliptical gas component are
991: indirect evidence for an inner bar. Observation of molecular gas in
992: the nuclear region of external barred galaxies with high spacial
993: resolution, e.g. ALMA, can give evidence of inner bars, even if they
994: are hidden by a large amount of gas and dust.
995:
996: \subsection{Important role of central mass concentration} \label{subsec:cmc}
997:
998: We discuss the difference between our numerical results and numerical
999: results of \citet{maciejewski:02}. In our simulations, the massive
1000: nuclear gas disks are formed in the galactic center. Formation of the
1001: nuclear gas disks is due to the straight shocks inside the inner
1002: bars. On the other hand, both such nuclear gas disks and straight
1003: shocks are not formed in \citet{maciejewski:02}, although they also
1004: simulated gas flow in a nested barred model.
1005:
1006: We consider the central mass concentration as the main reason for the
1007: difference, since major difference between our models and their model
1008: is central mass concentration. We assumed the high central mass
1009: concentration that is modeled on the basis of the nuclear bulge
1010: profile given by \citet{LZM:02}, while the central mass concentration
1011: in the model of \citet{maciejewski:02} is low (see Fig. 3 in
1012: \citealt{MS:00}). It is shown that a high central mass concentration
1013: in a barred potential strongly affects orbital structure of stars and
1014: gas
1015: (\citealt{fukuda98:_effec_of_centr_super_black,fukuda00:_effec_of_self_gravit_of,ann:05}).
1016: The central mass concentration tends to change the shape of the orbits
1017: of stars into rounder shapes at the nearer central region of the
1018: galaxy. When the galaxy has an inner bar, the shapes of the orbits
1019: are elongated at the radii which are comparable to the semi-major axis
1020: of the inner bar. In smaller radii, the shape of the orbits changes
1021: into the circular orbits in the inner bar potential, if the central
1022: mass concentration is sufficiently high. Straight shocks may form, if
1023: the shape of the orbits rapidly vary as the radii becomes small, since
1024: gas collides each other at the region where the orbits are overcrowded
1025: and dissipates. Hence, a high central mass concentration is important
1026: for formation of straight shocks and therefore formation of nuclear
1027: gas disks. We conclude that the difference between our numerical
1028: results and numerical results of \citet{maciejewski:02} is mainly due
1029: to the difference in a central mass concentration.
1030: It is important to study a self-consistent model of nested barred
1031: galaxies with high central mass concentrations and their stability.
1032:
1033:
1034:
1035: \section{SUMMARY} \label{SUMMARY}
1036: We summarize our study as follows:
1037:
1038: \begin{enumerate}
1039: \item We have performed two dimensional hydrodynamical simulations to
1040: investigate mass supply process by nested bars. We have assumed the
1041: gravitational potential model of our galaxy, based on the Galaxy
1042: models of \citet{bissantz:03} and the nuclear bulge profile given by
1043: \citet{LZM:02} adding an inner bar. We have assumed two cases of the
1044: size of the inner bar models, $a_{\mathrm{IB}}=200\sep\pc$ and
1045: $600\sep\pc$.
1046:
1047: \item In the small inner bar models, a large amount of gas
1048: concentrates into the galactic center for 1) $0.05\lesssim
1049: Q_{T}\lesssim 0.12$ and $\OmegaIB \sim 225\sep\pspeed$ and 2)
1050: $Q_{T}\gtrsim 0.12$ and, $\OmegaIB\approx (\Omega -\kappa
1051: /2)_{\mathrm{max}}$ or $\OmegaIB\sim 225\sep\pspeed$. The straight
1052: shocks are formed within the inner bar. This is partly due to that
1053: $Q_{T}$ in these models is high and partly due to that the central
1054: mass concentration in our models is high. The straight shocks sweep
1055: gas in the inner bar region. The gas trapped by the straight shocks
1056: falls into the galactic center and then the nuclear gas disk is formed
1057: at the center. The size and mass of the nuclear gas disk are
1058: $\lesssim 15\sep\pc$ and $\sim 10^{7}\sep\msun$, respectively.
1059:
1060: \item In the large inner bar models, a large amount of gas
1061: concentrates into the galactic center for $Q_{T}>0.11$. In the course
1062: of the gas concentration, the inner bar destroys the 200 pc gas ring.
1063: The destruction of the 200 pc gas ring is not consistent with the
1064: CMZ. We conclude that the inner bar of our galaxy is not both large
1065: and strong, if recent mass supply to the galactic center is due to the
1066: inner bar of our galaxy.
1067:
1068: \item The high gas mass concentration cases in the small inner bar
1069: models well agree with the observed feature as follows. Extent and
1070: kinematics of the nuclear gas disk in our results are consistent with
1071: the observations of the molecular gas in the central region of our
1072: galaxy. The size of the nuclear gas disk is very close to the
1073: location of the Arches cluster and the Quintuplet cluster, and its
1074: mass is enough to form these star clusters.
1075:
1076: \item We have discussed the self-gravitational instability of the
1077: nuclear gas disk formed in our simulations. Assuming magnetic fields
1078: as strong as observed one in the central tens parsecs of our galaxy,
1079: the most rapid growing unstable mode corresponds to gas clumps which
1080: have comparable mass to the Arches and Quintuplet cluster. In next
1081: paper, we will study non-linear evolution of massive nuclear gas
1082: disks.
1083:
1084: \item We have shown the characteristic features in the $l$-$v$ diagram
1085: induced by the small inner bar. These features can be clues about
1086: existence of inner bars in extra galaxies. They will be useful for
1087: future observation of central regions of galaxies, e.g. ALMA.
1088:
1089: \end{enumerate}
1090:
1091:
1092:
1093: \acknowledgments We thank Masayuki Fujimoto and Kazuo Sorai for fruitful
1094: discussions. This work has been supported in part by the Hokkaido
1095: University Grant Program for New Fusion of Extensive Research Fields,
1096: in part by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (14340058,19540233)
1097: of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
1098:
1099:
1100: \bibliographystyle{apj}
1101: \bibliography{ms}
1102:
1103: %==================%
1104: % FIGURE 1 %
1105: %==================%
1106: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1107: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
1108: %\Plottwo{f1a.jpg}{f1b.jpg}
1109: \caption{ Rotation curves in the entire (\textit{left panel}) and the
1110: central region (\textit{right panel}) of the model S33. These lines
1111: show rotation curves by total mass (\textit{solid line}), disk and
1112: bulge (\textit{dashed line}), inner bar (\textit{dotted line}), and
1113: dark halo (\textit{dotted-dashed line}), respectively.
1114: \label{fig:rotation_curve}}
1115: \begin{center}
1116: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1117: \end{center}
1118: \end{figure}
1119:
1120: %==================%
1121: % FIGURE 2 %
1122: %==================%
1123: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1124: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
1125: %\Plottwo{f2a.jpg}{f2b.jpg}
1126: \caption{ Angular frequency curve in the entire (\textit{left}) and
1127: the central region (\textit{right}). These lines show angular
1128: frequency curves of $\Omega -\kappa /2$(\textit{solid line}),
1129: $\Omega$(\textit{dashed line}), and $\Omega +\kappa
1130: /2$(\textit{dotted line}) and the pattern speed of the outer bar
1131: $\OmegaOB$(\textit{dash-dotted line}). The positions of the inner
1132: Lindblad resonance ($R_{\mathrm{ILR}}$), the corotation resonance
1133: ($R_{\mathrm{CR}}$), and the outer Lindblad resonance
1134: ($R_{\mathrm{OLR}}$) of the outer bar are $750\sep\pc$, $3750\sep\pc$
1135: and $6750\sep\pc$, respectively.
1136: \label{fig:angular_velocity_curve}}
1137: \begin{center}
1138: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1139: \end{center}
1140: \end{figure}
1141:
1142: %==================%
1143: % FIGURE 3 %
1144: %==================%
1145: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1146: \plotone{f3.eps}
1147: %\Plotone{f3.jpg}
1148: \caption{Surface density of gas in the model N at $t=500\sep\myr$.
1149: The gray-scale bar show the surface density of the range of
1150: $1\sep\sd$-$10^{5}\sep\sd$ in the logarithmic scale. The outer bar
1151: lies in the horizontal direction in all the panels.
1152: \label{fig:no_inner_bar}}
1153: \begin{center}
1154: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1155: \end{center}
1156: \end{figure}
1157:
1158: %==================%
1159: % FIGURE 4 %
1160: %==================%
1161: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1162: \plotone{f4.eps}
1163: %\Plotone{f4.jpg}
1164: \caption{Time variation of the surface density of the central kpc of
1165: the model S33 ($300\sep\pspeed$). The gray-scale range is the same as
1166: Fig. \ref{fig:no_inner_bar}. We show the calculation time and the
1167: angle between the outer bar and the inner bar, $\Delta\theta$, in the
1168: upper right corner in the each panel.
1169: \label{fig:S33a}}
1170: \begin{center}
1171: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1172: \end{center}
1173: \end{figure}
1174:
1175: %==================%
1176: % FIGURE 5 %
1177: %==================%
1178: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1179: \plotone{f5.eps}
1180: %\Plotone{f5.jpg}
1181: \caption{Velocity fields of the model S33 ($300\sep\pspeed$).
1182: The gray-scale are the same as Fig.\ref{fig:S33a}.
1183: \textit{Upper panels} : $\Delta\theta =0^{\circ}$ ($t=490\sep\myr$).
1184: \textit{Lower panels} : $\Delta\theta =90^{\circ}$ ($t=497\sep\myr$).
1185: Note that the arrows show velocities in these region in relative scale.
1186: \label{fig:VF_S33}}
1187: \begin{center}
1188: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1189: \end{center}
1190: \end{figure}
1191:
1192: %==================%
1193: % FIGURE 6 %
1194: %==================%
1195: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1196: \plotone{f6.eps}
1197: %\plotone{f6.jpg}
1198: \caption{Surface density distribution of the model S21.
1199: \textit{Upper row} : the model S21 ($\omegaib{300}$).
1200: \textit{Lower row} : the model S21 ($\omegaib{200}$).
1201: \textit{First and second columns} : $\Delta\theta =0^{\circ}$.
1202: \textit{Third and fourth columns} : $\Delta\theta =90^{\circ}$.
1203: \label{fig:weak_small_inner_bars}}
1204: \begin{center}
1205: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1206: \end{center}
1207: \end{figure}
1208:
1209: %==================%
1210: % FIGURE 7 %
1211: %==================%
1212: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1213: \plottwo{f7a.eps}{f7b.eps}
1214: \plotone{f7c.eps}
1215: %\Plottwo{f7a.jpg}{f7b.jpg}
1216: %\Plotone{f7c.jpg}
1217: \caption{$M_{20}(t)$ of different three models, S33 ($\omegaib{300}$),
1218: S21 ($\omegaib{300}$), and N (\textit{upper left panel}). $M_{20}(t)$
1219: of the model S21 (\textit{upper right panel}) and the model S33
1220: (\textit{lower panel}) for various pattern speeds of the inner
1221: bar. The horizontal and vertical axis are calculation time and
1222: logarithmic value of $M_{20}(t)/\msun$, respectively.
1223: \label{fig:Mass_inflows}}
1224: \begin{center}
1225: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1226: \end{center}
1227: \end{figure}
1228:
1229: %==================%
1230: % FIGURE 8 %
1231: %==================%
1232: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1233: \plotone{f8.eps}
1234: %\Plotone{f8.jpg}
1235: \caption{Time variation of the surface density of gas in the model
1236: L42. The gray-scale bar shows the surface density of the range
1237: $1\sep\sd$-$10^{6}\sep\sd$ in the logarithmic scale. The values of
1238: upper right corner in each panel are the same as Fig.\ref{fig:S33a}.
1239: \label{fig:L42a}}
1240: \begin{center}
1241: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1242: \end{center}
1243: \end{figure}
1244:
1245: %==================%
1246: % FIGURE 9 %
1247: %==================%
1248: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1249: \begin{center}
1250: \plotone{f9.eps}
1251: %\Plotone{f9.jpg}
1252: \caption{Gas mass concentration in our numerical results of the small
1253: inner bar models. The horizontal and vertical axis are $Q_{T}$ and
1254: $\OmegaIB$, respectively. The high gas mass concentration models are
1255: shown by the filled circles, the low gas mass concentration models are
1256: shown by the crosses.
1257: \label{fig:Qt-Omega}}
1258: \end{center}
1259: \begin{center}
1260: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1261: \end{center}
1262: \end{figure}
1263:
1264: %===================%
1265: % FIGURE 10 %
1266: %===================%
1267: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1268: \plottwo{f10a.eps}{f10b.eps}
1269: %\Plottwo{f10a.jpg}{f10b.jpg}
1270: \caption{ \textit{Left}: Time evolution of $M(<R)$ of the model S33
1271: ($300\sep\pspeed$) and the critical disk mass $M_{\mathrm{crit}}(R)$.
1272: $M(<R)$ at each time are shown by dashed lines, $M_{\mathrm{cirt}}(R)$
1273: are shown by two solid lines for the case of $B_{0}=0$ mG and
1274: $B_{0}=1$ mG. \textit{Right}: The mass of the gas clump
1275: $M_{\mathrm{clump}}$ given by eq.(10) at each radius.}
1276: \label{fig:toomre_instability}
1277: \begin{center}
1278: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1279: \end{center}
1280: \end{figure}
1281:
1282: %===================%
1283: % FIGURE 11 %
1284: %===================%
1285: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1286: \plottwo{f11a.eps}{f11b.eps}
1287: %\Plottwo{f11a.jpg}{f11b.jpg}
1288: \caption{ Longitude-velocity diagram of the model S33
1289: ($\omegaib{300}$). The horizontal and vertical axis represent
1290: Galactic longitude [$^{\circ}$] and line-of-sight velocity[$\kms$],
1291: respectively. \textit{Left panel} shows the $l$-$v$ diagram for
1292: $\Delta\theta' =0^{\circ}$ ($t=489\sep\myr$). \textit{Right panel}
1293: shows the $l$-$v$ diagram for $\Delta\theta' =90^{\circ}$
1294: ($t=495\sep\myr$). \textit{Red points}: the nuclear gas disk
1295: component; \textit{green points}: the straight shocks component;
1296: \textit{blue points}: the inner void component, which corresponds to
1297: low density regions within the elliptical gas ring; \textit{purple
1298: points}: the elliptical gas ring component; \textit{aqua points}: the
1299: outer void component, which corresponds to low density regions between
1300: the elliptical ring and the 200 pc gas ring; \textit{yellow points}:
1301: the 200 pc gas ring component; \textit{black points}: the region of
1302: $R>300\sep\pc$.}
1303: \label{fig:lv}
1304: \begin{center}
1305: The high resolutional version of the figure is available from \verb|http://astro3.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~name/|.
1306: \end{center}
1307: \end{figure}
1308:
1309: %=================%
1310: % TABEL 1 %
1311: %=================%
1312: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
1313: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1314: \tablecaption{Axial ratio and mass of the small inner bar models. \label{table:small_inner_bar_models}}
1315: \tablewidth{0pt}
1316: \tablehead{
1317: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{$M_{\mathrm{IB}}$$[\msun]$\tablenotemark{a}} \\
1318: %
1319: \cline{2-6} \\
1320: %
1321: \colhead{$a_{\mathrm{IB}}/b_{\mathrm{IB}}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
1322: \colhead{$5.0\times 10^{7}$} &
1323: \colhead{$7.5\times 10^{7}$} &
1324: \colhead{$1.0\times 10^{8}$} &
1325: \colhead{$1.5\times 10^{8}$} &
1326: \colhead{$2.5\times 10^{8}$}
1327: }
1328: \startdata
1329: 4 & S41 & S42 & S43 & --- & --- \\
1330: & (0.115)\tablenotemark{c}
1331: & (0.168) & (0.218) & & \\
1332: \hline
1333: 3 & S31 & S32 & S33 & S34 & S35 \\
1334: & (0.062) & (0.092) & (0.121) & (0.175) & (0.274) \\
1335: \hline
1336: 2 & S21 & S22 & S23 & S24 & S25 \\
1337: & (0.024) & (0.036) & (0.048) & (0.071) & (0.115) \\
1338: \hline
1339: 4/3 & --- & --- & S13 & S14 & S15 \\
1340: & & & (0.012) & (0.019) & (0.031) \\
1341: %
1342: \enddata
1343: \tablenotetext{a}{The mass of the inner bar model.}
1344: \tablenotetext{b}{The axial ratio of the inner bar model.
1345: $a_{\mathrm{IB}}$ is a semi-major axis of the inner bar model and
1346: $b_{\mathrm{IB}}$ is a semi-minor axis of the inner bar model.}
1347: \tablenotetext{c}{The values in parentheses show $Q_{T}$.}
1348: \end{deluxetable}
1349:
1350: %=================%
1351: % TABLE 2 %
1352: %=================%
1353: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
1354: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1355: \tablecaption{Axial ratio and mass of the large inner bar models. \label{table:large_inner_bar_models}}
1356: \tablewidth{0pt}
1357: \tablehead{
1358: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{$M_{\mathrm{IB}}[\msun]$\tablenotemark{a}} \\
1359: %
1360: \cline{2-6} \\
1361: %
1362: \colhead{$a_{\mathrm{IB}}/b_{\mathrm{IB}}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
1363: \colhead{$1.0\times 10^{8}$} &
1364: \colhead{$2.5\times 10^{8}$} &
1365: \colhead{$5.0\times 10^{8}$} &
1366: \colhead{$7.5\times 10^{8}$} &
1367: \colhead{$1.0\times 10^{9}$}
1368: }
1369: \startdata
1370: 4 & L41 & L42 & L43 & --- & --- \\
1371: & (0.047)\tablenotemark{c}
1372: & (0.115) & (0.220) & & \\
1373: \hline
1374: 3 & L31 & L32 & L33 & L34 & L35 \\
1375: & (0.031) & (0.075) & (0.146) & (0.213) & (0.276) \\
1376: \hline
1377: 2 & --- & L22 & L23 & L24 & L25 \\
1378: & & (0.036) & (0.071) & (0.105) & (0.138) \\
1379: \hline
1380: 4/3 & --- & --- & L13 & L14 & L15 \\
1381: & & & (0.023) & (0.036) & (0.046) \\
1382: %
1383: \enddata
1384: \tablenotetext{a}{The mass of the inner bar model.}
1385: \tablenotetext{b}{The axial ratio of the inner bar model.
1386: $a_{\mathrm{IB}}$ is a semi-major axis of the inner bar model and
1387: $b_{\mathrm{IB}}$ is a semi-minor axis of the inner bar model.}
1388: \tablenotetext{c}{The values in parentheses show $Q_{T}$.}
1389: \end{deluxetable}
1390:
1391: %=================%
1392: % TABLE 3 %
1393: %=================%
1394: %\clearpage
1395: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccccccccccc}
1396: \rotate
1397: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1398: \tablecaption{Pattern speeds of the inner bar models. \label{table:pattern_speeds_of_models}}
1399: \tablewidth{0pt}
1400: \tablehead{
1401: \colhead{} &
1402: \multicolumn{17}{c}{Pattern speed of the inner bar $\OmegaIB$ [$\pspeed$]} \\
1403: %%
1404: \cline{2-18} \\
1405: %%
1406: \colhead{Model Name} &
1407: \multicolumn{1}{c}{175} &
1408: \multicolumn{1}{c}{200} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{225} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{230} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{240} &
1409: \multicolumn{1}{c}{250} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{260} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{270} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{275} &
1410: \multicolumn{1}{c}{280} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{290} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{300} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{310} &
1411: \multicolumn{1}{c}{320} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{325} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{350} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{375}
1412: }
1413: \startdata
1414: % 175 200 225 230 240 250 260 270 275 280 290 300 310 320 325 350 375
1415: S41 & --- & \on\tablenotemark{a}
1416: & --- & \on & \on & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & --- \\
1417: S42 & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on \\
1418: S43 & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on \\
1419: S31 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1420: S32 & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & --- \\
1421: S33 & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & --- \\
1422: S34 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1423: S35 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & \on & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1424: S21 & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- \\
1425: S22 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1426: S23 & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & --- \\
1427: S24 & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & \on & \on & \on & --- & \on & \on & \on & \on & \on & --- & --- & --- \\
1428: S25 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1429: S13 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1430: S14 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1431: S15 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- \\
1432: L\tablenotemark{b}
1433: & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & \on & --- & --- \\
1434: \enddata
1435: \tablenotetext{a}{The open circles show the model we simulate.}
1436: \tablenotetext{b}{The letter 'L' means the large inner bar models.}
1437: \end{deluxetable}
1438: %\clearpage
1439:
1440: %=================%
1441: % TABLE 4 %
1442: %=================%
1443: \thispagestyle{empty}
1444: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccccccccccc}
1445: \rotate
1446: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1447: \tablecaption{High gas mass concentration cases in the small inner bar models.\label{table:HGMC_SIB}}
1448: \tablewidth{0pt}
1449:
1450: \tablehead{
1451: %%
1452: \colhead{} &
1453: \multicolumn{17}{c}{Pattern speed of the inner bar $\OmegaIB$ [$\pspeed$]} \\
1454: %%
1455: \cline{2-18} \\
1456: %%
1457: \colhead{Model Name} &
1458: \multicolumn{1}{c}{175} &
1459: \multicolumn{1}{c}{200} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{225} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{230} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{240} &
1460: \multicolumn{1}{c}{250} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{260} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{270} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{275} &
1461: \multicolumn{1}{c}{280} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{290} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{300} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{310} &
1462: \multicolumn{1}{c}{320} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{325} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{350} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{375}
1463: }
1464: \startdata
1465: S41 & \nodata & \ubf{2.0E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \nodata & \ubf{8.1E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{8.7E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{1.8E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & 7.6E+5 & 7.0E+5 & \nodata & 5.9E+5 & 6.3E+5 & 5.6E+5 & 4.7E+5 & 4.4E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1466: %
1467: S42 & 6.7E+5 & \ubf{3.2E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{1.5E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \nodata & \nodata & 6.7E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \ubf{6.5E+5}\tablenotemark{\ddagger\ast} & \nodata & \ubf{9.6E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{1.5E+7}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{7.5E+5}\tablenotemark{\ddagger\ast} & \nodata & \ubf{1.6E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{5.7E+5}\tablenotemark{\ddagger\ast} & 3.5E+5 \\
1468: %
1469: S43 & 4.7E+5 & \ubf{2.0E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \ubf{7.8E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \nodata & \nodata & 3.8E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \ubf{2.1E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \nodata & \ubf{1.1E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \ubf{7.7E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \ubf{4.8E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \nodata & \ubf{2.4E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \ubf{9.5E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{4.5E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} \\
1470: %
1471: S31 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 3.4E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1472: %
1473: S32 & 6.0E+5 & \ubf{2.2E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{1.5E+7}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \nodata & \nodata & 5.7E+5 & 5.0E+5 & 4.9E+5 & \nodata & 4.8E+5 & 4.4E+5 & 4.1E+5 & 4.0E+5 & 3.5E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1474: %
1475: S33 & 6.6E+5 & \ubf{4.2E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{1.4E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \nodata & \nodata & 5.4E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & 5.9E+5 & \nodata & \ubf{1.7E+7}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{8.5E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{2.9E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \nodata & \ubf{8.5E+5}\tablenotemark{\ddagger\ast} & 3.3E+5 & \nodata \\
1476: %
1477: S34 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 6.7E+5 & 6.2E+5 & 5.3E+5 & \nodata & \ubf{4.2E+6} & \ubf{1.6E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{8.5E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{8.7E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1478: %
1479: S35 & \nodata- & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 1.5E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \ubf{2.1E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{1.0E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{1.2E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{4.1E+7} & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1480: %
1481: S21 & 4.8E+5 & 6.2E+5 & 4.1E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & 4.0E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & 3.3E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & 3.3E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & 2.8E+5 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1482: %
1483: S22 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 3.2E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1484: %
1485: S23 & 7.4E+5 & \ubf{1.4E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{3.4E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \nodata & \nodata & 3.0E+5 & 3.2E+5 & 3.4E+5 & \nodata & 3.8E+5 & 3.7E+5 & 3.4E+5 & 3.2E+5 & 3.1E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1486: %
1487: S24 & 1.1E+6 & \ubf{3.9E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{1.3E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger\ast} & \nodata & \nodata & 3.6E+5 & 3.9E+5 & 4.1E+5 & \nodata & \ubf{1.4E+6}\tablenotemark{\ast} & \ubf{9.7E+5}\tablenotemark{\ast} & 5.1E+5 & 4.4E+5 & 3.7E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1488: %
1489: S25 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 4.8E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1490: %
1491: S13 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 1.7E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1492: %
1493: S14 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2.4E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1494: %
1495: S15 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2.3E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2.2E+5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1496: \enddata
1497: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{The models in which $M_{20}(t=500\sep\myr) > M_{\star}(<20\sep\pc)\approx 2\times 10^{7}\sep\msun$.}
1498: \tablenotetext{\ddagger}{The models in which the second mass inflow starts just before the end of the simulation.}
1499: \tablenotetext{\ast}{The models in which the second mass flow rate changes periodically.}
1500: \end{deluxetable}
1501:
1502: %=================%
1503: % TABLE 5 %
1504: %=================%
1505: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccccccccc}
1506: \rotate
1507: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1508: \tablecaption{High gas mass concentration cases in the large inner bar models.\label{table:HGMC_LIB}}
1509: \tablewidth{0pt}
1510: \tablehead{
1511: \colhead{Model Name} &
1512: \colhead{L41} & \colhead{L42} & \colhead{L43} & \colhead{L31} &
1513: \colhead{L32} & \colhead{L33} & \colhead{L34} & \colhead{L35} &
1514: \colhead{L22} & \colhead{L23} & \colhead{L24} & \colhead{L25} &
1515: \colhead{L13} & \colhead{L14} & \colhead{L15}
1516: }
1517: \startdata
1518: & 1.9E+5 & \ubf{1.7E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{3.2E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & 1.8E+5 &
1519: 1.7E+5 & \ubf{2.1E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{6.6E+7}\tablenotemark{\dagger} & \ubf{4.4E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} &
1520: 1.7E+5 & 1.9E+5 & 2.6E+5 & \ubf{2.6E+8}\tablenotemark{\dagger} &
1521: 1.1E+5 & 1.2E+5 & 1.6E+5 \\
1522: \enddata
1523: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{The models in which $M_{20}(t=500\sep\myr) > M_{\star}(<20\sep\pc)\approx 2\times 10^{7}\sep\msun$.}
1524: \end{deluxetable}
1525:
1526:
1527: \end{document}
1528: