1: %%
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
5: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6:
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9:
10: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
11: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
12: %% the \begin{document} command.
13: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
14: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
15:
16: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
17: %%\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
18:
19: \shorttitle{Hypervelocity stars}
20: \shortauthors{Abadi, Navarro \& Steinmetz}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{An Alternative Origin for Hypervelocity Stars}
25:
26: \author{Mario G. Abadi}
27: \affil{Instituto de Astronom\'ia Te\'orica y Experimental (IATE)
28: \\Observatorio Astron\'omico de C\'ordoba and CONICET
29: \\Laprida 854 X5000BGR C\'ordoba, Argentina
30: }
31: \email{mario@oac.uncor.edu}
32:
33: \author{Julio F. Navarro}
34: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria
35: \\3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada}
36: \email{jfn@uvic.ca}
37:
38: \and
39:
40: \author{Matthias Steinmetz}
41: \affil{Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam
42: \\An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany}
43: \email{msteinmetz@aip.de}
44:
45: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
46: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
47: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
48: %% affiliation.
49: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
50: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
51: %Foundation.}
52: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
53: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
54: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
55: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
56: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: Halo stars with unusually high radial velocity ("hypervelocity" stars,
60: or HVS) are thought to be stars unbound to the Milky Way that
61: originate from the gravitational interaction of stellar systems with
62: the supermassive black hole at the Galactic center. We examine the
63: latest HVS compilation and find peculiarities that are unexpected in
64: this black hole-ejection scenario. For example, a large fraction of
65: HVS cluster around the constellation of Leo and share a common travel
66: time of $\sim 100$-$200$ Myr. Furthermore, their velocities are not
67: really extreme if, as suggested by recent galaxy formation models, the
68: Milky Way is embedded within a $2.5\times 10^{12} \, h^{-1} \,
69: M_{\odot}$ dark halo with virial velocity of $\sim 220$ km/s. In this
70: case, the escape velocity at $\sim 50$ kpc would be $\sim 600$ km/s
71: and very few HVS would be truly unbound. We use numerical simulations
72: to show that disrupting dwarf galaxies may contribute halo stars with
73: velocities up to and sometimes exceeding the nominal escape speed of
74: the system. These stars are arranged in a thinly-collimated outgoing
75: ``tidal tail'' stripped from the dwarf during its latest pericentric
76: passage. We speculate that some HVS may therefore be tidal debris from
77: a dwarf recently disrupted near the center of the Galaxy. In this
78: interpretation, the angular clustering of HVS results because from our
79: perspective the tail is seen nearly ``end on'', whereas the common
80: travel time simply reflects the fact that these stars were stripped
81: simultaneously from the dwarf during a single pericentric
82: passage. This proposal is eminently falsifiable, since it makes a
83: number of predictions that are distinct from the black-hole ejection
84: mechanism and that should be testable with improved HVS datasets.
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
88: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
89: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
90: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
91:
92: \keywords{Galaxy: disk -- Galaxy: formation -- Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics -- Galaxy: structure}
93:
94: \section{Introduction}
95: The existence of ultra high-speed stars in the halo of the Milky Way
96: was recognized by Hills (1998) as an inevitable consequence of the
97: presence of a supermassive black hole (SMBH) in a region of high
98: stellar density such as the Galactic center. Hills estimated that the
99: disruption of tightly bound binaries in the vicinity of the black hole
100: may propel stars to speeds exceeding $1000$ km/s, well beyond the
101: escape velocity from the Milky Way. The discovery of a population of
102: ``hypervelocity'' stars (HVS, for short, Brown et al. 2005) in
103: radial velocity surveys of faint B-type stars in the Galactic halo
104: (Brown et al. 2006, 2007a,b) gave strong support to Hills' proposal
105: and led to substantial theoretical interest in the topic. The latest
106: compilation by Brown, Geller \& Kenyon (2008) lists 16 HVS, all
107: receding at speeds exceeding $\sim 300$ km/s and reaching up to $\sim
108: 720$ km/s in the Galactic rest frame.
109:
110: HVS are widely thought to owe their extreme velocities to Hills'
111: mechanism, since many of the stars appear to be short-lived, massive
112: main sequence stars such as those often found near the Galactic
113: center. Other mechanisms also capable of accelerating stars to high
114: speeds, such as binary disruption in stellar clusters, have usually
115: been disfavored on the grounds that the maximum ejection velocity is
116: unlikely to exceed the escape velocity at the surface of a star, and
117: thus would only be able to accelerate stars up to no more than a few
118: hundred km/s. The mediation of the much deeper potential well of a
119: supermassive black hole thus appears needed to explain the extreme
120: velocities observed for the HVS population.
121:
122: Although some HVS have very likely been ejected by the Galactic SMBH,
123: there are a number of issues that remain unresolved in this
124: scenario. For example, the velocity distribution of HVS and, in
125: particular, the lack of {\it very} high-velocity stars (i.e., with
126: speeds exceeding $1000$ km/s), is not easily understood (see, e.g.,
127: Sesana, Haardt \& Madau 2007). Nor is the existence of at least one
128: HVS moving at a speed greater than $600$ km/s in the Galactic rest
129: frame (HD 271791; Heber et al 2008) whose proper motion apparently
130: rules out a Galactic center origin.
131:
132: Although small number statistics may explain away these concerns, we
133: examine in this Letter further peculiarities in the spatial
134: distribution and kinematics of HVS and argue that these suggest, at
135: least for some HVS, an origin different from the SMBH-ejection
136: mechanism. We begin by examining the distribution of travel times and
137: the angular clustering of HVS compiled from the literature, and use
138: numerical simulations to explore an alternative mechanism able to
139: populate the Galactic halo with high-speed stars. We end by
140: considering several observational tests that may, in the future, be
141: used to discriminate between these competing scenarios.
142:
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: \begin{figure}
145: \epsscale{.89}
146: \begin{center}
147: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,clip]{f1.eps}
148: \plotone{f1.eps}
149: \end{center}
150: \caption{
151: Galactocentric rest frame radial velocity versus distance for all
152: high-velocity stars with estimated distances compiled from the BGKK
153: (filled symbols) and BGK08 (open symbols) references. Symbols with
154: central dots correspond to stars that fall in the Leo I-centered
155: circle shown in Fig.~\ref{figs:brown3}. Solid lines show travel times
156: from the Galactic center in Myrs, as indicated by labels, computed
157: using the Galactic potential of Bromley et al. (2006). Dotted curves
158: show the escape velocity of an NFW (Navarro, Frenk \& White 1996,
159: 1997) halo with virial velocity $V_{200}=220$ km/s (the circular velocity
160: at the solar circle) and $110$ km/s (half of that value), for
161: reference. Note that for $V_{200}=220$ km/s only {\it one} HVS is
162: clearly unbound to the Galaxy. The left panel shows the radial
163: velocity histogram for all stars in the BGKK dataset. Some Milky Way
164: satellites are also included for comparison.
165: \label{figs:vr_r}}
166: \end{figure}
167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
168:
169: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
170: \begin{figure}
171: \epsscale{.86}
172: \begin{center}
173: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,clip]{f2.eps}
174: \plotone{f2.eps}
175: \end{center}
176: \caption{ Aitoff projection in Galactic coordinates for all stars in
177: the BGKK survey. Stars highlighted in color are high-speed ($V_r \ga
178: 300$ km/s) stars with estimated distances (filled circles), and
179: include a few new stars reported by BGK08 (open symbols). The color
180: encodes the travel time of each star, as shown by the histogram in
181: the bottom left inset. The filled histogram corresponds to BGKK
182: stars, the open histogram adds the new stars in the BGK08
183: sample. The solid curve shows the travel-time distribution predicted
184: by a model where stars are continuously ejected by the SMBH at the
185: Galactic center (Bromley et al. 2006), after taking into account the
186: finite lifetime of the stars and the effective survey volume. The
187: black circle in the aitoff panel delineates a $26^{\circ}$-diameter
188: region in the constellation of Leo. More than half of all HVS with
189: $V_r>350$ km/s are contained within that region. This represents a
190: significant overdensity of HVS in the direction of Leo, since the
191: same region contains only about $\sim 20\%$ of all stars in the
192: survey. A few other Milky Way satellites are shown for reference.
193: \label{figs:brown3}}
194: \end{figure}
195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
196:
197: \section{Analysis}
198:
199: \subsection{Observational data}
200:
201: We use primarily data from the Brown et al (2006, 2007a,b, hereafter
202: BGKK, for short) MMT and Whipple surveys of B-type halo stars selected
203: from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Our analysis uses Galactic
204: rest-frame radial velocities, positions in the sky, and distances, as
205: given by the authors. We note that distance estimates are only listed
206: for stars with velocities exceeding $\sim 280$ km/s. These estimates
207: typically assume that the stars are in the main sequence, although it
208: is difficult to rule out that some (or many) are evolved stars in the
209: blue horizontal branch (BHB). This is one of the main systematic
210: uncertainties in our analysis, but it is a shortcoming shared with all
211: other attempts to study the kinematics of HVS stars with current
212: datasets.
213:
214: \subsection{Travel times}
215:
216: The left panel in Figure~\ref{figs:vr_r} shows the Galactic rest frame
217: radial velocity distribution of all stars in the BGKK survey, whereas
218: the right panel shows the radial velocity of all stars with published
219: distance estimates. These are all high-speed stars ($V_r \ga 280$
220: km/s) out in the tail of the radial velocity distribution (filled
221: symbols). Open symbols correspond to the $10$ new stars recently
222: reported by Brown, Geller \& Kenyon (2008, hereafter BGK08) and are
223: added here only for completeness, since data for the underlying survey
224: from which these stars have been identified are not yet publicly
225: available. (``Dotted'' symbols identify stars in the circle shown in
226: Fig.~\ref{figs:brown3}, as discussed below.) For illustration, we have
227: added in Figure~\ref{figs:vr_r} the position in the $r$-$V_r$ plane of
228: several Milky Way satellite companions, as labeled.
229:
230: For each star with published distance estimate and radial velocity we
231: compute a travel time from the Galactic center, assuming purely radial
232: orbits in the simple Galactic potential model of Bromley et al
233: (2006). This is given by a spherically symmetric density profile,
234: $\rho(r)=\rho_0/(1+(r/r_c)^2)$, where $\rho_0=1.396 \times 10^4 \,
235: M_{\odot} $pc$^{-3}$ and $r_c=8$ pc (Kenyon et al 2008). The thick
236: solid curves in Fig.~\ref{figs:vr_r} represent the loci of stars with
237: constant travel time (labeled in Myr), whereas the dotted lines show
238: the escape velocity from the Milky Way, assuming it is embedded within
239: a cold dark matter halo with virial velocity
240: %
241: \footnote{
242: We assume a Navarro, Frenk \& White (1996, 1997) mass profile for the
243: halo (with concentration $c=15$) and define the virial velocity as
244: the circular velocity within a radius, $r_{200}$, enclosing a mean
245: overdensity of $200$ times the critical value for closure. The virial
246: velocity defines implicitly the halo mass: for $V_{200}=220$ km/s, the
247: mass within $r_{200}=220$ kpc/h, is $M_{200}=2.5\times 10^{12}\,
248: M_{\odot}$/h. We assume h$=0.73$ throughout the paper.}
249: %
250: $V_{200}=220$ km/s and $110$ km/s, respectively. The HVS data in
251: Figure~\ref{figs:vr_r} is colored according to travel time, binned in
252: equally spaced logarithmic intervals (see also the histogram in the
253: inset of Fig.~\ref{figs:brown3}).
254:
255: Figure~\ref{figs:vr_r} illustrates a few interesting points. One is
256: that very few stars are actually unbound if the virial velocity of the
257: Milky Way is of the order of $220$ km/s, the circular speed at the
258: solar circle. This is actually what is required by recent models of
259: galaxy formation in order to match simultaneously the zero-point of
260: the Tully-Fisher relation and the normalization of the galaxy
261: luminosity function (see, e.g., Croton et al 2006 for a full
262: discussion). In other words, for $V_{200}=220$ km/s, the HVS
263: speeds are unusually high, but not necessarily extreme, and only one
264: HVS would be clearly unbound. This is important, since it suggests
265: that more prosaic dynamical effects that do not rely on SMBH ejection
266: may be responsible for the unusual speeds of the HVS population.
267:
268: The second point to note is that the distribution of HVS travel times
269: is not uniform. This is illustrated in the histogram shown in the
270: inset of Fig.~\ref{figs:brown3}: 19 of the 30 HVS in the northern
271: hemisphere seem to share a common travel time (see bin centered at
272: $\sim 133$ km/s). The peak in the histogram is higher than expected
273: from a model where ejections occur uniformly in time. The model
274: prediction is shown by the solid curve in the inset histogram, after
275: taking into account the volume surveyed, the finite lifetime of late
276: B-main sequence stars, and assuming the distribution of SMBH-ejection
277: velocities computed by Bromley et al (2006).
278:
279: The significance of the peak seems high: selecting at random 30 stars
280: from such model yields a peak with 19 (or more) stars in fewer than 1
281: in 1000 trials. The small number of objects involved precludes a
282: more conclusive assessment of this possibility, but we note that this
283: is not necessarily inconsistent with SMBH ejection. In this scenario,
284: a ``preferred travel time'' may just reflect a burst of star formation
285: that boosted the population of binaries in the Galactic center region
286: a few hundred Myr ago. We discuss a different interpretation below.
287:
288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
289: \begin{figure}
290: \epsscale{.89}
291: \begin{center}
292: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,clip]{f3.eps}
293: \plotone{f3.eps}
294: \end{center}
295: \caption{
296: Galactocentric radial velocity vs radius for star particles in the
297: simulated galaxy of Abadi et al (2003a,b). Dots in red highlight stars
298: belonging to a satellite that merged recently with the main galaxy. As
299: in Fig.~\ref{figs:vr_r}, dotted lines show the escape velocity and
300: solid lines denote loci of constant travel time. Note how the tidal
301: debris stripped from the dwarf forms a stream of stars of nearly
302: constant travel time and with velocities which reach and exceed the
303: escape velocity from the system. This shows that hypervelocity stars
304: may also be produced during the disruption of a dwarf galaxy.
305: \label{figs:vallstr}}
306: \end{figure}
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308:
309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
310: \begin{figure}
311: \epsscale{0.96}
312: \begin{center}
313: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,clip]{f4.eps}
314: \plotone{f4.eps}
315: \end{center}
316: \caption{
317: Aitoff projection of stars in Fig.~\ref{figs:vallstr}, after excluding
318: all stars in the main body of the galaxy (i.e., those with $r<20$
319: kpc), as seen by an observer at the Sun's location. Stars in red are
320: those belonging to the disrupted satellite; those in blue highlight
321: the HVS ($V_r>400$ km/s) component of the tidal stream. Note that the
322: tidal stream results in an overdensity of high-velocity stars
323: clustered tightly around the location of the tip of the stream and
324: that a gradient in the sky results from the projection of the stream
325: seen nearly ``end on''. Projected on the sky, the stream spans a few
326: tens of degrees and is roughly fully contained within a
327: $26^{\circ}$-radius circle such as that shown in
328: Fig.~\ref{figs:brown3}.
329: \label{figs:aitoff}}
330: \end{figure}
331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
332:
333: \subsection{HVS angular distribution}
334:
335: Fig.~\ref{figs:brown3} shows an aitoff projection in Galactic
336: coordinates of all stars in the BGKK survey. High-speed stars
337: (including those reported recently by BGK08) are shown in color, coded
338: according to their travel times, as shown in the bottom-left
339: inset. The main point to note in this figure is that the HVS
340: population is not uniformly distributed in the sky, and that its
341: angular distribution appears inconsistent with a random sample of
342: stars in the survey.
343:
344: One way of quantifying this is to focus on the region around the
345: constellation of Leo, which seems to contain the majority of HVS. We
346: choose for this a 26$^{\circ}$-radius circle centered at the position
347: of Leo I, itself a high-speed (possibly unbound) distant satellite
348: companion of the Milky Way (e.g. Sales et al. 2007a, and Mateo,
349: Olszewski \& Walker 2008). A total of $192$ stars in the BGKK survey
350: fall within the circle, or $21\%$ of the total of $935$ halo stars in
351: the northern section of the BGKK survey. By contrast, $42\%$ of all
352: stars with $V_r>280$ km/s fall within the vicinity of Leo I, a
353: proportion that rises to $54\%$ for stars with $V_r>350$ km/s.
354:
355: We may estimate the significance of this result by repeating the same
356: calculation after randomly reassigning the measured radial velocities
357: amongst the stars in the survey. A proportion at least as high as
358: $42\%$ of $V_r>280$ km/s stars falls within the circle in fewer than
359: $1$ in $100$ such random trials
360: %
361: \footnote{
362: Including the new high-velocity stars identified by BGK08 supports
363: this conclusion. The chance of observing such clustering around Leo I
364: goes down to roughly $1$ in $700$ for $V_r>280$ km/s stars, and
365: decreases even further if the center of the circle is moved from Leo I
366: in the direction of Leo IV. These estimates assume that the stars in
367: the BGK08 and BGKK parent surveys have similar distributions in the
368: sky.}
369: %
370: . For $V_r>350$ km/s stars, the corresponding number is fewer than $1$
371: in $125$ trials. Also, since the majority of HVS are at Galactic
372: longitude $l\sim 240^{\circ}$ (see Fig.~\ref{figs:brown3}) it is
373: unlikely that the HVS anisotropy is the result of the slightly larger
374: effective volume surveyed in the direction of the anti-Galactic
375: center. This supports the idea that the enhanced clustering of HVS in
376: the direction of Leo is real. The observed angular clustering is not
377: easily explained in the SMBH-ejection scenario, which predicts an HVS
378: population distributed approximately isotropically across the sky.
379:
380: \subsection{A tidal debris origin for hypervelocity stars?}
381:
382: The anisotropic distribution and the preferred travel time discussed
383: in the preceding subsections suggest that at least part of the HVS
384: population may have a different origin from the SMBH-ejection
385: mechanism. We explore here an alternative scenario where these two
386: peculiarities are reproduced naturally. Our proposal envisions
387: high-velocity stars in the halo as a result of the tidal disruption of
388: a dwarf galaxy in the Galactic potential.
389:
390: This is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{figs:vallstr}, where we show the
391: position of ``star'' particles in a cosmological simulation of the
392: formation of a galaxy in the $\Lambda$CDM cosmogony. The simulation is
393: one in the series presented by Steinmetz and Navarro (2002) and
394: analyzed in detail in Abadi, Navarro \& Steinmetz (2006), where we
395: refer the interested reader to for further technical details.
396: Fig.~\ref{figs:vallstr} shows the position of all stars in the
397: $r$-$V_r$ plane, after rescaling the system to a virial velocity of
398: $V_{200}=220$ km/s. This scaling allows us to compare the results
399: directly with observations of the Milky Way. As in
400: Fig.~\ref{figs:vr_r}, the dotted lines indicate the escape velocity of
401: the system, and the solid curves indicate loci of constant travel
402: time.
403:
404: The data in Fig.~\ref{figs:vallstr} are shown at a snapshot chosen a
405: couple of hundred Myr after the final merger/disruption of a dwarf
406: satellite in the potential of the main galaxy. The stars of the
407: disrupted satellite are shown in red in order to distinguish them
408: from the rest of the stars in the simulated galaxy, shown in
409: black. Note that a long stream of stars formerly belonging to the
410: satellite follow closely a line of constant travel time. These are
411: stars that were stripped from the dwarf during its last pericentric
412: passage, just before its main body merged with the central galaxy. The
413: travel-time coherence in the stream (or ``tidal tail'') results from
414: the fact that all those stars were stripped from the dwarf at the same
415: time. Stars along the stream have different energies, but it is clear
416: that the disruption event has been able to push some stars into very
417: high-velocity orbits, some even exceeding the local escape speed from
418: the system.
419:
420: >From the perspective of an observer near the center of the galaxy
421: (such as an observer at the Sun in the Milky Way) the stream would be
422: seen projected onto a well-defined direction in the sky. This is shown
423: in Fig.~\ref{figs:aitoff}, which shows a projection on the sky of all
424: stars in the halo of the simulated galaxy (i.e., excluding stars with
425: distances less than $20$ kpc from the center). The points in color
426: correspond to the tidal debris from the disrupting dwarf. In
427: particular, blue dots highlight those with radial velocity exceeding
428: $400$ km/s. Note that, from the Sun's perspective, the ``tidal tail''
429: of high velocity stars stripped from the dwarf falls within a
430: well-defined region spanning a few tens of degrees in the sky.
431:
432: Figs.~\ref{figs:vallstr} and ~\ref{figs:aitoff} thus illustrate that
433: tidal disruption of a dwarf galaxy is able to push stars to speeds
434: high enough to escape the galaxy, and provides a mechanism to populate
435: the halo with high-velocity stars with kinematic and angular
436: clustering peculiarities resembling those of the HVS population
437: discussed above. This suggests that at least some stars of the HVS
438: population may have originated in the recent disruption of a dwarf
439: galaxy.
440:
441: How can this rather unorthodox proposal be validated/ruled out?
442: Fortunately, the most natural predictions of this scenario differ
443: significantly from those motivated by the SMBH-ejection mechanism. In
444: particular, a broader search for high-speed stars should confirm the
445: enhancement of HVS in the constellation of Leo. High-speed stars
446: should also exist amongst all spectral types, and should contain a
447: significant number of evolved stars and stars of low metallicity,
448: which should make up the bulk of the stellar content of the
449: dwarf. With enough statistics, a radial-velocity angular gradient
450: amongst high-speed stars might also be observed, such as that shown in
451: Fig.~\ref{figs:aitoff}. The tail should also contain returning stars
452: with negative velocity that are relatively nearby (see, e.g.,
453: Fig.~\ref{figs:vallstr}) so it would be worth checking existing
454: surveys of nearby stars for unusual velocity patterns in the same
455: general direction in the sky.
456:
457: We note that our argumentation rests on the assumption that the halo
458: of the Milky Way is relatively massive (i.e., $V_{200}\sim 220$ km/s).
459: This is suggested by semianalytic galaxy formation models and is
460: consistent with timing argument mass estimates for the Milky Way (Li
461: \& White 2007). There is evidence, however, that the virial velocity
462: of the Galactic halo might be considerably smaller ($V_{\rm vir} \la
463: 140$ km/s), as indicated, for example, by recent analysis of Milky Way
464: satellite data (Sales et al 2007b), of RAVE data for solar
465: neighborhood stars (Smith et al 2007), and of SEGUE data on halo
466: stars (Xue et al 2008). This issue remains unresolved, but should a
467: low mass for the Milky Way halo be confirmed, it would mean that a
468: large fraction of HVS would be truly unbound and would argue against
469: the tidal debris interpretation proposed here.
470:
471: Although examining further a tidal debris origin for HVS appears
472: worthwhile, it should be recognized that this proposal is not without
473: shortcomings. One of the main difficulties is to explain why a tidal
474: stream emanating from a dwarf should contain short-lived, massive
475: main-sequence stars, unless the accreting dwarf was gas-rich and
476: underwent a burst of star formation, perhaps triggered by pericentric
477: passages prior to its final disruption. Gas-rich dwarfs tend to be
478: rather massive, and careful modeling is needed in order to examine
479: whether the timescales really work out and to explain why the remains
480: of the putative dwarf have escaped detection so far. Systematic
481: radial-velocity surveys of large numbers of faint stars across vast
482: regions of the sky, such as those being planned by the GAIA satellite,
483: will undoubtedly be able to settle these questions in the foreseeable
484: future.
485:
486: \acknowledgments
487: MGA acknowledges Laura V. Sales for a careful reading and for comments
488: on an early draft of this paper. We thank the anonymous referee for a
489: constructive report and acknowledge useful discussions with Warren
490: Brown during the KITP Conference ``Back to the Galaxy II''. This
491: research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation
492: under Grant No. PHY05-51164.
493:
494:
495: %%{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.
496:
497: \begin{thebibliography}{}
498:
499: \bibitem[Abadi et al.(2003a)]{2003ApJ...591..499A} Abadi, M.~G., Navarro,
500: J.~F., Steinmetz, M., \& Eke, V.~R.\ 2003a, \apj, 591, 499
501:
502: \bibitem[Abadi et al.(2003b)]{2003ApJ...597...21A} Abadi, M.~G., Navarro,
503: J.~F., Steinmetz, M., \& Eke, V.~R.\ 2003b, \apj, 597, 21
504:
505: \bibitem[Abadi et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.365..747A} Abadi, M.~G., Navarro,
506: J.~F., \& Steinmetz, M.\ 2006, \mnras, 365, 747
507:
508: \bibitem[Bromley et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...653.1194B} Bromley, B.~C., Kenyon,
509: S.~J., Geller, M.~J., Barcikowski, E., Brown, W.~R., \& Kurtz, M.~J.\ 2006,
510: \apj, 653, 1194
511:
512: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...622L..33B} Brown, W.~R., Geller,
513: M.~J., Kenyon, S.~J., \& Kurtz, M.~J.\ 2005, \apjl, 622, L33
514:
515: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...647..303B} Brown, W.~R., Geller,
516: M.~J., Kenyon, S.~J., \& Kurtz, M.~J.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 303
517:
518: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...660..311B} Brown, W.~R., Geller,
519: M.~J., Kenyon, S.~J., Kurtz, M.~J., \& Bromley, B.~C.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 311
520:
521: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...671.1708B} Brown, W.~R., Geller,
522: M.~J., Kenyon, S.~J., Kurtz, M.~J., \& Bromley, B.~C.\ 2007, \apj, 671,
523: 1708
524:
525: \bibitem[Brown Geller \& Kenyon (2008)]{2008astro-ph} Brown, W.~R., Geller,
526: M.~J., Kenyon, S.~J.\ 2008, astro-ph/0808.2469
527:
528: \bibitem[Croton et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.365...11C} Croton, D.~J., et al.\
529: 2006, \mnras, 365, 11
530:
531: \bibitem[Heber et al.(2008)]{2008A&A...483L..21H} Heber, U., Edelmann, H., Napiwotzki, R., Altmann, M., \& Scholz, R.-D.\ 2008, \aap, 483, L21
532:
533: \bibitem[Hills(1988)]{1988Natur.331..687H} Hills, J.~G.\ 1988, \nat, 331,
534: 687
535:
536: \bibitem[Kenyon et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...680..312K} Kenyon, S.~J., Bromley,
537: B.~C., Geller, M.~J., \& Brown, W.~R.\ 2008, \apj, 680, 312
538:
539: \bibitem[Li \& White(2008)]{2008MNRAS.384.1459L} Li, Y.-S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 2008, \mnras, 384, 1459
540:
541: \bibitem[Mateo et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...675..201M} Mateo, M., Olszewski,
542: E.~W., \& Walker, M.~G.\ 2008, \apj, 675, 201
543:
544: \bibitem[Navarro et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...462..563N} Navarro, J.~F., Frenk,
545: C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1996, \apj, 462, 563
546:
547: \bibitem[Navarro et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...490..493N} Navarro, J.~F., Frenk,
548: C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1997, \apj, 490, 493
549:
550: \bibitem[Sales et al.(2007)]{2007MNRAS.379.1464S} Sales, L.~V., Navarro,
551: J.~F., Abadi, M.~G., \& Steinmetz, M.\ 2007a, \mnras, 379, 1464
552:
553: \bibitem[Sales et al.(2007)]{2007MNRAS.379.1475S} Sales, L.~V., Navarro,
554: J.~F., Abadi, M.~G., \& Steinmetz, M.\ 2007b, \mnras, 379, 1475
555:
556: \bibitem[Sesana et al.(2007)]{2007MNRAS.379L..45S} Sesana, A., Haardt, F.,
557: \& Madau, P.\ 2007, \mnras, 379, L45
558:
559: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{2007MNRAS.379..755S} Smith, M.~C., et al.\
560: 2007, \mnras, 379, 755
561:
562: \bibitem[Xue et al.(2008)]{2008arXiv0801.1232X} Xue, X.~-., et al.\ 2008,
563: ArXiv e-prints, 801, arXiv:0801.1232
564:
565: \end{thebibliography}
566:
567: \end{document}
568: