1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %% Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in

3: %% Text Area: 8in (include Runningheads) x 5in

4: %% ws-mpla.tex   :   4-9-2007

5: %% TeX file to use with ws-mpla.cls written in Latex2E. 

6: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the 

7: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 

8: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co. 

9: %% All rights are reserved.

10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

11: %%

12: 

13: \documentclass{ws-mpla}

14: %\documentclass[prl,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,twocolumn,aps]{revtex4}

15: 

16: 

17: %\usepackage{espcrc2}

18: \usepackage{amssymb}

19: \usepackage{revsymb}

20: %\usepackage{asp2006}

21: %\usepackage{epsf}

22: \usepackage{epsfig}

23: \usepackage{graphicx}

24: \usepackage{lscape}

25: \usepackage[square,comma,numbers]{natbib}

26: \begin{document}

27: 

28: \markboth{Nissim Kanekar}

29: %{Probing fundamental constant evolution with radio spectroscopy}

30: {Do the fundamental constants change with time ?}

31: 

32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Publisher's Area please ignore %%%%%%%%%%%%%%

33: \catchline{}{}{}{}{}

34: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

35: 

36: 

37: \setcounter{equation}{0}

38: \setcounter{figure}{0}

39: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

40: \setcounter{section}{0}

41: \setcounter{table}{0}

42: 

43: %\citestyle{aa}

44: 

45: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.

46: 

47: \newcommand{\dal}{\ensuremath{\left[\Delta \alpha/ \alpha \right]}}

48: \newcommand{\dmu}{\ensuremath{\left[\Delta \mu/\mu \right]}}

49: \newcommand{\hi}{H{\sc i}}

50: \newcommand{\htwo}{${\rm H}_2$}

51: 

52: 

53: \title{DO THE FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS CHANGE WITH TIME ?}

54: \author{\footnotesize NISSIM KANEKAR}

55: \address{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 1003 Lopezville Road, 

56: Socorro, NM 87801, USA\\ nkanekar@nrao.edu}

57: \maketitle

58: \pub{}{}

59: 

60: \begin{abstract}

61: Comparisons between the redshifts of spectral lines from cosmologically-distant 

62: galaxies can be used to probe temporal changes in low-energy fundamental constants like

63: the fine structure constant and the proton-electron mass ratio. In this article, I 

64: review the results from, and the advantages and disadvantages of, the best techniques 

65: using this approach, before focussing on a new method, based on conjugate satellite OH lines, 

66: that appears to be less affected by systematic effects and hence holds much promise for the 

67: future.

68: \keywords{Line: profiles -- techniques: spectroscopic -- radio lines}

69: \end{abstract}

70: 

71: \ccode{PACS Nos.: 98.80.Es,06.20.Jr,33.20.Bx,98.58.-w}

72: 

73: \section{Introduction}

74: \label{sec:intro}

75: 

76: In modern higher-dimensional extensions of the standard model of particle physics,

77: low-energy fundamental constants like the fine structure constant $\alpha$, the 

78: proton-electron mass ratio $\mu \equiv m_p/m_e$, etc, are expected to be dynamical quantities

79: that show spatio-temporal evolution (e.g.  \cite{marciano84,damour94}). The detection of such 

80: changes provides an avenue to explore new physics, especially important because most 

81: other predictions of these models lie at inaccessibly high energies ($\gtrsim 10^{19}$~GeV). 

82: However, the timescales of these putative changes are unknown, implying that it is 

83: necessary to search for evolution over as wide a range of timescales as possible (especially

84: as it is not even clear that any evolution will be monotonic). It is also important to 

85: probe changes in different constants: fractional changes in $\mu$ are expected to be far 

86: larger than those in $\alpha$, by factors of $\sim 50- 500$ (e.g. \cite{calmet02,langacker02}). 

87: 

88: On short timescales (a few years), laboratory experiments, usually based on frequency 

89: comparisons between atomic clocks and other optical frequency standards have provided the 

90: strongest constraints on changes in (especially) the fine structure constant. For example,

91: a recent comparison between $^{199}$Hg$^+$ and $^{27}$Al$^+$ clocks found 

92: $\dot{\alpha}/\alpha < 4.6 \times 10^{-17}$~yr$^{-1}$ over one year \cite{rosenband08}. 

93: In the case of the proton-electron mass ratio, \cite{shelkolnikov08} obtained 

94: $\dot{\mu}/\mu < 1.2 \times 10^{-13}$~yr$^{-1}$, comparing frequencies derived from 

95: molecular and cesium clocks over a two-year period. Note that all limits quoted 

96: in this paper are at $2\sigma$ significance.

97: 

98: Besides the impressive precision of these (and other) laboratory results, 

99: it should be noted that they allow direct control over systematic effects. Unfortunately, 

100: they are limited to probing changes in the constants over timescales of only a few years. 

101: Various geological methods have allowed the extension of such studies to lookback times 

102: of a few billion years; most prominent amongst these are measurements of relative isotopic 

103: abundances in the Oklo natural fission reactor and studies of the time variation of the 

104: $\beta$-decay rate (e.g. \cite{uzan03}). However, while sensitive constraints on changes 

105: in $\alpha$ (over $\sim 1.8-4$~Gyr) have been obtained from both these methods, they 

106: typically are model-dependent and involve assumptions about the constancy of other 

107: parameters (e.g. \cite{fujii03,gould06,petrov06}). For example, \cite{gould06} obtain the 

108: $2\sigma$ limit $-0.24 \times 10^{-7} < \dal < 0.11 \times 10^{-7}$ from 

109: a re-analysis of Oklo nuclear yields, but emphasize that this depends critically on 

110: the assumption that $\alpha$ alone changes with time; any changes in the nuclear 

111: potential could significantly affect the result.

112: 

113: Astrophysical techniques allow tests of changes in the fundamental constants over 

114: large lookback times, out to significant fractions of the age of the Universe. 

115: The methods can be broadly divided into the following three categories: 

116: (1)~measurements of the abundances of elements formed during Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN)

117: \cite{kolb86}, (2)~observations of anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background 

118: \cite{hannestad99,kaplinghat99} and (3)~comparisons between the redshifts of 

119: spectral lines from distant galaxies \cite{savedoff56}. The first two of these

120: probe the largest lookback times, but the results are not very sensitive due to 

121: degeneracies with the cosmological parameters, which are not {\it a priori} known 

122: (e.g. \cite{rocha04}). Additionally, most BBN studies are 

123: highly model-dependent as the dependence of the nuclear binding energies on the 

124: fundamental constants is still not known \cite{dent07}. In this article, I will 

125: concentrate on the third category, the use of astronomical spectroscopy to probe 

126: changes in three constants, $\alpha$, $\mu \equiv m_p/m_e$ and the proton g-factor 

127: ratio $g_p$ (or combinations of these quantities). After discussing 

128: the results from, and advantages and disadvantages of, the main techniques currently 

129: used in this endeavour, I will focus on a new technique, based on ``conjugate'' 

130: satellite hydroxyl (OH) lines, that appears to be less affected by systematic effects. 

131: Finally, I will discuss prospects for such studies of fundamental constant evolution,

132: based on new telescopes and instruments over the next decade.

133: 

134: \section{Redshifted spectral lines: background}

135: \label{sec:astro-spec}

136: 

137: The idea that comparisons between the velocities of different transitions arising 

138: in a distant galaxy might be used to test for spatio-temporal dependences 

139: in the fundamental constants was first suggested more than half a century ago 

140: \cite{savedoff56} and is conceptually quite simple. Different spectral transitions 

141: arise from different physical mechanisms (e.g. interactions of fine structure, hyperfine 

142: structure, rotational or other types) and the line frequencies have different dependences 

143: on the fundamental constants. For example, hyperfine line frequencies 

144: are proportional to $g_p \mu \alpha^2$, while rotational line frequencies are 

145: proportional to $\mu$. If the fundamental constants are different at different 

146: space-time locations (e.g. in external galaxies), the rest frequency of a transition 

147: would be different at these locations from the value measured in terrestrial 

148: laboratories. Different spectral transitions arising in a given gas cloud 

149: (or galaxy) would then yield different systemic velocities, as the incorrect

150: (laboratory) rest frequency would be used for each line to estimate the cloud

151: velocity. A comparison between the line velocities and the known dependence of

152: the line rest frequency on the constants can then be used to determine the 

153: fractional change in a given constant between the space-time locations of the cloud

154: and the Earth. For example, a comparison between hyperfine and rotational velocities 

155: is sensitive to changes in $g_p \alpha^2$, and one between hyperfine and fine structure

156: transitions, to changes in $g_p \mu \alpha^2$. Most such studies are carried out 

157: in absorption (or stimulated emission), against distant quasars, because absorption

158: lines can be detected out to high redshifts with undiminished intensity and are also 

159: usually much narrower than emission lines, allowing precision measurements of the 

160: line redshift (but see \cite{bahcall04}).

161: 

162: A critical assumption here is that an observed velocity offset between different 

163: transitions can be ascribed to changes in the fundamental constants, i.e. that 

164: ``local'' velocity offsets (e.g. due to motions within galaxies or clouds) are 

165: negligible. This is manifestly incorrect as transitions from different species 

166: often arise from different parts of a gas cloud, at different velocities.

167: Even transitions from one species need not arise at the same velocity, if 

168: the cloud is not in equilibrium.  Intra-cloud velocities of $\sim 10$~km/s are 

169: common in astrophysical circumstances; these would yield systematic effects 

170: of order $(v/c) \sim few \times 10^{-5}$ on estimates of fractional changes in 

171: the constants (e.g. \cite{wiklind97,carilli00}). As will be seen later, the best 

172: present estimates of fractional changes in $\alpha$ and $\mu$ are of this order, 

173: implying that such local offsets cannot be neglected. Two approaches have been 

174: used to handle such systematics: (1)~a statistically-large sample of spectral lines, 

175: to average out local effects (e.g. the many-multiplet method; \cite{dzuba99}) and 

176: (2)~the use of certain spectral lines, where the physics of the line mechanism 

177: causes such local effects to be negligible (e.g. the conjugate satellite OH approach;

178: \cite{kanekar04b,darling04}). 

179: 

180: \section{Optical techniques}

181: \label{sec:optical}

182: 

183: Most studies of fundamental constant evolution based on redshifted spectral lines 

184: have used optical techniques, partly, no doubt, due to the profusion of strong 

185: ultraviolet transitions that are redshifted into optical wavebands. The three principal 

186: approaches are:

187: 

188: \subsection{Alkali doublet method}

189: \label{sec:optical-doublets}

190: 

191: For three decades, redshifted alkali doublet (AD) lines provided the main spectroscopic 

192: probe of the long-term evolution of the fine structure constant (e.g. 

193: \cite{bahcall67,ivanchik99}).  The fractional separation between the doublet 

194: wavelengths is proportional to $\alpha^2$ and the measured line redshifts 

195: thus directly provide an estimate of $\dal$ \citep{savedoff56}.  The best 

196: present result from this technique is $\dal < 2.6 \times 10^{-5}$, based on High Resolution 

197: Echelle Spectrograph (HIRES) absorption spectra of 21~Si{\sc iv} doublets at $2 < z < 3$, 

198: with the Keck telescope \cite{murphy01c}. While \cite{chand05} obtained 

199: $\dal < 0.86 \times 10^{-5}$ from Very Large Telescope Ultraviolet Echelle Spectrograph 

200: (VLT-UVES) spectra of 15~Si{\sc iv} doublets at $1.6 < z < 2.9$, it has been pointed out 

201: that their $\chi^2$ curves contain large fluctuations, making the result unreliable 

202: \cite{murphy08b}. Although the sensitivity of the AD method is nearly an order 

203: of magnitude poorer than that of the many-multiplet method (discussed next), the fact

204: that the two doublet lines have the same shape provides a useful test for systematic 

205: effects. Further, the doublet lines lie at nearby wavelengths, and hence usually 

206: on the same echelle order, implying that relative wavelength calibration across

207: orders is not an issue. \cite{murphy01d} note that differential isotopic saturation of 

208: the Si{\sc iv} lines must be taken into account when using saturated lines in this method; 

209: even better would be to restrict the analysis to unsaturated Si{\sc iv} absorbers alone.

210: 

211: 

212: \subsection{The many-multiplet method}

213: \label{sec:mm}

214: 

215: The many-multiplet (MM) method, devised by \cite{dzuba99}, is based on the fact that 

216: relativistic first-order corrections imply that the wavelengths of fine structure 

217: transitions in different species have different dependences on $\alpha$. Thus, unlike the 

218: AD method, the MM method is based on comparisons between transitions 

219: from {\it different} species and hence must be carried out on large absorber samples 

220: to average out local effects. This has resulted in a significant improvement 

221: in sensitivity to fractional changes in $\dal$ over the alkali doublet approach, 

222: albeit perhaps with a concomitant increase in systematic effects (see, e.g., 

223: \cite{bahcall04,murphy01d,murphy03,molaro07}). This is also, at present, the 

224: only technique that finds evidence for a change in the fine structure constant:

225: \cite{murphy04} used Keck-HIRES data to obtain $\dal = \left[-0.573 \pm 0.113\right] 

226: \times 10^{-5}$ from 143~absorbers in the redshift range $0.2 < z < 4.2$, implying that 

227: $\alpha$ was smaller at earlier times (see also \cite{murphy03}). A slew of later 

228: VLT-UVES observations have claimed strong constraints on $\dal$, from either the MM 

229: method or its variants (e.g. the SIDAM method; \cite{quast04,levshakov07}), some of which are 

230: inconsistent with the Keck-HIRES result (e.g. \cite{chand04}). For example, \cite{molaro07,levshakov07} 

231: use the SIDAM method to obtain $\dal = (5.7 \pm 2.7) \times 10^{-6}$ and 

232: $\dal = (-0.12 \pm 1.79) \times 10^{-6}$ from absorbers at $z \sim 1.84$ and $z \sim 1.15$, 

233: respectively. However, \cite{murphy08b} point out that the $\chi^2$ curves of \cite{chand04} 

234: show large fluctuations, causing them to under-estimate their errors by a factor of 

235: $\gtrsim 3$. \cite{murphy08b} also argue that some of the other VLT-UVES results are likely 

236: to be unreliable, notably due to the fitting of insufficient components \cite{quast04,levshakov07}. 

237: Conversely, \cite{molaro07} find non-gaussian tails in the distribution of the Keck-HIRES 

238: data of \cite{murphy03,murphy04}, as well as correlations in the data, suggesting that they 

239: too may have under-estimated their errors.

240: 

241: Excellent discussions of the systematic effects inherent in the MM (and AD) methods 

242: are provided by \cite{murphy01d,murphy03}, who find no evidence that their Keck-HIRES 

243: result may be affected by such systematics (but see \cite{molaro07}). Isotopic 

244: abundance variation with redshift is perhaps the most important source of 

245: systematic effects in the MM method, as lines from multiple isotopes are 

246: blended for most species (especially Mg), and terrestrial isotopic abundances are assumed 

247: in order to determine the central line wavelength \cite{murphy04,ashenfelter04}. For 

248: example, higher $^{25,26}$Mg fractional abundances in the $z < 1.8$ sample of \cite{murphy04} 

249: could yield the observed negative $\dal$ for this sample. Interestingly enough, \cite{molaro07} 

250: find that the results of \cite{murphy03,murphy04} appear to be dominated by the sample that uses 

251: Mg{\sc ii} lines: the sub-sample of \cite{murphy03} that uses the Mg{\sc ii} lines yields 

252: a $\beta$-trimmed mean of $\dal = (-0.48 \pm 0.12) \times 10^{-5}$, while the sub-sample 

253: without these lines gives $\dal = (-0.11 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-5}$ \cite{molaro07}.

254: Further, the isotopic structure is only known for a few of the transitions (e.g. Mg, Si) 

255: used in the full analysis \cite{murphy01c}. Unfortunately, it will be difficult to resolve this 

256: issue by direct observations, while indirect arguments depend on the details of galactic 

257: chemical evolution models \cite{ashenfelter04,fenner05}. 

258: 

259: 

260: Other sources of systematics in the MM method include the assumption 

261: that all species have the same kinematic structure and the possibilities of 

262: line blends and line misidentifications (e.g.  \cite{bahcall04,murphy01d,murphy03}). 

263: As emphasized by \cite{murphy01d}, these are likely to result in random contributions 

264: to $\dal$. However, it is unclear whether the number of systems is

265: sufficient to cancel such systematic effects at the level of $(v/c) \sim 0.1$, i.e. 

266: $\Delta v \sim 0.3$~km/s \cite{bahcall04}. Note that the SIDAM method does not

267: require the assumption that different species have the same velocity structure 

268: \cite{molaro07}, an advantage over the original MM method. Finally, the fact that the 

269: transitions used in the MM and SIDAM methods lie at rest-frame ultraviolet wavelengths 

270: has meant that it is difficult to apply these to Galactic lines of sight, to 

271: test whether the expected null result is obtained at $z = 0$. 

272: 

273: 

274: \subsection{Molecular hydrogen lines}

275: \label{sec:htwo}

276: 

277: The numerous ultraviolet ro-vibrational transitions of molecular hydrogen (\htwo)

278: have different dependences on the reduced molecular mass, implying that comparisons

279: between the line redshifts can be used to probe changes in $\mu$ \cite{thompson75,varshalovich93}.

280: Unfortunately, these lines are both weak and, for redshifted absorbers, lie in the 

281: Lyman-$\alpha$ forest, making them difficult to detect. As a result, only about a dozen 

282: redshifted \htwo\ absorbers are presently known, of which only three have been useful 

283: in studying changes in $\mu$ (e.g. \cite{varshalovich93,reinhold06,king08}).

284: While all earlier studies had provided constraints on $\dmu$, \cite{reinhold06} used 

285: VLT-UVES observations of two of these systems to obtain $\dmu = (2.0 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-5}$ 

286: over $0 < z < 3$, i.e. $3.5\sigma$ evidence for a larger value of $\mu$ at early times. 

287: A recent re-analysis of the same data, combined with VLT-UVES data on the third 

288: absorber, at $z \sim 2.811$ towards PKS~0528$-$25, has yielded the strong constraint 

289: $\dmu < 6.0 \times 10^{-6}$ \cite{king08}.  However, the new (high-sensitivity) data 

290: towards PKS~0528$-$25 show a complicated velocity structure and the result could be affected 

291: by the presence of unresolved spectral components. In addition, \cite{king08} choose to carry 

292: out a simultaneous fit to the \htwo\ profiles as well as all Lyman-$\alpha$ forest transitions 

293: near the \htwo\ lines, rather than excluding possible blends with Lyman-$\alpha$ forest 

294: interlopers (as is usually done; e.g. \cite{reinhold06}. While this allowed them to retain 

295: a far larger number of \htwo\ lines in the analysis, it is unclear what effect it might have 

296: for their results. Again, it has not been possible to test that this method yields the expected 

297: null result in the Galaxy.

298: 

299: 

300: 

301: \section{Radio techniques}

302: \label{sec:radio}

303: 

304: The methods discussed in the preceding section were all based on optical spectroscopy,

305: where relative wavelength calibration of echelle orders, line blending due to the low 

306: spectral resolution ($\sim 6-8$~km/s), local velocity offsets, line interlopers, etc, are all 

307: possible sources of systematic error (e.g. \cite{murphy03}). The many-multiplet method

308: is affected by the additional problem of unknown isotopic abundances at high redshift, 

309: while fits to redshifted \htwo\ transitions must be carried out in the fog of 

310: the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest. Given the possibility that under-estimated or unknown 

311: systematics might dominate the errors from a given technique, it is important that 

312: independent techniques, with entirely different systematic effects, be used. 

313: 

314: Different radio transitions arise from very different physical mechanisms (e.g. hyperfine 

315: splitting, molecular rotation, Lambda-doubling, etc) and the line frequencies hence have 

316: different dependences on the fundamental constants. Comparisons between the redshifts of 

317: radio lines (or between radio and optical lines; \cite{wolfe76}) can thus be used 

318: to probe changes in the fundamental constants, with the immediate benefit that systematic

319: effects are very different in the radio regime. Obvious advantages over optical techniques 

320: are the high spectral resolution ($< 1$~km/s) possible at radio frequencies, alleviating 

321: problems with line blending, and the fact that the frequency scale is set by accurate 

322: masers and local oscillators, allowing frequency calibration to better than $\sim 10$~m/s. 

323: Further, comparisons between the redshifts of multiple transitions from a single molecule 

324: (e.g. OH, NH$_3$, CH), with different dependences on the constants, reduces the likelihood

325: that the result might be affected by local velocity offsets in the gas cloud between the lines.

326: 

327: 

328: \subsection{The HI~21cm hyperfine transition}

329: \label{sec:hi-opt}

330: 

331: The \hi~21cm hyperfine transition is the most commonly detected radio line 

332: at cosmological distances and is hence used in a number of comparisons to 

333: probe changes in the fundamental constants. \cite{wolfe76} were the first 

334: to use the \hi~21cm line for this purpose, comparing \hi~21cm and metal-line 

335: (Mg{\sc ii}) absorption redshifts in a $z \sim 0.524$ absorber to constrain 

336: evolution in the quantity $X \equiv g_p \mu \alpha^2$. More recently, 

337: \cite{tzanavaris07} used a similar comparison to obtain $[\Delta X/X] < 2 \times 10^{-5}$ 

338: from nine redshifted \hi~21cm absorbers at $0.23 < z < 2.35$. 

339: An obvious concern about this measurement is that \cite{tzanavaris07} compared 

340: the redshifts of the deepest \hi~21cm and metal-line absorption components, 

341: assuming that these arise in the same gas. However, many of the systems used 

342: in \cite{tzanavaris07} have multiple components in both \hi~21cm and metal 

343: transitions and it is by no means necessary that the strongest absorption 

344: arises in the same component in both types of lines \cite{kanekar06}.

345: 

346: Comparisons between the redshifts of the \hi~21cm and molecular rotational transitions 

347: (e.g. CO, HCO$^+$) are sensitive to changes in $Y \equiv g_p \alpha^2$. At present, there are 

348: just four redshifted systems with detections of both \hi~21cm and rotational 

349: molecular absorption (e.g. \cite{wiklind97,carilli97}), of which 

350: only two are suitable to probe changes in the constants. \cite{carilli00} used these to obtain 

351: $[\Delta Y/Y] < 3.4 \times 10^{-5}$ from $z \sim 0.25$ and $z \sim 0.685$, conservatively 

352: assuming that differences between the \hi~21cm and millimetre sightlines could 

353: yield local velocity offsets of $\sim 10$~km/s.

354: 

355: An important source of systematic effects in both these techniques is that the 

356: background quasar is far larger at the low redshifted \hi~21cm frequencies 

357: ($\lesssim 1$~GHz) than at the millimetre wavelengths of the strong rotational 

358: transitions or the optical fine structure lines. This implies that the sightlines 

359: in the different transitions could probe different velocity structures in the 

360: absorbing gas. For example, large velocity offsets ($\sim 15$~km/s) have been 

361: observed between the \hi~21cm and HCO$^+$ redshifts at $z \sim 0.674$ towards 

362: B1504+377, probably due to small-scale structure in the absorbing gas 

363: \cite{wiklind96,carilli97,kanekar08c}. This is less of an issue for a comparison 

364: between the \hi~21cm and ``main'' OH~18cm lines, which is sensitive to changes in 

365: $Z \equiv g_p[\mu\alpha^2]^{1.57}$ \cite{chengalur03}. \cite{kanekar05} used four 

366: \hi~21cm and OH~18cm spectral components in two gravitational lenses to obtain 

367: $[\Delta Z/Z] < 2.1 \times 10^{-5}$ from $z \sim 0.7$, assuming possible systematic

368: velocity errors of $\sim 3$~km/s between the \hi~21cm and OH components. The strong 

369: dependence of $Z$ on $\alpha$ ($Z \propto \alpha^{3.14}$) implies that this 

370: comparison is very sensitive to changes in $\alpha$, with  a $2\sigma$ sensitivity of

371: $\dal < 6.7 \times 10^{-6}$ \cite{kanekar05}. 

372: 

373: 

374: \subsection{Ammonia inversion transitions}

375: \label{sec:nh3}

376: 

377: An interesting technique to probe changes in the proton-electron mass ratio, 

378: using inversion transitions of the ammonia (NH$_3$) molecule, was proposed by 

379: \cite{flambaum07b}. The dependence of the NH$_3$ inversion frequency on $\mu$ is 

380: far stronger than that of rotational line frequencies, implying that a comparison 

381: between NH$_3$ and (for example) CO redshifts in an absorber can yield a high 

382: sensitivity to changes in $\mu$. Recently, \cite{murphy08} used NH$_3$ and 

383: rotational (HCO$^+$ and HCN) lines in the $z \sim 0.685$ gravitational lens 

384: towards B0218+357 to obtain $\dmu < 1.8 \times 10^{-6}$ over $\sim 6.5$~Gyr. 

385: While this is the most sensitive single bound on changes in $\mu$, the analysis 

386: assumes the same velocity structure in the NH$_3$ and rotational 

387: lines (8 spectral components), despite the fact that there is no evidence for more 

388: than 2 components in the NH$_3$ spectra \cite{henkel05}. It is unclear 

389: what effect this might have on the results. Further, the NH$_3$ lines are assumed to be 

390: in local thermodynamic equilibrium, so that the eighteen components of the NH$_3$~1-1 

391: multiplet have the same velocity width; it is not possible to verify this at the low 

392: signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the present NH$_3$ spectrum. The quasar image (``A''; 

393: \cite{wiklind99a}) that shows strong molecular absorption is also only partly obscured at 

394: optical wavelengths (remaining clearly visible), despite the high extinction of the 

395: foreground molecular cloud.  This indicates structure in the molecular cloud on the very 

396: small scales of the optical quasar \cite{wiklind99a}, which could lead to different velocity 

397: structures in the NH$_3$ and HCO$^+$ lines, due to their very different line 

398: frequencies ($\sim 23.7$~GHz and $\sim 178.4$~GHz, in the absorber's rest frame; \cite{murphy08}).  

399: In addition, the analysis assumes no local velocity offsets between the NH$_3$ and rotational 

400: lines. As always, comparisons between lines from different species require large absorber 

401: samples to average out such effects.

402: 

403: 

404: \section{``Conjugate'' Satellite OH lines}

405: \label{sec:oh}

406: 

407: The satellite OH~18cm lines are said to be conjugate when the two lines have the 

408: same shape, but with one line in emission and the other in absorption. 

409: This arises due to an inversion of the level populations within the ground state of 

410: the OH molecule \cite{elitzur92,langevelde95}. For clarity, Fig.~\ref{fig:ohlevels} 

411: shows the three lowest OH rotational states (not to scale). The $^2\Pi_{3/2}$ J=3/2 OH 

412: ground rotational state (and every excited OH state) is split up into four sub-levels 

413: by $\Lambda$-doubling and hyperfine splitting; transitions between these sub-levels give 

414: rise to the microwave OH spectrum.  Transitions with $\Delta F = 0$, i.e. with no change in 

415: the total angular momentum quantum number $F$, are referred to as ``main'' lines, while 

416: transitions with $\Delta F = \pm 1$ are 

417: called ``satellite'' lines. The rest frequencies of the ground state lines are known to 

418: high accuracy, with the main lines at 1665.401803(12)~MHz and 1667.358996(4)~MHz 

419: \cite{hudson06}, and the satellite lines at 1612.230825(15)~MHz and 1720.529887(10)~MHz 

420: \cite{lev06}. 

421: 

422: \setcounter{figure}{0}

423: \begin{figure}[t!]

424: \begin{center}

425: \includegraphics[height=5.0in,angle=270]{oh.eps}

426: \end{center}

427: \caption{The 3 lowest rotational OH states (not to scale) and their microwave and infra-red lines.}

428: \label{fig:ohlevels}

429: \end{figure}

430: 

431: If the OH molecules are pumped from the ground state to higher rotational states, either

432: collisionally or radiatively, they cascade back down to the ground state. The last 

433: step of the cascade can be either the 119$\mu$m intra-ladder transition, 

434: {$2\Pi_{3/2}$~(J=5/2)}~$\rightarrow$~{$2\Pi_{3/2}$~(J=3/2)} or the 79$\mu$m cross-ladder 

435: transition, {$2\Pi_{1/2}$~(J=1/2)}~$\rightarrow$~~{$2\Pi_{3/2}$~(J=3/2)}. Both decays are 

436: governed by the quantum mechanical selection rules $\Delta F = 0,\: \pm 1$. For

437: the $119\mu$m route, this means that transitions from the $F=3$ sub-levels of the excited state 

438: to the $F=1$ sub-levels of the ground state are forbidden, while the $F=2$ sub-levels 

439: can decay to all ground state sub-levels. Conversely, for the $79\mu$m route, transitions 

440: between the $F=1$ excited state sub-levels and the $F=3$ ground state sub-levels are forbidden, 

441: while all other transitions are allowed. Further, if the $119\mu$m or $79\mu$m transitions 

442: are optically thick (requiring $N_{\rm OH} \gtrsim 10^{15}$~cm$^{-2}$; \cite{elitzur92}), 

443: the sub-level populations in the ground state are determined only by 

444: the number of possible routes to each sub-level \cite{elitzur92}. Thus, a cascade ending

445: with an optically-thick $119\mu$m decay will result in an over-population of the $F=2$ ground

446: state sub-levels, while one ending in an optically-thick $79\mu$m decay will yield an 

447: over-population of the $F=1$ sub-levels. Neither of these would have any effect on the ground state 

448: ``main'' lines, as the latter connect sub-levels with the same total angular momentum. 

449: However, the situation is very different for the satellite lines, connecting states with 

450: different $F$ values. The first case (an optically-thick $119\mu$m decay), would result in 

451: stimulated 1720~MHz emission and 1612~MHz absorption, while the second case (an optically-thick 

452: $79\mu$m decay) would give rise to 1612~MHz emission and 1720~MHz absorption. In both cases, the 

453: satellite lines would also have the same shapes, implying that the sum of the satellite optical 

454: depths would be consistent with noise \cite{elitzur92,langevelde95}.

455: 

456: Such ``conjugate'' satellite behaviour has been seen in nearby extra-galactic systems

457: for more than a decade (e.g. Centaurus~A; \cite{langevelde95}) but has only recently been 

458: discovered at cosmological distances \cite{kanekar04b,darling04,kanekar05}. This is extremely

459: useful for studies of fundamental constant evolution because the four OH~18cm transition 

460: frequencies have very different dependences on $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$ \cite{chengalur03}. 

461: Specifically, a comparison between the sum and difference of satellite line redshifts probes 

462: changes in the quantity $G \equiv g_p \left[ \mu \alpha^2 \right]^{1.85}$ \cite{chengalur03}, with

463: a high sensitivity to changes in both $\alpha$ and $\mu$ (a similar analysis by \cite{darling03} 

464: implicitly assumes no changes in $\mu$ and $g_p$). Note that \cite{kanekar04b,chengalur03}

465: define $\mu \equiv m_e/m_p$; the more common $\mu \equiv m_p/m_e$ is used here.

466: 

467: Only two redshifted conjugate satellite OH systems are currently known, at $z \sim 0.247$ 

468: towards PKS~1413+135 \cite{kanekar04b,darling04} and $z \sim 0.765$ 

469: towards PMN~J0134$-$0931 \cite{kanekar05}. We have recently carried out deep observations of 

470: the satellite OH lines of PKS~1413+135 with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) and 

471: the Arecibo telescope \cite{kanekar08b}. The WSRT and Arecibo optical depth spectra have root-mean-square 

472: noise values of $\sim 8.5 \times 10^{-4}$ per $\sim 0.55$~km/s and $\sim 7 \times 10^{-4}$ per $\sim 0.36$~km/s, 

473: respectively, after Hanning smoothing and re-sampling. These correspond to S/N$\sim 1200$ at a  

474: resolution $R \sim 550000$ and S/N$\sim 1430$ at $R \sim 830000$; for comparison, 

475: the 143~Keck-HIRES spectra of \cite{murphy04} typically had S/N$\sim 30$ at $R \sim 45000$. 

476: The sum of the 1612 and 1720~MHz optical depth profiles was found to be consistent 

477: with noise in both data sets, as expected for conjugate behaviour, with no evidence

478: for a velocity offset between the satellite lines. Our preliminary result from a 

479: cross-correlation analysis of the two data sets is $\left[ \Delta G/G\right] < 1.1 \times 10^{-5}$, 

480: where $G \equiv g_p\left[\mu \alpha^2\right]^{1.85}$, consistent with no changes in 

481: $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$ from $z \sim 0.247$ to the present epoch. Assuming that changes 

482: in $g_p$ are much smaller than those in $\alpha$ or $\mu$ (e.g. \cite{langacker02}), this

483: gives $2\sigma$ sensitivities of $\dal < 3.1 \times 10^{-6}$ or $\dmu < 6.2 \times 10^{-6}$,

484: over $0 <  z < 0.247$. The data are now being inspected for possible systematic 

485: effects.

486: 

487: We have also applied this technique to OH~18cm data from a nearby conjugate satellite 

488: system, Centaurus~A \cite{langevelde95}.

489: Here, the cross-correlation of the two spectra peaks at $\Delta V = (-0.05 \pm 0.11)$~km/s, 

490: consistent with no velocity offset between the lines. This yields $\left[\Delta G/G\right] <

491: 1.16 \times 10^{-5}$, from $z \sim 0.0018$. This demonstrates the expected null result 

492: in a ``local'' comparison, at a sensitivity similar to that of the high-$z$ result.

493: 

494: The result for PKS~1413+135 can be used to obtain (model-dependent) constraints on 

495: both $\dal$ and $\dmu$ by defining 

496: $\left[ \Delta \mu/\mu \right] = R \left[ \Delta \alpha/ \alpha \right]$. This yields

497: $\left[ \Delta \alpha/ \alpha \right] \times (2 - R) = (+5.0 \pm 3.1) \times 10^{-6}$, 

498: again assuming $\left[\Delta g_p/g_p\right] << \dal, \dmu$. Given a value of $R$ from 

499: a theoretical model, one can immediately obtain an estimate for $\left[ \Delta \alpha/\alpha \right]$. 

500: For example, values of $R \sim -50$ are typical in GUT models (e.g.  \cite{langacker02,calmet02}), 

501: giving $\left[ \Delta \alpha/ \alpha \right] \lesssim few \times 10^{-7}$ (note that $R$ can 

502: have either sign but is typically large in absolute value, in the absence of fine-tuning). 

503: Changes in $G$ are then dominated by changes in $\mu$; any model with $|R| \gtrsim 10$ yields 

504: a similar result.  This gives $\left[ \Delta \alpha/ \alpha \right] < 8 \times 10^{-7}$ and 

505: $ \left[ \Delta \mu/\mu \right] \lesssim 8 \times 10^{-6}$ from $z \sim 0.247$.

506: 

507: The above discussion also highlights the main drawback of the conjugate-satellites technique,

508: the fact that it cannot be used to directly measure changes in individual constants 

509: (like the many-multiplet or \htwo\ methods), but instead probes changes in a combination 

510: of three constants, $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$. Constraints on changes in the individual 

511: constants from this method are hence model-dependent (e.g. the assumption that $g_p$ 

512: remains unchanged). \cite{kanekar04b} point out that, for the $119\mu$m decays,

513: an over-population of the ground state $F=2$ sub-levels should be accompanied by an 

514: over-population of the $F=3$ sub-levels in the $J=5/2$ state, implying that the $J=5/2$ satellite

515: lines should also be conjugate. Using these lines in tandem with the ground state satellite

516: lines would reduce the degeneracy in the conjugate-satellites method between changes in 

517: $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$ \cite{kanekar04a}. However, despite deep searches \cite{kanekar08b}, 

518: the $J=5/2$ satellite lines have not so far been detected at cosmological distances.

519: 

520: The strength of the conjugate-satellites technique stems from the fact that the conjugate 

521: behaviour {\it guarantees that the satellite lines arise from the same gas}. Such systems 

522: are hence perfectly suited to probe changes in $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$ from the source 

523: redshift to today, as systematic velocity offsets between the lines are ruled out by the inversion 

524: mechanism. Any measured difference between the line redshifts must then arise due to a 

525: change in one or more of $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$ \cite{kanekar04b}. The technique 

526: also contains a stringent test of its own applicability, in that the shapes of the two 

527: lines must agree if they arise in the same gas. Further, it provides a estimate of changes 

528: in the fundamental constants from a single space-time location, without any averaging over 

529: multiple absorbers (which, for example, is essential in most other methods to average out 

530: local systematics). In addition, the velocity offset between the lines can be determined from

531: a cross-correlation analysis, as the shapes of the lines are the same; it is not necessary 

532: to model the line profiles with multiple spectral components of an assumed shape, 

533: which can, especially for complex profiles, itself affect the result. As noted earlier, 

534: the use of masers of local oscillators to set the radio frequency scale means that 

535: frequency calibration is also not an issue here. Finally, the nearest isotopic OH transitions 

536: are more than $50$~MHz away and this part of the radio spectrum has very few other known 

537: astronomical transitions; line interlopers are thus not likely to be an issue in this 

538: method, unlike the situation in the optical regime \cite{kanekar08b}. Overall, systematic 

539: effects appear to be far less important for the conjugate-satellites method than for 

540: the other techniques. 

541: 

542: \section{Results from the different techniques}

543: \label{sec:present}

544: 

545: \setcounter{figure}{1}

546: \begin{figure*}[t!]

547: \epsfig{file=alpha.eps,width=2.5in}

548: \vskip -2.5in

549: \hskip 2.5in

550: \epsfig{file=mu.eps,width=2.5in}

551: \caption{Current results from techniques probing fundamental constant evolution 

552: with redshifted spectral lines. The left panel [A] shows the best present 

553: estimates for $\dal$ as a function of redshift, from the [1]~conjugate-satellites \cite{kanekar08b}, 

554: [2]~\hi~21cm vs. OH lines \cite{kanekar05}, [3]~\hi~21cm vs. fine structure lines \cite{tzanavaris07}, 

555: [4]~SIDAM, at $z \sim 1.15$ \cite{molaro07}, [5]~MM \cite{murphy04}, [6]~SIDAM, at $z \sim 1.84$ 

556: \cite{molaro07}, and [7]~AD \cite{murphy01c}, methods. Panel~[B] shows similar results 

557: for $\dmu$, from the [1]~conjugate-satellites \cite{kanekar08b}, [2]~\hi~21cm vs. OH lines 

558: \cite{kanekar05}, [3]~\hi~21cm vs. fine structure lines \cite{tzanavaris07}, 

559: [4]~NH$_3$ vs. rotational lines \cite{murphy08}, and [5]~\htwo \cite{king08}, methods.

560: The assumptions $\dal >> \dmu, \left[\Delta g_p/g_p\right]$ (in [A]) and $\left[\Delta g_p/g_p\right], 

561: \dal << \dmu$ (in [B]) apply to the first three in each 

562: category. Note that the comparison between NH$_3$ and rotational lines assumes no local 

563: velocity offsets between the lines, while the \hi~21cm vs. OH comparison uses a 

564: velocity dispersion of 3~km/s \cite{kanekar05,murphy08}.}

565: \label{fig:full}

566: \end{figure*}

567: 

568: 

569: It is difficult to directly compare results from radio and optical techniques as the 

570: former (except for the NH$_3$ lines) probe combinations of $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$.

571: A model-dependent summary of the best present results can be obtained for the two limiting cases, 

572: $\dal >> \dmu$ and $\dal << \dmu$, assuming that $\left[ \Delta g_p/g_p\right] << \dal, \dmu$ 

573: (e.g. \cite{langacker02}). Such a comparison, between the alkali doublet, many-multiplet, SIDAM, 

574: \hi~21cm vs. fine structure, \hi~21cm vs. OH, NH$_3$ vs. rotational, conjugate-satellites and 

575: \htwo\ methods, is shown in the two panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:full} 

576: \cite{murphy01c,murphy03,king08,tzanavaris07,kanekar05,kanekar08b,murphy08}.

577: It is apparent that present results from the conjugate-satellites, many-multiplet and SIDAM

578: methods have similar sensitivities to changes in $\alpha$, although at very different 

579: lookback times. Conversely, the NH$_3$ method is the most sensitive among probes of changes 

580: in $\mu$ (although note that \cite{murphy08} assume no local offsets between the NH$_3$ 

581: and rotational lines), with the conjugate-satellites and \htwo\ methods having 

582: similar sensitivities, albeit again at widely separated redshifts.

583: 

584: The figure also shows a clear separation between the redshift ranges at which 

585: the radio and optical techniques have been applied. The optical techniques are all based on 

586: ultraviolet transitions that only move into optical wavebands (say, $\gtrsim 3200$\AA) for

587: absorbers beyond a certain redshift. This means that, for example, the H$_2$ technique can 

588: only be used at $z \gtrsim 2$, the Si{\sc iv} AD technique at $z \gtrsim 1.3$ and the SIDAM 

589: method (using the Fe{\sc ii}$\lambda$1608 line; \cite{quast04}) at $z \gtrsim 1$. Similarly, only a handful 

590: of lines from singly-ionized species are redshifted above 3200\AA\ at $z \lesssim 0.6$, 

591: implying that the many-multiplet method too works best at higher redshifts ($z \gtrsim 0.8$). 

592: On the other hand, the lack of known radio molecular absorbers at $z > 0.9$ 

593: limits the radio methods to relatively low redshifts. Present radio and optical techniques thus play 

594: complementary roles in studies of fundamental constant evolution, with the best low-$z$ 

595: measurements coming from radio wavebands and the best high-$z$ estimates, from the optical 

596: regime. It is also clear that the many-multiplet method is the only present technique 

597: that finds statistically significant evidence of changes in $\alpha$ or $\mu$.

598: 

599: 

600: \section{Future studies}

601: \label{sec:future}

602: 

603: The present limitations of the optical and radio techniques are very different in nature.

604: The optical methods are affected by issues like line blending, relative calibration of 

605: different echelle orders, unknown relative isotopic abundances at high redshifts and 

606: the fact that it has not been possible to obtain an estimate of local systematic 

607: effects in the Galaxy. The biggest drawback to the radio methods is the paucity 

608: of high-$z$ radio absorbers, due to which one cannot average out local systematics 

609: (note that this does not affect the conjugate-satellites method).

610: 

611: Over the next decade, new telescopes and associated instrumentation will address some 

612: of these issues, at both radio and optical wavebands. The next generation of (30-metre-class) 

613: optical telescopes and new spectrographs should result in both improved spectral resolution 

614: (alleviating problems with line blends, especially useful for the \htwo\ method) as well 

615: as much better wavelength calibration. However, even the planned spectrograph CODEX, with a 

616: resolving power of $R \sim 150000$ (e.g. \cite{molaro06}), will be unable to resolve out the 

617: Mg isotopic structure (the different isotopic transitions are separated by only $\sim 0.85$~km/s 

618: and $\sim 0.4$~km/s for Mg{\sc ii}$\lambda$2803 and Mg{\sc I}$\lambda$2853, respectively; 

619: \cite{murphy01c}). Unknown relative isotopic abundances in the high-$z$ absorbers 

620: is thus likely to remain an issue for the MM (and SIDAM) methods, although statistical errors

621: of $\dal \sim 10^{-7}$ should be achievable. 

622: Additional corrections to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation may be necessary to 

623: improve the precision in the \htwo\ method \cite{reinhold06} to reach similar sensitivities 

624: in $\dmu$. Finally, it is unlikely that it will be possible to test for a null result from 

625: these methods in the Galaxy, as this would require high-resolution ultraviolet spectroscopy.

626: 

627: On the other hand, increasing the number of redshifted systems detected in atomic and 

628: molecular radio lines is a critical ingredient for future radio studies of fundamental 

629: constant evolution. 

630: The wide-band receivers and correlators of the Green Bank Telescope, the Atacama Large 

631: Millimeter Array and the Expanded Very Large Array will, for the first time, allow ``blind'' 

632: surveys for redshifted absorption in the strong mm-wave rotational transitions towards a large 

633: number of background sources. This should yield sizeable samples of high-$z$

634: absorbers in these transitions, which can then be followed up in other molecular 

635: and atomic lines. It should then be possible to average over local velocity offsets 

636: or different kinematic structures to obtain reliable results when comparing line redshifts 

637: across species. These surveys should also reveal a new population of redshifted 

638: conjugate satellite OH systems (note that two of the five known radio molecular 

639: absorbers show conjugate-satellite behaviour). Deep ($ > 100$~hour) integrations on the 

640: $z \sim 0.247$ conjugate system in PKS~1413+135 with existing telescopes in the next few years 

641: should achieve $1\sigma$ sensitivities of $\dal, \dmu \sim few \times 10^{-7}$ while, in the 

642: long-term future, the Square Kilometer Array will be able to detect fractional changes of 

643: $\dal \sim 10^{-7}$ in both known (and any newly-detected) conjugate systems.

644: 

645: It thus appears that similar sensitivity to fractional changes in $\dal$ will be 

646: achievable with both the many-multiplet (or SIDAM) and conjugate-satellites methods 

647: over the next decade or so, although new conjugate systems will have to be detected at 

648: high redshifts to extend this method beyond $z \sim 0.8$. The lack of apparent 

649: systematic effects in the conjugate-satellites method suggest that it is likely to

650: be the most reliable probe of fundamental constant evolution, unless the issue of 

651: unknown isotopic abundances in the MM method can be resolved. However, the drawback 

652: that the conjugate-satellites method is only sensitive to changes in a combination of 

653: $\alpha$, $\mu$ and $g_p$ means that other approaches will be necessary to measure 

654: changes in these constants independently. In any event, it remains important that multiple 

655: techniques be used so as to ensure that the results are not affected by unknown systematic 

656: effects that could be specific to one method.

657: 

658: \section{Summary}

659: \label{sec:summary}

660: 

661: Optical and radio techniques have played complementary roles in extending studies 

662: of fundamental constant evolution to large lookback times. Optical approaches

663: have provided high sensitivity at high redshifts, $z \sim 0.8-3.0$, while radio 

664: approaches have been critical to study the late-time ($z \lesssim 0.8$) behaviour.

665: The best present results, from a variety of methods, have $2\sigma$ sensitivities 

666: of $\dal, \: \dmu \sim few \times 10^{-6}$ at $z \sim 0.25 - 2.8$, an improvement 

667: of nearly two orders of magnitude in the last decade. The conjugate-satellites

668: technique appears to have the fewest systematic effects of all methods considered here,

669: with the agreement between the satellite OH line shapes providing a stringent test 

670: of its own applicability. The only technique yielding statistically-significant evidence for 

671: changes in the fundamental constants remains the many-multiplet method \cite{murphy04}, which

672: finds a smaller value of $\alpha$ at early times. While it has still not been possible to 

673: definitely confirm or deny this result, much progress has been made in developing new 

674: techniques and understanding systematic effects. It is important to continue such studies 

675: with a range of techniques, both to ensure that the results are not dominated 

676: by systematic effects in any given approach and to probe changes in multiple constants

677: over a wide range of redshifts.

678: 

679: 

680: 

681: 

682: 

683: 

684: \section{Acknowledgments}

685: \label{sec:ack}

686: It is a pleasure to thank Jayaram Chengalur and Carlos Martins for stimulating 

687: discussions on fundamental constant evolution and comments on an earlier draft, 

688: Jayaram and Tapasi Ghosh for permission to discuss our unpublished results, and

689: Huib van Langevelde for providing us with the OH spectra towards Cen.A.

690: I acknowledge support from the Max Planck Foundation and an NRAO Jansky Fellowship.

691: 

692: \bibliographystyle{prsty}

693: \bibliography{ms}

694: \end{document}

695: 

696: