1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[aas2pp4]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5: %\documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
6: %\usepackage{natbib}
7: %\documentclass[12pt]{aastex}
8: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
9: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
10: %
11: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
12: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
13: %
14: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
15: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
16: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
17: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
18: \newcommand{\sol}{M_{\sun}}
19: \newcommand{\siml}{\la}
20: \newcommand{\simg}{\ga}
21: \newcommand{\lsim}{\la}
22: \newcommand{\gsim}{\ga}
23: \newcommand{\psim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-1.0ex}{$~\stackrel{\textstyle propto}
24: {\textstyle \sim}~$ }}}
25: \newcommand{\bfxi}{\mbox{\boldmath{$\xi$}}}
26: \newcommand{\bfeta}{\mbox{\boldmath{$\eta$}}}
27: \newcommand{\lmk}{\left(}
28: \newcommand{\rmk}{\right)}
29: \newcommand{\lnk}{\left\{ }
30: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
31: \newcommand{\rnk}{\right\} }
32: \newcommand{\lkk}{\left[}
33: \newcommand{\rkk}{\right]}
34: \newcommand{\lla}{\left\langle}
35: \newcommand{\p}{\partial}
36: \newcommand{\rra}{\right\rangle}
37: %\newcommand{\tot}{{\rm tot}}
38: %\newcommand{\obs}{{\rm obs}}
39: %\newcommand{\sub}{{\rm sub}}
40: %\newcommand{\dep}{{\rm dep}}
41: \newcommand{\bm}[1]{\mbox{{\boldmath $#1$}}}
42:
43: \def\N{\nonumber}
44: \def\f{\frac}
45: \def\max{{\rm max}}
46: \def\min{{\rm min}}
47: \def\j{{\scriptscriptstyle (j)}}
48: \def\sj{{\scriptscriptstyle (j)}}
49: \def\tot{{{\rm tot}}}
50: \def\sub{{{\rm sub}}}
51: \def\obs{{{\rm obs}}}
52: \def\dep{{{\rm dep}}}
53: \def\dur{{{\rm dur}}}
54:
55: \def\hess{{{HESS~J1745$-$303~}}}
56:
57:
58: \slugcomment{submitted to ApJ}
59: %
60: \shorttitle{HESS~J1745$-$303 with {\it Suzaku}}
61: \shortauthors{Bamba et al.}
62: \begin{document}
63:
64: % \title{{\it Suzaku} Observations of TeV Gamma-ray Source
65: % HESS~J1745$-$303}
66:
67: \title{X-ray Observation of Very High Energy Gamma-ray Source,
68: HESS~J1745$-$303, with {\it Suzaku}}
69:
70: %
71: \author{
72: Aya~Bamba\altaffilmark{1},
73: Ryo~Yamazaki\altaffilmark{2},
74: Kazunori~Kohri\altaffilmark{3},
75: Hironori~Matsumoto\altaffilmark{4},
76: Stefan~Wagner\altaffilmark{5},
77: Gerd P\"{u}hlhofer\altaffilmark{5},
78: Karl Kosack\altaffilmark{6}
79: }
80:
81: \altaffiltext{1}{
82: ISAS/JAXA Department of High Energy Astrophysics
83: 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara,
84: Kanagawa 229-8510, JAPAN;
85: bamba@astro.isas.jaxa.jp
86: }
87:
88: \altaffiltext{2}{
89: Department of Physical Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima,
90: Hiroshima 739-8526%, Japan;
91: }
92:
93: \altaffiltext{3}{
94: Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1~4YB, UK%;
95: }
96:
97: \altaffiltext{4}{
98: Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan%;
99: }
100:
101: \altaffiltext{5}{
102: Landessternwarte, Heidelberg, K\"{o}nigstuhl 12, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany%;
103: }
104:
105: \altaffiltext{5}{
106: Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany}
107:
108:
109: \begin{abstract}
110: {\it Suzaku} observations of a TeV unidentified (unID) source,
111: HESS~J1745$-$303, are presented.
112: %
113: A possible excess of neutral iron line emission is discovered, and
114: is likely associated with
115: the main part of HESS~J1745$-$303, named ``region~A''.
116: It may be an X-ray reflection nebula where the X-rays from
117: previous Galactic Center (GC) activity are reflected by
118: a molecular cloud.
119: %
120: This result further strengthens
121: the assumption that the molecular cloud which is
122: spatially coincident with region A of HESS~J1745$-$303 is located
123: in the GC region.
124: %
125: The TeV emission from molecular clouds is reminiscent of
126: the diffuse TeV gamma-rays from the GC giant molecular clouds,
127: and it could have the same emission mechanism.
128: %
129: %
130: With deep exposure mapping observations by {\it Suzaku},
131: a tight upper-limit on the 2--10~keV continuum
132: diffuse emission from region A is obtained,
133: as $2.1\times 10^{-13}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$.
134: %
135: The flux ratio between 1--10~TeV and 2--10~keV is larger than 4.
136: Possible scenarios to reproduce wide-band spectra from keV to TeV
137: are examined.
138: %
139: %
140: Thermal X-rays from nearby two old supernova remnants,
141: G359.0$-$0.9 and G359.1$-$0.5, are detected,
142: and their emission properties
143: are well determined in the present study
144: with deep exposure.
145: \end{abstract}
146:
147: \keywords{
148: acceleration of particles ---
149: shock waves ---
150: supernova remnants ---
151: X-rays: individual (HESS~J1745$-$303, G359.0$-$0.9, G359.1$-$0.5)}
152: %\pacs{PACS numbers: }
153: %\vfill\eject
154:
155: %\baselineskip 8mm
156:
157:
158:
159: \section{Introduction}
160: \label{sec:intro}
161:
162: Very high-energy gamma-rays with energies around TeV
163: are powerful tools to investigate the cosmic accelerators.
164: They arise from either leptonic
165: (cosmic microwave background (CMB) or other soft seed photons
166: up-scattered by accelerated electrons and their bremsstrahlung emission)
167: or hadronic (the
168: decay of neutral pions, arising from the collision of high energy
169: protons and interstellar matter) processes.
170: %
171: The strong evidence for electron acceleration up to more than
172: $\sim10$~TeV has been obtained with X-ray observations
173: of, for example, young supernova remnants (SNRs) that are
174: believed to be the most probable cosmic-ray accelerators in our Galaxy
175: \citep[e.g.,][]{koyama1995,koyama1997,
176: bamba2003a,bamba2003b,bamba2005a,bamba2005b}.
177: %
178: On the other hand, we have not yet derived firm evidence for
179: proton acceleration; although TeV gamma-rays have
180: been detected by several of young SNRs, such as
181: RX~J1713.7$-$3946 \citep{enomoto2002,aharonian2004}
182: and RX~J0852.0$-$4622 \citep{katagiri2005,aharonian2005c},
183: their origin is not yet fully understood
184: \citep[e.g,][]{pannuti2003,lazendic2004,ellison2001,bamba2005b,
185: uchiyama2005,uchiyama2007,yamazaki2008}.
186:
187: Recently, a survey of the inner part of our Galaxy
188: has revealed several new TeV $\gamma$-ray sources
189: \citep{aharonian2002,aharonian2005,aharonian2005b,aharonian2006}.
190: %
191: Some of them have no counterpart in the X-ray regime.
192: Then, the flux ratio, defined by
193: \[
194: R_{\rm TeV/X}=\f{F_\gamma(1-10~{\rm TeV})}{F_X(2-10~{\rm keV})}~~,
195: \]
196: is more than $\sim10$ \citep{yamazaki2006,bamba2007a,matsumoto2007}.
197: %
198: On the other hand, young supernova remnants (SNRs) and pulsar wind nebulae
199: have $R_{\rm TeV/X}$ less than $\sim2$.
200: %
201: It is interesting that
202: the TeV unidentified sources with large $R_{\rm TeV/X}$
203: may show evidence for
204: hadron acceleration because the leptonic inverse-Compton model requires
205: an unusually small magnetic field strength ($\ll1~\mu$G).
206: So far, several TeV gamma-ray objects have been followed up
207: in X-rays, which provide us a lot of hint
208: on the emission process of TeV gamma-rays
209: \citep[e.g.,][]{tian2007,bamba2007a,matsumoto2007,matsumoto2008}.
210:
211:
212: \hess is one of such TeV unidentified sources.
213: It was discovered by the Galactic plane survey of
214: High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.)
215: \citep{aharonian2006}, and subsequent follow-up observation
216: was performed recently \citep{aharonian2008}.
217: %
218: The observed flux from the whole object is estimated as
219: $F_\gamma(1-10~{\rm TeV})\sim5.2\times10^{-12}$~erg~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$
220: %
221: The low Galactic latitude and the fact that the source is spatially
222: extended strongly argues for a Galactic origin of \hess.
223: %
224: \hess mainly consists of three bright emission regions
225: \citep[named region~A, B, and C;][]{aharonian2008},
226: and the angular size of the whole object is
227: $\sim0.3^\circ\times0.5^\circ$,
228: which is one of the largest TeV unID sources.
229: %
230: \hess has direct positional coincidence with an unidentified EGRET
231: source \citep[3EG~J1744$-$3011,][]{hartman1999}, which implies
232: proton acceleration because the leptonic IC model for the TeV
233: emission usually predict very dim GeV $\gamma$-rays.
234: \citet{aharonian2008} suggested that
235: a molecular cloud coincides with the TeV emitting region,
236: although the precise distance to the molecular cloud is unknown.
237: This region was also observed with {\it XMM-Newton},
238: which gives an upper-limit on the diffuse X-ray emission,
239: $4.5\times10^{-13}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$,
240: from the region~A which is the main part of \hess and
241: has a TeV energy flux of
242: $8.0\times10^{-13}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.
243: %
244: Then, the TeV-to-X-ray flux ratio, $R_{\rm TeV/X}$, is larger
245: than $\sim2$.
246:
247: In this paper, we report on the deep mapping observations of \hess
248: with X-ray satellite {\it Suzaku} \citep{mitsuda2007}.
249: %
250: Section~\ref{sec:obs} introduces the observations. Our analysis
251: is explained in \S~\ref{sec:analysis}, and we
252: discuss our findings in \S~\ref{sec:discuss}.
253:
254: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
255: \label{sec:obs}
256:
257: We carried out mosaic observations of HESS~J1745$-$303
258: with {\it Suzaku}.
259: The mapping used four pointings as listed in Table~\ref{tab:obslog}.
260: {\it Suzaku} has two active instruments,
261: four X-ray Imaging Spectrometers \citep[XIS0--XIS3;][]{koyama2007}
262: each at the focus of an X-Ray Telescope \citep[XRTs][]{serlemitsos2007}
263: and a separate Hard X-ray Detector \citep[HXD;][]{takahashi2007}.
264: All four spectrometers were active in the first observation,
265: whereas only three could be used subsequently
266: due to a problem with XIS~2.
267: XIS1 is a back-illuminated (BI) CCD,
268: whereas the others are front-illuminated (FI).
269: The XIS was operated
270: in the normal full-frame clocking mode.
271: The spaced-row charge injection \citep{nakajima2008}
272: was used in the later three observations (Table~\ref{tab:obslog}).
273: The data reduction and analysis were made
274: using HEADAS software version 6.4.,
275: version 2.2.7.18 of the processed data,
276: and XSPEC version 11.3.2.
277: We filtered out data obtained during passages through the
278: South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA),
279: with elevation angle to the Earth's limb below 5$^\circ$,
280: or with elevation angle to the bright Earth's limb below 13$^\circ$.
281: in order to avoid the contamination of emission from the bright Earth.
282: In this paper, we concentrate on the XIS data analysis,
283: because HESS~J1745$-$303 is located near the Galactic plane,
284: and the HXD data is
285: contaminated by the Galactic ridge X-ray emission
286: \citep[GRXE; c.f.,][]{koyama1989,yuasa2007}
287: and bright point sources,
288: which are quite difficult to remove correctly.
289:
290: \section{Results}
291: \label{sec:analysis}
292:
293: \subsection{Images}
294:
295: We made mosaic intensity maps in the 0.5--2.0~keV,
296: 2.0--8.0~keV, and 6.3--6.5~keV bands
297: of the four pointing observations as described in
298: the following.
299:
300: The raw mosaic images were made in each energy band.
301: In order to estimate the continuum emission in the narrow iron intensity band,
302: we derived the spectrum over the entire region
303: and fitted 3--8~keV photons
304: with a power-law plus narrow Gaussians
305: which represent emission lines.
306: The 2--3~keV band photons were not used in order to avoid the influence of
307: soft discrete emission (two SNRs; described later).
308: The best-fit photon index was $\sim 1--1.3$.
309: We compared the count rates of the power-law component
310: in the 2.0--8.0~keV and 6.3--6.5~keV bands,
311: the latter is 1.15\% of the former,
312: and normalized the 2.0--8.0~keV image with the ratio.
313: The normalized continuum image was subtracted from the
314: 6.3--6.5~keV image, which is the ``neutral iron intensity image''.
315:
316: The non-X-ray background (NXB) image
317: for each energy band was generated from the NXB database
318: provided by the Suzaku team.
319: The NXB images were chosen to make the average geomagnetic cu-off rigidity
320: same as that of the observation,
321: and extracted from the same region in the detector.
322: In this procedure,
323: {\tt xisnxbgen} package developed by \citet{tawa2008} was used.
324: After subtracting NXB images from the raw images,
325: we combined the NXB-subtracted images using {\tt ximage} package.
326:
327: The exposure maps were made
328: for 0.5--2.0 and 2.0--8.0~keV bands
329: with the {\tt xissim} package \citep{ishisaki2007}.
330: For the neutral iron line map,
331: the 2.0--8.0~keV energy range was used.
332: The exposure maps were also combined.
333: Dividing the NXB-subtracted images with the exposure maps,
334: we made the mosaic images
335: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:images}.
336: Our observations cover all of the region~A of \hess.
337:
338: On the eastern edge of \hess,
339: we can see some diffuse components in the soft X-ray band,
340: (see Figure~\ref{fig:images}(a)).
341: They coincide with two radio SNRs,
342: G359.0$-$0.9 and G359.1$-$0.5
343: \citep{larosa2000,bamba2000}.
344: Some point sources are also seen,
345: as reported by \citet{aharonian2008}.
346: However, no excess was found within the \hess region.
347: The hard band image (Figure~\ref{fig:images}b) also shows no diffuse source.
348: In the neutral iron line map (Figure~\ref{fig:images}c), on the other hand,
349: some excess is shown around region~A.
350:
351: \subsection{Spectra}
352:
353: \subsubsection{The X-ray spectrum of the region~A}
354:
355: We selected source and background regions (``Src'' and ``Bgd1--3'' hereafter)
356: as shown with solid lines in Figure~\ref{fig:regions},
357: to make the upper-limit of the X-ray emission
358: of HESS~J1745$-$303 region~A.
359: The background regions were divided to 3 regions
360: (Bgd1--3 in Figure~\ref{fig:regions}).
361: Two types of background should be considered,
362: NXB and the GRXE
363: \citep[for example]{yamauchi1993}.
364: The latter has positional dependence along the Galactic longitude.
365: We thus used Bgd1 and 2 regions
366: to make the average longitude of each region similar.
367: %
368: The 3--8~keV count rates of XIS~0
369: are $(6.0\pm 0.05)\times 10^{-4}$
370: and $(7.0\pm 0.1)\times 10^{-4}$~cnts~s$^{-1}$arcmin$^{-2}$
371: for the source and the background regions, respectively.
372: For making the upper-limit of the X-ray flux
373: in the source region,
374: the response and auxiliary files were constructed using
375: {\tt xisrmfgen} and {\tt xissimarfgen} \citep{ishisaki2007}
376: in the HEADAS package,
377: with the assumption that
378: the emission comes from the source region uniformly.
379: The photons from the background regions were subtracted
380: from the source spectra.
381: We fit the background-subtracted spectra
382: in the 2--10~keV band
383: with a power-law model with fixed $\Gamma = 2$,
384: which is significantly harder value than
385: the TeV emission \citep{aharonian2008},
386: and to derive the 90\% upper-limit of
387: 2.1$\times 10^{-13}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.
388: The larger photon indices were also used to estimate
389: the systematic errors of the upper-limit
390: and derived the smaller value.
391:
392: We also derived the surface brightness of the neutral iron emission line
393: in each region.
394: Only the FI CCD data were used since the BI CCD has larger background
395: in the hard X-ray band.
396: We fitted 5--8~keV spectra with a power-law component,
397: narrow Gaussians for neutral, He-like, and H-like iron lines,
398: and for Mn-K, and Ni-K lines as NXB emission.
399: %
400: The best-fit models and parameters of the neutral and He-like iron lines
401: in each region are
402: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:spectra} and Table~\ref{tab:iron}.
403: The surface brightness of He-like iron is almost constant
404: between these regions.
405: We added all background regions to increase statistics
406: and derived the average values of line intensity.
407: After the procedure,
408: the neutral iron line is significantly stronger in the source region
409: than those in background regions,
410: whereas the He-like iron line is compatible in both regions.
411: The total excess of the line in these regions
412: is $1.1\times 10^{-5}$~ph~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$.
413:
414: \subsubsection{G359.0$-$0.9 and G359.1$-$0.5}
415:
416: For the spectral analysis of the two SNRs,
417: we used the regions with dashed-lines in Figure~\ref{fig:regions}.
418: Background photons were accumulated from the source-free regions
419: in the same observation.
420: The background-subtracted spectra are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:snrs}.
421: The spectra are rather soft
422: and there are emission lines from highly ionized Si and S
423: in both spectra.
424: These facts indicate that these emissions are thermal,
425: which is consistent with the ASCA results \citep{bamba2000}.
426: We then fitted these spectra
427: with non-equilibrium ionization collisional plasma model
428: \citep[{\tt nei} in XSPEC;][]{borkowski2001}
429: with absorption.
430: For the absorption model,
431: we used the cross sections of
432: \citet{morrison1983} and assumed solar abundances \citep{anders1989}.
433: The XIS team reported the gain uncertainty of a few eV
434: \citep[c.f.,][]{koyama2007},
435: thus the gain is allowed to vary within a few percent separately.
436: \citet{bamba2000} reported that
437: the spectrum of G359.1$-$0.5 was well described with
438: the two-temperature model
439: with high-S abundance in the higher temperature component.
440: So we have added another thermal component in the present analysis.
441: We treated some abundances in Table~\ref{tab:snrs} as free parameters
442: and fixed the others at 1 solar.
443: The best-fit models and parameters are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:snrs}
444: and Table~\ref{tab:snrs}.
445:
446: The results are consistent with the {\it ASCA} results,
447: but the abundance and the ionization time scale are better determined
448: thanks to the better energy resolution of XIS.
449: We expect a difference in flux,
450: since our observations do not cover the entire remnants.
451: The absorption column of G359.0$-$0.9 is smaller than
452: sources in the Galactic center (GC), thus
453: this SNR is likely a foreground source.
454: On the other hand, G359.1$-$0.5 shows a very large
455: absorption column, which implies
456: that it is in the GC region.
457:
458: \section{Discussion}
459: \label{sec:discuss}
460:
461:
462: \subsection{The neutral iron line and molecular clouds}
463:
464: \citet{aharonian2008} reported that HESS~J1745$-$303 region~A
465: had spatial coincidence with a molecular cloud \citep{bitran1997}.
466: We suggest that the TeV emission is also associated with
467: the neutral iron line emission,
468: although we cannot unambiguously conclude that due to the poor statistics.
469: The positional coincidence of the neutral iron line and the molecular cloud
470: reminds us of reflected
471: X-rays originating in the past activity in the GC
472: \citep[e.g.,][]{inui2008}.
473: %
474: If the molecular cloud is optically thin,
475: the line emission intensity, $I_{\rm Fe}$,
476: should be proportional to the mass of the molecular cloud
477: and the viewing angle from the GC, so that
478: \[
479: I_{\rm Fe} \propto
480: \frac{M_{\rm MC}}{(D\theta)^2} \ \ ,
481: \]
482: where $M_{\rm MC}$, $\theta$, and $D$ are the mass of the molecular cloud,
483: the angular size of the molecular cloud viewed from the GC,
484: and the angular separation between the cloud and the GC,
485: respectively \citep{nobukawa2008}.
486: We compared the masses of the molecular cloud
487: coincident with source~A of HESS~J1745$-$303
488: and the most famous X-ray reflection nebula,
489: Sgr~B2 \citep{murakami2001}.
490: The latter shows neutral iron line emission with an intensity of
491: $5.6\times 10^{-5}$~ph~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$.
492: Table~\ref{tab:MC} shows the characteristics of these molecular clouds.
493: For the molecular cloud at region~A of HESS~J1745$-$303, we obtain
494: $I_{\rm Fe}\sim7\times10^{-6}$~ph~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$
495: on the assumption of time-independent ejected X-ray luminosity at the GC.
496: This estimated value is compatible with the observed one,
497: $1.1\times 10^{-5}$~ph~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$.
498: Therefore, we conclude that this molecular cloud is a new example of
499: X-ray reflection nebula
500: and that the molecular cloud is located in the GC region.
501: We believe that hard X-ray observations are the strong tools
502: to judge whether the molecular clouds are in the GC region or not.
503:
504: \subsection{The upper-limit of the nonthermal Component of X-rays and
505: Possible Emission Mechanism of TeV Gamma-rays}
506:
507: We derive a 90\% X-ray flux upper-limit for the HESS~J1745$-$303 region~A
508: in the 2--10~keV band of $2.1\times 10^{-13}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$,
509: which is tighter than the {\it XMM} results \citep{aharonian2008}.
510: The flux ratio between 2--10~keV and 1--10~TeV,
511: $R_{\rm TeV/X}$, is larger than 4,
512: which could be larger than
513: TeV emitting shell-type SNRs and PWNe
514: \citep{bamba2007a,matsumoto2007,yamazaki2006}.
515: %
516:
517: In the following,
518: we discuss specific models of the emission mechanism
519: to reproduce the observed results of X-ray and TeV gamma-rays for
520: the region A of HESS~J1745$-$303.
521: %
522: In particular, we focus on whether or not
523: the upper limit of nonthermal X-ray emission,
524: which is derived in the present work,
525: gives us significant constraints on the theoretical models.
526: %
527: We consider hadronic and leptonic models separately.
528: %
529: Since \hess is near the Galactic center,
530: the GeV emission may be overlaid with the intense Galactic diffuse
531: emission and uncertainty is very large. Hence we neglect it here
532: for simplicity, and take into account
533: only X-ray and TeV gamma-ray bands.
534: %
535:
536:
537:
538: \subsubsection{Hadronic gamma-ray emission model}
539: \label{sec:hadronic}
540:
541: In hadronic models,
542: TeV gamma-rays originate from accelerated protons.
543: %
544: It is assumed that the proton energy spectrum has a form of
545: $E^{-p}\exp(-E/E_{\rm max,p})$ with an index, $p$, and
546: cut-off energy, $E_{\rm max, p}$.
547: Here, the value of $p$ is highly uncertain,
548: so we adopt $p=2$ as a typical value.
549: %
550: The high-energy protons collide with target protons in the
551: ISM or molecular cloud, generating neutral ($\pi^0$)
552: and charged ($\pi^{\pm}$) pions.
553: The former decays into gamma rays, while the decay
554: of the latter causes secondary electrons and positrons
555: producing bremsstrahlung, inverse Compton,
556: and synchrotron emission.
557:
558: Although it may be likely that the region~A
559: of \hess is associated with a %%MC
560: molecular cloud and target matter density
561: $n$ is high, the low-$n$ case cannot be, at present, excluded.
562: So, we consider two cases,
563: in which $n=1$~cm$^{-3}$ and $n=5\times10^3$~cm$^{-3}$,
564: independently.
565: %
566: The value of $n$ in the latter case is adopted according to
567: \citet{aharonian2008}.
568: %
569: Generally speaking, in the former, bremsstrahlung emission
570: is not dominant in the TeV gamma-ray band, while it may often be dominant
571: in the latter.
572:
573:
574: At first we consider the case $n=1$~cm$^{-3}$
575: (see the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}).
576: %
577: Since the value of $n$ is small, emissions from
578: secondary electrons is dim in the gamma-ray band, so that
579: the $\pi^0$-decay emission dominates.
580: %
581: We find that as long as $n\lesssim10^2$~cm$^{-3}$,
582: the bremsstrahlung emission of secondary electrons and
583: positrons is not dominant in the gamma-ray band.
584: %
585: We fix $E_{\rm max, p}=18$~TeV in order to fit the observed
586: spectral shape in the TeV energy range.
587: Then, as can be seen in the left panel of
588: Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum},
589: derived upper limit on nonthermal X-rays are explained
590: if the magnetic field $B\lesssim100$~mG.
591: This is rather loose limit on the magnetic field.
592: Because of the small value of $E_{\rm max, p}$,
593: the maximum energy of secondary electrons and positrons
594: is small, $\sim1$~TeV, so that
595: the large value of $B$ is necessary for bright
596: synchrotron X-rays emitted by them.
597: This comes from the fact that
598: the characteristic frequency
599: of electron/positron synchrotron radiation is given by
600: \[
601: h\nu_{\rm syn}\sim6~{\rm keV}
602: \left(\frac{B}{50~{\rm mG}}\right)
603: \left(\frac{E_{{\rm e}^\pm}}{1~{\rm TeV}}\right)^2~~,
604: \]
605: where $E_{{\rm e}^\pm}$ is the energy of secondary
606: electrons or positrons.
607: %
608: For assumed distance of 8.5~kpc,
609: the total energy of accelerated protons is estimated as
610: $\sim6\times10^{50}$~erg.
611:
612:
613: Next we consider the case $n=5\times10^3$~cm$^{-3}$
614: (see the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}).
615: %
616: If the magnetic field strength is small
617: ($B\lesssim10^2~\mu$G),
618: the bremsstrahlung emission from secondary
619: electrons and positrons is
620: comparable to the $\pi^0$-decay gamma-ray emission.
621: However, in the strong field cases,
622: the synchrotron cooling effect significantly suppresses
623: the number of $e^\pm$, resulting small contribution
624: to the gamma-rays.
625: On the other hand, the synchrotron radiation of
626: secondary $e^\pm$ is brighter for larger $B$.
627: Similar to the case of $n=1$~cm$^{-3}$,
628: the magnetic field is no larger than $\sim100$~mG.
629: %
630: %
631: \citet{robinson96} derived the relatively high
632: magnetic field value, 0.2--0.6~mG, which is measured
633: from the Zeeman splitting of maser lines.
634: The molecular cloud associated with the region~A
635: might have the similar magnetic field strength,
636: and then, $\sim$mG field and the number density
637: of the cloud $n\sim5\times10^3$~cm$^{-3}$
638: is roughly consistent
639: with the previous result on other molecular
640: clouds \citep{crutcher91}.
641: %
642: As long as the field strength in the cloud is
643: $B\sim$~mG or less, the expected flux of secondary synchrotron
644: radiation in the X-ray band is rather small and below
645: the observed upper limit.
646: %
647: For assumed distance of 8.5~kpc,
648: the total energy of accelerated protons is estimated as
649: $\sim1.2\times10^{47}$~erg.
650: Then, the mean energy density of high-energy protons
651: at region~A of \hess is calculated as $\sim6.0$~eV~cm$^{-3}$
652: if we assume the volume of the molecular cloud of
653: $1.2\times10^{58}$~cm$^3$ \citep{aharonian2008},
654:
655:
656: \subsubsection{Leptonic gamma-ray emission model}
657:
658: In the leptonic model, TeV gamma-rays
659: arise via bremsstrahlung and inverse Compton process
660: (with CMB seed photons)
661: emissions of primarily accelerated electrons, and
662: X-rays arise from their synchrotron radiation.
663: %
664: Again we assume that the electron energy spectrum
665: has a form of
666: $E^{-p}\exp(-E/E_{\rm max,e})$ with an fixed index, $p=2.0$, and the
667: cut-off energy, $E_{\rm max, e}$.
668: %
669: As well as the hadronic model, both low- and high-$n$ cases
670: are discussed.
671:
672:
673: First we consider the case $n=0.1$~cm$^{-3}$
674: (see the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum2}).
675: %
676: In this case, the TeV gamma-ray band is dominated by the
677: IC emission.
678: %
679: In order to explain the observed hard TeV spectrum,
680: we adopt $E_{\rm max, e}=10$~TeV.
681: %
682: Then, the relatively weak magnetic field, $B\lesssim6$~$\mu$G,
683: is necessary in order for the flux of synchrotron X-rays
684: to be smaller than the observed upper limit.
685: %
686: We find that for an assumed distance of 8.5~kpc,
687: the total energy of accelerated electrons is estimated as
688: $\sim6\times10^{48}$~erg, which is very large compared with
689: the typical young SNRs \citep[e.g.,][]{bamba2003b}.
690:
691: Next we consider the case $n=5\times10^3$~cm$^{-3}$
692: (see the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum2}).
693: In this case, the TeV gamma-ray band is dominated by the
694: bremsstrahlung emission.
695: %
696: When the magnetic field is larger than $\sim100~\mu$G,
697: the synchrotron cooling effect is significant and
698: the electron spectrum is modified enough for the emission
699: spectrum in the TeV gamma-ray band to deviate
700: from the observed one.
701: As long as $B\lesssim10^2$~$\mu$G,
702: we can fit the TeV gamma-ray spectrum with
703: bremsstrahlung emission, and the synchrotron X-rays
704: below the observed upper limit.
705: %
706: For assumed distance of 8.5~kpc,
707: the total energy of accelerated electrons is estimated as
708: $\sim6.0\times10^{45}$~erg and $\sim2.3\times10^{46}$~erg
709: for $B=10$~$\mu$G and $B=100$~$\mu$G, respectively.
710: If we assume the volume of the molecular cloud of
711: $1.2\times10^{58}$~cm$^3$ \citep{aharonian2008},
712: the mean energy density of high-energy protons
713: at region~A of \hess is calculated as $\sim0.31$~eV~cm$^{-3}$
714: and $\sim1.2$~eV~cm$^{-3}$ for $B=10$~$\mu$G and $B=100$~$\mu$G,
715: respectively.
716:
717: %% \subsubsection{}
718:
719:
720:
721:
722:
723: In the case of $n=5\times10^3$~cm$^{-3}$,
724: the energy-loss time scale, $t_{\rm loss}$,
725: for TeV-emitting electrons via
726: synchrotron and bremsstrahlung radiation is
727: less than $\sim3\times10^3$~yr.
728: Then, the diffusion length scale is estimated as
729: $\sqrt{2Kt_{\rm loss}}\lesssim0.26\eta^{1/2}
730: (B/10~\mu{\rm G})^{-1/2}
731: (E_e/{\rm TeV})^{1/2}$~pc,
732: where we assume the Bohm type diffusion,
733: $K=cE_e\eta/3eB$.
734: Even if $\eta\sim10^2$,
735: this length scale is much smaller than the
736: source size of region~A of \hess
737: ($\sim40$~pc assuming the distance of 8.5~kpc),
738: which implies that the high-energy electrons
739: coming from a nearby accelerator
740: cannot penetrate into deep interior of a molecular cloud.
741: %
742: On the other hand, when $n=0.1$~cm$^{-3}$,
743: relatively large energy of accelerated electrons is required.
744: %
745: So, the leptonic models considered above may be unlikely.
746: %
747: However, in order to derive the firm conclusion, we need
748: to discuss further detail with
749: more information on \hess, such as
750: the intrinsic source size, the number density of
751: target matter, more precise spectrum in all wavelength
752: (from radio to GeV--TeV gamma-rays), and so on.
753:
754:
755: \subsection{Source of High Energy Particles}
756:
757: Spatial coincidence of a molecular cloud and the TeV gamma-rays
758: at region~A of HESS~J1745$-$303
759: suggests that the TeV emission is possibly due to accelearated protons
760: interacting the molecular cloud.
761: The source of high energy protons is still unknown.
762: The past GC activity might be able to make protons
763: \citep{aharonian2006b}.
764: However, it is rather difficult due to the low mass of the molecular cloud
765: in our region.
766: Nearby SNRs and pulsars, on the other hand, could be high-energy
767: proton injectors.
768: G359.1$-$0.5 is an energetic SNR and interacting with the molecular cloud
769: \citep{uchida1992} and is located in the GC region.
770: %
771: We confirmed that
772: the distances to this SNR and the molecular clouds are similar,
773: but we could not find any signature of the interaction
774: in X-rays.
775: Hidden SNRs by the molecular cloud
776: also could be the source of accelerated particles.
777: The average absorption column of the molecular cloud is
778: $\sim 10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$,
779: which is enough to hide the soft X-ray emission from the SNRs.
780: %
781: %
782: For further study, more detailed radio observations are needed.
783: %
784: G359.0$-$0.9 is an unrelated source
785: with its significantly smaller distance \citep{bamba2000}.
786: %
787: A pulsar B1742$-$30 has been argued as a possible cosmic ray injector
788: \citep[e.g.,][]{lemiere2008},
789: but the estimated distance \citep[2.1~kpc;][]{taylor93}
790: is significantly smaller than that of \hess.
791: We thus concluded that the pulsar B1742$-$30
792: is also unrelated to \hess.
793:
794: \section{Summary}
795:
796: Deep mapping observations of a part of \hess
797: have been carried out with {\it Suzaku}.
798: The main part of \hess, region~A, is entirely covered
799: in the present observation.
800: %
801: We made a tight upper limit of hard X-rays of the \hess region,
802: $2.1\times 10^{-13}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$
803: in the 2--10~keV band.
804: The flux ratio between 1--10~TeV and 2--10~keV is larger than 4,
805: which could make \hess one of the ``dark particle accelerators''.
806: An excess of the neutral iron emission line on this region
807: is found.
808: This possible excess should be due to the X-ray reflection
809: from a molecular cloud by the past active GC.
810: This provides strong evidence for the interaction between
811: the molecular cloud --- \hess system in the GC region.
812: With the small flux in the hard X-ray band and coincidence with
813: a molecular cloud,
814: the TeV emission from \hess could be due to protons encountered
815: the molecular cloud.
816:
817: \acknowledgments
818: %
819: We would like to thank the referee for useful comments and
820: suggestions.
821: The authors also thank H.~Murakami,
822: A.~Kawachi, T.~Oka, and Y.~Fukui, for their useful comments
823: on molecular clouds and X-ray reflection nebulae.
824: This work was supported in part by
825: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
826: of the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
827: and Technology, No.~19$\cdot$4014 (A.~Bamba),
828: No.~18740153 and No.~19047004 (R.~Yamazaki),
829: %
830: and also supported in part by PPARC grant, PP/D000394/1, EU grant
831: MRTN-CT-2006-035863, the European Union through the Marie Curie
832: Research and Training Network ``UniverseNet'',
833: MRTN-CT-2006-035863 (K.~Kohri).
834:
835:
836: \begin{thebibliography}{}
837: %
838: %\bibitem[Achterberg, Blandford, \& Reynolds(1994)]{achterberg}
839: %Achterberg, A., Blandford,~R.D., \& Reynolds,~S.P.\ 1994,
840: %\aap, 281, 220
841: %
842: %\bibitem[Aharonian \& Atoyan(1999)]{aharonian}
843: %Aharonian, F.A., \& Atoyan, A.M.\ 1999, \aap, 351, 330
844: %
845: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2001)]{aharonian2001}
846: %Aharonian F. et al., 2001, A\&A, 370 112
847: %
848: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2002)]{aharonian2002}
849: Aharonian, F. et al., 2002, A\&A, 393, L37
850: %
851: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2004a)]{aharonian2004}
852: Aharonian, F. et al., 2004a, Nature, 432, 75
853: %
854: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2004b)]{aharonian2004b}
855: %Aharonian F. et al., 2004b, ApJ, 614, 897
856: %
857: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2004c)]{aharonian2004c}
858: %Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2004c, \apj, 614, 897
859: %
860: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005a)]{aharonian2005}
861: Aharonian, F. et al., 2005a, Science, 307, 1938
862: %
863: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005b)]{aharonian2005b}
864: Aharonian, F. et al., 2005b, A\&A, 439, 1013
865: %
866: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005c)]{aharonian2005c}
867: Aharonian, F. et al., 2005c, A\&A, 437, L7
868: %
869: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005d)]{aharonian2005e}
870: %Aharonian, F. et al., 2005d, A\&A, 437, 135
871: %
872: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005e)]{aharonian2005f}
873: %Aharonian, F. et al., 2005e, A\&A, 435, L17
874: %
875: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005f)]{aharonian2005g}
876: %Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2005f, \aap, 432, L25
877: %
878: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006a)]{aharonian2006}
879: Aharonian, F. et al., 2006a, ApJ, 636, 777
880: %
881: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006b)]{aharonian2006b}
882: Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2006b, \nat, 439, 695
883: %
884: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006b)]{aharonian2006b}
885: %Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2006b, \aap, 449, 223
886: %
887: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006c)]{aharonian2006c}
888: %Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2006c, \aap, 448, L43
889: %
890: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006d)]{aharonian2006d}
891: %Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2006d, \aap, 456, 245
892: %
893: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2007)]{aharonian2007}
894: %Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 661, 236
895: %
896: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2008)]{aharonian2008}
897: Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2008, \aap, 483, 509
898: %
899: %\bibitem[Allen, Petre, \& Gotthelf(2001)]{allen}
900: %Allen, G.E., Petre, R., \& Gotthelf, E.V.\ 2001, \apj, 558, 739
901: %
902: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{anders1989}
903: Anders, E., \& Grevesse, N. 1989, \gca, 53, 197
904: %
905: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2000)]{bamba2000}
906: Bamba, A., Yokogawa, J.,
907: Sakano, M., \& Koyama, K.\ 2000, \pasj, 52, 259
908: %\bibitem[Bamba et al.(2000)]{bamba0000}
909: %Bamba, A., Tomida, H., \& Koyama, K. 2000, \pasj, 52, 1157
910: %
911: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2003a)]{bamba2003a}
912: Bamba, A., Ueno, M., Koyama, K., Yamauchi, S., 2003a, \apj, 589, 253
913: %
914: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2003b)]{bamba2003b}
915: Bamba, A., Yamazaki, R., Ueno, M., Koyama, K., 2003b, \apj, 589, 827
916: %
917: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2005a)]{bamba2005a}
918: Bamba, A., Yamazaki, R., Yoshida, T., Terasawa, T.,
919: Koyama, K., 2005a, \apj, 621, 793
920: %
921: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2005b)]{bamba2005b}
922: Bamba, A., Yamazaki, R., Hiraga, J., 2005b, ApJ, 632, 294
923: %
924: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2007)]{bamba2007a}
925: Bamba, A.\ et al., 2007, \pasj, 59, S209
926: %
927: %\bibitem[Bamba et al.(2007b)]{bamba2007}
928: %Bamba, A.\ et al., 2007b, \pasj, in press
929: %(ArXiv e-prints, 708, arXiv:0708.0073)
930: %
931: %\bibitem[Bell(1978)]{bell}
932: %Bell, A.R.\ 1978, \mnras, 182, 443
933: %
934: %\bibitem[Berezhko, Ksenofontov, \& V\"{o}lk(2002)]{berezhko}
935: %Berezhko, E.G., Ksenofontov, \& L.T. V\"{o}lk, H.J.\ 2002,
936: %A\&A, 395, 943
937: %
938: \bibitem[Bitran et al.(1997)]{bitran1997}
939: Bitran, M., Alvarez, H., Bronfman, L., May, J., \& Thaddeus, P.\ 1997,
940: \aaps, 125, 99
941: %
942: %\bibitem[Blandford \& Eichler(1987)]{blandford1987}
943: %Blandford, R.D., \& Eichler, D.\ 1987, \physrep, 154,1
944: %
945: %\bibitem[Blandford \& Ostriker(1978)]{blandford1978}
946: %Blandford, R.D., \& Ostriker, J.P.\ 1978, \apj, 221, L29
947: %
948: \bibitem[Borkowski et al.(2001)]{borkowski2001}
949: Borkowski, K.J., Lyerly, W.J., \& Reynolds, S.P. 2001a, \apj, 548, 820
950: %
951: %\bibitem[Borkowski et al.(2001b)]{borkowski2001b}
952: %Borkowski, K.J., Rho, J., Reynolds, S.P. \& Dyer, K.K.
953: %2001b, \apj, 550, 334
954: %
955: %\bibitem[Brickhouse et al.(2000)]{brickhouse}
956: %Brickhouse, N.S., Dupree, A.K., Edgar, R.J., Liedahl, D.A.,
957: %Drake, S.A., White, N.E., \& Singh, K.P.\ 2000, \apj, 530, 387
958: %
959: %\bibitem[Clark \& Stephenson(1977)]{clark}
960: %Clark, D.H., \& Stephenson, F.R.\ 1977,
961: %``The Historical Supernova'', Pergamon, Elmsford, N.Y. 83
962: %
963: \bibitem[Crutcher(1991)]{crutcher91}
964: Crutcher, R. M. 1991, ApJ, 520, 706
965: %
966: %\bibitem[DeLaney et al.(2006)]{delaney2006}
967: %DeLaney, T., Gaensler, B.~M., Arons, J., \& Pivovaroff, M.~J.\ 2006,
968: %\apj, 640, 929
969: %
970: %\bibitem[Drury(1983)]{drury1983}
971: %Drury, L.O'C.\ 1983, Rep. Prog. Phys, 46, 973
972: %
973: %\bibitem[Drury et al.(1989)]{drury}
974: %Drury, L.O'C., Markiewicz, W.J., \& V\"olk, H.J.\ 1989,
975: %\aapr, 225, 179
976: %
977: %\bibitem[Dyer et al.(2001)]{dyer}
978: %Dyer, K.K., Reynolds, S.P., Borkowski, K.J., Allen, G.E.,
979: %\& Petre, R.\ 2001,
980: %\apj, 551, 439
981: %
982: \bibitem[Ellison(2001)]{ellison2001}
983: Ellison, D. C., 2001, PTPS, 143, 125
984: %
985: %\bibitem[Ellison, Berezhko, \& Baring(2000)]{ellison2000}
986: %Ellison, D.C., Berezhko, E.G., \& Baring, M.G.\ 2000, \apj, 540, 292
987: %
988: \bibitem[Enomoto et al.(2002)]{enomoto2002}
989: Enomoto, R. et al.\ 2002, \nat, 416, 823
990: %
991: %\bibitem[Funk et al.(2007)]{funk2007}
992: %Funk, S., et al.\ 2007, \aap, 470, 249
993: %
994: %\bibitem[Gabici \& Aharonian(2007)]{gabici2007}
995: %Gabici, S. \& Aharonian, F.\ 2007, ApJ, 665, L131
996: %
997: %\bibitem[Garmire et al.(2000)]{garmire2000}
998: %Garmire, G., Feigelson, E.~D., Broos, P., Hillenbrand, L.~A.,
999: %Pravdo, S.~H., Townsley, L.,\& Tsuboi, Y.\ 2000, \aj, 120, 1426
1000: %
1001: %\bibitem[Ghavamian et al.(2002)]{ghavamian}
1002: %Ghavamian,~P., Winkler,~P.F., Raymond,~J.C., \& Long,~K.S.\ 2002, \apj, 572, 888
1003: %
1004: %\bibitem[Green(2001)]{green}
1005: %Green, D.A.\ 2001,
1006: %A Catalogue of Galactic Supernova Remnants (2001 December version),
1007: %(Cambridge, UK, Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory)
1008: %available on the WWW at http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys/snrs/
1009: %
1010: %\bibitem[Gotthelf(2003)]{gotthelf2003}
1011: %Gotthelf, E.~V.\ 2003, \apj, 591, 361
1012: %
1013: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(1999)]{hartman1999}
1014: Hartman, R. C. et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 79
1015: %
1016: %\bibitem[Hess(1912)]{hess}
1017: %Hess, V.F.\ 1912, Phys. Zeits., 13, 1084
1018: %
1019: %\bibitem[Hester(1987)]{hester}
1020: %Hester, J.J.\ 1987, \apj, 314, 187
1021: %
1022: %\bibitem[Hoshino \& Shimada(2002)]{hoshino}
1023: %Hoshino, M., \& Shimada, N.\ 2002, \apj, 572, 880
1024: %
1025: %\bibitem[Hwang et al.(2002)]{hwang2002}
1026: %Hwang,~U., Decourchelle,~A., Holt,~S.S., \&
1027: %Petre,~R. \ 2002, \apj, 581, 1101
1028: %
1029: %\bibitem[Hiraga et al.(2005)]{hiraga2005}
1030: %Hiraga, J.~S., Uchiyama, Y., Takahashi, T., \& Aharonian, F.~A.\ 2005,
1031: %\aap, 431, 953
1032: %
1033: \bibitem[Inui et al.(2008)]{inui2008}
1034: Inui, T., Koyama, K.,
1035: Matsumoto, H., \& Tsuru, T.~G.\ 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 803, arXiv:0803.1528
1036: %
1037: \bibitem[Ishisaki et al.(2007)]{ishisaki2007}
1038: Ishisaki, Y.\ et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S113
1039: %
1040: %\bibitem[Jones \& Ellison(1991)]{jones}
1041: %Jones, F.C., \& Ellison, D.C.\ 1991, Space Science Rev., 58, 259
1042: %
1043: %\bibitem[Jokipii(1987)]{jokipii}
1044: %Jokipii, J.R,\ 1987, \apj, 313, 842
1045: %
1046: \bibitem[Katagiri et al.(2005)]{katagiri2005}
1047: Katagiri, H. et al., 2005, ApJ, 619, L163
1048: %
1049: %\bibitem[Kokubun et al.(2007)]{kokubun2007}
1050: %Kokubun, M.\ et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S53
1051: %
1052: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1989)]{koyama1989}
1053: Koyama, K., Awaki, H.,
1054: Kunieda, H., Takano, S., \& Tawara, Y.\ 1989, \nat, 339, 603
1055: %
1056: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1995)]{koyama1995}
1057: Koyama, K., Petre, R., Gotthelf, E.V., Hwang, U., Matsura, M.,
1058: Ozaki, M., \& Holt S.S.\ 1995, \nat, 378, 255
1059: %
1060: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1997)]{koyama1997}
1061: Koyama, K. et al. 1997, PASJ, 49, L7
1062: %
1063: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(2007)]{koyama2007}
1064: Koyama, K.\ et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S23
1065: %
1066: %\bibitem[Laming et al.(1996)]{laming}
1067: %Laming, J. M., Raymond, J. C., McLaughlin, B. M.,
1068: %\& Blair, W. P. 1996, \apj, 472, 267
1069: %
1070: \bibitem[LaRosa et al.(2000)]{larosa2000}
1071: LaRosa, T.~N., Kassim,
1072: N.~E., Lazio, T.~J.~W., \& Hyman, S.~D.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 207
1073: %
1074: \bibitem[Lazendic et al.(2004)]{lazendic2004}
1075: Lazendic J. S., Slane P. O., Gaensler B. M., Reynolds S. P.,
1076: Plucinsky P. P., Hughes J. P., 2004, ApJ, 602, 271
1077: %
1078: \bibitem[Lemiere et al.(2007)]{lemiere2008}
1079: Lemiere, A. et al. 2007,
1080: in proc. of 30th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Mexico),
1081: (p.42 in arXiv:0710.4057)
1082: %
1083: %\bibitem[Liedahl et al.(1995)]{liedahl1995}
1084: %Liedahl, D.~A.,
1085: %Osterheld, A.~L., \& Goldstein, W.~H.\ 1995, \apjl, 438, L115
1086: %
1087: \bibitem[Murakami et al.(2001)]{murakami2001}
1088: Murakami, H., Koyama, K., \& Maeda, Y.\ 2001, \apj, 558, 687
1089: %
1090: \bibitem[Roberts et al.(2001)]{roberts2001}
1091: Roberts, M.~S.~E., Romani, R.~W., \& Kawai, N.\ 2001, \apjs, 133, 451
1092: %
1093: %\bibitem[Long et al.(2003)]{long2003}
1094: %Long,~K.S., Reynolds,~S.P., Raymond,~J.C., Winkler,~P.F.,
1095: %Dyer,~K.K., \& Petre,~R.\ 2003, \apj, 586, 1162
1096: %
1097: %\bibitem[Lucek \& Bell(2000)]{lucek2000}
1098: %Lucek,~S.G., \& Bell,~A.R.\ 2000, \mnras, 314, 65
1099: %
1100: %\bibitem[Malkov \& Drury(2001)]{malkov2001}
1101: %Malkov, E., \& Drury, L.O'C.\ 2001, Rep.\ Prog.\ Phys., 64, 429
1102: %
1103: %\bibitem[Mangano et al.(2005)]{mangano2005}
1104: %Mangano, V., Massaro, E., Bocchino, F., Mineo, T., \& Cusumano, G.\ 2005,
1105: %\aap, 436, 917
1106: %
1107: \bibitem[Matsumoto et al.(2007)]{matsumoto2007}
1108: Matsumoto, H. et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S199
1109: %
1110: \bibitem[Matsumoto et al.(2008)]{matsumoto2008}
1111: Matsumoto, H. et al. 2008, \pasj, 60, S163
1112: %
1113: %\bibitem[Mewe et al.(1985)]{mewe1985}
1114: %Mewe, R., Gronenschild,
1115: %E.~H.~B.~M., \& van den Oord, G.~H.~J.\ 1985, \aaps, 62, 197
1116: %
1117: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al.(2007)]{mitsuda2007}
1118: Mitsuda, K.\ et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S1
1119: %
1120: %\bibitem[Miyata et al.(2001)]{miyata}
1121: %Miyata, E., Tsunemi, H., Aschenbach, B., \& Mori, K.\ 2001,
1122: % \apj, 559, L45
1123: %
1124: %\bibitem[Mori et al.(2004)]{mori2004}
1125: %Mori, K., Hailey, C.~J., Paerels, F., \& Zane, S.\ 2004,
1126: %Advances in Space Research, 33, 503
1127: %
1128: \bibitem[Morrison \& McCammon(1983)]{morrison1983}
1129: Morrison, R., \& McCammon, D.\ 1983, \apj, 270, 119
1130: %
1131: %\bibitem[Mukherjee \& Halpern(2005)]{mukherjee2005}
1132: %Mukherjee R. \& Halpern J. P., 2005, ApJ, 629, 1017
1133: %
1134: %\bibitem[Muraishi et al.(2000)]{muraishi}
1135: %Muraishi, H., Tanimori, T., Yanagita, S., Yoshida, T., Moriya, M.,
1136: %Kifune, T., Dazeley, S.A., Edwards, P.G. et al.\ 2000, \aap, 354, L57
1137: %
1138: \bibitem[Nakajima et al.(2008)]{nakajima2008}
1139: Nakajima, H.\ et al.\ 2008, \pasj, 60, S1
1140: %
1141: \bibitem[Nobukawa et al.(2008)]{nobukawa2008}
1142: Nobukawa, M., et al.\ 2008, \pasj, 60, 191
1143: %
1144: \bibitem[Pannuti et al.(2003)]{pannuti2003}
1145: Pannuti, T. G., Allen, G. E., Houck, J. C., \& Sturner, S. J., 2003, ApJ, 593, 377
1146: %
1147: %\bibitem[Reynolds \& Gilmore(1993)]{reynolds1993}
1148: %Reynolds, S.P., \& Gilmore, D.M.\ 1993, 106, 272
1149: %
1150: %\bibitem[Porquet et al.(2003)]{porquet2003}
1151: %Porquet, D., Decourchelle, A., \& Warwick, R.~S.\ 2003, \aap, 401, 197
1152: %
1153: %\bibitem[Ratkiewicz, Axford, \& McKenzie(1994)]{ratkiewicz}
1154: %Ratkiewicz,~R., Axford,~W.I., \& McKenzie,~J.F. 1994,
1155: %A\&A, 291, 935
1156: %
1157: %\bibitem[Reynolds(1998)]{reynolds1998}
1158: %Reynolds, S.P.\ 1998, \apj, 493, 375
1159: %
1160: %\bibitem[Reynolds \& Keohane(1999)]{reynolds1999}
1161: %Reynolds, S.P., \& Keohane, J.W.\ 1999, \apj, 525, 368
1162: %
1163: %\bibitem[Rho et al.(2002)]{rho}
1164: %Rho, J., Dyer, K.K. Borkowski, K.J., \& Reynolds, S.P.
1165: %2002, \apj, 581, 1116
1166: %
1167: \bibitem[Robinson et al.(1996)]{robinson96}
1168: Robinson, B. Yusef-Zadeh, F., \& Roberts, D. 1996,
1169: Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 28, 948
1170: %
1171: %\bibitem[Rothernflug, Decourchelle, \& Ballet]{rothernflug}
1172: %Rothernflug, R., Decourchelle, A., \& Ballet, J.\ 2001, Proceedings of
1173: %``New Visions of the X-ray Universe
1174: %in the XMM-Newton and Chandra era''
1175: %
1176: %\bibitem[Rybicki \& Lightman(1979)]{rybicki}
1177: %Rybicki, G.B., \& Lightman, A.P.\ 1979,
1178: %``Radiative Processes in Astrophysics'', Wiley-Interscience, New York
1179: %
1180: \bibitem[Serlemitsos et al.(2007)]{serlemitsos2007}
1181: Serlemitsos, P. et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S9
1182: %
1183: %\bibitem[Sidoli et al.(1999)]{sidoli1999}
1184: %Sidoli, L., Mereghetti, S., Israel, G.~L., Chiappetti, L., Treves, A.,
1185: %\& Orlandini, M.\ 1999, \apj, 525, 215
1186: %
1187: %\bibitem[Skilling(1975)]{skilling}
1188: %Skilling, J.\ 1975, \mnras, 172, 557
1189: %
1190: %\bibitem[Slane et al.(1999)]{slane1999}
1191: %Slane, P., Gaensler, B.M., Dame, T.M., Hughes, J.P., Plucinsky, P.P.,
1192: %\& Green, A. 1999, \apj, 525, 357
1193: %
1194: %\bibitem[Slane et al.(2001)]{slane2001}
1195: %Slane, P., Hughes, J.P., Edgar, R.J., Plucinsky, P.P., Miyata, E.,
1196: %Tsunemi, H., Aschenbach, B. 2001, 548, 814
1197: %
1198: %\bibitem[Spitzer(1978)]{spitzer1978}
1199: %Spitzer L. Jr., 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium
1200: %(New York: Wiley)
1201: %
1202: %\bibitem[Sturner et al.(1997)]{sturner1997}
1203: %Sturner S. J., Skibo J. G., Dermer C. D., \& Mattox J. R., 1997, ApJ, 490, 619
1204: %
1205: \bibitem[Takahashi et al.(2007)]{takahashi2007}
1206: Takahashi, T.\ et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S35
1207: %
1208: %\bibitem[Takahashi et al.(2007)]{takahashi2007b}
1209: %Takahashi, T.\ et al.\ 2007, \pasj, in press
1210: %
1211: \bibitem[Tawa et al.(2008)]{tawa2008}
1212: Tawa, N., et al.\ 2008, \pasj, 60, 11
1213: %
1214: \bibitem[Taylor et al.(1993)]{taylor93}
1215: Taylor, J. H., Manchester, R. N., \& Lyne, A. G.\ 1993, ApJS, 88, 529
1216: %
1217: %\bibitem[Tanimori et al.(1998)]{tanimori1998}
1218: %Tanimori, T., Hayami, Y., Kamei, S., Dazeley, S.A., Edwards, P.G.,
1219: %Gunji, S., Hara, S., Hara, T. et al.\ 1998, \apj, 497, L25
1220: %
1221: %\bibitem[Tanimori et al.(2001)]{tanimori2001}
1222: %Tanimori, T., Naito, T., Yoshida, T., \& CANGAROO collaboration
1223: %2001, to appear in proceedings of 27th ICRC, astro-ph/0108031
1224: %
1225: \bibitem[Tian et al.(2007)]{tian2007}
1226: Tian, W. W. et al.\ 2007, ApJ, 657, L25
1227: %
1228: %\bibitem[Townsley et al.(2000)]{townsley}
1229: %Townsley, L.K., Broos, P.S., Garmire, G.P., \& Nousek, J.A.\ 2000, \apj,
1230: %534, L139
1231: %
1232: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(1992)]{uchida1992}
1233: Uchida, K., Morris, M.,
1234: \& Yusef-Zadeh, F.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 1533
1235: %
1236: \bibitem[Uchiyama et al.(2005)]{uchiyama2005}
1237: Uchiyama, Y., Aharonian, F. A., Takahashi, T., Hiraga, J. S.,
1238: Moriguchi, Y., \& Fukui, Y., 2005,
1239: in Proc. of International Symposium on High Energy Gamma-ray Astronomy,
1240: Heidelberg, July 2004 (astro-ph/0503199)
1241: %
1242: \bibitem[Uchiyama et al.(2007)]{uchiyama2007}
1243: Uchiyama, Y., Aharonian, F.~A., Tanaka, T., Takahashi, T.,
1244: \& Maeda, Y.\ 2007, \nat, 449, 576
1245: %
1246: %\bibitem[Vink et al.(2000)]{vink}
1247: %Vink, J., Kaastra, J.S., Bleeker, J.A.M., \& Preite-Martinez, A.
1248: %2000, \aapr, 354, 931
1249: %
1250: %\bibitem[Vink \& Laming(2003)]{vink2003}
1251: %Vink, J., \& Laming, J.M.\ 2003, \apj, 584, 758
1252: %
1253: %\bibitem[V\"{o}lk, Berezhko, \& Ksenofontov(2003)]{voelk}
1254: %V\"{o}lk,~H.J., Berezhko,~E.G., \& Ksenofontov,~L.T.\ 2003,
1255: %\aap, in press (astro-ph/0306016)
1256: %
1257: %\bibitem[Weisskopf et al.(1996)]{weisskopf}
1258: %Weisskopf, M.C., O'dell, S.L., \& van Speybroeck, L.P.\ 1996,
1259: %{\it Proc. SPIE}, 2805, 2
1260: %
1261: %\bibitem[Weisskopf et al.(2002)]{weisskopf2002}
1262: %Weisskopf, M.~C.,
1263: %Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., Garmire, G., Murray, S., \& Van Speybroeck,
1264: %L.~P.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 1
1265: %
1266: %\bibitem[Wentzel(1974)]{wentzel}
1267: %Wentzel, D.G. 1974, \araa 12, 71
1268: %
1269: %\bibitem[Winkler \& Long(1997)]{winkler}
1270: %Winkler, P.F. \& Long, K.S.\ 1997, \apj, 491, 829
1271: %
1272: %\bibitem[Willingale et al.(2001)]{willingale2001}
1273: %Willingale, R., Aschenbach, B., Griffiths, R.~G., Sembay, S.,
1274: %Warwick, R.~S., Becker, W., Abbey, A.~F., \& Bonnet-Bidaud, J.-M.\ 2001,
1275: %\aap, 365, L212
1276: %
1277: %\bibitem[Winkler et al.(2003)]{winkler2}
1278: %Winkler, P.F., Gupta,~G., \& Long, K.S.\ 2003, \apj, 585, 324
1279: %
1280: \bibitem[Yamauchi \& Koyama(1993)]{yamauchi1993}
1281: Yamauchi, S., \& Koyama, K.\ 1993, \apj, 404, 620
1282: %
1283: \bibitem[Yamazaki et al.(2006)]{yamazaki2006}
1284: Yamazaki, R. et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1975
1285: %
1286: \bibitem[Yamazaki et al.(2008)]{yamazaki2008}
1287: Yamazaki, R. et al. 2008, arXiv:0806.3303
1288: %
1289: \bibitem[Yuasa et al.(2007)]{yuasa2007}
1290: Yuasa, T.\ et al.\ 2007, \pasj, in press
1291: %
1292: %\bibitem[Zou et al.(2006)]{zou05}
1293: %Zou, Y. C., Xu, D., \& Dai, Z. G. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1098
1294: %
1295: %\bibitem[The Hess Collaboration(2007)]{hess2007}
1296: %The HESS collaboration, 2007, astro-ph/0710.4057
1297: %
1298: \end{thebibliography}
1299:
1300:
1301: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
1302: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
1303:
1304: %\onecolumn
1305:
1306: \begin{figure}
1307: \epsscale{0.45}
1308: \plotone{f1a.eps}
1309: \plotone{f1b.eps}
1310: \plotone{f1c.eps}
1311: \caption{{\it Suzaku} XIS intensity maps of the HESS~J1745$-$303 region
1312: in the 0.5--2.0~keV (a) and 2.0--8.0~keV (b) bands,
1313: and the neutral iron line (c).
1314: The scale is in the logarithmic.
1315: The contour represents TeV emission in the linear scale.}
1316: \label{fig:images}
1317: \end{figure}
1318:
1319: \begin{figure}
1320: \epsscale{0.45}
1321: \plotone{f2.eps}
1322: \caption{Regions for the spectral analysis overlaid on the
1323: 0.5--2.0~keV image.
1324: Thick and thin solid rectangles are source and background regions
1325: for the HESS~J1745$-$303 region analysis.
1326: Dashed regions are for G359.0$-$0.9 and G359.1-0.5 analysis.}
1327: \label{fig:regions}
1328: \end{figure}
1329:
1330: \begin{figure}
1331: \epsscale{0.45}
1332: \plotone{f3a.eps}
1333: \plotone{f3b.eps}
1334: \plotone{f3c.eps}
1335: \plotone{f3d.eps}
1336: \caption{XIS spectra of src and bgd regions.
1337: Background photons were not subtracted.
1338: Solid and dotted lines represents
1339: the continuum and emission lines.
1340: Although the fittings were done with 4 XISs,
1341: only XIS0 data are plotted for convenience.
1342: }
1343: \label{fig:spectra}
1344: \end{figure}
1345:
1346: \begin{figure}
1347: \epsscale{0.45}
1348: \plotone{f4a.eps}
1349: \plotone{f4b.eps}
1350: \caption{XIS Spectra of G359.0$-$0.9 (left) and G359.1$-$0.5 (right).
1351: Only XIS0 data are plotted for convenience.
1352: Solid and dashed lines represents
1353: the lower and higher temperature plasma models.}
1354: \label{fig:snrs}
1355: \end{figure}
1356:
1357:
1358:
1359: \begin{figure}
1360: \epsscale{0.45}
1361: \plotone{f5a.eps}
1362: \plotone{f5b.eps}
1363: \caption{
1364: The wide-band $\nu F_\nu$ spectra of the region A of \hess
1365: calculated by the hadronic gamma-ray emission model.
1366: %
1367: The thick-solid line shows the total nonthermal flux.
1368: Thin-solid line corresponds to $\pi^0$-decay gamma-rays.
1369: The dotted, dashed, and long-dashed lines are
1370: for the inverse-Compton, bremsstrahlung, and
1371: synchrotron emissions
1372: from secondary electrons and positrons produced by charged pions.
1373: %
1374: The left panel is for the low-target density model
1375: ($n=1$~cm$^{-3}$), while the right is for the high-target
1376: density model ($n=5\times10^3$~cm$^{-3}$).
1377: In calculating the synchrotron radiation of secondary
1378: electrons and positrons,
1379: the magnetic filed strength is changed;
1380: 1~G, 100~mG, 10~mG, 1~mG, 100~$\mu$G,
1381: and 10~$\mu$G downward from right to left.
1382: In both panels, we assume that the primary proton spectrum
1383: is in the form of $E^{-p}\exp(-E/E_{\rm max,p})$
1384: with an index $p=2.0$ and the
1385: cut-off energy, $E_{\rm max, p}=18$~TeV.
1386: }
1387: \label{fig:spectrum}
1388: \end{figure}
1389:
1390: \begin{figure}
1391: \epsscale{0.45}
1392: \plotone{f6a.eps}
1393: \plotone{f6b.eps}
1394: \caption{
1395: The wide-band $\nu F_\nu$ spectra of the region A of \hess
1396: calculated by the leptonic gamma-ray emission model.
1397: %
1398: The thick-solid line shows the total nonthermal flux.
1399: The dotted, dashed, and long-dashed lines are
1400: for the inverse-Compton, bremsstrahlung, and
1401: synchrotron emissions from primarily accelerated electrons.
1402: %
1403: The left panel is for the low-target density model
1404: ($n=0.1$~cm$^{-3}$).
1405: In calculating the synchrotron radiation of secondary
1406: electrons and positrons,
1407: the magnetic filed strength is changed;
1408: 12~$\mu$G,
1409: 6~$\mu$G, and 3~$\mu$G, downward from right to left.
1410: %
1411: The right panel is for the high-target density model
1412: ($n=5\times10^3$~cm$^{-3}$).
1413: We consider two cases of $B=10$~$\mu$G and $100$~$\mu$G.
1414: In both panels, we assume that the primary electron spectrum
1415: is in the form of $E^{-p}\exp(-E/E_{\rm max,e})$
1416: with an index $p=2.0$ and the
1417: cut-off energy, $E_{\rm max, e}=10$~TeV.
1418: }
1419: \label{fig:spectrum2}
1420: \end{figure}
1421:
1422: \begin{deluxetable}{p{5pc}cccc}
1423: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1424: \tablecaption{Observation Log
1425: \label{tab:obslog}}
1426: \tablewidth{0pt}
1427: \tablehead{
1428: \colhead{ObsID} & \colhead{Date} & \colhead{Position} & \colhead{Exposure} & \colhead{SCI} \\
1429: & YYYY-MM-DD & (J2000) & [ksec]}
1430: \startdata
1431: 501010010\dotfill & 2006-10-07 & (266.26, $-$30.37) & 53 & OFF \\
1432: 502016010\dotfill & 2008-03-02 & (266.22, $-$30.11) & 73 & ON \\
1433: 502017010\dotfill & 2008-03-06 & (266.47, $-$30.09) & 75 & ON \\
1434: 502018010\dotfill & 2008-03-08 & (266.06, $-$30.24) & 82 & ON
1435: \enddata
1436: %\tablenotetext{a}
1437: %{For spectrum analysis.}
1438: \end{deluxetable}
1439:
1440: \begin{deluxetable}{p{15pc}ccccc}
1441: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1442: \tablecaption{Comparison of The Iron Emission Lines
1443: \label{tab:iron}}
1444: \tablewidth{0pt}
1445: \tablehead{
1446: & \colhead{Src} & \colhead{Bgd1} & \colhead{Bgd2} & \colhead{Bgd3} & \colhead{Bgd average}
1447: }
1448: \startdata
1449: Neutral Iron\\
1450: \hspace*{2mm}
1451: Line center [eV]\dotfill & 6.42 (6.41--6.43) & (fixed to Src1) & 6.38 (6.36--6.41) & 6.41 (6.37--6.45) & 6.40 (6.38--6.42) \\
1452: \hspace*{2mm}
1453: Surface brightness [$10^{-8}$ph~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$arcmin$^{-2}$]\dotfill & 6.5 (5.8--7.2) & 5.9 (3.7-8.1) & 6.6 (4.3--8.9) & 2.3 (1.2--3.4) & 3.2 (2.5--3.9) \\
1454: He-like Iron\\
1455: \hspace*{2mm}
1456: Line center [eV]\dotfill & 6.68 (6.67--6.69) & (fixed to Src1) & 6.67 (6.66--6.68) & 6.69 (6.67--6.71) & 6.68 (6.67--6.69) \\
1457: \hspace*{2mm}
1458: Surface brightness [$10^{-8}$ph~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$arcmin$^{-2}$]\dotfill & 11 (10--12) & 12 (10--14) & 17 (14--20) & 10 (9--11) & 11 (10--12)
1459: \enddata
1460: \end{deluxetable}
1461:
1462: \begin{deluxetable}{p{10pc}cc}
1463: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1464: \tablecaption{Best-fit parameters of G359.0$-$0.9 and G359.1$-$0.5%
1465: \tablenotemark{a}.
1466: \label{tab:snrs}}
1467: \tablewidth{0pt}
1468: \tablehead{
1469: & \colhead{G359.0$-$0.9} & \colhead{G359.1$-$0.5}
1470: }
1471: \startdata
1472: $kT_1$ [keV]\dotfill & 0.35 (0.32--0.38) & 1.1 (0.7--2.0) \\
1473: Mg \dotfill & 1.4 (1.1--1.6) & ---\tablenotemark{b} \\
1474: Si \dotfill & ---\tablenotemark{b} & 1.9 (1.3--2.9) \\
1475: %S \dotfill & ---\tablenotemark{b} & ($<$0.9) \\
1476: Fe \dotfill & 0.4 (0.2--0.6) & ---\tablenotemark{b} \\
1477: $n_et$ [$10^{11}$~cm$^{-3}$s]\dotfill & 2.3 (1.5--3.7) & ---\tablenotemark{c} \\
1478: $kT_2$ [keV]\dotfill & ---\tablenotemark{d} & 2.0 (1.7--2.5) \\
1479: S \dotfill & ---\tablenotemark{d} & ($>$40) \\
1480: $N_{\rm H}$ [$10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$]\dotfill & 1.6 (1.5--1.8) & 2.3 (1.6--2.5) \\
1481: Flux (2--10~keV) [ergs~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$]\dotfill & $7.1\times 10^{-14}$ & $2.6\times 10^{-13}$ \\
1482: $\chi^2$/d.o.f.\dotfill & 109.7/70 & 64.0/41
1483: \enddata
1484: \tablenotetext{a}{Errors indicate single parameter 90\% confidence regions.}
1485: \tablenotetext{b}{Fixed to the solar abundance.}
1486: \tablenotetext{c}{Not determined.}
1487: \tablenotetext{d}{This component was not used for this SNR.}
1488: \end{deluxetable}
1489:
1490:
1491: \begin{deluxetable}{p{9pc}cc}
1492: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1493: \tablecaption{Characteristics of molecular clouds
1494: \label{tab:MC}}
1495: \tablewidth{0pt}
1496: \tablehead{
1497: \colhead{} & \colhead{Sgr~B2\tablenotemark{a}} &
1498: \colhead{HESS~J1745$-$303\tablenotemark{b}}
1499: }
1500: \startdata
1501: $M_{\rm MC}$\tablenotemark{c}~[$M_\odot$]\dotfill & $6\times 10^6$ & $5\times 10^4$ \\
1502: $\theta$~[deg.]\tablenotemark{d}\dotfill & 0.05 & 0.3 \\
1503: $D$\tablenotemark{e}~[deg.]\dotfill & 1.2 & 0.7
1504: \enddata
1505: \tablenotetext{a}{\cite{murakami2001}.}
1506: \tablenotetext{b}{\cite{aharonian2008}.}
1507: \tablenotetext{c}{Mass of the molecular cloud.}
1508: \tablenotetext{d}{Angular size of the cloud from the direction of the GC.}
1509: \tablenotetext{e}{Angular separation from the GC to the cloud.}
1510: \end{deluxetable}
1511:
1512:
1513: \end{document}
1514:
1515:
1516:
1517:
1518:
1519: