1: \documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{epsf}
4: \newcommand{\insertplot}[5]{\begin{figure}
5: \hfill\hbox to 0.05in{\vbox to #5in{\vfill
6: \inputplot{#1}{#4}{#5}}\hfill}
7: \hfill\vspace{-.1in}
8: \caption{#2}\label{#3}
9: \end{figure}}
10: \newcommand{\inputplot}[3]{\special{ps:: gsave #2 -36 mul 0 rmoveto
11: currentpoint translate #2 7.0 div #3 5.0 div scale}
12: \special{ps: plotfile #1}\special{ps:: grestore}}
13:
14: \usepackage[german, english]{babel}
15: \usepackage{ifthen}
16: \usepackage{epsfig}
17: \newcounter{fig} \newcommand{\lbfig}[1]{\refstepcounter{fig}
18: \label{#1} }
19: \newcommand{\vacuum}{|0 \rangle}
20: \newcommand{\vphi}{\varphi}
21: \newcommand{\Tr}{{\rm Tr}}
22: \newenvironment{pseudofig}{}{}
23:
24: \begin{document}
25: \title{Electroweak Sphalerons with Spin and Charge}
26: \author{
27: {\bf Burkhard Kleihaus, Jutta Kunz and Michael Leissner}
28: }
29: \affiliation{
30: {Institut f\"ur Physik, Universit\"at Oldenburg,
31: D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany}
32: }
33: \date{\today}
34: %\pacs{04.20.Jb, 04.40.Nr}
35: \pacs{14.80.Hv,11.15Kc}
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38: We show that, at finite weak mixing angle
39: the sphaleron solution of Weinberg-Salam theory
40: can be endowed with angular momentum
41: proportional to the electric charge.
42: Carrying baryon number 1/2 these
43: sphalerons with spin and charge may contribute to
44: baryon number violating processes.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \maketitle
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: Like magnetic monopoles, sphalerons arise
52: as classical solutions in theories
53: which undergo spontaneous symmetry breaking.
54: The Higgs field then defines a map from the two-sphere at infinity
55: to the vacuum manifold, associated with the symmetry breaking.
56: But while this mapping is non-trivial
57: for monopoles, it is trivial for sphalerons.
58: Consequently, lacking a conserved topological charge,
59: sphalerons represent unstable solutions
60: associated in a semiclassical approximation
61: not with particles but with transition rates.
62: % between topologically inequivalent vacua.
63:
64: In the standard model the electroweak sector
65: gives rise to sphalerons
66: \cite{Manton:1983nd,Klinkhamer:1984di,Kleihaus:1991ks}.
67: The static sphaleron solution of Weinberg-Salam theory represents
68: the top of the energy barrier between topologically inequivalent vacua.
69: Since the standard model does not absolutely conserve
70: baryon number \cite{'tHooft:1976up}, at finite temperature
71: baryon number violating processes can arise because of
72: thermal fluctuations of the fields
73: large enough to overcome the energy barrier between %topologically
74: distinct vacua.
75: The rate for baryon number violating processes
76: is then largely determined by a Boltzmann factor,
77: containing the height of the barrier at a given temperature
78: \cite{McLerran:1993rv,Rubakov:1996vz,Klinkhamer:2003hz,Dine:2003ax}.
79: The sphaleron itself carries baryon number $Q_{\rm B}=1/2$
80: \cite{Klinkhamer:1984di}.
81:
82: At finite weak mixing angle the static electroweak sphaleron
83: possesses a large magnetic moment but does not carry electric charge.
84: Adding electric charge to the configuration should lead
85: to a non-vanishing Poynting vector and thus a finite angular momentum
86: density of the system, and consequently give rise to
87: a branch of spinning electrically charged sphalerons.
88: Carrying non-vanishing baryon number as well,
89: these configurations would then also entail
90: baryon number violating processes.
91:
92: Here we explicitly construct
93: this branch of spinning electrically charged sphalerons,
94: and study the dependence on the weak mixing angle.
95: We show that the angular momentum and the electric charge of the solutions
96: are proportional \cite{VanderBij:2001nm}.
97: %Interestingly, in the limit of vanishing mixing angle,
98: %a branch of rotating sphaleron solutions persists.
99: Electroweak sphalerons thus present the first spinning configuration,
100: based on non-Abelian gauge fields,
101: which corresponds to a single localized lump.
102: Previously, only composite configurations such as monopole-antimonopole
103: pairs were known to rotate \cite{Paturyan:2004ps,Kleihaus:2005fs},
104: whereas magnetic monopoles or dyons were shown to
105: exclude slow rotation \cite{Heusler:1998ec,Volkov:2003ew}.
106:
107: In section 2 we present the action, the Ansatz and the
108: boundary conditions. In section 3 we consider the
109: relevant physical properties and, in particular, derive the linear relation
110: between angular momentum and electric charge. %and calculate the baryon number.
111: We present and discuss the numerical results in section 4.
112:
113: \section{Action and Ansatz}
114:
115: %\subsection{Weinberg-Salam Lagrangian}
116:
117: We consider the bosonic sector of Weinberg-Salam theory
118: \begin{equation}
119: {\cal L} = -\frac{1}{2} {\rm Tr} (F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu})
120: - \frac{1}{4}f_{\mu \nu} f^{\mu \nu}
121: - (D_\mu \Phi)^{\dagger} (D^\mu \Phi)
122: - \lambda (\Phi^{\dagger} \Phi - \frac{v^2}{2} )^2
123: \
124: \label{lag1}
125: \end{equation}
126: with su(2) field strength tensor
127: \begin{equation}
128: F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu V_\nu-\partial_\nu V_\mu
129: + i g [V_\mu , V_\nu ]
130: , \end{equation}
131: su(2) gauge potential $V_\mu = V_\mu^a \tau_a/2$,
132: u(1) field strength tensor
133: \begin{equation}
134: f_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu
135: , \end{equation}
136: and covariant derivative of the Higgs field
137: \begin{equation}
138: D_{\mu} \Phi = \Bigl(\partial_{\mu}
139: +i g V_{\mu}
140: +i \frac{g'}{2} A_{\mu} \Bigr)\Phi
141: , \end{equation}
142: where $g$ and $g'$ denote the $SU(2)$ and $U(1)$ gauge coupling constants,
143: respectively,
144: $\lambda$ denotes the strength of the Higgs self-interaction and
145: $v$ the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field.
146:
147: The gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken
148: due to the non-vanishing vacuum expectation
149: value of the Higgs field
150: \begin{equation}
151: \langle \Phi \rangle = \frac{v}{\sqrt2}
152: \left( \begin{array}{c} 0\\1 \end{array} \right)
153: , \label{Higgs} \end{equation}
154: leading to the boson masses
155: \begin{equation}
156: M_W = \frac{1}{2} g v , \ \ \ \
157: M_Z = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{(g^2+g'^2)} v \, , \ \ \ \
158: M_H = v \sqrt{2 \lambda} \, .
159: \end{equation}
160: $ \tan \theta_{\rm w} = g'/g $ determines
161: the weak mixing angle $\theta_{\rm w}$,
162: defining the electric charge $e = g \sin \theta_{\rm w}$.
163:
164: %\subsection{Ansatz and boundary conditions}
165:
166: To obtain stationary rotating solutions of the bosonic sector
167: of Weinberg-Salam theory,
168: %with two commuting Killing vectors $\partial_t$ and $\partial_\varphi$,
169: %it is essential to include the $U(1)$ field.
170: we employ the time-independent axially symmetric Ansatz
171: \begin{equation}
172: V_\mu\, dx^\mu
173: % = V_0\, dt
174: = \left( B_1\, \frac{\tau_r}{2g} + B_2\, \frac{\tau_\theta}{2g} \right) \, dt
175: -\sin\theta\left(H_3 \frac{\tau_r}{2g}
176: + H_4 \frac{\tau_\theta}{2g}\right)\, d\varphi
177: +\left(\frac{H_1}{r}\, dr +(1-H_2)\, d\theta \right)\frac{\tau_\varphi}{2g}
178: , \label{a1} \end{equation}
179: %\begin{equation}
180: %V_0 %= {\tilde B}_1 \frac{\tau_r}{2g} + {\tilde B}_2 \frac{\tau_\theta}{2g}
181: %= B_1 \frac{\tau_z}{2g} + B_2 \frac{\tau_\rho}{2g}
182: % , \label{a2} \end{equation}
183: \begin{equation}
184: A_\mu\, dx^\mu = \left( a_1\, dt + a_2\, \sin^2 \theta \, d\varphi \right)/g'
185: , \end{equation}
186: and
187: \begin{equation}
188: \Phi = i\, \phi \, ( \cos\psi\, \tau_r + \sin\psi\, \tau_\theta )
189: \frac{v}{\sqrt2} \left( \begin{array}{c} 0\\1 \end{array} \right)
190: . \end{equation}
191: where $\tau_r$ denotes the cartesian product of the Pauli matrices
192: and the spherical unit vector $e_r$, etc.
193: %
194: The ten functions $B_1$, $B_2$, $H_1,\dots,H_4$, $a_1$, $a_2$,
195: $\phi$, and $\psi$ depend on $r$ and $\theta$, only.
196: %In general,
197: %these axially symmetric solutions represent
198: %rotating sphaleron configurations.
199: %The Ansatz contains the
200: %Klinkhamer-Manton sphaleron as a limit \cite{km}.
201: %
202: With this Ansatz the full set of field equations reduces to a system
203: of ten coupled partial differential equations in the independent variables
204: $r$ and $\theta$. A residual $U(1)$ gauge degree of freedom is
205: fixed by the condition $r\partial_r H_1 - \partial_\theta H_2=0$
206: \cite{Kleihaus:1991ks}.
207:
208: Requiring regularity and finite energy, we impose the boundary conditions
209: \begin{eqnarray}
210: %{\rm at }\
211: r=0: & & %\hspace{0.5cm}
212: B_1 \sin \theta + B_2 \cos \theta =0 , \
213: \partial_r \left( B_1 \cos \theta - B_2 \sin \theta\right) =0 , \
214: H_1=H_3=H_4=0 , \ H_2=1 , \
215: \partial_r a_1 =0 , \ a_2=0 , \
216: \nonumber \\
217: & & %\hspace{0.5cm}
218: %\partial_r a_1 =0 , \ a_2=0 , \
219: \phi=0 , \ \partial_r \psi =0
220: \nonumber \\
221: r\rightarrow \infty: & & %\hspace{0.5cm}
222: B_1 = \gamma \cos \theta , \ B_2 = \gamma \sin \theta , \
223: H_1=H_3=0 , \ H_2=-1 , \ H_4=2 , \
224: a_1=\gamma , \ a_2 = 0 , \
225: \phi = 1 , \ \psi = 0
226: \nonumber \\
227: \theta = 0: & & %\hspace{0.5cm}
228: \partial_\theta B_1 =0 , \ B_2 =0 , \
229: H_1=H_3=0 , \ \partial_\theta H_2=\partial_\theta H_4=0 , \
230: \partial_\theta a_1 = \partial_\theta a_2 = 0 , \
231: \partial_\theta \phi = 0 , \ \psi=0 ,
232: \end{eqnarray}
233: where the latter hold also at $\theta=\pi/2$,
234: except for $B_1=0$ and $\partial_\theta B_2 =0$.
235: Here $\gamma$ is a constant.
236:
237: \section{Sphaleron properties}
238:
239: We now address the global charges of the sphaleron solution,
240: its mass, angular momentum, electric charge, and baryon number.
241: The mass $M$ and angular momentum $J$ are defined in terms of
242: volume integrals of the respective components
243: of the energy-momentum tensor. The mass is obtained from
244: \begin{equation}
245: M = \int T_t^t d^3 r ,
246: \label{Mint}
247: \end{equation}
248: while the angular momentum
249: \begin{equation}
250: J = \int T_\varphi^t d^3 r
251: = \int \left[ 2 {\rm Tr} \left( F^{t\mu} F_{\varphi\mu} \right)
252: + f^{t\mu} f_{\varphi\mu} + 2 \left( D^t \Phi \right)^\dagger
253: \left( D_\varphi \Phi \right) \right] d^3 r
254: \label{Jint}
255: \end{equation}
256: can be reexpressed with help of the
257: equations of motion and the symmetry properties of the Ansatz
258: \cite{VanderBij:2001nm,Kleihaus:2002tc,Volkov:2003ew}
259: %($F_{\mu\varphi}= D_\mu \left(V_\varphi - W\right)$)
260: as a surface integral at spatial infinity
261: \begin{equation}
262: J = \int_{S_2} \left\{
263: 2 {\rm Tr} \left( \left(V_\varphi - \frac{\tau_z}{2g}\right) F^{r t} \right)
264: +
265: \left(A_\varphi - \frac{1}{g'}\right) f^{r t}
266: \right\} r^2 \sin \theta d \theta d \varphi .
267: \label{Joint}
268: \end{equation}
269: The power law fall-off of the $U(1)$ field
270: of a charged solution allows for a finite flux
271: integral at infinity and thus a finite angular momentum.
272: Insertion of the asymptotic expansion for the $U(1)$ field
273: \begin{eqnarray}
274: a_1= \gamma + \frac{Q}{r} + O \left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) , \nonumber\\
275: a_2= -\frac{\mu}{r} + O \left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) ,
276: \label{asymp}
277: \end{eqnarray}
278: and of the analogous expansion for the $SU(2)$ fields
279: then yields for the angular momentum
280: \begin{equation}
281: \frac{J}{4 \pi} =
282: % \frac{1}{g^2} Q \left(1 + \frac{1}{\tan^2 \theta_{\rm w}} \right)
283: \frac{Q}{g^2} + \frac{Q}{{g'}^2}
284: = \frac{Q}{g^2 \sin^2 \theta_{\rm w}} = \frac{Q}{e^2} .
285: \label{Joint2}
286: \end{equation}
287:
288: The field strength tensor ${\cal F}_{\mu\nu}$ of the
289: electromagnetic field ${\cal A}_{\mu}$,
290: \begin{equation}
291: {\cal A}_{\mu}=\sin \theta_{\rm w} V^3_\mu + \cos \theta_{\rm w} A_\mu ,
292: \label{emfield}
293: \end{equation}
294: as given in a gauge where the Higgs field asymptotically tends to
295: Eq.~(\ref{Higgs}),
296: then defines the electric charge $\cal Q$
297: \begin{equation}
298: {\cal Q} = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{S_2}
299: {^*}{\cal F}_{\theta\varphi} d\theta d\varphi
300: = \frac{\sin \theta_{\rm w} Q}{g} + \frac{\cos \theta_{\rm w} Q}{g'}
301: = \frac{Q}{e}
302: , \label{Qel} \end{equation}
303: where the integral is evaluated at spatial infinity.
304: %and ${\cal F}_{\mu\nu}$ is the electromagnetic field strength tensor.
305: %
306: Comparison of Eqs.~(\ref{Joint2}) and (\ref{Qel}) then
307: yields a linear relation between the angular momentum $J$
308: and the electric charge $\cal Q$
309: \begin{equation}
310: J = \frac{4 \pi \cal Q}{e}
311: \label{JQrel}
312: . \end{equation}
313: The magnetic moment $\mu$ is obtained from
314: the asymptotic expansion Eq.~(\ref{asymp}), analogously to the
315: electric charge.
316:
317: Addressing finally the baryon number $Q_{\rm B}$,
318: its rate of change is given by
319: \begin{equation}
320: \frac{d Q_{\rm B}}{dt} = \int d^3 r \partial_t j^0_{\rm B}
321: = \int d^3 r \left[ \vec \nabla \cdot \vec j_{\rm B}
322: + \frac{1}{32 \pi^2} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \, \left\{
323: g^2 {\rm Tr} \left(F_{\mu\nu} F_{\rho\sigma} \right)
324: + \frac{1}{2} {g'}^2 f_{\mu\nu} f_{\rho\sigma} \right\} \right] .
325: \end{equation}
326: Starting at time $t=-\infty$ at the vacuum with $Q_{\rm B}=0$,
327: one obtains the baryon number of a sphaleron solution at
328: time $t=t_0$ \cite{Klinkhamer:1984di},
329: \begin{equation}
330: Q_{\rm B} =
331: \int_{-\infty}^{t_0} dt \int_S \vec K \cdot d \vec S
332: + \int_{t=t_0} d^3r K^0
333: , \end{equation}
334: where the $\vec \nabla \cdot \vec j_{\rm B}$ term is neglected,
335: and the anomaly term is reexpressed in terms of the
336: Chern-Simons current
337: \begin{equation}
338: K^\mu=\frac{1}{16\pi^2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}
339: \left\{ g^2 {\rm Tr}\left( F_{\nu\rho}V_\sigma
340: - \frac{2}{3} i g V_\nu V_\rho V_\sigma \right)
341: + \frac{1}{2} {g'}^2 f_{\nu\rho}A_\sigma \right\}
342: . \end{equation}
343: In a gauge, where
344: \begin{equation}
345: V_\mu \to \frac{i}{g} \partial_\mu \hat{U} \hat{U}^\dagger , \ \ \
346: \hat{U}(\infty) = 1 ,
347: \end{equation}
348: $\vec K$ vanishes at infinity. %yielding
349: Subject to the above ansatz and boundary conditions
350: the baryon charge
351: of the sphaleron solution \cite{Kleihaus:1994tr} is then
352: \begin{equation}
353: Q_{\rm B} = \int_{t=t_0} d^3r K^0 = \frac{1}{2} .
354: \label{Q}
355: \end{equation}
356:
357: \section{Results and discussion}
358:
359: %\subsection{Global properties}
360:
361: We solve the set of ten coupled non-linear
362: elliptic partial differential equations numerically \cite{FIDISOL},
363: subject to the above boundary conditions
364: in compactified dimensionless coordinates,
365: $x = \tilde r/(1+ \tilde r)$, with $\tilde r = gvr$.
366:
367: Employing the physical value for the mixing angle $\theta_{\rm w}$,
368: and increasing the asymptotic value of the $U(1)$ field
369: $\tilde \gamma = \gamma/gv$,
370: a branch of rotating charged sphalerons emerges
371: smoothly from the static sphaleron.
372: The branch ends when a limiting value $\tilde \gamma_{\rm max}$
373: is reached \cite{footnote}. Here some of the gauge field functions
374: no longer decay exponentially,
375: precluding localized solutions for larger values of $\tilde \gamma$.
376: %The exponent arises as a combination from the mass term,
377: %obtained from the Higgs vaccuum expectation value,
378: %and the non-Abelian gauge field interaction term,
379: %yielding asymptotically an exponential decay with
380: %decay constant proportional to $\sqrt{1-4\tilde \gamma^2}$.
381: At $\tilde \gamma_{\rm max}$ the solution has maximal spin, charge and mass.
382: The dependence of the angular momentum $J$ on $\gamma$
383: is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{f-1}.
384: The figure also demonstrates the linear relation
385: (\ref{JQrel}) between the charge $\cal Q$ and
386: the angular momentum $J$.
387: In Fig.~\ref{f-2} we exhibit the dependence of the mass $M$
388: and the magnetic moment $\mu$ on the angular momentum $J$.
389: \begin{figure}[h!]
390: \lbfig{f-1}
391: \begin{center}
392: \includegraphics[height=.25\textheight, angle =0]{gamvsJ.eps}
393: \includegraphics[height=.25\textheight, angle =0]{QvsJ.eps}
394: \end{center}
395: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
396: \caption{%\small
397: (a) The asymptotic value of the $U(1)$ field $\tilde \gamma = \gamma/gv$
398: and (b) the $U(1)$ charge $Q$ versus the
399: angular momentum $J$ ($J_0=4 \pi/g^2$)
400: for several values of the mixing angle $\theta_{\rm w}$.
401: The asterisk marks the extrapolated maximal value for $J$
402: for $\theta_{\rm w}=0$.
403: }
404: \end{figure}
405: %
406: %As $\gamma$ reaches its maximal value $1/2$, the mass has increased by a factor of 1/3.
407: \begin{figure}[h!]
408: \lbfig{f-2}
409: \begin{center}
410: \includegraphics[height=.25\textheight, angle =0]{EvsJ.eps}
411: \includegraphics[height=.25\textheight, angle =0]{MMvsJ.eps}
412: \end{center}
413: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
414: \caption{%\small
415: Same as Fig.~\ref{f-1} for
416: (a) the mass $M$ ($M_0=v/g$) and (b) the magnetic moment $\mu$
417: ($\mu_0=2 \sin^2 \theta_{\rm w}/gv$).
418: }
419: \end{figure}
420:
421: To gain further understanding of these rotating solutions,
422: we now address the mixing angle dependence,
423: varying $\theta_{\rm w}$ in the range $0 \le \theta_{\rm w} \le \pi/2$.
424: %\cite{Kunz:1992uh}.
425: We recall that, as $\theta_{\rm w}$ is increased,
426: the mass of the static sphaleron decreases, and its energy density,
427: being spherical at $\theta_{\rm w}=0$, becomes increasingly prolate
428: \cite{Kunz:1992uh}.
429:
430: Choosing a fixed value of $\theta_{\rm w}$ beyond the physical value,
431: the respective branch of rotating charged solutions
432: exhibits a slower increase of angular momentum $J$ with
433: $U(1)$ parameter $\gamma$, and thus a smaller maximal value of $J$.
434: In the limit $\theta_{\rm w} \rightarrow \pi/2$,
435: the relation between $J$ and $\gamma$ becomes almost linear,
436: %$J=4 \pi \gamma$,
437: as seen in Fig.~\ref{f-1}, for $\theta_{\rm w}=0.49 \pi$.
438: Note, that the limit cannot be obtained numerically.
439:
440: Let us now consider smaller values of $\theta_{\rm w}$, and in particular
441: the limit $\theta_{\rm w} \rightarrow 0$.
442: In this limit the sphaleron was expected not to rotate \cite{Volkov:2003ew}.
443: The numerical data, as shown in Fig.~\ref{f-1}, however indicate
444: the presence of a rotating branch of solutions in this limit.
445: In fact, for a given value of $\gamma$,
446: the angular momentum increases with decreasing $\theta_{\rm w}$,
447: assuming its largest value in the limit.
448: The charge on the other hand, decreases to zero in this limit,
449: thus provoking the question as to
450: what then allows for the rotation?
451:
452: Analysis then shows that the $U(1)$ field becomes trivial
453: in the limit $\theta_{\rm w} \rightarrow 0$,
454: except that $a_1$ assumes a finite constant value, $a_1=\gamma$.
455: Thus $\gamma$ enters the covariant derivative of the Higgs field,
456: and provides non-trivial boundary conditions for the time-component
457: of the $SU(2)$ gauge field, thus giving rise to a non-vanishing
458: $SU(2)$ Poynting vector and, consequently, angular momentum.
459:
460: These limiting solutions can also be considered from an alternative
461: point of view. Giving the Higgs field a time-dependent phase,
462: as discussed in \cite{Radu:2008pp},
463: $\gamma$ enters as a frequency parameter,
464: analogous as in non-topological solitons.
465: This permits an otherwise identical set of solutions with the same
466: $\gamma$-dependence of the angular momentum and the mass.
467:
468: Let us finally consider the effect of spin and charge
469: on the energy density and thus the shape of the configuration.
470: The effect of charge is to spread the energy density further out,
471: while reducing its central magnitude,
472: as also seen in dyons, for instance.
473: This effect is quite pronounced for large charge.
474: On the other hand,
475: the expected effect of angular momentum, i.e.,
476: a relative centrifugal flattening of the shape of the energy density,
477: is barely noticable even at maximal spin.
478: In particular, for larger $\theta_{\rm w}$,
479: the prolate deformation of the solutions is retained,
480: and only marginally reduced in the presence of rotation.
481:
482: %\section{Conclusions}
483:
484: Concluding, we have shown that the static electroweak sphaleron
485: gives rise to a branch of rotating electrically charged solutions,
486: whose angular momentum and charge are proportional.
487: Carrying baryon number $Q_{\rm B}=1/2$,
488: they can be associated with baryon number violating processes.
489: Their presence may thus affect the calculations
490: of the generation of the baryon number asymmetry of the universe
491: within the standard model
492: \cite{McLerran:1993rv,Rubakov:1996vz,Dine:2003ax}.
493: The inclusion of rotation and charge in more general
494: solutions of Weinberg-Salam theory, such as multisphalerons
495: or sphaleron-antisphaleron systems \cite{Kleihaus:2008gn},
496: is currently under study.
497: Further insight is expected from the study
498: of the fermion modes in the background of these solutions
499: \cite{Kunz:1993ir}.
500:
501: {\bf Acknowledgement}:
502: B.K.~gratefully acknowledges support by the DFG.
503:
504: \begin{thebibliography}{000}
505:
506: %\cite{Manton:1983nd}
507: \bibitem{Manton:1983nd}
508: N.~S.~Manton,
509: %``Topology In The Weinberg-Salam Theory,''
510: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 28}, 2019 (1983).
511: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D28,2019;%%
512:
513: %\cite{Klinkhamer:1984di}
514: \bibitem{Klinkhamer:1984di}
515: F.~R.~Klinkhamer and N.~S.~Manton,
516: %``A Saddle Point Solution In The Weinberg-Salam Theory,''
517: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 30}, 2212 (1984).
518: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D30,2212;%%
519:
520: %\cite{Kleihaus:1991ks}
521: \bibitem{Kleihaus:1991ks}
522: B.~Kleihaus, J.~Kunz and Y.~Brihaye,
523: %``The Electroweak sphaleron at physical mixing angle,''
524: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 273}, 100 (1991).
525: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B273,100;%%
526:
527: %\cite{'tHooft:1976up}
528: \bibitem{'tHooft:1976up}
529: G.~'t Hooft,
530: %``Symmetry breaking through Bell-Jackiw anomalies,''
531: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 37}, 8 (1976).
532: %%CITATION = PRLTA,37,8;%%
533:
534: %\cite{McLerran:1993rv}
535: \bibitem{McLerran:1993rv}
536: L.~D.~McLerran,
537: %``B+L nonconservation as a semiclassical process,''
538: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 25}, 309 (1994)
539: [arXiv:hep-ph/9311239].
540: %%CITATION = APPOA,B25,309;%%
541:
542: %\cite{Rubakov:1996vz}
543: \bibitem{Rubakov:1996vz}
544: V.~A.~Rubakov and M.~E.~Shaposhnikov,
545: ``Electroweak baryon number non-conservation in the early universe and in
546: %high-energy collisions,''
547: Usp.\ Fiz.\ Nauk {\bf 166}, 493 (1996)
548: [Phys.\ Usp.\ {\bf 39}, 461 (1996)]
549: [arXiv:hep-ph/9603208].
550: %%CITATION = PHUSE,39,461;%%
551:
552: %\cite{Dine:2003ax}
553: \bibitem{Dine:2003ax}
554: M.~Dine and A.~Kusenko,
555: %``The origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry,''
556: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 76}, 1 (2004)
557: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303065].
558: %%CITATION = RMPHA,76,1;%%
559:
560: %\cite{Klinkhamer:2003hz}
561: \bibitem{Klinkhamer:2003hz}
562: F.~R.~Klinkhamer and C.~Rupp,
563: %``Sphalerons, spectral flow, and anomalies,''
564: J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 44}, 3619 (2003)
565: [arXiv:hep-th/0304167].
566: %%CITATION = JMAPA,44,3619;%%
567:
568: %\cite{VanderBij:2001nm}
569: \bibitem{VanderBij:2001nm}
570: J.~J.~Van der Bij and E.~Radu,
571: %``On rotating regular nonabelian solutions,''
572: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 17}, 1477 (2002)
573: [arXiv:gr-qc/0111046].
574: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A17,1477;%%
575:
576: %\cite{Paturyan:2004ps}
577: \bibitem{Paturyan:2004ps}
578: V.~Paturyan, E.~Radu and D.~H.~Tchrakian,
579: %``Rotating regular solutions in Einstein-Yang-Mills-Higgs theory,''
580: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 609}, 360 (2005)
581: [arXiv:hep-th/0412011].
582: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B609,360;%%
583:
584: %\cite{Kleihaus:2005fs}
585: \bibitem{Kleihaus:2005fs}
586: B.~Kleihaus, J.~Kunz and U.~Neemann,
587: %``Gravitating stationary dyons and rotating vortex rings,''
588: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 623}, 171 (2005)
589: [arXiv:gr-qc/0507047].
590: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B623,171;%%
591:
592: %\cite{Heusler:1998ec}
593: \bibitem{Heusler:1998ec}
594: M.~Heusler, N.~Straumann and M.~S.~Volkov,
595: %``On rotational excitations and axial deformations of BPS monopoles and
596: %Julia-Zee dyons,''
597: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 105021 (1998)
598: [arXiv:gr-qc/9805061].
599: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D58,105021;%%
600:
601: %\cite{Volkov:2003ew}
602: \bibitem{Volkov:2003ew}
603: M.~S.~Volkov and E.~Wohnert,
604: %``On the existence of spinning solitons in gauge field theory,''
605: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 105006 (2003)
606: [arXiv:hep-th/0302032].
607: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D67,105006;%%
608:
609: %\cite{Kleihaus:2002tc}
610: \bibitem{Kleihaus:2002tc}
611: B.~Kleihaus, J.~Kunz and F.~Navarro-Lerida,
612: %``Global charges of stationary non-Abelian black holes,''
613: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 90}, 171101 (2003)
614: [arXiv:hep-th/0210197].
615: %%CITATION = PRLTA,90,171101;%%
616:
617: %\cite{Kleihaus:1994tr}
618: \bibitem{Kleihaus:1994tr}
619: B.~Kleihaus and J.~Kunz,
620: %``Multi - Sphalerons In The Weinberg-Salam Theory,''
621: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 5343 (1994)
622: [arXiv:hep-ph/9405387].
623: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D50,5343;%%
624:
625: \bibitem{FIDISOL}
626: W. Sch\"onauer and R. Wei\ss ,
627: J. Comput. Appl. Math. 27, 279 (1989).
628: %M. Schauder, R. Wei\ss\ and W. Sch\"onauer,
629: %The CADSOL Program Package,
630: %Universit\"at Karlsruhe, Interner Bericht Nr. 46/92 (1992).
631:
632: \bibitem{footnote}
633: Assuming the exponent to arise from a combination of the
634: non-Abelian interaction and mass term,
635: a decay constant proportional to $\sqrt{1-4\tilde \gamma^2}$
636: should appear, yielding $\tilde \gamma_{\rm max}=1/2$.
637:
638: %\cite{Kunz:1992uh}
639: \bibitem{Kunz:1992uh}
640: J.~Kunz, B.~Kleihaus and Y.~Brihaye,
641: %``Sphalerons at finite mixing angle,''
642: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 3587 (1992).
643: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,3587;%%
644:
645: %\cite{Radu:2008pp}
646: \bibitem{Radu:2008pp}
647: E.~Radu and M.~S.~Volkov,
648: %``Existence of stationary, non-radiating ring solitons in field theory: knots
649: %and vortons,''
650: arXiv:0804.1357 [hep-th].
651: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0804.1357;%%
652:
653: %\cite{Kleihaus:2008gn}
654: \bibitem{Kleihaus:2008gn}
655: B.~Kleihaus, J.~Kunz and M.~Leissner,
656: %``Sphalerons, Antisphalerons and Vortex Rings,''
657: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 663}, 438 (2008)
658: [arXiv:0802.3275 [hep-th]].
659: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B663,438;%%
660:
661: %\cite{Kunz:1993ir}
662: \bibitem{Kunz:1993ir}
663: J.~Kunz and Y.~Brihaye,
664: %``Fermions in the background of the sphaleron barrier,''
665: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 304}, 141 (1993)
666: [arXiv:hep-ph/9302313].
667: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B304,141;%%
668:
669: \end{thebibliography}
670:
671: \end{document}
672:
673: The electroweak interactions thus satisfy the conditions
674: necessary for the genesis of the baryon asymmetry of the universe
675: (BAU) during its first fractal second, by providing
676: 1.~non-equilibrium conditions during the phase transition,
677: 2.~$C$ and $CP$ violation, and 3.~baryon number violating processes.
678: While the sphaleron contributions cannot explain the observed
679: size of the BAU \cite{review}, this might possibly be enhanced
680: further non-perturbative contributions.
681:
682:
683:
684: