1: % aa.dem
2: % AA vers. 6, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % demonstration file
4: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
5: % revised by EDP Sciences
6: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7: %
8: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
9: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa} % for a paper on 1 column
10: %\documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the long lists of affiliations
11: %\documentclass[rnote]{aa} % for the research notes
12: %
13: \documentclass{aa}
14: %
15: \usepackage{graphicx}
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: \usepackage{txfonts}
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %
20: \begin{document}
21: %
22: \title{Searching for spiral features in the outer Galactic disk.}
23: \subtitle{The field towards WR38 and WR38a}
24:
25: \author{Giovanni Carraro
26: \inst{1,2}
27: \and
28: Edgardo Costa\inst{3}
29: }
30:
31: \offprints{G. Carraro}
32:
33: \institute{
34: $^1$ESO, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile\\
35: $^2$Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Padova,
36: Vicolo Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, Italy\\
37: $^3$Departamento de Astronom\'ia, Universidad de Chile,
38: Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile\\
39: }
40:
41:
42:
43: \date{Received ....; accepted...}
44:
45:
46: \abstract
47: % {} leave it empty if necessary
48: {The detailed spiral structure in the outer Galactic disk is still poorly known, and for
49: several Galactic directions we still have to rely on model extrapolations.}
50: % aims heading (mandatory)
51: {One of these regions is the fourth Galactic quadrant, in the sector comprised between
52: Vela and Carina ($270^o \leq l \leq 300^o$) where -apart from the conspicuous Carina
53: branch of the Carina Sagittarius arm- no spiral arms have been detected so far in the optical
54: beyond $l \sim 270^o$.}
55: % methods heading (mandatory)
56: {By means of deep $UBVI$ photometry, we search for spiral features in known low absorption
57: windows. $U$ photometry, although observationally demanding, constitutes a powerful
58: tool to detect and characterize distant aggregates of young stars, and allows to derive
59: firmer distance estimates. We have studied a direction close to the tangent ($l \sim 290^o$)
60: to the Carina arm, in an attempt to detect optical spiral tracers far beyond the Carina branch,
61: where radio observations and models predictions seem to indicate the presence of the extension
62: of the Perseus and Norma-Cygnus spiral arms in the fourth quadrant.}
63: % results heading (mandatory)
64: {Along this line of sight, we detect three distinct groups of young stars. Two of them, at
65: distances of $\sim$2.5 and $\sim$6.0 kpc, belong to the Carina spiral arm (which is crossed twice
66: in this particular direction). Interestingly, the latter is here detected for the first time.
67: The third group, at a distance of $\sim$12.7 kpc, is likely a
68: part of the Perseus arm which lies beyond the Carina arm, and constitutes the first optical
69: detection of this arm in the fourth Galactic quadrant. The position of this feature is compatible
70: both with HI observations and model predictions. We furthermore present evidence that this
71: extremely distant group, formerly thought to be a star cluster (Shorlin~1), is in fact a diffuse
72: young population typical of spiral features. In addition, our data-set does not support,
73: as claimed in the
74: literature, the possible presence of the Monoceros Ring toward this direction}
75: % conclusions heading (optional), leave it empty if necessary
76: {This study highlights how multicolor optical studies can be effective to probe the spiral structure
77: in the outer Galactic disk. More fields need to be studied in this region of the Galaxy to better
78: constrain the spiral structure in the fourth Galactic quadrant, in particular the shape and extent
79: of the Perseus arm, and, possibly, to detect the even more distant Norma-Cygnus arm.}
80:
81: \keywords{Galaxy: spiral arms- Open clusters and associations: general- Open clusters
82: and associations: individual: Shorlin 1}
83:
84: \maketitle
85: %
86: %________________________________________________________________
87:
88: \section{Introduction}
89:
90: \noindent
91: In recent times the study of the spiral structure of the outer
92: Galactic disk has witnessed a renewed interest
93: (see e.g. Levine et al. 2006, V\'azquez et al. 2008, Benjamin 2008),
94: in part due to the claimed discovery of structures in the form of star
95: over-densities which would be produced by accretion/merging events.
96: Examples are those in Monoceros (Yanny et al. 2003), Canis Major (Martin
97: et al. 2004) and Argus (Rocha Pinto et al. 2006). To assess the reality
98: and properties of these over-densities, a detailed investigation of the
99: outer Galactic disk is a basic requirement. Such an investigation would
100: also improve our knowledge of the extreme periphery of the Milky Way (MW).\\
101:
102: \noindent
103: Spiral features can be detected by using a variety of tracers, namely
104: HI (see e.g. Levine et al. 2006), HII (see e.g. Russeil 2003), CO (see e.g.
105: Luna et al. 2006), and optical objects (see e.g. V\'azquez et al 2008).
106: These diverse techniques have provided a coherent picture of the spiral
107: structure in the third Galactic quadrant (Moitinho et al. 2008). Our group
108: has contributed to this effort providing optical information for a large
109: sample of young open clusters (Moitinho et al. 2006), in the field of which
110: we have recognized distant and reddened sequences which allowed us to define
111: the shape and extent of spiral arms up to 20 kpc from the Galactic center.\\
112:
113: \begin{figure*}
114: \centering
115: \includegraphics[width=18.5cm]{AA10800fig1.eps}
116: \caption{Left panel: $V$-band 100 sec exposure image of the field observed
117: in the area of the star cluster Shorlin~1. Field shown is $20\arcmin$ on a side.
118: North is up and East to the left. Right panel: Zoom of the cluster region,
119: in which the two WR stars (WR38 and WR38a) are indicated. Field shown is
120: $\sim3\arcmin$ on a side.}%
121: \end{figure*}
122: \noindent
123: This paper is the first result of a study of selected low-absorption regions in
124: the fourth Galactic quadrant, aimed at finding distant optical spiral features.
125: We present an investigation of the field towards the Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars WR38 and
126: WR38a ($RA = 11^{h}06^{m}$, $DEC = -61^{o}14^{\prime}$, Shorlin et al. 2004, hereafter Sh04; Wallace et al. 2005, hereafter Wa05),
127: which attracted our attention for several reasons.\\
128:
129: Sh04 and Wa05 discuss the discovery of a distant, young, compact
130: star cluster, at a distance of $\sim$12 kpc, associated with these two WR stars.
131: These two studies, however, reach quite different conclusions about the relationship
132: of this cluster with known spiral arms. While Sh04 propose that the cluster
133: is associated with an extension of the Perseus arm beyond the Carina-Sagittarius arm,
134: Wa05, more conservatively, suggest that it lies in the more distant part of the Carina
135: arm. In fact, the line-of-sight in the direction to WR38 and WR38a crosses twice the
136: Carina-Sagittarius arm. In a quite different interpretation, Frinchaboy et al. (2004)
137: associate this cluster to the Galactic Anticenter Stellar Structure (GASS), a
138: population of old star clusters, possibly members of the Monoceros Ring.\\
139:
140: With the purpose of clarifying these issues, we undertook an observational campaign
141: which addresses the following questions: Is the group of stars close to WR38 and WR38a
142: (i.e. Shorlin 1) a real star cluster? Does this group belong to the most distant
143: part of the Carina arm or to the Perseus arm? Are we looking in this direction at
144: signatures of the Monoceros ring, or the Argus system?\\
145:
146: \noindent
147: The paper is organized as follows. In Sect~2 we describe the observations and the
148: reduction procedure and compare our data-set with previous investigations,
149: and in Sect.~3 we discuss the reddening law in the Galactic direction under consideration.
150: In Sect.~4 and 5 we thoroughly discuss the properties of the three different stellar
151: populations detected in the field observed. Finally, Sec.~6 summarizes the results of
152: our study.
153:
154:
155: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
156:
157: \subsection{Observations}
158:
159: The region of interest (see Fig.~1) was observed with the Y4KCAM camera
160: attached to the 1.0m telescope, which is operated by the SMARTS consortium\footnote{{\tt http://http://www.astro.yale.edu/smarts}}
161: and located at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO). This camera
162: is equipped with an STA 4064$\times$4064 CCD with 15-$\mu$ pixels, yielding a scale of
163: 0.289$^{\prime\prime}$/pixel and a field-of-view (FOV) of $20^{\prime} \times 20^{\prime}$ at the
164: Cassegrain focus of the CTIO 1.0m telescope. The CCD was operated without binning, at a nominal
165: gain of 1.44 e$^-$/ADU, implying a readout noise of 7~e$^-$ per quadrant (this detector is read
166: by means of four different amplifiers). QE and other detector characteristics can be found at:
167: http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/Y4KCam/detector.html.\\
168:
169: \noindent
170: The observational material was obtained in three observing runs, resumed in Table~1. In our
171: first run we took deep $UBVI$ images of Shorlin~1, under good seeing, but non-photometric
172: conditions. In our second run we took medium and short exposures of Shorlin~1, and
173: observed Landolt's SA~98 $UBVRI$ standard stars area (Landolt 1992), to tie our $UBVI$
174: instrumental system to the standard system. In a final third run we secured an additional
175: set of $U$-band images of Shorlin~1. Average seeing was 1.2$\arcsec$.\\
176:
177: \begin{table}
178: %%\centering
179: \tabcolsep 0.1truecm
180: \caption{Log of $UBVI$ photometric observations.}
181: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
182: \hline
183: \noalign{\smallskip}
184: Target& Date & Filter & Exposure (sec) & airmass\\
185: \noalign{\smallskip}
186: \hline
187: \noalign{\smallskip}
188: Shorlin~1 & 24 May 2006 & U & 60, 1500 &1.28$-$1.33\\
189: & & B & 30, 100, 1200 &1.20$-$1.35\\
190: & & V & 30, 100, 900 &1.22$-$1.34\\
191: & & I & 100, 700 &1.25$-$1.34\\
192: Shorlin~1 & 29 January 2008 & U & 5, 15 &1.19$-$1.22\\
193: & & B & 3, 5, 10 &1.19$-$1.23\\
194: & & V & 3, 5, 10 &1.18$-$1.22\\
195: & & I & 3, 5, 10 &1.18$-$1.23\\
196: SA~98 & 29 January 2008 & U & 2x10, 200, 300, 400 &1.17$-$1.89\\
197: & & B & 2x10, 100, 2x200 &1.17$-$1.99\\
198: & & V & 2x10, 25, 50, 2x100 &1.20$-$2.27\\
199: & & I & 2x10, 50, 100, 2x150 &1.18$-$2.05\\
200: Shorlin~1 & 05 June 2008 & U & 30x3, 1800 &1.19$-$1.20\\
201: \noalign{\smallskip}
202: \hline
203: \end{tabular}
204: \end{table}
205:
206: Our $UBVI$ instrumental photometric system was defined by the use of a standard broad-band
207: Kitt Peak $BVR_{kc}I_{kc}$ set in combination with a U+CuSO4 $U$-band filter. Transmission
208: curves for these filters can be found at: http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/Y4KCam/filters.html.
209: To determine the transformation from our instrumental system to the standard Johnson-Kron-Cousins
210: system, we observed 46 stars in area SA~98 (Landolt 1992) multiple times, and with different
211: airmasses ranging from $\sim$1.2 to $\sim$2.3. Field SA~98 is very advantageous, as it
212: includes a large number of well observed standard stars, and it is completely covered by
213: the CCD's FOV. Furthermore, the standard's color coverage is very good, being:
214: $-0.5 \leq (U-B) \leq 2.2$; $-0.2 \leq (B-V) \leq 2.2$ and $-0.1 \leq (V-I) \leq 6.0$.\\
215:
216: \subsection{Reductions}
217:
218: Basic calibration of the CCD frames was done using the IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed
219: by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association
220: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with
221: the National Science Foundation.} package CCDRED. For this purpose, zero-exposure
222: frames and twilight sky flats were taken every night. Photometry was then performed
223: using the IRAF DAOPHOT and PHOTCAL packages. Instrumental magnitudes were extracted
224: following the point spread function (PSF) method (Stetson 1987). A quadratic, spatially
225: variable, Master PSF (PENNY function) was adopted. The PSF photometry was finally
226: aperture-corrected, filter by filter. Aperture corrections were determined performing
227: aperture photometry of a suitable number (typically 10 to 20) of bright stars in the field.
228: These corrections were found to vary from 0.120 to 0.215 mag, depending on the filter.\\
229:
230: \subsection{The photometry}
231:
232: Our final photometric catalog consists of 7425 entries having $UBVI$ measures down to
233: $V \sim $ 20, and 12250 entries having $BVI$ measures down to $V \sim 22$.\\
234:
235: After removing saturated stars, and stars having only a few measurements in Landolt's (1992)
236: catalog, our photometric solution for a grand-total of 183 measurements in $U$ and $B$, and of 206
237: measurements in $V$ and $I$, turned out to be:\\
238:
239: \noindent
240: $ U = u + (3.290\pm0.010) + (0.47\pm0.01) \times X - (0.010\pm0.016) \times (U-B)$ \\
241: $ B = b + (2.220\pm0.012) + (0.29\pm0.01) \times X - (0.131\pm0.012) \times (B-V)$ \\
242: $ V = v + (1.990\pm0.007) + (0.16\pm0.01) \times X + (0.021\pm0.007) \times (B-V)$ \\
243: $ I = i + (2.783\pm0.011) + (0.08\pm0.01) \times X + (0.043\pm0.008) \times (V-I)$ \\
244:
245: The final {\it r.m.s} of the fitting was 0.073, 0.069, 0.035 and 0.030 in $U$, $B$, $V$ and $I$,
246: respectively.\\
247:
248: \noindent
249: Global photometric errors were estimated using the scheme developed by Patat \& Carraro
250: (2001, Appendix A1), which takes into account the errors resulting from the PSF fitting
251: procedure (e.i. from ALLSTAR), and the calibration errors (corresponding to the zero point,
252: color terms and extinction errors). In Fig.~2 we present global photometric error trends
253: plotted as a function of $V$ magnitude. Quick inspection shows that stars brighter than
254: $V \approx 20$ mag have errors lower than 0.10~mag in magnitude and lower than 0.20~mag in
255: all colors. \\
256:
257: \begin{figure}s
258: \centering
259: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig2.eps}
260: \caption{Photometric errors in V, (B-V), (U-B) and (V-I) as a function of V mag.}%
261: \end{figure}
262:
263:
264:
265: The only previous $UBV$ (Johnson-Morgan) photometric study of this region is that of Sh04,
266: who present photoelectric and CCD photometry for roughly 140 stars brighter than $V \sim$ 16.5
267: in the field of WR38 and WR38a. In Fig.~3, we compare our photometry with that of Sh04 for
268: $V$, $B-V$ and $U-B$, in the sense ours minus theirs, as a function of our $V$ magnitude.
269: This comparison was possible only for 103 of their stars because, from the material presented
270: in Sh04, it was not possible to identify all objects measured by them (this issue was addressed
271: with D. Turner, private communication). From the stars in common we obtain:
272: $\Delta V = 0.017 \pm 0.065$, $\Delta (B-V) = 0.014 \pm 0.066$ and $\Delta (U-B) = 0.034 \pm 0.199$.\\
273:
274: \begin{figure}
275: \centering
276: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig3.eps}
277: \caption{Comparison of our photometry with that of Sh04 for $V$, $B-V$ and $U-B$ (in the sense
278: this work minus Sh04), as a function of our $V$ magnitude.}%
279: \end{figure}
280:
281: In spite of the significant scatter in the comparison for $U-B$, it can be concluded that the two
282: studies are in nice agreement. The poor match in this color may be ascribed to problems in their
283: $U-$band photometry, as extensively discussed in Sh04. Granted this, as a by-product we confirm that
284: the discrepancies between the photometry Sh04 and that of Wa05 is possibly due to the transformation
285: of the F336 ($U$), F439W ($B$), F555W ($V$) HST photometry to the Johnson-Morgan system.
286:
287: \subsection{Astrometry}
288:
289: For two-hundred stars in our photometric catalog there are J2000.0 equatorial coordinates
290: from the Guide Star Catalogue \footnote{Space telescope Science Institute, 2001, The Guide
291: Star Catalogue Version 2.2.02.}, version 2 (GSC-2.2, 2001). Using the SkyCat tool at ESO, and
292: the IRAF tasks ccxymatch and ccmap, we first established the transformation between our $(X,Y)$
293: pixel coordinates (from ALLSTAR) and the International Celestial Reference Frame (Arias et al.
294: 1995). These transformations turned out to have an ${\it r.m.s.}$ value of 0.15$^{\prime\prime}$.
295: Finally, using the IRAF task cctran, we computed J2000.0 coordinates for all objects in our
296: catalog.
297:
298:
299: \section{The reddening law toward l=290.63 and b=-0.903}
300:
301: A basic requirement before analyzing our photometric material is to investigate the reddening law
302: in the direction of WR38 and WR38a. Sh04 emphasize that according to their analysis the extinction
303: in this direction follows the normal law, namely that the ratio of total over selective absorption
304: $\frac{A_V}{E(B-V)}$ is 3.1. This value has already been found to be of general validity towards
305: Carina (Carraro 2002, Tapia et al. 2003). The $(V-I)$ vs. $(B-V)$ color-color diagram show in Fig.~4.,
306: constructed using our $UBVI$ photometry, confirms the above statements. Most stars lie close to the
307: reddening-free Schmidt-Kaler (1982) Zero Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) line (dashed line), which runs
308: almost parallel to the reddening vector plotted in the upper-right corner of this figure. This
309: vector has been drawn following the normal extinction ratio (Dean et al. 1978), which suggests that
310: in this specific Galactic direction absorption follows the normal law. In the subsequent discussion
311: we will therefore adopt $\frac{A_V}{E(B-V)} = 3.1$ and $\frac{E(U-B)}{E(B-V)} = 0.72$.
312:
313: \begin{figure}
314: \centering
315: \includegraphics[width=9.5truecm]{AA10800fig4.eps}
316: %%\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig4.eps}
317: \caption{$(V-I)$ vs. $(B-V)$ color-color diagram for stars in our field with $UBVI$ photometry.
318: The reddening vector for the normal extinction law is plotted in the upper-right corner. The
319: the dashed and dotted lines represent the reddening-free Schmidt-Kaler (1982) Zero Age Main
320: Sequence relations for dwarf and giant stars, respectively.}%
321: \end{figure}
322:
323:
324: \section{Stellar populations in the field}
325:
326: In Fig.~5. we present a $(B-V)$ vs. $(U-B)$ color-color diagram for those stars in our photometric
327: catalog which have photometric errors lower than 0.05 magnitudes in both $(B-V)$ and $(U-B)$.
328: This figure is similar to Fig.~3 of Sh04, except for the much larger number of stars resulting
329: from our larger area coverage and deeper photometry. The solid line is an empirical reddening-free
330: ZAMS for dwarf stars, from Schmidt-Kaler (1982). In agreement with what was discussed in the
331: previous section, we have adopted a normal reddening law for this region. The corresponding
332: reddening vector has been plotted in the bottom of the figure.\\
333:
334: \begin{figure*}
335: \centering
336: \includegraphics[width=15truecm]{AA10800fig5.eps}
337: \caption{$(B-V)$ vs. $(U-B)$ color-color diagram for stars in our photometric catalog
338: with photometric errors lower than 0.05 magnitudes in both $(B-V)$ and $(U-B)$. The
339: reddening vector for the normal extinction law has been plotted in the bottom of the
340: figure. The solid line is an empirical reddening-free ZAMS for dwarf stars, from
341: Schmidt-Kaler (1982). The same ZAMS (dashed lines) has been displaced along the reddening
342: line for three different amounts of reddening, 0.25, 0.52 and 1.45. The approximate
343: location of stars with spectral type O6, B5 and A0 is also indicated. The two crosses are
344: here used to show the position of WR38 and WR38a. See text for more details.}%
345: \end{figure*}
346:
347: \noindent
348: Shifting the ZAMS by different amounts in the direction of the reddening vector, we can fit the
349: most obvious stellar sequences, which has led us to identify three distinct stellar populations.
350: This displacement is illustrated by dotted lines (in black)
351: for three spectral type along the reddening direction. This permits to define
352: the spectral type of reddened stars.\\
353: In what follows we discuss how we have chosen these amounts and why we claim we are distinguishing
354: three different populations.\\
355:
356: \noindent
357: The yellow dot-dashed ZAMS has been shifted by $E(B-V)$ = 0.25, and fits a conspicuous sequence
358: of early type stars. As indicated in the figure, this group is composed by stars of spectral
359: type from as early as O8 up to A0. Beyond A0, the definition of spectral type becomes ambiguous
360: due to the crossing of different reddening ZAMS close to the A0V knee. This low-reddening
361: group of stars clearly suffers from variable extinction, as indicated by the significant
362: spread around the $E(B-V)$ = 0.25 ZAMS.
363: We estimate in fact that the mean reddening
364: for this group is 0.25$\pm$0.10. Sh04 identified this group as stars belonging to the Carina
365: branch of the Carina-Sagittarius spiral arm. We will refer to this group of stars as group
366: {\bf A}.\\
367:
368: \noindent
369: The blue short-dashed ZAMS has been shifted by $E(B-V)$ = 0.52. It passes through a group of
370: young stars, with spectral types ranging from B2 to A0, which exhibit almost no reddening
371: variation. In fact, we estimate that the mean reddening for this group is 0.52$\pm$0.05, namely
372: the scatter around the mean value of 0.52 is small, and compatible with the typical photometric
373: error in the (U-B) and (B-V) colors.
374: In Fig.~3 of
375: Sh04 this group is barely visible, and the authors make no comments about it. Because of the
376: wider area covered by our study, it could be readily detected in our $(B-V)$ vs. $(U-B)$
377: color-color diagram. We will refer to this group of stars as group {\bf B}.\\
378:
379: Similar features (namely secondary sequences in two-color diagrams) have been found in a
380: variety of two-color diagrams of stellar clusters and field stars in the third Galactic
381: Quadrant (see e.g. Carraro et al. 2005). They are though to be produced by early type stars stars belonging
382: to distant spiral features in the outer Galactic disk (see also Moitinho et al. 2008).\\
383:
384: \noindent
385: The two red long-dash ZAMSs have been shifted by $E(B-V)$ = 1.10 and $E(B-V)$=1.50,
386: and identify a group of
387: early-type (from O6 to B5) stars suffering strong reddening with a significant dispersion.
388: Since the region in the color-color diagram between the two red ZAMS is continuously occupied by stars,
389: we propose they basically belong to the same distant population.
390:
391: We estimate that the mean reddening for this group is 1.30$\pm$0.20.
392: %We find no clear evidence
393: %for the existence of later spectral type stars, in spite of our photometry being several
394: %magnitudes deeper than that of Sh04.
395: Within this group of stars,
396: Sh04 identify a cluster of young stars
397: surrounding the two WR stars (the two crosses in Fig.~5).
398: We will refer to this group of stars as group {\bf C} or
399: Shorlin~1 (also known as C1104-610a).\\
400:
401: \noindent
402: As anticipated, the two crosses in Fig.~5 identify the two WR stars; WR38 (WC4) and WR38a (WN5). As exhaustively
403: discussed by Sh04, $U$-band photometry of this type of star is difficult, but they do provide
404: corrections to transform their colors to the Johnson-Morgan standard system. Given that our
405: uncorrected colors (see Table~2) are in good agreement with theirs, we adopted their corrections
406: (see the Table~3 in Sh04).
407:
408: \begin{table}
409: %%\centering
410: \tabcolsep 0.1truecm
411: \caption{Photometry of the stars WR38 and WR38a}
412: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
413: \hline
414: \noalign{\smallskip}
415: & V & (B-V) & (U-B) \\
416: \noalign{\smallskip}
417: \hline
418: \noalign{\smallskip}
419: WR38 & 14.684 & 1.216 & 0.679\\
420: WR38a & 15.113 & 1.191 & 0.077\\
421: \noalign{\smallskip}
422: \hline
423: \end{tabular}
424: \end{table}
425:
426: \section{Properties of groups A, B and C}
427:
428: To be more quantitative, we first measured the individual reddening of the stars in groups {\bf A},
429: {\bf B} and {\bf C} using the well known reddening free $Q-$ parameter (see for instance Johnson 1966),
430: which allows to establish the membership of a certain
431: star to a group on the basis of common reddening (see e.g. V\'azquez et al. 1996, V\'azquez et al. 2005, and Carraro 2002).
432: Having provided evidences that the reddening law is normal, the Q-parameter is therefore defined as:
433:
434:
435: \[
436: Q = (U-B) - 0.72 \times (B-V)
437: \]
438:
439:
440: \noindent
441: The value of Q is a function of spectral type and absolute magnitude (Schmidt-Kaler 1982).
442: \\
443:
444: This technique permits to identify {\it bona fide} members of similar spectral type as late as
445: A0V. We have identified 146 stars in our sample with a mean $E(B-V)$ of 0.25$\pm$0.10 (group {\bf A}),
446: 96 stars with a mean $E(B-V)$ of 0.52$\pm$0.05 (group {\bf B}), and 212 stars with a mean $E(B-V)$
447: of 1.30$\pm$0.20 (group {\bf C}).\\
448:
449: \noindent
450: Then, to obtain an estimate of the mean distance of the three groups, we made use of the
451: variable extinction diagram shown in Fig.~6, where to derive ($V-M_V$) we
452: adopt M$_V$ as a function of sprectral type from Schmidt-Kaler 1982.
453: Yellow triangles, blue squares and red circles
454: depict members of groups {\bf A}, {\bf B}, and {\bf C}, respectively. The four lines plotted
455: have been drawn adopting the normal extinction law ($R_V$ = 3.1), and correspond to four different
456: absolute distance moduli (V$_{0}$ - M$_{V}$): 10.0 (solid), 12.0 (dotted), 14.0 (short-dashed) and
457: 16.0 (long-dashed). The histograms in the right panel of this figure give the apparent distance
458: moduli distribution, from which we infer the mean distance to the three groups.\\
459: One can in fact extrapolate the absolute
460: distance modulus (m-M)$_{V,o}$ reading the value along the $Y$-axis, where the reddening is zero.\\
461:
462:
463: \begin{figure}
464: \centering
465: \includegraphics[width=9.0truecm]{AA10800fig6.eps}
466: \caption{Variable extinction diagram for all early type star for which individual reddening
467: was measured. The four lines plotted have been drawn adopting the normal extinction law
468: ($R_V$ = 3.1), and correspond to four different absolute distance moduli (V$_{0}$ - M$_{V}$):
469: 10.0 (solid), 12.0 (dotted), 14.0 (short-dash) and 16.0 (long-dash). The histograms in the
470: right panel of this figure give the apparent distance moduli distribution, from which we
471: infer the mean distance of the three groups.}%
472: \end{figure}
473:
474: \noindent
475: In the left panels of figures 7, 8 and 9 we present $(B-V)$ vs. $(U-B)$ color-color diagrams
476: enhancing the stars of groups {\bf A} (yellow triangles), {\bf B} (red squares) and {\bf C}
477: (blue circles), respectively.
478: The right panels of these three figures show the distribution on the plane of the sky for the objects
479: in each group. In these latter panels stars have been plotted as circles scaled according to their
480: $V$ magnitude. The fields shown in these figures are centered at RA = $11^{h}05^{m}48.5^{sec}$,
481: DEC = $-61^{o}11^{\prime}5.9^{\prime \prime}$.
482: North is up, East to the left as in Fig.~1.\\
483:
484: \begin{figure}
485: \centering
486: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig7.eps}
487: \caption{Stars belonging to group {\bf A} (yellow triangles). Left panel (as well as left
488: panel of Fig.~6) illustrates how this group was selected on a reddening basis. See text for
489: details.}%
490: \end{figure}
491:
492: \begin{figure}
493: \centering
494: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig8.eps}
495: \caption{Same as Fig.~6, for stars belonging to group {\bf B} (red squares). See text for
496: details.}%
497: \end{figure}
498:
499: \begin{figure}
500: \centering
501: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig9.eps}
502: \caption{Same as Fig.~6, for stars belonging to group {\bf C} (blue circles). See text for
503: details.}%
504: \end{figure}
505:
506: \subsection{Group A}
507:
508: Inspection of the right panel of Fig.~7 shows that the objects in group {\bf A} are evenly distributed
509: on the sky, with no hints for any particular concentration.\\
510:
511: The sequence defined by this group in variable reddening diagram (Fig.~6) has a mean intrinsic
512: distance modulus of 12.0 magnitudes, with a large spread. Still, most of the stars lie at a mean
513: distance of 2.5$\pm$1.5 kpc. This mean distance is compatible with this group lying in the part
514: of the Carina branch of the Carina-Sagittarius arm closest to the Sun. The observed distance spread
515: is compatible with the typical size of inner Galactic spiral arms (1.5-2.0 kpc, Bronfman et al. 2000).\\
516:
517: We therefore conclude that group {\bf A} is composed of young field stars belonging to the Carina-Sagittarius
518: arm, confirming the suggestion by Sh04. We dispute however the possibility that these stars form a
519: star cluster as suggested by Shorlin (1998), and claim that this conclusion was possibly the result of
520: the small FOV covered by the photometry of Shorlin (1998). Our wider coverage clearly shows that we
521: are looking at a population of field stars having the same reddening and age, but located at different
522: distances in the Carina arm.
523:
524: \subsection {Group B}
525:
526: As was the case of group {\bf A}, the objects in group {\bf B} are also evenly distributed on the
527: plane of the sky, but they are, on the average, fainter (see right panel of Fig.~8).\\
528:
529: In the variable reddening diagram (Fig.~6) they trace a sequence of stars which lie at larger distance than
530: those of group {\bf A}. They have a mean absolute distance modulus of 14.0 magnitudes, which implies
531: a bulk distance of 6.0$\pm$2.0 kpc. The stars in this group are also young, and, according to modern
532: descriptions of the MW spiral structure (Vall\'ee 2005, Russeil 2003) they are most probably
533: located in the part of the Carina branch more distant from the Sun. In fact, the tangent to the
534: Carina-Sagittarius arm points to $l\sim280^o$, in a way that the line of sight to these groups is
535: expected to cross twice the Carina portion of this arm.\\
536:
537: This group had not been noticed before, which may be the origin of the different conclusions
538: suggested by Sh04 and Wa05 on the location, and distance, of the putative star cluster associated to
539: WR38 and WR38a (see discussion below).
540:
541: \subsection {Group C}
542:
543: This is the most interesting group of faint young stars with common reddening. Our mean $E(B-V)$
544: value (1.30$\pm$0.20) is smaller than the value found by Sh04, but still marginally compatible
545: within the errors declared. The 212 stars extracted within this reddening range have a broad distance
546: distribution (see Fig.~6), are faint, and fairly evenly distributed across the field of view
547: (see Fig.~9). Careful inspection of Fig.~9 indicates the existence of a concentration of stars close
548: to the center of the field. This concentration corresponds to Shorlin~1 (C1104-610a, Sh04).\\
549:
550: \noindent
551: The point now is whether this is really a cluster or just a chance concentration of bright stars-
552: and where it lies exactly. As Sh04 argue, the reality of the cluster can be assessed only with much
553: deeper photometry. To address these two issues we will make use of the variable reddening diagram
554: (Fig.~6) and of the CMDs presented in Fig~10 and Fig.~11, constructed with the objects belonging to
555: group {\bf C} having the largest reddening (E(B-V) $>$ 1.45), as Shorlin~1 (see Sh04).
556: Filled symbols in Figs.~10 and 11 indicate stars within a $0.6\arcmin$ wide circle
557: centered on Shorlin~1 (nominal center RA = $11^{h}05^{m}46.52^{sec}$; DEC=$-61^{o}13^{\prime}49.1^{\prime\prime}$),
558: which is the zone where the cluster seems to be located.\\
559:
560: \begin{figure}
561: \centering
562: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig10.eps}
563: \caption{Color-Magnitude Diagrams for stars belonging to group {\bf C}, for different color
564: combinations. Filled symbols indicate stars inside the Shorlin~1 area}%
565: \end{figure}
566:
567: \begin{figure}
568: \centering
569: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig11.eps}
570: \caption{Reddening free Color-Magnitude Diagram for stars belonging to group {\bf C}, for
571: different color combinations. Filled symbols indicate stars inside Shorlin~1 area. In this figure only
572: stars having E(B-V) larger than 1.45 are plotted. See text for more details.}%
573: \end{figure}
574:
575: \noindent
576: Given that these common reddening stars of group {\bf C} distribute evenly in the field (see Fig.~9),
577: we can compare the position (in a CMD) of objects in the general field with that of objects in
578: the Shorlin~1 region. As shown by the CMDs presented in Fig.~10, general field stars (open symbols)
579: occupy the same region as Shorlin~1 stars (filled symbols). This suggests that they share the same
580: distance range and age, and therefore conform a common properties, evenly distributed, population.\\
581:
582: The same conclusion can be drawn from the reddening-free CMDs presented in Fig.~11. In these
583: plots the stars within the putative cluster area and those in the general field define the same
584: sequence. The $V_o$ vs. $(B-V)_o$ CMD presented in the right panel of Fig.~11 has been plotted
585: in the same scale as Fig.~5 of Sho04. Note that, in spite of our photometry being six magnitudes
586: deeper in $V$, we detect only one fainter object in the cluster area. We can be confident therefore
587: that there are no fainter stars associated to the cluster.\\
588:
589: The ZAMS superposed in the both panels of Fig.~11 is for (m-M)$_{V,o}$ = 15.5, which suggests that
590: the distance of group {\bf C} is about 12.7$\pm$3.0 kpc. Both Shorlin~1 members and field stars exhibit
591: however a significant distance spread (see Fig.~6)\\
592:
593: For the reasons summarized below, we conclude that there is no clear evidence of a star
594: cluster at the location of WR38/WR38a.
595:
596: \begin{description}
597:
598: \item $\bullet$ a cluster hosting two WR stars would have to be a relatively massive one, with
599: numerous stars of spectral type later than B; on the contrary to what we see,
600:
601: \item $\bullet$ we do not see any special concentration of stars at the putative cluster location
602: (see Fig.~1),
603:
604: \item $\bullet$ the sequence defined by Shorlin~1 in the CMDs is also occupied by field stars which
605: have the same reddening, and are evenly distributed in the field (see Figs. 9, 10 and 11),
606:
607: \item $\bullet$ the stars defining the cluster (the 8 stars discovered by Sh04, plus one fainter
608: object from this work) exhibit a significant distance spread (see Fig.~6), incompatible with a
609: physical, although loose, star cluster.
610:
611: \end{description}
612:
613:
614: \noindent
615: To summarize our findings, we report in Table~3 the main properties of the three
616: groups. As for the age we only provide an upper limit, since the populations under
617: investigations are surely young, and a precise age estimate - by the way quite difficutl-
618: is beyond the scope of this work.
619:
620:
621:
622: \section{Conclusions}
623:
624: The large angular coverage, and depth, of our $UBVI$ photometry of the region around the
625: WR38/WR38a has allowed us to clarify the stellar populations towards Galactic longitude
626: $\approx$ 290$^o$, in the fourth Galactic quadrant.\\
627:
628: \noindent
629: Our results can be visualized with the aid of Fig.~12, where the spiral structure of the
630: Galaxy (Vall\'ee 2005) is presented in the $X-Y$ plane, where $X$ points in the direction of
631: Galactic rotation and $Y$ points towards the anti-center. The Carina and Perseus arms are
632: indicated with the symbols $I$ and $II$, respectively. The Galactic center and the position
633: of the Sun are also indicated, at (0.0,0.0) and (0.0,8.5), respectively. The position, pitch
634: angle, and extension of the arms are clearly model dependent; to a lesser extent for the Carina arm
635: (which is well known) and significantly more for the less-known Perseus arm (both HI observations
636: (Levine et al. 2006) and HII observations (Russeil 2003) coincide however on the approximate
637: location and extent of the Perseus arm). Beyond $\sim$9 kpc from the Sun, it is not expected
638: to find spiral features related to the Carina arm (Georgelin et al. 2000); more distant structures
639: can be associated with the Perseus arm. According to Levine et al. (2006, their Fig.~4) at l=290$^o$
640: the Perseus arm is located in the range $ -18.0\leq X \leq -13.0 $ and $0.0 \leq Y \leq 2.0$ Kpc,
641: respectively, in nice agreement with Vall\'ee model.\\
642:
643: \noindent
644: With a dashed arrow we indicate the line-of-sight in the direction of our field, and with thick
645: segments the distance range we derived for the three groups ({\bf A}, {\bf B} and {\bf C}) we
646: identified in this Galactic direction (see also Table~3). Fig.~12 shows that the groups detected remarkably fit
647: the position of the Carina and Perseus arm. This confirms Sh04's suggestion that the most distant
648: group ({\bf C}) is most probably associated with the extension of the Perseus arm in the fourth
649: Galactic quadrant, and constitutes the first optical detection of this arm. However, on the
650: contrary to Sh04, here we propose that this extreme group is not a star cluster, but simply a group
651: of young stars uniformly distributed within the Perseus arm.\\
652:
653: The direction we are investigating is about $\sim1^o$ below the Galactic plane. At distances of
654: 2.5, 6.0 and 12.7 kpc this implies heights below the Galactic plane of about 50, 100, and 210 pc,
655: respectively. These are sizeable values, and reflect the trend of the Galactic warp in this
656: zone of the disk (Momany et al. 2006).\\
657:
658: \begin{figure}
659: \centering
660: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{AA10800fig12.eps}
661: \caption{Schematic view of the spiral structure of the Galaxy (Vall\'ee 2005). $X$ points in
662: the direction of Galactic rotation, and $Y$ points towards the anti-center. The position of the Sun
663: (0.0,8.5) and of the Galactic center (0.0,0.0) are indicated. The symbols I and II indicate the
664: Carina and Perseus spiral arms, respectively. Thick segments illustrate the location of the three
665: groups ({\bf A}, {\bf B} and {\bf C}) discussed in the text. See text for details}%
666: \end{figure}
667:
668: \begin{table}
669: %%\centering
670: \tabcolsep 0.1truecm
671: \caption{Properties of the three distinct groups we detected in the field toward WR~38 and WR~38a.}
672: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
673: \hline
674: \noalign{\smallskip}
675: Group& E(B-V) & d$_{\odot}$ & age & Note\\
676: \noalign{\smallskip}
677: \hline
678: \noalign{\smallskip}
679: A & 0.25$\pm$0.10 & 2.5$\pm$1.5 & $<$ 100 Myr& Carina\\
680: B & 0.52$\pm$0.05 & 6.0$\pm$2.0 & $<$ 100 Myr& Carina\\
681: C & 1.30$\pm$0.20 & 12.7$\pm$3.0 & $<$ 100 Myr& Perseus\\
682: \noalign{\smallskip}
683: \hline
684: \end{tabular}
685: \end{table}
686:
687:
688: \noindent
689: We finally wish to discuss our photometric database in the framework of a possible detection
690: of the Argus over-density discussed in Rocha-Pinto et al. (2006), or the Monoceros Ring,
691: which Shorlin~1 was suggested to be associated with (Frinchaboy et al. 2004). With this aim, in
692: Fig.~13 we present $V$ vs. $(B-V)$ CMD for all the stars having BV photometry.\\
693:
694: \begin{figure}
695: \centering
696: \includegraphics[width=9.5truecm]{AA10800fig13.eps}
697: \caption{CMD of all stars with BV photometry in the field under study}%
698: \end{figure}
699:
700: The distribution of stars in this diagram is relatively easy to describe. Apart from the
701: prominent blue sequence of young stars brighter than V$\approx$ 14.0, which are the objects of
702: {\bf A}, we can distinguish two other remarkable features. The first is a thick Main Sequence (MS)
703: downward of V$\approx$ 14.0, widened by photometric errors and binaries, but mostly reflecting the
704: fact we are sampling objects at very different distances, and with different reddening, in the
705: Galactic disk. Along this thick MS we do not find any evidence of a blue Turn Off Point, typical
706: of the metal poor, intermediate age, population of the Monoceros Ring (Conn et al 2007).\\
707: Therefore we conclude that no indication of the presence of the Monoceros
708: Ring or the Argus system is detected in our field.\\
709: \noindent
710: The second is a Red Giant Branch, significantly widened and somewhat bent by variable reddening,
711: composed of giant stars at different distances. The relatively high number of giants can be easily accounted for,
712: because we are sampling a field located 1$^o$ below the Galactic plane.\\
713:
714:
715: \noindent
716: Our results confirm the effectiveness of multicolor optical photometry in the study of the
717: structure of the MW disk. More fields need to be observed to better constrain the
718: spiral structure in the fourth Galactic quadrant, in particular the shape and extent of the
719: Perseus arm, and, possibly, detect the more distant Norma-Cygnus arm.\\
720: At odds with radio observations, which has to rely on the poorly known Galactic rotation
721: curve, optical observation, especially in low absorption directions,
722: can better constraint the distance to spiral
723: features.
724:
725:
726: \begin{acknowledgements}
727: Tomer Tal and Jeff Kenney are deeply thanked for securing part of the observations
728: used in this paper. GC acknowledges R.A.V\'azquez for very
729: fruitful discussions. EC acknowledges the Chilean Centro de Astrof\'isica FONDAP
730: (No. 15010003).
731: \end{acknowledgements}
732:
733:
734: \begin{thebibliography}{}
735:
736: \bibitem[Arias et
737: al.(1995)]{1995A&A...303..604A} Arias, E.~F., Charlot, P., Feissel, M., \& Lestrade, J.-F.\ 1995, \aap, 303, 604
738: \bibitem[2008]{Ben}Benjamin, R.A., 2008, in {\it Massive Star Formation: Observations Confront Theory},
739: ASP Conference Series, Vol. 387, p. 375
740: \bibitem[2000]{Bro}Bronfman, L., Casassus, S., May, J., Nyman, L.-\AA~ 2000, A\&A 358, 521
741: \bibitem[2002]{car02} Carraro, G., 2002, MNRAS 331, 785
742: \bibitem[2005]{car} Carraro, G., V\'azquez, R.A., Moitinho, A., Baume, G., 2005
743: ApJ 630, L153
744: \bibitem[2007]{con} Conn, B.C., Lane, R.R., Lewis, G.F. et al., 2007, MNRAS 376, 939
745: \bibitem[1978]{dean} Dean, J.F., Warren, P.R., Cousins, A.W.J., 1978, MNRAS 183, 569
746: \bibitem[2004]{frincha} Frinchaboy, P.M., Majewski,S.R., Crane, J.D., et al. 2004, ApJ 603, L21
747: \bibitem[2000]{geor} Georgelin, Y.M., Russeil, D., Amram, P., Georgelin, Y.P., Marcelin, M.,
748: Parker, Q.A., Viale, A., 2000, A\&A 357, 308
749:
750: \bibitem[1966]{Johnson} Johnson, H.L., 1966, ARA\&A 4, 193
751: \bibitem[1992]{landolt} Landolt, A.U., 1992, AJ, 104, 372
752: \bibitem[2006]{luna} Luna, A., Bronfman, L., Carrasco, L., Maj, J., 2006, ApJ 641, 938
753: \bibitem[2006]{levine} Levine, E.S., Bliz, L., Heiles, C., 2006, Science 312, 1773
754: \bibitem[2006a]{moitinho} Moitinho, A., V\'azquez, R.A., Carraro, G.,
755: Baume, G., Giorgi, E.E, \& Lyra, W. 2006,
756: MNRAS, 368, L77
757: \bibitem[2008]{moiy} Moitinho, A., V\'azquez, R.A., Carraro, G., 2008, A\&A, to be submitted
758: \bibitem[2004]{mart} Martin, N.F., Ibata, R.A., Bellazzini, M., Irwin, M.J., Lewis, G.F., Dehnen, W.,
759: 2004, MNRAS, 348, 12
760: \bibitem[2006]{mom} Momany, Y., Zaggia, S., Gilmore, G., Piotto, G., Carraro, G., Bedin, L.,
761: de Angeli, F., 2006, A\&A 451, 515
762: \bibitem[2001]{pata} Patat, F., Carraro, G., 2001, MNRAS 325, 1591
763: \bibitem[2006]{roch} Rocha-Pinto, H.J, Majewski, S.R, Skrutskie, M.F, Patterson, R.J.,
764: Nakanishi, H., Mu\"noz, R.R., Sofue, Y., 2006, ApJ 640, L147
765: \bibitem[2003]{russ}Russeil, D., 2003, A\&A 397, 133
766: \bibitem[982]{sch82}
767: Schmidt-Kaler, Th., 1982, Landolt-B\"ornstein, Numerical data and Funct
768: ional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series, Group VI, Vol. 2(b),
769: K. Schaifers and H.H. Voigt Eds., Springer Verlag, Berlin, p.14
770: \bibitem[1998]{sho} Shorlin, S.L., 1998, M.Sc. thesis, Saint Mary's University
771: \bibitem[2004]{sho1} Shorlin, S.L., Turner, D.G., Pedreros, M., 2004, PASP 116, 170 (Sh04)
772: \bibitem[1987]{stetson} Stetson, P.B., 1987, PASP, 99, 191
773: \bibitem[2003]{tap} Tapia, M., Roth, M., V\'azquez, R.A., Feinstein, A., 2003, MNRAS 339, 44
774: \bibitem[2005]{val} Vall\'ee, J.P., 2005, AJ 130, 569
775: \bibitem[1996]{vaz1}V\'azquez, R.A., Baume, G.L., Feinstein, C., Prado, P., 1996, A\&A 116, 75
776: \bibitem[2005]{vaz1}V\'azquez, R.A., Baume, G.L., Feinstein, C., Nu\"nez, J.A., Vergne, M.M., 2005,
777: A\&A 430, 471
778: \bibitem[2008]{vaz2}V\'azquez, R.A., May, J., Carraro, G., Bronfman, L., Moitinho, A.,
779: Baume, G., 2008, ApJ 672, 930
780: \bibitem[2005]{wall} Wallace, D.J., Gies, D.R., Moffat, A.F.J., Shara, M.M., Niemela, V., 2005,
781: AJ 130, 126 (Wa05)
782: \bibitem[2003]{newb} Yanny, B., Newberg, H.J., Grebel, E.K., Kent, S. et al., 2003
783: ApJ 588, 824
784:
785:
786: \end{thebibliography}
787:
788: \end{document}
789: