1: %% ****** Start of file slactemplate.tex ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: %\RequirePackage{lineno}
18: \documentclass[slac_one]{revtex4}
19: \usepackage{graphicx}
20: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
21: \usepackage{d0_style}
22: \pagestyle{fancy}
23: %% Please do not change the header and footer -- specific to ICHEP08
24: %%
25: \fancyhead{} % clear all fields
26: \fancyhead[LO]{34$^{\rm th}$ International Conference on High Energy
27: Physics, Philadelphia, 2008}
28: \fancyfoot{} % clear all fields
29: \fancyfoot[RO]{\thepage} % PSN not used for ICHEP08
30: %\fancyfoot[LE,LO]{Insert PSN Here} % PSN not used for ICHEP08
31: \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
32: \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt}
33: \renewcommand{\sfdefault}{phv}
34: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
35: \setlength{\textheight}{235mm}
36: \setlength{\textwidth}{178mm}%{170mm}
37: \setlength{\topmargin}{-20mm}
38:
39: \begin{document}
40: %\linenumbers*[1]
41: %Title of paper
42: \title{Searching for the elusive graviton}
43: \author{Edgar Carrera for the \D0 Collaboration}
44: \affiliation{Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA}
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47: We present a search for large extra dimensions in the single photon plus
48: missing transverse energy channel (Kaluza-Klein graviton production)
49: performed using $2.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$ of data
50: collected by the \D0 experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron collider. At
51: $95\%$ C.L., we set
52: limits on the fundamental Planck scale $M_{D}$ from $970\ \text{GeV}$ to
53: $816\ \text{GeV}$ for two to eight extra dimensions.
54: \end{abstract}
55:
56: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract
57: \maketitle
58:
59: \thispagestyle{fancy}
60:
61: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
62: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
63: % Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing
64: %\section{\label{}}
65:
66: \section{\label{sec:intro} INTRODUCTION} % Section title should be in all
67: %capitals.
68: The large unexplained difference between the effective Planck scale in the
69: $4$-dimensional space-time ($M_{Pl}\sim 10^{16}\ \text{TeV}$)
70: and the electroweak scale ($\sim 1\ \text{TeV} $),
71: generally known as the hierarchy problem of the Standard Model (SM), served
72: as the main motivation for the emergence of theories of large extra
73: dimensions (LED),
74: also known as ADD theories~\cite{add}. They postulate the
75: presence of $n$ extra spatial dimensions with sizes ($R$) large
76: comparared to the
77: electroweak scale.
78: While SM particles are bound to the ordinary $3$-dimensional space ($3$-d
79: brane), gravitons can penetrate the additional volume in detriment of the
80: strength of the gravitational field in the $3$-d brane. The
81: hierarchy problem is solved, since the fundamental
82: Planck scale in the $(4+n)$-dimensional space-time ($M_{D}$), which could
83: be of the order of the electroweak scale,
84: is concealed by the large size of the extra volume:
85: $M_{Pl}^2 = 8\pi M_{D}^{n+2}R^{n}$.
86: The compactification of the extra space forces the gravitational field to
87: populate only certain energy modes known as Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes.
88: Towers of these modes behave like massive,
89: noninteracting, stable particles, the $KK$ gravitons ($G_{KK}$),
90: whose production
91: can be inferred in a collider detector by the presence of missing
92: transverse energy ($\met$).
93:
94: This review constitutes an update for a previous analysis~\cite{runIIa},
95: where
96: we searched for large extra dimensions in the
97: exclusive (monophoton) channel $q\bar{q}\rightarrow\gamma G_{KK}$ in
98: $1\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$ of
99: data, collected with the \D0~\cite{nim} detector at the Fermilab Tevatron collider.
100: The present study uses the same analysis techniques on
101: $1.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$ of additional data. At the end, we present
102: the final results as a combination of both analyses ($2.7\
103: {\rm fb^{-1}}$ of data). Recently,
104: the CDF collaboration analyzed $2\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$ of data to set
105: $95\%$ C.L. lower limits on $M_{D}$,
106: from $1080$~\gev~to $900$~\gev~for two to six
107: extra dimensions~\cite{cdfrun2}.
108: Searches for LED in other final states have been performed
109: by collaborations at the Tevatron~\cite{tevatron,cdfmonojet}
110: and the CERN LEP collider~\cite{lep1}.
111:
112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
113: \section{\label{sec:evt}EVENT SELECTION}
114:
115: A photon is identified in the detector as a calorimeter
116: cluster with at least $90\%$ of
117: its energy in the electromagnetic (EM) part.
118: The calorimeter isolation variable,
119: ${\cal{I}} = [(E^{\text{tot}}_{0.4}-E^{\text{em}}_{0.2})-\alpha\cdot
120: l]/E^{\text{em}}_{0.2}$, is required to be less than $0.07$. In this equation,
121: $E^{\text{tot}}_{0.4}$ denotes the total energy deposited
122: in the calorimeter in a cone of radius
123: ${\cal{R}}=\sqrt{(\Delta\eta)^{2}+(\Delta\phi)^{2}} = 0.4$,
124: $E^{\text{em}}_{0.2}$
125: is the EM energy in a cone of radius ${\cal{R}}=0.2$, $l$ is the
126: instantaneous luminosity, and $\alpha$ is a constant that takes different
127: values for the central ($|\eta|<1.1$) and end-cap regions ($1.3<|\eta|<4$)
128: of the calorimeter.
129: The track isolation variable, defined as the scalar sum
130: of the transverse momenta of
131: all tracks that originate from the interaction vertex in an annulus
132: of $0.05<{\cal{R}}<0.4$ around the cluster, is less than $2\ {\rm GeV}$.
133: Only EM clusters in the central region of the detector
134: with both transverse and longitudinal shower shapes consistent
135: with those of a photon are considered. The cluster has
136: neither an associated track in the central tracking
137: system, nor a significant density
138: of hits in the SMT and CFT systems
139: consistent with the presence of a track. Additionally, it is required that
140: the EM cluster matches an energy deposit in the central preshower (CPS) system.
141:
142:
143: The {\it photon} sample is created by
144: selecting events with only one photon with $p_{T}>90\ {\rm GeV}$, and
145: at least one reconstructed interaction
146: vertex consistent with direction of
147: the photon given by the CPS system. No jets with $p_{T}>15\ {\rm GeV}$ are allowed
148: in the event. Jets are reconstructed using the iterative midpoint
149: cone algorithm with a cone size of $0.5$. The missing
150: transverse energy, which is computed from calorimeter cells with $\eta<4$
151: and corrected for EM and jet energy scales, is required to be at
152: least $70\ \text{GeV}$. The applied \met~requirement guarantees
153: negligible multijet background in
154: the final candidate sample, while being
155: almost fully efficient for signal selection. Events containing muons,
156: cosmic ray muons, or tracks with
157: $p_{T}>8\ \text{GeV}$ are rejected.
158:
159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
160: \section{\label{sec:analysis}ANALYSIS}
161:
162: The EM pointing algorithm uses
163: the fine transverse and
164: longitudinal segmentation of the calorimeter and the CPS system
165: to measure the direction of the EM shower. It calculates
166: the distance of closest approach
167: (DCA) to the $z$ axis (along the beam
168: line) and predicts the $z$ position of the interaction vertex in the event
169: independently of the tracker information.
170: After standardized selection requirements, large backgrounds
171: to the $\gamma+\met$ signal, which originate from cosmic ray muons
172: and beam halo particles (non-collision)
173: depositing energy in the calorimeter, are still present. The discriminating
174: power of the EM pointing
175: variables help reduce this background significantly and very efficiently.
176: The remaining non-collision events, as well as the contribution from
177: $W/Z+\text{jet}$ events where the jet is
178: misidentified as a photon, are
179: estimated by performing a linear template
180: fit to the data where we exploit the differences in the
181: shapes of the DCA distributions (Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_1}). The procedure is described in detail
182: in~\cite{runIIa}.
183:
184: \begin{figure}[th]
185: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig_1.eps}
186: \caption{\label{fig:fig_1}DCA distribution for the selected events
187: in $1.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$ of
188: data (points with statistical uncertainties). The different
189: histograms represent the estimated background composition from the template
190: fit to this distribution. The inset figure compares the individual
191: template shapes.}
192: \end{figure}
193: %\hfill
194:
195:
196: The backgrounds arising from the
197: process $Z+\gamma \rightarrow \nu\overline{\nu}+\gamma$, which gives the
198: same signature as the signal, or from $W+\gamma$
199: where the lepton from the $W$ boson decay is not detected, are estimated
200: from a sample of Monte Carlo (MC) events generated
201: with {\sc pythia}~\cite{pythia}, and corrected for luminosity profile
202: differences with data. Additionally, we apply scale factors to account for
203: the differences between the efficiency determination in data and
204: simulation. $W\rightarrow e\nu$ background, where the
205: electron is misidentified as a photon, is estimated from data using a
206: sample of isolated electrons and the measured rate of electron-photon
207: mis-identification.
208:
209: We generate signal events for two to eight
210: extra dimensions using a modified version of {\sc pythia}~\cite{pythia}.
211: Table~\ref{tab:summary} gives the final numbers for data and backgrounds.
212: The main sources of systematic uncertainty are the
213: uncertainty in the photon
214: identification efficiency ($5\%$), the uncertainty in
215: the total integrated luminosity ($6.1\%$), and the uncertainty
216: in the signal acceptance from the PDFs ($4\%$). For the standard model
217: background estimated from MC an uncertainty of $7\%$ in the cross section
218: is also included.
219:
220: \begin{table}[t]
221: \begin{center}
222: \caption{\label{tab:summary}Data and estimated backgrounds }
223: %\begin{ruledtabular}
224: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
225: \hline
226:
227: Background&Number of expected events&Number of expected events\\
228: &($1.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$)&(combined analysis, $2.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$)\\
229: \hline
230: $Z+\gamma \rightarrow \nu\overline{\nu}+\gamma$&$17.4\pm2.2$&$29.5\pm2.5$ \\
231: $W\rightarrow e\nu$&$4.7\pm1.7$&$8.5\pm1.7$ \\
232: Non-collision&$3.8\pm1.8$&$6.6\pm2.3$ \\
233: Misidentified jets&$0.91\pm0.23$&$3.1\pm1.5$ \\
234: $W+\gamma$&$0.72\pm0.15$&$2.22\pm0.3$ \\
235: \hline
236: Total Background&$27.5\pm3.3$&$49.9\pm4.1$ \\
237: Data&$22$&$51$ \\
238: \hline
239: \end{tabular}
240: %\end{ruledtabular}
241: \end{center}
242: \end{table}
243:
244: The total efficiency for the MC signal is $0.38\pm0.04$.
245: In order to combine this efficiency with the one in the analysis described
246: in~\cite{runIIa}, we perform a luminosity-weighted
247: average of the two values and add an extra systematic
248: uncertainty of $5\%$ due to correlations.
249: The combined efficiency is then $0.43\pm0.05$.
250: Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_2}
251: shows the photon $p_{T}$
252: distribution for the combined analysis, with the SM backgrounds stacked on top
253: of each other.
254: We employ the modified frequentist approach~\cite{limitc} to
255: set limits at the $95\%$ C.L. on the production cross section for the signal, assuming
256: the leading-order theoretical cross section.
257: Table \ref{tab:limits} and Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_3} summarize the
258: limit setting results.
259:
260: \begin{figure}
261: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig2_2.eps}
262: \caption{\label{fig:fig_2}Photon $p_{T}$ distribution
263: for the final candidate events with $2.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$ of data after
264: all the selection requirements. Data points show statistical
265: uncertainties. The LED signal is stacked
266: on top of SM backgrounds.}
267: \end{figure}
268: %\hfill
269: \begin{figure}
270: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig_3.eps}
271: \caption{\label{fig:fig_3}The
272: expected and observed lower limits on $M_{D}$ for
273: LED in the $\gamma + \met$ final state. CDF
274: limits with $2\ \text{fb}^{-1}$~of data (monophoton
275: channel)~\cite{cdfrun2}, and
276: the LEP combined limits~\cite{lep1} are also shown.}
277: \end{figure}
278:
279: To conclude, we have conducted an update to the analysis described in~\cite{runIIa}
280: on a search for LED
281: in the $\gamma+\met$ channel, finding no evidence for
282: their presence. The updated limits show significant improvement from
283: our previous study and are competitive for $n>4$.
284:
285:
286:
287: \begin{table}[th]
288: \begin{center}
289: \caption{\label{tab:limits}Summary of limit calculations.}
290: %\begin{ruledtabular}
291: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
292: \hline
293: $n$&$1\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$~\cite{runIIa}&$1\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$~\cite{runIIa}&$2.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$&$2.7\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$
294: &CDF $2\ {\rm fb^{-1}}$~\cite{cdfrun2}\\
295: &observed (expected)&observed (expected)&observed (expected)&observed (expected)&observed\\
296: &cross section&$M_{D}$ lower&cross section&$M_{D}$ lower&$M_{D}$ lower\\
297: &limit (fb)&limit (\gev) &limit (fb)&limit (\gev)&limit (\gev)\\
298:
299: \hline
300: $2$&$27.6~(23.4)$&$884~(921)$&$19.0~(14.6)$&$970~(1037)$&$1080$\\
301: $3$&$24.5~(22.7)$&$864~(877)$&$20.1~(14.7)$&$899~(957)$&$1000$\\
302: $4$&$25.0~(22.8)$&$836~(848)$&$20.1~(14.9)$&$867~(916)$&$970$\\
303: $5$&$25.0~(24.8)$&$820~(821)$&$19.9~(15.0)$&$848~(883)$&$930$\\
304: $6$&$25.4~(22.3)$&$797~(810)$&$18.2~(15.2)$&$831~(850)$&$900$\\
305: $7$&$24.0~(23.1)$&$797~(801)$&$15.9~(14.9)$&$834~(841)$&$--$\\
306: $8$&$24.2~(21.9)$&$778~(786)$&$17.3~(15.0)$&$804~(816)$&$--$\\
307:
308: %$2$&$27.6~(23.4)$&$884~(921)$&$19.0~(14.6)$&$970~(1037)$&$1080$\\
309: %$3$&$24.5~(22.7)$&$864~(877)$&$20.1~(14.7)$&$899~(957)$&$1000$\\
310: %$4$&$25.0~(22.8)$&$836~(848)$&$20.1~(14.9)$&$867~(916)$&$970$\\
311: %$5$&$25.0~(24.8)$&$820~(821)$&$19.9~(15.0)$&$848~(883)$&$930$\\
312: %$6$&$25.4~(22.3)$&$797~(810)$&$18.2~(15.2)$&$831~(850)$&$900$\\
313: %$7$&$24.0~(23.1)$&$797~(801)$&$15.9~(14.9)$&$834~(841)$&$--$\\
314: %$8$&$24.2~(21.9)$&$778~(786)$&$17.3~(15.0)$&$804~(816)$&$--$\\
315: \hline
316: \end{tabular}
317: %\end{ruledtabular}
318: \end{center}
319: \end{table}
320:
321:
322:
323: \begin{acknowledgments}
324:
325: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
326: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
327: %\input acknowledgement_paragraph_r2.tex
328: The author wishes to thank Alexey Ferapontov, Yuri Gershtein and Yurii
329: Maravin for their guidance and help, and the staffs at Fermilab and collaborating institutions.
330: \end{acknowledgments}
331:
332:
333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
334: \begin{thebibliography}{999} % Use for 1-9 references
335: %\begin{thebibliography}{99} % Use for 10-99 references
336: \bibitem{add} N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 429}, 263 (1998).
337:
338: \bibitem{runIIa} V.M Abazov \etal~(D0 Collaboration),Phys. Rev. Lett.
339: {\bf 101}, 011601 (2008).
340:
341: \bibitem{nim} V.M. Abazov \etal~(D0 Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods
342: Phys. Res. A {\bf 565}, 463 (2006).
343:
344: %\bibitem{lumi} T. Andeen \etal, FERMILAB-TM-2365 (2007).
345:
346: \bibitem{cdfrun2} T. Aaltonen \etal~(CDF Collaboration),
347: arXiv:0807.3132v1[hep-ex] (2008).
348:
349: \bibitem{tevatron} B. Abbott \etal~(D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.
350: {\bf 86}, 1156 (2001); ibid {\bf 90}, 251802 (2003);
351: ibid {\bf 95}, 161602 (2005).
352:
353: \bibitem{cdfmonojet} D. Acosta \etal~(CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.
354: {\bf 97}, 171802 (2006).
355:
356: \bibitem{lep1} LEP Exotica Working Group, URL: \url{http://lepexotica.web.cern.ch/LEPEXOTICA/notes/2004-03/ed_note_final.ps.gz},
357: and references therein.
358:
359: \bibitem{pythia} T. Sj\"ostrand \etal, Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 135}, 238
360: (2001); Stephen Mrenna, private communication.
361:
362: \bibitem{limitc} W. Fisher, FERMILAB-TM-2386-E (2007); T. Junk.
363:
364: %\bibitem{jet} G. C. Blazey \etal, arXiv:hep-ex/0005012 (2000).
365:
366: \end{thebibliography}
367:
368:
369: \end{document}
370: