1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
23: \documentclass{emulateapj}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
36: \newcommand{\myemail}{djess01@qub.ac.uk}
37:
38: \slugcomment{}
39:
40: \shorttitle{Do all Flares have White Light Emission?}
41: \shortauthors{D.B. Jess et al.}
42:
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: \title{Do all Flares have White Light Emission?}
46:
47: \author{D. B. Jess}
48: \affil{Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7~1NN,
49: Northern Ireland, U.K.}
50: \affil{}
51: \affil{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Laboratory, Code 671, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
52: \email{djess01@qub.ac.uk}
53:
54: \and
55:
56: \author{M. Mathioudakis, P. J. Crockett and F. P. Keenan}
57: \affil{Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7~1NN,
58: Northern Ireland, U.K.}
59:
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62:
63: High-cadence, multiwavelength optical observations of a solar active region (NOAA~10969), obtained with the
64: Swedish Solar Telescope, are presented. Difference imaging of white light continuum data reveals a
65: white light brightening, 2~min in duration, linked to a co-temporal and co-spatial C2.0 flare event. The
66: flare kernel observed in the white light images has a diameter of 300~km, thus rendering it below the
67: resolution limit of most space-based telescopes. Continuum emission is present only during the impulsive stage
68: of the flare, with the effects of chromospheric emission subsequently delayed by $\approx~2$~min.
69: The localized flare emission peaks at 300\% above the quiescent flux. This large, yet tightly confined, increase in emission is
70: only resolvable due to the high spatial resolution of the Swedish Solar Telescope. An investigation of the line-of-sight
71: magnetic field derived from simultaneous {\sc{mdi}} data shows that the continuum brightening is located very close to a magnetic
72: polarity inversion line. Additionally, an H$\alpha$ flare ribbon is directed
73: along a region of rapid magnetic energy change, with the footpoints of the ribbon remaining co-spatial with
74: the observed white light brightening throughout the duration of the flare. The observed flare parameters are
75: compared with current observations and theoretical models for M- and X-class events and we determine the
76: observed white-light emission is caused by radiative back warming. We suggest that the creation of white-light emission
77: is a common feature of all solar flares.
78:
79:
80: \end{abstract}
81:
82: \keywords{Sun: activity --- Sun: evolution --- Sun: flares --- Sun: photosphere --- Sun: sunspots}
83:
84:
85:
86: \section{Introduction}
87: \label{intro}
88:
89: Solar white-light flares (WLFs) are events which are visible in the optical continuum and normally contain
90: very small flare kernels, often less than $3\arcsec$ in diameter \citep[]{Nei89}. Traditionally,
91: WLFs have been associated with more energetic solar flares, where the EUV or soft X-ray luminosity exceeds
92: a relatively large threshold \citep[]{Nei83}. Large X-class WLFs have been observed with ground- and space-based
93: telescopes in recent years \citep[]{Xu06,Iso07}, and studies of WLF energetics have indicated that the
94: energy required to power the WL emission is similar to the total energy carried by the electron beam, as
95: proposed by \cite{Met03}. In the regime of small-scale events, where the WLFs are energized by low-energy ($<20$~keV)
96: electrons, the electrons are unable to penetrate through the upper chromosphere. Therefore, for these events to
97: demonstrate WL emission, a common belief is to allow for energy transportation from the upper chromosphere to
98: the photosphere via the back-warming effect \citep[]{Mac89}.
99:
100: \cite{Mat03} and \cite{Hud06} have shown, using space-based instrumentation, that WLFs are detectable in flare
101: categories as low as C1.6. However, the mechanism describing the WL emission in such low-energy events is still
102: inconclusive and open to debate \citep[]{Fle07}. Often, a strong temporal correlation between the impulsive
103: stage of a flare and the resulting WL emission is observed \citep[]{Hud92}. Indeed, \cite{All05} demonstrate
104: dramatic increases in optical continuum emission during the impulsive stage of simulated flares. However, the
105: duration of these WL enhancements appear to be variable. \cite{Bop73} and \cite{Haw91}, through similar investigations of
106: WLFs on dMe stars, have found very different continuum emission behaviour. The former find the WL
107: enhancement ends once the impulsive stage of the flare has ceased, while the latter detect a gradual decay
108: in continuum emission, even after the end of the impulsive phase.
109:
110: Atmospheric seeing, which is an intrinsic part of all data sets
111: acquired using ground-based telescopes, has previously prevented small-scale WL brightenings from being
112: detected \citep[]{Hie82}. However, due to the high-order adaptive optics (AO) employed on large telescopes in
113: conjunction with proven image reconstruction
114: algorithms, small-scale structures can now be observed with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution.
115: In this letter, we utilize a high-cadence data set to search for flare-induced WL emission originating in the
116: solar photosphere from a very modest C2.0 flare.
117:
118:
119: \section{Observations}
120: \label{observations}
121:
122:
123: \begin{figure*}
124: \epsscale{0.85}
125: \plotone{f1.eps}
126: \caption{Simultaneous images taken in the red continuum (left) and blue continuum (right) during a C2.0
127: flare event (07:51:39~UT). The middle panel is an {\sc{mdi}} magnetogram taken at the closest time to the flare
128: (11:15:02~UT) which shows regions of rapidly changing magnetic field strength and polarity. The left panel
129: shows the extent of H$\alpha$ core-emission contamination during the flare as a result
130: of the filter sampling a large portion of the H$\alpha$ line profile. The blue continuum filter is
131: far removed from any chromospheric profiles and is therefore an accurate representation of the white-light continuum.
132: The right image, taken at the time of the flare, details the location of white-light emission
133: (blue contour) as well as a trace of the apparent polarity inversion lines (red contours) derived from {\sc{mdi}} data
134: close to the time of the flare. The scale is in heliocentric coordinates where $1\arcsec \approx 725$~km.
135: \label{f1}}
136: \end{figure*}
137:
138:
139: The data presented here are part of an observing sequence obtained on 2007 August 24, with the Swedish Solar Telescope (SST)
140: on the island of La~Palma. The optical setup allowed us to image a $68\arcsec \times 68\arcsec$ region surrounding active
141: region NOAA~10969 complete with solar rotation tracking. This active region was located at heliocentric
142: co-ordinates ($-516\arcsec$,$-179\arcsec$), or S05E33 in the solar NS-EW co-ordinate system. The Solar Optical Universal
143: Polarimeter (SOUP) was implemented to provide 2-dimensional spectral information across the H$\alpha$ line
144: profile centred at $6562.8$~{\AA}. In addition, a series of Ca~{\sc{ii}} interference filters were used to provide
145: high-cadence imaging in this portion of the optical spectrum.
146: For the purpose of this letter, only red (H$\alpha$) continuum and blue (Ca~{\sc{ii}}) continuum observations will be presented.
147:
148: The observations employed in the present analysis consist of 39000 images in each wavelength, taken with a 0.12~s cadence,
149: providing just over one hour of uninterrupted data. The acquired H$\alpha$ continuum images have a sampling of $0.068\arcsec$ per
150: pixel, to match the telescope's diffraction-limited resolution to that of the $1024 \times 1024$~pixel$^{2}$ CCD. Images of
151: the Ca~{\sc{ii}} continuum were captured using a $2048 \times 2048$~pixel$^{2}$ CCD with a sampling of $0.034\arcsec$ per
152: pixel. Although the Ca~{\sc{ii}} camera was oversampled, this was deemed necessary to keep the dimensions of the
153: field-of-view the same for both cameras. Eighth-order AO \cite[]{Sch03} were used throughout the data
154: acquisition. The acquisition time for this observing sequence was early in the
155: morning, and seeing levels were excellent with minimal variation throughout the time series. During the observing sequence a
156: C2.0 flare was observed, originating from NOAA~10969 at 07:49~UT.
157:
158: Multi-Object Multi-Frame Blind Deconvolution \citep[MOMFBD;][]{van05} image restoration was implemented to
159: remove small-scale atmospheric distortions present in the data. Sets of 80 exposures were included in the restorations, producing
160: a new effective cadence of 9~s. All reconstructed images were subjected to a Fourier co-aligning routine, in which cross-correlation
161: and squared mean absolute deviation techniques are utilized to provide sub-pixel co-alignment accuracy. In addition, full-disk
162: {\sc{mdi}} magnetogrames are used to study changes in the line-of-sight magnetic field during the observations.
163:
164: \section{Analysis and Results}
165: \label{analy}
166:
167: Due to the width of the red continuum filter (10~{\AA} centered at 6565.2~{\AA}), it includes the full
168: H$\alpha$ line profile. During the observed flare, the resulting images therefore include a significant contribution from
169: the H$\alpha$ core. Therefore, these data can be compared with the blue continuum (10~{\AA} filtergram centered at 3953.7~{\AA}),
170: whose images are not
171: contaminated by any chromospheric emission. The left panel of Figure~\ref{f1} indicates the clear-cut
172: nature of H$\alpha$ line-core contributions to the continuum filtergrams during the observed flare sequence. A
173: simultaneous blue continuum image is displayed in the right panel of Figure~\ref{f1}, yet due to the
174: bandpass of the chosen interference filter, no chromospheric contributions are visible.
175:
176: In order to pinpoint any brightenings in the blue continuum data set as a result of the flare, difference imaging
177: techniques are implemented \citep[see e.g.][]{Asc99}. By subtracting a quiescent continuum image from one undergoing
178: a flare brightening, small-scale intensity enhancements become more obvious. Figure~\ref{f2} shows the brightening present
179: in the blue continuum data set at the time of the flare. When compared to the footpoint of the H$\alpha$ flare ribbon shown in
180: Figure~\ref{f1}, it is clear that the blue continuum brightening originates from the same location in the sunspot
181: penumbra. Indeed, the location of the flare kernel is consistent with the results of a statistical study by \cite{Mat03},
182: who find a number of small-flare kernels located near the penumbra/photosphere boundary.
183: The blue continuum brightening occupies 106~pixels in an approximately circular shape, based on a $5\sigma$ detection
184: threshold above the quiescent mean. Assuming this circular geometry, a kernel diameter of $\approx 300$~km (12 pixels)
185: exists covering a total area of $\approx 70000$~km$^{2}$.
186: A flare kernel of these dimensions will therefore be undetectable by the space-based instrumentation used in the
187: \cite{Mat03} and \cite{Hud06} studies. These surveys struggled to detect C-class WLF emission, primarily due to the
188: limited spatial resolution offered by the {\sl{TRACE}} and {\sl{Yohkoh}} instruments, which is 725~km at best.
189:
190: \begin{figure}
191: \epsscale{1.0}
192: \plotone{f2.eps}
193: \caption{Difference image formed by subtracting a quiescent blue continuum image (taken at 07:50:30) from one obtained
194: during the impulsive stage of the observed white light flare (taken at 07:51:39). The outlines of the penumbra and small
195: pore (just south of the sunspot) are contoured in grey in the left panel. A strong brightening is visible in the
196: north-eastern edge of the penumbra, caused by white light emission during the flare. An expanded portion of the site
197: of the flare kernel is shown in the right panel, as denoted by the red box.
198: \label{f2}}
199: \end{figure}
200:
201: Examining the light curve of the blue continuum brightening, plotted as a solid black line in Figure~\ref{f3}, it is
202: clear that the intensity increase correlates directly with the heightened red continuum emission, plotted in the
203: upper panel. The associated peak in the blue continuum is $\approx$~300\% above the
204: quiescent value. This is significantly higher than the typical $5 - 50$\% increases detected in previous analyses of WLFs
205: \citep[e.g.][]{Lin76}. We believe that this large increase is an effect of the high spatial resolution used in this study.
206: By simply degrading the spatial resolution of the current data to that of {\sl{TRACE}} \citep[]{Han99}, we find that the peak
207: blue continuum brightening is reduced to only $\approx 1$\% above its quiescent value. This small increase in luminosity renders
208: the brightening below the values typically observed using satellite-based instruments, since a fluctuation of $\approx 1$\%
209: will be lost amongst detector noise. It is also interesting to note, from Figure~\ref{f3}, that the associated peak in the raw
210: blue continuum is only $\approx$~200\% above its quiescent value compared to the $\approx$~300\% increase found when investigating
211: the MOMFBD-reconstructed data. This difference can be attributed to the restoration of diffraction-limited resolution
212: after implementation of MOMFBD. An identical intensity threshold applied to reconstructed images will identify fewer pixels (due
213: to an improved spatial resolution), but with a higher overall intensity when compared to pre-reconstructed data. For
214: example, using a lower limit threshold of the quiescent mean plus $8\sigma$, MOMFBD-reconstructed data at the time of
215: the flare isolates only 36~pixels corresponding to the brightest regions of the flare kernel, whereas pre-reconstructed
216: continuum data extracts 57~pixels. For the 36~pixels isolated in
217: the MOMFBD-reconstructed data, the average intensity is $\approx$~300\% above the quiescent mean, whereas an average
218: increase of $\approx$~200\% is found for the 57~pixels extracted in the pre-reconstructed data set. This indicates the degree
219: of intensity ``smearing'' caused by the Earth's turbulent atmosphere, but through proven reconstruction algorithms this can
220: be removed to restore the image, and hence intensity, to its true diffraction-limited resolution.
221:
222: The detected contrast enhancement can provide some insight into the origin of the WL
223: continuum brightening. \cite{Din99} and \cite{Din03} carried out detailed non-LTE
224: calculations on solar atmospheres bombarded by electron beams and heated
225: by backwarming, with these calculations performed for several
226: heliocentric distances. Their main finding is that the highest contrast is
227: produced near the limb for a heated atmosphere that does not involve
228: non-thermal effects from the electron beam. The actual value for the measured contrast
229: is considerably higher than those predicted by the models and may seem well in excess of
230: the values predicted by current radiative transfer calculations. However, we need to
231: emphasize that since localized flare temperatures are high, it is easier for WL emission to be observed
232: in the generally cooler atmosphere of a sunspot \citep[]{Din96}. The high contrast ($\approx~300$\%) quoted
233: above has been estimated relative to quiescent penumbral intensities. If the contrast is determined with
234: respect to typical granulation values, it is reduced to 24\%. We therefore conclude that the high contrast
235: observed in this study remains consistent with current non-LTE calculations and supports heating through
236: radiative back-warming models \cite[see also][]{Liu01}.
237:
238: The initial impulsive stage of the flare is clearly visible in both the red and blue continuum plots. However, the red
239: intensity plot also reveals a signature of H$\alpha$ line-core contamination.
240: The large intensity spike after $\approx 4$~min is a result of H$\alpha$ core emission in the filtergrams
241: (see also left panel of Fig.~\ref{f1}). As expected, this form of ``chromospheric contamination'' is absent in the blue continuum
242: images. From Figure~\ref{f3}, it is clear that the true continuum brightening acts as a precursor to the influx of
243: H$\alpha$ core emission, with an associated delay time of 2~min. This is consistent with the theoretical work of
244: \cite{All05}, whose simulated flare events consist of impulsive WL brightenings followed by line-core emission, often
245: with delays of $\approx 2$~min. Furthermore, the continuum brightening lasts less than 2~min in both the red and
246: blue channels. The WLF emission is therefore short lived and only present during the impulsive stage of the
247: flare. Through examination of an M-class flare, \cite{Che06} find WLF emission during the impulsive phase, with
248: very little residual flux in the latter stages of the flare event. Therefore, the data presented here corroborate the
249: work of \cite{Bop73}, providing a good example of impulsively-generated, short-lived continuum emission. In many flare cases,
250: WL emission is compared directly to the derivative of soft X-ray flux. If the Neupert effect \citep[e.g.][]{Nin08} is valid,
251: a direct correspondence between the derivative of the soft X-ray flux and pure WL emission should be evident. Utilizing soft
252: X-ray data measured by the {\sl{GOES}} spacecraft, we determine that the Neupert effect is valid during the presented flare
253: event (Fig~\ref{f3}). However, the cadence of the {\sl{GOES}} instrument is 1~min, so timing errors associated with soft
254: X-ray investigations will be considerably larger than those based upon the continuum data presented here.
255:
256: With the location of the flare kernel identified, it is important to investigate how the magnetic-field morphology ties in with the
257: WL continuum brightening. Typically, flare kernels originate from locations of strong magnetic field gradient,
258: where the field strength changes abruptly over a very short distance \citep[]{Moo85}. Additionally, it is of
259: interest to examine where the magnetic energy is released as a result of the flare, and in what direction this release
260: takes place. A two-dimensional magnetic field gradient can be constructed from {\sc{mdi}} data obtained just prior to the
261: flare, when the magnitude of the gradient should be at its greatest \citep[]{Cui07}. Furthermore, by taking a difference
262: image (pre-flare subtracted from post-flare) of {\sc{mdi}} magnetic field information, an accurate representation of changes to the
263: line-of-sight magnetic field can be constructed. Following this form of analysis, we find the observed continuum flare kernel
264: is positioned within a region of strong magnetic field gradient and that the magnetic energy release (from {\sc{mdi}} difference
265: imaging) is directly correlated with the H$\alpha$ flare ribbon displayed in the left panel of Figure~\ref{f1}. This is consistent
266: with recent X-class flare observations \citep[]{Guo08,Jin08}, although on a much smaller scale.
267:
268: From examination of the right panel of Figure~\ref{f1}, it appears that the detected flare kernel is located
269: co-spatially with a polarity inversion line. \cite{Bel04} find that the inclination of the mean magnetic field near
270: the penumbral boundary reaches $70 - 80^{\circ}$, implying that active regions observed
271: away from disk center often show a false polarity inversion line. In such cases, the apparent neutral line
272: falls within the so-called limb-side penumbra \citep[]{Sai05}, as observed in the right panel of Figure~\ref{f1}.
273: Penumbral models involving two-component magnetic field inclinations produce two distinct neutral lines. Magnetic field
274: vectors with more horizontal components will show an apparent neutral line lying close to the umbra, whereas a more
275: vertical magnetic field component will display a polarity inversion line closer to the penumbral boundary. This dual
276: neutral-line configuration is visible in the North-East part of Figure~\ref{f1}, close to where the WL brightening originates.
277: The true neutral line will lie somewhere in between, with the precise location depending on the weightings made by each of
278: the two components \citep[]{Tit93}. We therefore conclude that the observed WL brightening originates very close to the
279: true polarity inversion line, often the case for large-scale WLFs \citep[]{Li05}.
280:
281: As detailed above, the detected flare kernel has a diameter of $\approx~300$~km, thus
282: placing this event out of the range of most current ground- and space-based observatories. As discussed
283: in \cite{Mat03} and demonstrated here, there is no reason why WLF emission should not be produced in all flares. It is
284: only the sensitivity and resolution of telescope instrumentation which limits the lower WL emission detection threshold.
285: Therefore, to probe these events and conclusively derive WL emission characteristics, observers must utilize high spatial
286: and temporal resolution data sets covering the wide energy range of solar flares.
287:
288:
289: \begin{figure}
290: \epsscale{1.0}
291: \plotone{f3.eps}
292: \caption{Intensity plots of the flare kernel evolution in the red continuum (solid red line), MOMFBD-reconstructed blue
293: continuum (solid black line), derivative of {\sl{GOES}} soft X-rays (solid green line) in arbitrary units and raw blue continuum
294: (solid blue line) averaged over 9~s to maintain consistency with the reconstructed data and to remove small-scale
295: fluctuations. Time from the start of the observing sequence (07:50:30~UT) is plotted
296: along the x-axis, while the corresponding intensities, as a percentage of the quiescent flare site, are displayed along the
297: y-axis. In each instance, the light curve is generated for the brightest flare-kernel pixels, i.e. those superceding a
298: threshold equal to the quiescent background plus $8\sigma$. Note how the continuum brightening is directly correlated
299: in all three intensity plots with the derivative of the {\sl{GOES}} soft X-ray flux, consistent with the Neupert effect.
300: The large brightening in the H$\alpha$ plot is a result of chromospheric line-core emission contaminating the filtergram.
301: \label{f3}}
302: \end{figure}
303:
304: \section{Concluding Remarks}
305: \label{conc}
306:
307: The unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution data acquired with the SST has revealed WLF emission, lasting
308: approximately 2~min, originating from a compact C2.0 flare. The localized flare emission peaks at 300\% above the
309: quiescent flux, much larger than previously observed in satellite-based data sets, simply as a consequence of the high
310: spatial resolution achieved here. Blue continuum images clearly show a bright flare kernel located close to a region of
311: magnetic polarity inversion. The WLF brightening is present during the impulsive stage
312: of the flare, with the effects of core emission subsequently delayed by $\approx~2$~min. This corroborates
313: current theoretical models \citep[e.g.][]{All05} related to the generation of optical flare emission.
314: Furthermore, the observed H$\alpha$ flare ribbon correlates spatially with the
315: location of rapidly changing magnetic energy. Additionally, the footpoint of the H$\alpha$ flare ribbon is co-spatially
316: located with the blue continuum brightening, thus establishing the observed WL emission as a flare-induced
317: phenomena, consistent with radiative back-warming models.
318:
319:
320:
321: \acknowledgments
322:
323:
324: DBJ is supported by a Northern Ireland Department for Employment and Learning studentship. DBJ additionally thanks NASA
325: Goddard Space Flight Center for a CAST studentship. FPK is grateful to AWE Aldermaston for the award of a William Penney
326: Fellowship. The Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma by the Institute for Solar Physics of
327: the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrof\'{i}sica
328: de Canarias. These observations have been funded by the Optical Infrared Coordination network (OPTICON), a major international
329: collaboration supported by the Research Infrastructures Programme of the European Commissions Sixth Framework Programme.
330:
331: \begin{thebibliography}{}
332: \bibitem[Allred et~al.(2005)]{All05}
333: Allred, J.~C., Hawley, S.~L., Abbett, W.~P., \& Carlsson, M., 2005, \apj, 630, 573
334: \bibitem[Aschwanden et~al.(1999)]{Asc99}
335: Aschwanden, M.~J., Fletcher, L., Schrijver, C.~J., \& Alexander, D., 1999, \apj, 520, 880
336: \bibitem[Bellot Rubio et~al.(2004)]{Bel04}
337: Bellot Rubio, L.~R., Balthasar, H., \& Collados, M., 2004, \aap, 427, 319
338: \bibitem[Bopp \& Moffett(1973)]{Bop73}
339: Bopp, B.~W., \& Moffett, T.~J., 1973, \apj, 185, 239
340: \bibitem[Chen \& Ding(2006)]{Che06}
341: Chen, Q.~R., \& Ding, M.~D., 2006, \apj, 641, 1217
342: \bibitem[Cui et~al.(2007)]{Cui07}
343: Cui, Y., Li, R., Wang, H., \& He, H., 2007, \solphys, 242, 1
344: \bibitem[Ding \& Fang(1996)]{Din96}
345: Ding, M.~D., \& Fang, C., 1996, \aap, 314, 643
346: \bibitem[Ding et al.(1999)]{Din99}
347: Ding, M.~D., Fang, C., \& Yun, H.~S., 1999, \apj, 512, 454
348: \bibitem[Ding et~al.(2003)]{Din03}
349: Ding, M.~D., Liu, Y., Yeh, C.-T., \& Li, J.~P., 2003, \aap, 403, 1151
350: \bibitem[Fletcher et al.(2007)]{Fle07}
351: Fletcher, L., Hannah, I.~G., Hudson, H.~S., \& Metcalf, T.~R., 2007, \apj, 656, 1187
352: \bibitem[Guo et~al.(2008)]{Guo08}
353: Guo, Y., Ding, M.~D., Wiegelmann, T., \& Li, H., 2008, \apj, 679, 1629
354: \bibitem[Handy et~al.(1999)]{Han99}
355: Handy, B.~N., et~al., 1999, \solphys, 187, 229
356: \bibitem[Hawley \& Pettersen(1991)]{Haw91}
357: Hawley, S.~L., \& Pettersen, B.~R., 1991, \apj, 378, 725
358: \bibitem[Hiei(1982)]{Hie82}
359: Hiei, E., 1982, \solphys, 80, 113
360: \bibitem[Hudson et al.(1992)]{Hud92}
361: Hudson, H.~S., Acton, L.~W., Hirayama, T., \& Uchida, Y., 1992, \pasj, 44, L77
362: \bibitem[Hudson et al.(2006)]{Hud06}
363: Hudson, H.~S., Wolfson, C.~J., \& Metcalf, T.~R., 2006, \solphys, 234, 79
364: \bibitem[Isobe et~al.(2007)]{Iso07}
365: Isobe, H., et al., 2007, \pasj, 59, 807
366: \bibitem[Jing et~al.(2008)]{Jin08}
367: Jing, J., Chae, J., \& Wang, H., 2008, \apjl, 672, L73
368: \bibitem[Li et~al.(2005)]{Li05}
369: Li, J.~P., Ding, M.~D., \& Liu, Y., 2005, \solphys, 229, 115
370: \bibitem[Lin \& Hudson(1976)]{Lin76}
371: Lin, R. P., \& Hudson, H. S., 1976, \solphys, 50, 153
372: \bibitem[Liu et~al.(2001)]{Liu01}
373: Liu, Y., Ding, M.~D., \& Fang, C., 2001, \apjl, 563, L169
374: \bibitem[Machado et al.(1989)]{Mac89}
375: Machado, M.~E., Emslie, A.~G., \& Avrett, E.~H., 1989, \solphys, 124, 303
376: \bibitem[Matthews et~al.(2003)]{Mat03}
377: Matthews, S.~A., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., Hudson, H.~S., \& Nitta, N.~V., 2003, \aap, 409, 1107
378: \bibitem[Metcalf et al.(2003)]{Met03}
379: Metcalf, T.~R., Alexander, D., Hudson, H.~S., \& Longcope, D.~W., 2003, \apj, 595, 483
380: \bibitem[Moore \& Rabin(1985)]{Moo85}
381: Moore, R., \& Rabin, D. M., 1985, \araa, 23, 239
382: \bibitem[Neidig \& Cliver(1983)]{Nei83}
383: Neidig, D.~F., \& Cliver, E.~W., 1983, \solphys, 88, 275
384: \bibitem[Neidig(1989)]{Nei89}
385: Neidig, D.~F., 1989, \solphys, 121, 261
386: \bibitem[Ning(2008)]{Nin08}
387: Ning, Z., 2008, \solphys, 248, 99
388: \bibitem[Sainz Dalda \& Mart{\'{\i}}nez Pillet(2005)]{Sai05}
389: Sainz Dalda, A., \& Mart{\'{\i}}nez Pillet, V., 2005, \apj, 632, 1176
390: \bibitem[Scharmer et~al.(2003)]{Sch03}
391: Scharmer, G.~B., Dettori, P.~M., Lofdahl, M.~G., \& Shand, M., 2003, \procspie, 4853, 370
392: \bibitem[Title et~al.(1993)]{Tit93}
393: Title, A.~M., Frank, Z.~A., Shine, R.~A., Tarbell, T.~D., Topka, K.~P., Scharmer, G., \& Schmidt, W., 1993, \apj, 403, 780
394: \bibitem[van Noort et~al.(2005)]{van05}
395: van Noort, M., Rouppe van der Voort, L., L{\"{o}}fdahl, M.~G., 2005, \solphys, 228, 191
396: \bibitem[Xu et~al.(2006)]{Xu06}
397: Xu, Y., Cao, W., Liu, C., Yang, G., Jing, J., Denker, C., Emslie, A.~G., \& Wang, H., 2006, \apj, 641, 1210
398: \end{thebibliography}
399:
400: %\begin{figure}
401: %\epsscale{0.9}
402: %\plotone{f4.eps}
403: %\caption{Blue continuum image, taken at the time of the flare, detailing the location of white-light emission
404: %(blue contour), regions of steep pre-flare magnetic-field gradient (red contours) and locations where magnetic energy
405: %is released as a result of the flare (green contours).
406: %\label{f4}}
407: %\end{figure}
408:
409:
410: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
411: %% for an mpeg animation.
412:
413: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
414: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
415: %% User Guide for details.
416: %%
417: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
418: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
419: %% after every seventh one.
420:
421: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
422: %% each one.
423:
424: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
425: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
426: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
427: %%
428:
429: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
430: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
431:
432: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
433: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
434: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
435: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
436: %% reduced font size.
437: %%
438: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
439: %% inside the \tablecaption.
440:
441: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
442: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
443: %% edition.
444:
445: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
446: %% \tableline, not \hline.
447: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
448: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
449:
450: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
451: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
452: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
453: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
454: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
455: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
456: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
457: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
458:
459: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
460: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
461:
462: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
463: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
464: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
465: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
466: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
467: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
468: %% to include it in this document.)
469:
470: %% \input{table}
471:
472: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
473: %% that appears after it.
474:
475: \end{document}
476:
477: %%
478: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
479: