1: % Please use the skeleton file you have received in the
2: % invitation-to-submit email, where your data are already
3: % filled in. Otherwise please make sure you insert your
4: % data according to the instructions in PoSauthmanual.pdf
5: \documentclass{PoS}
6:
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: % packages
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10:
11: \usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb,amsmath}
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13:
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: % definitions
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
18: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
19: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
20: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
21: \newcommand{\bpi}{\begin{picture}}
22: \newcommand{\bce}{\begin{center}}
23: \newcommand{\epi}{\end{picture}}
24: \newcommand{\ece}{\end{center}}
25: \newcommand{\D}{\displaystyle}
26: \def\chic#1{{\scriptscriptstyle #1}}
27:
28: \def\gb{{\rm I}\hspace{-0.07cm}\Gamma}
29: \def\kb{{\rm I}\hspace{-0.07cm} {\rm K}}
30: \def\l{{\rm I}\hspace{-0.07cm} {\rm L}}
31: %\def\gb{\bm{\Gamma}}
32: %\def\kb{\bm{\rm K}}
33: %\def\l{\bm{\rm L}}
34:
35:
36: %\def\k{\widetilde{{\rm I}\hspace{-0.07cm}{\rm K} }}
37: \def\g{\widetilde\gb}
38: %\def\k{\widetilde{\mathbb{K}}}
39: \def\k{\widetilde\kb}
40:
41:
42:
43:
44: \def\gb{{\rm I}\hspace{-0.07cm}\Gamma}
45: \def\g{\widetilde{{\rm I}\hspace{-0.07cm}\Gamma}}
46: \def\gt{\widetilde{\Gamma}^{\rm L}_{\nu\alpha\beta}}
47: \def\gnp{{\overline g}^2_{{\chic {\rm NP}}}}
48: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
49: \newcommand{\Valencia}{Departamento de F\'\i sica Te\'orica
50: and IFIC, Centro Mixto, Universidad de Valencia--CSIC \\
51: E-46100, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain}
52:
53: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
54:
55: \title{Infrared finite effective charge of QCD}
56:
57: \ShortTitle{Infrared finite effective charge of QCD}
58:
59:
60:
61: %\author{A. C. Aguilar, \speaker{J. Papavassiliou} \\
62: % \Valencia \\
63: % E-mail: \email{Arlene.Aguilar@uv.es}, \email{Joannis.Papavassiliou@uv.es}}
64:
65:
66: %\author{D.~Binosi\\
67: % European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear
68: % Physics and Related Areas (ECT*), \\Villa Tambosi, Strada delle
69: % Tabarelle 286, I-38050 Villazzano (TN), Italy. \\
70: % E-mail: \email{binosi@ect.it}}
71:
72:
73:
74: \author{A. C. Aguilar,$^a$ D.~Binosi$^{b}$
75: and \speaker{J. Papavassiliou}$ ^a$\\
76: \llap{$^a$}\Valencia \\
77: \llap{$^b$} European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear
78: Physics and Related Areas (ECT*), \\Villa Tambosi, Strada delle
79: Tabarelle 286, I-38050 Villazzano (TN), Italy. \\
80: E-mail: \email{Arlene.Aguilar@uv.es},\email{binosi@ect.it}, \email{Joannis.Papavassiliou@uv.es}}
81:
82:
83:
84:
85: \abstract{
86:
87: We show that the gauge invariant treatment of the Schwinger-Dyson
88: equations of QCD leads to an infrared finite gluon propagator,
89: signaling the dynamical generation of an effective gluon mass, and
90: a non-enhanced ghost propagator, in qualitative agreement with
91: recent lattice data. The truncation scheme employed is based on the
92: synergy between the pinch technique and the background field
93: method. One of its most powerful features is that the transversality
94: of the gluon self-energy is manifestly preserved, exactly as dictated
95: by the BRST symmetry of the theory. We then explain, for the first
96: time in the literature, how to construct non-perturbatively a
97: renormalization group invariant quantity out of the conventional gluon
98: propagator. This newly constructed quantity serves as the natural
99: starting point for defining a non-perturbative effective charge for
100: QCD, which constitutes, in all respects, the generalization in a
101: non-Abelian context of the universal QED effective charge. This
102: strong effective charge displays asymptotic freedom in the ultraviolet,
103: while in the low-energy regime it freezes at a finite value, giving
104: rise to an infrared fixed point for QCD. Some possible pitfalls
105: related to the extraction of such an effective charge from infrared
106: finite gluon propagators, such as those found on the lattice,
107: are briefly discussed.}
108:
109: \FullConference{LIGHT CONE 2008 Relativistic Nuclear and Particle Physics\\
110: July 7-11 2008\\
111: Mulhouse, France}
112: \begin{document}
113:
114:
115: It has been known for a long time that even though the gluon is
116: massless at the level of the fundamental Lagrangian, and remains
117: massless to all order in perturbation theory, the non-perturbative QCD
118: dynamics generate an effective, momentum-dependent mass, without
119: affecting the local $SU(3)_c$ invariance, which remains
120: intact~\cite{Cornwall:1982zr}. The existence of this mass is
121: discovered by studying the Schwinger-Dyson equations (SDEs) of QCD, in
122: a gauge-invariant framework known as the pinch technique
123: (PT)~\cite{Cornwall:1982zr,Cornwall:1989gv}.
124: To obtain massive
125: solutions it is necessary to include longitudinally-coupled massless
126: scalars in the Green's functions, which play a role rather like
127: Goldstone excitations, but do not signal any sort of breakdown of
128: local gauge symmetry, which is preserved. Like standard
129: Goldstone bosons these massless scalars do not appear explicitly in
130: the $S$-matrix; however, they play a crucial role in confinement,
131: furnishing the required long range potential.
132:
133:
134: An effective low-energy field
135: theory for describing the gluon mass
136: is the gauged non-linear sigma model known as ``massive
137: gauge-invariant Yang-Mills''~\cite{Cornwall:1979hz}, with
138: Lagrangian density
139: \begin{equation}
140: {\cal L}_{MYM}= \frac{1}{2} G_{\mu\nu}^2 -
141: m^2 {\rm Tr} \left[A_{\mu} - {g}^{-1} U(\theta)\partial_{\mu} U^{-1}(\theta) \right]^2\,,
142: \label{nlsm}
143: \end{equation}
144: where
145: $A_{\mu}= \frac{1}{2i}\sum_{a} \lambda_a A^{a}_{\mu}$, the $\lambda_a$ are the SU(3) generators
146: (with ${\rm Tr} \lambda_a \lambda_b=2\delta_{ab}$),
147: and the $N\times N$
148: unitary matrix $U(\theta) = \exp\left[i\frac{1}{2}\lambda_a\theta^{a}\right]$
149: describes the scalar fields $\theta_a$.
150: Note that ${\cal L}_{MYM}$ is locally gauge-invariant under the combined gauge transformation
151: \be
152: A^{\prime}_{\mu} = V A_{\mu} V^{-1} - {g}^{-1} \left[\partial_{\mu}V \right]V^{-1}\,,
153: \qquad
154: U^{\,\prime} = U(\theta^{\,\prime}) = V U(\theta)\,,
155: \label{gtransfb}
156: \ee
157: for any group matrix $V= \exp\left[i\frac{1}{2}\lambda_a\omega^{a}(x)\right]$, where
158: $\omega^{a}(x)$ are the group parameters.
159: One might think that, by employing (\ref{gtransfb}), the fields $\theta_a$ can always
160: be transformed to zero, but this is not so if the $\theta_a$ contain vortices.
161: To use the ${\cal L}_{MYM}$ in (\ref{nlsm}), one solves the equations of motion for $U$
162: in terms of the gauge potentials and substitutes the result in the equations for the gauge potential.
163: One then finds the Goldstone-like massless modes mentioned above.
164: This model admits vortex
165: solutions~\cite{Cornwall:1979hz}, with a long-range pure gauge term in their potentials,
166: which endows them with a topological quantum number corresponding to
167: the center of the gauge group [$Z_N$ for $SU(N)$], and is, in turn,
168: responsible for quark confinement and gluon screening.
169: Specifically, center vortices of thickness $\sim m^{-1}$, where $m$ is
170: the induced mass of the gluon, form a condensate because their entropy
171: (per unit size) is larger than their action. This condensation
172: furnishes an area law to the fundamental representation
173: Wilson loop, thus confining quarks~\cite{Cornwall:1982zr,Cornwall:1979hz}.
174:
175: Of course ${\cal L}_{MYM}$ is not renormalizable, and breaks down in the ultraviolet.
176: This breakdown simply reflects the fact that the gluon mass $m$ in (\ref{nlsm})
177: is assumed to be constant, while the solutions of the SDEs
178: reveal that the mass is momentum-dependent, vanishing at large $q^2$~\cite{Cornwall:1982zr}.
179: Specifically, when studying the SDE for the gluon propagator, $\Delta(q^2)$,
180: one looks for infrared finite solutions, i.e. with $\Delta^{-1}(0) > 0$.
181: Such solutions may
182: be fitted by ``massive'' propagators of the form \mbox{$\Delta^{-1}(q^2) = q^2 + m^2(q^2)$}, where
183: $m^2(q^2)$ is not ``hard'', but depends non-trivially on the momentum transfer $q^2$.
184: When the renormalization-group
185: logarithms are properly taken into account in the SDE analysis, one obtains, in addition,
186: the non-perturbative generalization of $\alpha(q^2)$,
187: the QCD running coupling (effective charge).
188: The presence of $m^2(q^2)$ in the argument of $\alpha(q^2)$
189: tames the Landau singularity associated with the
190: perturbative $\beta$ function, and the resulting effective charge is
191: asymptotically free in the ultraviolet , ``freezing'' at a finite value in the infrared.
192:
193: The general picture described above has received spectacular confirmation from
194: a plethora of lattice studies, spanning a period of several years:
195: the gluon propagator reaches indeed a finite (non-vanishing) value in the deep
196: infrared, as predicted by Cornwall. This rather characteristic behavior
197: was already seen in early studies~\cite{Alexandrou:2000ja}, and
198: has been firmly established recently using
199: large-volume lattices, for both $SU(2)$~\cite{Cucchieri:2007md} and $SU(3)$~\cite{Bogolubsky:2007ud}
200: pure Yang-Mills (no quarks included).
201:
202: In this talk we will present recent results from a gauge-invariant study of
203: the coupled gluon-ghost system of SDEs~\cite{Aguilar:2008xm}, yielding
204: an infrared finite gluon propagator and a divergent (but non-enhanced)
205: ghost propagator, in qualitative agreement with recent lattice data~\cite{Cucchieri:2007md,Bogolubsky:2007ud};
206: this behavior has also been confirmed within the Gribov-Zwanziger formalism \cite{Dudal:2008sp}.
207: As the title suggests, we will eventually focus on the issue of the infrared finite QCD effective charge.
208:
209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
210:
211: Obtaining an infrared finite result for the gluon self-energy from SDEs,
212: without violating the underlying local gauge symmetry, is far from trivial,
213: and hinges crucially on one's ability to devise
214: a self-consistent truncation scheme that would select a tractable
215: and, at the same time, {\it physically meaningful} subset of these equations.
216: Specifically, while in QED
217: the Green's functions satisfy naive
218: Ward Identities (WIs), in QCD they satisfy complicated
219: Slavnov-Taylor identities (STIs), which
220: involve various composite ghost operators. To see how this
221: complicates the truncation procedure of the SDEs,
222: consider the STI of the gluon self-energy
223: \be
224: q^{\mu} \Pi_{\mu\nu}(q) = 0 \,.
225: \label{fundtrans}
226: \ee
227: Eq.~(\ref{fundtrans}) is without a doubt the most fundamental
228: statement at the level of Green's functions that one can obtain
229: from the BRST symmetry; it affirms the transversality of the
230: gluon self-energy and is valid both
231: perturbatively to all orders as well as non-perturbatively.
232: The problem is that
233: in the SDE governing $\Pi_{\mu\nu}(q)$ enter higher order
234: Green's functions,
235: namely the fully-dressed fundamental vertices of the theory,
236: which satisfy complicated STIs.
237: Thus, whereas in QED the validity of Eq.~(\ref{fundtrans})
238: can be easily seen at
239: the level of the SDE, simply because \mbox{
240: $q^{\mu}\Gamma_{\mu}(p,p+q) =e\left[ S^{-1}(p+q)-S^{-1}(p)\right]$}, in QCD
241: proving Eq.~(\ref{fundtrans}) is very difficult, and requires the
242: conspiracy of all full vertices appearing in the SDE.
243: Truncating the SDE naively usually amounts to leaving out some of these vertices,
244: and, as a result, Eq.~(\ref{fundtrans}) is compromised.
245: Instead, the gauge-invariant truncation scheme \cite{Binosi:2007pi},
246: based on the PT~\cite{Cornwall:1982zr, Cornwall:1989gv} and its
247: correspondence with the background field method (BFM)~\cite{Abbott:1980hw}
248: maintains the validity of Eq.(\ref{fundtrans}) at every level of approximation.
249:
250:
251: The gluon propagator in the covariant gauges has the form
252: \mbox{
253: $i\Delta_{\mu\nu}(q)= \left[ {\rm P}_{\mu\nu}(q)\Delta(q^2) +\xi\frac{\D q_\mu
254: q_\nu}{\D q^4}\right]$},
255: where $\xi$ denotes the gauge-fixing parameter,
256: \mbox{${\rm P}_{\mu\nu}(q)= g_{\mu\nu} - q_\mu q_\nu /q^2$}
257: is the usual transverse projector, and, finally, $\Delta^{-1}(q^2) = q^2 + i \Pi(q^2)$,
258: with $\Pi_{\mu\nu}(q)={\rm P}_{\mu\nu}(q) \,\Pi(q^2)$ the gluon self-energy.
259: The full ghost propagator $D(p^2)$ and its self-energy $L(p^2)$ are related by
260: \mbox{$iD^{-1}(p^2)= p^2 - iL(p^2)$}. In the case of pure (quarkless) QCD,
261: the new SD series~\cite{Binosi:2007pi} for the gluon and ghost propagators reads (see also Fig.~\ref{SDeqs})
262: \bea
263: && \Delta^{-1}(q^2){\rm P}_{\mu\nu}(q) =
264: \frac{q^2 {\rm P}_{\mu\nu}(q) + i\,\sum_{i=1}^{4}(a_i)_{\mu\nu}}{[1+G(q^2)]^2} \,,
265: \nonumber\\
266: && iD^{-1}(p^2) = p^2 +i \lambda \int_k
267: \Gamma^{\mu}\Delta_{\mu\nu}(k)\gb^{\nu}(p,k) D(p+k) \,,
268: \nonumber\\
269: && i\Lambda_{\mu \nu}(q) = \lambda
270: \int_k H^{(0)}_{\mu\rho}
271: D(k+q)\Delta^{\rho\sigma}(k)\, H_{\sigma\nu}(k,q)\,,
272: \label{newSDb}
273: \eea
274: where \mbox{$\lambda=g^2 C_{\rm {A}}$}, with $C_{\rm {A}}$ the Casimir eigenvalue of the adjoint representation
275: [$C_{\rm {A}}=N$ for $SU(N)$],
276: and \mbox{$\int_{k}\equiv\mu^{2\varepsilon}(2\pi)^{-d}\int\!d^d k$},
277: with $d=4-\epsilon$ the dimension of space-time.
278: $\Gamma_{\mu}$ is the standard (asymmetric) gluon-ghost vertex at tree-level,
279: and $\gb^{\nu}$ the fully-dressed one.
280: $G(q^2)$ is the $g_{\mu\nu}$ component
281: of the auxiliary two-point function $\Lambda_{\mu \nu}(q)$, and the function $H_{\sigma\nu}$ is
282: defined diagrammatically in Fig.~\ref{SDeqs}.
283: $H_{\sigma\nu}$ is related to the full gluon-ghost vertex by
284: \mbox{$q^{\sigma} H_{\sigma\nu}(p,r,q) = -i{\gb}_{\nu}(p,r,q)$};
285: at tree-level, $H_{\sigma\nu}^{(0)} = ig_{\sigma\nu}$.
286: When evaluating the diagrams $(a_i)$ we use the BFM Feynman
287: rules~\cite{Abbott:1980hw}; the BFM fully dressed three-gluon and
288: gluon-ghost vertices are denoted by ${\g}_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ and ${\g}_{\mu}$.
289:
290:
291: % vertices will be denoted by
292: %${\g}_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ (three-gluon vertex), and ${\g}_{\mu}$ (gluon-ghost vertex).
293:
294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig.1%%%%%%%%
295: \begin{figure}
296: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{SDeqs.eps}
297: \caption{The PT-BFM gluon-ghost system. The circles attached
298: to the external gluons denote that,
299: from the point of view of Feynman rules, they are treated as background fields.}
300: \label{SDeqs}
301: \end{figure}
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303:
304:
305: Notice a point of paramount importance:
306: due to the Abelian all-order WIs that these two full
307: vertices satisfy (for all $\xi$), namely
308: \bea
309: q^{\mu}{\g}_{\mu\alpha\beta} = i\Delta^{-1}_{\alpha\beta}(k+q)
310: -i\Delta^{-1}_{\alpha\beta}(k)\,,\qquad
311: q^{\mu}{\g}_{\mu} = iD^{-1}(k+q) - iD^{-1}(k),
312: \label{PTWI}
313: \eea
314: one can demonstrate that
315: $q^{\mu}[(a_1)+(a_2)]_{\mu\nu} =0$
316: and \mbox{$q^{\mu}[(a_3)+(a_4)]_{\mu\nu} =0$} \cite{Aguilar:2006gr}.
317: Thus, unlike other treatments in the literature, within this formalism
318: the transversality of the gluon self-energy, i.e. Eq.~(\ref{fundtrans}),
319: is preserved at every step, in absolute compliance with the BRST symmetry.
320:
321:
322: Next, following standard techniques,
323: we express ${\g}_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ and ${\g}_{\mu}$
324: as a function of the gluon and ghost self-energy, respectively, in such a way as to
325: automatically satisfy the crucial WIs of Eq.~(\ref{PTWI}); failure to satisfy these WIs
326: would invariably compromise the transversality of the answer.
327: The Ansatz we will use is
328:
329: \bea
330: {\g}_{\mu\alpha\beta}= \Gamma_{\mu\alpha\beta} + i\frac{q_{\mu}}{q^2}
331: \left[\Pi_{\alpha\beta}(k+q)-\Pi_{\alpha\beta}(k)\right]\nonumber \,, \qquad
332: {\g}_{\mu}= \widetilde{\Gamma}_{\mu} -i\frac{q_{\mu}}{q^2}
333: \left[L(k+q)-L(k)\right]\,;
334: \label{gluonv}
335: \eea
336: its essential feature, other than satisfying the aforementioned WIs,
337: is the presence of massless, longitudinally coupled
338: pole terms, which are instrumental for obtaining
339: $\Delta^{-1}(0)\neq 0$~\cite{Jackiw:1973tr}. These poles are not kinematic but dynamical,
340: corresponding to a composite (bound-state) Goldstone excitation, enforcing the local gauge invariance.
341: For the conventional ghost-gluon vertex ${\gb}_{\nu}$,
342: appearing in the second SDE of (\ref{newSDb}) we will use its
343: tree-level expression, {\it i.e.}, ${\gb}_{\nu}\to \Gamma_{\nu} = -p_{\nu}$;
344: this is perfectly legitimate, since in this formalism
345: the two ghost vertices, ${\gb}_{\nu}$ and ${\g}_{\mu}$, are different.
346: Finally, for $H_{\sigma\nu}$ we use its tree-level value, $H_{\sigma\nu}^{(0)}$.
347:
348:
349: In Fig.\ref{figb}, we show the numerical result for $\Delta(q^2)$
350: renormalized at $\mu=M_b=4.5\,\mbox{GeV}$, and the comparison
351: with the corresponding lattice data of Ref.\cite{Bogolubsky:2007ud}.
352: In the right panel of Fig.\ref{figb}, we present the dressing function
353: for the ghost propagator, renormalized at the same point.
354: \vspace{-1.5cm}
355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
356: \begin{figure}[ht]
357: \hspace{-1.5cm}
358: \includegraphics[scale=2.0]{propagators.eps}
359: \vspace{-2.0cm}
360: \caption{Left Panel:The numerical solution for the gluon propagator from the SDE
361: (black continuous line) compared to the
362: lattice data of Ref.\cite{Bogolubsky:2007ud}. Right panel:The ghost dressing function $p^2D(p^2)$
363: obtained from the SDE. In the insert we show
364: the lattice data for the same quantity; notice that there is no ``enhancement''\cite{Boucaud:2008ky}.}
365: \label{figb}
366: \end{figure}
367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
368:
369:
370:
371: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
372:
373: Let us now turn to the QCD effective charge. There are two main issues:
374: (i) how to define it consistently at the level of perturbation theory:
375: specifically, which graphs determine the running, and
376: (ii) how to extend the (whatever) definition one reaches in (i)
377: into the non-perturbative regime.
378:
379:
380: %
381:
382: Point (i) has been addressed exhaustively in the literature~\cite{Watson:1996fg}: the upshot is that in the
383: context of the PT one may replicate to all-orders in perturbation theory the prototype QED construction
384: of an effective charge. To fix the ideas, the PT one-loop gluon self-energy
385: reads
386: \be
387: \widehat\Delta^{-1}(q^2)= q^2\left[1+ b g^2\ln\left(\frac{q^2}{\mu^2}\right)\right]\,,
388: \label{rightRG}
389: \ee
390: where $b = 11 C_A/48\pi^2$ is the first coefficient of the QCD $\beta$-function.
391: Due to the Abelian WIs satisfied by the PT effective Green's functions, the
392: new propagator-like quantity $\widehat\Delta^{-1}(q^2)$ absorbs all
393: the RG-logs, exactly as happens in QED with the photon self-energy.
394: Equivalently, since $Z_{g}$ and ${\widehat Z}_{A}$, the renormalization constants
395: of the gauge-coupling and the effective self-energy, respectively,
396: satisfy the QED relation ${Z}_{g} = {\widehat Z}^{-1/2}_{A}$,
397: the product
398: ${\widehat d}(q^2) = g^2 \widehat\Delta(q^2)$ forms a RG-invariant
399: ($\mu$-independent) quantity~\cite{Cornwall:1982zr};
400: for large momenta $q^2$,
401: \be
402: {\widehat d}(q^2) = \frac{\overline{g}^2(q^2)}{q^2}\,,
403: \label{ddef1}
404: \ee
405: where $\overline{g}^2(q^2)$ is the RG-invariant effective charge of QCD,
406: \be
407: \overline{g}^2(q^2) = \frac{g^2}{1+ b g^2\ln\left(q^2/\mu^2\right)}
408: = \frac{1}{b\ln\left(q^2/\Lambda^2\right)}\,.
409: \label{effch}
410: \ee
411: %
412: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
413: \begin{figure}[ht]
414: \vspace{-1.5cm}
415: \hspace{-2.0cm}
416: \includegraphics[scale=2.0]{rgi_procedure3.eps}
417: \vspace{-1.2cm}
418: \caption{Left panel: The solution of SDE renormalized at \mbox{$\mu=M_b=4.5\,\mbox{GeV}$}
419: (continuous blue curve) and $\mu=M_Z=91\,\mbox{GeV}$ (red line+square curve). Right Panel: The
420: corresponding PT-BFM $\widehat{\Delta}(q^2)$ obtained as the
421: convolution of $\Delta(q^2)$ and the function $g^2(\mu^2)/[1+G(q^2)]^2$. }
422: \label{rgi_fig}
423: \end{figure}
424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
425: %
426: Let us now come to point (ii): assuming that one has non-perturbative
427: information about the infrared behavior of the conventional gluon propagator $\Delta(q^2)$,
428: how should one extract an effective charge, which, perturbatively,
429: will go over to Eq.~(\ref{effch})? To accomplish this, one must use an additional
430: field-theoretic ingredient:
431: the conventional $\Delta(q^2)$ and the PT-BFM $\widehat{\Delta}(q^2)$
432: are related by the formal all-order relation~\cite{Binosi:2002ez}
433: \be
434: \Delta(q^2) =
435: \left[1+G(q^2)\right]^2 \widehat{\Delta}(q^2) \,.
436: \label{bqi}
437: \ee
438: Note that the $G(q^2)$ already appears in Eq.~(\ref{newSDb}) and Fig.\ref{SDeqs}.
439: With our approximations its SDE reads
440: \be
441: G(q^2) = - \frac{\lambda}{3}\int_k\,\left[
442: 2+\frac{(k\cdot q)^2}{k^2q^2}\right]\Delta(k)D(k+q) \,.
443: \label{gg}
444: \ee
445: %
446:
447: First of all, it is easy to verify that at lowest order
448: the $G(q^2)$ obtained from Eq.~(\ref{gg}) restores the $\beta$ function coefficient
449: in front of ultraviolet logarithm. In that limit
450: \mbox{$1+G(q^2) = 1 +\frac{9}{4}
451: \frac{C_{\rm {A}}g^2}{48\pi^2}\ln(q^2/\mu^2) $} and \mbox{$\Delta^{-1}(q^2)= q^2 \left[1+\frac{13}{2}
452: \frac{C_{\rm {A}}g^2}{48\pi^2}\ln(q^2/\mu^2)\right]$}. Then using
453: Eq.~(\ref{bqi}) we recover the $\widehat{\Delta}^{-1}(q^2)$ of Eq.~(\ref{rightRG}), as we should.
454: Then, non-perturbatively, one substitutes into Eq.~(\ref{bqi}) the $G(q^2)$ and $\Delta(q^2)$
455: obtained from solving the system in Eq.~(\ref{newSDb}), to obtain $\widehat{\Delta}(q^2)$.
456: This latter quantity is the non-perturbative generalization of Eq.~(\ref{rightRG});
457: for the same reasons explained above, when multiplied by $g^2$ it should form an RG-invariant quantity, e.g. the non-perturbative
458: generalization of ${\widehat d}(q^2)$. In Fig.\ref{rgi_fig} we present the combined result of the above steps:
459: ${\widehat d}(q^2)$ is obtained from two different sets of solutions of the system Eq.~(\ref{newSDb}), one
460: renormalized at $\mu=M_b=4.5\,\mbox{GeV}$ and one at $\mu=M_Z=91\,\mbox{GeV}$. Ideally
461: the two curves
462: of ${\widehat d}(q^2)$ should be identical; even though this does not happen, due to the approximations employed
463: when solving the system of Eq.~(\ref{newSDb}), the two curves are fairly close,
464: indicating that ${\widehat d}(q^2)$ is to a very good approximation an RG-invariant quantity, as it should.
465:
466: We are now in the position to define the non-perturbative
467: QCD effective charge from the RG-invariant quantity ${\widehat d}(q^2)$. Of course, given that
468: ${\widehat d}(q^2)$ reaches a finite value in the deep infrared,
469: it would be completely absurd to define the effective charge
470: by forcing out a factor of $1/q^2$; such a procedure would furnish a completely unphysical strong QCD coupling,
471: namely one that would vanish in the deep infrared(!) where QCD is supposed to be strongly coupled.
472: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
473: \vspace{-1.1cm}
474: \begin{figure}
475: \begin{minipage}[c]{.45\textwidth}
476: \hspace{-1.0cm}
477: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{effective_charge.eps}
478: \vspace{-1.4cm}
479: \begin{center}
480: \caption{The QCD effective charge, \mbox{$\alpha(q^2)=\overline{g}^2(q^2)/4\pi$},
481: extracted from Fig.3 by factoring out a gluon mass of
482: \mbox{m(0)=500\, \mbox{MeV}}.}
483: \label{figc}
484: \end{center}
485: \end{minipage}
486: \hspace{\fill}
487: \begin{minipage}[l]{.5\textwidth}
488: {The correct thing to do is to factor out a ``massive'' propagator, i.e. write
489: %
490: \be
491: \widehat{d}(q^2) = \frac{\overline{g}^2(q^2)}{q^2 + m^2(q^2)} \,.
492: \label{ddef}
493: \ee
494:
495: Of course, as we have emphasized, $m^2(q^2)$ itself is running, which must also
496: be taken into account in a more sophisticated treatment.
497: For the purposes of this talk, however, we assume that
498: $m^2(q^2)$ is constant, $m^2(q^2)=m^2(0)$, and use for $m(0)$ the value of $500\, \mbox{MeV}$
499: favored by phenomenology~\cite{Aguilar:2001zy}.
500: The $\alpha(q^2)$ obtained is shown in Fig.(\ref{figc}); as announced,
501: at low energies freezes to a finite value, indicating the appearance of an infrared fixed point of QCD.
502: }
503: \end{minipage}
504: \end{figure}
505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
506: %
507:
508: \acknowledgments
509: We thank Prof. J.~M.~Cornwall for numerous illuminating discussions.
510: Work supported by the Spanish MEC grants FPA 2005-01678 and the Fundaci\'on General of the UV.
511:
512: \vspace{-0.4cm}
513:
514: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
515:
516: \vspace{-0.2cm}
517:
518: %\cite{Cornwall:1982zr}
519: \bibitem{Cornwall:1982zr}
520: J.~M.~Cornwall,
521: %``Dynamical Mass Generation In Continuum QCD,''
522: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 26}, 1453 (1982).
523: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D26,1453;%%
524:
525: %\cite{Cornwall:1989gv}
526: \bibitem{Cornwall:1989gv}
527: J.~M.~Cornwall and J.~Papavassiliou,
528: %``Gauge Invariant three-gluon Vertex In QCD,''
529: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 40}, 3474 (1989).
530: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D40,3474;%%
531:
532:
533: %\cite{Cornwall:1979hz}
534: \bibitem{Cornwall:1979hz}
535: J.~M.~Cornwall,
536: %``Quark Confinement And Vortices In Massive Gauge Invariant QCD,''
537: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 157}, 392 (1979);
538: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B157,392;%%
539: %\cite{Cornwall:1997ds}
540: %\bibitem{Cornwall:1997ds}
541: % J.~M.~Cornwall,
542: %``Center vortices and confinement vs. screening,''
543: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 7589 (1998).
544: % [arXiv:hep-th/9712248].
545: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D57,7589;%%
546:
547:
548:
549: %\cite{Alexandrou:2000ja}
550: \bibitem{Alexandrou:2000ja}
551: C.~Alexandrou, P.~de Forcrand and E.~Follana,
552: %``The gluon propagator without lattice Gribov copies,''
553: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 094504 (2001),
554: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0008012].
555: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D63,094504;%%
556:
557:
558: %\cite{Cucchieri:2007md}
559: \bibitem{Cucchieri:2007md}
560: A.~Cucchieri and T.~Mendes,
561: %``What's up with IR gluon and ghost propagators in Landau gauge? A puzzling
562: %answer from huge lattices,''
563: PoS {\bf LAT2007}, 297 (2007).
564: % [arXiv:0710.0412 [hep-lat]].
565: %%CITATION = POSCI,LAT2007,297;%%
566:
567:
568: %\cite{Bogolubsky:2007ud}
569: \bibitem{Bogolubsky:2007ud}
570: I.~L.~Bogolubsky, E.~M.~Ilgenfritz, M.~Muller-Preussker and A.~Sternbeck,
571: %``The Landau gauge gluon and ghost propagators in 4D SU(3) gluodynamics in
572: %large lattice volumes,''
573: PoS {\bf LAT2007}, 290 (2007).
574: % [arXiv:0710.1968 [hep-lat]].
575: %%CITATION = POSCI,LAT2007,290;%%
576:
577:
578:
579:
580:
581: %\cite{Aguilar:2008xm}
582: \bibitem{Aguilar:2008xm}
583: A.~C.~Aguilar, D.~Binosi and J.~Papavassiliou,
584: %``Gluon and ghost propagators in the Landau gauge: Deriving lattice results
585: %from Schwinger-Dyson equations,''
586: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 78}, 025010 (2008).
587: % [arXiv:0802.1870 [hep-ph]].
588: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D78,025010;%%
589:
590:
591:
592: %\cite{Dudal:2008sp}
593: \bibitem{Dudal:2008sp}
594: D.~Dudal, J.~A.~Gracey, S.~P.~Sorella, N.~Vandersickel and H.~Verschelde,
595: %``A refinement of the Gribov-Zwanziger approach in the Landau gauge: infrared
596: %propagators in harmony with the lattice results,''
597: arXiv:0806.4348 [hep-th].
598: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0806.4348;%%
599:
600:
601:
602:
603: %\cite{Binosi:2007pi}
604: \bibitem{Binosi:2007pi}
605: D.~Binosi and J.~Papavassiliou,
606: %``Gauge-invariant truncation scheme for the Schwinger-Dyson equations of
607: %QCD,''
608: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 061702 (2008);
609: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,061702;%%
610: %\cite{Binosi:2008qk}
611: %\bibitem{Binosi:2008qk}
612: % D.~Binosi and J.~Papavassiliou,
613: %``New Schwinger-Dyson equations for non-Abelian gauge theories,''
614: arXiv:0805.3994 [hep-ph].
615: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0805.3994;%%
616:
617:
618: %\cite{Abbott:1980hw}
619: \bibitem{Abbott:1980hw}
620: L.~F.~Abbott,
621: %``The Background Field Method Beyond One Loop,''
622: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 185}, 189 (1981).
623: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B185,189;%%
624:
625:
626: %\cite{Aguilar:2006gr}
627: \bibitem{Aguilar:2006gr}
628: A.~C.~Aguilar and J.~Papavassiliou,
629: %``Gluon mass generation in the PT-BFM scheme,''
630: JHEP {\bf 0612}, 012 (2006).
631: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0610040].
632: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0612,012;%%
633:
634:
635: %\cite{Jackiw:1973tr}
636: \bibitem{Jackiw:1973tr}
637: R.~Jackiw and K.~Johnson,
638: %``Dynamical Model Of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetries,''
639: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 8}, 2386 (1973);
640: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D8,2386;%%
641: %\cite{Cornwall:1973ts}
642: %\bibitem{Cornwall:1973ts}
643: J.~M.~Cornwall and R.~E.~Norton,
644: %``Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Without Scalar Mesons,''
645: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 8} (1973) 3338;
646: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D8,3338;%%
647: %\cite{Eichten:1974et}
648: %\bibitem{Eichten:1974et}
649: E.~Eichten and F.~Feinberg,
650: %``Dynamical Symmetry Breaking Of Nonabelian Gauge Symmetries,''
651: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 10}, 3254 (1974).
652: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D10,3254;%%
653:
654:
655: %\cite{Boucaud:2008ky}
656: \bibitem{Boucaud:2008ky}
657: Ph.~Boucaud {\it et al.},
658: %``On the IR behaviour of the Landau-gauge ghost propagator,''
659: JHEP {\bf 0806}, 099 (2008);
660: % [arXiv:0803.2161 [hep-ph]].
661: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0806,099;%%
662: %\cite{Boucaud:2006if}
663: %\bibitem{Boucaud:2006if}
664: Ph.~Boucaud {\it et al.},
665: %``Is the QCD ghost dressing function finite at zero momentum?,''
666: JHEP {\bf 0606}, 001 (2006).
667: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0604056].
668: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0606,001;%%
669:
670:
671:
672: %\cite{Watson:1996fg}
673: \bibitem{Watson:1996fg}
674: N.~J.~Watson,
675: %``The gauge-independent QCD effective charge,''
676: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 494}, 388 (1997);
677: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9606381].
678: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B494,388;%%
679: %\cite{Binosi:2002vk}
680: %\bibitem{Binosi:2002vk}
681: D.~Binosi and J.~Papavassiliou,
682: %``The QCD effective charge to all orders,''
683: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 121}, 281 (2003).
684: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0209016].
685: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,121,281;%%
686:
687:
688:
689: %\cite{Binosi:2002ez}
690: \bibitem{Binosi:2002ez}
691: D.~Binosi and J.~Papavassiliou,
692: %``Pinch technique and the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism,''
693: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 025024 (2002).
694: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0204128].
695: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204128;%%
696:
697:
698:
699: %\cite{Aguilar:2001zy}
700: \bibitem{Aguilar:2001zy}
701: A.~C.~Aguilar, A.~Mihara and A.~A.~Natale,
702: %``Freezing of the QCD coupling constant and solutions of Schwinger-Dyson
703: %equations,''
704: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 054011 (2002).
705: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0109223].
706: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D65,054011;%%
707:
708:
709: \end{thebibliography}
710: \end{document}
711:
712:
713:
714:
715:
716:
717:
718: