1: %\documentclass[usenatbib,longnamesfirst,usedcolumn]{mn2e} % Normal MNRAS format
2: %\documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
3: %\documentclass[referee,usenatbib]{mn2e} % Normal MNRAS format
4: \documentclass[usenatbib]{mn2e} % Normal MNRAS format
5: %\usepackage{eincludegraphics}
6: %\usepackage{txfonts}
7: %\usepackage{lscape} % Allows landscape environment to be used
8: \usepackage{longtable} % Allows table to span multiple pages
9: \setlength{\LTcapwidth}{19cm} % Re-define longtable caption width
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11:
12: %AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%
13: %________________________________________________________________________
14:
15: \def\m{\multicolumn}
16: \def\h{\hspace}
17: \def\ubvri{$UBVRI$\,}
18: \def\CLN{ NGC 1767, NGC 1994, NGC 2002, NGC 2003, NGC 2006, SL 538, NGC 2011,
19: NGC 2098 and NGC 2136}
20: \newcommand{\cf}{{\textrm c.f.}}
21: \newcommand{\eg}{{\textrm e.g.}}
22: \newcommand{\ie}{{\textrm i.e.}}
23: \newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{\mbox{~km}}}
24: \newcommand{\pc}{\ensuremath{\mbox{~pc}}}
25: \newcommand{\kpc}{\ensuremath{\mbox{~kpc}}}
26: \newcommand{\kms}{\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}$^{-1}$}
27:
28: % For astro-ph only:
29: %\voffset-.5in % Shift page to allow for A4/US letter differences
30:
31: %BIB macros
32: \def\aj{AJ}% % Astronomical Journal
33: \def\actaa{Acta Astron.}% % Acta Astronomica
34: \def\araa{ARA\&A}% % Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys
35: \def\apj{ApJ}% % Astrophysical Journal
36: \def\apjl{ApJ}% % Astrophysical Journal, Letters
37: \def\apjs{ApJS}% % Astrophysical Journal, Supplement
38: \def\ao{Appl.~Opt.}% % Applied Optics
39: \def\apss{Ap\&SS}% % Astrophysics and Space Science
40: \def\aa{A\&A}% % Astronomy and Astrophysics
41: \def\aar{A\&A~Rev.}% % Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews
42: \def\aas{A\&AS}% % Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement
43: \def\azh{AZh}% % Astronomicheskii Zhurnal
44: \def\baas{BAAS}% % Bulletin of the AAS
45: \def\bac{Bull. astr. Inst. Czechosl.}% Bulletin of the Astronomical vakia
46: \def\caa{Chinese Astron. Astrophys.}% % Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics
47: \def\cjaa{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys.}% % Chinese Journal of Astronomy
48: \def\icarus{Icarus}% % Icarus
49: \def\jcap{J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.}% % Journal of Cosmology and Asics
50: \def\jrasc{JRASC}% % Journal of the RAS of Canada
51: \def\mnras{MNRAS}% % Monthly Notices of the RAS
52: \def\memras{MmRAS}% % Memoirs of the RAS
53: \def\na{New A}% % New Astronomy
54: \def\nar{New A Rev.}% % New Astronomy Review
55: \def\pasa{PASA}% % Publications of the Astron. Soc. of Australia
56: \def\pra{Phys.~Rev.~A}% % Physical Review A: General Physics
57: \def\prb{Phys.~Rev.~B}% % Physical Review B: Solid State
58: \def\prc{Phys.~Rev.~C}% % Physical Review C
59: \def\prd{Phys.~Rev.~D}% % Physical Review D
60: \def\pre{Phys.~Rev.~E}% % Physical Review E
61: \def\prl{Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}% % Physical Review Letters
62: \def\pasp{PASP}% % Publications of the ASP
63: \def\pasj{PASJ}% % Publications of the ASJ
64: \def\pasa{PASA}% % Publications of the ASA
65: \def\qjras{QJRAS}% % Quarterly Journal of the RAS
66: \def\rmxaa{Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis.}% % Revista Mexicana de Astronomia
67: \def\skytel{S\&T}% % Sky and Telescope
68: \def\solphys{Sol.~Phys.}% % Solar Physics
69: \def\sovast{Soviet~Ast.}% % Soviet Astronomy
70: \def\ssr{Space~Sci.~Rev.}% % Space Science Reviews
71: \def\zap{ZAp}% % Zeitschrift fuer Astrophysik
72: \def\nat{Nature}% % Nature
73: \def\iaucirc{IAU~Circ.}% % IAU Cirulars
74: \def\aplett{Astrophys.~Lett.}% % Astrophysics Letters
75: \def\apspr{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.}% % Astrophysics Space Physics Research
76: \def\bain{Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands}% % Bulletin Astronomical erlands
77: \def\fcp{Fund.~Cosmic~Phys.}% % Fundamental Cosmic Physics
78: \def\gca{Geochim.~Cosmochim.~Acta}% % Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta
79: \def\grl{Geophys.~Res.~Lett.}% % Geophysics Research Letters
80: \def\jcp{J.~Chem.~Phys.}% % Journal of Chemical Physics
81: \def\jgr{J.~Geophys.~Res.}% % Journal of Geophysics Research
82: \def\jqsrt{J.~Quant.~Spec.~Radiat.~Transf.}% % Journal of Quantitiative r
83: \def\memsai{Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Italiana}% % Mem. Societa Astronomica Italiana
84: \def\nphysa{Nucl.~Phys.~A}% % Nuclear Physics A
85: \def\physrep{Phys.~Rep.}% % Physics Reports
86: \def\physscr{Phys.~Scr}% % Physica Scripta
87: \def\planss{Planet.~Space~Sci.}% % Planetary Space Science
88: \def\procspie{Proc.~SPIE}% % Proceedings of the SPIE
89:
90: % MANUSCRIPT HEADER
91: %________________________________________________________________________
92:
93: \title[Study of open cluster NGC 637 and NGC 957]
94: {Optical and near-IR photometric study of the open cluster
95: NGC 637 and NGC 957
96: }
97:
98: \author[Yadav et al.]
99: {R. K. S. Yadav$^{1}$\thanks{E-mail: rkant@aries.ernet.in},
100: Brijesh Kumar$^{1,2}$, A. Subramaniam$^{3}$, Ram Sagar$^{1}$ and
101: \newauthor Blesson Mathew$^{3}$ \\
102: $^{1}$ Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences,
103: Manora Peak, Nainital 263129, India\\
104: $^{2}$ Departamento de F\'isica, Universidad de
105: Concepci\'on, Casilla 160-C, Concepci\'on, Chile\\
106: $^{3}$Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore 560 034, India
107: }
108:
109:
110: % MAIN DOCUMENT
111: %________________________________________________________________________
112:
113: \begin{document}
114:
115: \date{\today}
116:
117: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2007}
118:
119: \maketitle
120:
121: \label{firstpage}
122:
123: \begin{abstract}
124: We present $UBVRI$ CCD photometry in the region of the open clusters
125: NGC 637 and NGC 957. The radii are found to be 4\farcm2 and 4\farcm3. Their
126: reddenings $E(B-V)$ are $0.64\pm0.05$ mag and $0.71\pm0.05$ mag and their
127: distances, from main sequence fitting are $2.5\pm0.2$ kpc and $2.2\pm0.2$ kpc.
128: Comparison with $Z=0.02$ isochrones leads to an age of $10\pm5$ Myr for both
129: clusters. Combining our photometry with 2MASS JHK shows the reddening law
130: in these directions to be normal. Mass function slopes of $x=1.65\pm0.20$
131: and $1.31\pm0.50$ are derived for the clusters, both of which are found to
132: be dynamically relaxed. Spectral and photometric characteristics of three
133: Be stars, two in NGC 957 and one (newly discovered) in NGC 637 indicate
134: them to be of Classical Be type."
135:
136: \end{abstract}
137:
138: \begin{keywords}
139: Key words: stars: emission-line, Be HertzsprungRussell (HR) diagram
140: stars: luminosity function, mass function ISM: dust, extinction Galaxy:
141: open cluster and associations: individual: NGC 637 and NGC 957.
142: \end{keywords}
143:
144:
145: % sec:intro
146: %________________________________________________________________
147:
148: \section{Introduction} \label{sec:intro}
149:
150: Open clusters are excellent targets to understand issues related to Galactic
151: structure, chemical composition, stellar population, dynamical evolution and
152: star formation processes in the Galaxy. The importance of photometric studies
153: of star clusters lie in their colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) which allow us
154: to estimate cluster's fundamental parameters such as age,
155: distance and reddening. In this study, we consider two young open cluster,
156: NGC 637 and NGC 957, situated in perseus arm of Milky Way to estimate
157: their fundamental parameters and mass function.
158:
159: {\bf NGC 637} = C0139$+$637 ($\alpha_{2000} = 01^{h}43^{m}04^{s}$,
160: $\delta_{2000}$=$+$64\degr02\arcmin24\arcsec; $l$ = 128\fdg55, $b$=1\fdg73) is
161: classified as a Trumpler class I2m by \citet{ruprecht66}. Using $RGU$
162: photographic data, \citet{grubissich75} found the cluster to be located
163: in the Perseus arm at a distance of 2.4 kpc. \citet{huestamendia91} used
164: the $UBV$ photoelectic photometry and derived a colour excess
165: of $E(B-V)=0.66$ mag and a distance of 2.5 kpc. Recently,
166: \citet{phelps94} studied this cluster using $UBV$ CCD photometry and
167: estimated a colour excess of $E(B-V)=0.49\pm0.03$ mag. Further, using CMD and
168: assuming a total-to-selective absorption ($R_V$) of 3.1, they derived a
169: distance of 2.75 kpc.
170:
171: {\bf NGC 957} = C0230$+$573 ($\alpha_{2000} = 02^{h}33^{m}21^{s}$,
172: $\delta_{2000}$=57\degr33\arcmin36\arcsec; $l$=136\fdg28, $b$=$-$2\fdg65)
173: is located in the Perseus spiral arm of our Galaxy and according to
174: \citet{ruprecht66}, it is of type III 2p. This cluster was studied by
175: \citet{gimenez80} using $RGU$ photographic photometry and they found
176: that this is an young star cluster situated at a distance of 1.8 kpc.
177: This cluster was further investigated by \citet{gerasimenko91} using
178: Johnson $UBV$ photoelectric and photographic photometry. He derived
179: reddening of $E(B-V)=0.90$ mag, distance of 2.1 kpc and age of about 4 Myr.
180:
181: In the present study, we provide deep $UBVRI$ CCD photometry of NGC 637 and
182: NGC 957, and re-visit their basic parameters and estimate their luminosity
183: and mass functions. Both the clusters are poorly studied in the literature.
184: For NGC 957, CCD photometric observations is presented for
185: the first time alongwith spectroscopic observations of a few brightest
186: members of both the clusters.
187:
188: The paper is organized as follows. We present the observations and data
189: reductions in \S\ref{sec:obs}, while in \S\ref{sec:ana}, we describe
190: the data analysis. \S\ref{sec:mfu} and \S\ref{sec:mse} describe about
191: the mass function and mass segregation. Finally, \S\ref{sec:con} contains
192: the conclusions of our study.
193:
194: % fig:chart
195: %____________________________________________________________________
196: % \setcounter{figure}{1}
197: \begin{figure*}
198: \centering
199: \includegraphics[width=18cm, height=18cm]{Fig1.ps}
200: \caption{Finding chart of the stars in the field of NGC 637 and NGC 957.
201: The (X, Y) coordinates are in pixel units corresponding to 0$^{\prime\prime}$.72
202: on the sky. Direction is indicated in the map. Filled circles of different
203: sizes represent brightness of the stars. Smallest size denotes stars of
204: $V$$\sim$20 mag. Open circle represent the cluster size. S1 star in the region
205: of NGC 637 is emission type star.}
206: \label{fig:chart}
207: \end{figure*}
208:
209: % sec:obs
210: %_________________________________________________________________________
211: \section{observations and data reduction} \label{sec:obs}
212:
213: \subsection {Photometric observations}
214: Johnson $UBV$ and Cousins $RI$ CCD photometric observations were obtained
215: using 104-cm Sampurnanand telescope at Nainital on 13 November 2004
216: for NGC 637 and on 28 September 2006 for NGC 957. Data were recorded
217: using a liquid nitrogen cooled 2k$\times$2k CCD of 24$\mu$m square size
218: pixel, which results in a scale of 0\farcs36 per pixel and a square field
219: of 12\farcm7 in the sky on a side. The CCD has a gain of 10 electrons per
220: analog-to-digital unit and a read out noise of 5.3 electrons. To improve
221: the signal-to-noise ratio, all the observations were taken in $2\times2$
222: binning mode. Log of observations are given in Table 1. In $V$ and $I$
223: filters, we also observed field regions situated about 15\arcmin north from
224: the cluster center of both NGC 637 and NGC 957. Identification maps of
225: cluster and field regions are shown in Fig. 1.
226: \begin{table}
227: \centering
228: \scriptsize
229: \caption{Log of observations, with dates and exposure times for each passband.
230: $N$ denotes the number of stars measured in different passband.}
231: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
232: \hline\hline
233: Band &Exposure Time &Date&$N$\\
234: &(in seconds) & &\\
235: \hline\hline
236: &&NGC 637(Cluster region)&\\
237: $U$&1800$\times$2, 300$\times$1&2004 November 13/14&1057\\
238: $B$&1200$\times$3, 300$\times$1&2004 November 13/14\\
239: & 120$\times$1; 10$\times$1 &2004 November 13/14&2392\\
240: $V$&900$\times$3, 120$\times$1; 10$\times$1 &2004 November 13/14&3261\\
241: $R$&480$\times$3, 60$\times$2; 5$\times$1 &2004 November 13/14&3219\\
242: $I$&300$\times$3, 60$\times$1; 5$\times$1 &2004 November 13/14&3151\\
243: &&NGC 637(Field region)&\\
244: $V$&180$\times$2&2004 November 14/15&1286\\
245: $I$&180$\times$2&2004 November 14/15&1266\\
246: \hline
247: &&NGC 957&\\
248: $U$&1800$\times$2, 300$\times$1&2006 September 28/29&915\\
249: $B$&1200$\times$2, 300$\times$2&2006 September 28/29&2087\\
250: $V$&900$\times$2, 180$\times$2&2006 September 28/29&2855\\
251: $R$&600$\times$2, 120$\times$2&2006 September 28/29&2819\\
252: $I$&300$\times$3, 60$\times$2&2006 September 28/29&2707\\
253: &&NGC 957(Field region)&\\
254: $V$&180$\times$2&2004 November 14/15&1284\\
255: $I$&180$\times$2&2004 November 14/15&1269\\
256: \hline
257: \end{tabular}
258: \label{log}
259: \end{table}
260:
261: A number of bias and flat-field frames were taken during the observations.
262: Flat-field exposures were taken of the twilight sky in each filter. Bias
263: and flat field corrections were performed using the standard
264: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomical
265: Observatory which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research
266: in Astronomy, under contract with the National Science Foundation} tasks.
267: Subsequent data reduction and analysis were done using the DAOPHOT software
268: \citep{stetson87, stetson92}. We performed the profile fitting photometry
269: using quadratically varying point spread function. For each filter, the
270: stars have been aligned to that of a reference frame with largest exposure
271: time and an average instrumental magnitude weighted by the photometric error
272: was derived. A final catalogue was created of stellar objects identified in
273: at least two filters, with shape-defining parameter
274: $-2 \le {\it sharpness} \le 2$ and and the goodness-of-fit
275: estimator $\chi \le 5$.
276:
277: %____________________________________________________________________
278: % \setcounter{figure}{1}
279: \begin{figure}
280: \centering
281: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig2.ps}
282: \caption{The photometric errors (in magnitude) corresponding to the
283: brightness measurement at $V$, $U-B$, $B-V$, $V-R$ and $V-I$, are
284: plotted against the $V$-band brightness. Errors on the y-axis represent
285: the internal errors as estimated by DAOPHOT routine.}
286: \label{fig:error}
287: \end{figure}
288:
289: \begin{table}
290: \caption{Comparison of our photometry with others for NGC 637 and NGC 957. The difference
291: ($\Delta$) is always in the sense present minus comparison data. The mean along with their
292: standard deviations in magnitude are based on N stars. Few deviated points are not included
293: in the average determination.}
294: \tiny
295: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
296: \hline
297: $V$ range&$<\Delta$$V>$&$<\Delta(B-V)$$>$&$<\Delta(U-B)>$\\
298: &Mean$\pm$$\sigma$(N)&Mean$\pm$$\sigma$(N)&Mean$\pm$$\sigma$(N)\\
299: \hline
300: &&&\\
301: & {\bf NGC 637}&&\\
302: &&&\\
303: & Comparison with&&\\
304: & Huestamendia et al. (1991)&&\\
305: 10.0 $-$ 11.0&0.01$\pm$0.01(2)&0.01$\pm$0.01(2)&0.02$\pm$0.02(2)\\
306: 12.0 $-$ 13.0&0.03$\pm$0.05(3)&0.01$\pm$0.01(3)&0.03$\pm$0.02(3)\\
307: 13.0 $-$ 14.0&0.05$\pm$0.04(8)&0.01$\pm$0.02(8)&0.03$\pm$0.04(8)\\
308: 14.0 $-$ 15.0&0.02$\pm$0.02(7)&0.01$\pm$0.01(7)&0.04$\pm$0.02(4)\\
309:
310: &&&\\
311: & Comparison with &&\\
312: & Phelps \& Janes (1994)&&\\
313: &&&\\
314: 10.0 $-$ 11.0&0.05$\pm$0.06(4) &&\\
315: 12.0 $-$ 13.0&0.05$\pm$0.04(2) &0.03$\pm$0.01(3)&0.13$\pm$0.03(3)\\
316: 13.0 $-$ 14.0&0.08$\pm$0.06(12) &0.02$\pm$0.04(14)&0.13$\pm$0.06(14)\\
317: 14.0 $-$ 15.0&0.06$\pm$0.07(13) &0.03$\pm$0.03(15)&0.14$\pm$0.08(14)\\
318: 15.0 $-$ 16.0&0.04$\pm$0.04(12) &0.01$\pm$0.05(21)&0.13$\pm$0.05(15)\\
319: 16.0 $-$ 17.0&0.03$\pm$0.04(44) &0.02$\pm$0.04(45)&0.12$\pm$0.06(27)\\
320: 17.0 $-$ 18.0&0.03$\pm$0.05(61) &0.01$\pm$0.05(65)&0.10$\pm$0.07(42)\\
321: 18.0 $-$ 19.0&0.03$\pm$0.08(67) &0.01$\pm$0.06(73)&0.11$\pm$0.08(27)\\
322: 19.0 $-$ 20.0&0.03$\pm$0.07(102)&0.01$\pm$0.09(96)&\\
323: &&&\\
324: & {\bf NGC 957}&&\\
325: &&&\\
326: &Comp. with \\
327: &Gimenez \& Garcia-pelayo\\
328: &(1980)\\
329: &&&\\
330: 12.0 $-$ 13.0&$-$0.06$\pm$0.09(5) &$-$0.03$\pm$0.05(5)&0.03$\pm$0.05(5)\\
331: 13.0 $-$ 14.0&$-$0.04$\pm$0.07(6) &$-$0.03$\pm$0.06(6)&0.03$\pm$0.06(6)\\
332: 14.0 $-$ 15.0&$-$0.03$\pm$0.06(3) &$-$0.03$\pm$0.06(3)&0.03$\pm$0.06(3)\\
333: \hline
334:
335: \end{tabular}
336: \label{comput_dif}
337: \end{table}
338:
339: % fig:error
340:
341: % fig:litmch
342: %____________________________________________________________________
343: \begin{figure}
344: \centering
345: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig3.ps}
346: \caption{Comparison of present CCD $UBV$ photometry with that available in
347: the literature. For NGC 637, the solid ($\bullet$) circles represent
348: data from \citet{huestamendia91} while the open circles ($\circ$)
349: come from \citet{phelps94}. For NGC 957, the crosses ($\times$)
350: represent comparison with photographic data taken from
351: \citet{gerasimenko91}.}
352: \label{fig:litmch}
353: \end{figure}
354:
355:
356: For translating the instrumental magnitude to the standard magnitude, we
357: observed the standard field PG 0231$+$051 \citep{landolt92} on 20
358: November 2004 several times during the night to determine the Earth's
359: atmospheric extinction coefficients, color coefficients and the zero points
360: of the telescope and CCD system. The standard stars used in the calibrations
361: have brightness range of $12.77 \le V \le 16.11$ and a color range of
362: $-0.329 < (B-V) < 1.448$. The transformation equations derived using linear
363: least square regression are as follows:
364:
365: \begin{center}
366: $u=U+6.92\pm0.01-(0.06\pm0.01)(U-B)+(0.54\pm0.02)X$
367: $b=B+4.66\pm0.01-(0.02\pm0.01)(B-V)+(0.24\pm0.01)X$
368: $v=V+4.22\pm0.01-(0.01\pm0.01)(B-V)+(0.14\pm0.01)X$
369: $r=R+4.13\pm0.01-(0.00\pm0.01)(V-R)+(0.10\pm0.01)X$
370: $i=I+4.60\pm0.01-(0.02\pm0.02)(R-I)+(0.06\pm0.01)X$
371: \end{center}
372:
373:
374: \noindent
375: where $u, b, v, r$ and $i$ are the aperture instrumental magnitudes
376: and $U, B, V, R$ and $I$ are the standard magnitudes and $X$ is
377: the airmass. Zero-point and colour-coefficient errors are $\sim$ 0.01 mag.
378:
379: The internal errors, as derived from DAOPHOT, in magnitude and colour
380: are plotted against $V$ magnitude in Fig.~\ref{fig:error}. This figure
381: shows that photometric error is $\le$ 0.01 mag at $V\sim19$ mag while
382: error in different colours is $\le$ 0.02 mag. The final photometric data
383: are available in electronic form at the WEBDA
384: site \footnote{\it http://obswww.unige.ch/webda/} and it can also
385: be obtained from the authors.
386:
387: We cross identified our objects with that present in the literature.
388: Fig.~\ref{fig:litmch} shows the plots of difference $\Delta$ in $V$, $(B-V)$
389: and $(U-B)$ with $V$ magnitude. Solid and open circles represent the
390: difference with photoelectric and CCD data. The average difference
391: alongwith their standard deviation are listed in Table 2. The comparison of
392: present and photoelectric data in $V$ magnitude and $(B-V)$, $(U-B)$ colours
393: in NGC 637 do not show any significant difference with stellar magnitudes.
394: Comparison of NGC 957 CCD data with photographic data also do not show any
395: significant difference. So, we conclude that the present CCD photometry is
396: in good agreement with photoelectic and photographic data for NGC 637 and
397: NGC 957 respectively. On the other hand for NGC 637, comparison of CCD data
398: with \citet{phelps94} show a zero-point offset of $\sim$ 0.04 mag in $V$
399: and $\sim$ 0.12 mag in $(U-B)$ while there is no noticeable difference seen
400: in $(B-V)$. A possible cause of the zero-point offset may be due to the
401: difference in dates of observation for \citet{landolt92} standards and the
402: target cluster fields. Since the zero-points depend on the factors, such as
403: ambient temperature and Earth's atmospheric conditions, these coefficients
404: change from night-to-night. A typical nightly variation in zero-points
405: is found to be $\sim$ 0.08 mag in $U$ and $\sim$ 0.05 mag in $B, V, R$
406: and $I$ passband. In addition to this $\sim$ 0.02 mag nightly variation
407: is found in the extinction coefficients.
408:
409: \begin{table}
410: \scriptsize
411: \centering
412: \caption{Log of slitless and slit spectroscopic observations, with dates and exposure times.}
413:
414: \hspace{2cm}
415:
416: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
417: \hline\hline
418: Object&Band &Exposure Time &Date\\
419: &&(s) & \\
420: \hline\hline
421: NGC 637&R&5&2004 January 28 \\
422: &R+Gr5&60&2004 January 28\\
423: &R+Gr5&600&2004 January 28\\
424: NGC 957(East)&R&5&2004 January 29\\
425: &R+Gr5&60&2004 January 29\\
426: &R+Gr5&600&2004 January 29\\
427: NGC 957(West)&R&5&2004 January 29\\
428: &R+Gr5&60&2004 January 29\\
429: &R+Gr5&600&2004 January 29\\
430: NGC 957(West)&R&5&2004 January 29\\
431: &R+Gr5&60&2004 January 29\\
432: NGC 637(1) & Grism 7/167l & 900& 2006 September 30\\
433: & Grism 8/167l & 900&2006 September 30\\
434: NGC 957(1) & Grism 7/167l & 300& 2006 September 30\\
435: & Grism 8/167l & 300& 2006 September 30\\
436: NGC 957(2) & Grism 7/167l & 600& 2006 September 30\\
437: & Grism 8/167l & 600& 2006 September 30\\
438: \hline
439: \end{tabular}
440: \label{log_spec}
441: \end{table}
442:
443:
444: \subsection{Spectroscopic observations}
445:
446: We obtained slitless spectra of stars in the cluster regions using Himalayan
447: Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera mounted with the 2-m Himalayan
448: Chandra Telescope at Hanle, India\footnote{http://www.iiap.res.in}. Grism 5
449: ($\lambda \sim 5200-10300$ \AA{}, $\lambda/\Delta \lambda \sim 870$) was used as
450: dispersing element in combination with $R$ filter
451: ($\lambda \sim 7000$ \AA{}, $\Delta \lambda \sim 2200$ \AA{}).
452: The slitless spectra were recorded on a 2k$\times$2k CCD with 15$\mu$m pixel
453: size and with an image scale of 0\farcs297 per pixel, which covered a total
454: area of around $10\arcmin \times10\arcmin$. A typical spectral resolution
455: of 6 \AA{} is achieved at H$_{\alpha}$. We list the log of observations in
456: Table 3. We obtained the slit spectra of the three identified
457: emission line stars on 30 September 2006 using Grism 7 ($3800-6800$\AA{})
458: and 167 $\mu$m slit combination in the blue region which gives an effective
459: resolution of 1330. The spectra in the red region were obtained on the same
460: night using Grism 8 ($5800-8350$ \AA{}) and 167 $\mu$m slit, which gives
461: an effective resolution of 2190. The Gaussian FWHM seeing was
462: about $1\farcs5$ ($\sim5$ pixel).
463: %fig:dens
464: %______________________________________________________________________
465: % \setcounter{figure}{3}
466: \begin{figure}
467: \centering
468: \hbox{
469: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig4.ps}
470: }
471: \caption{Surface density distribution of stars in the field of the cluster
472: NGC 637 and NGC 957. Errors are determined from sampling
473: statistics(=$1/\sqrt{N}$ where $N$ is the number of stars used
474: in the density estimation at that point). Vertical and horizontal arrows
475: represent the radius of the clusters and field star density
476: respectively.}
477: \label{fig:dens}
478: \end{figure}
479:
480:
481: % sec:ana
482: %_______________________________________________________________________
483: \section{Analysis of the data} \label{sec:ana}
484:
485: \subsection{Cluster radius and radial stellar surface density}
486:
487: We perform star counts in concentric rings around an estimated centre of
488: the cluster, and then divide it by their respective areas. The cluster center
489: is estimated iteratively by calculating average X and Y position of the stars
490: within 400 pixels from an eye estimated center, until they converged to a
491: constant value. The cluster center in pixel units derived by this method
492: are (515, 515) for NGC 637 and (430, 630) for NGC 957.
493: The cluster center in celestial coordinate are
494: ($\alpha_{2000} = 01^{h}43^{m}04^{s}.2$,
495: $\delta_{2000}=64\degr02\arcmin23\farcs5$) for NGC 637 and
496: ($\alpha_{2000} = 02^{h}33^{m}23^{s}.9$,
497: $\delta_{2000}=57\degr33\arcmin29\farcs9$ for NGC 957. The derived
498: center of both the clusters are close to the one given in WEBDA
499: (\S\ref{sec:intro}). In Fig.~\ref{fig:dens} we show the radial density profile
500: for both the clusters which is calculated using successive annuli of
501: 50 pixels ($\sim 35\arcsec$) around the cluster centre. For NGC 637, it
502: flattens around $r=$ 250\arcsec and begin to merge with the background stellar
503: density. Therefore, we consider 250\arcsec as the cluster radius. A smooth
504: dashed line represents a fit by \citet{king62} profile:
505:
506: %eqn:king
507: %___________________________________________________
508: \begin{equation}
509: f(r) = \frac {f_0}{1+(r/r_{c})^2} + f_b
510: \label{eqn:king}
511: \end{equation}
512:
513: \noindent
514: where $f_0$ is the central density, $r_c$ is the core radius of the cluster
515: and $f_b$ is the background density. For NGC 637, these parameters
516: are $f_0 = 10.96 \times 10^{-3}$ star/arcsec$^2$, $r_c=39\farcs6$ and
517: $f_b = 6.15 \times 10^{-3}$ star/arcsec$^2$. In case of NGC 957,
518: \citet{king62} profile fitting could not converge because of large errors
519: in the value of $f(r)$. Radius of this cluster is assumed as 260\arcsec
520: considering the field star density on the basis of last two points
521: in the radial density profile. For NGC 637 and NGC 957, the radius has
522: been listed as 100\arcsec and 300\arcsec in \citet{dias02} catalog. Present
523: estimate of the radius is larger for the cluster NGC 637 while it is smaller
524: for NGC 957.
525:
526:
527:
528: %fig:cmd
529: %______________________________________________________________________
530: \begin{figure*}
531: \centering
532: \includegraphics[width=18cm]{Fig5.ps}
533: \caption{ The $V$, $(U-B)$; $V$, $(B-V)$ and $V$, $(V-I)$ CMDs for
534: the cluster NGC 637 and NGC 957 using stars within the cluster radius
535: and $V$, $(V-I)$ CMDs for the corresponding field regions.
536: Black triangles show the emission stars observed by us. Solid lines
537: represent the blue and red envelope of the cluster MS.}
538: \label{fig:cmd}
539: \end{figure*}
540:
541:
542: %sec:cmd
543: %______________________________________________________________________
544: \subsection{Colour-magnitude diagrams} \label{sec:cmd}
545:
546: The $V, (U-B); V, (B-V)$ and $V, (V-I)$ CMDs of NGC 637 and NGC 957 alongwith
547: the $V, (V-I)$ CMD of the corresponding field regions are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cmd}.
548: To get the clear sequence of the cluster we plot only the stars within
549: the cluster radius. It is evident that the morphology of CMDs for NGC 637 and
550: NGC 957 is typical of a young age open star clusters. The CMDs extends
551: down to $V \sim$ 21.0 mag except in $V$, $(U-B)$ CMDs where it is only up
552: to $V \sim$ 19 mag. Main-sequence (MS) of the clusters is clearly visible upto
553: $V\sim$ 17.0 mag. The MS fainter than 17.0 mag has more scatter and field
554: star contamination is also more evident for fainter stars and because of this
555: it is hard to delineate the field stars from the cluster members, only on the
556: basis of their closeness to the main populated area of the CMD as field
557: stars at cluster distance and reddening also occupy the same area. Proper motion
558: or radial velocity data are very useful in separating cluster members from
559: the field stars. But due to unavailability of this kind of data in the
560: literature we use photometric criterion to separate probable cluster members
561: from the field stars. We selected members by defining the blue and red
562: envelope around the MS which is shown in the CMDs of both the clusters. A
563: star is considered as a non-member if it lies outside the marked region in
564: the CMDs. In Table~\ref{tab:freq}, we have listed the expected number of
565: field stars using $V$, $(V-I)$ CMD of the field region. From this Table we
566: can estimate the frequency distribution of stars in different parts of the
567: CMD. It is also clear that all photometric probable members cannot be cluster
568: members and non-members should be subtracted in the studies of cluster mass
569: function etc. However, probable members located within a cluster radius
570: can be used to determine the cluster parameters, as they have
571: relatively less contamination due to field stars and the same has been assumed
572: in the subsequent analysis.
573:
574:
575: %tab:freq
576: %___________________________________________________________
577: \setcounter{table}{3}
578: \begin{table*}
579: \centering
580: \caption{Frequency distribution of the stars in the $V$, $(V-I)$
581: diagram of the cluster and field regions. $N_{B}$, $N_{S}$ and $N_{R}$ denote
582: the number of stars in a magnitude bin blueward, along and redward of the
583: cluster sequence respectively. The number of stars in the field regions are
584: corrected for area differences. $N_{C}$ (difference between the $N_{S}$ value
585: of cluster and field regions) denotes the statistically expected number of
586: cluster members in the corresponding magnitude bin.}
587:
588: \begin{tabular}{c|ccc|ccc|c|c|ccc|ccc|c}
589: \hline
590: &&&&NGC 637&&&&&&&NGC 957&&\\
591: \cline{2-7} \cline{9-15}
592: $V$ range &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{Cluster region} & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{Field region}& &\multicolumn{3}{|c|}{Cluster region} & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{Field region}& \\
593: &$N_{B}$&$N_{S}$&$N_{R}$&$N_{B}$&$N_{S}$&$N_{R}$&$N_{C}$ &$N_{B}$&$N_{S}$&$N_{R}$&$N_{B}$&$N_{S}$&$N_{R}$&$N_{C}$\\
594: \hline
595: 12 - 13 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0& 3 & 0 & 2 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 2& 2 \\
596: 13 - 14 &10 & 8 & 0 & 5 & 0 & 0& 8 & 0 & 7 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 5& 7 \\
597: 14 - 15 & 6 &15 & 0 &10 & 0 & 0& 15 & 0 &16 &11 & 0 & 0 & 11& 16 \\
598: 15 - 16 &17 &22 & 0 &17 & 3 & 0& 19 & 0 &35 &27 & 0 & 0 & 21& 35 \\
599: 16 - 17 &40 &42 &1 &28 & 13& 0& 29 & 1 &34 &20 & 0 & 7 & 38& 27 \\
600: 17 - 18 &48 &62 &2 &55 & 24& 2& 38 & 3 &45 &31 & 2 & 7 & 80& 38 \\
601: 18 - 19 &48 &95 &4 &52 & 70& 5& 25 &17 &66 &48 & 3 & 26&107& 40 \\
602: \hline
603: \end{tabular}
604: \label{tab:freq}
605: \end{table*}
606:
607:
608: \subsection{Colour-colour diagram}
609:
610: To estimate the interstellar extinction towards the clusters we plot
611: $(U-B)$ versus $(B-V)$ diagrams using probable cluster members. The intrinsic
612: zero-age main-sequence (ZAMS) given by \citet{schmidtkaler82} is fitted
613: by the dotted curve assuming the slope of reddening $E(U-B)/E(B-V)$ as 0.72.
614: The ZAMS fitted to the MS stars of spectral type earlier than A0 provides
615: a mean value of $E(B-V)=0.64\pm0.05$ mag for NGC 637 and $E(B-V)=0.71\pm0.05$
616: for NGC 957. Our derived values of reddening agree fairly well with the
617: values estimated by others (\S\ref{sec:intro}).
618:
619:
620: %fig:cc
621: %____________________________________________________________________
622: \begin{figure}
623: \centering
624: \hbox{
625: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig6.ps}
626: }
627: \caption{ The $(U-B)$ versus $(B-V)$ colour-colour diagram of the
628: clusters. The continuous curve represents locus of
629: Schmidt-Kaler's (1982) ZAMS for solar metallicity. The filled
630: triangles are the emission type stars observed by us.}
631: \label{fig:cc}
632: \end{figure}
633:
634: %fig:jhk_ir
635: %_______________________________________________________________________
636: % \setcounter{figure}{7}
637: \begin{figure}
638: \centering
639: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig7.ps}
640: \caption{The plot of $(J-K)$ versus $(V-K)$ colour-colour diagram of the
641: cluster for the stars within the cluster radius. The solid line is the ZAMS
642: of $Z =$ 0.02 fitted for the marked values of the excesses while short dash
643: lines show the errorbars.}
644: \label{fig:jhk_ir}
645: \end{figure}
646:
647: \subsection{Interstellar extinction in near-IR} \label{sec:extir}
648:
649: 2MASS $JHK$ data is used to study the interstellar extinction in
650: combination with the optical data. The $K_s$ magnitude are converted into $K$
651: magnitude following \citet{persson98}. The $(J-K)$ versus $(V-K)$ diagrams
652: for both the clusters are shown in Fig. 7. The ZAMS taken
653: from \citet{schaller92} for $Z=$ 0.02 is shown by solid line. The fit of
654: ZAMS provides $E(J-K) = 0.23\pm0.20$ mag and $E(V-K) = 1.70\pm0.20$ mag
655: for NGC 637 and $E(J-K) = 0.29\pm0.20$ mag and $E(V-K) = 2.00\pm0.20$ mag
656: for NGC 957. The ratios $\frac{E(J-K)}{E(V-K)} \sim 0.14\pm0.30$
657: and $0.15\pm0.20$ for NGC 637 and NGC 957 respectively are in good
658: agreement with the normal interstellar extinction value of 0.19
659: \citep{cardelli89}. However, scattering is more due to large error in
660: $JHK$ data.
661:
662:
663:
664: \subsection{Extinction Law}
665:
666: To investigate interstellar extinction law towards the clusters under
667: study, we selected stars with spectral type earlier than A0. These
668: have been identified from
669: their location in apparent colour-colour ($U-B$ versus $B-V$) and CM
670: diagrams, having $V<$ 15 mag, and $(B-V)<$ 0.70 mag, and for these stars,
671: the MS spectral type have been obtained using $UBV$ photometric
672: Q-method \citep{johnson53}. The colour excesses are determined by
673: subtracting intrinsic colours from observed colours. The intrinsic
674: colours are derived from the colour relation given by \citet{fitzgerald70}
675: for $(U-B)$ and $(B-V)$; by \citet{johnson66} for $(V-R)$ and $(V-I)$ and
676: by \citet{koornneef83} for $(V-J)$, $(V-H)$ and $(V-K)$. To get the intrinsic
677: colors for $V-R$ and $V-I$, the present Cousins $RI$ system are converted to
678: the Johnson $RI$ using the relation given by \citet{bessell79}.
679: Table~\ref{tab:ratio} lists the colour excess ratios estimated for both
680: the clusters alongwith the ratios for normal interstellar matter
681: (\citet{cardelli89}. The colour excess ratios generally agree
682: within 3$\sigma$ with those given for the normal interstellar extinction law.
683: This indicates that the interstellar extinction law is normal in the
684: direction of both the clusters.
685:
686: Using the relation $R_V = 1.1 E(V-K)/E(B-V)$ \citep{whittet80}, we
687: derived the values of $R_V$ as 3.1 for NGC 637 and 3.2 for NGC 957 and this
688: indicates normal interstellar extinction law in the direction of both the
689: clusters.
690:
691:
692: %tab:ratio
693: %___________________________________________________________________
694: \begin{table*}
695: \caption{A comparison of extinction law in the direction of cluster with normal
696: extinction law given by \citet{cardelli89}.}
697: \begin{center}
698: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
699: \hline
700: &&&&&&&\\
701: Objects&$\frac{E(U-B)}{E(V-J)}$&$\frac{E(B-V)}{E(V-J)}$&$\frac{E(V-R)}{E(V-J)}$&$
702: \frac{E(V-I)}{E(V-J)}$&$\frac{E(V-H)}{E(V-J)}$&$\frac{E(V-K)}{E(V-J)}$&$\frac{E(
703: J-K)}{E(V-K)}$\\
704: &&&&&&&\\
705: \hline
706: Normal value&0.32&0.43&0.35&0.70&1.13&1.21&0.19\\
707: NGC 637&0.32$\pm$0.03&0.45$\pm$0.04&0.36$\pm$0.03&0.69$\pm$0.05&1.11
708: $\pm$0.08&1.19$\pm$0.07&0.15$\pm$0.30\\
709: NGC 957&0.34$\pm$0.02&0.47$\pm$0.01&0.39$\pm$0.03&0.75$\pm$0.05&1.12
710: $\pm$0.03&1.19$\pm$0.02&0.14$\pm$0.30\\
711: \hline
712: \end{tabular}
713: \end{center}
714: \label{tab:ratio}
715: \end{table*}
716:
717: \subsection{Distance to the clusters}
718:
719: %fig:dist
720: %_______________________________________________________________________
721: % \setcounter{figure}{7}
722: \begin{figure*}
723: \centering
724: \includegraphics[width=18cm]{Fig8.ps}
725: \caption{ The intrinsic colour-magnitude diagram of the clusters. The
726: continuous solid lines curve are the ZAMS given by \citet{schaller92}
727: for $Z =$ 0.02 and the dotted lines are isochrones of
728: log(age) $=$ 6.8,7.0 and 7.2 (shown left to right respectively)
729: for NGC 637 and NGC 957.}
730: \label{fig:dist}
731: \end{figure*}
732:
733: %fig:cmdir
734: %________________________________________________________________________
735: \begin{figure*}
736: \centering
737: \hbox{
738: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig9a.ps}
739: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig9b.ps}
740: }
741: \caption{The $K$ versus $(J-K)$ and $V$ versus $(V-K)$ CMDs of
742: the clusters using probable cluster members. The solid curve
743: represents the isochrones of log(age) $=$ 7.0 for NGC 637 and NGC 957
744: taken from \citet{schaller92} for $Z =$ 0.02.}
745: \label{fig:cmdir}
746: \end{figure*}
747:
748: The ZAMS fitting procedure was used to derive distances to the clusters.
749: Fig.~\ref{fig:dist} shows the intrinsic CMDs of probable cluster members
750: as selected in \S\ref{sec:cmd} for the clusters NGC 637 and NGC 957.
751: Employing mean $E(B-V)$ for the clusters, we converted
752: apparent magnitude and colours into the intrinsic one using the method
753: as described in \citet{yadav02}. A theoretical ZAMS \citep{schaller92}
754: for $Z =$ 0.02 is visually fitted to the blue part of intrinsic
755: CMDs in $V_{0}$, $(U-B)_0$; $V_0$, $(B-V)_0$; $V_0$, $(V-R)_0$ and $V_0$,
756: $(V-I)_0$. This gives an intrinsic distance modulus, $(m-M)_0$, of
757: $12.0\pm0.2$ mag for NGC 637 and $11.7\pm0.2$ mag for NGC 957. The fact
758: that we were able to find faint probable cluster members allow us to get
759: a better definition of the cluster lower main sequence which in turn improves
760: the estimation of the distances. The above distance moduli corresponds to a
761: distance of $2.5\pm0.2$ kpc for NGC 637 and
762: $2.2\pm0.2$ kpc for NGC 957. For NGC 637, it is similar to the value 2.5 kpc
763: derived by \citet{huestamendia91} while it is less than the value 2.75 kpc
764: derived by \citet{phelps94}. In case of NGC 957, our derived values are
765: similar to the values given in literature (\S\ref{sec:intro}).
766:
767: \subsection{Age of the clusters}
768:
769: Age of the cluster is determined by visually fitting the theoretical stellar
770: evolutionary isochrones \citep{schaller92} for $Z=0.02$ with the
771: observed intrinsic CMDs of the clusters as shown in
772: Fig.~\ref{fig:dist}. We chose to use the isochrones of $Z=0.02$, as the
773: present target clusters are young and also many recent studies, for example,
774: by \citet{twarog97}, does indicate that between 6.5 to 10 kpc galactocentric
775: zone, the metallicity shows no gradient and its value is consistent with
776: the solar value within the uncertainties. Also for cluster
777: NGC 637, \citet{phelps94} considered solar metallicity.
778:
779: Isochrones of log(age) $=$ 6.8, 7.0 and 7.2 are shown with dotted lines from
780: left to right in Fig.~\ref{fig:dist} and these visually fitted isochrones
781: to the brighter stars indicate that CMDs are represented well with an isochrone
782: of about 10 Myr for both the clusters. Furthermore, the isochrones of
783: log(age) $=$ 6.8 and 7.2 Myr seem to confine blue and red end of the upper
784: main sequence stars. The most massive stars in NGC 637 and NGC 957 is about
785: 13 M$_{\odot}$ and it sets an upper limit of about 15 Myr for the MS age of
786: the clusters. We have therefore adopted a mean age of 10 Myr with an
787: uncertainty of about 5 Myr for both the clusters.
788:
789: The present age estimate for NGC 637 is not too different from the values of
790: 15 Myr as derived by \citet{huestamendia91} and 4 Myr by \citet{phelps94}.
791: For NGC 957, \citet{gerasimenko91} has given an age of 5 Myr,
792: which agrees within error with the present estimate.
793:
794: Using optical and near-IR data we re-determined distance and age of both the
795: clusters. We plot $V$ versus $(V-K)$ and $K$ versus $(J-K)$ CMDs in
796: Fig~\ref{fig:cmdir}. The theoretical isochrones given by \citet{schaller92}
797: for $Z =$ 0.02 and log(age) $=$ 7.0 have been overplotted in the CMDs of
798: NGC 637 and NGC 957. The apparent distance moduli $(m - M)_{V, (V-K)}$
799: and $(m-M)_{K, (J-K)}$ turn out to be 14.0$\pm$0.3 and 12.0$\pm$0.3 mag
800: for the cluster NGC 637 and 14.0$\pm$0.3 and 12.1$\pm$0.3 mag for the
801: cluster NGC 957. Using the reddening values estimated in \S\ref{sec:extir},
802: we derived a distance of 2.5$\pm$0.3 for NGC 637 and 2.2$\pm$0.3 kpc for
803: NGC 957. Both age and distance determination for the clusters are thus
804: in agreement with the estimates using optical data. However,
805: scattering is larger due to the large errors in $JHK$ mags.
806:
807:
808: \subsection {Gaps in the main-sequences}
809:
810: A peculiarity that appears in the intrinsic CMDs is the presence of gaps in
811: the MS (see Fig.~\ref{fig:dist}). A MS gap is present between
812: $9<V_0<10$ ($11<M/M_\odot<8$) in NGC 637. This gap has already been noticed
813: by \citet{huestamendia91} and \citet{phelps93}. The deficiency of
814: stars between $11<V_0<12$ ($4<M/M_\odot<3$) is also seen in NGC 957. To check
815: the significance of the gap, we computed the probability that a lack of
816: stars in the mass interval is a result of random processes
817: \citep[see][]{scalo86,giorgi02} by using the relation
818: $P_{gap} = (M_{sup}/M_{inf})^{(-N\times x)}$, where $M_{sup}$ and $M_{inf}$
819: are the upper and lower masses of the gap and $x$ is the exponent of mass
820: function while $N$ is the number of cluster members located above the gap.
821: Adopting the MF slope in advance (\S\ref{sec:mfu}), we find $P_{gap} = 4\%$ for
822: NGC 637 and 16\% for NGC 957. The low resulting probabilities for both the
823: clusters suggest that gaps in the MS are not due to the random processes.
824: Hence, observed gaps in the MS of the clusters are real features, though we
825: note that the significance test of gaps in MS are only approximate because
826: the terms of the test were set after the data were observed. Specifically,
827: upper and lower masses of the gap were derived after seeing the data. Thus,
828: the quantitative statistical significance of the gaps has been overestimated.
829:
830: There are many reports about the MS gaps of other star clusters in the
831: literature \citep{mermilliod76,forbes96,herbst82,baume04,kumar08}.
832: A detailed description of gaps
833: in several open clusters has recently been given by \citet{rachford00}.
834: The explanation of the gaps found in open clusters range from the
835: onset of convection in the stellar envelopes \citep{bohmvitense74}
836: to peculiarities in the Balmer jump and Balmer lines as suggested
837: by \citet{mermilliod76}. \citep{ulrich71a,ulrich71b} speculated that gaps in
838: young clusters might be produced by the presence of ${}^{3}$He isotopes that
839: halt gravitational contraction 1-2 mags above the main-sequence.
840: Mermilliod's gaps occur in the range of B-type stars while B\"{o}hm-Vitense \&
841: Canterna's gaps are found at less massive stars. Observed gap in NGC 637
842: may be related to that found by \citet{mermilliod76} at the types B1-B2.
843:
844: %fig:sp
845: %________________________________________________________________________
846: \begin{figure}
847: \centering
848: \hbox{
849: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig10.ps}
850: }
851: \caption{Slitless spectra of three emission line stars in NGC 637 and NGC 957}
852: \label{fig:sp}
853: \end{figure}
854:
855: %fig:spec637
856: %______________________________________________________________________
857: % \setcounter{figure}{10}
858: \begin{figure}
859: \centering
860: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig11.ps}
861: \caption {The normalised, continuum fitted spectra of the emission star
862: NGC 637-S1 in the wavelength range 3700-9000 \AA{} in the cluster
863: NGC 637.}
864: \label{fig:spec637}
865: \end{figure}
866:
867: %spec957
868: %______________________________________________________________________
869: \begin{figure}
870: \centering
871: \includegraphics[width=9cm,height=9cm]{Fig12.ps}
872: \caption {The normalised, continuum fitted spectra of the emission stars
873: in NGC 957 in the wavelength range 3700-9000 \AA{}. The top spectra
874: corresponds to star NGC 957-S2 and the bottom one corresponds to star
875: NGC 957-S1.}
876: \label{fig:spec957}
877: \end{figure}
878:
879:
880:
881: \subsection{Emission type stars}
882:
883: The Be star phenomenon in young open clusters is known to arise due to
884: mass loss from early type stars during its evolution on the MS and
885: are found to be maximum for clusters with 10-25 Myr age \citep{fabregat00}.
886: About 20\% of the early-type ($<$ B5) stars show Be
887: phenomenon in young clusters of our Galaxy \citep{maeder99}. However,
888: in some young clusters, resulting from on-going/episodic star formation, an
889: over-abundance of Be stars ($> 30\%$) are caused due to presence of Herbig Be
890: stars, which are usually associated with nebulosity and show large
891: near-infrared excess \citep{subramaniam05,subramaniam06}.
892:
893: In the slit-less spectra, the emission-line stars are usually seen as
894: continuum enhancement and they were identified by visual inspection of each
895: spectra. We could identify emission-line stars with a typical limit of about
896: $V \sim$ 16 mag in 10-min exposure. This roughly corresponds to a late
897: F-type star for present clusters. The positions of the emission stars are
898: identified from the $R$-band images and the spectra are extracted from the
899: slit-less spectral images. The spectra of individual stars are extracted with
900: an aperture width of about 5 pixels
901: \citep[see][for detailed description]{subramaniam05,subramaniam06}.
902: We identified an emission line star in NGC 637 for the
903: first time. We also identified two emission stars in NGC 957, which are
904: previously known. The slitless spectra of one star in NGC 637 and two stars
905: in NGC 957 are shown in Fig. 10. These spectra
906: cannot be used for quantitative analysis, therefore, we obtained the slit
907: spectra of the identified emission stars. The slit spectra of NGC 637-S1
908: is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spec637}. The spectra show H$_\alpha$ in emission,
909: H$_\beta$ in emission within absorption. Two emission stars in NGC 957 were
910: also observed in the slit mode, the spectra are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spec957}.
911: NGC 957-S1 is found to show H$_\alpha$, H$_\beta$ and H$_\gamma$,
912: along with a large number of FeII, OI and Paschen lines in emission.
913: NGC 957-S2 shows partially filled up H$_\beta$, faint emissions in Paschen
914: lines along with H$_\alpha$ emission. Photometric data with position of all
915: three emission stars identified in the present study are listed in
916: Table 6. Because of the CCD saturation in the
917: present observations, photometric data of two emission stars in NGC 957 are
918: taken from \citet{hoag61} and tabulated in Table 6. Thus, in the
919: CMDs, the brighter and redder star is S1 and the fainter and bluer star is S2.
920: The values of H$_\alpha$ equivalent width, stellar rotation, vsini, as
921: estimated from the width of the HeI (4471\AA) line and the disk rotation, as
922: estimated from the width of the H$_\alpha$ profile are also tabulated.
923:
924: The spectral type of the star is estimated from its $V$ and $(B-V)$ magnitudes
925: and using the estimated cluster reddening and distance. In NGC 637, the
926: emission star is found to be a late B-type (B6.5V; NGC 637-S1) star with low
927: infrared excess. This star is located well below the turn-off. The stellar
928: vsini is found to be very large, 450\kms{} and disk vsini is found to be
929: much smaller, 180\kms. Thus, this is a Classical Be star in the
930: MS evolutionary phase and with large stellar rotation. Thus, this young
931: clusters houses a fast rotating Classical Be star.
932:
933: The stars NGC 957-S1 and NGC 957-S2 in the cluster NGC 957 were earlier
934: identified by \citet{kohoutek99} as emission type stars. The emission
935: stars are found to belong to early B-type (S1 - B2V and S2 - B2.5V)
936: from photometry. These stars are located near the tip of the cluster MS, but
937: below the turn-off. These stars have stellar vsini more than 300\kms{}
938: indicating these are Classical Be candidates. These
939: stars also have low near-infrared excess which supports the above.
940: The star with relatively large H$_\alpha$ emission, S1, is found to have a
941: relatively slow rotating disk. Thus, this is another young cluster which
942: houses Classical Be stars.
943:
944: \begin{table*}
945: \centering
946: \caption {Photometric information about emission stars. Photometric data
947: of NGC 957-S1 and NGC 957-S2 star are taken from Hoag et al. (1961).}
948:
949: \hspace{2cm}
950:
951: \scriptsize
952: \begin{tabular}{|c|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
953: \hline
954: Objects&Coordinate (J2000)&$V$&$(U-B)$&$(B-V)$&$(V-R)$&$(V-I)$ &H$_\alpha$ EW & vsini(disk)& vsini(star)\\ \hline
955: NGC 637-S1&$\alpha=01^{h}43^{m}23^{s}$.1&13.67&$-$0.03&0.55&0.38&0.78 & -21.97 & 179.65 & 450.37 \\
956: &$\delta=64^{0}01^{\prime}19^{\prime\prime}$.2&&&&&&&&\\
957: NGC 957-S1&$\alpha=02^{h}33^{m}08^{s}$.2&11.13&$-$0.38&0.66&& & -37.99& 184.32& 342.72\\
958: &$\delta=57^{0}28^{\prime}10^{\prime\prime}$.8&&&&&&&&\\
959: NGC 957-S2&$\alpha=02^{h}33^{m}10^{s}$.5&11.99&$-$0.28&0.54&& &-16.96& 251.62 & 308.85\\
960: &$\delta=57^{0}32^{\prime}53^{\prime\prime}$.9&&&&&&&&\\
961: \hline
962: \end{tabular}
963: \label{emis_star}
964: \end{table*}
965:
966: % sec : mfu
967: %________________________________________________________________________
968:
969: \section{Luminosity and Mass function} \label{sec:mfu}
970:
971: To construct the luminosity function for the cluster, we used the deepest $V$
972: versus $(V-I)$ CMD. Photometric criteria (see \S\ref{sec:cmd}) have been used
973: to select the cluster members. The same envelope as made for selection of
974: cluster members is also drawn in the $V$ versus $(V-I)$ CMD of the
975: field region (see Fig~\ref{fig:cmd}). Stars are counted within this
976: envelope, for both cluster and field region. Difference between the
977: counts in two fields after accounting for the difference in area between
978: the cluster and field regions will be the observed cluster luminosity
979: function. To get the correct luminosity function it is very essential to
980: derive completeness factor of CCD data. To know about the completeness of our
981: photometric data, we performed experiments with artificial stars using
982: ADDSTAR routine in DAOPHOT II. Detailed description about the experiment
983: is given in \citet{yadav02} and \citet{sagar98}. The completeness factors
984: derived in this way are tabulated in Table~\ref{tab:cf} for NGC 637 and
985: NGC 957 and it shows that the completeness factor is
986: $\sim$ 93\% at 20 mag for both clusters. The completeness factor of
987: field region is assumed to be 100\%.
988:
989: %fig:mass
990: %______________________________________________________________________
991: \begin{figure}
992: \centering
993: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig13.ps}
994: \caption{Mass function for NGC 637 and NGC 957 derived using
995: \citet{schaller92} isochrones.}
996: \label{fig:mass}
997: \end{figure}
998:
999:
1000: Using the cluster's parameters derived in this analysis and theoretical models
1001: given by \citet{schaller92} we have converted LF to MF and the resulting
1002: MF is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:mass}. The mass function slope can be derived by
1003: using the relation
1004: ${\rm log}\frac{dN}{dM} = -(1+x) \times {\rm log}(M)+${}constant,
1005: where $dN$ represents the number of stars in a mass bin $dM$ with central
1006: mass $M$ and $x$ is the slope of MF. The slope of the MF is
1007: $x = 1.65\pm0.20$ and $1.31\pm0.50$ for the cluster NGC 637 and NGC 957
1008: respectively. Our derived values of mass function slope is in
1009: agreement within the error with the value 1.35 given by
1010: \citet{salpeter55} for field stars in solar neighbourhood.
1011:
1012: % tab:cf
1013: %______________________________________________________________________
1014: \setcounter{table}{6}
1015: \begin{table}
1016: \centering
1017: \caption{Variation of completeness factor (CF) in the $V$, $(V-I)$
1018: diagram with the MS brightness.}
1019: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c}
1020: \hline
1021: $V$ mag range&NGC 637&NGC 957\\
1022: \hline
1023: 12 - 13&0.99&0.99\\
1024: 13 - 14&0.99&0.99\\
1025: 14 - 15&0.99&0.99\\
1026: 15 - 16&0.98&0.98\\
1027: 16 - 17&0.97&0.98\\
1028: 17 - 18&0.95&0.94\\
1029: 18 - 19&0.94&0.94\\
1030: 19 - 20&0.93&0.93\\
1031: \hline
1032: \end{tabular}
1033: \label{tab:cf}
1034: \end{table}
1035:
1036: There are many MF studies available in the literature using open star clusters
1037: in the Milky Way. Recently, \citet{piskunov04} studied 5 young open star
1038: clusters and found that stellar mass spectra of these clusters are well
1039: represented with a power law very similar to Salpeter value within the
1040: uncertainties. MF study of \citet{phelps93} using a sample of seven star
1041: clusters also conclude the Salpeter type MF slope in these clusters.
1042: These studies alongwith the others \citep{sanner01, sagar01, yadav02, yadav04}
1043: found their results consistent with the Salpeter value.
1044:
1045:
1046: % sec : mse
1047: %________________________________________________________________________
1048:
1049: \section{Mass segregation} \label{sec:mse}
1050:
1051: In order to study the mass segregation effect in the clusters, we
1052: plot the cumulative radial stellar distribution of stars for different masses
1053: in Fig~\ref{fig:mseg} and mass segregation effect is seen for both the
1054: clusters, meaning, higher-mass stars gradually sink towards the
1055: cluster center than the lower mass stars. Further, We performed K-S test to
1056: see the statistical significance of mass segregation. For NGC 637, we divided
1057: the MS stars in three magnitude range i.e. $12.0 \le V<15.0$, $15.0\le V<18.0$
1058: and $18.0\le V<20.0$ corresponding to the mass range of
1059: $9.0\le M/M_{\odot}<2.5, ~2.5\le M/M_{\odot}<1.2$ and
1060: 1.2$\le$ M/M$_{\odot}$$<$0.8. For NGC 957,
1061: the magnitude range are $12.0\le V<14.0, 14.0\le V<16.0$ and
1062: $16.0\le V<18.0$ corresponding to the mass range of
1063: $8.0\le M/M_{\odot}<3.5$, ~$3.5\le M/M_{\odot}<2.0$ and
1064: $2.0\le M/M_{\odot}<1.0$.
1065: The K-S test shows the mass segregation effect at confidence
1066: level of 99\% for NGC 637 and 70\% for NGC 957.
1067:
1068: Mass segregation effect can be due to dynamical evolution or imprint of star
1069: formation or both. In the lifetime of star clusters, encounters between its
1070: member stars gradually lead to an increased degree of energy equipartition
1071: throughout the clusters. In this process the higher mass cluster
1072: members gradually sink towards the cluster center and transfer their kinetic
1073: energy to the more numerous lower-mass stellar component, thus leading to mass
1074: segregation. The time scale on which a cluster will have lost all traces of
1075: its initial conditions is well represented by its relaxation
1076: time $T_E$, which is given by
1077:
1078: \begin{equation}
1079: T_{E} = \frac {8.9 \times 10^{5} N^{1/2} R_{h}^{3/2}}{ <m>^{1/2}log(0.4N)}
1080: \end{equation}
1081:
1082: \noindent
1083: where $N$ is the number of cluster members, $R_{h}$ is the half-mass radius
1084: of the cluster and $<m>$ is the mean mass of the cluster stars
1085: \citep{spitzer71}. The value of $R_{h}$ has been assumed as half of
1086: the cluster radius derived by us. Using the above relation we estimated the
1087: dynamical relaxation time $T_E =$ 10 Myr for NGC 637 and NGC 957. This
1088: indicates that the age of both clusters is same as its relaxation age.
1089: Therefore, we conclude that both the clusters are dynamically relaxed.
1090:
1091: %fig:mseg
1092: %________________________________________________________________________
1093: \begin{figure}
1094: \centering
1095: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{Fig14.ps}
1096: \caption{The cumulative radial distribution of stars in various mass
1097: range.}
1098: \label{fig:mseg}
1099: \end{figure}
1100:
1101:
1102:
1103: % sec : con
1104: %______________________________________________________________________
1105: \section{Conclusions} \label{sec:con}
1106:
1107: We studied two open star clusters NGC 637 and NGC 957 using $UBVRI$ CCD
1108: and 2MASS $JHK$ data. Results obtained in the analysis are the following.
1109:
1110: \begin{enumerate}
1111:
1112: \item The radii of the clusters are obtained as 4\farcm2 and 4\farcm3
1113: which corresponds to 3.0 and 2.8 pc respectively at the distance of the
1114: clusters NGC 637 and NGC 957.
1115:
1116: \item From the two colour diagram, we estimated
1117: $E(B-V) = 0.64\pm0.05$ mag for NGC 637 and $0.71\pm$0.05 mag for NGC 957.
1118: The $JHK$ data in combination with the optical data provide $E(J-K) =
1119: 0.23\pm$0.20 mag and 0.23$\pm$0.20 mag while $E(V-K) = 1.70\pm$0.20 mag
1120: and $E(V-K) = 2.00\pm$0.20 mag for NGC 637 and NGC 957 respectively. Analysis
1121: indicates that interstellar extinction law is normal towards the direction of
1122: both the clusters.
1123:
1124: \item Distances to the cluster NGC 637 and NGC 957 are determined as
1125: 2.5$\pm$0.2 and 2.2$\pm$0.2 kpc respectively. These distances are supported
1126: by the distance values derived using optical and near-IR data.
1127: An age of 10$\pm$5 Myr is determined for both NGC 637 and NGC 957 by
1128: comparing the isochrones of $Z =$ 0.02 given by \citet{schaller92}.
1129:
1130: \item We discovered one emission type star in NGC 637. Two emission type stars
1131: in NGC 957 are also confirmed by the present study. These are classical Be
1132: star candidates. The two emission stars in NGC 957 are about to leave the MS while the emission star in NGC 637 is in the MS evolutionary phase.
1133:
1134: \item The mass function slopes $x = 1.65\pm0.20$ and $1.31\pm0.50$ are derived
1135: for NGC 637 and NGC 957 by considering the corrections of field star
1136: contamination and data incompleteness. Our analysis indicate that both the
1137: cluster are dynamically relaxed and one plausible reason
1138: of this relaxation may be the dynamical evolution of the clusters.
1139:
1140: \end{enumerate}
1141:
1142:
1143: {\bf ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
1144:
1145: We thank the anonymous referee for the useful comments and suggestions which
1146: surely helped to improve the paper. One of us (BK) acknowledge support from
1147: the Chilean center for Astrophysics FONDAP No. 15010003. This publication
1148: made use of data from the
1149: Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
1150: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
1151: Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
1152: Administration and the National Science Foundation. We are also much obliged
1153: for the use of the NASA Astrophysics Data System, of the Simbad database
1154: (Centre de Donn$\acute{e}$s Stellaires-Strasbourg, France) and of the WEBDA
1155: open cluster database.
1156:
1157: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1158:
1159: \bibitem[Maeder et al.(1999)]{maeder99}
1160: Maeder A., Grebel E. K., Mermilliod J. C., 1999, \aa, 346, 459
1161:
1162: \bibitem[Baume et al.(2004)]{baume04}
1163: Baume G., Moitinho A., Giorgi E. E., Carraro G, Vazquez R. A.,
1164: 2004, \aa, 417, 961
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Bessell(1979)]{bessell79}
1167: Bessell, M. S., 1979, \pasp, 91, 589
1168:
1169: \bibitem[B\"{o}hm-Vitense \& Canterna(1974)]{bohmvitense74}
1170: B\"{o}hm-Vitense E., Canterna R., 1974, \apj, 194, 629
1171:
1172: \bibitem[Caldwell et al.(1993)]{caldwell93}
1173: Caldwell A. R., John, Cousins, A. W. J., Ahlers C. C., Wamelen P.
1174: van, Maritz E. J., 1993, SAAO Circ. No. 15
1175:
1176: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{cardelli89}
1177: Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, \apj, 345, 245
1178:
1179: \bibitem[Dias et al.(2002)]{dias02}
1180: Dias W. S., Alessi B. S., Moitinho A., L\'{e}pine J. R. D, 2002, \aa,
1181: 389, 871
1182:
1183: \bibitem[Fabregat \& Torrej\'on(2000)]{fabregat00}
1184: Fabregat J., Torrej\'on J.M, 2000, \aa, 357, 451
1185:
1186: \bibitem[FitzGerald(1970)]{fitzgerald70}
1187: FitzGerald M. P., 1970, \aa, 4, 234
1188:
1189: \bibitem[Forbes(1996)]{forbes96}
1190: Forbes D., 1996, \aj, 112, 1073
1191:
1192: \bibitem[Gerasimenko(1991)]{gerasimenko91}
1193: Gerasimenko T. P, 1991, Astron. Zh, 68, 1103
1194:
1195: \bibitem[Gimenez \& Garcia-pelayo(1980)]{gimenez80}
1196: Gimenez A., Garcia-pelayo J., 1980, \aas, 41, 9
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Giorgi et al.(2002)]{giorgi02}
1199: Giorgi E. E., Vazquez R. A., Baume G., Seggewiss W., Will J.-M.,
1200: 2002, \aa, 381, 884
1201:
1202: \bibitem[Grubissich(1975)]{grubissich75}
1203: Grubissich C., 1975, \aas, 21, 99
1204:
1205: \bibitem[Hoag et al.(1961)]{hoag61}
1206: Hoag A. A., Johnson H. L., Iriarte B., Mitchell R. I., Hallam K. L.,
1207: Sharpless S., 1961, Publ. US. Nav. Obs. 17, 347
1208:
1209: \bibitem[Huestamendia et al.(1991)]{huestamendia91}
1210: Huestamendia G., del Rio G., Mermilliod J.-C., 1991, \aas, 87, 153
1211:
1212: \bibitem[Herbst \& Miller(1982)]{herbst82}
1213: Herbst W. \& Miller D. P., 1982, \aj, 87, 1478
1214:
1215: \bibitem[Johnson \& Morgan(1953)]{johnson53}
1216: Johnson H. L., Morgan W. W., 1953, \apj, 117, 313
1217:
1218: \bibitem[Johnson \& Morgan(1966)]{johnson66}
1219: Johnson H. L., Morgan W. W., 1966, \araa, 4, 193
1220:
1221: \bibitem[King(1962)]{king62}
1222: King, Ivan, 1962, \aj, 67, 274
1223:
1224: \bibitem[Kohoutek \& Wehmeyer(1999)]{kohoutek99}
1225: Kohoutek L., Wehmeyer R., 1999, \aas, 134, 255
1226:
1227: \bibitem[Koornneef(1983)]{koornneef83}
1228: Koornneef J., 1983, \aa, 128, 84
1229:
1230: \bibitem[Kumar et al.(2008)]{kumar08}
1231: Kumar B., Sagar R., Melnick J., 2008, \mnras, 386, 1380
1232:
1233: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{landolt92}
1234: Landolt A. U., 1992, \aj, 104, 340
1235:
1236: \bibitem[Mermilliod(1976)]{mermilliod76}
1237: Mermilliod J.-C., 1976, \aa, 53, 289
1238:
1239: \bibitem[Persson et al.(1998)]{persson98}
1240: Persson S. E., Murphy D. C., Krzeminski W., Roth M., Rieke M. J.,
1241: 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
1242:
1243: \bibitem[Phelps \& Janes(1993)]{phelps93}
1244: Phelps R. L., Janes K. A., 1993, \aj, 106, 1870
1245:
1246: \bibitem[Phelps \& Janes(1994)]{phelps94}
1247: Phelps R. L., Janes K. A., 1994, \apjs, 90, 31
1248:
1249: \bibitem[Piskunov et al.(2004)]{piskunov04}
1250: Piskunov A. E., Belikov A. N., Kharchenko N. V., Sagar, R.,
1251: Subramaniam A., 2004, \mnras, 349, 1449.
1252:
1253: \bibitem[Rachford \& Canterna(2000)]{rachford00}
1254: Rachford B. J., Canterna R., 2000, \aj, 119, 1296
1255:
1256: \bibitem[Ruprecht(1966)]{ruprecht66}
1257: Ruprecht J., 1966, \bac, 17, 33
1258:
1259: \bibitem[Sagar \& Griffiths(1998)]{sagar98}
1260: Sagar R., Griffiths W. K., 1998, \mnras, 299, 777
1261:
1262: \bibitem[Sagar et al.(2001)]{sagar01}
1263: Sagar R., Munari U., de Boer K. S., 2001, \mnras, 327, 23
1264:
1265: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{salpeter55}
1266: Salpeter E. E., 1955, \apj, 121, 161
1267:
1268: \bibitem[Sanner \& Geffert(2001)]{sanner01}
1269: Sanner J., Geffert M., 2001, \aa, 370, 87
1270:
1271: \bibitem[Scalo(1986)]{scalo86}
1272: Scalo J. M., 1986, \fcp, 11, 1
1273:
1274: \bibitem[Schaller et al.(1992)]{schaller92}
1275: Schaller G., Schaerer D., Meynet G., Maeder A., 1992, \aas, 96, 269
1276:
1277: \bibitem[Schmidt-Kaler(1982)]{schmidtkaler82}
1278: Schmidt - Kaler Th., 1982, In: Landolt/Bornstein, Numerical Data and
1279: Functional Relationship in Science and Technology, New series, Group VI,
1280: Vol. 2b, Scaifers K. \& Voigt H. H. (eds.) Springer - Verlog, Berlin,
1281: p. 14
1282:
1283: \bibitem[Spitzer \& Hart(1971)]{spitzer71}
1284: Spitzer L., Hart M. H., 1971, \apj, 164, 399
1285:
1286: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{stetson87}
1287: Stetson P. B., 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
1288:
1289: \bibitem[Stetson(1992)]{stetson92}
1290: Stetson P. B., 1992, in Warrall D. M., Biemesderfer C., Barnes J.
1291: eds., ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 25, Astronomical Data Analysis Software
1292: and System I. Astron. Soc. Pac., San Francisco, p. 297
1293:
1294: \bibitem[Subramaniam et al.(2005)]{subramaniam05}
1295: Subramaniam A., Sahu D. K., Sagar R., Vijitha P., 2005, \aa, 440, 511
1296:
1297: \bibitem[Subramaniam et al.(2006)]{subramaniam06}
1298: Subramaniam A., Mathew, B., Bhatt, B. C., Ramya S., 2006, \mnras, 370, 743
1299:
1300: \bibitem[Twarog et al.(1997)]{twarog97}
1301: Twarog B. A., Ashman K. M., Anthony-Twarog B. J., 1997, \aj, 114, 2556
1302:
1303: \bibitem[Ulrich(1971a)]{ulrich71a}
1304: Ulrich R. K., 1971a, \apj, 165, L95
1305:
1306: \bibitem[Ulrich(1971b)]{ulrich71b}
1307: Ulrich R. K., 1971b, \apj, 168, 57
1308:
1309: \bibitem[Whittet \& van Breda(1980)]{whittet80}
1310: Whittet D. C. B., van Breda I. G., 1980, \mnras, 192, 467
1311:
1312: \bibitem[Yadav \& Sagar(2002)]{yadav02}
1313: Yadav R. K. S., Sagar R., 2002, \mnras, 337, 133
1314:
1315: \bibitem[Yadav \& Sagar(2004)]{yadav04}
1316: Yadav R. K. S., Sagar R., 2004, \mnras, 351, 667
1317:
1318: \end{thebibliography}
1319:
1320: \end{document}
1321: