1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

4: 

5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

6: 

7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

8: 

9: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

10: \documentclass{emulateapj}

11: 

12: %\usepackage{aas_macros}

13: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

14: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

15: %% use the longabstract style option.

16: 

17: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

18: 

19: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

20: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

21: %% the \begin{document} command.

22: %%

23: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

24: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

25: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

26: %% for information.

27: 

28: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

29: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

30: \newcommand{\msun}{\rm M_{\odot}}

31: \usepackage{color}

32: %\newcommand{\changed}[1]{\textcolor{red}{\textbf{\emph{#1}}}}

33: 

34: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

35: 

36: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJL}

37: 

38: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

39: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

40: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

41: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

42: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

43: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

44: 

45: \shorttitle{Rescuing the IMF}

46: \shortauthors{Kotulla, Fritze \& Gallagher}

47: 

48: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

49: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

50: 

51: \begin{document}

52: 

53: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

54: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

55: %% you desire.

56: 

57: \title{Rescuing the Initial Mass Function for Arp~78}

58: 

59: \author{Ralf Kotulla and Uta Fritze}

60: \affil{Centre for Astrophysics Research, 

61: %School of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, 

62: University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, United

63:   Kingdom} \email{r.kotulla@herts.ac.uk, u.fritze@herts.ac.uk}

64: \and

65: \author{John S Gallagher III}

66: %\affil{University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI}

67: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin, 475 N. Charter Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA}

68: \email{jsg@astro.wisc.edu}

69: 

70: 

71: 

72: 

73: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

74: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

75: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

76: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

77: %% editorial office after submission.

78: 

79: \begin{abstract}

80:   We present deep R and narrow-band ${\rm H\alpha}$ images of Arp~78 obtained

81:   with the WIYN 3.5-m telescope on Kitt Peak. GALEX observations had shown a

82:   very extended UV structure for this system, reaching beyond the optical

83:   radius of Arp~78 and also beyond its previously known ${\rm H\alpha-}$

84:   radius. Our new ${\rm H\alpha}$ data now show agreement not only with the

85:   spatial extent of the near- and far-UV maps, but also in terms of structural

86:   details. Star formation rates derived from L(H$\alpha$) and L(FUV) are in

87:   reasonable agreement, indicating that in this case the upper stellar IMF in

88:   the UV-bright outer arm is relatively normal.  The star forming sites in the

89:   outer arms are younger than $\sim 15\,$Myr and massive enough to properly

90:   sample the IMF up to high masses; their low optical visibility

91:     evidently is a property of their youth.

92: \end{abstract}

93: 

94: 

95: 

96: \keywords{galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: stellar content --- galaxies: individual (Arp~78) --- ultraviolet: galaxies}

97: 

98: 

99: 

100: \section{Introduction}

101: A major surprise from early data taken with the GALEX ultraviolet explorer

102: satellite was the detection of extended near- and far-UV (NUV, FUV) emission

103: in the extreme outer environment of star-forming galaxies like M83 and NGC

104: 4625 \citep{Thilker+05,GildePaz+05}. Other examples include both apparently

105: undisturbed spirals where the UV emission reveals the inside-out growth of the

106: stellar disk and galaxies that are surrounded by filaments and substructure

107: indicative of tidal encounters with active star formation (SF) going on within

108: these filaments.

109:  

110: An analysis 189 disk galaxies (types S0-Sm) within 40~Mpc from the GALEX Atlas

111: of Nearby Galaxies \citep{GildePaz+07,Thilker+07} establishes that extended UV

112: (XUV) galaxies are surprisingly common, showing up in $>30 \%$ of this sample.

113: Two classes of XUV galaxies are defined from this sample.  Arp~78 (NGC~772),

114: that we study here, belongs to the XUV-type 1 class of objects, that make up

115: $\geq 20 \%$ of the 40~Mpc sample and of which over 75\% show optical or HI

116: morphological evidence for recent interactions or external perturbations. A

117: prototype of this class is M83.

118: 

119: These galaxies have structured, UV-bright, optically faint emission features

120: beyond their normal optical radii and in regions beyond the traditional SF

121: threshold.  The latter is defined as the surface brightness contour

122: corresponding to $\Sigma_{\rm SFR} = 3 \times 10^{-4}\,{\rm

123:   M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}\,kpc^{-2}}$, evaluated at 1 kpc resolution. With

124: \cite{Kennicutt98}'s star formation rate (SFR) calibration, this threshold

125: corresponds to $\mu_{\rm FUV} =27.25$ ABmag/arcsec$^2$ or $\mu_{\rm NUV}

126: =27.35$ ABmag/arcsec$^2$. These UV surface brightness thresholds correspond to

127: an HI column density threshold for actively star-forming zones, as predicted

128: by \cite[see also \citealt{Thilker+07}]{Schaye04}, as well as to the

129: H${\alpha}$ ``edge'' in galaxies from \cite{MartinKennicutt01}'s sample, as

130: demonstrated by \cite{Boissier+07}.

131: 

132: A great deal of discussion has focused on objects where UV emission was

133: detected at larger radii than H${\alpha}$ emission from HII regions, as was

134: the case for Arp~78.  A variety of possible explanations for this discrepancy

135: have been put forward, e.g. a top-light IMF as a consequence of a low level of

136: SF with the resulting low star cluster masses precluding the formation of

137: ionizing stars while still forming enough stars below the ionization limit to

138: account for the FUV flux \citep{WeidnerKroupa06,Boissier+07}. Wholesale

139: truncations of the IMF at the upper end also have been suggested to simply cut

140: off sources of photoionization.  This situation could be attributed to the low

141: gas column densities in the outskirts of galaxies. Under these conditions

142: fragmentation of a molecular cloud happens too quickly for it to grow to a

143: point where it can readily produce stars massive enough to ionize the

144: surrounding gas \citep{KrumholzMcKee08}.

145: 

146: Alternatively, age effects have been discussed, in the sense that presumably

147: episodic SF events ceased in the outskirts of some galaxies long enough in the

148: past for HII regions to have faded below detection, but recently enough for

149: the stellar UV flux to still be measurable \citep{ZaritskyChristlein07}.

150: Leakage of ionizing photons in the very low density environment of these outer

151: regions provides yet another possible explanation, as this would act to

152: decrease the observability of photoionized regions \citep{OeyKennicutt97}.

153: 

154: In some undisturbed face-on spirals, \cite{Ferguson+98b} were the first to show

155: that very deep H$\alpha$ exposures revealed small and low-luminosity HII

156: regions beyond -- and sometimes {\em far} beyond -- the optical radius, giving

157: evidence for low-level SF activity going on beyond the optical radius and

158: interpreted as a signature of the inside-out growth of stellar disks. Another

159: factor then is the question of detectability of HII regions versus the UV

160: light of stars.

161: 

162: Here we present deep narrow band H${\alpha}$ imaging of Arp~78, including its

163: outer regions, to check whether we can find H${\alpha}$ flux from HII

164: counterparts to the XUV flux detected by GALEX.  Our approach involves

165: comparing SFRs derived from L(H$\alpha$) with those based on L(FUV) assuming a

166: normal relationship between these two measures of massive stellar populations.

167: In this way we can check whether or not the outer regions of Arp~78 have

168: normal young stellar populations.

169: 

170: \section{Arp~78 -- NGC~772}

171: 

172: Arp~78 is a luminous (${\rm M_B = -21.6}$) galaxy with pronounced spiral

173: structure at an adopted distance of ${\rm 34~Mpc}$ ($\rm v_r =

174: 2472\,km\,s^{-1}$). It is experiencing multiple interactions involving its

175: spectroscopically confirmed low-luminosity (${\rm M_B = -18.2}$) elliptical

176: satellite, NGC~770, at a projected distance of $\sim 30$ kpc, plus two more

177: companions (${\rm M_B = -15.5}$ and $-16.2$, respectively) within projected

178: distances $\sim 400~$kpc \citep{Zaritsky+97}.

179: 

180: The outer regions of Arp~78 feature an obviously disturbed, one-sided spiral

181: arm-like morphology that appears to be a tidally driven structure. The XUV

182: emission in Arp~78 is clearly associated with this region, as seen in Fig.

183: \ref{fig:fuvha}. Whether or not the stellar population age in the filaments

184: agrees with the nuclear starburst age of $\sim 2$ Gyr as determined by

185: \cite{Ganda+07} and possibly even with the stellar population age of $3 \pm

186: 0.5$ Gyr given by \cite{Geha+05} for the counter-rotating disk in the

187: companion NGC~770, are subjects of our ongoing more extensive multi-band

188: analysis.

189: 

190: \section{Observations and Data reduction}

191: Our optical observations were obtained using the WIYN\footnote{The WIYN

192:   Observatory is a joint facility of the University of Wisconsin-Madison,

193:   Indiana University, Yale University, and the National Optical Astronomy

194:   Observatories.} 3.5~m telescope at Kitt Peak equipped with the MiniMosaic

195: camera. MiniMo consists of two 2K$\times$4K CCD chips with a spatial sampling

196: of $0.14$ arcsec per pixel resulting in a field-of-view of $9.5\times9.5$

197: arcmin. The seeing in the R-band was $\approx1.0''$ and $\approx 1.2''$ in

198: H$\alpha$.

199: 

200: Data reduction consisted of overscan- and bias-subtraction, flat-fielding and

201: cosmic ray removal. We took special care to correct for slight gain variations

202: between the two CCDs to yield a flat background across the full FoV by

203: multiplying them individually with correction factors $\approx 1$ until

204: sky-noise and background level were identical in all readout zones. The

205: resulting frames were then aligned by matching the positions of several stars

206: in each frame and stacked; bad-pixel-masks were used to remove bad pixels and

207: the small gap between the detectors.

208: 

209: Obtaining a proper continuum subtraction requires that we match the point

210: spread function (PSF) in the R and H$\alpha$ filters. We accomplished this by

211: iteratively smoothing the R-band image with a Gaussian of varying widths in

212: the x- and y-directions until the PSFs in both filters matched and residuals

213: were acceptable.  To remove the continuum contribution from the H$\alpha$

214: image, we measured the intensity of several stars in both the R-band and

215: H$\alpha$ frame, scaled the R-band so that the stars have on average the same

216: count rates in both R and H$\alpha$ and subtracted this frame from the

217: H$\alpha$ narrowband exposure.  The resulting scaling factor is in good

218: agreement with that derived from the widths of the filter transmission curves,

219: but allows for a more accurate continuum subtraction. Although the WIYN W16

220: narrow band filter also includes the [NII] emission lines, we refer to the

221: continuum subtracted data as H$\alpha$ images since this is the dominant

222: source of emission line flux.

223: 

224: The GALEX images have been obtained from the GALEX science archive at the

225: Space Telescope Science Institute. To minimize offsets introduced by slightly

226: differing coordinate systems we aligned the FUV and NUV frames relative to the

227: optical data by matching the positions of several stars. The full width at

228: half maximum of the FUV PSF is $4.2''$ sampled with $1.5''$ pixels

229: \citep{Morrissey+07}.

230: 

231: \section{Results and Implications for IMF}

232: Figure \ref{fig:fuvha} shows the FUV image of Arp~78 as grayscale with WIYN

233: narrow band H$\alpha$-brightness contours overplotted. To suppress noise from

234: the image we used adaptive and median-filtering of the FUV image. The

235: H$\alpha$ contours, however, have been constructed from the original continuum

236: subtracted H$\alpha$ frame to make sure this filtering does not induce

237: artifacts into our results.

238: 

239: \begin{figure*}

240: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f1}

241: \caption{The far-UV image of Arp~78 shown as grayscales is overplotted with

242:   contour lines for the H$\alpha$ emission. The four circles mark positions of

243:   three background galaxies and a point source (probably an AGN or a hot star)

244:   that show up in the FUV, but not in our H$\alpha$ images.}

245: \label{fig:fuvha}

246: \end{figure*}

247: 

248: This Figure clearly shows a nearly perfect match between the FUV and HII

249: regions, as is expected if both the UV-flux and H$\alpha$ flux are emitted by

250: the young stars in the same regions where the IMF extends up to high stellar

251: masses. The close coincidence between FUV- and H$\alpha$ emitting regions both

252: in the inner disk and in the outer tidal features is {\em inconsistent} with a

253: scenario where a low level of star formation in the XUV-disk leads to a low

254: upper stellar mass cutoff of the IMF. It also excludes timing models where the

255: FUV-emitting star clusters are systematically too old to produce significant

256: H$\alpha$ emission through photoionization, i.e. older than $\rm\approx

257: 7\,Myr$.

258: 

259: Several small isolated regions seen in the UV GALEX images but lacking

260: H$\alpha$ emission can be identified as background galaxies in our WIYN

261: optical images; they are marked by encircled crosses in Figure~1. %The bright

262: %FUV source in the lower right part of the frame is the center of the companion

263: %galaxy NGC~770. 

264: There are also a few horizontal structures visible in the H$\alpha$

265: contour map: these originate in chip defects or saturated stars that could not

266: perfectly be corrected for in the data reduction process.

267: 

268: \subsection{Comparing SFRs from FUV/NUV and H$\alpha$}

269: The existence of HII regions could be consistent with models where the upper

270: IMF is biased in outer regions of galaxies, e.g. the \cite{WeidnerKroupa06}

271: models.  To test for this possibility we compare the SFRs obtained from the

272: FUV and H$\alpha$ luminosities using \cite{Kennicutt98}'s calibrations.

273: Although those were obtained -- and hence are strictly accurate only -- for

274: close-to-solar metallicity, they provide a reasonable first estimate for the

275: outer regions of Arp~78. While central spectroscopy has revealed solar to

276: slightly super-solar abundances \citep{Ganda+07}, we expect the outer regions

277: to have subsolar -- albeit probably not dramatically subsolar -- abundances.

278: If IMF biasing exists in the XUV regions, then we expect the SFR derived from

279: the H$\alpha$ luminosity to be significantly lower than that based on FUV

280: data.

281: 

282: \begin{figure}

283:   \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{f2}

284:   \caption{Grayscale image of the region of our continuum subtracted H$\alpha$

285:     frame used to compute the SFR (bordered by the solid black line). For

286:     reference we also show contour lines of the R-band continuum image with

287:     thin blue lines.}

288:   \label{fig:haregions}

289: \end{figure}

290: 

291: To obtain the fluxes in the outer tidal filaments, we masked the outer

292: ring-like structure (cf. Fig. \ref{fig:haregions}) and obtained integrated

293: count rates for this region from which we derive fluxes.  Using the Galactic

294: extinction law from \cite{Valencic+04}, we derive a value of $\rm

295: A_{FUV}=0.63\,mag$ at 1540 {\AA} from the Galactic extinction $\rm

296: E(B-V)=0.073\,mag$ towards Arp~78 \citep{Schlegel+98}. At the distance of $\rm

297: 34\,Mpc$ towards Arp~78, this yields a FUV-luminosity of $\rm

298: 2.5\times10^{39}\,erg\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-2}\,\AA^{-1}$. Based on uncertainties in

299: the background determination and sky- and readout noise we estimate that this

300: luminosity is accurate to $\approx \pm15\%$. From this FUV luminosity we

301: estimate a SFR of $\rm SFR_{FUV}=(0.3\pm0.05)\,M_{\sun}\,yr^{-1}$ using the

302: calibration from \cite{Kennicutt98}.

303: 

304: 

305: To derive an H$\alpha$ flux we use the calibration data from the R-band to

306: convert the count rates we measure into physical units.  For the photometry in

307: the region identical with the one used to derive the FUV flux we considered

308: two extreme cases: To derive an upper limit to the SFR we only count pixels

309: with counts $> 1 \sigma$ above the background level as determined from the

310: nearby sky. Using an effective filter width of $\rm 62\,\AA$ for the WIYN-W16

311: filter yields $\rm L(H\alpha) = 3.2\,\times 10^{40}\,erg\,s^{-1}$ for the

312: regions marked in Fig.  \ref{fig:haregions}, corresponding to a SFR in the

313: tidal debris region of $\rm SFR_{\rm H\alpha} = 0.24\,M_{\sun}\,yr^{-1}$,

314: also based on the \cite{Kennicutt98} calibration. A 3$\sigma$ threshold, taken

315: to be a lower limit to the true SFR, reduced the SFR$_{\rm H\alpha}$ to $\rm

316: 0.15\,M_{\sun}\,yr^{-1}$.  The uncertainty is dominated by potential

317: systematic errors, such as imperfect registration of the FUV and H$\alpha$

318: frames, variations of the continuum scaling factor (on the order of $10\,\%$

319: or $\rm 0.02\,M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$)

320: and large scale fluctuations in the background subtraction due to remaining

321: flat-field errors ($\rm\approx 0.05\,M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$ if integrated over the

322: masked area).  We therefore adopt a SFR$_{\rm H\alpha} =$ 0.2 $\pm$0.05

323: (random) $\pm$0.1 (systematic)~$\rm M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$ .  Thus the ratio of

324: FUV-to-H$\alpha$ SFRs lies in the range of 0.5-1.2, close to expectations for 

325: a normal upper stellar mass function. 

326: 

327: The observed ratio of SFRs depends on a variety of factors other than the

328: present day average upper stellar mass distribution. FUV luminosities can be

329: reduced by dust absorption internal to Arp~78. The L(H$\alpha$) is very

330: dependent on detecting faint emission against a comparatively bright optical

331: sky background. This problem can be especially serious in low surface

332: brightness regions where 30-50\% of the H$\alpha$ flux may be in the form of

333: diffuse emission \citep[e.g.][]{Ferguson+96}.  In addition, the calibration

334: for the SFR derived from H$\alpha$ is only valid for solar metallicity

335: galaxies, while the outskirts of Arp 78 are likely to have somewhat subsolar

336: metallicities.  Investigating the metallicity dependence of SFR indicators

337: with our GALEV models \citep[cf.][]{BickerFritze05}, we found that SFRs in low

338: metallicity regions are overestimated by factors up to 2 if derived from

339: L(H$\alpha$) and by up to 50\% if calculated from L(FUV) using calibrations

340: obtained for close-to-solar metallicity environments.

341: 

342: Even after allowing for these effects, the SFRs derived from the H$\alpha$ and

343: FUV luminosities are in acceptable concordance. The estimated SFR across the

344: outer tidal arm structure in Arp~78 as defined in Fig. \ref{fig:haregions} is

345: $\rm SFR(outer) = 0.2 \pm 0.1\ M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$. This result indicates that

346: the upper mass stellar IMF is normal in the sense that the satisfactory

347: agreement within reasonable observational uncertainties between SFRs derived

348: from FUV and H$\alpha$ luminosities does not require significantly abnormal

349: IMF slope or a peculiarly low upper stellar mass cutoff.

350: 

351: 

352: \subsection{Extended UV Emission and the IMF in Arp~78}

353: 

354: The UV-bright outer arm of Arp~78 contains several HII regions with

355: $\rm L(H\alpha) \geq 10^{38}\,erg\,s^{-1}$.  Photoionization requires some

356: component of the region to have an age of ${\rm \leq 7-9~Myr}$ and for a

357: normal mass function the inferred young stellar masses in these regions are

358: ${\rm >10^4\,M_{\sun}}$.  Hence, these young clusters are sufficiently massive

359: to properly sample the IMF up to high masses

360: \citep{WeidnerKroupa06,Boissier+07}.

361: 

362: Why then is the XUV outer arm structure so obvious in Arp~78 while the optical

363: counterpart is faint? This appears to be an effect similar to what is observed

364: in the context of Tidal Dwarf Galaxies, where the mass and the NIR light can

365: be dominated by stars inherited from the spiral disk while the

366: short-wavelength light is due to stars formed in a major outer SF event

367: triggered by the ongoing interactions in this system. Evidently this tidal arm

368: feature has not persisted for sufficient time to build up an optically

369: luminous stellar population. For example, \cite{Neff+05} show that FUV-R

370: can readily exceed 4 magnitudes in transitory features with ages of $<$

371: 500~Myr.

372: 

373: 

374: \section{Summary} 

375: Deep narrow-band H$\alpha$ imaging from the WIYN 3.5-m telescope on Kitt Peak

376: allowed us to detect H$\alpha$ emission in spatial coincidence with the

377: extended GALEX FUV structure across the inner part and, in particular, across

378: the XUV extended outer structures of Arp 78, that very probably are of tidal

379: origin. We calculated the SFR across these outer structures and found

380:   a value of $\rm 0.2 \pm 0.1\ M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$ from both the FUV and

381:   H$\alpha$ luminosities. The agreement between these two measures points to

382:   a relatively normal upper stellar IMF in this system. We also find the

383:   individual star forming regions in this system to be younger than 15 Myr and

384:   sufficiently massive to properly sample the IMF up to high masses.

385: 

386: The XUV-strong and optically faint outer structures of Arp~78 are consistent

387: with ongoing SF superimposed on an older stellar population torn out from the

388: spiral disk by tidal forces. A detailed investigation of stellar population

389: ages and metallicities across Arp~78 will be the subject of a forthcoming

390: paper.

391: 

392: \acknowledgments

393: These data were obtained as a result of support of the WIYN Observatory by the

394: University of Wisconsin-Madison. We thank our referee, Dr. Gerhardt Meurer,

395: for his very insightful and helpful comments which helped to improve and

396: clarify this paper. We are also grateful to the WIYN staff for their many

397: contributions to the success of these WIYN observations. JSG gratefully

398: acknowledges partial support for this research from the National Science

399: Foundation through grant AST-0708967 and from the University of Wisconsin

400: Graduate School.

401: 

402: 

403: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their

404: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope

405: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches

406: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be

407: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes

408: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.

409: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX

410: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.

411: 

412: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the

413: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research

414: %% for the paper.  Each keyword will be checked against the master list during

415: %% copy editing.  Individual instruments or configurations can be provided 

416: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.

417: 

418: {\it Facilities:} \facility{WIYN (MiniMo)}, \facility{GALEX ()}.

419: 

420: \bibliographystyle{bibstyle}

421: \bibliography{ms}

422: 

423: 

424: \end{document}

425: 

426: %%

427: %% End of file `ms.tex'.

428: